©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Selective Activation of c-Jun Kinase Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase by CD40 on Human B Cells (*)

(Received for publication, June 16, 1995; and in revised form, October 19, 1995)

Naoki Sakata Hiren R. Patel Naohiro Terada Alejandro Aruffo (1) Gary L. Johnson Erwin W. Gelfand (§)

From the Division of Basic Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Center for Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Denver, Colorado 80206 Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Seattle, Washington 98121

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Results
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

The B cell surface antigen receptor, surface IgM (sIgM), is involved in B cell activation and proliferation. CD40 is involved in regulating IgE production and B cell survival. Cross-linking of B cell sIgM activates the Ras/Raf/p42pathway. In contrast, ligation of CD40 by antibody or soluble gp39 (CD40 ligand) leads to activation of the c-Jun kinase (JNK)/stress-activated protein kinase pathway. JNK/stress-activated protein kinase activation correlated with the stimulation of MEK kinase activity. CD40 does not activate the p42 pathway, and sIgM fails to regulate the JNK/stress-activated protein kinase pathway in B cells. Thus, two important cell surface receptors involved in controlling specific B cell response differentially regulate sequential protein kinase pathways involving different members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase family. Anti-CD40 also rescued B cell apoptosis induced by anti-IgM. CD40 ligation did not affect the sIgM stimulation of p42 activity. Conversely, sIgM ligation did not influence CD40 stimulation of JNK/stress-activated protein kinase. These results suggest that independent, parallel protein kinase response pathways are involved in the integration of sIgM and CD40 control of B cell phenotype and function.


INTRODUCTION

The B lymphocyte surface antigen receptor, membrane immunoglobulin, has important functions in the binding and internalization of antigen as well as in transducing signals through the plasma membrane that lead to cell activation, differentiation, and apoptosis(1, 2) . Cross-linking of the receptor stimulates the Ras/Raf-1/MEK (^1)cascade with activation of p42 MAP kinase and p90(3) . A second important B cell surface antigen receptor is CD40. CD40 is a 45-50-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein expressed on all mature B cells (4) . CD40 is a member of the TNF receptor family and has homology to the receptors for nerve growth factor(5) , TNF-alpha(6, 7, 8) , Fas(9) , and CD30(10) . The ligand for CD40 (CD40L, gp39) is expressed on activated T cells(11) , and activation through CD40 plays an important role in T cell-dependent immunoglobulin isotype switching(12, 13) . In contrast to cross-linking of sIgM, which can cause apoptosis, CD40 can rescue cells from apoptosis(13, 14, 15, 16, 17) . The signal transduction pathways through CD40 are not well delineated, but may induce protein tyrosine phosphorylation of a number of substrates(18, 19, 20) .

In this paper, we demonstrate that c-Jun amino-terminal kinases (JNKs)/stress-activated protein kinases are activated following CD40 ligation of human B cells. JNKs are members of the MAP kinase family (21) and are activated by stresses such as UV irradiation(22, 23, 24) , osmotic change(25, 26) , and heat shock(21) . In contrast to CD40, signaling through the antigen receptor activated p42, but failed to activate JNK.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cells

The human Burkitt's lymphoma cell line Ramos was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD), and cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 50 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, and 10% fetal calf serum. Exponentially growing cells were used in all experiments. Human primary B cells were prepared from tonsils as described previously(27) .

Reagents

Anti-IgM (F(ab`)(2) goat anti-human IgM antibody) was purchased from Zymed Laboratories, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA). The mouse monoclonal anti-human CD40 antibody (G28-5) was generously provided by Dr. E. A. Clark (Washington University, Seattle). The monoclonal anti-gp39 antibody (39-1.106) and recombinant soluble gp39 protein were prepared as described previously (28, 29) . Monoclonal mouse anti-ERK2 antibody was obtained from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). Polyclonal rabbit anti-Raf-1 antibody was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). GSH-Sepharose was obtained from Pharmacia Biotech (Uppsala), and protein A-Sepharose and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) were obtained from Sigma. EGFR-(662-681)-peptide (RRELVEPLTPSGEAPNQALLR) was synthesized as described(3) .

Immunoblot Analysis

Cells (10^6/ml) were treated with anti-IgM or anti-CD40 antibody (G28-5) for various times. Cells were lysed in 100 µl of lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 50 mM NaCl, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 2% Nonidet P-40, 0.2% SDS, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 50 µg/ml aprotinin, and 50 µM leupeptin). Lysates were centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 rpm in an Eppendorf microcentrifuge; 90 µl of the supernatants were mixed with 30 µl of 4 times Laemmli sample buffer(59) . Samples were boiled for 5 min. Twenty µl of the prepared samples were electrophoresed through a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were incubated in blocking buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 125 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20, 2% bovine serum albumin, and 0.1% NaN(3)) at 4 °C overnight; then monoclonal mouse anti-ERK2 antibody (1:2000) was added to the blocking buffer, and blots were incubated for an additional 2 h at room temperature. The blots were washed three times in TBST (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 125 mM NaCl, 0.025% Tween 20) and incubated with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig (Promega; 1:10,000 in TBST) for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were washed three times in TBST and developed with the colorigenic substrates 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate and nitro blue tetrazolium (Promega Protoblot alkaline phosphatase system).

