©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Demonstration That Mutation of the Type II Transforming Growth Factor Receptor Inactivates Its Tumor Suppressor Activity in Replication Error-positive Colon Carcinoma Cells (*)

(Received for publication, May 26, 1995; and in revised form, July 19, 1995)

Jing Wang (1)(§)(¶) LuZhe Sun (1)(§)(**) Lois Myeroff (3) Xiaofan Wang (2) Larry E. Gentry (1) Junhua Yang (1) Jiurong Liang (1) Elizabeth Zborowska (3) Sanford Markowitz (3) James K. V. Willson (3) Michael G. Brattain (1)(§§)

From the  (1)Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, Ohio 43699, the (2)Department of Pharmacology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, and the (3)Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Escape from negative growth regulation by transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) as a result of the loss of TGF-beta type II receptor (RII) expression has been found to be associated with the replication error (RER) colorectal cancer genotype, which is characteristic of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancers. The RER-positive HCT 116 colon carcinoma cell line was examined for RII mutations. A 1-base deletion was found within a sequence of 10 repeating adenines (nucleotides 709-718), which resulted in a frameshift mutation. Although it is reasonable to predict that the loss of RII function would be an important determinant of malignancy, the large number of potential mutations in cells of this phenotype raises the possibility that an RII mutation may not be a key event in the tumorigenic phenotype of these cells. One way to test directly the importance of RII mutations in determining the malignant phenotype would be to restore its expression. If restoration of expression leads to diminished tumorigenicity, it would indicate that RII mutation is an important determinant of malignancy in the RER phenotype. To determine whether restoration of RII would lead to reversal of malignancy in RER colon cancers, an RII expression vector was transfected into the HCT 116 cell line. RII stable clones showed mRNA and protein expression of transfected RII. The fibronectin mRNA level was increased by exogenous TGF-beta(1) treatment in a dose-dependent manner in RII-positive clones, whereas the control cells remained insensitive. The RII transfectants showed reduced clonogenicity in both monolayer culture and soft agarose. They were growth arrested at a lower saturation density than control cells. TGF-beta(1)-neutralizing antibody stimulated the proliferation of RII-transfected but not control cells, indicating that the alterations in the growth parameters of the transfected cells were due to the acquisition of autocrine-negative activity. Tumorigenicity in athymic mice was reduced and delayed in RII transfectants. These results indicate that reconstitution of TGF-beta autocrine activity by reexpression of RII can reverse malignancy in RER colon cancers, thus verifying that the malignancy of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer can be directly associated with the loss of RII expression.


INTRODUCTION

Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) (^1)is a multifunctional polypeptide that regulates a number of cellular processes including growth, differentiation, deposition of the extracellular matrix, and immunosuppression (Roberts and Sporn, 1991; Massagué, 1990; Moses et al., 1990). TGF-beta exerts its effects through binding to specific cell surface proteins. Three major types of TGF-beta receptors have been identified in most cells by receptor affinity labeling assays (Roberts and Sporn, 1991; Massagué, 1990). These receptors have been termed type I (RI), type II (RII), and type III (RIII). RI and RII are glycoproteins of 53 and 75 kDa, respectively, whereas RIII is a proteoglycan of 280-330 kDa. Both RI and RII are transmembrane serine/threonine kinase receptors indispensable for TGF-beta signaling (Lin et al., 1992; Wrana et al., 1992; Franzén et al., 1993; Bassing et al., 1994). RIII is a membrane protein lacking a cytoplasmic protein kinase domain (Wang et al., 1991; Morén et al., 1992). The direct involvement of RI and RII in TGF-beta signal transduction would suggest that loss of functional RI and/or RII expression could contribute to the loss of TGF-beta responsiveness.

