In vitro post-antibiotic effect of fluoroquinolones, macrolides, ß-lactams, tetracyclines, vancomycin, clindamycin, linezolid, chloramphenicol, quinupristin/dalfopristin and rifampicin on Bacillus anthracis

A. Athamna1,2, M. Athamna1, B. Medlej1,2, D. J. Bast3 and E. Rubinstein2,4,*

1 The Triangle Research and Development Center, Kfar-Qaraa; 2 Department of Human Microbiology, Tel-Aviv University, School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv; 4 Infectious Diseases Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, School of Medicine, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel; 3 Toronto Centre for Antimicrobial Research & Evaluation (ToCARE), Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Received 17 December 2003; accepted 22 December 2003


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro the post-antibiotic effect (PAE) of 19 antibacterial agents against two strains of Bacillus anthracis (ST-1 and Sterne strains).

Methods: PAE was determined by calculating the time required for the viable counts of antibiotic-exposed bacteria (at concentrations of 10x MIC and exposure for 2 h) at 37°C to increase by 1 log10 above the counts observed immediately after antibiotic removal compared with the corresponding time for controls not exposed to antibiotics.

Results: The PAEs of the fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and garenoxacin) were 2–5 h. The macrolide (erythromycin, clarithromycin and telithromycin) PAEs were 1–4 h, and that of clindamycin was 2 h. The PAEs induced by tetracycline and minocycline were 1–3 h. The PAEs induced by the ß-lactams (penicillin G, amoxicillin and ceftriaxone), vancomycin, linezolid and chloramphenicol were 1–2 h. The PAE induced by rifampicin was 4–5 h. Quinupristin/dalfopristin had the longest PAE, lasting for 7–8 h.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that the PAE is unrelated to the MIC but may be related to the rapidity of bacterial kill. These observations may bear importance on treatment regimens of human anthrax.

Keywords: anthrax, PAE, susceptibility


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Post-antibiotic effect (PAE) is a well-established pharmacodynamic parameter that reflects an arrested bacterial growth following the removal of the active antibacterial agent from the growth medium.14 The duration of the PAE is mainly influenced by the bacterial species, and the nature of the antibacterial drug and its concentration, but also by environmental factors such as temperature, pH, pO2, growth medium, the kind of body fluid, etc.58 The clinical significance of the PAE pertains primarily to the impact it may have on the design of antimicrobial dosing regimens in clinical practice.6 Antimicrobials that induce long PAEs may be administered at longer dosing intervals than determined by their pharmacokinetic properties such as t1/2 values. The benefit of a prolonged PAE may thus allow for fewer daily drug administrations without reduced efficacy, and possibly a lower frequency of adverse events.9,10

Since post-exposure prophylaxis and therapy of anthrax require prolonged antibiotic therapy extending to 60 days or more,11 a reduction in the frequency of dosings by an increase in the administration intervals might be more efficient than the current recommended regimen. We have therefore examined the PAEs of 19 antibacterials belonging to different antibiotic classes against two strains of Bacillus anthracis (the Sterne strain and the Russian vaccine strain ST-1).


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Antibacterial agents

The antibiotics tested in this study were: ofloxacin and levofloxacin (gifts from Aventis, Netanya, Israel, and Aventis, Paris, France, respectively), ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin (a gift from Bayer Leverkusen, Germany), garenoxacin (a gift from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Waterloo, Belgium), minocycline (Dexxon, Haifa, Israel), tetracycline (Sigma, Rehovot, Israel), penicillin G (Rafa Laboratories, Jerusalem, Israel), amoxicillin (GSK, Petach-Tikva, Israel), ceftriaxone (Roche, Tel-Aviv, Israel), vancomycin (E. Lilly, Italy), erythromycin (Sigma, Rehovot, Israel), clarithromycin [Abbott (Promedico, Petach-Tikva, Israel)], telithromycin and quinupristin/dalfopristin (Aventis, Paris, France), clindamycin and linezolid [Pharmacia (Agis), Bnei-Braq, Israel and Pharmacia, Kalamazoo, USA], rifampicin (Sigma, Rehovot, Israel) and chloramphenicol (Teva, Petach-Tikva, Israel). Penicillin G, minocycline, vancomycin, erythromycin, rifampicin, clindamycin, linezolid, ceftriaxone, garenoxacin and quinupristin/dalfopristin were each received as a dry laboratory powder and were dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2). Amoxicillin was dissolved in distilled water. Clarithromycin was dissolved in analytical acetone, and telithromycin and tetracycline were dissolved initially in two drops of acetic acid and ethanol (100%), respectively, and subsequently diluted in distilled water to the required concentration. The antibiotics were sterilized through 0.45 µm pore-size filters (Millipore S.A., Paris, France).

Ofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin and chloramphenicol were obtained in a liquid form (as injectables).

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Bacteria used in this study were two strains of B. anthracis, the Sterne veterinary vaccine strain (a gift from the Colorado Serum Institute, Denver, CO, USA) and the Russian anthrax vaccine strain Sanitary Technical Institute (ST-1) purchased commercially from a veterinary supply store in Moscow, Russia. Both strains are not human pathogens, as both lack a plasmid necessary to produce the capsule of the vegetative cells. Bacterial spores were stored in sterile 30% glycerol in PBS, and were spread on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar (Difco Laboratories, USA) and incubated for 18–24 h at 37°C to obtain single colonies (vegetative form). A single colony was inoculated into 20 mL of BHI broth and incubated overnight at 37°C. The grown bacteria were used in the experiments.

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs)

MICs were determined according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) criteria for Staphylococcus aureus.12,13

Determination of the PAE

Twenty millilitres of 1:20 diluted overnight culture (OD of 0.1 at 600 nm = 106 cfu) in BHI broth was incubated for 2 h at 37°C with or without the antibiotics to be tested, at concentrations of 10x MIC. In order to remove the antibiotics, exposed bacteria were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2) by centrifugation for 10 min at 7000 rpm; controls were handled similarly. The pellets were resuspended in 20 mL of BHI broth followed by incubation at 37°C and samples (1 mL) were obtained at –2 h (2 h of exposure to antibiotics) for corrections that were made to ensure that all the cultures would start with the same bacterial count. Samples were obtained at time 0 (immediately after washing and after correction) and then hourly up to 7 h and OD values determined (reflecting bacterial growth). The OD values were converted into cfu (bacterial growth) by using a standard curve which was constructed relating the number of bacteria to the OD. The PAE was defined according to Craig & Gudmundsson6 as PAE = T – C, where T is the time required for the viable counts of the exposed bacteria to increase by 1 log10 above the counts observed immediately after washing and C is the corresponding time for the antibiotic unexposed controls.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MICs

The MICs of the 19 antibacterial agents tested against the two strains of B. anthracis, reported previously, are shown in Table 1.14


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. MICs of 19 antibiotics against B. anthracis strains
 
PAEs

All five fluoroquinolones tested exhibited similar PAE patterns for both strains (Figure 1). Ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin had PAE durations of 2–3 h for both strains, whereas ofloxacin and levofloxacin had PAE durations ranging from 2 to 5 h, with the Sterne strain having PAEs of 2–3 h and the ST-1 strain having PAEs of 4–5 h (Table 2).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Induction of PAE by ofloxacin (a), ciprofloxacin (b), levofloxacin (c) and moxifloxacin (d) against B. anthracis ST-1 (control, filled circles; antibiotic-exposed, open circles) and Sterne (control, filled triangles; antibiotic-exposed, open triangles) strains.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. PAEs of various antibiotics against B. anthracis strains ST-1 and Sterne
 
The PAE durations of the macrolides erythromycin and clarithromycin and the ketolide telithromycin ranged from 1 to 4 h (Figure 2 and Table 2). The longest PAE in this group was observed with telithromycin (4 h for both strains), and the shortest with erythromycin (1–2 h), whereas clarithromycin had a PAE of 2 h for both strains.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Induction of PAE by clarithromycin (a), erythromycin (b) and telithromycin (c) against B. anthracis ST-1 (control, filled circles; antibiotic-exposed, open circles) and Sterne (control, filled triangles; antibiotic-exposed, open triangles) strains.

