©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Presence of the Opiate Receptor in Endothelial Cells
COUPLING TO NITRIC OXIDE PRODUCTION AND VASODILATION (*)

(Received for publication, October 12, 1995)

George B. Stefano (1) (2) Alan Hartman (1) Thomas V. Bilfinger (1) Harold I. Magazine (1) (3) Yu Liu (2) Federico Casares (2) Michael S. Goligorsky (1) (4)

From the  (1)Cardiac Research Program, University Medical Center at State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794, (2)Neuroscience Research Institute, State University of New York, Old Westbury, New York 11568, (3)Department of Biology, Queens College and Graduate School of the City University of New York, Flushing, New York 11367, and (4)Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Initial confinement of opiate receptors to the nervous system has recently been broadened to several other cell types. Based on the well established hypotensive effect of morphine, we hypothesized that endothelial cells may represent a target for this opiate substance. Endothelial cells (human arterial and rat microvascular) contain a high affinity, saturable opiate binding site presumed to mediate the morphine effects that is stereoselectively and characteristically antagonized by naloxone. This opiate alkaloid-specific binding site is insensitive to opioid peptides. It is, therefore, considered to be the same subtype of opiate receptor (designated µ(3)) used in the mediation of morphine in other cell types exhibiting the same binding profile. Experiments with endothelial cultures and the aortic ring of rats cultured in vitro demonstrate that morphine exerts direct modulatory control over the activities of endothelial cells, which leads to vasodilation. It induces the production of nitric oxide, a process that is sensitive to naloxone antagonism and nitric oxide synthase inhibition. In contrast with that of opiates, the administration of opioid peptides does not induce nitric oxide production by endothelial cells. In conclusion, the data presented above reveal a novel site of morphine action, endothelial cells, where a µ(3) receptor is coupled to nitric oxide release and vasodilation.


INTRODUCTION

The vast majority of pharmacological studies of the properties of opiate substances have long been almost exclusively concerned with their effects on analgesic and antinociceptive phenomena. More recently, a number of experiments have demonstrated that morphine modulates the activity of varieties of cell types, among them the immunocytes of several mammalian and invertebrate species(1, 2) . In addition, this largely down-regulating effect was found to be mediated by a highly specific, opiate alkaloid-sensitive receptor used selectively by opiates(1, 2) . In the present case, the receptor (µ(3)) accomplishes this by counteracting the cellular responsiveness to a number of immunoexcitatory molecules, e.g. lipopolysaccharides and some cytokines (see (3) ).

In this context, morphine was found to be quite potent in lowering or terminating the activation of human granulocytes and monocytes exposed to the stimulatory activity of plasma obtained from cardiopulmonary bypass patients(4, 5, 6, 7) . From these observations, we surmised that a proportion of these cells may have been derived from intravascular immune cells whose adhesiveness to the vascular lining may have been altered by the presence of morphine in this tissue.

The present study was aimed at the exploration of the possibility that endothelial cells may be under the direct control of the opiates. It provided evidence for the specific binding of morphine to endothelial cells, resulting in stimulation of nitric oxide (NO) (^1)production in a naloxone-reversible manner and relaxation of blood vessels. It also demonstrated that these activities are mediated by the special opiate receptor µ(3) present in the endothelial cells.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Cultures

Human arterial endothelial cells were obtained from a commercial laboratory (Cell Systems, Kirkland, WA) for binding analysis as a prefrozen pellet (10^7 cells). In addition, microvascular endothelial cells (MVE) were established in our laboratory (8, 9) by SV40 transfection of endothelial cells from microdissected rat renal resistance arteries and cloned by limiting dilution. The cells were characterized as endothelial in origin based on the following criteria: distinct cobblestone-like morphology, tendency for capillary tube formation, positive identification of the factor VIII immunoreactivity, uptake of acetylated low density lipoprotein, and absent immunoreactivity of smooth muscle-specific actin. MVEs were grown in M199 medium (Mediatech, Washington, D.C.) supplemented by 5% fetal bovine serum (HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT).

