©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Monobromobimane as an Affinity Label of the Xenobiotic Binding Site of Rat Glutathione S-Transferase 33 (*)

(Received for publication, May 19, 1995; and in revised form, July 7, 1995)

Longqin Hu (§) Roberta F. Colman (¶)

From the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Monobromobimane (mBBr), besides being a substrate in the presence of glutathione, inactivates rat liver glutathione S-transferase 3-3 at pH 7.5 and 25 °C as assayed using 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB). The rate of inactivation is enhanced about 5-fold by S-methylglutathione. Substrate analogs bromosulfophthalein and 2,4-dinitrophenol decrease the rate of inactivation at least 20-fold. Upon incubation for 60 min with 0.25 mM mBBr and S-methylglutathione, the enzyme loses 91% of its activity toward CDNB and incorporates 2.14 mol of reagent/mol of subunit, whereas incubation under the same conditions but with added protectant 2,4-dinitrophenol yields an enzyme that is catalytically active and contains only 0.89 mol of reagent/mol of subunit. mBBr-modified enzyme is fluorescent, and fluorescence energy transfer occurs between intrinsic tryptophan and covalently bound bimane in modified enzyme. Both Tyr and Cys are modified, but Tyr is the initial reaction target and its modification correlates with loss of activity toward CDNB. The fact that the activity toward mBBr is retained by the enzyme after modification suggests that rat isozyme 3-3 has two binding sites for mBBr.


INTRODUCTION

Glutathione S-transferases constitute a family of enzymes that catalyze the nucleophilic attack by the thiol of glutathione on a variety of structurally diverse endogenic and xenobiotic substrates(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) . Glutathione S-transferases are classified into five classes, one microsomal and four cytosolic (alpha, µ, , and )(2, 6, 7) . Each class consists of two or more different subunits, which combine to form homodimers or heterodimers. Crystallographic studies of alpha, µ, and isozymes indicate that each protein subunit has two distinct domains(8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13) . The glutathione binding site is located almost entirely within the N-terminal domain with only salt bridges at each end of the tripeptide linking to domain II of the adjacent subunit, while the xenobiotic binding site is a highly hydrophobic pocket composed of residues in both the N- and C-terminal domains(11, 14) . These crystallographic studies coupled with site-directed mutagenesis and kinetic studies of the enzyme have provided some insights into the structural importance of amino acid residues or regions in catalysis and binding of glutathione and certain xenobiotic substrates(6, 9, 11) . However, little is known about the binding of xenobiotic substrates to the enzyme and what determines the distinct substrate specificities of the various isozymes of glutathione S-transferase.

Among the residues contributing to the binding of substrates and catalysis of the enzyme is a tyrosine residue in the N-terminal region of the enzyme: i.e. Tyr^9 in 1-1 and Tyr^6 in 3-3 and 4-4 isozymes. The tyrosine hydroxyl group is within hydrogen bonding distance (3.2-3.4 Å) of the sulfur of glutathione and is thought to be responsible for decreasing the pK of the sulfhydryl group of glutathione(9, 15) . Affinity labeling studies using S-(4-bromo-2,3-dioxobutyl)glutathione and 4-(fluorosulfonyl)benzoic acid demonstrated that Tyr in both isozyme 3-3 and 4-4 is located in the xenobiotic binding site and contributes to binding of these hydrophobic substrates in addition to its function as a general acid in reactions with certain substrates (i.e. those involving epoxide ring opening and Michael addition reactions)(11, 16, 17) . More recently, Tyr has been identified as a target of other affinity labels(18, 19) . Reaction of isozyme 3-3 with S-(4-bromo-2,3-dioxobutyl)glutathione demonstrated that Cys in this isozyme is also modified but without loss of activity when the reaction is carried out in the presence of S-hexylglutathione(16) ; this result is consistent with the crystal structure of the enzyme, which shows that Cys is located on the loop connecting the two domains and is exposed to solvent(9, 10, 11) .

Monobromobimane (mBBr) (^1)is a nonfluorescent hydrophobic compound that reacts with nucleophiles to give fluorescent derivatives(20) . mBBr was reported to be a substrate of an unfractionated preparation of glutathione S-transferases, although activities of individual isozymes were not distinguished(21) .

In this paper, we report that mBBr, besides being a substrate of rat liver glutathione S-transferase 3-3, also acts as an affinity label of this isozyme in the presence of a glutathione analog, S-methylglutathione. A series of experiments are described that are designed to determine the amino acid and functional targets of mBBr within glutathione S-transferase 3-3. We report that covalent modification with mBBr causes substantial loss of enzymatic activity toward 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) with little or no effect toward another substrate, suggesting the existence of more than one binding site for xenobiotic substrates in the 3-3 isozyme. A preliminary version of this work was presented at the Eighth Symposium of the Protein Society(22) .


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Frozen Sprague-Dawley rat livers were purchased from Pel Freez Biologicals. Tyrosine, cysteine hydrochloride, glutathione, S-hexylglutathione, S-methylglutathione, S-(nitrobenzyl)glutathione, S-hexylglutathione-Sepharose, bromosulfophthalein, 2,4-dinitrophenol, Sephadex G-50, N-ethylmaleimide, and N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethylketone-treated trypsin were all obtained from Sigma. CDNB was purchased from Aldrich, and guanidine HCl and urea were from ICN Biochemicals, Inc. mBBr was obtained from Molecular Probes, Inc. Polybuffer exchanger PBE 118 and Pharmalyte® pH 8-10.5 were purchased from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. Hydroxylapatite (Bio-Gel HT) and Bio-Rad protein assay dye reagent were supplied by Bio-Rad.

