©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Binding of Shc to the NPXY Motif Is Mediated by Its N-terminal Domain (*)

(Received for publication, April 19, 1995; and in revised form, July 26, 1995)

Sally A. Prigent (1)(§) Tahir S. Pillay (2) Kodimangalam S. Ravichandran (3) William J. Gullick (4)

From the  (1)University of California, San Diego Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0684, (2)Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, (3)Division of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, and (4)Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund Oncology Unit, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 OHS, United Kingdom

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Shc is an SH2-containing adapter protein that binds to and is phosphorylated by a large number of growth factor receptors. Phosphorylated Shc is able to interact with the Grb2-Sos complex which is responsible for mediating nucleotide exchange on Ras. We have shown previously that binding of Shc to the epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like receptor, c-ErbB-3, is through an NPXY motif (Prigent, S. A., and Gullick, W. J.(1994) EMBO J. 13, 2831-2841) shared by middle T antigen, TrkA, and EGF receptor. It has recently been reported that a region distinct from the SH2 domain is able to bind to tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins. In this paper we have used fusion proteins of various Shc domains to show that it is the N-terminal domain of Shc that is primarily responsible for binding EGF receptor and c-ErbB-3. Furthermore, by competition studies with synthetic phosphopeptides we have shown that this N-terminal domain binds to the previously identified NPXY motif.


INTRODUCTION

The Shc gene product was isolated from cDNA libraries by screening with probes corresponding to SH2 domain sequences(1) . It contains three distinct domains: a single SH2 domain in the C-terminal portion of the protein; a region with homology to collagen, which contains a tyrosine phosphorylation site at position 317 responsible for binding the adapter protein Grb2; and an N-terminal region of poorly defined structure and function. In contrast to Grb2, the Shc protein is transforming when expressed in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. Association of Shc with Grb2 appears to be essential for this transforming ability since mutants lacking the Tyr-317 phosphorylation site lose their ability to induce neoplastic transformation(2) . The Shc protein is ubiquitously expressed and is involved in the signaling pathways of many different classes of proteins. Tyrosine kinase receptors including those of the EGF (^1)receptor(3, 4, 5) , insulin receptor(6, 7, 8) , platelet-derived growth factor receptor(9) , and nerve growth factor receptor families (10) utilize Shc as do non-receptor kinases such as v-Src, v-Fps, and p56(11, 12, 13) . Other receptors that form complexes with Shc include the interleukin receptors(14, 15, 16) , the B-cell antigen receptor (17, 18) , the T-cell receptor(19) , and the erythropoietin receptor (20) . Recently it has been shown that Shc is phosphorylated in response to endothelin, which utilizes a heterotrimeric G-protein-coupled receptor(21) . Shc has also been demonstrated to bind to middle T antigen and is involved in middle T antigen-induced transformation (22) . Shc would therefore appear to be a highly versatile molecule involved in the function of diverse families of proteins.

We have previously identified the binding site for Shc on the type I growth factor receptor c-ErbB-3 as tyrosine 1309(4) . This tyrosine is contained in a motif Asn-Pro-X-Tyr (NPXY). Comparison of this site with the then reported Shc binding sites on TrkA and middle T antigen (11, 22, 23) led us to propose that this binding motif represented a consensus binding site for Shc(4) . These studies were performed by generating NIH 3T3 cell lines expressing a chimeric EGF receptor/c-ErbB-3 protein, which contained the extracellular portion of EGF receptor linked to the intracellular domain of c-ErbB-3. Following activation by EGF, we were able to detect binding of Shc to the EGF receptor/c-ErbB-3 chimera, which could be inhibited by introducing a phosphopeptide corresponding to tyrosine 1309 of c-ErbB-3 into the cells by streptolysin O permeabilization.

