©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
A p53-independent Pathway for Activation of WAF1/CIP1 Expression Following Oxidative Stress (*)

(Received for publication, June 6, 1995; and in revised form, August 17, 1995)

Tommaso Russo (1) Nicola Zambrano (1) Franca Esposito (1) Rosario Ammendola (1) Filiberto Cimino (1) Michele Fiscella (2) Joany Jackman (3) Patrick M. O'Connor (4) Carl W. Anderson (5)(§) Ettore Appella (2)(¶)

From the  (1)Dipartimento di Biochimica e Biotecnologie Mediche, Università degli Studi di Napoli ``Federico II'', I-80131 Naples, Italy, the (2)Laboratory of Cell Biology, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, the (3)Georgetown University Medical Center, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Washington, D. C. 20007, the (4)Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Division of Cancer Treatment, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, and the (5)Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Incubating human cells in diethylmaleate (DEM) depletes the intracellular pool of reduced glutathione (GSH) and increases the concentration of oxidative free radicals. We found that DEM-induced oxidative stress reduced the ability of p53 to bind its consensus recognition sequence and to activate transcription of a p53-specific reporter gene. Nevertheless, DEM treatment induced expression of WAF1/CIP1 but not GADD45 mRNA. The fact that N-acetylcysteine, a precursor of GSH that blocks oxidative stress, prevented WAF1/CIP1 induction by DEM suggests that WAF1/CIP1 induction probably was a consequence of the ability of DEM to reduce intracellular GSH levels. DEM induced WAF1/CIP1 expression in Saos-2 and T98G cells, both of which lack functional p53 protein. DEM treatment did not produce an increase in membrane-associated protein kinase C, but ERK2, a mitogen-activated protein kinase, was phosphorylated in a manner consistent with ERK2 activation. DEM treatment also produced a dose-dependent delay in cell cycle progression, which at low concentrations (0.25 mM) consisted of a G(2)/M arrest and at higher concentrations (1 mM) also involved G(1) and S phase delays. Our results indicate that oxidative stress induces WAF1/CIP1 expression and arrests cell cycle progression through a mechanism that is independent of p53. This mechanism may provide for cell cycle checkpoint control under conditions that inactivate p53.


INTRODUCTION

The accumulation of oxidative damage is believed to be an important cause of aging and may contribute to the increased incidence of cancer in older individuals(1) . Reactive oxygen radicals are capable of damaging many cellular components including DNA(2, 3) . A wide variety of DNA damages result in the activation of mechanisms that arrest cell cycle progression at specific checkpoints, presumably to allow time for the damage to be repaired. Activation of the G(1) checkpoint mechanism by DNA damage requires the function of the p53 tumor suppressor protein, which transiently accumulates in cells after exposure to several agents that damage DNA (4, 5) . p53 is a transcription factor that binds to specific DNA sequence elements and activates transcription; among the genes whose transcription is activated by p53 are WAF1/CIP1 and GADD45(6, 7, 8) . p53 also suppresses transcription from other genes that do not have p53-specific binding elements(9, 10) . WAF1/CIP1 encodes a potent 21-kDa (p21) inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase activities that are required for progression from the G(1) into the S phase of the cell cycle(11, 12) . In vitro experiments have shown that p53 is sensitive to oxidation and that the oxidized form of p53 is unable to bind its cognate DNA cis-element(13, 14) .

If the p53 protein is similarly sensitive to oxidation in vivo, then inactivation would render it incapable of protecting a cell from the DNA damages provoked by oxidizing radicals. To address this possibility, we asked whether p53 DNA binding and transactivation are affected by treatment with diethylmaleate (DEM), (^1)an agent that increases the intracellular concentration of free radicals by depleting the cellular store of reduced glutathione (GSH).


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Culture and Transfections

Hep3B, HeLa, COS-2, Saos-2, and T98G cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Flow Laboratories) containing 10% fetal calf serum (Hyclone), 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM glutamine (Flow Laboratories). COS-2 and Saos-2 cell lines were transfected by the calcium phosphate procedure (15) in 60-mm dishes with 10 µg of the pCMV-neo expression vector (16) containing a human wild-type p53 cDNA (pCMV-p53) (17) and 10 µg of a multimeric p53 responsive element (PG13) (18) driving the transcription of the luciferase reporter gene in the pGL2-promoter vector (Promega). Control transfections with the parental vector were also carried out for determination of basal luciferase activity. 24 h after the transfection, DEM (Sigma) was added to the culture at a final concentration of 0.5 or 1 mM(19, 20) , and 6 h later extracts were prepared for luciferase activity determination (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Control experiments were performed in cells transfected as described above and not exposed to DEM or transfected with pRSV-luciferase reporter plasmid to evaluate the effect of DEM on a p53-independent promoter.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays

