©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Reconstitution of Hairpin Ribozyme Activity following Separation of Functional Domains (*)

(Received for publication, September 27, 1995)

Samuel E. Butcher Joyce E. Heckman John M. Burke (§)

From the Markey Center for Molecular Genetics, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

The hairpin ribozyme is a 50-nucleotide RNA enzyme of unknown three-dimensional structure. Here, we demonstrate that interdomain interactions are required for catalytic function by reconstitution of activity following separation of an essential, independently folding domain (loop B) from the substrate binding strand at a helical junction. The resulting construct relies on long range tertiary contacts for catalysis. For this work, we used an optimized ribozyme and substrate, which included sequence changes to minimize the formation of nonproductive conformational isomers. Kinetic analysis was carried out using both single and multiple turnover methods and shows that the catalytic efficiency (k/K) of the reconstituted ribozyme is 10^4-fold lower than that of the intact ribozyme. The decrease in k/K results entirely from a 10^4-fold increase in the apparent K, whereas the k parameter is essentially unchanged. Therefore, cleavage chemistry appears to be unimpaired, but the reaction is limited by the productive assembly of the two domains. Our results strongly support a previously proposed model in which the catalytic topology of the ribozyme contains a bend at a helical junction.


INTRODUCTION

The hairpin ribozyme is derived from the satellite RNA of the tobacco ringspot virus and catalyzes the reversible, site-specific cleavage of RNA substrates, generating 5`-OH and 2`,3`-cyclic phosphate termini(1, 2, 3) . Nucleotides and functional groups that are essential for catalytic function have been identified by several methods, including mutagenesis(4, 5) , in vitro selection(6, 7, 8, 9) , and the introduction of modified nucleotides(10, 11, 12) . Interestingly, essential elements of the ribozyme are concentrated within a large asymmetrical internal loop (loop B) and a smaller symmetrical loop formed through binding of the substrate to the substrate binding strand (SBS) (^1)(see Fig. 1). The finding that many of the essential determinants reside within loop B strongly suggests that this portion of the molecule interacts with the rest of the ribozyme-substrate complex during catalysis. Linker insertion (13, 14) and chemical modification studies (15) of the helix 2-3 junction indicate that helix 2 is not coaxially stacked upon helix 3, i.e. the ribozyme-substrate complex has a bend between helices 2 and 3. Such a bend would presumably be required to bring essential elements in loop B proximal to the cleavage site.


Figure 1: Domain separation strategy and reconstitution of catalysis. A, secondary structure of the optimized hairpin ribozyme ( (30) and this work). Substrate cleavage site is indicated with an arrow. The loop B domain was separated at the junction between helices 2 and 3, yielding a three-piece ribozyme consisting of a duplex between substrate and substrate binding strand (SbulletSBS) together with the loop B domain. B, reconstitution of catalysis. Reactions were for 30 min at 37 °C in a buffer containing 50 mM TrisbulletCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM MgCl(2). S, 1 nM 5` end-labeled substrate only; S + SBS, 1 nM substrate in the presence of excess (15 µM) SBS; S + LB, substrate in the presence of 10 µM loop B domain; S + SBS + LB, reconstituted reaction with 1 nM substrate, 15 µM SBS, 10 µM loop B domain; S + HpRz, substrate incubated with 60 nM intact, optimized hairpin ribozyme as shown in A, left. 5`P, 5` cleavage product.



Local tertiary interactions within loop B have been studied by UV cross-linking (16) and chemical modification analysis(15) . These studies indicate that a photosensitive structural motif occupies the segment of loop B that is proximal to helix 3. This portion of the ribozyme is strikingly similar to the conserved central domain of viroids(17) , to loop E of eukaryotic 5 S rRNA, and to the sarcin-ricin loop of 26 S rRNA. The latter two structures have been analyzed using NMR methods(18, 19, 20) . These structures are comprised of non-canonical GbulletA, AbulletU, and AbulletA base pairs across the loop and result in a helical conformation with accessible major and minor grooves. The reason a common structural motif is found in several functionally distinct RNAs is not yet clear, but it has been proposed that the structure may serve as a common ``docking module'' for RNA-RNA or RNA-protein interactions(20, 21) . In the hairpin ribozyme, the cross-linkable loop B structure is clearly essential for catalytic function. Furthermore, results of chemical modification experiments suggest that magnesium-dependent higher order structure is superimposed on the photoreactive motif(15) .

