©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
The Mouse APLP2 Gene
CHROMOSOMAL LOCALIZATION AND PROMOTER CHARACTERIZATION (*)

(Received for publication, May 10, 1995; and in revised form, July 19, 1995)

Cornelia S. von Koch (1)(§) Debomoy K. Lahiri (3) Andrew L. Mammen (1) Neal G. Copeland (4) Debra J. Gilbert (4) Nancy A. Jenkins (4) Sangram S. Sisodia(§) (2)(¶)

From the  (1)Departments of Neuroscience and (2)Pathology and the Neuropathology Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205-2196, the (3)Department of Psychiatry and Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, and the (4)Mammalian Genetics Laboratory, ABL-Basic Research Program, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, Maryland 21702

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Senile plaques are primarily comprised of deposits of the beta-amyloid protein derived from larger amyloid precursor proteins (APPs). APP is a member of a gene family, including amyloid precursor-like proteins APLP1 and APLP2.

Using interspecific mouse backcross mapping, we localized the mouse APLP2 gene to the proximal region of mouse chromosome 9, syntenic with a region of human 11q.

We cloned an 1.2-kilobase mouse genomic fragment containing the APLP2 gene promoter. The APLP2 promoter lacks a typical TATA box, is GC-rich, and contains several sequences for transcription factor binding. S1 nuclease protection analysis revealed the presence of multiple transcription start sites. The lack of a TATA box, the presence of a high GC content, and multiple transcription start sites place the APLP2 promoter in the class of promoters of ``housekeeping genes.''

Regulatory regions within the promoter were assayed by transfection of mouse N2a and Ltk cells with constructs containing progressive 5`-deletions of the APLP2 promoter fused to the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) reporter gene. A minimal region that includes sequences 99 bp upstream of the predominant transcription start site of the APLP2 promoter was sufficient to direct high levels of CAT expression.


INTRODUCTION

Senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles constitute two of the neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease. The predominant constituent of senile plaques is the 4-kDa beta-amyloid peptide, derived from larger amyloid precursor proteins (APPs)(^1)(1, 2) . APP is a member of a larger gene family including amyloid precursor-like proteins APLP1 and APLP2(3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) . Notably, APLP2 shares considerable sequence homology with APP with the exception of the beta-amyloid domain(5, 7, 8) . In earlier studies, we demonstrated that APLP2 matures through the same unusual secretory/cleavage pathway as APP. Furthermore, APLP2 pre-mRNAs are alternatively spliced to generate at least four alternatively spliced transcripts(9, 10) . Using in situ hybridization and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) approaches, we and others have demonstrated that in most adult tissues, APLP2 and APP mRNAs were expressed at similar, if not identical, levels. There are several exceptions; notably, in liver APP mRNA is essentially undetectable, but APLP2 mRNA is fairly abundant(5, 7, 9, 11) . In recent studies, we have also demonstrated that specific alternatively spliced APLP2 mRNAs are differentially expressed in the olfactory epithelium(12) . Moreover, APLP2 is highly enriched in olfactory sensory axons and axon terminals in glomeruli. On the other hand, APP is expressed, albeit at lower levels, in olfactory sensory neurons and to a lesser extent in sensory axons. This suggests that APLP2 and APP are regulated differentially in selected neuronal populations.

In order to assess whether the differential levels of APLP2 and APP expression may be a reflection of differences in sequence elements contained within respective promoters, we cloned and characterized an 1.2-kb fragment of the mouse APLP2 gene promoter. The mouse APP promoter has been characterized previously(13) . We show that the mouse APLP2 gene promoter contains several features characteristic of promoters of ``housekeeping genes''; these include the lack of a typical TATA box, the presence of a high GC content, and multiple transcription start sites. These latter features of the APLP2 promoter are similar to features described for mouse, rat, and human APP promoter regions(13, 14, 15, 16, 17) . We assessed whether the APLP2 promoter contained positive or negative regulatory elements by transfecting mouse neuroblastoma (N2a) cells and mouse fibroblast (Ltk) cells with constructs containing progressive 5`-truncated promoter fragments of the APLP2 gene fused with the reporter gene chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT). We demonstrate that CAT expression remains fairly constant across different deletion constructs in both N2a and Ltk cells and that a fragment representing just 99 bp upstream of the predominant transcription start site is sufficient to direct high levels of transgene expression in both cell lines. Interestingly, 5`-deletion studies of the human, mouse, and rat promoters also revealed that 100 bp of the respective promoters can drive high levels of expression of reporter genes(13, 15, 18) .


