A multicentre study of the early bactericidal activity of anti-tuberculosis drugs

F. A. Sirgela, P. R. Donaldb, J. Odhiamboc, W. Githuic, K. C. Umapathyd, C. N. Paramasivand, C. M. Tame, K. M. Kamf, C. W. Lamg, K. M. Soleh, D. A. Mitchisonh,* and the EBA Collaborative Study Group

a Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa; b Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; c Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya; d Tuberculosis Research Centre, Madras, India; e Hong Kong Government Tuberculosis Service; f Pathology Service, Hong Kong Government; g Ruttonjee Hospital, Hong Kong; h St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The early bactericidal activities (EBAs) of 300 mg isoniazid, 18.5 mg isoniazid, 600 mg rifampicin and 800 mg ofloxacin given daily to 262 patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis in Cape Town, Nairobi, Madras and Hong Kong were measured by counting cfu and total acid-fast bacilli in sputum collections taken pre-treatment (S1), at 2 days (S3) and at 5 days (S6). In Cape Town, Nairobi and Madras, the cfu findings suggested that isoniazid produced a massive kill, perhaps of actively growing organisms, during the first 2 days (mean S1–S3 EBAs of 0.636–1.006) but was almost inactive thereafter (mean S3–S6 EBAs of 0.000–0.081), whereas rifampicin maintained moderate activity against slowly growing organisms throughout the 5 days (mean S3–S6 EBAs of 0.242–0.305). This finding suggests that EBAs measured during the 2–5 day interval might be able to assess the sterilizing activity of drugs. Ofloxacin had moderately high mean S1–S3 EBAs of 0.130–0.391. However, in Hong Kong rifampicin appeared to be the most bactericidal drug from the start, possibly because patients had more chronic disease. A method of adjusting the cfu EBAs using total counts was devised which decreased the variability between patients within a treatment group without altering the mean cfu EBA. This resulted in a large gain in precision in Hong Kong, suggesting that their estimates were greatly affected by type II variation, due to dilution of pus by saliva and bronchial secretions, whereas small or no gains were obtained in the other three centres, suggesting that the main cause of variability was type I, due to other factors.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The early bactericidal activity (EBA) of anti-tuberculosis drugs has been measured as the fall in cfu of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum during the start of treatment. It can be used for the rapid assessment of drug activity in tuberculous cavities.14 In the initial study, considerable differences were found between the fall in counts from patients receiving different drugs during the first 2 days of treatment, but no such differences were found if the fall in cfu counts was measured during succeeding 2 day periods of treatment.1 The standard EBA was therefore defined as the fall in log cfu counts per mL sputum per day over the first 2 days. It seems likely to measure the bactericidal activity of a drug against rapidly growing bacilli in cavity walls. The activity in cavities can be measured by giving groups of patients monotherapy with the drug in a range of dose sizes, usually spaced at logarithmic intervals. The potency of the drug can then be estimated by comparison with a similar drug also given in a similar range of dose sizes.2 Alternatively, it can be measured as a titration in which the ‘therapeutic margin’ is defined as the ratio between the usual dose size and the dose size giving an EBA of 0.3 These measurements are now being carried out on most new drugs with potential anti-tuberculosis activity. Nevertheless, the standard EBA does not measure the sterilizing activity of drugs, which can only be estimated in patients from the relapse rates after treatment in conventional clinical trials or from the sputum conversion rate at 2 months.5,6

In 1993, at the suggestion of the WHO Steering Committee on Treatment of Mycobacterial Diseases (THEMYC), a multi-centre study of EBA was started. The four collaborating centres agreed to use the same protocol, and central co-ordination was provided at St George's Hospital Medical School. The aims of the study were (i) to compare estimates of the EBAs obtained by viable counting with those obtained by counting total numbers of acid-fast bacilli (AFB), using drugs and dosages with a wide expected range of EBAs; (ii) to see whether estimates of the EBAs obtained by total counting could be used to correct and make more accurate the EBAs obtained by viable counting; (iii) to see whether the EBAs were similar in the different collaborating centres; (iv) to see whether extending the treatment period from 2 days to 5 days gave additional information; and (v) to compare the variation between patients in the centres to test the hypothesis that precise estimates are only obtained with Africans.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

