©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Structure-Function Relationships in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Poly(A) Polymerase
IDENTIFICATION OF A NOVEL RNA BINDING SITE AND A DOMAIN THAT INTERACTS WITH SPECIFICITY FACTOR(S) (*)

(Received for publication, July 14, 1995; and in revised form, September 9, 1995)

Alexander M. Zhelkovsky Marco M. Kessler Claire L. Moore (§)

From the Department of Molecular Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111-1800

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

We have constructed deletions in the nonconserved regions at the amino and carboxyl ends of the poly(A) polymerase (PAP) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and examined the effects of these truncations on function of the enzyme. PAP synthesizes a poly(A) tail onto the 3`-end of RNA without any primer specificity but, in the presence of cellular factors, is directed specifically to the cleaved ends of mRNA precursors. The last 31 amino acids of PAP are dispensable for both nonspecific and specific activities. Removal of the next 36 amino acids affects an RNA binding domain, which is essential for the activity of the enzyme and for cell viability. This novel RNA binding site was further localized using additional deletions, cyanogen bromide cleavage of PAP cross-linked with RNA or 8-azido-ATP, and a monoclonal antibody against a COOH-terminal PAP epitope. A deletion that partially disrupts this domain has reduced nonspecific activity but functions in specific polyadenylation. In contrast, deletion of the first 18 amino acids of PAP has no effect on nonspecific polyadenylation but completely eliminates specific activity. This region is essential for enzyme function in vivo and is probably involved in the interaction of PAP with other protein(s) of the polyadenylation machinery.


INTRODUCTION

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae shares mechanisms of mRNA maturation common to most eukaryotic species. One step in mRNA biogenesis is the formation of a modified 3`-end, a complex and highly regulated process that includes recognition of specific RNA sequence, cleavage and polyadenylation, and termination of poly(A) addition once a certain average tail length is reached(1, 2) . This is accomplished by a multiprotein complex, which in yeast can be separated into four factors (CF I, CF II, PF I, and PAP) (^1)essential for reconstitution of accurate 3`-end formation in vitro(3) . The yeast PAP is an important component of the 3`-processing machinery. When mixed with partially purified CF I and PF I, it is active only on RNA substrates containing specific polyadenylation signal sequences (3) . However, replacement of magnesium for manganese or separation of PAP from CF I and/or PF I (3) completely eliminates this specificity. Components in mammalian cells, similar to CF I and PF I, provide analogous functions(1, 2) . In this sense, PAP can be considered as a catalytic subunit of a multicomponent enzyme, which requires at least two other polypeptides to confer specificity for RNA substrate. A similar situation has been described for vaccinia PAP, in which two proteins comprise the holoenzyme(4, 5) .

The nature of the interaction of PAP and other components, as well as the interaction of PAP with RNA and ATP during catalysis, is mostly unknown. Purified yeast PAP has been characterized(6) , and the gene has been cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli(7) . By using PAP as a bait in the two-hybrid system for screening yeast DNA libraries, it has been shown that PAP interacts with FIP1, a component of the PF I factor(8) , and with PIP2, a protein homologous to ubiquitin-activating enzyme, and PIP3, a protein of unknown function (9) . (^2)

The yeast PAP has strong homology in some regions with vertebrate PAPs (10) but also has unique nonconserved sequences located in the amino and carboxyl-terminal parts of the protein. There is a common RNA binding domain (RNP1) (7) whose role in PAP function has been confirmed by mutagenesis of the bovine gene(11) . Surprisingly, similar conservation does not exist when the eukaryotic PAP sequences are compared to that of PAP from E. coli(12, 13) or Vaccinia virus(5) . A knowledge of the mechanism of poly(A) polymerase action and a correlation of structure with function would provide useful insights into the regulation of polyadenylation and its interaction with other components of the polyadenylation complex. In this paper, we describe a previously uncharacterized region at the amino terminus of the yeast PAP, which is responsible for specific protein-protein interaction, and a new and unsuspected RNA binding site at the carboxyl end. We also discuss the importance of these regions to in vitro polyadenylation and cell viability.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nucleic Acids

