a Urologic Clinic, Hospital St Elisabeth, Straubing; b Department of Urology, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
It has been estimated that up to half of all men suffer from symptoms of prostatitis at some time in their lives.1 In the early 1990s, prostatitis resulted in 2 million office visits per year in the USA,2 rivalling the number of visits for benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) at the time. It is the most frequent urological diagnosis in men less than 50 years of age and the third most common urological diagnosis in men greater than 50 years of age.2 It has been clearly demonstrated that chronic prostatitis has an impact on a patient's quality of life similar to a myocardial infarction, angina or Crohn's disease.3 Prostatitis is a major health care issue, as important as the other two major prostatic diseases, BPH and carcinoma.4 Even so, our knowledge of prostatitis is still somewhat limited.
Acute bacterial prostatitis
The term prostatitis, suggests that this disease is of an inflammatory nature, possibly caused by an infective agent. This obviously holds true for patients with acute bacterial prostatitis. These patients often present with a flu-like illness with systemic symptoms, indicating tissue invasion, in addition to local symptoms of bacteriuria, such as urinary urgency, dysuria, frequency, etc. On physical examination the prostate can feel tense and be exquisitely tender. There are leucocytes in the prostatic fluid and midstream urine: culture of either usually reveals Escherichia coli, or less commonly, other bacteria such as Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Enterococcus spp., etc. Prostatic massage, however, should not be performed in these patients because this could induce septicaemia. The majority of these patients get better when treated with appropriate antibiotics. Occasionally, patients develop complications such as urinary retention, septicaemia, prostatic abscess and, in rare cases, metastatic infections such as pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis.5 How often such an acute infection becomes a chronic infection is unclear.
Chronic prostatitis syndrome
In contrast, the term chronic prostatitis is applied to a mixture of different entities that cannot be clearly separated with our present knowledge. Therefore, this complex is best described as a syndrome of various types of chronic pelvic pain, voiding disturbances and sexual dysfunction, of which the pelvic pain is the most prominent symptom (as compared with patients with BPH and those with erectile dysfunction).6 Stress and psychological problems, particularly depression, are very commonly found in these patients, but it is not yet clear whether, a priori, psychological dysfunctions cause this syndrome, or if this syndrome itself causes the psychological dysfunction.
Classification of prostatitis syndrome
Various classification systems have been used to define which patients with this syndrome have an infection, which have an inflammatory process of other aetiology and which have other problems, e.g. neuromuscular, psychogenic disorders, etc.
In the past, the classification of Drach et al.7 was most frequently used. It is based on the bacteriological localization patterns obtained by the four glass test.8 In this classification the chronic prostatitis syndrome is divided into: (i) chronic bacterial prostatitis; (ii) non-bacterial prostatitis; and (iii) prostatodynia depending on whether the prostatic secretion contains: (a) bacteria and leucocytes; (b) leucocytes only; or (c) neither. Chronic bacterial prostatitis is also diagnosed when the number of bacteria cultured in prostatic fluid or in urine obtained after prostatic massage (specimen VB3 in the four glass test) is at least 10 times greater than in the first voided (VB1) and midstream urine (VB2) specimens. An inflammatory process is assumed if the number of leucocytes exceeds 10 per high power field (x400) or 1000 per µL in prostatic fluid or VB3, without pyuria in VB2.8
Because of the lack of knowledge concerning the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of prostatitis, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of the USA started an international initiative. A new classification system,9 which provides uniform definitions of the various types of prostatitis, was proposed in order to facilitate collaborative research. The NIH and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) proposed this new classification system in 199510 and this was reaffirmed in 1998 (Table I).
|
There is a continuing debate about which bacteria can be considered as pathogens. In the most conservative approach only those bacteria that can be localized to the expressed prostatic secretions and that cause documented recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) are included.11 By this definition, few bacteria other than E. coli, other Enterobacteriaceae, such as Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Proteus and Serratia spp, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are considered to be pathogens. Enterococci and staphylococci would not be included even though these pathogens can often be localized to the prostate and may be associated with the chronic prostatitis syndrome.1214 Furthermore, in several clinical studies,1519 Gram-positive cocci have been cultured from prostatic secretions in numbers meeting the criteria of Meares & Stamey8 and these patients responded to antibiotic therapy.
