©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Streptolydigin Resistance Can Be Conferred by Alterations to Either the or ` Subunits of Bacillus subtilis RNA Polymerase (*)

(Received for publication, July 26, 1995; and in revised form, August 23, 1995)

Xiaofeng Yang Chester W. Price (§)

From the Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, California 95616

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Rifampicin and streptolydigin are antibiotics which inhibit prokaryotic RNA polymerase at the initiation and elongation steps, respectively. In Escherichia coli, resistance to each antibiotic results from alterations in the beta subunit of the core enzyme. However, in Bacillus subtilis, reconstitution studies found rifampicin resistance (Rif^R) associated with the beta subunit and streptolydigin resistance (Stl^R) with beta`. To understand the basis of bacterial Stl^R, we isolated the B. subtilis rpoC gene, which encodes a 1,199-residue product that is 53% identical to E. coli beta`. Two spontaneous Stl^R mutants carried the same D796G substitution in rpoC, and this substitution alone was sufficient to confer Stl^Rin vivo. D796 falls within Region F, which is conserved among the largest subunits of prokaryotic and eukaryotic RNA polymerases. Among eukaryotes, alterations in Region F promote resistance to alpha-amanitin, a toxin which inhibits transcription elongation; among prokaryotes, alterations in Region F cause aberrant termination. To determine whether alterations in the beta subunit of B. subtilis could also confer Stl^R, we made three Stl^R substitutions (A499V, G500R, and E502V) in the rif region of rpoB. Together these results suggest that beta and beta` interact to form an Stl binding site, and that this site is important for transcription elongation.


INTRODUCTION

The RNA polymerase core enzyme of eubacteria has a multisubunit structure containing one beta, one beta`, and two alpha subunits (see (1) for a review). Most of the catalytic functions of the enzyme are thought to reside in the two largest subunits, beta and beta`. Because the beta and beta` subunits share colinear blocks of conserved sequence with the two largest subunits of eukaryotic RNA polymerases, genetic and biochemical analysis of the eubacterial enzyme can contribute to an understanding of the structure-function relationships among RNA polymerases of all organisms(1) .

One way to explore these structure-function relationships in eubacteria is to study the action of two antibiotics that specifically target RNA polymerase, rifampicin (Rif)^1 and streptolydigin (Stl), each of which has a different mechanism of inhibition. Rif arrests transcriptional initiation at the promoter by locking RNA polymerase in an abortive initiation complex capable of synthesizing only short oligonucleotides, but this antibiotic has no effect once the transcription complex has elongated past the promoter (2) . In contrast, Stl blocks both transcriptional initiation and elongation by inhibiting the translocation step, thereby reducing the rate of chain formation. This translocation inhibition has been suggested to result from interference with either the nucleotide triphosphate binding site or the ability to form the phosphodiester bond between the incoming triphosphate and the nascent RNA chain (3, 4, 5) .

In the Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli, mutations that confer either Rif resistance (Rif^R) or Stl resistance (Stl^R) have been mapped to rpoB, the gene encoding the beta subunit(6, 7, 8, 9, 10) . Likewise, reconstitution studies in the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis found that Rif^R is also associated with the beta subunit, but that Stl^R is associated with beta`(11, 12) . Because the primary sequences of beta and beta` are highly conserved between E. coli and B. subtilis(13) , it was reasonable to presume that additional sites for Stl^R might lay within the beta` subunit of E. coli and within the beta subunit of B. subtilis.

Here we use in vitro mutagenesis to establish that additional sites for Stl^R in B. subtilis do map within rpoB, the gene encoding the beta subunit of RNA polymerase. We also use molecular techniques to precisely map two previously isolated Stl^R mutations within rpoC, the gene encoding the beta` subunit. Both Stl^R mutations in rpoC alter the same residue in a region highly conserved among the largest subunits of prokaryotic and eukaryotic RNA polymerases. In the accompanying paper, Severinov et al.(14) show that newly isolated alterations to Stl^R also affect the same conserved region in E. coli rpoC. Together with previous results, these data suggest that the beta and beta` subunits of eubacterial RNA polymerase interact to form an Stl binding site.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Strains, Phage, and Genetic Methods

