Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, MMC 334, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
1 Present address: Department of Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, CH 4031 Basel, Switzerland
Correspondence to: S. C. Jameson; E-mail: james024{at}umn.edu
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Keywords: activation, CTL, tetramer
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
On the other hand, some groups have reported that stimulation of T cells reduces their ability to bind specific peptide/MHC multimers. While in some cases, a reduction in multimer binding might simply be a consequence of the well-known phenomenon of TCR down-regulation following T cell activation (3, 17), this appears not to explain the loss of multimer binding in several studies (1820). In one elegant series of studies, activated T cells specific for sub-dominant influenza epitopes were shown to be unable to bind specific peptide/MHC multimers, although TCR and CD8 expression levels were found to be normal (21, 22). Furthermore, reduced multimer binding could be induced by disruption of lipid raft domains even though TCR and CD8 levels were maintained (22), indicating that multimer binding can be compromised despite sustained surface expression of TCR and CD8.
Therefore, it is currently unclear whether T cell activation leads to enhanced or diminished peptide/MHC ligand binding, with reports supporting both conclusions.
We previously used peptide/MHC Class I multimers to explore the requirement for CD8 in binding to cognate TCR ligands on naive T cells (23), and also to study the developmental regulation of CD8 non-cognate binding (10). These and other studies suggested that there is considerable variability in multimer staining depending on the maturation state of the T cell and the participation of the CD8ß co-receptor (10, 11, 24, 25). In this report, we studied the changes in peptide/MHC multimer binding which accompany T cell activation. We make the surprising finding that the capacity of activated CD8 T cells to bind cognate multimers is severely depressed for several days following stimulation, even after TCR expression has returned to normal levels. We find that the loss of cognate binding is more dramatic and sustained when low-affinity TCR ligands are studied, suggesting that activated CD8 T cells may preferentially lose sensitivity to weak agonists. These changes in tetramer binding are in part due to alterations in CD8Class I binding, since we observe a precipitous decline in non-cognate multimer binding with T cell stimulation, despite the fact that CD8
and CD8ß expression levels are maintained after T cell activation. Thus, our data suggest that CD8 T cell activation induces a state of impaired engagement with Class I MHCpeptide complexes, which compromises recognition of all but the highest affinity ligands.
![]() |
Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Peptides and MHC multimers
The peptides ovalbumin peptide (OVA) (SIINFEKL), G4 (SIIGFEKL), SIY (SIYRYYGL), SIY-A6 (SIYRYAGL), VP10 (STLNFNNL) and P815p (HIYEFPQL) were synthesized by Research Genetics or Invitrogen. Kbß2mpeptide complexes were made as described previously (23) from procedures adapted from Busch and Altman (26, 27). Biotinylated monomers were concentrated to 1 mg ml1 and stored in 10100 µl aliquots at 80°C. Multimers were prepared by mixing with regular grade streptavidinphycoerythrin (SAPE) conjugate (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) at an 8:1 molar ratio (1:1 mass ratio) and incubating at room temperature for 3060 min prior to staining. The mass concentration of multimers was assumed to be 2x the mass concentration of SAPE (e.g. 0.5 mg ml1 of SAPE yields
1 mg ml1 multimers). Multimers were used at 250 µg ml1 without further purification. We found that multimer staining intensity, especially with low-affinity peptide/MHC ligands, decreased with prolonged storage of pre-formed multimers. Hence for optimal sensitivity, non-cognate and low-affinity multimer binding assays were performed within 12 h after multimerization.
Antibodies, multimer staining and flow cytometry
T cells (0.5 x 106 to 1 x 106) were stained on ice with multimers in 100 µl of FACS buffer (PBS, 1% FCS and 0.2% sodium azide) for 30 min (FACS buffer conditions) or RP10 for 2 h (RP10 conditions). Standard staining conditions include multimers at 10 µg ml1 (23), which gives staining close to saturating levels (data not shown), but higher or lower concentrations were used in some experiments, as indicated. Staining at 4°C was used to enhance the low-affinity interactions studied, since preliminary experiments suggested that staining at 37°C decreased low-affinity multimer binding, similar to the observations of Whelan et al. (28), and also raised background, non-CD8 binding (data not shown). In some experiments, CD8 dependence for multimer binding was tested by inclusion of the blocking anti-CD8 antibody, CT-CD8
(Caltag Laboratories), which was used at 5 µg ml1 of FITC-conjugated antibody added immediately prior to the multimer. For all other multimer stains, we gated on CD8+ cells in flow cytometric analyses by using the anti-CD8
antibody, 53-6.7 (5 µg ml1, FITC conjugated) (PharMingen or Biolegend). The 53-6.7 is known to enhance Class I MHC multimer binding (23), but it does not influence prebound multimers (data not shown). Therefore, with the exception of Fig. 6 (as indicated), cells were stained first with multimers and then washed and stained with 53-6.7. All surface staining aside from the multimer stains were done for 30 min on ice in PBS + 10% FCS. Anti-CD8ß (53-5.8), anti-V
2 (B20.1) and anti-Vß8 (F23.1) antibodies were purchased from PharMingen or Biolegend and used at 12 µg ml1. Peanut agglutinin (PNA)FITC was purchased from Vector Laboratories and used at 0.5 µg ml1. Cells were analyzed on a Becton Dickinson FACSCaliburTM or LSRII, and data were analyzed using FlowJo (TreeStar, San Carlos, CA, USA) software.