COS-2, Hep3B, and HeLa cells were transfected with 10 µg of the pCMV-p53 construct per 100-mm dish; the cells were left untreated or treated with 1 mM DEM for 3 h and then harvested for the preparation of nuclear extracts according to (21) . Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed with approximately 1 ng of end-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotide by using 10 µg of nuclear proteins in a volume of 12 µl in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl(2), 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml each of pepstatin and leupeptin, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 20% glycerol. 100 ng of the p53-specific monoclonal antibody PAb421 (Oncogene Science) were added to each reaction. Complexes were then resolved on 4% native polyacrylamide gels in 0.25 times TBE (1 times TBE is 89 mM Tris borate, pH 8.3, and 1 mM EDTA), run for 2 h at 4 °C at 200 V, dried, and exposed to autoradiographic films. The double-stranded oligonucleotide 5`-TCGAGTTGCCTGGACTTGCCTGGCCTTGCCTTTTC-3` corresponded to the p53 cis-element of the ribosomal gene cluster (RGC) promoter (22) .

Northern and Western Blots

Exponentially growing HeLa, T98G, and Saos-2 cells were treated for 3 h with various concentrations of DEM. Total RNA was prepared from treated and untreated cultures as described(23) , electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose/formaldehyde gels, and transferred onto Nytran filters (Schleicher & Schuell). Baked filters were hybridized to radioactive probes generated by using random priming reactions, washed, and autoradiographed with x-ray films (Fuji). For p21 Western blot, 50 µg of protein extracts from T98G cells were fractionated on a 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to an Immobilon polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore). The filters were incubated with anti-p21 antibody (Pharmingen), and detection was by the ECL system (Amersham Corp.). For ERK2 Western blot, 10 µg of HeLa cell protein extract were fractionated on a 10% polyacrylamide SDS gel and transferred to an Immobilon polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The anti-ERK2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used at 0.1 µg/ml. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) treatment was performed by exposing the cells to 30 mM NAC for 2 h before DEM treatment.

Flow Cytometry

Subconfluent cultures of T98G cells were split 1:4, incubated for 24 h, and then split again 1:2 16 h before being treated with various concentrations of DEM (0, 0.25, 0.5, or 1 mM) for 12 h in the presence and the absence of 400 ng/ml nocodazole (Sigma). Flow cytometric analysis was performed essentially as described(24) .


RESULTS

Oxidative Stress Inhibits Site-specific p53 DNA Binding in Vivo

We evaluated the possibility that oxidizing conditions might interfere with the ability of p53 to activate transcription in vivo first by examining the ability of p53 from oxidatively stressed cells to bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner (Fig. 1). Oxidative stress was induced by treating cells in culture with DEM, a weak electrophile that induces a rapid and transient depletion of GSH by forming DEM-GSH conjugates in a reaction catalyzed by the enzyme glutathione S-transferase(25) . Exposure to 1 mM DEM reduces the levels of GSH in cells by about 90% within 30 min, and this reduction impairs the cell's ability to scavenge oxidative radicals produced as a normal consequence of oxidative metabolism ( (19) and data not shown). To provide adequate amounts of wild-type p53, COS-2, Hep3B, and HeLa cells were transfected before treatment with pCMV-p53, a plasmid containing the wild-type human p53 cDNA under expression control of the strong, constitutive cytomegalovirus promoter(17) . 36 h after transfection and 3 h before harvesting, cells were exposed to 1 mM DEM. The nuclear extracts were then analyzed for p53 binding ability by electrophoretic mobility shift assays with a P-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotide probe containing the p53 DNA binding sequence from the RGC promoter(22) . A retarded band was observed with extracts from COS-2 and Hep3B cells that had been transfected with the pCMV-p53 expression vector (Fig. 1, lanes c and g). This band was specific for wild-type p53 as shown by the fact that excess cold competitor RGC oligonucleotide caused a dramatic reduction in its intensity (lane d), but an excess of an oligonucleotide unrelated to the p53 binding motif did not (lane e). The position of the complex also was dependent on the presence of the PAb421 antibody, which was added to reactions to enhance sequence specific binding. The p53-specific band was decreased significantly in intensity in nuclear extracts from COS-2 and Hep3B cells that had been exposed to 1 mM DEM (lanes f and h); however, adding DEM directly to extracts had no effect on the ability of p53 to bind DNA (data not shown). Similar results were observed with nuclear extracts from treated and untreated HeLa cells (data not shown). Thus, exposing cells to DEM significantly reduced the ability of the intracellular p53 to bind a DNA recognition site.


