Multiple effects of green tea catechin on the antifungal activity of antimycotics against Candida albicans

Masatomo Hirasawa* and Kazuko Takada

Department of Microbiology, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, 2–870–1 Sakaecho-nishi, Matsudo City, Chiba 271–8587, Japan

Received 25 June 2003; returned 26 August 2003, revised 26 October 2003; accepted 31 October 2003


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Objectives: The susceptibility of Candida albicans to catechin under varying pH conditions and the synergism of the combination of catechin and antimycotics were evaluated.

Method: Antifungal activity was determined by broth dilution and calculation of cfu.

Results: The antifungal activity of catechin was pH dependent. The concentration of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCg) causing 90% growth inhibition of tested strains of C. albicans was 2000 mg/L at pH 6.0, 500–1000 mg/L at pH 6.5 and 15.6–250 mg/L at pH 7.0. Among catechins, pyrogallol catechin showed stronger antifungal activity against C. albicans than catechol catechin. The addition of 6.25–25 or 3.12–12.5 mg/L EGCg to amphotericin B 0.125 or 0.25 mg/L (below MIC) at pH 7.0 resulted in enhancement, respectively, of the antifungal effect of amphotericin B against amphotericin B-susceptible or -resistant C. albicans. Combined treatment with 3.12–12.5 mg/L EGCg plus amphotericin B 0.5 mg/L (below MIC) markedly decreased the growth of amphotericin B-resistant C. albicans. When fluconazole-susceptible C. albicans was treated with 25–50 mg/L EGCg and fluconazole 0.125–0.25 mg/L (below MIC), its growth was inhibited by 93.0%–99.4% compared with its growth in the presence of fluconazole alone. The combined use of 12.5 mg/L EGCg and fluconazole 10–50 mg/L (below MIC) inhibited the growth of fluconazole-resistant C. albicans by 98.5%–99.7%.

Conclusions: These results indicate that EGCg enhances the antifungal effect of amphotericin B or fluconazole against antimycotic-susceptible and -resistant C. albicans. Combined treatment with catechin allows the use of lower doses of antimycotics and induces multiple antifungal effects. It is hoped that this may help to avoid the side effects of antimycotics.

Keywords: Japanese green tea, polyphenols, antifungal effects, yeast


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Candida albicans is part of the indigenous microbial flora in humans and can be found in the oral cavity and the digestive and vaginal tracts, and is unique among opportunistic pathogens because it is part of the normal microbial flora of the host.1 However, an increased prevalence of candidosis is well documented and has been attributed to the widespread use of antibiotics and immunosuppressive agents.2 C. albicans has been shown to play an important role in oral candidosis, denture stomatitis and severe periodontitis.36

Amphotericin B is one of the polyene antibiotics, and fluconazole is an azole antifungal agent. They have strong antifungal activity, especially against C. albicans. However, they also have side effects,7 and antimycotic-resistant clinical isolates of C. albicans have appeared.8,9 Therefore, a non-antibiotic agent that is both highly effective and safe might be important for the eradication of both antibiotic-susceptible and -resistant strains of C. albicans. There are several reports that show antifungal activity by natural products.1014 Green tea is a natural substance that is commonly drunk worldwide, especially in Asia. Catechin from tea has been reported to have an antimicrobial effect against oral,15,16 intestinal17 and food-borne18 bacteria, antitoxicity against various bacterial haemolysins19 and antiviral activity.20

In this study, we examined the antifungal effects on C. albicans of tea catechins on their own and combined with antimycotics.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Microorganisms and culture conditions

Candida albicans ATCC 90028, ATCC 90029, ATCC 96901 and ATCC 200955, and 10 clinical isolates were used in this study. All strains were maintained routinely and cfu were calculated on Sabouraud agar (Nissui Co., Tokyo, Japan). The plates were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 48 h.

Catechins and antimycotics

The catechins used in this study were (–)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCg), (–)-epicatechin gallate (ECg), (–)-epigallocatechin (EGC), (–)-epicatechin (EC), (+)-catechin (C), catechin gallate (Cg), (+)-gallocatechin (GC) and gallocatechin gallate (GCg), and they were purchased from Funakoshi Co. (Tokyo, Japan). Amphotericin B and fluconazole were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO, USA).