E. coli DH5alpha was host for plasmid constructions, and E. coli Y1090 was host for gt11 phage, grown as described previously(15) . Streptolydigin, a gift of Laura Heisler and Carol Gross, was incorporated into tryptose blood agar base plates (Difco) at 3-50 µg/ml. Standard genetic and recombinant DNA methods were performed as described previously(13) . Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were done using Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI) according to published protocols(16) , and the resulting products were cloned into the pCR(TM) II vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). DNA sequencing was done on subcloned fragments by one of two methods: (i) automated DNA sequencing using the Applied Biosystems 373A with analysis software version 1.2, or (ii) dideoxynucleotide chain termination with reactions primed on double-stranded DNA templates, using the Sequenase enzyme and protocols from U. S. Biochemical Corp. For direct genomic sequencing the fmol(TM) DNA Sequencing System (Promega) was used as specified by the manufacturer.

Isolation of the B. subtilis rpoC Gene

We previously isolated a gt11 phage that carried the 5` third of rpoC(13) . To obtain the remaining portion of rpoC, we first amplified a 2.2-kb PCR product from the B. subtilis genome using Primer A (5`-GAAGTTTGGGATGTACTAG) from the available rpoC sequence together with degenerate Primer B (5`-AGCAAGAGAAGCTTTNGTRATNCC), designed by comparing the conserved 3` ends of the rpoC genes from E. coli(17) and Staphylococcus aureus(18) . This PCR probe was used to screen a random library of B. subtilis chromosomal DNA carried in gt11(15) . One positive phage designated gt11-21 was obtained; this phage carried a 2.8-kb insert from the B. subtilis genome.

Inspection of the DNA sequence revealed that the gt11-21 insert significantly extended the available rpoC sequence and lacked only the extreme 3` end of the gene. When additional screening of the libraries failed to identify an overlapping clone bearing the missing region, we used PCR to directly isolate and sequence the 3` end of rpoC and the 5` end of rpsL, which encodes ribosomal protein S12(19) . To this end, degenerate Primer C (5`-GCAGACGCCACGWTTYTGNGG) was designed by comparing the conserved portions of the S12 sequences from E. coli(20) and Bacillus stearothermophilus(21) . A 3.1-kb fragment was then amplified from the B. subtilis chromosome using Primers A and C. This fragment allowed extension of the rpoC sequence beyond clone gt11-21 by directly sequencing both strands from the chromosome using the fmol(TM) DNA sequencing system.

Location of the Stl445 Allele within rpoC

B. subtilis strain MO34 (stl445) and MO38 (stl6) were provided by A. L. Sonenshein(22, 23) . Three overlapping fragments covering the entire rpoC region were amplified from the chromosome of MO34 by PCR. As shown in Fig. 1, these three fragments were subcloned into pCR(TM) II to yield pXY11 (carrying the rpoC fragment extending from nt 4413 to 6216), pXY12 (nt 5924-8119), and PXY13 (nt 7347-8672). The resulting plasmids were linearized by digestion with NcoI and transformed into the wild-type strain PB2 with selection for Stl^R at 10 µg/ml. Only the fragment carried by pXY12 conferred Stl^R at a significant frequency. To locate the stl445 alteration within the pXY12 insert, the BamHI and HindIII sites (Fig. 1) were used to construct pXY16 (from nt 5924 to the HindIII site at nt 6422), pXY19 (from the HindIII site at nt 6422 to the BamHI site at nt 7386), and pXY21 (from nt 6811 to the BamHI site at nt 7386).


Figure 1: Genetic organization of the B. subtilis rpoB-rpoC region. The chromosome in the rpoB-rpoC region is represented by the heavy line and kilobase scale. The rectangles above the physical map indicate the open reading frames encoding ribosomal protein L7/12 (rplL), the 23,000-dalton protein P23 (orf23), the beta (rpoB) and beta` (rpoC) subunits of RNA polymerase, the 9,180-dalton protein P9 (orf82), and ribosomal protein S12 (rpsL), all of which are transcribed from left to right. The arrows adjacent to the L7/12 and S12 reading frames indicate that they extend beyond the cloned region. The positions of the Rif-Stl region of beta and conserved Region F of beta` are denoted by the cross-hatched and shaded rectangles, respectively. The triangle following Region F indicates the location of the 189-residue deletion of B. subtilis beta` compared to the sequence of the E. coli subunit. The horizontal lines beneath the restriction map show the regions of the chromosome of strain MO34 (stl445) used in the plasmid constructions described under ``Experimental Procedures''; the three plasmids conferring Stl^R are labeled (+). The physical map of the rpoB-rpoC region between 0 and 6.1 kb is from Boor et al.(13) , whereas the map from 6.1 to 9.0 kb was derived from the DNA sequence of the chromosomal insert of the gt11-21 phage and the PCR product shown by the light horizontal lines at the bottom of the figure.



