a Department of Pathobiology, Box 357238, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7238, USA b Department of Microbiology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
More recently, resistance to macrolides in the absence of resistance to lincosamides or streptogramin B has been described in S. pneumoniae and ß-hemolytic (Lancefield Group A) streptococci. This is determined by the presence of a membrane bound efflux protein, encoded by the mef genes, mefA or mefE. 12,13,14,15,16 mefA has been cloned from Streptococcus pyogenes and has been identified in Lancefield Group C and G streptococci originating from Finland. 14,16 The mefEgene has been identified and cloned from S. pneumoniae in the USA. 13,15,17 The two genes have 90% nucleotide sequence identity, and using DNA probes for conserved regions, both mefA and mefE will be detected. In this study, probes to the conserved regions of the genes were used. The mef gene will be referred to as mefE for S. pneumoniae and the mef gene for other species.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Streptococcus spp. were grown on Brucella blood agar (BA) (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) supplemented with 5% sheep red blood cells and incubated with 5% CO 2 at 36.5°C. M. luteus and Corynebacterium spp. were grown on Brain Heart Infusion Agar (BHIA) (Difco) supplemented with 5% NAD and 5% Vitamin K- haemin. Enterococcus faecalis JH2-2 was grown on BHIA without supplements. Bacteria for DNA dot blots and DNA extractions were grown overnight at 36.5°C in BHI broth (Difco) supplemented with 0.03 M D-glucose and 0.04% DL-threonine. 21,22
Mating experiments
Ten Em r S. pneumoniae from Seattle and S. pneumoniae 02J1048, known to contain the mefE gene, from Pfizer, Inc. (Groton, CT, USA), 15 Em r M. luteus 64, four Em r Corynebacterium spp. (214, 260, 274 and 388), three Em r Enterococcus spp. (102, 106 and 138) and two Em r viridans streptococci (7405B2-47 and 7405B2-48) were used as donors. The donor organisms were susceptible to fusidic acid, rifampicin and streptomycin. E. faecalis JH2-2 was used as a recipient (erythromycin susceptible), and had been previously selected for chromosomal resistance to rifampicin (25 mg/L) and fusidic acid (25 mg/L) (Em s Rif r Fus r). 21,23 The other recipient was a clinical isolate, S. pneumoniae 915, a 6B serotype from Alaska, which was susceptible to erythromycin and, by stepwise selection, made chromosomally resistant to streptomycin (1 g/L), fusidic acid (25 mg/L) and rifampicin (25 mg/L) (Em s Rif r Fus r Str r). 21 Donor and recipient bacteria were grown separately at 36.5°C overnight on BA or BHIA plates. Each isolate was suspended in 0.5-1.0 mL of BHI broth (Difco) to a density of approximately 10 9 cells/mL (3 McFarland). Donor and recipient at a 1:1 (donor to recipient) ratio for S. pneumoniae to S. pneumoniaematings,or a 5:1 (donor to recipient) ratio for all other matings, were mixed, plated directly on to BA plates, and incubated in CO 2 at 36.5°C for 48 h. 21 After incubation, the mating mixture was serially diluted on to antibiotic supplemented plates as previously described. 21,22,23 Transconjugants from the S. pneumoniae-S. pneumoniae and S. pneumoniae-viridans streptococcus matings were selected on BA plates supplemented with 2 mg/L of erythromycin and 25 mg/L of rifampicin. S. pneumoniae transconjugants grew on BA plates supplemented with either erythromycin (2 mg/L), rifampicin (25 mg/L), fusidic acid (25 mg/L) or streptomycin (1 g/L). These isolates were identified biochemically as S. pneumoniae. 18 The E. faecalis tranconjugants were selected on BHIA supplemented with erythromycin 10 mg/L and either rifampicin 25 mg/L. E. faecalis tranconjugants grew in the presence of rifampicin (25 mg/L), erythromycin (10 mg/L) or fusidic acid (25 mg/L), as previously described, 23 and were identified biochemically as E. faecalis. 24 Plates with no growth were held for 7 days. All matings were done in duplicate. Some matings were done in the presence of DNase (1 g/L) (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA) as previously described, to rule out transformation. 25 Duplicate matings were performed without DNase, and the frequencies were compared with the frequencies of the matings with DNase, and were shown to be the same. mef was detected using labelled mef oligonucleotide probe hybridization of bacterial dot blots and/or Southern blots.
