©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Glucocorticoid-induced Functional Polarity of Growth Factor Responsiveness Regulates Tight Junction Dynamics in Transformed Mammary Epithelial Tumor Cells (*)

(Received for publication, February 15, 1995; and in revised form, July 12, 1995)

Patricia Buse (§) Paul L. Woo (§) David B. Alexander Avid Reza Gary L. Firestone (¶)

From the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and the Cancer Research Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

The synthetic glucocorticoid, dexamethasone, induces the ``normal-like'' differentiated property of tight junction formation and suppresses growth of the Con8 mammary epithelial tumor cell line, derived from a 7,12-dimethylbenz(alpha)anthracene-induced rat mammary adenocarcinoma. Characterization of the transepithelial electrical resistance of Con8 mammary tumor cells cultured on permeable supports revealed that a novel response to dexamethasone is the generation of a polarized cell monolayer with respect to epidermal growth factor receptor responsiveness. Administration of transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha) to the basolateral, but not the apical, plasma membrane compartment disrupted the glucocorticoid-stimulated tight junction barrier. Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that dexamethasone caused the ZO-1 tight junction-associated protein to localize exclusively to the apical border of laterally adjacent membranes of the cell periphery, whereas basolateral administration of TGF-alpha caused the redistribution of ZO-1 back to disorganized aggregates along the cell periphery. In contrast, TGF-alpha was able to exert its mitogenic effects equally on both sides of the cell monolayer independent of its polarized disruption of tight junction formation. Our results represent the first evidence for a functional polarization of the epidermal growth factor receptor and strongly implicate the glucocorticoid-regulated formation of tight junctions in policing the polarized responsiveness of mammary cells to growth factors.


INTRODUCTION

Differentiation and proliferation of mammary gland tissue is stringently regulated by a dynamic balance of environmental cues that include systemic steroid and protein hormones, such as the lactogenic factors prolactin and glucocorticoids as well as estrogen and progestin ovarian steroids, locally acting growth factors, and extracellular matrix components(1, 2, 3, 4, 5) . A distinguishing feature of transformed mammary epithelial cells is the dysregulation of cellular responsiveness to particular sets of extracellular signals and loss of normal interdependence between these signals, which can result in uncontrolled proliferation and loss of differentiated properties(6, 7) . One mechanism by which transformed mammary epithelial cells lose their ability to be controlled by the microenvironment is by the inappropriate expression of growth factors and/or function of their cognate receptors(1, 2, 5, 6) . For example, two particularly important mammary-derived growth factors regulated at different stages of normal mammary gland growth and development are transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha) (^1)and epidermal growth factor (EGF), which both act through the EGF receptor and have been directly implicated in the pathogenesis and growth of mammary tumors in rodents and humans(1, 2, 4, 5) . However, virtually nothing is known about the role of cell-cell interactions in controlling access to growth factors and other signals from the microenvironment.

The regulation of tight junction permeability in normal mammary epithelia prevents the paracellular leakage of macromolecules, such as growth factors, from the apical and basolateral membranes during the onset of lactation(8) . In addition to this ``gate'' function, tight junctions maintain cellular polarity by physically defining the border between the apical and basolateral plasma membrane compartments (9, 10, 11) . Tight junction structure is highly dynamic in that permeability, assembly and/or disassembly can be controlled by a variety of cellular and metabolic regulators(9, 10, 12) , which include calcium(13) , phorbol esters(14) , and members of the insulin-like growth factor-I family(15) . Our recent studies have documented that glucocorticoids stimulate the in vitro formation of tight junctions in nontransformed mouse mammary epithelial cell line of ductal origin(16, 17, 18) , which directly implicates glucocorticoids as one of the in vivo physiological modulators of tight junctions in the mammary gland. Given the biological importance of structurally distinguishing the lumenal side from the blood or basolateral side of normal mammary epithelia, it is tempting to consider that tight junctions mediate the polarized availability of growth factor receptors and/or their signaling pathways in mammary cells.