Opiate Binding Analysis

The endothelial cells (human arterial and rat microvascular were processed separately) were homogenized in 50 volumes of 0.32 M sucrose, pH 7.4, at 4 °C by the use of a Brinkmann Instruments Polytron (30 s, setting no. 5). The crude homogenate was centrifuged at 900 times g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was preserved on ice. The whitish crude pellet was resuspended by homogenization (15 s, setting no. 5) in 30 volumes of 0.32 M sucrose/Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, and centrifuged at 900 times g for 10 min. The extraction procedure was repeated one more time, and the combined supernatants were centrifuged at 900 times g for 10 min. The resulting supernatants (S1`) were used immediately.

Immediately prior to the binding experiment, the S1` supernatant was centrifuged at 30,000 times g for 15 min, and the resulting pellet (P2) was washed once by centrifugation in 50 volumes of the sucrose/Tris-HCl. The P2 pellet was then resuspended with a Dounce hand-held homogenizer (10 strokes) in 100 volumes of buffer. Binding analysis was then performed on the cell membrane suspensions.

Aliquots of membrane suspensions from these cells were incubated with nonradioactive compounds at six concentrations for 10 min at 22 °C and then with [^3H]dihydromorphine (3DHM) for 60 min at 4 °C. One hundred percent binding is defined as bound 3DHM in the presence of 10 µM dextrorphan minus bound 3DHM in the presence of 10 µM levorphanol. K(i) is defined as the concentration of drug that elicits half-maximal inhibition of specific binding. The mean ± S.E. for three experiments is given. The displacement analysis data indicate the potency of various opioid (Met-enkephalin and D-Ala(2)-Met(5)-enkephalin, Sigma) and opiate substances in displacing 3DHM (58 Ci/mM, DuPont NEN) and may give specific information on different receptor populations. The incubation medium for Met-enkephalin contained phosphoramidon (100 µM) and bestatin (100 µM) to inhibit enzyme degradation.

Monitoring of NO Release

The cells were incubated in 2 ml of Krebs-Henseleit buffer containing (in mM) 120 NaCl, 4.6 KCl, 1.5 CaCl(2), 0.5 MgCl(2), 1.5 NaH(2)PO(4), 0.7 Na(2)HPO(4), 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose, pH 7.4.

NO release was monitored with an NO-selective microprobe manufactured by Inter Medical Co. (Nagoya, Japan). The working electrode made of platinum/iridium alloy was coated with a film containing KCl, NO-selective nitrocellulose resin (pyroxyline lacquer), and a gas-permeable silicon membrane(10) . A counter electrode was made of carbon fiber. The redox current was detected by a current-voltage converter circuit and continuously recorded. Tip diameter of the probe (25 µm) permitted the use of a micromanipulator (Zeiss-Eppendorff) attached to the stage of an inverted microscope (Nikon Diaphot) to position the sensor, which was enclosed in a Faraday's chamber, 3-5 µm above the cell surface. Calibration of the electrochemical sensor was performed by use of different concentrations of a nitrosothiol donor S-nitroso-N-acetyl-DL-penicillamine, as previously detailed(10) .

Vascular Relaxation Experiments

Male Sprague-Dawley rats, 6-8 weeks of age, were anesthetized with 1 cc of sodium pentobarbital, followed by removal of the thoracic aorta for evaluation of developed isometric tension. The procedure was performed as described elsewhere in detail(11) . The vessel was placed in physiological salt solution (PSS), and excess connective tissue was removed. The preparation was cut into 3-mm rings, mounted on metal tissue holders, and placed in a 5-ml tissue bath (Kent Scientific Corp.) containing aerated (95% O(2), 5% CO(2)) PSS buffer maintained at 37 °C. Relaxation of rings precontracted with 1 nM phenylephrine was detected by computer-interfaced force transducers (Kent Scientific Corp.) set at a sampling rate of 6/min. Data are expressed as percent maximal relaxation in response to 1 µM morphine. Opiate receptor specificity was evaluated by measurement of vascular relaxation in response to treatment with 1 µM morphine rings pretreated for 10 min with 5 µM naloxone or, for µ(3) identity, with 10 µM [D-Ala^2,MePhe^4,Gly(ol)^5]enkephalin (DAGO).

