©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Concordant Loss of Imprinting of the Human Insulin-like Growth Factor II Gene Promoters in Cancer (*)

(Received for publication, August 8, 1995; and in revised form, September 28, 1995)

Shili Zhan David Shapiro (1)(§) Shixing Zhan Lijuan Zhang Steven Hirschfeld Joseph Elassal Lee J. Helman (¶)

From the Pediatric Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 and Department of Experimental Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38101-0318

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

The human insulin-like growth factor II (IGFII) gene has been shown to be imprinted for the promoters P2, P3, and P4 but not for the promoter P1 in liver and chondrocytes. Loss of imprinting of the IGFII gene has been found in a variety of human tumors including rhabdomyosarcoma and lung cancer. In this report, we determined whether loss of imprinting in tumors displays a promoter-specific pattern. We examined allelic expression of all four IGFII promoters in rhabdomyosarcoma, lung cancer, and normal skeletal muscle. We demonstrate that the imprinting of all IGFII promoters is relaxed in rhabdomyosarcoma and lung cancer. These data suggest that loss of imprinting of IGFII gene promoters may be regulated coordinately by a common mechanism in these tumors. Unexpectedly, we also found that P1, in addition to P2, P3, and P4 is monoallelically expressed in three informative adult skeletal muscle tissues. This indicates that imprinting of the IGFII promoter P1 occurs in a tissue-specific manner.


INTRODUCTION

Human insulin-like growth factor II (IGFII), (^1)a 67-amino acid mitogenic peptide, appears to be involved in normal fetal growth and development(1, 2) . In addition, it has been shown that abnormally high levels of IGFII mRNA are expressed in a number of human malignant tumors, and it has been suggested that IGFII may act as an autocrine or paracrine growth factor, maintaining and enhancing tumor growth(3, 4, 5) . An important role for IGFII in oncogenesis was further supported by the finding that IGFII acts as a second important signal in SV40 large T antigen-induced tumorigenesis(6) .

Genomic imprinting, or the differential expression of parental alleles of a gene in somatic cells, is now thought to play a role in human disease and cancer(7) . Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome are associated with genomic imprinting on chromosome 15q11-q13(8, 9) . Imprinting has also been proposed to be a potential mechanism for Beckwith Wiedemann syndrome with paternal chromosome 11 isodisomy (10) . It has been shown that the IGFII gene is maternally imprinted in both mice and humans(11, 12, 13) . Altered imprinting of the IGFII gene has been found in a number of tumors where IGFII is believed to play a role in pathogenesis, such as Wilms' tumors, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), lung cancer, and leiomyosarcoma(12, 13, 14, 15, 16) . Furthermore, it has recently been shown that in Wilms' tumor, loss of imprinting (LOI) of the IGFII gene is associated with reduced expression of H19 mRNA(17, 18) , which has been suggested to act as a tumor suppressor gene(19) . More recently, an important role for LOI of IGFII in cancer was supported by the evidence that transgenic mice expressing SV40 large T-antigen develop insulinomas and that biallelic expression of IGFII appears to be required for progression from adenoma to carcinoma(20) . These studies suggest that deregulation of IGFII genomic imprinting may play an important role in the development of some tumors.

Tissue-specific imprinting of all three IGFII promoters has been reported in both rats and mice(21, 22) . All three rodent IGFII promoters were found to be expressed from the paternal allele exclusively in all tissues except in the choroid plexus and leptomeninges of the central nervous system. While the human IGFII promoters P2, P3, and P4 have their counterparts in the rodent, the promoter P1 appears to be unique to human(1) . It has also been documented that the IGFII promoter P1 directs expression from both parental alleles while the promoters P2, P3, and P4 transcribe mRNA from only one parental allele in liver and chondrocytes(23, 24) . Relaxation of imprinting of IGFII occurs at high frequency in some human tumors overexpressing IGFII(12, 13, 14, 15, 16) . To explore whether or not this relaxation involved all promoters, we examined the allelic expression status of all four IGFII promoters in RMS, lung cancer, and normal skeletal muscle.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

All tumor tissues and adult muscle tissues were obtained from a tumor tissue bank of samples from patients treated at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (Memphis, TN) or at NIH, or from the Cooperative Human Tissue Network, and all tumor samples had been confirmed to contain viable tumor.

Extraction of DNA and RNA

Chromosomal DNA was extracted from tumor tissues or adult muscles using the ``QuickClean DNA Extraction System'' (Oncogene Science, Inc., New York) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Total cellular RNA was isolated as described previously(25) .

