©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Insulin Regulation of Membrane-associated Insulin Receptor Substrate 1 (*)

(Received for publication, June 22, 1995; and in revised form, August 4, 1995)

Robin A. Heller-Harrison (§) Michelle Morin Michael P. Czech

From the Program in Molecular Medicine and the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Insulin stimulation of 3T3-L1 adipocytes results in rapid activation of the insulin receptor tyrosine kinase followed by autophosphorylation of the receptor and phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1), its major substrate. The insulin receptor resides mostly at the cell surface of 3T3-L1 adipocytes under basal conditions, while about two-thirds of IRS-1 fractionates with intracellular membranes and one-third fractionates with cytosol. To test whether insulin receptor internalization is required for optimal tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1, 3T3-L1 adipocytes and CHO-T cells were incubated at 4 °C which inhibits receptor endocytosis but not its tyrosine kinase activity. Under these conditions, tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 in the low density microsome fraction in response to insulin was as intense as that observed at 37 °C, indicating that endocytosis of insulin receptors is not necessary for tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 to occur. Surprisingly, at 37 °C, insulin action on 3T3-L1 adipocytes progressively decreased the amount of IRS-1 protein associated with the low density microsome fraction and increased that in the cytosol. This redistribution of IRS-1 from the low density microsome fraction to the cytosol in response to insulin was accompanied by decreased electrophoretic mobility of IRS-1 on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Incubation of adipocytes at 4 °C blocked the appearance of tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 in the cytosol. Taken together, these data indicate that insulin receptors phosphorylate IRS-1 at the cell surface, perhaps in coated pits which are included in the low density microsome fraction. The results also suggest a desensitization mechanism in which the tyrosine-phosphorylated membrane-bound IRS-1, associated with signaling molecules such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, is released into the cytoplasm in concert with its serine/threonine phosphorylation.


INTRODUCTION

Intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity of the cell surface insulin receptor is required to mediate its biological actions suggesting the importance of its protein substrates in signal transduction. One such cellular substrate is the insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) (^1)(for recent reviews, see (1, 2, 3) ). The amino acid sequences deduced from cloned rat, mouse, and human IRS-1 cDNAs (4, 5, 6) indicate the presence of multiple potential sites of phosphorylation by both tyrosine and serine/threonine protein kinases. In the intact cell, insulin stimulation causes rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 at multiple sites(7) . These phosphotyrosine-containing sequences within IRS-1 serve as binding sites for a number of proteins containing Src homology 2 (SH2) domains(1, 2, 3) . Proteins recruited to IRS-1 in this manner include the p85 regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase)(8, 9) , the tyrosine phosphatase Syp(10) , and the adaptor proteins Grb2 (11, 12) and Nck(13) . The enzymatic activities of both PI 3-kinase (8) and Syp (14) are markedly increased upon their binding to IRS-1. Thus, IRS-1 is thought to serve as a docking protein which facilitates the actions of various signaling proteins in initiating their biological responses.

Recent evidence directly implicates IRS-1 and PI 3-kinase in one of the major metabolic actions of insulin, glucose transport. The binding of p85 to IRS-1 is required for activation of the p110 catalytic subunit of PI 3-kinase which is responsible for catalyzing the phosphorylation of phosphoinositides at the D-3 position of the inositol ring(8, 15) . PI 3-kinase also possesses a serine kinase activity (16, 17) which phosphorylates both p85 and IRS-1(18) . Insulin causes stimulation of PI 3-kinase activity in isolated rat adipocytes(19) , 3T3-L1 adipocytes (20) , and cells overexpressing the insulin receptor(21, 22, 23) . Specific inhibitors of both the lipid and serine kinase activities of PI 3-kinase abolish insulin-stimulated glucose transport and the translocation of GLUT4 in insulin-responsive cells(18, 24, 25) . Furthermore, the introduction of IRS-1 antisense constructs into GLUT4-transfected fat cells decreases the sensitivity to insulin of GLUT4 glucose transporter movement to the cell surface, and this effect can be overcome by co-expressing IRS-1 in these cells(26) .

Studies of the insulin receptor indicate that critical structural element(s) exist in its cytoplasmic domain to propagate signaling to components in the pathway leading to glucose transport. Specifically, point mutations of Tyr-960 in the NPXY motif located within the juxtamembrane sequence of the receptor which do not alter receptor kinase activity or the rate of I-insulin endocytosis abolish the phosphorylation of IRS-1, the activation of PI 3-kinase, and insulin-stimulated glucose transport in cells expressing these mutant receptors(27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32) . Interestingly, a direct interaction between the amino terminus of IRS-1 and the region of the insulin receptor containing phosphorylated Tyr-960 has been shown utilizing the yeast two-hybrid system(33) . However, it is unclear how IRS-1 interacts with the insulin receptor, an integral plasma membrane protein, in intact cells.

The distribution of IRS-1 in rat fat cells was recently shown to be mostly cytosolic, but approximately 20% of the IRS-1 was associated with intracellular membranes(34) . The IRS-1 in both these subcellular fractions was tyrosine-phosphorylated following insulin stimulation. The authors of this work proposed that internalized, activated insulin receptors are responsible for the phosphorylation of the IRS-1 located in the intracellular membranes. A previous study indicated that basal PI 3-kinase activity in rat fat cells appears to be cytosolic while essentially all of the insulin-stimulated PI 3-kinase activity, presumably in IRS-1bulletPI 3-kinase complexes, exists in microsomal membranes(19) , a heterogeneous mixture of Golgi membranes and endosomes. It was further determined that the activated complexes of IRS-1 and PI 3-kinase were present in vesicles distinct from those containing the insulin-regulated glucose transporters GLUT4 and those containing internalized insulin receptors(35) . Hence, these studies suggest that activated IRS-1bulletPI 3-kinase complexes are specifically localized to intracellular membranes, but it remains unclear as to where these complexes are initially formed and how these complexes are targeted to this site.