ERK Kinase Assay

Kinase activity was evaluated using EGFR-(662-681)-peptide as a substrate as described previously(30) . Following stimulation, 10^6 cells were lysed in 75 µl of lysis buffer (70 mM beta-glycerophosphate, pH 7.2, 100 mM Na(3)VO(4), 2 mM MgCl(2), 1 mM EGTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM dithiothreitol) and placed on ice for 15 min. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min, and 20 µl of the supernatant were removed and mixed with 20 µl of 2 times kinase buffer (50 mM beta-glycerophosphate, pH 7.2, 100 mM Na(3)VO(4), 20 mM MgCl(2), 50 mg/ml IP-20, 1 mM EGTA, 400 µM EGFR-(662-681)-peptide, 200 µM ATP, and 0.225 mCi/ml [-P]ATP (ICN Biochemicals, Costa Mesa, CA)). After 15 min at 30 °C, 10 µl of 250 mM EDTA were added, and 45 µl of the reaction mixture were spotted onto Whatman P-81 phosphocellulose paper. The papers were washed four times (5 min each) in 400 ml of 75 mM phosphoric acid, and then radioactivity bound to the filter paper was determined by liquid scintillation counting. The assay system contained both EGTA (1 mM) and IP-20 (25 mg/ml), reagents that should effectively inhibit protein kinase C and calcium/calmodulin- and cAMP-dependent kinases.

Measurement of JNK

GST-c-Jun-(1-79) fusion protein was purified from bacterial lysates using GSH-Sepharose beads at room temperature with gentle rocking(25) . Following stimulation, 3 times 10^6 cells were lysed in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 250 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 3 mM EGTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 2 mM Na(3)VO(4), 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 µg/ml aprotinin, and 5 µg/ml leupeptin). The lysates were mixed with 10 µl of GST-c-Jun-(1-79) coupled to GSH-Sepharose beads. The mixture was rotated at 4 °C for 3 h in a microcentrifuge tube and pelleted by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 5 min. The pelleted beads were washed two times in lysis buffer and once in kinase buffer (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 20 mM beta-glycerophosphate, 10 mM MgCl(2), 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM Na(3)VO(4), and 10 mMp-nitrophenyl phosphate) and then resuspended in 40 µl of kinase buffer containing 10 µCi of [-P]ATP. After 20 min at 30 °C, the reaction was terminated by adding 4 times Laemmli sample buffer and boiling for 3 min. Samples were resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE and subjected to autoradiography. Phosphate incorporation was determined by a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA).

Measurement of Ras Activation

Cells (10^7) were labeled with [P]orthophosphate for 16 h and then stimulated. Ras was immunoprecipitated using the Y13-259 anti-Ras antibody, and GTP was separated from GDP by thin-layer chromatography as described(31) . The radiolabeled nucleotides were visualized by autoradiography. Radioactivity was quantitated with a PhosphorImager and the GTP/GTP + (1.5) GDP ratios were calculated.

Measurement of Raf-1 Kinase Activity

Cells (10^7) were stimulated in RPMI 1640 medium and then lysed in radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS, 1% aprotinin, 50 mM NaF, 200 mM Na(3)VO(4), 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The lysates were precleared by protein A-Sepharose beads for 30 min at 4 °C. A purified polyclonal anti-Raf-1 antibody was added to the lysates (1:100) and incubated for 90 min at 4 °C. The immunocomplexes were collected by protein A-Sepharose beads. The beads were then washed three times in radioimmune precipitation assay buffer and three times in buffer containing 10 mM PIPES, pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, and 2 µg/ml aprotinin. A kinase mixture (40 µl) containing 10 mM PIPES, pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MnCl(2), 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 30 µCi of [-P]ATP, and 100-200 ng of catalytically inactive MEK (KMMEK) was added to the beads. KMMEK was expressed and purified as described(32) . The samples were incubated for 30 min at 30 °C. The kinase reaction was stopped by the addition of 4 times Laemmli sample buffer and boiling for 3 min. The proteins were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was probed using the same anti-Raf-1 antibody and visualized as described above and subjected to autoradiography.

Measurement of MEK Kinase Activity

Following stimulation, 5 times 10^6 cells were lysed in 400 µl of extraction buffer (1% Triton X-100, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 20 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 2 mM Na(3)VO(4)). The lysates were centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 rpm, and pellets were discarded. The supernatants were incubated with the rabbit MEK kinase (MEKK) antiserum (1:100 dilution) raised against the MEKK NH(2)-terminal fusion protein (33) for 2 h at 4 °C. The immune complexes were collected by protein A-Sepharose beads. The beads were then washed twice in radioimmune precipitation assay buffer buffer and three times in buffer containing 10 mM PIPES, pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, and 2 µg/ml aprotinin. A kinase mixture (40 µl) containing 10 mM PIPES, pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MnCl(2), 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 30 µCi of [-P]ATP, and 0.5 µl of recombinant JNK-activating protein kinase (JNKK) (34) as a substrate was added to the beads. The samples were incubated for 30 min at 30 °C. The kinase reaction was stopped by the addition of 4 times Laemmli sample buffer and boiling for 3 min. The proteins were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and subjected to autoradiography. Phosphate incorporation was quantitated by a PhosphorImager.

