©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Association of SH2 Domain Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases with the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Human Tumor Cells
PHOSPHATIDIC ACID ACTIVATES RECEPTOR DEPHOSPHORYLATION BY PTP1C (*)

(Received for publication, February 3, 1995; and in revised form, May 18, 1995)

Sinisa Tomic (1)(§) Udo Greiser (1)(§)(¶) Reiner Lammers (2) Alexei Kharitonenkov (2) Evgeny Imyanitov (2) Axel Ullrich (2) Frank-D. Böhmer (1)(**)

From the  (1)Max-Planck Society, Research Unit ``Growth Factor Signal Transduction,'' Medical Faculty, Friedrich-Schiller University, Drackendorfer Str. 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany and (2)Max-Planck-Institut für Biochemie, Department of Molecular Biology, Am Klopferspitz 18A, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

The SH2 domain protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPases) PTP1C and PTP1D were found associated with epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor which was purified from A431 cell membranes by several steps of chromatography. Both PTPases also associated with the EGF receptor upon exposure of immunoprecipitated receptor to lysates of MCF7 mammary carcinoma cells. The associated PTPases had little activity toward the bound receptor when it was autophosphorylated in vitro. Receptor dephosphorylation could, however, be initiated by treatment of the receptor-PTPase complex with phosphatidic acid (PA). When autophosphorylated EGF receptor was exposed to lysates of PTP1C or PTP1D overexpressing 293 cells, the association of PTP1C but not of PTP1D was enhanced in the presence of PA. In intact A431 cells, an association of PTP1C and PTP1D with the EGF receptor was detectable by coimmunoprecipitation experiments. PA treatment reduced the phosphorylation state of ligand activated EGF receptors in A431 cells and in 293 cells overexpressing EGF receptors together with PTP1C but not in 293 cells overexpressing EGF receptors alone or together with PTP1D. We conclude that PTP1C but not PTP1D participates in dephosphorylation of activated EGF receptors. A possible role of PA for physiological modulation of EGF receptor signaling is discussed.


INTRODUCTION

Growth factor receptors of the tyrosine kinase-type undergo rapid autophosphorylation upon ligand stimulation(1, 2) . The autophosphorylation generates binding sites for SH2 domain containing intracellular proteins. Membrane recruitment of these molecules by binding to the autophosphorylated growth factor receptors is considered an important step for activation of several intracellular signaling pathways which ultimately lead to the cellular responses as cell division, cell differentiation, or cell locomotion. Dephosphorylation of the autophosphorylated growth factor receptors by PTPases (^1)(3, 4, 5, 6) presumably presents a major mechanism of negative regulation of tyrosine kinase receptor signaling. Recently, it has become clear that PTPases comprise a large family of structurally very diverse molecules which can broadly be classified into cytosolic and transmembrane enzymes (see (7, 8, 9, 10) for reviews). Different PTPases of both classes are capable to dephosphorylate autophosphorylated growth factor receptors in vitro(11, 12, 13) and when overexpressed together with the receptors in animal cells(14, 15) . Also, attenuation of growth factor receptor signaling by overexpression of PTPases has been demonstrated(16) . In particular, it could be shown that cellular transformation induced by overexpression of the growth factor receptors HER2/Neu or v-Fms can be reverted by coexpression of the PTPases PTP1B or T-cell PTP(15, 17, 18) . The currently available data suggest that, despite an only moderate substrate specificity of PTPases in vitro, the interaction of PTPases with phosphorylated substrates in intact cells is rather specific and in addition finely tuned by various mechanisms regulating the activity of the PTPases, including phosphorylation of the PTPases at Ser/Thr or Tyr residues(14, 19, 20, 21, 22) . To date, little is known about the identity and regulation of PTPases which physiologically interact with specific growth factor receptors and thereby regulate the respective signaling pathways. Such knowledge is, however, highly desirable for understanding the regulation of tyrosine kinase receptor signaling in normal and tumor cells. Also, characterization of PTPases which specifically regulate certain signaling pathways will identify novel targets for pharmacological modulation of cell growth. It might be possible to identify such PTPases by virtue of their physical association with receptor tyrosine kinases. Obvious candidates for a physical association with autophosphorylated growth factor receptors are PTPases possessing SH2 domains. Two SH2 domain-containing PTPases have been identified so far and designated (among other names) PTP1C (SH-PTP1) and PTP1D (SH-PTP2, syp, SH-PTP3, PTP2C) (see (23) for review). Association of PTP1D to the cytoplasmic domains of PDGF receptor, HER2/Neu, the EGF receptor, and Kit/SCF receptor has been demonstrated when the PTPase and the respective receptors were transiently overexpressed in 293 cells(14) . Association of PTP1D was also shown with PDGF and EGF receptors in fibroblasts(24) , with PDGF receptors in epithelial cells(25) , and with insulin receptors as well as the insulin receptor substrate-1 in vitro(26) . Receptor association with PTP1D leads to its tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of the PTPase activity(14, 24, 27) . Although PTP1D is capable of dephosphorylating in vitro tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides corresponding to growth factor receptor autophosphorylation sites(28) , it has little activity on coexpressed or coimmunoprecipitated receptors(14, 24) , with the possible exception of Kit/SCF receptor(14) . For PTP1C, physical association with autophosphorylated growth factor receptors has also been demonstrated for ligand-stimulated Kit/SCF receptor in hematopoietic cells (29) and with the cytoplasmic domain of HER2 in a transient overexpression system(14) . Transient coexpression of PTP1C with different tyrosine kinase receptors results in complete or partial dephosphorylation of PDGFalpha and beta receptors, insulin-like growth factor-I receptor, Kit/SCF receptor, insulin receptor, EGF receptor, and HER2(14) . A role of PTP1C for negative modulation of tyrosine kinase receptor signaling in hematopoietic cells has been proposed in relation to various proliferation abnormalities observed in mice carrying a defective PTP1C gene(23, 30) . Recently, association of PTP1C with the erythropoietin receptor (31) and with the FcRIIB1 receptor in B lymphocytes (32) and a role for PTP1C in negative regulation of erythropoiesis and B cell signaling, respectively, have been demonstrated. Both PTP1C and PTP1D are phosphorylated and possibly regulated by Ser/Thr specific kinases(33, 34) , and PTP1C is potently activated in vitro by anionic phospholipids (35) including PA. Various tyrosine kinases are capable of phosphorylating PTP1C in vitro, and it becomes tyrosine phosphorylated in A431 cells in response to EGF treatment(36) . It is not known if these mechanisms are important for the regulation of the activity of the SH2 domain PTPases toward growth factor receptors or other substrates in intact cells.

