(Received for publication, August 28, 1995; and in revised form, October 11, 1995)
From the
Activation of the superoxide generating NADPH oxidase of phagocytes involves the assembly of a multimolecular complex and is dependent on the participation of the small molecular weight GTP-binding protein Rac (1 or 2). This model system was used for mapping functional domains in the primary sequence of Rac1, based on assessing the inhibitory effect of 90 individual overlapping pentadecapeptides, spanning the entire length of Rac1, on NADPH oxidase activation in two types of cell-free assay. Five functional domains were identified, each consisting of a cluster of contiguous residues shared by members of five groups of overlapping inhibitory peptides. Four of the five domains are exposed on the molecular surface of Rac1 and were not identified previously by mutational analysis; the fifth corresponds to a polybasic motif near the carboxyl terminus, confirming earlier reports. Screening the entire linear sequence of a protein with a battery of overlapping peptides for interference with its ability to interact with upstream or downstream molecules should be of wide applicability as a reliable, fast, and economical method for mapping of functionally relevant domains.
Oxygen-derived radicals are essential components in the
microbicidal armory of phagocytic cells. The primordial oxygen radical,
superoxide (O), (
)is
generated by the one-electron reduction of molecular oxygen catalyzed
by a membrane-contained heterodimeric flavocytochrome (cytochrome b
), utilizing cytosolic NADPH as the electron
donor (reviewed in (1) and (2) ). The catalytic
activity of cytochrome b
is initiated by its
interaction with at least two cytosolic components, p47
and p67
, which translocate to the
membrane, leading to the assembly of what is known as the NADPH oxidase
complex (reviewed in (3) ). NADPH oxidase activation can be
mimicked in vitro by a cell-free system, consisting, in its
most elementary form, of phagocyte membranes and cytosol (4, 5) and in its more sophisticated versions, of
purified or recombinant components(6, 7) ,
supplemented with a critical concentration of an anionic amphiphile,
such as arachidonic acid or the sodium or lithium salts of
dodecylsulfonic acid.
Activation of NADPH oxidase was found to
involve a GTP-binding protein (8, 9) and this was
identified as the Rho-like GTPase Rac1 (10) or Rac2 (11) . Rac is found in the phagocyte cytosol as a heterodimer
with the regulatory protein GDP dissociation inhibitor for Rho (Rho
GDI)(10, 12) . The central role of Rac in the
activation of NADPH oxidase complex suggests that this well defined
system could serve as a suitable model for the understanding of Rac
function in particular and that of proteins of the Rho subfamily, in
general. So far, two approaches have been used for this purpose. In the
first, interaction of Rac with individual oxidase components was
investigated, leading to the finding that Rac1, in the GTP-bound form,
binds to p67(13, 14) . The
second approach was based on studying the effect of mutations performed
in the putative effector region of Rac (based on the Ras model) on the
ability of Rac to support NADPH oxidase activation in the cell-free
system. This methodology led to the identification of residues 26, 27,
28, 30, 33, 35, 36, 38, 40, and 45 in Rac1 as being essential for the
expression of oxidase activating
ability(13, 15, 16, 17) .
Here we describe a novel methodology for the identification of functional domains in the primary structure of proteins. This is based on testing a large set of overlapping synthetic peptides, spanning the entire amino acid sequence of the protein, for an inhibitory effect on an enzymatic reaction in which the relevant protein is an obligatory participant. We have applied this approach to the analysis of Rac1, with the purpose of identifying domains essential for sustaining activation of NADPH oxidase. Overlapping peptides were used in the past, almost exclusively, for mapping antibody-defined (18) and T cell-defined (19) linear epitopes in protein antigens.
Each of the 90 individual peptides was tested, at a
concentration of 20 µM, for the ability to inhibit
O production in two types of cell-free
NADPH oxidase activation assays. The first assay consisted of
solubilized macrophage membranes combined with cytosol, whereas the
second contained solubilized macrophage membranes combined with a
cytosolic fraction enriched in p47
and p67
and highly purified cytosolic Rac1-Rho GDI. As apparent in Fig. 1, several groups of peptides caused significant and
reproducible inhibition of NADPH oxidase activation. There was very
good correlation between the ability of specific peptides to inhibit
O
production by mixtures of membranes
and total cytosol (Fig. 1A) and their effect in a
cell-free system consisting of membranes and purified cytosolic
components (Fig. 1B). Substitution of purified Rac1-Rho
GDI dimer by recombinant Rac1, in the GTP
S-bound form, yielded
identical results (data not shown). With one exception, all inhibitory
peptides corresponded to residues located in the carboxyl-terminal
two-thirds of the Rac1 molecule. The inhibitory peptides were clustered
in five groups: a, peptides 34-37 (spanning residues
67-87); b, peptides 46-53 (spanning residues
91-119); c, peptides 60-62 (spanning residues
119-137); d, peptides 77-83 (spanning residues
153-179); and e, peptides 86-90 (spanning residues
171-192). In addition to these clusters, three isolated peptides
were found to be inhibitory: peptide 7 (residues 13-27) was
weakly inhibitory, whereas peptides 43 (residues 85-99) and 55
(residues 109-123) caused significant inhibition.