|
|
|
Neuraminidase treatment
Cells were treated with neuraminidase as previously described (10). Briefly, cells were prepared as above, washed one to two times in HBSS and re-suspended at 1 x 106 to 2 x 106 ml1 in HBSS. Following pre-incubation at 37°C for 15 min, neuraminidase (0.0095 units per 12 million cells) from Vibrio cholerae (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) was added, and the treated cells were incubated at 37°C for 2040 min. Cells were washed one to two times with RP10 before staining with the indicated multimers. Controls were processed in the same way without addition of neuraminidase.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
We tested this idea by performing a TCR blockade experiment to mimic TCR down-regulation. Naive OT-I cells were coated with increasing doses of a blocking TCR antibody (B20.1) to progressively inhibit the capacity of surface OT-I TCRs from binding multimers. The amount of remaining available TCR was then quantitated by measuring the level of staining with the PE-labeled B20.1 antibody. Alternatively, the antibody-coated naive OT-I cells were stained with OVA/Kb multimers. This allowed us to determine a relationship between available surface TCR and multimer binding, as shown in Fig. 2(A). Blockade with the B20 antibody led to efficient blockade of the OT-I TCR and, at high doses, resulted in loss of >99% of OVA/Kb multimer binding to naive OT-I cells (Fig. 2A). Next, we compared multimer staining on activated OT-I cells (which were not treated with anti-TCR antibody) in comparison with naive OT-I cells subjected to TCR blockade. We observed that, even at equivalent levels of accessible TCRs, the multimer binding on activated OT-I cells was lower than that on naive T cells (Fig. 2B). For example, activation with 1 nM OVA resulted in loss of 50% of surface TCR by day 1, yet cognate multimer staining was reduced by
98% (Figs 2B and C). We note some variation between experiments in the magnitude of the TCR down-regulation and loss of multimer binding, especially in cultures activated with low doses of antigen (data not shown), but the pattern shown is highly consistent. Thus, we reliably observed that OVA/Kb binding was
5- to 10-fold lower on activated OT-I cells compared with antibody-blocked naive cells with similar levels of available OT-I TCR (Fig. 2C). These data again suggest that activation impairs ligand binding beyond levels expected from TCR down-regulation, and that changes in TCR levels alone do not account for the loss of multimer binding.
|
We activated naive OT-I cells as described above and stained the cells with non-cognate (P815/Kb) multimers on successive days. The binding of CD8 to Class I multimers dropped to nearly undetectable levels within the first day after activation, and this phenomenon persisted throughout the time course (Fig. 3A). Importantly, this loss in non-cognate multimer binding could not be attributed to changes in surface levels of either CD8 or CD8ß. Consistent with other reports (3), CD8 expression remained relatively constant throughout the activation (Fig. 3 and data not shown). This result implies that the drop in Class I MHC multimer binding is a result of changes in the quality of the CD8 molecules, not the quantity of its expression.
We were also interested in determining how early this phenomenon can be detected after activation. We observed changes in non-cognate multimers at 8-h post-activation (Fig. 3B). These data argue against a model in which the loss in multimer avidity was due to changes in cell size since cells at this time point have not begun blasting (data not shown). We detected a slight drop in non-cognate multimer binding when OT-I cells were cultured without antigen stimulus at this time point, which may be attributable to a slight loss of CD8ß levels (Fig. 3B); however, the loss in binding due to activation is much more pronounced. It is important to note that loss of cognate binding is also severely impaired at 8 h of activation, however TCR down-regulation is also quite marked at this time point (data not shown).
Hence, these data suggested that T cell activation leads to a profound, rapid and sustained loss in CD8Class I binding.