PCR Analyses

To screen normal muscle tissues and tumor tissues for informative heterozygosity, amplification of DNA was performed using oligonucleotides p5 and end-labeled p7 and the same conditions as described previously(14) . Labeled PCR products were digested with HinfI or HinfI + ApaI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) and electrophoresed on 6% polyacrylamide-urea gel. For analysis of allelic usage of the four IGFII promoters, 1 µg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using random primers at 42 °C for 15 min, and aliquots of 4-fold diluted cDNA were amplified using p8 and each of four specific primers (p1a, p2a, p3a, and p4a) for 30 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 65 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 2 min followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. Nested PCR (20 cycles) was performed using P end-labeled p9 and each of following primers: p1b, p2b, p3b, and p4b. Labeled PCR products were purified on 1% agarose gel, digested with HinfI or HinfI + ApaI at 37 °C for 30 min, and analyzed on a 6% polyacrylamide-urea gel. Primers used were: p1a, 5`-CGA ATT CTG GGC ACC AGT GAC TCC CCG-3`; p1b, 5`-CAG TCC TGA GGT GAG CTG CTG-3`; p2a, 5`-GTT GCT CCC GGA CAC TGA GGA CTG-3`; p2b, 5`-AGA GCG TTC GAT CGC TCG CTG CCT G-3`; p3a, 5`-CGT CGC ACA TTC GGC C(TC)C(TC)G CGA CT-3`; p3b, 5`-GGT TTG CGA CAC GCA GCA GGG AG(AG)T G-3`; p4a, 5`-GCT TCT CCT GTG AAA GAG ACT TCC A-3`; p4b, 5`-CAG CGA GCC TTC TGC TGA GCT GTA G-3`; p5, 5`-CTT GGA CTT T(GT)A GTC AAA TTG GC-3`; p7, 5`-GGG GTG AGG GT(CT) GTG CCA ATT A-3`; p8, 5`-GTG ATG GAA AAG GGA GTG AGG AGC C-3`; p9, 5`-GAG GAG CCA GTC TGG GTT GTT GCT A-3`.

Methylation Analysis of H19

Methylation analysis of the 3`-half region of H19 gene and the H19 promoter region was the same as described(26) .


RESULTS

PCR Amplification of Promoter-specific IGFII Transcripts

We used a modified technique described previously to determine allelic expression of the four IGFII promoters(23) . The exon organization of the human IGFII gene and the primers used for amplification of the promoter-specific transcripts generated by the four different promoters are shown in Fig. 1A. IGFII cDNA was generated from total RNA by reverse transcription. Promoter-specific PCR products were then generated by amplification using p8 and each of four promoter-specific primers (Fig. 1B), followed by a nested PCR using P end-labeled p9 and each of additional promoter-specific primers (Fig. 1C). Digestion of the PCR products with HinfI and polymorphic site ApaI distinguishes the A and B alleles (Fig. 1C). Complete digestion of the PCR products was verified by the co-digestion of homologous B/B alleles in the identical enzymatic reaction (Fig. 1D). Promoter-specific PCR products were verified by sizes (Fig. 1E).


Figure 1: Structure of the human IGFII gene. A, the numbered boxes indicate the nine exons of the IGFII gene. The locations of four promoters (P1-P4) are indicated. The coding regions which encode prepro-IGFII are shown as shaded boxes. Parental alleles were distinguished by digestion using a common HinfI site and the polymorphic ApaI site. B, total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA. Each promoter-specific cDNA transcript was amplified using a common primer p8 and one of four promoter-specific primers (p1a, p2a, p3a, and p4a). C, 50-fold diluted first round PCR products were amplified by nested PCR using P end-labeled p9 (asterisks) and one of four promoter-specific primers (p1b, p2b, p3b, and p4b). HinfI digestion resulted in a 141-bp end-labeled fragment, which was digested further with ApaI. Transcripts that do not demonstrate genomic imprinting show two alleles: an ApaI-undigested allele A (141 bp) and an ApaI-digested allele B (108 bp). D, to rule out partial digestion by ApaI, control template B/B alleles were amplified using p5 and P end-labeled p7 (asterisks). This product was added to all enzymatic reactions and generated a 268-bp end-labeled HinfI fragment and a 235-bp end-labeled ApaI fragment. E, amplification of IGFII from total RNA of adult muscle. The nested PCR products were sized on a 1% agarose gel with a DNA molecular weight ladder (lane M). Amplified transcripts from promoters P1, P2, P3, and P4 show expected 1350, 1306, 1291, and 1266 bp, respectively.