Detection of Apoptosis

For detection of DNA strand breaks in individual cells, an in situ terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase assay was employed based on the method of Gorczyca et al.(35) with minor modifications. Cells were treated for 18 h as indicated; 10^6 cultured cells were washed in PBS and suspended in 500 µl of PBS. Paraform (4%, 170 µl) was added, and the mixture was stored on ice for 15 min. Cells were then washed in cold PBS and fixed with 70% ethanol at -20 °C for 1 h. Following washing in cold PBS, the cells were resuspended in terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase reaction buffer (0.1 M potassium cacodylate, pH 7.2, 2 mM CoCl(2), 0.2 mM dithiothreitol, 20 units of terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase, 2 nmol of fluorescein-labeled dUTP, and 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin). After 30 min at 37 °C, cells were washed once in 0.2% bovine serum albumin/PBS, and fluorescence staining was evaluated on an EPICS Profile (Coulter Corp., Hialeah, FL).


Results

ERK Is Activated by Anti-IgM, but Not by Anti-CD40

The Ramos cell line expresses both IgM and CD40 on the cell surface. When these cells were stimulated by cross-linking sIgM and immunoblotting was carried out using a monoclonal anti-ERK2 antibody, we detected a second lower mobility species of ERK2 (Fig. 1A). This lower mobility form represents the activated form of this kinase as described previously (30) and was also stimulated in response to PMA (Fig. 1A). In contrast to stimulation with anti-IgM antibody, immunoblotting analysis following treatment with 5 µg/ml (or 10 µg/ml (data not shown)) anti-CD40 antibody (G28-5) showed no lower mobility shift in p42 (Fig. 1A). These data indicate that anti-IgM antibody activates p42, but anti-CD40 antibody fails to activate p42. Similar results were shown when kinase activities were measured using EGFR-(662-681)-peptide as a substrate. Activation of p42 by anti-IgM was confirmed by increases in EGFR-(662-681)-peptide phosphorylation (Fig. 1B). In contrast, the addition of anti-CD40 antibody at concentrations up to 10 µg/ml failed to activate p42 in Ramos cells (Fig. 1B). Furthermore, we confirmed that anti-CD40 failed to activate p42 in freshly isolated tonsillar B cells (Fig. 1C).


Figure 1: Activation of ERK following treatment with anti-IgM, but not with anti-CD40. A, Ramos cells were treated with 10 µg/ml anti-IgM antibody or 5 µg/ml anti-CD40 antibody (G28-5) for the indicated times (in minutes), and immunoblot analysis was performed using monoclonal anti-ERK2 antibody. The untreated samples contained a single band (42 kDa) reactive with anti-ERK2 antibody (lane 0`). In samples treated with PMA (100 ng/ml) or anti-IgM for 20 min, a second band with immunoreactivity to anti-ERK2 antibody appeared (lane PMA and anti-IgM lanes 1`-60`). This lower mobility form represents the activated form due to phosphorylation(30) . The samples treated with anti-CD40 demonstrated only a single band throughout the time course. B, ERK activity was evaluated using EGFR-(662-681)-peptide as a substrate as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Data are shown as incorporation of P (±S.D.) from separately prepared duplicate samples from two independent experiments. Statistically significant differences from control (C; untreated) samples are represented by an asterisk (p < 0.05). The kinase activity of samples treated with 100 ng/ml PMA for 20 min and with 10 µg/ml anti-IgM for 5 min was significantly higher than that of samples from unstimulated (control) cells or cells treated with 1, 5, or 10 µg/ml anti-CD40 for 20 min. C, immunoblot analysis of lysates from freshly isolated tonsillar B cells following treatment with 5 µg/ml anti-CD40 for the indicated times also showed no shift in ERK2 mobility. Results are representative of at least two independent experiments.



JNK Is Activated by Anti-CD40 and Soluble gp39, but Not by Anti-IgM Antibody

JNK activity was measured by solid-phase kinase assay using GST-c-Jun (1-79) as a substrate following treatment with anti-IgM or anti-CD40 antibody. A rapid and marked increase in JNK activation was detected within 1 min of treatment with 1 µg/ml anti-CD40 antibody (Fig. 2A), reached peak levels within 15 min, and then began to decline by 30-60 min. Fig. 2B illustrates CD40-activated JNK activity in Ramos cells treated with various concentrations of anti-CD40 antibody for 15 min. In the presence of 0.5 µg/ml anti-CD40 antibody, levels of P incorporation were 5-fold higher than control samples. JNK activity increased in a dose-dependent fashion, with peak levels (7-fold) observed at a concentration of 2-5 µg/ml antibody. A dose-dependent response to anti-CD40 antibody was also detected in tonsillar B cells (Fig. 2C). Throughout the dose-response curve, lower levels of activation were observed in tonsillar B cells relative to Ramos cells, but both cell types clearly respond to CD40 ligation with a significant JNK activation. Recombinant soluble gp39 also activated JNK in a dose-dependent fashion in Ramos cells (Fig. 2D) and tonsillar B cells (data not shown). JNK activation was significantly higher using soluble gp39, and the response was specific in that anti-gp39 antibody prevented activation of JNK by soluble gp39 (Fig. 2E). Anti-gp39 antibody failed to block UV irradiation-induced activation of JNK (Fig. 2E).


