©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Glucocorticoids Increase Osteopontin Expression in Cardiac Myocytes and Microvascular Endothelial Cells
ROLE IN REGULATION OF INDUCIBLE NITRIC OXIDE SYNTHASE (*)

(Received for publication, June 26, 1995; and in revised form, September 13, 1995)

Krishna Singh Jean-Luc Balligand (§) Thomas A. Fischer Thomas W. Smith Ralph A. Kelly (¶)

From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

In heart muscle, the cytokine-inducible isoform of nitric oxide synthase (NOS2) is expressed in both cardiac myocytes and microvascular endothelial cells (CMEC). mRNA levels for both NOS2 and for osteopontin, a multifunctional extracellular matrix phosphoprotein containing an RGD integrin binding domain, are increased in cardiac muscle following intraperitoneal injection of adult rats with lipopolysaccharide. In vitro, interleukin-1beta and interferon- increased osteopontin mRNA levels in CMEC as well as NOS2 expression in both CMEC and cardiac myocytes. However, osteopontin mRNA levels in heart muscle in vivo, and in cardiac myocytes and CMEC in vitro, also are increased 10-30-fold by the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone, an agent that suppresses cytokine induction of NOS2 in both cell types. The hexapeptide GRGDSP, which interrupts binding of RGD-containing proteins to cell surface integrins, increased NOS2 mRNA, while a synthetic osteopontin peptide analogue decreased NOS2 mRNA and protein levels in both cytokine-pretreated cardiac myocytes and CMEC cultures. Also, transfection with a full-length antisense-osteopontin cDNA in cytokine-pretreated CMEC decreased endogenous osteopontin mRNA and increased NOS2 mRNA levels. These results suggest that osteopontin could regulate the location and extent of NOS2 induction in the heart. Increased expression of osteopontin also may be one mechanism by which glucocorticoids suppress NOS2 activity in cardiac myocytes and microvascular endothelial cells.


INTRODUCTION

Among the cellular constituents of heart muscle, both microvascular endothelial cells (CMEC) (^1)and cardiac myocytes exhibit a marked induction of the cytokine-inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS or NOS2) in response to soluble inflammatory mediators in vitro and in vivo in experimental animal models that mimic systemic sepsis or regional or global myocardial inflammation(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) . Within the heart, for example, high levels of NO produced by cardiac myocytes or by CMEC following induction of NOS2 causes impaired myocyte contractile function that may contribute to the heart failure characteristic of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome or advanced cardiac allograft rejection(8, 9, 10) . Unless the expression and activity of NOS2 are spatially and temporally regulated, NO and other highly reactive nitrogen oxide radicals can induce nonspecific cellular toxicity that may contribute to the death of the organism(11, 12, 13, 14) .

The regulation of NOS2 activity in most tissues is primarily at the transcriptional level, although post-transcriptional and post-translational regulatory mechanisms have been described(12, 14) . In addition to interrupting selected components of the immune response that trigger NOS2 induction, glucocorticoids have been shown to suppress NOS2 activity. In ventricular myocytes and CMEC exposed to interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) and interferon- (IFN-), for example, pretreatment with dexamethasone decreases NOS2 mRNA and protein abundance(4, 5) . The mechanism(s) by which glucocorticoids suppress NOS2 induction in the presence of cytokines is unclear.

Other agents have also been shown to regulate the extent of induction of NOS2 by inflammatory mediators. Among these is osteopontin, a relatively ubiquitous extracellular matrix phosphoprotein that contains an RGD integrin-binding motif. Its function appears to be determined by the specific tissue and cell type from which it is secreted(15, 16) . Hwang et al.(17) have recently shown that exogenous recombinant human osteopontin decreased both NOS2 mRNA abundance and enzyme activity in primary cultures of renal proximal tubular epithelial cells that had been exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxin and IFN-. It was unclear, however, what regulated endogenous production and secretion of osteopontin in these cells.

Within the heart, it is not known which cell types express osteopontin nor what role, if any, osteopontin could have in the regulation of NOS2 expression in cardiac cells. In this report, we demonstrate that CMEC and ventricular myocytes constitutively express osteopontin mRNA in vivo and in primary culture, and that dexamethasone markedly increases osteopontin mRNA and secretion by both cell types. The data suggest that the suppression of NOS2 by glucocorticoids in both ventricular myocytes and in CMEC could be mediated in part by this multifunctional extracellular matrix phosphoprotein.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Cell Isolation and Culture

Calcium-tolerant ventricular myocytes were isolated from hearts of adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (175-200 g) as described previously (19) . Cells were plated in Dulbecco's modified essential medium (DMEM, Sigma), supplemented with albumin (2 mg/ml), L-carnitine (2 mM), creatine (5 mM), taurine (5 mM), L-glutamine (1.3 mM), and 0.1% penicillin-streptomycin, on laminin-coated (10 µg/ml) plates. This modified DMEM is the medium termed ``ACCT'' in Berger et al.(20) and is referred to here as ``defined medium.'' The cells were washed twice following 1 h of plating and incubated in defined medium for another 3 h. These primary isolates typically contained 94-96% adult ventricular myocytes(20) .