The present studies were designed to determine whether insulin receptors must first internalize into endosomes in order for IRS-1 to become tyrosine-phosphorylated. We took advantage of the fact that, at low temperature, endocytosis of the insulin receptor is inhibited (36, 37) while its tyrosine kinase activity remains functional. Our results demonstrate that IRS-1 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes undergoes insulin-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation at both 4 °C and 37 °C, indicating that receptor internalization is not required for its phosphorylation. We also show that, under basal conditions, the majority of IRS-1 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes is present in the low density microsome fraction, and that following insulin stimulation, tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 is released from these membranes into the cytosol. Furthermore, this release is accompanied by a change in the electrophoretic mobility of IRS-1, suggesting that serine/threonine phosphorylation of IRS-1 is occurring. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, IRS-1 undergoes directed intracellular routing which is regulated by insulin.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

4G10 anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody and rabbit polyclonal anti-IRS-1 used for immunoblotting were purchased from UBI. CT-1 anti-insulin receptor monoclonal antibody was a gift from Dr. Kenneth Siddle and was utilized as purified IgG(1) prepared from mouse ascites. Rabbit polyclonal anti-IRS-1 used for immunoprecipitation was prepared by injecting a peptide of the carboxyl-terminal 15 amino acids derived from the sequence of rat liver IRS-1 conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin into New Zealand White rabbits. An IgG fraction from the resultant serum was prepared by Protein A-Sepharose chromatography. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim. Control mouse and rabbit immunoglobulins, Protein A-Sepharose, and goat anti-mouse Sepharose were from Sigma. Rhodamine and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse were from Tago. [-P]ATP and Renaissance enhanced chemiluminescence reagent were purchased from DuPont NEN. Centriprep-10 concentrators were obtained from Amicon. Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein determination kit was from Pierce. Phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylserine were purchased from Avanti Lipids. PE SIL G thin layer chromatography plates were purchased from Whatman.

Cell Culture

3T3-L1 fibroblasts were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% calf serum, 50 units/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate. Two days post-confluence, differentiation was induced by incubating the cells for 3 days in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 5 µg/ml insulin, 1 µM dexamethasone, and 0.5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine. Cells were subsequently incubated for 3 days in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 5 µg/ml insulin. Thereafter, the cells were maintained in DMEM plus 10% fetal bovine serum with medium changes every 3 days. Differentiated adipocytes were routinely used for experiments between day 8 and day 14, at which time >90% of the cells displayed the adipocyte phenotype. CHO-T cells overexpressing the human insulin receptor were grown in F12 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum.

Preparation of Cell Fractions

Differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes were grown in 15-cm^2 dishes and were serum-starved for 12-18 h in DMEM supplemented with 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA). For experiments at 4 °C, the medium was aspirated and replaced with 4 °C unsupplemented DMEM for 15 min. Cells were then stimulated with the indicated concentrations of insulin for the indicated times at either 4 °C or 37 °C. The insulin-containing medium was aspirated, and the cell monolayers were washed once at either 4 °C or 37 °C with Buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 255 mM sucrose, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mM NaF, 100 µM Na(3)VO(4), 1 mM NaPP(i), 5 µg/ml aprotinin, and 5 µg/ml leupeptin). Cell fractions were then prepared using modifications of previously described methods(38) . All procedures were performed at 0-4 °C. Briefly, cells were homogenized for 15 strokes with a motor-driven Teflon/glass homogenizer in 24 ml of ice-cold Buffer A, and the homogenate was centrifuged at 16,000 times g for 20 min. The resulting pellet containing the plasma membranes was resuspended in 6 ml of Buffer A, homogenized with 10 strokes in a glass dounce homogenizer (pestle A), and this was layered onto a sucrose cushion consisting of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 1.12 M sucrose. The homogenate was centrifuged at 100,000 times g for 1 h. The band containing plasma membranes was collected, diluted with 20 ml of Buffer A, and recentrifuged for 15 min at 250,000 times g to pellet the plasma membranes. The final plasma membrane pellet was resuspended in Buffer A to a concentration of approximately 1-2 mg/ml. The 16,000 times g supernatant was centrifuged for 20 min at 48,000 times g. The 48,000 times g supernatant was centrifuged for 1.5 h at 250,000 times g to obtain a pellet containing low density microsomes. The final low density microsome pellet was resuspended in Buffer A to a concentration of approximately 1.5-3 mg/ml. The supernatant from this 250,000 times g centrifugation step was concentrated using a Centriprep-10 apparatus which had been previously blocked for 1 h with 5% Tween 80 and exhaustively washed with water to remove traces of the detergent. The final concentration of this cytosolic fraction was approximately 0.5 mg/ml. Protein was quantitated using the BCA protein determination kit with BSA as standard.

CHO-T cells were grown in 15-cm^2 dishes and were serum-starved for 12-18 h in F12 media supplemented with 0.5% BSA. Cell fractions from CHO-T cells were then prepared as above except that the first homogenization step consisted of 10 strokes with a motor-driven Teflon/glass homogenizer in 24 ml of ice-cold Buffer A.

Immune Precipitation of Insulin Receptor

Low density microsome and plasma membrane fractions were prepared from 3T3-L1 adipocytes as described. 125 µg of protein from each fraction were resuspended in Buffer B (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 1% Brij-96, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 50 mM NaF, 0.5 mM Na(3)VO(4), 30 mM NaPP(i), 5 µg/ml aprotinin, and 5 µg/ml leupeptin) and were precleared by incubating for 90 min with 20 µl of packed goat anti-mouse Sepharose at 4 °C. Samples were centrifuged at 16,000 times g for 30 s, and the supernatants were transferred to fresh tubes. CT-1 anti-insulin receptor IgG(1) (5 µg) was added to the precleared cell fractions and incubated overnight at 4 °C. 20 µl of packed goat anti-mouse Sepharose were added per tube and incubated for an additional 90 min at 4 °C. Sepharose-bound immune complexes were washed five times in Buffer B, solubilized in sample buffer containing 2-mercaptoethanol with heating at 100 °C for 5 min, and resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) using polyacrylamide gels as described by Laemmli(39) .

SDS-PAGE Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting

Cell fractions were thawed on ice, solubilized in sample buffer containing 2-mercaptoethanol with heating at 100 °C for 5 min, and resolved by SDS-PAGE(39) . Proteins were transferred electrophoretically to nitrocellulose essentially as described by Towbin et al.(40) . The nitrocellulose was blocked with either 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 2% BSA, 0.1% Triton X-100 (anti-phosphotyrosine antibody) or 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 3% nonfat dry milk, 0.5% BSA, 0.1% Triton X-100 (anti-IRS-1). The nitrocellulose was then incubated with gentle agitation in primary antibody according to supplier's specifications for 2 h at room temperature, washed several times in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, and then incubated with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 20 min at room temperature. Following several washes in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, bound antibodies were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence.