Here we demonstrate that PTP1D and PTP1C associate with EGF receptors in human epithelial tumor cells. The phosphatase(s) can be activated by PA to dephosphorylate the associated autophosphorylated receptor in vitro. PA stimulates association of PTP1C but not PTP1D to the EGF receptor. Phosphatase activity toward the EGF receptor can be activated by PA in intact A431 cells, and the activity of PTP1C toward EGF receptor, when transiently coexpressed in 293 cells, can be enhanced by PA. Our data suggest that PTP1C plays a role in EGF receptor dephosphorylation and that PA might be a physiological modulator of PTP1C activity.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Purification of EGF Receptors from A431 Cells

Preparation of A431 cell membranes and isolation of EGF receptors were performed according to Akiyama et al.(37) with some modifications. In brief, A431 human epidermoid carcinoma cells (CRL 1555, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) were cultured in DMEM (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 4.5 g of glucose, 2 mM glutamine, 7.5% fetal calf serum, and antibiotics. Cells were grown to near confluence on 625-cm^2 plates (Nunc). The medium was decanted, and the cells were washed twice with an ice-cold buffer containing 20 mM Tris-maleate, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.2, and once with 20 mM PIPES, pH 7.2. The cells were scraped into PIPES buffer with a rubber policeman and sonicated with a Branson Sonifier (1 min, level 3) under cooling. Proteinase inhibitors (leupeptin, 1 µg/ml; pepstatin A, 1 µg/ml; Pefabloc (Boehringer Mannheim), 100 µg/ml; final concentrations), EGTA (1 mM), and DTT (10 mM) were added and the particulate fraction was pelleted at 48,000 g for 30 min in a Sorvall SS34 rotor. The pellet was resuspended in 20 mM PIPES, pH 7.2, and stored at -80 °C. Membranes were extracted with 1% Triton X-100, and extracted proteins corresponding to about 5 10^8 cells were bound to 1 ml of wheat germ agglutinin agarose (Sigma) and eluted with 0.3 MN-acetylglucosamine in buffer containing 40 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.05% TX-100 (``column buffer''). A 10-ml tyrosine-Sepharose column was prepared as described elsewhere (37) and equilibrated with column buffer containing 0.8 M ammonium sulfate. The membrane fraction eluted from the wheat germ agglutinin column was made 0.8 M in ammonium sulfate, and binding to the tyrosine-Sepharose was allowed for 24 h at 4 °C (end-over-end rotation). The column was washed with column buffer containing 0.8 M ammonium sulfate and subsequently eluted with column buffer containing 0.25 M ammonium sulfate. Elution of EGF receptor was monitored with an autophosphorylation assay. EGF receptor preparations obtained this way were about 90-95% pure as judged by SDS-PAGE and silver staining. For further fractionation, peak fractions were pooled and concentrated with Microcon 30 (Amicon) treated (or not) with 20 mM phenylphosphate for 30 min at 4 °C and applied to a Superdex 200HRSC column (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.), previously equilibrated with column buffer containing 0.1 M ammonium sulfate. The column was eluted at 0.5 ml/min, and 1.0-ml fractions were collected and analyzed.

Binding of PTPase(s) from MCF-7 Cell Lysates to Immunoprecipitated EGF Receptor

MCF-7 human mammary carcinoma cells were grown in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. Subconfluent cell monolayers were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 100 µMp-nitrophenyl phosphate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 µg/ml aprotinin (``lysis buffer,'' 1 ml per 15-cm dish). Cell debris were removed by centrifugation (15 min, 13,000 rpm) in a microcentrifuge, and the supernatant was stored until use at -80 °C. EGF receptor was transiently overexpressed in 293 cells as previously described(15) , and cell lysates of these cells were obtained as described above (1 ml of lysate from a 10-cm dish). For immunoprecipitation of EGF receptors from the 293 cell lysates, 60 µl of lysate were incubated with 1 µg of monoclonal anti-EGF receptor antibody 108 for 2 h at 4 °C, and the immune complexes were collected with 30 µl of a 50% suspension of protein A-Sepharose (Pharmacia). The precipitates were washed four times with buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Triton X-100 (``washing buffer''). For receptor autophosphorylation, 30 µl of of washing buffer containing 200 ng of EGF, 15 mM MnCl(2), and 20 mM ATP or ATPS were added to the immunoprecipitates and the mixture was incubated for 30 min at 25 °C. Subsequently, the precipitates were washed three times with washing buffer and then incubated with 200 µl of MCF-7 cell lysate per sample for 2 h at 4 °C under shaking. Thereafter, the precipitates were washed again four times and divided in three aliquots. One aliquot was subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-PTPase antibodies, and two aliquots were assayed for PTPase activity as described below.

