©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Gating Effects of Component B on Oxygen Activation by the Methane Monooxygenase Hydroxylase Component (*)

(Received for publication, July 14, 1995; and in revised form, August 10, 1995)

Yi Liu Jeremy C. Nesheim (§) Sang-Kyu Lee John D. Lipscomb (¶)

From the Department of Biochemistry, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Component B (MMOB) of the soluble methane monooxygenase (MMO) system accelerates the initial velocity of methane oxidation by up to 150-fold by an unknown mechanism. The active site of MMO contains a diferric, hydroxo-bridged diiron cluster located on the hydroxylase component (MMOH). This cluster is reduced by the NAD(P)H-coupled reductase component to the diferrous state, which then reacts with O(2) to yield two reaction cycle intermediates sequentially termed compounds P and Q. The rate of compound P formation is shown here to be independent of O(2) concentration, suggesting that an MMOH-O(2) complex (compound O) is (irreversibly) formed before compound P. Compound Q is capable of reacting with hydrocarbons to yield the MMOH-product complex, compound T. It is shown here that MMOB accelerates catalysis by increasing 1000-fold the rate of O(2) association and reaction with diferrous MMOH leading to compound P. Modeling of the single turnover reaction in the presence of substoichiometric MMOB suggests that MMOB also accelerates the compound P to Q conversion by 40-fold. Due to this O(2)-gating effect of MMOB, either compound Q or T becomes the dominant species during turnover, depending upon the substrate concentration and type. Because these are the species that either react with substrate (Q) or release product (T), their buildup maximizes the turnover rate. This is the first direct role in catalysis to be recognized for MMOB and represents a novel method for oxygenase regulation.


INTRODUCTION

Methane monooxygenase (MMO) (^1)catalyzes activation of O(2) for the oxidation of methane to methanol(1, 2) .

Many other hydrocarbons serve as adventitious substrates(3) . The soluble form of MMO isolated from Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b consists of three independent components; a 245-kDa hydroxylase (MMOH), a 40-kDa reductase (MMOR), and a 15-kDa protein termed component B (MMOB)(4) . The roles of MMOR and MMOH in catalysis have been defined in a straightforward manner. Each of the two alphabeta-protomers of MMOH contains a hydroxo-bridged diiron cluster that is essential for O(2) activation and hydrocarbon oxidation and thus appears to be at the active site of the enzyme(2, 7, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) . MMOR contains FAD and a [2Fe-2S] cluster and serves to transfer electrons from NADH to the MMOH active site cluster(4, 12, 13) . In contrast to the well defined roles of these components, that of MMOB has been more difficult to determine.

MMOB contains no metals, prosthetic groups, or cofactors. Nevertheless, in past studies, we have shown that MMOB is active in: (i) increasing the rate of the steady state reaction up to 150-fold(15) ; (ii) perturbing the spectroscopic features of MMOH(15, 16) ; (iii) shifting the redox potential values of MMOH(17) ; (iv) altering the product distribution for complex substrates that can be hydroxylated in more than one position(6) ; and (v) varying the rate of product formation when MMOH functions through a H(2)O(2) shunt(6, 18) . It has also been postulated that MMOB plays roles in increasing the rate of electron transfer and in efficiently coupling substrate oxidation to NADH consumption(14, 19, 20, 21) . Together, these studies suggest that MMOB alters the structure of MMOH in a way that accelerates and potentially regulates the reaction. However, the basis for these effects is unknown.

