©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Immunochemical Characterization and Developmental Expression of Shaker Potassium Channels from the Nervous System of Drosophila(*)

(Received for publication, March 20, 1995; and in revised form, June 12, 1995)

Oscar Rogero Francisco J. Tejedor (§)

From the Instituto Cajal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cietificas Madrid 28002, Spain

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

We have raised antisera against recombinant peptides expressed from cDNAs fragments common to all splicing variants generated at the Shaker locus of Drosophila and used them as a tool to biochemically characterize these channel proteins. This antisera succeeded in detecting the expression of multiple Shaker potassium channels (Sh Kch), proteins with variable molecular mass (65-85 kDa) and pI (5.5-7). Additionally, for first time, specific Sh proteins of 40-45 kDa most probably corresponding to some of the so-called short Sh cDNAs previously isolated by others have been identified. Using genetic criteria, it has been determined that at least a good part of this variety of proteins is generated by alternative splicing. Developmental experiments show a double wave of Sh Kch channel expression with a first pick at the third instar larvae stage, a minimum at the beginning of puparation, and the highest plateau 36 h after hatching of adult flies. The pattern of Sh splice variants changes dramatically throughout development. A detergent-resistant fraction with about 50% of Sh Kch which seems to be anchored to submembranous structures has been found. Finally, other biochemical properties of Sh Kch, like membrane fractionation and glycosylation, are also described.


INTRODUCTION

Potassium channels are the molecules mostly responsible for stabilizing the membrane potential of excitable cells thereby regulating their excitability(1) . Most cells express various potassium channels with diverse functional and pharmacological properties(2) . Thus, in the nervous system different types of potassium channels set the resting potential, control the duration and frequency of action potentials, determine the length of bursting periods, etc. In contrast to other ionic channels, this diversity and ubiquity, together with their small quantity, and the lack of good molecular markers have precluded the productive standard purification of most voltage-gated potassium channel proteins. Thus, the first cloning of a potassium channel gene was undertaken by means of a genetic approach(3, 4, 5) . Homology cloning in different species and tissues together with site-directed mutagenesis and in vitro expression have unravelled the existence of various voltage-gated potassium channel gene subfamilies and yielded a great increase in the knowledge of these molecules (see (6) and (7) for recent reviews). In spite of this great advance in molecular studies and a few brave purifications (8, 9, 10, 11) , the above mentioned difficulties have prevented successful investigation into the biochemical properties, tissular and cellular distribution, and other relevant data regarding the potassium channels proteins.

The Shaker locus of Drosophila harbors a transcription unit that by means of alternative and differential splicing at its 3` and 5` ends can produce a wide variety of transcripts encoding homologous proteins. The resulting channel isoforms share a common central core region and have different N-terminals and C-terminals (12, 13, 14) which confer differential electrical properties when expressed in Xenopus oocytes(15, 16) . It has been shown that four Sh (^1)subunits assemble to form a functional potassium channel(17) . Since properties of heteromultimeric Sh Kch differ from those of homomultimeric channels(18) , the possible combination of Sh isoforms can provide in this way a molecular basis for potassium channel diversity in this organism.

Although, there have been previous reports on the preparation of antisera against Shaker proteins from Drosophila(19, 20) , the theoretically expected variety of Sh Kch isoforms was not detected and the biochemical study of these proteins was not followed up.

We show here that by using immunochemical techniques the biochemical characterization of native Shaker potassium channels from Drosophila can be successfully approached.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Subcloning of cDNAs and Recombinant Protein Expression

Standard molecular biology techniques were performed as described(21) . cDNA Shalpha and Sh were kindly provided by O. Pongs. The fusion protein ShHX was produced by subcloning a HincII-XhoII fragment of cDNA Sh (nucleotides 205-828, (14) ) in the expression vector pMALcRI (New England Biolabs). The fusion protein was expressed and isolated as suggested by the supplier. The fusion protein ShSCX was produced by subcloning a BamHI-KpnI fragment (nucleotides 141-1185) of the same cDNA in the vector pEX3 and expressing it as suggested(22) . A PstI-BamHI fragment (nucleotides 100-373) of the cDNA Shalpha was cloned in the vector pEX1 (22) in order to generate the fusion protein ShAPBX.

