(Received for publication, April 24, 1995; and in revised form, August 16, 1995)
From the
By using a band mobility shift assay, deoxyinosine
3`-endonuclease, an Escherichia coli enzyme which recognizes
deoxyinosine, AP site, urea residue, and base mismatches in DNA, was
shown to bind tightly to deoxyinosine-containing oligonucleotide
duplexes. Two distinct protein-DNA complexes were observed, the faster
migrating complex (complex I, K =
4
10
M) contained one molecule of
deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease, while the slower migrating complex
(complex II, K
= 4
10
M) contained two molecules of the
protein bound to every molecule of duplex DNA. The endonucleolytic
activity of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease paralleled the formation of
the complex I. Interestingly, deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease exhibited
similar affinities for both the substrate and the nicked duplex product
and thus remained bound to the DNA after the cleavage reaction. The
formation of a stable complex required the presence of a duplex
structure 5` to the deoxyinosine residue. DNase I footprinting revealed
that deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease protected 4-5 nucleotides 5` to
the deoxyinosine, and when complex II was formed, at least 13
nucleotides 3` to deoxyinosine were protected. Based on these results,
a model is proposed for the interaction of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease
with DNA containing deoxyinosine.
Deoxyinosine in DNA can arise from deamination of deoxyadenosine, which can be spontaneous or promoted by exposure of DNA to ionizing radiation, UV light, or nitrous acid(1, 2, 3) . Deoxyinosine in DNA is premutagenic and can lead to A/T to C/G transition mutations(4) . Deoxyinosine in DNA was thought to be removed by hypoxanthine DNA glycosylase, which has been partially purified from Escherichia coli as well as other eukaryotic sources(5, 6, 7, 8) . However, it was reported recently (9) that a well characterized repair enzyme, 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase II, encoded by alkA gene in E. coli possesses hypoxanthine DNA glycosylase activity and releases hypoxanthine from deoxyinosine-containing DNA, suggesting that both 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase and hypoxanthine DNA glycosylase activities reside in the same protein. It has also been shown that 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase from human (ANPG protein), rat (APDG protein), and yeast (MAG protein) are able to excise hypoxanthine from DNA(9) .
Recently, we identified and purified a novel deoxyinosine specific endonuclease from E. coli, deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease (10) . The enzyme hydrolyzes the second phosphodiester bond 3` to the deoxyinosine residue. In addition to deoxyinosine, deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease also recognizes AP site, urea residue, and base mismatches in DNA and exhibits strand-specific cleavage of base mismatches in DNA(11) . In contrast to hypoxanthine DNA glycosylase, deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease does not remove deoxyinosine or other lesions from the DNA(10) . Therefore, it is likely that other proteins are required to complete the repair process initiated by deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease.
The initial binding of a protein to DNA is critical for multiprotein interaction with DNA(12, 13) . The protein-DNA complexes formed promote the entry of other proteins by protein-protein interaction or by induced comformational changes of the DNA. In DNA repair systems, both nucleotide excision repair and methyl-directed mismatch repair require multiple protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions to remove the DNA damages (for reviews, see (14) and (15) ). Since deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease might also initiate a repair process that requires more than one protein, it is of interest to determine whether deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease can interact with DNA containing deoxyinosine to form a stable complex. In this paper, we show that deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease forms two stable complexes with duplex oligodeoxynucleotides containing deoxyinosine, and we propose a model to explain its interaction with the DNA containing deoxyinosine.
T4 polynucleotide kinase and deoxynucleotidyl terminal transferase were from U. S. Biochemical Corp. DNase I was from Life Technologies, Inc.
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
To obtain oligodeoxynucleotide duplexes containing a nick,
oligodeoxynucleotide 5`-GGTCGACTIA-3` was 5`-end-labeled with
-
P and mixed with 5`-pGGAGGATCCCCGGGTAC-3` and
5`-CCGGGGATCCTCCTTAGTCGACCTGCA-3` or
5`-CCGGGGATCCTCCTCAGTCGACCTGCA-3` at a 1:1:1 ratio in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1 M NaCl, and 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. The mixture was heated to 90 °C and cooling
down gradually to 20 °C. Other nicked and partial duplexes used
were prepared similarly and will be described in the appropriate
section.