Recently, we have shown that the catalytic cycle of MMOH proceeds through several discrete intermediates(22, 23) . In an initial step, the diferric resting state of the MMOH diiron cluster is reduced to the diferrous state. This state reacts with O(2) to form an intermediate termed compound P (formally a peroxy adduct), which then spontaneously converts to a yellow species termed compound Q. Compound Q appears to be the species that reacts directly with substrates to yield the terminal enzyme-product complex (compound T)(22) . In the presence of MMOB at low substrate concentrations, these intermediates form at progressively decreasing rates. This has allowed some of them to be trapped and characterized (23, 24, 25) . (^2)

In this study, we have investigated the effect of MMOB on the kinetics of compounds P and Q formation and decay. We show that a major new role for MMOB is to greatly increase the rates of formation of these intermediates. Our findings provide the first direct demonstration of the kinetic basis for the essential regulatory role of MMOB in establishing efficient catalysis.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Bacterial growth and purification of MMO from M. trichosporium OB3b, as well as enzyme activity assays, were as reported previously(4, 26) . MMOH exhibited specific activity in the range of 600-1200 nmol/min/mg for furan turnover. The buffer for all experiments was 100 mM MOPS, pH 7.7. All reagents were the highest grade available and were obtained from Sigma, Aldrich, or EM Scientific. Water was glass distilled. Anaerobic sample handling techniques have been described previously(4, 5) .

Stopped-flow Absorption Spectroscopy

Single turnover reactions by MMOH were monitored using a stopped-flow apparatus (Update Instruments, Inc.) as described previously(22) . In general, MMOH (60 µM, 120 µM active sites) and methyl viologen (50 µM) were made anaerobic in buffer. Sodium dithionite was added stoichiometrically (2 reducing eq/active site) to reduce MMOH. The enzyme solution was then loaded anaerobically into one stopped-flow syringe. The other stopped-flow syringe was loaded with O(2)-saturated buffer containing MMOB in the stated concentration, ± substrate. After rapidly mixing the solutions at 4 °C, absorbance changes were monitored at 430 nm.

Freeze-Quench Techniques and EPR Analysis

These experiments were carried out as described above except that MMOH was in higher concentration (250 µM). The procedures for the freeze-quench techniques were as described previously(22, 23) . The samples were analyzed by EPR spectroscopy as described previously(5, 15, 22, 27) .

Product Yield Determinations for Single Turnover Reactions

Diferrous MMOH (250 µM, 500 µM active sites) solutions ± MMOB were prepared as described above. Propylene gas (99%, 5 p.s.i.) was bubbled through sodium dithionite solution to trap any O(2) impurity and then added to the head space of the protein sample vessel and allowed to equilibrate. Single turnover reactions were initiated by the addition of an equal volume of 100% O(2)-saturated buffer at 4 °C. After the required reaction time, the reactions were quenched by addition of an equal volume of CHCl(3). The solution was rapidly mixed with a vortex and centrifuged, and the volatile product (propylene oxide) in the CHCl(3) layer was analyzed by GC as described previously(6, 18) .

Kinetic Data Analysis

For all optically monitored experiments, O(2) and substrate (when present) were added in large excess over MMOH. When MMOB was added in concentrations equal to or larger than that of MMOH active sites, these conditions allowed the reaction kinetics to be analyzed as one or more exponential phases using the nonlinear regression fitting program KFIT developed by Dr. N. C. Millar, Kings College, London as described previously(22) . When MMOB was substoichiometric, the time course of the reaction did not follow exponential kinetic phases. In this case, a model was proposed, and the numerical integration program KSIM, also developed by Dr. Millar, was used to simulate the data. Free parameters in the model were varied to minimize the squared residual difference between the simulation and the data.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The Effect of MMOB on Oxygen Reactivity with Diferrous MMOH

Past catalytic studies have shown that MMOH reacts rapidly with O(2) only when in the diferrous state(4) . The concentration of this state is conveniently monitored using an EPR signal near g = 16(5, 26) . Fig. 1shows the time course of the disappearance of diferrous MMOH ± MMOB at 4 °C after addition of O(2). The first order rate constant for the disappearance of diferrous MMOH-MMOB was 22 ± 2 s, confirming our earlier observations (22) (Fig. 1, ). Without MMOB, the rate constant decreased approximately 1000-fold to 0.023 ± 0.003 s (Fig. 1, bullet). This rate constant would be limiting in the catalytic cycle of reconstituted MMO for many substrates including methane (turnover number = 0.17 s at 4 °C). This activation toward reaction with O(2) is the first direct evidence for a specific role that MMOB plays during the catalytic cycle.