Figure 1: Effects of DEM on the DNA binding efficiency of p53. COS-2 and Hep3B cells transfected to induce the expression of wild-type p53 protein were incubated without or with 1 mM DEM for 3 h before harvesting. Nuclear extracts were examined by electrophoretic mobility shift assay for the ability to bind a double-stranded, P-labeled oligonucleotide containing the RGC sequence. Lane a, P-labeled RGC-containing oligonucleotide alone; lane b, RGC-containing oligonucleotide plus nuclear extract from mock transfected COS-2 cells; lane c, nuclear extract from COS-2 cells transfected with pCMV-p53 human p53 cDNA; lane d, as in lane c but preincubated with a 20-fold molar excess of cold RGC oligonucleotide; lane e, as in lane c but preincubated with a 20-fold molar excess of an unrelated oligonucleotide (Sp1); lane f, nuclear extract from COS-2 cells transfected with pCMV-p53 and exposed to 1 mM DEM; lane g, nuclear extract from Hep3B cells transfected with pCMV-p53; lane h, nuclear extract from Hep3B cells transfected with pCMV-p53 and exposed to 1 mM DEM. The arrow designates the shifted complex that is p53-specific.



To determine if treatment of cells with DEM also impaired the ability of wild-type p53 to activate transcription in vivo, we examined the effect of DEM treatment on the transcription of a reporter gene whose transcription was dependent on wild-type p53 function (Fig. 2). Saos-2 cells, a human cell line that does not express an endogenous p53, and COS-2 cells were co-transfected with two plasmids: pCMV-p53 to provide wild-type p53 and PG13-luciferase, a reporter plasmid in which luciferase expression is driven by 13 direct repeats of the p53-binding sequence 5`-CCTGCCTGGACTTGCCTGG-3` placed upstream of a basal SV40 early promoter (see ``Materials and Methods''). Transfection with both plasmids resulted in high levels of luciferase expression, whereas after transfection with the PG13-luciferase reporter alone, very little luciferase was produced in Saos-2 cells, and expression in COS-2 cells also was modest. In cells co-transfected with both plasmids, luciferase activity was significantly decreased by exposing cells for 6 h beginning 24 h after transfection to either 0.5 mM DEM or 1 mM DEM. Expression from two p53-independent promoters, pSV2-CAT and RSV-luciferase, was not affected by DEM treatment (Fig. 2); thus, DEM does not act as a general inhibitor of transcription, nor is it an inhibitor of luciferase activity. We conclude that oxidative stress impairs the ability of p53 to function as a transcriptional activator in vivo in a dose-dependent fashion. Together with studies showing that exposing p53 to oxidizing conditions in vitro impairs its sequence-specific DNA binding ability(13, 14) , this experiment and the gel shift experiments described above suggest oxidative stress may block the ability of p53 to activate transcription in vivo by inactivating its ability to bind specific DNA sequences.


Figure 2: Effects of DEM on p53-mediated transactivation. COS-2 and Saos-2 cells were co-transfected with the PG13-luciferase or pRSV-luciferase reporter plasmids with pCMV-p53 and 24 h later were treated with 0, 0.5, or 1 mM DEM for 6 h. Luciferase activity is reported as the percentage of activity in mock treated COS-2 or Saos-2 cells co-transfected with both plasmids (see ``Materials and Methods''). The results represent the mean of three independent experiments; the error bars show one standard deviation from the mean. Black bars, COS-2 cells; hatched bars, Saos-2 cells.



Effect of DEM on the Expression of p53-regulated Genes

p53 activates the expression of several endogenous genes including WAF1/CIP1, GADD45, and HMD2 (human mdm-2) in response to a variety of DNA damage-inducing agents(26, 27, 28) . Before asking if DEM treatment blocked activation of these endogenous genes by DNA damage-inducing agents, we first asked if exposing cells to DEM alone affected their expression in HeLa cells. HeLa cells that had been left alone or exposed for 3 h to 1 mM DEM were examined for WAF1/CIP1 and GADD45 expression by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 3A). DEM treatment produced a substantial increase in WAF1/CIP1 mRNA, but the amount of GADD45 mRNA was not appreciably affected by this treatment. Pretreating the cells with N-acetylcysteine, which increases the intracellular GSH concentration, largely prevented the DEM-induced increase in WAF1/CIP1 mRNA (Fig. 3B); this result supports the notion that DEM acts by decreasing the intracellular concentration of GSH. HeLa cells are impaired in their ability to express p53; thus, the finding that WAF1/CIP1 mRNA levels increased in HeLa cells exposed to DEM suggested that another mechanism was responsible for activating the expression of this gene. To show unambiguously that the DEM-mediated increase in WAF1/CIP1 mRNA was not dependent on p53, we prepared RNA from Saos-2 and T98G glioblastoma cells, both of which lack functional p53 genes. As was the case for HeLa cells, the levels of GADD45 mRNA were unchanged in response to DEM concentrations between 0.25 and 1 mM; however, the levels of WAF1/CIP1 mRNA increased in both p53 defective cell lines. Furthermore, the observed increases in WAF1/CIP1 mRNA were proportional to the DEM concentrations to which the cells were exposed (Fig. 4). Western blot analysis of the T98G cells also showed that DEM treatment produced a dose-dependent increase in the levels of Waf1 protein (Fig. 5). Thus, we conclude that cells have a p53-independent mechanism for activating WAF1/CIP1 expression in response to oxidative stress.