Activation induces loss of TCR and CD8Class I binding by 2C CD8+ T cells
While the data above implicated changes in CD8 binding as a basis for the loss of specific peptide/MHC binding by activated OT-I cells, we wanted to determine whether CD8-independent binding to the TCR was also influenced by activation.
For this, we turned to the 2C TCR transgenic system. As we and others have shown previously, 2C TCR binding to the SIY/Kb ligand can be detected even when CD8 molecules are absent or blocked (23, 32). Hence, to look at multimer binding in the absence of CD8 co-receptor participation, we stained resting and activated 2C cells with SIY/Kb multimers in the presence of the blocking CT-CD8 antibody. This antibody inhibits CD8-dependent multimer staining (23, 32). Activated 2C CD8 T cells showed a decline in TCR binding to SIY/Kb multimers in these assays (Fig. 4). The kinetics of multimer loss correlated with the drop in TCR levels at days 1 and 2 of post-activation, but the magnitude of the loss in surface TCR did not match that of the reduction in multimer staining (Fig. 4). Furthermore, TCR levels were similar to those on naive 2C cells at day 3 of activation, yet CD8-independent multimer binding is still only 60% of naive, suggesting that activation influenced the ability of the TCR to interact with its ligand. We saw similar results using SIY/KbD227K multimers, which bear a crippling mutation in the CD8-binding site (data not shown). While we had hoped to analyze the CD8-negative 2C population in these experiments, these cells were poorly stimulated and rapidly lost in our activation cultures, limiting our ability to track their multimer-binding potential (data not shown).
We also studied 2C binding to SIY-A6/Kb multimers. SIY-A6/Kb was defined as an antagonist for 2C T cells (33), and is presumed to bind the 2C TCR with a lower affinity than SIY. Unlike SIY/Kb, 2C staining with SIY-A6/Kb multimers is highly dependent on CD8 (Fig. 4) (34). Similar to the OT-I system, cognate multimer binding to this low-affinity ligand was drastically impaired following 2C activation, and this effect was maintained over several days, even after TCR expression had returned to the same levels as naive 2C cells (Fig. 4). As with OT-I cells, CD8ß levels were not notably changed on activated 2C cells, yet non-cognate binding by 2C T cells (to OVA/Kb multimers) was drastically reduced (data not shown).
Hence, these data suggest that both CD8Class I and TCRClass I interactions with specific peptide/MHC ligands are compromised following T cell activation, but argue that CD8-dependent multimer binding is much more severely impacted.
Activation-induced loss in multimer binding is partially attributable to surface sialylation
Our laboratory and that of others have previously demonstrated that cell-surface sialylation is inversely correlated with non-cognate Class I multimer binding (10, 11). We examined the effects of surface sialylation on non-cognate multimer binding after activation using V. cholera neuraminidase, a broad range sialidase which cleaves sialic acid from many types of glycan adducts, including CD8 itself (13, 35). Hence, we tested whether neuraminidase would also influence multimer binding to activated CD8 T cells.
OT-I lymph node cells were activated with OVA in vitro for 60 h and stained with cognate and non-cognate multimers. As expected, OT-I activation led to notable loss of OVA/Kb multimer binding and profound decrease in binding of G4/Kb (low-TCR affinity ligand) and P815/Kb (non-cognate ligand) (Fig. 5).
|
The effect on non-cognate binding was even more dramatic. As expected, activated OT-I cells showed inefficient non-cognate multimer binding compared with naive OT-I cells, yet neuraminidase treatment disproportionately enhanced non-cognate multimer binding to the activated T cells, such that desialylated activated and naive OT-I cells now had similar staining intensities (Fig. 5).
In additional experiments, we found that this enhancing effect of desialylation on non-cognate CD8 binding also applied to cells at days 1 and 2 of activation (Fig. 6). As we have previously shown, binding of both cognate and non-cognate Class I MHC ligands can be enhanced by the anti-CD8 antibody 53-6.7 (10, 23), which may be due to the stabilization of a Class I receptive conformation of CD8 (36). When included in staining assays of activated OT-I cells, 53-6.7 increased non-cognate multimer binding, but still did not fully compensate for the loss of non-cognate multimer binding seen with OT-I activation (Fig. 6). Interestingly, however, a combination of neuraminidase treatment and staining with the 53-6.7 antibody restored non-cognate multimer staining on activated OT-I cells to the levels seen on naive OT-I cells (Fig. 6). The binding of the non-cognate multimers (with or without neuraminidase treatment) was completely blocked by CT-CD8
(Fig. 6) which we previously showed inhibits CD8Class I multimer binding (10, 23), strongly suggesting that all of the binding observed involves CD8 directly.