Radioactive nucleotide triphosphates were from ICN and DuPont NEN. To create the transcriptional templates ending at the GAL7 poly(A) site, an NsiI site was introduced by site-directed oligonucleotide mutagenesis into the GAL7 insert of plasmids pJCGAL7-1 and pJCGAL7-3, a mutated version containing a deletion of a 12-base TA repeat(3) , generating pJCGAL7-9 and pJCGAL7-10, respectively. Transcription with pJCGAL7-9 and pJCGAL7-10 templates, cut with NsiI, generates ``precleaved'' RNA substrates with the same 3`-end as the upstream cleavage product(14, 15) . RNA was transcribed in vitro using T3 RNA polymerase (Life Technologies, Inc.), diguanosine triphosphate ``cap'' (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.), and the manufacturer's suggested protocol. In the case of randomly labeled RNA, [alpha-P]UTP was added to the transcription reaction. 3`-End-labeled RNA was synthesized by using nonradioactive RNA, 3`-[alpha-P]dATP, and PAP(16) . In case of 5`-end-labeled RNA, uncapped nonradioactive RNA transcript was first treated with calf alkaline phosphatase (Pharmacia) and then phosphorylated with [-P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase(17) . All radioactive RNAs were purified from 5% acrylamide, 8.3 M urea gels(17) . Oligo(A) and poly(A) were from Pharmacia and Boehringer Mannheim, respectively.

The pJPAP1 expression plasmid was a kind gift of J. Lingner and W. Keller(7) . Serial deletions of the 5`- and 3`-ends of the PAP gene were made using polymerase chain reaction and natural restriction sites. To delete the last 67 amino acids of PAP, pJDelta6PAP was created by digesting pJPAP1 with BstEII and PvuII, and to delete the last 20 amino acids (pJDelta7PAP), pJPAP1 was digested with BglII and PvuII. The digestion products were blunted with DNA polymerase I (Klenow) fragment (New England Biolabs), and the large fragments were circularized using DNA ligase (New England Biolabs). pJDelta8PAP (deleting the last 55 amino acids), pJDelta9PAP (deleting the last 43 amino acids), pJDelta10PAP (deleting the last 31 amino acids), pJDelta14PAP (deleting amino-terminal amino acids 3-18), and pJDelta15PAP (deleting amino-terminal amino acids 3-44) were made by replacement of the PAP gene sequence between the SacI and PvuII sites in pJPAP1 with appropriate polymerase chain reaction fragments (Fig. 1). For testing function of the truncated PAPs in yeast, the same fragments were inserted into pHCp50 plasmid, a derivative of YCp50(18) , with the HindIII fragment of yeast chromosomal DNA containing PAP1 sequence. pHCp50 was a kind gift of Dr. W. Keller. All restriction and modifying enzymes were from New England Biolabs.


Figure 1: Schematic diagram of yeast poly(A) polymerase showing known functional and structural domains and sites of deletion used in this study. The scale represents the number of amino acids, and the relative positions of restriction sites used for truncations and subcloning are indicated. The positions of epitopes recognized by two different monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against the yeast PAP (21) are also marked. The table (inset) represents the reference number of the deletion, the number of amino acids (-a.a.) deleted from the amino (N)- or carboxyl (C)-terminal parts of the protein, and the nonspecific activity of each truncated recombinant PAP in E. coli cell lysate expressed as a percentage of that of the wild type enzyme.



Protein Expression and Purification

All procedures were done at 4 °C except where indicated. Truncated proteins were expressed with the T7 expression system(19) , using BL21(DE3)pLysS cells grown for 2 h at 37 °C after isopropyl-1-thio-beta-D-galactopyranoside induction. Cells from 1 liter of culture were harvested, washed in 100 ml of phosphate-buffered saline, 1 mM PMSF, pelleted, and quickly resuspended in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10% glycerol, 250 mM KCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 0.6 µM leupeptin, 2 µM pepstatin A), and frozen with liquid nitrogen. Cells were thawed at 30 °C and incubated 15 min at this temperature. Lysates were centrifuged at 100,000 times g for 1 h. The supernatant was briefly sonicated, diluted with DE 0 buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10% glycerol, 0.25 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF) to a concentration of 100 mM KCl and loaded onto an equilibrated 20-ml DEAE-Sephacel (Pharmacia) column, and proteins eluted with either a loading buffer or a gradient of 100-500 mM KCl, if necessary. Fractions containing PAP activity were combined. Potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, was added to a final concentration of 30 mM, and the solution was loaded onto a 10-ml phosphocellulose P-11 (Whatman) column equilibrated with 30 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, 100 mM KCl, 0.25 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF. After washing the column with the same buffer, PAP was eluted with a salt gradient of 100-700 mM KCl in the same buffer. Fractions containing PAP activity were dialyzed against DE100 buffer (DE 0 plus 100 mM KCl) and loaded onto a 1-ml HiTrap Heparin column (Pharmacia) equilibrated with DE100 buffer. After washing with DE100 buffer, proteins were eluted with a 100-500-mM KCl gradient. Active fractions were combined, diluted with DE 0 buffer to 50 mM KCl, and loaded onto a 1-ml Mono Q column (Pharmacia). After washing with DE50 buffer, a 50-500 mM KCl gradient was applied. Fractions containing PAP activity were combined and stored at -70 °C.

