a Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, S-171 82 Solna; b Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institute, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Endogenous antimicrobial peptides are well recognized components of the innate immune defence.1,2 PR-39 is a proline-arginine-rich antibacterial peptide that was isolated from pig intestine in 1991.3 PR-39 has a broad antibacterial spectrum and is active against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Synthetic D-and L-PR-39 peptides have non-identical antibacterial spectra, suggesting that stereo-specificity is important, at least against some bacteria such as Pseudomonas spp.4 The antibacterial domain in PR-39 resides in residues 126, whereas shorter internal or end fragments do not possess such activity.5 PR-39 binds to negatively charged membranes but appears not to form discrete pores in artificial membranes.6 Unlike many other antibacterial peptides, PR-39 does not lyse Escherichia coli but rather inhibits DNA and protein synthesis.7
PR-39 is a multi-functional peptide with activities that also include involvement in wound healing through inhibition of syndecan expression,8 anti-inflammatory properties through inhibition of NADPH oxidase9 and chemoattractant activity for neutrophil leucocytes.10 PR-39 is lethal against certain tumour cells, although with different potency against different malignant cells; >0.5 µM reduces the viability of kidney cells whereas >50 µM is required to reduce the viability of epithelial cells.9 However, the antibacterial domain (126) of PR-39 does not appear to have cidal activity against tumour cells.9
Two other antibiotic peptides, defensin and protegrin-1 (PG-1), have been shown to be active against Mycobacterium avium complex and M. tuberculosis.11,12 Defensin acts on the mycobacterial cell envelope and disrupts the membrane architecture.13 A similar permeability increasing activity of defensin has also been seen against E. coli.14
We have previously used the radiometric system to analyse drug resistance patterns of M. tuberculosis.15 In this study, we investigated the activity of PR-39 and two other antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), cecropin P1 and LL-37, against various mycobacteria.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
M. tuberculosis H37Rv ATCC 25618, M. avium ATCC 26518 and Mycobacterium smegmatis ATCC 19420 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). M. tuberculosis E1380/94 and P34/95 were clinical isolates from patients with pulmonary MDR-TB, received from Tartu University Lung Hospital, Estonia. Strain E1380/94 was resistant to all of the first-line drugs (isoniazid, rifampicin, streptomycin, ethambutol), as well as some second-line drugs, and strain P34/95 was resistant to isoniazid and rifampicin.15 M. tuberculosis #894-D11, a well-characterized, low-level, streptomycin-resistant strain, was received from Dr E. C. Böttger (Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover, Germany).16 BTB 98-492 was a drug-susceptible Swedish clinical isolate. All bacteria were stored at 70°C in Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) containing 10% glycerol. Thawed aliquots were cultured on LoewensteinJensen medium before use.
Peptides
PR-39 and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) were isolated from porcine intestine.3 Cecropin P1,17 LL-37 (kindly donated by B. Agerberth, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden), human defensin and protegrin (kindly donated by R. Lehrer, UCLA, CA, USA) were all synthetic peptides.
Methods
Anti-mycobacterial activity was assessed by means of a BACTEC radiometric assay (Becton Dickinson, MD, USA).18,19 Peptides were dissolved in sterile distilled water, and 100 µL aliquots were inoculated into BACTEC 12B vials containing 2 mL 7H12 Middlebrook medium (Becton Dickinson) before inoculation with bacteria. The bacteria were suspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to a density of 1.0 McFarland standard (3 x 108 cfu/mL). These suspensions were further diluted 1:10, and 100 µL aliquots were inoculated into the test vials to give a final concentration corresponding to 1.5 x 106 cfu/mL. The growth index (GI) values were monitored for 8 days. A 10-fold dilution of the control bacterial suspension was inoculated into new vials, the GI values of which were considered equivalent to 90% inhibition of growth. The effect of AMPs was evaluated by comparing the GI values of the control vials with those of peptide-treated cultures [(GIsample/
GIcontrol) x 100 = % relative growth]. Growth rates were estimated from the calculated doubling time of exponential increasing metabolic activity. MIC50 was defined as the concentration giving 50% reduction in GI.
