©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Interaction of Integrin with Multiple Fibrinogen Domains during Platelet Adhesion (*)

(Received for publication, August 17, 1995)

Brian Savage Enrica Bottini (§) Zaverio M. Ruggeri (¶)

From the Roon Research Center for Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis, Division of Experimental Hemostasis and Thrombosis, Departments of Molecular and Experimental Medicine and of Vascular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

We have investigated how modulation of integrin alphabeta(3) function influences the mechanisms that initiate platelet thrombus formation onto surface-bound fibrinogen and isolated fibrinogen domains. Under stationary conditions and with full activation of platelets blocked by prostaglandin E(1), the carboxyl-terminal sequence is necessary for establishing initial contact with the immobilized substrate. Molecules containing a single copy of this sequence, like the plasmin-generated fibrinogen fragment D, support platelet spreading, but the resulting attachment to the surface is loose and disrupted by minimal peeling force. In contrast, platelets adhere firmly to intact fibrinogen under the same conditions, suggesting that recognition of contact sites outside a single D domain can secure the firm interaction not supported by a single sequence. If platelets are activated, the sequence is no longer necessary to initiate the adhesion process but becomes sufficient, even as a single copy, to mediate stable surface attachment in the absence of shear stress. Under conditions of flow, however, intact fibrinogen but not fragment D can support adhesion, regardless of whether platelets have the potential to become activated or not. These results indicate the functional relevance of multiple fibrinogen domains during the initial stages of the platelet adhesion process.


INTRODUCTION

Fibrinogen is required for normal hemostasis not only as the precursor of fibrin but also to mediate platelet thrombus formation (1) . With respect to the latter role, fibrinogen can support both platelet-surface and platelet-platelet interactions, i.e. platelet adhesion and aggregation, respectively(2, 3) , by binding to the glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor (integrin alphabeta(3))(4, 5, 6) . These two functions occur in sequence at the onset of hemostasis and, when deranged in pathological conditions, may cause vascular occlusion. Platelet adhesion and aggregation are influenced by changes in the recognition specificity of alphabeta(3), which, as present on the membrane of nonactivated platelets, serves as a specific receptor for surface-bound fibrinogen (7, 8) but, after activation, acquires the ability to interact with other immobilized adhesive proteins, particularly von Willebrand factor(8) . Moreover, alphabeta(3) activation is required for the binding of soluble fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor (9, 10) leading to aggregation(3, 11) .

Fibrinogen contains three putative platelet interaction sites, namely the sequence Arg-Gly-Asp-Phe (RGDF) at Aalpha, the sequence Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser (RGDS) at Aalpha, and the dodecapeptide sequence His-His-Leu-Gly-Gly-Ala-Lys-Gln-Ala-Gly-Asp-Val (HHLGGAKQAGDV) at (12, 13) . Small synthetic peptides reproducing each of the three sequences have been shown to bind to alphabeta(3) regardless of its state of activation(14, 15) . It is not yet known, however, how these different sites, and possibly others(16) , contribute to the complex adhesive functions of the intact fibrinogen macromolecule. Evidence obtained with recombinant mutants indicates a predominant role for the carboxyl-terminal chain dodecapeptide in the binding of soluble fibrinogen to activated platelets and thus in mediating aggregation(17, 18) . Moreover, it has been postulated that the presence of two chain carboxyl-terminal domains in the dimeric fibrinogen molecule may influence the adhesion of nonstimulated platelets when the ligand is immobilized onto a surface(19) . To elucidate mechanisms important in the initiation of platelet response to vascular injury, we have evaluated the ability of intact fibrinogen and isolated fibrinogen fragments to interact with platelets and support their attachment to a surface. The results obtained indicate that multiple sites are responsible for the adhesive potential of fibrinogen depending on the state of alphabeta(3) activation. Modulation of the interaction with distinct domains in an appropriate substrate may be an example applicable to the activity of different integrins involved with the adhesive functions of vascular cells exposed to flowing blood.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Purification of Adhesive Proteins

Fibrinogen was purified from blood collected in acid/citrate/dextrose anticoagulant containing 0.1 M (final concentration) -aminocaproic acid, using the glycine precipitation method (20) as previously reported(21) . Fragments D and E were prepared by digestion of purified fibrinogen with plasmin in 20 mM Hepes/150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4(7) . After purification, the fibrinogen fragments were characterized using specific monoclonal antibodies reacting with the different putative adhesion sites in fibrinogen as described previously in detail(7, 22) .