PTPase Assays

10 µg of Raytide (Dianova, Hamburg) was labeled with about 100 ng of column-purified (see above) EGF receptor overnight at 25 °C in a total volume of 25 µl containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 0.015% Brij 35, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 0.2% beta-mercaptoethanol, 20 mM MgCl(2), 4 mM MnCl(2), 100 µM ATP, and 20 µCi of [P]ATP. The labeling mixture was applied to a 0.5-ml column of Dowex 1X-8, equilibrated in 30% acetic acid, and the P-labeled Raytide was eluted with acetic acid and stored at -80 °C. For the assay, an aliquot was dried in a Speedvac evaporator and redissolved in PTPase ``assay buffer'' containing 50 mM MES, pH 6.0, and 5 mM DTT. For the assay, 20 µl of column fractions were diluted with 30 µl of assay buffer and incubated with P-labeled Raytide (20,000-40,000 cpm) for 30 min at 37 °C. Otherwise, the assays were performed exactly as described by Pot et al.(38) . To detect PTPase activity in immunoprecipitates, phosphorylated EGF receptor was prepared as follows. EGF receptors from 293 cell lysates were adsorbed to lentil lectin-Sepharose (Pharmacia) (200 µl of beads per 1 ml of 293 cell lysate). The beads were washed five times with washing buffer and once with 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5. Then a phosphorylation mixture containing 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 15 mM MnCl(2), 200 ng of EGF, 200 µM sodium orthovanadate, 5 µM ATP, and 50 µCi of [-P]ATP was added. After incubation for 30 min at 25 °C the beads were washed five times with washing buffer, and the P-phosphorylated EGF receptor was eluted with 600 µl of 0.3 M mannose in washing buffer. To measure PTPase activity, MCF-7 cell lysate-exposed immunoprecipitates (10 µl) were mixed with 5 µl of buffer containing 200 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, 40 mM DTT, 4 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 0.4% CHAPS, and 5 µl of P-phosphorylated EGF receptor 10,000-50,000 cpm) and incubated at 25 °C for 2 h. The reaction was stopped, and released [P]phosphate was measured as described elsewhere(38) .

Receptor Autophosphorylation and Dephosphorylation Experiments

EGF receptor containing samples were incubated in the presence of 1.2 µg/ml EGF, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, and 3 mM MnCl(2) (final concentrations) for 20 min on ice. In some cases incubation was done in the presence of 50 µg/ml PA (Sigma). To detect receptor autophosphorylation the samples were incubated on ice in the presence of [-P]ATP (final concentration, 2 µM) for 5 min. Then SDS-PAGE sample buffer was added, and the samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. For dephosphorylation experiments, receptor autophosphorylation was initiated by addition of [P]ATP (final concentration, 6 µM) and inhibited after 10 min of incubation on ice by the addition of EDTA to a final concentration of 10 mM. The samples were transferred to 37 °C, and aliquots corresponding to about 2.5 µCi of initially added [-P]ATP were taken at different time points as indicated in the figure legends and mixed with SDS-PAGE sample buffer. The samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE, the gels were stained and dried, and the radioactivity in the EGF receptor band was quantified using a GS250 Molecular Imager (Bio-Rad).

Immunoblotting and Immunoprecipitation

For detection of PTP1D and PTP1C on immunoblots, specific respective monoclonal antibodies (Transduction Laboratories) were used at a dilution of 1:500. No mutual cross-reactivity of these antibodies was observed even with large amounts of antigen. In some experiments affinity-purified peptide-specific polyclonal anti-PTP1D antibodies and polyclonal anti-PTP1C antibodies (14) (dilution, 1:1000) were used. The blots were developed with secondary antibodies coupled to peroxidase (Dianova, Hamburg) and ECL (Amersham Corp.).

For immunoprecipitation, peak fractions of column-purified EGF receptor were diluted with column buffer containing additionally 2 mM sodium orthovanadate and incubated with either 3 µg of monoclonal anti-PTP1C or anti-PTP1D antibodies or 1 µg of monoclonal anti-EGF receptor antibody 425 (kind gift of Dr. A. Luckenbach, E. Merck, Darmstadt) for 2 h at 4 °C. The immune complexes were collected with 20 µl of 50% suspension of protein A-Sepharose (Pharmacia), extensively washed with column buffer containing 2 mM sodium orthovanadate and once with 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, containing 3 mM MnCl(2) and 2 mM sodium orthovanadate. Then receptor autophosphorylation was performed as described above. For detection of PTPase association to EGF receptors in intact A431 cells, subconfluent cultures in six-well plates (Falcon) were kept in serum-free DMEM overnight. Then cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 10 min at room temperature or left unstimulated. The cultures were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and extracted with lysis buffer, containing 2 mM sodium orthovanadate. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation and subjected to immunoprecipitation and autophosphorylation as described above. Lysate corresponding to 1-2 10^5 cells was used per precipitation.

Effect of PA on EGF Receptor Phosphorylation in Intact A431 Cells

PA (Sigma) was dissolved in 20 mM imidazole, pH 7.0, containing 1 mM EDTA and 1 mM DTT. The solution was sonified in a bath sonifier (Branson) two times for 15 min. The so prepared solution contained mainly unilamellar vesicles of about 700 nm in diameter. A431 cells in six-well plates were treated for different lengths of time with serum-free DMEM in the presence or absence of 50 µg/ml PA and were then stimulated with 1 µg/ml EGF for 1 min at room temperature or left unstimulated. Cell extracts were prepared with lysis buffer containing in addition 2 mM sodium orthovanadate and 20 µM zinc acetate, and about 10 µg of protein/lane were analyzed by immunoblotting with antiphosphotyrosine antibodies (RC20-peroxidase conjugate, Transduction Laboratories). In some experiments, sodium pervanadate, prepared as described by Pumiglia et al.(39) was added at 50 µM 2 h prior to EGF stimulation.