Antisera Production and Purification

Rabbit antisera against fusion proteins ShHX, ShSCX, and ShAPBX were produced with standard procedures(23) . Nonspecific recognition of bacterial proteins was eliminated from all antisera by preabsorbing to total Escherichia coli proteins. Affinity purification was carried out using nitrocellulose matrices prepared with the corresponding purified recombinant fusion proteins. Monospecific antisera thus obtained were tested for their specificity by mono-dimensional Western blot assays with total proteins from CS flies. Df flies which lack the genomic DNA from the Shaker coding region (13) were used as a negative control. In a second step, the most specific antisera were selected according to their affinity and titrated by testing dilutions of the sera against decreasing amounts of the purified recombinant fusion protein.

Flies Stocks, Culture, and Harvesting

Drosophila melanogaster stocks were grown on standard medium at 25 °C with 12 h dark/light cycles. The Canton-S strain was used as a wild-type control although no differences were found with other common wild-type strains such as Berlin. Males of the mutant strains B55^D/W32^P/C(1)M3/0 and T(X;Y)W32/FM7a/Y were also used(24) .

Electrophoresis, Western Blotting, and Quantitative Immunoblots

In the course of this work three different electrophoretic techniques have been used: A, regular mono-dimensional SDS-PAGE was according to Laemmli(25) . The concentration of acrylamide was 8% but the ratio acryl/bisacrylamide was lowered to 30/0.6 in order to increase the resolution of Sh proteins. Different tissue samples (whole flies, head, larval central nervous system, etc.) were homogenized at 80 °C in 50 mM Tris, 25 mM KCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.3 M sucrose, and 2% SDS (pH 7.4) with a microglass potter. Afterward, samples were boiled for 5 min in SDS-PAGE sample buffer and 20 mM dithiothreitol before being applied to the gel. B, for some specific purposes, mono-dimensional gel electrophoresis modified from the method of Kyte and Rodriguez (26) was employed. Separation gels containing 7% acryl/bisacrylamide were used. C, bi-dimensional electrophoresis was carried out according to O'Farrell (27) with some modifications introduced by Santarén and Bravo(28) . A 5-7 range of pH for the first dimension and 8% acrylamide gels for the second dimension was used.

Western blot was done by electrotransferring the proteins of the gel to nitrocellulose membranes under standard conditions. Immunoblots were carried out with monospecific anti-Sh antisera and a secondary goat anti-rabbit IgG antiserum couple to horseradish peroxidase. Finally, the chemiluminescent ECL method (Amersham) for the detection of antibody binding was used. When required, laser densitometry and the computer program Image-Quant (Molecular Dynamics) were used for the quantitation of immunoblots. The optical density obtained in this way was standardized against the total protein applied to the gel which was calculated by Coomassie Blue staining and densitometry of a gel run in parallel. All quantitative experiments were done at least in duplicate and repeated with two different sets of samples. Results are shown as average.

Preparation of Membranes and Fractionation

We have basically followed the method of Breer and Kniper (29) for the isolation of Drosophila neuronal membranes. Depending on the mass required, adult fly heads were obtained either by vortexing anaesthetized flies on liquid nitrogen and sieving or cutting by hand with a scalpel. Heads were homogenized in manitol buffer (0.6 M manitol, 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) containing protein inhibitors (aprotinin, pepstatin A, leupeptin, and E64 at 2 µg/ml and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride at 10 µg/ml) and nucleases (DNase I and RNase A at 10 µg/ml). Membrane (P3) and cytosolic (S3) fractions were collected and P3 crude membranes were resuspended with 2% Ficoll in manitol buffer, loaded on a discontinuous density gradient. We have found that by using 8, 12, 16, and 20% Ficoll steps in manitol buffer instead of 5, 12, and 20% as described previously (29) and increasing the centrifuging conditions (126,000 times g for 90 min) we were able to further resolve in three different density fractions the previously reported single neuronal membrane fraction(29) . The resulting membrane fractions were collected from the Ficoll interfaces and pelleted by centrifugation at 356,000 times g for 30 min. These pellets were analyzed by electron microscopy (EM) as described previously(29) .

Solubilization of Membranes and Deglycosylation

Solubilization experiments were done by resuspending membrane pellets in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 10 mM EDTA (pH 7.5) and stepwise addition of the appropriate detergent from a concentrated solution made in the same buffer. Unsolubilized material was pelleted by centrifuging 1 h at 48,000 times g. For deglycosylation assays, solubilized membrane proteins obtained with 1% Triton X-100 were diluted 1-fold with the buffer suggested by the enzyme supplier (Boehringer Mannhein), and digested with either mixed endoglycosidase F/N-glycosidase F (13 units/ml) or endo-alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase (O-glycosidase, 10 milliunits/ml), for 2 h at 37 °C in the presence of protein inhibitors. Neuraminidase digestion was carried out in the same conditions but in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) with 0.7 unit/ml enzyme.