Figure 3: Effects of DEM on WAF1/CIP1 and GADD45 mRNA expression. Total RNA from HeLa cells left untreated (N) or treated (DEM) with 1 mM DEM for 3 h was analyzed by the Northern blot method. The hybridization probes were P-labeled human WAF1/CIP1 and GADD45 cDNAs. A, the right panel shows a photograph of an ethidium-stained gel to confirm equivalent RNA loading. B, effect of N-acetylcysteine on WAF1/C1P1 expression.




Figure 4: Effects of DEM on WAF1/CIP1 and GADD45 mRNA expression in cells lacking functional p53 activity. Total RNA from Saos-2 (lanes a-d) and T98G (lanes a`-d`) cells exposed to different concentrations of DEM for 3 h was analyzed by the Northern blot method. The hybridization probes were P-labeled WAF1/CIP1 and GADD45 cDNAs. a and a`, untreated cells; b and b`, 0.25 mM DEM; c and c`, 0.5 mM DEM; d and d`, 1 mM DEM. The lower panel shows a photograph of the ethidium-stained gel to confirm equivalent RNA loading.




Figure 5: Induction of WAF1/CIP1 protein expression by DEM. T98G cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of DEM for 6 h, and extracts were analyzed by the Western blot method for WAF1/CIP1 expression. a, 0 mM; b, 0.25 mM DEM; c, 0.5 mM DEM; d, 1 mM DEM.



DEM Treatment Activates the MAP kinase ERK2 but Not Protein Kinase C

Recently, several groups have shown that exposure of cells to TPA, a phorbol ester that activates protein kinase C, induces a significant increase in the concentration of WAF1/CIP1 mRNA through a p53-independent pathway(29, 30, 31) . We therefore asked if DEM treatment resulted in the activation of protein kinase C. As shown in Fig. 6, TPA induced a significant increase in the fraction of protein kinase C activity that was membrane-associated in both Saos-2 and Hela cells; a concomitant decrease was observed in cytosolic protein kinase C activity. In contrast, DEM treatment had no effect on the amount or distribution of protein kinase C activity, suggesting that DEM does not induce WAF1/CIP1 through a protein kinase C-mediated pathway.


Figure 6: Effect of DEM Treatment on protein kinase C activity. Saos-2 (A) and HeLa (B) cells were exposed to 20 ng/ml TPA or 1 mM DEM for 2 h, then harvested, and fractionated as described under ``Materials and Methods'' to provide a membrane preparation (white bars) and a cytosolic fraction (hatched bars). Protein kinase C activity was assayed with the Life Technologies, Inc. assay kit (61) .



Growth factors and DNA damage-inducing agents activate the MAP kinase cascade(32, 33, 34) , which, in turn, activates the transcription of specific genes through phosphorylation of immediate early transcription factors including c-Jun. Activation of the MAP kinase ERK2 is accomplished by its phosphorylation by a MAP kinase kinase, and this phosphorylation decreases the mobility of the ERK2 polypeptide during SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis(32) . Thus, ERK2 activation can be accessed by monitoring ERK2 mobility by Western blot analysis. Fig. 7shows that exposing HeLa cells to 1 mM DEM produced a significant increase in the phosphorylated (active) form of ERK2. The increase in mobility was similar to that induced by TPA; furthermore, the change was prevented by the pretreatment of cells with N-acetylcysteine. We conclude that the DEM-induced reduction in GSH concentration activates the MAP kinase cascade in a manner similar to the way it is activated after exposing cells to DNA damaging agents such as UV light.


Figure 7: Effect of DEM Treatment on ERK2 activity. HeLa cells were exposed to TPA, DEM, NAC, or NAC and DEM, and the cell extracts were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blotting for phosphorylated (upper band) and unphosphorylated ERK2 as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' N, untreated cells; TPA, cells treated with 20 ng TPA for 30 min; DEM, cells treated with 1 mM DEM for 30 min; NAC, cells treated with 30 mM NAC for 2 h; NAC + DEM, cells treated with 30 mM NAC for 2 h and then with 1 mM DEM for 30 min.