Cross-linking and chemical modification results indicate that the loop B domain of the hairpin ribozyme, defined as helix 3, loop B, and helix 4, folds into its correct structure independently of substrate and SBS (15, 16) . We took advantage of this property to search for functional interactions between loop B and a duplex consisting of substrate bound to the SBS (SbulletSBS). Using this strategy, we have been able to reconstitute the cleavage reaction. The interdomain interactions demonstrated by this reconstitution are likely to be tertiary contacts, since little potential for formation of canonical base pairs exists between the domains and no phylogenetic evidence for interdomain secondary structure could be obtained by analyzing a large number of sequence variants(6, 7, 9) .


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

RNA Synthesis

RNA molecules comprising the loop B domain were transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase in vitro as described(16, 22) . Substrate and SBS RNAs and DNA oligonucleotides were synthesized using standard solid-phase phosphoramidite chemistry, deprotected as described(23) , and purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Single Turnover Kinetics

Single turnover kinetics were performed essentially as described(24) . The optimal magnesium ion concentration for the reaction was determined by measuring initial reaction velocities as a function of MgCl(2) concentration and was found to be 50 mM or greater, which is approximately 4-fold higher than that of the intact ribozyme(2, 25) . An increase in the observed optimal magnesium ion concentration is common for reactions that rely on tertiary interactions(26, 27) . All kinetic analyses were performed in magnesium excess (100 mM MgCl(2)). Each experiment was performed at least twice, and variances of leq10% were obtained in duplicate experiments. Single turnover reactions were performed with 1 nM 5`-P end-labeled substrate, which was prebound to excess SBS by equilibrating at 37 °C for 5 min in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM MgCl(2). These conditions were shown by nondenaturing gel electrophoresis to result in essentially quantitative association of substrate with SBS. Reactions were then initiated by the addition of the loop B domain, also pre-equilibrated in the same buffer. Reactions were quenched by the addition of 4 volumes of formamide, which was shown to completely arrest the reaction. Samples were then electrophoresed through 20% polyacrylamide, 8 M urea denaturing gels. Results were quantitated with a GS-250 radioimaging system (Bio-Rad) and plotted as a function of the remaining fraction of substrate present versus time, yielding slopes equivalent to the negative rate of the reaction (k). Initial velocities were calculated over a time span that was within the linear range (leq30% cleavage) and were plotted as a function of loop B concentration. K(m) and k values were determined by curve fitting to the Michaelis-Menten equation using non-linear least squares regression analysis (k software, Biometallics).

Multiple Turnover Kinetics

Multiple turnover kinetics were performed under conditions identical to the single turnover reactions, except that the loop B domain was present at low concentrations (100 nM) and loop A duplex (SbulletSBS) was in excess. A range of SbulletSBS concentrations (1-370 µM) was used, in which a trace amount of the substrate (1 nM) was 5` end-labeled. When substrate concentrations were below 15 µM, SBS was kept in excess (15 µM) to maintain substrate in the form of bound duplex. For concentrations above 15 µM, SBS and substrate were present at equimolar concentrations. Reactions were incubated at 37 °C for up to 14 h. For the intact hairpin ribozyme, much lower concentrations of substrate (0.01-1 µM) and ribozyme (1-5 nM) were required, and reactions were incubated for 4 min. All reactions were performed at 37 °C in the buffer described above. Initial velocities were calculated for each substrate concentration, and K(m) and k values were determined as described above.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The naturally occurring substrate sequence for the hairpin ribozyme (UGACAGUCCUGUUU) is conformationally heterogeneous and migrates as multiple conformations on native polyacrylamide gels (28) . (^2)In general, it was found that conformationally heterogeneous substrates and ribozymes showed unsatisfactory kinetic behavior. To design a well behaved substrate and SBS, we varied sequences in such a manner that the conformational heterogeneity is minimized while maintaining sequences essential for catalytic function (Fig. 1). Conformational homogeneity of the new substrate and SBS over a concentration range of 1 nM to 40 µM was confirmed by native gel electrophoresis (data not shown). We utilized a stabilized loop B domain in which helix 4 was extended by the addition of seven base pairs and a stable GUAA tetraloop (29) and which contained a rate-enhancing U39C mutation(7, 9) . These modifications each approximately double the catalytic efficiencies of intact hairpin ribozymes and produce a loop B domain that gives only one detectable conformation, which is the active and cross-linkable structure(16, 30) .