Rings of thoracic aorta (3 mm) were placed in PSS, and NO release in response to 1 µM morphine was evaluated by use of a computer-interfaced NO-specific amperometric probe as described above.


RESULTS

Membrane homogenates of human arterial and rat microvascular endothelial cells revealed opiate binding sites and their ligand specification ( Fig. 1and Table 1). Saturation and Scatchard analysis showed a single, relatively high affinity binding site with K(d) values of 38 and 19 nM, with B(max) values of 1,167 and 1,098 fmol/mg membrane protein for human and rat-derived endothelial cells, respectively ( Fig. 1and Table 1). Nonspecific binding increased linearly with respect to the concentration of the binding ligand (Fig. 1, inset). Furthermore, a variety of opioid peptides was found to be ineffective in displacing specifically bound 3DHM (Table 1). By contrast, the opiate alkaloid ligands were the most potent, and kappa ligands dynorphin 1-17 and ethylketocyclazocine were weak. Interestingly, fentanyl was quite poor in this regard. Naloxone was found to be less potent than naltrexone in counteracting 3DHM binding. Of interest was the finding that the µ opioid peptide DAGO was ineffective in displacing 3DHM (Table 1). Of equal interest was that the displacement profile for all ligands in both types of endothelial cells was identical. This profile demonstrating opiate alkaloid sensitivity and opioid peptide insensitivity is characteristic of the presence of the µ(3) opiate receptor (1) .


Figure 1: Scatchard analysis of 3DHM binding to human arterial endothelial cells. Inset, circle represents saturation of specific sites and box represents nonspecific binding, which continues in a linear fashion.





Experiments with endothelial cells and aortic rings examined in vitro have revealed a direct modulating influence of morphine on the activities of these cells. Morphine resulted in a dose-dependent release of NO from endothelial cells ( Fig. 2and Fig. 3). The effect was blocked by naloxone. By contrast, opioid peptides or the µ opioid receptive DAGO (10 µM) did not effect any changes in NO release (data not shown). For comparison, the effect of a well established stimulator of NO release, bradykinin, is presented. The effect of morphine is qualitatively and quantitatively similar to that of bradykinin, with no delay in NO release (Fig. 2). Furthermore, pretreatment of the human endothelial cells with L-nitroarginine methyl ester (10M for 5 min before morphine exposure), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, also abolished morphine-induced (10M) NO release (data not shown).


Figure 2: In vitro stimulation of NO production by morphine. Representative recordings of NO in the incubation medium prior to and following opiate and opioid exposure are shown (arrow, M, morphine). a, 50 nM morphine; b, 100 nM morphine; c, 200 nM morphine; d, 200 nM naloxone + 200 nM morphine. ME, 100 nM Met-enkephalin; DAME, 100 nM [D-Ala^2,Met^5]enkephalin. Bradykinin (BK, 10M) was added for comparison.




Figure 3: Morphine-induced relaxation of rat aorta. Morphine (1 µM) was added to aortic rings in the absence (boldface line) or presence (narrow line) of naloxone (5 µM). The data shown are representative of n = 4 experiments, which did not vary. Inset, stimulation of aortic rings with morphine (1 µM) resulted in a marked increase in NO release (boldface line) that was abrogated by pretreatment with naloxone (5 µM, narrow line). The data shown are representative of n = 4 experiments, which did not vary.



In intact aortic rings, morphine (1 µM) induced relaxation, a phenomenon that was attributable to NO and that was naloxone-reversible (Fig. 3). DAGO (10 µM) did not cause relaxation of the vascular rings (data not shown). In aortic rings denuded of the endothelial layer all opiate actions were lost.

In view of the distinct vasorelaxing action of morphine (12) and the presence of the µ(3) opiate receptors on endothelial cells expressed with comparative density at the level of conduit and resistance arteries, the effects of morphine on vascular endothelium can be considered to be direct and not via interaction with the neural or neuroendocrine systems.