The polyacrylamide gel (10%) contained acrylamide/N,N`-methylenebisacrylamide at a 19.76/0.24 ratio in TBE buffer (89 mM Tris, 89 mM boric acid, pH 8.3, and 2.5 mM EDTA). The gels were prerun at 300 volts (4 °C) for 30 min, samples were applied, and electrophoresis was continued at 300 volts (4 °C) for 150 min. Following electrophoresis, the gels were dried under vacuum and exposed to x-ray film. The radioactive bands in the dried gels were quantitated with a Bio-Rad PhosphorImager.
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
E1 and E2 represent one and two molecules of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease, respectively. As will be shown in a later section, complex I contains one molecule of protein and complex II has two molecules of protein bound to one DNA molecule.
The dissociation
constant (K) can then be calculated as
follows,
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
By using low DNA concentration, the protein concentration is
always in great excess compared to the substrate concentration, thus, K = [protein]
can
be approximated when 50% of the DNA is bound
Therefore by
plotting [complex I]
[free
DNA]
against [total protein], the protein
concentration at which the radioactivity in complex I equals free DNA
will be the apparent K
. Similarly, by
plotting [complex I]
[complex
II
against [total protein], K
can be estimated when the
radioactivity in complex I equals complex II.
To correlate the nicking activity of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease with the formation of protein-DNA complex, the reaction was performed under standard binding reaction conditions as described above. An aliquot (2 µl) of the binding reaction mixture was withdrawn and added to 2 µl of loading buffer. The mixture was then loaded onto a 20% polyacrylamide gel containing 8 M urea and electrophoresed as above. The remaining 18 µl of the binding reactions was analyzed by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Figure 1: Binding of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease to DNA containing deoxyinosine. The binding reactions contained 1 nM of 5`-labeled deoxyinosine-containing oligodeoxynucleotide (duplex I/T or duplex I/C) and the indicated amounts of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease under standard conditions. The reaction mixtures were analyzed by a band mobility shift assay as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Panel A, binding of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease to duplex I/T and duplex I/C at the enzyme concentration ranged from 0.001 to 0.16 µM. Panel B, binding reactions with higher enzyme concentrations.
To examine the specificity of the complexes formed, duplex 27-mers containing either an A/T or a C/G pair in placed of an I/T or an I/C pair were used as controls (duplex A/T and duplex C/G, see ``Materials and Methods''). No complexes were found with the control oligodeoxynucleotides even at the highest protein concentration used (1.28 µM). The specificity of the complex formation was further demonstrated by a competition assay in which increasing amounts of unlabeled duplex containing deoxyinosine or control duplex were added to the reaction mixture prior to the addition of the enzyme (5 nM). Fig. 2shows the results of the competition reactions. As it was shown above, there was no detectable complex II formed at this enzyme concentration. The addition of an equal amount of unlabeled specific oligodeoxynucleotide duplex containing deoxyinosine to the reaction mixture (lane 3) reduced by approximately 50% the amount of labeled complex I when no competitor was present (lane 2); the addition of large excess (32-fold) of unlabeled specific duplex abolished the binding of the deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease to the labeled oligodeoxynucleotide. However, it required more than 40-80-fold excess of unlabeled nonspecific control oligodeoxynucleotide duplex to obtain a 50% reduction in the formation of labeled complex I. These data suggest that complex I is formed by specific binding of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease to DNA containing deoxyinosine. In order to examine the specificity of complex II, an enzyme concentration of 0.32 µM was used. Under this condition, the reaction mixture yielded approximately 75% complex II, 20% complex I, and 5% free labeled duplex DNA. The preformed complex II was then chased by addition of unlabeled specific or control oligodeoxynucleotide duplex. Fig. 3shows that the addition of an excess amount of specific duplex led to a reduction of complex II and a concomitant increase in the amount of complex I. As will be shown later, this is due to the formation of a tight complex, complex I, between deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease and deoxyinosine-containing DNA. The addition of unlabeled specific DNA trapped any enzyme that dissociated from the labeled complex II, thus regenerating labeled complex I. No such trapping was observed, even when a large excess (100-fold) of unlabeled control DNA was added, suggesting that complex II is also a specific complex with deoxyinosine-containing DNA. Similar to the competition reaction shown above for complex I, unlabeled specific DNA premixed with labeled specific DNA also led to drastic inhibition of the formation of complex II (data not shown).