The protocol stated that patients should be aged 18 years or more, have newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis with smear-positive sputum and should never have received any previous antituberculosis chemotherapy. They should weigh 40–60 kg, so as to be able to state the dose size approximately as mg drug/kg body weight. Drug addicts, pregnant women, diabetics and patients in poor general condition were excluded. Ethical permission for the study was gained from local committees at each centre. Patients gave informed consent. The presence of HIV infection was not examined at all centres for cost reasons. About 36% of patients in Nairobi would have been infected7 whereas the prevalence of infection was estimated to be much lower amongst those in Cape Town (3.1% in a survey8) and Madras (0.5% in 800 tuberculosis patients; P. R. Narayanan, personal communication). In Hong Kong <0.5% of patients would have been HIV seropositive.9

Anti-tuberculosis drugs

Patients were randomly allocated, by the use of treatment slips inside envelopes, to daily dosage with either isoniazid 300 mg (6 mg/kg), isoniazid 18.5 mg (0.35 mg/kg), rifampicin 600 mg (12 mg/kg), ofloxacin 800 mg (16 mg/kg) or no drug. These treatment groups are termed INH 300, INH 18.5, RMP 600, OFL 800 or Nil, respectively. The drug dosages used cover a wide range of expected EBA values. The dose sizes of rifampicin and ofloxacin are those usually used in the treatment of tuberculosis; 600 mg rifampicin has been found to yield an EBA lower than that of 300 mg isoniazid1,2 and only one study, with wide confidence limits, has been done previously on ofloxacin by a group in Durban, South Africa.4

Timetable

Drugs were given daily soon after 8 am for 5 days. Collections of sputum were made over a 16 h period from 4 pm to 8 am the next day before the first drug dose (S1 collection), before the third dose (S3 collection) and after the last dose (S6 collection). Only S1–S3 estimates were obtained in the Nil group in Cape Town. Routine short-course chemotherapy was then started.

Sputum collections

Sputum was collected in wide-mouthed 200 mL polystyrene, screw-capped ‘honey-pots' (Medfor, Farnborough, UK) and the volume of the collection was measured by comparison with a calibrated honey-pot. The sputum was homogenized by adding three to six glass beads 10 mm in diameter, and shaking vigorously. Portions of the sputum from the S1 and S6 collections were examined by smear and culture; positive cultures were tested for their sensitivity to isoniazid, rifampicin and to ofloxacin in some centres.

Cfu counts

The method described elsewhere3 has been modified slightly to improve antifungal activity. Plates of 7H11 oleic acid-albumin agar were made selective by the addition of special batches of ‘Selectatabs' (Mast, Bootle, UK) so that final concentrations of antibiotics in the medium were: polymyxin B sulphate 200000 units/L, carbenicillin 100 mg/L, trimethoprim (as lactate) 20 mg/L and amphotericin B 100 mg/L, added without bile salt.

A portion of homogenized sputum was mixed with an equal volume of dithiothreitol as Sputasol (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) or Sputolysin (Hoechst, Hounslow, UK) in a screw-capped container and vortex mixed for 20 s. The sputum was then placed on a rotating mixer for 30–60 min until well digested. Serial 10-fold dilutions from undiluted to 10–5 were prepared in sterile 2% horse serum or in sterile 0.2% bovine albumin by adding 100 µL from a Gilson pipette to 900 µL diluent or by using separate pipettes. Duplicate or triplicate segments of selective 7H11 medium plates were inoculated with 100 µL of each dilution. The plates were placed in polythene bags together with a plate inoculated with Mycobacterium phlei, to provide CO2, and were incubated at 37°C for 3 weeks. Colonies were counted a day after addition of a square of blotting paper soaked in 40% formaldehyde to the lids of the plates. Counts were calculated per mL sputum. S1–S3 EBA = (log S1 counts–log S3 counts)/2. S3–S6 EBA = (log S3 counts–log S6 counts)/3.

