Department of Oral Biology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
Received 3 June 2003; returned 18 August 2003; revised 12 January 2004; accepted 11 February 2004
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Methods: Antifungal activities of MUC7 12-mer and other compounds against several fungal strains were first measured by MIC and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) tests using broth microdilution assay. The viability of Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans were also determined by killing assays and time kinetics of peptide-mediated killing. Antifungal activities of MUC7 12-mer in combination with other compounds [histatin-5 (Hsn5) 12-mer: AKRHHGYKRKFH, amphotericin B or miconazole] against C. albicans and C. neoformans were determined by chequerboard assays and confirmed by killing assays. Toxicities of individual compounds were determined by haemolytic assays.
Results: MICs and MFCs of MUC7 12-mer ranged from 3.13 to 6.25 mg/L for most of the strains tested, and were, in most cases, comparable to those of amphotericin B and miconazole (0.786.25 mg/L). ED50 values of MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer were 7.1 and 7.4 µM (or 11.2 and 11.6 mg/L), respectively, for C. albicans; and 1.2 and 1.1 µM (or 1.9 and 1.7 mg/L), respectively, for C. neoformans. The killing of C. albicans and C. neoformans was achieved after 30 and 10 min exposure to the peptides, respectively. Combinations of MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer, and of MUC7 12-mer and miconazole have a synergic antifungal effect on C. neoformans, with a fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) of 0.37 and 0.25, respectively; and a slightly lower than synergic effect on C. albicans, with a FICI of 0.63 and 0.56, respectively. In addition, using human erythrocytes, the two salivary peptides showed low levels of haemolytic activity.
Conclusions: This study suggests that MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer peptides may be suitable candidates for use in combination antifungal therapy.
Keywords: antimicrobial peptides, salivary mucin, combination, chequerboard assay, haemolysis
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Histatins and mucins are two families of human salivary proteins that are important components of the innate host defence system. Ourselves and others have previously reported that histatins possess a significant in vitro antimicrobial activity, especially against fungi such as Candida, Cryptococcus neoformans and Aspergillus fumigatus.1015 The low molecular weight salivary mucin, MUC7, in its full-length form (357 amino acid residues) protects the oral cavity from microbial infections through more general protective mechanisms rather than the direct killing of microorganisms. However, recently, we have discovered that peptides derived from its N-terminal region have a significant and a broad-spectrum in vitro fungicidal and bactericidal activity.1618 These properties, along with their low toxicity for human cells,19,20 make these peptides promising candidates for the treatment of fungal infection as supplements to conventional antimycotics.
The best antimicrobial treatment may involve drug combination therapy, using two or more drugs each of which has a separate mode of action and each of which results in a distinct mechanism of resistance. Antimicrobial agents in combination can, in certain cases, exhibit improved efficacy, reduce the development of resistant strains and side effects of some currently used antibiotics.21 Achievement of synergy is one of the major theoretical justifications for combination therapy. Some in vitro studies show that antimicrobial peptides enhance the activity of antibiotics against bacteria22 and of conventional antimycotics against fungi.2326 Recently, Lupetti et al. reported synergic activity of lactoferrin-derived peptide and fluconazole against Candida species,27 and vant Hof et al. reported synergic activity of histatin-5 (Hsn5) and amphotericin B.23 Yan & Hancock showed synergy between antimicrobial peptides.28 However, to date, there has been no report on antifungal activity using combinations of salivary CAMPs. We have previously determined that MUC7 20-mer (amino acids 3251 of the parent MUC7) is a potent agent against a broad range of microorganisms including fungi that are resistant to conventional antifungal drugs, and that it appears to work by a mechanism distinct from that of Hsn5.18 Further, we have shown that MUC7 12-mer, a 12-amino acid C-terminal fragment of MUC7 20-mer (amino acids 4051 of MUC7) not only retained but exceeded the antifungal activity of the 20-mer.29 Its activity is also comparable to that of other CAMPs.14,30,31 Rothstein et al. reported that Hsn5 12-mer (P113), a 12 amino acid fragment of Hsn5, retains anticandidal activity comparable to that of the parent compound.14 Based on the results of the above studies, we selected the MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer for this study where we aimed to examine the antifungal effect of combination of these two peptides, and of MUC7 12-mer with amphotericin B or miconazole against Candida albicans and C. neoformans.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Hsn5 12-mer (AKRHHGYKRKFH, amino acids 415 of the parent Hsn5) and MUC7 12-mer (RKSYKCLHKRCR, amino acids 4051 of the parent MUC7) were custom-synthesized by Bio-Synthesis (Lewisville, TX, USA). HPLC and mass spectrometry assays were carried out to analyse the purity of the peptides. The purity (80%) was taken into consideration in preparation of the stock solution of each peptide for antifungal assays. The peptides were dissolved in sterile double-distilled water at 1 mg/mL; aliquots were freeze-dried and stored at 20°C. For each experiment, the freeze-dried peptides were re-dissolved at 1 mg/mL in sterile double-distilled water. Amphotericin B (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) at 1 mg/mL. Miconazole (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in sterile double-distilled water at 0.1 mg/mL.
