©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Characterization of a Mutation in the Reduced Folate Carrier in a Transport Defective L1210 Murine Leukemia Cell Line (*)

(Received for publication, December 19, 1994; and in revised form, July 25, 1995)

Kevin E. Brigle Michael J. Spinella Esteban E. Sierra I. David Goldman (§)

From the Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia 23298

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

This laboratory previously described an L1210 leukemia cell line (MTX^rA) selected for resistance to methotrexate by virtue of impaired transport due to a functional defect in the translocation process. We now report on the sequence analysis of cDNAs encoding the reduced folate carrier from this line and identify a single mutation that results in the substitution of a proline for an alanine in a highly conserved transmembrane region of the protein. Transfection of the parental reduced folate carrier into MTX^rA cells resulted in a cell line which exhibited a complete restoration of methotrexate uptake and an enhanced sensitivity to methotrexate. Northern analysis and specific [^3H]MTX cell surface binding indicated that expression of the reduced folate carrier was elevated 5-fold in the transfectant compared to parental and MTX^rA cells. The MTX influx properties of the transfectant cell line were identical to those of the well characterized reduced folate carrier from parental L1210 cells in terms of: 1) patterns of sensitivity to competing folates, 2) sensitivity to the organic anion sulfobromophthalein, 3) lack of energy dependence, and 4) capacity for trans-stimulation. We also provide new data which suggests that the nucleotide sequence 5` of the predicted ATG initiation codon may encode additional protein information in the form of a leader sequence. Finally, we demonstrate that the MTX^rA line has both the mutant and the parental reduced folate carrier alleles but that expression appears to be restricted to the mutant allele. Thus, the methotrexate transport phenotype and resultant drug resistance in this cell line result from genetic/regulatory events at both alleles.


INTRODUCTION

Resistance to methotrexate (MTX) (^1)is a major limiting factor in the clinical utility of this agent and can occur by a variety of mechanisms(1, 2) . Of particular interest to this and other laboratories has been the resistance associated with impaired transport of the drug via the reduced folate carrier system. In murine L1210 leukemia cells, this carrier system mediates the rapid transport of reduced folates and the 4-amino analogs of folic acid and its kinetic and thermodynamic properties have been characterized in detail by several laboratories(3, 4, 5) . Clones encoding a transmembrane carrier protein have recently been isolated from murine, hamster, and human cDNA libraries (6, 7, 8, 9) and shown to restore folate transport in cell lines defective in carrier-mediated transport. Hydropathy plots of this 60-kDa protein, designated RFC1 in the murine system, predict 12 alpha-helical transmembrane regions and suggested that it was likely a member of a superfamily of membrane spanning transporters. Based upon the relative molecular mass of membrane components which are labeled when murine cells are treated with various MTX-affinity analogs (M(r) = 43-48), the predicted M(r) of the cloned RFC1 protein is different from that predicted for the reduced folate carrier(10, 11, 12) . This suggests that, in the murine system, there is either significant post-translational modification of RFC1 or that this protein is just one component of the reduced folate carrier system.

Several mechanisms of carrier-associated drug resistance have been characterized and shown to result from an increase in the influx K, a decrease in the influx V(max), or changes in both parameters(1, 3) . Changes in the latter parameter usually result from a decrease in the number of carrier sites. This laboratory previously described a MTX-resistant L1210 murine leukemia line (MTX^rA) which exhibits a unique transport alteration due to an immobilization of the reduced folate carrier(10) . In this cell line, the number of apparent carrier binding sites was slightly decreased, the affinity of these sites for MTX at the cell surface was unchanged, but the influx V(max) for MTX was markedly decreased(10, 13) . These observations were consistent with a highly specific loss of function, or mobility, of the reduced folate carrier. The MTX^rA line exhibits multiple membrane protein alterations, but the functional change in transport is highly specific for the reduced folate carrier as transport of folic acid, amino acids, nucleosides, and sugars is not impaired(10) .