Total counts

Counts were done within 8 mm diameter clear circles in slides otherwise coated with polytetrafluorethylene (Hedley, Loughton, UK). To these circles were added either 30 µL undiluted sputum homogenate, or 10 µL undiluted homogenate or 10 µL from the 10–1 or 10–2 dilutions made for the cfu counts. The drops of sputum dilutions were spread evenly within the clear circles, allowed to dry, and were then fixed and stained with auramine O. AFB were counted under epifluorescence using a 40x or 60x objective. The number of fields examined and the total number of bacilli counted were noted until either 200 bacilli had been counted in all or, where few bacilli were seen, at least 20 bacilli were found in at least 200 fields. The area of a field scanned by the particular lens combination used for counting was measured with a stage graticule engraved with 0.1 mm rulings. The number of bacilli per mL sputum was then obtained as:

The dilution constant was 66.67, 200, 2000 or 20000 according to counting sputum from 30 µL undiluted to 10 µL of the 10–2 dilution, respectively.

Statistical procedures

Patient details and the sputum counts obtained were entered into EXCEL worksheets (Microsoft Corp) from which were obtained the mean, range, standard deviation (S.D.) and 95% confidence limits (95CL). Further statistical analyses were done with EPI INFO 6,10 using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric analyses where indicated by Bartlett's tests and regression analyses. The mean EBA weighted for differences in variance was calculated as Ym = {Sigma}wiYi /{Sigma}wi where wi = 1/Vi and Yi and Vi are individual means and variances, respectively. Homogeneity of the means was tested with k–2 degrees of freedom as X2 = {Sigma}wiYi2 – ({Sigma}wiYi)2/{Sigma}wi where k = number of groups. If homogeneous, the 95CI = Ym ± 1.96 {surd} (1/{Sigma}wi).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

The study started after about 1 year of preparation in May 1995, ran more slowly than had initially been envisaged and was closed in June 1998 with only part of the planned intake of 70 patients per centre completed in three of the four centres. Of the total of 262 patients admitted, 63 were studied in Cape Town, 58 in Nairobi, 75 in Madras and 66 in Hong Kong (Table IGo). The protocol unfortunately failed to include mandatory urine tests for isonicotinic acid to provide evidence that patients had not received antituberculosis chemotherapy before admission. The content of isoniazid in the sputum collections was, however, measured at Cape Town and six patients were excluded because it was found. None of the centres kept the weight range of patients within the limits of 40–60 kg specified by the protocol though deviations were not large and no exclusions for out of range weight were made. The entire results from patients with initial resistance to their study drug have been excluded. Particular items of data are missing or have been excluded for a variety of reasons such as failure to obtain a sputum collection, contamination, freezing of sputum before cfu counting or because the volume of the sputum collection was less than 5 mL. In such cases, the remaining data for the patient were used. In Cape Town, total counts were not done on a high proportion of the sputum collections from patients admitted towards the end of the study, nor for ethical reasons were patients in the Nil group studied for more than the initial 2 days. In none of the patients did drug resistance arise during the 5 days of monotherapy.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Patients in the study
 
Correlation between initial cfu and total counts

Highly significant correlations between the initial S1 cfu and total counts were found in the four centres (Table IIGo). The cfu count was slightly lower than the total count in all centres except Madras. The high cfu counts in Madras, the poor correlation and a lack of proportionality in the cfu counting data (not tabulated here) indicated a problem in the cfu counting technique at Madras probably due to carry-over from lower to higher dilutions in pipettes.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Correlation (r) between total and cfu counts of M. tuberculosis in pre-treatment (S1) sputum collections
 
Adjustment of cfu EBA values using total counts

There are many reasons why cfu EBAs may vary from one patient to another in the same drug dosage group, such as previous chemotherapy, differences in individual response to drugs, faulty collection or labelling of sputum collections. Although these type I variations can affect total as well as cfu counts, there is no way in which the cfu counts can be corrected by the total counts. In type II variation, sputum collections may vary in the proportion of purulent cavitary material containing viable bacilli to the content of mucus from bronchial walls and saliva, as emphasized by Sturm.4 Type II variation can be corrected by using total counts since both will be altered to the same extent by dilution of the purulent material. An adjustment was therefore made to estimate the proportion of total bacilli (t) that are viable (v), so that a new EBA can be calculated, for instance over the S1–S3 interval, as the subtraction EBA (Sub EBA):