Effect of PA on Association of EGF Receptor with PTPases 1C and 1D

1 mg of monoclonal anti-EGF receptor antibody Ab425 was coupled to 600 µl of Affi-Prep Hz beads (Bio-Rad) according to the instructions of the manufacturer to give ``Ab425 beads.'' 10 µl of Ab425 beads were incubated with shaking in the absence or presence of 10 µl of lysate of EGF receptor overexpressing 293 cells in a solution containing 3 mM ATP, 6 mM MnCl(2) additionally to the components of lysis buffer (see above) for 1 h at 4 °C to allow phosphorylation of the EGF receptor and binding to the Ab425 beads. The beads were washed three times with 100 mM HEPES, pH 7.5. Then 10 µl of lysate of either PTP1C or PTP1D overexpressing 293 cells were added, and the incubation was continued for another 1 h at 4 °C. PA (or the respective solvent) was added to a final concentration of 50 µg/ml, and a further incubation was performed at 37 °C for 30 min. The beads were washed twice with 100 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, and the noncovalently bound proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting as described in the respective figure legends.

Transient Coexpression of EGF Receptor and PTPases 1C and 1D

These assays were performed using CMV-driven expression constructs and 293 fibroblasts as recipient cells essentially as described earlier(15) . To test the effect of PA in these assays, it was added at 50 µg/ml to the medium 1 or 24 h before cell harvest.


RESULTS

Association of Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase(s) with the EGF Receptor and Identification as PTP1C and PTP1D

EGF receptor was purified from A431 cell membranes according to the procedure of Akiyama et al.(37) involving preparation of a crude membrane fraction, membrane solubilization in Triton X-100, affinity chromatography on wheat germ agglutinin, and tyrosine-Sepharose chromatography. We consistently observed copurification of PTPase activity with the EGF receptor when assayed with phosphorylated Raytide as a substrate (not shown). To further characterize the EGF receptor-associated PTPase(s) the peak fractions from the tyrosine-Sepharose column were subjected to a further chromatographic step employing a high resolution sizing column (Fig. 1A). Again, much of the PTPase activity coeluted with the EGF receptor (fractions 9-11) in this fractionation. A second peak and a third peak of PTPase activity eluted later (fractions 12 and 13 and 15-17, respectively) and might represent the same PTPase(s) which gradually dissociate from the receptor (see below). To test the possible involvement of SH2 domains in the association, the PTPasebulletEGF receptor complex was treated with phenylphosphate before application to the sizing column. Under these conditions, part of the PTPase activity still coeluted with the EGF receptor (fractions 9-11), whereas the majority of PTPase activity eluted from the column now at apparent lower molecular mass (fractions 12 and 13 and fractions 14-17) suggesting a partial disruption of the PTPasebulletEGF receptor complex.


Figure 1: Association of PTPase activity with the EGF receptor (EGFR). A, copurification of EGF receptor and PTPase activity from A431 cell membranes. A particulate fraction from A431 cells was extracted with detergent and subjected to affinity chromatography on wheat germ agglutinin as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The glycoprotein fraction eluted from the wheat germ agglutinin column was then chromatographed over a tyrosine-Sepharose column as described by Akiyama et al.(37) . Fractions were monitored for the presence of EGF receptor by an autophosphorylation assay. The peak fractions were concentrated and either directly subjected to chromatography on a Superdex 200HRC sizing column (squares) or incubated with 20 mM phenylphosphate and subsequently separated on the same column (triangles). The points represent the PTPase activity toward P-labeled Raytide. The elution position of EGF receptor (hatched area) was detected by autophosphorylation assays and found to be identical (fractions 9-11) under both conditions. B, binding of PTPase to immunoprecipitated EGF receptor. EGF receptor was immunoprecipitated with anti-EGF receptor antibodies 108 from cell lysates of EGF receptor overexpressing 293 cells, as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The precipitates were incubated in the absence of any agents (1) or in the presence of ATP (2) or ATPS (3-5), washed, and exposed to lysates of MCF7 human mammary carcinoma cells in the presence (4) or absence (1-3, 5) of 20 mM phenylphosphate (PhP). After extensive washing, the receptor-associated PTPase activity was measured using exogenously added P-labeled EGF receptor, as described under ``Experimental Procedures,'' in the absence (lanes 1-4) or presence (lane 5) of 1 mM sodium orthovanadate (V). The results are expressed in arbitrary units.