The SH2 domain of Shc has been shown to bind directly to a number of receptors including the EGF receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and T-cell receptors but not to c-ErbB-3. The binding preference of the Shc SH2 domain has been mapped using a degenerate peptide library to the generalized motif phosphotyrosine-hydrophobic-X-hydrophobic(24) . This consensus sequence is inconsistent with binding to the NPXY motif previously identified and as a result has generated confusion in the literature. In addition, for all previously identified SH2 interactions, the three residues C-terminal to the phosphotyrosine residue have been identified as the critical residues for binding. Very recently it has been reported that the N-terminal region of Shc contains a novel domain capable of binding phosphotyrosine residues(25, 26) . It was therefore the objective of this study to determine whether the N-terminal domain of Shc is responsible for binding to the NPXY motif of c-ErbB-3 and EGF receptor.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

GST-Shc Fusion Proteins

GST-Shc constructs in the pGEX2T vector were as described previously (27) and are illustrated in Fig. 1. Fusion proteins were expressed in the protease-deficient Escherichia coli strain BL21 by induction with 0.1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-beta-D-galactopyranoside overnight at 30 °C. Bacteria were lysed using 1 mg/ml lysozyme in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 10 µg/ml each of the protease inhibitors leupeptin, aprotinin, and pepstatin, and fusion proteins were recovered by binding to glutathione-agarose. Following extensive washing (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100) a 10-µl sample was analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Coomassie Blue staining together with bovine serum albumin standards to estimate the amount of protein bound. 10 µg of bound protein was used per precipitation.


Figure 1: Diagrammatic representation of Shc domains expressed as GST fusion proteins.



Cell Lines

NIH 3T3 cells expressing approximately 10^5 human EGF receptors/cell (EGFR-3T3) were kindly provided by Dr. D. Hills, ICRF Oncology Unit, Hammersmith Hospital, UK. NIH 3T3 cells expressing an EGF receptor/c-ErbB-3 chimera (clone 18) were as described previously(4) . Cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal calf serum.

EGF Stimulation and GST-Shc Precipitations

Cell monolayers in 150-mm dishes were washed and incubated for 5 min at 37 °C with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium in the presence or absence of 10M EGF (Life Technologies, Inc.). The medium was removed and cells were lysed in lysis buffer containing phosphatase inhibitors (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1% Triton X-100, 5 mM EGTA, 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM benzamidine, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 100 mM NaF, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate). Lysate from one 150-mm dish was used for three precipitations. Proteins were incubated for 4 h with 10 µg of purified fusion protein as indicated in Fig. 1. Precipitates were washed extensively with Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100 and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting using a rabbit polyclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody(28) , a rabbit polyclonal antibody 49.3 (29) , which reacts specifically with the intracellular domain of c-ErbB-3, and 12E(30) , which reacts with the intracellular domain of EGF receptor. Immunoblots were developed using the ECL system (Amersham Corp.). When reprobing with different antibodies was required, blots were stripped for 1 h at 60 °C with 2% SDS, 100 mM beta-mercaptoethanol in 62.5 mM Tris, pH 6.8.

Inhibition of GST-Shc Binding to EGFR/c-ErbB-3 and EGF Receptor Using Phosphopeptides

To test the specificity of binding of the N terminus of Shc to EGF receptor and c-ErbB-3, precipitations were performed in the absence and presence of synthetic phosphopeptides. For initial studies two peptides were used, one (peptide 5) containing the NPXY sequence of c-ErbB-3 (DSAFDNPDpYWHSRLF), and for control, peptide 4, a peptide encoding a p85 binding site on c-ErbB-3 was used (SPSSGpYMPMNQGNL) as described previously(4) . 10 µg of GST-NCH fusion protein bound to glutathione-agarose was preincubated for 30 min with 75 µg of phosphopeptide prior to addition of 1.5 ml of cell lysate (30 µM final peptide concentration). Precipitations were performed as described above, and proteins were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting with an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody(28) . To further test the binding specificity of the N-terminal domain of Shc, precipitations were repeated in the presence of two concentrations of peptide 5 (30 and 3 µM) and in the presence of two additional peptides, peptide 11 (AFDNADpYWHS) and peptide 12 (AFDAPDpYWHS), in which the proline and asparagine residues of the NPXY motif are replaced by alanine. These peptides were also tested for their ability to interfere with the EGF receptor/Shc-SH2 domain interaction. In this case precipitations were performed as described above using 10 µg of the Shc GST-SH2 construct. In order to control for possible variations in the amount of precipitate analyzed, immunoblots were stripped and reprobed with a monoclonal antibody recognizing the GST portion of the fusion proteins (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA).