Monoclonal Antibodies

The anti-fibrinogen monoclonal antibody used for these studies, LJ-Z69/8 (IgM), was generated using as immunogen a synthetic peptide corresponding to residues 400-411 of the fibrinogen chain and has been shown to recognize an epitope located in the D domain of the molecule including the carboxyl-terminal region of the chain(7, 23) . Two complex specific anti-alphabeta(3) antibodies (IgG) were utilized; their preparation and characterization has already been reported(8, 21) . LJ-CP8 inhibits the interaction of soluble ligands, including fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor, with activated platelets as well as the adhesion of nonactivated platelets to immobilized fibrinogen; LJ-P4, in contrast, has no appreciable inhibitory effect on the ligand-binding function of the receptor. The two antibodies do not compete for binding to platelets. The beta(3)-specific monoclonal antibody, AP5, was a generous gift from Dr. Thomas J. Kunicki (The Scripps Research Institute); it was prepared and characterized as described previously (24) and was used to ``activate'' alphabeta(3). This antibody interacts with an epitope modulated by ligand occupancy of the receptor and located in the amino-terminal region of beta(3)(24) ; binding of the antibody, in turn, induces soluble ligand interaction with alphabeta(3) even when platelet activation is inhibited(24) . IgG and IgM antibodies were purified as previously reported (7) and stored in 20 mM Hepes/150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4, at -70 °C until used.

Platelet Adhesion Assay and Scanning Electron Microscopy

The stationary adhesion assay was performed essentially as described previously, using platelets in native plasma to avoid activation due to manipulation(8) . Briefly, 4-mm polystyrene wells (96 wells/plate) were coated overnight at room temperature (22-25 °C) with 50 µl of a 50 µg/ml solution of fibrinogen or fibrinogen fragments in 0.04 M phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, containing 0.15 M NaCl (PBS-8). Previous studies demonstrated no significant differences in the coating efficiency of the ligands used(7) . Bovine serum albumin was used as a control protein. After removal of the coating solution by aspiration, the plates were blocked with 0.2% bovine serum albumin in PBS-8 for 1 h at room temperature. When indicated, the substrate coated on the surface was treated before the assay with 100 µg/ml of antibody LJ-Z69/8 for 1 h at room temperature; the antibody was then removed by aspiration, and the surface was washed twice with 100 µl of 0.04 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 0.15 M NaCl (PBS-7.4). Platelet-rich plasma was isolated from freshly drawn blood containing the thrombin inhibitor D-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone dihydrochloride (PPACK) (final concentration, 40 µM) and supplemented, where indicated, with prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)) (^1)(final concentration, 10 µM). Platelets in plasma were incubated in the protein-coated wells at room temperature for the appropriate time. In some experiments, platelets were stimulated by the addition of epinephrine (final concentration, 20 µM) or of the activating antibody AP5 (final concentration, 60 µg/ml IgG) before incubation in the protein-coated wells. Where indicated, platelets were incubated with 100 µg/ml of function blocking anti-alphabeta(3) monoclonal antibody, LJ-CP8, before the assay. To measure platelets firmly attached to the substrate, the content of the wells was removed by aspiration at the end of the incubation, and the surface was washed twice with PBS-7.4 before addition of I-labeled anti-alphabeta(3) monoclonal antibody LJ-P4 (4 µg/ml; 50 µl/well). After 30 min at room temperature, unbound antibody was removed by aspiration, and the wells were washed twice with PBS-7.4 to decrease nonspecific binding. The content of the wells was solubilized with 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and the I-associated radioactivity was measured to estimate the number of adherent platelets. Note that the repeated washing steps necessary to reduce the background radioactivity in the wells removed all platelets not firmly attached to the surface (see ``Results and Discussion'').

Platelets interacting with the surface-bound substrate were visualized by scanning electron microscopy in two ways. For the study of loosely attached platelets, wells were subjected to a single gentle washing by adding 100 µl of PBS-7.4 followed by mild aspiration of the fluid. Attached platelets were immediately fixed with modified Karnovsky fixative (1.5% glutaraldehyde and 2.0% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4; 50 µl/well) for 60 min at 4 °C. Samples were dehydrated using graded ethanol and freon 113, critical point-dried in freon 13, and sputter-coated using a carbon target prior to analysis. For the study of irreversibly attached platelets, washing was repeated four times before fixing.