An important feature of normal growth regulation is the balance of autocrine-negative and -positive signals regulating the cell cycle. TGF-beta has been shown to act as an autocrine-negative growth regulator as evidenced by TGF-beta-neutralizing antibody stimulation of several cell lines (Arteaga et al., 1990; Hafez et al., 1990; Singh et al., 1990). Accordingly, cells that lose the ability to express or respond to TGF-beta are more likely to exhibit uncontrolled growth and to become tumorigenic. Previous work in our laboratory showed that repression of endogenous TGF-beta expression by antisense TGF-beta(1) RNA led to malignant progression of colon cancer cells (Wu et al., 1992, 1993). TGF-beta antisense transfected cells retained sensitivity to exogenous TGF-beta, thus suggesting that the loss of autocrine TGF-beta function was a key feature in the development of these transfectants to a more progressed phenotype. The loss of TGF-beta receptors in association with the inability to respond to TGF-beta has been reported for some tumor cell lines (Arteaga et al., 1988; Kimchi et al., 1988). In particular, some strains of MCF-7 cells appear to be resistant to TGF-beta because of the loss of RII expression (Arteaga et al., 1993; Sun et al., 1994). Reconstitution of the autocrine TGF-beta loop by reexpression of TGF-beta receptors in this breast cancer cell line restored TGF-beta sensitivity and reversed malignancy (Sun et al., 1994). Reexpression of RII by complementation of a bladder cancer and a colon carcinoma cell line also led to reversal of tumorigenicity (Geiser et al., 1992). Transfection of an RII expression vector into a human hepatoma cell line with a receptor defect restored TGF-beta sensitivity, but in vivo tumorigenicity was not addressed in this study (Inagaki et al., 1993). Taken together, these studies indicated that TGF-beta has a significant suppressive role in malignancy.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer has been found to have a high incidence of microsatellite instability (termed RER), which is characterized by genetic alteration of simple repeated sequences (Aaltonen et al., 1993, 1994; Thibodeau et al., 1993; Lindbolm et al., 1993). Recently, RER was found to be associated with mismatch repair defects, which are responsible for markedly elevated gene mutation rates (Aaltonen et al., 1994; Fishel et al., 1993; Leach et al., 1993). We have shown that TGF-beta RII is a downstream mutation target resulting in the disruption of growth regulation of this hereditary form of colon cancer in both cell lines and primary tissues as 9 of 10 RER tumors showed loss of RII transcript, whereas 48 of 53 non-RER tumors expressed the receptor mRNA (Markowitz et al., 1995). Disruption of the RII gene has been noted in gastric cancer, which also has a high incidence of RER (Park et al., 1994; Eshleman and Markowitz, 1995). These studies indicate that RII is a tumor repressor gene in gastrointestinal cancers.

RII is of particular interest as a suppressor gene because of the negative growth regulatory activity of TGF-beta. In view of the association of the RER colorectal cancer phenotype with the loss of RII, it is important to determine whether reconstitution of RII would lead to reversal of tumorigenicity. This would provide direct evidence that RII mutation and/or loss of transcript contributes to the malignancy of this hereditary form of cancer. In this report we describe mutation of RII in the RER-positive HCT 116 colon cancer cell line. Stable transfection of an RII expression vector into HCT 116 cells reversed both in vitro and in vivo malignant properties, thus indicating that the malignancy of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is directly associated with loss of RII expression.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Culture

The HCT 116 human colon carcinoma cell line was established in vitro from a primary tumor and maintained as described previously (Brattain et al., 1984; Boyd et al., 1988). HCT 116 clones were obtained by limiting dilution in 96-well tissue culture plates at a density of 0.5 cells/well.

RII cDNA Sequencing

RII from cell line HCT 116 and normal tissue control was isolated as follows. Five µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA with murine Moloney leukemia virus reverse transcriptase primed with random hexamers. One-fourth of the cDNA reaction was used in a polymerase chain reaction with the sense primer 297 (5`-CGCTGGGGGCTCGGTCTATG-3`) and the antisense primer 55 (5`-CCACTGTCTCAAACTGCTCT-3`) using the cycle 95 °C for 30 s, 61 °C for 1 min, 70 °C for 3 min for 35 cycles, followed by a 70 °C 10-min final extension. The 861-bp product covering the 5` half of the RII coding region was purified by electrophoresis on a SeaPlaque low melting agarose gel and Elutip (Schleicher & Schüll). The purified product was then sequenced directly with Sequenase using the (antisense) primer 847 (5`-CTGATGCCTGTCACTTGAAA-3`) and electrophoresed on a 6% polyacrylamide, 7 M urea gel.

RII Transfection

The TGF-beta RII cDNA (3 kilobases) was cloned into the pRC/CMV expression vector (Invitrogen) as described previously (Lin et al., 1992). The plasmid (10 µg) was linearized and transfected into a typical limiting dilution clone from HCT 116. Electroporation was carried out at 250 V, 960 microfarads with a Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad). The control cells were similarly transfected with 10 µg pRC/CMV plasmid lacking the RII cDNA.