Standard colony count assays were performed to assess the bactericidal activity of PR-39. PR-39 was added at 50 or 100 mg/L to BACTEC vials containing 7H12 medium inoculated with M. tuberculosis H37Rv or MDR strain E1380/94, respectively. After incubation for 24 h at 37deg;C, 100 µL aliquots of each suspension were plated on 7H11 agar and incubated at 37°C for 21 days. The M. smegmatis isolate was resuspended in Middlebrook 7H9 medium (Difco Laboratories) and treated with 50 mg/L PR-39 or cecropin P1 for 4 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. After incubation, a cfu count was determined by diluting the samples and plating them on LuriaBertani agar plates. Plates were incubated at 37°C and colonies were counted every day for 5 days.
Statistical analyses were performed by MannWhitney and KruskalWallis tests using the GraphPad Prism program (Intuitive Software for Science, CA, USA).
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
GIs of untreated and PR-39-treated M. tuberculosis H37Rv are shown in Figure 1a. Treatment of M. tuberculosis H37Rv with 50 mg/L PR-39 caused a delay of measurable growth followed by a growth rate that paralleled control suspensions and 10-fold diluted suspensions. VIP had no effect. Figure 1b
illustrates the relative growth of bacteria incubated with PR-39 calculated for each day. The relative growth was higher on days 1 and 2, but levelled out on days 45. Consequently, mean relative growth on days 35 was used to present relative growth in further experiments. The mycobactericidal effect of PR-39 was examined by incubating the peptide (at 50 and 100 mg/L) with M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv or MDR strain E1380/94 suspended at 3 x 106 cfu/mL in Middlebrook medium. Cfus were determined after 24 h incubation as described in Materials and methods. PR-39 caused a decrease in the cfus of M. tuberculosis in a dose-dependent manner. This did not differ significantly from the relative growth reduction observed in the BACTEC system (Figure 1c
). The fast growing mycobacterial species M. smegmatis was treated with 50 mg/L PR-39 or cecropin P1. In these experiments, PR-39 reduced the cfu by >90% and cecropin P1 by 5% after 4 h incubation at 37°C.
|
PR-39 reduced the growth of M. tuberculosis H37Rv and the clinical MDR isolate E1380/94 in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2). The effect was most pronounced against M. tuberculosis H37Rv, with close to 30% growth inhibition at 6.25 mg/L peptide and 80% GI inhibition at 50 mg/L. The MDR strain E1380/94 showed about 50% growth inhibition when treated with PR-39 at 100 mg/L. The MIC50 values calculated were 17 ± 9 mg/L for H37Rv and 93 ± 12 mg/L for E1380/94, suggesting that the latter had a five-fold lower susceptibility to the peptide than strain H37Rv.
|
Two drug-susceptible clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis and the M. smegmatis strain were as susceptible as M. tuberculosis H37Rv, while the two MDR M. tuberculosis strains were less susceptible to PR-39 at 50 mg/L (Figure 3) when tested in the BACTEC system. The KruskalWallis test showed a significant difference in relative growth between drug-susceptible clinical isolates and the MDR strains. PR-39 had low activity against M. avium. The growth rates of H37Rv and E1380/94 at 1.29 ± 0.03 and 1.19 ± 0.24, respectively, were not significantly different, while M. avium grew faster.
|
We have compared the activity of the AMPs defensin HNP-1, LL-37, protegrin PG-1 and cecropin P1 with that of PR-39. HNP-1 and PG-1 have internal disulphide bonds that constrain their three-dimensional structure, while the others are linear extended peptides with amphipathic -helices. The linear peptides LL-37, cecropin P1 and VIP were inactive against the three strains of mycobacteria tested, whereas HNP-1 and PG-1 showed an activity pattern against mycobacteria similar to that of PR-39 (Figure 4
). M. avium was resistant, M. tuberculosis H37Rv susceptible and the MDR strain M. tuberculosis E1380/94 moderately susceptible to PR-39.
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The effect of PR-39 was assayed by the BACTEC radiometric method, which detected growth of mycobacteria by measurement of 14CO2 released as a consequence of bacterial catabolism. After 5 days of incubation in PR-39 at 50 mg/L, c. 8090% inhibition of bacterial growth of drug-susceptible or low-level streptomycin-resistant strains was observed. The MDR-TB strains E1380/94 and P34/95 were inhibited by 3949%. PR-39 reduced the cfus of H37Rv and MDR-TB strain E1380/94 at a level comparable to its bacteriostatic activity, showing that the inhibition of growth involved killing of the bacteria. It has been reported that the radiometric method and cfu measurements correlate well.20,21 Our data on M. smegmatis suggest further that killing is rapid, since a reduction of >90% cfu was obtained within 4 h of incubation.
