Septicaemias caused by a strain of Staphylococcus haemolyticus exhibiting intermediate susceptibility to teicoplanin in multiple intensive care unit patients

J. H. Sloos*, L. Dijkshoorn and C. P. A. van Boven

Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Sir,

Septicaemias caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), including Staphylococcus haemolyticus, are common in neutropenic patients. Since these bacteria are often resistant to both ß-lactam antibiotics and aminoglycosides, the empirical therapy of choice is a glycopeptide, either vancomycin or teicoplanin. Teicoplanin is less active in vitro against isolates of S. haemolyticus compared with other CoNS and there have been reports of treatment failures in neutropenic patients who had received the antibiotic for septicaemias caused by bacteria belonging to this species.1,2 In a recent study we compared the MICs of vancomycin and teicoplanin for 201 clinical isolates of CoNS recovered at the Leiden University Medical Center in 1985 and in 1994.3 In 1994 we identified eight isolates of S. haemolyticus, three of which exhibited intermediate susceptibility to teicoplanin (MICs 9, 9 and 10 mg/L, respectively) according to MIC breakpoints recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.4 The three isolates, all of which were susceptible to vancomycin, were recovered during a 1 month period from blood cultures obtained from three patients in the intensive care unit. All three patients suffered septicaemia according to CDC criteria.5 The remaining five isolates were recovered from patients in various other wards and were temporally unrelated.

In order to determine whether the three strains exhibiting intermediate susceptibility to teicoplanin were clonally related, DNA extracted from these bacteria was analysed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) according to a method described previously.6 The FigureGo demonstrates the PFGE patterns for the eight S. haemolyticus isolates collected during 1994. The pattern of each of the five teicoplanin-susceptible isolates was unique, whereas those of the three intermediately susceptible isolates were indistinguishable, suggesting that the latter isolates belonged to a single clone.



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure. PFGE patterns of eight S. haemolyticus isolates recovered from blood cultures obtained from eight patients. Lanes 1–3: three isolates exhibiting intermediate susceptibility to teicoplanin which were recovered from patients in the intensive care unit during a 1 month period. Lanes 4–8: five teicoplanin-susceptible isolates that were from patients in various other wards and were not temporally related. M: marker strain.

 
To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of septicaemias in multiple patients caused by one S. haemolyticus strain exhibiting intermediate susceptibility to teicoplanin. The spread of strains of S. haemolyticus with reduced susceptibilities to teicoplanin among immunocompromised patients is a worrying development and the observation reported here suggests that this glycopeptide should be used with caution as empirical therapy for such patients with septicaemias caused by CoNS.

Notes

J Antimicrob Chemother 2000; 45: 410–411

* Correspondence address. Laboratory for Clinical Microbiology, Medical Center Alkmaar, PO Box 501, 1800 AM Alkmaar, The Netherlands. Tel: +31-72-5483671; Fax: +31-72-5482186; E-mail: j.h.sloos{at}mca.alkmaar.nl Back

References

1 . Spanik, S., Trupl, J., Studena, M. & Krcmery, V. (1997). Breakthrough nosocomial bacteraemia due to teicoplanin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus in five patients with acute leukaemia. Journal of Hospital Infection 35, 155–9.[ISI][Medline]

2 . Cunningham, R., Gurnell, M., Bayston, R., Cockayne, A. & Shelton, A. (1997). Teicoplanin resistance in Staphylococcus haemolyticus, developing during treatment. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 39, 438–9.[Free Full Text]

3 . Sloos, J. H., van de Klundert, J. A. M., Dijkshoorn, L. & van Boven, C. P. A. (1998). Changing susceptibilities of coagulasenegative staphylococci to teicoplanin in a teaching hospital. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 42, 787–91.[Abstract]

4 . National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. (1995). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing—Sixth Informational Supplement: Approved Standard M100-S6. NCCLS, Wayne, PA.

5 . Garner, J. S., Jarvis, W. R., Emori, T. G., Horan, T. C. & Hughes, J. M. (1988). CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. American Journal of Infection Control 16, 128–40.[ISI][Medline]

6 . Sloos, J. H., Horrevorts, A. M., van Boven, C. P. A. & Dijkshoorn, L. (1998). Identification of multiresistant Staphylococcus epidermidis in neonates of a secondary care hospital using pulsed field gel electrophoresis and quantitative antibiogram typing. Journal of Clinical Pathology 51, 62–7.[Abstract]





This Article
Extract
FREE Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My Personal Archive
Download to citation manager
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Disclaimer
Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Sloos, J. H.
Articles by van Boven, C. P. A.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Sloos, J. H.
Articles by van Boven, C. P. A.