Figure 1: Effect of MMOB on the rate of disappearance of the g = 16 EPR signal of diferrous MMOH upon addition of O(2). MMOH (0.5 mM active sites) alone (bullet) or in the presence of MMOB (0.5 mM) () in buffer was rapidly mixed with O(2)-saturated buffer (1.4 mM) (1:1) at 4 °C and then frozen at the times indicated using the freeze-quench technique for the preparation of EPR samples. Decay of the g = 16 EPR signal of diferrous MMOH was fitted to a single exponential curve (solid line). X-band EPR measurement conditions are: temperature = 8 K; microwave power = 0.4 milliwatts.



Oxygen Concentration Dependence

The rates of disappearance of the g = 16 EPR signal for diferrous MMOH ± MMOB were found to be independent of O(2) concentration in the range of 300-700 µM within experimental error (data not shown). This suggests that a fast, effectively irreversible O(2) association step precedes the formation of compound P. We will term this new Michaelis complex between diferrous MMOH and O(2) compound O.

Effect of MMOB on the Compound Q Time Course in the Absence of Substrate

In the presence of MMOB, compound Q ((max) = 430 nm) forms (k approx 1 s, 4 °C) and decays (k approx 0.05 s, 4 °C) in the catalytic cycle following the disappearance of the diferrous MMOH, compound O, and compound P(22) . Without MMOB, compound Q is difficult to detect during single turnover reactions, indicating that the rate of at least one reaction in its formation or decay has been significantly changed. Fig. 2(solidlines) shows the effect of the ratio of MMOB to MMOH concentration on the time course of compound Q. In this study, we find: (i) the maximum observed amount of compound Q increases in close proportion to the relative amount of MMOB until MMOB is stoichiometric with the MMOH sites; (ii) when the ratio of MMOB to MMOH sites is substoichiometric, the compound Q concentration first builds rapidly, then plateaus for a period of time, and finally decays at a rate almost independent of MMOB concentration; (iii) the duration of the plateau decreases as the ratio of MMOB to MMOH sites increases.


Figure 2: Effect of MMOB on the time course of compound Q after reaction of diferrous MMOH with O(2). MMOH (120 µM sites) and MMOB (0-240 µM) in buffer were rapidly mixed with O(2)-saturated buffer (1:1) at 4 °C. The MMOB:MMOH diiron cluster ratio was as shown in the figure. Time courses of the reactions were monitored at 430 nm, which is maximal for compound Q (solidlines). At a ratio of 1.3:1 MMOB:MMOH sites, the time course was essentially superimposable on the 2:1 curve shown and is omitted here for clarity. The dottedlines represent the simulation of the kinetic model shown in Fig. 4.




Figure 4: Proposed kinetic model for a single turnover reaction in the absence of substrate. Experimentally determined rate and dissociation constants (15, 17, 22) are shown in boldface italics. Other constants were chosen to give the best simulation. The abbreviations used in the model: H^r, diferrous MMOH; H^o, diferric MMOH; B, MMOB; O, compound O; P, compound P; Q, compound Q; H^rB, OB, PB, QB, and H^oB, MMOB-bound form of each species. The free parameter values shown should be considered approximate for the reasons given in the text. See Fig. 2and Fig. 3for simulations based on this model. Component B binding steps were simulated under the assumption of rapid equilibrium.




Figure 3: Effect of MMOB on the time course of propylene oxidation during single turnover reactions of diferrous MMOH. Propylene oxide was extracted and analyzed after a single turnover reaction of diferrous MMOH (0.5 mM sites) without (bullet) or with a stoichiometric amount of MMOB () as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The solidlines indicate the simulated time courses of the product formation based on the kinetic model shown in Fig. 4augmented by a reaction of compound Q with propylene to form product (k = 3500 M s).