Flow Studies

Platelet interaction with immobilized fibrinogen and fragment D under flow conditions was studied using a parallel plate perfusion chamber in which a glass coverslip coated with the adhesive substrate formed the lower surface and a silicone rubber gasket determined a flow path height of 254 µm between this and the upper plate made of nonreactive plastic. The chamber was assembled and filled with PBS-7.4. A syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus Inc.) and silicone tubing connections were used to aspirate blood through the chamber at a constant flow rate calculated to give a wall shear rate of 50 s. Platelets were labeled in whole blood by incubation with the fluorescent dye mepacrine (quinacrine dihydrochloride; final concentration, 10 µM)(25) . Although this dye also labels leukocytes, the latter could be readily distinguished from platelets by their relatively large size and sparsity; moreover, leukocytes showed no tendency to adhere to fibrinogen and fragment D. Labeled red cells were not visualized due to quenching of the fluorescence by hemoglobin. Mepacrine accumulates in the dense granules of platelets and has been reported to have no effect on function at the concentration used(26) . Platelet secretion of mepacrine from dense granules after adhesion did not cause a detectable decrease of fluorescence under the experimental conditions used. Furthermore, a pilot study was performed to ensure that mepacrine did not alter platelet adhesion. In this study, unlabeled blood was perfused through the flow chamber and adherent platelets were post-labeled with mepacrine without interrupting flow. Under these conditions, platelet uptake of mepacrine occurred almost instantly, and no quantitative differences were found between the results of pre-labeled and post-labeled samples. The flow chamber, mounted on an inverted epifluorescence microscope (Axiovert 135 M, Carl Zeiss Inc.), allowed direct visualization in real time of the platelet adhesion process, which was recorded on tape using a video cassette recorder (Magnavox).


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Platelet Interaction with Adhesive Domains of Immobilized Fibrinogen

First we evaluated the extent to which intact fibrinogen and two plasmin-derived fragments containing known alphabeta(3)-binding sites support platelet adhesion. Sequence-specific antibodies were used to demonstrated the presence of the carboxyl-terminal dodecapeptide sequence at in fragment D and of the RGDF sequence at Aalpha in fragment E(7) . Examination by scanning electron microscopy revealed that platelets in the plasma milieu became firmly attached to surfaces coated with fibrinogen or fragment D, showing multiple pseudopodia, extensive spreading and aggregates consisting of platelets interacting mainly with other adhering platelets rather than with the surface (Fig. 1, upper row). These platelets appeared activated, in agreement with the findings in a previous study demonstrating that platelets attached to immobilized fibrinogen can bind the activation-dependent anti-alphabeta(3) monoclonal antibody PAC1(8) . In contrast, platelets treated with PGE(1) to inhibit activation were attached to intact fibrinogen but not to fragment D and, in accordance with previous data(7, 8) , exhibited various stages of spreading but essentially no tendency to aggregate (Fig. 1, lower row). Extensive survey of fragment E-coated surfaces revealed no platelets attached under any conditions (Fig. 1).


Figure 1: Morphologic evaluation of platelets attached to surface-bound fibrinogen and fibrinogen fragments under stationary conditions. Platelets in plasma, isolated from freshly drawn blood containing PPACK, were allowed to attach to polystyrene wells coated with fibrinogen (A), fragment D (B), or fragment E (C) in the absence (upper row) or in the presence (lower row) of PGE(1). After 60 min at room temperature, nonadherent platelets were removed by four aspiration and washing steps, and attached platelets were immediately fixed and processed for analysis by scanning electron microscopy. Note the equivalent extensive platelet spreading and aggregate formation on fibrinogen and fragment D as compared with the absence of platelets on fragment E when platelet activation is not inhibited (upper row) and the absence of platelets on fragments D and E when platelet activation is inhibited with PGE(1) (lower row). Bar, 5 µm.



These findings indicate that the carboxyl terminus of the chain in fragment D can support stable adhesion mediated by alphabeta(3) only when platelets have the potential to become activated but not when they are kept in the ``resting'' state and that the RGDF sequence in fragment E is not active under the same conditions. Thus, isolated fragments D and E (Fig. 1), as well as a combination of the two immobilized together on a surface (not shown here), cannot function like intact fibrinogen in supporting adhesion. This suggests that additional sequences not present in these two fragments are involved in the process and/or that only the native molecule can present multiple adhesive sites in the appropriate conformation for interacting with platelets. As shown below, however, this does not rule out the occurrence of specific interactions with single domains resulting in loose and/or transient attachment that cannot be detected in standard assays because it is disrupted during the washing steps performed to reduce ``nonspecific'' background.