, which is algebraically equivalent to

, or

While calculation of the Sub EBA may reduce the variation between patients expressed as the S.D. within a treatment group, it is also greatly affected by the values of the total EBA, which can be quite large and can be due to a particular property of a drug. The total EBA is therefore unlikely to be directly related to the bactericidal activity measured by the standard cfu EBA. In order to avoid these problems, we added to the Sub EBA from each patient the mean of the total EBAs calculated for the treatment group. The adjusted EBA (Adj EBA), thus obtained, retains the mean value of the cfu EBA and the S.D. calculated for the Sub EBA. In effect, the adjustment does not alter the mean of the cfu EBA but alters the variation about it. Note that as the Sub EBA is based on two calculated EBAs, its S.D. will be increased in the absence of any correlation between cfu and total EBA.

An example of the adjustment process using Hong Kong data sets that have complete cfu and total counts for the S1–S3 period is shown in Table IIIGo. Hong Kong results were chosen because of the high correlation (r = 0.88, Table IIGo) between the total and cfu counts, which suggest that adjustment should be successful in reducing the S.D. In comparing the Sub EBA with the original cfu EBA, the same means are obtained but there is a fall in S.D. within each treatment group, indicating the success of the adjustment process. The overall discrimination between the treatment groups measured by F increased from 5.1 (P = 0.002) to 10.5 (P = 0.00003) and the pooled S.D. decreased, correspondingly, from 0.39 to 0.27 as a result of the adjustment.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Adjustment process with complete Hong Kong data sets
 
EBAs obtained by cfu counting

Tables IV–VIIGoGoGoGo reporting the results in the four centres have been calculated for all available results, not just for those patients who have complete sets of results. EBAs by the standard cfu counting method are set out in the top third of each table. The variation between the patients was least at Cape Town (Table IVGo) with pooled S.D. values of 0.17 for both the S1–S3 and the S3–S6 periods. Variation was greater with S.D. values of 0.41 and 0.30, respectively, at Nairobi (Table VGo), 0.64 and 0.32, respectively, at Madras (Table VIGo) and 0.39 and 0.29, respectively, at Hong Kong (Table VIIGo). The overall ability of the EBA to discriminate between the four groups that received drugs during the S1–S3 period, although statistically significant in each centre, was also greater at Cape Town (F = 19.9) than at Nairobi (F = 3.0), Madras (F = 6.0) or Hong Kong (F = 6.1). However, during the S3–S6 period, as was expected, the discrimination between the treatment groups only just achieved statistical significance (F = 3.5, P = 0.02) at Cape Town but was not significant at Nairobi, Madras or Hong Kong.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. Early bactericidal activity (EBA) calculated from cfu counts and from total counts at Cape Town
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table V. Early bactericidal activity (EBA) calculated from cfu counts and from total counts at Nairobi
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table VI. Early bactericidal activity (EBA) calculated from cfu counts and from total counts at Madras
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table VII. Early bactericidal activity (EBA) calculated from cfu counts and from total counts at Hong Kong
 
Results with isoniazid and rifampicin at Cape Town, Nairobi and Madras will be considered first. The INH 300 groups had the highest mean EBA during the standard S1–S3 interval, ranging from 0.636 to 1.006 in the three centres. However, in all three centres, the EBAs in the subsequent S3–S6 interval (0.000–0.081) fell close to the Nil group values (–0.059 to 0.090). The S1–S3 EBAs in the INH 18.5 groups were appreciably lower than those for the 300 mg dose, ranging from 0.072 to 0.329, and there was some suggestion that the fall in the S3–S6 interval was not as complete as in the INH 300 group. The EBAs in the RMP 600 group during the S1–S3 period were lower than in the INH 300 group (0.174–0.533); and the difference between the means of the INH 300 and the RMP 600 groups at Cape Town is significant (P < 0.001). However, in contrast to the findings with isoniazid, the EBAs in the RMP 600 group were maintained in the S3–S6 period with values ranging from 0.242 to 0.302. The difference between the means of 0.064 in the INH 300 groups and 0.302 in the RMP 600 group during the S3–S6 period at Cape Town is significant (P = 0.006). Weighted means for the three centres are set out in Table VIIIGo, but it should be noted that although they are the best estimate of the pooled results, the 95CL values of weighted means were less precise than the means from Cape Town (Table IVGo), the centre with the most accurate results.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table VIII. Weighted means of estimates of early bactericidal activity (EBA) in Cape Town, Nairobi and Madras
 
The findings at Hong Kong (Table VIIGo) with isoniazid and rifampicin were different from those in the other three centres. The highest S1–S3 EBA was 0.631 in the RMP 600 group, while it was appreciably lower at 0.371 in the INH 300 group. The difference between these means is not, however, significant. The EBA for the INH 300 group in the S3–S6 period remained fairly high at 0.278 with the lower 95CL above 0.