Fungal strains and growth media
C. albicans ATCC 96112, Candida glabrata ATCC 90030 and C. neoformans ATCC 52817(capsular mutant), were purchased from ATCC. C. albicans DIS was kindly provided by M. Edgerton (Department of Oral Biology, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA). C. albicans 12-99 was kindly provided by Theodore C. White (Department of Pathology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, and Seattle Biomedical Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA). C. albicans E81022 was kindly provided by K. Hata (Department of Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Tsukuba Research Laboratories, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tsukuba, Ibaraki 30026, Japan). An azole-resistant clinical isolate of C. glabrata 65C was kindly provided by John E. Bennett, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA). A clinical isolate of Candida krusei was obtained from the Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, NY, USA. Amphotericin B-sensitive (CN1, CN2 and CN3) and amphotericin B-resistant (CN2843 and CN2406) C. neoformans strains were obtained from AIDS patients with cryptococcal meningitis and were generously provided by John H. Rex (Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for the Study of Emerging and Reemerging Pathogens, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, TX, USA). Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain S288C was kindly provided by D. Kosman (Department of Biochemistry, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA). The fungal strains were stored at 80°C in glycerol. For each experiment, cells were cultured freshly from frozen stock on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA, Difco) for 24 h at 37°C, except for S. cerevisiae S288C, which was grown for 96 h at 30°C. To prepare fungal cell suspension (blastoconidia) for antifungal activity assays, one colony was picked from the plate and resuspended in LYM medium, and the concentration was adjusted to 1 x 105 cells/mL.
Antifungal susceptibility test
MICs of MUC7 12-mer and other reference antifungal agents were determined by the broth microdilution method modified by Rothstein et al.14 Briefly, two-fold serial dilutions of each peptide or antimycotics were prepared with modified RPMI 1640 medium (LYM broth),14 pH 7.0, at a volume of 200 µL per well in 96-well flat-bottomed microtitre plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA, USA). The final concentration of the antifungal agents ranged from 50 to 0.39 mg/L for MUC7 12-mer, Hsn5 12-mer, and amphotericin B, and 12.5 to 0.195 mg/L for miconazole. Each well of the microtitre plate was inoculated with fungal cell suspension to a final concentration of 1 x 104 cells per mL and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 2448 h. Afterwards, the absorbance was measured at 620 nm using a microplate reader (Model 3550, Bio-Rad, Japan) to assess the cell growth. The MIC endpoint was the lowest concentration of antifungal agent that completely inhibited growth or that produced at least 90% reduction in turbidity when compared with that of the drug-free control. The MIC value of two independent experiments was usually the same for a particular isolate; if not, a third test was required and the value from the majority of tests was reported. The minimal fungicidal concentration (MFC) was determined by the method used by Hong et al.25 Briefly, an aliquot (100 µL) of cell suspension was taken from two wells above the MIC, centrifuged and washed three times with fresh LYM broth. Then each cell suspension was plated on SDA plate, and the fungal cells were enumerated after incubation at 37°C for 48 h. The MFC was defined as the lowest concentration of the peptide in which no growth occurred.
Chequerboard antifungal assay
In one dimension of a 96-well microtitre plate, two-fold serial dilutions of amphotericin B, or miconazole, or Hsn5 12-mer in LYM were prepared in a volume of 100 µL per well, giving final concentrations from 3.13 to 0.03 mg/L, 10 to 0.16 mg/L, or 12.5 to 0.1 mg/L, respectively. In the second dimension, a two-fold dilution series of MUC7 12-mer in the same broth was added in a volume of 100 µL per well, giving a final concentration of MUC7 12-mer from 12.5 to 0.1 mg/L. Each well of the microtitre plate was inoculated with fungal cell suspension [C. albicans (DIS) or C. neoformans (CN2)], to a final concentration of 1 x 104 cells per mL, and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 2448 h. Afterwards, the absorbance was measured at 620 nm using a microplate reader. The lowest drug concentration that inhibited the growth of the fungal cells was used to determine the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC), defined as the ratio of the MIC of a drug used in combination to the MIC of the drug tested lone. The FIC index (FICI, the sum of the FICs) was calculated for the most equally effective concentration of drugs.32 According to the new policy of this journal, fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) values 0.5 are considered to indicate synergy; 0.54.0, no interaction; and >4, antagonism.33 Each experiment was carried out in duplicate.
