Physical activity and health: current issues and research needs

Adrianne E Hardman

Professor Adrianne E Hardman, Department of Physical Education, Sports Science and Recreation Management, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK. E-mail: a.e.hardman{at}lboro.ac.uk

Accepted 21 March 2001

A substantial body of evidence now demonstrates the burden of ill-health attributable to sedentary living. This is most compelling for coronary heart disease (CHD) and, combined with the high prevalence of inactivity,1 provides the rationale for Professor Morris's claim that exercise is 'today's best buy in public health'.2 Besides a reduced risk of CHD, evidence is secure for many other health gains from physical activity; these include a reduced risk of stroke,3,4 type II diabetes,5,6 colon cancer,7,8 and hip fracture.9,10 There is evidence enough to justify the further development of public health policies to promote physical activity. The difficulty is with the specifics of what to promote and prescribe.

This paper is concerned with future contributions by research to an evidence-based rationale for exercise recommendations—both to the public at large and to individuals. It is clear that physically active people have a lower disease risk than sedentary individuals but the components of activity which determine particular health gains are poorly understood. Thus the 'dose-response' relationships for physical activity are the subject of current research interest. Intuitively, these will not be the same for different health outcomes and this is one reason why further study of the associated mechanisms is important. Understanding the underlying mechanisms will clarify the relative importance of intensity, frequency, duration and mode of exercise for specified health gains. It will also help us to distinguish the effects of exercise per se from those of co-existing behaviours and to identify stages of life during which levels of particular types of activity are critical for given health outcomes. This paper presents a personal view of research needs.

Cardiovascular and associated metabolic disease

How important is intensity?
The intensity of exercise likely influences some of its effects on disease risk but the difficulty of defining and then measuring this in a meaningful way has restricted progress. More uniformity has been evident in recent years with the widespread adoption of the MET§ but this is, of course, an absolute index of intensity and most physiological responses to exercise are governed by the relative intensity of the exercise. An intensity of 10 METS might be a warm-up for one person but require a near-maximal effort for another. During the second half of the 20th Century, exercise physiologists have most commonly expressed intensity relative to the individual's maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). Whilst this approach is valid across a broad range of fitness levels, it is inadequate for individuals with low functional capacity for whom the resting metabolic rate represents a higher fraction of VO2max.11 For these individuals—who of course make up the majority of sedentary people—intensity is better expressed relative to oxygen uptake reserve{dagger}. To the author's knowledge, this concept has been adopted only in scientific (as opposed to epidemiological) studies.

Its importance in the epidemiology of physical activity is evidenced by data from British civil servants.12 Whereas only frequent vigorous exercise (defined as liable to entail peaks of energy expenditure of >=7.5 kcal.min–1 [31.5 kJ.min–1]) was associated with protection against heart attack in men aged 45–54 at entry, there was a dose-response relationship for a lesser degree of such exercise (either <2 sessions per week or not so intense, e.g. 'fairly brisk' walking for >30 min. per day) among older men aged 55–64 at entry. Thus, for example, older men reporting moderately intense activity such as 'much stair climbing' (not judged sufficiently vigorous to be included in the 'vigorous aerobic' cluster of activities) showed a coronary rate which was significantly lower than that in less active men. Protection among younger men was limited to those reporting frequent vigorous aerobic exercise. This finding suggests that the key features of cardio-protective exercise include its intensity relative to individual capacity. VO2max declines, on average, by about 10% per decade in middle-aged and older people,13 so exercise of a given MET value represents a higher relative intensity for older people. Where the number of individuals surveyed permit, one approach14 may be to express the MET value of the activity in relation to age-related average values for oxygen uptake reserve.