Preparation of O-mB-tyrosine (mB-Tyr) and S-mB-cysteine (mB-Cys)

mB-Tyr was prepared by a modified procedure of Wünsch et al.(23, 24) . Briefly, L-tyrosine (18.1 mg, 100 µmol) was dissolved in 2 N NaOH (100 µl), and a solution of cupric sulfate (pentahydrate, 12.5 mg, 50 µmol) in water (50 µl) was added. The mixture was heated to 60 °C, cooled to room temperature, diluted with methanol (350 µl), and made more basic with 2 N NaOH (15 µl) to give a total of 515 µl of cupric-complexed tyrosine anion. After addition of mBBr (3 mg, 11.1 µmol) to the above prepared tyrosine anion solution (57 µl, 11.1 µmol), the reaction mixture was vigorously stirred at room temperature for 5 h and at 4 °C overnight. The mixture was neutralized by 1 N HCl (26 µl) and diluted with water (500 µl). High performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) analysis showed mB-Tyr as the major product peak eluting at 22% acetonitrile in a 30-min gradient of 5-30% acetonitrile containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid on a C(18) column. The product, mB-Tyr, was isolated by HPLC using the same system. The UV absorption spectrum shows wavelength maxima at 275 and 390 nm. The fluorescence spectra exhibit an excitation maximum at 395 nm and an emission maximum at 480 nm, similar to that of mB-SG; however, the fluorescence intensity of mB-Tyr is only about 19% of that of mB-SG at comparable concentrations. The PTH derivative of mB-Tyr yields a distinct peak appearing between DPT and PTH-Trp on an Applied Biosystems gas-phase protein (peptide) sequencer; the amount of mB-Tyr was estimated using Tyr as a standard.

mB-Cys was prepared by reacting mBBr with 20-fold excess cysteine at pH 8. Briefly, a 50 mM mBBr solution in DMF (2 µl) was added to a 1 mM cysteine solution in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate at pH 8 (2 ml). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 h, and the product was purified by HPLC using the same system as for mB-Tyr, with mB-Cys eluting at 14% acetonitrile. The UV absorption spectrum for mB-Cys shows a wavelength maximum at 390 nm. The fluorescence spectra exhibit an excitation maximum at 395 nm and an emission maximum at 480 nm, similar to that of mB-SG in terms of the position of the peaks and in fluorescence intensity at comparable concentrations. The PTH derivative of mB-Cys is a distinct peak appearing between PTH-Tyr and PTH-Pro on an Applied Biosystems gas-phase protein (peptide) sequencer; the amount of mB-Cys was estimated using Met as a standard.

Determination of the Stability of mBBr

The rate of decomposition of mBBr was determined by measurement of the time dependence of bromide release from the molecule. Bromide release was monitored by measuring the free bromide present in solution using a modified procedure of Zall et al. (25, 26) in which bromide displaces thiocyanate from mercuric thiocyanate and the liberated thiocyanate reacts with ferric ion to form a colored complex, which is then measured spectrophotometrically. A solution of mBBr (5.0 mM) was incubated in 100 mM potassium phosphate containing 10% DMF at pH 7.5 and 25 °C. Sample aliquots (50 µl) were withdrawn at various times and mixed with 60% perchloric acid (100 µl), 0.07% mercuric thiocyanate (saturated water solution, 50 µl), and 0.17 M ferric perchlorate in 4 N perchloric acid (100 µl); methanol was added to bring the final total volume to 1 ml. The absorbance was measured at 480 nm for both the samples and known solutions containing 2-250 nmol of sodium bromide, the latter of which were used as standards to calculate the concentration of free bromide in the sample.

Enzyme Preparation

Rat liver glutathione S-transferase 3-3 was purified from Sprague-Dawley rat livers either by the method of Cobb et al.(27) , which uses column chromatography on DEAE-cellulose, S-hexylglutathione-Sepharose, and hydroxylapatite as previously reported (16) or by a simplified procedure using only affinity column chromatography on S-hexylglutathione-Sepharose followed by chromatofocusing on PBE 118 resin in the pH range of 10-7. About 160 g (frozen weight) of livers from 25 rats were homogenized in aqueous solution in a Waring blender for 30 s at medium speed and 30 s at high speed. The homogenate was then centrifuged for 1.5 h at 10,000 rpm. The supernatant, after passing through cheese cloth to remove floating debris, was loaded onto a S-hexylglutathione-Sepharose column, which was washed with 10 mM TrisbulletHCl buffer, pH 7.8, containing 0.2 M NaCl, to base line and then eluted with 1 mMS-hexylglutathione. The pool of glutathione S-transferases eluted by S-hexylglutathione from the affinity column was loaded, after dialysis against 10 mM TrisbulletHCl, pH 7.0, onto a chromatofocusing column of PBE 118 equilibrated at pH 10. The column was then washed with a Pharmalyte® pH 8-10.5 solution adjusted to pH 7.0, and the 3-3 isozyme was eluted from the column at pH 8.8 between the alpha class isozymes,(1, 2) ) and the 3-4 isozyme; the 4-4 isozyme elutes after the 3-4 isozyme. In a typical experiment, about 20 mg each of the pure 3-3 and 4-4 isozymes were isolated from 160 g of rat liver. The enzyme concentration was measured using an of 37,700 M cm(28) . A M(r) of 26,500/subunit was used in calculations (29) . HPLC was used to assess the purity of the final preparation using a 30-min gradient of 30-48% acetonitrile containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid on a Vydac C(4) column. Based on the absorbance at 280 nm, the major protein peak constitutes more than 95% of the final preparation. The amino-terminal sequence was determined on a gas-phase protein (peptide) sequence analyzer to be Pro-Met-Ile-Leu-Gly-Tyr-Trp-Asn-Val-Arg-Gly-Leu-Thr-His-Pro-Ile-Arg, consistent with the known sequence of the 3-3 isozyme, which is distinguished at five of these positions from the amino acid sequence of the 4-4 isozyme(29, 30) .

Enzymatic Assays

Unless otherwise indicated, enzymatic activity was measured using a Gilford model 240 spectrophotometer by monitoring the formation of the conjugate of CDNB (1 mM) and glutathione (2.5 mM) at 340 nm (Delta = 9.6 mM cm) in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, at 25 °C according to the method of Habig et al.(31) . All measurements were corrected for the spontaneous nonenzymatic rate of the formation of the conjugate of glutathione and CDNB.