A number of other microorganisms have been reported as likely causes of this syndrome: Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis, genital mycoplasmas, difficult-to-culture coryneforms, genital viruses and, rarely, mycobacteria, gonococci, parasites and fungi have all been implicated in prostatitis.20 Evidence of the misclassification of at least some cases of non-bacterial prostatitis is also accumulating.4 Immunological evidence, such as the existence of antibodies to uropathogenic bacteria in patients with negative cultures21,22 suggests a bacterial presence. This is supported by evidence of both bacterial DNA23 and cultured cryptic bacteria20 detected in prostate biopsies and prostatic fluid of patients with sterile cultures. As many as 50% of transperineal prostatic biopsies in patients with chronic inflammatory prostatitis grow bacteria.24,25 Thus, the full impact of infection remains unresolved in chronic inflammatory prostatitis.
The role of antimicrobial therapy in chronic prostatitis
Despite reports that fewer than 10% of prostatitis cases are bacterial,26 a much higher proportion of men diagnosed with prostatitis receive antimicrobials. Antibiotic therapy is recommended for acute bacterial prostatitis and chronic bacterial prostatitis; it is of debatable benefit in patients with inflammatory chronic pelvic pain syndrome.27
The therapeutic problems with antimicrobials are, on one hand, the different biological status of the pathogens (which are often in a biofilm infection) and, on the other hand, the penetration barrier for many agents. Only a few antibiotics are able to penetrate sufficiently well into prostatic secretions. Penetration depends mainly on the degree of ionization of the compound in plasma. In the acidic prostatic secretions, a weak base such as trimethoprim (with a pKa of 7.4) can be expected to be concentrated about four- or five-fold compared with plasma.28 Clinical studies have shown, however, that the pH of prostatic fluid in patients with chronic prostatitis is often neutral or alkaline.29 In this case no concentration of trimethroprim could be expected. This may explain why the results obtained with trimethoprim or co-trimoxazole generally did not produce cure rates of >50%.
Because of their favourable pharmacokinetic properties, the fluoroquinolones may be better options. The quinolones are zwitterions with a different pKa in an acidic and an alkaline milieu.28 For example, the isoelectric point of ciprofloxacin is at pH 7.4, which corresponds to the pH of plasma. At this pH only 10% of ciprofloxacin is ionized and thus it can penetrate through biological barriers.
We determined the concentrations of several quinolones (ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, fleroxacin, lomefloxacin, norfloxacin and ofloxacin) in the prostatic fluid of volunteers.30 We obtained prostatic fluid by prostatic massage and took care to ensure that the prostatic fluid was not contaminated by urethral urine with a high antibiotic content: the volunteers were not allowed to void between drug intake and prostatic massage. We also administered an iv renal contrast medium at the same time as the quinolones, enabling us to detect urinary contamination at levels of <1%.
The quinolones penetrated into prostatic fluid to variable degrees. It was lowest for norfloxacin (c. 10%) and highest for lomefloxacin (c. 50%), but none of the concentrations within prostatic fluid exceeded the corresponding plasma concentrations. In contrast, all quinolones were concentrated within seminal fluid: concentration of lomefloxacin exceeded plasma concentrations by c. 1020% and those of ciprofloxacin being seven- to nine-fold higher than the plasma concentration.30 For gatifloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone with activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive uropathogens, as well as against gonococci, chlamydia, ureaplasma, mycoplasma and anaeobes, the concentrations in prostatic and seminal fluids were about the same as in plasma.31 The concentrations of quinolones in prostatic tissue obtained from patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate also, in general, exceeded the corresponding plasma concentration, the ratio being lowest for ofloxacin (c. 1), and highest for ciprofloxacin and enoxacin (c. 2).30
Several clinical studies of quinolone therapy for prostatitis have been published.32 The results are difficult to compare, however, because not all workers used the Meares & Stamey technique8 for diagnosis. The duration of treatment, which should be for a minimum of 24 weeks, and the follow-up period also differed tremendously. Only a few studies had a follow-up period of 4 weeks or more. Since, in chronic prostatitis, relapse is the main problem, the follow-up period must be sufficiently long in order to confirm that the patient is cured. Results of studies of quinolones with a follow-up period of at least 6 months are shown in Table II.
|
Other causes of the chronic prostatitis syndrome
Other pathogenic mechanisms of the chronic prostatitis syndrome have been suggested. Barbalias et al.34,35 proposed that there was a sympathetically mediated urethral spasm synchronous with voiding and thus used the term painful male urethral syndrome instead. In the majority of, but not all, patients urinary flow rate (both maximum and mean) was, indeed, decreased. The video study of micturition showed a distal narrowing of the prostatic urethra with a high maximum urethral closure, and in several patients there was also a proximal urethral stenosis (incomplete funnelling). The authors also found increased urethral pressures at rest, i.e. without voiding, in an area corresponding to the distal urethra and/or the membranous urethral segment. This condition may be a form of detrusor internal sphincter dysynergia.