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Interspecific Mouse Backcross Mapping

Interspecific backcross progeny were generated by mating (C57BL/6J times Mus spretus)F(1) females and C57BL/6J males as described(19) . A total of 205 N(2) mice were used to map the APLP2 locus (see ``Results and Discussion'' for details). DNA isolation, restriction enzyme digestion, agarose gel electrophoresis, Southern blot transfer, and hybridization were performed essentially as described(20) . All blots were prepared with Hybond-N nylon membrane (Amersham Corp.). The probe, an 2.65-kb XhoI/EcoRI fragment of mouse cDNA, was labeled with [alphaP]dCTP using a nick translation labeling kit (Boehringer Mannheim); washing was done to a final stringency of 0.1 times SSCP, 0.1% SDS, 65 °C. Major fragments of 21.0, 3.5, 2.9, and 2.5 kb were detected in ScaI-digested C57BL/6J DNA, and major fragments of 6.6, 4.2, and 2.7 kb were detected in ScaI-digested M. spretus DNA. The presence or absence of the 6.6-, 4.2-, and 2.7-kb M. spretus-specific fragments, which cosegregated, was followed in backcross mice.

A description of the probes and restriction fragment length polymorphisms for the loci linked to APLP2 including low density lipoprotein receptor (Ldlr), preproenkephalin (Penk), and E26 avian leukemia oncogene (Ets1) has been reported previously (21) . Recombination distances were calculated as described (22) using the computer program SPRETUS MADNESS. Gene order was determined by minimizing the number of recombination events required to explain the allele distribution patterns.

Library Screening

To isolate the promoter of mouse APLP2, a 67-bp fragment of the 5`-untranslated region of mouse APLP2, position -64 to +3 with respect to the translation start codon, was generated by PCR and labeled with [alpha-P]dATP by random primer-initiated synthesis. This probe was used to screen a genomic DNA library, prepared from 129 SV mouse embryonic stem cells cloned into EMBL3. Hybridization and wash conditions were 50% formamide, 6 times SSC at 42 °C for 16 h, and 2 times SSC at 50 °C for 15 min, followed by 0.2 times SSC at 50 °C for 15 min, respectively.

One positive phage contained a 14-kb SalI-SalI fragment, which included 2.8 kb of sequence upstream of the translation start codon. A 2.84-kb SalI-HindIII restriction fragment from this phage was subsequently subcloned into Bluescript KS (Stratagene) to generate plasmid pAPLP2P and partially sequenced with Sequenase (U.S. Biochemical Corp.). Sequences were analyzed for putative transcription factor binding sites using a MacVector version 4.1 software package.

RNA Isolation

Total RNA was isolated by homogenization of mouse thymus, heart, brain, liver, kidney, lung, testes, and spleen in 4 M guanidine thiocyanate and centrifugation of the lysate over a 5.7 M cesium chloride cushion (23) . Poly(A) RNA from Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells was prepared similarly with the addition of fractionation on an oligo(dT)-Sepharose column(24) . Total cytoplasmic RNA, from confluent dishes of mouse neuroblastoma (N2a) cells and mouse fibroblast (Ltk) cells, was isolated as described(25) .