Other substrates utilized to assay for enzymatic activity include bromosulfophthalein and mBBr. For bromosulfophthalein, the enzymatic activity was measured at 330 nm (Delta = 4.5 mM cm) by monitoring the conjugate formation between bromosulfophthalein (0.2 mM) and glutathione (5.0 mM) in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, at 25 °C according to the method of Habig et al.(31) . For mBBr, the enzymatic activity was measured using a Perkin-Elmer MPF-3 fluorescence spectrophotometer (excitation at 395 nm and emission at 480 nm) by monitoring the formation of the conjugate of mBBr (30 µM) and glutathione (600 µM) in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, at 25 °C according to the method of Hulbert and Yakubu(21) . A lower glutathione concentration was chosen because of the relatively large spontaneous nonenzymatic rate of reaction between glutathione and mBBr. For each experiment, a known amount of mB-SG was prepared in the presence of glutathione S-transferase (0.5 µg/ml) from mBBr (5 µM) and glutathione (600 µM) and used as a fluorescence standard to calibrate and calculate the initial rate of product formation.

To determine the apparent K(m) value of glutathione, a range of glutathione concentrations (9-600 µM) was investigated at a constant mBBr concentration (100 µM). Similarly, the apparent K(m) for mBBr was determined at a range of concentrations of mBBr (0.4-100 µM) and a constant concentration of glutathione (600 µM). Data were analyzed by fitting directly to the Michaelis-Menten equation of v = V(max)bulletC/(K(m) + C) using a nonlinear curve fitting program MINSQ from MicroMath Scientific Software.

Reaction of mBBr with Glutathione S-Transferase

Glutathione S-transferase 3-3 (0.3 mg/ml) was incubated in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, at 25 °C with various concentrations of mBBr by the addition of appropriate stock solutions of mBBr in DMF. The volume of DMF was always 10% of the total volume of the reaction mixture. When the effect of ligands on the rate of inactivation was studied, the enzyme was preincubated with the ligands for 10 min prior to the addition of mBBr. In control experiments, enzyme was incubated under the same conditions including 10% DMF but without mBBr. Aliquots of the reaction mixture were withdrawn at various times, diluted 15-fold with 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, at 0 °C, and assayed for residual activity toward CDNB. The rate constant of reaction of the enzyme with mBBr was calculated by fitting data for E(t)/E(0)versus time to a pseudo first-order kinetic equation: E(t)/E(0) = e, where E(0) is the activity of the enzyme at time 0, E(t) represents the activity at a given time, t, and k is the observed pseudo first-order rate constant.

In the preparation of modified and control enzyme, excess unreacted reagent was removed from the reaction mixture by the gel filtration procedure of Penefsky(32) . Aliquots (0.5 ml) of the reaction mixture at the end of reaction were applied to two successive 5-ml columns of Sephadex G-50 equilibrated with 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5; it was found later that one column was sufficient to remove the unreacted reagent. The protein concentration in the filtrate was determined by the Bio-Rad protein assay, which is based on the dye-binding method of Bradford(33) , using a Bio-Rad 2550 radioimmunoassay reader (600-nm filter). Purified glutathione S-transferase 3-3 was used to establish the standard protein concentration curve for these determinations.

Measurement of Incorporation of mBBr into Glutathione S-Transferase

Glutathione S-transferase 3-3 (0.3 mg/ml) was incubated for the indicated time with 0.25 mM mBBr in the presence of 5 mMS-methylglutathione, with or without the addition of 10 mM 2,4-dinitrophenol under standard reaction conditions. Excess reagents were removed by gel filtration, and the protein concentration was determined by the Bio-Rad method as described above. The amount of reagent incorporated was determined from the absorbance at 390 nm using = 5360 M cm, which is the characteristic absorptivity for the bimane moiety in model compounds such as mB-SG(20) . Similar results were obtained when measurements were performed under nondenaturing and denaturing conditions.

Preparation of Proteolytic Digest of Modified Glutathione S-Transferase

Glutathione S-transferase 3-3 (0.3 mg/ml) was incubated for the indicated time with 0.25 mM mBBr in the presence of 5 mMS-methylglutathione with or without the addition of 10 mM 2,4-dinitrophenol under standard reaction conditions. Excess reagent was removed by gel filtration as described above. The thiol groups of free cysteine residues in the enzyme were blocked by reaction with N-ethylmaleimide (10 mM) for 5 min under nondenaturing conditions at pH 7.5 and 25 °C and for an additional 30 min under denaturing conditions in 9 M urea at pH 7.5 and 25 °C. The solution was then dialyzed against 6 liters of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0, at 4 °C with one change for a total of 20 h.

After dialysis, the solution of modified enzyme was lyophilized. The lyophilized enzyme was solubilized in 8 M urea in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (250 µl) by incubation at 37 °C for 2 h, after which 750 µl of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate was added to give a final urea concentration of 2 M. The modified glutathione S-transferase was digested at 37 °C with two additions of N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethylketone-treated trypsin (2.5% w/w) at 1-h intervals. After trypsin digestion, the digest was lyophilized and stored at -20 °C.

Separation of Modified Peptides by HPLC

The tryptic peptides were separated by HPLC on a Varian 5000 LC equipped with a Vydac C(18) column (0.46 times 25 cm) and two consecutive UV detectors, one UV-100 detector set at 390 nm and one Vari-Chrom UV detector set at 220 nm. The solvent system used was 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water (solvent A) and acetonitrile containing 0.07% trifluoroacetic acid (solvent B). After elution with 10% solvent B for 5 min, a linear gradient was run to 15% solvent B at 55 min followed by successive linear gradients to 27% solvent B at 75 min, 40% solvent B at 205 min, and 95% solvent B at 210 min (chromatography system 1). The flow rate was 1 ml/min. The effluent was monitored continuously at both 220 and 390 nm; 1-ml fractions were collected and checked for fluorescence (excitation at 395 nm and emission at 480 nm).

When further purification of peptides was needed, samples were separated using a second solvent system with 20 mM ammonium acetate in water, pH 6.0, as solvent A and 20 mM ammonium acetate in 90% acetonitrile, pH 6.0, as solvent B. Elution was started with isocratic 20% solvent B for 5 min followed by a linear gradient to 100% solvent B for a total of 149 min at a flow rate of 1 ml/min (chromatography system 2).