These interpretations rely on the notion that platelets maintained in their plasma environment with intact divalent cation concentrations should be minimally altered by uncontrolled stimulation. Other investigators, however, have found that they behave like washed platelets stimulated by the combination of epinephrine and ADP, whereas nonstimulated washed platelets behave like PGE(1)-treated platelets in plasma(19) . It is debatable whether any ex vivo study is compatible with the absence of stimulation, because the unavoidable manipulations necessary to remove platelets from the circulation may be sufficient to cause functional perturbation. Moreover, the definition of whether circulating platelets are truly resting is essentially arbitrary. For example, platelets in plasma never exposed to exogenous agonists may act like stimulated washed platelets because of the presence of small quantities of activating substances, like ADP, released from erythrocytes or platelets themselves. Alternatively, nonstimulated washed platelets may appear to function like PGE(1)-treated platelets because they are rendered refractory to weak stimuli by activation during isolation procedures. In spite of these problems, our results are in agreement with the previous study(19) , demonstrating that platelets can adhere firmly to fragment D, containing a single chain carboxyl-terminal domain, only when they become activated and that nonstimulated platelets adhere only to substrates, like intact fibrinogen, with two such domains. In view of these findings, additional experiments were designed to evaluate whether the chain carboxyl-terminal sequences are necessary and sufficient to support the adhesive functions of fibrinogen and whether platelet activation can influence their interaction with alphabeta(3).

Time Course of Platelet Adhesion to Immobilized Fibrinogen and Fragment D: Role of the Chain Carboxyl Terminus and Effect of Platelet Activation

Platelets in their plasma environment were firmly attached to fibrinogen already after 20 min of incubation and reached nearly maximal adhesion by 30 min, a time at which stable attachment to fragment D was still negligible; however, comparable adhesion to the two substrates was observed at 60 min (Fig. 2). In several experiments, platelets were exposed to the immobilized substrate for up to 80 min, but the results obtained were essentially as seen at 60 min. Of note, no adhesion to fragment E occurred under the same conditions (six experiments; not shown). Adhesion of untreated platelets to both fibrinogen and fragment D was completely inhibited at all time points tested by the anti-alphabeta(3) monoclonal antibody LJ-CP8, confirming that the process is strictly dependent on the function of this receptor (Fig. 2). On the other hand, an antibody against the chain carboxyl terminus, LJ-Z69/8, could completely block adhesion to fragment D but was only partially effective in blocking adhesion to fibrinogen at later time points (Fig. 2).


Figure 2: Time course of adhesion of untreated platelets to fibrinogen and fragment D: effect of a monoclonal antibody against the chain carboxyl terminus. Platelets in plasma were allowed to incubate in polystyrene wells coated with fibrinogen (upper panel) or fragment D (lower panel) for the times indicated. Before adding platelets, the immobilized ligands were treated with the monoclonal antibody LJ-Z69/8 (100 µg/ml) directed against the fibrinogen chain carboxyl terminus, including residues , or with control buffer (PBS-7.4). After 60 min of incubation, unbound antibody was removed by two washing steps before adding the platelets. In another set of wells, platelets were treated with the anti-alphabeta(3) monoclonal antibody LJ-CP8 (100 µg/ml) for 30 min before incubation with the immobilized ligands. At the end of the incubation period, nonadherent platelets were removed by two consecutive aspiration and washing steps with PBS-7.4. Adherent platelets were detected by adding the nonfunction blocking anti-alphabeta(3) monoclonal antibody, LJ-P4, labeled with I. After 30 min at room temperature, residual unbound antibody was removed by two consecutive aspiration and washing steps. The contents of the wells were solubilized with 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and the I-associated radioactivity was measured to obtain a relative estimate of the number of adherent platelets. The results represent the means ± S.E. for nine separate experiments, each performed in duplicate. Statistical evaluation confirmed that the inhibitory effect of the antibody LJ-Z69/8 was progressively less significant with time in the case of adhesion to fibrinogen (Student's t distribution of control versus treated groups: p < 0.001 at 40 min; p < 0.1 at 60 min) but remained highly significant in the case of adhesion to fragment D (p < 0.001 at 60 min).



Platelets treated with PGE(1) to inhibit the response to activating stimuli still adhered well to intact fibrinogen but, unlike untreated platelets, their interaction was completely inhibited by the anti- chain dodecapeptide antibody, as well as by the anti-alphabeta(3) antibody, regardless of the length of incubation (Fig. 3). Moreover, PGE(1)-treated platelets could not attach firmly to fragment D (Fig. 3).


Figure 3: Time course of adhesion of PGE(1)-treated platelets to fibrinogen and fragment D: effect of a monoclonal antibody against the chain carboxyl terminus. The experiment was performed as described in the legend to Fig. 2with the only exception being that platelets in plasma supplemented with PGE(1) were used instead of untreated platelets. The results represent the means ± S.E. for nine separate experiments, each performed in duplicate.



