Candida krusei fungaemia: antifungal susceptibility and clinical presentation of an uncommon entity during 15 years in a single general hospital

Patricia Muñoz*, Mar Sánchez-Somolinos, Luis Alcalá, Marta Rodríguez-Créixems, Teresa Peláez and Emilio Bouza

Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital General Universitario ‘Gregorio Marañón’, Doctor Esquerdo 47, 28006 Madrid, Spain


* Corresponding author. Tel: +34-91-58684-53; Fax: +34-91-5044906; Email: pmunoz{at}micro.hggm.es

Received 1 July 2004; returned 24 August 2004; revised 9 November 2004; accepted 10 November 2004


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background:

Candida krusei fungaemia is an uncommon entity described in immunocompromised patients previously exposed to azole agents.

Methods:

From 1988 to 2003, 13 episodes of C. krusei fungaemia (2.3% of all fungaemias) were detected in our institution and compared with 39 Candida albicans controls. Susceptibility testing was carried out with the modified microdilution method according to NCCLS recommendations.

Results:

Underlying conditions were: HIV infection (4), haematological malignancies (4), organ transplantation (2), abdominal surgery (2) and lactose intolerance (1). Nine patients (69%) were not neutropenic. In comparison with C. albicans, patients with C. krusei infection had more commonly received antifungal agents (54% versus 15%, P=0.006), had a haematological disease (31% versus 3%, P=0.03), or a transplant (15% versus 3%, P=0.08), were on corticosteroids (47% versus 13%, P=0.01) and were neutropenic (31% versus 0%, P < 0.001). Patients with C. albicans had more surgical interventions (41% versus 15%, P=0.09) and bladder catheters (61% versus 31%, P=0.05). The most common origin for C. albicans was a catheter (41% versus 0%; P=0.006) whereas for C. krusei the most common origin was unknown (69% versus 20%; P=0.001). C. krusei presented more commonly with skin lesions in neutropenic patients (23% versus 5%; P=0.05). Multivariate analysis of these differential characteristics showed that the only factor that independently predicted the presence of C. krusei fungaemia was the administration of antifungal agents before the fungaemia (RR: 6.4; P=0.009; 95%CI 1.6–25.99). Overall mortality of C. krusei fungaemia was 38% (C. albicans 49%). Except for voriconazole (MIC90 0.125 mg/L), azoles and 5-flucytosine had poor activity against C. krusei, whereas amphotericin (MIC90 1 mg/L) and LY-303366 (MIC90 0.06 mg/L) showed good activity.

Conclusion:

C. krusei fungaemia incidence remains low despite widespread use of azoles. It may occur outside the setting of cancer patients with previous antifungal use. The presence of skin lesions should be a warning sign.

Keywords: candidosis , candidaemia , transplantation , HIV , neutropenia


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Nosocomial infections caused by Candida spp. have significantly increased during the last two decades1 and remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill and immunocompromised patients.2,3

In recent years, a sharp increase in the incidence of infections caused by non-albicans Candida (NAC) species has been reported.4 C. krusei has been described in severely ill patients previously exposed to azole agents. It is claimed to be intrinsically resistant to fluconazole and may have reduced susceptibility to amphotericin B. Few series have specifically addressed the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of C. krusei and most included only patients with cancer57 or bone marrow transplantation (BMT).8 We compared all our C. krusei patients with C. albicans fungaemia patients (controls) in order to identify the risk factors and clinical characteristics of C. krusei fungaemia. We randomly selected three controls for each case only matched by year of occurrence.

The antifungal susceptibility pattern of C. krusei is also provided.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study design

Between 1988 and 2003, 569 episodes of significant fungaemias were detected in our 1750 bed institution, and 13 cases corresponded to C. krusei (2.3%). These isolates of Candida krusei recovered from blood cultures (stored at –70°C) in our microbiology laboratory were included in the study.

Clinical reports of the patients with an isolate of C. krusei were reviewed according to a pre-established protocol and each one was compared with three cases of C. albicans fungaemia. The controls were only matched with respect to year of positive blood culture and selected by means of a random number table.