RNA Analysis

To determine TGF-beta(1), RI, and RII mRNA levels, RNase protection assays were performed as described previously (Wu et al., 1993; Sun et al., 1994). The RII riboprobe plasmid was constructed by inserting a piece of human RII cDNA from the 5` end of the expression vector into the pBSK(-) plasmid. This piece of DNA contained 264 bp of human RII cDNA and 18 bp of vector DNA. The vector DNA is transcribed into recombinant RNA when the RII expression vector is transfected into HCT 116 cells. As a result, the transfected mRNA could be distinguished from the endogenous RII mRNA because the antisense riboprobe synthesized by T3 RNA polymerase in vitro protected a larger fragment (282 bp) when hybridized with transfected RII mRNA than when hybridized with the endogenous 264-bp RII mRNA (Sun et al., 1994). The P-labeled probes were hybridized with 40 µg of total RNA. The hybridization mixture was then digested with RNase A and RNase T1 followed by proteinase K treatment. The protected fragments of the probes were analyzed by urea-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by autoradiography. Actin mRNA protected by an actin riboprobe was used to normalize sample loading as described previously (Wu et al., 1993).

To study the effect of exogenous TGF-beta(1) on fibronectin expression, exponentially growing RII clones and the NEO pool were treated with various concentrations of TGF-beta(1) for 24 h. Total RNA was then extracted for detection of fibronectin mRNA using an RNase protection assay. The fibronectin antisense riboprobe for RNase protection assay was synthesized in vitro from a 232-bp BamHI-PvuII fragment of human fibronectin cDNA inserted into pGEM3Z(-) plasmid using T7 RNA polymerase.

Receptor Cross-linking

Simian recombinant TGF-beta(1) was purified from conditioned medium of transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells as described by Gentry et al.(1988). Purified TGF-beta(1) was iodinated by the chloramine-T method (Ruff and Rizzino, 1986). The cell monolayers were incubated with 400 pMI-TGF-beta(1) on 35-mm tissue culture wells at 4 °C for 3.5 h with shaking followed by cross-linking with disuccinimidyl suberate (Segarini et al., 1987). Labeled cell monolayers were solubilized in 200 µl of 1% Triton X-100 containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Equal amounts of cell lysate protein were electrophoresed on a 4-10% gradient sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing conditions and exposed for autoradiography.

Plating Efficiency Assay

To study the effects of RII expression on clonogenic potential at low seeding density, HCT 116 RII transfectants and control cells were plated in 24-well plates at a density of 300 cells/well with McCoy's serum-free medium. TGF-beta(1)-neutralizing antibody (R& Systems, Minneapolis) was added to the medium at a final concentration of 10 µg/ml to determine the autocrine TGF-beta activity. Cell colonies were visualized by staining with MTT (Sigma).

Soft Agarose Assays

Soft agarose assays were performed as described previously (Wu et al., 1992) to compare the clonogenic potential of control and RII-transfected cells in semisolid medium. Briefly, cells were suspended at 3 times 10^3 cells/ml in 1 ml of 0.4% SeaPlaque agarose in McCoy's 5A serum-free medium and plated on top of 1 ml of 0.8% agarose in the same medium in triplicate in six-well tissue culture plates. Plates were incubated for 2-3 weeks at 37 °C with 5% CO(2) in a humidified incubator. Cell colonies were visualized by staining with 0.5 ml of p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet staining (Sigma).

Tumorigenicity

Tumorigenicity studies were performed as described previously (Wu et al., 1992, 1993; Sun et al., 1994). Briefly, cells from exponential cultures of HCT 116 transfectants and control cells were inoculated subcutaneously behind the anterior forelimb of 4-week-old athymic mice (athymic nu/nu-CWRU, Cancer Center athymic mouse colony). Mice were maintained in a pathogen-free environment. Growth curves for xenografts were determined by externally measuring tumors in two dimensions. Volume was determined by the equation V = (L times W^2) times 0.5, where V = volume, L = length, and W = width.


RESULTS

Mutation of RII

The wild type RII cDNA has a repeat sequence of 10 adenines at nucleotides 709-718 ( Fig. 1and Lin et al., 1992). Sequencing of the 5` half of RII cDNA from the RER-positive HCT 116 cells showed a homozygous loss of one A (no wild type sequences detected) in the polyadenine tracts (Fig. 1). This mutation predicts an inactive truncated receptor of 161 amino acids, with the terminal 34 amino acids different from the wild type sequence. Similar RII mutations resulting from 1- and 2-bp deletions within this poly(A) tract have been detected previously in both RER-positive colon cancer cells and primary RER-positive colon cancer tissues (Markowitz et al., 1995). It has been shown that frameshift mutations located in the 5` half of mRNA transcripts can accelerate the decay of mRNAs (Hagan et al., 1995). This likely accounts for the reduced RII transcript levels in HCT116 (Fig. 2) and in previously characterized RER-positive colon cancer cell lines with similar RII mutations.