DISCUSSION

The present report demonstrates the following. 1) Endothelial cells (human arterial and rat microvascular) contain a high affinity saturable opiate binding site that is stereoselectively and characteristically antagonized by naloxone. 2) This binding site is opiate alkaloid-specific and opioid peptide-insensitive. 3) The binding to this site as well as to other cell types exhibiting this novel binding profile (Table 1) is designated to be of the µ(3) opiate receptor subtype. 4) Morphine can induce the production of NO from MVE cells and rat aortic ring endothelial cells in vitro, a phenomenon that is sensitive to naloxone antagonism. 5) Aortic rings respond to morphine by relaxation which was endothelial dependent. 6) Opioid peptides do not induce in vitro NO production or relaxation of the aortic ring. 6) Endothelial NO production, therefore, appears to be mediated by the µ(3) opiate alkaloid-specific receptor.

With regard to the interaction of NO and opiate substances mentioned earlier, recent studies suggest a definite link. Nitric oxide has been associated with antinociception (13, 14, 15) as well as the states of tolerance and dependence(16) . Peripheral morphine analgesia involves NO-stimulating cGMP(17) . Morphine-depressed concanavalin A stimulated macrophage NO production(18) . Morphine and NO have been linked in gastrointestinal regulation (19) and in food intake(20, 21) . Thus, the present report further documents this interaction, for the first time, in endothelial cells mediated by way of the µ(3) receptor.

The specificity of the opiate receptor subtype (µ(3)) in mediating endothelial NO production substantiates the strict involvement of opiate alkaloids or similar substances in this process and simultaneously excludes the involvement of opioid peptides. The µ(3) opiate-selective receptor has now been found on human monocytes and granulocytes(1, 2) , invertebrate and vertebrate microglia(22, 23) , neuronal cell lines (24) , and, in a preliminary study, on specific invertebrate neurons (25) (see Table 1). Clearly, the presence of such a highly selective opiate receptor strongly suggests that endogenous substances exist that make use of this receptor. In this regard, naturally occurring morphine appears to be a strong candidate(3) .

The present study demonstrates that opiate alkaloids have the potential to mediate vasodilation by way of regulation of NO production. Many reports suggest that opiates, in this regard, mediate their effects by way of the central nervous system. Effects of intravenously injected morphine in the rat include depressor response and bradycardia(12) . These investigators have demonstrated that the specific µ opioid receptor agonist, DAGO, reproduced hemodynamic effects of morphine. Effects of either agonist were attenuated by the µ(2)-specific antagonist beta-funalfrexamine, whereas naloxonazine, the µ(1)-specific antagonist, inhibited the effects of DAGO but not those induced by morphine(12) . In conscious chronically instrumented pigs, morphine at a high dose (1 mg/kg bolus intravenously) induced tachycardia, elevation in mean systemic and pulmonary arterial pressure, but did not change stroke volume or peripheral vascular resistance(26) . These data indicate that in pigs, the species that shows an excitatory response to morphine, hemodynamic changes were largely induced by tachycardia. Apart from its well established hemodynamic effects, morphine has been shown to attenuate vasopressor responses to angiotensin II or substance P(27) . Furthermore, the pressor effect of social deprivation during 1-15 days of isolation in rats was inhibited by administration of morphine; however, 7 days after morphine withdrawal elevation of blood pressure occurred in these rats(28) . In a study on morphine-induced hypotension, Calignano et al.(29) suggested that it was mediated by adenosine. Based on the results of the present study, endothelial cells are capable of mediating a direct action of morphine or morphine-like molecules. Thus, future studies must be concerned with this phenomenon and its involvement in the regulation of vasomotor responsiveness.


FOOTNOTES

*
These studies were supported in part by the National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant 17138, and National Institute on Drug Abuse Grants 09010 (to G. B. S.) and DK 41573 and 45695 (to M. S. G.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: NO, nitric oxide; 3DHM, [^3H]dihydromorphine; DAGO, [D-Ala^2,MePhe^4,Gly(ol)^5]enkephalin; MVE, microvascular endothelial cells; PSS, physiological salt solution.


