©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Rhamnogalacturonan Acetylesterase from Aspergillus aculeatus
SYNERGISM BETWEEN RHAMNOGALACTURONAN DEGRADING ENZYMES (*)

(Received for publication, March 14, 1995; and in revised form, July 17, 1995)

Sakari Kauppinen Stephan Christgau Lene V. Kofod Torben Halkier Kurt Dörreich Henrik Dalbøge

From the From GeneSearch, Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Allé, Building 1B1.21, DK-2880, Bagsværd, Denmark

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

A rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase (RGAE) was purified to homogeneity from the filamentous fungus Aspergillus aculeatus, and the NH(2)-terminal amino acid sequence was determined. Full-length cDNAs encoding the enzyme were isolated from an A. aculeatus cDNA library using a polymerase chain reaction-generated product as a probe. The 936-base pair rha1 cDNA encodes a 250-residue precursor protein of 26,350 Da, including a 17-amino acid signal peptide. The rha1 cDNA was overexpressed in Aspergillus oryzae, a filamentous fungus that does not possess RGAE activity, and the recombinant enzyme was purified and characterized. Mass spectrometry of the native and recombinant RGAE revealed that the enzymes are heterogeneously glycosylated. In addition, the observed differences in their molecular masses, lectin binding patterns, and monosaccharide compositions indicate that the glycan moieties on the two enzymes are structurally different. The RGAE was shown to act in synergy with rhamnogalacturonase A as well as rhamnogalacturonase B from A. aculeatus in the degradation of apple pectin rhamnogalacturonan. RNA gel blot analyses indicate that the expression of rhamnogalacturonan degrading enzymes by A. aculeatus is regulated at the level of transcription and is subjected to carbon catabolite repression by glucose.


INTRODUCTION

Pectic polysaccharides are located predominantly in the middle lamella and primary cell wall of dicotyledonous plants(1) . The main backbone in pectins can be divided into linear homogalacturonan (smooth) regions of up to 200 residues of(1, 4) -linked alpha-D-galacturonic acid (GalUA)^1 and highly branched rhamnogalacturonan (hairy) regions consisting of repeating alpha-(1,2)-L-Rha-alpha-(1,4)-D-GalUA disaccharide units(1, 2, 3) . In general, about half of the Rha residues in the hairy regions are substituted with neutral oligosaccharides such as arabinans, galactans, and arabinogalactans. Most pectic substances are furthermore esterified with acetyl or methyl groups at some of the GalUA residues in the backbone(1, 4) .

Many saprophytic and plant pathogenic fungi and bacteria possess an array of extracellular enzymes involved in the degradation of plant cell wall polymers(5, 6) . In the primary cell wall, the cellulose-xyloglucan framework is embedded in a matrix of pectic polysaccharides, which thereby control the access of hydrolytic enzymes to the cellulose and hemicellulose substrates(1, 7) . Thus, pectinases are often the first cell wall degrading enzymes produced by plant pathogens when cultured on purified plant cell walls or during infection(8, 9) . Due to the structural complexity of the pectin matrix a synergistic or sequential action of several different pectinolytic enzymes is required for efficient breakdown(5) . For example, the hydrolysis of smooth regions of pectin by polygalacturonases is highly dependent upon demethylation of the homogalacturonan backbone by pectin methylesterase(5) . Similarly, the degradation of rhamnogalacturonan by rhamnogalacturonases (RGases) depends on the removal of the acetyl esters from the substrate(10, 11) . Thus, the presence of a rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase (RGAE) in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus aculeatus(12) suggests that this enzyme is essential for the action of RGases in vivo.

With the goal of elucidating the role of rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase in the enzymatic degradation of plant cell wall rhamnogalacturonan we have undertaken purification of the RGAE from A. aculeatus and isolation and characterization of full-length rha1 cDNAs encoding the enzyme. In addition, we have overexpressed the rha1 cDNA in Aspergillus oryzae, and characterized the purified, recombinant RGAE (rRGAE). In a previous study we have reported the cloning of two structurally and functionally different rhamnogalacturonases, RGase A and RGase B, from A. aculeatus(11) . Here we show that RGAE acts in synergy with RGase A as well as RGase B in the degradation of apple pectin rhamnogalacturonan. As a first step in dissecting the molecular mechanisms that control the regulation of rhamnogalacturonan degrading enzymes in A. aculeatus the expression of their genes is compared at mRNA level.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fungal Strains and Growth Conditions

Aspergillus aculeatus strain KSM 510 was cultivated as described previously (11) ; the mycelium was harvested after 1 to 5 days growth at 30 °C, frozen in liquid N(2), and stored at -80 °C. The amount of glucose remaining in the culture filtrates was determined by using the D-glucose kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). The A. oryzae A 1560 (13) transformants were grown in YP medium containing (per liter) 35 g of maltodextrin.