Figure 2: Activation of JNK following treatment with anti-IgM or anti-CD40. JNK activity was measured by solid-phase kinase assay using GST-c-Jun-(1-79) as a substrate following treatment with anti-IgM antibody or anti-CD40 antibody (G28-5) in Ramos cells (three independent experiments) and in tonsillar B cells (two independent experiments). The level of P incorporation (±S.D.) into the substrate from at least two experiments was also evaluated by the PhosphorImager and then illustrated as the ratio of JNK activity to that of untreated samples. Statistically significant differences from control (untreated) samples are represented by an asterisk (p < 0.05). A, shown is the time course of JNK activation after treatment of Ramos cell with 1 µg/ml anti-CD40. B, shown is the dose response of anti-CD40-activated JNK in Ramos cells treated with various concentrations of anti-CD40 for 15 min. C, shown is the dose response of anti-CD40 in tonsillar B cells treated for 15 min. D, soluble gp39 activates JNK. Dilutions of culture supernatants containing soluble gp39 were added to Ramos cells for 15 min. E, anti-gp39 antibody prevents activation of JNK by soluble gp39. Dilutions of culture supernatants containing soluble gp39 were preincubated with anti-gp39 antibody (2 µg/ml) for 5 min prior to addition to Ramos cells. JNK activation by UV irradiation was unaffected by the presence of the antibody. F and G, anti-IgM fails to activate JNK. Anti-IgM antibody was added to Ramos cells (F) or tonsillar B cells (G) for different time periods. mAb, monoclonal antibody.



JNK activity was not increased following surface IgM cross-linking even in the presence of 10 µg/ml anti-IgM antibody in Ramos cells (Fig. 2F) and tonsillar B cells (Fig. 2G). These anti-IgM antibody concentrations were effective in ERK activation (Fig. 1A). The results demonstrate that JNK is activated by anti-CD40, but not anti-IgM, indicating that anti-CD40 activates JNK through a different signaling pathway than that which mediates ERK activation by anti-IgM. We therefore investigated the signaling pathways that lead to ERK and JNK activation following treatment with anti-IgM or anti-CD40 antibody.

Anti-CD40 Activates JNK through a Ras-independent Pathway

It is known that Ras is involved in the signaling pathway that activates ERKs following treatment with PMA or antigen-receptor ligation of human B cells(3) . Metabolically P-labeled Ramos cells were treated with 10 µg/ml anti-IgM or 5 µg/ml anti-CD40 for 1, 5, and 10 min. Ras was immunoprecipitated, and radioactive GTP and GDP bound to Ras were measured(31) . Anti-IgM treatment activated Ras as reported previously(3) . However, anti-CD40 treatment failed to activate Ras at concentrations that were effective in JNK activation (Fig. 3). Our results demonstrate that the signals transduced following CD40 engagement lead to JNK activation through a pathway that does not involve Ras activation.


Figure 3: Activation of Ras following treatment with anti-IgM, but not with anti-CD40. Metabolically P-labeled Ramos cells were untreated (control) or treated with 10 µg/ml anti-IgM or 5 µg/ml anti-CD40 for 1, 5, and 10 min. Ras was immunoprecipitated using the Y13-259 anti-Ras antibody, and radioactive GTP and GDP bound to Ras were measured as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' The data were quantitated by a PhosphorImager, and shown are the GTP/GDP + (1.5) GDP ratios (in percent) for each condition. Results are representative of three separate experiments. The data indicate means ± S.D., and statistically significant differences from control (untreated) samples are represented by an asterisk (p < 0.05).



Raf-1 Does Not Participate in the CD40-activated JNK Pathway

The activation of ERKs by Ras is mediated via Raf-1(36) . We investigated Raf-1 activity in order to confirm that the signals leading to JNK activation were mediated via a different pathway than the one leading to ERK activation. The Raf-1 assay was carried out using catalytically inactive MEK (KMMEK) as a substrate(32) . KMMEK is a recombinant mutant form that lacks both kinase and autophosphorylation activities due to a mutation of lysine 97 to methionine in the ATP-binding site(32) . Fig. 4illustrates that the levels of KMMEK phosphorylation following treatment with 5 µg/ml anti-CD40 were not different than control samples, whereas cells treated with anti-IgM antibody resulted in increased KMMEK phosphorylation. To verify similar loading of immunoprecipitated Raf-1, an immunoblot was concomitantly performed using the same antibody as was used for the immunoprecipitates (Fig. 4). The Raf-1 mobility shifts (Fig. 4, lower panel) were consistent with the increased levels of kinase activity (upper panel) measured using KMMEK. As previously reported(3) , PMA gives a very robust Raf-1 activation. Nonetheless, the magnitude of anti-IgM activation of Raf-1 is sufficient to activate ERK2 similarly compared with PMA. Raf-1, which is an efficient activator of the ERK pathway, is not measurably activated during JNK activation in response to CD40 ligation.