The unusually lipid-rich cell wall structure of mycobacteria make the cell surface hydrophobic, which causes aggregation of the cells and reduces its permeability to various molecules. Since M. tuberculosis differs from the majority of bacteria in that it may survive and multiply within phagocytic cells, it is likely that its unique cell envelope helps it to evade and escape intracellular host antibacterial and bactericidal mechanisms, as well as affording protection against some antibiotics. This compact and hydrophobic membrane structure could be one reason for the low activity observed for the LL-37 and cecropin P1 against the mycobacteria isolates tested.
The role of AMPs in host defence against mycobacteria is still unclear. Human or rabbit defensin as well as porcine PG-1 has been shown to be active against M. avium complex and M. tuberculosis.11,12 Mikiyama et al.11 reported similar inhibition of M. tuberculosis H37Ra growth by PG-1 to that found in our study with M. tuberculosis H37Rv. Ogata et al.12 showed PG-1 activity against M. avium complex, although we could not reproduce this result against our own strain of M. avium. The reason for this is not clear but could be due to strain differences or the different experimental methods used.
After initiation of infection by mycobacteria, an inflammatory response follows that results in an accumulation of macrophages and neutrophils. Mycobacteria grow primarily within macrophages, but once activated these cells have the capacity to kill mycobacteria. To date, LL-37 but not defensin has been detected in human lung macrophages.22 Neutrophils may play a much more important role in tuberculosis than previously believed.23 They are continuously recruited to foci of infection where they may phagocytose mycobacteria.24 Whether ingestion of the bacteria is followed by killing has been questioned.25,26 Others have demonstrated killing,24,27 and Jones et al.28 showed that killing is independent of the oxygen metabolic burst. This raises the question of whether AMPs are involved in a mycobactericidal mechanism present in neutrophils. Defensin, PG-1 and PR-39 are produced and stored in phagocytes, mainly neutrophils, where they are believed to play a part in the non-oxidative defence mechanisms of these cells. Defensins29 and PR-3930 are found in neutrophils at mycobactericidal concentrations, but can also be released during phagocytosis and infection.31,32 Released peptides may act as chemotactic agents, defensin for monocytes and PR-39 for neutrophils.10,33 Thus, AMPs may be contributing to intracellular and extracellular defence against M. tuberculosis.
The observation that MDR-TB strains are more resistant to PR-39 than drug-susceptible strains is interesting. We did notice a statistical difference between the groups, but further analysis of other MDR strains is required to conclude if this is a general phenomenon. We did not find any difference in the metabolic doubling time, thus the activity does not seem to correlate with growth rates. The mechanism of action of PR-39 is not yet fully defined. The peptide does not lyse E. coli and acts through a mechanism that may involve stereo-specificity.4,7 An initial membrane uptake is postulated that is similar to that seen with defensin.6,13,14 This would not be sufficient for PR-39 to exert a bactericidal effect, but rather additional internalization and interaction with intracellular proteins are postulated as killing mechanisms.5,34 Recent findings with Salmonella, Staphylococcus aureus and Neisseria gonorrhoeae show that surface lipid modification as well as alteration in efflux pumps may influence the susceptibility of bacteria to AMPs,3537 also suggesting that different AMPs may have different mechanisms of action. Target structures in both drug-susceptible and MDR mycobacteria need to be investigated further to determine whether MDR M. tuberculosis has altered physiological properties that allow it to evade peptide-based innate immune defences.