In this paper, we describe the isolation and characterization of cDNAs encoding the RFC1 protein in the MTX^rA line and identify a single mutation that appears to be responsible for the defect in MTX transport. We demonstrate that this MTX transport phenotype can be complemented by expression of the parental RFC1 in the MTX^rA line and, further, that the restored transport has properties identical to those of the well characterized reduced folate carrier present in parental L1210 cells.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals

[3`,5`,7-^3H]MTX was obtained from Moravek Biochemicals and purified by high performance liquid chromatography prior to use.

Cell Culture

Parental L1210 cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium (containing 2.2 µM folic acid) supplemented with 10% bovine calf serum (Hyclone), 2 mM glutamine, 20 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, penicillin (100 units/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml).

Growth Inhibition Studies

0.2-ml cultures (8.0 times 10^4 cells/ml) in 96-well plates were continuously exposed to the appropriate concentration of MTX in replete medium for 72 h following which cell numbers were determined by hemocytometer count and viability determined by trypan blue exclusion.

Influx of MTX

Cells were harvested, washed with 0 °C HBS buffer (20 mM HEPES, 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl(2), 5 mM glucose, pH 7.4), and resuspended in HBS to 1 times 10^7 cells/ml. Uptake was initiated with the addition of radiolabeled MTX and samples taken over 4 min. For [^3H]MTX transport inhibition studies, folic acid, and 5-formyltetrahydrofolate were added simultaneously with the drug. To assess the effects of sulfobromophthalein and azide, cells were incubated 10 min at 37 °C in the presence of these compounds (100 µM and 10 mM, respectively) prior to the addition of [^3H]MTX. In studies utilizing azide, glucose was absent from the transport buffer. For trans-stimulation studies, cells were incubated with 60 µMdl-5-formyltetrahydrofolate for 30 min at 37 °C, washed two times with ice-cold transport buffer, and resuspended in transport buffer at 37 °C containing [^3H]MTX. For all of the studies, uptake was terminated by injecting 1.0 ml of the cell suspensions into 9.0 ml 0 °C acid HBS (pH 4.5). Cells were collected by centrifugation, washed twice in 0 °C HBS (pH 7.4), and processed for determination of intracellular tritium as described previously(14) .

Analysis of Specific MTX Binding to the Reduced Folate Carrier at the Cell Surface

Cells were harvested, washed, resuspended in 0 °C HEPES buffer (160 mM HEPES, 2 mM MgCl(2), pH 7.4) to 5 times 10^7 cells/ml and 200-µl aliquots incubated with 10 µM [^3H]MTX for 10 min at 0 °C. Bound and free ligand were separated by centrifugation of a 100-µl aliquot of the reaction mixture through 300 µl of oil (80% dibutyl phosphate, 20% olive oil) at 12,000 times g for 5 s in 5.8 times 47.5-mm microcentrifuge tubes. The supernatant and oil were aspirated and residual fluid was removed by a second centrifugation and aspiration step. The microcentrifuge tubes were cut, cell pellets digested in 1 M KOH, and radioactivity determined. Aliquots of the reaction mixture were used for dry weight determinations of cell pellets as described previously(14) . Specific binding was determined as the difference between total drug bound and binding in the presence of 1 mM unlabeled MTX.

Northern Analyses

RNA was isolated using the RNAzol B (Biotecx) procedure, fractionated by electrophoresis on 1.0% formaldehyde-agarose gels, transferred to Nytran membrane (Schleicher and Schuell), and fixed by baking in a vacuum oven at 80 °C for 2 h. Hybridizations with nick-translated probes were performed exactly as described previously(15) . Quantitation of specific transcripts was performed by direct analysis of radioactive blots using a Molecular Dynamics 445 SI PhosphoImager and transcript levels normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Cloning of the Reduced Folate Carrier