Immunofluorescence

CHO-T cells were grown on glass coverslips and were serum-starved for 12-18 h in F12 media supplemented with 0.5% BSA. For experiments at 4 °C, the medium was aspirated and replaced with 4 °C unsupplemented DMEM for 15 min. Cells were then stimulated with 1 µM insulin for the indicated times at either 4 °C or 37 °C. The insulin-containing medium was aspirated, the cells were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) consisting of 10.1 mM Na(2)HPO(4), 1.8 mM KH(2)PO(4), 3.35 mM KCl, 170 mM NaCl, 0.68 mM CaCl(2), and 0.49 mM MgCl(2) and were then fixed at 4 °C for 10 min in 4% formaldehyde. The cells were washed several times with ice-cold PBS and were then permeabilized for 6 min with -20 °C methanol. The cells were washed several times with PBS and were then blocked for 1 h with 2% BSA in PBS. Cells were incubated for 3 h with 20 µg/ml anti-phosphotyrosine antibody, 1.5 µg/ml anti-IR IgG(1), or 20 µg/ml mouse IgG as negative control. Cells were washed with PBS containing 0.05% Triton X-100 and were then incubated for 30 min with fluorescein isothiocyanate or rhodamine-conjugated anti-mouse. Cells were washed, postfixed in 4% formaldehyde for 10 min, and mounted. Immunofluorescence was visualized by digital imaging microscopy using a thermoelectrically cooled charged-coupled device camera. Each image was corrected for lamp intensity variations and photobleaching.

Assay of PI 3-Kinase Activity

Low density microsome and cytosol fractions were prepared from 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with 1 µM insulin for 15 min at 4 °C or 37 °C as described above. These fractions were then subjected to PI 3-kinase activity assay according to previously published procedures(41) . Briefly, 125 µg of protein from each fraction were resuspended in Buffer C containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 1% Nonidet P-40, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 50 mM NaF, 0.5 mM Na(3)VO(4), 30 mM NaPP(i), 5 µg/ml aprotinin, and 5 µg/ml leupeptin. Anti-IRS-1 IgG was incubated with 20 µl of packed Protein A-Sepharose in 1 ml of Buffer C for 2 h at 4 °C. Antibody-bound Protein A-Sepharose was then washed several times with Buffer C. Resuspended adipocyte fractions were added to the anti-IRS-1-bound Protein A-Sepharose and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Immune complexes were washed five times in Buffer C, washed twice in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 500 mM LiCl, once in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 1 mM EDTA and 100 mM NaCl, and once in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 100 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EGTA, 10 mM MgCl(2), and 120 µM adenosine. Immune complexes were resuspended in 40 µl of the latter buffer, 100 µM phosphatidylinositol, 100 µM phosphatidylserine, and 10 µM [-P]ATP, and the reaction was incubated for 10 min at 30 °C. The reaction was quenched with HCl, extracted with methanol:chloroform (1:1), and 10 µl were spotted onto PE SIL G plates. Separation of phosphatidylinositol monophosphates by borate thin layer chromatography (42) was performed.


RESULTS

Insulin-stimulated Tyrosine Phosphorylation of IRS-1 Occurs at 4 °C

To determine whether tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 requires internalization of activated insulin receptors, subcellular fractions were prepared from 3T3-L1 adipocytes stimulated with insulin at 37 °C or at 4 °C, a temperature at which insulin receptors are not expected to internalize. The subcellular fractions were subjected to immunoblot analysis utilizing anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (Fig. 1). The major phosphorylated band, which corresponded to the molecular weight of IRS-1, was densitometrically scanned, the data was normalized per cell, and the results were displayed graphically (Fig. 2). As shown in Fig. 1and Fig. 2, tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 present in the low density microsome fraction of 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with insulin for 15 min increases to identical levels at both temperatures, suggesting that tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 can occur in the absence of insulin receptor internalization at 4 °C. Between 15 and 60 min of insulin stimulation at 37 °C, a 2-fold decrease in tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 is observed in the low density microsome fraction of cells with a concomitant 2-fold increase in cytosolic tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1. In contrast, additional insulin stimulation at 4 °C causes a time-dependent increase in the tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 associated with the low density microsome fraction. Strikingly, there is no tyrosine-phosphorylated cytosolic IRS-1 after stimulation with insulin at 4 °C.


Figure 1: Insulin causes tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 present in the low density microsome fraction of 3T3-L1 adipocytes at both 4 °C and 37 °C. Plasma membrane (PM), low density microsome (LDM), and cytosolic fractions were prepared from 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with (+) or without(-) 1 µM insulin for 15 or 60 min at 4 °C or 37 °C by the methods described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Protein (25 µg) from each fraction was resolved by SDS-PAGE on 7.5% gels and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose for 8 h at 150 mA. The filters were blocked and subsequently incubated with 0.5 µg/ml 4G10 anti-phosphotyrosine antibody as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Bands corresponding to IRS-1 (160 kDa) and the beta subunit of the insulin receptor (IR, 95 kDa) are designated with an arrowhead. The immunoblots presented are representative of five experiments.




Figure 2: Tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 in low density microsome and cytosol of 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with insulin at 4 °C and 37 °C. The data shown in Fig. 1for IRS-1 were quantitated using a scanning densitometer. The data were normalized by adjusting the numerical value obtained from densitometric scanning to the total protein from each subcellular fraction prepared from an equal number of cells and are depicted as arbitrary units.



As demonstrated in Fig. 1, levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 present in the plasma membrane fractions at both temperatures following insulin stimulation are substantially (approximately 20-fold) lower than levels present in the low density microsome fractions under identical conditions. Thus, the results of the plasma membrane fractions are not displayed graphically in Fig. 2.