Yeast whole extract was prepared as described (3) except that the spheroplasting step was omitted. Fractions containing CF II/PF I were concentrated to 4 mg/ml, and CF I was further purified about 100-fold and used at a concentration of 0.4 mg/ml. All extracts and factors were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70 °C.

Protein concentrations were determined by the procedure of Bradford (20) using the Bio-Rad kit and bovine serum albumin as a standard. Protein markers were from New England Biolabs.

PAP Assays

Nonspecific polyadenylation (6) was carried out in 10 µl of 20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5, containing 1 mM MnCl(2), 50 mM KCl, 0.25 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 0.25 mM ATP, 1 µCi of [alpha-P]ATP, RNA, and appropriately diluted PAP. For poly(A) priming, 8.9 µg of poly(A) (0.27 µM) and 10-20 ng of PAP were used. For kinetic studies, a variable concentration of oligo(A) (0.25-50 µM range) or 100 µM oligo(A) and a variable concentration of ATP (25-250 µM range) and 10-20 ng of PAP were used. After incubation at 30 °C for 20 min, reactions were stopped by adding 100 µl of 10% trichloroacetic acid. Trichloroacetic acid-precipitable counts were collected on GF/C filters (Whatman), and Cherenkov counts were measured. For kinetic studies, 2-µl aliquots were taken at 2, 5, 10, and 20 min, stopped, and counted, and the initial rate of reaction was calculated.

To assay specific polyadenylation, the reactions (16 µl) were assembled on ice and contained 1 mM magnesium acetate, 75 mM potassium acetate, 2% polyethylene glycol(8000), 2 mM ATP, 20 mM creatine phosphate, 10 nM (16 ng) labeled pre-cleaved mRNA, and 1.5 µM (0.6 µg) tRNA. The reactions contained either 1 µl of yeast whole cell extract (20 µg of protein) or 2 µl of CF I fraction (0.8 µg of protein), 2 µl of CF II/PF I (8 µg of protein), and 1 µl of diluted PAP (13 ng of protein) and were incubated at 30 °C for 20 min and stopped with proteinase K and SDS as described previously(3, 21) . The reaction products were fractionated on 5% polyacrylamide, 8.3 M urea gels and visualized by autoradiography.

Cross-linking of PAP with RNA and 8-Azido-ATP

Reactions were carried out in 10 µl of 20 mM HEPES KOH, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol, 50 mM KCl, 0.25 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.64 µg (10 pmol) of PAP, and 10-50 µM [alpha-P]8-azido-ATP or 10^6 cpm (10-50 nM) of P-labeled RNA. After incubation at room temperature for 5 min, samples were irradiated in a UV Stratalinker 1800 (Stratagene), 1 auto cycle for azido-ATP (120 millijoules) and 10 cycles for RNA (1.2 joules). For PAP/RNA cross-linking, samples were digested with RNase A (1 µg/ml) for 1 h at 37 °C. In the case of binding competition experiments, different nucleic acids were added to the reaction mixture prior to incubation as indicated in the figure legends. After treatment, samples were separated on a 10% polyacrylamide gel containing SDS, and proteins were visualized by autoradiography.

For cyanogen bromide (CNBr) cleavage(22) , UV-cross-linked samples were precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid, rinsed with ethyl ether, and resuspended in 100 µl of 70% formic acid containing 10-100 µg/ml freshly sublimated CNBr. After an overnight reaction at room temperature, samples were diluted with water and lyophilized twice. The resulting peptides were separated on a 16% polyacrylamide gel using Tris-tricine-SDS buffer(23, 24) , transferred to PVDF membrane, and detected by autoradiography. The membrane was treated for immunoblot analysis using PAP-specific monoclonal antibody as described previously (21) .

Yeast Culture

Derivatives of plasmid pHCp50, containing truncations of the S. cerevisiae PAP1 gene, were transformed by the lithium acetate method (25) into the diploid strain JC17 (a/alpha, ade2-1/ade2-1, his3-11, 15/his3-11, 15, leu2-3, 112/leu2-3, 112, trp1-1/trp1-1, ura3/ura3, can1-100/can1-100, PAP1/pap1::LEU2)(7) . Transformants were selected by growth on synthetic media lacking uracil and sporulated(25) . Tetrads were dissected and spores analyzed for viability on YPD media (1% yeast extract, 2% Bacto-peptone, 2% glucose). Outgrowth from viable spores was tested for the ability to grow on synthetic media lacking leucine to detect the presence or absence of the disrupted chromosomal pap1 allele.