Poly(A) mRNA was isolated from 1 times 10^7 cells using Quickprep (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) and resuspended in 5 µl of sterile water. Using 0.5 µl of the poly(A) RNA, first strand synthesis was performed with oligo(dT) in a final volume of 20 µl using a reverse transcription kit (Life Technologies, Inc./BRL). The protein coding sequence of RFC1 was isolated from the products of this first strand synthesis by amplification utilizing oligonucleotide primers based on the sequence as reported by Dixon et al.(6) and the following conditions: 3 µl of the first strand synthesis product was amplified in 10 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 10 mM (NH(4))(2)SO(4), 2 mM MgSO(4), 0.1% Triton X-100, 300 µM of each deoxyribonucleotide, 0.4 µM each primer, and 1.0 unit of VENT polymerase (New England Biolabs) in a 50-µl reaction volume. Following an initial melt for 2 min at 94 °C, amplification was carried out for 35 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C, 45 s at 62 °C, and 90 s at 72 °C. All amplification products were cloned into the EcoRV site of pBluescriptKSII (Stratagene) and double-stranded DNA sequencing was performed by the dideoxy chain termination method using the protocol supplied with Sequenase version 2.0 (U. S. Biochemical Corp.). Computer analysis of the nucleotide and protein sequences was performed using the sequence analysis software package of the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group(16) . For construction of the cDNA library, blunt ended double stranded cDNA was prepared using the BRL SuperScript Choice System and ligated to EcoRI(NotI) adapters. This was ligated to EcoRI-digested gt11 arms (Promega), packaged, and 250,000 plaques plated. Lifts were made onto nitrocellulose filters (Schleicher and Schuell) and hybridized with a nick-translated RFC1 probe exactly as described above. Inserts from positive clones were subcloned into pBluescriptKSII and analyzed as described above.

Transfection Studies

The parent expression vector pTK-PGK used in these studies was constructed as follows: plasmid pJK-FR-alpha (13) was restricted with BamHI and XhoI to remove all FR-alpha coding sequences, blunted with Klenow, and religated. The resultant plasmid was linearized with EcoRI (5` of the PGK promoter) and the pMC1NeoPoly(A) (neo^R) cassette (derived from pMC1NeoPoly(A) in which the single mutation present in the neo^R cassette was corrected) was inserted. To generate the parental RFC1 expression vector pPGK-RFC1, the pTK-PGK vector was linearized with Ecl136II and DNA encoding the RFC1 protein from L1210 parental cells (nt 38-1584 based on the published sequence by Dixon et al.(6) ) was inserted.

MTX^rA cells (1 times 10^7 cells) were electroporated (250 V, 200 microfarads) with 40 µg of BglII-linearized pPGK-RFC1 in a final volume of 800 µl of RPMI 1640 folate-free medium without serum. Cells were brought to 10 ml with RPMI 1640 medium and allowed to recover 36 h following which they were adjusted to 1 times 10^5 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 medium containing G418 (750 µg of active drug/ml) and distributed into 96-well plates at approximately 20,000 cells per well. Positive (G418 resistant) wells developed within 8-10 days and these cells were expanded for further study.

Genomic Amplification and Restriction Analysis

Amplification of a genomic RFC1-specific 520-bp fragment was performed using the following primers which flanked the mutation identified in the MTX^rA RFC1: 5`-CCTGCGATACAAGCCAGTCT-3` and 5`-TTCCACCAGTTCACTTAGCA-3`. Genomic DNA was isolated using DNAzol (Molecular Research Center, Inc.) and 300 ng used for the amplification reaction under the following conditions: 10 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 10 mM (NH(4))(2)SO(4), 3 mM MgSO(4), 0.1% Triton X-100, 300 µM of each deoxyribonucleotide, 0.4 µM each primer, and 1.0 unit of VENT in a 100-µl reaction volume. Following an initial melt for 2 min at 96 °C, amplification was carried out for 31 cycles of 45 s at 96 °C, 40 s at 62 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C. The 520-bp fragment was gel purified, restricted, and fractionated on a 6% TBE polyacrylamide gel.


