1 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Location Stratenum, PO Box 85060, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2 Department of General Practice, Erasmus MCUniversity Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Received 12 April 2005; returned 19 May 2005; revised 23 June 2005; accepted 23 June 2005
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Patients and methods: A total of 146 general practitioners (GPs) from the Netherlands included all patients with AOM during a 4 week period in winter, and recorded patient characteristics, clinical presentation and management. Under- and overprescribing of antibiotics in AOM was assessed using the Dutch national guideline.
Results: A total of 458 AOM consultations were recorded. In seven out of 10 consultations (310/439; excluding 19 consultations in which patients were referred to secondary care), antibiotic prescribing decisions were according to the national guideline. In 11% of all consultations (50/439), there was underprescribing and in 18% (79/439) there was overprescribing. Patients with an antibiotic indication but without an antibiotic prescription (underprescribing; n = 50) had more short-term symptoms (OR: 0.93), relatively few inflammation signs (OR: 0.47) and were less severely ill (OR: 0.30), compared with patients with an antibiotic indication and an antibiotic prescription (n = 167). Patients without an antibiotic indication but with an antibiotic prescription (overprescribing; n = 79) were more often younger than 24 months (OR: 0.34), more severely ill (OR: 3.30) and expected more often an antibiotic as perceived by their GP (OR: 2.11), compared with patients without an antibiotic indication and without an antibiotic prescription (n = 143).
Conclusions: Clinical determinants which are stated as criteria for antibiotic treatment of AOM in the Dutch national guideline were recognized by GPs as important items, but were frequently given too much weight.
Keywords: antibiotic prescribing , appropriateness , general practice , the Netherlands
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
There is much discussion about what might be an optimal antibiotic prescribing rate in patients with AOM. Overprescribing of antibiotics leads to unnecessary costs, frequent side effects and risk of antimicrobial resistance.11,12 On the other hand, some suggest that a very restricted antibiotic use in respiratory tract infections is associated with a relatively high incidence of complications.13,14 Notably, our group showed a somewhat higher incidence of acute mastoiditis in the Netherlands as opposed to countries with higher antibiotic use for AOM.15 Thus, it is important not only to study overprescribing of antibiotics in AOM but also possible underprescribing, in order to enhance evidence-based use of antibiotics in general practice without putting patients at risk for preventable complications.
Therefore, this study assessed clinical determinants of under- and overprescribing of antibiotics in Dutch general practice patients with AOM. To study this association, the Dutch general practice setting is well suited because of patient enlistment, high involvement of general practitioners (GPs) in research projects, and computerized records of patient contacts in daily practice.
![]() |
Patients and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Data for this study were prospectively collected. About 600 GPs in the middle region of the Netherlands were invited to participate and 146 GPs volunteered. The participating GPs included all patients with a diagnosis of AOM (complaints persisting up to 21 days) during a 4 week period between November 2002 and May 2003. For each consultation, GPs recorded patient characteristics, clinical presentation, their perception of the severity of illness, and whether patients (or their parents) expected an antibiotic (Table 1). At the end of the consultation, the final diagnosis and management (reassurance, symptomatic treatment, antibiotics, referral to secondary care) were recorded. Because we aimed to describe everyday practice, GPs interpreted the signs and symptoms of their patients in their usual way. Only consultations with diagnosis code H71 acute otitis media, classified according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) coding,16 were included. Medication was classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutical Chemical (ATC) classification system.17 All records were checked after the 4 weeks of recording and additional information was gathered from the electronic patient records.
|
To assess under- and overprescribing of antibiotics, the recommendations of the national guideline on AOM of the Dutch College of General Practitioners18 (which apply to ear complaints persisting up to 21 days) were converted into criteria, by three GPs with special expertise on AOM. The criteria are given in Table 2. Only one of these criteria was expert-based and not guideline-based, i.e. the need for more than four episodes of AOM in a year for children aged 624 months. These criteria were put into an algorithm for data analysis. This algorithm was used to categorize all AOM consultations according to antibiotic indication and prescribing; categories were: antibiotics indicated and prescribed (category A), antibiotics not indicated but prescribed (overprescribing; B), antibiotics indicated but not prescribed (underprescribing; C) and antibiotics not indicated and not prescribed (D).