Construction of Stl^RMutations in rpoB

We used a four-primer system of site-directed mutagenesis (24) to construct alterations in B. subtilis beta residues 499-502(13) . For the A499V alteration, we used pairs of primers to amplify two overlapping fragments from the chromosome. Primer 1 (5`-TCGGCAATGCTTACATCGAAG, corresponding to the beta coding region for residues 364-370) was first used with Primer 2A (5`-GTAGTGAACGTCACGCACTTCCATTCCGACACG, complementary to the coding region for residues 498-508). Primer 2A bears a transition from G to A (underlined) that leads to substitution of valine for alanine at residue 499. Then Primer 3 (5`-GTGCGTGACGTTCAC, corresponding to residues 503-508) was used with Primer 4 (5`-TTTGGCTTCTACGCGTTC, complementary to residues 683-688). The resulting two fragments were mixed and further amplified using Primer 1 and Primer 4, yielding the A499V alteration on a 957-base pair fragment.

To construct additional alterations, we replaced Primer 2A with Primer 2G (5`-GTAGTGAACGTCACGCACTTCCATTCGGGCACG), Primer 2M (5`-GTAGTGAACGTCACGCACTTCCCTTCCGGCACG), Primer 2E (5`-GTAGTGAACGTCACGCACTACCATTCCGGCACG), or Primer 2Delta (5`-GTAGTGAACGTCACGCAC[Delta]ACGCTCACGTGTCAATCC), each containing either a single mutation (underlined) or a deletion of the 12 base pairs coding for residues 499-502 (Delta). Each of these PCR-mutagenized products was cloned into the pCR(TM) II vector, resulting in plasmids pXY31 (containing the A499V alteration), pXY32 (G500R), pXY33 (M501S), pXY34 (E502V), and pXY35 (Delta499-502). These plasmids were linearized with NcoI and transformed into the B. subtilis wild type strain PB2 with selection for Stl^R (5 µg/ml).


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A Different Organization of the B. subtilis rpoC Region

We previously described the isolation of the B. subtilis rpoB gene and the 5` third of rpoC(13) . To address the question of whether Stl^R could be conferred by alterations in either the beta or beta` subunits of RNA polymerase, we first used chromosomal walking methods to isolate the remainder of rpoC and the downstream rpsL gene. As shown in Fig. 1, the resulting fragments carried overlapping regions of the B. subtilis chromosome, which bore the 3` two-thirds of the beta` coding region.

Coding regions were identified by aligning the predicted B. subtilis products with their E. coli counterparts(25) . As shown in Fig. 1, B. subtilis had a gene order similar but not identical to E. coli, with the rpoC homologue (encoding beta`) followed by an open reading frame (orf82) that could encode a protein of 82 residues (P9). This P9 reading frame was in turn closely followed by the rpsL homologue (encoding ribosomal protein S12). The predicted sequence of P9 was significantly similar (28% identity in a 71-residue overlap; z value of 10.6 standard deviations above the mean of a shuffled sequence) to a hypothetical ribosomal protein encoded by orf104, which occupies a similar position downstream of the rpoC homologue in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius(26) . However, the P9 reading frame is entirely absent from the equivalent E. coli region, where rpoC is directly followed by rpsL.

The proposed rpoC reading frame encodes a predicted 1,199-residue product that is 53% identical to E. coli beta` (17) and 55% identical to Mycobacterium leprae beta`(27) . Moreover, all three beta` sequences share the eight regions (A through H) that are highly conserved among the largest subunits of eubacterial and eukaryotic RNA polymerases (nomenclature according to (28) ). Notably, as shown in Fig. 1, the beta` subunit from the Gram-positive B. subtilis lacks a 189-residue segment found between conserved regions G and H in the equivalent subunit of the Gram-negative E. coli. The beta` subunit from the Gram-positive M. leprae also lacks this segment(27) . The complete absence of this segment from the Gram-positive lineage suggests that it is not essential for minimal beta` function.