To reconstitute a cleavage reaction between separated loop A and B domains, loop A duplexes were preformed by annealing substrate to its cognate SBS. Cleavage activity was observed only when the loop B domain was incubated with the SbulletSBS duplex (Fig. 1B). No reaction could be detected in the absence of the loop B domain or in the absence of the substrate binding sequence, even upon extended incubation times. The reaction occurs at the normal site, as evidenced by product mobility, and no inaccuracy of cleavage is detectable. These results clearly demonstrate a functional interaction between the two domains of the ribozyme-substrate complex.

The background rate of hydrolysis of substrate RNA was measured in the absence of ribozyme, under buffer and temperature conditions identical to those used in the Fig. 1reconstitution experiment (data not shown). The measured rate was approximately 10 min, which is similar to previously reported values for RNA hydrolysis(31) . Similar background rates were observed in the presence of a 100-1000-fold excess of SBS, indicating that formation of the loop A domain does not result in an increased lability of the scissile bond. In these latter experiments, 1 nM 5` end-labeled substrate was incubated with 100 and 1000 nM SBS for up to 48 h. Similarly, no increased lability of the scissile bond was observed with substrate incubated in the presence of loop B (5 µM) with no SBS present.

Kinetic analysis of the bisected ribozyme construct provides useful insights into interactions between the domains. To ensure that substrates remained bound to substrate binding strands in the form of SbulletSBS duplexes, we first determined the apparent K(m) for the SBS in the ternary complex (Fig. 2). The apparent K(m) was observed to be approximately 70 nM for the SBS, and saturation was observed in all cases where SBS concentration was geq5 µM. In these experiments, K(m) was observed to be independent of loop B concentration. To maintain the SbulletSBS duplex in subsequent experiments, we chose to use an excess of SBS relative to S, such that SBS concentrations were always 15 µM or greater.


Figure 2: Apparent K of the SBS in the reconstituted reaction. 1 nM 5` end-labeled substrate was bound to varying concentrations of SBS, from 0.01 to 100 µM, and the initial velocities of the reactions at each SBS concentration were determined by single turnover kinetics as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The experiment was performed with three different concentrations of the loop B domain as indicated, and the initial velocities were normalized to the maximum velocity obtained with 75 µM loop B. An apparent K value of approximately 70 nM was obtained for all three loop B domain concentrations. In these experiments, K describes interactions between S and SBS.



We used both pre-steady state (single turnover) and steady state (multiple turnover) kinetic analysis to describe the reconstituted reaction. Single turnover reactions were performed by using a trace amount of radioactive substrate prebound to SBS and increasing amounts of the loop B domain. Loop B domain was always in significant excess over substrate. The reaction could not be fully saturated even when the concentration of loop B was increased to 400 µM (Fig. 3, A-C). The observed reaction velocities at 400 µM loop B are within 2-3-fold of the maximum velocity of the corresponding version of the intact ribozyme. First order rate constants obtained at eight different concentrations of loop B were plotted, and the resulting curve was fitted by non-linear least squares regression analysis to the Michaelis-Menten equation, yielding a k of 0.53 min and an observed K(m) of 270 µM (Fig. 3C and Table 1). The value of k is essentially unchanged relative to that of the intact ribozyme, while K(m) for the reconstituted reaction is increased by a factor of 10^4. These results indicate that the reconstituted reaction is likely to be limited only by the productive association between the two ribozyme loop domains.