In conclusion, studies of the mechanism of action of AMPs against mycobacteria will increase our understanding of the host immune response in general as well as of the defence mechanisms of bacteria. It will be of interest to explore the possible role of PR-39 in the innate host defence against tuberculosis.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
Notes |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
2 . Andreu, D. & Rivas, L. (1998). Animal antimicrobial peptides: an overview. Biopolymers 47, 41533.[ISI][Medline]
3 . Agerberth, B., Lee, J. Y., Bergman, T., Carlquist, M., Boman, H. G., Mutt, V. et al. (1991). Amino acid sequence of PR-39. Isolation from pig intestine of a new member of the family of proline-arginine-rich antibacterial peptides. European Journal of Biochemistry 202, 84954.[Abstract]
4 . Vunnam, S., Juvvadi, P. & Merrifield, R. B. (1997). Synthesis and antibacterial action of cecropin and proline-arginine-rich peptides from pig intestine. Journal of Peptide Research 49, 5966.[ISI][Medline]
5 . Shi, J., Ross, C. R., Chengappa, M. M., Sylte, M. J., McVey, D. S. & Blecha, F. (1996). Antibacterial activity of a synthetic peptide (PR-26) derived from PR-39, a proline-arginine-rich neutrophil antimicrobial peptide. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 40, 11521.[Abstract]
6 . Cabiaux, V., Agerberth, B., Johansson, J., Homble, F., Goormaghtigh, E. & Ruysschaert, J. M. (1994). Secondary structure and membrane interaction of PR-39, a Pro+Arg-rich antibacterial peptide. European Journal of Biochemistry 224, 101927.[Abstract]
7 . Boman, H. G., Agerberth, B. & Boman, A. (1993). Mechanisms of action on Escherichia coli of cecropin P1 and PR-39, two antibacterial peptides from pig intestine. Infection and Immunity 61, 297884.[Abstract]
8
.
Gallo, R. L., Ono, M., Povsic, T., Page, C., Eriksson, E., Klagsbrun, M. et al. (1994). Syndecans, cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans, are induced by a proline-rich antimicrobial peptide from wounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91, 110359.
9
.
Shi, J., Ross, C. R., Leto, T. L. & Blecha, F. (1996). PR-39, a proline-rich antibacterial peptide that inhibits phagocyte NADPH oxidase activity by binding to Src homology 3 domains of p47 phox. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93, 60148.
10 . Huang, H. J., Ross, C. R. & Blecha, F. (1997). Chemoattractant properties of PR-39, a neutrophil antibacterial peptide. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 61, 6249.[Abstract]
11 . Miyakawa, Y., Ratnakar, P., Rao, A. G., Costello, M. L., Mathieu-Costello, O., Lehrer, R. I. et al. (1996). In vitro activity of the antimicrobial peptides human and rabbit defensins and porcine leukocyte protegrin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infection and Immunity 64, 92632.[Abstract]
12 . Ogata, K., Linzer, B. A., Zuberi, R. I., Ganz, T., Lehrer, R. I. & Catanzaro, A. (1992). Activity of defensins from human neutrophilic granulocytes against Mycobacterium aviumMycobacterium intracellulare. Infection and Immunity 60, 47205.[Abstract]
13 . Sharma, S., Verma, I. & Khuller, G. K. (1999). Biochemical interaction of human neutrophil peptide-1 with Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra. Archives of Microbiology 171, 33842.[ISI][Medline]
14 . Lehrer, R. I., Barton, A., Daher, K. A., Harwig, S. S., Ganz, T. & Selsted, M. E. (1989). Interaction of human defensins with Escherichia coli. Mechanism of bactericidal activity. Journal of Clinical Investigation 84, 55361.[ISI][Medline]
15 . Hoffner, S. E., Gezelius, L. & Olsson-Liljequist, B. (1997). In-vitro activity of fluorinated quinolones and macrolides against drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 40, 8858.[Abstract]
16 . Meier, A., Sander, P., Schaper, K. J., Scholz, M. & Bottger, E. C. (1996). Correlation of molecular resistance mechanisms and phenotypic resistance levels in streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 40, 24524.[Abstract]
17 . Andersson, M. (1990). Solid-phase synthesis of a 31-residue mammalian cecropin and its C-terminally amidated analogue. Journal of Protein Chemistry 9, 359.
18 . Snider, D. E., Jr, Good, R. C., Kilburn, J. O., Laskowski, L. F., Jr, Lusk, R. H., Marr, J. J. et al. (1981). Rapid drug-susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. American Review of Respiratory Disease 123, 4026.[ISI][Medline]
19 . Middlebrook, G., Reggiardo, Z. & Tigertt, W. D. (1977). Automatable radiometric detection of growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in selective media. American Review of Respiratory Diseases 115, 10669.