Effect of MMOB on Product Yield During A Single Turnover

The time course of propylene oxidation during a single turnover of diferrous MMOH ± MMOB is shown in Fig. 3. With MMOB present, the product is produced both much more rapidly and in higher yield. Essentially identical yield and MMOB effect on yield were observed for single turnover oxidation of nitrobenzene (data not shown).

A Model for the Effect of MMOB on O(2)Reactivity

The time course data shown in Fig. 2could be fit reasonably well to two exponential phases when the MMOB to MMOH diiron cluster ratio was geq1. Such fits are characteristic of a reaction with two steps (rate constants of 1.2 and 0.054 s, respectively, for the preparations utilized). However, when the ratio of MMOB to MMOH diiron cluster was <1, the kinetics of compound Q formation and decay could not be fit in this way. Analysis of these complex kinetics was approached using numerical integration of models based on the measured rate and binding constants. Several kinetic models were evaluated. The simplest model that accounts well for the data is shown in Fig. 4, and the results of a simulation based on this model are presented in Fig. 2(dottedlines). The right and leftsides of the model in Fig. 4represent the pathways of the single turnover reaction of MMOH ± MMOB, respectively. Rate constants for most of these steps have been measured during the current or previous study(22) . An equilibrium binding step between MMOH and MMOB is shown to occur at each step of the model. The MMOB complexes with diferric and diferrous MMOH have been detected and their dissociation constants determined(15, 17) . The product yield data reported in Fig. 3suggests that it is possible to oxidize diferrous MMOH without product formation. The ratio of the rates for productive and nonproductive pathways is fixed by the observed product yields. We have modeled this ``leak'' as a breakdown of compound P in the absence of direct evidence for the species involved. (^3)The information now in hand fixes the values of the rates or relative rates of many steps of the model (indicated in boldfaceitalic in Fig. 4). Trial and error methods were used to find the remaining values to best simulate the experimental observations. From this simulation, we find that a satisfactory fit to the data requires: (i) much higher rates of compound P and compound Q formation in the presence of MMOB; (ii) little effect of MMOB on compound Q decay; and (iii) a significant increase in affinity between MMOB and the MMOH as the cycle progresses toward diferric MMOH. In this way, some compound Q is quickly formed by the rapid oxidation of the diferrous MMOH-MMOB complex, but its concentration then plateaus as MMOB is sequestered in the high affinity diferric MMOH-MMOB complex. As shown in Fig. 2, the result of the simulation reproduces the major features of the data. Most significantly, the model correctly predicts the dependence on MMOB of the maximum amount of compound Q formed as well as the occurrence of a plateau in the compound Q time course for substoichiometric MMOB. Consequently, we believe that the basis of this model is correct. However, values for constants determined by trial and error for a simulation of this complexity are unlikely to be unique, and additional measurements of individual rate and equilibrium constants will be required before further refinement of the model can be made. Also, other, more complicated aspects of the MMOH-MMOB interaction may have to be taken into consideration in order to fully account for the data, including: (i) the formation of a secondary complex consisting of MMOH and 2 MMOB (15) and (ii) the effect of hysteresis in the structural change of MMOH caused by MMOB(6) .

The simulation predicts that neither compound Q nor compound P will accumulate in high levels in the absence of MMOB. Accordingly, we have recently observed using Mössbauer spectroscopy that for Fe-enriched diferrous MMOH exposed to saturating O(2) and frozen after 35 s at 4 °C, diferrous and diferric MMOH were the only major species present and that these occurred in approximately the 1:1 ratio predicted by the model for that time. (^4)In contrast, in the presence of MMOB, the model predicts that compounds P and Q will accumulate in geq70% yield at different times during the first few seconds of the reaction because their formation rates are much faster than their decay rates. Past Mössbauer studies have shown that these compounds do form in high yield (23, 24, 25) at the predicted times.