Figure 4: Activation of Raf-1 following treatment with anti-IgM, but not with anti-CD40. Ramos cells were untreated (control (C)) or treated with 100 ng/ml PMA, 10 µg/ml anti-IgM, or 5 µg/ml anti-CD40 for the indicated times (in minutes). Raf-1 was immunoprecipitated, and a kinase assay was performed as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' After SDS-PAGE, the proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. P incorporation into catalytically inactive MEK (KMMEK) was measured by autoradiography (upper panel). The membrane was also probed with the same anti-Raf-1 antibody used for immunoprecipitation, and immunoreactivity was visualized by the alkaline phosphatase system to verify similar loading of immunoprecipitated Raf-1 (lower panel). Results are representative of two separate experiments.



p90 Mobility Shift following ERK but Not JNK Activation

p90 is a known downstream kinase of the ERK pathway(37) . Following treatment with anti-IgM or anti-CD40, cell lysates were assayed for p90 activation using the mobility shift of the kinase as a measure of increased activity. Anti-IgM treatment induced a shift in the mobility of p90, whereas in the samples treated with anti-CD40 antibody, no shift in the mobility of p90 protein was detected (data not shown). This finding is consistent with the differential signaling of sIgM and CD40 involving MAP kinase pathways in B cells.

Anti-CD40 Activates MEKK

JNK activation involves a sequential protein kinase pathway including JNKK (34, 38) and MEKK(40) . We measured MEKK activity following the addition of anti-CD40 antibody (2 µg/ml) to Ramos cells. At different time points, cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-MEKK antibody and subjected to an in vitro kinase assay using recombinant JNKK as a substrate. JNKK lies between MEKK and JNK in the JNK sequential protein kinase pathway (34, 38, 40) . Fig. 5illustrates the kinetics of MEKK activation by anti-CD40 antibody. MEKK was activated rapidly, reaching maximal stimulation by 30 s after anti-CD40 antibody treatment, and then decreased gradually with time. We were unable to obtain data at times earlier than 30 s because of inaccuracies in stimulating and lysing the cells at shorter time intervals. Immunoblots of immunoprecipitated MEKK with the polyclonal anti-MEKK antibody that was used for immunoprecipitation revealed similar amounts of a 98-kDa MEKK protein for each time point (data not shown). These data indicate that in B lymphoblastoid cells, an MEKK is present that regulates the JNK pathway and is activated in response to CD40 ligation.


Figure 5: Activation of MEKK following treatment with anti-CD40 antibody. Ramos cells were treated with 2 µg/ml anti-CD40 antibody for the indicated times (in minutes). MEKK was immunoprecipitated, and a kinase assay was performed as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' After SDS-PAGE, the proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. P incorporation into JNKK was measured by autoradiography (upper panel). COS cells transfected with full-length MEKK were used to localize JNKK. The level of P incorporation (±S.D.) into the substrate from three independent experiments was evaluated by the PhosphorImager and then illustrated as the ratio of MEKK activity to that of untreated samples (lower panel). Statistically significant differences from untreated (lane 0`) samples are represented by an asterisk (p < 0.05).



Anti-CD40 Rescues Apoptosis Induced by Anti-IgM

Anti-IgM treatment induces apoptosis in B lymphoblastoid cells(13, 14, 15, 16, 17) . For detection of DNA breaks derived from anti-IgM-induced apoptosis, an in situ terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase assay (35) was employed. Fig. 6A shows that DNA breaks were detected in 64.2% of Ramos cells 18 h following treatment with 10 µg/ml anti-IgM antibody, whereas there was no shift in fluorescence intensity in control (untreated) cells or in cells treated with 2 µg/ml anti-CD40 antibody. However, in the presence of 2 µg/ml anti-CD40 antibody preincubated for 30 min prior to the addition of anti-IgM antibody, DNA breaks induced by anti-IgM antibody were reduced to 3.5% of the cells. Under identical conditions (Fig. 6B), an immunoblot using monoclonal anti-ERK2 antibody indicated the mobility shift in p42 protein 5 min following treatment with 10 µg/ml anti-IgM antibody in the presence of 2 µg/ml anti-CD40 antibody preincubated for 30 min. In addition, JNK activity, measured by solid-phase kinase assay using GST-c-Jun fusion protein, was increased 15 min following treatment with anti-CD40 antibody in the presence of anti-IgM antibody. Thus, CD40 ligation does not affect p42 activation by sIgM, and sIgM ligation does not affect CD40 activation of JNK.