Global IGFII Promoter Imprinting in Normal Human Skeletal Muscle

Three normal muscles were informative heterozygotes at the ApaI restriction site. Fig. 2A shows two such muscle tissues that contain the ApaI polymorphism. Total RNA from informative muscle tissues was used to determine allele-specific expression in all four IGFII promoters. In adult muscle of subject 1, full-length PCR transcripts from P2, P3, and P4 were digested to a 141-bp end-labeled fragment with HinfI (Fig. 2B, lanes 3, 5, and 7) and showed that only allele B was present after further digestion with ApaI (Fig. 2B, lanes 4, 6, and 8). These data are consistent with the previously described results in normal liver(23) . In contrast, however, the PCR transcript of the IGFII P1 promoter showed that only allele B was present after digestion with both HinfI and ApaI (Fig. 2B, lane 2). This result was confirmed by analysis of the other two informative adult muscles (Table 1). Since the IGFII P1 promoter is expressed from both parental alleles in liver and chondrocytes(23, 24) , we conclude that imprinting of the IGFII promoter P1 appears to be tissue-specific.


Figure 2: Allele usage in the four IGFII promoters in adult skeletal muscles. A, genomic DNA extracted from adult skeletal muscles of subjects 1 and 2 was PCR-amplified with primer p5 and P end-labeled primer p7. Labeled PCR products were purified and digested with HinfI or HinfI + ApaI and analyzed on a 6% polyacrylamide-urea gel and demonstrate heterozygosity for the ApaI site. B, total RNA from adult muscle of subject 1 was reverse-transcribed into cDNA, and nested PCR was performed as described in Fig. 1. Nested PCR products from four promoters (P1-P4) were digested with HinfI (H, lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7) or HinfI + ApaI (HA, lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8) in the presence of internal control template and analyzed on 6% polyacrylamide-urea gel. Lane M shows a P end-labeled ladder. Note that the internal control template generates a 268-bp HinfI fragment and a 235-bp HinfI + ApaI fragment to indicate complete digestion.





Global Loss of IGFII Promoter Imprinting in RMS

We have shown that all four promoters are imprinted in normal skeletal muscle. In addition, we have previously demonstrated LOI in RMS, which is thought to arise from skeletal muscle precursors. To determine whether LOI in RMS includes all four promoters or displays a promoter-specific pattern, we examined allele usage of the IGFII promoters in RMS tumors with LOI. Transcripts from all four IGFII promoters showed that both A and B alleles are expressed (Fig. 3A, lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8). This observation was confirmed for the other three RMS tumors (Table 1). Since it has been shown that all four IGFII promoters are imprinted in normal adult skeletal muscle, these data indicate the deficiency of IGFII genomic imprinting in RMS involves all four promoters.


Figure 3: Allele usage in the four IGFII promoters in cancer. A, RMS of subject 4. B, lung carcinoma of subject 8. cDNA was transcribed from total RNA of RMS of subject 4 and lung carcinoma of subject 8 and then amplified by PCR as described in Fig. 1. Nested PCR products from four promoters (P1-P4) were digested with HinfI (H, lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7) or HinfI+ ApaI (HA, lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8). Completed digestion is demonstrated by a single 268-bp band (HinfI) or 235-bp band (HinfI + ApaI). Lane M shows a P end-labeled ladder.



It has been demonstrated that biallelic expression of IGFII in Wilms' tumor was associated with hypermethylation of the H19 promoter region (17, 18) . To determine if Wilms' tumor and RMS share common characteristics, we have studied the methylation status of H19 in RMS tumors as well as in normal skeletal muscle. In contrast with Wilms' tumor, no differences in the methylation pattern between the normal skeletal muscle and the RMS tumors with LOI of IGFII were observed either in the promoter region or in the 3`-region of the H19 gene (Table 1). Therefore, we conclude that biallelic IGFII expression is not linked to H19 hypermethylation in RMS.