RESULTS

Cloning of the Reduced Folate Carrier

We previously described an L1210 cell line, designated MTX^rA, which exhibited a 100-fold increased resistance to MTX due to impaired transport associated with a loss of function of the reduced folate carrier(10) . Recently, the reduced folate carrier, or a component (designated RFC1) of this carrier system, was cloned by several groups(6, 7, 8, 9) . Therefore, studies were undertaken to determine whether a mutation in this transport protein could be the basis for the MTX transport defect and resultant MTX resistance exhibited by the MTX^rA cell line. Using primers based on the published RFC1 murine sequence, a cDNA encoding the translated region of RFC1 was isolated from parental cells by RT-PCR and used to probe a cDNA library generated from the MTX^rA cell line. Several clones were identified and complete sequence analysis performed on the one (accession number U32469) having the longest insert (2283 bp). As the RFC1 transcript identified upon Northern analysis is 2300 nt (Fig. 1), this clone appears to encode a nearly full-length message. There is not, however, a good consensus polyadenylation signal upstream of the poly(A) tail and it is possible that the 3` terminus of this clone resulted from priming at an internal stretch of adenine residues during the initial reverse transcription reaction. The nucleotide sequence of this clone extends the 5`- and 3`-untranslated region sequences of the published murine RFC1 transcript (accession number L23755) by 82 and 232 bp, respectively, and was otherwise identical except for the insertion of a G residue between nt 29 and 30 of the published sequence(6) . With the insertion of this residue, however, translation of the 123 nucleotides upstream of the predicted ATG start codon results in an additional 41-amino acid residues which no longer contains the in-frame TGA termination codon predicted by Dixon et al.(6) . The two closed reading frames each contain at least one termination codon. Interestingly, these same upstream nucleotide sequences from both human and CHO cells encode an additional 31 and 33 amino acid residues, respectively, and neither encodes a termination codon(7, 8, 9) . As shown in Fig. 1, 13 of the initial 16 amino acid residues (and 20 of 33 overall) predicted for the L1210 sequence are identical to those predicted for this upstream sequence in CHO cells. These data raise the possibility that the nucleotide sequence in this 5`-region may actually encode additional protein information, perhaps in the form of a signal sequence which directs the RFC1 protein (or one of its potential splice forms, see below) to a target membrane. Accordingly, the predicted stretch of 41 amino acid residues is well within the size range for mitochondrial signal sequences and it contains a high proportion (39%) of those residues (Ala, Arg, Leu, and Ser) commonly found in such targeting sequences and a low proportion (7%) of those (Asp, Glu, Ile, and Lys) which are rarely found(17, 18) . Likewise, the predicted human and CHO protein sequences encode, respectively, 58 and 52% of the four common residues and only 0 and 9% of the four uncommon residues.


Figure 1: Alignment of the translated nucleotide sequence upstream of the predicted ATG initiation codon for RFC1 from L1210 and CHO cells. Conserved residues are indicated with a ↕ and dashes represent an alignment adjustment to provide best fit. ``Met'' designates the predicted ATG start codon for RFC1(6, 7) . Numbering is based on the L1210 sequence.



While the nucleotide sequence of the translated region of RFC1 from parental cells was identical to the published murine sequence, a single mutation (nt G C; numbering is based on the published (6) murine L1210 sequence) was identified in all of the RFC1 clones derived from the MTX^rA line. This mutation resulted in the substitution of proline for alanine at amino acid residue 130. This residue is also an alanine in the RFC1 protein isolated from both human and CHO cells and is located in a highly conserved region in the middle of the predicted fourth transmembrane domain of the protein.

Transfection Studies

To verify that the alanine proline mutation identified in RFC1 was responsible for the defective MTX transport phenotype observed in the MTX^rA cell line, an expression vector encoding the parental RFC1 was transfected into this line in an effort to complement the mutation and restore transport function. MTX^rA cells were electroporated with the expression vector pPGK-RFC1 (``Materials and Methods'') and G418 resistant clonal lines were isolated. A typical transfectant, designated MTX^rA-R16, was chosen for the remaining experiments described below.

As shown in Fig. 2, the transcript encoding the endogenous RFC1 (2300 nt) was present in all three (L1210 parent, MTX^rA, and MTX^rA-R16) cell lines. In contrast, the RFC1-encoding transcript produced by the pPGK-RFC1 expression vector was diagnostically shorter than the endogenous message and was present only in the transfected cell line. Phosphoimage analysis of multiple samples indicated that the steady state level of total RFC1 message present in the MTX^rA-R16 line was 5-fold higher than in the parental line. Conversely, there was a 30% decrease in the total level of RFC1 message expressed in the MTX^rA line compared with the parental line. The level of reduced folate carrier expressed on the surface of these three cell lines was determined by measuring specific cell surface binding of [^3H]MTX at 0 °C. As shown in Table 1, the level of specific [^3H]MTX binding roughly correlated with the total level of RFC1 message present upon Northern analysis.