To address whether EGF receptor signaling can be regulated by tight junction formation in mammary epithelial tumor cells, we have been utilizing the Con8 rat mammary tumor cell line which is derived from a 7,12-dimethylbenz(alpha)anthracene-induced rat mammary adenocarcinoma (19) . The synthetic glucocorticoid, dexamethasone, strongly suppresses the growth of Con8 mammary tumor cells(20, 21) , by inducing a G(1) block in cell cycle progression (22) and inhibiting the production of autocrine-acting TGF-alpha(23, 24) . We have recently shown that glucocorticoids stimulate tight junction formation in confluent monolayers of Con8 cells and that constitutive expression and secretion of TGF-alpha reversed this process under conditions in which cellular proliferation is stimulated(25) . This result suggests that exogenously added TGF-alpha may be capable of disrupting fully functioning tight junctions in glucocorticoid treated Con8 cell monolayers, depending on the cell surface availability of EGF receptors. By examining the responsiveness of dexamethasone-treated monolayers of mammary tumor cells to TGF-alpha, we uncovered the first evidence for a polarized responsiveness of EGF receptors and provide direct support for steroid-stimulated intercellular junctions as crucial structures that police the ability of mammary tumor cells to respond to locally acting growth factors.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 medium (50/50) and calf serum were supplied by Whittaker (Walkersville, MD) and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), trypsin-EDTA, araC, and dexamethasone were obtained from Sigma. [^3H]Thymidine (5 Ci/mmol) was obtained from Amersham Corp. Permeable supports manufactured by Nunc were distributed by Applied Scientific (San Francisco, CA). Human recombinant TGF-alpha was purchased from Becton Dickinson (San Jose, CA). The ZO-1 monoclonal antibodies (R40.76) were a generous gift of Bruce R. Stevenson (Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Alberta, Edmonton) and fluorescein 5-isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-Rat IgG antibodies were supplied by Cappel (Malvern, PA). All other reagents were of highest available purity.

Cells, Method of Culture on Permeable Supports, and Measurement of Transepithelial Electrical Resistance

Con8 is a single cell-derived epithelial subclone obtained after collagenase digestion of the 13762NF transplantable rat mammary adenocarcinoma(20, 21) . This cell line was routinely grown to 100% confluency on Nunc permeable tissue culture supports in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with 10% calf serum, at 37 °C in a humid atmosphere of air/CO(2) (95:5). Cell culture medium was routinely changed every 24 h. In appropriate experiments, dexamethasone was added to a final concentration of 1 µM, and human recombinant TGF-alpha was added to a final concentration of 10 ng/ml. In order to inhibit DNA synthesis, cells cultures were exposed to 10 µM araC. The transepithelial electrical resistance was measured on support-grown cells at room temperature, using the EVOM Epithelial Voltohmmeter (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) as described previously (16, 17, 25) . Resistance measurements were taken aseptically every 8-24 h. Calculations for ohmsbulletcm^2 were determined by subtracting the resistance measurement of a blank filter and multiplying by the area of the monolayer (0.49 cm^2 for the 10-mm filters).

Assay of DNA Synthesis by [^3H]Thymidine Incorporation

To quantitate relative rates of DNA synthesis, triplicate samples of Con8 cells were grown to confluency on permeable supports and treated with indicated combinations of dexamethasone, TGF-alpha, and/or araC. The media were replaced with fresh media containing 1-4 µCi/ml of [^3H]thymidine (5 Ci/mmol), and the cells were incubated for 1 h. The cells were washed four times with PBS and twice with 100% methanol and air-dried for 12 h. The filter inserts were placed directly into scintillation vials, and radioactivity was quantitated by liquid scintillation counting.