DEM Induces the Arrest of Cell Cycle Progression

The induction of p21 following DNA damage in cells with wild-type p53 is associated with the arrest of cell cycle progression in the G(1) phase(35, 36) . To determine whether the DEM-induced increase in p21 is also associated with cell cycle arrest, we treated T98G cells with increasing concentrations of DEM for 12 h and then assessed cell cycle progression by flow cytometry (Fig. 8). In the first series of experiments we included the microtubule inhibitor nocodazole in the culture medium to arrest cells in mitosis. With nocodazole alone, after 12 h approximately 70% of the cells progressed across the cell cycle and arrested in G(2)/M phase (Fig. 8A). Administration of DEM at the same time as nocodazole resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in the percentage of cells that reached G(2)/M phase (Fig. 8A). This reduction in G(2)/M cells was due to the delayed progression of cells through both the G(1) and the S phases. These results support our contention that the induction of p21 following DEM treatment ( Fig. 4and Fig. 5) induces cell cycle arrest. We also assessed the effects of DEM on G(2)/M progression by omitting nocodazole from the culture medium (Fig. 8B). Interestingly, low doses of DEM (0.25-0.5 mM) caused an arrest of cell cycle progression in G(2)/M phase. Furthermore, this effect diminished as the concentration of DEM increased, presumably because DEM at higher concentrations induced G(1)/S phase arrest and prevented cells from reaching G(2)/M (Fig. 8A).


Figure 8: Effects of DEM on cell cycle progression of T98G cells. T98G cells were exposed to DEM (0.25-1 mM) for 12 h in the presence (A) or the absence (B) of nocodazole (0.4 µg/ml). Cell cycle progression was assessed by flow cytometry as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Values shown are the percentage of cells in the G(1), S, or G(2)/M phases from a representative experiment in which at least 15,000 cells were analyzed for each point.




DISCUSSION

The p21 protein product of WAF1/CIP1 is a potent inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase activities that are required for progression from the G(1) phase of the cell cycle into S phase(11, 12) . Transcription of the p21 gene is induced following DNA damage as a consequence of the accumulation of wild-type p53, and the elevated concentration of p21 protein mediates, at least in part, p53-induced growth arrest in response to DNA damage(7, 12) . These recent findings have evoked considerable interest because the p53 gene is mutated in many human tumors, and alternate methods of inducing p21 expression could provide approaches for controlling tumor growth and influencing the survival of tumor cells that have lost functional p53.

In this paper we show that p21 is rapidly induced in response to DEM, an agent that increases intracellular oxidative damage by decreasing the intracellular pool of glutathione. p21 induction by DEM was prevented by pretreatment with N-acetylcysteine, a precursor of reduced glutathione, indicating that the DEM-mediated induction of p21 is a consequence of oxidative damage. Induction of p21 by DEM was independent of p53 because it occurs in cell lines that do not express p53 protein (e.g. Saos-2) and that express mutant p53 proteins (e.g. T98G) that cannot activate transcription in response to DNA damage or overexpression.

The induction of p21 following DEM exposure was associated with arrest of T98G cells in the G(1) and S phases of the cell cycle (Fig. 8). Arrest at these points in the cell cycle corresponds well with the proposed actions of p21 on components of the cell cycle machinery. Arrest in G(1) phase is probably related to inhibition of cyclin/Cdk kinase activity, which is required for progression of cells through the G(1) restriction point(35) . Arrest in the S phase following DEM treatment probably reflects the ability of p21 to inhibit DNA synthesis by binding to and blocking PCNA function(37) . Indeed, overexpression of the PCNA binding domain of p21 is sufficient to inhibit DNA synthesis when transfected into mammalian cells(38) .

Recently, p21 expression was shown to be induced in several cell lines by agents that cause terminal differentiation through a p53-independent mechanism. p21 mRNA expression was elevated after exposure to TPA, butyrate, trans-retinoic acid, and Me(2)SO in HL-60, K562, and U937 cells, human hematopoietic or hepatoma-derived lines that express no or mutant p53(29, 30, 31) . p21 expression also is induced by serum, PDGF, FGF, EGF, TPA, and okadaic acid in quiescent fibroblastic cell lines derived from transgenic mice lacking a functional p53 gene(26, 29) . The mechanism by which these agents induce p21 expression is unknown, but induction is insensitive to cyclohexamide, suggesting that it is a consequence of the activation of pre-existing transcription factors. The ability of mitogenic growth factors and TPA to induce p21 expression suggests the involvement of protein kinase C in modulating its expression. Consistent with this suggestion, TPA-resistant variants of HL-60 cells exhibit altered responses in immediate early gene expression including c-fos and c-jun (39) , and these cells display an altered protein kinase C isozyme profile, are incapable of translocating protein kinase C from the cytosol to the membrane fraction, and exhibit altered protein phosphorylation after TPA treatment(39, 40) . Further support for the involvement of protein kinase C comes from the observation that adriamycin, which activates protein kinase C(41) , is a potent inducer of p21 in cells containing wild-type p53(35) , and, at higher concentrations, induces WAF1/CIP1 transcription in p53 null cells(26) . In contrast to these results, exposing HeLa and Saos-2 cells to DEM had no effect on the amount or the distribution of protein kinase C activity (Fig. 6), indicating that the major forms of protein kinase C are not activated by DEM. Instead, DEM treatment produced an increase in the phosphorylated form of ERK2 (Fig. 7), a member of the mitogen-activated kinase family; furthermore, ERK2 phosphorylation, which is required for its activation, was prevented by pretreating cells with NAC.