In marked contrast to these results, platelets in plasma stimulated by the addition of exogenous epinephrine attached firmly to fragment D even after the first time interval of 20 min; the interaction was completely inhibited by the monoclonal antibodies LJ-Z69/8 against the chain carboxyl terminus and LJ-CP8 against alphabeta(3) (Fig. 4). The same platelets adhered well to fibrinogen, but in this case the interaction was still completely inhibited by LJ-CP8 but only minimally affected by LJ-Z69/8 (Fig. 4).


Figure 4: Time course of adhesion of epinephrine-treated platelets to fibrinogen and fragment D. The experiment was performed as described in the legend to Fig. 2with the only exception being that platelets in plasma were treated with epinephrine (final concentration, 20 µM) for 10 min before addition to the substrate-coated wells. The results represent the means ± S.E. for nine separate experiments, each performed in duplicate. Statistical evaluation confirmed that the inhibitory effect of the antibody LJ-Z69/8 was not significant at later time points in the case of adhesion to fibrinogen (Student's t distribution of control versus treated groups: p < 0.025 at 20 min; p > 0.5 at 60 min) but remained highly significant in the case of adhesion to fragment D (p < 0.001 at all time points tested).



These findings support the concept that the chain carboxyl terminus is the only alphabeta(3) interactive site in fragment D but cannot mediate irreversible attachment unless platelets are activated. The sequence is clearly necessary for initiating platelet adhesion to fibrinogen when full activation is blocked and under these conditions two copies of it, as opposed to the single one in fragment D, may support irreversible attachment, as previously suggested(19) . Alternatively, the distinct properties of intact fibrinogen may indicate functional co-operation between this sequence and one or more additional sites present in fibrinogen but not in fragment D. When platelets can become activated, the chain carboxyl-terminal sequence is no longer strictly required to initiate or mediate adhesion to intact fibrinogen, although it retains its essential role in fragment D. This is in agreement with the results of previous studies demonstrating that several domains in fibrinogen can interact with activated alphabeta(3)(7) .

Our findings show that untreated platelets (not inhibited by PGE(1)) exposed for a sufficiently long time to immobilized fibrinogen or fragment D in the absence of any added stimulus, exhibit adhesive properties similar to those of platelets activated by exogenous epinephrine. Indeed, in assays like the one described here performed in the absence of flow, membrane contacts developing when platelets sediment onto the surface over time can induce the release reaction(27) , leading to the local availability of agonists like ADP and thromboxane A(2)(28) , as well as favor guanylate cyclase activation and signal transduction (29) ; thus platelets become activated. Of note, in experiments not reported here, we found that agitation preventing platelet sedimentation during the assay effectively inhibited adhesion to fragment D but not to fibrinogen, in agreement with all the other results indicating that activation is essential for stable attachment to the former but not the latter. It appears, therefore, that the relatively slow time course of adhesion to fragment D exhibited by untreated platelets is a reflection of the slow process of activation upon sedimentation, not the consequence of other undefined properties of this substrate. In agreement with this hypothesis, platelet attachment to fragment D occurred more rapidly after activation with exogenous epinephrine. In the latter situation, as well as in the case of adhesion to fibrinogen, the time course of the process may reflect the rate at which platelets sediment and can interact with the surface more than the generation of stimuli deriving from close contact. Along similar lines, the fact that the anti- chain antibody had no effect on adhesion to fibrinogen of platelets stimulated with epinephrine (Fig. 4), whereas it inhibited partially but significantly that of untreated platelets (Fig. 2), also seems to indicate that activation upon sedimentation is a slow process involving platelets in a nonsynchronous manner; thus only platelets that are not yet activated in the well would fail to adhere to fibrinogen in the presence of the antibody, as shown in Fig. 3for those treated with PGE(1).

Functional Modulation of alphabeta(3): Effects on Platelet Adhesion to Fibrinogen and Fragment D

To evaluate whether the effect of epinephrine was mediated by a change in the functional state of alphabeta(3) following activation as opposed to the possible synergistic amplification of post-occupancy signals not affecting ligand-receptor interactions, we performed experiments using the anti-beta(3) monoclonal antibody AP5, which has been shown to directly activate alphabeta(3) even when platelet stimulation is blocked with PGE(1)(24) . Antibodies like AP5 are thought to cause a conformational change in the alphabeta(3) receptor upon binding to it and induce the ability to interact with soluble ligands (30) , the typical feature of activated alphabeta(3)(31) . In this case, platelets in plasma treated with AP5 became firmly attached to both intact fibrinogen and fragment D whether in the presence or in the absence of PGE(1) (Fig. 5). Such a finding supports the concept that the modulation of alphabeta(3) function, usually thought of as activation, can explain the different adhesive properties of platelets that can respond to stimulation as compared with those treated with PGE(1) that cannot become fully activated. Of note, soluble fibrinogen binding that is expected to occur following treatment with AP5 (24) or epinephrine (32) did not interfere with platelet adhesion to surface-bound substrates, perhaps because the latter interaction with alphabeta(3) is immediately irreversible as opposed to the initially reversible binding of soluble ligands(33) .


