Commentary: Can adult anthropometry be used as a ‘biomarker’ for prenatal and childhood exposures?

David Gunnell

University of Bristol, Department of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK.

Life Course Epidemiology

Life course epidemiology is concerned with investigating the effect on health of accumulating and interacting biological, social, and psychosocial processes.1 Parental health and genetic endowment together with intrauterine, childhood and early adult exposures may all influence an individual's health, but investigating their joint effects presents two important challenges. The first is that many of the exposures studied are socially patterned, therefore identifying the relevant factors using observational studies, which are prone to confounding, is problematic. Randomized controlled trials with long follow-up are the best means of identifying the long-term effects of possible interventions on health.2 The second challenge is that there are few cohort studies with exposure and health information from before birth until old age. Most of the studies where data have been prospectively recorded at different stages of the life course3–6 are either of relatively young individuals, or currently limited by insufficient power to examine major clinical end-points.

Indirect Measures of Fetal, Infant and Childhood Exposures

When prospectively recorded data on a person's health, diet, health-related behaviours and living conditions at particular ages do not exist, indirect or proxy measures may be used (Table 1Go). To interpret the association of these measures with later disease requires a fuller understanding of their meaning and shortcomings. The investigation by Wadsworth and colleagues provides information concerning two possible anthropometric ‘biomarkers’—leg length and trunk length.7 Their analysis may provide clues concerning the possible exposures underlying stature-disease associations. Furthermore it suggests that leg length and trunk length may act as markers for exposures operating at different stages during childhood.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Proxy measures of fetal, infant and childhood exposures
 
Body Shape and Disease

Interest in the association between body shape and health dates back over a century (see Burchard 1936).8 Early studies of physical illness characterized human body forms into three main classes—endomorphs, ectomorphs and mesomorphs.9,10 A different form of classification was used in the psychiatric literature—classes include aesthenics, athletics and pyknics.8 Categorization was based on a number of features including height, limb length, weight and fat distribution. More recent investigations have focussed separately on overall stature and adiposity/fat distribution. Adult height is a measure both of genetic endowment and of health and nutrition throughout the growing years.11 Unlike adiposity measures, height changes little during adulthood. For this reason the association of greater stature with an increased risk of cancer12 and a decreased risk of cardiovascular disease13 may reflect the long-term consequences of pre-adult exposures.

Neither the relevant period of growth nor the exposures for which stature may be acting as a ‘biomarker’ are well characterized. Growth disturbances at several stages of development may contribute to short adult stature.14 It has been suggested that one way of further investigating height-disease associations may be to study associations between the two components of height—leg length and trunk length—and disease risk. The rationale for such an approach lies in the observation that post-natal linear growth is in greater part due to an increase in leg length than trunk growth and that adversity at this time causes impaired lower limb development.15 This is demonstrated by changes in the trunk length: height ratio during growth. At birth the ratio is around 0.66, but by puberty it has declined to 0.50 (Figures 1 and 2GoGo). From puberty, linear growth occurs equally in trunk and leg length.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Change in the leg length:height ratio with age. Cross-sectional data from the Carnegie Survey (1937–1939). Source: Family diet and health in pre-war Britain. Carnegie Trust, Dunfermline, 1955

 


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Change in shape of the human body from birth to adulthood

From Stratz CH (1904) Der Korper des Kindes. Fur Eltern, Erzieher, Arzta und Kunstler. Ferdinand Enke. Stuttgart. Reprinted from: Prog Fd Nutr Sci (2) Leitch I. Change in shape of the human body, pp.99–141. Copyright (1976) with permission from Elsevier Science.

 
It is of interest, therefore, that studies to date indicate that the component of height generating height-cancer and height-cardiovascular disease associations is the leg.12,16,17 This indicates that the relevant exposures underlying these associations operate pre-pubertally. A better understanding of the nature of these exposures may contribute to understanding the biological mechanisms underlying what at first sight appear to be somewhat peripheral epidemiological observations.

The 1946 Cohort

Previous analyses of the 1946 cohort, the UK's first national birth cohort study, have made important contributions to understanding early life influences on adult health.4,18–21 Indeed an earlier investigation identified a range of social and pre-natal factors associated with the adult height of cohort members.22 Relevant factors were: parental height, birthweight, childhood social class, birth order, number of younger siblings, parental education and household crowding.

In this latest analysis, pre-natal, infant and childhood correlates of adult leg length and trunk length are assessed. Most of the factors investigated in the earlier analysis are also examined here. Recent coding of the childhood diet data has also enabled an investigation of diet-stature associations and the influence of infant feeding, parental divorce and death are also assessed. The availability of height measurements at ages 4, 7, 11 and 15 allows the authors to gain insights into the timing of the effects of the exposures, and availability of parental height allows for some control of genetic or inter-generational influences. However, the use of overall parental stature in this way is limited by the possibility that the two components of height may be under separate genetic influence. Information on parental leg length and trunk length was not available.