RESULTS

We have raised affinity purified polyclonal antisera against various recombinant proteins obtained by expression of different cDNA fragments of the central core region common to all Sh transcripts. All of them recognized several specific Shaker proteins but after a selection procedure (see ``Experimental Procedures''), one of them, called alpha-ShHX1, showed the highest titer and affinity and, therefore, was used in all the experiments described in this paper.

An analysis by Western blot of total proteins from adult flies with alpha-ShHX1 detects multiple bands with apparent molecular mass in the range of 65-85 kDa (Fig. 1A). The molecular size of the detected peptides is slightly larger than the theoretical molecular mass (65.1-76.2 kDa). All the labeled proteins must be specific to Shaker since the antiserum is monospecific and, moreover, these bands are absent in the track of control Df flies. Almost all the protein detected with the antiserum is in the P3 membrane fraction. None of the bands seemed to appear in significant amounts in the cytosolic S3 extract (Fig. 1B), probably indicating the low occurrence or total absence of any intracellular pool of channels as that described for sodium and calcium channels(30, 31) . The results presented here are in apparent contradiction to the large intracellular pool found in the case of Shaker-baculovirus infected insect cells (32) although, as the authors pointed out, this might be a consequence of hyperexpression. High resolution bi-dimensional electrophoresis and Western blot dramatically improves the resolution of immunolabeled bands. Thus, a homogenate of head proteins yields more than 10 spots with different pI and molecular mass in the range of 65-85 kDa (Fig. 1C). Again, all the immunostained spots seem to be specific since none of them is detected in the Df flies blot (Fig. 1D). Very interestingly, a single spot of about 45 kDa at the middle of the pI range is also specifically labeled (Fig. 1C, arrowhead). Due to various reasons it is very unlikely that the observed multiplicity of bands could be generated by degradation of channel proteins. First, the denaturing conditions used in the preparation of samples (see ``Experimental Procedures'') strongly preclude this possibility. Second, when a homogenate of head proteins prepared for bi-dimensional electrophoresis was left at room temperature for up to 5 h prior to being applied to the gel, no significant changes in the relative intensity of spots were observed (not shown), clearly indicating that the various proteins detected are not the result of proteolysis during sample preparation. Due to its size, the 45-kDa protein might correspond to one of the so-called short Shaker cDNAs isolated in a few laboratories(3, 12, 13) . We have checked whether this short Shaker protein is in fact inserted in the plasma membrane. To this end, a protein extract of a membrane preparation from adult head (Fig. 1E) was analyzed. Except for some changes in the most acidic proteins, probably due to modifications in the phosphorylation state of the channel proteins commonly produced during the isolation of the membranes, the pattern of membrane proteins is very similar to that of total proteins. This experiment shows that the 45-kDa peptide is indeed in the plasma membrane.


Figure 1: Western blot analysis of Sh potassium channels proteins. Total proteins from adult whole flies (A), heads (C, D, F, G, and H), and S3-cytosol (B) or P3-membrane (B and E) fractions of wt or mutant as indicated, were electrophoresed in either mono-dimensional or bi-dimensional gels, electroblotted, and probed with alpha-ShHX1 antiserum. Complete blots are shown for mono-dimensional electrophoresis while in the case of bi-dimensional blots, panels show only the area corresponding to approximately molecular mass = 35-95 kDa and pI 5.5-7 where all the specific spots were detected. Exposure time in the autoradiography ranged from 2 to 5 min. G, total head proteins were analyzed by a modification of the electrophoretic technique of Kite and Rodriguez (26) as indicated under ``Experimental Procedures.'' H, to the same sample as that load in C, we added SDS to a final concentration of 2% and the sample was incubated at 65 °C for 15 min. Finally, proteins were analyzed by regular mono-dimensional SDS-PAGE and Western blot.