 
Clindamycin exhibited a PAE equal to clarithromycin (2 h for both strains) (Figure 3 and Table 2). Linezolid PAE was found to be 1 h for both strains (Figure 4 and Table 2). The PAE induced by the three ß-lactams (penicillin G, amoxicillin and ceftriaxone) was similar and short (1–2 h against both strains) (Figure 5). Vancomycin exhibited a similar effect to the ß-lactams with a PAE of 1–2 h (Figure 6 and Table 2). The tetracyclines (tetracycline and minocycline) exhibited somewhat divergent PAEs with tetracycline having a short PAE of ~1 h, whereas minocycline had a somewhat longer PAE of 2–3 h for both strains (Figure 7 and Table 2). Chloramphenicol exhibited a PAE of 1–2 h for both strains (Figure 8 and Table 2). Rifampicin exhibited a PAE ranging from 4 to 5 h (Figure 9 and Table 2) and quinupristin/dalfopristin exhibited the longest PAE amongst all the antibacterials tested, ranging from 7 to 8 h (Figure 10 and Table 2).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Induction of PAE by clindamycin against B. anthracis ST-1 (control, filled circles; antibiotic-exposed, open circles) and Sterne (control, filled triangles; antibiotic-exposed, open triangles) strains.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Induction of PAE by linezolid against B. anthracis ST-1 (control, filled circles; antibiotic-exposed, open circles) and Sterne (control, filled triangles; antibiotic-exposed, open triangles) strains.

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Induction of PAE by penicillin G (a), amoxicillin (b) and ceftriaxone (c) against B. anthracis ST-1 (control, filled circles; antibiotic-exposed, open circles) and Sterne (control, filled triangles; antibiotic-exposed, open triangles) strains.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Induction of PAE by vancomycin against B. anthracis ST-1 (control, filled circles; antibiotic-exposed, open circles) and Sterne (control, filled triangles; antibiotic-exposed, open triangles) strains.

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Induction of PAE by tetracycline (a) and minocycline (b) against B. anthracis ST-1 (control, filled circles; antibiotic-exposed, open circles) and Sterne (control, filled triangles; antibiotic-exposed, open triangles) strains.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Induction of PAE by chloramphenicol against B. anthracis ST-1 (control, filled circles; antibiotic-exposed, open circles) and Sterne (control, filled triangles; antibiotic-exposed, open triangles) strains.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Induction of PAE by rifampicin against B. anthracis ST-1 (control, filled circles; antibiotic-exposed, open circles) and Sterne (control, filled triangles; antibiotic-exposed, open triangles) strains.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. Induction of PAE by quinupristin/dalfopristin against B. anthracis ST-1 (control, filled circles; antibiotic-exposed, open circles) and Sterne (control, filled triangles; antibiotic-exposed, open triangles) strains.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The dosage and frequency of administration of an antibacterial agent are determined by bacterial susceptibility expressed as the MIC, and by the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the agent. The MICs of the antibiotics tested in this study were determined previously (Table 1).14 All antibiotics tested except chloramphenicol and possibly ceftriaxone were active against the tested B. anthracis strains according to NCCLS breakpoints for S. aureus.13

The PAE refers to the time period after complete removal of an antibiotic, during which there is delayed regrowth of the bacteria. Although this phenomenon was first described by Bigger in 1944, it was only many years thereafter that the PAE was recognized as an important pharmacodynamic parameter.6

