Department of Medical Microbiology, Edinburgh University Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
One hundred consecutively obtained isolates of H. influenzae from respiratory sources were collected from specimens received in the clinical bacteriology laboratories of Edinburgh Royal Infirmary. Isolates were identified as H. influenzae by their requirement for XV factors by use of Mast ID rings (Mast Group Ltd, Liverpool, UK). Isolates were stored at 70°C on Microbank beads (Pro-Lab Diagnostics, Neston, UK) until required.
Sensitivity tests
MICs of clarithromycin were determined for all isolates using Etest strips (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) on IsoSensitest agar (IST; Oxoid Ltd, Basingstoke, UK) supplemented with 5% horse blood (E & O Laboratories, Stirling, UK) and nicotinamideadenine dinucleotide (NAD) 20 mg/L (Sigma Chemicals, Dorset, UK). The MIC was defined as the point of intersection between the ellipse edge and the Etest strip where there was complete inhibition of all growth. MICs were determined both in air and in 46% CO2 with incubation overnight at 37°C. Breakpoint values for the scattergrams were extrapolated from the MIC results. Results for isolates incubated in air and CO2 were therefore set at 8 and 16 mg/L, respectively.
For disc testing two disc concentrations were used, 5 µg and 15 µg (Mast Group Ltd). The same medium was used as for MIC testing. The plates were inoculated with a cotton swab using a rotary plater (Denley Instruments Ltd, Billingshurst, UK) with 0.5 McFarlane standard suspensions of H. influenzae diluted 1:100 with sterile distilled water. Immediately after application of the antibiotic discs all isolates were incubated in both air and 46% CO2 overnight. Zone diameters for the disc susceptibility tests were well defined with the technique employed and were measured with a ruler. Staphylococcus aureus NCTC 6571 was used as a control; all its values were within the expected limits.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
We have adopted the recent BSAC (British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy) guidelines for disc susceptibility testing of H. influenzae.6 Employing this method it was found that susceptibility testing with clarithromycin employing IST agar with added NAD at 20 mg/L and a 5 µg disc incubated in 46% CO2 overnight increased our resistance rate to approximately 25%.
The BSAC guidelines suggest that clarithromycin MIC values of 116 mg/L be categorized as intermediate susceptibility to this drug, with values below and above this range denoting susceptibility and resistance, respectively. The zone diameter for disc susceptibility testing in 46% CO2 overnight suggests a diameter of 1024 mm denoting intermediate sensitivity, with values below and above this range suggesting sensitivity and resistance, respectively. It should be noted, however, that these guidelines for clarithromycin are tentative and have not been confirmed by a BSAC field trial.
Etest strips were used as the reference method for our study as they have been shown to be reliable for macrolides and have good correlation with the NCCLS reference microdilution method.5
The most accurate results in the study were with the 15 µg disc incubated overnight in air; however, this technique suffered from the inability of 24% of the isolates to grow without incubation in CO2. Testing under these conditions would suggest a cut-off zone of 14 mm diameter to indicate susceptibility. This would greatly aid interpretation of the results. The
10 mm zone diameter recommended at present with a 5 µg disc incubated in 46% CO2 is only 4 mm larger than the disc size itself and is a difficult value to measure. Clearly, these results show that the use of a 5 µg disc is unacceptable whether incubated in air or CO2. Results obtained with a 15 µg disc incubated in CO2 would indicate that this method was the most practical for day-to-day use. A cut-off zone of
10 mm diameter denoting susceptibility would still be indicated for use but only 5% of isolates tested gave this value; most were
14 mm diameter.
It is important that we address problems of susceptibility testing of any organism on a dynamic continuing basis and that reports to clinicians reflect the in vivo response as accurately as possible. We would therefore recommend that for routine susceptibility testing of H. influenzae from respiratory sources a 15 µg disc be used. Incubation should be in 46% CO2, a zone diameter of 10 mm denoting sensitivity and
9 mm diameter denoting resistance. If the breakpoint method is used the value should be 16 mg/L with incubation in CO2 overnight.
![]() |
Notes |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
2 . Guay, D. R. & Craft, J. C. (1992). Comparative safety and efficacy of clarithromycin and ampicillin in the treatment of out-patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Journal of International Medicine 3, 295301.
3 . Olsson-Liljequist, B. & Hoffman, B. M. (1991). In-vitro activity of clarithromycin combined with its 14-hydroxy metabolite A62671 against Haemophilus influenzae. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 27, Suppl. A, 1117.[ISI][Medline]
4 . Dibb, W. L., Digranes, A. & Bottosfen, K. L. (1986). Effects of carbon dioxide upon the in vitro activity of erythromycin. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica (B) 94, 1736.
5 . National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. (1995). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow AerobicallyThird Edition: Approved Standard M100-S6, M7-A3. NCCLS, Villanova, PA.
6 . British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Working Party. (1998). BSAC Standardized Disc Sensitivity Testing Method. Newsletter of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Summer 1998.
Received 6 July 1999; returned 8 November 1999; revised 25 November 1999; accepted 6 December 1999