Analysis of Isolated Peptides

An Applied Biosystems gas-phase protein (peptide) sequencer, model 470, equipped with a model 120 phenylthiohydantoin analyzer and a model 900A computer, was used to determine the amino acid sequence of peptides. Cysteine modified by N-ethylmaleimide (S-(N-ethylsuccinimido)cysteine) was identified by a doublet migrating on the HPLC column of the sequencer between the PTH derivatives of Pro and Met(34) , mB-Cys by a distinct peak appearing between PTH derivatives of Tyr and Pro, and mB-Tyr by a characteristic peak appearing between DPT and PTH-Trp. In addition, there is measurable fluorescence associated with the PTH derivatives of mB-Cys and mB-Tyr. The amount of mB-Cys and mB-Tyr in picomoles was estimated using PTH derivatives of Met and Tyr, respectively, as standards.

Preparation of Modified Glutathione S-Transferase for Fluorescence and Kinetic Studies

Glutathione S-transferase 3-3 (0.3 mg/ml) was incubated for 60 min with 0.25 mM mBBr in the presence of 5 mMS-methylglutathione under standard reaction conditions. Excess reagents were removed by gel filtration and the protein concentration determined by the Bio-Rad dye-binding method. The prepared modified enzyme was frozen quickly and stored at -80 °C.

Measurement of Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Steady-state fluorescence spectroscopy was measured on a Perkin-Elmer MPF-3 fluorescence spectrophotometer equipped with a Hitachi chart recorder. The samples were excited at 280 nm, and a bandwidth of 5 nm and the emission spectra were monitored at a bandwidth of 10 nm from 300 to 600 nm, a range that includes emission from both tryptophan and bimane fluorophores. The spectra were uncorrected.

Molecular Modeling

Modeling was conducted using the program Insight II from Biosym Technologies on a Silicon Graphics workstation. The molecular model of mBBr was built and energy minimized using the Builder module of the Insight II program. The atomic coordinates for the rat 3-3 isozyme were obtained from the Brookhaven Protein data bank(9) . The mBBr molecule was positioned manually into the xenobiotic binding site of rat isozyme subunit 3 by sequentially rotating and translating it along the x, y, and z axes, and the intermolecular energy in terms of both van der Waals' and electrostatic interactions and the interatomic distance between the phenolic oxygen atom of Tyr and the bromine-bearing carbon atom of mBBr were continuously monitored for conformations with reasonable distances and potential energies constituting possible productive interactions for chemical modification of the tyrosyl hydroxyl group. mBBr modified subunit 3 was constructed by merging the docked mBBr and the enzyme and forming a covalent bond between the respective electrophilic and nucleophilic centers. The manually docked complex, as well as mBBr-modified enzyme models were submitted to the Discover® program from Biosym for extensive energy minimization using steepest descent and conjugate gradient methods to relieve residual van der Waals' overlaps and to optimize the structures.


RESULTS

mBBr as a Substrate for Rat Liver Glutathione S-Transferase 3-3

The formation of the glutathione conjugate with mBBr is catalyzed by glutathione S-transferase 3-3, and the catalysis follows Michaelis-Menten kinetics (Fig. 1). A Lineweaver-Burk plot of 1/vversus 1/[mBBr] gives a K(m) of 0.54 µM and a V(max) of 3.4 µmol/min/mg of protein at pH 6.5 and 25 °C. For comparison, rat glutathione S-transferase 3-3 has a K(m) of 60 µM and a V(max) of 66 µmol/min/mg of protein when using CDNB as the substrate(31) .


Figure 1: Kinetics of the formation of the glutathione conjugate of mBBr as catalyzed by glutathione S-transferase 3-3. Rat liver glutathione S-transferase 3-3 (0.3 µg/ml) was incubated in the presence of 600 µM glutathione and various concentrations of mBBr at pH 6.5 and 25 °C, and the product formation was monitored by fluorescence as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The data, fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation, gave K = 0.54 µM and V(max) = 3.4 µmol/min/mg. Inset, Lineweaver-Burk plot of 1/vversus 1/[mBBr].



Inactivation of Rat Glutathione S-Transferase 3-3 with mBBr

Incubation of rat glutathione S-transferase 3-3 with 2 mM mBBr at pH 7.5 and 25 °C results in a time-dependent inactivation of the enzyme (Fig. 2). Control enzyme, incubated under the same conditions but in the absence of the reagent, showed no change in activity during the same period. The observed rate constant, k, for mBBr inactivation of the enzyme exhibits a linear dependence on the concentration of mBBr (Fig. 2, inset), with a second order rate constant of 0.026 min mM.


Figure 2: Inactivation of glutathione S-transferase 3-3 by mBBr. Rat liver glutathione S-transferase 3-3 (0.3 mg/ml) was incubated with (bullet) or without (circle) 2 mM mBBr at pH 7.5 and 25 °C. Residual activity, E/E(0), was measured as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Inset, the concentration dependence of inactivation of glutathione S-transferase 3-3 by mBBr appears to be linear with a second order rate constant of 0.026 min mM.



Effect of Substrate Analogs on the Rate of Inactivation of Glutathione S-Transferase by mBBr

The results shown in Table 1summarize the effect of substrate analogs on the reaction rate of 2.0 mM mBBr with rat liver glutathione S-transferase 3-3. The addition of 5 mMS-methylglutathione causes a 5-fold increase in the rate constant of inactivation over the mBBr concentration range tested (0.15-2.0 mM). Other S-alkylglutathione derivatives such as S-hexylglutathione and S-(p-nitrobenzyl)glutathione, as well as xenobiotic substrate analogs like bromosulfophthalein and 2,4-dinitrophenol, alone afford limited protection against mBBr inactivation of glutathione S-transferase 3-3.