The low correlation (0.1) between leg length and trunk length underlines the possibility that the two height components provide relatively independent information on exposures influencing growth. The principle findings are that birthweight and parental height were associated with both components of height, energy intake and breastfeeding were independently associated with leg length, whereas serious illness in childhood and parental divorce were associated with trunk length.

A methodological challenge when examining associations with the components of stature is how to take account of overall body size and whether the biologically relevant measurement is disproportion or absolute length of the leg or trunk. Various approaches have been used previously. Analyses of mortality patterns in the Boyd Orr cohort models examining leg length-mortality associations included a term for trunk length and vice versa.16,23 In assessing the association of leg length and trunk length with cardiovascular disease in Caerphilly men the ratio of trunk length to leg length was used.17 In Wadsworth's analysis the difference between z-scores for leg and trunk length was used. The factors most strongly related to this measure were overcrowding and breastfeeding—overcrowding leading to disproportionately short legs, and breastfeeding to long legs. The authors however make little of this analysis focussing mainly on the multivariable models for leg length and trunk length separately.

How should we interpret these findings? Many factors were examined in the models and the fact that different exposures were associated with each component of height may be a chance finding. The lack of association with most of the nutrients is not surprising in view of the limited nature of the dietary data (mothers recall of the child's diet in the previous 24 hours). This area requires consideration in birth cohorts with more detailed diet information. Whilst the association between leg length and energy intake replicates a finding in univariable analyses of the Boyd Orr cohort, in multivariable analyses in that study energy intake was associated with trunk but not leg length.24 The association of breastfeeding with leg length replicates findings in the Boyd Orr cohort25 and suggests this is an area worthy of further study. There is debate concerning the long-term impact of patterns of infant feeding on adult health, but the associations between breastfeeding and leg length suggest this may be a biologically relevant exposure underlying leg length-mortality associations.

Leg Length, Trunk Length and Chronic Disease Risk

This analysis of the 1946 birth cohort provides further evidence of the potential use of leg length as a measure of pre-pubertal exposures. Its independence from birthweight26 is suggested by the similarity of trunk-birthweight and leg-birthweight associations. Other analyses of the exposures influencing leg and trunk length in childhood and adulthood are now needed to confirm these findings. Similarly further analyses of risk factor and mortality associations with the components of stature are necessary to replicate the findings to date in a limited number of cohorts—Boyd Orr, Caerphilly, NHANES and the Honolulu Heart Programme.16,17,27,28

Importantly consensus regarding the relevant ‘biomarker’ is required—is somatic disproportion or absolute leg the more important. In the Caerphilly study, findings were similar for both measures.

References

1 Kuh D, Ben-Shlomo Y. A Life Course Approach to Chronic Disease Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

2 Fehily AM, Coles RJ, Evans WD, Elwood PC. Factors affecting bone density in young adults. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;56:579–86.[Abstract]

3 Golding J, Pembrey M, Jones R. ALSPAC—the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. I. Study methodology. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15:74–87.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

4 Wadsworth MEJ, Kuh DJL. Childhood influences on adult health: a review of recent work from the British 1946 national birth cohort study, the MRC National Survey of Health and Development. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1997;11:2–20.

5 Power C, Matthews S, Manor O. Inequalities in self rated health in the 1958 birth cohort: lifetime social circumstances or social mobility. BMJ 1996;313:449–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 Strauss RS. Adult functional outcome of those born small for gestational age: twenty-six-year follow-up of the 1970 British Birth Cohort. JAMA 2000;283:625–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7 Wadsworth MEJ, Hardy RJ, Paul AA, Marshall SF, Cole TJ. Leg and trunk length at 43 years in relation to childhood health, diet and family circumstances; evidence from the 1946 national birth cohort. Int J Epidemiol 2002;31:383–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8 Burchard EML. Physique and psychosis. Comparative Psychology Monographs 1936;13:1–73.

9 Sheldon WH, Stevens SS, Tucker WB. The Varieties of Human Physique. New York and London: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1940.

10 Dupertuis CW. Anthropometry of extreme somatotypes. Am J Phys Anthropol 1950;8:367–83.[Medline]

11 Tanner JM. Foetus into Man. Physical Growth from Conception to Maturity. Ware: Castlemead Publications, 1989.

12 Gunnell D, Okasha M, Davey Smith G, Oliver SE, Sandhu J, Holly JMP. Height, leg length and cancer risk: a systematic review. Epidemiol Rev 2001;23:313–342.[ISI][Medline]

13 Williams SR, Jones E, Bell W, Davies B, Bourne MW. Body habitus and coronary heart disease in men. A review with reference to methods of body habitus assessment. Eur Heart J 1997;18:376–93.[Abstract]

14 Luo ZC, Karlberg J. Critical growth phases for adult shortness. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:125–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15 Leitch I. Growth and Health. Br J Nutr 1951;5:142–51.[ISI]