In an alternative approach, EGF receptors were immunoprecipitated from lysates of 293 cells which overexpressed the receptor. Then, the immunoprecipitates were incubated with lysates of MCF7 human mammary carcinoma cells, thereafter washed extensively and checked for associated PTPase activity using autophosphorylated EGF receptor as a substrate. As shown in Fig. 1B, PTPase activity was associated with the immunoprecipitated receptors. The extent of PTPase association was dependent on the pretreatment of the immunoprecipitated receptors. Only little PTPase activity associated in the absence of any pretreatment. A clear PTPase association was, however, detectable by allowing autophosphorylation of the receptors in the presence of ATP and even more in the presence of ATPS before exposing it to the cells lysates. The associated PTPase activity was almost completely inhibited by sodium orthovanadate (Fig. 1B). When immunoprecipitated autophosphorylated EGF receptor was exposed to MCF7 lysate in the presence of phenylphosphate, the amount of receptor-associated PTPase activity was greatly reduced (Fig. 1B), again indicating the involvement of SH2 domains in the receptor-PTPase association. We therefore analyzed the EGF receptor preparations containing PTPase activity for the presence of SH2 domain PTPases by immunoblotting. Clearly, PTP1C and PTP1D were detectable by immunoblotting with specific antibodies in peak fractions of the column-purified EGF receptor (Fig. 2) as well as associated from MCF7 cell lysates to immunoprecipitated EGF receptor (not shown). To determine whether a PTPase-EGF receptor-association also occurs in intact A431 cells, A431 cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-PTP1C and anti-PTP1D antibodies, and the immunoprecipitates were analyzed by autophosphorylation in the presence of [-P]ATP and EGF, followed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. When lysates of serum-deprived but not EGF-stimulated cells were subjected to immunoprecipitation, weak autophosphorylation signals at the expected size of EGF receptors were obtained upon precipitation with both PTP1C and PTP1D antibodies (Fig. 3, lanes 1 and 2), whereas no signal was seen when nonspecific IgG was employed for the immunoprecipitation (Fig. 3, lane 3). When the A431 cells were stimulated with EGF prior to lysis and subsequent immunoprecipitation, the intensity of the phosphorylated 170-kDa band which was immunoprecipitated with anti-PTP1C and anti-PTP1D antibodies was greatly enhanced (Fig. 3, lanes 4 and 5). Only a small amount of EGF receptor was precipitated with nonspecific IgG (lane 6). These results clearly demonstrate an association of EGF receptor with both PTP1C and PTP1D in intact A431 cells and also indicate a more efficient interaction of PTP1C and PTP1D with the stimulated EGF receptor versus the nonstimulated receptor.


Figure 2: Detection of PTP1D and PTP1C in column- purified EGF receptor (EGFR) preparations. EGF receptor was purified from A431 cell membranes, as described under ``Experimental Procedures,'' to the stage of tyrosine-Sepharose chromatography. Peak fractions were highly concentrated (Microcon) and subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with monoclonal anti-PTP1D or PTP1C antibodies as indicated. The amount of sample applied per lane corresponds to EGF receptor isolated from about 5 10^7 A431 cells (lanes 3 and 4). For reference, aliquots of lysates of 293 cells overexpressing either PTP1C (lane 1) or PTP1D (lane 6) were also analyzed. Only SDS-PAGE sample buffer was loaded in lanes 2 and 5. The positions of the phosphatases and of molecular mass markers are indicated.




Figure 3: Detection of EGF receptor (EGFR) in anti-PTP1C and anti-PTP1D immunoprecipitates. Serum-deprived subconfluent cultures of A431 cells were left unstimulated (lanes 1-3) or were stimulated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 10 min at room temperature (lanes 4-6). Cell lysates were prepared and subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-PTP1C antibodies (lanes 1 and 4), anti-PTP1D antibodies (lanes 2 and 5) or nonspecific IgG (lanes 3 and 6). Subsequently, the samples were incubated on ice in the presence of [-P]ATP, as described under ``Experimental Procedures,'' and then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.



Activation of EGF Receptor Dephosphorylation by PA and Involvement of PTP1C

We then tested the capability of the EGF receptor-associated PTPases to dephosphorylate the autophosphorylated receptor. In these experiments, peak fractions of the column-purified EGF receptor containing the associated PTPases 1C and 1D were allowed to autophosphorylate in the presence of [-P]ATP. The kinase reaction was quenched by addition of EDTA, and after different time points aliquots of the receptor were analyzed for radioactivity by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Only little dephosphorylation of the receptors occurred under these conditions (Fig. 4A), indicating that the receptor-associated PTPases despite their activity against exogenous substrate (see above) were unable to use the bound receptor as a substrate. A complete failure to dephosphorylate the bound receptor was also observed in case of PTPase(s) associated with immunoprecipitated receptor from MCF7 cell lysates (not shown), although exogenously added autophosphorylated EGF receptor was readily dephosphorylated. These findings were unexpected, since previous transient coexpression experiments suggested the capability of PTP1C to dephosphorylate EGF receptors in intact cells (14) . We therefore asked if, under certain circumstances, the bound PTPases could be activated to use the bound receptor as a substrate. As potential activators we considered phospholipids, since three findings point to a modulatory role of membrane lipids for PTPase activity. 1) The activity of PTPases to dephosphorylate autophosphorylated receptors in cell membranes is impaired by detergents(5, 6) . 2) Various acidic phospholipids have been shown to enhance PTP1C activity for artificial substrates in vitro(35) . 3) PA enhances EGF receptor dephosphorylation in A431 cell membranes, whereas other lipids including other acidic phospholipids have no or inhibitory effects on EGF receptor dephosphorylation. (^2)Indeed, when the dephosphorylation reaction of column-purified EGF receptor was carried out in the presence of PA, a clear decrease of radioactivity in the receptor could now be observed (Fig. 4B). This activity was due to the associated PTPases, because the dephosphorylation could be completely blocked with 50 µM pervanadate, and activation by PA was specific, since palmitic acid, when applied in the same concentration, had much less effect on the receptor dephosphorylation (data not shown).


Figure 4: PA activates EGF receptor (EGFR) dephosphorylation by the receptor-associated PTPase(s). Column-purified EGF receptor was incubated in the absence (A) or presence of 50 µg/ml PA (B) for 20 min on ice. Then, the receptor was autophosphorylated, as described under ``Experimental Procedures,'' the phosphorylation was quenched by addition of EDTA, the samples were transferred to 37 °C, and the radioactivity in the receptor was monitored at the indicated time points by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Numbers underneath the lanes represent the percentage of radioactivity (mean of the duplicates, 100% at time point 0 min) as obtained by densitometric quantification.