Tyrosine-phosphorylated Insulin Receptors Are Present in the Low Density Microsome Fraction at Both 4 and 37 °C

Also shown in Fig. 1are tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptors present in the subcellular fractions. The amount of tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptor beta subunit detected in the plasma membrane fraction at 4 °C is significantly lower relative to the amount of tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptor beta subunit in the plasma membrane fraction at 37 °C. There are nonspecific anti-phosphotyrosine immunoreactive bands which co-migrate with the 95-kDa insulin receptor beta subunit in the low density microsome fraction, thus making it difficult to determine the relative levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptor present in this fraction at the two temperatures. In order to clarify the levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptor present in the low density microsome fraction and to confirm the levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptor present in the plasma membrane fraction, insulin receptors were quantitatively immunoprecipitated from subcellular fractions prepared from 3T3-L1 adipocytes utilizing conditions that were identical with those in the previous experiment. Immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody as shown in Fig. 3. Bands corresponding to the 95-kDa insulin receptor beta subunit were densitometrically scanned, the data were normalized per cell, and the results are displayed graphically in Fig. 4.


Figure 3: Insulin receptors in 3T3-L1 adipocytes are tyrosine-phosphorylated at both 4 °C and 37 °C in response to insulin. Plasma membrane (PM) and low density microsomes (LDM) were prepared from 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with (+) or without(-) 1 µM insulin for 15 or 60 min at 4 °C or 37 °C by the methods described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Protein (125 µg) from each fraction was solubilized in HEPES buffer containing 1% Brij and incubated with 5 µg of anti-insulin receptor IgG(1). Samples were incubated with goat anti-mouse Sepharose and then washed several times. The immune pellets were solubilized in sample buffer containing reductant, resolved by SDS-PAGE on 7.5% gels, and were then electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose for 8 h at 150 mA. The filters were blocked and subsequently incubated with 0.5 µg/ml 4G10 anti-phosphotyrosine as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The band corresponding to the beta subunit of the insulin receptor (IR, 95 kDa) is designated with an arrowhead.




Figure 4: Insulin receptor tyrosine phosphorylation in the plasma membranes and low density microsomes of 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with insulin at 4 °C and 37 °C. The data shown in Fig. 3for insulin receptor were quantitated using a scanning densitometer. The data were normalized by adjusting the numerical value obtained from densitometric scanning to the total protein from each subcellular fraction prepared from an equal number of cells and are depicted as arbitrary units.



Tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor in the plasma membrane fraction increases in a time-dependent manner at both 4 °C and 37 °C. There are 4-fold more tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptors in the plasma membrane fraction at 37 °C relative to 4 °C following a 15-min insulin stimulation suggesting that tyrosine phosphorylation of receptors is slower at 4 °C. Tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptors in the plasma membrane fraction increases slightly with increased exposure to insulin at 37 °C, while the increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptors in the plasma membrane fraction at 4 °C is greater. This is most likely due to the fact that, at 37 °C, tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptors are being internalized in a time-dependent fashion, and hence their numbers would be expected to decrease in the plasma membrane fraction and increase in the low density microsome fraction. This is reflected in the data shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 4. Levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptor in the low density microsome fraction from cells stimulated at 37 °C are slightly increased over time. Our data indicate the presence of tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptors in the low density microsome fraction at both 37 °C and at 4 °C.

To confirm that insulin receptors are not significantly internalized following insulin stimulation at 4 °C, we performed immunofluorescence microscopy using CHO-T cells. We first tested whether insulin stimulation of CHO-T cells at 4 °C would result in the tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 present in the low density microsome fraction as observed in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Confluent CHO-T cells were stimulated with insulin at 4 °C or 37 °C for 15 min and 60 min, and subcellular fractions were prepared and immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. As the results presented in Fig. 5demonstrate, tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 is present in the low density microsome fractions prepared from cells stimulated with insulin at both 4 °C and 37 °C. Additionally, similar to the effect observed in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, a substantial amount of tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 is present in the cytosol at 37 °C following insulin stimulation. Thus, our findings show that CHO-T cells are similar to 3T3-L1 adipocytes in that IRS-1 associated with the low density microsome fraction can be tyrosine-phosphorylated in an insulin-dependent manner at 4 °C.


Figure 5: Insulin causes tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 present in the low density microsome fraction of CHO-T cells at both 4 °C and 37 °C. Low density microsome (LDM) and cytosolic fractions were prepared from CHO-T cells treated with (+) or without(-) 1 µM insulin for 15 or 60 min at 4 °C or 37 °C by the methods described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Low density microsome protein (25 µg) and cytosolic protein (75 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE on 7.5% gels and were electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose for 8 h at 150 mA. The filters were blocked and subsequently incubated with 0.5 µg/ml 4G10 anti-phosphotyrosine antibody as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Bands corresponding to IRS-1 (160 kDa) are designated with an arrowhead. The immunoblots presented are representative of two experiments.



Insulin Receptor Internalization Is Inhibited at 4 °C

Immunofluorescence microscopy of CHO-T cells stimulated with insulin at 4 °C and 37 °C was performed (Fig. 6). A weak, fibrillar pattern of intracellular staining, similar to the staining observed for focal adhesions, is observed in cells in the absence of insulin at both 4 °C and 37 °C when anti-phosphotyrosine antibody is incubated with fixed, permeabilized CHO-T cells (Fig. 6, B and E). Cells stimulated with insulin at 4 °C and then incubated with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody display intense cell surface staining (Fig. 6C). In contrast, cells stimulated with insulin at 37 °C do not show this intense staining at the cell periphery. Rather, they exhibit bright intracellular staining suggesting that at 37 °C internalization of tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptors has occurred (Fig. 6F). To confirm that internalization of insulin receptors is inhibited at 4 °C in CHO-T cells following insulin stimulation, fixed, permeabilized cells were incubated with a monoclonal antibody generated against the carboxyl terminus of the insulin receptor. As shown in Fig. 6, bright staining is observed at the surface of cells at both 4 °C and 37 °C in the absence of insulin (Fig. 6, H and K) and in cells stimulated with insulin at 4 °C (Fig. 6I). In contrast, CHO-T cells stimulated with insulin at 37 °C and incubated with anti-insulin receptor antibody show intracellular staining rather than surface staining (Fig. 6L). This pattern is markedly similar to the pattern observed when cells are insulin-stimulated at 37 °C and then incubated with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (compare Fig. 6, F and L). Our results show that following insulin stimulation at 4 °C, the insulin receptor largely remains at the cell surface while insulin stimulation at 37 °C results in receptor endocytosis. Taken together, the results presented above indicate that tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 does not require the internalization of activated insulin receptors.


