Clinical use of a pronuclear stage score following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: impact on pregnancy rates under the conditions of the German embryo protection law

M. Ludwig1, B. Schöpper, S. Al-Hasani and K. Diedrich

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The German embryo protection law does not allow embryo selection, but only selection of pronuclear stage (PN) oocytes. Only as many PN oocytes are allowed to be selected as are planned to be transferred. Therefore, a clinically applicable score to assess the quality of PN oocytes would be helpful. A recently published score was used under the conditions of the German embryo protection law in 74 non-selected, consecutive intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Only criteria which could be evaluated at the PN stage were included, i.e. not criteria which could only be assessed after pronuclear membrane breakdown or the first cleavage division. Supernumerary PN oocytes were cryopreserved after selection. A mean PN score of <13 (sum of scores of all selected PN oocytes/number of selected PN oocytes) led to a pregnancy rate of 4%, a mean PN score of >=13 to a pregnancy rate of 22%. Embryo morphology and cumulative PN were correlated (r = 0.52, P < 0.05). The negative predictive value was 92% at a threshold of 13 for the mean PN score. The use of this and perhaps additional scoring systems of PN stage oocytes might help to offer patients in Germany the transfer of two selected PN oocytes, which would reduce the multiple pregnancy rate.

Key words: embryo selection/multiple pregnancy rates/pronuclear stage oocytes


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It has been proved that the multiple pregnancy rate can be successfully reduced by transferring only two morphologically excellent embryos (Staessen et al., 1993Go, 1995Go; Coetsier and Dhont, 1998Go; Cohen, 1998Go). In Germany the embryo protection law (Embryonenschutzgesetz, ESchG) does not allow embryo selection. Selection can therefore only happen at the pronuclear stage (PN) in oocytes, which are much more difficult to assess than are embryos. Only as many PN oocytes are allowed to be selected for culture as are planned for use in embryo transfer. The number of embryos per transfer is limited to three. All supernumerary PN stages which are not selected for transfer are allowed to be cryopreserved (Ludwig and Diedrich, 1999Go). It would be helpful to have a tool for PN selection according to their later developmental potential.

Several authors have tried to find a reliable scoring system for PN stage oocytes which has the same value for the prediction of implantation and pregnancy rates as have the ones for embryo selection at later cleaving stages. These scores are clearly indicated, as shown in recent articles because there is a definite polarity present, even as early as the PN stage, for different factors, e.g. gene expression (Edwards and Beard, 1997Go, 1999Go). This tendency to polarization is the basis for the alignment of pronuclei as well as nucleoli during the fertilization process.

A maturation process of pronuclei in human oocytes following cryopreservation has been proposed (Wright et al.. 1990Go). These workers observed an ongoing association of pronuclei and the process of alignment of nucleoli which takes up to 26 h following insemination. The observation of aligned pronuclei was correlated with increased pregnancy rates. Similiar changes have been observed using time-lapse cinematography (Payne et al., 1997Go), who also described a defined time-course of events as well as a great variation in the timing of these processes.

Based on these observations, Scott and Smith (1998) recently published a new scoring system for oocytes at the PN stage. This score is based on the fact that a faster developmental process after fertilization demonstrates a better quality of the oocytes and resulting embryos. Their score included not only the morphological appearance of the pronuclei, but also the further development up to the PN membrane breakdown and first cleavage division. This last item (PN membrane breakdown and first cleavage division within 24–26 h post oocyte retrieval) constituted 2/5 of the maximum score. In Germany, however, this item cannot be included, since only selection at the PN stage is allowed and supernumerary PN oocytes must be cryopreserved at the PN stage or discarded.

In this study we applied the scoring system on the quality assessment of PN stages, based only on the morphological appearance of the PN oocytes, in order to evaluate its impact on the pregnancy rate under the conditions of the ESchG.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study design and scoring system
A total of 74 unselected, consecutive in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with 405 PN oocytes was evaluated prospectively using a previously published scoring system (Scott and Smith, 1998Go). The two or three PN oocytes selected from each cycle with the highest scores were kept in culture for a further 24 h. The remaining ones were cryopreserved according to the protocol published previously (Al-Hasani et al., 1996Go).

Scoring was done at 16–18 h post ICSI according to (i) the position of the PN, (ii) the alignment of nucleoli at the junction of the two pronuclei, and (iii) the appearance of the cytoplasm, as shown in Table IGo. Each PN oocyte was evaluated at x400 magnification under an inverted microscope.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Pronuclear scoring system of pronuclear (PN) stage oocytes (Scott and Smith, 1998Go). The scoring was done 16–18 h post intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
 
For each treatment cycle, we calculated the mean PN score as the sum of the scores of all selected PN oocytes per total number of selected PN oocytes, as well as the cumulative PN score (sum of the scores of all selected PN oocytes).