CMEC from adult rat hearts were isolated as described by Nishida et al.(21) . Briefly, after removing the atrial and valvular tissue, and right ventricle, the left ventricle was immersed in 70% ethanol for 10 s to devitalize epicardial mesothelial and endocardial endothelial cells. After peeling off the outer to of the ventricular wall, the remaining tissue was minced finely and treated with collagenase and trypsin in Ca-free Hanks' balanced salt solution (Life Technologies, Inc.). Dissociated cells were washed and resuspended in DMEM containing 20% fetal calf serum (Life Technologies, Inc.) and plated on laminin (10 µg/ml)-coated dishes at a density of 2,500 cells/cm^2. After 1 h of plating, the cells were washed twice with DMEM to remove loosely adherent cells. These primary isolates have been documented to contain >90% endothelial cells, with a phenotype at low passage number consistent with their microvascular origin, as described previously(21) .

In some studies, cardiac myocytes and non-myocyte cell fractions were isolated from 300-g male Sprague-Dawley rats that had been injected intraperitoneally with LPS (from Salmonella typhimurium, 4 mg/kg; Sigma) and/or dexamethasone (1.2 mg/kg), while control animals received only phosphate-buffered saline injections. When animals received both reagents, the LPS was injected 1 h after dexamethasone. Animals were sacrificed 8 or 16 h following injection(s), and ventricular myocytes and the non-myocyte fractions were obtained after density gradient sedimentation as described above.

Immunoblot Analyses

Detection of Osteopontin

Freshly isolated myocytes or confluent serum-starved CMEC cells were treated in 5 ml of medium with 3 µM dexamethasone in serum-free DMEM. Conditioned media were collected and adjusted with 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Media were centrifuged at 3,000 times g to remove cells and cellular debris and concentrated using Centricon 10 filters (Amicon, Inc.). Twelve µg of protein from each sample were resolved by 4-20% gradient SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad). Proteins from the gel were electrophorectically blotted to 0.2-µm nitrocellulose membranes (Schleischer & Schuell). The membrane was stained with Ponceau S to confirm equal loading of the samples. After destaining, the membrane was incubated overnight in the blocking buffer TBST (25 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 0.2% Tween-20) containing 5% nonfat dry milk. The membrane was then incubated with monoclonal anti-osteopontin antibody MPIIIB10 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA) diluted (1:20) in TBST containing 1% bovine serum albumin. Following washings with TBST, the membrane was incubated with a 1:10,000 dilution of peroxidase-conjugated mouse antigoat IgG. The immune complexes were detected using a chemiluminescence kit (NEN DuPont).

Detection of NOS2

Freshly isolated myocytes or confluent serum-starved CMEC cells were treated with a combination of cytokines (IL-1beta and IFN-) for 16 h, with or without a 1-h preincubation in medium containing 20 nM synthetic osteopontin peptide (OPP). Cells were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed with an immunoprecipitation buffer (1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.2 mM sodium vanadate, 0.2 mM PMSF, 0.5% Nonidet P-40). Sixty and 90 µg of proteins obtained from CMEC and myocytes, respectively, were resolved by 7.5% SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad) and analyzed by immunoblot using an anti-NOS2 monoclonal antibody (Transduction Laboratories) as described above.

RNA Isolation and Northern Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from treated or untreated cardiac myocytes and CMEC by the method of Chomczynski and Sacchi(22) . RNA was size-fractionated on 1.0% agarose gels containing 2.2 M formaldehyde and transferred to nylon membranes (Gene Screen Plus; NEN DuPont) by using a transblot apparatus (Bio-Rad) in 10 times SSC (SSC is 0.15 M NaCl and 0.015 M citrate). Blots were hybridized overnight to radiolabeled probes in the presence of 1% SDS, 10% dextran sulfate, 1 mM NaCl, and 50% formamide at 42 °C. Full-length rat osteopontin (23) and partial-length type 2 NOS (5) cDNAs were labeled using a random prime labeling kit (Boehringer Mannheim). After hybridization, membranes were washed twice with 2 times SSC for 5 min each at room temperature, twice with 2 times SSC containing 1% SDS (for osteopontin) or 0.1% SDS (for NOS2) at 60 °C for 30 min, and twice with 0.05 times SSC at room temperature for 15 min prior to autoradiography. The same blots were then hybridized with an 18 S oligonucleotide (30 mer) end-labeled by T4 polynucleotide kinase to normalize for loading differences(24) . Differences in mRNA signal intensity were calculated using a 2202 Ultroscan densitometer (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). Polyadenylated RNA was isolated from intact adult rat ventricular muscle using a kit (Invitrogen) exactly as described by the manufacturer. Five µg of poly(A) mRNA were analyzed by Northern blotting using the rat osteopontin cDNA probe as described above.

Peptides

A hexapeptide with the amino acid sequence N-methyl-Gly-Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser-Pro (GRGDSP) was purchased from Sigma. A synthetic OPP with amino acid sequence Ac-Pro-Thr-Val-Asp-Val-Pro-Asp-Gly-Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser-Leu-Ala-Tyr-Gly-Leu-Arg-Ser-Lys-NH(2)(17) was synthesized by Tana Research Laboratories (Houston, TX).