Figure 1:
Inhibition of NADPH oxidase activation
by synthetic pentadecapeptides scanning the complete Rac1 sequence. All
peptides were tested at a concentration of 20 µM. Bars
represent means ± S.E. A, reaction mixtures consisted
of solubilized membrane and cytosol. Results are derived from 4-9
experiments. B, reaction mixtures consisted of solubilized
membrane, a cytosolic fraction enriched in p47 and p67
and purified Rac1-Rho GDI
dimer. Results are derived from 4-12
experiments.
There were
significant differences in the inhibitory potencies of peptides
belonging to the various groups. Thus, peptides in groups a and c were the least active (IC exceeding 40
µM); peptides in groups b and d were
more active (IC
in the 20-40 µM range),
whereas peptides in group e were the most potent (IC
in the 1 µM range). There were no differences in the
IC
values of peptides when tested in cell-free assays
containing purified Rac1-Rho GDI dimer (posttranslationally processed
Rac1, in the GDP-bound form; (26) ) or recombinant monomeric
Rac1 (unprocessed, converted to the GTP
S-bound form).
Peptides were inhibitory only when added simultaneously with all components of the cell-free reaction (Fig. 2). No inhibition was observed when peptides were added 1 min after the initiation of activation, indicating that Rac1 peptides interfere with NADPH oxidase activation (assembly) and not with its catalytic function.
Figure 2:
Peptides prevent NADPH oxidase activation
but do not interfere with catalytic activity. Peptide 46 (residues
91-105) was tested in a reaction mixture consisting of
solubilized membrane, a cytosolic fraction enriched in p47 and p67
, and purified Rac1-Rho GDI
dimer. Speckled bars represent results of an experiment in
which the peptide was added at time 0; solid bars represent
results of an experiment in which the peptide was added 1 min after the
initiation of NADPH oxidase activation.
Since NADPH oxidase assembly involves the interaction of Rac1 with at least one other oxidase component (13, 14) and probably with other proteins(14, 27, 28, 29) , inhibition of NADPH oxidase activation by Rac1 peptides offers a suitable model for the mapping of domains in Rac1 involved in protein-protein interactions. The most straightforward interpretation of our findings is that inhibitory peptides mimic domains in the intact Rac1 molecule and, consequently, compete with Rac1 for binding to another component of NADPH oxidase. However, it cannot, at present, be excluded that peptides interfere with some form of intramolecular interaction within Rac1, necessary for NADPH oxidase activation.
Analysis of the five groups of inhibitory peptides revealed that all members of one group shared a minimal sequence domain or part of it. The precise boundaries of the domains could not be determined with absolute certitude by the present set of peptides and will require finer analysis, using peptides with a higher degree of overlap as well as truncated peptides.
A remarkable feature of the grouping of inhibitory peptides was that some clusters could be divided into two subclusters of contiguous active peptides, divided by a group of one or more peptides with lesser or no inhibitory activity. This situation was most clearly expressed in peptide clusters b and d, as illustrated in Fig. 3. It can be seen that in both clusters, the expression of inhibitory activity was maximal when the putative domain was exposed at or close to either the carboxyl or amino terminus of the peptide. Peptides containing the domain at the center of the sequence were generally either inactive or less inhibitory. Therefore, the ability of a particular peptide to inhibit NADPH oxidase activation was dependent on the fraction of the complete functional domain expressed by the peptide and on its location within the peptide sequence.
Figure 3: Relationship between the ability of overlapping Rac1 peptides to inhibit NADPH oxidase activation and the location of the putative functional domain in the peptide sequences. Results are derived from experiments in which peptides were added to reaction mixtures consisting of solubilized membrane and cytosol (see Fig. 1A). A, maximal inhibition was obtained when the putative domain HHCPN was exposed at the carboxyl-terminal end of the peptide (peptide 47). Activity was absent when the domain was at the center of the peptide (peptide 50) and reappeared when exposed at the amino-terminal end (peptide 52). B, maximal inhibition was obtained when the putative domain RGLKTVF was exposed at the carboxyl-terminal end of the peptide (peptide 78). Activity was absent when the domain was at or close to the center of the peptide (peptides 79-81) and reappeared when exposed at the amino-terminal end (peptide 82).