Purification of Native Rhamnogalacturonan Acetylesterase from A. aculeatus

A 100-ml aliquot of A. aculeatus supernatant was ultrafiltrated in a 200 ml of Amicon cell with a 10-kDa Diaflo YM10 membrane (Amicon). The retentate was diluted 10 times in 0.02 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, and applied onto a 250-ml DEAE-Sepharose column (5.0 times 15 cm, Pharmacia, Sweden) in 0.02 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, at 4 ml/min. Bound proteins were eluted with a linear gradient from 0 to 0.1 M NaCl over 0.25 column volumes and from 0.1 to 0.4 M NaCl over 3.2 column volumes; 10-ml fractions were collected and assayed for activity on para-nitrophenyl (PNP)-acetate and for RGAE activity as described under ``Enzyme Characterization.'' One unit of PNP-acetylesterase activity is defined as 1 µmol of para-nitrophenol released per min. Fractions containing RGAE activity were collected and pooled, (NH(4))(2)SO(4) was added to a 2 M final concentration, and the sample was applied to a 60-ml phenyl-Sepharose column (2.6 times 11 cm, Pharmacia) in 0.05 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.5, 2 M (NH(4))(2)SO(4) at a flow rate of 2 ml/min. Bound proteins were eluted by lowering the concentration of (NH(4))(2)SO(4) stepwise from 2 to 1 to 0.5 to 0 M. Each step was eluted in approximately 1 column volume. RGAE containing fractions were pooled followed by gel filtration on a 300-ml Superdex G-75 column (2.6 times 55 cm, Pharmacia) in 0.25 M NH(4)-acetate, pH 5.5, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Finally, the enzyme was concentrated and the buffer changed to 0.02 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, by ultrafiltration, applied onto a 50-ml fast flow Q-Sepharose anion exchange column (Pharmacia) at 1 ml/min and eluted with a linear salt gradient from 0 to 0.4 M NaCl over 2 column volumes.

NH(2)-terminal Sequencing and Amino Acid Analysis

The NH(2)-terminal sequences of native and recombinant RGAE were determined in an Applied Biosystems 473A protein sequencer according to the manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems). Lyophilized, duplicate samples of the purified enzymes were hydrolyzed in evacuated, sealed glass tubes with 100 µl of 6 N HCl (BDH, Poole, United Kingdom) containing 0.1% phenol for 16 h at 110 °C. Amino acid analysis was carried out using an Applied Biosystems 420A system.

Generation of a rha1 Probe Using PCR and Screening of the cDNA Library

One µg of plasmid DNA from a A. aculeatus cDNA library pool (11) was PCR-amplified using 500 pmol of the rha1-specific primer (5`-GGAATTCCGA(C/T)(A/T)(G/C)IACIATGGCIAA(A/G)AA(C/T)GGIGG- 3`) in two combinations with 500 pmol of each pYES 2.0 polylinker primer (forward 5`-ATCACTCAGCATAATGTC-3`, reverse 5`-ATTACATGATGCGGCCCT-3`), a DNA thermal cycler (Landgraf, Hannover, Germany) and 2.5 units of Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer). Thirty cycles of PCR were performed using a cycle profile of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 55 °C for 2 min, and extension at 72 °C for 3 min. The PCR fragment of interest was subcloned into pUC18 vector and sequenced as described previously (14) .

The A. aculeatus cDNA library in pYES 2.0 (11) was screened by colony hybridization (15) using a random-primed (16) P-labeled (>1 times 10^9 cpm/µg) PCR product for rha1 as a probe. The hybridizations were carried out in 2 times SSC(15) , 5 times Denhardt's solution(15) , 0.5% (w/v) SDS, 100 µg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA for 20 h at 65 °C followed by washes in 5 times SSC at 25 °C (2 times 15 min), 2 times SSC, 0.5% SDS at 65 °C (30 min), 0.2 times SSC, 0.5% SDS at 65 °C (30 min) and finally in 5 times SSC (2 times 15 min) at 25 °C.

RNA Gel Blot Analysis

Total RNA was prepared from frozen, powdered mycelium of A. aculeatus by extraction with guanidinium thiocyanate followed by ultracentrifugation through a 5.7 M CsCl cushion(17) . Poly(A) RNA was isolated by oligo(dT)-cellulose affinity chromatography(18) . The poly(A) RNAs (1 µg/sample) were electrophoresed in 1.2% agarose, 2.2 M formaldehyde gels (19) and blotted to a nylon membrane (Hybond-N, Amersham Corp.) with 10 times SSC as transfer buffer. The 0.9-kb rha1 cDNA was P-labeled (>1 times 10^9 cpm/µg) by random priming and hybridized to the membrane for 18-20 h at 65 °C in 5 times SSC, 5 times Denhardt's solution, 0.5% SDS (w/v), and 100 µg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA. The filter was washed in 5 times SSC at 65 °C (2 times 15 min), 2 times SSC, 0.5% SDS (1 times 30 min), 0.2 times SSC, 0.5% SDS (1 times 30 min), and 5 times SSC (2 times 15 min). After autoradiography at -80 °C, the probe was removed from the membrane according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the filter was rehybridized sequentially with 1) a 1.6-kb rhgA cDNA, 2) a 1.8-kb rhgB cDNA(11) , and 3) a 5.4-kb PstI fragment for the benA encoded beta-tubulin of Aspergillus nidulans(20) . The probes were P-labeled as above (1-2 times 10^9 cpm/µg), and the hybridization and washing conditions were identical to those with the rha1 probe.