Frequency of exercise
Recent recommendations15,16 are for exercise on '... most, preferably all, days of the week', underlining the importance of frequent exercise. This notion reflects increasing recognition of the acute effects of exercise, i.e. altered physiological or metabolic responses lasting between several hours and a few days after a session of exercise. These include a decrease in blood pressure,17 improved insulin sensitivity18 and decreases in plasma triglycerides.19 The time-courses over which they disappear are poorly understood, however. Some information is available, for example the attenuation of the postprandial rise in plasma triglycerides following a standard high-fat meal has been reported to disappear within 60 hours of an exercise session.20 Improved insulin sensitivity may persist for a little longer.21 More information is required, however, as the duration of these effects dictates the frequency with which exercise sessions must be taken if favourable postprandial responses are to be maintained. Similarly, the determinants of the magnitude of acute effects of exercise need to be elucidated. Theoretically, this may be enhanced by training22 because training permits more frequent and longer exercise sessions to be accomplished without fatigue. To the author's knowledge, this proposition has seldom been tested.23

Pattern of exercise
Epidemiological studies have found an inverse relationship between the total energy expended in leisure time physical activity and health outcomes. These include a lower risk of all-cause mortality,24 cardiovascular morbidity and mortality,24,25 type II diabetes,6 hypertension,26 and site-specific cancers.27,28 Some activities contributing to high totals of energy expenditure seem likely to have been performed at least partly on an intermittent basis, for example walking,29 climbing stairs,25,30 gardening,29 and repair work.24 Survey evidence therefore suggests that several short sessions of moderate physical activity during the day influence health outcomes in a positive manner, at least when they contribute to a high total energy expenditure.

Scientific evidence for the efficacy of this pattern of exercise as a means of eliciting chronic (training) effects is limited however, both in the number of randomly controlled trials (three to the author's knowledge) and scope (the only common outcome measure was fitness).31 Evidence is limited to scientific studies with outcome measures primarily of fitness and/or fatness. Only one study reported the effect of exercise pattern on acute health-related responses. This found similar reductions in plasma triglycerides with three, 10-minute bouts of brisk walking at intervals during the day and one, 30-minute bout in sedentary people consuming normal meals.32

Further research is clearly required before the principle of accumulating exercise in short bouts throughout the day can be endorsed with confidence.

Energy expenditure and energy turnover
The product of intensity, frequency and duration of exercise—sometimes described as the total 'volume' of exercise (a difficult term)—yields the total gross energy expenditure. Some evidence points to this as an important determinant of health gains. In addition to the surveys referred to above, this includes the finding from the US Runners' Health Study that running mileage was six times more important in predicting high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration than running speed.33 This was not the case for associations with blood pressure or waist circumference, however, where running speed was the more important determinant.33 Total energy expenditure may also be the main determinant of some acute effects of exercise. Two examples are relevant. First, the increase in glucose disposal rate was similar following exercise at 50% or 75% VO2max when the total energy expended was held constant.34 Second, the attenuation of postprandial plasma triglycerides by prior exercise was strikingly similar following a long bout of low intensity exercise and a shorter bout of moderate exercise expending the same energy.35 This topic, again under-researched, is related to that of the accumulation of exercise (referred to above) because that enshrines the notion that the total energy expenditure is all-important.

Of course, in free-living people, an increased level of physical activity is invariably associated with an increase in energy intake so that energy turnover is increased. Speculatively, a higher energy turnover may constitute a metabolically desirable state because of effects on the pathways concerned with the disposition, storage and degradation of muscle energy substrates. Evidence for the health gains from such a state include the finding that men who were classified as obese by body mass index (BMI) but who had a high level of physical fitness had lower cardiovascular and total mortality rates than lean men who were unfit.36 Similarly, although both high BMI and a high energy intake were associated with increased risk of colon cancer among inactive people, this was not the case among physically active individuals.8 This finding suggests that a high energy intake does not confer increased risk of this cancer in the presence of a high expenditure.

The suggestion that a high energy turnover is metabolically advantageous is not new. The term 'metabolic fitness' was introduced by Després and Lamarche,37 on the basis of a series of studies showing that change to plasma lipoprotein lipids and body fatness were achieved through high-volume, low intensity training in the absence of increases in VO2max. Efforts to test this hypothesis through comparing the effects of 'lifestyle' activity with those of traditional exercise programmes have recently been reported38–40 but information is needed for a variety of health outcomes in different populations.