Figure 6: Rescue from anti-IgM-induced apoptosis by anti-CD40 antibody. Ramos cells were untreated (control) or treated with 10 µg/ml anti-IgM antibody or 2 µg/ml anti-CD40 antibody; costimulation of cells consisted of a 30-min preincubation with anti-CD40 antibody followed by anti-IgM antibody. A, after an 18-h culture, DNA breaks derived from anti-IgM-induced apoptosis were evaluated using an in situ terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase assay as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' B, p42 activation (5 min following treatment) and JNK activation (15 min following treatment) were evaluated under identical conditions as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' The level of P incorporation (±S.D.) from two independent experiments was evaluated by the PhosphorImager and then illustrated as the ratio of JNK activation to that of untreated samples. Statistically significant differences from untreated samples are represented by an asterisk (p < 0.05).




DISCUSSION

Many growth factors and cytokines activate MAP kinase family members, including ERKs and JNKs. Many growth factors have been shown to activate ERKs, and the signaling cascade has been well characterized. Similar to other members of the MAP kinase family, JNKs are activated through phosphorylation at conserved Thr and Tyr residues (41) . The pathways leading to JNK activation are less well understood and may function as a protective response against environmental stresses and may influence the apoptotic response.

We previously showed (3) and confirmed here that following triggering of B cells through the surface antigen receptor, Ras, Raf-1, and MEK are all activated and participate in p42 activation. Following stimulation with anti-IgM, Ras activation was observed, and the ability of Raf-1 to phosphorylate recombinant and kinase-inactive MEK was increased. In parallel, MEK activity toward kinase-active or -inactive recombinant MAP kinase also increased. Under conditions where anti-IgM increased phosphorylation of p42, we were unable to detect any activation of JNK in either a B lymphoblastoid cell line or freshly isolated tonsillar B cells.

In contrast to anti-IgM, the addition of anti-CD40 antibody or recombinant soluble gp39 activated JNK in a dose- and time-dependent fashion. Qualitatively, the results were similar when studied in Ramos cells or tonsillar B cells. The higher level of JNK activation in Ramos cells may reflect higher levels of CD40 expression on the B cell line compared with freshly isolated tonsillar B cells(42) . As reported previously (43) for activation of NF-kappaB or B cell proliferation, soluble gp39 resulted in greater increases in JNK activation than did the addition of anti-CD40 antibody. This may be due to the fact that soluble gp39 is highly aggregated, resulting in oligomerization of CD40 and in a stronger signal. Activation of B lymphocytes through CD40 did not result in any detectable increase in phosphorylation or activation of p42 or its downstream substrate, p90. Furthermore, the addition of anti-CD40 failed to affect Ras or Raf-1 activation. These data indicate that signaling of B cells through CD40 leads to JNK activation by a Ras-independent pathway.

These results are similar to what has been described for TNF-alpha stimulation of PC12 cells(40) . In these cells, activation of JNK by epidermal growth factor or nerve growth factor was dependent on Ha-Ras activation, while activation by TNF-alpha was Ras-independent. It appears that Ras activates two kinases, Raf-1 and MEK kinase (MEKK1)(44) . Although Raf-1 contributes to ERK but not JNK activation(40) , MEKK is involved in JNK activation(40, 45) . In the absence of measurable Ras activation, as observed with TNF-alpha in PC12 cells and signaling through CD40 in B cells, the pathway leading to MEKK activation is presently unclear(34, 38) .

The B cell antigen receptor (surface immunoglobulin) is important for binding and internalization of antigen as well as transducing signals through the plasma membrane, resulting in cell activation and differentiation(1, 2) . Anti-Ig antibodies trigger the rapid activation of phospholipase C and several tyrosine kinases, increases in cytosolic Ca concentrations, and increased transcription of a number of early genes including Egr, c-fos, and c-myc(46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54) . Ligation of CD40 appears to initiate a distinct series of events with no increase in cytosolic Ca concentrations and inconsistent results from different groups on Src kinase activation(18, 19, 20) . Together with the absence of Ras activation, it appears that CD40 uses signal transduction pathways resulting in MEKK and JNK activation distinct from responses controlled by sIgM. Whether these pathways may involve other GTP-binding proteins such as Rac, which has been shown to regulate the JNK pathway(55, 56) , is not known.

The role of JNK activation in CD40-mediated B cell survival is unclear. CD40 is also involved in B cell activation, differentiation(57, 58) , and Ig class switching(12, 13) . It is likely that CD40 signaling involves more than the activation of JNK sequential protein kinase pathways. Nonetheless, the identification of JNK as a CD40-regulated kinase allows, for the first time, for the characterization of cytoplasmic signal transduction pathways that can influence sIgM control of the B cell phenotype. This activity of CD40 was independent of the sIgM activation of p42. In neurons, dominant negative c-Jun has been shown to block serum deprivation-induced apoptosis(39) . This finding infers that stimulation of JNK would contribute to the apoptotic response. This is not the case in B lymphocytes, where JNK activation is not observed in sIgM-stimulated apoptosis. Rather, JNK is activated in association with the protective response mediated by CD40 and even possibly augmented to some degree in the presence of anti-IgM antibody. The apparent independence of CD40 and sIgM signaling involving MAP kinase pathways suggests that the integration of the JNK pathway with sIgM responses dramatically alters the functional response of the B cell. Genetic manipulation of JNK activation in B cells, including altering the apoptotic response to sIgM ligation, will define whether this is a dominant pathway in CD40 function.