In our study, the exposure of the tested B. anthracis organisms to the antibiotics was at concentrations of 10x MIC, the MICs having been determined in a previous study. The exposure lasted for 2 h. In an earlier publication,14 we have found that the rapidity of kill of most antibiotics against these strains is rather slow. Indeed, only moxifloxacin, rifampicin and quinupristin/dalfopristin were able to reduce the initial inoculum substantially within the first 2 h of exposure. It was therefore necessary to carry out the necessary corrections after 2 h of exposure. The PAEs induced by the fluoroquinolones ranged between 2 and 5 h, in accordance with PAEs induced by this class of agents in other bacteria, e.g. Streptococcus pneumoniae showed a PAE of 0.5–6.5 h in response to fluoroquinolones and a PAE of 2.3 h following exposure to ciprofloxacin.15,16 Against S. aureus, the PAE of fluoroquinolones ranged between 1.13 h for ciprofloxacin, 1.75 h for levofloxacin and 1.1–2.4 h for trovafloxacin.17,18 The macrolides, in this study, showed slightly shorter PAEs compared with the fluoroquinolones (1–4 h), similarly to PAEs described for S. pneumoniae (2.9 h for clarithromycin and 2.5 h for erythromycin).19 The shortest PAEs (1–2 h) were found with the ß-lactams, vancomycin, linezolid and chloramphenicol. Similarly short PAEs were found for ß-lactams and vancomycin against S. aureus.20,21 Quinupristin/dalfopristin was found to possess the longest PAE, lasting 7–8 h. A similar PAE (7.4 h) with quinupristin/dalfopristin was demonstrated with S. pneumoniae.22

All antibiotics tested in this study appeared to induce in vitro a similar PAE in both strains of B. anthracis, suggesting that pathogenic B. anthracis may also show the same phenomenon. In a previous study,14 we have demonstrated that moxifloxacin, quinupristin/dalfopristin and rifampicin caused the most rapid bacterial killing, achieving a complete kill within 2–4 h. The ß-lactams and vancomycin demonstrated a 2–4 log10 bacterial kill within 4–6 h. The macrolides, tetracyclines and linezolid demonstrated a slower kill rate, whereas chloramphenicol did not kill at all. Thus, it appears that the PAE is unrelated to the MIC but may bear some relationship to the rapidity of bacterial kill. For example, quinupristin/dalfopristin had the most rapid kill and the longest PAE. Rifampicin had a 2–4 log10 bacterial kill within 4–6 h and a PAE of 5 h. In contrast, chloramphenicol was a poor killer of B. anthracis and had a short PAE of 1–2 h. However, a linear relationship between the rapidity of kill and the length of the PAE could not be established, R=0.54 and 0.35 for the Stern and ST-1 strains, respectively.

The clinical implication of long PAEs lies in the possibility of increasing the intervals between drug administrations thus allowing for fewer daily dosages, thereby potentially reducing treatment costs, increasing patient compliance and decreasing drug exposure.23 In addition to the possible therapeutically beneficial long PAE caused by some antibiotics, the patients who will receive these agents may potentially benefit also from a rapid bacterial kill caused by these antibiotics, possibly allowing for shorter therapeutic regimens.


    Acknowledgements
 
This study was supported by a grant from Aventis France and Bayer AG, and by partial support from the Israeli Ministry of Science and Technology.


    Footnotes
 
* Corresponding author. Tel: +972-3-5345-389; Fax: +972-3-5347-081; E-mail: erubins{at}yahoo.com Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1 . Bigger, J. W. (1944). The bactericidal action of penicillin on Streptococcus pyogenes. Journal of Medical Science 227, 553–68.

2 . Eagle, H. & Musselman, A. D. (1949). The slow recovery of bacteria from the toxic effect of penicillin. Journal of Bacteriology 58, 475–90.[ISI]

3 . Gengo, F. M., Mannion, T. W., Nightingale, C. H. et al. (1984). Integration of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of methicillin in curative treatment of experimental endocarditis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 14, 619–31.[Abstract]

4 . Parker, R. F. & Marsh, H. C. (1946). The action of penicillin on Staphylococcus. Journal of Bacteriology 51, 181–6.[ISI]

5 . Bustamante, C. I., Drusano, G. L., Tatem, B. A. et al. (1984). Postantibiotic effect of imipenem on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 5, 678–82.