S1 Nuclease Analysis

A 534-bp KpnI-HindIII fragment, extending from 494 bp upstream of the translation start site to 40 bp into exon 1, was liberated from pAPLP2P and subcloned into KpnI-HindIII-digested Bluescript KS (Stratagene), to generate plasmid pAPLP2S1. This plasmid was linearized with HindIII, which lies 40 bp 3` to the translation start codon, and the 5` ends were dephosphorylated with calf alkaline phosphatase. S1 nuclease probe was prepared by 5` end-labeling with [-P]ATP. For S1 nuclease analysis (25) 0.02 pmol of P-end-labeled double-stranded DNA probe was mixed with either 20 µg of total RNA or with 1 µg of poly(A) RNA and hybridized in a solution containing 80% formamide, 0.4 M NaCl, 40 mM PIPES, pH 6.4, and 1 mM EDTA for 12-16 h at 57 °C. Samples were then diluted 15-fold with ice-cold S1 nuclease buffer to yield a final concentration of 1 times S1 buffer (0.2 M NaCl, 30 mM NaOAc, pH 4.5, 5 mM ZnCl(2), and 0.05 µg/µl salmon sperm DNA) and treated with 100 units of S1 nuclease at 25 °C for 1 h. S1-resistant hybrids were fractionated by electrophoresis on 4% acrylamide, 9 M urea-containing gels, and the protected probe was visualized by autoradiography.

RT-PCR

To determine the endogenous levels of APLP2 and APP mRNA in mouse N2a and mouse Ltk cells, 1 µg of total cytoplasmic RNA was reverse-transcribed in the presence of reverse transcriptase and random hexamer primers (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). The first strand cDNA obtained from reverse-transcribed RNA was then subjected to PCR with degenerate primers, APP/APLP2S and APP/APLP2AS(5) . Primer APP/APLP2S is GAGCAYGCCCRYTTCCAGAARGC, where Y = C + T and R = A + G, and encodes APLP2-751 residues 386-392 or APP-751 residues 368-374. Primer APP/APLP2AS is GGAGGTGTGTCATMACCTGGGA, where M = A + C, and is complementary to sequences that encode APLP2-751 residues 527-532 or APP-751 residues 509-514(5) . PCR was performed at an annealing temperature of 58 °C for 20 cycles. PCR generated 444-bp products consisting of a mixture of APP and APLP2 cDNAs, which were subsequently digested with XhoI to specifically cleave the APP-related species. Digested PCR products were fractionated on 2% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide. PCR products generated from plasmids encoding mouse APLP2 and mouse APP templates were used as controls.

Construction of Deletion Plasmids

A 2.8-kb SalI-BamHI fragment, extending from 2.7 kb upstream of the transcription start codon to 62 bp of exon 1, was isolated by PCR using a sense primer EMBL (GCTTCTCATAGAGTCTTGCAGACAAACTGCGCAAC, located in the left arm of EMBL3 polylinker; (26) ) and an antisense primer BamHI+62 (CCGGGATCCCTCTCCCCGTCTCTCGCACAGCCAGGCTACAG, located from +62 to +31 with respect to the transcription start codon), in the presence of -APLP2 DNA and subcloned into SalI-BamHI-digested pBLCAT3(27) , to generate plasmid pAPLP2PCAT. pAPLP2PCAT was digested with PstI and religated to generate plasmid pAPLP2PCAT-380. During this digestion, a 590-bp PstI-PstI fragment was isolated and cloned in the sense orientation into PstI-digested pAPLP2PCAT-380 to generate plasmid pAPLP2PCAT-971. APLP2 promoter fragments range from -380 to +62 in pAPLP2PCAT-380 and from -971 to +62 in pAPLP2PCAT-971 (with respect to the transcription start site).

Additional promoter deletions were prepared by PCR using the following sense primers linked to a HindIII site, GCCAAGCTTCACGGTCTACCCGCGAAG, GCCAAGCTTAGCCTCGGGTCCAGAG, GCCAAGCTTGAGTCGGTGTATCCGTGCT, and GCCAAGCTTGTTATGCCGGCTCGTATTG, respectively, with antisense primer BamHI+62 in the presence of pAPLP2P. The resulting 334-bp HindIII-BamHI (-272 to +62), 302-bp HindIII-BamHI (-240 to +62), 222-bp HindIII-BamHI (-160 to +62), and 161-bp HindIII-BamHI (-99 to +62) fragments were ligated to HindIII-BamHI-digested pBLCAT3 to generate plasmids pAPLP2PCAT-272, pAPLP2PCAT-240, pAPLP2PCAT-160, and pAPLP2PCAT-99, respectively. pRSVCAT(28, 29) , including the Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat as a promoter, was used as a positive control, and pBLCAT3 containing no insert was used as a negative control.