FOOTNOTES

*
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: National Jewish Center, 1400 Jackson St., Denver, CO 80206. Tel.: 303-398-1196; Fax: 303-270-2105.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; sIgM, surface IgM; JNK, c-Jun kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid; KMMEK, catalytically inactive MEK; MEKK, MEK kinase; JNKK, JNK kinase; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.


REFERENCES

  1. Lanzavecchia, A. (1990) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 8, 773-793
  2. Hasbold, J., and Klaus, G. G. B. (1990) Eur. J. Immunol. 20, 1685-1690 [Medline]
  3. Tordai, A., Franklin, R. A., Patel, H., Gardner, A. M., Johnson, G. L., and Gelfand, E. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7538-7543 [Medline]
  4. Clark, E. A., and Ledbetter, J. A. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 4494-4498 [Medline]
  5. Johnson, D., Lanahan, A., Buck, C. R., Sehgal, A., Morgan, C., Mercer, E., Bothwell, M., and Chao, M. (1986) Cell 47, 545-554 [Medline]
  6. Loetscher, H., Pan, Y. C. E., Lahm, H. W., Gentz, R., Brockhaus, M., Tabuchi, H., and Lesslauer, W. (1990) Cell 61, 351-359 [Medline]
  7. Schall, T. J., Lewis, M., Koller, K. J., Lee, A., Rice, G. C., Wong, G. H. W., Gatanaga, T., Granger, G. A., Lentz, R., Raab, H., Kohr, W., and Goeddel, D. (1990) Cell 61, 361-370 [Medline]
  8. Smith, C. A., Davis, T., Anderson, D., Solam, L., Beckmann, M. P., Jerzy, R., Dower, S. K., Cosman, D., and Goodwin, R. G. (1990) Science 248, 1019-1023 [Medline]
  9. Itoh, N., Yonehara, S., Ishii, A., Yonehara, M., Mizushima, S., Sameshima, M., Hase, A., Seto, Y., and Nagata, S. (1991) Cell 66, 233-243 [Medline]
  10. Durkop, H., Latza, U., Hummel, M., Eitelbach, F., Seed, B., and Stein, H. (1992) Cell 68, 421-427 [Medline]
  11. Noelle, R. J., Roy, M., and Shepherd, D. M. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 6550-6554 [Medline]
  12. Fanslow, W. C., Anderson, D. M., Grabstein, K. H., Clark, E. A., Cosman, D., and Armitage, R. J. (1992) J. Immunol. 149, 655-660 [Medline]
  13. Lederman, S., Yellin, M. J., Cleary, A. M., Pernis, A., Inghirami, G., Cohn, L. E., Covey, L. R., Lee, J. J., Rothman, P., and Chess, L. (1994) J. Immunol. 152, 2163-2171 [Medline]
  14. Tsubata, T., Wu, J., and Honjo, T. (1993) Nature 364, 645-648 [Medline]
  15. Holder, M. J., Wang, H., Milner, A. E., Casamayor, M., Armitage, R., Spriggs, M. K., Fanslow, W. C., MacLennan, I. C. M., Gregory, C. D., and Gordon, J. (1993) Eur. J. Immunol. 23, 2368-2371 [Medline]
  16. Valentine, M. A., and Licciardi, K. A. (1992) Eur. J. Immunol. 22, 3141-3148 [Medline]
  17. Sumimoto, S., Heike, T., Kanazashi, S., Shintaku, N., Jung, E., Hata, D., Katamura, K., and Mayumi, M. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 2488-2496 [Medline]
  18. Uckun, F. M., Schieven, G. L., Dibirdik, I., Chandan-Langlie, M., Tuel-Ahlgren, L., and Ledbetter, J. A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 17478-17485 [Medline]
  19. Ren, C. L., Morio, T., Fu, S. M., and Geha, R. S. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 179, 673-680 [Medline]
  20. Faris, M., Gaskin, F., Parson, T., and Fu, S. M. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 179, 1923-1931 [Medline]
  21. Kyriakis, J. M., Banerjee, P., Nikolakaki, E., Dai, T., Rubie, E. A., Ahmad, M. F., Avruch, J., and Woodgett, J. R. (1994) Nature 369, 156-160 [Medline]
  22. Binetruy, B., Smeal, T., and Karin, M. (1991) Nature 351, 122-127 [Medline]
  23. Smeal, T., Binetruy, B., Mercola, D., Birrer, M., and Karin, M. (1991) Nature 354, 494-496 [Medline]
  24. Derijard, B., Hibi, M., Wu, I.-H., Barrett, T., Su, B., Deng, T., Karin, M., and Davis, R. J. (1994) Cell 76, 1025-1037 [Medline]
  25. Galcheva-Gargova, Z., Derijard, B., Wu, I., and Davis, R. J. (1994) Science 265, 806-808 [Medline]
  26. Han, J., Lee, J., Bibbs, L., and Ulevitch, R. J. (1994) Science 265, 808-811 [Medline]
  27. Takase, K., Terada, N., Lucas, J. J., and Gelfand, E. W. (1995) J. Cell. Physiol. 162, 246-255 [Medline]