A patient was considered to have significant candidaemia if C. krusei or C. albicans was isolated from at least one blood culture specimen associated with fever or signs of infection. Source of fungaemia was defined as a culture-positive site or a clinically evident site of infection. Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count < 500 cells/mm3. Complications of fungaemia were defined as endocarditis, endophthalmitis, skin infiltrates etc. following fungaemia. Related mortality was defined as death occurring within 5 days of the fungaemia with concurrent signs of active infection and no other apparent cause.

From 1988 to October 1995, blood samples were processed by using the automated system BACTEC-NR (Becton Dickinson, MD, USA) and thereafter, with the BACTER-9240 instrument (Becton Dickinson). In the first period, all vials were incubated at 35°C for 7 days, while in the second period vials were shaken continuously for 5 days.

Statistical methods

Categorical data were analysed using a {chi}2 or Fisher exact test (two-tailed), and the unpaired Student's t-test was used for continuous variables. Stepwise logistic multivariate analysis to identify differential characteristics of C. krusei fungaemia was carried out. Variables with a P value < 0.1 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model. All comparisons were considered statistically significant for P values of 0.05 or less. Statistical analysis was carried out using the SPSS software system.

Susceptibility analysis

Isolates were thawed and subcultured onto CHROMagar Candida plates (Tec-Laim, Madrid, Spain) for 5 days at 35°C to identify possible mixed infections and to assure purity. Identification was confirmed by the Vitek and API ID 32 C (bioMérieux, St. Louis, MO, USA) systems as recommended by the manufacturer. The following antifungals were included in the study: amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine, ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole and LY-303366. The susceptibility study was carried out using a modified microdilution method according to NCCLS recommendations (document M-27A),9 using antibiotic medium 3 for amphotericin B and RPMI-2% glucose medium for the remaining antifungals.10,11 The micropanels were incubated for 24–48 h at 35°C. Endpoint readings were defined visually as a full (amphotericin B) or prominent inhibition of growth (for the remaining antifungals). The interpretive breakpoints defined by NCCLS for antifungals are as follows: 5-flucytosine (susceptible, <8 mg/L; intermediate, 8–16 mg/L; and resistant, >16 mg/L), fluconazole (susceptible, <16 mg/L; susceptible dependent upon dose, 16–32 mg/L; and resistant, >32 mg/L) and itraconazole (susceptible, <0.25 mg/L; susceptible dependent upon dose, 0.25–0.5 mg/L; and resistant, >0.5 mg/L). For the remaining antifungals, the following interpretative breakpoints were used: amphotericin (susceptible, <4 mg/L; and resistant, >2 mg/L) and ketoconazole (susceptible, <0.25 mg/L; susceptible dependent upon dose, 0.25–0.5 mg/L; and resistant, >0.5 mg/L). No breakpoints were used for voriconazole and LY-303366.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Between 1988 and 2003, 569 episodes of significant fungaemia were detected in our institution (271 corresponded to C. albicans, 170 to C. parapsilosis, 13 to C. krusei (2.3%) and 115 to other species. The annual distribution of C. krusei fungaemias was: five cases in 1990, three in 1992, and one each in 1994, 1996, 1997, 2000 and 2001. No epidemiological link was found between the five patients who had C. krusei fungaemia in 1990.

Susceptibility testing was carried out on the 13 C. krusei strains. The MICs are shown in Table 1. With the exception of voriconazole (MIC90 0.125 mg/L), azoles and 5-flucytosine did not have good activity against C. krusei (for fluconazole, all isolates have to be considered resistant irrespective of the MIC). On the other hand, amphotericin (MIC90 1 mg/L) and the antifungal LY-303366 (MIC90 0.06 mg/L) showed good activity (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. MICs (mg/L) of antifungals tested for the C. krusei fungaemia isolates

 
Clinical characteristics of the 13 patients with C. krusei fungaemia are shown in Table 2. Nine patients were male and median age was 50 years (8 months–82 years). All patients had significant debilitating conditions: HIV infection (4), haematological malignancies (4), solid organ transplantation (2), abdominal surgery due to gastric cancer and urinary fistula after prostatic surgery (1 each) and lactose intolerance (1). Median number of positive blood cultures was 2.5 (1–6).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Clinical data for 13 patients with C. krusei fungaemia

 
Fungaemia was community-acquired in four cases (three intravenous drug abusers and one baby with severe diarrhoea due to lactose intolerance). Regarding clinical presentation, the three patients with acute leukaemia had related skin lesions, three patients had lung infiltrates and one had chorioretinitis (Table 2).