Figure 1: Mutant RII sequence in HCT 116 cells. Five µg of total RNA from HCT 116 cells was transcribed into cDNA by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' The purified product was then sequenced directly with Sequenase using the antisense primer and electrophoresed on a 6% polyacrylamide, 7 M urea gel. The sequence from this primer covers the polyadenine tract (nucleotides 709-718).




Figure 2: Expression of TGF-beta RII mRNA in HCT 116 transfectants. A typical HCT 116 limiting dilution clone was stably transfected with an RII expression vector and selected in geneticin. The stable clones (designated RII clone 17, 21, 26, and 37) were compared with the NEO transfection control pool for RII mRNA levels by RNase protection assay. Endogenous RI, RII, TGF-beta(1), and transfected RII mRNA levels are shown. Actin mRNA levels were used for normalization.



Expression of RII

Several positive clones (designated as RII clones 17, 21, 26 and 37) with varying levels of transfected RII mRNA expression were obtained (Fig. 2). RII clones 17 and 37 expressed the highest levels of transfected RII. A pool of control plasmid-transfected clones (the NEO pool) expressed little or no endogenous RII mRNA. Consistent with mRNA levels, RII clones 17 and 37 also expressed the highest levels of RII protein as shown by receptor cross-linking assays (Fig. 3, from left, second, fourth, fifth, and sixth lanes), whereas the cell surface receptor expression of RII was undetectable in the NEO pool (Fig. 3, first lane). It appears that restoration of RII expression increased cell surface expression of RI, which is consistent with previous reports that the presence of RII is required for TGF-beta binding to RI (Wrana et al., 1992). The specificity of RI and RII was shown by competing I-TGF-beta(1) binding to RI and RII with 50-fold unlabeled TGF-beta(1) (Fig. 3, third lane). This indicated that transfected RII can be expressed and bind ligand in HCT 116.


Figure 3: Cell surface expression of TGF-beta receptors in HCT 116 transfectants. Receptor cross-linking assays were used to verify cell surface expression of RII. Confluent monolayer cultures of HCT 116 NEO pool and RII clones 17, 21, 26, and 37 were incubated with 400 pMI-TGF-beta(1) alone (from left, first, second, fourth, fifth, and sixth lanes) or in the presence of 20 nM cold TGF-beta(1) (third lane) as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Electrophoresis of 150 µg of protein was performed (4-10% gradient sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing conditions).



Increased Fibronectin mRNA Expression

We determined whether expression of RII, as well as increased TGF-beta binding to RI, could restore the TGF-beta sensitivity of the RII transfectants. One of the cellular responses to TGF-beta is induction of fibronectin expression (Ignotz and Massagué, 1986). Consequently, exponential phase RII clone 17 and the NEO pool were treated with 1.0 and 5.0 ng/ml TGF-beta(1) for 24 h. Fibronectin mRNA levels increased in RII-transfected cells in a dose-dependent manner, whereas fibronectin mRNA levels remained the same in the NEO pool cells (Fig. 4). Similar results were also observed in RII clone 37. These observations indicated that RII expression in HCT 116 cells restored TGF-beta(1) sensitivity of extracellular matrix (ECM)-associated molecules (ECM pathway).


Figure 4: Fibronectin mRNA induction by TGF-beta(1) in HCT 116 RII transfectants. HCT 116 NEO pool and RII clone 17 were treated in log phase with 0, 1.0, and 5.0 ng/ml TGF-beta(1) for 24 h. Total RNA was isolated, and RNase protection assay for fibronectin was performed. Actin mRNA levels were used for normalization.



Growth Arrest at Low Cell Density

Growth curves for RII clones 17 and 37 and the NEO pool were generated to determine whether RII expression led to alteration of growth parameters in tissue culture (Fig. 5). Growth rates in the exponential growth phase were essentially similar for the NEO pool and RII clones, but some delay in reaching log phase was observed in RII transfectants. The NEO pool had a slightly higher saturation density than the RII-transfected clones.


Figure 5: Growth curves of HCT 116 NEO pool (box) and RII clones 17 () and 37 (). Cells were plated at 1,500 cells/well in 96-well plates in 0.1 ml of serum-free medium. The relative cell number was determined using the MTT assay (Carmichael et al., 1987). Values are means ± S.E. of 12 replicates.