Blastoconidia killing assay
Killing assays were carried out essentially as described previously.18 In brief, 20 µL of two-fold serial dilutions of peptides (501.56 µM in LYM) were incubated in duplicate with an equal volume (20 µL) of a C. albicans (DIS) or C. neoformans (CN2) suspension (1 x 105 cells/mL) in LYM medium. After incubation at 37°C for 1.5 h, the reactions were diluted 20-fold with 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and aliquots (50 µL, or 120 cells) of each sample were plated on SDA. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 1 or 2 days aerobically. The number of colony-forming units (cfu) was counted. Percentage of killing was calculated as: [1 (amount of viable cells in the test group/amount of viable cells in the control group)] x 100%.
Killing activity in combination was carried out by exposure of the yeast cells to varying concentrations of MUC7 12-mer in LYM and a fixed concentration of the other agent. The concentrations of MUC7 12-mer used were based on ED50 and ED90 values of the peptide; they were 6.26, 12.5 and 25 µM for C. albicans, and 0.78, 1.56 and 3.13 µM for C. neoformans. Fixed concentrations of Hsn5 12-mer, amphotericin B or miconazole were: 7.5, 7.5 or 15 µM for C. albicans, and 0.78, 7.5 and 7.5 µM for C. neoformans, respectively. Untreated cells were used as control. Percentage of killing was calculated by the equation given above.
Timekill curves were determined by incubation of C. albicans (DIS) or C. neoformans (CN2) (20 µL of 1x105 cells/mL in LYM) with equal volumes of the peptides (in LYM) at three concentrations (10, 20 or 30 µM). At different time points (0, 5, 15, 30, 45 and 90 min), samples were diluted 20-fold with 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and cell viability was determined by plating on SDA.
Haemolytic assay
Human erythrocytes from healthy individuals were collected in vacuum tubes containing heparin (final concentration 20.4 U/mL) as anti-coagulant. The erythrocytes were harvested by centrifugation for 10 min at 2000 rpm at 20°C, and washed three times in PBS (10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, in 150 mM NaCl). To the pellet, PBS was added to yield a 10% (v/v) erythrocytes/PBS suspension. The 10% suspension was diluted 1:10 either in PBS or isotonic glucose phosphate buffer (IGP, 1 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, supplemented with 287 mM glucose as an osmoprotectant),19 or LYM supplemented with 287 mM glucose as an osmoprotectant (LYMG). From each suspension, 100 µL was added in duplicate to 100 µL of a two-fold dilution series of peptide in the same buffer in a 96-well V-bottomed microtitre plate (Dynatech Laboratories, Inc, Alexandria, VA, USA). Total haemolysis was achieved with 1% Triton X-100. The plates were incubated for 1 h at 37°C and then centrifuged for 10 min at 2000 r.p.m. at 20°C. From the supernatant fluid, 150 µL was transferred to a flat-bottomed low affinity microtitre plate (Corning, New York, USA), and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Model 3550, Bio-Rad, Japan). The percentage of haemolysis was calculated by: [(A450 of the peptide-treated sample A450 of buffer-treated sample)/(A450 of Triton X-100-treated sample A450 of buffer-treated sample)] x 100%.
Statistical analysis
Each value was determined from at least two independent experiments carried out in duplicate. Statistical significance was evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey test. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. Molar concentrations of peptides resulting in killing 50% or 90% of control cells (ED50 or ED90) and corresponding 95% confidence limits were determined by PROBIT regression procedure in SPSS (SPSS software package 6.1.2 for Macintosh).
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Many antimicrobial peptides are sensitive to high ionic strength and thus their antimicrobial activity is usually determined by killing assays in low ionic strength buffers rather than by broth dilution assay commonly used for conventional antimicrobials.8,14 In order to measure the activity of Hsn5 and Hsn5-derived peptides in terms of MIC, Rothstein et al.14 developed a modified broth dilution susceptibility test. This broth, designated LYM, is a modified RPMI 1640 medium, which excludes excess of divalent cations and monovalent salt and includes a chelating agent and trace elements. In this study, we used this low ionic strength LYM medium for all susceptibility tests, including the killing assays, to determine the antifungal activity of MUC7 12-mer.