RESULTS

Protein Expression and Purification

Truncated forms of PAP (Fig. 1) were expressed in vitro using the T7 expression system(19) , and crude E. coli lysates were tested for PAP activity and by immunoblotting, using PAP-specific monoclonal antibodies(21) . Degradation was minimal if the expression time was limited to 2 h after induction. The nonspecific activity of the various truncated enzymes was measured and compared with the activity of wild type PAP from the same amount of cells. This assay estimates the enzyme's ability to incorporate adenosine monophosphate onto a primer in the presence of manganese. The average nonspecific activity from two independent expressions of truncated and wild type PAPs is shown in Fig. 1. The first 18 and the last 31 amino acids of PAP are dispensable for nonspecific polyadenylation. Deletion of 44 amino acids from the amino terminus of yeast PAP eliminates the epitope of an amino-terminal specific antibody and inactivates the enzyme. Serial deletions from the carboxyl terminus lead to a partial inactivation of the enzyme until a deletion of 67 amino acids, which completely inactivates the PAP's ability to catalyze nonspecific polyadenylation. The nature of this inactivation is discussed in a later section.

Truncated forms of PAP were purified using the protocol described under ``Materials and Methods.'' It is interesting that some of the COOH-terminal truncated proteins exhibited chromatographic behavior different from that of the full-length enzyme. For example, on a DEAE-Sephacel column, wild type PAP comes out in the first half of the flow through fractions at a KCl concentration of 100 mM, but Delta8PAP eluted from DEAE-Sephacel with 250 mM KCl. On a phosphocellulose column, this effect is even more dramatic. Wild type PAP elutes at 400 mM KCl, Delta10PAP at 300 mM, and Delta9PAP at 50 mM KCl; Delta8PAP does not bind phosphocellulose at all and appears in the flow-through fractions at 0 mM KCl. This altered behavior of Delta9PAP and Delta8PAP correlates with the large drop-off in nonspecific activity observed with these truncations and may indicate that we have deleted a phosphate binding site.

Enzymatic Properties of Purified Truncated PAPs in Nonspecific and Specific Polyadenylation

Using Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics, we determined some of the kinetic parameters of the active COOH-terminal truncated PAPs. We calculated the initial rates of reaction using time courses of oligo(A) polyadenylation at varying concentrations of primer or ATP, and the kinetic constants K(m) and V(max) were determined by a double reciprocal plot of 1/V(0) against 1/S. As shown in Table 1, the K(m) for ATP is the same for wild type and the COOH-terminal truncated PAPs, indicating that the deletions do not affect ATP binding. In contrast, the K(m) for RNA increased 50-fold for Delta9PAP. These results suggest that the decrease in the nonspecific activity of Delta9PAP, despite the 2-fold increase of the V(max) compared to that of wild type, is due primarily to an inability to bind the RNA substrate.



Two different RNA substrates, both of which terminate at the GAL7 poly(A) site, were used to assay the ability of the enzyme to participate with other protein factors in specific polyadenylation. The first substrate contains 161 nucleotides of the wild type GAL7 sequence upstream of the poly(A) site, and the second is identical except for a deletion of a 12-nucleotide UA repeat, an element essential for specific activity (3) (Fig. 2A, lanes 1 and 2). Purified recombinant PAP was mixed with either of these substrates in the presence of CF I and PF I. As expected, in the absence of PAP, no poly(A) addition activity is observed (Fig. 2A, lane 3). The Delta10PAP exhibits the same specific activity as the wild type enzyme (Fig. 2A, lanes 4 and 5). As might be expected, the amount of polyadenylated product in reactions containing Delta9PAP is less (Fig. 2A, lane 6), but all of this is the result of specific polyadenylation, since no product is observed using the mutated substrate (Fig. 2A, lanes 7-9).


Figure 2: Specific polyadenylation assay of truncated PAPs. Panel A, the activity of COOH-terminal deletion mutants. Precleaved radiolabeled GAL7 wild type (lanes 1, 3-6) or mutant transcripts (lanes 2, 7-9) were assayed with yeast extract (lanes 1 and 2) or with partially purified CF I and PF I (lanes 3-9) supplemented with PAPs (lane 3, no PAP; lanes 4 and 7, wild type PAP; lanes 5 and 8, Delta10PAP; lanes 6 and 9, Delta9PAP). Panel B, the activity of the amino-terminal deletion mutant. Precleaved radiolabeled GAL7 transcript was assayed with yeast extract (lane 1) or partially purified CF I and PF I (lanes 2-4) supplemented with wild type PAP (lane 3), Delta14PAP (lane 4), or without PAP (lane 2). Lanes 5 (wtPAP) and 6 (Delta14PAP) show a nonspecific assay using GAL7 transcript in presence of manganese and without specificity factors.