Cell Culture, Transfection, and CAT Assay

Mouse N2a cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and reduced serum-modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were plated 22-26 h prior to transfection at a density of 0.25 times 10^6 cells/well in a 6-well dish. N2a cells were transiently transfected with 2 µg of double CsCl-purified DNA using a calcium phosphate co-precipitation procedure(30) . 0.12 µg of pBLCAT3, or equivalent molar amounts of APLP2-CAT constructs containing various 5`-deletions of APLP2 promoter were adjusted to 2 µg with empty vector DNA. DNA was incubated with 62.5 µmol of CaCl(2) and 1 times BES-buffered saline (pH 6.97) at 25 °C for 20 min, and the mixture was added dropwise to each well. Cells were incubated at 3% CO(2) for 16-18 h, after which time the precipitate was removed by washing cells two times with culture medium. The cells were subsequently returned to 5% CO(2) for 12-14 h, washed once with 1 times phosphate-buffered saline and scraped in 200 µl of 0.25 M Tris/HCl, pH 7.9.

To assay for CAT activity, 20 µg of cell lysate was incubated in the presence of 1.1 mM acetyl CoA, 100 nCi of [^14C]chloramphenicol (60 mCi/mmol) in 0.22 M Tris/HCl, pH 7.7, at 37 °C for 45 min. Acetylated and nonacetylated forms of chloramphenicol were extracted with 0.5 ml of ethyl acetate and separated by ascending silica gel thin-layer chromatography in chloroform:methanol (95:5) at room temperature. Thin-layer chromatography sheets were then air-dried, and acetylated and nonacetylated forms of chloramphenicol were quantified using a PhosphorImager. The percentages of monoacetylated forms of chloramphenicol were plotted for each construct and normalized to the CAT activity of pRSVCAT. Each construct was tested in three separate transfections, and standard error of the mean was determined.

For transfections of mouse fibroblast Ltk cells, cells were plated at a density of 0.2 times 10^6 cells/well in a 6-well dish. Cells were transiently transfected with 4.26 µg of pBLCAT3 or equivalent molar amounts of CAT plasmids containing various 5`-deletions of the APLP2 promoter adjusted to 7 µg with empty vector DNA. 20 µg of cell lysate was used for CAT assays.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Recent studies have indicated that APP is a member of a larger gene family that includes APLP1 and APLP2. The physiological function(s) and regulation of the APP-related proteins is not well understood. In this study, we mapped the genomic location of APLP2 and have analyzed the APLP2 promoter for the presence of potential regulatory sequences that may be involved in transcriptional activity of the APLP2 gene.

Chromosomal Localization of APLP2

The chromosomal location of the mouse APLP2 gene was determined by interspecific backcross analysis using progeny derived from matings of ((C57BL/6J times M. spretus)F(1) times C57BL/6J) mice. This interspecific backcross mapping panel has been typed for over 1800 loci that are well distributed among all of the autosomes as well as the X chromosome(19) . C57BL/6J and M. spretus DNAs were digested with several enzymes and analyzed by Southern blot hybridization for informative restriction fragment length polymorphisms using a mouse cDNA APLP2 probe. The 6.6-, 4.2-, and 2.7-kb M. spretus restriction fragment length polymorphisms (see ``Materials and Methods'') were used to follow the segregation of the APLP2 locus in backcross mice. The mapping results indicated that APLP2 is located in the proximal region of mouse chromosome 9 linked to Ldlr, Penk, and Ets1. Although 152 mice were analyzed for every marker and are shown in the segregation analysis (Fig. 1), up to 185 mice were typed for some pairs of markers. Each locus was analyzed in pairwise combinations for recombination frequencies using the additional data. The ratios of the total number of mice exhibiting recombinant chromosomes to the total number of mice analyzed for each pair of loci and the most likely gene order are: centromere, Ldlr (3/162) Penk (13/185) APLP2 (5/158) Ets1. The recombination frequencies (expressed as genetic distances in centimorgans ± the standard error) are as follows: Ldlr (1.9 ± 1.1) Penk (7.0 ± 1.9) APLP2 (3.2 ± 1.4) Ets1.