The increased urethral pressure may push bacteria retrogradely into the prostatic ducts and cause discomfort or pain: later this may result in inflammation. McNeal36 found that inflammation in the peripheral zone of the prostate occurred more frequently than in the central zone. Furthermore, all of the ducts from the peripheral zone drain into the distal part of the prostatic urethra, beyond the verumontanum. This urethral segment corresponds to the site of the distal urethral narrowing seen in the video studies. However, the authors did not find any statistically significant difference in the urodynamic parameters in patients with or without inflammatory findings (leucocytes) in prostatic secretion. This region of the prostate is known to be rich in -adrenergic receptors. Therefore, treatment with
-blockers, especially the newer selective
-1-blockers, may relieve symptoms.
In a large clinical study, Barbalias et al.37 treated patients with either non-bacterial prostatitis or prostatodynia with demonstrable high maximal urethral closure pressure with -blockers: 50% of a group with documented chronic bacterial prostatitis were also given
-blockers. Ciprofloxacin was given to all patients with positive cultures of expressed prostatic secretions, and to 50% of those with non-bacterial prostatitis. The recurrence rate of bacterial prostatitis was significantly reduced by
-blockade and symptom relief was achieved for many months. For non-bacterial prostatitis a lower rate of symptom recurrence was found in patients receiving only
-blockers compared with those treated with a combination of
-blockers and antibiotics. About 90% of patients with prostatodynia responded to
-blockade given for up to 6 months.37
Urinary reflux into the prostatic ducts owing to functional urethral obstruction35 may also lead to a chemical inflammatory reaction.38 Patients with non-bacterial prostatitis were treated with allopurinol for 240 days in a placebo-controlled study in order to determine the effects of a reduction in the urate concentration.38 Patients showed relief of symptoms. It was postulated that prostatic inflammation in non-bacterial prostatitis is due to increased levels of purine- and pyrimidine-containing metabolites in prostatic ducts, a novel concept that deserves further examination.39
Conclusion
In contrast to acute bacterial prostatitis the chronic prostatitis syndrome is caused by infection and needs antimicrobial therapy in only a minority of patients. In these cases fluoroquinolones can be considered drugs of choice, although controlled clinical studies with a sufficient follow-up period are still needed to define the role of antimicrobial therapy. In most patients other ill-understood mechanisms may cause this syndrome and require alternative treatment modalities.
Notes
* Corresponding author. Professor and Head of Urologic Clinic, St Elisabeth Hospital, St Elisabeth Strasse 23, D-94315 Straubing, Germany. Tel: +49-9421-710-1700; Fax: +49-9421-710-270; E-mail: NaberK{at}klinikum-straubing.de
References
1 . Stamey, T. A. (1980). Pathogenesis and Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections, pp. 342429. Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, MD.
2 . Collins, M. M., Stafford, R. S., O'Lary, M. P. & Barry, M. J. (1998). How common is prostatitis? A national survey of physician visits Journal of Urology 159, 12248.[ISI][Medline]
3 . Wenninger, K., Heiman, J. R., Rothman, I., Berghuis, J. P. & Berger, R. E. (1996). Sickness impact of chronic nonbacterial prostatitis and its correlates. Journal of Urology 155, 9658.[ISI][Medline]
4 . Nickel, J. C. (1998). Effective office management of chronic prostatitis. Urologic Clinics of North America 25, 67784.[ISI][Medline]
5 . Soda, T., Ogura, K., Ishitoya, S., Niibayashi, H. & Yoshida, O. (1996). Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis after acute bacterial prostatitis: a case report. International Journal of Urology 3, 4024.[Medline]
6 . Krieger, J. N., Egan, K. J., Ross, S. O., Jacobs, R. & Berger, R. E. (1996). Chronic pelvic pains represent the most prominent urogenital symptoms of chronic prostatitis. Urology 48, 71522.[ISI][Medline]
7 . Drach, G. W., Fair, W. R., Meares, E. M. & Stamey, T. A. (1978). Classification of benign diseases associated with prostatic pain: Prostatitis or prostatodynia? Journal of Urology 120, 266.[ISI][Medline]
8 . Meares, E. M. & Stamey, T. A. (1968). Bacteriologic localisation patterns in bacterial prostatitis and urethritis. Investigative Urology 5, 492518.[ISI][Medline]
9 . Schaeffer, A. J. (1999). Prostatitis: US perspective. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 11, 20511.[ISI][Medline]
10 . Workshop Committee of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (NIDDK): Chronic Prostatitis Workshop, Bethesda, MD, Dec 78, 1995.