Recently, it has become clear that DNA damage-inducing agents, including oxidizing agents, may activate immediate early gene expression through pathways that do not directly involve DNA damage (32, 33, 42, 43) . Treatment of cells with UV light, ionizing radiation, and H(2)O(2) all cause a rapid increase in membrane-bound tyrosine kinase activity, protein kinase C activity, and MAP kinase activity(32, 44, 45) . These kinases activate several transcription factors including c-jun, EGR1, and NF-[kappa]B, and transcription factor and MAP kinase activation were prevented by pretreating cells with NAC(46, 47, 48, 49) , suggesting that in each case activation is mediated through oxidative damage. Although other mechanisms could account for the accumulation of WAF1/CIP1 mRNA in DEM treated cells, our finding that DEM treatment activates ERK2 and that activation is prevented by pretreatment with NAC is consistent with the hypothesis that oxidative damage induces transcription of the WAF1/CIP1 gene through the activation of a transcription factor(s) other than p53. A serum response element that overlaps the proximal p53 recognition element in the murine WAF1/CIP1 promoter recently was identified(50) . However, serum-mediated activation of MAP kinase is not prevented by NAC(49) ; thus, the DEM-induced MAP kinase activation seems to take place downstream of the membrane receptor growth signal initiating machinery. A possibility to be explored is the DEM-induced inhibition of the MAP kinase phosphatase, which is inhibited by oxidants as are other tyrosine phosphatases(51) . This possibility is consistent with the observed induction of MAP kinase (52) and of WAF1 (26) as a consequence of okadaic acid treatment.

Other important findings of this study are that the DEM treatment was incapable of inducing transcription of the endogenous GADD45 gene and that the transcription of an exogenous p53-regulated reporter gene was impaired in cells treated with DEM. Furthermore, the p53 from DEM-treated cells exhibited a decreased ability to bind a consensus recognition sequence. Previous studies had shown that the specific DNA binding ability of p53 is sensitive to oxidation in vitro(13, 14) ; this effect can be traced to the oxidation of cysteines that are critical for DNA binding(55) . A similar sensitivity to oxidation is exhibited by transcription factor Sp1 (56) and by the glucocorticoid receptor(20) . Our study extends these observations and suggests that because of its sensitivity to oxidation, p53 may be incapable of activating a response to oxidative stress in vivo. Oxidants generated through normal aerobic metabolism and by inflammatory reactions appear to be a major cause of damage to DNA and other cellular components. Exposure to oxidative stress can cause neoplastic transformation as well as a loss of proliferative capacity that resembles cellular senescence, and it was suggested that the accumulation of oxidative damage with age might lead to senescence through a p53-mediated activation of p21(57) . Recent studies indicate, however, that p53 levels are elevated only modestly in senescent cells (58) . Our results with those of others suggest that p21 induction in response to oxidative stress is mediated through another mechanism, possibly involving activation of the MAP kinase cascade.

Interestingly, low concentrations of DEM also induced a G(2) arrest in T98G cells. Arrest at this junction in the cell cycle does not appear to require p21 (36, 59) and consistent with these earlier studies we found no appreciable induction of p21 with low doses of DEM (Fig. 5). G(2) arrest following DNA damage has been linked to a failure to remove inhibitory phosphorylations from the ATP-binding domain of the Cdc2 kinase(59, 60) , suggesting that DEM could block the G(2)/M transition by a mechanism independent of p21 induction. Elucidation of the G(2) arrest mechanism evoked by DEM could provide a useful insight into additional mechanisms governing cell cycle progression during periods of oxidative stress.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by grants from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (to T. R.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Supported by the Office of Health and Environment of the U. S. Department of Energy.