Transient Transfection of CMEC with Antisense Osteopontin Construct

A full-length rat osteopontin cDNA, isolated and characterized as described previously(23) , was subcloned into the NotI site of the mammalian expression vector pcDNA3 (Invitrogen). The orientation of resulting clones was checked by restriction analysis and the plasmid containing the cDNA insert in antisense orientation was used to transfect primary cultures of microvascular endothelial cells that had attained approximately 50% confluency (i.e. 4-5 days after isolation and plating in DMEM + 20% fetal calf serum). The cells were washed twice with serum-free OPTI-MEM medium (without antibiotics; Life Technologies, Inc.), and then transfected with 60 µg of Lipofectin and 40 µg of the antisense osteopontin cDNA in 3 ml of serum-free OPTI-MEM medium, according to the vendor's instructions (Life Technologies, Inc.). Control cells were mock-transfected with Lipofectin alone in OPTI-MEM medium using the same protocol. The cells were incubated for 6 h before the medium was supplemented with DMEM and 20% fetal calf serum. After 48 h of transfection, CMEC were serum-starved for 3 h and then treated with cytokines for a further 16 h before analysis of osteopontin and NOS2 mRNA abundance.


RESULTS

Osteopontin Expression and Secretion by Cardiac Myocytes and Microvascular Endothelial Cells in Vitro and in Vivo: Regulation by Dexamethasone

Although several groups have reported data from tissue screens for osteopontin mRNA, only Giachelli et al.(18) have reported detecting osteopontin in normal rat myocardium, but at a level 50-60-fold lower than in normal rat aorta or carotid artery. To determine whether we could confirm this observation, poly(A) mRNA was isolated from ventricular muscle of two rat hearts. As shown in Fig. 1A, osteopontin mRNA could be detected readily by Northern blot in both samples. Osteopontin mRNA abundance also was examined in fresh primary isolates of adult rat ventricular myocytes and confluent primary cultures of CMEC by Northern blot. As shown in Fig. 1B, in the absence of inflammatory cytokines or dexamethasone, a 1.5-kilobase band consistent with osteopontin transcripts was readily detectable in RNA from CMEC, but only a faint band was observed in Northern blots of RNA from ventricular myocytes after much longer exposures of the autoradiogram.


Figure 1: Constitutive expression of osteopontin in normal adult rat heart. A, Poly(A) mRNA was isolated from the ventricular muscle of two normal adult rat hearts. Five µg of the RNA were electrophoresed and analyzed by Northern blot using P-labeled osteopontin cDNA as a probe. Each band represents the hybridization signal from one heart. B, CMEC were isolated from the ventricular muscle of adult rat hearts according to the methods described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Total cellular RNA (15 µg) isolated from confluent serum-starved CMEC (lane 1) or from 24-h plated primary isolates of myocytes (lane 2) were electrophoresed on formaldehyde agarose gels and analyzed by Northern blot using P-labeled rat osteopontin cDNA probe.



The regulation of osteopontin expression is tissue-specific and complex in those cell types in which it has been examined(15, 16) . In osteoblasts, agents that induce bone resorption including inflammatory mediators such as TNF-alpha, IL-1beta and LPS, also induce osteopontin expression and secretion(26) . To determine whether osteopontin expression could be enhanced in cardiac myocytes and CMEC, respectively, cells were exposed to a combination of cytokines (rhIL-1beta and rmIFN-) for 16 h. As shown in Fig. 2A, incubation with this combination of cytokines approximately doubled CMEC osteopontin mRNA abundance compared to control CMEC cultures, whereas osteopontin mRNA remained low and unchanged as analyzed by Northern blot in cytokine-pretreated adult ventricular myocyte primary isolates at 16 h (Fig. 2B).


Figure 2: Regulation of osteopontin mRNA levels by cytokines and dexamethasone in cardiac cells. Confluent 3-h serum-starved CMEC (A) or primary isolates of ventricular myocytes (B) were exposed to vehicle alone (lane 1) or to a combination of cytokines (rhIL-1beta, 4 ng/ml + rmIFN-, 500 U/ml, lane 2) or dexamethasone alone (3 µM) (lane 3) for 16 h. The cells in lane 4 were pretreated with dexamethasone for 1 h, and then with the combination of cytokines for 16 h. Total RNA was extracted, and 15 µg of RNA were analyzed by Northern blot using P-labeled rat osteopontin cDNA as a probe. The filters were then hybridized to an 18 S probe to normalize for loading differences. The data are expressed as normalized osteopontin mRNA levels as a percent of control levels in the absence of dexamethasone or cytokines.