Concentration Dependence of the Rate Constant for mBBr-Inactivation of Glutathione S-Transferase 3-3 in the Presence of S-Methylglutathione

Since S-methylglutathione enhances the rate of inactivation of glutathione S-transferase 3-3 by mBBr, we were able to use lower reagent concentrations when inactivation was carried out in the presence of 5 mMS-methylglutathione. Glutathione S-transferase 3-3 was incubated with various concentrations of mBBr (0.15-2.0 mM) to determine the dependence of the rate of inactivation on the reagent concentration. As shown in Fig. 3, the rate constant of inactivation, k, appears to exhibit a nonlinear dependence on the reagent concentrations. At higher concentrations of mBBr, k could not be measured with confidence. The observed rate constant, k, for inactivation at various mBBr concentrations were fitted to equation k = (k(max)bullet[mBBr])/(K(I) + [mBBr]), where k(max) is the maximum rate of inactivation at saturating concentrations of the reagent and K(I) = (k + k(max))/k(1) and represents the reagent concentration that results in half of the maximal inactivation rate(35) . This nonlinear curve fitting gave k(max) = 0.56 min and K(I) = 1.73 mM, with k(max)/K(I) = 0.32 min mM.


Figure 3: Inactivation of glutathione S-transferase 3-3 by mBBr in the presence of 5 mMS-methylglutathione. Rat liver glutathione S-transferase 3-3 (0.3 mg/ml) was incubated with various concentrations of mBBr in the presence of 5 mMS-methylglutathione at pH 7.5 and 25 °C. Residual activity E/E(0) was measured as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Concentrations of mBBr shown are 0.15 mM (bullet), 0.25 mM (circle), and 1 mM (). Inset, plot of the observed rate constant of inactivation of glutathione S-transferase 3-3 by mBBr in the presence of 5 mMS-methylglutathione versus the concentration of mBBr. The data, fitted to equation k = (k(max)bullet )/(K+ [mBBr]), gave k(max) = 0.56 min and K = 1.73 mM, with a k(max)/K = 0.32 min mM.



Effect of Xenobiotic Substrate Analogs on the Rate of Inactivation in the Presence of S-Methylglutathione

Table 2shows the effect of adding a xenobiotic substrate analog, like bromosulfophthalein or 2,4-dinitrophenol, on the rate constant of inactivation of glutathione S-transferase 3-3 by 0.25 mM mBBr in the presence of S-methylglutathione. Such additions are found to give effective protection against inactivation; incubation with 400 µM bromosulfophthalein reduces the observed rate of inactivation by 20-fold while the addition of 10 mM 2,4-dinitrophenol reduces the rate by more than 100-fold. Both bromosulfophthalein and 2,4-dinitrophenol, under the same conditions, have no effect on the half-life of the reagent, which is 37.3 h as determined by release of bromide ion from the bimane molecule. These results indicate that reaction with mBBr in the presence of S-methylglutathione occurs at the xenobiotic substrate binding site.



Incorporation of mBBr by Glutathione S-Transferase 3-3

Glutathione S-transferase 3-3 was incubated with 0.25 mM mBBr in the presence of S-methylglutathione with or without the added protectant, 2,4-dinitrophenol, after which the modified enzymes were isolated and the incorporation of bimane was measured from the characteristic absorbance of bimane moiety at 390 nm. The time-dependent incorporation of mBBr into glutathione S-transferase 3-3 and corresponding loss of activity in the absence of the added protectant are shown in Table 3. Incubation of glutathione S-transferase 3-3 with 0.25 mM mBBr in the presence of S-methylglutathione for 60 min affords a modified enzyme that is 91% inactivated and contains 2.14 mol of reagent/mol of subunit. Incubation under the same conditions, but with the added protectant, 2,4-dinitrophenol, yields an enzyme that is catalytically active and contains only 0.89 mol of reagent/mol of subunit, suggesting that reaction occurs at a limited number of sites in glutathione S-transferase, which includes the catalytic site, but that some additional reactions occur at amino acid(s) not essential for enzymatic activity.



Isolation of Tryptic Peptides from Modified Glutathione S-Transferase

Glutathione S-transferase (0.3 mg/ml) was inactivated for 60 min by 0.25 mM mBBr in the presence of 5 mMS-methylglutathione at pH 7.5 and 25 °C. The resulting modified enzyme with 9% residual activity was isolated, incubated with N-ethylmaleimide, dialyzed, and digested with trypsin. The digest was subjected to HPLC separation using a C(18) column and an acetonitrile gradient in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid as illustrated in Fig. 4, A and B. Five peptide regions showing the characteristic bimane absorbance at 390 nm (Fig. 4B) are labeled as I, Ia, II, III, and IV.


Figure 4: HPLC separation of proteolytic digests of proteins resulting from the 60-min modification of glutathione S-transferase 3-3 by mBBr. The enzyme was modified by 0.25 mM mBBr in the presence of 5 mMS-methylglutathione for 60 min, digested, and separated as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' A (A) and B (A) show profiles of digest of the modified enzyme prepared in the absence of protectant 2,4-dinitrophenol. C, A profile of digest of the modified enzyme prepared in the presence of protectant 2,4-dinitrophenol.



Fig. 4C shows the HPLC pattern of a tryptic digest, as monitored at 390 nm, of catalytically active, modified glutathione S-transferase prepared by incubation of the rat liver enzyme for 60 min with 0.25 mM mBBr in the presence of 5 mMS-methylglutathione and 10 mM 2,4-dinitrophenol. The digest of this active enzyme (Fig. 4C) contains no significant amount of peptides corresponding to peaks I-IV of the inactive enzyme digest (Fig. 4B); the measured reagent incorporation of 0.89 mol/mol of subunit was distributed in small amounts at different nonspecific sites as shown using the more sensitive measurement of fluorescence associated with each peptide (data not shown). These results indicate that peaks I, Ia, II, III, and IV contain modified peptides, whose appearance correlates with inactivation.

The development of these modified peptide peaks was monitored as a function of time of reaction and corresponding degree of inactivation. The enzyme was 35% inactivated after incubation for 8 min with 0.25 mM mBBr in the presence of 5 mMS-methylglutathione; in this sample, peak II was the most abundant modified peptide present with only traces of I and III. Upon increasing the incubation time to 15 min (yielding 55% inactivated enzyme) and to 60 min (yielding 91% inactivated enzyme), peak II decreased in intensity while peaks I, III, and IV clearly increased, indicating that peak II is the precursor of one or more of four later-appearing peaks (I, Ia, III, and IV).