|
After description of the management of AOM in three age groups (infants from 0 to 2 years, children from 3 to 12 years, and patients aged 13 years and over), the algorithm for under- and overprescribing of antibiotics was applied to all consultations (excluding those in which patients were referred to secondary care). After checking for interactions between age and clinical determinants, we calculated the independent association (univariate and multivariate) between patient characteristics, clinical presentation and GPs' perception of severity of illness and whether the patient expected an antibiotic on the one hand (see Table 1 for the exact determinants for analysis), and under- and overprescribing of antibiotics on the other; underprescribing was defined as consultations in which an indication was present without an antibiotic prescription (C) versus consultations in which an indication was present with an antibiotic prescription (A), and overprescribing was defined as consultations in which no indication was present with an antibiotic prescription (B) versus consultations in which no indication was present without an antibiotic prescription (D). Associations were assessed by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using logistic regression (backward stepwise analysis) with Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) estimations19 to control for clustering at the level of GPs.
For descriptive analyses, SPSS version 12.0 was used and for the GEE analysis SAS version 8.02.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The 146 GPs included a total of 458 AOM consultations (median: 3 consultations per GP; range: 115 consultations). The median age of the patients was 4 years (mean: 10 years; range: 087 years) and 49% were male (Table 3). More than 80% of all patients had earache and 16% had ear discharge. The only significant differences between the age groups [infants from 0 to 2 years (171 patients), children from 3 to 12 years (197 patients), and patients aged 13 years and over (90 patients)] were for fever and cough. These latter symptoms were most often present in younger patients: presence of fever was 51% in infants, 43% in children and 24% in older patients, and presence of cough was 39%, 23% and 10%, respectively (2 = 17 for fever, and 27 for cough with df = 2 and P < 0.001).
|
In three-quarters of all consultations, GPs reassured the patient (75%; 343/458 consultations), with no differences between age groups [infants (02 years): 75%; children (312 years): 76%; older patients (13+ years): 73%]. In 4% of consultations, patients were referred to secondary care (n = 19), these consultations were not taken into consideration in further analyses (consultations for analyses; n = 439). Antibiotics were prescribed in 56% of the consultations (246/439 consultations). Amoxicillin was the most frequently prescribed antibiotic (82%), and amoxicillin/clavulanate and macrolides were prescribed in 7% and 9% of all antibiotic prescriptions (n = 246), respectively. These latter percentages vary little between the three age groups (Figure 1). Amoxicillin was prescribed in 84% of all prescriptions (n = 97) in infants, amoxicillin/clavulanate in 6% and macrolides in 9%. In children, these percentages were 84%, 6% and 7%, respectively (95 prescriptions), and in older patients 74%, 9% and 11%, respectively (54 prescriptions).
|
In about half of the AOM consultations, antibiotics were indicated (category A + C = 49%; Table 4) and in three-quarters of these consultations, an antibiotic was prescribed (A versus C = 38% versus 11%); thus, in one-quarter of these consultations an antibiotic was not prescribed while indicated. In the other half of the AOM consultations, antibiotics were not indicated (B + D = 51%; Table 4), but in one-third of these consultations an antibiotic was prescribed (B versus D = 18% versus 33%). This means that in seven out of each 10 AOM consultations the antibiotic prescribing decisions were according to the guideline (A + D = 71%; Table 4). One-third (29%) of the antibiotic prescribing decisions were inappropriate (B + C); in 11%, antibiotics were indicated but not prescribed (C: underprescribing) and in 18% antibiotics were not indicated but prescribed (B: overprescribing). These percentages varied little between the three age groups.
|
There were no interactions between age and clinical determinants relating to under- or overprescribing of antibiotics. Patients who should have been prescribed an antibiotic according to the Dutch national guideline but who did not get it, had a shorter duration of symptoms, had few inflammation signs (e.g. fever), and were less severely ill according to their GP, compared with the remaining patients to whom antibiotics were indeed prescribed (Table 5).