Since glucocorticoids are known to suppress the induction of inflammatory cytokine-induced gene expression in many cell types, including cardiac myocytes(5) , cytokine-treated CMEC and ventricular myocytes were also pretreated with dexamethasone, which we presumed would suppress any cytokine-induced expression of osteopontin mRNA as has been shown, for example, in rat osteoblast cells(27) . Unexpectedly, as shown in Fig. 2, dexamethasone markedly enhanced osteopontin mRNA abundance in both CMEC and adult ventricular myocytes, regardless of whether IL-1beta and IFN- were present in the incubation medium. Cells treated with a combination of dexamethasone with cytokines tended to have lower levels of osteopontin mRNA than cells treated with dexamethasone alone, although cultures treated with both classes of reagents still expressed osteopontin mRNA at levels that were 10-15-fold higher than base line. To determine whether similar changes in osteopontin mRNA abundance could be detected in vivo, adult rats were injected intraperitoneally with either LPS or dexamethasone (or both). Myocyte and non-myocyte fractions were obtained, and total RNA was isolated and analyzed by Northern blot. A faint band of the appropriate size for osteopontin mRNA was detected in both myocyte and non-myocyte fractions from normal hearts. This signal could be increased severalfold at 16 h following injection of dexamethasone or of LPS, or with a combination of these agents (Fig. 3). A detectable increase above base-line osteopontin mRNA levels could be detected within 8 h of injection of LPS, with or without dexamethasone (data not shown).


Figure 3: Regulation of osteopontin mRNA levels in myocyte and non-myocyte fractions of hearts from adult rats injected in vivo with dexamethasone and/or LPS. Animals were injected intraperitoneally with either dexamethasone (1.2 mg/kg; 16 h before sacrifice) or with LPS (4 mg/kg; 8 h before sacrifice), or both reagents. Animals were sacrificed to isolate myocyte and non-myocyte fractions, and total RNA was prepared. Northern analyses were performed as described in Fig. 2using a P-labeled rat osteopontin cDNA. The 18 S hybridization signal was used to determine the relative amount of RNA loaded per lane. Data are shown for one animal in each treatment group. The experiment was performed twice with similar results.



To verify that these changes in mRNA abundance were paralleled by similar directional changes in osteopontin synthesis and secretion, the media conditioned by control or dexamethasone-treated cells were concentrated and analyzed by Western blot using a monoclonal anti-osteopontin antibody. As shown in Fig. 4A, a band corresponding to osteopontin (approximately 62 kDa) was detected in medium conditioned by CMEC. The intensity of this band was increased significantly in conditioned medium from dexamethasone-treated CMEC. In myocyte-conditioned medium, a slightly higher molecular mass band (approximately 69 kDa) was detected by the same antibody by Western blot. This band is within the range of sizes that has been reported for this glycosylated phosphoprotein (i.e. 44-75 kDa)(16) . As in CMEC, dexamethasone increased by approximately 3-fold the intensity of this 69-kDa band in proteins from ventricular myocytes (Fig. 4B). Similar data were obtained by immunoprecipitation of conditioned media from both cell types following metabolic labeling with [S]methionine, using a polyclonal anti-peptide osteopontin antiserum prepared as described previously (23) , followed by SDS-PAGE (data not shown).


Figure 4: Western blot analysis of osteopontin in media conditioned by CMEC and ventricular myocytes. Confluent serum-starved CMEC (A) or primary isolates of ventricular myocytes (B) were treated with vehicle alone (Me(2)SO, lane ``C'') or with dexamethasone (3 µM, DEX) for 16 h in serum-free medium. The conditioned media were collected and concentrated, and 12 µg of protein from the concentrate were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Equivalent loading and transfer of protein was checked by Ponceau S staining of the membrane. Osteopontin was detected by immunoblotting using a monoclonal anti-osteopontin antibody. The arrow indicates the position of osteopontin.



Concentration Dependence and Time Course of Dexamethasone-induced Osteopontin Expression

Earlier studies (27) reporting suppression of osteopontin gene expression by dexamethasone in a rat osteoblast cell line (ROS 17/2.8) used lower dexamethasone concentrations (in the range of 30-100 nM) than were used to generate the data in Fig. 2(i.e. 3 µM). To determine whether CMEC and cardiac myocytes also exhibited evidence of decreased osteopontin mRNA abundance at lower concentrations of dexamethasone, concentration-effect curves were performed that bracketed the concentrations used in these earlier studies and those used to generate the data in Fig. 2(i.e. 30 nM to 15 µM). As shown in Fig. 5A, there was an increase in osteopontin mRNA levels above those observed in CMEC treated with vehicle alone at 30 nM, and this response increased with higher dexamethasone concentrations. An osteopontin mRNA hybridization signal was easily detected in adult cardiac myocytes at 30 nM and was maximal at 100 nM (Fig. 5B). At 3 µM dexamethasone, an increase in osteopontin transcript levels was apparent in microvascular endothelial cells within 1 h and continued to increase throughout the 16-h incubation period of the experiment (Fig. 6A). After addition of 3 µM dexamethasone, no increase in osteopontin transcript was detected by Northern blot until a 5-h time point in freshly isolated adult ventricular myocytes, and levels continued to increase through 16 h (Fig. 6B).