Elimination of amino acids 3 through 18 (Delta14PAP) from the amino-terminal end of PAP has no effect on nonspecific activity (Fig. 1). However, this truncation completely knocks out specific polyadenylation activity (Fig. 2B, lanes 3 and 4). The Delta14PAP used in this experiment is active for nonspecific polyadenylation, since it exhibits wild type activity when magnesium is replaced with manganese (Fig. 2B, lanes 5 and 6).

Cross-linking of PAP to RNA

It was reported, based on sequence alignment and mutagenesis of bovine PAP, that an RNP1-type RNA binding domain was located in a highly conserved amino-terminal part of eukaryotic PAPs(7, 11) . However, our preliminary data discussed above pointed to the existence of another RNA binding site in the yeast PAP. We decided to use a more direct approach to determine whether the unique COOH-terminal part of the yeast PAP binds RNA and to explore the specificity of this binding site by cross-linking PAP to radioactive RNA using UV light. PAP could be UV cross-linked to P randomly labeled precleaved GAL7 RNA, and this cross-linking can be competed with an excess of unlabeled tRNA (Fig. 3A). To localize the RNA cross-link, PAP was incubated with various substrates and exposed to UV light, and the complexes were treated with RNase A and partially cleaved with CNBr. The resulting peptides were separated on an 16% polyacrylamide SDS gel and blotted onto PVDF membrane, and labeled peptides were detected by autoradiography. These were matched with peptides visualized with a monoclonal antibody specific for the COOH terminus of yeast PAP (Fig. 3B). The epitope recognized by this antibody had been previously mapped by our laboratory using deletions of PAP as well as CNBr digests(21) . The partial cleavage with CNBr generates a ladder of peptides of the size predicted from the location of methionines in the amino acid sequence (Fig. 3C). The positions of radioactive peptides correlated with immunostained peptides and indicated that the major RNA binding site detected using randomly labeled RNA was in the COOH-terminal part of yeast PAP (Fig. 3B, lane 3). An identical pattern was observed when the cross-linking was performed with precleaved GAL7 RNA labeled with P only at the 5`-end (Fig. 3, lane 2). When RNA labeled at the 3`-end was used, a different set of peptides was detected (Fig. 3, lane 1). The molecular mass of the major 3`-labeled peptide, calculated using the CNBr-generated peptides as standards, is about 17.5 kDa, which correlates well with the 17.8-kDa peptide containing the RNP1 motif (C3, in Fig. 3C). These results suggest that the region in the COOH-terminal peptide (C9, in Fig. 3C) binds the body but not the 3`-acceptor end of the RNA.


Figure 3: Panel A, UV cross-linking of PAP to RNA. Randomly radiolabeled GAL7 precleaved RNA, with (lane 2) and without (lane 1) competitor tRNA, was UV cross-linked to PAP, digested with RNase A, separated on a 10% polyacrylamide gel in Tris glycine SDS buffer, and visualized by autoradiography. Panel B, PAP was cross-linked to GAL7 precleaved RNA labeled in different ways, and the complexes were digested with RNase A and partially cleaved with CNBr. Protein fragments were separated on a 16% polyacrylamide gel in Tris-tricine-SDS buffer and blotted onto PVDF membrane. Peptides were visualized by immunostaining with antibody specific for the PAP carboxyl end (lanes 4-6) and radioactive peptides by autoradiography (lanes 1-3); lanes 1 and 4, 3`-end-labeled RNA; lanes 2 and 5, 5`-end-labeled RNA, lanes 3 and 6, randomly labeled RNA. The size and position of CNBr-generated peptides detected with the PAP COOH-terminal specific antibody is indicated on the right. This immunostaining reveals a ladder of partial digestion products containing C9. Panel C, diagram of the nine peptides (C1-C9) generated by CNBr cleavage of purified recombinant PAP. The peptides are arranged in order from the amino terminus (left) to carboxyl terminus (right). The molecular masses of the fragments are calculated from the number of amino acids.



Cross-linking of PAP to 8-Azido-ATP

We wanted to use the same approach to identify the ATP binding site of yeast PAP. Because ATP UV-cross-links to PAP with very low efficiency (data not shown), we chose the ATP analog [alpha-P]8-azido-ATP, which has been commonly used to identify nucleotide binding sites(26) . Yeast PAP is readily labeled with this analog (Fig. 4, lane 1).