  28. Bajorath, J., Chalupny, N. J., Marken, J. S., Siadek, A. W., Skonier, J., Gordon, M., Hollenbaugh, D., Noelle, R. J., Ochs, H. D., and Aruffo, A. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 1833-1844 [Medline]
  29. Hollenbaugh, D., Grosmaire, L. S., Kullas, C. D., Chalupny, N. J., Braesch-Andersen, S., Noelle, R. J., Stamenkovic, I., Ledbetter, J. A., and Aruffo, A. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 4313-4321 [Medline]
  30. Franklin, R. A., Tordai, A., Mazer, B., Terada, N., Lucas, J. J., and Gelfand, E. W. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 4890-4898 [Medline]
  31. Downward, J., Graves, J. D., Warne, P. H., Rayter, S., and Cantrell, D. A. (1990) Nature 346, 719-723 [Medline]
  32. Gardner, A. M., Lange-Carter, C. A., Vaillancourt, R. R., and Johson, G. L. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 238, 258-270 [Medline]
  33. Lange-Carter, C. A., and Johnson, G. L. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 255, 290-301
  34. Lin, A., Minden, A., Martinetto, H., Claret, F.-X., Lange-Carter, C. A., Mercurio, F., Johnson, G. L., and Karin, M. (1995) Science 268, 286-290 [Medline]
  35. Gorczyca, W., Gong, J., Ardelt, B., Traganos, F., and Darzynkiewicz, Z. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 3186-3192 [Medline]
  36. Dent, P., Haren, W., Haystead, T. A., Vincent, L. A., Roberts, T. M., and Sturgill, T. W. (1992) Science 257, 1404-1407 [Medline]
  37. Sturgill, T. W., and Wu, J. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1092, 350-357
  38. Derijard, B., Raingeaud, J., Barrett, T., Wu, I., Han, J., Ulevitch, R., and Davis, R. (1995) Science 267, 682-685 [Medline]
  39. Ham, J., Babij, C., Whitfield, J., Pfarr, C. M., Lallemand, D., Yaniv, M., and Rubin, L. L. (1995) Neuron 14, 927-939 [Medline]
  40. Minden, A., Lin, A., McMahon, M., Lange-Carter, C. A., Derijard, B., Davis, R. J., Johnson, G. L., and Karin, M. (1994) Science 266, 1719-1723 [Medline]
  41. Hibi, M., Lin, A., Smeal, T., Minden, A., and Karin, M. (1993) Genes & Dev. 7, 2135-2148 [Medline]
  42. Brodie, C., and Gelfand, E. W. (1994) J. Neuroimmunol. 52, 87-96
  43. Ledbetter, J. A., Grosmaire, L. S., Hollenbaugh, D., Aruffo, A., and Nadler, S. G. (1995) Circ. Shock 44, 67-72 [Medline]
  44. Lange-Carter, C. A., and Johnson, G. L. (1994) Science 265, 1458-1461 [Medline]
  45. Yan, M., Dai, T., Deak, J. C., Kyriakis, J. M., Zon, L. I., Woodgett, J. R., and Templeton, D. J. (1994) Nature 372, 798-800 [Medline]
  46. Cambier, J. C., and Campbell, K. S. (1992) FASEB J. 6, 3207-3217 [Medline]
  47. Reth, M., Hombach, J., Wienands, J., Campbell, K. S., Chien, N., Justement, L. B., and Cambier, J. C. (1991) Immunol. Today 12, 196-210 [Medline]
  48. Bijsterbosch, M. K., Meade, C. J., Turner, G. A., and Klaus, G. G. B. (1985) Cell 41, 999-1006
  49. Cheung, R. K., and Dosch, H. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 8667-8670 [Medline]
  50. Roifman, C. M., Chin, K., Gazit, A., Mills, G. B., Gilon, C., and Levitzki, A. (1991) J. Immunol. 146, 2965-2971 [Medline]
  51. Klemsz, M., Justement, L., Palmer, E., and Cambier, J. (1989) J. Immunol. 143, 1032-1039 [Medline]
  52. Brunswick, M., Samelson, L., and Mond, J. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1311-1314 [Medline]
  53. Roifman, C., and Wang, G. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 183, 411-416 [Medline]
  54. Seyfert, B. L., Sukhatme, V. P., and Monroe, J. C. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 2083-2088 [Medline]
  55. Coso, O. A., Chiariello, M., Yu, J.-C., Teramoto, H., Crespo, P., Xu, N., Miki, T., and Gutkind, J. S. (1995) Cell 81, 1137-1146 [Medline]
  56. Minden, A., Lin, A., Claret, F.-X., Abo, A., and Karin, M. (1995) Cell 81, 1147-1157 [Medline]
  57. Jabara, H. H., Fu, S. M., Geha, R. S., and Vercelli, D. (1990) J. Exp. Med. 172, 1861-1864 [Medline]
  58. Armitage, R. J., Macduff, B. M., Spriggs, M. K., and Fanslow, W. C. (1993) J. Immunol. 150, 3671-3680 [Medline]
  59. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [Medline]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.