Figure 5: Concentration-effect relationship of dexamethasone on osteopontin mRNA abundance in cardiac cells. Confluent, serum-starved CMEC (A) or ventricular myocyte primary isolates (B) were treated over a range of dexamethasone concentrations (30 nM to 15 µM). Total RNA was isolated after 16 h of treatment and analyzed by Northern blot with P-labeled rat osteopontin and 18 S probes. The density of each osteopontin signal was divided by that of corresponding 18 S rRNA and is expressed as a percentage of the normalized osteopontin hybridization signal in the absence of dexamethasone for both cell types.




Figure 6: Time course of increase in osteopontin mRNA levels by dexamethasone. Confluent serum-starved CMEC (A) or ventricular myocyte primary isolates (B) were treated with dexamethasone (3 µM) for the time periods indicated. Total RNA was extracted and 15 µg of the RNA was analyzed by Northern blot using P-labeled osteopontin and 18 S probes. The signal density of osteopontin mRNA was divided by that of 18 S rRNA, and the data are expressed as a percentage of the normalized osteopontin hybridization signal at 0 h.



Dexamethasone and Osteopontin mRNA Stability

To determine the effect of dexamethasone on osteopontin mRNA stability, confluent serum-starved CMEC were treated with actinomycin D (10 µg/ml; Sigma) after 16 h of dexamethasone pretreatment. The results in Fig. 7show that the half-life of osteopontin mRNA in control CMEC is approximately 11 h and is similar to that reported for ROS 17/2.8 cells by Noda et al.(28) . There was a trend toward a slightly longer half-life for osteopontin in dexamethasone-pretreated cells, although this was not statistically significant. Thus, the principal mechanism by which glucocorticoids regulate osteopontin mRNA abundance appears to be at the transcriptional level.


Figure 7: Dexamethasone and osteopontin mRNA stability. Confluent serum-starved CMEC were exposed to either vehicle or 3 µM dexamethasone for 16 h before adding actinomycin D (10 µg/ml). Total RNA was isolated at the indicated time points. Northern blot analyses were performed using 15 µg of total RNA per lane and P-labeled rat osteopontin and 18 S probes. The signal density of osteopontin mRNA was divided by that of 18 S rRNA. The data, expressed as natural logarithm of osteopontin mRNA at successive time points (R) normalized to the maximal level at time 0 (R(0)), from four independent experiments are plotted as a function of time (mean ± S.E.).



Regulation of Inducible NOS2 Expression by Osteopontin

Both microvascular endothelial cells and ventricular myocytes express NOS2 in situ in intact rat hearts and in vitro following exposure to soluble inflammatory mediators. To test the hypothesis that osteopontin secretion by one or both cell types in vitro could modulate NOS2 mRNA abundance, we first determined whether interruption of matrix protein-integrin binding affected NOS2 transcript levels. As shown in Fig. 8A, confluent serum-starved CMEC pretreated for 1 h with the synthetic hexapeptide GRGDSP (10 nM), which acts as an inhibitor of matrix ligand-integrin binding(29) , increased NOS2 mRNA abundance by 50% after a subsequent 16-h incubation in the presence of IL-1beta and IFN- over that of cells incubated in the absence of the hexapeptide. No NOS2 mRNA could be detected under basal conditions (i.e. in the absence of cytokines) or in cells incubated in the presence of the GRGDSP peptide alone. Higher concentrations of this synthetic hexapeptide did not result in any further increase in NO synthase transcript levels (data not shown) and led to some cell detachment from the plate. Similarly, in adult ventricular myocytes, as shown in Fig. 8B, GRGDSP (10-50 nM) enhanced NOS2 transcript levels by about 20-60% over those observed in myocytes treated with cytokines alone. These cells tolerated higher concentrations of the peptide without observable cellular detachment.


Figure 8: Regulation of NOS II mRNA abundance by GRGDSP peptide in cardiac cells. Confluent serum-starved CMEC cells (A) or primary isolates of myocytes (B) were pretreated for 1 h with the indicated concentrations of GRGDSP peptide (RGD) and then exposed to a combination of cytokines (rhIL-1beta, 4 ng/ml + rmIFN-, 500 units/ml) for 16 h. Total RNA (15 µg) was used for Northern analysis using P-labeled NOS2 and 18 S probes. The normalized NOS2 mRNA hybridization signals are presented as a percentage of NOS2 mRNA abundance with IL-1beta and IFN- alone. No NOS2 mRNA was detectable by Northern blot in the absence of cytokines regardless of whether or not the GRGDSP peptide was present (mean ± S.E.; data shown are the averages of three experiments).



These data suggested that some matrix protein attachments, possibly involving endogenous osteopontin, could suppress the extent of NOS2 expression in both cell types. To determine whether osteopontin did affect the extent of induction of this NO synthase isoform, microvascular endothelial cells and ventricular myocytes were treated with a 20-mer synthetic peptide analogue (OPP) based on the rat osteopontin sequence that spans the RGD integrin-binding motif. OPP has been shown to be functional for osteopontin signaling and mimics recombinant human osteopontin in renal tubular epithelial cells(17) . As shown in Fig. 9, 20 nM OPP decreased NOS2 transcript levels by approximately 50% in cytokine-pretreated microvascular endothelial cells. In cytokine-treated primary isolates of adult ventricular myocytes, there was about a 40% decline in NOS2 mRNA abundance at 20 nM and 50 nM OPP. This decline in NOS2 transcript with OPP also was accompanied by a reduction in NOS2 protein by approximately 20 and 50% in CMEC and adult ventricular myocytes, respectively, as detected by immunoblot analysis using an anti-NOS2 monoclonal antibody (data not shown).