11 . Schaeffer, A. J. (1992). Editorial Comments to Nickel, J. C. and Costerton, J. W. Coagulase-negative staphylococci in chronic prostatitis. Journal of Urology 147, 398401.[ISI][Medline]
12 . Drach, G. W. (1974). Problems in diagnosis of bacterial prostatitis: gram-negative, gram-positive and mixed infections. Journal of Urology 111, 6306.[ISI][Medline]
13 . Bergman, B., Wedren, H. & Holm, S. E. (1989). Staphylococcus saprophyticus in males with symptoms of chronic prostatitis. Urology 34, 2415.[ISI][Medline]
14 . Nickel, J. C. & Costerton, J. W. (1992). Coagulase-negative staphylococcus in chronic prostatitis. Journal of Urology 147, 398401.[ISI][Medline]
15 . Arakawa, S., Matsui, T., Gohji, K., Okada, H. & Kamidono, S. (1999). Prostatitisthe Japanese viewpoint. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 11, 2016.[ISI][Medline]
16 . Boerema, J. B. J., Bischoff, W., Focht, J. & Naber, K. G. (1991). An open multicentre study on the efficacy and safety of rufloxacin in patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 28, 58797.[Abstract]
17 . Naber, K. G., Boerema, J. B. J., Bischoff, W., Blenk, H., Focht, J., Carpentier, P. & Sylvester, J. (1991). An assessment of temafloxacin in the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 28, Suppl. C, 8796.[Abstract]
18 . Cox, C. E. & Childs, S. J. (1991). Treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis with temafloxacin. American Journal of Medicine 91, Suppl. 6A, 134S9S.[Medline]
19 . Childs, S. J. (1987). Treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis with ciprofloxacin. Infections in Surgery 6, 64951.
20
.
Domingue, G. J., Sr. & Hellstrom, W. J. (1998). Prostatitis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 11, 60413.
21 . Shortliffe, L., Elliot, J. K. & Sellers, R. G. (1989). Measurement of urinary antibodies to crude bacterial antigen in patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis. Journal of Urology 141, 6326.[ISI][Medline]
22 . Kumon, H. (1992). Detection of local prostatic immune response to bacterial prostatitis. Infection 20, Suppl. 3, S2368.[ISI][Medline]
23 . Krieger, J. N., Riley, D. E., Roberts, M. C. & Berger, R. E. (1996). Prokaryotic DNA sequences in patients with chronic idiopathic prostatitis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 34, 31208.[Abstract]
24 . Nickel, J. C. & Costerton, J. W. (1993). Bacterial localization in antibiotic-refractory chronic bacterial prostatitis. Prostate 23, 10714.[ISI][Medline]
25 . Berger, R. E., Krieger, J. N., Rothman, I., Muller, C. H. & Hillier, S. L. (1997). Bacteria in the prostate tissue of men with idiopathic prostatic inflammation. Journal of Urology 157, 8635.[ISI][Medline]
26 . Weidner, W., Schiefer, H. G., Krauss, H., Jantos, Ch., Friedrich, H. J. & Altmannsberger, M. (1991). Chronic prostatitis: A thorough search for etiologically involved microorganisms in 1,461 patients. Infection 19, Suppl. 3, 11925.
27 . Bjerklund Johansen, T. E., Grüneberg, R. N., Guibert, J., Hofstetter, A., Lobel, B., Naber, K. G. et al. (1998). The role of antibiotics in the treatment of chronic prostatitis: a consensus statement. European Urology 34, 45766.[ISI][Medline]
28 . Naber, K. G. & Madsen, P. O. (1999). Antibiotics: basic concepts. In Textbook of Prostatitis. (Nickel J. C., Ed.) pp. 8394. Isis Medical Media, Cambridge.