Stl^RMutations Map within a Highly Conserved Region of rpoC That Is Important for Transcriptional Elongation

Two spontaneous Stl^R mutations, stl445 and stl6, were previously isolated by A. L. Sonenshein and colleagues(22, 23) , and they kindly supplied strains bearing these alleles. To first establish whether alterations in the beta` subunit could indeed confer Stl^R on B. subtilis RNA polymerase in vivo as suggested by subunit reconstitution experiments (12) , we made three overlapping PCR fragments that carried the entire rpoC coding sequence. For these experiments, chromosomal DNA from the Stl^R strain MO34 (stl445) was used as a template. As shown in Fig. 1, these overlapping fragments were carried by plasmids pXY11, pXY12, and pXY13. To identify the fragment containing the stl445 alteration, these plasmids were linearized so that they could replace the homologous rpoC region on the B. subtilis chromosome via a double crossover event. Upon transformation into the wild-type strain PB2, only plasmid pXY12 conferred Stl^R at a frequency significantly higher (50-fold) than the control plasmids, which bore the same three fragments isolated from the wild-type, Stl^S strain (not shown). We inferred from these results that the stl445 alteration lay within the 1-kb rpoC fragment that was unique to pXY12 and was not present on the other two plasmids (see Fig. 1).

To locate the stl445 alteration more precisely, we made three additional plasmids carrying portions of this 1-kb region. As shown in Fig. 1, these fragments were carried by plasmids pXY16, pXY19, and pXY21. After transformation into wild-type strain PB2, linearized plasmids pXY19 and pXY21 both yielded Stl^R transformants at a frequency significantly higher than the control plasmids. We concluded that the stl445 alteration lay within the 565-nt rpoC fragment common to both pXY19 and pXY21. Analysis of this fragment revealed only a single transition from the wild-type sequence, an A to a G at nt 7118. This transition would lead to substitution of a glycine for an aspartate at residue 796 of B. subtilis beta` (D796G). We directly sequenced the corresponding region of the MO34 (stl445) parent chromosome and confirmed that it was identical to wild type except for the A to G transition at nt 7118. Furthermore, this sequenced region again bestowed Stl^R when amplified from the MO34 genome and transformed into a Stl^S recipient. Similar transformation and sequencing experiments were performed using PCR fragments generated from strain MO38 (stl6). These experiments found that the stl6 allele caused the identical D796G substitution. Thus two independently isolated stl alleles targeted the same beta` residue. We conclude that the D796G substitution alone is sufficient to confer Stl^Rin vivo. Notably, B. subtilis residue D796 lies in the C-terminal portion of Region F, one of the eight regions that are conserved among the largest subunits of eukaryotic RNA polymerases and E. coli beta`(28) .

Fig. 2shows a comparison of Region F in B. subtilis beta`, E. coli beta`, and representative eukaryotic homologues. Significantly, the available evidence indicates that Region F is important for transcriptional elongation in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Among eukaryotes, all known alterations that enhance resistance to the fungal toxin alpha-amanitin are found in or immediately adjacent to Region F (see (29) and references therein). alpha-Amanitin binds directly to RNA polymerase II and inhibits both transcriptional initiation and elongation, slowing phosphodiester bond formation and translocation by an as yet unknown mechanism(30, 31, 32, 33) . Among prokaryotes, substitutions at 14 of the 85 residues in E. coli Region F are known to alter the termination properties of the enzyme, and this consequence is thought to reflect the effects of these substitutions on elongation kinetics (34) . Weilbaecher et al.(34) advanced a possible explanation for these various phenotypes; Region F might comprise part of a site that binds either the 3` end of the nascent transcript or the new DNA template as it directs incorporation of incoming nucleotides, and disruption of either of these activities would inhibit the elongation reaction.