Seven patients had received antifungal drugs (non-absorbable or systemic) before the fungaemia (three nystatin, three fluconazole, and one developed a breakthrough fungaemia while receiving itraconazole). Therapy consisted of amphotericin B (nine patients) and four patients did not receive treatment. Therapy was started a median of 2.3 ± 2.6 days after blood cultures were obtained. Three patients recovered despite not receiving antifungal therapy: a neonate with diarrhoea and lactose intolerance, an HIV patient who developed a transient fungaemia after a self-administration of illegal intravenous (iv) drugs and a patient with a urinary tract infection.

Overall mortality was 38.5%, but one out of five deaths was unrelated to the fungaemia (related mortality 30.7%) (Table 1).

For the identification of differential characteristics of C. krusei fungaemia, we compared each C. krusei patient with three randomly selected C. albicans patients (controls). The differences found in the univariate analysis are shown in Table 3. Patients with C. krusei had more commonly received antifungal agents before the fungaemia (54% versus 15%, P=0.006), had an underlying haematological disease (31% versus 3%, P=0.03), or a transplant (15% versus 3%, P=0.08), were on corticosteroids (47% versus 13%, P=0.01) and were neutropenic (31% versus 0%, P < 0.001). Patients with C. albicans had more frequently undergone a surgical intervention (41% versus 15%, P=0.09) and had indwelling bladder catheters (61% versus 31%, P=0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Comparison of the epidemiological characteristics of patients with C. krusei and C. albicans fungaemia

 
With regard to portal of entry, vascular catheters were the most common portal for C. albicans (41% versus 0%; P=0.006), whereas an unknown origin was the most common portal for C. krusei (69% versus 20%; P=0.001). C. krusei presented more frequently than C. albicans with skin lesions (23% versus 5%; P=0.05). Skin lesions were necrotic disseminated varicelliform papules and were only detected in neutropenic patients (Figure 1). GI-tract colonization data were not available to localize the possible origin of fungaemia.



View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Skin lesions of a patient with Candida krusei fungaemia.

 
Multivariate analysis of these differential characteristics, showed that the only factor that independently predicted the presence of C. krusei fungaemia was the administration of antifungal agents before the fungaemia (RR: 6.4; P=0.009; 95%CI 1.6–25.99).

There were no significant differences regarding therapy and evolution. We could not find significant differences between the overall mortality rate of C. albicans and C. krusei fungaemias (49% versus 38%; P=0.5), nor between their related mortality (36% versus 31%, P=0.7). Overall, the presence of skin lesions due to Candida fungaemia was a protective factor (no mortality versus 49%, P=0.03), whereas indwelling bladder catheter (mortality rate 57% versus 29% P=0.04), intravenous catheter (50% versus 12%, P=0.04) and septic shock (100% versus 34%; P=0.001) were related to a poorer outcome. Patients with previous surgery (61% versus 35%, P=0.07) and total parenteral nutrition (60% versus 34%, P=0.07) also showed a trend towards higher mortality.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In our hospital, a general tertiary institution, C. krusei represents 2.3% of all episodes of candidaemia, and this proportion has not increased during the last 12 years, despite a widespread use of fluconazole prophylaxis in neutropenic patients and in other areas of the centre (more than 6000 daily defined doses provided in 2001). The estimates of C. krusei fungaemia vary between institutions, and also between units in the same institution and over different years. Information comes mainly from units with neutropenic or highly immunocompromised patients, where it may represent from 4% to 61% of all episodes of fungaemia. Wingard et al. found that 4% of fungaemia episodes were due to C. krusei in patients who had undergone BMT or who had leukaemia.12 However, in high-risk allogeneic BMT recipients on low-dose fluconazole prophylaxis, or in other neutropenic patients, C. krusei accounted for 33.3–61% of the episodes.8,13 At the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 6.8% of all episodes of fungaemia were caused by C. krusei and the incidence rose from 5% in 1989–1992 to 10% in 1993–1996.5

