Rifampicin-resistant meningococci causing invasive disease: detection of point mutations in the rpoB gene and molecular characterization of the strains

Paola Stefanellia, Cecilia Fazioa, Giuseppina La Rosab, Cinzia Marianellib, Michele Muscillob and Paola Mastrantonioa,*

a Department of Bacteriology and Medical Mycology, and b Department of Environmental Hygiene, Istituto Superiore di Sanita', Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mutations in the rpoB gene affecting two amino acids were found in eight rifampicin-resistant Neisseria meningitidis group B and C strains isolated in Italy. The Asp542->Val substitution, documented for the first time in N. meningitidis, was found in four of the isolates; the His552->Tyr or Asn substitution in the other four resistant strains. Mutations in the mtr gene did not seem to be involved in the resistance since the same mutations occurred in both resistant and susceptible strains. Two different clusters were identified among these resistant strains, without any correlation with the specific mutations detected in the rpoB gene.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemoprophylactic treatment with rifampicin is particularly useful in eradicating nasopharyngeal colonization by Neisseria meningitidis for close contacts of the index case, reducing the carriage state by up to 90%.1 Although rifampicin resistance is rare, resistant strains have been isolated from recipients of the drug, and there have been reports of meningococcal disease due to rifampicin-resistant strains.2 The mechanism of resistance in N. meningitidis strains has been linked to the presence of point mutations in a region corresponding to the cluster I of the Escherichia coli rpoB gene.3,4 Other mechanisms, such as mutations of the mtr efflux pump, were found to play a role in increased resistance to hydrophobic agents, including antibiotics and detergents, in Neisseria gonorrhoeae.5

During a long low endemic period in Italy, N. meningitidis isolates showed a trend of slightly decreased susceptibility to rifampicin, recommended by the Health Authorities in Italy, as most of the strains isolated in the last 15 years are highly resistant to sulphonamides.6

Sequencing of the rpoB and mtr genes was performed on six rifampicin-resistant N. meningitidis isolates belonging to serogroup C and two to serogroup B. The strains were also characterized phenotypically and genotypically to determine their clonal relationship.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
From 1995 to mid-1999, 315 N. meningitidis isolates obtained from cases occurring nationally were sent to the Reference Laboratory of the Istituto Superiore di Sanita'. All strains were confirmed biochemically (API NH, bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), serogrouped by slide agglutination with polyclonal antisera (Murex Diagnostics, Dartford, UK), serotyped according to the standard serological techniques,7 tested for antimicrobial susceptibility and stored at –80°C. MICs of rifampicin were determined by Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) using Mueller– Hinton agar (Oxoid, Milan, Italy) supplemented with 5% laked horse blood and incubated in 5% CO2 at 35°C for 24 h. Breakpoint criteria were: susceptibility <=1 mg/L and resistance >=4 mg/L. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 was used for quality control.

Eight strains were found to be resistant and were included in the study together with sixteen Rifs strains.

Five sets of primers were designed, referring to the sequence of N. meningitidis rpoB gene clusters I, II and III (AC# Z54353, by O. J. Nolte, unpublished), and N. gonorrhoeae mtrR and its promoter gene (AC# Z25796), to generate templates for sequencing (Table IGo). Analysis of the sequences was performed using the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group (GCG) software package.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Primer sets used for sequence analysis of the rpoB and mtr genes in N. meningitidis
 
Plugs containing DNA for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis were digested with 30 U of NheI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA) and electrophoresed in a CHEF-MAPPER II (Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy). Fingerprinting patterns were compared according to the criteria indicated by Dice.8 The guidelines and interpretative criteria to identify relatedness among isolates described by Tenover et al.9 were also used.

For PCR–RFLP analysis a 1116 bp region of the porA gene and a 910 bp region of the porB gene were amplified using two sets of primers, as described by Feavers et al.10 Ten microlitres of the PCR products were digested at 37°C for 3 h with 40 U of the following endonucleases: MspI, HaeIII, RsaI, HinfI (New England Biolabs). To define the degree of polymorphism for porA and porB genes, each pattern was compared with the others for the number of shared bands.

The following GenBank accession numbers were assigned to the rpoB genes of the eight rifampicin-resistant N. meningitidis strains: 694 (AJ270498); 745 (AJ270495); 870 (AJ270496); 888 (AJ270497); 899 (AJ270499); 901 (AJ270503); 944 (AJ270502); and 978 (AJ270494).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Results of serotyping and MICs of rifampicin for the eight Rifr N. meningitidis isolates are shown in Table IIGo. The strains were isolated in different hospitals in North and Central Italy at different times between 1995 and 1999.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Serotyping, MIC values and amino acid substitutions in the rpoB gene of eight rifampicin-resistant N. meningitidis strains
 
The comparison of the rpoB gene of the eight Rifr strains with the sequence AC# Z54353, showed nucleotide substitutions resulting in amino acid changes at positions 542 and 552, inside the region corresponding to cluster I (Table IIGo). The substitution at position 542 (Asp->Val) was found in strains 745, 870, 888 and 978.

A histidine was replaced by a tyrosine residue at position 552 in strains 694, 899 and 901. At the same 552 position, an asparagine residue instead of a histidine, was found in strain 944.

Sequencing performed in the same region of three Rifs strains, used as controls, showed the absence of these mutations.

The mtr promoter region and mtrR gene showed the presence of some mutations (data not shown) that were the same in both resistant and susceptible strains (eight Rifr and 16 Rifs).