Using this strategy, for which we propose the name ``peptide walking,'' we were able to map five functional domains in the primary structure of Rac1, required for supporting NADPH oxidase activation. These domains are indicated in Fig. 4and are labeled to parallel the classification of the five clusters of inhibitory peptides. One domain (cluster e) corresponds to the polybasic motif KKRKRK, recently defined by the inhibitory effect of positively charged peptides (24, 30) and by mutational analysis(31) . Unlike in peptide clusters b and d, the location (central or exposed) of the polybasic motif within the sequences of peptides belonging to cluster e, had little effect on the ability of a particular peptide to inhibit NADPH oxidase activation. The other four domains were not previously known to be required for Rac1-supported NADPH oxidase activation. It is of interest that all Rac residues found earlier to be involved in NADPH oxidase activation by mutational analysis (13, 15, 16, 17) are located in the putative ``effector domain'' (residues 26-48), the boundaries of which were set by analogy with Ras(32) . It has, however, been suggested, based on the generation of Ras/Rho chimeras, that proteins of the Rho subfamily possess a second effector domain, located in the carboxyl-terminal two-thirds of the molecule, downstream of residue 69(33) . This suggestion is in good agreement with our findings, delineating five effector domains, all located downstream of residue 67. Experiments performed while this paper was being reviewed, involving systematic truncation of inhibitory peptides 47 and 78 starting from their amino termini, indicated that heptapeptides VRHHCPN, containing domain b, and RGLKTVF, indentical to domain d, inhibited NADPH oxidase activation.
Figure 4: Putative functional domains in Rac1 required for activation of NADPH oxidase. A, the five domains revealed by inhibition of NADPH oxidase by clusters of overlapping peptides are indicated by the bold underlined single-letter amino acid codes in the linear sequence of Rac1. B, probable secondary structure elements corresponding to the five domains in Rac1, based on sequence alignment with Ras (34) .
An analysis
of the surface exposure of the domains defined by overlapping peptides,
based on the predicted secondary structure of Rac deduced by analogy
with Ras(34, 35) , indicates that the major parts of
domains a, b, c, and d are located
at the molecular surface (Fig. 4B). The domains in
Rac1, revealed by peptide walking, are analogous to domains, present in
other low molecular mass GTPases, found to participate in
protein-protein interactions. Most prominent among these is domain b (residues 103-107). This is analogous to a region
governing functional specificity in a variety of GTPases, including the let-60 Ras gene product in Caenorhabditis elegans(36) , c-Ha-Ras(37, 38) , the Rab
family(39) , and the yeast GTPases Ypt1 and
Sec4(40, 41) . The motif is likely to be important for
interaction with guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Two structural
elements, analogous to domains a and b in Rac1, were
found to be required for stimulation of endocytosis by Rab5 (42) and correspond to two effector-activating clusters of
residues in the -subunit of the trimeric GTP-binding protein
G
(43) . To the best of our knowledge, there are no
reports on the functional significance, in other GTPases, of residues
analogous to domains c and d in Rac1, as defined
here.
We propose peptide walking as a general method for the identification of domains in the primary sequence of proteins interacting with either downstream effectors or upstream activators. The relative ease with which a large number of overlapping peptides can be prepared by the multipin synthesis method, with various lengths and extent of overlap, and either free or modified ends, makes this method especially attractive. Peptide walking appears to offer excellent reproducibility, opportunities for automation and is faster and more economical than site-directed mutagenesis or the generation of truncated or chimeric proteins. A number of techniques can be used for assessing the effect of peptides, in addition to inhibition of the protein's activity, as presently described. These include: inhibition by the peptides of specific protein to protein binding and measuring binding of the peptides to potential targets or modulators of the protein being mapped. Experiments using the latter technique for the identification of the NADPH oxidase component(s) recognized by Rac1 and of the domains in Rac1 involved in recognition are in progress.
Peptide walking is, probably, not an effective approach to the detection of discontinuous (assembled) domains in proteins. Additional restraints might be imposed by the variable ability of peptides to assume a conformation similar to that of the corresponding region in the intact molecule. These limitations could explain the inability of peptide walking to identify the presumed effector domain of Rac1 (residues 26-48). For optimal results, therefore, peptide walking should be applied as one component of a wider mapping strategy, to include mutagenesis and the use of truncated and chimeric proteins.
Addendum-While this manuscript was being prepared we became aware of the report by Barnard et al.(44) , describing the use of a limited number of overlapping peptides, corresponding to the Ras binding domain of c-Raf-1, for defining sites of interaction between Raf and Ras.