Ofloxacin in the OFL 800 group had appreciable S1–S3 EBAs, with values of 0.391 at Cape Town, 0.146 at Nairobi and 0.130 at Madras (weighted mean of 0.263). In the subsequent 3 days, it maintained bactericidal activity with EBAs of 0.165 at Cape Town, 0.293 at Nairobi and 0.236 at Madras (weighted mean of 0.202). Lower EBAs of 0.009 and 0.122 were found at Hong Kong but the results are not sufficiently precise to allow comparison with other centres.

EBAs obtained by counting total AFB

The total EBAs obtained by counting AFB in sputum are set out in the middle sections of Tables IV–VIIGoGoGoGo. There are no consistent patterns of results. However, of the 32 estimates during the S1–S3 and S3–S6 periods from the four treatment groups given drugs at the four centres, 25 were positive and only seven were negative, indicating a tendency towards a fall in counts during treatment. Of the six EBAs in the INH 300 groups (S1–S3 and S3–S6) at Cape Town, Nairobi and Madras, five had total EBAs > 0.2. Exposure to isoniazid is known to cause loss of acid-fastness which has been used as an endpoint in microbiological assay.11 A total EBA in the RMP 600 group of > 0.2 was also found at Nairobi (S1–S3). At Hong Kong, in keeping with cfu EBAs, total EBAs in the INH 300 group were low, but in the RMP 600 group both S1–S3 and S3–S6 total EBAs were > 0.2. The variation between patients, estimated as the pooled S.D., was smaller when calculated as total EBAs than as cfu EBAs at Nairobi, Madras and Hong Kong but was similar at Cape Town.

Adjusted EBAs

The adjusted EBAs, calculated from all available data, are set out in the bottom section of Tables IV–VIIGoGoGoGo. Weighted means giving the best estimates of combined results in Cape Town, Nairobi and Madras are in Table VIIIGo. The success of adjustment in decreasing the S.D. from cfu EBAs to adjusted EBAs agrees with the value of r correlating cfu EBAs and total EBAs (Table IXGo). The value of r was –0.01 (small, negative and non-significant) for the correlation over 0–2 days at Cape Town. Adjustment then increased the pooled S.D. of the cfu EBAs from 0.17 to 0.24. In the Madras data over 3–5 days (Table IXGo), r = 0.31 and adjustment led to a small increase in the pooled S.D. from 0.32 to 0.38. With higher values of r, from 0.48 to 0.59, adjustment either did not change the pooled S.D. (Madras 0–2 days) or reduced it slightly (Cape Town 3–5 days, Nairobi 0–2 days and 3–5 days, Hong Kong 3–5 days). In the Hong Kong 0–2 days data, r had its largest value of 0.76 and the adjustment created the greatest reduction in pooled S.D. from 0.39 to 0.28. The value of F for the comparison of variation between and within treatment groups shows corresponding changes before and after adjustment.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IX. Results of the adjustment process related to the correlation between cfu and total EBAs
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The behaviour of cfu EBA results in the INH 300 and RMP 600 groups was similar at Cape Town, Nairobi and Madras. They are best estimated by the weighted means in Table VIIIGo. The EBA in the INH 300 group of 0.653 was the highest encountered with any drug during the first 2 days of treatment, as found in previous studies,14 but it decreased to 0.060, near the low value found in the Nil group (0.037) during the following 3 days. Thus isoniazid appeared to be the most bactericidal drug initially, but having killed the actively growing bacilli during the first 2 days, it was unable to kill more slowly growing organisms that survived. At the lower dose of 18.5 mg, isoniazid killed much more slowly (0.141) during the first 2 days and then had an EBA of 0.105, slightly higher than with the 300 mg dose during the following 3 days, suggesting that the initial kill was less effective and that actively multiplying organisms had survived. Rifampicin, on the other hand, though initially less bactericidal than isoniazid (0.211) because of its lower therapeutic margin,3 was more bactericidal against residual organisms in the succeeding 3 days (0.288), in keeping with its known high sterilizing activity against persisting organisms. These findings suggest that the change in the bacterial population from an actively growing majority killed by isoniazid to slowly growing persisters killed by rifampicin occurs remarkably early, after only 2 days. Furthermore, it seems possible that the S3–S6 EBA might allow measurement of the sterilizing activity of anti-tuberculosis drugs, a possibility that would greatly extend the usefulness of the EBA technique. However, the ability of the S3–S6 EBA to discriminate differences between the drugs was statistically significant only at Cape Town. Even there, the value of F, which measures discrimination between the mean EBAs in the treatment groups, fell from 19.9 for the S1–S3 interval to only 3.5 for the S3–S6 interval. One can conclude that rifampicin and pyrazinamide are the drugs mainly responsible for bactericidal activity during standard chemotherapy, while the main function of isoniazid, after the initial kill of perhaps 95% of bacilli, is to prevent the emergence of resistance. This interpretation is in keeping with the evidence presented elsewhere that patients with initial resistance to isoniazid have relapse rates after regimens with a rifamycin/isoniazid continuation phase that are closely similar to those in patients with sensitive organisms12 and that the relapse rate of patients treated with once-weekly rifapentine/isoniazid is unrelated to the rate of acetylation of isoniazid.13