Confocal Immunofluorescence Staining for ZO-1

Con8 cells were grown to 100% confluency on permeable 24-well filters and incubated with the indicated combinations of dexamethasone and TGF-alpha. TGF-alpha was added to either the apical or basolateral side of the monolayer. The monolayers were washed three times with Dulbecco's PBS (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD), and the cells were fixed with 1.75% formaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. After three washes with PBS, the monolayers were permeabilized with TX-100 extraction buffer (0.5% Triton X-100, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 120 mM NaCl, 25 mM KCl, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in TBST (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20) with 3% nonfat dry milk. The cells were washed three more times with PBS and then blocked with 3% nonfat dry milk in PBS. ZO-1-specific antibody R40.76 was used at a dilution of 1:400. Cells were incubated at room temperature for 1 h and then washed three times with TBST with 3% nonfat dry milk. The secondary antibody was a fluorescein 5-isothiocyanate-conjugated goat IgG fraction to rat IgG and used at a dilution of 1:100. Cells were incubated with the antibody for 1 h in the dark at room temperature. The cell monolayers were then washed three times with TBST containing 3% nonfat dry milk. The supports were punched out and mounted on glass slides in 50% glycerol, 50 mM Tris, pH 8-9, and 0.4% n-propyl gallate. Confocal images were obtained from a Zeiss Axioplan epifluorescence microscope using a Zeiss 40X Plan-Neofluar multi-immersion objective (0.9 numerical aperture) and processed with a MRC 600 system. A series of digitized optical sections were collected starting from the basal side of the monolayer and stepping toward the apical membrane in 1.0-µm steps. The sections representing the plane of ZO-1 were printed on a Kodak Colorease PS printer.

Western Blot Analysis for ZO-1 Protein Production

For Western blot analysis, whole cell samples in lysis buffer were normalized for protein content with the Bio-Rad Bradford protein assay. Cell lysates were subjected to 6% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to nitrocellulose (nitro ME, Micron Separations Inc, Westboro, MA), Western blots sequentially incubated with rat anti-ZO-1 monoclonal antibodies (R40.76), and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG secondary antibody, and the signal was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence as described previously(16) . Parallel cell samples were electrophoretically fractionated, and equivalent protein loading was demonstrated by Coomassie Blue staining of the protein gels.


RESULTS

Tight junctions define the distinct boundary between the apical and basolateral plasma membrane surfaces(9, 10) , and the in vitro formation of tight junctions in glucocorticoid-treated Con8 mammary tumor cells (25) provides the opportunity to examine the polarized responsiveness of mammary tumor cells to environmental signals. A key issue is to determine whether mammogenic growth factor receptor responsiveness is polarized, since polarity of the normal epithelia is critical to the function of the mammary gland(2, 8, 26) . To test this notion, confluent monolayers of Con8 mammary tumor cells were cultured on permeable supports and tight junctions formed by treatment with 1 µM dexamethasone. The trans-well permeable support system allows the apical or basolateral surfaces of the cells to be selectively manipulated once tight junctions are formed since cell surface acting agents, such as TGF-alpha, can be added to either the basolateral (via the ``outer compartment'') or apical (via the ``inner compartment'') plasma membrane of the cell monolayer. Consistent with our previous results (25) , dexamethasone induced a significant increase in transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) of the cell monolayer over a 42-h time course, which remained essentially unchanged in the absence of steroid (Fig. 1, upper panel; +DEX versus -DEX). To test for the polarized distribution and/or function of EGF receptors, TGF-alpha was added to either the apical or basolateral surfaces of dexamethasone-treated mammary tumor cells, and the effects on monolayer TER were monitored over 42 h. When TGF-alpha was added to the apical side of a Con8 mammary tumor cell monolayer treated with dexamethasone for 24 h, TER continued to increase at a rate slightly greater than that of cells treated only with dexamethasone (Fig. 1, upper panel; +DEX/TGFalpha Ap versus +DEX) which indicates that the tight junctional machinery was intact. In striking contrast, when TGF-alpha was added to the basolateral surface of the cells, TER was reduced to basal levels within 18 h of growth factor treatment (Fig. 1, upper panel; +DEX/TGFalpha Bl versus -DEX). Similarly, when both the apical and basolateral surfaces of the monolayer were exposed to TGF-alpha (Fig. 1, upper panel; +DEX/TGFalpha Ap/Bl), the monolayer electrical resistance was quickly restored to basal levels. Basolateral, but not apical, addition of TGF-alpha reversed the dexamethasone-inhibited paracellular leakage of small radiolabeled tracers, such as [^3H]inulin (data not shown), further confirming that TGF-alpha disrupts the ``gate'' function and increases monolayer permeability in a polarized manner.