29 . Pfau, A., Perleberg, S. & Shapiro, A. (1978). The pH of the prostatic fluid in health and disease: implications of treatment in chronic bacterial prostatitis. Journal of Urology 119, 3847.[ISI][Medline]
30 . Naber, K. G. (1993). Role of quinolones in treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis. In Quinolone Antimicrobial Agents, (Hooper, D. C. & Wolfson, J. S., Eds), pp. 28597. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
31
.
Naber, C. K., Steghafner, M., Kinzig-Schippers, M., Sörgel, F., Stahlberg, H. J., Hajos, A. K. & Naber, K. G. (1999). Gatifloxacin: plasma and urine concentrations and penetration into prostatic and seminal fluid after single oral dose of 400 mg in volunteers. (Abstract P447) Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 44, Suppl. A, 139.
32 . Naber, K. G. & Weidner, W. (1999). Prostatitis, epididymitis and orchitis. In Infectious Diseases, (Armstrong, D. & Cohen, J. Eds), pp. 58.158.6. Mosby, London.
33 . Naber, K. G. & Giamarellou, H. (1994). Proposed study design in prostatitis. Infection 22, Suppl 1. S59S60.[ISI][Medline]
34 . Barbalias, G. A., Maeres, E. M. & Sant, G. R. (1983). Prostatodynia: clinical and urodynamic characteristics. Journal of Urology 130, 5147.[ISI][Medline]
35 . Barbalias, G. A. (1990). Prostatodynia or painful male urethral syndrome? Urology 36, 14653.[ISI][Medline]
36 . McNeal, J. E. (1983). The prostate gland morphology and pathobiology. Monographs in Urology 4, 1.
37 . Barbalias, G. A., Nikiforidis, G. & Liatsikos, E. N. (1998). Alpha-blockers for the treatment of chronic prostatitis in combination with antibiotics. Journal of Urology 159, 8837.[ISI][Medline]
38 . Persson, B. E., Ronquist, G. & Ekblom, M. (1996). Ameliorative effect of allopurinol on nonbacterial prostatitis: a parallel double-blind controlled study. Journal of Urology 155, 9614.[ISI][Medline]
39 . Nickel, J. C., Siemens, D. R. & Lundie, M. J. (1997). Ameliorative effect of allopurinol on nonbacterial prostatitis: a parallel double-blind controlled study. Journal of Urology 157, 6289.[Medline]
40 . Schaeffer, A. J. & Darras, F. S. (1990). The efficacy of norfloxacin in the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis refractory to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and/or carbenicillin. Journal of Urology 144, 6903.[ISI][Medline]
41 . Petrikkos, G., Peppas, T., Giamarellou, H., Poulios, K., Zouboulis, P. & Sfikakis, P. (1991). Four year experience with norfloxacin in the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis, Seventeenth International Congress of Chemotherapy, Berlin, FRG, June 2328, 1991, Abstract 1302. Futuramed, Munich.
42 . Pust, R. A., Achenheil-Koppe, Gilbert P. & Weidner, W. (1989). Clinical efficacy of ofloxacin (Tarivid®) in patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis: preliminary results. Journal of Chemotherapy 1, Suppl. 4, 46971.
43 . Weidner, W., Schiefer, H. G. & Brähler, E. (1991). Refractory chronic bacterial prostatitis: a re-evaluation of ciprofloxacin treatment after a median follow up of 30 months. Journal of Urology 146, 3502.[ISI][Medline]
44 . Weidner, W. & Schiefer, H. G. (1991). Chronic bacterial prostatitis: therapeutic experience with ciprofloxacin. Infection 19, Suppl. 3, S 165.[ISI][Medline]
45 . Pfau, A. (1987). Therapie der unteren Harnwegsinfektionen beim Mann unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der chronischen bakteriellen Prostatitis. Aktuelle Urologie 18, 313.
46 . Pfau, A. (1991). The treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis. Infection 19, Suppl. 3, S1604.[ISI][Medline]
47 . Naber, K. G., Busch, W., Focht, J. & the German Prostatitis Study Group (1999). Ciprofloxacin in the treatment of chronic prostatitis: a prospective, non-comparative multicentre clinical trial with long term follow-up. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 14, 1439.[ISI]