As reported previously, staining with PNA (a lectin which binds unsialylated core-1 O-glycans) increases on activated CD8 T cells, including OT-I (37, 38). Naive T cells are heavily sialylated at core-1 O-glycans residues [due to the action of ST3Gal-I (16, 39)], and hence staining by PNA is low on naive cells (Fig. 6) (10, 11, 37, 38). Under our stimulation conditions, at 24 h of activation, PNA binding is only modestly enhanced (Fig. 6B) compared with naive cells, but PNA staining increases markedly by 4872 h (Fig. 6B) as shown previously for OT-I cells (37). Hence, despite the fact that the cells are becoming desialylated on some O-linked residues, neuraminidase still has the capacity to enhance non-cognate multimer binding at these time points.
Overall then, these results suggest that changed sialylation may account for at least some of the defective non-cognate and cognate multimer binding which accompanies T cell stimulation. Moreover, these data suggest that neither CD8 nor TCR molecules on activated T cells are irreversibly compromised in their capacity to bind Class I ligands.
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
We observe that T cell activation leads to dramatic and rapid loss in specific peptide/MHC multimer binding. While some loss in cognate multimer binding was predicted due to transient TCR down-regulation with activation, the loss of multimer staining does not correlate with TCR down-regulation either in its magnitude or duration. Thus we found that, for both the OT-I and 2C systems, defective cognate multimer binding was impaired on activated T cells even when TCR levels had recovered to the levels on naive cells. Furthermore, anti-TCR antibody treatment of naive T cells could block the TCR down to levels seen on activated T cells, but did not reduce cognate multimer binding to the same extent (Fig. 2). Hence, our data suggest that loss of multimer binding occurs not only in unusual T cell responses [such as those directed against sub-dominant epitopes or during chronic T cell responses (1822)] but this same phenomenon occurs in following conventional, acute T cell activation, a conclusion reinforced by the recent report from Drake et al. (40). Our report further suggests that changes in CD8Class I binding, in part mediated by altered cell-surface sialylation, contribute to such changes in TCR/CD8Class I MHC binding.
Numerous reports have shown that peptide/MHC Class I multimer binding requires coordinate recognition by both TCR and CD8 (23). Thus, it was important to determine whether loss of cognate multimer staining was due to impairment in TCR and/or CD8 engagement. Our data suggest that CD8 binding is profoundly impaired following T cell activation. TCR-independent (non-cognate) CD8 binding was virtually abolished, and CD8-dependent TCR interactions, especially with low-affinity TCR ligands, were also severely compromised. Analysis of CD8-independent multimer binding in the 2C system argued that TCR binding per se was less dramatically influenced, although some impairment was noted.
We had initially expected that naive T cell activation would increase CD8 non-cognate binding, based on the work performed with CTL clones which showed poor CD8-mediated adhesion to non-cognate Class I until the cells were activated through the TCR (8, 9, 42). Our data indicate that stimulation of naive T cells leads to the opposite pattern, in which CD8Class I binding is diminished. Interestingly, preliminary data suggest that, consistent with published reports using Class I adhesion assays (8, 9, 42), TCR stimulation of CTL clones leads to increased levels of non-cognate multimer binding (C.K. and S.C.J., unpublished results). Such data would argue that the regulation of CD8Class I binding on naive versus differentiated CD8 T cells is quite different, a possibility which we are currently exploring.
Loss of multimer binding did not correlate solely with receptor expression levels, suggesting a qualitative effect on CD8/TCR capacity to bind multimers. Drake et al. (40) showed that activation induced changes in cell-surface distribution of TCR molecules. This model may correlate with the effect of neuraminidase which we report here since previous reports have argued that desialylation can influence the ability of the TCR to cluster and engage peptide/MHC ligands (43). The effect of desialylation on activated T cells was unexpected, since effector T cells are known to have already decreased in cell-surface sialylation (12, 15, 16), including changes in sialylation of CD8 itself following T cell activation (13, 38). One likely explanation for this evident discrepancy is the specificity of sialylation. There are more than a dozen murine sialyltransfersases, which differ with respect to the anomeric linkage of the sialic acid adduct as well as substrate preferences (44). Indeed, the sialyltransferase ST6GalNAc IV has been shown to be induced by activation of CD8 T cells, with similar kinetics to the effects documented here (45), and this enzyme represents a good candidate for control of the phenotype reported here. A more complex issue will be to determine whether changes in CD8 sialylation itself plays the key role, or whether changes in other (more prominently glycosylated) T cell surface molecules influence the access of CD8 with its ligand, a model which has been proposed earlier (46).