The in vitro susceptibilities of the fungal strains to MUC7 12-mer, Hsn5 12-mer, amphotericin B and miconazole are shown in Table 1. The data are presented as MIC and MFC of the peptide or drug concentrations required to inhibit (MIC) or kill 90% or greater (MFC) of the fungal strain tested. MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer were active against the majority of selected stains, with MIC and MFC values ranging from 3.13 to 6.25 mg/L, with the exception of C. glabrata ATCC 90030. In comparison, the MIC and MFC values for amphotericin B, and miconazole ranged from 0.78 to 6.25 mg/L. Interestingly, for C. krusei and C. neoformans 2406, the MICs and MFCs of the two peptides were 25-fold lower than those of amphotericin B. In addition, MFCs of MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer for C. albicans ATCC 96112 were two- and four-fold lower, respectively, than those of miconazole.
|
Because MUC7 12-mer showed antifungal activity in LYM medium using broth microdilution assay, next we determined how MUC7 12-mer (and Hsn5 12-mer) fungicidal activities in LYM media compared to those in phosphate buffer. Table 2 shows the ED50 and ED90 values (and their 95% confidence limits) of these peptides against C. albicans and C. neoformans. In order to compare these values with the MIC values shown in Table 1, they are expressed in both µM and mg/L. The results indicate that killing activities of both peptides in LYM are retained, but in comparison to those in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (determined previously)29 they are somewhat lower for C. albicans but comparable for C. neoformans. In general, the fungicidal assays showed that the ED50 or ED90 values for C. neoformans were lower than those for C. albicans in LYM. For comparison, in the phosphate buffer, ED50 values for C. albicans were: MUC7 12-mer, 2.68 (2.043.35) µM, Hsn5 12-mer, 3.68 (2.664.84) µM; and for C. neoformans: MUC7 12-mer, 1.75 (0.462.68) µM, and Hsn5 12-mer, 2.55 (0.484.45) µM.
|
Timekill experiments, carried out with three different concentrations of peptides (10, 20 and 30 µM), indicated differences in killing rate between Hsn5 12-mer and MUC7 12-mer, as well as between C. albicans and C. neoformans (Figure 1). At a concentration of 30 µM, 90 min of incubation with Hsn5 12-mer was needed to reach more than 90% killing of C. albicans, whereas MUC7 12-mer achieved 95% killing within 45 min at this concentration. Both MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer killed C. neoformans much faster than C. albicans. At concentrations of 30 µM, both peptides needed only 5 min to achieve complete killing for C. neoformans, whereas for C. albicans this was only accomplished after 45 min. However, at equally potent concentrations of the two peptides, MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer showed similar rates of killing for both fungi (Figure 2).
|
|
A two-dimensional chequerboard assay was used first to characterize interactions between MUC7 12-mer and other agents. In this method, one is looking for a reduction in the MIC of each compound in the presence of the other. The results are expressed in fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). Compared to the MICs obtained when each compound was used alone, MICs were substantially reduced, although to a variable extent, when the compounds were used in combinations. As shown in Table 3, the combination of MUC7 12-mer with Hsn5 12-mer appeared to have strong synergic effect on the growth of C. neoformans (FICI 0.37); MUC7 12-mer at 1/4 MIC promoted the activity of Hsn5 12-mer by decreasing the MIC of Hsn5 12-mer by eight-fold. A strong synergic effect on the growth of C. neoformans (FICI 0.25) was also found when MUC7 12-mer was combined with miconazole; the MICs of the two agents in combination were eight-fold lower than the MICs of each agent alone. No interaction (according to the new standard of this journal) on growth of either fungus was found when MUC7 12-mer was combined with amphotericin B (FICI 0.75). In general, C. albicans showed lower susceptibility to the tested compounds than C. neoformans. No interaction was found when MUC7 12-mer was used in combination with Hsn5 12-mer, amphotericin B, or miconazole (FICI 0.63, 0.75 or 0.56, respectively). Yet, the addition of MUC7 12-mer at 1/2 MIC led to a decrease in the MIC of amphotericin B by four-fold, of Hsn5 12-mer by eight-fold, and of miconazole by 16-fold. No antagonism was found with any combination of compounds used.