Characterization of Modified Peptides

As shown in Table 4, peaks I, Ia, II, and III are all derived from the same peptide, i.e. Met-Gln-Leu-Ile-Met-Leu-Cys-Tyr-Asn-Pro-Asp-Phe-Glu-Lys, corresponding to residues 108-121 in the known amino acid sequence of rat liver glutathione S-transferase 3-3(36) . To confirm our assignment of modified residues, we synthesized mB-modified amino acids, mB-Cys and mB-Tyr. The PTH derivatives of the synthesized mB-Cys and mB-Tyr yield characteristic peaks appearing between PTH-Tyr and PTH-Pro and between DPT and PTH-Trp, respectively, on a gas-phase sequencer. In addition, there is fluorescence characteristic of bimane derivatives (excitation at 395 nm and emission at 480 nm) in the effluent from the sequencer with the PTH derivatives of mB-Cys and mB-Tyr but not with other PTH amino acids. Cysteine modification by N-ethylmaleimide (S-(N-ethylsuccinimido)cysteine) is demonstrated as a distinct doublet appearing between PTH-Pro and PTH-Met as previously reported by Smyth and Colman(34) .



Peptide I and Ia represent different proteolytic products of the same peptide, where both Cys and Tyr are modified by mBBr. In peptide II, only Tyr is modified by mBBr, while Cys is not modified by mBBr and is available for subsequent N-ethylmaleimide modification. Only Cys is modified by mBBr in peptide III. In peptide IV, at both cycles 7 and 8, the amino acids are identified to be mB-Cys while the rest of the amino acids are identical to those in peptide I, II, and III, suggesting the existence of a new form of rat liver glutathione S-transferase 3-3 with a Tyr to Cys mutation at position 115. The relative amount of this mutated form is batch-dependent (data not shown). Such a mutation at an equivalent position of the rat glutathione S-transferase µ class subunit Yb(4) was reported previously by others (37, 38) and resulted in an enzyme that was shown to be difficult to separate from the other µ class isozymes(38) .

Fluorescence Properties of mB-modified Glutathione S-Transferase under Nondenaturing and Denaturing Conditions

Modified enzyme exhibits excitation maxima at 280 and 395 nm and emission maxima at 330 and 460 nm under nondenaturing conditions at pH 7.5 and 25 °C. The 330-nm emission is characteristic of tryptophan residues in a hydrophobic environment as is observed for rat glutathione S-transferase 1-1(39) . The 460-nm emission is the result of the incorporated bimane moiety(20) . Under denaturing conditions in 4 M guanidine HCl, pH 7.5, and 25 °C, the modified enzyme exhibits a 20-nm red shift in both emission maxima when excited at 280 nm (Fig. 5), consistent with the fact that the fluorophores are exposed to a polar environment after denaturation. There is substantial spectral overlap between the emission spectrum of the native enzyme and excitation spectrum of bimane-modified enzyme (data not shown), which makes fluorescence energy transfer measurement between the two fluorophores possible, with a calculated Förster critical distance of 20 Å, using in the calculation values of 1.4 for the refractive index (n) between the two fluorophores and of for the orientation factor (kappa^2)(40) . The relative increase in tryptophan emission (350/330 nm) and decrease in bimane emission (480/460 nm) after denaturation, when excited at 280 nm (Fig. 5), suggest that there is significant energy transfer between the tryptophan and bimane fluorophores in the modified enzyme under nondenaturing conditions. In contrast, if the samples are excited at the bimane excitation maximum of 395 nm, the modified enzyme shows the same 20-nm red shift in bimane emission (460-480 nm) but with a slight increase in intensity (about 10%) after denaturation in 4 M guanidine HCl, pH 7.5, and 25 °C (data not shown). The emission maximum for bimane-modified enzyme after denaturation (480 nm) is the same as that for mB-Tyr and mB-Cys in aqueous solutions, models for the modified enzyme, and the same as that for mB-SG in aqueous solutions(20) .


Figure 5: Fluorescence emission spectra of modified glutathione S-transferase 3-3 under nondenaturing conditions at pH 7.5 and 25 °C (--) and denaturing conditions in 4 M guanidine HCl, pH 7.5, and 25 °C(- - -). Modified glutathione S-transferase was prepared by reacting the enzyme (0.3 mg/ml) with 0.25 mM mBBr in the presence of 5 mMS-methylglutathione at pH 7.5 and 25 °C, and the samples were excited at 280 nm as described under ``Experimental Procedures.''



Comparison of Kinetic Properties of mB-modified Glutathione S-Transferase

The catalytic properties of mB-modified and control enzymes were investigated using as substrates CDNB, bromosulfophthalein, and mBBr. In the rate measurements of Fig. 2and 3, the reaction of glutathione S-transferase with mBBr was monitored only with CDNB. Modification of glutathione S-transferase by 0.25 mM mBBr for 60 min yields an enzyme with only 6-9% residual activity for both CDNB and bromosulfophthalein but, surprisingly, retains full activity for mBBr when assayed with 30 µM mBBr and 600 µM glutathione at pH 6.5.

The apparent K(m) and V(max) values of modified and control enzymes for mBBr and glutathione were determined in order to further evaluate the effect of modification. As shown in Table 5, the modification affects both the apparent K(m) and V(max), with the effect on K(m) being much greater than that on V(max), and the effect on mBBr being greater than that on glutathione. For mBBr, the K(m) was increased by 50-fold, and V(max) was also increased by about 3-fold. Overall, the catalytic efficiency of the modified enzyme decreased by about 15-fold as judged by the apparent k/K(m). For glutathione, the K(m) was increased by about 8-fold and V(max) by about 2.3-fold, resulting in an overall decrease in the catalytic efficiency by 3.6-fold.