Southern Blot Analysis

Genomic DNA from A. aculeatus was isolated according to Yelton et al.(21) and digested to completion with BamHI, BglII, EcoRI, and HindIII (10 µg/sample), fractionated on a 0.7% agarose gel, denatured, and blotted to a nylon filter (Hybond-N, Amersham) using 10 times SSC as transfer buffer(22) . The 0.9-kb rha1 cDNA was P-labeled (>1 times 10^9 cpm/µg) by random priming and used as a probe in Southern analysis. The hybridization and washing conditions were as described in RNA gel blot analysis. The filter was autoradiographed at -80 °C for 12 h.

Nucleotide Sequence Analysis

The nucleotide sequence of the rha1 cDNA clone pC1RGAE1 was determined from both strands by the dideoxy chain-termination method (23) using Qiagen-purified plasmid DNA (Qiagen), the Sequenase kit (U. S. Biochemical Corp.) and either pYES 2.0 polylinker primers (Invitrogen) or synthetic oligonucleotide primers. Analysis of the sequence data was performed according to Devereux et al.(24) .

Expression of the rha1 cDNA in A. oryzae and Purification of the Recombinant Enzyme

One µg of plasmid DNA from pC1RGAE1 was digested with BamHI and XhoI and electrophoresed in a 0.7% agarose gel. The cDNA insert for rha1 was recovered from the gel (Geneclean II, BIO 101 Inc.) and ligated into BamHI/XhoI-cleaved pHD464 vector(25) . Co-transformation of A. oryzae A 1560 was carried out as described by Christensen et al.(13) . The AmdS transformants were screened for RGAE activity in culture, and the amount and purity of secreted proteins were evaluated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The rRGAE was purified from the culture supernatant of an A. oryzae transformant producing RGAE. A 50-ml aliquot of the supernatant was ultrafiltrated into 0.025 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, applied on a 50-ml fast Q-Sepharose anion exchange column (Pharmacia), and bound proteins were eluted with a linear gradient from 0 to 0.15 M NaCl over 0.2 column volumes and from 0.15 to 0.5 M NaCl over 1.2 column volumes. The enzyme was eluted in electrophoretically pure form.

Electrophoresis and Western Blotting

SDS-PAGE was performed according to Laemmli(26) , with minor modifications as described(11, 27) . Isoelectric focusing was carried out in Ampholine PAG plates, pH 3.5-9.5 (Pharmacia), on a Multiphor electrophoresis unit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pharmacia). Gels were stained with 0.1% Coomassie Brilliant Blue (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) in 40% ethanol, 5% acetic acid for visualization of protein bands. SDS-PAGE gels were electroblotted to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon, Millipore) by semi-dry electroblotting and immunostained as described(11) . Lectin blotting was performed with biotin-labeled lectins used in dilutions and buffers specified by the manufacturer (Boehringer Mannheim), and for the visualization, alkaline phosphatase-labeled avidin (DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used.

Analysis of Monosaccharide Composition

Hydrolysis of protein-bound carbohydrate was done in duplicate. Lyophilized samples were hydrolyzed in evacuated sealed glass tubes with 100 µl of 2 M trifluoroacetic acid at 100 °C. Monosaccharides were separated by high performance anion exchange chromatography using a CarboPac PA1 column (Dionex) eluted with 16 mM NaOH and detected by pulsed amperometric detection. The amounts of glucosamine and mannose were determined after 4 h of hydrolysis, whereas the amount of galactose was determined after 1 h of hydrolysis.

Mass Spectrometry

Mass spectrometry was done using matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry in a VG Analytical TofSpec (VG Analytical, Manchester, UK). Purified RGAE and rRGAE (2 µl with a concentration of 10 pmol/µl) were mixed with 2 µl of saturated matrix solution (alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid:acetonitrile (70:30)), and 2 µl of the mixture was spotted onto the target plate. Samples were evaporated, desorbed, and ionized by 4-ns laser pulses (337 nm) at threshold laser power and accelerated into the field-free flight tube by an accelerating voltage of 25 kV. Ions were detected by a microchannel plate set at 1850 V. The spectra were calibrated externally with proteins of known masses.

Enzyme Characterization

RGAE activity was quantified by incubation of modified hairy regions from apples (MHR) (11) with enzyme in temperature-controlled mixers (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) for 15 min at 30 °C, followed by heat inactivation of enzyme and determination of acetic acid by the acetic acid kit (Boehringer Mannheim) adapted to microtiter plates. The concentration of acetic acid was calculated from linear regression analysis of an acetate standard curve. Alternatively, acetyl esterase activity was determined by measuring spectrophotometrically the release of para-nitrophenol from PNP-acetate. 2 mM PNP-acetate in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, was incubated with enzyme for 15 min at 30 °C, 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, was added 1:1, and the absorbance at 405 nm was measured immediately in microtiter plates.