In order to check whether this variety of protein detected by our antiserum is in fact generated by alternative splicing at the Shaker locus, a genetic approach has been taken. Previously, by using various recombinant Sh proteins containing the central common core region and different alternative amino and carboxyl ends, it has been found that antiserum alpha-ShHX1 is able to equally recognize all Sh Kch isoforms (not shown). The chromosomal break point W32 interrupts the Shaker transcription unit between exon 2 and 3 (13) but does not completely preclude the transcription(14) , probably through the use of a second promoter located downstream of the translocation point. Therefore, at least exons 1 and 2 cannot be transcribed and the corresponding alternative splice transcripts ShB and ShD (in the nomenclature of (13) ) are never produced in this mutant. As expected, the bi-dimensional immunoblot pattern of W32 flies lacks a few of the peptides labeled in wt flies (Fig. 1, C and F) clearly indicating that the complex pattern of Sh proteins is indeed generated by alternative splicing. The fact that short Sh proteins also disappear in W32 flies, gives clear evidence for its specificity and additionally indicates that the 45-kDa peptide must belong to either ShB or ShD N-terminal isoforms. A couple of very close spots running at equal molecular size on the most acidic side of the gel are not detected in this mutant either (Fig. 1C, arrows), whereas another protein on the most basic side of the W32 map increases its intensity in respect to CS (Fig. 1F, arrowhead). Thus, the question remains as to why this smaller 45-kDa Sh peptide could not be detected by mono-dimensional SDS-PAGE and Western blot (as in Fig. 1A, for instance). One explanation could be the differences in the manner of preparing samples for each type of electrophoresis. Accordingly, a modified mono-dimensional electrophoretic method which uses concentrated urea instead of SDS as denaturating agent (26) was used. Under these experimental conditions an intense band of 45 kDa and a weaker one of 41 kDa together with a few intense bands in the range of 65-90 kDa were specifically labeled (Fig. 1G). Moreover, when an urea/Nonidet P-40 protein extract as that used for bi-dimensional electrophoresis of CS head proteins (Fig. 1C) was heated in the presence of SDS and run in a regular SDS-PAGE gel, peptides in the range of 65-85 kDa were normally labeled while the 45-kDa protein was no longer detected (Fig. 1H). Altogether, these results point to a probable aggregation and precipitation of the short Sh peptides during boiling with SDS. This can also explain why these truncated channel proteins have not been detected in previous work by other laboratories(19, 20) .

A quantitative immunoblot analysis of the anatomical distribution of Sh Kch has been carried out. As shown in Fig. 2A, Sh proteins are more abundant in the head than in thorax, and they are practically absent in the abdomen of adult flies. This distribution of Sh Kch proteins correlates well with that of nervous tissue. Additionally, with this simple anatomical dissection one can observe that the pattern of Sh proteins of head and thorax are rather different (Fig. 2C), clearly indicating a tissue-specific alternative splicing as previously suggested by Northern blot analysis(14) .


Figure 2: Quantitative immunoblotting of different tissue homogenates. A, quantitative analysis of the immunoblots (see ``Experimental Procedures'') of the CS tracks in panel B carried out with affinity purified alpha-HXSh1 antiserum. B, detail of the central part of an immunoblot of total proteins from head, thorax, and abdomen of CS and Df flies electrophoresed as in Fig. 1A. C, further detail at higher magnification of head and thorax tracks of CS. Notice that in order to compare both band patterns the thorax autoradiography was overexposed to bring it up to about the same intensity as that of head.



Protein extracts of developmentally staged samples of Drosophila have been analyzed by quantitative immunoblotting with the antiserum alpha-ShHX1. As shown in Fig. 3A, there are two waves of Sh Kch expression during development. Sh proteins are first clearly detected in first instar larvae and increase in intensity up to the early third instar. At the beginning of puparation they seem to disappear. The expression restarts at the late pupal stage and continues to increase up to the adult fly. Changes in the pattern of bands can be nicely viewed in bi-dimensional blots. Thus, protein extracts from larval brain (Fig. 3B) were prepared and their bi-dimensional immunoblot was compared to that of adult head (Fig. 1C) since both structures hold more than 90% of the Sh proteins present in their respective developmental stages. The pattern of adult brain is clearly more complex than that of larval central nervous system. This lacks most of the high molecular size proteins and shows no more than four labeled spots that seem to have their counterpart in the adult bi-dimensional map including a weak labeling of the 45-kDa spot. As stated above, immunoblots carried out from mono-dimensional gels under normal conditions did not detect a significant amount of Sh channels in protein extracts from embryo (Fig. 3A). In situ hybridization with a variety of probes has also failed in detecting Sh transcripts in embryos(33) . However, Sh potassium channel currents have been recorded in embryonic cells(34) . Therefore, we have tried to improve the detection level by overloading bi-dimensional gels and increasing the time of autoradiography in the final chemiluminescent reaction of the immunoblot. Under these experimental conditions Sh proteins could finally be detected (Fig. 3C) indicating that even at considerably lower comparable levels Sh Kch are indeed expressed in embryonic stages. The bi-dimensional map obtained in this way is very similar although not identical to that of larval central nervous system and mainly consists of the most acidic high molecular mass proteins and the 45-kDa spot (compare Fig. 1C and Fig. 3, B and C). It must be highlighted here that the Sh proteins most abundant in embryo and larval brain are those which disappear in W32 flies (ShB and ShD as above). A density separation of membranes from Drosophila head has been carried out by using ultracentrifugation in stepped Ficoll gradients and the distribution of Sh Kch was analyzed as shown in the diagram of Fig. 4A. Although Sh Kch are more concentrated in the 8-12% fraction, all membrane fractions isolated from the various interfaces contained considerable amounts of Sh Kch proteins. This separation of membranes does not seem to yield any segregation of Sh Kch isoforms since these different membrane fractions exhibit a rather similar mono-dimensional immunoblot pattern (Fig. 4A). Although very much alike techniques have been applied to the isolation of Drosophila neuronal membranes (29) , the lack of prevalence of different Sh proteins that was observed in the fractionation of neuronal membranes could be due to an inefficient separation. In order to check this point, the morphological composition of membrane fractions has been analyzed with EM techniques. The EM micrograph of total P3 membranes shows a very heterogeneous composition of vesicles of different shape, size, and appearance (Fig. 4B). On the contrary, membrane fractions purified by density ultracentrifugation exhibited a more homogeneous membrane composition than the crude membranes but each was different from the others. For instance, the 8-12% interface fraction, containing the highest concentration of Sh proteins, is quite rich in vesicles of 80-100 nm in diameter as well as highly electrodense walls (Fig. 4C, arrows). Altogether, these experiments demonstrate that the major Shaker proteins are more or less evenly distributed in fractions of nervous tissue membranes of diverse compositions. However, with this kind of analysis the possibility that Sh isoforms with a low level of expression might be segregated in different kinds of membranes cannot be ruled out.