Figure 4: Specificity of UV cross-linking of 8-azido-ATP to PAP was determined by competition with different nucleic acids. Competitors were preincubated with PAP and 15 µM 8-azido-ATP prior to irradiation, and complexes were separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography. Lanes 1 and 11, no competitor; lane 2, 250 µM ATP; lane 3, 250 µM GTP; lane 4, 250 µM CTP; lane 5, 250 µM UTP; lane 6, 250 µM 2`-dATP; lane 7, 250 µM 3`-dATP; lane 8, 0.3 µM poly(A); lane 9, 100 µM tRNA; lane 10, 10 µM single-stranded DNA, a 24-base oligonucleotide.



To investigate the specificity of the azido-ATP cross-linking, we performed a competition assay by mixing different nucleic acids or nucleotides with PAP and azido-ATP before UV irradiation. RNA molecules, and even single-stranded DNA, competed with azido-ATP for PAP binding much more effectively than ATP and other nucleotide triphosphates (Fig. 4). These results suggest that azido-ATP is most likely interacting with an RNA binding site. To determine if this site corresponded to the one at the PAP carboxyl end, azido-ATP was cross-linked to wild type PAP, Delta10PAP, and Delta9PAP (Fig. 5). Delta9PAP cross-links to 8-azido ATP much less efficiently than wild type PAP, and Delta10PAP cross-links more efficiently, consistent with the results obtained for RNA binding by enzyme kinetic analysis.


Figure 5: The efficiency of 8-azido-ATP binding of different truncated PAPs was determined by UV cross-linking followed by separation on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, which was stained with silver (lanes 1-3), and radioactive proteins were visualized by autoradiography (lanes 5-7). Lanes 1 and 5, wild type PAP; lanes 2 and 6, Delta10PAP; and lanes 3 and 7, Delta9PAP. Lane 4, broad range marker proteins (New England Biolabs).



To our surprise, 8-azido-ATP labeled the same peptide as did the randomly labeled RNA (Fig. 6, lanes 1 and 3). To further confirm that the carboxyl-terminal peptide was being labeled, we cross-linked azido-ATP to Delta10PAP, which lacks the last 31 amino acids and would give a correspondingly shorter terminal peptide after CNBr cleavage. The labeled peptides after partial CNBr cleavage of Delta10PAP shifted down the predicted distance (Fig. 6, lane 2), and this truncated PAP lost the epitope recognized by the COOH-terminal specific antibody (Fig. 6, lane 4)(21) .


Figure 6: CNBr digest of wild type PAP (lane 1 and 3) and Delta10PAP (lanes 2 and 4) UV-cross-linked with radiolabeled 8-azido-ATP. Samples were separated on 16% polyacrylamide gel in Tris-tricine-SDS buffer and blotted onto PVDF membrane. Peptides were visualized by immunostaining with antibody specific for the PAP carboxyl end (lanes 3 and 4) and radioactive peptides by autoradiography (lanes 1 and 2). The size and position of CNBr-generated peptides is indicated on the right (see Fig. 3, panels B and C). The carboxyl-terminal peptides (C9) of wild type (a) and Delta10PAP (b) are indicated with arrows.



The effect of PAP Truncations on Cell Viability

To test the ability of different PAP truncations to function in vivo, the wild type copy of the PAP1 gene on the plasmid pHCp50 was replaced with deleted forms of the gene. These plasmids were then transformed into a heterozygous diploid strain containing a LEU2 disruption in one copy of the endogenous PAP1 gene(7) . The diploids were sporulated, and tetrad analysis was performed to determine if the truncated forms of PAP could rescue a lethal disruption of the chromosomal PAP1 gene. Eight or more tetrads were examined for each strain. Diploid strains containing the carboxyl deletions Delta7PAP, Delta10PAP, and Delta9PAP all yielded tetrads with four viable spores. This is not surprising for Delta7PAP and Delta10PAP, which have wild type or nearly wild type nonspecific activity (Fig. 1). It is interesting that cells survived and grew normally with Delta9PAP as the only PAP1 gene, since this deletion is only partially functional. On the other hand, tetrad analysis of Delta8PAP yielded only two viable Leu spores from each tetrad, indicating that the small amount of residual activity left in this enzyme was not sufficient for viability. Delta14PAP, with a 16-amino acid deletion from the amino-terminal end and 100% of the wild type nonspecific activity, also could not support growth of cells, consistent with the hypothesis that an ability to associate with specificity factors would be essential for proper functioning of PAP in vivo.


DISCUSSION

The results described in this report present new features of the yeast poly(A) polymerase. A novel RNA binding site has been found and characterized in the carboxyl end of PAP, and a sequence involved in specific protein-protein interaction has been identified in the first 18 amino acids.