Ovarian stimulation and ICSI
All patients were stimulated according to the long luteal protocol, using a gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist depot preparation (Decapeptyl Gyn Depot; Ferring Arzneimittel GmbH, Kiel, Germany) and either human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG, Menogon; Ferring Arzneimittel GmbH) or recombinant FSH (recFSH, Gonal F; Serono GmbH, München, Germany). Ovulation induction was begun when at least three follicles had a diameter of >=18 mm, using 10 000 IU human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG, Choragon; Ferring Arzneimittel GmbH). Transvaginal oocyte retrieval was performed by ultrasound guidance under general anaesthesia or slight sedation. ICSI was performed in each of these cycles as previously described (Al-Hasani et al., 1999Go). In 62 cycles the indication for an ICSI procedure was male factor infertility; in 12 cases other indications, including previously failed or low fertilization rate or a thick zona was present.

Luteal phase support was performed using either vaginal progesterone alone (Utrogest; Kade, Berlin, Germany), in combination with a single injection of HCG (Choragon, Ferring Arzneimittel GmbH) on the day of embryo transfer, or several injections of HCG on the day of embryo transfer (5000 IU), and 3 days (5000 IU) and 6 days later (2500 IU).

Only clinical pregnancies with positive fetal heart beats were registered.

Cumulative embryo score
The cumulative embryo score (Steer et al., 1992Go) was slightly modified, since we did not use four but three different grades of embryo quality. The quality score of a single embryo was calculated as the product of the number of its blastomeres and the degree of its quality grade (1: fair; 2: moderate; 3: ideal). The cumulative embryo score was calculated as the sum of all single embryo scores.

Statistics
All statistics were done using a two-sided heteroscedastic t-test using the Microsoft Office Excel 7.0 software.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Data were complete from 74 cycles, including the pregnancy status. A total of 864 oocytes (mean ± SD 11.66 ± 5.8 per cycle) was retrieved; of these, 83% were at metaphase II (n = 718) and were injected with spermatozoa. Of metaphase II oocytes, 56% were fertilized (n = 405) and status according to the PN score as described above (Table IGo); 11 clinical pregnancies were achieved following 74 transfers (15%).

The mean and cumulative PN scores for all cycles are shown in Table IIGo. Table IIIGo shows the scores for those cycles in which surplus PN oocytes were available and therefore could be selected for further embryo culture, whilst supernumerary PN oocytes were cryopreserved, as well as for those cycles where a maximum of three 2PN oocytes was present and therefore no selection was possible.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Overall results of the pronuclear (PN) scoring. Data are from all patients, including those in which no oocyte selection was required because only 2PN or 3PN stage oocytes were available. Values are mean ± SD
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Results of pronuclear (PN) scoring in cases where selection of pronuclear stage oocytes was possible (elective transfer) or not possible (non-elective transfer). Values are mean ± SD
 
On the basis of these results, we tried to find a reliable threshold value, which allowed prediction of the establishment of a pregnancy. With a mean PN score per transferred embryo (sum of all PN oocytes selected/total number of PN oocytes) of <13, the pregnancy rate was 4% (1/28). With a mean PN score per transferred embryo of >=13, the pregnancy rate was 22% (10/46). This resulted in a positive predictive value of 22% and a negative predictive value of 92%. However, the cumulative embryo scores for those patients with a mean PN score <13 and those with a mean PN score >=13 was not significantly different (19 ± 9 and 22 ± 8 respectively).

The mean PN score was not different in those cycles with and without male factor infertility (12.83 ± 1.47, n = 62 and 12.97 ± 1.28, n = 12 respectively). The data arranged according to different female ages are shown in Table IVGo, and revealed an apparent trend towards lower cumulative PN scores for older women, but this was not significant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. Relationship between mean and cumulative pronuclear (PN) score and patients age for two different threshold values. Numbers are mean ± SD. No significant difference was present
 
The cumulative PN and embryo scores were positively correlated (r = 0.52, P < 0.05) (Figure 1Go).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Relationship between the cumulative embryo score and cumulative pronuclear score (r = 0.52; P < 0.05).

 
Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves are shown in Figure 2Go for cumulative embryo score, cumulative PN score, mean PN score. All three curves were similar.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Receiver operating characteristics curves for the sensitivity and specificity of the cumulative embryo score (- – -), the cumulative pronuclear score (———) and mean pronuclear score (—— ——).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, using a partial PN score (Scott and Smith, 1998Go) not including the first cleavage division, we predicted the failure to establish a pregnancy with a negative predictive value of 92%, using a threshold value of 13 for the mean PN score. The positive predictive value, however, was only 22%. This was due to a low overall pregnancy rate in the cohort analysed (15%). The results using the threshold value of 13, the positive correlation between the cumulative PN and embryo scores, and the parallel ROC curves clearly demonstrated that scoring of PN oocytes in relation to the quality of the resulting embryos and their probability of implantation should be possible. Even in those cycles in which selection of PN oocytes was not possible because only a maximum of three was available (non-elective, Table IIIGo), there was a significant difference in the mean and cumulative PN scores between those patients who became pregnant and those who did not. Here also a mean PN score of 13 seemed to be a good threshold by which to discriminate these two subgroups of patients.