Figure 3: Analytical and quantitative immunoblot of developmentally staged samples. A, quantitative determination of Sh proteins in developmentally staged samples carried out as described elsewhere. The data was standardized to the value of A48. Abbreviations are: E, embryo; LI, first instar larvae; LII, second instar larvae; ELII and LLII, early and late third instar larvae; EP and LP, early and late pupae; A0-48, adult flies collected at the indicated time (hours) after emerging. B and C, bi-dimensional immunoblot of larval brain and embryo protein extracts, respectively. Electrophoretic conditions are the same as in Fig. 1C. Autoradiography exposure times were 20 and 45 min, respectively.




Figure 4: Distribution of Shaker potassium channels in purified membranes. A, total membranes of Drosophila head (P3) were fractionated in discontinuous Ficoll gradients as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Membranes were collected from density interfaces as indicated in the scheme and either used for electrophoresis and immunoblotting (lower panel) followed by quantitative determination of Sh proteins (upper panel) or for EM analysis (C and D). The concentration of Sh Kch to total membrane protein has been standardized to the value of the 8-12% fraction because this contains the highest concentration. The low amount isolated from the 16-20% interface preclude any accurate analysis of this fraction. B and C, EM micrographs of the membranes pelleted from P3 and the 8-12% fraction, respectively. Pictures were taken at magnification 25,000. Arrows point to a population of membrane vesicles enriched in that fraction. Bars correspond to 200 nm.



In order to further biochemically study the Sh Kch proteins, membrane fractions were solubilized. Most common biological detergents tested, including CHAPS, deoxycholate, Nonidet P-40, and Triton X-100, were efficient enough in solubilizing these channel proteins. As can be seen in Fig. 5A, increasing concentrations of detergents progressively solubilized Sh protein, reaching a plateau at around 50% of the channel proteins. Addition of either the same or other detergents to the insoluble fraction did not solubilize further significant amounts (Fig. 5B). This has lead to the conclusion that the detergent-resistant fraction of Sh Kch is the same for all nondenaturating detergents. In order for the solubilization to be completed, strong denaturating agents such as urea (Fig. 5B) or boiling in SDS had to be used. It must be also mentioned here that both solubilized and insoluble fractions have a very similar pattern of bands regardless of the detergent and concentration used (Fig. 5C), probably indicating that at least the most abundant Sh Kch isoforms are present with similar ratios in both fractions.


Figure 5: Solubilization of Shaker potassium channels proteins. A, total membranes of Drosophila head were solubilized with increasing concentrations of either deoxycholate or Triton X-100. Solubilized and insoluble fractions were analyzed by electrophoresis and Western blot and the relative amounts of Sh proteins determined by densitometry as explained elsewhere. B, sequential solubilization of membranes with two detergents were also carried out as schematically shown. Concentrations of detergents and other compounds are as indicated. The rest of experimental conditions are as those used for solubilization in a single step. C, detail at high magnification of a mono-dimensional immunoblot containing soluble and insoluble fractions generated with 0.3% deoxycholate.