From amino acids 80-390, the yeast PAP has a strong, 70% homology to mammalian PAPs (Fig. 1)(7) . The RNP1 sequence, a conserved motif found in many RNA binding proteins(27) , is located in this region. The first 79 amino acids and the last 178 amino acids of yeast PAP have very loose or very little homology to the mammalian counterparts. However, elimination of the first 44 amino acids (Delta15PAP) or the last 67 amino acids (Delta6PAP) completely inactivates the yeast enzyme. On the other hand, elimination of 16 amino acids from the amino-terminal end (Delta14PAP) or a COOH-terminal deletion of 31 amino acids (Delta10PAP) has no effect on the nonspecific activity of the yeast PAP.

Deletion of an additional 12 amino acids (Delta9PAP) from the COOH-terminal end of PAP causes a dramatic loss of nonspecific activity in crude extract, decreases the protein's ability to bind phosphocellulose, and increases the constant of RNA binding (K(m)) by 50-fold. The sequence removed in Delta9PAP (Fig. 7A) is highly basic; seven of the amino acids are lysine and arginine. Our data are consistent with a model in which this deleted sequence is part of an RNA binding site. After deletion of the next 12 amino acids (Delta8PAP), only a low level of activity remains, and deletion of the next 12 amino acids (Delta6PAP) completely inactivates the enzyme. A sequence related to that deleted in the yeast Delta8PAP and Delta9PAP is located in the amino-terminal region of mammalian PAPs (28, 29) and Xenopus PAP (10) (Fig. 7A). Similarity can also be found in parts of the Vaccinia (5) and E. coli enzymes(12) . However, this stretch does not resemble any of the previously described RNA binding motifs(27) .


Figure 7: Comparison of the amino acid sequences of the novel RNA binding site (A) and specificity domain (B) of yeast PAP with other poly(A) polymerases.



Because recombinant yeast PAP can use ATP instead of RNA as a primer (^3)and 8-azido-ATP binds to the carboxyl RNA binding site, we suspected that this site might bind the 3`-end of the RNA primer in preparation to receive an adenosyl residue. However, by using RNAs labeled randomly or at either end, we could show that, even though this site is essential for activity, it is not specific for any portion of the RNA strand. This conclusion was supported by the binding competition assay where even single-stranded DNA competed effectively. These results also imply that the authentic ATP binding site is very specific and that the bulky azido group in this position of the analog interferes with binding.

A good candidate for a 3`-RNA binding site may be the RNP1 motif, which is very conserved among the eukaryotic, nonviral PAPs (10) and is adjacent to a potential catalytic domain(11) . Mutations in the RNP1 of bovine PAP inhibit both specific and nonspecific activities, and this defect could be rescued by increasing the concentration of RNA(11) , suggesting it is indeed involved in RNA binding, perhaps of the 3`-end. The fact that the major yeast PAP peptide cross-linked to 3`-end-labeled RNA after CNBr cleavage is similar in size to the yeast RNP1-containing peptide lends support to this hypothesis.

Deletion of 16 amino acids(3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18) from the amino terminus of the yeast PAP (Delta14PAP) completely knocked out the specific activity of the enzyme, leaving the nonspecific activity untouched. Regions with strong similarity (56%) to this yeast sequence are found in the amino-terminal ends of the higher eukaryotic enzymes (Fig. 7B), but this region has not been correlated with any particular function. The discovery of a specificity determinant in this part of the yeast PAP was surprising because previous mutagenesis of the bovine PAP indicated that a domain with similar function coincided with a nuclear localization signal (NLS1) in the COOH-terminal part of the protein(11) . This region has no homology to the motif we have identified, and it is possible that two different domains contribute to the interactions of PAP with other polyadenylation factors.

Such a model invoking multiple contacts would not be implausible, since it has been shown that the processivity of the mammalian PAP is stimulated by either CPSF, the mammalian specificity factor, or PABII, a nuclear poly(A) binding protein, but is maximal when both factors are present simultaneously(30, 31) . Interestingly, the U1A protein can down-regulate PAP activity, apparently through a domain which is further toward the carboxyl end of PAP than the NLS1 site, yet this interaction does not affect the ability of PAP to stimulate the cleavage reaction(32) , again suggesting that two factors may contact PAP at the same time.