Measurement of MIC of EGCg at various pHs

Measurement of the MIC of EGCg for C. albicans was performed by broth dilution and calculation of cfu. In the experiments, RPMI medium 1640 (Gibco BRL) buffered with 0.15 M sodium phosphate buffer (NaPB-RPMI) at pH 6.0, 6.5 or 7.0 was used for the test medium. The experimental medium was prepared by twofold dilution of 8000 mg/L EGCg with NaPB-RPMI at pH 6.0, 6.5 or 7.0. C. albicans was pre-incubated in the NaPB-RPMI and buffered at each pH at 37°C for 24 h with shaking (100 strokes/min). The pre-cultured C. albicans (final fungal count of ~1 x 103 cfu/mL) was inoculated into 1 mL of the experimental media at various pHs. After cultures were shaken at 37°C for 48 h, they were spread on Sabouraud agar plates at 10-fold dilutions in triplicate. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h under aerobic conditions. Antifungal activity was determined by calculation of cfu. The minimum concentration that inhibited the growth of C. albicans on the Sabouraud agar plates by 90%, compared with the growth in EGCg-free medium, was defined as the MIC90.10 The minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) was determined as the lowest concentration resulting in the death of 99.9% or more of the initial inoculum. To determine MFCs, 0.1 mL of the test sample was inoculated on Sabouraud agar plates in triplicate and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The cfu were counted to assess viability.10

Assay of antifungal activity of catechins

To investigate the effect of catechins on non-multiplying fungal cells, resting fungal cells were prepared. C. albicans was cultured in brain heart infusion (BHI, Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) broth at 37°C for 24 h aerobically with shaking. The growing cells were harvested, washed three times with 0.15 M NaPB (pH 7.0), suspended in the same buffer to a final concentration of ~1 x 106 cfu/mL and used for the assay. One milligram per mL of each catechin was added to the resting cells (~1 x 106 cfu/mL) in NaPB, pH 7.0, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C with shaking. Aliquots (0.1 mL) of the cell suspensions were collected over an extended period. Ten-fold dilutions of the samples were made in 0.9 mL of Tris–HCl buffer (0.05 M, pH 7.0) and inoculated onto Sabouraud agar plates. The plates were cultured aerobically at 37°C for 48 h and the cfu calculated.

Measurement of multiple effects of EGCg and antimycotics

Assays of antifungal activity against C. albicans were performed in a similar manner to that described above for the measurement of MIC. Catechins, amphotericin B and fluconazole were prepared at 50–3.12, 0.5–0.125 and 50–0.125 mg/L in NaPB-RPMI at pH 7.0. At these concentrations, none of the agents alone affects the growth of C. albicans. The pre-cultured C. albicans (~2 x 107 cfu/mL) was adjusted to ~2 x 103 cfu/mL with NaPB-RPMI at pH 7.0 using the 10-fold dilution method for inoculation. One millilitre of these diluted solutions of C. albicans was added to 1 mL of the mixtures of various concentrations of EGCg and antimycotic solutions in NaPB-RPMI at pH 7.0. After shaking incubation at 37°C for 48 h, the cultures were spread on plates at 10-fold dilutions in triplicate, and the cfu calculated. The percentage of growth inhibition was calculated from the cfu compared with that of drug-free control cultures.