Figure 5: Effect of alphabeta(3) activation with the monoclonal antibody, AP5, on platelet adhesion to fibrinogen and fragment D. The experiment was performed as described in the legend to Fig. 2, except that platelets in plasma with or without the addition of PGE(1) were treated with the activating monoclonal antibody AP5 (Fab; final concentration, 50 µg/ml) for 20 min before addition to the substrate-coated wells for 60 min.



Because all the experiments reported to this point were performed in the presence of plasma proteins, it is possible that unidentified molecules interacting differently with immobilized fragment D or fibrinogen modify the surface to which platelets are exposed and influenced the process of adhesion. To rule this out, we performed additional studies, to be described in detail elsewhere, (^2)using heterologous cells expressing recombinant alphabeta(3). In this case, in the absence of any plasma protein, the monoclonal antibody AP5 in the presence of Mncould induce the cells to mimic the function of ``stimulated'' platelets (adhesion to both fibrinogen and fragment D), whereas cells treated with the antibody but without Mn behaved like resting platelets (more prominent adhesion to fibrinogen), demonstrating that specific differences in the receptor-substrate interaction are responsible for the findings observed.

Immobilized Fragment D Can Interact with PGE(1)-treated Platelets

The results of the experiments reported to this point suggest that a single copy of the chain dodecapeptide sequence may interact with nonactivated alphabeta(3) and mediate responses necessary to initiate platelet adhesion, albeit not sufficient to support irreversible attachment without alphabeta(3) activation. In order to examine this hypothesis, platelets treated with PGE(1) were exposed to immobilized fragment D for an appropriate time and then fixed after a single gentle washing step, instead of the usual four, to preserve the stability of weak interactions with the surface; the specimens were then processed and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Under these conditions, extensively spread platelets could be visualized on both fibrinogen and fragment D but not on fragment E or on a bovine serum albumin-coated control surface, where platelets retained the nonspread morphology typically seen with nonactivated platelets (Fig. 6, upper row). Examination at low magnification demonstrated that the occurrence of spreading involved a majority of the platelets interacting with fragment D (Fig. 6, lower row). The anti-alphabeta(3) monoclonal antibody, LJ-CP8, abolished spreading (not shown). These findings prove that the sequence, even when present in a single copy as in fragment D, is recognized by alphabeta(3) on platelets that cannot become fully activated.


Figure 6: Interaction of nonactivated PGE(1)-treated platelets with fragment D. Platelets in plasma supplemented with PGE(1) were allowed to attach to immobilized fibrinogen or fibrinogen fragments under the conditions described in the legend to Fig. 2. However, in order to determine the morphology of any loosely attached platelets that would otherwise be detached by the four washing steps described for the experiment presented in Fig. 2, at the end of the 60-min incubation, surface-associated platelets were fixed and processed for scanning electron microscopy after a single washing step. Upper row, high magnification; bar, 5 µm. Lower row, low magnification; bar, 30 µm. Note extensive platelet spreading on fibrinogen (A) and fragment D (B) but not on fragment E (C) where residual platelets retain a nonspread morphology. Compare the results shown here for fragment D with those shown in Fig. 2(lower row) performed under identical conditions except for the number of washing steps.



A Mechanistic Interpretation of Platelet Adhesion to Fibrinogen in the Absence of Flow

The results of the stationary adhesion assays reported here support a schematic model for the mechanism of platelet adhesion to immobilized fibrinogen involving the interaction of multiple domains of the substrate with alphabeta(3). The latter appears as the necessary receptor participating in the process and possibly the only one, because the other platelet receptor that can bind fibrinogen, alpha(v)beta(3)(34, 35) , is present in limited copy number on platelets (36, 37) and presumably has a negligible functional role. With regard to fibrinogen, the dodecapeptide sequence is clearly required to mediate the initial contact with nonstimulated platelets (Fig. 3) and, as a single copy, it is also sufficient to support subsequent spreading and loose attachment to the surface (Fig. 6). If full activation cannot proceed, however, stable adhesion can only occur when one or more additional sites, yet to be defined, are present as in native fibrinogen (Fig. 3). The concept of additional sites includes a second copy of the sequence.