Figure 2: Comparison of Region F among the largest subunits of eukaryotic and prokaryotic RNA polymerases. The alignment of the four eukaryotic sequences and the E. coli beta` sequence (Ec) are from Jokerst et al.(28) ; the B. subtilis beta` sequence (Bs) is from this study. Residues identical to the Drosophila IIa sequence are indicated by colons (:), whereas substitutions are indicated by a lowercase letter. Gaps introduced into the prokaryotic sequences to improve the alignment are shown by dashed lines. Because there is additional strong conservation between B. subtilis and E. coli beta`, identity between the B. subtilis and E. coli subunits is indicated by periods (.). The arrow above the B. subtilis sequence denotes the D796G substitution, which confers Stl^Rin vivo. The similar arrow at the adjacent E. coli residue denotes the S793F substitution(14) , which confers Stl^Rin vitro and in vivo. E. coli residues at which single substitutions cause altered termination phenotypes (34) are indicated by carets () below the E. coli sequence. Eukaryotic residues at which single substitutions yield alpha-amanitin resistance are indicated by asterisks above the Drosophila IIa sequence(29) .



The results we report here and those in the accompanying paper (14) are consistent with this possibility. In addition to the Stl^R alteration we mapped in Region F of B. subtilis beta`, Severinov and colleagues identified three alterations to Region F of E. coli beta` that confer Stl^Rin vitro(14) . One of these, S793F, targets the residue that corresponds to S797 in B. subtilis and lies immediately adjacent to the B. subtilis D796G alteration we mapped (see Fig. 2). The other two, M747I and R780H, are from the collection of termination-altering mutants selected by Weilbaecher et al.(34) and confer only weak Stl^R. Stl in prokaryotes might be considered the functional analog of alpha-amanitin in eukaryotes, in that both molecules affect transcription initiation and elongation primarily by interfering with the elongation reaction. If this is the case, then the similar location of alterations conferring Stl^R in organisms as evolutionarily diverse as B. subtilis and E. coli provides further evidence for the importance of Region F in the elongation reaction of RNA polymerases from all organisms.

Stl^RMutations Also Map in the Conserved rif Region of rpoB

In E. coli beta, a number of substitution, deletions, and insertions in the region between Rif clusters I and II were found to confer Stl^R(6, 9) . Further extensive mutagenesis found that single substitutions conferring Stl^R were confined to the four contiguous residues 543-546(10) , which correspond to residues 499-502 of B. subtilis beta(13) . Because the sequences of the two Rif clusters and the intervening spacer regions are so similar in the two species (Fig. 3), it was reasonable to expect that alterations in residues 499-502 of B. subtilis beta would also lead to Stl^R.


Figure 3: Rif-Stl region of the B. subtilis and E. coli beta subunits. The sequence of B. subtilis beta is from (13) and that of E. coli beta from (35) . Residues identical to the B. subtilis subunit are indicated by periods (.) and substitutions by lowercase letters. The locations of Rif clusters I and II are shown underlined(7, 8, 9) . In E. coli, the four residues in the intervening spacer region that are the site of substitutions conferring Stl^R(10) are shown in larger type (residues 543-546). In B. subtilis, we made the corresponding substitutions (residues 499-502) and found that A499V, G500R, and E502V elicited Stl^Rin vivo.



Plasmids bearing five different alterations in this region were constructed as described under ``Experimental Procedures'' and introduced into the rpoB region of the B. subtilis chromosome by transformation. Only plasmids bearing the A499V, G500R, or E502V alterations yielded Stl^R transformants at a frequency significantly greater (10-fold) than the control plasmid, which bore the corresponding wild-type region. In contrast, plasmids bearing the M501S and Delta(499-502) alterations failed to yield significant numbers of Stl^R transformants. Direct sequencing of the chromosome of representative Stl^R strains verified that each of the alterations, A499V, G500R, and E502V, was the only change that had been introduced into the rpoB region. To determine whether the A499V, G500R, and E502V alterations were sufficient to confer Stl^Rin vivo, the region containing each was amplified from the appropriate Stl^R strain by PCR, sequenced to confirm the fidelity of the amplification, then transformed a second time into a Stl^S recipient. The high frequency of Stl^R transformants obtained verified that each alteration was indeed sufficient. Thus M501S was the only substitution that did not lead to Stl^R, and M501 occupies the only position that is not exactly conserved between the Stl regions of B. subtilis and E. coli beta (Fig. 3).