Figure 9: Regulation of NOS II gene expression by a synthetic OPP. Confluent serum-starved CMEC (A) or primary isolates of ventricular myocytes (B) were pretreated for 1 h with the indicated concentrations of a 20-amino acid synthetic peptide (OPP) and then exposed to a combination of cytokines (rhIL-1beta, 4 ng/ml + rmIFN-, 500 units/ml) for an additional 16 h in the continuous presence of OPP. Total RNA was extracted and analyzed by Northern blot using P-labeled NOS2 and 18 S probes. The hybridization signal density of NOS2 was divided by that of 18 S, and normalized NOS2 mRNA levels are expressed as a percent of maximal NOS2 mRNA levels following exposure to cytokines alone.



Transfection of Antisense Osteopontin cDNA and NOS2 Expression in CMEC

To determine whether inhibition of endogenous osteopontin expression in microvascular endothelial cells could affect NOS2 mRNA abundance in cytokine-treated microvascular endothelial cells, primary cultures were transiently transfected with a rat osteopontin antisense cDNA construct using Lipofectin. The cells were treated with cytokines following 48 h of transfection. Lipofectin alone did not affect osteopontin or NOS2 mRNA levels in cytokine-treated CMEC. Transfection with an antisense osteopontin cDNA reduced osteopontin mRNA by approximately 50% as compared to osteopontin mRNA levels in cells treated with cytokines alone or with Lipofectin alone (Fig. 10). However, NOS2 mRNA abundance was enhanced more than 2-fold in plates transfected with the antisense osteopontin cDNA construct (Fig. 10).


Figure 10: Transfection of CMEC with an antisense rat osteopontin cDNA construct increases NOS2 mRNA levels. CMEC primary cultures that were approximately 50% confluent were transfected with an antisense osteopontin cDNA construct (AS OP cDNA) using Lipofectin for 6 h. As a control, cells were mock-transfected with Lipofectin alone. The media were supplemented with 10 ml of DMEM containing 20% serum for 48 h. The cells were then serum-starved for 3 h before exposure to rhIL-1beta (4 ng/ml) and rmIFN- (500 units/ml) for a subsequent 16 h. Total RNA was isolated and analyzed by Northern blot using P-labeled osteopontin, NOS2, and 18 S probes. The normalized NOS2 and osteopontin hybridization signals are expressed relative to the NOS2 and osteopontin mRNA levels in CMEC treated with cytokines alone, the mean of which was set to 100% (*p < 0.01 compared to control NOS2 signal;**p < 0.02 compared to control osteopontin signal; mean ± S.E. of three experiments).




DISCUSSION

Osteopontin, originally identified in its role of facilitating resorption of bone hydroxylapatite by osteoclasts, is now known to be synthesized in many different cell types including luminal epithelial cells in many organs and by smooth muscle in a number of tissues including the vasculature(27, 30, 31, 32, 33) . Osteopontin mRNA has been inconsistently detected in normal rat heart(18, 27, 34) . Murry et al.(35) have reported that osteopontin expression was markedly increased in a subset of infiltrating macrophages around and within zones of myocardial injury induced by a transdiaphragmatic freeze-thaw technique. Similarly, Williams et al.(36) have recently reported that osteopontin mRNA is increased markedly in hearts of hamsters with a heritable cardiomyopathy, which they attributed to infiltrating tissue macrophages.

Osteopontin may play an important role in several cardiovascular disease processes, including atherosclerosis, aortic valve calcification, as well as repair of myocardial injury as reviewed by Giachelli et al.(37) . An increase in osteopontin levels was observed in rat carotid arteries following vascular injury induced by experimental balloon angioplasty(18) . Indeed, this extracellular matrix phosphoprotein may play a more general role in the immune response than mediating chemotaxis of phagocytic cells; for example, the early T-cell activation gene 1 (Eta1) that is expressed following nonspecific activation of several lymphocyte subclasses has been identified as being osteopontin(38) . Osteopontin also can stimulate lymphocyte immunoglobulin production, suggesting that it may function as a cytokine in some circumstances(16) . Murry et al.(35) also demonstrated that osteopontin expression could be detected in other tissues and cell types following injury, including regenerating skeletal muscle cells. Within the heart, osteopontin mRNA and protein has been detected by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry only within macrophages in injured muscle, but not in the extracellular matrix or other cell types (35, 36) . Since the only known functions of osteopontin are related to its role as an extracellular matrix phosphoprotein, Murry et al.(35) speculated that extracellular osteopontin protein levels and presumably levels in otherwise normal heart muscle were below the level of detection by the immunohistochemical techniques they employed.