Figure 6: Internalization of tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptors is inhibited at 4 °C in CHO-T cells. CHO-T cells grown on coverslips were treated with (+) or without(-) 1 µM insulin for 60 min at 4 °C or 37 °C by the methods described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Cells were fixed, permeabilized, and blocked as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Cells were incubated with 20 µg/ml 4G10 anti-phosphotyrosine, 1.5 µg/ml anti-insulin receptor IgG1, or 20 µg/ml mouse IgG as negative control, washed, and then incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate- (ANTI-IR) or rhodamine- (ANTI-P-TYR) conjugated anti-mouse. Cells were washed, postfixed, and mounted. Top panel: A, nonimmune mouse IgG, 4 °C; B, anti-phosphotyrosine, -ins, 4 °C; C, anti-phosphotyrosine, +ins, 4 °C; D, nonimmune mouse IgG, 37 °C; E, anti-phosphotyrosine, -ins, 37 °C; F, anti-phosphotyrosine, +ins, 37 °C. Bottom panel: G, nonimmune mouse IgG, 4 °C; H, anti-insulin receptor, -ins, 4 °C; I, anti-insulin receptor, +ins, 4 °C; J, nonimmune mouse IgG, 37 °C; K, anti-insulin receptor, -ins, 37 °C; L, anti-insulin receptor, +ins, 37 °C.



Insulin Causes a Temperature-dependent Release of IRS-1 Protein from the Low Density Microsome Fraction into the Cytosol

To investigate in more detail the localization of IRS-1 in intracellular membranes, subcellular fractions identical with those utilized in Fig. 1were immunoblotted with anti-IRS-1 antibody. The bands corresponding to IRS-1 were densitometrically scanned, the data were normalized per cell, and the results are presented in Fig. 7and 8. Under basal conditions, approximately 62% of the IRS-1 protein in 3T3-L1 adipocytes is present in the low density microsome fraction, approximately 35% is present in the cytosol, and approximately 3% is in the plasma membrane fraction. Remarkably, at 37 °C, IRS-1 protein in the low density microsome fraction is decreased 80% with increasing exposure to insulin with a simultaneous 2.5-fold increase in IRS-1 protein in the cytosol. In addition, the small amount of IRS-1 protein in the plasma membrane fraction is decreased 30% at 37 °C. At 4 °C, this apparent insulin-dependent release of membrane-associated IRS-1 into the cytosol is completely inhibited. A decreased electrophoretic mobility of IRS-1 protein present in the low density microsome and cytosolic fractions following 15-min and 60-min insulin stimulations at 37 °C is clearly evident in Fig. 7. In contrast, this electrophoretic shift is not observed when cells are incubated with insulin at 4 °C. As the levels of tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 in the low density microsome fractions are identical following a 15-min insulin stimulation at 4 °C and 37 °C (see Fig. 1and Fig. 2), this electrophoretic shift suggests that serine/threonine phosphorylation may be occurring on IRS-1 at 37 °C.


Figure 7: Insulin causes a temperature-dependent release of IRS-1 protein from the low density microsome fraction of 3T3-L1 adipocytes into the cytosol. Plasma membrane (PM), low density microsome (LDM), and cytosolic fractions were prepared from 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with (+) or without(-) 1 µM insulin for 15 or 60 min at 4 °C or 37 °C by the methods described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Protein (25 µg) from each fraction was resolved by SDS-PAGE on 7.5% gels and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose for 8 h at 150 mA. The filters were blocked and subsequently incubated with 2 µg/ml anti-IRS-1 as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Bands corresponding to IRS-1 (160 kDa) are designated with arrowheads. The immunoblots presented are representative of three experiments.



The concentration dependence of insulin in inducing the release of IRS-1 protein from the low density microsome fraction into the cytosol is shown in Fig. 9. 3T3-L1 adipocytes were stimulated with insulin at the indicated concentrations at 37 °C, subcellular fractions were prepared and immunoblotted with anti-IRS-1. The IRS-1 bands were scanned, and the data were normalized per cell and presented graphically. The data demonstrate that with increasing insulin concentration, there is an increasing loss of IRS-1 protein from the low density microsome fraction with a corresponding increase in cytosolic IRS-1. It appears that 10 nM insulin results in maximal loss of IRS-1 protein from the low density microsome fraction since stimulation with higher concentrations of insulin did not further increase the effect although increases in cytosolic IRS-1 have still not reached a plateau by 1 µM insulin. The percentages of IRS-1 protein present in the cytosolic and low density microsome fractions under basal conditions and following 1 µM insulin stimulation in this experiment were similar to those observed previously (see Fig. 8).


Figure 9: Effect of insulin concentration on the release of IRS-1 protein from the low density microsome fraction of 3T3-L1 adipocytes into the cytosol. Low density microsome (LDM) and cytosolic fractions were prepared from 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with insulin at the indicated concentrations for 60 min at 37 °C by the methods described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Equal amounts of protein from each fraction were resolved by SDS-PAGE on 7.5% gels and were electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose for 8 h at 150 mA. The filters were blocked and subsequently incubated with 2 µg/ml anti-IRS-1 as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Bands corresponding to IRS-1 were quantitated using a scanning densitometer. The data were normalized by adjusting the numerical value obtained from densitometric scanning to the total protein from each subcellular fraction prepared from an equal number of cells and are depicted as arbitrary units.




Figure 8: Time course of the temperature-dependent release of IRS-1 protein into the cytosol of 3T3-L1 adipocytes. The data shown in Fig. 7for IRS-1 were quantitated using a scanning densitometer. The data were normalized by adjusting the numerical value obtained from densitometric scanning to the total protein from each subcellular fraction prepared from an equal number of cells, and are displayed as the percent IRS-1 present in each subcellular fraction.



PI 3-Kinase Associates with Cytosolic IRS-1 in a Temperature-dependent Manner

To compare the PI 3-kinase activity associated with the IRS-1 present in the low density microsome fraction and cytosol of 3T3-L1 adipocytes stimulated with insulin at 4 °C and at 37 °C, subcellular fractions prepared from cells stimulated with insulin at the two temperatures were immunoprecipitated with anti-IRS-1 and then assayed for PI 3-kinase activity. As shown in Fig. 10, PI 3-kinase activity is associated with the low density microsome fraction in response to insulin at both 4 °C and at 37 °C. The levels of PI 3-kinase activity associated with the low density microsome fractions correlate well with the levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 present in this fraction (see Fig. 1and Fig. 2). This observation is similar to results obtained in primary rat adipocytes where activation of PI 3-kinase correlated closely with the extent of tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 present in low density vesicles(35) . Fig. 10also illustrates that approximately 5-fold more PI 3-kinase activity is present in IRS-1 immunoprecipitates of cytosols prepared from cells stimulated with insulin at 37 °C than from cells stimulated with insulin at 4 °C.