Most reports of C. krusei fungaemia are from cancer centres or units and neutropenia is present in more than 70% of such patients.5,8 Very few cases have been described in non-cancer patients. In a retrospective 5 year review, Iwen et al. identified 203 cases of invasive candidiasis of which eight cases were caused by C. krusei. Four of the patients involved had leukaemia, two had breast cancer, one had end-stage liver disease, and one had suffered abdominal trauma.14 C. krusei fungaemia is extremely rare in intensive care units2 and after solid organ transplantation (SOT). We describe two cases in SOT recipients and have been able to find another three in the literature.1517 In our series, we had three episodes in HIV-positive patients and four others have been reported.18,19 Our episode in a baby with massive diarrhoea and lactose intolerance is exceptional. Fungal overgrowth has been related to diarrhoea, mainly in children,20,21 and intestinal mucosal lesions may be the origin of the fungaemia.

The clinical condition of our patients probably represents the overall spectrum of C. krusei fungaemia in a large institution better than series from cancer centres. When we compared patients with C. krusei and C. albicans fungaemia, patients with C. krusei had more commonly received previous antifungal agents (54% versus 15%, P=0.006), suffered more haematological diseases (31% versus 3%, P=0.03), had received a transplant (15% versus 3%, P=0.08), were on corticosteroids (47% versus 13%, P=0.01) and were neutropenic (31% versus 0%, P < 0.001). Patients with C. albicans had more frequently undergone a surgical intervention (41% versus 15%, P=0.09) and had indwelling bladder catheters (61% versus 31%, P=0.05).

In our series, C. krusei fungaemia was predominantly nosocomial (69%) and was acquired in the community in four cases (three iv drug abusers and one baby with diarrhoea and lactose intolerance). Abbas et al. reported that eight (14%) episodes of C. krusei fungaemia in cancer patients were considered to be community-acquired.5 C. krusei has been detected on the hands of healthcare workers (potential reservoirs for nosocomial transmission),22 but there is no evidence of nosocomial dissemination.23

It is difficult to argue against the role of prior prophylaxis with azole derivatives (mainly fluconazole) as a predisposing condition for C. krusei infection.12,24 Prophylaxis with fluconazole increases colonization by C. krusei.6,12 The proportion of patients with C. krusei fungaemia that had received previous fluconazole ranges from 50% to 90% in different series,5,13,23,25,26 whereas only 5–10% of patients with C. albicans fungaemia had received fluconazole in other studies.7,23 In our series, seven patients had received antifungals before the fungaemia (3 nystatin, 3 fluconazole, and one developed a breakthrough fungaemia while receiving itraconazole). Nevertheless, in our opinion and that of other authors, the absence of prior fluconazole treatment should not lead physicians to exclude C. krusei fungaemia.8,14,23,2729

Clinical presentation of C. krusei differed according to the underlying condition. Haematological patients had a higher incidence of metastatic lesions than HIV-infected or SOT patients. When we compared patients with C. krusei and C. albicans fungaemia, we found significant differences in the clinical presentation. C. krusei presented more commonly with skin lesions (23% versus 5%; P=0.05) or other septic metastases (23% versus 5%; P=0.05). Other authors have also found a high proportion (37%) of disseminated infections when C. krusei fungaemia is detected in cancer patients.5 However, the significantly higher proportion of patients with skin lesions among C. krusei infections may have been influenced by the different underlying conditions in the two groups, since other Candida species have also been described to cause skin dissemination in neutropenic patients.

The portal of entry of C. krusei fungaemia was different from that of the C. albicans patients. Vascular catheter-related fungaemia predominated in C. albicans cases (41% versus 0%; P=0.006) and primary fungaemia in those caused by C. krusei (69% versus 20%; P=0.001), which suggests that the gastrointestinal tract was the most probable source. However, GI-tract colonization data were not available.