We next wished to determine whether an activation of phosphatase(s) for the autophosphorylated EGF receptor by PA might occur in intact cells and further to differentiate whether PTP1C or PTP1D (both present in the investigated receptor preparations) might mediate the effect of PA. To this end, PTP1C and PTP1D were transiently coexpressed with the EGF receptor in 293 cells. The cells were left untreated or were treated with PA, then stimulated with EGF. Subsequently the phosphorylation state of the EGF receptors was analyzed by immunoblotting with antiphosphotyrosine antibodies. When EGF receptor was expressed in the absence of PTPase, no effect of PA treatment on the phosphorylation state of the receptor was seen (Fig. 5, upper panel as indicated). As described earlier(14) , expression of PTP1D had no effect on the phosphorylation state of coexpressed EGF receptors (Fig. 5, upper panel), and PA treatment of cells expressing EGF receptors and PTP1D had no effect (Fig. 5, upper panel). In contrast, PTP1C expression reduced the phosphorylation state of coexpressed EGF receptors to 32% of the respective control. When cells overexpressing EGF receptors and PTP1C were in addition treated with PA, the extent of EGF receptor phosphorylation was further reduced after 1 h of treatment to 21% and even further after 24 h of PA treatment to 13%. Control experiments (Fig. 5, lower panels) confirmed that comparable amounts of EGF receptor and the respective PTPases entered the analysis in all cases. We conclude that PA treatment enhances the EGF receptor-directed activity of PTP1C in this system.


Figure 5: Effect of transient expression of PTP1C or PTP1D on the phosphorylation state of co-expressed EGF receptor (EGFR) in the absence or presence of PA. The indicated genes were transiently expressed under control of a CMV promotor in 293 fibroblasts. Cells were left untreated or were treated for 1 or 24 h with 50 µg/ml PA and were then stimulated (or not) with EGF as indicated. Then cell lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with antiphosphotyrosine antibodies (upper panel). Numbers underneath the lanes represent the percentage of intensity of the EGF receptor phosphorylation signal compared to the respective treatment variants of cells expressing only EGF receptors (100%) as obtained by densitometric quantification. The blot was stripped and reprobed with anti-EGF receptor antibodies and polyclonal anti-PTP1D antibodies which weakly cross-react with PTP1C (lower panels as indicated) to verify that comparable amounts of the respective proteins were expressed. All lanes are from the same blot, but were rearranged for better clarity.



We further considered whether PA would also modulate the EGF receptor phosphorylation state in intact A431 cells. Cells were pretreated for different length of time with PA or left untreated, then stimulated with EGF and analyzed for the phosphotyrosine content of the EGF receptors. We consistently found that PA treatment for 1 h reduced the phosphotyrosine content of the EGF receptors (Fig. 6A). A similar reduction after 15 min and 24 h of treatment was observed occasionally but not in all experiments (not shown). To check the involvement of PTPases in this reduction of receptor phosphorylation, parallel cultures were treated with 50 µM pervanadate prior to EGF stimulation. No differences in the phosphorylation state between samples from PA-treated or nontreated cells were seen in presence of pervanadate (Fig. 6B). These data suggest that the reduction in phosphotyrosine content of EGF receptors induced by PA in A431 cells is mediated by PTPases.


Figure 6: Effect of PA treatment on the phosphorylation state of EGF receptors (EGFR) in A431 cells. A, subconfluent A431 cells were cultivated for 1 h in serum-free medium in the absence or presence of 50 µg/ml PA as indicated. Thereafter, the cells were stimulated with EGF as indicated, and cell extracts were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with antiphosphotyrosine antibodies. Numbers underneath the lanes represent the percentage of intensity of the EGF receptor signal compared to untreated cells. Arrows indicate the position of the autophosphorylated EGF receptor. B, same experiment as in A; however, the cells were treated in addition with 50 µM pervanadate prior to EGF stimulation.



PA Promotes Association of PTP1C with the Autophosphorylated EGF Receptor

As a first attempt to understand the mechanism underlying the observed activation of PTP1C, we investigated the effect of PA on the association of PTP1C and PTP1D with the autophosphorylated EGF receptor in vitro. EGF receptor was immunoprecipitated from lysates of receptor overexpressing 293 cells with anti-EGF receptor antibodies (Ab425 coupled to Affi-Prep Hz beads) and autophosphorylated. Thereafter, the receptor precipitates or respective control precipitates were exposed to lysates of 293 cells either overexpressing PTP1C or PTP1D, in the presence or absence of PA. The amount of receptor-associated PTPase was then analyzed by immunoblotting with the respective PTPase-specific antibodies. In this experimental setting, binding of PTP1C and PTP1D to the precipitates which depended on the presence of immunoprecipitated autophosphorylated EGF receptor was clearly detectable (Fig. 7, lanes 2 and 6, respectively, versus lanes 1 and 5). The presence of PA increased the amount of receptor-associated PTP1C strongly (Fig. 7, lane 4 versus lanes 2 and 3). No effect of PA on the association of PTP1D to the precipitated EGF receptor could be observed (Fig. 7, lane 8 versus lanes 6 and 7).


Figure 7: Effect of PA on the association of PTP1C and PTP1D with the EGF receptor (EGFR). EGF receptor was immunoprecipitated from lysates of receptor overexpressing 293 cells using the monoclonal anti-EGF receptor antibody Ab425 coupled to Affi-Prep Hz beads. The receptor was allowed to autophosphorylate and the beads with bound phosphorylated receptor (lanes 2-4 and 6-8) or beads without bound receptor (lanes 1 and 5) were then incubated with lysates of either PTP1C (lanes 1-4) or PTP1D (lanes 5-8) overexpressing 293 cells. Incubation was performed, as described under ``Experimental Procedures,'' in the absence of further additives (lanes 2 and 6) or in the presence of solvent vehicle (lanes 3 and 7) or 50 µg/ml PA (lanes 4 and 8). Thereafter, the beads were washed and bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with monoclonal antibodies specific for either PTP1C or PTP1D as indicated. The asterisks indicate the bands of some IgG which bled from beads despite the coupling. Lanes 1-4 and 5-8 are from the same blots, but were rearranged for better clarity.