|
Recently, there have been some concerns that the FIC values determined by chequerboard assay are inherently prone to inaccuracies due to the possibility of partial inhibitory effects of the antimicrobial agents used individually. Thus, it is important to strengthen the data by combination killing assay. The effects of the MUC7 12-mer alone and in the combination with Hsn5 12-mer, amphotericin B, or miconazole on the killing of C. albicans or C. neoformans are shown in Figure 3. However, in this assay, the concentration of only one agent can be varied (by serial dilution), while the concentration of the other is fixed (in contrast to the chequerboard assay, where there are serial dilutions of both agents). Compared to MUC7 12-mer alone, an enhanced effect on the loss of C. albicans viability was observed when MUC7 12-mer (at 12.5, and 6.25 µM) was combined with Hsn5 12-mer at 7.5 µM, or miconazole at 15 µM. The addition of amphotericin B at 7.5 µM had only a slightly increased effect on the activity of MUC7 12-mer at 12.5 µM concentration. A significant enhancement (P < 0.05) of activity of MUC7 12-mer was also found in killing of C. neoformans when MUC7 12-mer at 0.78 µM was combined with 0.78 µM of Hsn5 12-mer or 7.5 µM of miconazole. MUC7 12-mer induced a significant increase (P < 0.05) in the activity of the second agent (Hsn5 12-mer, amphotericin B, or miconazole) against both C. albicans and C. neoformans, compared to those of each second agent alone. The enhancement of MUC7 12-mer appeared to be concentration-dependent. Overall, these results showed consistency with those obtained in chequerboard assay.
|
Since human erythrocytes are readily available, and their lysis is easy to monitor by measuring the release of haemoglobin, the haemolytic activity of antifungal agents is usually used as an indication for measuring their cytotoxicity. Effects of MUC7 12-mer, Hsn5 12-mer, magainin II, amphotericin B and miconazole on human red blood cells are shown in Figure 4. Haemolysis assays were carried out under the following conditions: PBS, where the peptide antifungal activity is decreased and haemolysis masked due to high salt concentration, in IGP buffer (isotonic glucose phosphate buffer containing 287 mM glucose) and LYMG medium (modified, low salt RPMI 1640 medium, supplemented with 287 mM glucose). In IGP and LYMG, the peptide activity is retained and sugar provides osmotic stabilization in place of salt. Generally, the haemolysis of each test agent except amphotericin B was higher in IGP and LYMG than those in PBS (the test agents except amphotericin B did not exhibit remarkable haemolysis in PBS). At the highest concentration tested in this study (100 µM), conventional antifungal therapeutic agent amphotericin B exerted 100% haemolysis in all test media; and miconazole 98% and 44% in IGP and LYMG, respectively. MUC7 12-mer caused 4.3%, 56% and 35% haemolysis in PBS, IGP and LYMG, respectively. Compared to MUC7 12-mer, Hsn5 12-mer exerted less haemolysis (1%, 41%, 16%, respectively), whereas magainin, a membrane-active antimicrobial peptide, caused more haemolysis than MUC7 12-mer (92% in IGP and 65% in LYMG). This indicates that the two salivary peptides tested in this study show low cytotoxic activity.
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In vitro timekill assays demonstrated that, similar to the assays carried out in phosphate buffer, in LYM medium both MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer exhibit concentration-dependent fungicidal activity. This is also consistent with the activity of other antifungal peptides.31,36,37 The killing rate of Hsn5 12-mer in this study agreed with that of full-length Hsn5 molecule (24-mer).38 However, to date no comparison of the killing rate of the two peptides at equal potent concentrations has been reported. This study showed that at the same molar concentrations the killing rate of MUC7 12-mer appeared to be faster than that of Hsn5 12-mer. However, when compared at equally potent concentrations, the killing rate was almost the same.
In this study, we also found both MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer to kill C. neoformans faster than C. albicans. This, in agreement with previous studies, suggests that C. neoformans is more susceptible than C. albicans to these peptides. Electrostatic interactions between the CAMP and anionic microbial surface has been proposed as one of the important processes in the mode of CAMP action.39,40 C. neoformans is an encapsulated yeast with a highly negatively charged surface due to its polysaccharide capsule and melanin;41 this may favour the association with MUC7 12-mer or Hsn5 12-mer, of cationic peptides with the net positive charge of 6 and 5, respectively.