Figure 2: Competition of unlabeled specific and nonspecific oligonucleotide with the binding of deoxyinosine 3` endonuclease to duplex I/T. 5`-End-labeled duplex I/T (1 nM) was premixed with unlabeled duplex I/T (specific) or duplex A/T (nonspecific) at the indicated ratio (labeled:unlabeled) in the binding reaction buffer. Deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease was added to the mixture at a final concentration of 5 nM. The reaction was incubated at 20 °C for 10 min and analyzed by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as described.
Figure 3: Chase of complex II by unlabeled specific and nonspecific oligonucleotide. Deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease (0.32 µM) was incubated with 5`-end-labeled duplex I/T or duplex I/C (1 nM) at 20 °C for 10 min. Ten-fold, 50-fold, or 100-fold excess of unlabeled specific (duplex I/T or duplex I/C) or nonspecific (duplex A/T or duplex C/G) oligodeoxynucleotide duplex was added to the reaction mixture. The reactions were incubated at 20 °C for another 10 min and analyzed by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as described.
When
using single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide containing deoxyinosine as a
substrate for a band mobility shift assay, two electrophoretic bands
were observed. One migrated as the free oligodeoxynucleotide, and the
other faster migrating species corresponded to the cleaved
single-stranded product(10) . No stable protein-DNA complex was
observed with single-stranded DNA containing deoxyinosine. Even in the
absence of Mg, a reaction condition in which the
enzyme does not nick DNA, stable complexes were not formed with
single-stranded DNA. Thus, it appears that the formation of a stable
DNA-protein complex requires a duplex DNA substrate.
Figure 4:
Comparison of binding and nicking activity
of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease on deoxyinosine-containing
oligodeoxynucleotide. Standard binding reactions were performed with 1
nM 5`-end-labeled duplex I/T and the indicated amounts of
deoxyinosine 3` endonuclease. An aliquot (2 µl) of reaction mixture
was withdrawn and added to an equal volume of loading buffer. The
mixture was electrophoresed in 20% polyacrylamide gel containing 8 M urea as described under ``Material and Methods.''
The remaining binding reaction mixture was analyzed by gel retardation.
The gels were dried under vacuum and quantitated with a Bio-Rad
PhosphorImager. The percent cleavage or percent complex formation was
plotted against the enzyme concentration for comparison of these two
activities. , percent total complex formation;
, percent
complex I;
, percent complex II.
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
These oligodeoxynucleotide duplexes contain a nick 1 base 3` to
deoxyinosine. The nick contains a 3`-hydroxyl- and 5`-phosphoryl
terminus, which is identical to the products that would be generated by
deoxyinosine 3` endonuclease on duplex I/T or duplex I/C. Duplexes A
and B were P-labeled at the 5` termini of the top
oligonucleotide GGTCGACTIA. Band mobility shift assay (Fig. 5). showed that deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease formed stable
complexes with these duplexes. No complex was formed with nicked DNA
duplexes containing either A/T and C/G pair replacing the I/T or I/C
pair (data not shown), suggesting that the binding was
deoxyinosine-specific but not nick-specific. Binding of deoxyinosine
3`-endonuclease to nicked deoxyinosine-containing DNA was also
Mg
-independent.
Figure 5: Binding of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease to nicked deoxyinosine-containing oligodeoxynucleotides. Nicked I/T pair and I/C pair containing oligodeoxynucleotides (duplex A and duplex B) were prepared as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Standard binding reactions were performed with 1 nM of DNA duplex and indicated amount of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease. The reaction mixture was analyzed by band mobility shift assay.
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
On-line formulae not verified for accuracy
Band mobility shift assays were performed with these duplexes under the same conditions as described above. Deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease bound to duplex C and duplex D poorly; less than 25% of the DNA was bound as complex I even when the enzyme concentration was 128 nM. Furthermore, no complex II was observed with these duplexes, even at very high enzyme concentration (1.28 µM). However, as shown in Fig. 6, the ability of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease to form stable complexes with duplex E was comparable with that with duplex I/T. Similar results were obtained with duplex F. Thus, the data obtained with partial duplexes suggest that the presence of duplex structure 5` to the deoxyinosine is essential for the formation of stable complexes.