Figure 1: Polarized disruption of glucocorticoid stimulated transepithelial electrical resistance by transforming growth factor-alpha. Upper panel, Con8 mammary tumor cells were cultured on permeable supports in the presence (+DEX) of 1 µM dexamethasone and a control culture was incubated in the absence of steroid (-DEX). After 24 h in dexamethasone, 10 ng/ml of human recombinant TGF-alpha was added to either the apical side of the monolayer (+DEX/TGFalpha Ap), the basolateral side of the monolayer (+DEX/TGFalpha Bl), or to both sides of the monolayer (+DEX/TGFalpha Ap/Bl). Throughout the 42-h time course, the monolayer transepithelial electrical resistance was determined at the indicated times, and the ohmsbulletcm^2 were calculated. Each assay was performed in triplicate, and the results are an average from three separate experiments. Lower panel, Con8 cells were cultured on permeable supports in the presence of 1 µM dexamethasone for 42 h and then incubated for 72 h with the indicated concentrations of TGF-alpha added to either the apical or basolateral sides of the monolayer. The transepithelial electrical resistance at each concentration of growth factor was determined, and the difference in ohmsbulletcm^2 was calculated relative to dexamethasone-treated cells not treated with TGF-alpha (0 point). Each assay was performed in triplicate, and the results are an average from three separate experiments.



To determine whether the observed polarized disruption of tight junction integrity may simply be due to differences in EGF receptor ligand responsiveness, 42-h dexamethasone-stimulated cells were incubated for an additional 72 h with various concentrations of TGF-alpha (0-20 ng/ml) added to either the apical or basolateral sides of the monolayer. Cells treated with dexamethasone without TGF-alpha displayed a 6-fold stimulation in TER (defined as 0 point in lower panel in Fig. 1). Basolateral addition of TGF-alpha dose-dependently reduced the TER to basal levels, whereas apical addition of TGF-alpha further increased the TER (Fig. 1, lower panel). Although most dramatic at the higher doses of TGF-alpha, the polarized effects are observed at the lower concentrations of TGF-alpha corresponding to the physiological levels of growth factor. The similarities in each dose response suggest that the EGF receptor affinities are similar on both sides of the monolayer and supports the hypothesis that TGF-alpha activates different components of the EGF-receptor signal transduction pathways linked to the apical versus the basolateral compartments.

To further investigate the dynamic steroid and growth factor control of tight junction structure, we tested whether the localization or expression of ZO-1, an intracellular peripheral membrane protein highly associated with tight junctions in epithelial cells (10, 27) may be a target of glucocorticoid or TGF-alpha signaling in Con8 mammary tumor cells. The images shown in Fig. 2illustrate sections taken in the apical plane of ZO-1 at the top through the basolateral plane at the bottom. The distance between each optical section is 2 µm. In the absence of steroid (Fig. 2, Panels a-c), ZO-1 staining displayed a spotty, discontinuous pattern, which appeared as apparent aggregates along the cell periphery, especially at the junctions between several cells. In addition, ZO-1 at the middle and basolateral plane (Fig. 2, Panels b and c) in certain cells of the untreated monolayer were visualized as intense, linear series of accumulations at the cell border. When cells were treated with dexamethasone (Fig. 2, Panels d-f), ZO-1 localization exhibited a very discrete and continuous band at the lateral membrane of adjacent cells in all three planes. Consistent with the effects on TER, addition of TGF-alpha to the apical side of a glucocorticoid-induced polarized monolayer (Fig. 2, Panels g-i) had no effect on ZO-1 localization which was maintained as a distinct and continuous band surrounding the peripheries of the cells. In contrast, when cells were treated with TGF-alpha at the basolateral surface of the monolayer (Fig. 2, Panels j-l), ZO-1 distribution reverted back to a disorganized and discontinuous pattern of staining, analogous to that seen in control cells without drug treatment. Although these cells retained the peripheral ZO-1 localization, the more intense staining was at the junctions shared by numerous cells. A similar disorganized ZO-1 immunostaining was also observed after the addition of TGF-alpha to both the apical and basolateral sides of the monolayer (data not shown). This growth factor alteration of ZO-1 localization is indicative of the disruption in the apical/basolateral boundary mediated by the loss of tight junctions. Under conditions in which glucocorticoids or TGF-alpha modulates the pattern of ZO-1 immunostaining, Western blot analysis revealed that there were no detectable differences in ZO-1 protein levels (Fig. 3). Thus, the coordinate and opposing regulation of the cellular distribution of ZO-1 correlates with the regulation of monolayer transepithelial electrical resistance of mammary tumor cells by glucocorticoids and basolateral addition of TGF-alpha. These results demonstrate for the first time a polarity of EGF receptor responsiveness in epithelial cells and strongly implicates the glucocorticoid induction of tight junction formation in mammary tumor cells as playing a role in governing this process.