Combination regimens exhibiting synergy could provide additional options for treating fungal infections. As pointed out in the Introduction, a combination of antimicrobial peptides with conventional antimycotics has been investigated by other researchers.2327,42 Antifungal activity of amphotericin B was enhanced by Hsn523 and pneumocandin (a cyclic hexapeptide) derivatives.24 A promoted antifungal activity was found in the combination of a membrane-active peptide (MP 11-mer) with fluconazole,25 and the combination of lactoferrin peptide (LF 9-mer) with miconazole.26 In agreement with these reports, MUC7 12-mer also showed enhancement of antifungal activity when combined with amphotericin B, or miconazole. Significantly, the combination of MUC7 12-mer with miconazole showed a synergic effect (FICI 0.25) against C. neoformans (Table 3), and promoted antifungal activity (FICI 0.56) against C. albicans (however, no synergic effect was found). Moreover, in this study, we showed for the first time that the combination of two salivary antimicrobial peptides, MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer, exhibits synergic activity against C. neoformans. These findings may have substantial significance for combination therapy. Beneficial effects of combination therapy may be slowing down the development of drug-resistant subpopulations of pathogenic organism32 and a reduction in the adverse effects.
Generally, the synergic effects of two agents can result from the combination of two different mechanisms of action. We found synergy between miconazole and MUC7 12-mer. Miconazole is one of the azole-based antifungal therapeutic agents. Azole antifungals inhibit the formation of ergosterol (the major component of fungal cell membrane) via inhibition of enzyme(s) involved in ergosterol biosynthesis. The peptides exert their effect through different mechanisms of action. Our recent study demonstrated that even two salivary molecule-derived peptides, MUC7 20-mer and full-length Hsn5 appear to work by distinct mechanisms. MUC7 20-mer fungicidal activity, unlike that of Hsn5,43 does not require an active cell metabolic state.18 MUC7 20-mer was able to cross the fungal cell membrane and to accumulate inside the cells but unlike Hsn5 and C. albicans,43 mitochondria are not the targets of MUC7 20-mer for both C. albicans and C. neoformans.18 The internalization of MUC7 20-mer, unlike Hsn5, was not inhibited by low temperature, sodium azide or carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), an uncoupler of cellular respiration.18 Based on the above studies on the mechanism of action of the full-length Hsn-5 and MUC7 20-mer,18,20,44 we speculate that the synergic effect between MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer may be the result of two different mechanisms of action by these two peptides.
Haemolytic effect is believed to be one of the adverse effects of some cationic antimicrobial peptides such as magainin, protegrin, mellitin, defensin and cecropin.45 Most cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAMPs) do not show haemolysis in PBS (physiological conditions) partly because of the protection by high ionic strength.19 Some CAMPs, however, still show haemolysis when examined under physiological conditions.46 Compared with amphotericin B, MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer showed almost no haemolytic activity against human erythrocytes in PBS (at peptide concentrations up to 100 µM; Figure 4). In the assays conducted in low ionic strength isotonic glucose phosphate buffer (IGP) or a low ionic strength broth (LYM, supplemented with glucose), the haemolysis caused by the peptides increased. However, MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer still showed lower haemolysis than magainin and the two classical antifungal therapeutic agents. These results indicate that these peptides are not toxic to mammalian cells under physiological conditions.
In summary, this study shows that MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer have many potential advantages as candidates for antifungal agents. First, MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer show fungicidal activity against pathogenic and resistant fungi and a fast killing rate but low cytotoxicity for mammalian cells (based on haemolytic assays carried out both in PBS, and low ionic strength buffer and medium). Second, the combination of MUC7 12-mer with miconazole shows a synergic effect (FICI 0.25) against C. neoformans and an enhanced antifungal activity (FICI 0.56) against C. albicans. Finally, combination of MUC7 12-mer and Hsn5 12-mer exhibits synergic activity against C. neoformans. On the basis of these results, we suggest that these peptides can be attractive and novel candidates for development into effective and safe antimicrobial therapeutic agents for topical and possibly systemic applications.
![]() |
Acknowledgements |
---|
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
2 . Ellepola, A. N. & Samaranayake, L. P. (2000). Oral candidal infections and antimycotics. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine 11, 17298.[Medline]
3 . Ostrosky-Zeichner, L. & Rex, J. H. (2002). Antifungal prophylaxis: an ounce of prevention is worth three grams of amphotericin B. [Online] http://www.medscape.com (16 March 2004, date last accessed).