Denhardt and Guo(16) , in a recent review, have emphasized the cell type specificity of the regulation of osteopontin gene expression. Osteopontin is expressed constitutively in arterial vascular smooth muscle cells and osteoblasts and its expression is increased by peptide growth factors such as basic fibroblast growth factor and transforming growth factor-beta and by phorbol esters (16) and decreased by glucocorticoids, at least in the osteoblast cell line ROS 17/2.8(27) . In contrast, we find that glucocorticoids increase osteopontin expression and protein secretion in ventricular myocytes and CMEC in primary culture. This differential responsiveness to glucocorticoids may be due to the fact that the osteopontin promoter is known to contain two glucocorticoid response elements, as well as two AP-1 sites (16, 39, 40) . Glucocorticoids, by binding to steroid hormone receptors, can directly repress AP-1-mediated transcriptional activation(41) .

In addition to increasing osteopontin mRNA levels and protein content in ventricular myocytes and CMEC, dexamethasone also decreases NOS2 mRNA abundance and activity in both cell types(4, 5) . The mechanisms by which glucocorticoids regulate cytokine-induced gene expression are complex and differ among specific cell types(42) . However, the temporal association between osteopontin expression and decreased NOS2 mRNA levels suggests that endogenous osteopontin in the extracellular matrix could regulate NOS2 activity in these cells. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that the synthetic 20-mer osteopontin peptide analogue (OPP) decreased NOS2 mRNA and protein levels in both cell types and that transfection of CMEC with an antisense osteopontin cDNA decreased endogenous osteopontin mRNA levels while increasing NOS2 mRNA abundance in response to IL-1beta and IFN-. The specific intracellular signaling pathways initiated by osteopontin binding to alphavbeta3 (or other) integrins that result in decreased NOS2 mRNA abundance are not known. Integrin recruited and autophosphorylated focal adhesion kinase, which can subsequently activate either ras or protein kinase C-dependent pathways, has been shown to synergistically enhance some cellular responses to cytokines(43) . It is possible that osteopontin acts to interrupt downstream signaling by other extracellular matrix proteins (such as fibronectin, with which osteopontin is known to interact)(25, 44, 45) . Regardless of the specific mechanisms, it is likely that the increased expression, synthesis, and secretion of osteopontin induced by specific cytokines or glucocorticoids contributes to the spatial and temporal regulation of nitric oxide production by NOS2 in cardiac muscle.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work is supported in part by National Institutes of Health NHLBI Grants R37-HL36141 and IP50-HL52320 (to T. W. S.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Supported by a research fellowship award from the American Heart Association (Massachusetts Affiliate).