Figure 10: PI 3-kinase is associated with tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 in the low density microsome fraction of 3T3-L1 adipocytes at both 4 °C and 37 °C. Low density microsomes (LDM) and cytosols were prepared from 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with 1 µM insulin for 15 min at 4 °C or 37 °C. 125 µg of total protein from each fraction were immunoprecipitated with anti-IRS-1 and then subjected to a PI 3-kinase assay. Spots corresponding to PI 3-phosphate on the thin layer plate were quantitated using a Betascope. Data were normalized by adjusting the counts/min to the total protein from each subcellular fraction prepared from an equal number of cells.




DISCUSSION

Our present approach to determine whether insulin receptor internalization is required for tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 in intact 3T3-L1 adipocytes and CHO-T cells depends upon the premise that insulin receptors cannot internalize at low temperature while their tyrosine kinase activity is functional. Immunofluorescence microscopy presented here (Fig. 6) directly documents that activated insulin receptors remain largely at the cell surface at 4 °C, consistent with previously published reports that insulin receptor internalization is inhibited at low temperature(36, 37) . Thus, our results demonstrating that IRS-1 undergoes similar levels of insulin-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation at 4 °C versus 37 °C ( Fig. 1and Fig. 2for 3T3-L1 adipocytes and Fig. 5for CHO-T cells) show that insulin receptor internalization is not necessary for IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation in these cells. A previous study suggested that internalization of activated insulin receptors is required for the tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 in microsomal membranes(34) . This conclusion was based on the observations that there are 5-6-fold more tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptors in low density microsomes relative to plasma membranes shortly after exposure to insulin, and that both the kinase activity associated with these receptors and the phosphorylation state of IRS-1 in the low density microsomes paralleled the phosphotyrosine content of the receptors. These correlations were quite striking. However, we have clearly demonstrated in two different cell types that, under conditions where insulin receptor internalization is inhibited (4 °C), insulin elicits levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 that are identical with those observed under physiological conditions (37 °C) where receptor internalization does occur.

If insulin receptor internalization is not required for tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 in the low density microsome fraction, which is thought to consist of intracellular membranes, what is the mechanism for such phosphorylation? Results presented in Fig. 3and Fig. 4demonstrate that there are tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptors present in the low density microsome fraction following insulin stimulation of adipocytes at 4 °C even though internalization of receptors is inhibited. Results using autoradiographic electron microscopy have demonstrated that at low temperature, insulin-bound receptor complexes redistribute at the cell surface and cluster within coated pits (43) although this occurs more slowly than at 37 °C. Clathrin-coated vesicles are present in the low density microsome fraction of adipocytes. (^2)Therefore, a likely explanation for the presence of tyrosine-phosphorylated receptors in the low density microsome fraction at low temperature is that clathrin-coated vesicles are included in this fraction. These considerations lead us to propose that a pool of the membrane-bound IRS-1 protein is associated with coated pits, and that tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 by the insulin receptor can occur in these structures. Consistent with this concept, we found that significant amounts of IRS-1 protein in the low density microsome fraction of 3T3-L1 adipocytes are resistant to Triton X-100 extraction, as is clathrin (data not shown). As depicted in the model of Fig. 11, IRS-1 phosphorylation in coated pits may then be followed by its endocytosis and its delivery to endosomal sites where PI 3-kinase or other associated proteins may act. This hypothesis is not inconsistent with the possibility that IRS-1 may also be phosphorylated by internalized insulin receptors in intracellular membrane compartments at 37 °C as suggested by Kublaoui et al.(34) .


Figure 11: Model of insulin-regulated IRS-1 recycling in the cell. Membrane-bound IRS-1 is hypothesized to be tyrosine-phosphorylated by the insulin receptor in coated pits at the cell surface. Tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 associates with PI 3-kinase and is internalized on vesicles where it delivers PI 3-kinase, and perhaps other signaling components, to specific sites in the endosomes. Serine/threonine phosphorylation of IRS-1, caused by PI 3-kinase or another protein kinase(s), is hypothesized to cause the release of IRS-1 from its binding element in the membrane into the cytosol, where it is dephosphorylated. Dephosphorylated IRS-1 in the cytosol then associates with its binding element in coated pits where it can be tyrosine-phosphorylated by the insulin receptor.



The mechanism by which IRS-1 might interact with membranes is unknown. Activated insulin receptors cannot account for the putative IRS-1 binding component in membranes because IRS-1 is associated with low density microsome in the absence of insulin ( Fig. 7and Fig. 8). IRS-1 contains a structural domain, the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, that is thought to represent an interaction motif(44) . The PH domain in beta-adrenergic receptor kinase has been shown to bind heterotrimeric G protein beta subunits at the plasma membrane, thus recruiting beta-adrenergic receptor kinase to the cell surface(45, 46) . Similarly, the region containing the PH domain in oxysterol-binding protein is responsible for its binding to Golgi membranes(44) . The PH domains of several proteins have been shown to interact selectively with phosphatidylinositol derivatives(47) . An important hypothesis for future investigation is whether the PH domain in IRS-1 is required for its association with membranes in the low density microsome fraction.