The pH optimum of rRGAE was determined by incubation of 1% MHR in citrate/phosphate buffers of varying pH for 15 min at 30 °C followed by acetate determination. The temperature optimum was determined from PNP-acetate after incubation with rRGAE at varying temperatures for 15 min. The specific activity and Michaelis-Menten constant (K(m)) were determined by incubating RGAE with different concentrations of MHR in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, for 15 min at 30 °C. The substrate concentration (S) ranged from 0.1 to 1.5% and 43 µg of rRGAE was added to 1.1 ml of substrate. The reaction velocity (V) was calculated and 1 unit is defined as 1 µmol of acetate released per min. Then V/S was depicted as a function of S, and K(m) and V(max) were determined by linear regression analysis. The specific activity was calculated as V(max)/E, where E is the amount of enzyme added. To determine the substrate specificity, RGAE and rRGAE were incubated with acetylated xylan and acetylated mannan (kindly provided by Dr. Jürgen Puls) followed by determination of acetate as described.

Degradation of MHR by rRGAE and rRGases

MHR were saponified according to Kofod et al.(11) and 1 ml of 1% MHR or MHR-S in 0.05 M sodium acetate buffer was incubated at 30 °C in thermomixers with rRGAE (43 µg), rRGase A (10 µg), rRGase B (10 µg), or combinations of rRGAE and rRGases at pH 3.5 and 6.0 for RGase A and RGase B, respectively(11) . After 24 h of incubation the enzymes were heat-inactivated at 95 °C for 20 min. The degradation products were analyzed by high performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC), which included separation on three TSK-gel columns (G4000PWXL, G3000PWXL, and G2500PWXL, TosoHaas, Japan) connected in a row and detection of eluting saccharides by a RID6A refractive index detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan)(11) . The amount of acetic acid released from MHR by saponification or by the prolonged action of rRGAE in citrate/phosphate buffer was determined using the acetic acid kit (Boehringer Mannheim).


RESULTS

Purification of Rhamnogalacturonan Acetylesterase

PNP-acetate was used as substrate in monitoring the purification of acetylesterases, including RGAE, from the culture supernatant of A. aculeatus. An aliquot of the supernatant containing 10 g of protein and 6320 units of PNP-acetylesterase activity was purified on a DEAE-Sepharose anion exchange column. Two peaks active on PNP-acetate were eluted from the column. The last peak contained the RGAE activity, 680 units of PNP-acetylesterase activity, and 432 mg of protein. When the sample was further purified by hydrophobic interaction chromatography, three distinct peaks of PNP-acetate hydrolyzing activity were eluted. The first peak contained 560 units of PNP-acetylesterase activity, the RGAE activity and 16.5 mg of protein. The RGAE was further purified to electrophoretic homogeneity by gel filtration and anion exchange chromatography, resulting in 3 mg of RGAE and 19 units of PNP-acetylesterase activity. The enzyme was subjected to direct NH(2)-terminal sequencing (Fig. 1).


Figure 1: The nucleotide sequence of the rha1 cDNA and the deduced primary structure of rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase from A. aculeatus. The signal peptide is boxed, the NH(2)-terminal sequence obtained from the purified, native enzyme is underlined, and the putative N-glycosylation sites are indicated by double underlines.



Primary Structure of the rha1-encoded Rhamnogalacturonan Acetylesterase from A. aculeatus

To obtain a cDNA probe for rha1, an oligonucleotide corresponding to a part of the NH(2)-terminal sequence (amino acids 25-33, Fig. 1) was designed. The primer was used pairwise with the forward and reverse pYES primers to amplify the target cDNA from a library pool of approximately 5000 clones employing the PCR technique(28) . Analysis of the PCR products revealed a 0.8-kb product with one primer pair. Sequencing of the subcloned PCR fragment revealed a unique 826-bp cDNA with an open reading frame of 226 amino acids (nucleotide positions 111-936, Fig. 1). In addition to the primer-encoded residues, 12 amino acids concurred with the NH(2) terminus of the purified RGAE, confirming that the PCR had specifically amplified the desired region of the rha1 cDNA. Approximately 10,000 colonies from the A. aculeatus cDNA library in Escherichia coli were screened by colony hybridization using the rha1-specific PCR product as a probe. This yielded 20 positive clones which were further analyzed by sequencing the ends of the cDNAs and determining the nucleotide sequence of the longest cDNA from both strands with synthetic oligonucleotide primers.