Figure 2: Glucocorticoid induced localization of ZO-1 and the polarized disruption of ZO-1 distribution by transforming growth factor-alpha. Con8 mammary tumor cells were treated with no hormones (-Dex, Panels a-c), 1 µM dexamethasone (+Dex, Panels d-f), dexamethasone for 24 h followed by 10 ng/ml human recombinant TGF-alpha applied on the apical surface of the monolayer for 18 h (+Dex/+TGFalpha Ap, Panels g-i) or dexamethasone for 24 h follow by 10 ng/ml TGF-alpha added on the basolateral surface of the monolayer for 18 h (+Dex/+TGFalpha Bl, Panels j-l). The cells were fixed and analyzed for ZO-1 localization by confocal microscopy. The upper panels display the apical sections, and the bottom panels display the basolateral sections. The bar represents 25 µm.




Figure 3: Western blot analysis of ZO-1 expression levels. Con8 mammary tumor cells were treated with no hormones (-Dex) or 1 µM dexamethasone (+Dex) for 72 h. 10 ng/ml human recombinant TGF-alpha was applied to 24-h dexamethasone-treated cells for an additional 48 h on the apical surface of the monolayer, +Dex+TGFalpha (Ap), basolateral surface, +Dex+TGFalpha (Bl), or simultaneously to the apical and basolateral surface, +Dex+TGFalpha (Ap+Bl). Cell lysates were normalized for total protein (confirmed by Coomassie Blue staining of a parallel polyacrylamide gel), electrophoretically fractionated, blotted onto nitrocellulose filters, and analyzed for ZO-1 protein as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The protein molecular mass standards are myosin (200 kDa) and phosphorylase b (97.4 kDa).



Conceivably, the polarized manner in which TGF-alpha disrupts the dexamethasone-stimulated formation of tight junctions may be due to the selective localization of the EGF receptor protein or due to the polarized function of the receptor-signaling pathway either at the apical or basolateral side of the cell. To test this possibility, TGF-alpha's mitogenic activity on Con8 cells was examined in monolayers exposed at the apical and/or basolateral surfaces to this growth factor. Dexamethasone strongly inhibited the DNA synthesis of Con8 cell monolayers grown on permeable supports (Fig. 4). In contrast to the polarized effects on monolayer TER, the addition of TGF-alpha to either the apical, basolateral, or both sides of the monolayer strongly restimulated [^3H]thymidine incorporation of dexamethasone treated mammary tumor cells to approximately the same extent (Fig. 4). This result demonstrates that EGF receptors are distributed to and are functional at both the apical or basolateral cell surfaces in glucocorticoid-treated cells; however, the signal transduction events triggering the disruption of tight junctions appear to be distinct for the apical versus the basolateral compartments of the mammary tumor cells.


Figure 4: Nonpolarized stimulation of Con8 mammary tumor cell DNA synthesis by transforming growth factor-alpha. Con8 mammary tumor cells were cultured on permeable supports in the presence of 1 µM dexamethasone (DEX), and one control culture was incubated in the absence of steroid. After 24 h in dexamethasone, 10 ng/ml human recombinant TGF-alpha was added to either the apical side of the monolayer (Ap), the basolateral side of the monolayer (Bl), or to both sides of the monolayer (Ap/Bl). After an additional 18-h incubation, DNA synthesis was determined by the incorporation of [^3H]thymidine. The results are an average of quadruplicate samples.