RESULTS

Binding of EGFR/c-ErbB-3 and EGF Receptor to Shc Domains

To determine which domain of Shc was primarily responsible for binding to the EGF receptor and c-ErbB-3, GST fusion proteins of Shc subdomains (Fig. 1) were used to precipitate receptors from EGF-stimulated NIH 3T3 cells expressing either EGF receptor or an EGF receptor/c-ErbB-3 chimera. Binding of EGF receptor and EGFR/c-ErbB-3 to Shc domains was detected using antibodies specific for phosphotyrosine, EGF receptor, and c-ErbB-3 (Fig. 2). EGFR/c-ErbB-3 could only be detected bound to the NCH fusion protein using antibodies specific for phosphotyrosine (alphaPY) and c-ErbB-3 (49.3) and could not be detected in association with the SH2 domain or the collagen homology region. Phosphorylated EGF receptor also bound predominantly to the fusion protein containing the N terminus of Shc. A small amount of binding to the SH2 domain could be detected with the anti-phosphotyrosine antibody and with the EGF receptor antibody (12E). EGF receptor binding to the SH2 domain was only seen in the EGF-stimulated lane indicating that it is a weak but phosphorylation-dependent association (Fig. 2). A very faint EGF receptor band was visualized bound to the collagen homology domain following prolonged exposure to autoradiography film (PY(1)), which is probably a nonspecific interaction due to the large amount of EGF receptor present in the cell lysate. This band was not seen with the EGF receptor antibody due to the reduced sensitivity of this antibody relative to the anti-phosphotyrosine antibody.


Figure 2: Interaction of EGF receptor and EGF receptor/c-ErbB-3 chimera with Shc-GST fusion proteins. NIH 3T3 cells expressing EGF receptor (EGFR-3T3) or an EGF receptor/c-ErbB-3 chimera (EGFR/c-ErbB-3-3T3) were stimulated with 10M EGF (+) and lysed, and proteins were precipitated using Shc-GST fusion proteins as described in Fig. 1. For comparison, lysates from unstimulated cells(-) were prepared, and precipitations were performed similarly. Precipitated proteins were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting with antibodies recognizing PY, EGFR, and c-ErbB-3. Phosphotyrosine immunoblots were exposed to autoradiography film for 30 s (PY(1)) and 15 s (PY(2)).



Inhibition of Binding to N-terminal Domain Using Synthetic Phosphopeptides

Since the major Shc binding site on c-ErbB-3 is contained within an NPXY motif, we used a synthetic phosphopeptide corresponding to this region (peptide 5) to determine whether receptor binding to the N terminus of Shc was mediated through this site. Precipitates from EGF-stimulated cells were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting with an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. Complex formation between the NCH fusion protein and EGF receptor or the EGFR/c-ErbB-3 chimera was completely abolished by the presence of a synthetic peptide containing the NPXY sequence (Fig. 3A). In contrast, when precipitation was performed in the presence of a tyrosine phosphopeptide containing an unrelated sequence encoding a p85 binding site (peptide 4), no reduction in binding was observed. Binding of endogenous EGF receptor in the parental NIH 3T3 cells was also eliminated by the presence of peptide 5.