Plating Efficiency Assay

To assess further the effects of RII expression on cell growth properties, we compared the ability of the control and RII-transfected cells to expand and form colonies at low seeding density. As shown in Fig. 6, RII clones 17 and 37 showed a significant reduction of cloning efficiency (38 and 22% of that of the NEO pool, respectively). HCT 116 cells expressed high levels of TGF-beta(1) mRNA (Fig. 2) and secreted TGF-beta(1) protein (0.4 ng/ml/10^6 cells). Taken together with the growth curves, it suggested that endogenous TGF-beta was acting in an autocrine-negative manner to inhibit cell proliferation. If this were true, TGF-beta-neutralizing antibody should be able to uncouple the TGF-beta autocrine loop and increase cell proliferation as described previously (Wu et al., 1992, 1993). TGF-beta(1)-neutralizing antibody increased RII clone 17 cloning efficiency as reflected by increases in the number and size of colonies relative to the control antibody-treated RII clone 17 cells (Fig. 7A). The proliferation of RII clone 17 was stimulated by 60% after neutralizing antibody treatment, whereas the NEO pool showed no significant response (Fig. 7B). Similar results were seen with RII clone 37 (data not shown).


Figure 6: Plating efficiency of HCT 116 NEO control and RII clones 17 and 37. Cells were plated in 24-well plates at 300 cells/well in 1 ml of McCoy's 5A serum-free medium. Cell colonies were observed by MTT staining after 2 weeks of incubation. This was followed by suspension in dimethyl sulfoxide. Relative cell numbers were then determined by the resultant absorbance at 595 nm. Values are the means ± S.E. of four replicates.




Figure 7: Autocrine TGF-beta activity in HCT 116 RII transfectants. HCT 116 NEO pool and RII clone 17 cells were plated in 24-well plates at 300 cells/well in the presence of 10 µg/ml normal IgG or 10 µg/ml TGF-beta(1)-neutralizing antibody. Cell colonies were stained and photographed, and the relative cell number was determined as described in Fig. 6after a 2-week incubation. Panel A depicts the effectiveness of the TGF-beta(1)-neutralizing antibody in the clonogenicity of RII clone 17. Panel B shows the quantitation of the colony formation of the NEO pool and RII clone 17 cells. Stimulation by TGF-beta(1)-neutralizing antibody is expressed as the percent increase of absorbance relative to normal IgG-treated cells. The values are the means ± S.E. of four replicates.



Anchorage-independent Growth

The ability to form colonies in soft agarose is reflective of malignant transformation. Therefore, to assess the effect of the restoration of autocrine TGF-beta activity on the malignant properties of HCT 116 RII transfectants, we compared the ability of the NEO pool and RII-transfected clones to form colonies in soft agarose. As shown in Fig. 8, RII clones 17 and 37 had a significantly lower cloning efficiency in semisolid medium than the NEO pool.


Figure 8: Anchorage-independent colony formation in soft agarose of HCT 116 NEO control and RII transfectants. Exponentially growing cells (3 times 10^3) were suspended in 1 ml of 0.4% SeaPlaque agarose in McCoy's 5A serum-free medium and plated on top of a 1-ml underlayer of 0.8% agarose in the same medium in a six-well plate. Cell colonies were visualized by staining with 0.5 ml of p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet after 2 weeks of incubation.



Tumorigenicity

Reduction of the ability for anchorage-independent growth suggested that restoration of autocrine TGF-beta activity might also render HCT 116 cells less tumorigenic. To test this hypothesis, we inoculated exponentially growing cells of the NEO pool and RII clones 17 and 37 into nude mice at 5 times 10^6 cells/site and followed progression of xenograft formation. The NEO pool cells formed xenografts in 10 of 10 inoculation sites, and all grew rapidly. Xenograft formation of RII clones 17 and 37 was delayed compared with the NEO pool (Fig. 9). The time needed to form xenografts of >100 mm^3 was 4 days for the NEO pool and 14 days for RII clones 17 and 37; once formed, RII clones 17 and 37 tumors grew at a slower rate than the NEO pool tumors. By day 20, the xenograft size of RII clones 17 and 37 was less than 20% of that of the NEO pool. The experiments assessing the tumorigenicity of RII clones 17 and 37 were performed at different times. Consequently, curves of the NEO controls in these two separate experiments are shown in Fig. 9. This provides a demonstration of the reproducibility of this model system.


Figure 9: Xenograft formation by HCT 116 NEO pool and RII clones 17 and 37. Exponentially growing cells (5 times 10^6) were inoculated subcutaneously in athymic nude mice. Tumors were measured externally on the indicated days in two dimensions using calipers. Tumor volume was determined by the equation V = (L times W^2) times 0.5, where L = the length and W = the width of the tumor. Values are the means ± S.E. of 10 xenografts. Experiments for RII clones 17 and 37 were performed at different times; consequently, the NEO control for each experiment is shown.