Figure 3: Kinetic analysis of the reconstituted reaction. A, representative autoradiogram of a time course of substrate cleavage in the presence of saturating (15 µM) concentrations of SBS, 1 nM 5` end-labeled substrate, and 200 µM loop B domain. S, substrate; 5`P, 5` cleavage product. B, kinetics of substrate cleavage in the reconstituted reactions in the presence of excess loop B domain (2-400 µM). C, initial reaction rates (k) for each time course experiment are plotted as a function of the concentration of the loop B domain (2-400 µM). D, multiple turnover kinetic analysis. Loop B domain (100 nM) was reacted with varying concentrations of SbulletSBS duplex as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Results from two independent experiments are shown.





Multiple turnover kinetics were performed by incubating a small amount of the loop B domain in the presence of a large excess of the SbulletSBS duplex and monitoring initial reaction velocities. As in the pre-steady state analysis, we observe that the reaction requires very high concentrations of substrate to achieve maximum velocity. We find that the loop B domain is capable of cleaving multiple SbulletSBS duplexes, with a turnover rate (k) of 0.13 min (Fig. 3D, Table 1). This value is about 4-fold lower than the k value measured by single turnover kinetics. Therefore, it appears that reactions in the presence of a large excess (200-300 µM) of SbulletSBS are slightly less efficient than reactions with a corresponding excess of the loop B domain. This difference may be due to inhibition by high concentrations of SbulletSBS (for example, RNA aggregation or inhibition by excess substrate or SBS) or to a change in the rate-limiting step. The steady state analysis of the reconstituted reaction indicates that the loop B domain can cleave multiple SbulletSBS complexes, but reaction efficiency is limited by a 10^4-fold increase in K(m).

Reconstitution of activity based on tertiary interactions has been shown for large group I and group II ribozymes(26, 27, 32, 33, 34, 35) . Feldstein and Bruening (13) showed that a trans-ribozyme restored self-ligation activity to a conformationally constrained construct that had little or no intramolecular activity. This work showed that intermolecular interactions could enhance hairpin ribozyme activity but did not define the mode of interaction between the two ribozymes. The interdomain tertiary interactions in the hairpin ribozyme are surprisingly weak in comparison with those observed in the larger ribozymes. For example, domain V of the self-splicing ai5 group II intron binds to the intron through tertiary interactions and has a K(m) of 300 nM(26) . In contrast, our observed value of K(m) for the hairpin ribozyme domains (60-270 µM) correlates more closely with that of the interaction between guanosine substrate and the Tetrahymena group I intron, where a K(m) of 320 µM is observed (36, 37) . Although we have not demonstrated that our K(m) corresponds to a dissociation constant, the notion of weak interdomain interactions is supported by direct analysis of complex formation on nondenaturing gels. (^3)In these experiments, formation of the SbulletSBS loop B ternary complex could not be detected, while SbulletSBS and Sbulletribozyme complexes were readily identified. Therefore, it appears that the interdomain tertiary interactions in the hairpin ribozyme may be limited to a small number of contacts. Additionally, it is likely that an entropic penalty accompanies domain separation, giving rise to high apparent K(m) values.

In light of the apparently high K(m) value for interdomain interactions in the hairpin ribozyme, the covalent linkage between the domains in the intact ribozyme may serve to increase greatly the local effective concentrations of the domains. Additionally, it is possible that the phosphodiester linkage partly constrains the orientation of the two domains, such that the frequency of productive interactions may be increased. It is interesting to note that the interdomain interactions described here require a strong bend at a helical junction in the intact ribozyme; this is unusual because coaxial stacking is a common feature of RNA structure and is energetically favorable(38) . We expect that this reconstituted reaction will be useful in the identification of specific interdomain interactions and for analysis of the catalytic mechanism in the hairpin ribozyme system.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by Research Grants AI29829 and AI30534 from the National Institutes of Health. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, Rm. 306, Stafford Hall, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405. Tel.: 802-656-8503; Fax: 802-656-8749; jburke@moose.uvm.edu.

(^1)
The abbreviation used is: SBS, substrate binding strand.

(^2)
J. Heckman, unpublished observations.