Figure 2: Northern analysis. Total RNA was isolated from L1210 parent, MTX^rA, and MTX^rA-R16 (R16) cells, fractionated on 1.0% formaldehyde-agarose gels, and transferred to Nytran. The blots were hybridized successively with an RFC1-specific probe (2300 nt) and a probe specific for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The large and small arrowheads designate, respectively, the endogenous RFC1 transcript and the transcript produced from the pPGK-RFC1 expression vector. Transcripts were quantitated by phosphoimage analysis of the radioactive blots and normalized to GAPDH.





MTX Influx Studies

As shown in Fig. 3, the 5-fold increase in the level of RFC1 expression in the MTX^rA-R16 transfectant resulted not only in a restoration of MTX uptake, but in a nearly 10-fold increase in MTX influx compared with L1210 parental cells. In fact, influx of 0.1 µM [^3H]MTX in MTX^rA-R16 cells was slightly greater than the influx of 1 µM [^3H]MTX in the parental line. The recovery of MTX transport in the MTX^rA-R16 cell line was reflected in its restored sensitivity to MTX in growth inhibition studies. This transfectant exhibited an IC of 4.0 nM, a value which is 200- and 2.4-fold less than that of MTX^rA and L1210 parental cells, respectively. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that the mutation identified in RFC1 in the MTX^rA cell line is responsible for the observed MTX transport defect.


Figure 3: Transport of [^3H]MTX in parental L1210, MTX^rA, and MTX^rA-R16 cell lines. Cells were harvested, washed, resuspended in HEPES-buffered saline, and at time 0, exposed to 1 µM [^3H]MTX (closed symbols) or 0.1 µM [^3H] MTX (open symbol). The graph is representative of four experiments.



As there is virtually no uptake of MTX in the MTX^rA cell line, transport in MTX^rA-R16 cells must be meditated entirely by the transfected RFC1 and should exhibit properties essentially identical to those of the well characterized L1210 parental cell line. In parental cells, MTX influx mediated by the classical reduced folate carrier has the general characteristics of a carrier mediated process(19) , is unaffected by metabolic poisons(13, 20, 21) , exhibits sensitivity to structurally unrelated organic and inorganic ions(22, 23, 24) , and shows preference for MTX and reduced folates (k(m) = 1-5 µM) compared with folic acid (k(m) = 100-200 µM)(5, 25) .

As shown in Fig. 4, [^3H]MTX influx in the transfectant was relatively insensitive to the presence of 5 µM folic acid but was inhibited nearly 60% by 5 µM 5-formyltetrahydrofolate. As in parental L1210 cells, the addition of the inorganic anion sulfobromophthalein (100 µM) nearly abolished the influx of [^3H]MTX in the transfectant. In contrast, the presence of 10 mM azide had essentially no effect on [^3H]MTX influx. Finally, transport by the classical reduced folate carrier in parental L1210 cells shows the characteristic of influx stimulation by the presence within the intracellular compartment of a similar substrate which shares this carrier. Accordingly, there was a 1.13-fold trans-stimulation of [^3H]MTX influx when the transfectant was preloaded with dl-5-formyltetrahydrofolate. These results demonstrate that the restored (and augmented) MTX influx mediated by the transfected RFC1 has properties of the well characterized reduced folate carrier and that RFC1 indeed encodes this classical murine folate transporter.


Figure 4: Effect of various treatments on initial rates of [^3H]MTX uptake in MTX^rA-R16 cells. MTX^rA-R16 cells were harvested, washed, resuspended in HEPES-buffered saline, and at time 0, simultaneously exposed to 0.1 µM [^3H]MTX and either 5 µM folic acid or 5 µM 5-formyltetrahydrofolate. Details of the sulfobromophthalein (BSP), azide, and trans-stimulation treatments are described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Data represent the mean ± S.E. of four experiments.