Figure 3: Inhibition of EGF receptor and EGF receptor/c-ErbB-3 binding to N-terminal domain construct of Shc using synthetic phosphopeptides. A, EGF receptor and EGF receptor/c-ErbB-3 chimera were precipitated from EGF-stimulated NIH 3T3 cells overexpressing these proteins (EGFR-3T3, EGFR/c-ErbB-3-3T3) using the Shc GST-NCH protein. Precipitations were performed in parallel from EGF-stimulated NIH 3T3 cells (NIH3T3). Precipitations were performed in the absence of peptide(-) or in the presence of 30 µM phosphopeptide containing the NPXY motif corresponding to Tyr-1309 of c-ErbB-3 (peptide 5) or control peptide containing a p85 binding site of c-ErbB-3 (peptide 4). B, EGF receptor and EGF receptor/c-ErbB-3 chimera were precipitated from EGF-stimulated NIH 3T3 cells overexpressing these proteins (EGFR, EGFR/c-ErbB-3) using the Shc GST-NCH protein and in the case of EGF receptor using Shc GST-SH2. Precipitations were performed in the absence of peptide(-) or in the presence of 30 and 3 µM phosphopeptide containing the NPXY motif corresponding to Tyr-1309 of c-ErbB-3 (peptide 5) or peptides containing a NAXY motif (peptide 11) or an APXY motif (peptide 12). Precipitates were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting with a polyclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (PY) and a monoclonal antibody recognizing glutathione S-transferase (GST). In order to show comparable intensities of the bands, phosphotyrosine immunoblots of the EGF receptor-NCH precipitates were exposed for 15 s whereas immunoblots of the EGF receptor-SH2 and EGF receptor/c-ErbB-3-NCH precipitates were exposed for 60 s.



To further assess the specificity of the interaction between the Shc N-terminal domain and the NPXY motif of EGF receptor and EGFR/c-ErbB-3, precipitations were performed in the presence of two concentrations of peptide 5 and in the presence of two additional peptides 11 and 12 in which the proline and asparagine residues of the NPXY motif are replaced by alanine. To control for any experimental variation in the amount of protein analyzed, immunoblots were probed with an antibody recognizing the glutathione S-transferase portion of the fusion proteins used. The results illustrated in Fig. 3B are representative of a number of experiments in which the inhibitory effects of the peptides described were completely reproducible. At a concentration of 30 µM, peptide 5 completely inhibited binding of the NCH protein to EGF receptor and EGFR/c-ErbB-3 and significantly reduced binding to both receptors at a concentration of 3 µM. Replacement of the proline residue by an alanine residue abolished the inhibitory effect of this peptide (peptide 11). Peptide 12, in which the asparagine residue is replaced by alanine, was able to partially inhibit binding of EGF receptor and EGFR/c-ErbB-3 to the NCH protein at a high concentration (30 µM) but had little or no effect at lower concentration. The inhibition obtained with peptide 12 at a 30 µM concentration was comparable with that seen with peptide 5 at a 10-fold lower concentration. None of these peptides had any effect on the EGF receptor/SH2 domain interaction. An apparent reduction in the EGF receptor binding to the SH2 domain in the presence of 3 µM peptide 12 reflects a decrease in protein loaded in this case.


DISCUSSION

There is an increasing body of evidence implicating Shc in the mechanisms responsible for Ras activation; however, its precise mechanism of action remains unclear. It appears that the complexes formed following growth factor stimulation depend on the growth factor in question(14, 27, 31) . The demonstration recently that the N-terminal domain of Shc is able to interact with phosphotyrosine residues in addition to its SH2 domain has provided some insight into the mechanisms by which Shc could recruit different subsets of proteins with potentially different consequences depending on the cell environment(25) .