Statistical analysis

Data shown are from three separate experiments and were analysed statistically by calculating means and S.D. of the means. The differences were evaluated by Student’s t-test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Measurement of MIC

The MIC90 and MFC of EGCg for C. albicans ATCC 90028, ATCC 90029, ATCC 96901 and ATCC 200955 are shown in Table 1. The antifungal effect of EGCg was dependent on pH. The MIC90 of EGCg at pH 6.0 against ATCC 90028, ATCC 90029, ATCC 96901 and ATCC 200955 strains was 2000 mg/L. However, at pH 7.0 it was 15.6–250 mg/L. The MFC of EGCg against the test strains was 4000–8000 mg/L at pH 6.0 and 125–2000 mg/L at pH 7.0. Strain ATCC 96901, which is fluconazole resistant, was slightly more susceptible to EGCg than the other strains. Table 2 shows the MIC90 of EGCg for clinical isolates of C. albicans at pH 7.0. The range of MIC90 values was 31.2–250 mg/L. The MIC90 of fluconazole and amphotericin B for strain ATCC 90029 at pH 7.0 was 0.5–1 mg/L and 0.25–0.5 mg/L, respectively (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. MIC90 and MFC of EGCg for C. albicans at various pHs
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. MIC90 of EGCg against clinical isolates of C. albicans at pH 7.0
 
Antifungal activity of various catechins

Figure 1 shows the antifungal effects of the various catechins on resting fungal cells of C. albicans ATCC 90029. The survival of resting cells decreased immediately and rapidly with EGC, GC, EGCg and GCg, and the survival rate was <1% after 4 h. A few colonies still survived after 24 h of culturing. In contrast, the survival of resting cells treated with C, EC, Cg and ECg had hardly decreased after 4 h, but decreased gradually and slowly with increasing incubation time. The survival rate was 1%–10% after 24 h of culturing.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Antifungal effect of various catechins against C. albicans ATCC 90029 using resting cells with NaPB, pH 7.0.

 
The antifungal effects of EC, EGC and ECg on resting cells of C. albicans ATCC 90028 and clinical isolates NUM-CA11, NUM-CA18, NUM-CA27, NUM-CA35 and NUM-CA43 were also examined. The effects of EC and ECg on ATCC 90028 and the five clinical isolates showed gradual antifungal activity similar to that on strain ATCC 90029. The effects of EGC on ATCC 90028 and the five clinical isolates were observed to be more marked than the effects of catechol catechins, similar to the effects on ATCC 90029 (data not shown).

Effect of EGCg on the antifungal activity of antimycotics

The addition of EGCg to amphotericin B resulted in enhancement of the antifungal activity of amphotericin B (Figures 2 and 3). Amphotericin B at 0.125 and 0.25 mg/L in the presence of 6.25 mg/L EGCg caused, respectively, 94.2% and 99.5% inhibition of the growth of amphotericin B-susceptible ATCC 90029. Stronger growth inhibition was obtained with 25 mg/L EGCg. The ATCC 90029 strain grew to only 0.2% or 0.01% of the extent seen with amphotericin B alone. The addition of 3.12 mg/L EGCg to amphotericin B 0.25 or 0.5 mg/L inhibited the growth of amphotericin B-resistant C. albicans ATCC 200955, resulting in, respectively, 0.04% or 0.001% of the extent of growth seen with amphotericin B alone. A stronger synergic effect of EGCg was obtained using 12.5 mg/L with amphotericin B 0.25 and 0.5 mg/L. The growth level of the ATCC 200955 strain was 3.4 x 102 and 8.3 x 10 cfu at these concentrations, whereas that of the control was ~5 x 107 cfu.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The effect of the combination of amphotericin B (AMPH) with EGCg on the growth of C. albicans ATCC 90029. The culture was incubated in NaPB-RPMI, pH 7.0, for 48 h. Error bars indicate S.D. *Values differ significantly (P < 0.01) from values without catechin.

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The effect of the combination of amphotericin B (AMPH) with EGCg on the growth of C. albicans ATCC 200955. *Values differ significantly (P < 0.01) from values without catechin.

 
The effect of the combined use of fluconazole and EGCg on antifungal activity against fluconazole-susceptible C. albicans is shown in Figure 4. The growth of ATCC 90029 was observed to be 93.0% and 95.1% inhibited using fluconazole 0.125 and 0.25 mg/L, respectively, together with 25 mg/L EGCg, compared with fluconazole alone. The strongest growth inhibition was obtained with the combined use of fluconazole 0.125–0.25 mg/L and 50 mg/L EGCg, with 98.5%–99.4% inhibition compared with controls.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. The effect of the combination of fluconazole (FCZ) with EGCg on the growth of C. albicans ATCC 90029. *Values differ significantly (P < 0.01) from values without catechin.