(^3)
J. Heckman and S. Butcher, unpublished results.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Aloke Raj Banerjee for a gift of RNA, David Pecchia for synthesis of oligonucleotides, Jillian Amaral for purification of T7 RNA polymerase, and Bruno Sargueil, Ken Hampel, and Jose Esteban for helpful discussions.


REFERENCES

  1. Feldstein, P. A., Buzayan, J. M., and Bruening, G. (1989) Gene (Amst.) 82, 53-61 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Hampel, A., and Tritz, R. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 4929-4933 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Haseloff, J., and Gerlach, W. (1989) Gene (Amst.) 82, 43-52 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Hampel, A., Tritz, R., Hicks, M., and Cruz, P. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 299-304 [Abstract]
  5. Anderson, P., Monforte, J., Tritz, R., Nesbitt, S., Hearst, J., and Hampel, A. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 1096-1100 [Abstract]
  6. Berzal-Herranz, A., Joseph, S., and Burke, J. M. (1992) Genes & Dev. 6, 129-134
  7. Berzal-Herranz, A., Joseph, S., Chowrira, B. M., Butcher, S. E., and Burke, J. M. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 2567-2574 [Abstract]
  8. Joseph, S., and Burke, J. M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 24515-24518 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Joseph, S., Berzal-Herranz, A., Chowrira, B. M., Butcher, S. E., and Burke, J. M. (1993) Genes & Dev. 7, 130-138
  10. Chowrira, B. M., Berzal-Herranz, A., and Burke, J. M. (1991) Nature 354, 320-322 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Chowrira, B. M., Berzal-Herranz, A., Keller, C. F., and Burke, J. M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 19458-19462 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Grasby, J. A., Mersmann, K., Singh, M., and Gait, M. J. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 4068-4076 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Feldstein, P. A., and Bruening, G. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 1991-1998 [Abstract]
  14. Komatsu, Y., Koizumi, M., Nakamura, H., and Ohtsuka, E. (1994) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 3692-3696
  15. Butcher, S. E., and Burke, J. M. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 244, 52-63 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Butcher, S. E., and Burke, J. M. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 992-999 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Branch, A. D., Benenfield, B. J., and Robertson, H. D. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 6590-6594 [Abstract]
  18. Wimberly, B., Varani, G., and Tinoco, I., Jr. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 1078-1087 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Szewczak, A. A., Moore, P. B., Chan, Y.-L., and Wool, I. G. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 9581-9585 [Abstract]
  20. Szewczak, A. A., and Moore P. B. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 247, 81-98 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Wimberly, B. (1994) Nat. Struct. Biol. 1, 820-827 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Milligan, J. F., and Uhlenbeck, O. C. (1989) Methods Enzymol. 180, 51-62 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Sproat, B., Colonna, F., Mullah, B., Tsou, D., Andrus, A., Hampel, A., and Vinayak, R. (1995) Nucleosides & Nucleotides 14, 255-273
  24. Herschlag, D., and Cech, T. R. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 10159-10171 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Chowrira, B. M., Berzal-Herranz, A., and Burke, J. M. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 1088-1095 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Pyle, A. M., and Green, J. B. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 2716-2725 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Doudna, J. A., and Cech, T. R. (1995) RNA 1, 36-45 [Abstract]
  28. Chowrira, B. M., and Burke, J. M. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 8518-8522 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Heus, H. A., and Pardi, A. (1991) Science 253, 191-194 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Sargueil, B., Pecchia, D. B., and Burke, J. M. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 7739-7748 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Pan, T., Long, D. M., and Uhlenbeck, O. C. (1993) in The RNA World (Gesteland, R. F., and Atkins, J. F., eds) pp. 271-302, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  32. Jarrell, K. A., Dietrich, R. C., and Perlman, P. S. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 2361-2366 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Doudna, J. A., and Szostak, J. W. (1989) Nature 339, 519-522 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Sargueil, B., and Tanner, N. K. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 233, 629-643 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Michels, W., Jr., and Pyle, A. M. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 2965-2977 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Bass, B. L., and Cech, T. R. (1984) Nature 308, 820-826 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. McConnell, T. S., Cech, T. R., and Herschlag, D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 8362-8366 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Walter, A. E., and Turner, D. H. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 12715-12719 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.