In this paper we show that the N-terminal region of Shc binds to EGF receptor and to c-ErbB-3 and that it binds to the NPXY motif first defined by us(4) . Various Shc GST-fusion proteins were examined for their ability to precipitate EGF receptor and EGF receptor/c-ErbB-3. In addition to the fusion proteins described, we attempted to express a shorter fragment of the N-terminal domain (amino acids 1-238) in bacteria but were unable to obtain material of sufficient quality to use in our experiments. The construct encompassing the N-terminal domain and the collagen homology region combined (NCH) was more readily expressed and produced a major product of the appropriate molecular weight on Coomassie-stained gels and GST immunoblots. We therefore chose to use the NCH protein for these studies and to perform precipitations in parallel with the CH domain, lacking the N terminus for comparison. Only the protein containing the N terminus (NCH) was able to precipitate EGF receptor/c-ErbB-3, and this interaction was completely abolished by the presence of an excess of phosphopeptide containing the c-ErbB-3 sequence spanning the NPXY motif. While the SH2 domain of Shc specifically precipitated a small amount of EGF receptor, the most striking interaction of EGF receptor was seen with the fusion protein containing the N terminus of Shc. As was the case for the EGF receptor/c-ErbB-3 chimera this interaction was completely abolished by competition with an NPXY-containing peptide. Thus we have clearly demonstrated that it is the N terminus of Shc that is primarily responsible for its interaction with EGF receptor and c-ErbB-3. The NPXY peptide had no effect on binding of EGF receptor to the Shc SH2 domain providing further evidence that this binding occurs through a different site. In addition we have shown that the most critical residue in the NPXY motif is the proline in the -2 position since alteration of this amino acid abolished the inhibitory effect of the peptide on receptor/Shc-NCH binding. A peptide in which the asparagine was changed to alanine still retained some inhibitory properties at high concentration indicating that some variability in this residue may be permitted. Although these studies were performed in vitro, this result should help to clarify the current confusion in the literature regarding the EGF receptor binding sites for Shc and the role of the Shc SH2 domain. While one study (3) using mutant EGF receptors reported the major binding site for Shc to be Tyr-1148 (NPDYQQD), another study (32) using the Shc-SH2 domain reported tyrosines 1173 (NAGYLRVA) and 992 (ADEYLIPQ) to be the most important. Our data would support the notion that Tyr-1148, contained in an NPXY motif, is the major site of interaction via the N terminus of Shc. However, other interactions between the SH2 domain of Shc and different sites on the same or a different receptor may have important functional consequences.

Using the yeast two-hybrid system, Gustafson et al.(33) have demonstrated that Tyr-960 of the human insulin receptor, also contained in an NPXY sequence, is also able to bind to residues 1-238 of Shc in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Similar results have been obtained for Tyr-950 of the IGF-1 receptor, which is also within an NPXY sequence(34) . Interestingly, the same sites on the insulin receptor and IGF-1 receptor are also able to bind to IRS1(35) .

While this paper was under review a number of articles have appeared that generally support our conclusions(36, 37, 38, 39) . Two of these groups also used phosphopeptide competition assays to demonstrate that the NPXY motif is required for interaction of the Shc N-terminal domain (phosphotyrosine interaction domain) with EGF receptor and TrkA(36, 39) . These authors also found a non-polar residue at position -5 to be essential for competition of these peptides(36, 39) . Other studies have utilized phosphorylated expression libraries (37) or synthetic phosphopeptide libraries (38) to reach the same conclusion.