Labelled probes
The oligonucleotide probes used were MF4 (sequence: 5'-ACC GAT TCT ATC AGC AAA-3'), MF5 (sequence: 5'-GGT GCT GTG ATT GCA TCT ATT AC-3'), and ErmB F (sequence: 5'-GAA AAG GTA CTC AAC CAA ATA-3'). 26 The probes were labelled using the Genius Oligonucleotide Labeling Kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN, USA), following the manufacturer's procedures for purified Southern blots and whole cell DNA dot blots only. 32P-labelled probes were used for whole bacterial cell dots using T4 polynucleotide kinase (10 U) (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) as previously described. 22
Whole cell DNA extraction
Whole cell DNA was prepared from isolates and transconjugants, using cells grown overnight, in 100 mL of supplemented BHI broth, as previously described. 27 After extractions with Tris-saturated phenol, pH 8.0, and chloroform, the DNA was precipitated with ethanol, resuspended in nanopure sterile water and stored at -20°C until needed. The whole cell DNA was run on a 0.7% agarose gel and Southern blots were prepared. 28
Dot blots
Overnight bacterial growth (1 mL) in supplemented BHI broth was placed into 1.5 mL sterile
Eppendorf tubes, centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 2 min, and the supernatant decanted. The
bacterial
pellet was resuspended with 1 mL BHI broth to create a turbid suspension (corresponding to 3
McFarland; 10
9 bacteria/mL). Suspension (200 µL) was spotted onto GeneScreenPlus
membrane (NEN Research, Boston, MA, USA), dried, treated with 0.5 M NaOH for 10 min, 1
M
Tris- HCl for 3 min and 1 M Tris- HCl with 1.5% NaCl, pH 7.5, for 10 min. The membrane was
dried, washed twice in chloroform- isoamylalcohol (24:1), rinsed in water twice, then washed in
1 M
Tris- HCl, and 1 M Tris- HCl with 1.5% NaCl, and baked at 80°C for 1 h. The filters were
stored at room temperature until labelled.
28
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
A PCR assay was used as a second method for detection of the mefgenes in donors and transconjugants. The PCR assay used 40 ng of genomic DNA from S. pneumoniae 02J1048 as a positive control, and 40 ng genomic DNA as a template from S. pneumoniae, Micrococcus, Corynebacterium spp., viridans streptococci and Enterococcus spp. The primers used were: MF4a (5'-ACC GAT TCT ATC AGC AAA G-3') and MF6 (5'-GGA CCT GCC ATT GGT GTG-3'). 17 Both are in the conserved regions of mefA and mefE genes. Each reaction contained 2 units of Taq polymerase (Perkin Elmer- Cetus, Norwalk, CT, USA), 200 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 1x PCR buffer (1.5 mM MgCl 2) and 100 ng of each primer. Using a Perkin Elmer- Cetus thermal cycler, the reactions were carried out by denaturing at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 37°C for 1 min and elongation at 72°C for 2 min for 35 cycles. The PCR products were lyophilized, resuspended in 1/10 volume sterile water, and run on a 1.5% agarose gel with 0.5x TBE running buffer. Ethidium bromide staining allowing visualization of PCR bands and Southern blots were prepared. The 940 bp PCR product was confirmed by hybridization with a labelled internal mef probe, MF5 (5'-GGT GCT GTG ATT GCA TCT ATT AC-3'). Negative and positive controls were included in each run.
DNA- DNA hybridization
Southern blots of the uncut whole cell DNA were prepared on Magnagraph nylon (Micron Separation Inc., Westboro, MA, USA) and hybridized with nonradiolabelled oligonucleotide probe MF4 or ermB F following the manufacturer's directions (Boehringer). Southern blots of the PCR assay were prepared using the Magnagraph nylon membrane (Micron Separation, Inc.) and hybridized with labelled MF5. Detection of the probe was performed using the CDP-Star reagent at a 1:1000 dilution, following the manufacturer's instructions (Boehringer Mannheim Biochemica). DNA dot blots containing 30-300 µg of purified whole cell DNA were placed on GeneScreenPlus membrane (NEN Research Products) and hybridized with the nonradiolabelled probe. The whole bacterial cell dot blots were placed on GeneScreenPlus membrane and hybridized with a 32P-labelled oligonucleotide probe. 22
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Sixty-three (50%) of the total 125 bacterial isolates tested hybridized with the mef
and/or ermB probes (Table I). Twenty-six (76%) of the 34 S. pneumoniae isolates tested hybridized with the mef probe only, two isolates
hybridized with mef and ermB probes, and four isolates hybridized with the ermB probe only (Table I). One of the M. luteus, four Corynebacterium spp.