Significance for Turnover Rate and Efficiency

We have shown previously that substrates react directly with compound Q to form an MMOH-product complex (compound T) and that the rate of this reaction depends linearly on both the compound Q and substrate concentrations (22) . The results shown in Fig. 2and the model in Fig. 4indicate that the effect of MMOB is to increase the rate of formation of compound Q, thereby maximizing the rate of product formation when substrate is present. Conversely, the rate of product formation is expected to be slow in the absence of MMOB because compound Q is slowly formed. These predictions are confirmed by the good fit to the data presented in Fig. 3(solidlines) based on the model shown in Fig. 4with the addition of a new step in which compound Q reacts with substrate to form product. The model predicts that the yield of product from a single turnover will be independent of the type of substrate added, which was shown here to be approximately the case for propylene and nitrobenzene.


CONCLUSION

It has been shown here that MMOB plays a specific role in MMO catalysis by increasing the rate of compound P formation by as much as 1000-fold. It is likely that the rate of conversion of compound P to compound Q is also increased at least 40-fold. This has the effect of shifting the rate-limiting step in catalysis either to the reaction of substrates with compound Q to form enzyme-bound product or to the product release step, depending upon the specific substrate utilized. Together these effects maximize the rate of turnover and minimize the possibility that an activated species prior to compound Q in the catalytic cycle will react with adventitious substrates or the enzyme itself.

The physical basis for the enhancement in the reaction rate with O(2) remains unknown. It may be that it derives from the lower redox potential of the MMOH-MMOB complex, which would be expected to increase the affinity of the diiron cluster for O(2) and perhaps facilitate the O-O bond-breaking chemistry (17) . (^5)Alternatively, the effect may derive from an increase in the O(2) accessibility of the active site or the diiron cluster through a conformational change in accord with previous observations demonstrating such changes(6, 15, 17) .

We believe that the ``gating'' effect of MMOB on O(2) reactivity described here is its major role in catalysis. Many other effects of MMOB documented thus far can be accounted for in the context of an accelerated reactivity with O(2) that maximizes the efficiency of catalysis. In other multicomponent oxygenases, regulation of catalysis has been shown to be effected by factors such as: (i) specificity between components for electron transfer (see, for example, (28) ); (ii) substrate gating of electron transfer through coupling of redox potential to binding free energy(29) ; and (iii) requirement for specific component complexes for catalysis of the O(2) bond-breaking reaction(30) . The regulation of catalytic efficiency through oxygen gating appears to be a novel role for an accessory protein in an oxygenase mechanism. A comparable role is likely to be played by the component B from MMO systems isolated from other bacteria and perhaps also by the similar small protein components from other, newly recognized oxygenases that use dinuclear iron clusters in catalysis(31) .


FOOTNOTES

*
The work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM40466. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Supported in part by National Institutes of Health Training Grant GM08277.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, 4-225 Millard Hall, University of Minnesota, 435 Delaware St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455. Tel.: 612-625-6454; Fax: 612-625-2163; lipsc001@maroon.tc.umn.edu.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: MMO, methane monooxygenase; MMOH, MMO hydroxylase component; MMOB, MMO component B; MMOR, MMO reductase component; MOPS, 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid.

(^2)
Compound P is termed compound L or the peroxy intermediate for MMOH isolated from Methylococcus capsulatus Bath(24, 25) .

(^3)
The ``leak'' is unlikely to occur at compound Q because different substrates with different rate constants for reaction with compound Q would then be expected to exhibit greatly different yields, which is not the case. Compound O appears to be a Michaelis complex between diferrous MMOH and O(2) and is thus also unlikely to break down directly to oxidized MMOH. Note that MMOB appears to increase the rates of both the formation of compound Q and the ``leak'' to similar extents. Thus, these processes may represent a branch in the same reaction.

(^4)
Y. Liu, K. Kauffmann, J. C. Nesheim, E. Münck, and J. D. Lipscomb, unpublished results.

(^5)
This possibility is made less likely by the fact that we have recently observed that the ternary MMOH-MMOB-MMOR complex has a higher redox potential than MMOH alone but, nevertheless, exhibits a much faster reaction with O(2)(17) (Y. Liu, K. E. Paulsen, M. T. Stankovich, and J. D. Lipscomb, unpublished results).