4 . Patel, R. (1998). Antifungal agents. Part I. Amphotericin B preparations and flucytosine. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 73, 120525.[ISI][Medline]
5 . Lewis, R. E. & Klepser, M. E. (1999). The changing face of nosocomial candidemia: epidemiology, resistance, and drug therapy. American Journal of Health System Pharmacy 56, 52533; quiz 53435.
6 . Groll, A. H. & Walsh, T. J. (2002). Antifungal chemotherapy: advances and perspectives. Swiss Medical Weekly 132, 30311.[ISI][Medline]
7 . Hancock, R. E. (1997). Peptide antibiotics. Lancet 349, 41822.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
8 . vant Hof, W., Veerman, E. C., Helmerhorst, E. J. et al. (2001). Antimicrobial peptides: properties and applicability. Biological Chemistry 382, 597619.[ISI][Medline]
9
.
Yeaman, M. R., Gank, K. D., Bayer, A. S. et al. (2002). Synthetic peptides that exert antimicrobial activities in whole blood and blood-derived matrices. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 46, 388391.
10
.
Oppenheim, F. G., Xu, T., McMillian, F. M. et al. (1988). Histatins, a novel family of histidine-rich proteins in human parotid secretion. Isolation, characterization, primary structure, and fungistatic effects on Candida albicans. Journal of Biological Chemistry 263, 74727.
11 . Xu, T., Levitz, S. M., Diamond, R. D. et al. (1991). Anticandidal activity of major human salivary histatins. Infection and Immunity 59, 254954.[ISI][Medline]
12 . Tsai, H. & Bobek, L. A. (1997). Human salivary histatin-5 exerts potent fungicidal activity against Cryptococcus neoformans. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1336, 3679.[ISI][Medline]
13
.
Helmerhorst, E. J., Reijnders, I. M., vant Hof, W. et al. (1999). Amphotericin B- and fluconazole-resistant Candida spp., Aspergillus fumigatus, and other newly emerging pathogenic fungi are susceptible to basic antifungal peptides. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 43, 7024.
14
.
Rothstein, D. M., Spacciapoli, P., Tran, L. T. et al. (2001). Anticandida activity is retained in P-113, a 12-amino-acid fragment of histatin 5. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 45, 136773.
15 . Tsai, H., & Bobek, L. A. (1998). Human salivary histatins: promising antifungal therapeutic agents. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine 9, 48097.[Medline]
16 . Satyanarayana, J., Situ, H., Narasimhamurthy, S. et al. (2000). Divergent solid-phase synthesis and candidacidal activity of MUC7 D1, a 51-residue histidine-rich N-terminal domain of human salivary mucin MUC7. Journal of Peptide Research 56, 27582.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
17
.
Bobek, L. A., Mashhoon, S. & Situ, H. (2002). Human salivary MUC7 mucin peptides: effect of size, charge, and cysteine residues on antifungal activity. Journal of Dental Research 81, 236.
18 . Bobek, L. A. & Situ, H. (2003). MUC7 20-mer: investigation of antimicrobial activity, secondary structure and possible mechanism of antifungal action. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 47, 64552.
19 . Helmerhorst, E. J., Reijnders, I. M., vant Hof, W. et al. (1999). A critical comparison of the hemolytic and fungicidal activities of cationic antimicrobial peptides. FEBS Letters 449, 10510.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
20
.
Situ, H. & Bobek, L. A. (2000). In vitro assessment of antifungal therapeutic potential of salivary histatin-5, two variants of histatin-5, and salivary mucin (MUC7) domain 1. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 44, 148593.
21 . Kauffman, C. A. & Carver, P. L. (1997). Antifungal agents in the 1990s. Current status and future developments. Drugs 53, 53949.[ISI][Medline]
22 . Vaara, M. & Porro, M. (1996). Group of peptides that act synergistically with hydrophobic antibiotics against gram-negative enteric bacteria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 40, 18015.[Abstract]
23 . vant Hof, W., Reijnders, I. M., Helmerhorst, E. J. et al. (2000). Synergistic effects of low doses of histatin 5 and its analogues on amphotericin B anti-mycotic activity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 78, 1639.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
24 . Franzot, S. P. & Casadevall, A. (1997). Pneumocandin L-743,872 enhances the activities of amphotericin B and fluconazole against Cryptococcus neoformans in vitro. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 41, 3316.[Abstract]
25
.
Hong, S. Y., Oh, J. E. & Lee, K. H. (1999). In vitro antifungal activity and cytotoxicity of a novel membrane-active peptide. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 43, 17047.