Biallelic Expression of All Four IGFII Promoters in Lung Carcinoma

It has been demonstrated that relaxation of IGFII imprinting also occurs in lung cancer, a common adult malignancy(15) . We therefore sought to determine whether all four IGFII promoters are biallelically expressed in these tumors. Fig. 3B demonstrates biallelic expression of IGFII transcripts from all four promoters, P1-P4. This result was confirmed in two other lung carcinomas with LOI (Table 1). These data demonstrate that biallelic expression of all four IGFII promoters also occurs in lung cancer and suggests that disruption of IGFII imprinting in these two tumor types may be regulated by similar mechanisms.


DISCUSSION

Our data demonstrate that silent alleles of all four IGFII promoters are coordinately activated in RMS, indicating that LOI of IGFII promoters may be regulated coordinately in this tumor. Our data also show biallelic expression of all four promoters in lung cancer. Since IGFII promoters P1-P4 span a 20-kb DNA region, our data support the hypothesis that imprinting may be regulated in a regional manner(27) . A recent study has shown that deletion of the H19 gene region in mice disrupted the imprinting of two other genes, IGFII and insulin, located over 100 kb upstream, implying an imprinting control center around the H19 gene(27) . A group of investigators has also identified an imprinting center within a locus on chromosome 15 responsible for Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome(28) . Furthermore, it has recently been shown that LOI of IGFII in Wilms' tumor is linked to increased methylation of the maternal H19 allele (17) , which is located 200 kb downstream of the IGFII gene(29) . Since epigenetic alterations at the H19 locus can regulate neighboring imprinted genes located more than 100 kb away, it is not surprising to find that LOI involves all IGFII promoters.

The results reported here document the existence of concordant imprinting of all four IGFII promoters in human adult skeletal muscle. While the IGFII promoter P1 can direct expression from both parental alleles in liver and chondrocytes(23) , all informative adult muscles examined expressed P1-specific IGFII transcripts monoallelically. These data demonstrate that imprinting of the IGFII promoter P1 is tissue-specific. Tissue-specific imprinting has also been found in all three rodent IGFII promoters and the mouse insulin-2 gene(30) . All these genes or their promoters express mRNA biallelically in some specific tissues. On the other hand, a number of tumors also transcribed IGFII from both parental alleles. Although the mechanisms responsible for biallelic expression in normal tissues and in cancer are unknown, the processes involved may be similar. A recent study indicated that allele-specific inactivation occurs early postimplantation(31) . After the establishment of imprinting in the early embryo, a repressed allele of an imprinted gene is reactivated in the precursor cells of specific tissues, and this activation is maintained throughout adult life. To date, no association between LOI and stages of tumor development have been found. This implies that activation of a silenced allele may also occur in the precursor of tumor cells.

In Wilms' tumor, biallelic expression of IGFII was shown to be linked to reduced expression of H19 and increased methylation of H19 promoter region(17, 18) . In the RMS tumors with LOI, we did not observe any H19 methylation differences between normal skeletal muscle tissues and tumor tissues. In addition, overexpression of H19 mRNA was observed by Northern blot analysis in the two RMS tumors with biallelic expression of IGFII, using normal muscle tissue as a control (data not shown). These findings indicate that the mechanisms for LOI of IGFII in RMS may be distinct from those in Wilms' tumor in which the model of enhancer competition between H19 and IGFII is supported. One possible explanation is that LOI of IGFII in RMS may involve IGFII methylation but not H19 methylation. We are currently investigating the methylation pattern of four IGFII promoter regions.

Thus the mechanisms for biallelic expression in normal tissues and cancer as well as the precise molecular mechanisms involved in the process of genomic imprinting remain to be determined, and identification of these mechanisms may have important implications for understanding the biology of these tumors.


FOOTNOTES

*
This project was supported in part by the Cooperative Human Tissue Network, which is funded by the National Cancer Institute. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant CA-23099, Cancer Center Core Grant CA-21765, and the American-Lebanese-Syrian Associated Charities.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 301-402-2592; Fax: 301-402-0575.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: IGFII, insulin-like growth factor II; RMS, rhabdomyosarcoma; LOI, loss of imprinting; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobase pair(s).