Figure 1: APLP2 maps in the proximal region of mouse chromosome 9. APLP2 was placed on mouse chromosome 9 by interspecific backcross analysis. The segregation patterns of APLP2 and flanking genes in 152 backcross animals that were typed for all loci are shown at the top of the figure. For individual pairs of loci, more than 152 animals were typed. Each column represents the chromosome identified in the backcross progeny that was inherited from the (C57BL/6J times M. spretus)F(1) parent. The black boxes represent the presence of a C57BL/6J allele, and white boxes represent the presence of the M. spretus allele. The number of offspring inheriting each type of chromosome is listed at the bottom of each column. A partial chromosome 9 linkage map showing the location of APLP2 in relation to linked genes is shown at the bottom of the figure. Recombination distances between loci in centimorgans are shown to the left of the chromosome, and the positions of loci in human chromosomes are shown to the right. References for the human map positions of loci cited in this study can be obtained from the Genome Data Base, a computerized database of human linkage information maintained by the William H. Welch Medical Library of the Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, MD).



We have compared our interspecific map of chromosome 9 with a composite mouse linkage map that reports the map location of many uncloned mouse mutations (provided from the Mouse Genome data base, a computerized data base maintained at The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). APLP2 mapped in a region of the composite map that lacks mouse mutations with a phenotype that might be expected for an alteration in this locus (data not shown).

The proximal region of mouse chromosome 9 shares regions of homology with human chromosomes 19p, 8q, and 11q (summarized in Fig. 1). The recent assignment of APLP2 to 11q23-q25 (31) confirms and extends the synteny between mouse chromosome 9 and human 11q.

Transcription Initiation Site of Mouse APLP2 mRNA

RNA prepared from CHO cells and several mouse tissues was subjected to S1 nuclease protection analysis using a double-stranded DNA probe 5` end-labeled 40 bp downstream of the translation start codon (Fig. 2A). Although the predominant start site is located 89 bp upstream of the translation start codon, there appeared to be variable levels of alternatively initiated APLP2 transcripts in mRNA isolated from CHO cells or from mouse thymus, heart, brain, liver, kidney, lung, testes, and spleen (Fig. 2B, lanes 1 and 2-9, respectively). Primer extension analysis also revealed the presence of multiple transcription start sites in mouse tissues (data not shown). Multiple transcription start sites have been identified for human (14) and rat (15) APP mRNA, with the predominant start sites located 146 and 156 bp upstream of the translation start codons, respectively. However, the transcription start site of mouse APP has not yet been reported.


Figure 2: Mapping of the 5` termini of APLP2 mRNA. A, diagram of S1 nuclease protection assay. A 533-bp KpnI-HindIII restriction fragment from the mouse APLP2 promoter was subcloned into Bluescript KS. The locations of restriction sites are with respect to the translation start site (ATG). S1 nuclease probe was prepared by P end labeling at HindIII after linearizing the clone with HindIII. B, S1 nuclease protection assay of poly(A) RNA from CHO cells (lane 1), of total RNA from mouse thymus, heart, brain, liver, kidney, lung, testes, and spleen (lanes 2-9, respectively). tRNA served as negative control (lane 10). Marker (M) DNA fragments are in bp.



Isolation of Genomic Sequences Containing the Mouse APLP2 Promoter

We screened 800,000 independent phage-containing genomic DNA from a 129 SV embryonic stem cell library with a 67-bp fragment of the 5`-untranslated region of APLP2 (position -64 to +3 with respect to the translation start codon). We obtained two overlapping phage with the longest insert containing 2.8 kb of sequence upstream of the translation start codon. 1.2 kb of this promoter region was sequenced (Fig. 3).


Figure 3: DNA sequence of the 5`-regulatory region of the mouse APLP2 gene. Base numbers are relative to the predominant transcription start site, 89 bp upstream of the translation start site. Consensus sequences for putative transcription factors are overlined, including the GC element (GCE) and GC factors (GCF). Exon 1 (bold) is followed by 120 bp of intron 1.