Supported by the AIDS Directed Anti-Viral Program of the Office of the Director of NIH. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of Cell Biology, NCI, NIH, Bldg. 37, Rm. 1B04, Bethesda, MD 20892. Tel.: 301-402-4177; Fax: 301-496-7220.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: DEM, diethylmaleate; GSH, glutathione; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; RGC, ribosomal gene cluster; NAC, N-acetylcysteine; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate; PCNA, proliferating cellular antigen.


REFERENCES

  1. Ames, B. N., Shigenaga, M. K., and Hagen, T. M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 7915-7922 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Simic, M. G., and Jovanovic, S. V. (1986) in Mechanisms of DNA Damage and Repair (Simic, M. G., Grossman, L., and Upton, A. C. eds) pp. 39-49, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York
  3. Demple, B., and Harrison, L. (1994) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 915-948 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Kuerbitz, S. J., Plunkett, B. S., Walsh, W. V., and Kastan, M. B. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 7491-7495 [Abstract]
  5. Nelson, W. G., and Kastan, M. B. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1815-1823 [Abstract]
  6. Kastan, M. B., Zhan, Q., El-Deiry, W. S., Carrier, F., Jacks, T., Walsh, W. V., Plunkett, B. S., Vogelstein, B., and Fornace, A. J. Jr. (1992) Cell 71, 587-597 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. El-Deiry, W. S., Tokino, T., Velculescu, V. E., Levy, D. B., Parsons, R., Trent, J. M., Lin, D., Mercer, W. E., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1993) Cell 75, 817-825 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Donehower, L. A., and Bradley, A. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1155, 181-205 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Subler, M. A., Martin, D. W., and Deb, S. (1992) J. Virol. 66, 4757-4762 [Abstract]
  10. Lin, D., Shields, M. T., Ullrich, S. J., Appella, E., and Mercer, W. E. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 9210-9214 [Abstract]
  11. Harper, J. W., Adami, G. R., Wei, N., Keyomarsi, K., and Elledge, S. J. (1993) Cell 75, 805-816 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Dulic, V., Kaufmann, W. K., Wilson, S. J., Tlsty, T. D., Lees, E., Harper, J. W., Elledge, S. J., and Reed, S. I. (1994) Cell 76, 1013-1023 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Hupp, T. R., Meek, D. W., Midgley, C. A., and Lane, D. P. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 3167-3174 [Abstract]
  14. Hainaut, P., and Milner, J. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 4469-4473 [Abstract]
  15. Graham, F. L., and van der Eb, A. (1973) J. Virology 52, 456-467 [CrossRef]
  16. Baker, S. J., Markowitz, S., Fearon, E. R., Willson, J. K. V., and Vogelstein, B. (1990) Science 249, 912-915 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Fiscella, M., Ullrich, S. J., Zambrano, N., Shields, M. T., Lin, D., Lees-Miller, S. P., Anderson, C. W., Mercer, W. E., and Appella, E. (1993) Oncogene 8, 1519-1528 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Kern, S. E., Pietenpol, J. A., Thiagalingam, S., Seymour, A., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1992) Science 256, 827-830 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Esposito, F., Agosti, V., Morrone, G., Morra, F., Cuomo, C., Russo, T., Venuta, S., and Cimino, F. (1994) Biochem. J. 301, 649-653 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Esposito, F., Cuccovillo, F., Morra, F., Russo, T., and Cimino, F. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1260, 308-314 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Lassar, A. B., Davis, R. L., Wright, W. E., Kadesch, T., Murre, C., Voronova, A., Baltimore, D., and Weintraub, H. (1991) Cell 66, 305-315 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Bargonetti, J., Reynisdóttir, I., Friedman, P. N., and Prives, C. (1992) Genes & Dev. 6, 1886-1898
  23. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed., pp. 7.19-7.22, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  24. O'Connor, P., Jackman, J., Jondle, D., Bhatia, K., Magrath, I., and Kohn, K. W. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 4776-4780 [Abstract]
  25. Boyland, E., and Chasseaud, L. F. (1970) Biochem. Pharmacol. 19, 1526-1528 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Michieli, P., Chedid, M., Lin, D., Pierce, J. H., Mercer, W. E., and Givol, D. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 3391-3395 [Abstract]
  27. Hollander, M. C., Alamo, I., Jackman, J., Wang, M. G., McBride, O. W., and Fornace, A. J., Jr. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 24385-24393 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Perry, M. E., Piette, J., Zawadzki, J. A., Harvey, D., and Levine, A. J. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 11623-11627 [Abstract]
