a School of Public Health, The University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
b Demography Program, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Methods We compared two methods for converting the SMR to life expectancy using mortality data from the largest developing country, China.
Results The first model, using the Gompertz function, does not provide a good fit to the life expectancy and SMR of China. The regression lines derived from the second, a log-linear model using parameters estimated from the US white population are not a good fit to Chinese males and older females. However, if the parameters in the log-linear model are estimated using Chinese mortality data, the resultant regression lines fit the data reasonably well.
Conclusion The relationship between life expectancy and SMR based on mortality data from developed countries may not be valid for developing countries. Based on our empirical study, separate estimates of the coefficients of the model are required for developing countries.
Keywords Chinese mortality, Gompertz function, life expectancy, regression, standardized mortality ratio
Accepted 17 March 2000
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
Methods and Materials |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
We studied two types of relationship between life expectancy and SMR. One was the log-linear model in Lai et al.3 and the other was based on the Gompertz function in Haybittle.4
From Lai et al.3 we have:
![]() | (1) |
where e*x and ex are the life expectancy at age x for the study population and the standard population respectively, and and ß are parameters which can be estimated from the observed values of the life expectancies and SMR from subregions.
In the second approach by Haybittle,4 we have:
![]() | (2) |
where e*x and ex are the same as in equation (1) and k is a constant estimated from the observed age-specific mortality rate based on the Gompertz function. Equation (2)
is an approximated model of a general model (equation (2)
and equation (3)
given in Haybittle4). We conducted a comparative study using model (1), model (2) and the general model, equation (2)
and (3)
of Haybittle. Since the general model did not achieve better results than those of model (2) above, we only report the comparative results of model (1) and model (2).
Let µx be the age-specific mortality rate of the standard population. (In our case, the standard population was the whole Chinese population.) The Gompertz function is defined as:
![]() | (3) |
Equivalently, we can have two types of relationship between the changes in life expectancy and the SMR:
![]() | (4) |
and
![]() | (5) |
where the SMR is computed from the whole range of age groups of the Chinese population.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
![]() | (6) |
The regression analyses were performed for the age groups 3034 upwards as suggested in Haybittle4 for the Gompertz function. The estimates of k for males and females were 0.0890 and 0.0904, respectively. The value of k in equation (2) is assumed to be the same constant for all age groups.
The parameters in equation (1) were also estimated using the least squares method for males and females as well as for the age groups 25, 45 and 65 years (Table 1
). For comparative purposes, estimates of the parameters (
, ß) based on the data from the US population in Lai et al.3 are also presented in Table 1
.
|
|
For the 25- and 45-year age groups in Figure 2, the regression lines of equation (2)
and equation (1)
with parameters estimated from the US white population are very close to each other in the neighbourhood of SMR = 1. However, these regression lines have noticeable differences when compared to the regression line of equation (1)
with parameters estimated from the Chinese population. For females aged 25, the regression lines of all equations are very close to each other as shown in Figure 2
(d). Generally, the slopes in the absolute value of the regression lines of equation (2)
and equation (1)
with parameters estimated from the US white population are greater than those of the regression lines of equation (1)
with parameters estimated from the Chinese population.
For a better cross plot comparison, we selected a common range (0.51.7) of SMR for all plots and used 20-year intervals for the vertical axis of Figure 2(a) and Figure 2
(d), 15-year intervals for Figure 2
(b) and Figure 2
(e), and 10-year intervals for Figure 2
(c) and Figure 2
(f).
Figure 3 compares the changes in life expectancy of the study population associated with various values of SMR based on equations (4)
and (5)
.
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In a developed country or in a small country, the range of SMR is usually small due to the relatively homogeneous population. The regression lines established based on these regional data may not be suitable for more heterogeneous populations. For example, the SMR of the 25-year age group of the white population in the US are between 0.8 and 1.1. However, in a large developing country, such as China, mortality patterns are not so homogeneous across regions. The SMR of the Chinese population range from 0.7 to 1.7.
To establish the regression lines of equation (1), one needs to have observations from each region of the country. For the models (equation 2
) proposed in Haybittle4 using the Gompertz function, information from regions is not needed. However, the model does not provide a good fit to the Chinese mortality data. The regression lines generated from equation (2)
are very sensitive to the estimates of k. Very different regression lines can be produced by including younger (<30) age groups for estimating the value of k. Once the value of k is obtained, the same value applies to different age groups (25, 45 and 65 years) studied.
Haybittle4 showed that model (2) did not fit the older age group well, based on data from England and Wales. Equations (2) and (3)
of Haybittle4 were recommended for the older age group. We tried this approach on the Chinese data set but did not find a better fit than that of model (1) in this article. The results are not presented here but are available upon request. The values of the correlation coefficient (r) of log(e*x/ex) and (1 SMR) for the Chinese population at age groups 25, 45 and 65 years were 0.8303, 0.7056 and 0.4875 for the males and 0.8857, 0.7798 and 0.6624 for the females, respectively. Equation (2)
is derived from the Gompertz function and equation (1)
of the US white population is not based on regression on the Chinese data. Therefore, we could not compute the values of r (r2) for equation (2)
and equation (1)
of the US white population from the Chinese data. In general, equation (1)
provided a reasonable fit for all age groups studied based on the Chinese data set. However, no global conclusions can be drawn from this single application. The approach appears useful in a developing country (China) and in a developed country (US).
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
2 Office of National Statistics. Mortality Statistics: General. Review of the Registrar General on Deaths in England and Wales 19931995. Series DH1 no. 28. London: The Stationery Office, 1997.
3 Lai D, Hardy RJ, Tsai SP. Statistical analysis of the standardized mortality ratio and life expectancy. Am J Epidemiol 1996;143:83240.[Abstract]
4 Haybittle JL. The use of the Gompertz function to relate changes in life expectancy to the standardized mortality ratio. Int J Epidemiol 1998;27:88589.[Abstract]
5 State Statistical Bureau of China. Monograph on the 1990 Population Census of the People's Republic of China. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House, 1995.