This is highly relevant to German IVF programmes, which are governed by the ESchG prohibiting embryo selection: from our results, it should be possible to select the two best PN oocytes and therefore limit the number of embryos for transfer to two, without reduction of pregnancy rates. The mean PN score might be advantageous over the cumulative PN score, since only the former can be directly related to pregnancy rates in cycles in which only two PN oocytes are selected, since the mean PN score is independent from the total number of selected PN oocytes.

A reason for the lower positive preditive value in our series, compared to that of Scott and Smith (1998) may be that we exclusively used ICSI and not conventional IVF. It is known that the fertilization process after ICSI is accelerated compared to conventional IVF (Nagy et al., 1994Go, 1998Go). Therefore it might be necessary to evalute the PN score earlier in ICSI than in conventional IVF.

Furthermore, it has been shown that early cleavage of embryos [the item of the Scott and Smith score (1998) which we by law had to exclude] is one of the most important predictors of embryo quality and pregnancy rates (Edwards et al., 1984Go; Sakkas et al., 1998Go).

Finally, the transfer procedure in the original series (Scott and Smith, 1998Go) is responsible for the difference in pregnancy rates: three, four, five and six embryos were transferred in patients <30, 30–35, 36–39 and >=40 years of age respectively. In our own series the mean number of embryos was of necessity below three because in Germany only a maximum of three embryos is allowed to be transferred (Ludwig and Diedrich, 1999Go).

Scott and Smith (1998) were the first to propose a score for clinical application. Recently, however, Tesarik and Greco (1999) used the assembly, growth and mutual fusion of nucleolar precursor bodies (NPB) as a parameter for PN oocyte quality assessment. Evaluation was done 12 to 20 h post insemination or post ICSI, and six different patterns of PN stage morphology were proposed. A normal pattern was defined as either the alignment of a mean of four NPB at the contact of the two pronuclei, or a random pattern of more than seven NPB in each pronucleus (pattern 0). These zygotes showed the lowest significant rate of cleavage arrest during further development over the next 1–2 days. Abnormal patterns were defined by a difference >3 between the number of NPB in the two pronuclei (pattern 1), or a reduced number of randomly scattered NPB (<7) (pattern 2), a large number (>7) of polarized NPB at the contact of the two pronuclei (pattern 3), a small number of NPB (<3) in at least one pronucleus (pattern 4), or a polarized distribution of NPB in one pronucleus and a non-polarized distribution in the other (pattern 5). This categorization, however, did not allow a good prediction of embryo morphology. The authors therefore proposed combining several scoring systems, e.g. from Scott and Smith (1998) and their own (Tesarik and Greco, 1999Go). Since this scoring system did not include the further development of the resulting embryos as an essential element, it might well be helpful for the PN scoring required in Germany. For this, however, another, prospective study is required.

The question remains as to which are the best culture conditions for human embryos. This is especially true since sequential media were proposed (Gardner and Lane 1997Go), thus reviving the idea of blastocyst transfer in the minds of most embryologists and clinicians in reproductive medicine. This may, however, work only in a setting where further selection of embryos is possible. Therefore, the practice of blastocyst transfer does not seem to be a good approach under the conditions of the German embryo protection law. It is also an interesting observation from our own study that the mean and cumulative PN scores were significantly different between the group of pregnant and non-pregnant patients, but that the cumulative embryo score was not significantly different between these two groups. This might indicate that in fact the further culture of qualitatively excellent PN oocytes leads to a loss in embryo quality. Consequently, in Germany the transfer at the PN stage would be the best way to circumvent these possibly negative effects of in-vitro culture. To our knowledge, only one prospective randomized study has been done which addressed this topic (Prietl et al., 1993Go). Either PN stages or embryos were transferred at different time points. There was no significant difference between the pregnancy rates achieved by PN transfer or by embryo transfer on day 2. The fact that embryo quality did not improve during in-vitro culture after pre-selection at the PN stage confirms the results of others, who have demonstrated the highly efficient strategy of self-selection of embryos. By that natural strategy at day 3 or day 5, embryos with a much higher implantation rate can be achieved (Dawson et al., 1995Go; Gardner et al., 1998Go).