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Strengths and weaknesses of the study
This study addressed 458 consultations from 146 GPs. The recruitment rate was in line with the incidence of AOM, because, based on Dutch national morbidity studies,1,20 we expected somewhat less than 1 consultation per week per GP. Characteristics of the participating GPs did not differ from other Dutch GPs.21 However, because the participating GPs were volunteers, they may more often follow guidelines than non-participating GPs. In that case, our results could underestimate inappropriateness of antibiotic prescribing. It is, however, highly unlikely that a possible underestimation of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing will bias the associations explored in this study.
While our data can be considered complete for consultations and antibiotic prescriptions, misclassification of clinical determinants is possible. Such misclassification because of missing data might result in inaccurate estimates of the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing. However, bias would only occur if misclassification is limited to a specific subgroup of patients; we think that this is highly unlikely.
Guidelines are partly evidence-based and partly based on expert opinion, and should be regarded as the best indication at this moment as to how patients should be treated. For individual patients, GPs can of course have valid reasons to deviate from the guidelines. However, for large groups of patients, we think that non-compliance with the current guidelines is the best estimation of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in the total group of patients under study.
Comparison with the literature
The rates of under- and overprescribing of antibiotics we found are comparable with those reported more than 10 years ago in the Netherlands.22 Our results showed that characteristics such as age of the child, duration of symptoms, signs of inflammation (e.g. fever) and severity of illness, all of which are mentioned in the guideline as criteria for antibiotic treatment, were recognized by GPs as important items but not applied in a correct manner. In the presence of only one or two criteria (e.g. a red tympanic membrane with severe illness), some GPs prescribed an antibiotic, whereas a combination of at least three criteria (e.g. presence of fever, a red tympanic membrane and severe illness) is required for an antibiotic according to the Dutch guidelines. It may be difficult for GPs to appreciate combinations of multiple signs and symptoms. This study confirmed earlier findings on inappropriate assessment of the clinical impact of severity of illness and GPs' perception of patients expectations as causes of overprescribing.23,24 In daily practice, it is worthwhile to explore whether the patient with for example a respiratory tract infection (or his/her parent) really does expect an antibiotic or merely desires reassurance that nothing is seriously wrong, as we found in an earlier study.25
Our conclusion is that both under- and overprescribing of antibiotics for AOM are important problems in Dutch general practice. More appropriate use of the Dutch national guideline in this field should be targeted to prevent under- and overprescribing of antibiotics. In particular, a correct interpretation and recognition of combinations of signs and symptoms as indications for antibiotic therapy should be emphasized. To obtain these targets, a multiple educational intervention has been proven effective in the Netherlands.26
![]() |
Acknowledgements |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
2.
Froom J, Culpepper L, Green LA et al. A cross-national study of acute otitis media: risk factors, severity, and treatment at initial visit. Report from the international primary care network (IPCN) and the ambulatory sentinel practice network (ASPN). J Am Board Fam Pract 2001; 14: 40617.
3. Glasziou PP, Del Mar CB, Sanders SL et al. Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software, 2003.
4. Rovers MM, Schilder AGM, Zielhuis GA et al. Otitis media. Lancet 2004; 363: 46573.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
5.
Little P, Gould C, Moore M et al. Predictors of poor outcome and benefits from antibiotics in children with acute otitis media: pragmatic randomised trial. BMJ 2002; 325: 225.