Other well known voltage-sensitive channels such as sodium channels have shown a wide variety of post-translational modifications(35) . Here the biochemical characterization of post-translational modifications of Sh Kch has been initiated by studying its glycosylation. Because of probable interference of deoxycholate with some glycosydases, Triton X-100 soluble fractions were used for this purpose. As shown in Fig. 6, N-glycopeptidase F produces some sharpening and a clear shift of about 6 kDa to lower M(r) in all bands without any apparent change in the relative positions of the major bands. Other common glycosidase such as neuraminidase and O-glycosidase did not produce any apparent change in the electrophoretic mobility of Sh proteins (not shown), suggesting that they are only N-glycosidated and that, in contrast to rat brain potassium channels(36) , Sh Kch of Drosophila lack sialic acid in their carbohydrate chains.


Figure 6: Deglycosylation of Sh proteins. Triton X-100 solubilized head proteins were incubated in the absence (A) or presence (B) of endoglycosidase F/N-glycosidase F (see ``Experimental Procedures'') and analyzed by regular SDS-PAGE and Western blot as in previous experiments.




DISCUSSION

Multiple potassium channel isoforms can presumably be generated by splicing at the Shaker locus of Drosophila(12, 13, 14, 15) . This has raised the question of whether this theoretical repertoire of Sh Kch variants is in fact expressed and how it is used. With our immunochemical approach we have detected a high number of proteins in different anatomical and developmental preparations. The genetic control with Df flies makes the specificity of the detected proteins undoubtable, whereas the control with the mutant W32 demonstrates that the multiplicity of detected Sh peptides is at least in part generated by alternative splicing although post-translational modifications of Sh Kch may also contribute to the complexity of the electrophoretic pattern. Our results clearly contrast with work previously reported by other laboratories which, in spite of the diversity of cDNAs isolated, have shown single bands in Western blot analysis(19, 20) . This is most probably due to the increase in resolution of the electrophoretic techniques used and/or to a higher affinity of the antisera. As we have shown in this paper, the wide repertoire of Sh Kch isoforms in Drosophila is differentially expressed both as tissue as well as in a developmentally regulated manner. Previous reports using in situ hybridization(33) , polymerase chain reaction(37) , and reporter gene DNA engineering (38) have indicated that Shaker transcripts are differentially expressed in some Drosophila tissues. In other organisms where neuronal electrical recording is easier, sharp changes in the electrical properties of neurons take place throughout development together with abrupt changes in the densities and kinetics of potassium currents (see (39) for a recent review). In the same way, two Shaker potassium type A currents with different electrical properties were recorded during the differentiation of Drosophila myotubes showing a progressive replacement of an early type A current by a late mature one(34) . Therefore, our results demonstrating changes in the expression of Sh Kch isoforms during development probably reflect modifications in potassium conductance and, as a result, in the neuronal electrical properties. Further work with isoform specific antibodies will be necessary to identify the Sh Kch variants expressed in different tissues at developmentally defined stages.

Together with the regular full-length Sh transcripts previously described, the isolation of short Sh cDNAs that would theoretically produce truncated channel subunits has been reported by a few laboratories(3, 12, 13) . The fact that the corresponding short proteins were not detected in previous studies (19, 20) has made the actual existence of these truncated proteins doubtful until now. For the first time some specific short Sh proteins have been detected in this work. They most probably correspond to the so-called short Sh mRNAs under various criteria. First, their size (40-45 kDa) fit nicely with that deduced from the cDNAs having the first three (S1-S3) out of the six membrane expanding domains of a potassium channel subunit (3, 13) and the possibility of being glycosylated at the S1-S2 loop(5, 12, 13) . Second, they are detected by our antiserum alpha-ShHX1 which has been raised against a recombinant peptide which contains a cytoplasmic stretch common to all Sh isoforms, the S1 segment and the whole S1-S2 loop. Third, most short Sh peptides are eliminated by the mutation W32. Thus, our results are the first evidence for the existence of native truncated Sh proteins and raise the question of their biological role. Although it has here been demonstrated that the 45-kDa peptide reaches the plasma membrane, it is very unlikely that such a truncated Sh protein could drive a potassium current by itself since it lacks three (S4-S6) out of the six membrane expanding domains of a voltage-gated potassium channel subunit and consequently it is missing some of the most important structural features of a functional channel(6) . However, the short Sh protein does contain the complete N-terminal and S1 domain where the structural elements mostly responsible for the assembly of channel subunits have been localized(40, 41) . Accordingly, recombinantly produced short potassium channels insert in the membrane and seem to form heterotetramers with regular large subunits(42) . Coinjection in Xenopus oocytes of mRNAs corresponding to large and truncated Sh Kch produce a decrease in the expressed potassium current (41) suggesting a dominant-negative role. Transgenic flies carrying a heat inducible gene encoding a truncated Sh Kch together with regular doses of the wt gene show a Shaker phenotype after heat shock(43) . Interestingly, a truncated splice variant of the mouse Kv1-5 potassium channel also shows a dominant-negative effect (44) . A possible dominant-negative function of the truncated Sh Kch subunits is a very attractive hypothesis which needs to be further explored.