 
Figure 5 shows the effect of the combined use of fluconazole and EGCg on fluconazole-resistant C. albicans ATCC 96901. The MIC90 of fluconazole for the ATCC 96901 strain at pH 7.0 was 200 mg/L (data not shown). Strain ATCC 96901 grew well in the presence of less than fluconazole 50 mg/L. The combined use of fluconazole 10 mg/L and 6.25 or 12.5 mg/L of EGCg caused, respectively, 76.1% and 98.5% growth inhibition of the ATCC 96901 strain compared with fluconazole alone. Furthermore, the addition of 6.25 mg/L or 12.5 mg/L EGCg to fluconazole 50 mg/L caused, respectively, 98.4% and 99.7% growth inhibition compared with fluconazole alone.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. The effect of the combination of fluconazole (FCZ) with EGCg on the growth of C. albicans ATCC 96901. *Values differ significantly (P < 0.01) from values without catechin.

 
To confirm these multiple effects further, similar examinations were performed using 25 mg/L EGCg and amphotericin B 0.125 mg/L or fluconazole 0.25 mg/L, concentrations at which neither agent alone affects the growth, and C. albicans ATCC 90028 and clinical isolates NUM-CA11, NUM-CA18, NUM-CA27, NUM-CA35 and NUM-CA43. The growth of ATCC 90028 and the clinical isolates was inhibited, respectively, 99.0%–99.9% and 95.1%–98.6% compared with antimycotic-free growth using the combination of EGCg and amphotericin B or EGCg and fluconazole (data not shown).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It has been reported that tea catechins have antibacterial activity against various pathogenic bacteria.1518,21,22 Concerning fungi, Okubo et al.23 reported that 2.5% of black tea extract completely inhibited the growth of Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton rubrum; however, even at a 10% concentration, this extract did not inhibit the growth of C. albicans or Cryptococcus (Filobasidiella) neoformans. Recently, botanical,10,13 marine11,14 and bacterial12 natural products were reported to have antifungal activity. In the present study, we showed that the antifungal activity of catechins against C. albicans was pH dependent (Table 1). These findings suggest that the antifungal action of EGCg was weakened by acidic conditions. The MIC90 of EGCg increased by more than 10-fold as the pH was reduced from 7.0 to 6.5 and further increased several fold as the pH was reduced from 6.5 to 6.0.

For reference, a normal cup of tea has a concentration of ~1000 p.p.m. polyphenol. The catechins extracted from Japanese green tea consist of mainly EGCg, EGC and GC, and minor amounts of EC, ECg and C. Cg and GCg are not contained in extracts from green tea. Among these catechins, pyrogallol catechins (EGCg, EGC, GC and GCg) were more effective than catechol catechins (EC, ECg, C and Cg) against C. albicans (Figure 1). The actions of EGCg, EGC and GC were fungicidal. Studies of the antibacterial activity of catechins against phytopathogenic bacteria showed results similar to those against C. albicans.22 Ikigai et al. 24 reported that the mechanism of the bactericidal effects of catechins primarily involved acting on and damaging bacterial membranes of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. The antibacterial activities of catechins were predominantly related to the gallic acid moiety and the hydroxyl group member.24 The mode of catechin action involves inducing rapid leakage of small molecules entrapped in the intraliposomal space and aggregation of the liposomes.24 Toyoshima et al.25 examined the mechanism of the effects of green tea catechin on T. mentagrophytes using electron microscopy and suggested that catechin attacked the cell membrane and caused lysis of the conidia and hyphae.