Other changes might also regulate CD8 (and/or TCR) ligand binding by activated T cells. An interesting mechanism is suggested by the recent report which proposed the production of CD8 homodimers on activated CD8 T cells (47). CD8
binds well to the non-classical Class I molecule TL, but poorly to classical Class I MHC molecules (11, 24, 48), hence such a change might contribute to the loss of Kb multimer binding studied here. However, the report from Madakamutil et al., and our own unpublished studies using TL multimers (kindly provided by H. Cheroutre) suggest that up-regulation of CD8
expression is detected at 48 h but not at 24 h (data not shown), whereas we see profound impairment of cognate and non-cognate binding by day 1 of activation (Figs 3, 5 and 6). Thus, although appearance of the TL-binding form of CD8 may play a role at later stages of activation, this effect appears not to account for the early loss in classical Class I multimer binding we report here.
But what might be the physiological role for this change in Class I MHC binding? Loss of binding to specific peptide/MHC ligands might seem counterintuitive, given the functional sensitivity of CTLs. Indeed, previous data from Schneck and colleagues suggested that effector CTLs were superior to naive cells in binding bivalent cognate peptide/MHC ligands at low density (7). This may relate simply to the valency of the peptide/MHC ligands used in these studies. It is interesting to note however, that Fahmy et al. used 2C T cells at >d4 post-activation, and exclusively studied binding of high-affinity cognate ligands. In our hands, such binding is largely CD8 independent and is mostly restored by that time point (Fig. 4). Thus, although we have been unable to observe enhanced multimer binding on activated T cells, such effects may be more subtle than the large-scale loss in multimer binding we observe at earlier activation time points. Furthermore, we observe a greater impact of activation on binding to lower affinity cognate ligands. For both the OT-I system (G4/Kb binding, Fig. 1) and 2C (SIY-A6/Kb binding, Fig. 4), activated T cells suffered a profound and sustained loss in binding to these types of ligands. Hence, these data do not necessarily disagree with the report by Fahmy et al., but suggest that enhanced peptide/MHC recognition by effector T cells is preceded by stage of reduced sensitivity.
The changes in peptide/MHC ligand binding which we observe would be expected to have functional consequences. Indeed, recent data from Braciale's group suggest that tetramerlow cells are altered in their ability to respond to TCR engagement, showing depressed calcium flux, IFN- synthesis and degranulation (40). Our data on the decreased ability of activated T cells to engage low-affinity peptide/MHC ligands suggests additional consequences. The first is that activated T cells with the lowest affinity for a stimulatory foreign peptide/MHC ligand will disproportionately lose sensitivity to it. These clones would therefore fail to receive further stimulation by the antigen and may be outcompeted by more fit clones (i.e. in this context, T cells bearing TCRs with higher affinity for the foreign peptide/MHC ligand). Furthermore, loss of binding to low-affinity peptide/MHC ligands may prevent recognition of self-peptide/MHC ligands. Numerous experiments suggest that naive T cells engage self-peptideMHC complexes, resulting in basal TCR signaling, which may influence T cell homeostasis (4951). However, were these interactions to be maintained in the effector T cell population, there is grave potential for autoaggressive responses. Hence, activation-induced desensitization to these (low affinity) self-ligands may be beneficial for the host.
Alternatively, it has long been appreciated that repeated TCR stimulation of T cells can lead to activation-induced cell death, hence the loss of peptide/MHC ligand binding we report may enhance effector survival. A distinct element in this argument is suggested by data from Potter's group, showing immature thymocyte sensitivity to apoptosis induced by non-cognate CD8 interactions (52). It is possible that loss of non-cognate binding protects highly vulnerable activated CD8 T cells from apoptosis induced in the same way, a possibility we are currently exploring. Clearly, further experiments will be needed to elucidate the consequences of decreased peptideMHC interactions on activated CD8 T cells.
In summary, our data suggest that CD8 T cells pass through a stage of depressed CD8/TCR binding following activation, which may influence the fate of the activated T cells and selection for the most robust responder cells. It is interesting to note that TCR engagement during positive selection in the thymus also leads to decreased TCR/CD8 binding and sensitivity, and that this process is also regulated by changes in sialylation. Such data suggest that T cells have an unexpectedly large dynamic range in the ability of their receptors to engage peptide/MHC receptors during differentiation.
![]() |
Acknowledgements |
---|
![]() |
Abbreviations |
---|
OVA | ovalbumin peptide |
PNA | peanut agglutinin |
PE | Phycoerythrin |
SA | streptavidin |
![]() |
Notes |
---|
Received 14 September 2005, accepted 22 September 2005.
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|