Hong Kong results differed from those found elsewhere. There was greater variation in the S1–S3 cfu EBAs amongst Hong Kong patients than amongst those from Cape Town. The pooled S.D. in Hong Kong was 0.39, almost identical to the previous estimate of 0.38.14 Using S1–S3 EBAs with or without adjustment according to which had the lowest values (Table IXGo), the Hong Kong pooled S.D. was 0.28, >0.17 in Cape Town, substantially less than 0.36 in Nairobi and 0.57 in Madras. This must be due to characteristics of the patients since findings in both Hong Kong studies, such as the excellent correlation between the cfu and total S1 counts, the constancy of standard EBAs between studies and the low S.D. values of the total EBAs, indicate accurate work in the laboratory. Also, in the Hong Kong data, the mean S1–S3 EBA was greater in the RMP 600 group (0.612) than in the INH 300 group (0.371), though the difference is not significant. Since the EBA of INH 300 was greater than the EBA of RMP 600 in an earlier study, weighted means and confidence limits were calculated to include the Hong Kong results in the present and the earlier study and the ‘African’ results from the present Cape Town and Nairobi centres as well as those from previous studies at Nairobi and Cape Town4 (Table XGo). The weighted means indicate lower EBAs of isoniazid and higher EBAs of rifampicin in Hong Kong than in the African studies though the differences just fail to attain statistical significance. An explanation for these findings might be that tuberculosis in Hong Kong is more chronic than in the other centres, with bacteria growing more slowly in the lesions. Slow growth would favour the sterilizing activity of rifampicin but limit the early kill due to isoniazid. Thick-walled chronic cavities might also interconnect less well than in acute disease, thus making it more difficult to sample their contents. This could be responsible for the high variability of the Hong Kong EBA results. The proposition that lesions in Hong Kong are more chronic than in African patients is supported by evidence that sterilization during clinical trials of the same chemotherapy regimen proceeds more slowly in Hong Kong patients than in African patients.15


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table X. Studies of S1–S3 cfu EBAs of isoniazid and rifampicin in Hong Kong and combined African centres
 
Type I variation may well have been responsible for a pooled (S1–S3) S.D. of 0.56 in Madras and also 0.41 in Nairobi patients, who were housed in an under-resourced hospital (the pooled S.D. was previously 0.191). In type II variation, given emphasis by Sturm in a recent review,4 the proportion of bacillary material in the sputum collection changes from day to day with a corresponding variation in the cfu EBA. The extent of this type of variation is indicated by the correlation between the cfu EBA and the total EBA. Correlation was greatest in Hong Kong, probably because of the chronicity of tuberculous lesions, and least in the acute disease typical of Cape Town. The adjustment procedure described reduced the amount of intra-group variation between patients but did not alter the mean EBA. As might be expected, it had the biggest effect in Hong Kong, reducing the between-patients S.D. from 0.39 to 0.28. It had no effect on S1–S3 cfu EBAs in Cape Town where no correlation was found between the cfu and total EBAs. However, total EBAs were not performed in all Cape Town patients and it would be remarkable if no type II variation occurred in the future.