We characterized the three verified mutants on tryptose blood agar base plates and found that they manifested different levels of Stl^R: 3 µg/ml for wild type, 20 µg/ml for A499V, 10 µg/ml for G500R, and 50 µg/ml for E502V. We compared the resistances imparted by equivalent changes to each of the four contiguous positions in B. subtilis and E. coli beta (see Fig. 3). Counting from the N-terminal end of each four-residue region, in B. subtilis the lowest in vivo resistance was imparted by the second substitution, G500R, and the highest by the fourth, E502V. In contrast, the highest resistances in E. coli beta were associated with the second and third substitutions, G544R and F545S(10) .

This difference in resistance may reflect subtle differences in the putative Stl binding sites in the two organisms. In this regard, our inability to obtain Stl^R mutants from the M501S and Delta(499-502) plasmids leads us to speculate that M501 plays a more critical role in beta function than the other three residues, and that alterations at position 501 are therefore proscribed in B. subtilis beta. In accord with this notion, the F545S substitution of the corresponding residue in E. coli beta caused slower elongation kinetics in a P(R)-t pausing assay when compared to enzyme containing either wild type beta or a beta subunit bearing A543V(10) .

In B. subtilis beta, the A499V, G500R, and E502V substitutions did not noticeably affect the function of RNA polymerase in vivo. Strains bearing these substitutions were indistinguishable from wild type with regard to growth rate, sporulation frequency, and temperature range (data not shown). Therefore, as a practical matter, the new Stl^R alterations we constructed in B. subtilis rpoB furnish neutral genetic markers for the analysis of beta function, in marked contrast to the available Rif^R alterations in rpoB which often cause highly pleiotropic phenotypes (see Refs. 8, 13, 36, and 37). Similarly, the availability of a well characterized Stl^R marker within B. subtilis rpoC should facilitate analysis of beta` function.

Do beta and beta` Interact to Form a Single Stl Binding Site?

Based on the available data, Weilbaecher et al.(34) proposed a speculative model in which the beta and beta` subunits join to form a symmetrical scaffold and catalytic center that directs RNA synthesis from double-stranded DNA templates. In light of this model, one interpretation of our results is that the Stl target residues in beta and Region F in beta` together form a single Stl binding site, which overlaps a catalytic domain important in transcription elongation. In this view, Stl binding could to be prevented by changing a key contact on either beta or beta`. There are three lines of evidence in support of this interpretation. First, studies of elongation kinetics in the presence of Stl are consistent with a single site of interaction between the antibiotic and the eubacterial core enzyme(5) . Second, in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems, there is ample evidence which suggests that regions homologous to the putative Stl target in B. subtilis beta` are important in transcription elongation(29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34) . And third, the putative Stl target region in E. coli beta, although itself dispensable(9, 10) , nonetheless lies immediately adjacent to regions implicated in nucleotide binding and transcription elongation(8, 38) .


FOOTNOTES

*
This research was supported by United States Public Health Service Grant GM42077 from NIGMS, National Institutes of Health. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBank(TM)/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) L43593[GenBank].