The DNA sequence upstream of the predominant transcription start site contains a CAAT box (-135 in antisense orientation) but lacks a typical TATA box (Fig. 3). The promoter has a high GC content, specifically between positions -1 and -300 (68%) and -500 and -700 (69%). Multiple consensus sequences for transcription factor binding sites are present in the entire region, including one AP-1, two AP-2s, five GC boxes, one GC element, two GC factors, and seven SP-1 sites. Similar putative transcription factor binding sites are found in the APP promoter, however, at different locations with respect to the transcription start site(13, 14, 16, 17) . Furthermore, the APP promoter contains sites for transcription factors not present in the APLP2 promoter, including a potential heat shock element and an overlapping AP-1/AP-4 site(14, 16, 18) , suggesting that the transcriptional regulation of APLP2 and APP genes may be dissimilar. The presence of multiple transcription start sites, the absence of a typical TATA box, the high GC content, and the presence of GC-rich boxes places the APLP2 promoter in the class of promoters of housekeeping genes; these include the human, rat, and mouse APP genes (13, 14, 16, 17) , the adenosine deaminase gene(32) , the dihydrofolate reductase gene(33) , and the hamster prion gene(34) .

Recently, the upstream AP-1 site (position -350 with respect to the predominant transcription start site) in the APP promoter has been implicated in protein kinase C mediated up-regulation of APP gene expression(35) . The AP-1 binding activity is thought to be composed of Jun-Jun homodimers. Interleukin-1, nerve growth factor, and retinoic acid, agents known to increase APP gene expression, have been shown to induce c-jun and c-fos expression and cause transcriptional activation of target genes through AP-1 sites(36, 37, 38, 39) . Furthermore, interleukin-1 effects are thought to involve protein kinase C activation(40) . It remains to be determined if APLP2 gene expression is also regulated by interleukin-1, nerve growth factor, and retinoic acid, particularly in view of the presence of a potential AP-1 site located at position -982.

99 bp of the Mouse APLP2 Promoter Is Sufficient to Direct High Levels of CAT Expression in N2a and Ltk Cells

To identify regulatory sequences responsible for the expression of the mouse APLP2 gene, we constructed plasmids containing progressive 5`-deletions of the APLP2 promoter fused upstream of the bacterial reporter gene CAT, as diagrammed in Fig. 4B. Equimolar amounts of each construct were transfected into mouse neuroblastoma (N2a) (Fig. 4C) and mouse fibroblast (Ltk) (Fig. 4D) cells. RT-PCR analysis of cytoplasmic RNA from mouse N2a and mouse Ltk cells with degenerate primers which hybridize to both APLP2 and APP mRNA revealed that these two cell lines express moderate levels of endogenous APLP2 mRNA (Fig. 4A, lanes 1 and 2). Hence, we concluded that these cell lines would be appropriate for analysis of the APLP2 promoter.


Figure 4: CAT assay of APLP2 promoter in mouse N2a and Ltk cells. A, EtBr-stained agarose gel of XhoI-digested RT-PCR products derived from mouse N2a (lane 1) and mouse Ltk cells (lane 2). Plasmids containing mouse APP and mouse APLP2 cDNA were used as positive controls (lanes 3 and 4, respectively). Marker (M) DNA fragments are in bp. B, diagram of 5`-truncated APLP2 promoter constructs used for transfection into mouse N2a and Ltk cells (constructs 1-6). Sites of termination of these constructs are indicated with respect to the predominant transcription start site. C, CAT assays of APLP2 promoter constructs 1-6 in N2a cells. CAT activity was determined as the percentage of monoacetylated forms of chloramphenicol. CAT activity of the promoter construct containing the long terminal repeat of the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) was assigned the activity of 100%, and the activities of the constructs carrying 5`-deletions of the APLP2 promoter were expressed as values relative to the Rous sarcoma virus construct. The vector pBLCAT3, containing CAT in the absence of any promoter fragment, was used as a negative control (BL). Each construct was tested in three separate sets of transfections, and the standard error of the mean is indicated by the error bars. D, CAT assays of APLP2 promoter constructs 1-6 in Ltk cells; otherwise as in panel C above.