A recent American study reported on the effects of various factors, such as the duration of the study period and of daily sputum collections, on the cfu and total EBAs of 16 patients treated with 300 mg isoniazid daily over a 5 day period.16 Their finding that total EBAs were measurable and started after a delay of about 2 days, justifies subtraction of the mean for the total EBAs in the adjustment procedure used in the present study. However, further findings in their study differ considerably from ours, in that the mean of the 2 day cfu EBAs derived from 12 h sputum collections (corresponding to our S1–S3 period), was only 0.27 and the S.D. was high at 0.62. Furthermore, the rate at which sputum cfu counts fell persisted during the 5 day period. These discrepancies may have arisen because a proportion of their patients had taken isoniazid before the study commenced. No tests were apparently done on urine or sputum for the presence of anti-tuberculosis drugs at the start of the study. A mixture of the S1–S3 cfu EBAs and S3–S6 cfu EBAs in our present study would produce similar results. In Cape Town, six patients were found to have isoniazid in their sputum despite earlier assertions that it was impossible for such patients to obtain anti-tuberculosis drugs without the knowledge of the tuberculosis treatment service.2 Unfortunately, other centres did not test for the presence of isoniazid and the inclusion of patients who had actually started drug treatment is likely to be a cause of excess variation in EBA estimates

The findings of the present study with ofloxacin are of interest since little work has been done on the EBAs of quinolones. In Durban, a mean EBA of 0.36 was found in 10 patients given 800 mg ofloxacin, similar to the estimate of 0.391 at Cape Town.4 These EBAs appear higher than the 0.121 obtained with 1000 mg ciprofloxacin daily at Cape Town.17 The difference suggests that 800 mg ofloxacin would be more effective than 500 mg ciprofloxacin, though a reliable comparison cannot be made without studying a range of ofloxacin doses.

The most important implication of the study is the possibility of assessing the sterilizing activity of antituberculosis drugs by extending the dosage period of EBA studies beyond the first 2 days. This method would have advantages of speed and low cost, in assessing the sterilizing activity of new drugs, over currently available surrogate markers of relapse rates which are 2 month sputum bacteriology6 and the presence of fbpB (85B, alpha antigen) mRNA in sputum at about 15 days.18 However, it was only the Cape Town centre that was able to demonstrate the activity of rifampicin during days 2–5 (S3–S6 EBA), because it had the least variation between EBAs of patients in the same treatment groups. The adjustment procedure might help to reduce this variation but further studies to develop the technique are necessary and should concentrate on precision.


    Notes
 
* Correspondence address. Department of Medical Microbiology, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE. Tel: +44-020-8725-5704; Fax: +44-020-8672-0234; E-mail: dmitchis{at}sghms.ac.uk EBA collaborative study group: F. J. Botha, D. P. Parkin, B. W. Van de Wal, H. I. Seifart (Stellenbosch University); A. Venter (Medical Research Council, Tygerberg); P. Morris, J. Talent (Brooklyn Hospital for Chest Diseases); J. M. Chakaya, E. Juma, C. Gicheha, J. Kimari, F. Karimi, P. Mumbi, J. Kimwomi (Kenya Medical Research Institute); R. Prabhakar, D. Herbert, K. J. Ilampuranan, K. Thyagarajan (Tuberculosis Research Centre, Madras); S. L.Chan (Ruttonjee Hospital, Hong Kong). Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1 . Jindani, A., Aber, V. R., Edwards, E. A. & Mitchison, D. A. (1980). The early bactericidal activity of drugs in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. American Review of Respiratory Disease 121, 939–49.[ISI][Medline]

2 . Sirgel, F. A., Botha, F. J., Parkin, D. P., Van de Wal, B. W., Donald, P. R., Clark, P. K. et al. (1993). The early bactericidal activity of rifabutin in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis measured by sputum viable counts: a new method of drug assessment. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 32, 867–75.[Abstract]