It would appear from our studies that EGF receptor and c-ErbB-3 differ with respect to their ability to bind the SH2 domain of Shc. It is interesting to speculate that by binding to c-ErbB-3 exclusively through its N-terminal domain, Shc is able to recruit other proteins to the receptor through its SH2 domain. Although we did not precipitate any tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins from the EGF-stimulated EGFR/c-ErbB-3-3T3 cells using the Shc GST-SH2, this may be due to the fact that the proteins were already bound to endogenous Shc and were therefore not available for precipitation or that these proteins were not phosphorylated in this cell system. In the case of EGF receptor it is not clear whether the SH2 and N-terminal domains bind simultaneously to the same receptor or to different receptors. Interaction of Shc with both sites simultaneously could result in the exposure of unique phosphorylation sites on the receptor, or Shc itself, whereas binding through either the Shc N terminus or SH2 domain would leave the other functional domain accessible to tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins. A number of proteins of unknown function have been identified in complexes with phosphorylated Shc, which could be differentially recruited. Proteins of 145-150 kDa (18, 27, 40) and of 100 kDa(8, 31) have been reported in complexes with Shc in a number of systems and could conceivably be selectively recruited by EGF receptor and c-ErbB-3. One might also envisage a role for a heterofunctional protein like Shc in the stabilization of receptor hetero- or homodimers. Heterodimerization between EGF receptor and c-ErbB-3 is of particular importance physiologically as c-ErbB-3 appears to be the vehicle by which the EGF receptor activates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (41) . The identification of the interaction site for the N-terminal domain and its mode of interaction should provide a first step in understanding the complex series of interactions involving Shc. This knowledge will facilitate the rational design of mutants of both receptors and of Shc for functional studies in vivo.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported in part by grants (to J. R. Feramisco) from the California Tobacco-related Disease Research Program and the National Institutes of Health. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Recipient of a NATO postdoctoral fellowship. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 619-534-8803; Fax: 619-534-7286; sprigent{at}ucsd.edu.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: EGF, epidermal growth factor; GST, glutathione S-transferase; EGFR, EGF receptor; PY, phosphotyrosine.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are very grateful to Dr. James R. Feramisco, Depts. of Medicine and Pharmacology, UCSD Cancer Center for allowing the experiments to be performed in his laboratory and for his comments on the manuscript. We are especially grateful to Dr. Thomas Gustafson, University of Maryland, Baltimore for his valuable discussions and comments and for providing copies of unpublished manuscripts. We thank Dr. Tony Pawson for providing the SH2 domain construct.