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-732-7503; Fax: 617-732-5132; rakelly@bics.bwh.harvard.edu.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: CMEC, cardiac microvascular endothelial cells; NOS2, inducible nitric oxide synthase; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; IL, interleukin; rhIL-1beta, recombinant human IL-1beta; IFN, interferon; rmIFN-, recombinant mouse IFN-; OPP, osteopontin peptide; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Ying Zi Zhao and Jing Wang for their help in cell isolation and culturing, and Paula McColgan for editorial assistance and preparation of the manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Roberts, A. B., Vodovotz, Y., Roche, N. S., Sporn, M. B., and Nathan, C. F. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 1921-1930 [Abstract]
  2. Schulz, R., Nava, E., and Moncada, S. (1992) Br. J. Pharmacol. 105, 575-580 [Abstract]
  3. Balligand, J.-L., Ungureanu, D., Kelly, R. A., Kobzik, L., Pimental, D., Michel, T., and Smith, T. W. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 91, 2314-2319 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Balligand, J.-L., Ungureanu-Longrois, D., Simmons, W. W., Kobzik, L., Lowenstein, C. J., Lamas, S., Kelly, R. A., Smith, T. W., and Michel, T. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 268, H1293-H1303
  5. Balligand, J.-L., Ungureanu-Longrois, D., Simmons, W. W., Pimental, D., Malinski, T. A., Kapturczak, M., Taha, Z., Lowenstein, C. J., Davidoff, A. J., Kelly, R. A., Smith, T. W., and Michel, T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27580-27588 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ungureanu-Longrois, D., Balligand, J.-L., Okada, I., Simmons, W. W., Kobzik, L., Lowenstein, C. J., Kunkel, S. L., Michel, T., Kelly, R. A., and Smith, T. W. (1995) Circ. Res. 77, 486-493 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ungureanu-Longrois, D., Balligand, J.-L., Simmons, W. W., Okada, I., Kobzik, L., Lowenstein, C. J., Kunkel, S., Michel, T., Kelly, R. A., and Smith, T. W. (1995) Circ. Res. 77, 494-502 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Yang, X., Chowdhury, N., Cai, B., Brett, J., Marboe, C., Sciacca, R., Michler, R., and Cannon, P. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 94, 714-721 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Ungureanu-Longrois, D., Balligand, J.-L., Kelly, R. A., and Smith, T. W. (1995) J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 27, 155-167 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Pinsky, D. J., Cai, B., Yang, X., Rodriguez, C., Sciacca, R. R., and Cannon, P. J. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 95, 677-685 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Schmidt, H. H. H., and Walter, U. (1994) Cell 78, 919-925 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Nathan, C., and Xie, Q.-W. (1994) Cell 78, 915-918 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Stamler, J. S. (1994) Cell 78, 931-936 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Nathan, C., and Xie, Q.-W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13725-13728 [Free Full Text]
  15. Butter, W. T. (1989) Connect. Tissue Res. 23, 123-136 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Denhardt, D. T., and Guo, X. (1993) FASEB J. 7, 1475-1482 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hwang, S., Lopez, C. A., Heck, D. E., Gardner, C. R., Laskin, D. L., Laskin, J. D., and Denhardt, D. T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 711-715 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Giachelli, C., Bae, N., Lombardi, D., Majesky, M., and Schwartz, S. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 177, 867-873 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Ellingsen, O., Davidoff, A. J., Prasad, S. K., Berger, H.-J., Springhorn, J. P., Marsh, J. D., Kelly, R. A., and Smith, T. W. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 265, H747-H754
  20. Berger, H.-J., Prasad, S. K., Davidoff, A. J., Pimental, D., Ellingsen, O., Marsh, J. D., Smith, T. W., and Kelly, R. A. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 266, H341-H349
  21. Nishida, M., Carley, W. W., Gerritsen, M. E., Ellingsen, O., Kelly, R. A., and Smith, T. W. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 264, H639-H652
  22. Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Singh, K., Mukherjee, A. B., DeVouge, M. W., and Mukherjee, B. B. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 23847-23851 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Perrella, M. A., Maki, T., Prasad, S., Pimental, D., Singh, K., Takahashi, N., Yoshizumi, M., Alali, A., Higashiyama, S., Kelly, R. A., Lee, M.-E., and Smith, T. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27045-27050 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Singh, K., DeVouge, M. W., and Mukherjee, B. B. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 18696-18701 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Jin, C., Miyaura, C., Ishini, I., Hong, M., Sato, T., Abe, E., and Suda, T. (1990) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 74, 221-228 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Yoon, K., Buenaga, R., and Rodan, G. A. (1987) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 148, 1129-1136 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Noda, M., Yoon, K., Prince, C. W., Butler, W. T., and Rodan, G. A. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 13916-13921 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Pytela, R., Pierschbacher, M. D., Ginsberg, M. H., Plow, E. F., and Ruoslahti, E. (1986) Science 231, 1559-1562 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Franzen, A., and Heinegard, D. (1985) Biochem. J. 232, 715-724 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Prince, C. W., Oosawa, T., Butler, W. T., Tomana, M., Bhown, A. S., Bhown, M., and Schrohenloher, R. E. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 2900-2907 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Oldberg, A., Franzen, A., and Heinegard, D. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 8819-8823 [Abstract]
  33. Brown, L. F., Berse, B., Van de Water, L., Papadopoulos-Sergiou, A., Perruzzi, C. A., Manseau, E. J., Dvorak, H. F., and Senger, D. R. (1992) Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 1169-1180 [Abstract]
  34. Gadeau, A.-P., Campan, M., Millet, D., Candresse, T., and Desgranges, C. (1993) Arterioscler. Thromb. 13, 120-125 [Abstract]
  35. Murry, C. E., Giachelli, C. M., Schwartz, S. M., and Vracko, R. (1994) Am. J. Pathol. 145, 1450-1462 [Abstract]
  36. Williams, E. B., Halpert, I., Wickline, S., Davison, G., Parks, W. C., and Rottman, J. N. (1995) Circulation 92, 705-709 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Giachelli, C. M., Schwartz, S. M., and Liaw, L. (1995) Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 5, 88-95 [CrossRef]
  38. Patarca, R., Freeman, G. J., Singh, R. P., Wei, F. Y., Durfee, T., Blattner, F., Regnier, D. C., Kozak, C. A., Mock, B. A., Morse, H. C., III, Jerrells, T. R., and Cantor, H. (1989) J. Exp. Med. 170, 145-161 [Abstract]
  39. Zhang, Q., Wrana, J. L., and Sodek, J. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 207, 649-659 [Abstract]
  40. Craig, A. M., and Denhardt, D. T. (1991) Gene (Amst.) 100, 163-171 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Jonat, C., Rahmsdorf, H. J., Park, K.-K., Cato, A. C. B., Gebel, S., Ponta, H., and Herrlich, P. (1990) Cell 62, 1189-1204 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Scheinman, R. I., Gualberto, A., Jewell, C. M., Cidlowski, J. A., and Baldwin, A. S., Jr. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 943-953 [Abstract]
  43. Clark, E. A., and Brugge, J. S. (1995) Science 268, 233-239 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Nemir, M., DeVouge, M. W., and Mukherjee, B. B. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 18202-18208 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Beninati, S., Senger, D. R., Eleonora, C.-M., Mukherjee, A. B., Chackalaparampil, I., Shanmugam, V., Singh, K., and Mukherjee, B. B. (1993) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 114, 702-707 [Abstract]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.