To examine whether the basolateral-mediated disruption of tight junction formation by TGF-alpha is independent of the proliferative response, the glucocorticoid and growth factor regulation of [^3H]thymidine incorporation and TER of Con8 cell monolayers were analyzed after treatment with araC, an inhibitor of DNA synthesis. As shown in Table 1, dexamethasone stimulated the monolayer TER to the same extent in the presence or absence of 10 µM araC. Under conditions in which [^3H]thymidine incorporation remains strongly inhibited by araC, basolateral exposure to TGF-alpha rapidly reduced the monolayer TER back to basal levels (Table 1). The monolayer TER remained at approximately the steroid-induced level after apical addition of TGF-alpha in the presence or absence of araC. This result suggests that the basolateral specific signaling pathway leading to the disruption of cell-cell interactions by TGF-alpha is distinct from and independent of the proliferative pathway mediated by this growth factor.




DISCUSSION

A key consequence of the glucocorticoid stimulated formation of tight junctions in Con8 mammary tumor cells is the formation of a polarized cell monolayer, since TGF-alpha reduces monolayer electrical resistance when added to the basolateral membrane compartment but not when exposed to the apical or lumenal compartment. Growth factor addition to either compartment of a dexamethasone-treated monolayer restimulates DNA synthesis, demonstrating for the first time that TGF-alpha, which binds to the EGF receptor(28) , appears to trigger different signal transduction cascades or activate polarized intermediates depending on the compartmental localization of its cognate receptor (Fig. 4). The proliferative pathway of TGF-alpha involves activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase and protein kinase C signal transduction pathways via the EGF receptor tyrosine kinase(29) , and we are currently attempting to uncover the basolateral specific components which selectively transduce the TGF-alpha disruption of cell-cell interactions.

Reduction of tight junction permeability is an important differentiated function of normal mammary gland cells(8) , and our results show that glucocorticoid-regulated tight junctions can control access of growth factors to one class of receptor signaling networks (30) which govern the growth and development of normal and transformed mammary cells(1, 2, 4) . We propose that the glucocorticoid stimulation of tight junction formation provides a functional switch which restricts the biological response to TGF-alpha, and perhaps other factors, selectively secreted into the apical or lumenal side of the monolayer. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have implicated a role for TGF-alpha in the growth and development of the normal mammary gland as well as in tumor progression and proliferation of rodent and human mammary tumor cells(2, 4, 5, 31) . For example, the introduction of TGF-alpha cDNA into the germ line of transgenic mice causes the appearance of hormone-dependent mammary adenocarcinomas (32) . Mammary tumor cells produce TGF-alpha (33) and the biological implication of basolateral exposure to TGF-alpha, and subsequent disruption of the apical/basolateral boundary and intercellular ``gate'' functions controlled by tight junctions may be the permissive passage of substances between lumenal and basolateral sides of mammary epithelia, thereby allowing the epithelium to be responsive to a variety of factors which normally are confined to one side of the mammary epithelium. Therefore, it is tempting to consider that dynamic interactions between steroid and EGF receptor-signaling networks, which have opposing effects on tight junction formation, ZO-1 protein localization, and cell polarity, may suppress or mediate the dysfunctional autocrine signaling cascades within mammary tumor cells.

The ZO-1 tight junction-associated protein, whose cellular localization is regulated in an antagonistic manner by glucocorticoids and TGF-alpha in Con8 mammary tumor cells, has significant sequence homology to the product of the lethal (l) disc large-1 (dlg) gene of Drosophila(27, 34) which has been implicated as a tumor-suppressor gene. Drosophila mutations in dlg result in a loss of apical-basolateral epithelial cell polarity and in a stimulation of neoplastic growth(35) . Recent evidence has implicated other junctional components, adhesion molecules, and integral membrane proteins as potential tumor suppressors (34, 36, 37) or interactions with tumor suppressor proteins, such as beta-catenin's direct interaction with APC(38, 39) . Thus, in mammalian cells, the hormonal control of junctional plaque proteins, such as ZO-1, may play a key role in suppression of a malignant phenotype by modulating growth factor receptor signal transduction pathways involved in tumor proliferation, dedifferentiation, or metastasis.

