Inhibition of bacteria on agar surfaces by vapour phase triclosan

R. J. Lewis*, C. Torkornoo, C. N. H. Marques, S. M. Nelson and V. C. Salisbury

Faculty of Applied Sciences, Frenchay Campus, University of the West of England, Bristol, Frenchay, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK

Keywords: zone formation, self-bioluminescence, microban, food boxes

Sir,

Triclosan is the most widely used member of the bisphenol family of disinfectants, which are characterized by their high intrinsic activities and proportional low solubility in water. Unfortunately, they also share ineffectiveness against pseudomonads and an ability to select for resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. In recent years, an increasing number of domestic plastic and cleaning products incorporating triclosan have been marketed under the Microban trade mark.

In their paper in this journal1 on triclosan-impregnated food-storage boxes, Braid & Wale described, but were "unable to account for the complete suppression of growth of S. aureus on one side of open agar plates that were directly adjacent to the triclosan-impregnated wall of the 9 L boxes used". This effect is reproducible and we have also demonstrated it, under experimental conditions, by exposure of strains of both S. aureus and Escherichia coli to a proprietary Microban household cleaning fluid and a 5% solution of triclosan. The degree of inhibition appears to be proportional to both the concentration of the agent and the respective susceptibility of the test strains.

The authors1 also found it difficult to equate the vapour phase of triclosan with the pattern of inhibition found, asking why all of their plates had not been affected equally and evenly; however, we believe that the pattern of suppression seen can be entirely explained in terms of classical zone formation theory.2 In our experiments, we inoculated nutrient agar plates with our test organisms, as if for a conventional susceptibility test. We then aseptically removed one-third of the agar and, into the space, we placed an inverted plastic cap from a 5 mL bottle, filled with either the Microban cleaning fluid or 5% triclosan. The plates, with lids, were incubated overnight at 37°C and examined for inhibition. Large, rather flattened, zones of inhibition were seen immediately opposite the reservoir of cleaning fluid. We also used modified Petri dishes, in which spacing shims held the inoculated agar surfaces at varying heights above reservoirs of the test solutions. Large zones of inhibition were formed at heights of up to 6 cm.

It was noted that the label on the cleaning fluid bottle stated that the product also contained formaldehyde. However, tests indicated that the inhibition zones produced were consistent with those produced by triclosan and the differences in zone sizes seen between the test strains were consistent with the differing MICs of triclosan for those organisms.

The experiment was also carried out using a genetically modified self-bioluminescent strain of E. coli, DH5{alpha} pLITE,3 and the formation of the zone of inhibition was observed with a photon counting camera (ICCD 225, Photek Ltd, St Leonards on Sea, Sussex, UK). Reduction of light emitted by the inoculum within the future zone boundary was observed within 30 min, and by 45 min, a distinct zone of inhibition had been established.

All of these observations are consistent with the three-dimensional migration of the triclosan in the vapour phase, away from the fluid reservoir through relatively stable air, in a manner analogous to an antimicrobial diffusing through the liquid of an agar matrix in a conventional test. Triclosan molecules reaching the bacterial cells would be expected to preferentially solubilize in lipids present in the membranes and ultimately enter and inhibit the cell. This will occur until the point is reached where the concentration of inhibitory molecules is only just sufficient to inhibit all of the cells (critical population) and a zone edge will form.2 From then on, since the number of target sites is multiplying as a result of bacterial growth, the eventual vapour pressure obtained will never be sufficient to prevent the visible zone from forming. The flattened zones seen in the figures presented by Braid & Wale,1 and also seen in our work, can be explained by the geometry of the plates and are paralleled by those seen when a disc is placed too near the edge of a Petri dish.

Controversially, Braid & Wale1 concluded their article by suggesting that triclosan impregnated storage boxes are "potentially useful for storage of foods for short periods (e.g. lunch boxes or overnight) where refrigeration is not possible". In the light of their own findings, we question this proposition. Only when bacteria were suspended in broth directly in contact with the triclosan-impregnated plastic was there inhibition of growth for some species. When the bacteria were spiral-plated onto solid media the authors observed no significant reduction in colony counts compared to controls, other than where total inhibition zones had formed. The important observation to make is that, outside of the inhibition zone, the inoculated cells multiplied to form visible colonies despite being in the triclosan vapour for up to 72 h at 22°C. This is entirely in accord with zone theory and, of course, everyday experience with diffusion susceptibility tests. It is unlikely therefore that at ambient temperatures perishable foods, in a triclosan-impregnated lunch box, would keep any better than food in a plain plastic box.

The debate remains open as to whether the use of these products might also contribute to the emergence of clinically important resistance.4

Footnotes

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-117-344-2530; Fax: +44-117-344-2904; E-mail roger.lewis{at}uwe.ac.uk Back

References

1 . Braid, J. J. & Wale, M. C. J. (2002). The antibacterial activity of triclosan-impregnated storage boxes against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus and Shewanella putrefaciens in conditions simulating domestic use. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 49, 87–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2 . Cooper, K. E. (1963). The theory of antibiotic inhibition zones. In Analytical Microbiology (Kavanagh, F., Ed.), pp. 1–86. Academic Press, New York & London.

3 . Salisbury, V., Pfoestl, A., Weisinger-Mayr, H. et al. (1999). Use of a clinical Escherichia coli isolate expressing lux genes to study antimicrobial pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 43, 829–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4 . Fraise, A. P. (2002). Biocide abuse and antimicrobial resistance—a cause for concern. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 49, 11–2.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Extract
FREE Full Text (PDF)
All Versions of this Article:
52/2/314    most recent
dkg327v1
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My Personal Archive
Download to citation manager
Disclaimer
Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Lewis, R. J.
Articles by Salisbury, V. C.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Lewis, R. J.
Articles by Salisbury, V. C.