20 . Heifets, L. B., Iseman, M. D., Lindholm-Levy, P. J. & Kanes, W. (1985). Determination of ansamycin MICs for Mycobacterium avium complex in liquid medium by radiometric and conventional methods. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 28, 5705.[ISI][Medline]
21 . Heifets, L. B., Iseman, M. D. & Lindholm-Levy, P. J. (1986). Ethambutol MICs and MBCs for Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 30, 92732.[ISI][Medline]
22
.
Agerberth, B., Grunewald, J., Castanos-Velez, E., Olsson, B., Jörnvall, H., Wigzell, H. et al. (1999). Antibacterial components in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from healthy individuals and sarcoidosis patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 160, 28390.
23
.
Pedrosa, J., Saunders, B. M., Appelberg, R., Orme, I. M., Silva, M. T. & Cooper, A. M. (2000). Neutrophils play a protective nonphagocytic role in systemic Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection of mice. Infection and Immunity 68, 57783.
24 . Brown, A. E., Holzer, T. J. & Andersen, B. R. (1987). Capacity of human neutrophils to kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 156, 9859.[ISI][Medline]
25 . May, M. E. & Spagnuolo, P. J. (1987). Evidence for activation of a respiratory burst in the interaction of human neutrophils with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infection and Immunity 55, 23047.[ISI][Medline]
26 . Denis, M. (1991). Human neutrophils, activated with cytokines or not, do not kill virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 163, 91920.[ISI][Medline]
27 . Majeed, M., Perskvist, N., Ernst, J. D., Orselius, K. & Stendahl, O. (1998). Roles of calcium and annexins in phagocytosis and elimination of an attenuated strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in human neutrophils. Microbial Pathogenesis 24, 30920.[ISI][Medline]
28 . Jones, G. S., Amirault, H. J. & Andersen, B. R. (1990). Killing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by neutrophils: a nonoxidative process. Journal of Infectious Diseases 162, 7004.[ISI][Medline]
29 . Ganz, T., Selsted, M. E., Szklarek, D., Harwig, S. S., Daher, K., Bainton, D. F. et al. (1985). Defensins. Natural peptide antibiotics of human neutrophils. Journal of Clinical Investigation 76, 142735.[ISI][Medline]
30 . Bonetto, V., Andersson, M., Bergman, T., Sillard, R., Norberg, Å., Mutt, V. et al. (1999). Spleen antibacterial peptides: high levels of PR-39 and presence of two forms of NK-lysin. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 56, 1748.[ISI][Medline]
31 . Ganz, T. (1987). Extracellular release of antimicrobial defensins from human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Infection and Immunity 55, 56871.[ISI][Medline]
32 . Zhang, G., Ross, C. R., Dritz, S. S., Nietfeld, J. C. & Blecha, F. (1997). Salmonella infection increases porcine antibacterial peptide concentrations in serum. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 4, 7747.[Abstract]
33 . Territo, M. C., Ganz, T., Selsted, M. E. & Lehrer, R. (1989). Monocyte-chemotactic activity of defensins from human neutrophils. Journal of Clinical Investigation 84, 201720.[ISI][Medline]
34
.
Chan, Y. R. & Gallo, R. L. (1998). PR-39, a syndecan-inducing antimicrobial peptide, binds and affects p130(Cas). Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, 2897885.
35
.
Peschel, A., Otto, M., Jack, R. W., Kallbacher, H., Jung, G. & Götz, F. (1999). Inactivation of the dlt operon in Staphylococcus aureus confers sensitivity to defensins, protegrins, and other antimicrobial peptides. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274, 840510.
36 . Guo, L., Lim, K. B., Poduje, C. M., Daniel, M., Gunn, J. S., Hackett, M. et al. (1998). Lipid A acylation and bacterial resistance against vertebrate antimicrobial peptides. Cell 95, 18998.[ISI][Medline]
37
.
Shafer, W. M., Qu, X.-D., Waring, A. J. & Lehrer, R. I. (1998). Modulation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae susceptibility to vertebrate antibacterial peptides due to a member of the resistance/nodulation/division efflux pump family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95, 182933.
Received 19 July 2000; returned 4 October 2000; revised 13 November 2000; accepted 2 January 2001