The present results also demonstrate a striking regulatory action of insulin on IRS-1 binding to low density membranes. In control 3T3-L1 adipocytes, approximately two-thirds of the IRS-1 protein is associated with intracellular membranes, while approximately one-third is cytosolic ( Fig. 7and Fig. 8). Insulin stimulation at 37 °C causes a substantial decrease in the levels of IRS-1 protein in the low density microsome fraction with a concomitant increase in IRS-1 protein in the cytosol. The insulin concentration required to elicit this release of IRS-1 protein into the cytosol is within the range of concentrations required to observe biological effects such as glucose transport regulation in these cells (Fig. 9). In addition, this effect is observed in 3T3-L1 adipocytes as early as 3 min following stimulation with 100 nM insulin (data not shown) which correlates temporally with insulin-induced translocation of GLUT4 glucose transporters to the plasma membrane(34) . Taken together, these results strongly suggest that this novel effect of insulin that causes dissociation of IRS-1 from low density membranes is of physiological importance. A likely role for this phenomenon is desensitization of the insulin effect. Thus, as depicted in the model of Fig. 11, subsequent to delivery of tyrosine-phosphorylated, PI 3-kinase-associated IRS-1 to specific sites within intracellular membranes, IRS-1 is released for recycling back to its location of tyrosine phosphorylation. Such a mechanism might operate in concert with dephosphorylation of phosphotyrosine sites on IRS-1 by tyrosine phosphatases. Interestingly, we find PI 3-kinase-associated IRS-1 in the cytosol following insulin treatment (Fig. 10), indicating that IRS-1 release from membranes occurs prior to its complete dephosphorylation of tyrosine phosphates.

Some apparent diversity of results has been reported with regard to the amount of tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 that is present in the cytosol of adipocytes. A previous study (35) suggested that in primary rat adipocytes activation of PI 3-kinase correlated closely with the extent of tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 present in low density microsomes, but no PI 3-kinase activity bound to IRS-1 in cytosol was observed. However, another study showed clearly detectable tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 in the cytosolic fraction of rat adipocytes after incubation with insulin(34) . Our findings in 3T3-L1 adipocytes are consistent with this latter report. Insulin stimulation of these cultured adipocytes at physiological temperature caused a time-dependent diminution of tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 in the low density microsome fraction, and the simultaneous appearance of tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 in the cytosol ( Fig. 1and Fig. 2). Insulin-stimulated PI 3-kinase activity associated with the low density microsome fractions correlates well with the levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 present in this fraction (Fig. 10). We also observed PI 3-kinase activity associated with tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 in the cytosol of 3T3-L1 adipocytes following insulin stimulation. Although we have no direct data indicating whether the cytosolic IRS-1bulletPI 3-kinase complexes in the cytosol are required for biological actions of insulin, our data strongly suggest that these cytosolic complexes are derived from released membrane-bound components.

As depicted in the model of Fig. 11, our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that phosphorylation of IRS-1 on serine/threonine residues is involved in the mechanism of IRS-1 release from intracellular membranes. Thus, following insulin stimulation at 37 °C in both 3T3-L1 adipocytes and in CHO-T cells, the tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 present in the low density microsome fraction exhibits decreased electrophoretic mobility ( Fig. 1and Fig. 5). This decreased electrophoretic mobility of IRS-1 coincides with the decreased amount of IRS-1 associated with the low density microsome fraction and the appearance of tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 in the cytosol. Moreover, both the release of IRS-1 into the cytosol and the electrophoretic mobility shift in IRS-1 due to insulin are abolished at low temperature ( Fig. 7and Fig. 8). The electrophoretic mobility shift in IRS-1 at 37 °C may not be explained by tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 because this also occurs at 4 °C. IRS-1 is known to be phosphorylated on serine within its PH domain in response to insulin (48) . Additionally, PI 3-kinase has been shown to be a dual specificity enzyme in that it possesses both lipid and serine kinase activities (16, 17) , and IRS-1 was demonstrated to be an insulin-dependent substrate for this serine kinase activity of PI 3-kinase in intact cells(18) . We hypothesize that insulin may regulate the intracellular localization of IRS-1 by causing it to be phosphorylated by PI 3-kinase and subsequently released from intracellular membranes into the cytosol. Alternatively, perhaps other serine/threonine protein kinases are involved in IRS-1 phosphorylation in response to insulin. Further work is required to determine whether serine/threonine phosphorylation of IRS-1 is required for the release mechanism and which protein kinase(s) may be involved.

It is noteworthy that in contrast to results obtained with 3T3-L1 adipocytes, increased tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 was detected in the cytosol of CHO-T cells stimulated with insulin at 4 °C (Fig. 5). However, this cytosolic tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 in CHO-T cells does not exhibit decreased electrophoretic mobility, as does that prepared from 3T3-L1 or CHO-T cells stimulated with insulin at 37 °C ( Fig. 1and Fig. 5). One possibility is that tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 in CHO-T cells binds more weakly to intracellular membranes relative to 3T3-L1 adipocytes.

In summary, the results presented here provide two new insights into the dynamics of IRS-1 function in insulin receptor signaling. First, based on the marked tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 in response to insulin at low temperature, we can conclude that insulin receptor endocytosis is not required for initiating the IRS-1 signaling pathway. This is consistent with studies showing that in certain cell types, mutant insulin receptors which fail to undergo internalization are still effective in mediating downstream biological effects(49) . Secondly, based on the striking redistribution of IRS-1 protein in subcellular fractions in response to insulin, we suggest that IRS-1 cycles between membrane-bound and cytosolic locations in an insulin-regulated manner. This recycling may reflect an important physiological mechanism for the release of IRS-1 signaling complexes from targeted membrane sites where regulatory events may occur.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by Grant DK30648 from the National Institutes of Health. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: IRS-1, insulin receptor substrate 1; SH, Src homology; PI 3-kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; BSA, bovine serum albumin; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PH, pleckstrin homology.