  29. Jiang, H. P., Lin, J., Su, Z.-Z., Collart, F. R., Huberman, E., and Fisher, P. B. (1994) Oncogene 9, 3397-3406 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Steinman, R. A., Hoffman, B., Iro, A., Guillouf, C., Liebermann, D. A., and El-Houseini, M. E. (1994) Oncogene 9, 3389-3396 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Zhang, W., Grasso, L., McClain, C. D., Gambel, A. M., Cha, Y., Travali, S., Deisseroth, A. B., and Mercer, W. E. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 668-674 [Abstract]
  32. Leevers, S. J., and Marshall, C. J. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 569-574 [Abstract]
  33. Anderson, C. W. (1994) Semin. Cell Biol. 5, 427-436 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Sachsenmaier, C., Radler-Pohl, A., Muller, A., Herrlich, P., and Rahmsdorf, H. J. (1994) Biochem. Pharmacol. 47, 129-136 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. El-Deiry, W. S., Harper, J. W., O Connor, P. M., Velculescu, V. E., Canman, C. E., Jackman, J., Pietenpol, J. A., Burrell, M., Hill, D. E., Wang, Y., Wiman, K. G., Mercer, W. E., Kastan, M. B., Kohn, K. W., Elledge, S. J., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 1169-1174 [Abstract]
  36. Fan, S., El-Deiry, W. S., Bae, I., Freeman, J., Jondle, D., Bhatia, K., Fornace, A. J., Jr., Magrath, I., Kohn, K. W., and O'Connor, P. M. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 5824-5830 [Abstract]
  37. Waga, S., Hannon, G. J., Beach, D., and Stillman, B. (1994) Nature 369, 574-578 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Luo, Y., Hurwitz, J., and Massagué, J. (1995) Nature 375, 159-161 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Tonetti, D. A., Horio, M., Collart, F. R., and Huberman, E. (1992) Cell Growth & Diff. 3, 730-745
  40. Homma, Y., Gemmell, M. A., and Huberman, E. (1988) Cancer Res. 48, 2744-2748 [Abstract]
  41. McClean, S., and Hill, B. T. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1114, 107-127 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Schieven, G. L., and Ledbetter, J. A. (1994) Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 5, 383-388 [CrossRef]
  43. Carr, A. M., and Hoekstra, M. F. (1995) Trends Cell Biol. 5, 32-40 [CrossRef]
  44. Uckun, F. M., Tuel-Ahlgren, L., Song, C. W., Waddick, K., Myers, D. E., Kirihara, J., Ledbetter, J. A., and Schieven, G. L. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 9005-9009 [Abstract]
  45. Radler-Pohl, A., Sachsenmaier, C., Gebel, S., Auer, H. P., Bruder, J. T., Rapp, U., Angel, P. Rahmsdorf, H. J., and Herrlich, P. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 1005-1012 [Abstract]
  46. Schreck, R., Albermann, K., and Baeuerle, P. (1992) Free Rad. Res. Commun. 17, 221-237 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Datta, R., Hallahan, D. E., Kharbanda, S. M., Rubin, E., Sherman, M. L., Huberman, E., Weichselbaum, R. R., and Kufe, D. W. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 8300-8306 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Datta, R., Taneja, N., Sukhatme, V. P., Qureshi, S. A, Weichselbaum, R., and Kufe, D. W. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 2419-2422 [Abstract]
  49. Stevenson, M. A., Pollock, S. S., Coleman, C. N., and Calderwood, S. K. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 12-15 [Abstract]
  50. Macleod, K. F., Sherry, N., Hannon, G., Beach, D., Tokino, T., Kinzler, K., Vogelstein, B., and Jacks, T. (1995) Genes & Dev. 9, 935-944
  51. Fialkow, L., Chan, C. K., Rotin, D., Grinstein, S., and Downey, G. P. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 31234-31242 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Haystead, T. A. J., Weiel, J. E., Litchfield, D. W., Tsukitani, Y., Fisher, E. H., and Krebs, E. G. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 16571-16580 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Deleted in proof
  54. Deleted in proof
  55. Cho, Y., Gorina, S., Jeffrey, P. D., and Pavletich, N. P. (1994) Science 265, 346-355 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Ammendola, R., Mesuraca, M., Russo, T., and Cimino, F. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 225, 483-489 [Abstract]
  57. Chen, Q., and Ames, B. N. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 4130-4134 [Abstract]
  58. Kulju, K. S., and Lehman, J. M. (1995) Exp. Cell Res. 217, 336-345 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. O'Connor, P. M., Ferris, D. K., Pagano, M., Draetta, G., Pines, J., Hunter, T., Longo, D. L., and Kohn, K. W. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 8298-9308 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. O'Connor, P. M., Ferris, D. K., Hoffmann, I., Jackman, J., Draetta, G., and Kohn, K. W. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9480-9484 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Yasuda, I., Kishimoto, A., Tanaka, S., Tominaga, M., Sakurai, A., and Nishizuka, Y. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 166, 1220-1227 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.