Progressive 5`-deletions from position -971 to position -99, with respect to the predominant transcription start site, had no significant effect on promoter activity in either of the two cell lines tested. These findings suggest that in N2a and Ltk cells, 99 bp of the APLP2 promoter are sufficient for directing high levels of promoter activity. Similarly, studies that analyzed progressive 5`-deletions of the APP promoter from human, mouse, and rat have shown that reporter gene expression levels remained fairly constant up to approximately 100 bp upstream of the predominant transcription start site(13, 15, 18) .

In summary, we have localized APLP2 to the proximal region of mouse chromosome 9, characterized 1.2 kb of the APLP2 promoter, and shown it to contain features characteristic of promoters in the class of housekeeping genes. We further showed that 99 bp upstream of the predominant transcription start site are sufficient to direct high levels of promoter activity.

Given the similarities in overall structure of the APLP2 and APP promoters and the minimal sequence requirements for transcription initiation, it is highly likely that additional sequence elements distal to the regions analyzed here are responsible for differential expression of APLP2/APP in specific neuronal populations or systemic organs (i.e. liver). Further studies will be directed toward using transgenic strategies with larger genomic fragments to clarify these issues with the eventual goal of identifying transcription factors responsible for mediating basal level of APLP2 gene expression.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by grants from the United States Public Health Service (National Institutes of Health Grant AG 05146) (to S. S. S.), the Adler Foundation (to S. S. S.), the Alzheimer's Association (to S. S. S.), and the NCI (to N. G. C. and N. A. J.), DHHS, National Institutes of Health, under contract NO1-CO-46000 with ABL. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Neuropathology Laboratory, 558 Ross Research Bldg., 720 Rutland Ave., Baltimore, MD 21205-2196. Tel.: 410-955-5632; Fax: 410-955-9777.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: APP, amyloid precursor protein; AP-1 and AP-2, activator protein 1 and 2, respectively; APLP, amyloid precursor-like protein; bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobase(s); CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; Ets1, E26 avian leukemia oncogene; Ldlr, low density lipoprotein receptor; Penk, preproenkephalin; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-PCR; SP-1, promoter-specific transcription factor; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; PIPES, piperazine-N,N`-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid); BES, N,N-bis[2-hydroxyethyl]-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dave Bol for providing the 129 SV embryonic stem cell genomic library and Mary Barnstead for excellent technical assistance.