DISCUSSION

Many cancers are believed to develop through a series of sequential pathologic steps (Filmus and Kerbel, 1993) that reflect the progressive accumulation of mutations (Fearon and Vogelstein, 1990). Early malignant models of colorectal carcinoma, which are unaggressive and well differentiated, retain some responsiveness to TGF-beta growth inhibition, whereas their highly aggressive counterparts do not (Hoosein et al., 1989). Several studies have shown that the progression from adenomas to carcinomas is accompanied by a reduced responsiveness to the growth inhibitory effects to TGF-beta (Hoosein et al., 1989; Manning et al., 1991; Markowitz et al., 1994). Since malignant progression in cancer is thought to be related to an accumulation of genetic defects, it was of interest to correlate TGF-beta resistance to specific gene mutations or alterations of gene expression. An obvious mechanism that can be proposed when cells develop resistance to TGF-beta effects is the loss or significant reduction of TGF-beta receptor expression. Our recent studies showed that TGF-beta RII, but not RI, can be a downstream mutation target in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancers which are characterized by high incidence of RER. Although inactivation of TGF-beta RII correlated with DNA repair-defective RER colon tumors (Markowitz et al., 1995), it had not been shown that the loss of the receptor had a direct impact on the malignant phenotype of the cells. To show that the loss of RII expression is directly associated with malignancy of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, we restored RII expression in HCT 116 cells. Our results showed that RII expression led to reconstitution of a TGF-beta autocrine-negative loop in HCT 116 cells and reversed both its in vitro and in vivo malignant properties.

In addition to restoration of autocrine-negative activity, the RII-transfected cells displayed sensitivity to exogenous TGF-beta for induction of the ECM pathway. However, RII-transfected cells were insensitive to growth inhibition by exogenous TGF-beta (data not shown). Segregation of growth inhibition and ECM protein induction in response to exogenous TGF-beta has been observed in other colon carcinoma cells (Geiser et al., 1992) as well as other model systems (Ebner et al., 1993). As such, the TGF-beta signal transduction pathways for these two types of TGF-beta responses may diverge downstream of receptor binding, and the effectors of ECM induction may be more sensitive than growth inhibition effectors. The ECM response is completely absent from untransfected HCT 116 cells, whereas RII clone 26 with a low level of exogenous RII expression showed only 20% as much induction of fibronectin as RII clones 17 and 37 following TGF-beta treatment. Thus, the ECM response appears to be a function of available receptors in this model system. Exogenous TGF-beta may not be inhibitory because the pathways capable of transducing the inhibitory pathway are saturated by the endogenous TGF-beta produced by HCT 116 RII-transfected cells, whereas pathways capable of transducing the ECM pathway are not saturated by these levels of TGF-beta and hence are capable of responding to exogenous TGF-beta(1). For example, HCT 116 cells may have a low potential for induction of cdk inhibitors such as p15 or p27 (Ewen et al., 1993; Hannon and Beach, 1994; Polyak et al., 1994a; Slingerland et al., 1994) which allows for saturation of the pathway by autocrine-negative TGF-beta activity. Presumably, the ECM pathway would not be dependent upon the induction of these inhibitors but rather upon specific transactivation factors associated with ECM molecule transcription (Polyak et al., 1994b).

Our finding that the tumorigenicity of HCT 116 is reversible upon restoration of wild type RII expression establishes that RII is a tumor suppressor gene in RER colon cancer. Thus the inactivation of RII in HCT 116 by a 1-base truncation of a polyadenylate sequence is an event that directly promotes tumor progression. Deletions and insertions in repetitive DNA sequences are characteristic of RER tumors (Ionov et al., 1993; Aaltonen et al., 1993; Kim et al., 1994), and the shortening of polyadenylate sequences in RER tumors is particularly common (Chen et al., 1995). The occurrence of a polyadenylate tract within the RII coding region thus renders it particularly vulnerable to mutation in a cell with the RER mutator phenotype. RII inactivation is thus both a consequence of the RER mutator defect and a mechanism by which the RER defect is able to drive tumor progression forward.


FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants CA38173 and CA50457 (to M. G. B.), CA60848 (to L. E. G.), CA63480 (to L. S.), CA51504 and CA57208 (to S. M.), P01 CA51183 (to J. K. V. W. and S. M.), and P30CA4370301 (to the Case Western Reserve University Cancer Center) and by United States Army Grant DAMD17-94-J-4065 (to X. W.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
These authors contributed equally to the work.

Performed as part of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree at the Medical College of Ohio.