REFERENCES

  1. Pelicci, G., Lanfrancone, L., Grignani, F., McGlade, J., Cavallo, F., Forni, G., Nicoletti, I., Pawson, T., and Pelicci, P. G. (1992) Cell 70,93-104 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Salcini, A. E., McGlade, J., Pelicci, G., Nicoletti, I., Pawson, T., and Pelicci, P. G. (1994) Oncogene 9,2827-2836 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Okabayashi, Y., Kido, Y., Okutani, T., Sugimoto, Y., Sakaguchi, K., and Kasuga, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,18674-18678 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Prigent, S. A., and Gullick, W. J. (1994) EMBO J. 13,2831-2841 [Abstract]
  5. Segatto, O., Pelicci, G., Giuli, S., Digiesi, G., di Fiore, P. P., McGlade, J., Pawson, T., and Pelicci, P. G. (1993) Oncogene 8,2105-2112 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Sasaoka, T., Rose, D. W., Jhun, B. H., Saltiel, A. R., Draznin, B., and Olefsky, J. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,13689-13694 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Pronk, G. J., de Vries-Smits, A. M., Buday, L., Downward, J., Maassen, J. A., Medema, R. H., and Bos, J. L. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14,1575-1581 [Abstract]
  8. Pronk, G. J., McGlade, J., Pelicci, G., Pawson, T., and Bos, J. L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,5748-5753 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Yokote, K., Mori, S., Hansen, K., McGlade, J., Pawson, T., Heldin, C. H., and Claesson-Welsh, L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,15337-15353 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Obermeier, A., Bradshaw, R. A., Seedorf, K., Choidas, A., Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1994) EMBO J. 13,1585-1590 [Abstract]
  11. Campbell, K. S., Ogris, E., Burke, B., Su, W., Auger, K. R., Druker, B. J., Schaffhausen, B. S., Roberts, T. M., and Pallas, D. C. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91,6344-6348 [Abstract]
  12. McGlade, J., Cheng, A., Pelicci, G., Pelicci, P. G., and Pawson, T. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89,8869-8873 [Abstract]
  13. Baldari, C. T., Pelicci, G., Di Somma, M. M., Milia, E., Giuli, S., Pelicci, P. G., and Telford, J. L. (1995) Oncogene 10,1141-1147 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Welham, M. J., Duronio, V., Leslie, K. B., Bowtell, D., and Schrader, J. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,21165-21176 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Zhu, X., Suen, K. L., Barbacid, M., Bolen, J. B., and Fargnoli, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,5518-5522 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ravichandran, K. S., and Burakoff, S. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,1599-1602 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Smit, L., de Vries-Smits, A. M., Bos, J. L., and Borst, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,20209-20212 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Saxton, T. M., van Oostveen, I., Bowtell, D., Aebersold, R., and Gold, M. R. (1994) J. Immunol. 153,623-636 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ravichandran, K. S., Lee, K. K., Songyang, Z., Cantley, L. C., Burn, P., and Burakoff, S. J. (1993) Science 262,902-905 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Damen, J. E., Liu, L., Cutler, R. L., and Krystal, G. (1993) Blood 82,2296-2303 [Abstract]
  21. Cazaubon, S. M., Ramos-Morales, F., Fischer, S., Schweighoffer, F., Strosberg, A. D., and Couraud, P. O. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,24805-24809 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Dilworth, S. M., Brewster, C. E., Jones, M. D., Lanfrancone, L., Pelicci, G., and Pelicci, P. G. (1994) Nature 367,87-90 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Obermeier, A., Lammers, R., Wiesmuller, K. H., Jung, G., Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,22963-22966 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., McGlade, J., Olivier, P., Pawson, T., Bustelo, X. R., Barbacid, M., Sabe, H., Hanafusa, H., and Yi, T. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14,2777-2785 [Abstract]
  25. Blaikie, P., Immanuel, D., Wu, J., Li, N., Yajnik, V., and Margolis, B. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,32031-32034 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Kavanaugh, W. M., and Williams, L. T. (1994) Science 266,1862-1865 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Ravichandran, K. S., Lorenz, U., Shoelson, S. E., and Burakoff, S. J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15,593-600 [Abstract]
  28. Pillay, T. S., and Makgoba, M. W. (1992) FEBS Lett. 308,38-42 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Prigent, S. A., Lemoine, N. R., Hughes, C. M., Plowman, G. D., Selden, C., and Gullick, W. J. (1992) Oncogene 7,1273-1278 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Gullick, W. J., Downward, J., and Waterfield, M. D. (1985) EMBO J. 4,2869-2877 [Abstract]
  31. Basu, T., Warne, P. H., and Downward, J. (1994) Oncogene 9,3483-3491 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Batzer, A. G., Rotin, D., Urena, J. M., Skolnik, E. Y., and Schlessinger, J. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14,5192-5201 [Abstract]
  33. Gustafson, T. A., Weimin, H., Craparo, A., Schaub, C. D., and O' Neill, T. J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15,2500-2508 [Abstract]
  34. Craparo, A., O'Neill, T. J., and Gustafson, T. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270,15639-15643 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. O'Neill, T. J., Craparo, A., and Gustafson, T. A. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14,6433-6442 [Abstract]
  36. Van der Geer, P., Wiley, S., Lai, V. K-M., Olivier, J. P., Gish, G. D., Stephens, R., Kaplan, D., Shoelson, S., and Pawson, T. (1995) Curr. Biol. 5,404-412 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Kavanaugh, W. M., Turck, C. W., and Williams, L. T. (1995) Science 268,1177-1179 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Songyang, Z., Margolis, B., Chaudhuri, M., Shoelson, S. E., and Cantley, L. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270,14863-14866 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Dikic, I., Batzer, A. G., Blaikie, P., Obermeier, A., Schlessinger, J., and Margolis, B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270,15125-15129 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Liu, L., Damen, J. E., Cutler, R. L., and Krystal, G. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14,6926-6935 [Abstract]
  41. Soltoff, S. P., Carraway, K. L., III, Prigent, S. A., Gullick, W. J., and Cantley, L. C. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14,3550-3558 [Abstract]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.