REFERENCES

  1. Stefano, G. B., Digenis, A., Spector, S., Leung, M. K., Bilfinger, T. V., Makman, M. H., Scharrer, B. & Abumrad, N. N. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 11099-11103 [Medline]
  2. Makman, M. H., Bilfinger, T. V. & Stefano, G. B. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 1323-1330 [Medline]
  3. Stefano, G. B. & Scharrer, B. (1994) Adv. Neuroimmunol. 4, 57-68
  4. Bilfinger, T. V. & Stefano, G. B. (1993) J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 34, 129-133
  5. Stefano, G. B., Kushnerik, V., Rodriquez, M. & Bilfinger, T. V. (1994) Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 16, 329-334 [Medline]
  6. Stefano, G. B., Rodriquez, M., Glass, R., Casares, F., Hughes, T. K. & Bilfinger, T. V. (1995) J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 36, 25-30
  7. Stefano, G. B. & Bilfinger, T. V. (1993) J. Neuroimmunol. 47, 189-198
  8. Tsukahara, H., Gordienko, D. V., Tonshoff, B., Gelato, M. C. & Goligorsky, M. S. (1994) Kidney Int. 45, 598-604
  9. Tsukahara, H., Ende, H., Magazine, H. I., Bahou, W. F. & Goligorsky, M. S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21778-21785 [Medline]
  10. Ichimori, K., Ishida, H., Fukabori, M., Nakazawa, H. & Murakami, E. (1994) Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65, 1-5
  11. Magazine, H. I., Bruner, C. A., Anderson, T. T. & Malik, A. B. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 226, H1620-H1625
  12. Randich, A., Robertson, J. D. & Willingham, T. (1993) Brain Res. 603, 186-200
  13. Duarte, I. D. & Ferreira, S. H. (1992) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 221, 171-174
  14. Przewlocki, R., Machelska, H. & Przewlocka, B. (1993) Life Sci. 53, PL1-5
  15. McDonald, C. E., Gagnon, M. J., Ellenberger, E. A., Hodges, B. L., Ream, J. K., Tousman, S. A. & Quock, R. M. (1994) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 269, 601-608
  16. Majeed, N. H., Przewlocka, B., Machelska, H. & Przewlocki, R. (1994) Neuropharmacology 33, 189-192
  17. Ferreira, S. H., Duarte, I. D. & Lorenzetti, B. B. (1991) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 201, 121-122
  18. Fecho, K., Maslonek, K. A., Coussons-Read, M. E., Dykstra, L. A. & Lysle, D. T. (1994) J. Immunol. 152, 5845-5852 [Medline]
  19. Gyires, K. (1994) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 255, 33-37
  20. Calignano, A., Moncada, S. & DiRosa, M. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 181, 889-893 [Medline]
  21. Calignano, A., Persico, P., Mancuso, F. & Sorrentino, L. (1993) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 231, 415-419
  22. Sonetti, D., Ottaviani, E., Bianchi, F., Rodriguez, M., Stefano, M. L., Scharrer, B. & Stefano, G. B. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9180-9184 [Medline]
  23. Dubrenis, K., Makman, M. H. & Stefano, G. B. (1995) Brain Res. 686, 239-248
  24. Makman, M. H. (1994) Adv. Neuroimmunol. 4, 79-86
  25. Stefano, G. B. & Scharrer, B. (1995) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. , in press
  26. Hannon, J. P. & Bossone, C. A. (1991) Am. J. Physiol. 261, R1286-R1293
  27. Itoi, K., Jost, N., Tschope, C., Culman, J., Badoer, E. & Unger, T. (1994) Neuropharmacology 33, 181-187
  28. Jimenez, I. & Fuentes, J. A. (1993) Neuropharmacology 32, 223-227
  29. Calignano, A., Persico, P., Mancuso, F. & Sorrentino, L. (1992) Gen. Pharmacol. 23, 7-10

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.