**
Present address: Dept. of Pharmacology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY 40536.

§§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 419-381-4324; Fax: 419-382-7395.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: TGF-beta, transforming growth factor beta; RI, RII, and RIII, receptor types I, II, and III, respectively; RER, replication error(s); bp, base pair(s); MTT, (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide); ECM, extracellular matrix.


REFERENCES

  1. Aaltonen, L. A., Paltomaki, P., Leach, F. S., Sistonen, P., Pylkkanen, L., Mecklin, J. P., Jarvinen, H., Powell, S. M., Jen, J., Hamilton, S. R., Petersen, G. M., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., and de la Chapelle, A. (1993) Science 260,812-816 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Aaltonen, L. A., Peltomaki, P., Mecklin, J. P., Jarvinen, H., Jass, J. R., Green, J. S., Lynch, H. T., Watson, P., Tallqvist, G., Juhola, M., Sistonen, P., Hamilton, S. R., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., and de la Chapelle, A. (1994) Cancer Res. 54,1645-1648 [Abstract]
  3. Arteaga, C. L., Tandon, A. K., VonHoff, D. D., and Osborne, C. K. (1988) Cancer Res. 48,3898-3904 [Abstract]
  4. Arteaga, C. L., Coffey, R. J., Jr., Dugger, T. C., McCutchen, C. M., Moses, H. L., and Lyons, R. M. (1990) Cell Growth & Differ. 1,367-374
  5. Arteaga, C. L., Carty-Dugger, T., Moses, H. L., Hurd, S. D., and Pietenpol, J. A. (1993) Cell Growth & Differ. 4,193-201
  6. Bassing, C. H., Yingling, J. M., Howe, D. J., Wang, T., He, W. W., Gustafson, M. L., Shah, P., Donahoe, P. K., and Wang, X.-F. (1994) Science 263,87-89 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Boyd, D., Levine, A. E., Brattain, D. E., McKnight, M. K., and Brattain, M. G. (1988) Cancer Res. 48,2469-2474 [Abstract]
  8. Brattain, M. G., Levine, A. E., Chakrabarty, S., Yeoman, L. C., Willson, J. K. V., and Long, B. (1984) Cancer Metastasis Rev. 3,177-191 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Carmichael, J., DeGraff, W. G., Gazdar, A. F., Mina, J. D., and Mitchell, J. B. (1987) Cancer Res. 47,936-942 [Abstract]
  10. Chen, J., Heerdt, B., and Augenlicht, L. (1995) Cancer Res. 55,174-180 [Abstract]
  11. Ebner, R., Chen, R.-H., Lawler, S., Zioncheck, T., and Derynck, R. (1993) Science 262,900-902 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Eshleman, J., and Markowitz, S. (1995) Curr. Opin. Oncol. 7,83-89 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Ewen, M. E., Sluss, H. K., Whitehouse, L. L., and Livingston, D. M. (1993) Cell 74,1009-1020 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Fearon, E. R., and Vogelstein, B. (1990) Cell 61,759-767 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Filmus, J., and Kerbel, R. S. (1993) Curr. Opin. Oncol. 5,123-129 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Fishel, R., Lescoe, M. K., Rao, M. R. S., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., Garber, J., Kane, M., and Kolodner, R. (1993) Cell 75,1027-1038 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Franzén, P., ten Dijke, P., Ichijo, H., Yamashita, H., Schulz, P., Helden, C.-H., and Miyazono, K. (1993) Cell 75,681-692 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Geiser, A., Burmester, J., Webbink, R., Roberts, A. B., and Sporn, M. B. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267,2588-2593 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Gentry, L. E., Lioubin, M. N., Purchio, A. F., and Marquardt, H. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8,4162-4168 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Hafez, M. M., Infante, D., Winawer, S., and Friedman, E. (1990) Cell Growth & Differ. 1,617-626
  21. Hagan, K. W., Ruiz-Echevarria, M. J., Quan, Y., and Peltz, S. W. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15,809-823 [Abstract]
  22. Hannon, G. J., and Beach, D. (1994) Nature 371,257-261 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Hoosein, N. M., McKnight, M. K., Levine, A. E., Mulder, K. M., Childress, K. E., Brattain, D. E., and Brattain, M. G. (1989) Exp. Cell Res. 181,442-453 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Ignotz, R. A., and Massagué, J. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261,4337-4345 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Inagaki, M., Moustakas, A., Lin, H. Y., Lodish, H. F., and Carr, B. I. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90,5359-5363 [Abstract]
  26. Ionov, Y., Peinado, M. A., Malkhosyan, S., Shibata, D., and Perucho, M. (1993) Nature 363,558-561 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Kim, H., Jen, J., Vogelstein, B., and Hamilton, S. R. (1994) Am. J. Pathol. 145,148-156 [Abstract]