6. Jelinski S, Parfrey P, Hutchinson J. Antibiotic utilisation in community practices: guideline concurrence and prescription necessity. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2005; 14: 31926.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
7. Ryan J, Giles M. Management of acute otitis media by New Zealand general practitioners. New Zealand Med J 2002; 115: 679.[ISI][Medline]
8. Andre M, Odenholt I, Schwan A et al.; the Swedish Study Group on Antibiotic Use. Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in general practice: diagnosis, antibiotic prescribing, duration of symptoms and use of diagnostic tests. Scand J Infect Dis 2002; 34: 8806.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
9. Sanz E, Hernández MA, Kumari M et al. Pharmacological treatment of acute otitis media in children. A comparison among seven locations: Tenerife, Barcelona and Valencia (Spain), Toulouse (France), Smolensk (Russia), Bratislava (Slovakia) and Sofia (Bulgaria). Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 60: 3743.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
10.
Otters HBM, van der Wouden JC, Schellevis FG et al. Trends in prescribing antibiotics for children in Dutch general practice. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004; 53: 3616.
11.
Ball P, Baquero F, Cars O et al. Antibiotic therapy of community respiratory tract infections: strategies for optimal outcomes and minimized resistance emergence. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002; 49: 3140.
12.
Wise R. The relentless rise of resistance? J Antimicrob Chemother 2004; 54: 30610.
13. Preyer S. Acute otitis media and its life-threatening complications. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 2004; 98: 25963.[Medline]
14. Price DB, Honeybourne D, Little P et al. Community-acquired pneumonia mortality: a potential link to antibiotic prescribing trends in general practice. Respir Med 2004; 98: 1724.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
15. Van Zuijlen DA, Schilder AG, van Balen FA et al. National differences in incidence of acute mastoiditis: relationship to prescribing patterns of antibiotics for acute otitis media? Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001; 20: 1404.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
16. Anonymous. ICPC-2: International Classification of Primary Care. Oxford: World Organization of National Colleges, Academies, and Academic Associations of General Practitioners/Family Physicians, 1998.
17. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System: Guidelines for ATC Classification and DDD Assignment. http://www.whocc.no/atcddd/ (6 April 2005, date last accessed).
18. Appelman CLM, van Balen FAM, van de Lisdonk EH et al. NHG standard Otitis Media Acuta (eerste herziening) [Guideline on acute otitis media of the Dutch College of General Practitioners, first revision]. Huisarts Wet 1999; 33: 2425.
19. Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986; 42: 12130.[ISI][Medline]
20. Van der Linden MW, Westert GP, de Bakker DH et al. Tweede nationale studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk. Klachten en aandoeningen in de bevolking en in de huisartspraktijk [Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice. Signs and Symptoms in General Population and General Practice]. Utrecht/Bilthoven: Nivel/RIVM, 2004.
21. Nederlands instituut voor onderzoek van de gezondheidszorg (NIVEL). Huisarts > cijfers uit de registratie van huisartsen. http://www.nivel.nl (6 April 2005, date last accessed).
22. Dalhuijzen J, Zwaard AM, Grol RPTM et al. Het handelen van huisartsen volgens de standaard Otitis Media Acuta van het Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap [The performance of general practitioners according to the guidelines on acute otitis media of the Dutch College of General Practitioners]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1993; 137: 213944.[Medline]
23.
Damoiseaux RAMJ, de Melker RA, Ausems MJE et al. Reasons for non-guideline-based antibiotic prescriptions for acute otitis media in the Netherlands. Fam Pract 1999; 16: 5053.
24. Bradley CP. Uncomfortable prescribing decisions: a critical incident study. BMJ 1992; 304: 2946.[ISI][Medline]
25.
Welschen I, Kuyvenhoven M, Hoes A et al. Antibiotics for acute respiratory tract symptoms: patients' expectations, GPs' management and patient satisfaction. Fam Pract 2004; 21: 2347.
26.
Welschen I, Kuyvenhoven MM, Hoes AW et al. Effectiveness of a multiple intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract symptoms in primary care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004: 329: 4315.
|