Glucocorticoids can exert their effects on gene expression by specific binding of the steroid receptor complex to DNA transcriptional enhancer elements, which are present in promoters of steroid regulated genes, or by interfering with the action of other transcription factors via protein-protein interactions(40, 41) . We hypothesize that specific subsets of glucocorticoid-regulated gene products act as structural and/or regulatory components which modulate tight junction permeability, selectively target or functionally regulate cellular trafficking pathways mediating ZO-1 localization, and/or guide the cellular decision that determines whether TGF-alpha disrupts the tight junction belt. Steroid hormones have been shown to regulate the expression of certain cell adhesion molecules, for example C-CAM (cell-cell adhesion molecule) expression is repressed by androgens in rat ventral prostatic epithelium (42) and glucocorticoids reduce integrin alpha(1) transcript levels in PC12 pheochromocytoma cells (43) as well as stimulate expression of the connexin 26 and connexin 32 gap junction gene transcripts in rat hepatocytes and hepatoma cells(44) . Thus, an emerging subset of steroid-regulated genes have been detected which mediate different types of cell-cell interactions in a variety of tissues. We are currently attempting to define the glucocorticoid-regulated components which target tight junction complex proteins and induce functional polarity to growth factor responsiveness in mammary cells.


FOOTNOTES

*
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant DK-42799. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Contributed equally to this work.

To whom all correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular and Cell Biology, Box 591 LSA, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. Tel.: 510-642-8319; Fax: 510-643-6791.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: TGF-alpha, transforming growth factor-alpha; EGF, epidermal growth factor; TER, transepithelial electrical resistance; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; araC, cytosine beta-D-arabinofuranoside.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Helen Cha, Carolyn Cover, Terry E. Machen, Anita C. Maiyar, and Ross A. Ramos for their constructive comments during the course of the work and for their critical comments of this manuscript. We also express our appreciation to Anna C. Fung for her superb typing and preparation of this manuscript, Jerry Kapler for his skillful photography, and Charles Jackson, William J. Meilandt, Marina Chin, Ritu Patel, Vinh Trinh, and Thai Truong for their technical support.