Fitness
Over the last decade, epidemiological data on physical activity (a behaviour) has been complemented by findings based on physical fitness (a set of attributes related to the ability to perform exercise). These studies show a dose-response relationship so that, although men in the highest fitness groups consistently show the lowest coronary attack and total mortality rates, moderate levels of fitness also confer a statistically significant and clinically important reduction in risk.41,42 Physical fitness, because it is probably a more objective measure than physical activity is an attractive outcome measure. Its use could be extended of course if it could be measured satisfactorily outside the laboratory. A low-cost, rapid, non-intimidating method for this would allow large surveys with the statistical power to detect, for example, effects in sub-groups and effects of specific activities. Walking tests such as the UKK Institute's 2 km protocol43 are attractive for both practical and theoretical reasons. Performance on these tests measures not only functional capacity (VO2max, the most frequently used laboratory measure), but also endurance. This is defined as the capability to sustain aerobic exercise using a high proportion of VO2max. Endurance is more sensitive to changes in physical activity level than VO2max and, because it derives largely from metabolic adaptations in muscle, may be a more important determinant of related health gains.

As mentioned, epidemiological studies show associations between fitness and a variety of health outcomes. The need to elucidate the relationships between the 'dose' and pattern of activity and the health outcome has been mentioned above. Fitness (particularly endurance) is labile and so rather easily changed through short-term interventions. It therefore offers a means of studying these dose-response relations indirectly (but inexpensively), serving a link between the behaviour and health outcomes.

Walking
Most epidemiological studies have classified physical activities according to estimated energy expenditure—either totals or threshold rates. Recommendations to the public (whether direct or via health professionals), however, need to promote activities rather than energy expenditures. Walking is an obvious example. It is popular, inexpensive and carries a low risk of injury. It is often the most commonly reported activity, particularly among women44 and older men.12 Some landmark studies, including those by Professor Morris's group,12 have published separate analyses for walking.25 In British civil servants brisk walking accounted for over half of the exercise which was protective against heart attack in 55–64-year-old men.12 Protection from attack among fairly brisk walkers was not significantly affected by controlling for participation in sports and cycling or for a lot of other CHD predictive factors. In recent years more data has become available, however. In the US Nurses Health Study, for example, walking was inversely associated with coronary events; women in the highest quintile group for walking (>=3 h per week at a brisk pace) had a multivariate relative risk of 0.65 (95% CI : 0.47–0.91).45 Similarly, healthy older men in the Honolulu Heart Study who walked >1.5 miles per day had half the coronary risk of those who walked <0.25 miles per day.46 Walking has also been reported to be associated with a lower risk of type II diabetes47 (independently of participation in vigorous activity).

These observations are consistent with reports that moderate levels of fitness, associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality, are attainable through brisk or fast walking.48,49 Bearing in mind that sedentary people seldom exert themselves at more than 30–35% of VO2max,50 such walking is sufficiently vigorous to improve fitness in a majority of people whose health is at risk because of their inactivity.

Walking is especially suitable for older people and the functional gains it elicits will likely improve quality of life. It is plainly acceptable for them, and carries a low risk of injury. In 13 weeks of training by walking, only one injury was sustained among 57 healthy men and women their 70s.51 Among older people, regular walking has been associated with lower rates of hospitalization,52 lower plasma triglycerides and higher bone mineral density.53

Because it is accessible to all but the very frail, more information on the specific benefits from walking—according to pace and distance—is sorely needed.