Potential Splice Forms

Additional sequence analysis of random RT-PCR-generated clones identified a potential RFC1 splice variant which was present in a small percentage of the clones. This specific variant exhibited a 119-bp deletion (loss of nt T nt G) and is considered to result from alternative splicing because: (a) it is present in clones isolated from both the parental and mutant cell lines, (b) it arose in several independent RT-PCR reactions, and (c) the 3` junction of this 119-bp deletion maps to the exact 3` site of an internal deletion found by Williams et al.(7) in an RFC1 clone isolated from a CHO cDNA library (nt 940 based on the CHO sequence). While this 119-bp deletion alters the normal RFC1 reading frame, the resulting novel polypeptide continues for an additional 72 amino acid residues before reaching a termination codon. In its entirety, the predicted protein that would result from translation of this splice form is one-third shorter than the full-length RFC1 and has a novel hydrophilic COOH terminus which comprises 20% of the protein. Interestingly, this predicted polypeptide essentially bisects the full-length RFC1, having only the first six hydrophobic transmembrane domains which are present in the full-length RFC1.

Identification of RFC1 Alleles

The original MTX^rA clonal line was isolated by a single step selection in 50 nM MTX and has essentially no MTX transport capacity. Accordingly, in the present study, no cDNA clones encoding a functional RFC1 were isolated from these cells by either RT-PCR or from the cDNA library. This data suggests that either the MTX^rA line does not have an allele which encodes a functional RFC1 protein or alternatively, that this cell line has two distinct RFC1 alleles (functional and mutated) but that it expresses only the mutated allele. Fortuitously, the mutation present in the MTX^rA line generates two new restriction sites (BsaHI and NlaIV) and results in the loss of another (Sau96I). Thus, it was possible to distinguish between the two RFC1 alleles utilizing genomic PCR and subsequent restriction analysis of the amplified fragment. As detailed in Table 2and shown in Fig. 5, the amplified fragment from parental L1210 cells generates a restriction pattern that is characteristic of the functional RFC1 allele only. In the MTX^rA line, however, the amplified fragment generates a restriction pattern which is indicative of both the functional and mutated alleles. While the inability of the MTX^rA cell line to express a functional RFC1 could be due to an inactivating gene rearrangement at the RFC1 gene locus, no such event was evident by Southern analysis (data not shown).




Figure 5: Genomic amplification and restriction analysis of the RFC1 alleles. Genomic DNA from L1210 parental and MTX^rA cells was isolated and a 520-bp RFC1 fragment amplified as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' The fragment was restricted with the indicated enzymes and fractionated on a 6% TBE polyacrylamide gel. Molecular weight markers are the 1-kilobase ladder (Life Technologies, Inc.). Novel restriction fragments generated by the loss or gain of a restriction site in the mutant RFC1 allele (see Table 2) are indicated by bullets to the right of the fragments.




DISCUSSION

We previously described an L1210 cell line, designated MTX^rA, which exhibited a 100-fold increased resistance to MTX by virtue of a novel, functional defect in the reduced folate carrier(10, 13) . A cDNA (RFC1) thought to encode the reduced folate carrier has recently been isolated and, in the present study, we cloned and characterized cDNAs encoding this protein from the MTX^rA cell line and identified a single mutation in the RFC1 protein that results in the substitution of a proline residue for an alanine. When the parental RFC1 was transfected into MTX^rA cells, MTX sensitivity was regained and MTX transport restored. The transport properties of the restored MTX uptake in the transfectant were identical to those of the well characterized classical reduced folate carrier present in parental L1210 cells. This confirms that RFC1 does indeed encode this transport protein and that, in the MTX^rA cell line, the mutation identified in this protein is responsible for the defective MTX transport phenotype.