The 936-bp cDNA clone pC1RGAE1 contains a 750-bp open reading frame initiating at nucleotide position 39 and terminating with a TGA stop codon at nucleotide position 789, thus predicting a 250-residue polypeptide of 26,350 Da (Fig. 1). The open reading frame is preceded by a 38-bp 5`-noncoding region and followed by a 116-bp 3`-noncoding region and a poly(A) tail. The deduced primary structure of RGAE matches the NH(2)-terminal sequence determined from the purified enzyme (Fig. 1). In addition, the rha1 cDNA encodes an apparent signal peptide of 17 amino acids(29) , revealed by comparison with the NH(2)-terminal sequence of the purified enzyme. Hence, the mature RGAE has a calculated molecular weight of 24,605. A search of the Swiss-Prot protein sequence data base with the deduced RGAE amino acid sequence revealed no significant similarities, implying that RGAE from A. aculeatus is a novel enzyme representing a new family of esterases.

The copy number of the rha1 gene in the A. aculeatus genome was determined by Southern blot hybridization. Total DNA isolated from A. aculeatus was digested to completion with BamHI, BglII, EcoRI, or HindIII and hybridized with the rha1 cDNA. The rha1 probe detects only single strongly hybridizing fragments in each digest, indicating that the rha1 gene is present as a single copy in the A. aculeatus genome (Fig. 2).


Figure 2: Southern blot analysis of A. aculeatus. Genomic DNA from A. aculeatus was digested to completion with BamHI (Ba), BglII (Bg), EcoRI (E), and HindIII (H), fractionated on a 0.7% agarose gel, and transferred to a nylon membrane. The blot was hybridized with the radiolabeled 0.9-kb BamHI-XhoI insert of pC1RGAE1 containing the full-length rha1 cDNA from A. aculeatus.



Regulation of rha1, rhgA, and rhgB Transcript Levels in A. aculeatus

To study the effect of glucose on the expression of rhamnogalacturonan degrading enzymes, A. aculeatus was cultivated in a medium containing both glucose and soybean meal as carbon sources(11) , and the culture supernatants were assayed for glucose concentration after 1-5 days of growth. During the first 3 days, the concentration of glucose in the culture filtrates decreased from 178 to 0.14 mM, while no glucose was detected in the 4- and 5-day-old cultures, respectively. Furthermore, A. aculeatus produced RGAE and total RGase activity (11) in culture only after glucose had been expended from the medium.

The rha1 cDNA probe hybridized readily to a single 0.9-kb mRNA species in the 5-day-old mycelium, while the rha1 message did not accumulate to detectable levels in the fungus when glucose was present in the growth medium (Fig. 3). This is consistent with the RGAE activity observed in the culture filtrate from day 5. Reprobing the same filter with the rhgA and rhgB cDNAs encoding RGase A and RGase B(11) , respectively, revealed a similar expression pattern for the 1.6-kb rhgA and 1.8-kb rhgB mRNAs, except that the message levels appeared to be lower compared with rha1 (Fig. 3). In contrast, the 1.5-kb benA encoded beta-tubulin mRNA accumulated to comparable levels in both samples irrespective of the presence of glucose in the medium (Fig. 3).


Figure 3: Regulation of rha1, rhgA, and rhgB transcript levels in A. aculeatus. Poly(A) RNAs isolated from A. aculeatus mycelia grown on medium containing soybean meal plus glucose (+Glc) and soybean meal without glucose (-Glc) as carbon sources were subjected to RNA gel blot analysis. The same filter was sequentially hybridized with a 5.4-kb PstI fragment containing the benA gene of A. nidulans, and cDNA probes for the rha1 encoded RGAE, rhgA for RGase A, and rhgB-encoding RGase B from A. aculeatus.



Heterologous Expression of the rha1 cDNA in A. oryzae

To obtain high level production of RGAE in A. oryzae, the rha1 cDNA was subcloned behind the A. oryzae alpha-amylase promoter, and the resulting construct was introduced into the A. oryzae wild type strain A 1560 by co-transformation with the amdS plasmid as described(13) . Ten transformants were purified twice through conidial spores and screened for RGAE secretion by the activity assay and SDS-PAGE. The highest yielding transformant was grown in a 1-liter fermentor, and the culture supernatant was harvested after 5 days of growth for purification of rRGAE by anion exchange chromatography.

Molecular Characterization of Rhamnogalacturonan Acetylesterase

The molecular masses were determined by SDS-PAGE to 32-34 kDa for native RGAE and to 32-35 kDa for rRGAE (Fig. 4). The discrepancy of 8-11 kDa compared with the calculated molecular weight of 24,605 implies that a substantial amount of glycan structures is attached to the enzyme. The validity of this conclusion was assessed by mass spectrometry of RGAE and rRGAE. As shown in Fig. 5, both native and recombinant RGAE are glycosylated as the determined molecular masses exceed the predicted molecular weight of the rha1-encoded polypeptide. The masses of native RGAE range from 25.5 to 28 kDa, with an average of 26.7 kDa, while the average mass for rRGAE is 28.3 kDa, ranging from 25 to 31 kDa, suggesting that the glycosylation of the recombinant enzyme is slightly different from that of the native RGAE. In addition, the glycosylation of both enzymes is clearly heterogeneous.