DISCUSSION

The activated and autophosphorylated receptor for EGF is subject to a rapid dephosphorylation by PTPases(3, 6) . Receptor dephosphorylation is believed to present a major mechanism of negative regulation of receptor function, and the identification of the involved PTPases is therefore important for understanding of EGF receptor signaling. Also, since mitogenic signaling of EGF receptors and related receptors has been implicated in unwanted growth of certain human tumors, characterization of the receptor dephosphorylation mechanisms might be of significance for a pharmacological modulation of receptor signaling. As one approach to characterize such PTPases we tried to identify those which are capable of physically associating with EGF receptors. PTPase activity which associated from MCF7 cell lysates to immunoprecipitated EGF receptors and PTPase activity which was detectable in EGF receptor preparations obtained with several purification steps from A431 cell membranes could at least in part be attributed to receptor-associated PTP1C and PTP1D. We could also demonstrate the capability of PTP1D and PTP1C to interact with the EGF receptor in intact A431 cells. A physiological interaction of these PTPases with EGF receptors has been predicted from in vitro experiments and from data obtained in cells overexpressing the phosphatases(14, 24) . Here we show that an interaction of PTP1C and PTP1D with EGF receptors is detectable in nontransfected cells, i.e. the human tumor cell line A431. As expected, the association seems largely to depend on the interaction of the PTPase SH2 domains with the receptors, since significantly more PTPase could be bound to activated phosphorylated receptors, and the association was largely abrogated by phenylphosphate. Although the displacement of a large fraction of the receptor-associated PTPase activity by phenylphosphate suggests that SH2 domain PTPases account for most if not all of the activity, our data do not completely rule out the possibility that, in addition to PTP1C and PTP1D, other, not yet identified, PTPases contribute to the receptor-associated PTPase activity.

Despite the activity of the EGF receptor-bound PTPases against exogenous substrates, little activity against the bound receptor was detectable in vitro. In the presence of PA, however, dephosphorylation activity could clearly be observed. PA also enhanced EGF receptor dephosphorylation in intact A431 cells and in 293 cells transiently coexpressing EGF receptors and PTP1C, but not in 293 cells expressing EGF receptors alone or EGF receptors and PTP1D. Taken together, these data suggest that PTP1C but not PTP1D is capable of dephosphorylating EGF receptors and that this activity can be enhanced by PA. EGF stimulation of A431 cells has previously been shown to increase cellular PA levels up to 0.17% of the total cellular phospholipids largely via a pathway involving phosphorylation of diacylglycerol(40, 41) . One might therefore speculate that the activation of the receptor-dephosphorylating PTPase PTP1C by PA could present part of a negative feedback regulation of EGF receptor signaling. A role for PTP1C in negative control of receptor activity has also been suggested in case of Kit/SCF receptor(24, 30) , and recently PTP1C has been shown to be involved in negative regulation of erythropoietin receptor (31) and FcRIIB1 receptor signaling(32) .

The activation of PTP1C by various acidic phospholipids in vitro against artificial substrates has previously been shown by Zhao et al.(35) . The data in this study suggest that the lipid-PTP1C interaction leading to PTP1C activation is direct and involves a conformational change of the phosphatase which facilitates proteolytic degradation(35) . When we examined the effect of PA on the association of both SH2 domain PTPases to the autophosphorylated EGF receptor in vitro, association of PTP1C, but not PTP1D, was increased in the presence of PA. It is possible that the conformational change of PTP1C which is induced by PA leads to the increased association with the EGF receptor and also forms the basis for activation toward the receptor as observed in our dephosphorylation experiments. Recently, a structural model for PTP1C was proposed (42) based on the kinetic analysis of differently truncated enzyme variants and enzyme activation by phosphorylated peptides which interact with the PTP1C SH2 domains. According to this model, the PTP1C SH2 domains are capable of interacting with the PTP1C C terminus in a phosphotyrosine-independent manner and thereby drive the PTPase domain in an inactive conformation(42) . One could speculate that PA has the capacity to disrupt this intramolecular interaction. Further experiments are required to clarify the activation mechanism.

In our experiments no evidence for a role of EGF receptor-associated PTP1D in receptor dephosphorylation was obtained. PTP1D has previously been demonstrated to mediate mitogenic signals of the receptors for PDGF, insulin, EGF, and insulin-like growth factor-I (43, 44, 45) and a positive role of PTP1D in tyrosine kinase receptor signaling is also likely from its homology to Drosophila csw(14, 25, 46) . The association of PTP1D with EGF receptors in human tumor cells therefore defines an interesting target for interference with EGF-driven tumor cell growth.


FOOTNOTES

*
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
The first two authors contributed equally to the paper.

Supported by a scholarship from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Sonderforschungsbereich 197.

**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel. 49-3641-304-460; Fax: 49-3641-304-462.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: PTPase, protein tyrosine phosphatase; ATPS, adenosine 5`-O-(3-thiotriphosphate); CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propane sulfonate; EGF, epidermal growth factor; PA, phosphatidic acid; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; MES, 2-(N-morpholino)-ethanesulfonic acid; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid; DTT, dithiothreitol; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; CMV, cytomegalovirus.

(^2)
U. Greiser, unpublished results.