The present study also showed synergic antifungal activity of the combination of EGCg and antimycotics against C. albicans. Amphotericin B possesses antifungal activity against C. albicans. However, amphotericin B has strong side effects even at low doses. The combination of amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine, an antimycotic, was tried in an attempt to reduce the effective dose of amphotericin B.26 In the present study, the combined use of EGCg and amphotericin B (below MIC) inhibited the growth of C. albicans, and the action was fungicidal. Amphotericin B binds to ergosterol, one of the cell membrane sterols, and damages the cell membrane directly, leading to fungicidal activity against the fungi. Amphotericin B below the MFC also stimulates fungal membrane permeability. The combined use of amphotericin B and catechin may stimulate catechin uptake into the cell by the action of amphotericin B, and intracellular catechin may act as a fungicidal agent. A similar finding was reported previously. Catechin induces antibacterial activity of oxacillin below the MIC against methicillin-resistant S. aureus.27 The bactericidal mechanism may be as follows: first, catechin acts on and damages bacterial membranes, and second, oxacillin binds to penicillin-binding protein and deactivates bacteria.24 Since the arrival of azole antifungal agents as first-line drugs,28 fluconazole-resistant C. albicans has begun to appear.8 The combined use of EGCg and fluconazole was effective even against fluconazole-resistant C. albicans. The effective dose of fluconazole was decreased to one-fortieth using 6.25 mg/L EGCg compared with the growth in the presence of fluconazole alone (Figure 5). C. albicans expresses multidrug efflux transporter (MET), which mediates the efflux of a broad range of compounds, including fluconazole. MET inhibitor, cyclosporine, and fluconazole showed a potent synergic effect against C. albicans.29 The mechanism of the synergic effect of the combination of fluconazole and EGCg is still unknown.

C. albicans superinfection results from taking antibiotics for a long period, and is predominately detected in the oral cavity, intestine and vagina. Local administration of amphotericin B and fluconazole is very effective against C. albicans. The addition of catechin to amphotericin B or fluconazole induces antifungal activity via stimulation of multiple functions (Figures 2–5). Catechins are not destroyed and retain their effectiveness when exposed to artificial gastric juice for over 60 min (data not shown). Catechin combined with amphotericin B or fluconazole, and perhaps other antimycotics, may be beneficial and may contribute to the effective medical treatment of candidoses, such as thrush, denture stomatitis, and intestinal candidosis. However, in vivo experiments would be needed to test these possibilities in living animals or humans.


    Acknowledgements
 
This study was supported in part by a grant from The Tsuchiya Foundation.


    Footnotes
 
* Corresponding author. Tel: +47-360-9488; Fax: +47-360-9488; E-mail: masahira{at}mascat.nihon-u.ac.jp Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1 . Shepherd, M. G. (1986). The pathogenesis and host defence mechanisms of oral candidosis. New Zealand Dental Journal 82, 78–81.[Medline]

2 . Gadea, I., Cuenca, M., Gegúndez, M. I. et al. (1997). Effect of pH and buffer system on the in-vitro activity of five antifungals against yeasts. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 39, 453–9.[Abstract]

3 . McCullough, M. J., Ross, B. C. & Reade, P. C. (1996). Candida albicans: a review of its history, taxonomy, epidemiology, virulence attributes, and methods of strain differentiation. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 25, 136–44.[ISI][Medline]

4 . Lynch, D. P. (1994). Oral candidiasis: history, classification, and clinical presentation. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 78, 189–93.[ISI][Medline]

5 . Slots, J., Rams, T. E. & Listgarten, M. A. (1988). Yeasts, enteric rods and pseudomonads in the subgingival flora of severe adult periodontitis. Oral Microbiology and Immunology 3, 47–52.[Medline]

6 . Fotos, P. G. & Hellstein, J. W. (1992). Candida and candidosis. Epidemiology, diagnosis and therapeutic management. Dental Clinics of North America 36, 857–78.[Medline]

7 . Martin, M. V. (1999). The use of fluconazole and itraconazole in the treatment of Candida albicans infections: a review. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 44, 429–37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8 . Denning, D. W., Baily, G. G. & Hood, S. V. (1997). Azole resistance in Candida. European Journal of Clinical and Microbiological Infectious Disease 16, 261–80.