Figure 4: Purification and glycosylation of RGAE from A. aculeatus. A, Coomassie Brilliant Blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel showing A. aculeatus culture supernatant (lane 1), RGAE containing fraction from the DEAE-Sepharose column (lane 2), RGAE containing fraction from the gel filtration column (lane 3), purified RGAE (lane 4) (1 µg), and rRGAE (lane 5) (1 µg). B, Western blot of an SDS-PAGE gel with A. aculeatus culture supernatant, purified RGAE and rRGAE, probed with a polyclonal rabbit antiserum raised against authentic RGAE. C, lectin blot of an identical gel as shown in B, probed with G. nivalis lectin, specific for terminal mannose in glycan structures. D, lectin blot of an identical gel as shown in B, probed with peanut lectin, specific for Galbeta1-3GalNAc in some N-linked glycans.




Figure 5: Mass spectrometric analysis of the native and recombinant RGAE. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of native (A) and recombinant (B) RGAE. The molecular ions carrying one, two, and three positive charges are indicated as (M + H), (M + H), and (M + H).



The recombinant, but not native, RGAE binds Galanthus nivalis lectin specific for a terminal mannose residue in glycan moieties (Fig. 4). A similar pattern was observed with peanut lectin specific for Galbeta1-3GalNAc in some N-linked glycans, supporting the notion that the glycans attached to the enzymes are different. The polyclonal anti-RGAE antiserum recognized a number of polypeptides in the A. aculeatus supernatant, suggesting that they contain identical or similar antigenic epitopes, such as glycan structures. This is supported by the fact that both G. nivalis and peanut lectins reacted with several extracellular proteins from A. aculeatus (Fig. 4, C and D). The differences seen in the amount of mannose (6 pmol/pmol of RGAE, 11 pmol/pmol of rRGAE) and galactose (0 pmol/pmol of RGAE, 1 pmol/pmol of rRGAE) in the glycan moieties of RGAE and rRGAE confirmed that the two enzymes are differentially glycosylated. Furthermore, the presence of glucosamine (2 pmol/pmol of protein) in both RGAE and rRGAE indicates that at least some of the carbohydrate is N-linked, in accordance with two potential N-glycosylation sites in the primary structure of RGAE (Fig. 1).

Characterization of Enzymatic Properties

The enzyme characteristics of the purified rRGAE are shown in Table 1. The temperature optimum of 40 °C, the pH optimum of 6.0, and the specific activity of about 1 unit/mg are consistent with the results obtained by Searle-van Leeuwen et al.(12) . The rRGAE released about 60% of the total amount of saponifiable acetyl esters (Table 1) present in the substrate. This is slightly lower than the previously reported 70% (12) and could be a result of a lower degree of acetylation in the MHR preparation used in this study (results not shown). Although the pH optimum indicates that the rate of hydrolysis is slower under acidic conditions, it was shown that upon prolonged incubation rRGAE hydrolyses acetyl groups from MHR to the same extent at pH 3.5 as at pH 6.0 (Table 1). Neither RGAE nor rRGAE released acetate from acetylated xylan or mannan, in accordance with previous reports(12) .



Synergistic Degradation of MHR by rRGAE and rRGases

The HPSEC analysis of MHR incubated with rRGAE showed that the enzyme had no inherent cleaving activity within the backbone of MHR (Fig. 6). MHR incubated with rRGase A or rRGase B alone was only slightly depolymerized, whereas the combination of rRGase A or rRGase B with rRGAE resulted in extensive depolymerization of the substrate (Fig. 6). The concerted action of rRGAE and rRGases on the MHR substrate was comparable with the degradation of saponified MHR by rRGases alone (Fig. 6).


Figure 6: Synergistic degradation of MHR by RGAE and RGases. The incubations of MHR and MHR-S were performed for 24 h in acetate buffers at optimal pH for RGase A (A) and RGase B (B), and the degradation products were analyzed by HPSEC. The estimated molecular weight (Mw) and degree of polymerization (DP) are indicated on the horizontal axis.




DISCUSSION

Several independent lines of evidence indicate that the cDNA clone pC1RGAE1 encodes the rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase from A. aculeatus. First, the deduced primary structure of the cDNA encoded protein contains an amino acid sequence with 100% identity to the NH(2)-terminal sequence determined from the purified, native RGAE from A. aculeatus. Second, heterologous expression of the rha1 cDNA in A. oryzae, a filamentous fungus that does not possess a rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase activity, resulted in a RGAE activity in the culture supernatant, similar to that found in A. aculeatus. Both recombinant and native RGAE were shown to be active on apple pectin rhamnogalacturonan and PNP-acetate, but not on acetylated mannan or xylan. Furthermore, the enzyme characteristics of the purified rRGAE correspond well with the values reported previously for the native RGAE from A. aculeatus(12) . Third, a polyclonal rabbit antiserum raised against the native, purified RGAE recognized the recombinant enzyme expressed in A. oryzae (Fig. 4B). Finally, the NH(2)-terminal sequence and amino acid composition of recombinant RGAE concurred with those of native RGAE, indicating that the rRGAE secreted by A. oryzae is highly similar to the native enzyme from A. aculeatus.