  28. Kimchi, A., Wang, X.-F., Weinberg, R. A., Cheifetz, S., and Massagué, J. (1988) Science 240,196-198 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Leach, F. S., Nicolaides, N. C., Papadopoulous, N., Liu, B., Jen, J., Parsons, R., Peltomaki, P., Sistonen, T., Aaltonen, L. A., Nystrom-Lahti, M., Guan, X.-Y., Zhang, J., Meltzer, P. S., Yu, J.-W., Kao, F.-T., Chen, D. J., Cerosaletti, K. M., Fournier, R. E. K., Todd, S., Lewis, T., Leach, R. J., Naylor, S. L., Weissenbach, J., Mecklin, J.-P., Jarvinen, H., Peterson, G. M., Hamilton, S. R., Green, J., Jass, J., Watson, P., Lynch, H. T., Trent, J. M., de la Chapelle, A., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1993) Cell 75, 1215-1225 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Lin, H. Y., Wang, X.-F., Ng-Eaton, E., Weinberg, R. A., and Lodish, H. F. (1992) Cell 68,775-785 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Lindbolm, A., Tannergard, P., Werelius, B., and Nordenskjold, M. (1993) Nature Genet. 5,279-283 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Manning, A. M., Williams, A. C., Game, S. M., and Paraskeva, C. (1991) Oncogene 6,1471-1476 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Markowitz, S., Meyeroff, L., Cooper, M., Traicoff, J., Kochera, M., Lutterbaugh, J., Swiriduk, M., and Willson, J. K. V. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 93,1005-1013 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Markowitz, S., Wang, J., Myeroff, L., Parsons, R., Sun, L. Z., Lutterbaugh, J., Fan, R. S., Zborowska, E., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., Brattain, M. G., and Willson, J. K. V. (1995) Science 268,1336-1338 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Massagué, J. (1990) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 6,597-641 [CrossRef]
  36. Morén, A., Ichijo, H., and Miyazono, K. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 189,356-362 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Moses, H. L., Yang, E. Y., and Peitenpol, J. A. (1990) Cell 63,245-247 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Park, K., Kim, S.-J., Bang, Y.-J., Park, J.-G., Kim, N. K., Roberts, A. B., and Sporn, M. B. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91,8772-8776 [Abstract]
  39. Polyak, K., Kato, J. Y., Solomon, M. J., Sherr, C. J., Massagué, J., Roberts, J. M., and Koff, A. (1994a) Genes & Dev. 8,9-22
  40. Polyak, K., Lee, M.-H., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Koff, A., Roberts, J. M., Tempst, P., and Massagué, J. (1994b) Cell 78,59-66 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Roberts, A. B., and Sporn, M. B. (1991) in Peptide Growth Factors and Their Receptors (Sporn, M. B., and Roberts, A. B., eds) pp. 419-472, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
  42. Ruff, E., and Rizzino, A. (1986) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 138,714-719 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Segarini, P. R., Roberts, A. B., Rosen, D. M., and Seyedin, S. M. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262,14655-14662 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Singh, G. K., Ruscetti, F. W., Beckwith, M., Keller, J. R., Ellingsworth, L., Urba, W. J., and Long, D. L. (1990) Cell Growth & Differ. 1,549-557
  45. Slingerland, J. M., Hengst, L., Pan, C.-H., Alexander, D., Stampfer, M., and Reed, S. I. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14,3683-3694 [Abstract]
  46. Sun, L., Wu, G., Willson, J. K. V., Zborowska, E., Yang, J., Rajkarunanayake, I., Wang, J., Gentry, L. E., Wang, X.-F., and Brattain, M. G. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,26449-26455 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Thibodeau, S. N., Bren, G., and Schaid, D. (1993) Science 260,816-819 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Wang, X.-F., Lin, H. Y., Ng-Eaton, E., Downward, J., Lodish, H. F., and Weinberg, R. A. (1991) Cell 67,797-805 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Wrana, J. L., Attisano, L., Cárcamo, J., Zentella, A., Doody, J., Laiho, M., Wang, X.-F., and Massagué, J. (1992) Cell 71,1003-1014 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Wu, S. P., Theodorescu, D., Kerbel, R., Willson, J. K. V., Mulder, K. M., Humphrey, L. E., and Brattain, M. G. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116,186-197
  51. Wu, S. P., Sun, L. Z., Willson, J. K. V., Fields, K., Humphrey, L., and Brattain, M. G. (1993) Cell Growth & Differ. 4,115-123

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.