REFERENCES

  1. Glenner, G. G., and Wong, C. W. (1984) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 120, 885-890 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Masters, C. L., Multhaup, G., Simms, G., Pottgieser, J., Martins, R. N., and Beyreuther, K. (1985) EMBO J. 4, 2757-2763 [Abstract]
  3. Wasco, W., Bupp, K., Magendantz, M., Gusella, J. F., Tanzi, R. E., and Solomon, F. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 10758-10762 [Abstract]
  4. Hanes, J., von der Kammer, H., Kristjansson, G. I., and Scheit, K. H. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1216, 154-156 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Slunt, H. H., Thinakaran, G., von Koch, C., Lo, A. C. Y., Tanzi, R. E., and Sisodia, S. S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2637-2644 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Sandbrink, R., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1994a) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1219, 167-170 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Wasco, W., Gurubhagavatula, S., Paradis, M. D., Romano, D. M., Sisodia, S. S., Hyman, B, T., Neve, R. L., and Tanzi, R. E. (1993) Nat. Genet. 5, 95-100 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Sprecher, C. A., Grant, F. J., Grimm, G., O'Hara, P. J., Norris, F., Norris, K., and Foster, D. C. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 4481-4486 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Sandbrink, R., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1994b) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 14227-14234 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Sandbrink, R., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1994c) Neurobiol. Dis. 1, 13-24 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Lorent, K., Overbergh, L., Moechars, D., deStrooper, B., van Leuven, F., and van den Berghe, H. (1995) Neuroscience 65, 1009-1025 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Thinakaran, G., Roskams, A. J. I., Kitt, C. A., Slunt, H. H., Masliah, E., von Koch, C., Ginsberg, S. D., Ronnett, G. V., Reed, R. R., Price, D. L., and Sisodia, S. S. (1995) J. Neurosci. , in press
  13. Izumi, R., Yamada, T., Yoshikai, S., Sasaki, H., Hattori, M., and Sakaki, Y. (1992) Gene (Amst.) 112, 189-195 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Salbaum, J. M., Weidemann, A., Lemaire, H. G., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 2807-2813 [Abstract]
  15. Hoffman, P. W., and Chernak, J. M. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 201, 610-617 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. La Fauci, G., Lahiri, D. K., Salton, S. R. J., and Robakis, N. K. (1989) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 159, 297-304 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Chernak, J. M. (1993) Gene (Amst.) 133, 255-260 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Quitschke, W. W., and Goldgaber, D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17362-17368 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Copeland, N. G., and Jenkins, N. A. (1991) Trends Genet. 7, 113-118 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Jenkins, N. A., Copeland, N. G., Taylor, B. A., and Lee, B. K. (1982) J. Virol. 43, 26-36 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Wilkie, T. M., Chen, Y., Gilbert, D. J., Moore, K. J., Yu, L., Simon, M. I., Copeland, N. G., and Jenkins, N. A. (1993) Genomics 18, 175-184 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Green, E. L. (1981) Genetics and Probability in Animal Breeding Experiments , pp. 77-113, Oxford University Press, New York
  23. Chirgwin, J. M., Przybyla, A. E., MacDonald, R. J., and Rutter, W. J. (1979) Biochemistry 18, 5294-5299 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Aviv, H., and Leder, P. (1972) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 69, 1408-1412 [Abstract]
  25. Sisodia, S. S., Sollner-Webb, B., and Cleveland, D. W. (1987) Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 3602-3612 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Manninen, I., and Schulman, A. H. (1993) BioTechniques 14, 174 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Luckow, B., and Schuetz, G. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 5490 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Gorman, C. M., Moffat, L., and Howard, B. (1982a) Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 1044-1051 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Gorman, C. M., Merlino, G. T., Willingham, M. C., Pastan, I., and Howard, B. H. (1982b) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 79, 6777-6781 [Abstract]
  30. Chen, C., and Okayama, H. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2745-2752 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. von der Kammer, H., Loeffler, C., Hanes, J., Klaudiny, J., Scheit, K. H., and Hansmann, I. (1994) Genomics 10, 308-311 [CrossRef]
  32. Valerio, D., Duyvesteyn, M. G. C., Dekker, B. M. M., Weeda, G., Berkvens, T. M., van der Voorn, L., van Ormondt, G., and van der Eb, A. J. (1985) EMBO J. 4, 437-443 [Abstract]
  33. Crouse, G. F., Simonsen, C. C., McEwan, R. N., and Schimke, R. T. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 7887-7897 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Basler, K., Oesch, B., Scott, M., Westaway, D., Walchli, M., Groth, D. F., McKinley, M. P., Prusiner, S. B., and Weissmann, C. (1986) Cell 46, 417-428 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Trejo, J., Massamiri, T., Deng, T., Dewji, N. N., Bayney, R. M., and Heller Brown, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21682-21690 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Gizang-Ginsberg, E., and Ziff, E. B. (1990) Genes & Dev. 4, 477-491
  37. Muegge, K., Williams, T. M., Kant, J., Karin, M., Chiu, R., Schmidt, A., Siebenlist, U., Young, H. A., and Durum, S. K. (1989) Science 246, 249-251 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Bartel, D. P., Sheng, M., Lau, L. F., and Greenberg, M. E. (1989) Genes & Dev. 3, 304-313
  39. Yang-Yen, H., Chiu, R., and Karin, M. (1990) New Biol. 2, 351-361 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Goldgaber, D., Harris, H. W., Hla, T., Maciag, T., Donnelly, R. J., Jacobsen, J. S., Vitek, M. P., and Gajdusek, D. C. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 7606-7610 [Abstract]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.




This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Purchase Article
View Shopping Cart
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Copyright Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by von Koch, C. S.
Articles by Sisodia, S. S.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by von Koch, C. S.
Articles by Sisodia, S. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.