a Medical Research Council Unit for Inflammation and Immunity, Department of Immunology, Institute for Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pretoria; b Department of Medical Microbiology, Institute for Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pretoria; c Enerkom (Pty) Ltd, Pretoria, South Africa
Sir
Humic substances, of which 9095% are fulvic acids, commonly account for 50% of the dissolved organic carbon in stream water. Humic acids are three to five times more abundant in soils than fulvic acids,1 whereas fulvic acids are nine to 10 times more abundant in water than humic acids.2 The application potential of fulvic acids in the treatment of human and animal diseases has not been investigated properly, possibly due to the difficulty of isolating fulvic acids from waters and soils in nature.
A South African company [Enerkom (Pty) Ltd] has developed a unique process to convert bituminous coal by controlled wet oxidation with oxygen in high yield to high quality humic and fulvic acids. To distinguish these coal-derived products from naturally occurring humic and fulvic acids, the former are called oxihumic and oxifulvic acid respectively. From a thorough analysis of oxifulvic acid by means of mass spectrometry (MS) and gas chromatography MS (GC-MS) techniques, Bergh et al.3 identified some 50 different compounds. Most of these were carboxylic acids and ordinary physiological metabolites with no evidence of any toxic compound in the product mixture.
The effect of oxifulvic acid solutions on the growth of eight microbial pathogens was determined by the macrobroth tube dilution method.4 Oxifulvic acid, supplied by Enerkom (Pty) Ltd, was dissolved in water to a concentration of 240 g/L and further diluted in brain heart infusion broth. All eight organisms tested were sensitive to oxifulvic acid at a concentration of 15 g/L (Table), Enterococcus faecalis and Klebsiella pneumoniae being susceptible to concentrations as low as 5 g/L.
|
Notes
J Antimicrob Chemother 2000; 46: 853854
* Correspondence address. Department of Immunology, PO Box 2034, Pretoria 0001, South Africa; Tel: + 27-12-319-2622; Fax: + 27-12-323-0732; E-mail: cmedlen{at}postillion.up.ac.za
References
1 . Stevenson, F. J. (1982). Reactive functional groups of humic substances. In Humus Chemistry. Genesis, Composition, Reactions. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
2 . Malcolm, R. L. (1985). The geochemistry of stream fulvic and humic substances. In Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment and Water: Geochemistry Isolation and Characterization, (Aiken, G. R., Ed.), pp. 181209. Interscience, New York.
3 . Bergh, J. J., Cronje, I. J., Dekker, J., Dekker, T. G., Gerritsma, L. M. & Mienie, L. J. (1997). Non-catalytic oxidation of water-slurried coal with oxygen: identification of fulvic acids and acute toxicity. Fuel 76, 14754.
4 . National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. (1999). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility TestingApproved Standard M2-A4. NCCLS, Villanova, PA.
5 . Dekker, J. & Medlen, C. E. (1999). Fulvic acid and its use in the treatment of various conditions. Patent Corporation application no. PTC/IB/99/01649.