REFERENCES

  1. Van Dijk, M. A., Van Schaik, F. M. A., Bootsma, H. J., Holthuizen, P., and Sussenbach, J. S. (1991) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 81, 81-94 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Ohlsson, R., Hedborg, F., Holmgren, L., Walsh, C., and Ekstrom, T. J. (1994) Development 120, 361-368 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Reeve, A. E., Eccles, M. R., Wilkins, R. J., Bell, G. I., and Millow, L. J. (1985) Nature 317, 258-260 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. El-badry, O. M., Minniti, C., Kohn, E. C., Houghton, P. J., Daughaday, W. H., and Helman, L. J. (1990) Cell Growth & Differ. 1, 325-331
  5. El-Badry, O. M., Helman, L. J., Chatten, J., Steimberg, S. M., Evans, A. E., and Israel, M. A. (1991) J. Clin. Invest. 87, 648-657 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Christofori, T., Naik, P., and Hanahan, D. (1994) Nature 369, 414-418 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Hall, J. G. (1990) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 46, 857-873 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Nicholls, R. D., Knoll, J. H. M., Butler, M. G., Karam, S., and Lalande, M. (1989) Nature 342, 281-285 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Malcolm, S., Clayton-Smith, J., Nichols, M., Robb, S., Webb, T., Armor, J. A. L., Jeffreys, A. J., and Pembrey, M. E. (1991) Lancet 337, 694-697 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Henry, I., Bonaiti-Pellie, C., Chehensse, V., Beldjord, C., Schwartz, C., Utermann, G., and Junien, C. (1991) Nature 351, 665-667 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. DeChiara, T. M., Robertson, E. J., and Efatratiadis, A. (1991) Cell 64, 849-859 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Rainier, S., Johnson, L. A., Dobry, C. J., Ping, A. J., Grundy, P. E., and Feinberg, A. P. (1993) Nature 362, 747-749 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Ogawa, O., Eccles, M. R., Szeto, J., McNoe, L. A., Yun, K., Maw, M. A., Smith, P. J., and Reeve, A. E. (1993) Nature 362, 749-751 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Zhan, S., Shapiro, D. N., and Helman, L. J. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 94, 445-448 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Suzuki, H., Ueda, R., Takahashi, T., and Takahashi, T. (1994) Nat. Genet. 6, 332-333 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Vu, T., Yballe, C., Boonyanit, S., and Hoffman, A. R. (1995) J. Clin. Endocrinol. & Metab. 80, 1670-1676 [Abstract]
  17. Steenman, M. J. C., Rainier, S., Dobry, C. J., Grundy, P., Horon, I. L., and Feinberg, A. P. (1994) Nat. Genet. 7, 432-438
  18. Moulton, T., Crenshaw, T., Hao, Y., Moosikasuwan, J., Lin, N., Dembitzer, F., Hensle, T., Weiss, L., McMorrow, L., Loew, T., Kraus, W., Gerald, W., and Tycko, B. (1994) Nat. Genet. 7, 440-447 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Hao, Y., Crenshaw, T., Moulton, T., Newcomb, E., and Tycko, B. (1993) Nature 365, 764-767 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Christofori, T., Naik, P., and Hanahan, D. (1995) Nat. Genet. 10, 196-201 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Pedone, P. V., Cosma, M. P., Ungaro, P., Colantuoni, V., Bruni, C. B., Zarrilli, R., and Riccio, A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 23970-23975 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Hu, J., Vu, T. H., and Hoffman, A. R. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 628-636 [Abstract]
  23. Vu, T. H., and Hoffman, A. R. (1994) Nature 371, 714-717 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Ekstrom, T. J., Cui, H., Li, X., and Ohlsson, R. (1995) Development 121, 309-316 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Chirgwin, J. M., Przybyla, A. E., MacDonald, R. J., and Rutter, W. J. (1979) Biochemistry 18, 5294-5299 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Kondo, M., Suzuki, H., Ueda, R., Osada, H., Takagi, K., Takahashi, T., and Takahashi, T. (1995) Oncogene 10, 1193-1198 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Leighton, P. A., Ingram, R. S., Eggenschwiler, J., Efstratiadis, A., and Tilghman, S. M. (1995) Nature 375, 34-39 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Sutcliffe, J. S., Nakao, M., Christian, S., Orstavik, K. H., Tommerup, N., Ledbetter, D. H., and Beaudet, A. L. (1994) Nat. Genet. 8, 52-58 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Zemel, S., Bartolomei, M. S., and Tilghman, S. M. (1992) Nat. Genet. 2, 61-65 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Giddings, S. J., King, C. D., Harman, K. W., Flood, J. F., and Carnaghi, L. R. (1994) Nat. Genet. 6, 310-313 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Latham, K. E., Doherty, A. S., Scott, C. D., and Shultz, R. M. (1994) Genes & Dev. 8, 290-299

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.