If platelets can be activated normally and alphabeta(3) function can be modulated, platelet adhesion to fibrinogen may proceed along different pathways, because the chain carboxyl terminus is no longer strictly required to initiate or mediate the process (Fig. 4) but, even as a single copy, becomes sufficient to support stable adhesion (Fig. 2). Thus, other fibrinogen domains in addition to and distinct from the dodecapeptide can interact with activated alphabeta(3). In a static adhesion assay this occurs whenever platelet activation is not impaired, most likely through mechanisms requiring close platelet contact; it can also occur after platelet stimulation with an exogenous agonist (Fig. 4). The difference between the former and the latter is probably one of extent of activation. In the case of a weak stimulus, like that developed when platelets sediment onto a surface, the synergistic effect of the initial contact with an appropriate fibrinogen domain, like the sequence, is still required for adhesion to occur; therefore, nonstimulated but metabolically active platelets adhere selectively to fibrinogen and fragment D, as shown here, but not to other potential adhesive substrates like fibronectin or vitronectin(8) . In the case of a stronger stimulus, for example the combination of ADP plus epinephrine (7) , activated alphabeta(3) becomes less selective and mediates adhesion to other fibrinogen domains, like fragment E, and to other substrates(7) . The latter processes take place under the same conditions required for soluble ligand binding to alphabeta(3), indicating that they depend on full activation of the receptor. Clearly, functional modulation of alphabeta(3) has a profound impact on the mechanism of platelet adhesion to surface-bound fibrinogen.

The Multi-domain Structure of Fibrinogen Is Required to Support Platelet Adhesion under Flow Conditions

Platelet interaction with a thrombogenic surface is always subjected to the effects of hemodynamic forces except in limited areas of the vascular system where stagnation may develop. The pathophysiological relevance of the multi-domain structure of fibrinogen with regard to the expression of adhesive function was highlighted by experiments performed with flowing blood at a wall shear rate of 50 s, a relatively low level of shear stress chosen to allow visualization of weak interactions. Platelets with the full potential to become activated adhered irreversibly to intact fibrinogen and, after 5 min of perfusion, formed a homogeneous monolayer on the surface; in contrast, there was essentially no interaction with immobilized fragments D and E (Fig. 7), even though platelets treated in a similar manner adhere to fragment D under stationary conditions (Fig. 1). Identical results were obtained with PGE(1)-treated platelets, indicating that the function of multiple domains in surface-bound fibrinogen may be important for the initiation of thrombus formation by supporting irreversible platelet attachment before full activation takes place. Subsequent activation of alphabeta(3) may then reinforce adhesion and mediate thrombus growth by allowing interacting with soluble adhesive ligands.


Figure 7: Direct real-time observation of platelet interaction with surface-bound fibrinogen and fibrinogen fragments under flow. Substrates were coated onto glass coverslips that were used in a parallel plate flow chamber. Blood containing PPACK as anticoagulant and treated with the fluorescent dye mepacrine (final concentration, 10 µM) was perfused through the flow chamber in the direction indicated by the arrow at 37 °C. A computerized epifluorescence video microscopy system was used for real-time visualization of platelet interaction with surface-bound fibrinogen and fibrinogen fragments. Fluorescent images after 5 min of perfusion at a wall shear rate of 50 s were captured from video tapes; single frames are shown here.




FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported in part by Grants HL-31950 and HL-48728 from the National Institutes of Health. Additional support was provided by National Institutes of Health Grant RR0833 to the General Clinical Research Center of Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation and by the Stein Endowment Fund. This is manuscript 9303-MEM from The Scripps Research Institute. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Deceased.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Scripps Research Inst., SBR-8, 10666 No. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037. Tel.: 619-554-8950; Fax: 619-554-6779; Ruggeri@Scripps.edu.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: PGE(1), prostaglandin E(1); PPACK, D-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone dihydrochloride.

(^2)
I. Stuiver, T. E. O'Toole, T. Kunicki, M. H. Ginsberg, and Z. M. Ruggeri, manuscript in preparation.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Richard McClintock for purifying fibrinogen fragments, James Roberts and Benjamin Gutierrez for preparing monoclonal antibodies, and Faye Miller and Ellye Lukaschewsky for secretarial assistance.