6 . Craig, W. A. & Gudmundsson, S. (1999). The postantibiotic effect. In Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine, 3rd edn (Lorian, V., Ed.), pp. 403–31. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.

7 . Cozens, R. M., Tuomanen, E., Tosch, W. et al. (1986). Evaluation of the bactericidal activity of ß-lactam antibiotics on slowly growing bacteria cultured in the chemostat. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 29, 797–802.[ISI][Medline]

8 . Eagle, H. (1952). Experimental approach to the problem of treatment failure with penicillin. American Journal of Medicine 13, 389–99.[ISI]

9 . ter Braak, E. W., de Vries, P. J., Bouter, K. P. et al. (1990). Once-daily dosing regimen for aminoglycoside plus ß-lactam combination therapy of serious bacterial infections: comparative trial with netilmicin plus ceftriaxone. American Journal of Medicine 89, 58–66.[ISI][Medline]

10 . Gilbert, D. N. (1991). Once-daily aminoglycoside therapy. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 35, 399–405.[ISI][Medline]

11 . Inglesby, T. V., O’Toole, T., Henderson, D. A. et al. (2002). Anthrax as a biological weapon, 2002: updated recommendations for management. Journal of the American Medical Association 287, 2236–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12 . Mohammed, M. J., Marston, C. K., Popovic, T. et al. (2002). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Bacillus anthracis: comparison of results obtained by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth microdilution reference and Etest agar gradient diffusion methods. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 40, 1902–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13 . National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. (1997). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically—Fourth Edition: Approved Standard M7-A4. NCCLS, Wayne, PA, USA.

14 . Athamna, A., Massalha, M., Athamna, M. et al. (2004). In vitro susceptibility of Bacillus anthracis to various antibacterial agents and their time–kill activity. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 53, 247–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15 . Odenholt, I. (2001). Pharmacodynamic effects of subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 17, 1–8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

16 . Spangler, S. K., Lin, G., Jacobs, M. R. et al. (1998). Postantibiotic effect and postantibiotic sub-MIC effect of levofloxacin compared to those of ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin against 20 pneumococci. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 42, 1253–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17 . Licata, L., Smith, C. E., Goldschmidt, R. M. et al. (1997). Comparison of the postantibiotic sub-MIC effects of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin on Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 41, 950–5.[Abstract]

18 . Pankuch, G. A., Jacobs, M. R. & Appelbaum, P. C. (1998). Postantibiotic effect of trovafloxacin against Gram-positive and -negative organisms. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 42, 1503–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19 . Odenholt-Tornqvist, I., Löwdin, E. & Cars, O. (1995). Postantibiotic effects and postantibiotic sub-MIC effects of roxithromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin on respiratory tract pathogens. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 39, 221–6.[Abstract]

20 . Odenholt-Tornqvist, I., Löwdin, E. & Cars, O. (1998). In vitro pharmacodynamic studies of L-749,345 in comparison with imipenem and ceftriaxone against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 42, 2365–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21 . Löwdin, E., Odenholt, I. & Cars, O. (1998). In vitro studies of pharmacodynamic properties of vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 42, 2739–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22 . Pankuch, G. A., Jacobs, M. R. & Appelbaum, P. C. (1998). Postantibiotic effect and postantibiotic sub-MIC effect of quinupristin–dalfopristin against Gram-positive and -negative organisms. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 42, 3028–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23 . Kardas, P. (2002). Patient compliance with antibiotic treatment for respiratory tract infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 49, 897–903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Abstract
FREE Full Text (PDF)
All Versions of this Article:
53/4/609    most recent
dkh130v1
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My Personal Archive
Download to citation manager
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Disclaimer
Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Athamna, A.
Articles by Rubinstein, E.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Athamna, A.
Articles by Rubinstein, E.