Our experiments have shown that the major Sh Kch proteins are evenly distributed in neuronal membranes of different composition and, therefore, strongly suggest a lack of subcellular segregation of major Sh isoforms. Conversely, as mentioned previously, there are reports indicating that certain Sh isoforms are differentially expressed in some areas of the nervous tissue and retina(33, 37, 38) . Nevertheless, our results are not in contradiction with those since extensive work on separation of nervous tissue membranes has demonstrated that fractionation by density centrifugation takes place more as a function of the subcellular nature of membranes than as a result of their cellular origin(29, 45) . In principle, an alternative explanation to our results can be that similar Sh Kch isoforms are detected in membranes at various steps of biosynthesis. However, this is very unlikely since immature channel proteins show a distinct electrophoretic mobility due to differential glycosylation(35, 46) .

The solubilization experiments carried out suggest that about half of the Sh Kch of adult fly brain remains anchored to some submembranous structures and in this way they are resistant to detergents. Other authors have found a similar percentage of solubilized channels in Shaker transfected cells(47) . Interestingly, our detergent resistant pool has the same pattern of Sh isoforms than the solubilized one. This suggests that the structural elements responsible for such an interaction must be within the region common to all Sh Kch subunits. Membrane-cytoskeleton interactions as those found for other ion channels and that seem to play an important role in their distribution and clustering (48, 49) appear as the most likely candidate.

Native Sh Kch proteins from Drosophila have been here demonstrated to be N-glycosylated. The equal shift to lower size of Sh proteins after complete enzymatic deglycosylation leads to the conclusion that at least the major Sh Kch isoforms are glycosylated to a similar extent and probably at the same site(s). However, the contribution of the carbohydrate chains to Sh Kch in different cellular systems (32, 46, 47) range from 16 to 44 kDa which is much greater than the 6 kDa that we have found in native channels. Two consensus sites for N-glycosylation can be found in the sequence of Shaker transcripts at the S1-S2 loop in a region common to all splice variants (5, 12, 13) and both are modified in Shaker channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes (32) and mammalian cells(46) . Unfortunately, with the present data we cannot determine whether one or both sites are glycosylated in the native Sh Kch.

We trust that the immunochemical approach used here can be generally applied to other channel molecules which have already been cloned and present serious difficulties in their standard purification.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by grants from the Direccion General de Investigacion Cientifica y Téchnica and the Comunidad de Madrid (to F. J. T.) and a predoctoral fellowship of Comunidad de Madrid (to O. R.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 34-1-585-4734; Fax: 34-1-585-4754; isrft15@cc.csic.es.