The molecular typing obtained by PFGE of the eight Rifr strains, is shown in the Figure.Go Two PFGE types were identified: one produced by strains 694, 899, 901, 944 and 978 (FigureGo, lanes 1–5); the other by strains 745, 870 and 888 (FigureGo, lanes 6–8). The two PFGE patterns were considered unrelated according to Tenover's classification and with a Dice coefficient of <0.85.



View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure. Genomic fingerprinting of Rifr N. meningitidis strains by PFGE using NheI restriction enzyme. Lanes 1–5, patterns produced by N. meningitidis strains 694, 899, 901, 944 and 978, respectively. Lanes 6–8, patterns produced by N. meningitidis strains 745, 870 and 888. Lane M, lambda ladder molecular size marker (New England Biolabs). DNA size standards (marked on the right) are given in kilobase pairs.

 
Identical grouping of the strains was obtained by PCR– RFLP for porA and porB genes (data not shown).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The aim of the present study was to investigate the molecular mechanism of rifampicin resistance in the first eight Rifr N. meningitidis strains isolated in Italy from patients with invasive disease who had not been treated with rifampicin beforehand.

Few reports have been published concerning the mutations affecting the rpoB gene in N. meningitidis strains.3,4

The results obtained by sequencing a 1082 bp fragment in the rpoB gene of all the Rifr strains examined, showed the presence of two mutations in the region corresponding to cluster I. According to these mutations the strains could be divided into two groups. The first, including strains 745, 870 and 888 (serogroup C) and 978 (serogroup B), showed the presence of a valine residue instead of an asparagine at codon position 542. This substitution is documented in N. meningitidis for the first time.

In the second group, a histidine was replaced by a tyrosine at position 552 in strains 694, 899 and 901 (serogroup C), and by an asparagine in strain 944 (serogroup B). Both mutations have already been described by Carter et al.3

Among the resistant strains no relationship was found between MIC values for rifampicin and specific genetic mutations in the rpoB gene, as the same mutations gave two different resistance phenotypes with MICs of 64 and >256 mg/L, respectively.

To explain this difference we also investigated the role of the mtr efflux system recognized as a contributor to antimicrobial resistance in gonococci.5 However, no difference was found between mutations detected in Rifr and Rifs N. meningitidis strains examined in this study. Thus, other factors as yet unknown could contribute to the increased resistance to rifampicin, such as reduced entry of drug into the bacterium.

Molecular typing by PFGE and PCR–RFLP analysis of porA and porB genes indicated that rifampicin resistance in the Italian strains may be associated with the circulation of two different clonal groups without any correlation with the specific mutation detected in the rpoB gene.

Since the role of genetic exchange mechanisms in the spread of rifampicin-resistant N. meningitidis strains cannot be ruled out, the circulation of isolates with this Rifr phenotype will be monitored carefully.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank all the microbiologists of the laboratories of the Public Health Hospitals for collaborating in the National Surveillance Programme for Bacterial Meningitis and for forwarding the meningococcal isolates. The authors also thank Tonino Sofia for excellent technical assistance.


    Notes
 
* Corresponding author. Tel: +39-06-49902335; Fax: +39-06-49387112; E-mail: pmastran{at}iss.it Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1 . Deal, W. B. & Sanders, E. (1969). Efficacy of rifampin in treatment of meningococcal carriers. New England Journal of Medicine 281, 641–5.[ISI][Medline]

2 . Yagupsky, P., Ashkenazi, S. & Block, C. (1993). Rifampicin-resistant meningococci causing invasive disease and failure of prophylaxis. Lancet 341, 1152–3.[ISI][Medline]

3 . Carter, P. E., Abadi, J. R., Yakubu, D. E. & Pennington, T. H. (1994). Molecular characterization of rifampin-resistant Neisseria meningitidis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 38, 1256–61.[Abstract]

4 . Nolte, O. (1997). Rifampicin resistance in Neisseria meningitidis: evidence from a study of sibling strains, description of new mutations and notes on population genetics. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 39, 747–55.[Abstract]

5 . Veal, W. L., Yellen, A., Balthazar, J. T., Pan, W., Spratt, B. G. & Shafer, W. M. (1998). Loss-of-function mutations in the mtr efflux system of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Microbiology 144, 621–7.[Abstract]

6 . Connolly, M. & Noah, N. (1999). Is group C meningococcal disease increasing in Europe? A report of surveillance of meningococcal infection in Europe 1993–6. Epidemiology and Infection 122, 41–9.[ISI][Medline]

7 . Abdillabi, H. & Poolman, J. T. (1987). Whole-cell Elisa for typing Neisseria meningitidis with monoclonal antibodies. FEMS Microbiology Letters 48, 367–71.[ISI]

8 . Dice, L. R. (1945). Measure of the amount of ecologic associations between species. Ecology 26, 277–302.

9 . Tenover, F. C., Arbeit, R. D., Goering, R. V., Mickelsen, P. A., Murray, B. E., Persing, D. H. et al. (1995). Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 33, 2233–9.[Free Full Text]

10 . Feavers, I. M., Suker, J., McKenna, A. J., Heath, A. B. & Maiden, M. C. (1992). Molecular analysis of the serotyping antigens of Neisseria meningitidis. Infection and Immunity 60, 3620–9.[Abstract]

Received 2 August 2000; returned 21 September 2000; revised 20 October 2000; accepted 3 November 2000