REFERENCES

  1. Ruggeri, Z. M. (1993) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 5, 898-906 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Coller, B. S. (1980) Blood 55, 169-178 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Mustard, J. F., Packham, M. A., Kinlough-Rathbone, R. L., Perry, D. W., and Regoeczi, E. (1978) Blood 52, 453-466 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Nachman, R. L., and Leung, L. L. K. (1982) J. Clin. Invest. 69, 263-269 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Bennett, J. S., Vilaire, G., and Cines, D. B. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 8049-8054 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Gogstad, G. O., Brosstad, F., Krutnes, M., Hagen, I., and Solum, N. O. (1982) Blood 60, 663-671 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Savage, B., and Ruggeri, Z. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11227-11233 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Savage, B., Shattil, S. J., and Ruggeri, Z. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 11300-11306 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Marguerie, G. A., Plow, E. F., and Edgington, T. S. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 5357-5363 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Ruggeri, Z. M., De Marco, L., Gatti, L., Bader, R., and Montgomery, R. R. (1983) J. Clin. Invest. 72, 1-12 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. De Marco, L., Girolami, A., Zimmerman, T. S., and Ruggeri, Z. M. (1986) J. Clin. Invest. 77, 1272-1277 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Hawiger, J., Timmons, S., Kloczewiak, M., Strong, D. D., and Doolittle, R. F. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 79, 2068-2071 [Abstract]
  13. Kloczewiak, M., Timmons, S., Lukas, T., and Hawiger, J. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 1767-1774 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Pytela, R., Pierschbacher, M. D., Ginsberg, M. H., Plow, E. F., and Ruoslahti, E. (1986) Science 231, 1559-1562 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Lam, S. C.-T., Plow, E. F., Smith, M. A., Andrieux, A., Ryckwaert, J.-J., Marguerie, G., and Ginsberg, M. H. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 947-950 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Chen, C. S., Chou, S., and Thiagarajan, P. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 6121-6126 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Farrell, D. H., Thiagarajan, P., Chung, D. W., and Davie, E. W. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 10729-10732 [Abstract]
  18. Farrell, D. H., and Thiagarajan, P. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 226-231 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Gartner, T. K., Amrani, D. L., Derrick, J. M., Kirschbaum, N. E., Matsueda, G. R., and Taylor, D. B. (1993) Thromb. Res. 71, 47-60 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Kazal, L. A., Amsel, S., Miller, O. P., and Tocantins, L. M. (1963) Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 113, 989-994
  21. Niiya, K., Hodson, E., Bader, R., Byers-Ward, V., Koziol, J. A., Plow, E. F., and Ruggeri, Z. M. (1987) Blood 70, 475-483 [Abstract]
  22. Cheresh, D. A., Berliner, A. S., Vicente, V., and Ruggeri, Z. M. (1989) Cell 58, 945-953 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Abrams, C. S., Ruggeri, Z. M., Taub, R., Hoxie, J. A., Nagaswami, C., Weisle, J. W., and Shattil, S. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 2775-2785 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Honda, S., Tomiyama, Y., Pelletier, A. J., Annis, D., Honda, Y., Orchekowski, R., Ruggeri, Z., and Kunicki, T. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 11947-11954 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Alevriadou, B. R., Moake, J. L., Turner, N. A., Ruggeri, Z. M., Folie, B. J., Phillips, M. D., Schreiber, A. B., Hrinda, M. E., and McIntire, L. V. (1993) Blood 81, 1263-1276 [Abstract]
  26. Dise, C. A., Burch, J. W., and Goodman, D. B. P. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 4701-4704 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Massini, P., and Luscher, E. F. (1971) Thromb. Diath. Haemorrh. 25, 13-20 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Packham, M. A., Kinlough-Rathbone, R. L., and Mustard, J. F. (1987) Blood 70, 647-651 [Abstract]
  29. Edgecombe, M., Scrutton, M. C., and Kerry, R. (1993) Platelets 4, 141-149
  30. O'Toole, T. E., Loftus, J. C., Xiaoping, D., Glass, A. A., Ruggeri, Z. M., Shattil, S. J., Plow, E. F., and Ginsberg, M. H. (1990) Cell Reg. 1, 883-893 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Ginsberg, M. H., Loftus, J. C., and Plow, E. F. (1988) Thromb. Haemostasis 59, 1-6 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Plow, E. F., and Marguerie, G. A. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 10971-10977 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Marguerie, G. A., Edgington, T. S., and Plow, E. F. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 154-161 [Free Full Text]
  34. Smith, J. W., Ruggeri, Z. M., Kunicki, T. J., and Cheresh, D. A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 12267-12271 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Lam, S. C.-T., Plow, E. F., D'Souza, S. E., Cheresh, D. A., Frelinger, A. L., and Ginsberg, M. H. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 3742-3749 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Coller, B. S., Cheresh, D. A., Asch, E., and Seligsohn, U. (1991) Blood 77, 75-83 [Abstract]
  37. Coller, B. S., Seligsohn, U., West, S. N., Scudder, L. E., and Norton, K. J. (1991) Blood 78, 2603-2610 [Abstract]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.