(^1)
The abbreviations use are: Sh, Shaker; Kch, potassium channels; B55, T(X,Y)B55; Df, Shaker deficient flies with the genotype B55^D/W32^P; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; W32, mutant flies with genotype T(X,Y)W32; CHAPS, 3-[(3-chloramidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are indebted to M. J. Chuliá for expert technical assistance and to A. Ferrús for fly stocks and fruitful discussions. We thank L. M. García-Segura, B. Hämmerle, and J. R. Rodriguez for their help with EM of membranes, to J. F. Santarén for his assistance in setting up bi-dimensional electrophoresis, and to J. A. Barbas and O. Pongs for critically reading this manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Hille, B. (1992) Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes, Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA
  2. Rudy, B. (1988) Neuroscience 25, 729-749 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Baumann, A., Krah-Jentgens, I., Müller, R., Müller-Holtkamp, F., Seidel, R., Kecskemethy, N., Casal, J., Ferrús, A., and Pongs, O. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 3419-3429
  4. Kamb, A., Iverson, L. E., and Tanouye, M. (1987) Cell 50, 405-413 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Tempel, B. L., Papazian, D. M., Schwarz, T. L., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1987) Science 237, 770-775 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Miller, C. (1991) Science 252, 1092-1096 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Jan, L. Y., and Jan, Y. N. (1992) Cell 69, 715-718 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Rehm, H., and Betz, H. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 6865-6869 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Rehm, H., and Lazdunski, M. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 4919-4923 [Abstract]
  10. Parcej, D. N., and Dolly, J. O. (1989) Biochem. J. 257, 899-903 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. García-Calvo, M., Knaus, H.-G., McManus, O. B., Giangiacomo, K. M., Kaczorowski, G. J., and García, M. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 676-682 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kamb, A., Tseng-Crank, J., and Tanouye, M. (1988) Neuron 1, 421-430 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Pongs, O., Kecskemethy, N., Müller, R., Krah-Jentgens, I., Baumann, A., Kiltz, H. H., Canal, I., Llamazares, S., and Ferrús, A. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 1087-1096 [Abstract]
  14. Schwarz, T. L., Tempel, B. L., Papazian, D. M., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1988) Nature 331, 137-142 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Iverson, L. E., Tanouye, M., Lester, H. A., Davidson, N., and Rudy, B. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 5723-5727 [Abstract]
  16. Timpe, L. C., Schwarz, T. L., Tempel, B. L., Papazian, D. M., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1988) Nature 331, 143-145 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. MacKinnon, R. (1991) Nature 350, 232-235 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Isacoff, E. Y., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1990) Nature 345, 530-534 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Barbas, J. A., Rubio, N., Pedroso, E., Pongs, O., and Ferrús, A. (1989) Mol. Brain Res. 5, 171-176 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Schwarz, T. L., Papazian, D. M., Carretto, R. C., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1990) Neuron 4, 119-127 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  22. Stanley, K. K., and Luzio, J. P. (1984) EMBO J. 3, 1429-1434 [Abstract]
  23. Harlow, E., and Lane, D. (1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  24. Ferrús, A., Llamazares, S., de la Pompa, J. L., Tanouye, M. A., and Pongs, O. (1990) Genetics 125, 383-398 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Kyte, J., and Rodriguez, H. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 133, 515-522 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. O'Farrell, P. H. (1975) J. Biol. Chem. 250, 4007-4021 [Abstract]
  28. Santarén, J. F., and Bravo, R. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 877-882 [Abstract]
  29. Breer, H., and Knipper, M. (1985) in Neurochemical Techniques in Insect Research, pp. 125-155, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
  30. Schmidt, J. W., Rossie, S., and Catterall, W. A. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 4847-4851 [Abstract]
  31. Passafaro, M., Clementi, F., Pollo, A., Carbone, E., and Sher, E. (1994) Neuron 12, 317-326 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Santacruz-Toloza, L., Huang, Y., John, S. A., and Papazian, D. M. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 5607-5613 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Tseng-Crank, J., Pollock, J. A., Hayashi, I., and Tanouye, M. A. (1991) J. Neurogenet. 7, 229-239 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Broadie, K. S., and Bate, M. (1993) J. Neurosci. 13, 167-180 [Abstract]
  35. Schmidt, J. W., and Catterall, W. A. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 13713-13723 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Rehm, H. (1989) FEBS Lett. 247, 28-30 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Hardie, R. C., Voss, D., Pong, O., and Laughlin, S. B. (1991) Neuron 6, 477-486 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Mottes, J. R., and Iverson, L. E. (1995) Neuron 14, 613-623 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Spitzer, C. N. (1991) J. Neurobiology 22, 659-673 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Li, M., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1992) Science 257, 1225-1230 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Babila, T., Moscucci, A., Wang, H., Weaver, F. E., and Koren, G. (1994) Neuron 12, 615-626 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Shen, N. V., Chen, X., Boyer, M. M., and Pfaffinger, P. J. (1993) Neuron 11, 67-76 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Gisselman, G., Sewing, S., Madsen, B. W., Mallart, A., Angaut-Petit, D., Müller-Holtkamp, F., Ferrús, A., and Pongs, O. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 2359-2364 [Abstract]
  44. Attali, B., Lesage, F., Ziliani, P., Guillemare, E., Honoré, E., Waldmann, R., Hugnot, J. P., Mattei, M. G., Lazdunski, M., and Barhanin, J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 24283-24289 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Whittaker, V. P. (1965) Prog. Biophys. Met. Biol. 15, 39-97
  46. Schulteis, C. T., John, S. A., Huang, Y., Tang, C. Y., and Papazian, D. M. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 1725-1733 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Sun, T., Naini, A. A., and Miller, C. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 9992-9999 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Flucher, B. E., and Daniels, M. P. (1989) Neuron 3, 163-175 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Srinivasan, Y., Elmer, L., Davis, J., Bennett, V., and Angelides, K. (1988) Nature 333, 177-180 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.