Previous work has shown that the production of extracellular polygalacturonases by Aspergillus niger(30) , A. nidulans(31) , and Penicillium frequentans(32) is induced by the presence of pectin and repressed by glucose. In addition, the carbon catabolite repression of the polygalacturonase expression by glucose has been reported to operate at the transcriptional level(30, 33, 34) . The rha1 mRNA accumulates in substantial amounts in A. aculeatus grown on the mixed carbon source after glucose has been depleted from the medium coinciding with the extracellular RGAE activity, whereas the rha1 message is absent in the fungus grown on glucose-containing medium. The comparable expression patterns observed for the rhgA and rhgB mRNAs imply that they are coordinately regulated. Furthermore, the message levels correlate well with the high total RGase activity detected in the 5-day-old culture of A. aculeatus(11) . Taken together, these results indicate that the expression of rhamnogalacturonan degrading enzymes by A. aculeatus is primarily regulated at the level of transcription and is subjected to carbon catabolite repression by glucose.

The heterogeneous size in SDS-PAGE together with the difference of 8-11 kDa in apparent mobility and molecular mass compared with the predicted molecular weight of RGAE imply that the enzyme is modified by glycosylation. By comparison, mass spectrometric analyses resulted in average molecular masses of 26.7 and 28.3 kDa for RGAE and rRGAE, respectively. While the values are significantly lower than those determined by SDS-PAGE, they are consistent with substantial glycosylation of the predicted 24,605-Da RGAE polypeptide. The deduced amino acid sequence of RGAE contains two potential sites for N-linked glycosylation, in good agreement with the presence of glucosamine in both RGAE and rRGAE. Yet, this is probably not sufficient to explain the discrepancy between the observed and calculated molecular weights, suggesting that additional, O-linked glycans could be attached to the enzyme. In addition, the observed differences in the molecular masses, lectin binding patterns, and monosaccharide compositions indicate that the glycan moieties on the native and recombinant RGAE are structurally different.

The HPSEC chromatograms showed only limited depolymerization of unsaponified MHR when the rRGases were used alone (Fig. 6), although the degradation of MHR by rRGase A was more pronounced than that obtained by Schols et al.(35) . In contrast, the combination of rRGAE with rRGase A and rRGase B revealed a marked synergism between the enzymes, resulting in extensive breakdown of the MHR substrate. Although only 60% of the saponifiable acetyl esters in MHR were hydrolyzed by rRGAE, it enhanced depolymerization of MHR almost to the level seen with MHR-S, implying that acetyl esters are a major hindrance for the action of RGases on rhamnogalacturonan. This is in accordance with previous reports for RGase A (10, 11) and is here shown to be valid for RGase B as well. The remaining acetyl esters seem to inhibit the rRGases mainly in MHR fragments of molecular weight exceeding 30,000 (Fig. 6), indicating that RGAE is sterically hindered by the side chains in heavily substituted regions of the rhamnogalacturonan backbone.

An expanding inventory of purified microbial pectinolytic enzymes, active within the smooth regions of pectin, along with a number of cloned enzymes, has significantly improved our understanding of the structure and degradation of plant cell wall pectin(5, 31, 36, 37, 38, 39) . In contrast, the enzymatic breakdown of the rhamnogalacturonan backbone in pectic hairy regions has received only limited attention. The recently reported rhamnogalacturonan alpha-L-rhamnopyranohydrolase from A. aculeatus(40) together with the previously described RGase A and RGase B(10, 11) , and the rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase (12) cloned and characterized in this study, imply that analogous to the degradation of the smooth regions, a family of rhamnogalacturonan degrading enzymes can be found in nature. Furthermore, the data presented here demonstrate that the deduced primary structure of RGAE is unique, representing a novel family of esterases and that the enzyme acts in synergy together with RGase B as well as RGase A in the degradation of plant cell wall rhamnogalacturonan.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by the Danish Board for Industry and Trade. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBank(TM)/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) X89714[GenBank].

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: GalUA, alpha-D-galacturonic acid; bp, base pair(s); HPSEC, high performance size exclusion chromatography; kb, kilobase(s); MHR, modified hairy regions from apples; MHR-S, saponified MHR; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PNP, para-nitrophenyl; RGAE, rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase; rRGAE, recombinant RGAE; rha, gene encoding RGAE; RGase, rhamnogalacturonase; rhg, gene encoding RGase.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Maria Holm, Jan Juul de Jong, Margit T. Kjær, Ina Nørgaard, Marcel Mischler, and Susanne Jacobsen for skillful technical assistance. We also thank Dr. M. T. Hansen for the benA clone.