Based on hydrophobicity plots, the RFC1 protein is predicted to have 12 alpha-helical transmembrane spanning domains(6) . The alanine proline substitution identified in the MTX^rA line occurs in one such domain in a highly conserved region of the protein. Transmembrane alpha-helices of integral membrane transport proteins, such as the family of glucose transporters, are believed to form channels through which substrates pass(26, 27) . While proline residues frequently occur in such transmembrane helices (serving both structural and dynamic roles), this imino acid generally has significant alpha-helix destabilizing features(28) . Random insertion of a proline residue into a protein would be expected to have adverse structural consequences due to the induction of backbone kinks. In the present case, such a structural alteration in a transmembrane region of RFC1 could result in a functional change that readily prevents substrate passage into the cell (i.e. 100-fold decrease in V(max)) without having an effect on substrate binding (i.e. unchanged K(m)).

The MTX^rA cell line is essentially unable to transport MTX and all of the RFC1-encoding cDNAs isolated from this line contained the alanine proline mutation. Therefore, it was apparent that the MTX^rA cell line either did not have a parental (i.e. functional) RFC1 allele or that, if one was present, it was not expressed. Southern analyses and diagnostic restrictions of an amplified genomic RFC1 fragment unequivocally demonstrated that a structurally unaltered parental RFC1 allele was present in the MTX^rA cell line. As such, it appears that the initial selection of the clonal MTX^rA cell line in 50 nM MTX was the result of two events: 1) a G C transversion mutation which led to the substitution of a proline for an alanine in one RFC1 allele, and 2) either a second mutation or epigenetic mechanism which led to a silencing of the functional RFC1 allele. While a second mutational event may have occurred, it would likely be present in the 5`-regulatory region of the RFC1 gene and would not have been detected in this study. Alternatively, drug induced DNA hypermethylation and subsequent inactivation of the functional RFC1 allele is also quite possible. DNA hypermethylation has been shown to occur as a normal cellular response to drugs such as MTX which inhibit DNA synthesis(29, 30) . Furthermore, as DNA methylation is often associated with gene silencing, Nyce (29) has suggested that hypermethylation may aid in the development of drug resistance by inactivating genes whose products are required for drug toxicity. In fact, a previous study by Hsueh and Dolnick (31) has shown that decreased expression of a folate receptor due to hypermethylation of the encoding gene is, in large part, responsible for the MTX resistance which developed in a human KB cell line following selection for growth on the drug.

Williams et al.(7) identified several RFC1 clones from a CHO cDNA library that contained internal deletions and were suggestive of alternative splicing. In the present study, a potential alternative RFC1 splice form was identified in a number of RT-PCR generated clones isolated from these L1210 cell lines. While multiple RFC1 transcripts were not visible on Northern analysis, the size of this potential splice form may not differ significantly from the major RFC1 transcript or its steady state level of expression may simply be too low to visualize. The nucleotide sequence of this splice form predicts a protein which contains the first six transmembrane domains of the RFC1 protein followed by a novel hydrophilic carboxyl terminus of 72 amino acid residues. While there is no evidence that this transcript is ultimately translated into a functional protein, it should be noted that other investigators have demonstrated the presence of alternative MTX transport systems with properties distinct from the classical reduced folate carrier(32, 33, 34, 35, 36) . Additionally, Horne et al.(37) have characterized a transporter that mediates the translocation of reduced folates into mitochondria. The potential presence of additional protein information (42 amino acid residues, see Fig. 1) encoded upstream of the putative ATG start codon raises the possibility that putative RFC1 splice forms could be targeted to different membrane systems. Together, these observations raise the possibility that alternative splice forms of the RFC1 gene transcript may give rise to transmembrane carriers which have distinct structural, biochemical, and thermodynamic properties.

Finally, the homologous murine expression system resulting from a combination of the MTX^rA cell line and the pTK-PGK expression vector developed in this study will be a very useful model for expression and characterization of RFC1 transport proteins that contain specifically engineered mutations. Such structure-function studies may aid in the development of additional pharmacologic agents which utilize this carrier for transport into the cell.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by National Cancer Institute Grants CA-39807, CA-09340, and CA-09349. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBank(TM)/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) U32469[GenBank].

§
To whom requests for reprints should be addressed: Dept. of Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Box 980230 MCV Station, Richmond, VA 23298.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: MTX, methotrexate; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; nt, nucleotide; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT, reverse transcription; bp, base pair(s).


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Mary Leftwich and Cathy Leyco for technical assistance and Eric Westin and Rick Moran for helpful discussions.