Recent studies are beginning to clarify the association of the yeast PAP with equivalent factors. For example, application of the two-hybrid system identified FIP1 as a protein that interacts with the yeast PAP (8) . FIP1 is a component of PF I(8) , a factor that works in conjunction with CF I, the yeast analog of CPSF, to catalyze specific poly(A) addition(3) . It appears that FIP1 links PAP to RNA14, a subunit of CF I. Depletion of PAP from yeast-processing extracts with PAP-specific antibody leads to a loss of both cleavage and poly(A) addition activity(21, 33) . Both activities can be restored if only CF I is added to the depleted extracts, suggesting that a direct interaction of CF I with PAP may also exist. It will be interesting to determine which protein(s) interact with PAP through the amino-terminal domain identified in this study.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by U. S. Public Health Service Grant R01 GM41752 from the National Institutes of Health (to C. L. M.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 617-636-6935; Fax: 617-636-0337; cmoore@opal.tufts.edu.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: PAP, poly(A) polymerase; DeltaNPAP, different truncated forms of PAP; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; DTT, dithiothreitol; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; CF, cleavage factor; PF, polyadenylation factor.

(^2)
M. del Olmo and C. Moore, submitted for publication.

(^3)
A. M. Zhelkovsky, M. M. Kessler, and C. L. Moore, unpublished observation.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Joachim Lingner and Walter Keller for the plasmids pJPAP1 and pHCp50 and yeast diploid strain JC17 with disrupted PAP1; we also thank Lucas Henderson for contributing to this work.


REFERENCES

  1. Wahle, E. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1261, 183-194 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Keller, W. (1995) Cell 81, 829-832 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Chen, J., and Moore, C. L. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 3470-3481 [Abstract]
  4. Nevins, J. R., and Joklik, W., K. (1977) J. Biol. Chem. 252, 6939-6947 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Gershon, P. D., Ahn, B.-Y., Garfield, M., and Moss, B. (1991) Cell 66, 1269-1278 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Lingner, J., Radtke, I., Wahle, E., and Keller, W. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 8741-8746 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Lingner, J., Kellermann, J., and Keller, W. (1991) Nature 354, 496-498 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Preker, P. J., Lingner, L. M.-S., and Keller, W. (1995) Cell 81, 379-389 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Dohmen, R. J., Stappen, R., McGrath, J. P., Forrova, H., Kolarov, J., Goffeau, A., and Varshavsky, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18099-18109 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ballantyne, S., Bilger, A., Astrom, J., Virtanen, A., and Wickens, M. (1995) RNA 1, 64-78 [Abstract]
  11. Raabe, T., Murthy, K. G. K., and Manley, J. L. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 2946-2957 [Abstract]
  12. Cao, G.-J., and Sarkar, N. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 10380-10384 [Abstract]
  13. Liu, J., and Parkinson, J. S. (1988) J. Bacteriol. 171, 1254-1261
  14. Abe, A., Hiraoka, Y., and Fukasawa, T. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 3691-3697 [Abstract]
  15. Sadhale, P. P., Sapolsky, R., Davis, R. W., Butler, J. S., and Platt, T. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 3683-3688 [Abstract]
  16. Lingner, J., and Keller, W. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 2917-2920 [Abstract]
  17. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F., and Sambrook, J. (1982) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  18. Rose, M. D., Novick, P., Thomas, J. H., Botstein, D., and Fink, G. R. (1987) Gene (Amst.) 60, 237-243 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Studier, F. W. (1991) J. Mol. Biol. 219, 37-44 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Kessler, M., Zhelkovsky, A., Skvorak, A., and Moore, C. L. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 1750-1759 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Nikodem, V., and Fresco, J. R. (1979) Anal. Biochem. 97, 382-386 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Schagger, H., and von Jagow, G. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 166, 368-379 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Dayhuff, T. J., Gesteland, R. F., and Atkins, J. F. (1992) BioTechniques 13, 499-502 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Guthrie, C., and Fink, G. R. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 194, 94-110, 186 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Potter, R. L., and Haley, B. E. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 91, 613-633 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Dreyfuss, G., Matunis, M. J., Pina Roma, S., and Burd, C. G. (1993) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 62, 289-321 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Wahle, E., Martin, G., Schiltz, E., and Keller, W. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 4251-4257 [Abstract]
  29. Thuresson, A.-C., Astrom, J., Astrom, A., Gronvik, K.-O., and Virtanen, A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 979-983 [Abstract]
  30. Wahle, E. (1991) Cell 66, 759-768 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Bienroth, S., Keller, W., and Wahle, E. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 585-594 [Abstract]
  32. Gunderson, S. I., Beyer, K., Martin, G., Keller, W., Boelens, W. C., and Mattaj, I. W. (1994) Cell 76, 531-541 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Minvielle-Sabastia, L., Precker, P. J., and Keller, W. (1994) Science 266, 1702-1705 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.