REFERENCES

  1. Carpita, N. C., and Gibeaut, D. M. (1993) Plant J. 3, 1-30 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. O'Neill, M., Albersheim, P., and Darvill, A. (1990) Methods Plant Biochem. 2, 415-441
  3. Thibault, J.-F., Renard, C. M. G. C., Axelos, M. A. V., Roger, P., and Crepeau, M.-J. (1993) Carbohydr. Res. 238, 271-286 [CrossRef]
  4. Schols, H. A., Posthumus, M. A., and Voragen, A. G. J. (1990) Carbohydr. Res. 206, 117-129 [CrossRef]
  5. Pilnik, W., and Rombouts, F. M. (1979) in Polysaccharides in Food (Blanshard, J. M. V., and Mitchell, J. R., eds) pp. 109-126, Butterworths, London
  6. Cooper, R. M. (1984) in Plant Diseases: Infection, Damage and Loss (Wood, R. K. S., and Jellis, G. J., eds) pp. 13-27, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford
  7. Ben-Shalom, N. (1986) J. Food Sci. 51, 720-722
  8. Anderson, A. J. (1978) Phytopathology 68, 1585-1589
  9. Mankarios, A. T., and Friend, J. (1980) Physiol. Plant Pathol. 17, 93-104
  10. Schols, H. A., Geraeds, C. C. J. M., Searle-van Leeuwen, M. F., Kormelink, F. J. M., and Voragen, A. G. J. (1990) Carbohydr. Res. 206, 105-115 [CrossRef]
  11. Kofod, L. V., Kauppinen, S., Christgau, S., Andersen, L. N., Heldt-Hansen, H. P., Dörreich, K., and Dalbøge, H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29182-29189 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Searle-van Leeuwen, M. J. F., van den Broek, L. A. M., Schols, H. A., Beldman, G., and Voragen, A. G. J. (1992) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38, 347-349
  13. Christensen, T., Wøldike, H., Boel, E., Mortensen, S. B., Hjortshøj, K., Thim, L., and Hansen, M. T. (1988) Bio/Technology 6, 1419-1422
  14. Siggaard-Andersen, M., Kauppinen, S., and von Wettstein-Knowles, P. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 4114-4118 [Abstract]
  15. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  16. Feinberg, A. P., and Vogelstein, B. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 132, 6-13 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Chirgwin, J. M., Przybyla, A. E., MacDonald, R. J., and Rutter, W. J. (1979) Biochemistry 18, 5294-5299 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Aviv, H., and Leder, P. (1972) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 69, 1408-1412 [Abstract]
  19. Thomas, P. S. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 100, 255-266 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. May, G. S., Gambino, J., Weatherbee, J. A., and Morris, N. R. (1985) J. Cell Biol. 101, 712-719 [Abstract]
  21. Yelton, M. M., Hamer, J. E., and Timberlake, W. E. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 1470-1474 [Abstract]
  22. Southern, E. M. (1975) J. Mol. Biol. 98, 503-517 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A. R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5463-5467 [Abstract]
  24. Devereux, J., Haeberli, P., and Smithies, O. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 387-395 [Abstract]
  25. Dalbøge, H., and Heldt-Hansen, H. (1994) Mol. & Gen. Genet. 243, 253-260
  26. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Christgau, S., Kauppinen, S., Vind, J., Kofod, L. V., and Dalbøge, H. (1994) Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 33, 917-925 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Frohman, M. A., Dush, M. K., and Martin, G. R. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 8998-9002 [Abstract]
  29. von Heijne, G. (1986) Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 4683-4690 [Abstract]
  30. Bussink, H. J. D., Buxton, F. P., and Visser, J. (1991) Curr. Genet. 19, 467-474 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Dean, R. A., and Timberlake, W. E. (1989) Plant Cell 1, 265-273 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Siéssere, V., Fonseca, M. J. V., and Said, R. (1992) J. Gen. Microbiol. 138, 1801-1805
  33. Tahara, T., Kotani, H., Shinmyo, A., and Enatsu, T. (1975) J. Ferment. Technol. 53, 409-412
  34. Bussink, H. J. D., van den Humbergh, J. P. T. W., van den Ijssel, P. R. L. A., and Visser, J. (1992) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37, 324-329
  35. Schols, H. A., Voragen, A. G. J., and Colquhoun, I. J. (1994) Carbohydr. Res. 256, 97-111 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Dean, R. A., and Timberlake, W. E. (1989) Plant Cell 1, 275-284 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Harmsen, J. A. M., Kusters-van Someren, M. A., and Visser, J. (1990) Curr. Genet. 18, 161-166 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Polizeli, M. L. T. M., Jorge, J. A., and Terenzi, H. F. (1991) J. Gen. Microbiol. 137, 1815-1823 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Bussink, H. J. D., Buxton, F. P., Fraaye, B. A., de Graaff, L. H., and Visser, J. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 208, 83-90 [Abstract]
  40. Mutter, M., Beldman, G., Schols, H. A., and Voragen, A. G. J. (1994) Plant Physiol. 106, 241-250 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.