16 Gunnell DJ, Davey Smith G, Frankel S et al. Childhood leg length and adult mortality: follow up of the Carnegie (Boyd Orr) Survey of Diet and Health in Pre-war Britain. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52:142–52.[Abstract]

17 Davey Smith G, Greenwood R, Gunnell D, Sweetnam P, Yarnell J, Elwood P. Leg length, insulin resistance, and coronary heart disease risk: The Caerphilly Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001; 55:867–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18 Jones P, Rodgers B, Murray R, Marmot M. Child development risk factors for adult schizophrenia in the British 1946 birth cohort. Lancet 1994;344:1398–402.[ISI][Medline]

19 Stavola BL, Hardy R, Kuh D, Silva IS, Wadsworth M, Swerdlow AJ. Birthweight, childhood growth and risk of breast cancer in a British cohort. Br J Cancer 2000;83:964–68.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

20 Cooper C, Kuh D, Egger P, Wadsworth M, Barker D. Childhood growth and age at menarche. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:814–17.[ISI][Medline]

21 Kuh D, Maclean M. Women's childhood experience of parental separation and their subsequent health and socioeconomic status in adulthood. J Biosoci Sci 1990;22:121–35.

22 Kuh D, Wadsworth M. Parental height: childhood environment and subsequent adult height in a national birth cohort. Int J Epidemiol 1989;18:663–68.[Abstract]

23 Gunnell DJ, Davey Smith G, Holly JMP, Frankel SJ. Leg length and risk of cancer in the Boyd Orr cohort. BMJ 1998;317:1350–51.[Free Full Text]

24 Gunnell DJ, Davey Smith G, Frankel SJ, Kemp M, Peters TJ. Socio-economic and dietary influences on leg length and trunk length in childhood: a reanalysis of the Carnegie (Boyd Orr) survey of diet and health in prewar Britain (1937–39). Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1998; 12:96–113.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

25 Martin R, Gunnell D, Mangtani P, Frankel S, Davey Smith G. Association between breast feeding and growth in childhood through to adulthood: the Boyd Orr cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:784.

26 Gunnell D, Davey-Smith G, McConnachie A, Greenwood R, Upton M, Frankel S. Separating in-utero and postnatal influences on later disease. Lancet 1999;354:1526–27.[ISI][Medline]

27 Albanes D, Jones DY, Shatekin A et al. Adult stature and risk of cancer. Cancer Res 1988;48:1658–62.[Abstract]

28 Severson RK, Grove JS, Nomura AMY, Stemmerman GN. Body mass and prostatic cancer: a prospective study. BMJ 1988; 297:713–15.[ISI][Medline]

29 Barker DJP. Fetal and Infant Origins of Adult Disease. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1992.

30 Barker DJP. Mothers, Babies, and Disease in Later Life. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1994.

31 Susser ES, Lin SP. Schizophrenia after prenatal exposure to the Dutch hunger winter of 1944–1945. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:983–88.[Abstract]

32 Strachan DP. Respiratory and allergic diseases. In: Kuh D, Ben-Shlomo Y. A Life Course Approach to Chronic Disease Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1997.

33 Davey Smith G, Hart C, Blane D, Gillis C, Hawthorne V. Lifetime socioeconomic position and mortality: prospective observational study. BMJ 1997;314:547–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34 Torrey EF, Miller J, Rawlings R, Yolken RH. Seasonality of births in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a review of the literature. Schizoph Res 1997;28:1–38.[CrossRef][ISI]

35 Dalman C, Allebeck P, Cullberg J, Grunewald C, Koster M. Obstetric complications and the risk of schizophrenia: a longitudinal study of a national birth cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;56:234–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36 Lewis G, David A, Andreasson S, Allebeck P. Schizophrenia and city life. Lancet 1992;340:137–40.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

37 Dwyer JT, Gardner J, Halvorsen K, Krall EA, Cohen A, Valadian I. Memory of food intake in the distant past. Am J Epidemiol 1989;130: 1033–46.[Abstract]

38 Bobak M, Hertzman C, Skodova Z, Marmot M. Own education, current conditions, parental material circumstances, and risk of myocardial infarction in a former communist country. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:91–96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39 Dedman DJ, Gunnell D, Davey Smith G, Frankel S. Childhood housing conditions and later mortality in the Boyd Orr cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55:10–15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40 Wright CM, Parker L, Lamont D, Craft AW. Implications of childhood obesity for adult health: findings from thousand families cohort study. BMJ 2001;323:1280–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41 Ong KK, Ahmed ML, Emmett PM, Preece MA, Dunger DB. Association between postnatal catch-up growth and obesity in childhood: prospective cohort study [published erratum appears in BMJ 2000; 320(7244):1244] BMJ 2000;320:967–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42 Westergaard T, Melbye M, Pederson JB, Frisch M, Olsen JH, Andersen PK. Birth order, sibship size and risk of Hodgkin's disease in children and young adults: a population-based study of 31 million person-years. Int J Cancer 1997;72:977–81.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]