Figure 6: Binding of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease to partial oligodeoxynucleotide dupexes containing deoxyinosine. Partial oligodeoxynucleotide duplexes (duplex E) were prepared as described in the text. Standard binding reactions were performed with 1 nM of DNA duplex and the indicated amounts of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease. The reaction mixture was analyzed by band mobility shift assay. The figure shows the comparison of binding of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease with duplex I/T and duplex E.
Figure 7:
Determination of stoichiometry.
Nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels, between 5 and 10%, were prerun at
300 volts at 4 °C for 30 min. Experimental samples of binding
reactions as well as native protein markers were loaded onto the gels.
Electrophoresis was continued at 300 volts at 4 °C until the
bromphenol blue migrated close to the bottom of the gels. The gels were
sliced into two parts: the portion containing protein standard markers
was stained with Coomassie Blue, while the other portion containing
binding reactions were dried under vacuum and subjected to
autoradiography. The distance migrated by the complexes and by each
standard protein was measured and divided by the distance that the
bromphenol blue in the same gel migrated, giving the relative mobility (R). Panel A, calibration curve.
Logarithm of relative mobility (R
) of
each molecular weight standard and the protein-DNA complex was plotted
against the percentage of acrylamide, showing the relationship between
each species' mobility and the gel concentration:
,
lactalbumin, M
14,200;
, carbonic anhydrase, M
29,000;
, ovalbumin, M
45,000;
, bovine serum albumin monomer, M
66,000;
, bovine serum albumin dimer, M
132,000;
, urease trimer, M
272,000;
, complex I; +, complex II. Panel B, Ferguson plot.
The gradients of each line in panel A (
, slope, i.e.
K
) were plotted against the molecular weights of the
standards, generating a standard curve from which the molecular weights
of the the complexes (
) formed by deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease and
deoxyinosine-containing oligodeoxynucleotide can be
determined.
Fig. 8shows the results of DNase I
footprinting with 5`-end-labeled oligodeoxynucleotide (the strand
containing deoxyinosine was labeled), demonstrating that deoxyinosine
3`-endonuclease protected five bases of the DNA 5` to the nick site
(this appeared as a thick dark band). The protection of band I and band
II was quantitated and plotted against the protein concentration (Fig. 9). From these data, an apparent K (calculated as the enzyme concentration at which 50% protection
from DNase I digestion was attained) was found to be about 4
nM, a value in good agreement with the K
determined for complex I using the band mobility shift assay.
This suggests that the protection of DNA 5` to the nick is consistent
with the formation of complex I. Due to the cleavage catalyzed by
deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease, the protection pattern 3` to deoxyinosine
was not able to be obtained using the 5`-end-labeled
oligodeoxynucleotide.
Figure 8:
DNase I footprinting of 5`-end-labeled
deoxyinosine-containing oligodeoxynucleotide. Panel A, the
strand containing deoxyinosine of duplex I/T was 5`-end-labeled. DNase
I footprinting was performed as described under ``Material and
Methods'' with the indicated amounts of deoxyinosine
3`-endonuclease. Included for comparison is the digestion by DNase I of
a single-stranded 10-mer oligodeoxynucleotide with the same sequence as
the 5` cleavage product of duplex I/T. Panel B, band I
() and band II (
) in A were quantitated and the relative
amount of signal was calibrated by the total signal of each lane. The
percent protection of each band by deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease was
determined by comparison with the signal of the band when no
deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease was present.
Figure 9:
DNase I footprinting of 3`-end-labeled
deoxyinosine-containing oligodeoxynucleotide. The strand containing
deoxyinosine of duplex I/T was 3`-end-labeled with
[-
P]cordycepin 5`-triphosphate. DNase I
footprinting was performed as described under ``Material and
Methods'' with indicated amount of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease.
Included for comparison is the digestion by DNase I of a
single-stranded 17-mer oligodeoxynucleotide (also 3`-end-labeled with
cordycepin 5`-triphosphate) with the same sequence as the 3` cleavage
product of duplex I/T. Panel A, DNase I footprinting assay at
concentration of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease ranged from 1 to 32
nM. Panel B, DNase I footprinting assay at higher
concentration of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease from 32 to 160
nM.