9 . Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Jones, R. N. et al. (2002). Trends in antifungal susceptibility of Candida spp. isolated from pediatric and adult patients with bloodstream infections: SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997 to 2000. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 40, 852–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10 . Mondello, F., De Bernardis, F., Girolamo, A. et al. (2003). In vitro and in vivo activity of tea tree oil against azole-susceptible and -resistant human pathogenic yeasts. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 51, 1223–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11 . Donia, M. & Hamann, M. T. (2003). Marine natural products and their potential applications as anti-infective agents. Lancet Infectious Diseases 3, 338–48.[Medline]

12 . Lavermicocca, P., Valerio, F. & Visconti, A. (2003). Antifungal activity of phenyllactic acid against molds isolated from bakery products. Applied and Enviromental Microbiology 69, 634–40.[CrossRef]

13 . Gertsch, J., Tobler, R. T., Brun, R. et al. (2003). Antifungal, antiprotozoal, cytotoxic and piscicidal properties of Justicidin B and a new arylnaphthalide lignan from Phyllanthus piscatorum. Planta Medica 69, 420–4.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

14 . Hellio, C., Pons, A. M., Beaupoil, C. et al. (2002). Antibacterial, antifungal and cytotoxic activities of extracts from fish epidermis and epidermal mucus. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 20, 214–9.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

15 . Sakanaka, S., Kim, M-J., Taniguchi, M. et al. (1989). Antibacterial substances in Japanese green tea extract against Streptococcus mutans, a cariogenic bacterium. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 53, 2307–11.[ISI]

16 . Hirasawa, M., Takada, K., Makimura, M. et al. (2002). Improvement of periodontal status by green tea catechin using a local delivery system: a clinical pilot study. Journal of Periodontal Research 37, 433–8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

17 . Ahn, Y-J., Sakanaka, S., Kim, M-J. et al. (1990). Effect of green tea extract on growth of intestinal bacteria. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease 3, 335–8.

18 . Hara, Y. & Ishigami, T. (1989). Antibacterial activities of tea polyphenols against foodborne pathogenic bacteria. Journal of Japanese Society for Food Science and Technology 36, 996–9.[ISI]

19 . Okubo, S., Ikigai, H., Toda, M. et al. (1989). The anti-haemolysin activity of tea and coffee. Letters in Applied Microbiology 9, 65–6.[ISI]

20 . Nakane, H. & Ono, K. (1989). Differential inhibitory effects of some catechin derivatives on the activities of human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase and cellular deoxyribonucleic and ribonucleic acid polymerases. Biochemistry 29, 2841–5.[ISI]

21 . Mabe, K., Yamada, M., Oguni, I. et al. (1999). In vitro and in vivo activities of tea catechins against Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 43, 1788–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22 . Fukai, K., Ishigami, T. & Hara, Y. (1991). Antibacterial activity of tea polyphenols against phytopathogenic bacteria. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 55, 1895–7.[ISI]

23 . Okubo, S., Toda, M., Hara, Y. et al. (1991). Antifungal and fungicidal activities of tea extract and catechin against Trichophyton. Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi 46, 509–14.[Medline]

24 . Ikigai, H., Nakae, T., Hara, Y. et al. (1993). Bactericidal catechins damage the lipid bilayer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1147, 132–6.[ISI][Medline]

25 . Toyoshima, Y., Okubo, S., Toda, M. et al. (1993). Effect of catechin on the ultrastructure of Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 68, 295–303.

26 . Richardson, M. D., Paton, M. & Shankland, G. S. (1991). Intracellular kicking of Candida albicans by human neutrophils is potentiated by exposure to combinations of amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine. Mycoses 34, 201–4.[ISI][Medline]

27 . Takahashi, O., Cai, Z., Toda, M. et al. (1995). Appearance of antibacterial activity of oxacillin against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the presence of catechin. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 69, 1126–34.[Medline]

28 . Edwards, J. E., Jr (1997). International conference for the development of a consensus on the management and prevention of severe candidal infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases 24, 43–59.

29 . Marchetti, O., Moreillon, P., Glauser, M. P. et al. (2000). Potent synergism of the combination of fluconazole and cyclosporine in Candida albicans. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 44, 2373–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]