REFERENCES

  1. Dalton, H. (1980) Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 26,71-87
  2. Lipscomb, J. D. (1994) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 48,371-399 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Higgins, I. J., Best, D. J., and Hammond, R. C. (1980) Nature 286,561-564 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Fox, B. G., Froland, W. A., Dege, J. E., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264,10023-10033 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Fox, B. G., Surerus, K. K., Münck, E., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263,10553-10556 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Froland, W. A., Andersson, K. K., Lee, S.-K., Liu, Y., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267,17588-17597 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Fox, B. G., Hendrich, M. P., Surerus, K. K., Andersson, K. K., Froland, W. A., Lipscomb, J. D., and Münck, E. (1993) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115,3688-3701
  8. Rosenzweig, A. C., Frederick, C. A., Lippard, S. J., and Nordlund, P. (1993) Nature 366,537-543 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. DeWitt, J. G., Bentsen, J. G., Rosenzweig, A. C., Hedman, B., Green, J., Pilkington, S., Papaefthymiou, G. C., Dalton, H., Hodgson, K. O., and Lippard, S. J. (1991) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113,9219-9235
  10. DeRose, V. J., Liu, K. E., Kurtz, D. M., Hoffman, B. M., and Lippard, S. J. (1993) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115,6440-6441
  11. Thomann, H., Bernardo, M., McCormick J. M., Pulver, S., Andersson, K. K., Lipscomb, J. D., and Solomon, E. I. (1993) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115,8881-8882
  12. Lund, J., Woodland, M. P., and Dalton, H. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem. 147,297-305 [Abstract]
  13. Lund, J., and Dalton, H. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem. 147,291-296 [Abstract]
  14. Green, J., and Dalton, H. (1989) Biochem. J. 259,167-172 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Fox, B. G., Liu, Y., Dege, J. E., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266,540-550 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Pulver, S., Froland, W. A., Fox, B. G., Lipscomb, J. D., and Solomon, E. I. (1993) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115,12409-12422
  17. Paulsen, K. E., Liu, Y., Fox, B. G., Münck, E., Stankovich, M. T., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1994) Biochemistry 33,713-722 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Andersson, K. K., Froland, W. A., Lee, S-K., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1991) New J. Chem. 15,411-415
  19. Green, J., and Dalton, H. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260,15795-15801 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Liu, K. E., and Lippard, S. J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266,12836-12839 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Liu, K. E., and Lippard, S. J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266,12836 [Abstract/Free Full Text] -12839; Correction(1991) J. Biol. Chem.266, 24859
  22. Lee, S.-K., Nesheim, J. C., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,21569-21577 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Lee, S.-K., Fox, B. G., Froland, W. A., Lipscomb, J. D., and Münck, E. (1993) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115,6450-6451
  24. Liu, K. E., Wang, D., Huynh, B. H., Edmondson, D. E., Salifoglou, A., and Lippard, S. J. (1994) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116,7465-7466
  25. Liu, K. E., Valentine, A. M., Qui, D., Edmondson, D. E., Appelman, E. H., Spiro, T. G., and Lippard S. J. (1995) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117,4997-4998
  26. Fox, B. G., Froland, W. A., Jollie, D. R., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1990) Methods Enzymol. 188,191-202 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Hendrich, M. P., Münck, E., Fox, B. G., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1990) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112,5861-5865
  28. Mason, J. R., and Cammack, R. (1992) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 46,277-305 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Sligar, S. G., and Gunsalus, I. C. (1974) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 71,3906-3910 [Abstract]
  30. Lipscomb, J. D., Sligar, S. G., Namtvedt, M. J., and Gunsalus, I. C. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251,1116-1124 [Abstract]
  31. Fox, B. G., Shanklin, J., Ai, J., Loehr, T. M., and Sanders-Loehr, J. (1994) Biochemistry 33,12776-12786 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.