To obtain the protection pattern of the DNA 3`
to the deoxyinosine by the enzyme, the oligodeoxynucleotide was
3`-end-labeled with [-
P]cordecypin
triphosphate, and DNase I footprinting assay was performed as described
with the 5`-end-labeled oligodeoxynucleotide. The results are shown in Fig. 9. In contrast to the 5`-end-labeled substrate, very little
protection was observed when the protein concentration was below 16
nM; however, up to 20-40% protection was observed when
the protein concentration was increased to 32 nM (panel
A), a concentration shown previously to give rise to complex II.
Thus, it appears that the protection of the DNA 3` to the deoxyinosine
was not due to the formation of complex I but to complex II which
contains two molecules of protein. Furthermore, at the higher protein
concentration when complex II is formed, the segment of DNA protected
by deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease dimer was very broad (panel
B). The exact border of protection was not clear with this
oligodeoxynucleotide. Based on the data presented in Fig. 9, we
concluded that at least 13 bases 3` to deoxyinosine were protected from
DNase I digestion upon formation of complex II. However, the 2 to 3
bases immediate 3` to the nick appeared to be hypersensitive to DNase I
digestion when complex II formed.
When the complementary strand (the DNA strand that does not contain deoxyinosine) of duplex I/T was labeled and used in DNase I footprinting assay, no protection by deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease was observed (data not shown). This suggests that the enzyme binds only to the DNA strand containing deoxyinosine and makes no contact with the opposite strand. Furthermore, no footprinting was observed when the DNA digestion was performed with 1,10-phenanthroline-copper ion system(17, 18) , suggesting that the protein interacts with the DNA along the major groove (data not shown).
As shown above, deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease can also form stable complex I and complex II with deoxyinosine-containing DNA duplexes lacking the DNA segment 3` to the deoxyinosine residue (duplex F) and 3` to the nick (duplex E). This suggests that the DNA sequences 3` to the deoxyinosine residue are not essential for the binding of the enzyme. However, the results of the DNase I footprinting assay with duplex I/T revealed that the formation of complex II provided protection to the DNA segment 3` to the nick. Thus, it is possible that the second molecule of the enzyme binds to complex I by interacting with the enzyme already bound to the DNA. Consistent with the results of the DNase I footprinting assay with the labeled complementary strand of duplex I/T, no significant protection from DNase I digestion was observed on the complementary strand (the strand that does not contain deoxyinosine) of duplex E and duplex F, even at high concentration of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease (data not shown). These data suggest that the second molecule of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease binds to complex I through protein-protein interaction.
In this paper, we show that deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease from E. coli interacts with deoxyinosine-containing DNA and forms
two stable protein-DNA complexes, complex I and complex II. Complex I
contains a single molecule of protein, and complex II has two molecules
of protein bound to one molecule of DNA. An unusual feature of the
interaction of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease with
deoxyinosine-containing DNA is that the enzyme can bind to the DNA
under optimal cleavage conditions, exhibiting identical affinity for
both the DNA substrate and the product. This is different from most
endonucleases, such as restriction endonucleases. Under nonrestricting
conditions, i.e. in the absence of Mg, these
enzymes exhibit very high affinity to their substrates(19) .
Other enzymes, such as formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase, a repair
enzyme which recognizes 8-oxoguanine and formamidopyrimidines, form a
tight complex with its uncleavable substrate analogue, reduced AP site,
with a K
value of 2.6
10
M(23) . No complex can be detected with its DNA
substrates once it has been cleaved.
Another unique feature of the interaction of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease with deoxyinosine-containing DNA also makes it different from most DNA binding proteins. The primary function of most DNA-binding proteins is to recognize DNA with a specific sequence and form a stable complex with the DNA, thus promoting the binding of other proteins to the DNA. These DNA-binding proteins generally do not have specific enzymatic functions. Their role is to locate the specific sequence on the DNA and bring other proteins with specific enzymatic functions to the site. For example, in nucleotide excision repair(14) , the function of the UvrA protein is to recognize and locate DNA damage, such as a UV photodimer, and help to deliver the UvrB protein to the damage site. After UvrB forms a stable complex with the lesion, UvrA then dissociates from the DNA(13, 24) . Similarly, MutS protein in a methyl-directed mismatch repair system binds to base mismatches and helps to activate the endonucleolytic activity of MutH protein through interaction with the MutL protein(15, 25, 26) . These proteins have high affinity to their recognition sequences and form very stable complexes with the DNA, since they have no need for rapid dissociation to continue a catalytic cycle. In contrast to these proteins, deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease exhibits not only high affinity to DNA containing deoxyinosine, but also an endonucleolytic activity which cleaves the DNA in the protein-DNA complex.