DISCUSSION

The results of this paper demonstrate that mBBr reacts predominantly with 2 amino acid residues of glutathione S-transferase 3-3: Tyr and Cys. However, modification occurs initially at Tyr, paralleling the loss of enzymatic activity toward CDNB. Cys modification appears to be slow and secondary, and it is not clear whether modification of only this residue is sufficient to cause inactivation. A schematic representation of the sequence of reaction of mBBr with glutathione S-transferase is shown in .




From the time-dependent development of modified peptides, we conclude that the rate of reaction of mBBr at Tyr of the native enzyme, k(1), is greater than the reaction rate at Cys of the native enzyme, k(2). The accumulation of peptide II and the slow appearance of peptide I (and Ia) at the early period of reaction indicate that k(1) is greater than k(3). The slow appearance and the existence of significant amount of peptide III peak at 60 min indicates that modification of Cys slows down further modification at Tyr, i.e.k(2) > k(4). Therefore, the relative order of the rate constants for modification is k(1) > k(2) > k(4) and k(1) > k(3). Cys is not appreciably modified by mBBr in our studies, although it does react with S-(4-bromo-2,3-dioxobutyl)glutathione(16) . This difference could be due to the more hydrophobic character of mBBr, which makes it more likely to react within the interior of proteins.

From the crystal structure represented in Fig. 6, Tyr is positioned in a conformation to react with mBBr docked at the active site, which would explain why this residue is modified first and the rate of reaction is greater. Fig. 6also suggests that Cys is located in the vicinity of the active site; but the sulfur atom of this cysteinyl residue is pointed away from the substrate binding cavity, making it inaccessible to the active site-bound reagent. As suggested in the affinity labeling studies of glutathione S-transferase 3-3 using 2-(S-glutathionyl)-3,5,6-trichloro-1,4-benzoquinone(18) , a conformation different from the one shown in Fig. 6may exist in solution, in which the cysteinyl side chain is more exposed to the active site-bound reagent.


Figure 6: A model showing the relative locations of side chains of Tyr and Cys in one of the docked structures of glutathione S-transferase 3-3 and mBBr. Glutathione S-transferase 3-3 is illustrated as redribbons. Atoms of protein side chains are shown in white, those for S-methylglutathione in yellow, and those for mBBr in blue. The whitearrow indicates the attack of the phenolic oxygen nucleophile on the bromomethyl carbon of mBBr docked in the xenobiotic binding site of glutathione S-transferase 3-3.



Alternatively, the sulfhydryl group of Cys may react with mBBr from the outside of the protein molecule. In the structure shown in Fig. 6, this sulfhydryl group is imbedded in a hydrophobic environment 7-8 Å from the surface, surrounded by the hydrophobic side chains of Trp, Phe, Phe, Phe, and Leu. Close examination of the structure reveals that a bimane molecule can be placed in a position to react with the sulfhydryl group of Cys, requiring minimal perturbation of conformations of residues in this region. This is consistent with the results of energy minimization of a model (not shown) of glutathione S-transferase 3-3 with covalently bound bimanes at both Tyr and Cys, which leads only to movements of less than 2 Å in atoms of residues of this region. Movements in side chain atoms of Trp, Phe, and Phe are the most apparent; these residues are distant from the active site.

Fig. 5suggests that the bimane moiety in the modified enzyme may serve as a fluorescence resonance energy acceptor in the determination of distances between sites in glutathione S-transferases. Under nondenaturing conditions, there is substantial reduction of the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence by the covalently bound bimane in the active site. In rat liver glutathione S-transferase 3-3, there are 4 tryptophan residues/subunit, three of which (Trp^7, Trp, Trp) are in the range of 8-14 Å to the bound bimane moiety in the same subunit (Trp^7, 8.2 Å; Trp, 12.4 Å; Trp, 13.8 Å), while the fourth tryptophan as well as tryptophan residues from the adjacent subunit are more than 25 Å away from the bound bimane moiety in an energy minimized mB-modified glutathione S-transferase 3-3 model. In addition, the efficiency of fluorescence energy transfer is inversely related to the sixth power of the distance between the two fluorophores(40) . It is, therefore, considered that tryptophan residues at positions 7, 45, and 214 make the dominant contributions to the transfer of fluorescence energy to the bimane fluorophore under nondenaturing conditions. Studies are presently in progress to use this property to investigate solution conformational properties of the enzyme.

The data presented in this paper indicate that glutathione S-transferase 3-3 may have two different binding sites for mBBr, one that is identical or overlaps with the CDNB site and a second or alternate site that is independent of the CDNB site. Glutathione S-transferase 3-3 incubated with mBBr in the presence of S-methylglutathione yields a modified enzyme that exhibits only about 6-9% residual activity toward CDNB and bromosulfophthalein but retains full activity toward mBBr, indicating that the site shared with CDNB and bromosulfophthalein is covalently modified by mBBr, while the other independent site remains available. Since the modified enzyme is still catalytically competent toward mBBr, both sites must be very close to the glutathione binding site. There may not be any accessible nucleophiles to react covalently with mBBr in the second site, which would explain why only one site is modified.

Our molecular modeling simulations suggest that after modification of Tyr by active site-bound mBBr and of Cys by mBBr approaching from the outside as discussed above, there is still sufficient room in the xenobiotic binding cavity to bind another molecule of mBBr. Evidence for the existence of a second xenobiotic binding site for other glutathione S-transferases has been obtained previously from equilibrium binding experiments(41, 42) .

S-Methylglutathione enhances the rate of reaction between the enzyme and mBBr, probably through S-methylglutathione-induced conformational change, which facilitates the binding of mBBr to the enzyme. Fig. 3, inset, showing saturation kinetics for inactivation in the presence of S-methylglutathione, suggests that mBBr first binds to the enzyme before covalently modifying the enzyme and causing inactivation. Comparison of the second order rate constant for reaction of mBBr with the enzyme alone (0.026 min mM) with the k(max)/K(I) measured in the presence of S-methylglutathione (0.32 min mM) indicates a 12-fold enhancement of the reactivity of the target site in the presence of the glutathione derivative. The use of S-methylglutathione in our present study enables us to reduce the concentration of mBBr needed to obtain the desired inactivation, thus reducing nonspecific labeling of the enzyme.