(one C. jeikeium, one Corynebacterium Group A, and two Corynebacterium spp.), seven of the Enterococcus spp. and two viridans
streptococci hybridized with the mef probe. Six Enterococcus spp., one M.
luteus, one Corynebacterium(Group A) and nine viridans streptococci hybridized
with the ermB probe (Table I). The PCR assay with
hybridization of the internal MF5 probe confirmed the
presence of the mef gene in the isolates. Correlations were found between low-level
erythromycin resistance (MIC of 2- 4 mg/L) and the presence of the mefE gene in S.
pneumoniae, or high-level erythromycin resistance (MIC of 16 to >128 mg/L) with ermB, or mefE and ermB in S. pneumoniae (Table II). In Enterococcus spp. there were similar correlations between low-level
erythromycin resistance (MIC of 2-16 mg/L) and the presence of the mef gene and
high-level
resistance (MIC 32 mg/L) and the presence of ermB. In viridans streptococci,
low-level
erythromycin resistance (MIC of 2-4 mg/L) was associated with the mef gene, but both
low-
and high-level resistance was seen in the isolates with the ermB gene (Table
II). MIC in M. luteus and Corynebacterium spp. did not correlate
with the
presence of the mef gene, but the numbers tested were small (Table II). Other ermgenes (ermA, ermC, etc.) were not examined.
|
|
Erythromycin resistance erm genes are often associated with mobile elements.
Therefore, it
was of interest to see whether the mef gene was associated with mobile elements in
these
isolates. It was possible to move the mefgene from three of four S. pneumoniae donors to the S. pneumoniae recipient, at frequencies ranging from 10
-6 to 10
-7 per recipient (Table III). To selected matings,
DNase (1
g/L) was added to the mating mixtures and the frequencies were compared with matings without
DNase. The frequencies of transfer were within 0.5 log
10 with DNase, compared with the same matings without DNase, suggesting that
conjugation rather than transformation was taking place in S. pneumoniae-S.
pneumoniae matings. Two mating pairs are shown inTable III. In
these three S.
pneumoniae donors and eight other (total 11) S. pneumoniae donors, transfer of the
mefE gene to the E. faecalis recipient could be demonstrated, at frequencies
ranging from
10
-6 to 10
-8 per recipient (Table III).
The mef gene could also be moved from M. luteus 64, C. jeikeium388
and Corynebacteriumspp. (214, 274) to E. faecalis JH2-2, at frequencies of
10
-6 to 10
-8 per recipient (Table III).
The same transfer of mefgenes was effected from Enterococcusspp. (102, 106,
138)
and viridans streptococci donors (7405B2-47, 7405B2-48) to E. faecalis JH2-2, at
frequencies of 10
-8 and 10
-6 per recipient, respectively (Table III). The MIC of
erythromycin in the transconjugants from each mating with the various donors was five-fold
higher than
the MIC of the parental recipient (0.5 mg/L vs 16 mg/L). Whole cell DNA from donors,
recipients
and transconjugants were run on 0.7% agarose gel and Southern blots were prepared.
Transconjugants
hybridized with the labelled mef probe, whereas the susceptible recipients did not. The
probe
hybridized with the chromosomal fraction, suggesting a chromosomal location (data not shown).
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In earlier studies, the mef genes have been found in a limited number of hosts (S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes and Lancefield Groups C and G streptococci). 14,15,16,29 This study has demonstrated that the mef genes are present in three new Em r Gram-positive genera (Corynebacterium, Enterococcus and Micrococcus) (Table I) as well as in Em r viridans streptococci. Recently sequencing of the PCR fragments from M. luteus and Corynebacterium spp. 388 and 214 showed 93%, 93% and 95% DNA homology with the mefE GeneBank sequence, respectively. Twenty-six S. pneumoniae carried the mefE gene, and two additional isolates carried both the mefE and ermB genes.
A correlation was found between lower erythromycin MIC (2-4 mg/L) for isolates carrying the mefE gene in S. pneumoniae and for enterococci (2-16 mg/L) carrying the mef
gene. In contrast, isolates with higher MICs (16 mg/L) carried the ermB gene,
either
alone or in addition to the mef gene (Table II). More examples
from
different locations will need to be studied to determine whether the presence of these genes
would
predict the therapeutic usefulness of clindamycin. What impact, if any, the differences seen
between
carriage of mef versus ermgenes will have on treatment of S. pneumoniae or
other Gram-positive disease has not yet been examined. It is clear from this study that the host
range of
the mef genes in Gram-positive bacteria needs to be more fully examined.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
Notes |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
2 . Schutze, G. E., Kaplan, S. L. & Jacobs, R. F. (1994). Resistant Pneumococcus: a worldwide problem. Infection 22, 2337.[ISI][Medline]
3 . Doern, G. V., Brueggemann, A., Holley, H. P. & Rauch, A. M. (1996). Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from outpatients in the United States during the winter months of 1994 to 1995: results of a 30-center national surveillance study. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy40, 120813.[Abstract]
4 . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1996). Defining the public health impact of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: report of a working group. MMWRMorbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 45, 114.