26 . Ueta, E., Tanida, T. & Osaki, T. (2001). A novel bovine lactoferrin peptide, FKCRRWQWRM, suppresses Candida cell growth and activates neutrophils. Journal of Peptide Research 57, 2409.[ISI][Medline]
27
.
Lupetti, A., Paulusma-Annema, A., Welling, M. M. et al. (2003). Synergistic activity of the N-terminal peptide of human lactoferrin and fluconazole against Candida species. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 47, 2627.
28
.
Yan, H. & Hancock, R. E. (2001). Synergistic interactions between mammalian antimicrobial defense peptides. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 45, 155860.
29 . Situ, H., Wei, G., Smith, C. J. et al. (2003). Human salivary MUC7 mucin peptides: effect of size, charge and cysteine residues on antifungal activity. Biochemical Journal 375, 17582.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
30 . Helmerhorst, E. J., Vant Hof, W., Veerman, E. C. et al. (1997). Synthetic histatin analogues with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. Biochemical Journal 326, 3945.[ISI][Medline]
31 . Ruissen, A. L., Groenink, J., Helmerhorst, E. J. et al. (2001). Effects of histatin 5 and derived peptides on Candida albicans. Biochemical Journal 356, 3618.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
32 . Eliopoulos, G. M. & Moellering, T. C. (1996). Antimicrobial combinations. In Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine, 4th edn (Lorian, V., Ed), pp. 33096. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
33 . Odds, F. C. (2003). Synergy, antagonism, and what the chequerboard puts between them. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 52, 1.[ISI][Medline]
34 . Hancock, R. E. & Lehrer, R. (1998). Cationic peptides: a new source of antibiotics. Trends in Biotechnology 16, 828.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
35 . Lee, K. H., Hong, S. Y., Oh, J. E. et al. (1998). Identification and characterization of the antimicrobial peptide corresponding to C-terminal beta-sheet domain of tenecin 1, an antibacterial protein of larvae of Tenebrio molitor. Biochemical Journal 334, 99105.[ISI][Medline]
36
.
Lupetti, A., Paulusma-Annema, A., Welling, M. M. et al. (2000). Candidacidal activities of human lactoferrin peptides derived from the N terminus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 44, 325763.
37 . Hamamoto, K., Kida, Y., Zhang, Y. et al. (2002). Antimicrobial activity and stability to proteolysis of small linear cationic peptides with D-amino acid substitutions. Microbiology and Immunology 46, 7419.[ISI][Medline]
38
.
Edgerton, M., Koshlukova, S. E., Lo, T. E. et al. (1998). Candidacidal activity of salivary histatins. Identification of a histatin 5-binding protein on Candida albicans. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, 2043847.
39 . Tossi, A., Sandri, L. & Giangaspero, A. (2000). Amphipathic, alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides. Biopolymers 55, 430.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
40 . Hong, S. Y., Park, T. G. & Lee, K. H. (2001). The effect of charge increase on the specificity and activity of a short antimicrobial peptide. Peptides 22, 166974.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
41 . Nosanchuk, J. D. & Casadevall, A. (1997). Cellular charge of Cryptococcus neoformans: contributions from the capsular polysaccharide, melanin, and monoclonal antibody binding. Infection and Immunity 65, 183641.[Abstract]
42 . Nibbering, P. H., Danesi, R., vant Wout, J. W. et al. (2002). Antimicrobial peptides: therapeutic potential for the treatment of Candida infections. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 11, 30918.[ISI][Medline]
43
.
Helmerhorst, E. J., Breeuwer, P., vant Hof, W. et al. (1999). The cellular target of histatin 5 on Candida albicans is the energized mitochondrion. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274, 728691.
44 . Tsai, H. & Bobek, L. A. (1997). Studies of the mechanism of human salivary histatin-5 candidacidal activity with histatin-5 variants and azole-sensitive and -resistant Candida species. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 41, 22248.[Abstract]
45 . Lee, D. G., Kim, H. N., Park, Y. et al. (2002). Design of novel analogue peptides with potent antibiotic activity based on the antimicrobial peptide, HP (2-20), derived from N-terminus of Helicobacter pylori ribosomal protein L1. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1598, 18594.[ISI][Medline]
46 . Gobbo, M., Biondi, L., Filira, F. et al. (2002). Antimicrobial peptides: synthesis and antibacterial activity of linear and cyclic drosocin and apidaecin 1b analogues. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45, 4494504.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]