All our C. krusei isolates were intrinsically fluconazole-resistant, the amphotericin B MIC90 was 1 mg/L and the voriconazole MIC90 was 0.12 mg/L. In our study, eight patients received amphotericin B for therapy (two deaths). C. krusei has been reported to cause breakthrough fungaemia during treatment with fluconazole or ketoconazole,30 even in patients treated with amphotericin B (0.3–0.5 mg/kg per day for a mean of 13 days).5

Some authors have suggested that C. krusei may be less virulent than C. albicans, but in most series C. krusei has a higher mortality than the other species.5,7,13 Mortality is particularly high in patients with persistent fungaemia, persistent neutropenia and septic shock.5,8

We could not find significant differences regarding therapy and evolution between C. krusei and C. albicans fungaemia. The overall mortality rate of C. albicans fungaemia was 49% and for C. krusei, it was 38% (P=0.2). Our analysis of both C. albicans and C. krusei fungaemia revealed that the underlying conditions that were poor prognostic factors were the presence of bladder and intravenous catheters and septic shock.

The limitations of our study are that only C. albicans and C. krusei were compared and that we could not match patients by the presence of neutropenia, since C. albicans has completely disappeared from haematological patients in our centre, probably due to the use of prophylaxis.

In summary, our study suggests that the evolution of C. krusei fungaemia may be stable in the overall perspective of non-selected units for the care of cancer patients. Clinical hints enable it to be distinguished from C. albicans fungaemia and, at least in our experience, mortality is comparable to that caused by C. albicans fungaemia.


    Acknowledgements
 
We are indebted to Thomas O'Boyle for his revision of the English language. This work was supported in part by a grant from the Spanish Social Security Health Investigation Fund (FISS 02/0016-01) and from a Grant of the Community of Madrid (CMA 082/0026/2001).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1 . Beck-Sagué, C. M. & Jarvis, W. R. & the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (N. N. I. S.). (1993). Secular trends in the epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections in the United States, 1980–1990. Journal of Infectious Diseases 167, 1247–51.[ISI][Medline]

2 . Nolla-Salas, J., Sitges-Serra, A., Leon-Gil, C. et al. (1997). Candidaemia in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: analysis of prognostic factors and assessment of systemic antifungal therapy. Study Group of Fungal Infection in the ICU. Intensive Care Medicine 23, 23–30.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

3 . Walsh, T. J., Hiemenz, J. W. & Anaissie, E. (1996). Recent progress and current problems in treatment of invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 10, 365–400.[ISI][Medline]

4 . Krcmery, V. & Barnes, A. J. (2002). Non-albicans Candida spp. causing fungaemia: pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. Journal of Hospital Infection 50, 243–60.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

5 . Abbas, J., Bodey, G. P., Hanna, H. A. et al. (2000). Candida krusei fungaemia. An escalating serious infection in immunocompromised patients. Archives of Internal Medicine 160, 2659–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 . Girmenia, C., Pagano, L., Leone, G. et al. (2001). Fluconazole and Candida krusei fungaemia. Archives of Internal Medicine 161, 2267–9.[Free Full Text]

7 . Krcmery, V., Jr, Spanik, S., Kunova, A. et al. (1999). Nosocomial Candida krusei fungaemia in cancer patients: report of 10 cases and review. Journal of Chemotherapy 11, 131–6.[ISI][Medline]

8 . Safdar, A., Van Rhee, F., Henslee-Downey, J. P. et al. (2001). Candida glabrata and Candida krusei fungaemia after high-risk allogeneic marrow transplantation: no adverse effect of low-dose fluconazole prophylaxis on incidence and outcome. Bone Marrow Transplantation 28, 873–8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

9 . National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (1997). Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: Approved Standard M27-A. NCCLS, Wayne, PA, USA.

10 . Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L. & Martinez-Suarez, J. V. (1995). Defining conditions for microbroth antifungal susceptibility tests: influence of RPMI and RPMI-2% glucose on the selection of endpoint criteria. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 35, 739–49.[Abstract]

11 . Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L., Berenguer, J., Martinez-Suarez, J. V. et al. (1996). Comparison of a spectrophotometric microdilution method with RPMI-2% glucose with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference macrodilution method M27-P for in vitro susceptibility testing of amphotericin B, flucytosine, and fluconazole against Candida albicans. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 40, 1998–2003.[Abstract]

12 . Wingard, J. R., Merz, W. G., Rinaldi, M. G. et al. (1991). Increase in Candida krusei infection among patients with bone marrow transplantation and neutropenia treated prophylactically with fluconazole. New England Journal of Medicine 325, 1274–7.[Abstract]