5 . Tomasz, A. (1997). Antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clinical Infectious Diseases 24, Suppl. 1, S858.[ISI][Medline]
6 . Courvalin, P. & Carlier, C. (1987). Tn1545: a conjugative shuttle transposon. Molecular and General Genetics 206, 25964.[Medline]
7 . Clewell, D. B. & Gawron-Burke, C. (1986). Conjugative transposons and the dissemination of antibiotic resistance in streptococci. Annual Review of Microbiology 40, 63559.[ISI][Medline]
8
.
Weisblum, B. (1995). Erythromycin
resistance
by ribosome modification. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 39, 57785.
9 . Leclercq, R. & Courvalin, P. (1991). Bacterial resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin antibiotics by target modification. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 35, 126772.[ISI][Medline]
10 . Brown, M. B. & Roberts, M. C. (1991). Tetracycline resistance determinants in streptococcal species isolated from the bovine mammary gland. Veterinary Microbiology 29, 17380 [ISI][Medline]
11 . Clermont, D. & Horaud, T. (1990). Identification of chromosomal antibiotic resistance genes in Streptococcus anginosus (S. milleri). Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 34, 168590.[ISI][Medline]
12 . Shortridge, V. D., Flamm, R. K., Ramer, N., Beyer, J. & Tanaka, S. K. (1996). Novel mechanism of macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 26, 738.[ISI][Medline]
13 . Sutcliffe, J., Tait-Kamradt, A. & Wondrack, L. (1996) Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes resistant to macrolides but sensitive to clindamycin: a common resistance pattern mediated by an efflux system. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 40, 181724.[Abstract]
14 . Seppala, H., Nissinen, A., Yu, Q. & Huovinen, P. (1993). Three different phenotypes of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Finland. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 32, 88591.[ISI][Medline]
15 . Clancy, J., Petitpas, J., Dib-Hajj, F., Yuan, W., Cronan, M., Kamath, A. V. et al. (1996). Molecular cloning and functional analysis of a novel macrolide-resistance determinant mefA from Streptococcus pyogenes. Molecular Microbiology 22, 86779.[ISI][Medline]
16
.
Kataja, J., Seppala, H., Skurnik, M., Sarkkinen, H. &
Houvinen, P. (1998). Different erythromycin resistance mechanisms in group C
and
group G streptococci. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 42, 14934.
17 . Tait-Kamradt, A., Clancy, J., Cronan, M., Dib-Hajj, F., Wondrack, L., Yuan, W. et al. (1997). mefE is necessary for the erythromycin-resistant M phenotype in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 41, 22515.[Abstract]
18 . Ruoff, K. L. (1995). Streptococcus. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 6th edn (Murray, P. R., Baron, E. J., Pfaller, M. A., Tenover, F. C. & Yolken, R. H., Eds), pp. 299307. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
19 . National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. (1997). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow AerobicallyThird Edition: Approved Standard M7A4. NCCLS, Villanova, PA.
20 . Doern, G.V. (1995). Susceptibility tests of fastidious bacteria. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 6th edn (Murray, P. R., Baron, E. J., Pfaller, M. A., Tenover, F. C. & Yolken, R. H., Eds), pp. 13429. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
21 . Luna, V. A. & Roberts, M. C. (1998). The presence of the tetO gene in a variety of tetracycline resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes from Washington State. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 42, 61319.[Abstract]
22 . Roe, D. E., Braham, P. H., Weinberg, A. & Roberts, M. C. (1995). Characterization of tetracycline resistance in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Oral Microbiology and Immunology10, 22732.[ISI][Medline]
23 . Roberts, M. C., Chung, W. O. & Roe, D. E. (1996). Characterization of tetracycline and erythromycin resistance determinants in Treponema denticola. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 40, 16904.[Abstract]
24 . Facklam, R. R. & Sahm, D. F. (1995). Enterococcus. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 6th edn (Murray, P. R., Baron, E. J., Pfaller, M. A., Tenover, F. C. & Yolken, R. H., Eds), pp. 30814. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
25 . Roberts, M. & Falkow, S. (1997). Conjugal transfer of R plasmids in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Nature 226, 6301.
26 . Sutcliffe, J., Grebe, T., Tait-Kamradt, A. & Wondrack, L. (1996). Detection of erythromycin-resistant determinants by PCR. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 40, 25626. [Abstract]
27 . Anderson, D. G. & McKay, L. L. (1983). Simple and rapid method for isolating large plasmid DNA from lactic streptococci. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 46, 54952. [ISI][Medline]
28 . Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn, pp. 5.315.32. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
29
.
Kataja, J., Huovinen, P., Skurnik, M. & Seppala, H. (1999). Erythromycin resistance genes in group A streptococci in Finland. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 43,48
52.
Received 21 October 1998; returned 5 February 1999; revised 17 February 1999; accepted 12 April 1999