Mechanisms

Studies of the associations between physical activity habits and disease outcomes must be complemented by research into the underlying mechanisms. Not only does this increase confidence that such associations may be causal but it helps us to understand the relative importance of the different components of exercise as mediators of specified health gains. For cardiovascular disease much is known of the potential contribution from exercise-induced changes to blood lipids, with recent information about considerable effects on the dynamic postprandial phase. Other mechanisms must be involved, however, because patients with CHD get improved myocardial perfusion (and decreased risk of further episodes) without net regression.54

Recent findings suggest effects on the acute phases of the disease. (This would be concordant with observations that only continuing, current exercise confers a lower risk; past exercise has no effect.12,55) These include improved flow-mediated dilatation.56 There may be links here with lipoprotein metabolism because flow-mediated dilatation is impaired by high plasma triglycerides, in proportion to concentration.57

Mechanisms need elucidating in other areas, for instance skeletal health. Is the lower risk of hip fracture among physically active older women due to a decreased risk of falling and/or to an effect on bone mineral density? Is physical activity level particularly important during the years when bone formation predominates? The relationship between physical activity and a reduced risk of colon cancer is among the most consistent finding in the epidemiological literature. Is the mechanism systemic (reduced growth-promoting milieu) or local (increased colonic peristalsis)? Women who regularly engage in exercise may have a lower risk of breast cancer.58 Speculation on potential mechanisms has involved endocrine factors and/or improved weight maintenance. Depending on the answers to such questions, some forms and regimens of exercise may be more effective than others in the achievement of particular objectives.

Conclusion

Physical inactivity is a waste of human potential for health and well-being and its high prevalence is a cause for concern. Its potential contribution to positive health (not merely the absence of disease but associated with a capacity to enjoy life and to withstand challenges16) is considerable. So much is known—yet we need to understand much more. The effective 'dose' of exercise needed to elicit effects likely to be of clinical importance must be defined and this information translated into practical advice readily understood by the population at risk. Ten years after Professor Morris's plea for 'physiology and epidemiology to get together',12 the need for co-operative efforts from these disciplines is even more urgent.

Acknowledgments

'Thank you'

I thank Professor Morris for posing thought-provoking questions and for stimulating discussion of these. His contributions—to research, to the National Fitness Survey for England, and to the development of public health policies—are valued by so many. It continues to be an education and a privilege to work with him.

Notes

§ The rate of energy expenditure (in oxygen uptake units) of common physical activities is expressed in METS. One MET is equivalent to the resting metabolic rate, assumed to be 3.5 ml oxygen per kg of body mass per minute. Back

{dagger} Oxygen uptake reserve is obtained by subtracting one MET (3.5 ml.kg.–1min–1) from the maximal oxygen uptake. Back

References

1 National Fitness Survey: Main Findings. London: Sports Council and Health Education Authority, 1992.

2 Morris JN. Exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease: today's best buy in public health. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994;26:807–14.[ISI][Medline]

3 Wannamethee G, Shaper AG. Physical activity and stroke in British middle-aged men. Br Med J 1992;304:597–601.[ISI][Medline]

4 Lee I-M, Paffenbarger RS. Physical activity and stroke incidence. The Harvard Alumni Health Study. Stroke 1998;29:2049–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 Haapanen N, Miilunpalo S, Vuori I, Oja P, Pasanen M. Association of leisure time physical activity with the risk of coronary heart disease, hypertension and diabetes in middle-aged men and women. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26:739–47.[Abstract]

6 Helmrich SP, Ragland DR, Leung RW, Paffenbarger RS. Physical activity and reduced occurrence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1991;325:147–52.[Abstract]

7 Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Physical activity, obesity, and risk for colon cancer and adenoma in men. Ann Int Med 1995;122:327–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8 Slattery ML, Potter J, Caan B et al. Energy balance and colon cancer—beyond physical activity. Cancer Res 1997;57:75–80.[Abstract]

9 Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS et al. Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. N Engl J Med 1995;332:767–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10 Dargen-Molina P, Favier F, Grandjean H et al. Fall-related factors and risk of hip fracture: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 1996;348: 145–49.[ISI][Medline]

11 Swain DP, Leutholtz BC. Heart rate reserve is equivalent to %VO2Reserve, not to %VO2max. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997;29:410–14.[ISI][Medline]

12 Morris JN, Clayton DG, Everitt MG, Semmence AM, Burgess EH. Exercise in leisure time: coronary attack and death rates. Br Heart J 1990;63:325–34.[Abstract]

13 Hagberg JM. Effect of training on the decline of VO2max with aging. Fed Proc 1987;46:1830–33.[ISI][Medline]

14 Howley ET. Type of activity: resistance, aerobic, anaerobic and leisure-time versus occupational physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001 (in press).