3 . Donald, P. R., Sirgel, F. A., Botha, F. J., Seifart, H. I., Parkin, D. P., Vandenplas, M. L. et al. (1997). The early bactericidal activity of isoniazid related to its dose size in pulmonary tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 156, 895–900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4 . Mitchison, D. A. & Sturm, W. A. (1997). The measurement of early bactericidal activity. In Bailliere's Clinical Infectious Diseases: Mycobacterial Diseases Part II, (Malin, A. & McAdam, K. P. W. J., Eds), pp. 185–206. Bailliere Tindall, London.

5 . Mitchison, D. A. (1992). The Garrod Lecture. Understanding the chemotherapy of tuberculosis—current problems. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 29, 477–93.[ISI][Medline]

6 . Mitchison, D. A. (1993). Assessment of new sterilizing drugs for treating pulmonary tuberculosis by culture at 2 months. American Review of Respiratory Disease 147, 1062–3.[ISI][Medline]

7 . Odhiambo, J. A., Borgdorff, M. W., Kiambih, F. M., Kibuga, D. K., Kwamanga, D. O., Ng'ang'a, L. et al. (1999). Tuberculosis and the HIV epidemic: increasing annual risk of tuberculous infection in Kenya, 1986–1996. American Journal of Public Health 89, 1078–82.[Abstract]

8 . Galloway, M. R. (1998). Results of the eighth national HIV survey of women attending antenatal clinics of the public health service in South Africa in 1997. AIDS Bulletin (SAMTC) 7, 16–7.

9 . Report. (1997). Fourth annual report August 1996 to July 1997. Advisory Council on Aids, Hong Kong.

10 . Dean, A. G., Dean, J. A., Coulombier, D., Brendel, K. A., Smith, D. C., Burton, A. H. et al. (1994). Epi Info. Version 6: a word processing, database and statistics program for epidemiology on microcomputers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

11 . Mandel, W., Cohn, M. L., Russell, W. F. & Middlebrook, G. (1957). Serum isoniazid levels and catalase activities of tubercle bacilli from isoniazid-treated patients. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 233, 66–8.[ISI][Medline]

12 . Mitchison, D. A. (2000). Role of individual drugs in the chemotherapy of tuberculosis. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 4, 262–7.[ISI][Medline]

13 . Tam, C. M., Chan, S. L., Kam, K. M., Sim, E., Staples, D., Sole, K. M. et al. (2000). Rifapentine and isoniazid in the continuation phase of a 6-month regimen. Interim report: no activity of isoniazid in the continuation phase. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. In press.

14 . Chan, S. L., Yew, W. W., Ma, W. K., Girling, D. J., Aber, V. R., Felmingham, D. et al. (1992). The early bactericidal activity of rifabutin measured by sputum viable counts in Hong Kong patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Tubercle and Lung Disease 73, 33–8.[ISI][Medline]

15 . Fox, W., Ellard, G. A. & Mitchison, D. A. (1999). Studies on the treatment of tuberculosis undertaken by the British Medical Research Council tuberculosis units, 1946–1986, with relevant subsequent publications. Section 1.26.5. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 3, Suppl. 2, S231–S79.[ISI][Medline]

16 . Hafner, R., Cohn, J. A., Wright, D. J., Dunlap, N. E., Egorin, M. J., Enama, M. E. et al. (1997). Early bactericidal activity of isoniazid in pulmonary tuberculosis. Optimization of Methodology. The DATRI 008 Study Group. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 156, 918–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17 . Sirgel, F. A., Botha, F. J., Parkin, D. P., Van de Wal, B. W., Schall, R., Donald, P. R. et al. (1997). The early bactericidal activity of ciprofloxacin in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 156, 901–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18 . Desjardin, L. E., Perkins, M. D., Wolski, K., Haun, S., Teixeira, L., Chen, Y. et al. (1999). Measurement of sputum Mycobacterium tuberculosis messenger RNA as a surrogate for response to chemotherapy. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 160, 203–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received 14 April 1999; returned 15 July 1999; revised 8 December 1999; accepted 22 January 2000