REFERENCES

  1. Sirotnak, F. M. (1987) NCI Monogr. 5,27-35 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Albrecht, A. M., and Bierer, B. E. (1984) in Folate Antagonists as Therapeutic Agents (Sirotnak, F. M., ed) pp. 317-353, Academic Press, New York
  3. Goldman, I. D., and Matherly, L. H. (1985) Pharmacol. & Ther. 28,77-102
  4. Sirotnak, F. M. (1980) Pharmacol. & Ther. 8,71-103
  5. Henderson, G. B., Grzelakowska-Sztabert, B., Zevely, E. M., and Huennekens, F. M. (1980) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 202,144-149 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Dixon, K. H., Lanpher, B. C., Chiu, J., Kelley, K., and Cowan, K. H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,17-20 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Williams, F. M. R., Murray, R. C., Underhill, T. M., and Flintoff, W. F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,5810-5816 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Prasad, P. D., Ramamoorthy, S., Leibach, F. H., and Ganapathy, V. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 206,681-687 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Williams, F. M. R., and Flintoff, W. F. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270,2987-2992 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Schuetz, J. D., Westin, E. H., Matherly, L. H., Pincus, R., Swerdlow, P. S., and Goldman, I. D. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264,16261-16267 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Price, E. M., Ratnam, M., Rodeman, K. M., and Freisheim, J. H. (1988) Biochemistry 27,7853-7858 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Fan, J., Vitols, K. S., and Huennekens, F. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266,14862-14865 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Spinella, M. J., Brigle, K. E., Sierra, E. E., and Goldman, I. D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270,7842-7849 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Fry, D. W., and Goldman, I. D. (1982) J. Membr. Biol. 66,87-95 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Brigle, K. E., Seither, R. L., Westin, E. H., and Goldman, I. D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,4267-4272 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Devereux, J., Haeberli, P., and Smithies, O. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12,387-395 [Abstract]
  17. von Heijne, G., Steppuhn, J., and Herrmann, R. G. (1989) Eur. J. Biochem. 180,535-545 [Abstract]
  18. Verner, K., and Schatz, G. (1988) Science 241,1307-1313 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Goldman, I. D., Lichtenstein, N. S., and Oliverio, V. T. (1968) J. Biol. Chem. 243,5007-5017 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Fry, D. W., White, J. C., and Goldman, I. D. (1980) Cancer Res. 40,3669-3673 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Goldman, I. D. (1969) J. Biol. Chem. 244,3779-3785 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Goldman, I. D. (1971) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 186,400-422 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Yang, C.-H., Sirotnak, F. M., and Dembo, M. (1984) J. Membr. Biol. 79,285-292 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Henderson, G. B., and Zevely, E. M. (1983) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 221,438-446 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Sirotnak, F. M. (1985) Cancer Res. 45,3992-4000 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Gould, G. W., and Holman, G. D. (1993) Biochem. J. 295,329-341 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Hresko, R. C., Kruse, M., Strube, M., and Mueckler, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,20482-20488 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Williams, K. A., and Deber, C. M. (1991) Biochemistry 30,8919-8923 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Nyce, J. (1989) Cancer Res. 49,5829-5836 [Abstract]
  30. Nyce, J., Leonard, S., Canupp, D., Schulz, S., and Wong, S. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90,2960-2964 [Abstract]
  31. Hsueh, C.-T., and Dolnick, B. J. (1994) Biochem. Pharmacol. 47,1019-1027 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Horne, D. W., Briggs, W. T., and Wagner, C. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253,3529-3535 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Gewirtz, D. A., White, J. C., Randolph, J. K., and Goldman, I. D. (1980) Cancer Res. 40,573-578 [Abstract]
  34. Zimmerman, J. (1992) Biochem. Pharmacol. 44,1839-1842 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Zimmerman, J. (1992) Biochem. Pharmacol. 43,2377-2383 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Henderson, G. B., and Strauss, B. P. (1990) Cancer Res. 50,1709-1714 [Abstract]
  37. Horne, D. W., Holloway, R. S., and Said, H. M. (1992) J. Nutr. 122,2204-2209 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.