15 More People, More Active, More Often. Report of Physical Activity Task Force. London: Department of Health, 1995.

16 Physical Activity and Health. A Report of the Surgeon General. US Departments of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA, 1996.

17 Pescatello LS, Fargo AE, Leach CN, Scherzer HH. Short-term effect of dynamic exercsie on arterial blood pressure. Circulation 1991;83: 1557–61.[Abstract]

18 Dela F, Mikines KJ, von Linstow M, Secher NH, Galbo H. Effect of training on insulin-mediated glucose uptake in human muscle. Am J Physiol 1992;263:E1134–43.

19 Tsetsonis NV, Hardman AE, Mastana SS. Acute effects of exercise on postprandial lipemia: a comparative study in trained and untrained middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;65:525–33.[Abstract]

20 Hardman AE, Lawrence JEM, Herd SL. Postprandial lipemia in endurance-trained people during a short interruption to training. J Appl Physiol 1998;84:1895–901.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21 King DS, Baldus RJ, Sharp RL, Kesl LD, Feltmeyer TL, Riddle MS. Time course for exercise-induced alterations in insulin action and glucose tolerance in middle-aged people. J Appl Physiol 1995;78: 17–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22 Haskell WL. Health consequences of physical activity: understanding and challenges regarding dose-response. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994;26: 649–60.[ISI][Medline]

23 Crouse SF, O'Brien BC, Grandjean PW, Lowe RC, Rohack JJ, Green JS. Effects of training and a single session of exercise on lipids and apolipoproteins in hypercholesterolemic men. J Appl Physiol 1997;83: 2019–28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24 Haapanen N, Miilunpalo S, Vuori I, Oja P, Pasanen M. Characteristics of leisure time physical activity associated with decreased risk of premature all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. Am J Epidemiol 1996;143:870–80.[Abstract]

25 Paffenbarger RS, Hyde RT, Wing AL, Hsieh C-C. Physical activity, all-cause mortality, and longevity of college alumni. N Engl J Med 1986;314:605–13.[Abstract]

26 Paffenbarger RS, Wing AL, Hyde RT, Jung DL. Physical activity and incidence of hypertension in college alumni. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 117:247–57.

27 Thune I, Lund E. Physical activity and risk of colorectal cancer in men and women. Br J Cancer 1996;73:1134–40.[ISI][Medline]

28 Thune I, Brenn T, Lund E, Gaard M. Physical activity and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1269–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29 Magnus K, Matroos A, Strackee J. Walking, cycling, or gardening, with or without seasonal interruption, in relation to coronary events. Am J Epidemiol 1979;110:724–33.[Abstract]

30 Paffenbarger RS, Hyde RT, Wing AL, Lee I-M, Jung DL, Kampert JB. The association of changes in physical activity level and other lifestyle characteristics with mortality among men. N Engl J Med 1993;328: 538–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31 Hardman AE. Issues of fractionalization (intermittent versus continuous exercise). Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33(6Suppl.):S421–27.[ISI][Medline]

32 Murphy MH, Nevill AM, Hardman AE. Different patterns of brisk walking are equally effective in decreasing postprandial lipaemia. Int J Obesity 2000;24:1303–09.[ISI]

33 Williams PT. Relationships of heart disease risk factors to exercise quantity and intensity. Arch Int Med 1998;158:237–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34 Braun B, Zimmermann MB, Kretchmer N. Effects of exercise intensity on insulin sensitivity in women with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Appl Physiol 1995;78:300–06.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35 Tsetsonis NV, Hardman AE. Reduction in postprandial lipemia after walking: influence of exercise intensity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28:1235–42.[ISI][Medline]