The use of the PN scoring may help to improve the pregnancy rate even under the conditions of the ESchG. To evaluate this possibility further, a prospective study would be necessary with a score-assisted selection of PN oocyte in one group and a random selection of PN oocytes in another. It is questionable if such an approach is ethical. However, even prospective use of the PN oocyte score in Germany combined with retrospective analysis of a matched control group should make it possible to show whether this score improves pregnancy rates in Germany after selection of the two best PN oocytes.


    Notes
 
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed

Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Al-Hasani, S., Ludwig, M., Gagsteiger, F. et al. (1996) Comparison of cryopreservation of supernumerary pronuclear human oocytes obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and after conventional in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod., 11, 604–607.[Abstract]

Al-Hasani, S., Ludwig, M., Karabulut, O. et al. (1999) Results of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using microprocessor controlled TransferMan Eppendorf Manipulator system. J. Middle East Fertil. Soc., 4, 41–44.

Coetsier, T. and Dhont, M. (1998) Avoiding multiple pregnancies in in-vitro fertilization: who's afraid of single embryo transfer? Hum. Reprod., 13, 2663–2664.[Free Full Text]

Cohen, J. (1998) How to avoid multiple pregnancies in assisted reproduction. Hum. Reprod., 13 (Suppl. 3), 197–214.[Medline]

Dawson, K.J., Conaghan, J., Ostera, G.R. et al. (1995) Delaying transfer to the third day post-insemination, to select non-arrested embryos, increases development to the fetal heart stage. Hum. Reprod., 10, 177–82.[Abstract]

Edwards, R.G. and Beard, H.K. (1997) Oocyte polarity and cell determination in early mammalian embryos. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 3, 863–905.[Abstract]

Edwards, R.G. and Beard, H.K. (1999) Hypothesis: sex determination and germline formation are committed at the pronucleate stage in mammalian embryos. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 5, 595–606.[Free Full Text]

Edwards, R.G., Fishel, S.B., Cohen, J. et al. (1984) Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J. In Vitro Fertil. Embryo Transfer, 1, 3–23.[Medline]

Gardner, D.K. and Lane, M. (1997) Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF? Hum. Reprod. Update, 3, 367–382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gardner, D.K., Schoolcraft, W.B., Wagley, L. et al. (1998) A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in- vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod., 13, 3434–3440.[Abstract]

Ludwig, M. and Diedrich, K. (1999) Regulation of assisted reproductive technology: the German experience. In Brinsden, P.R. (ed.), A Textbook of In Vitro Fertilization and Assisted Reproduction. Parthenon, New York, Vol. 2, pp. 431–434.

Nagy, P.Z., Liu, J., Joris, H. et al. (1994) Time-course of oocyte activation, pronucleus formation and cleavage in human oocytes fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum. Reprod., 9, 1743–1748.[Abstract]

Nagy, Z.P., Janssenswillen, C., Janssens, R. et al. (1998) Timing of oocyte activation, pronucleus formation and cleavage in humans after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with testicular spermatozoa and after ICSI or in-vitro fertilization on sibling oocytes with ejaculated spermatozoa. Hum. Reprod., 13, 1606–1612.[Abstract]

Payne, D., Flaherty, S.P., Barry, M.F. and Matthews, C.D. (1997) Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography. Hum. Reprod., 12, 532–541.[ISI][Medline]

Prietl, G., Al-Hasani, S., Diedrich, K. and Krebs, D. (1993) Pronuclear stage transfer versus embryo stage transfer in patients with tubal block. Hum. Reprod., 8 (Abstract book), 104–105.

Sakkas, D., Shoukir, Y., Chardonnens, D. et al. (1998) Early cleavage of human embryos to the two-cell stage after intracytoplasmic sperm injection as an indicator of embryo viability. Hum. Reprod., 13, 182–187.[Abstract]

Scott, L.A. and Smith, S. (1998) The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval. Hum. Reprod., 13, 1003–1013.[Abstract]

Staessen, C., Janssenswillen, C., van, den Abbeel, E. et al. (1993) Avoidance of triplet pregnancies by elective transfer of two good quality embryos. Hum. Reprod., 8, 1650–1653.[Abstract]

Staessen, C., Nagy, Z.P., Liu, J. et al. (1995) One year's experience with elective transfer of two good quality embryos in the human in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection programmes. Hum. Reprod., 10, 3305–3312.[Abstract]

Steer, C.V., Mills, C.L., Tan, S.L. et al. (1992) The cumulative embryo score: a predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. Hum. Reprod., 7, 117–119.[Abstract]

Tesarik, J. and Greco, E. (1999) The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Hum. Reprod., 14, 1318–1323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wright, G., Wiker, S.R., Elsner, C. et al. (1990) Observations on the morphology of pronuclei and nucleoli in human zygotes and implications for cryopreservation. Hum. Reprod., 5, 109–115.[Abstract]

Submitted on May 24, 1999; accepted on October 15, 1999.