§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 916-752-1596; Fax: 916-752-4759; cwprice{at}ucdavis.edu.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: Rif, rifampicin; Stl, streptolydigin; kb, kilobase pair(s); nt, nucleotide(s); ^R, resistant or resistance; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Konstantin Severinov and colleagues for communicating results prior to publication, Laura Heisler and Carol Gross for their generous gift of streptolydigin, A. L. Sonenshein for providing strains MO34 and MO38, and Michele Igo for helpful comments on the manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Archambault, J., and Friesen, J. D. (1993) Microbiol. Rev. 57,703-724 [Abstract]
  2. Johnson, D., and McClure, W. (1976) in RNA Polymerase (Losick, R., and Chamberlin, M. J., eds) pp. 101-126, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  3. Krakow, J. S., and von der Helm, K. (1970) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 35,73-83
  4. Cassani, G., Burgess, R. R., Goodman, H. M., and Gold, L. (1971) Nature New Biol. 230,197-200 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. McClure, W. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255,1610-1616 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lysitsyn, N. A., Sverdlov, E. D., Moiseyeva, E. P., and Nikiforov, V. I. (1985) Bioorg. Khim. 11,132-134 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Jin, D. J., and Gross, C. A. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 202,45-58 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Landick, R., Stewart, J., and Lee, D. N. (1990) Genes & Devel. 4,1623-1636
  9. Severinov, K., Soushko, M., Goldfarb, A., and Nikiforov, V. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,14820-14825 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Heisler, L. M., Suzuki, H., Landick, R., and Gross, C. A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,25369-25375 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Halling, S. M., Burtis, K. C., and Doi, R. H. (1977) J. Biol. Chem. 252,9024-9031 [Abstract]
  12. Halling, S. M., Burtis, K. C., and Doi, R. H. (1978) Nature 272,837-839 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Boor, K. J., Duncan, M. L., and Price, C. W. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270,20329-20336 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Severinov, K., Markov, D., Severinova, E., Nikiforov, V., Landick, R., Darst, S., and Goldfarb, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270,23926-23929 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Suh, J.-W., Boylan, S. A., and Price, C. W. (1986) J. Bacteriol. 168,65-71 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J., and White, T. J. (1990) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications , Academic Press Inc., New York
  17. Ovchinnikov, Y. A., Monastryskaya, G. S., Gubanov, V. V., Guryev, S. O., Salomatina, I. S., Shuvaeva, T. M., Lipkin, V. M., and Sverdlov, E. V. (1982) Nucleic Acids Res. 10,4035-4044 [Abstract]
  18. Aboshkiwa, M., al-Ani, B., Coleman, G., and Rowland, G. (1992) J. Gen. Microbiol. 138,1875-1880 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Anagnostopoulos, C., Piggot, P. J., and Hoch, J. A. (1993) in Bacillus subtilis and Other Gram Positive Bacteria (Sonenshein, A. L., Hoch, J. A., and Losick, R., eds) pp 425-461, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC
  20. Ozaki, M., Mizushima, S., and Nomura, M. (1969) Nature 222,333-339 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Kimura, M., and Kimura, J. (1987) FEBS Lett. 210,91-96 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Sonenshein, A. L., Cami, B., Brevet, J., and Cote, R. (1974) J. Bacteriol. 120,253-265 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Rothstein, D. M., Keeler, C. L., and Sonenshein, A. L. (1976) in RNA Polymerase (Losick, R., and Chamberlin, M. J., eds) pp. 601-616, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  24. Ho, S., Hunt, H. D., Horton, R. M., Pollen, J. K., and Pease, L. R. (1989) Gene (Amst.) 77,51-59 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Pearson, W. R., and Lipman, D. J. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85,2444-2448 [Abstract]
  26. Puhler, G., Lottspeich, F., and Zillig, W. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17,4517-4534 [Abstract]
  27. Honoré, N., Bergh, S., Chanteau, S., Doucet-Populaire, F., Eiglmeier, K., Garnier, T., Georges, C., Launois, P., Limpaiboon, T., Newton, S., Niang, K., del Portillo, P., Ramesh, G. R., Reddi, P., Ridel, P. R., Sittisombut, N., Wu-Hunter, S., and Cole, S. T. (1993) Mol. Microbiol. 7,207-214 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Jokerst, R. S., Weeks, J. R., Zehring, W. A., and Greenleaf, A. L. (1989) Mol. Gen. Genet. 215,266-275 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Bartolomei, M. S., and Corden, J. L. (1995) Mol. Gen. Genet. 246,778-782 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Cochet-Meilhac, M., and Chambon, P. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 353,160-184 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Coulter, D. E., and Greenleaf, A. L. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260,13190-13198 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. DeMercoyrol, L., Job, C., and Job, D. (1989) Biochem. J. 258,165-169 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Chafin, D. R., Guo, H., and Price, D. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270,19114-19119 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Weilbaecher, R., Hebron, C., Feng, G., and Landick, R. (1994) Genes & Dev. 8,2913-2927
  35. Ovchinnikov, Y. A., Monastryskaya, G. S., Gubanov, V. V., Guryev, S. O., Chertov, O. Y., Modyanov, N. N., Ginkevich, U. A., Marakova, I. A., Marchenko, T. V., Polovnikova, I. N., Lipkin, V. M., and Sverdlov, E. D. (1981) Eur. J. Biochem. 116,621-629 [Abstract]
  36. Jin, D. J., and Gross, C. A. (1989) J. Bacteriol. 171,5229-5231 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Jin, D. J., and Turnbough, C. L. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 236,72-80 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Jin, D. J., and Gross, C. A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266,14478-14485 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.