36 Wei M, Kampert JB, Barlow CE et al. Relationship between low cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality in normal-weight, overweight, and obese men. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:1547–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37 Després J-P, Lamarche B. Low-intensity endurance exercise training, plasma lipoproteins and the risk of coronary heart disease. J Int Med 1994;236:7–22.[ISI][Medline]

38 Andersen RE. Effects of lifestyle activity vs structured aerobic exercise in obese women. A randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc 1999;281: 335–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39 Jakicic JM, Winters C, Lang W, Wing RR. Effects of intermittent exercise and use of home exercise equipment on adherence, weight loss, and fitness in overweight women. A randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:1554–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40 Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, Garcia ME, Kohl HW, Blair SN. Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness. J Am Med Assoc 1999; 281:327–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41 Lakka TA, Venäläinen JM, Raurama R, Salonen R, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT. Relation of leisure-time physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness to the risk of acute myocardial infarction in men. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1549–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42 Blair SN, Kampert JB, Kohl HW et al. Influences of cardiorespiratory fitness and other precursors on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in men and women. J Am Med Assoc 1996;276:205–10.[Abstract]

43 Oja P, Laukkanen R, Pasanen M, Tyry T, Vuori I. A 2-km walking test for assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy adults. Int J Sports Med 1991;12:356–62.[ISI][Medline]

44 Lemaitre RN, Heckbert SR, Psaty BM, Siscovick DS. Leisure-time physical activity and the risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction in postmenopausal women. Arch Int Med 1995;155:2302–08.[Abstract]

45 Manson J, Hu FB, Rich-Edwards JW et al. A prospective study of walking as compared with vigorous exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med 1999;341: 650–58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46 Hakim AA, Curb JD, Petrovitch H et al. Effects of walking on coronary heart disease in elderly men. The Honolulu Heart Program. Circulation 1999;100:9–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47 Hu FB, Sigal RJ, Rich-Edwards JW et al. Walking compared with vigorous physical activity and risk of type 2 diabetes in women. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:1433–39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48 Stensel DJ, Brooke-Wavell K, Hardman AE, Jones PRM, Norgan NG. The influence of a one year programme of brisk walking on endurance fitness and body composition in previously sedentary men aged 42–59 years. Eur J Appl Physiol 1994;68:531–37.

49 Hardman AE, Jones PRM, Norgan NG, Hudson A. Brisk walking improves endurance fitness without changing body fatness in previously sedentary women. Eur J Appl Physiol 1992;65:354–59.

50 Franklin BA, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Thompson PD, Van Camp SP. Exercise and cardiac complications. Do the benefits outweigh the risks? Physician Sportsmed 1994;22:56–68.

51 Pollock ML, Carroll JF, Graves JE et al. Injuries and adherence to walk/jog and resistance training programs in the elderly. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991;23:1194–200.[Medline]

52 LaCroiz AZ, Leveille SG, Hecht JA, Grothaus LC, Wagner EH. Does walking decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease hospitalizations and death in older adults? J Am Geriatr Soc 1996;44:113–20.[ISI][Medline]

53 Frändin K, Grimby G, Mellström D, Svanborg D. Walking habits and health-related factors in a 70-year-old population. Gerontology 1991; 37:281–88.[ISI][Medline]

54 Schuler G, Hambrecht R, Schlierf G et al. Regular physical exercise and low-fat diet: effects on the progression of coronary artery disease. Circulation 1992;86:1–11.[Abstract]

55 Paffenbarger RS, Wing AL, Hyde RT. Physical activity as an index of heart attack risk in college alumni. Am J Epidemiol 1978;108:161–75.[Abstract]

56 Hambrecht R, Wolf A, Gielen S et al. Effect of exercise on coronary endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2000;342:454–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57 Vogel RA, Corretti MC, Plotnick GD. Effect of a single high-fat meal on endothelial function in healthy subjects. Am J Cardiol 1997;79: 350–54.[ISI][Medline]

58 Bernstein L, Henderson BE, Hanisch R, Sullivan-Halley J, Ross RK. Physical exercise and reduced risk of breast cancer in young women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:1403–08.[Abstract]