In summary, mBBr modification of rat liver glutathione S-transferase 3-3 occurs initially at the active site residue Tyr, which leads to loss of catalytic activity toward CDNB and bromosulfophthalein. Prolonged treatment of the enzyme with mBBr also results in the modification of Cys, which is located in the vicinity of the active site. Glutathione S-transferase 3-3 is shown to have two binding sites for mBBr, one site that is identical or overlaps with the CDNB site and another site that is independent of the CDNB site and is also catalytically active after modification of the first site.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported in part by American Cancer Society Grant BE-11. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Recipient of individual National Research Service Award postdoctoral fellowship F32 CA66276 from United States Public Health Service.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 302-831-2973; Fax: 302-831-6335.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: mBBr, monobromobimane; CDNB, 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; mB-Tyr, O-mB-tyrosine; mB-Cys, S-mB-cysteine; mB-SG, S-mB-glutathione; PTH, phenylthiohydantoin; DPT, N,N`-diphenylthiourea; DMF, N,N-dimethylformamide.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Yu-Chu Huang for performing the protein/peptide sequencing.


REFERENCES

  1. Armstrong, R. N. (1987) CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. 22,39-60 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Mannervik, G., and Danielson, U. H. (1988) CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. 23,283-337 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Pickett, C. B., and Lu, A. Y. H. (1989) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 58,743-764 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Coles, B., and Ketterer, B. (1990) CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 25,47-70
  5. Armstrong, R. N. (1991) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 4,131-140 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Rushmore, T. H., and Pickett, C. B. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,11475-11478 [Free Full Text]
  7. Tsuchida, S., and Sato, K. (1992) CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 27,337-384
  8. Cowan, S. W., Bergfors, T., Jones, T. A., Tibbelin, G., Olin, B., Board, P. G., and Mannervik, B. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 208,369-370 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Ji, X., Zhang, P., Armstrong, R. N., and Gilliland, G. L. (1992) Biochemistry 31,10169-10184 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Ji, X., Armstrong, R. N., and Gilliland, G. L. (1993) Biochemistry 32,12949-12954 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Ji, X., Johnson, W. W., Sesay, M. A., Dickert, L., Prasad, S. M., Ammon, H. L., Armstrong, R. N., and Gilliland, G. L. (1994) Biochemistry 33,1043-1052 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Reinemer, P., Dirr, H. W., Ladenstein, R., Schaeffer, J., Gallay, O., and Huber, R. (1991) EMBO J. 10,1997-2005 [Abstract]
  13. Reinemer, P., Dirr, H. W., Ladenstein, R., Huber, R., Bello, M. L., Federici, G., and Parker, M. W. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 227,214-226 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Sinning, I., Kleywegt, G. J., Cowan, S. W., Reinemer, P., Dirr, H. W., Huber, R., Gilliland, G. L., Armstrong, R. N., Ji, X., Board, P. G., Olin, B., Mannervik, B., and Jones, T. A. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 232,192-212 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Liu, S., Zhang, P., Ji, X., Johnson, W. W., Gilliland, G. L., and Armstrong, R. N. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267,4296-4299 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Katusz, R. M., Bono, B., and Colman, R. F. (1992) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 298,667-677 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Barycki, J., and Colman, R. F. (1993) Biochemistry 32,13002-13011 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Ploemen, J. H. T. M., Johnson, W. W., Jespersen, S., Vanderwall, D., van Ommen, B., van der Greef, J., van Bladeren, P. J., and Armstrong, R. N. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,26890-26897 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Cooke, R. J., Bjoernestedt, R., Douglas, K. T., McKie, J. H., King, M. D., Coles, B., Ketterer, B., and Mannervik, B. (1994) Biochem. J. 302,383-390 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Kosower, N. S., and Kosower, E. M. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 143,76-84 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Hulbert, P. B., and Yakubu, S. I. (1983) J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 35,384-386 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Hu, L., and Colman, R. F. (1994) Protein Sci. 3,127 (Abstr. 432-T)
  23. Wünsch, E., Fries, G., and Zwick, A. (1958) Chem. Ber. 91,542-547
  24. Bodanszky, M., and Bodanszky, A. (1984) The Practice of Peptide Synthesis , pp. 62-63, Springer-Verlag, New York
  25. Zall, D. M., Fisher, D., and Garner, M. Q. (1956) Anal. Chem. 28,1665-1668
  26. Colman, R. F., Huang, Y.-C., King, M. M., and Erb, M. (1984) Biochemistry 23,3281-3286 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Cobb, D., Boehlert, C., Lewis, D., and Armstrong, R. N. (1983) Biochemistry 22,805-812 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Graminski, G. F., Kubo, Y., and Armstrong, R. N. (1989) Biochemistry 28,3562-3568 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Mannervik, B. (1985) Adv. Enzymol. 57,357-417 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Ding, G. J.-F., Lu, A. Y. H., and Pickett, C. B. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260,13268-13271 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Habig, W. H., Pabst, M. J., and Jakoby, W. B. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 249,7130-7139 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Penefsky, H. S. (1979) Methods Enzymol. 56,527-530 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72,248-254 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Smyth, G. E., and Colman, R. F. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266,14918-14925 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Huang, Y. C., and Colman, R. F. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259,12481-12488 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Ding, G. J.-F., Ding, V. D.-H., Rodkey, J. A., Bennett, C. B., Lu, A. Y. H., and Pickett, C. B. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261,7952-7957 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Lai, H. J., Qian, B., Grove, G., and Tu, C. D. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263,11389-11395 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Rowe, J., and Listowsky, I. (1994) FASEB J. 8,1467 (abstr.)
  39. Wang, R. W., Bird, A. W., Newton, D. J., Lu, A. Y. H., and Atkins, W. M. (1993) Protein Sci. 2,2085-2094 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Fairclough, R. H., and Cantor, C. R. (1978) Methods Enzymol. 48,347-379 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Bhargava, M. M., Listowsky, I., and Arias, I. M. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253,4112-4115 [Abstract]
  42. Vander Jagt, D. L., Hunsaker, L. A., Garcia, K. B., and Royer, R. E. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260,11603-11610 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.