13 . Jarque, I., Saavedra, S., Martin, G. et al. (2000). Delay of onset of candidaemia and emergence of Candida krusei fungaemia in haematologic patients receiving prophylactic fluconazole. Haematologica 85, 441–3.[ISI][Medline]

14 . Iwen, P. C., Kelly, D. M., Reed, E. C. et al. (1995). Invasive infection due to Candida krusei in immunocompromised patients not treated with fluconazole. Clinical Infectious Diseases 20, 342–7.[ISI][Medline]

15 . Grossi, P., Farina, C., Fiocchi, R. et al. (2000). Prevalence and outcome of invasive fungal infections in 1,963 thoracic organ transplant recipients: a multicenter retrospective study. Italian Study Group of Fungal Infections in Thoracic Organ Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 70, 112–6.[ISI][Medline]

16 . Viviani, M. A., Tortorano, A. M., Malaspina, C. et al. (1992). Surveillance and treatment of liver transplant recipients for candidiasis and aspergillosis. European Journal of Epidemiology 8, 433–6.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

17 . Thomalla, J. V., Steidle, C. P., Leapman, S. B. et al. (1998). Ureteral obstruction of a renal allograft secondary to Candida krusei. Transplantation Proceedings 20, 551–4.

18 . Palacios, R., Santos, J., Romero, C. et al. (1999). [Fungaemia by Candida non albicans in patients with HIV infection]. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clínica 17, 279–82.[Medline]

19 . Laguna, F., Martinez-Suarez, J. V. & Adrados, M. (1994). [Fungaemia caused by Candida krusei in a female patient with AIDS]. Medicina Clínica (Barcelona) 103, 678.

20 . Talwar, P., Chakrabarti, A., Chawla, A. et al. (1990). Fungal diarrhoea: association of different fungi and seasonal variation in their incidence. Mycopathologia 110, 101–5.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

21 . Ponnuvel, K. M., Rajkumar, R., Menon, T. et al. (1996). Role of Candida in indirect pathogenesis of antibiotic associated diarrhoea in infants. Mycopathologia 135, 145–7.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

22 . Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Houston, A. et al. (1998). National epidemiology of mycoses survey: a multicenter study of strain variation and antifungal susceptibility among isolates of Candida species. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 31, 289–96.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

23 . Hope, W., Morton, A. & Eisen, D. P. (2002). Increase in prevalence of nosocomial non-Candida albicans candidaemia and the association of Candida krusei with fluconazole use. Journal of Hospital Infection 50, 56–65.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

24 . Abi-Said, D., Anaissie, E., Uzun, O. et al. (1997). The epidemiology of haematogenous candidiasis caused by different Candida species. Clinical Infectious Diseases 24, 1122–8.[ISI][Medline]

25 . Goldman, M., Pottage, J. C., Jr & Weaver, D. C. (1993). Candida krusei fungaemia. Report of 4 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 72, 143–50.[ISI][Medline]

26 . Merz, W. G., Karp, J. E., Schron, D. et al. (1986). Increased incidence of fungaemia caused by Candida krusei. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 24, 581–4.[ISI][Medline]

27 . Winston, D. J., Chandrasekar, P. H., Lazarus, H. M. et al. (1993). Fluconazole prophylaxis of fungal infections in patients with acute leukaemia. Results of a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 118, 495–503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28 . Goodman, J. L., Winston, D. J., Greenfield, R. A. et al. (1992). A controlled trial of fluconazole to prevent fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine 326, 845–51.[Abstract]

29 . Slavin, M. A., Osborne, B., Adams, R. et al. (1995). Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis for fungal infections after marrow transplantation—a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Journal of Infectious Diseases 171, 1545–52.[ISI][Medline]

30 . Krcmery, V., Jr, Oravcova, E., Spanik, S. et al. (1998). Nosocomial breakthrough fungaemia during antifungal prophylaxis or empirical antifungal therapy in 41 cancer patients receiving antineoplastic chemotherapy: analysis of aetiology risk factors and outcome. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 41, 373–80.[Abstract]





This Article
Abstract
FREE Full Text (PDF)
All Versions of this Article:
55/2/188    most recent
dkh532v1
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My Personal Archive
Download to citation manager
Disclaimer
Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Muñoz, P.
Articles by Bouza, E.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Muñoz, P.
Articles by Bouza, E.