REFERENCES

  1. Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1990) Cell 61,203-212 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Fantl, W. J., Johnson, D. E., and Williams, L. T. (1993) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 62,453-81 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Swarup, G., Cohen, S., and Garbers, D. L. (1982) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 107,1104-1109 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Brautigan, D. L., Bornstein, P., and Gallis, B. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256,6519-6522 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Faure, R., Baquiran, G., Bergeron, J. J. M., and Posner, B. I. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267,11215-11221 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Böhmer, F. D., Böhmer, S. A., and Heldin, C. H. (1993) FEBS Lett. 331,276-280 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Fischer, E. H., Charbonneau, H., and Tonks, N. K. (1991) Science 253,401-406 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Charbonneau, H., and Tonks, N. K. (1992) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 8,463-493 [CrossRef]
  9. Pot, D. A., and Dixon, J. E. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1136,35-43 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Brautigan, D. L. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1114,63-77 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Tonks, N. K., Diltz, C. D., and Fischer, E. H. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263,6731-6737 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hashimoto, N., Zhang, W. R., and Goldstein, B. J. (1992) Biochem. J. 284,569-576 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Zhang, W. R., Hashimoto, N., Ahmad, F., Ding, W. D., and Goldstein, B. J. (1994) Biochem. J. 302,39-47 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Vogel, W., Lammers, R., Huang, J., and Ullrich, A. (1993) Science 259,1611-1614 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Lammers, R., Bossenmaier, B., Cool, D. E., Tonks, N. K., Schlessinger, J., Fischer, E. H., and Ullrich, A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,22456-22462 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Mooney, R. A., Freund, G. G., Way, B. A., and Bordwell, K. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267,23443-23446 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Brown-Shimer, S., Johnson, K. A., Hill, D. E., and Bruskin, A. M. (1992) Cancer Res. 52,478-482 [Abstract]
  18. Zander, N. F., Cool, D. E., Diltz, C. D., Rohrschneider, L. R., Krebs, E. G., and Fischer, E. H. (1993) Oncogene 8,1175-1182 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Brautigan, D. L., and Pinault, F. M. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88,6696-6700 [Abstract]
  20. Schievella, A. R., Paige, L. A., Johnson, K. A., Hill, D. E., and Erikson, R. L. (1993) Cell Growth & Differ. 4,239-246
  21. Flint, A. J., Gebbink, M. F., Franza, B. J., Hill, D. E., and Tonks, N. K. (1993) EMBO J. 12,1937-1946 [Abstract]
  22. Garton, A. J., and Tonks, N. K. (1994) EMBO J. 13,3763-3771 [Abstract]
  23. Feng, G. S., and Pawson, T. (1994) Trends Genet. 10,54-58 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Feng, G. S., Hui, C. C., and Pawson, T. (1993) Science 259,1607-1611 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Kazlauskas, A., Feng, G. S., Pawson, T., and Valius, M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90,6939-6942 [Abstract]
  26. Ugi, S., Maegawa, H., Olefsky, J. M., Shigeta, Y., and Kashiwagi, A. (1994) FEBS Lett. 340,216-220 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Lechleider, R. J., Sugimoto, S., Bennett, A. M., Kashishian, A. S., Cooper, J. A., Shoelson, S. E., Walsh, C. T., and Neel, B. G. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,21478-21481 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sugimoto, S., Lechleider, R. J., Shoelson, S. E., Neel, B. G., and Walsh, C. T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,22771-22776 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Yi, T. L., Mui, A. L. F., Krystal, G., and Ihle, J. N. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13,7577-7586 [Abstract]
  30. Kozlowski, M., Mlinaric, R. I., Feng, G. S., Shen, R., Pawson, T., and Siminovitch, K. A. (1993) J. Exp. Med. 178,2157-2163 [Abstract]
  31. Klingmüller, U., Lorenz, U., Cantley, L. C., Neel, B. G., and Lodish, H. F. (1995) Cell 80,729-738 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. D'Ambrosio, D., Hippen, K. L., Minskoff, S. A., Mellman, I., Pani, G., Siminovitch, K. A., and Cambier, J. C. (1995) Science 268,293-297 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Peraldi, P., Zhao, Z. H., Filloux, C., Fischer, E. H., and VanObberghen, E. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91,5002-5006 [Abstract]
  34. Zhao, Z. H., Shen, S. H., and Fischer, E. H. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91,5007-5011 [Abstract]
  35. Zhao, Z. H., Shen, S. H., and Fischer, E. H. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90,4251-4255 [Abstract]
  36. Bouchard, P., Zhao, Z., Banville, D., Dumas, F., Fischer, E. H., and Shen, S. H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,19585-19589 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Akiyama, T., Kadooka, T., and Ogawara, H. (1985) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 131,442-448 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Pot, D. A., Woodford, T. A., Remboutsika, E., Haun, R. S., and Dixon, J. E. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266,19688-19696 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Pumiglia, K. M., Lau, L. F., Huang, C. K., Burroughs, S., and Feinstein, M. B. (1992) Biochem. J. 286,441-449 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Kaszkin, M., Fürstenberger, G., Richards, J., Seidler, L., and Kinzel, V. (1991) Cancer Res. 51,4328-4335 [Abstract]
  41. Kaszkin, M., Richards, J., and Kinzel, V. (1992) Cancer Res. 52,5627-5634 [Abstract]
  42. Pei, D. H., Lorenz, U., Klingmüller, U., Neel, B. G., and Walsh, C. T. (1994) Biochemistry 33,15483-15493 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Milarski, K. L., and Saltiel, A. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,21239-21243 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Bennett, A. M., Tang, T. L., Sugimoto, S., Walsh, C. T., and Neel, B. G. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91,7335-7339 [Abstract]
  45. Xiao, S., Rose, D. W., Sasaoka, T., Maegawa, H., Burke, T. R., Roller, P. P., Shoelson, S. E., and Olefsky, J. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,21244-21248 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Perkins, L. A., Larsen, I., and Perrimon, N. (1992) Cell 70,225-236 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.