(^2)
R. Heller-Harrison and M. Czech, unpublished results.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Judy Kula for excellent assistance in preparing this manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Kahn, C. R., White, M., Shoelson, S., Backer, J., Araki, E., Cheatham, B., Csermely, P., Folli, F., Goldstein, B., Huertas, P., Rothenberg, P., Saad, M., Siddle, K., Sun, X.-J., Wilden, P., Yamada, K., and Kahn, S. (1993) Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 48,291-339 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Keller, S., and Lienhard, G. (1994) Trends Cell Biol. 4,115-119 [CrossRef]
  3. Myers, M., Sun, X.-J., and White, M. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19,289-292 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Sun, X-J., Rothenberg, P., Kahn, C. R., Backer, J., Araki, E., Wilden, P., Cahill, D., Goldstein, B., and White, M. (1991) Nature 352,73-77 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Keller, S., Aebersold, R., Garner, C., and Lienhard, G. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1172,323-326 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Araki, E., Sun, X.-J., Haag, B., Chuang, L.-M., Zhang, Y., Yang-Feng, T., White, M., and Kahn, C. R. (1993) Diabetes 42,1041-1054 [Abstract]
  7. Sun, X-J., Miralpeix, M., Myers, M., Glasheen, E., Backer, J., Kahn, C. R., and White, M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267,22662-22672 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Backer, J., Myers, M., Shoelson, S., Chin, D., Sun, X. J., Miralpeix, M., Hu, P., Margolis, B., Skolnik, E., Schlessinger, J., and White, M. (1992) EMBO J. 11,3469-3479 [Abstract]
  9. Yonezawa, K., Ueda, H., Hara, K., Nishida, K., Ando, A., Chavanieu, A., Matsuba, H., Shii, K., Yokono, K., Fukui, Y., Calas, B., Grigorescu, F., Dhand, R., Gout, I., Otsu, M., Waterfield, M., and Kasuga, M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267,25958-25965 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kuhne, M., Pawson, T., Lienhard, G., and Feng, G.-S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,11479-11481 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Skolnik, E., Lee, C.-H., Batzer, A., Vicentini, L., Zhou, M., Daly, R., Myers, M., Backer, J., Ullrich, A., White, M., and Schlessinger, J. (1993) EMBO J. 12,1929-1936 [Abstract]
  12. Tobe, K., Matuoka, K., Tamemoto, H., Ueki, K., Kaburagi, Y., Asai, S., Noguchi, T., Matsuda, M., Tanaka, S., Hattori, S., Fukui, Y., Akanuma, Y., Yazaki, Y., Takenawa, T., and Kadowaki, T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,11167-11171 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Lee, C.-H., Li, W., Nishimura, R., Zhou, M., Batzer, A., Myers, M., White, M., Schlessinger, J., and Skolnik, E. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90,11713-11717 [Abstract]
  14. Sugimoto, S., Wandless, T., Shoelson, S., Neel, B., and Walsh, C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,13614-13622 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kapeller, R., and Cantley, L. (1994) BioEssays 16,565-576 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Carpenter, C., Auger, K., Duckworth, B., Hou, W., Schaffhausen, B., and Cantley, L. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13,1657-1665 [Abstract]
  17. Dhand, R., Hiles, I., Panayotou, G., Roche, S., Fry, J., Gout, I., Totty, N., Truong, O., Vicendo, P., Yonezawa, K., Kasuga, M., Courtneidge, S., and Waterfield, M. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 522-533 [Abstract]
  18. Lam, K., Carpenter, C., Ruderman, N., Friel, J., and Kelly, K. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,20648-20652 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kelly, K., Ruderman, N., and Chen, K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267,3423-3428 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Lamphere, L., Carpenter, C., Sheng, Z-F., Kallen, R., and Lienhard, G. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 266,E486-E494
  21. Backer, J., Schroeder, G., Kahn, C. R., Myers, M., Wilden, P., Cahill, D., and White, M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267,1367-1374 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Levy-Toledano, R., Taouis, M., Blaettler, D., Gorden, P., and Taylor, S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,31178-31182 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ruderman, N., Kapeller, R., White, M., and Cantley, L. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87,1411-1415 [Abstract]
  24. Cheatham, B., Vlahos, C., Cheatham, L., Wang, L., Blenis, J., and Kahn, C. R. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14,4902-4911 [Abstract]
  25. Okada, T., Kawano, Y., Sakakibara, T., Hazeki, O., and Ui, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,3568-3573 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Quon, M., Butte, A., Zarnowski, M., Sesti, G., Cushman, S., and Taylor, S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,27920-27924 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Carpentier, J.-L., Paccaud, J.-P., Backer, J., Gilbert, A., Orci, L., and Kahn, C. R. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122,1243-1252 [Abstract]
  28. Kaburagi, Y., Momomura, K., Yamamoto-Honda, R., Tobe, K., Tamori, Y., Sakura, H., Akanuma, Y., Yazaki, Y., and Kadowaki, T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,16610-16622 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kanai, F., Ito, K, Todaka, M., Hayashi, H., Kamohara, S., Ishii, K., Okada, T., Hazeki, O., Ui, M., and Ebina, Y. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 195,762-768 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Kapeller, R., Chen, K., Yoakim, M., Schaffhausen, B., Backer, J., White, M., Cantley, L., and Ruderman, N. (1991) Mol. Endocrinol. 5,769-777 [Abstract]
  31. White, M., Livingston, J., Backer, J., Lauris, V., Dull, T., Ullrich, A., and Kahn, C. R. (1988) Cell 54,641-649 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Backer, J., Kahn, C. R., Cahill, D., Ullrich, A., and White, M. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265,16450-16454 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. O'Neill, T., Craparo, A., and Gustafson, T. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14,6433-6442 [Abstract]
  34. Kublaoui, B., Lee, J., and Pilch, P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270,59-65 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Kelly, K., and Ruderman, N. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,4391-4398 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Carpentier, J.-L. (1989) Diabetologia 32,627-635 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Marshall, S., and Olefsky, J. (1981) Diabetes 30,746-753 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Clancy, B., Harrison, S., Buxton, J., and Czech, M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266,10122-10130 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227,680-685 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76,4350-4354 [Abstract]
  41. Kozma, L., Baltensperger, K., Klarlund, J., Porras, A., Santos, E., and Czech, M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90,4460-4464 [Abstract]
  42. Walsh, J., Caldwell, K., and Majerus, P. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88,9184-9187 [Abstract]
  43. Fan, J., Carpentier, J.-L., Gorden, P., VanObberghen, E., Blackett, N., Grunfeld, C., and Orci, L. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 79,7788-7791 [Abstract]
  44. Musacchio, A., Gibson, T., Rice, P., Thompson, J., and Saraste, M. (1993) Trends Biochem. Sci. 18,343-348 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Inglese, J., Koch, W., Touhara, K., and Lefkowitz, R. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20,151-156 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Touhara, K., Inglese, J., Pitcher, J., Shaw, G., and Lefkowitz, R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,10217-10220 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Harlan, J., Hadjuk, P., Yoon, H. S., and Fesik, S. (1994) Nature 371,168-170 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Tanasijevic, M., Myers, M., Thoma, R., Crimmins, D., White, M., and Sacks, D. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,18157-18166 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Thies, R., Webster, N., and McClain, D. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265,10132-10137 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.