REFERENCES

  1. Lippman, M. E., and Dickson, R. B. (1989) Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 45, 383-440 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Imagawa, W., Bandyopadhyay, G. K., and Nandi, S. (1990) Endocr. Rev. 11, 494-523 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Howlett, A. R., and Bissell, M. J. (1993) Epithelial Cell Biol. 2, 79-89 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Vonderhaar, B. K. (1988) Cancer Treat. Res. 40, 251-266 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Welsch, C. W. (1985) Cancer Res. 45, 3415-3443 [Abstract]
  6. Aaronson, S. A. (1991) Science 254, 1146-1153 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Pardee, A. B. (1989) Science 246, 603-608 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Pitelka, D. R. (1978), in Lactation: A Comprehensive Treatise (Larson, B. L., and Smith, V. R., eds) pp. 141-166, Academic Press, New York
  9. Citi, S. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 121, 485-489 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Anderson, J. M., Balda, M. S., and Fanning, S. S. (1993) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 5, 772-778 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Mandel, L. J., Bacallao, R., and Zampighi, G. (1993) Nature 361, 552-555 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Madara, J. L. (1988) Cell 53, 497-498 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Gonzalez, M. L., Contreras, R. G., Bolivar, J. J., Ponce, A., Chavez, De Ramirez, B., and Cereijido, M. (1990) Am. J. Physiol. C978-C986
  14. Balda, M. S., Gonzalez-Mariscal, L., Contreras, R. G., Macias-Silva, M., Torres-Marquez, M., Garcia-Sainz, J., and Cereijido, M. (1991) J. Membr. Biol. 122, 193-202 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. McRoberts, J. A., and Riley, N. E. (1992) Am. J. Physiol. C207-C213
  16. Singer, K. L., Stevenson, B. R., Woo, P. L., and Firestone, G. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 16108-16115 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Zettl, K. S., Sjaastad, M. D., Riskin, P. M., Parry, G., Machen, T. E., and Firestone, G. L. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 9069-9073 [Abstract]
  18. Sjaastad, M. D., Zettl, K. S., Parry, G., Firestone, G. L., and Machen, T. E. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 589-600 [Abstract]
  19. Segaloff, A. (1966) Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 22, 351-379 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Webster, M. K., Guthrie, J., and Firestone, G. L. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 4831-4838 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Webster, M. K., Guthrie, J., and Firestone, G. L. (1991) Cancer Res. 51, 6031-6038 [Abstract]
  22. Goya, L., Maiyar, A. C., Ge, Y., and Firestone, G. L. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 1121-1132 [Abstract]
  23. Goya, L., Alexander, D. B., Webster, M. K., Kern, F. G., Guzman, R. C., Nandi, S., and Firestone, G. L. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 1816-1822 [Abstract]
  24. Alexander, D. B., Goya, L., Webster, M. K., Haraguchi, T., and Firestone, G. L. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 1808-1815 [Abstract]
  25. Buse, P., Woo, P. L., Alexander, D. B., Cha, H. H., Reza, A., Sirota, N. D., and Firestone, G. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 6505-6514 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Parry, G., Li, J., Stubbs, J., Bissell, M. J., Schmidhauser, C., Spicer, A. P., and Gendler, S. J. (1992) J. Cell Sci. 191-199
  27. Willott, E., Balda, M. S., Fanning, A. S., Jameson, B., Van, I. C., and Anderson, J. M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 7834-7838 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Derynck, R. (1988) Cell 54, 593-595 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Johnson, G. L., and Vaillancourt, R. R. (1994) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 230-238 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Pawson, T., Olivier, P., Rozakis, A. M., McGlade, J., and Henkemeyer, M. (1993) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 340, 279-285 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Klijn, J. G., Berns, P. M., Schmitz, P. I., and Foekens, J. A. (1992) Endocr. Rev. 13, 3-17 [Abstract]
  32. Matsui, Y., Halter, S. A., Holt, J. T., Hogan, B. L., and Coffey, R. J. (1990) Cell 61, 1147-1155 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Liu, S. C., Sanfilippo, B., Perroteau, I., Derynck, R., Salomon, D. S., and Kidwell, W. R. (1987) Mol. Endocrinol. 1, 683-692 [Abstract]
  34. Tsukita, S., Itoh, M., Nagafuchi, A., Yonemura, S., and Tsukita, S. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 123, 1049-1053 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Abbott, L. A., and Natzle, J. E. (1992) Mech. Dev. 37, 43-56 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Lee, S. W., Tomasetto, C., Paul, D., Keyomarsi, K., and Sager, R. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 118, 1213-1221 [Abstract]
  37. Mehta, P. P., Hotz-Wagenblatt, A., Rose, B., Shalloway, D., and Loewenstein, W. R. (1991) J. Membr. Biol. 124, 207-225 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Rubinfeld, B., Souza, B., Albert, I., Muller, O., Chamberlain, S. H., Masiarz, F. R., Munemitsu, S., and Polakis, P. (1993) Science 262, 1731-1734 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Su, L. K., Vogelstein, B., and Kinzler, K. W. (1993) Science 262, 1734-1737 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Fuller, P. J. (1991) FASEB J. 5, 3092-3099 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Truss, M., and Beato, M. (1993) Endocr. Rev. 14, 459-479 [Abstract]
  42. Hsieh, J. T., and Lin, S. H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 3711-3716 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Zhang, Z., Tarone, G., and Turner, D. C. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 5557-5565 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Ren, P., de, F. A., Paul, D. L., and Ruch, R. J. (1994) Carcinogenesis 15, 1807-1813 [Abstract]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.