Since deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease can form stable complexes with partial duplexes E and F, but not partial duplexes C and D, DNA duplex structure 5` to the deoxyinosine residue must be essential for complex formation. Furthermore, the binding activities of the enzyme to partial duplexes E and F are comparable with those of duplex I/T or I/C. This demonstrates that duplex structure 5` to deoxyinosine residues is not only essential but also sufficient for the enzyme to bind to DNA. Combined with the results of the DNase I footprinting, we propose that a single molecule of deoxyinosine 3` endonuclease binds to a deoxyinosine-containing DNA duplex by direct contact with the four bases 5` to the deoxyinosine residue, leading to the formation of complex I. DNase I footprinting also shows that the second molecule of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease protects the DNA 3` to the nick. However, the formation of complex II does not require the DNA segment 3` to the nick (as with duplex E and duplex F) nor does it provide protection to the complementary strand from DNase I digestion. Therefore, the second molecule of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease appears to bind to complex I by interacting with the first molecule of the enzyme.
The biological role of the tight
binding of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease to deoxyinosine-containing DNA
is not clear. Even though the binding and cleavage reaction of
deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease to deoxyinosine-containing DNA do not lead
to the removal of the lesion, the formation of stable complexes might
be important for other biological processes. Hypoxanthine DNA
glycosylase activity has been reported to be very low in E.
coli(5, 8) . Although the AlkA protein releases
hypoxanthine from DNA containing deoxyinosine, the enzyme shows a very
high K (420 nM) (9) for
deoxyinosine. In contrast, the affinity of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease
to deoxyinosine-containing DNA is 100-fold lower (K
about 4 nM). Furthermore, there are about 100 molecules
of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease in a E. coli cell(10) . It is likely that deoxyinosine in DNA is
primarily trapped in a complex with deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease. We
have found that the binding of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease to the DNA
blocks the recognition of hypoxanthine by the AlkA protein, leading to
a strong inhibition of the removal of hypoxanthine by AlkA protein. (
)Therefore, based on the current biochemical data, it is
unlikely that AlkA protein will be able to remove deoxyinosine from DNA
when deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease is present. Binding to DNA, even
after nicking, indicates that deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease not only
acts as an endonuclease but also as a DNA binding protein. It is
possible that the formation of stable complexes might be important for
targeting other repair enzyme(s) to the damage site, which then leads
to efficient removal of the lesion. The binding activity of
deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease would be similar then to the function of
the UvrA protein in nucleotide excision repair or the MutS protein in
the methyl-directed mismatch repair in E. coli. The strong
binding of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease to deoxyinosine-containing DNA
prevents the dissociation of the enzyme from the DNA after cleavage.
Thus, no turnover of the enzyme cleavage activity was observed when
duplex I/T or duplex I/C was used as a substrate.
However,
deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease retains nicking activity on duplex C and
duplex D and exhibits a turning over of cleavage, since the enzyme
cannot form stable complexes with these duplexes. One can speculate
that other repair protein(s) brought to the damage site by interacting
with deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease in the protein-DNA complex would make
an incision in the DNA 5` to deoxyinosine. This would lead to the
dissociation of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease from the DNA and
generation of a small gap on DNA with the removal of the lesion.
Alternatively, the binding of deoxyinosine 3`-endonuclease to the DNA
might expose the nick, thus facilitating the entry of a 3`- to
5`-helicase. This is supported by the finding that complex II renders
the 2 to 3 bases immediate 3` to the nick hypersensitive to DNase I
digestion. Actually, although the binding of deoxyinosine
3`-endonuclease to the DNA blocks the hypoxanthine base, it does not
block the nick, since DNA polymerase I can nick-translate the DNA in
the complex(10) . Recently, we have cloned the gene for
deoxyinosine 3` endonuclease from E. coli,
thus
allowing us to investigate the biological function of the enzyme in
vivo.