Exposure of actin on the surface of the human sperm head during in vitro culture relates to sperm morphology, capacitation and zona binding

D.Y. Liu1,2,5, G.N. Clarke3 and H.W.G. Baker1,2,4

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Melbourne, 2 Reproductive Services and 3 Andrology Laboratory, Royal Women's Hospital and 4 Melbourne IVF, Melbourne, Australia

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: dyl{at}unimelb.edu.au


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the proportion of motile sperm with actin exposed on the surface of the head and sperm function. METHODS: Semen samples were obtained from normozoospermic men and sperm function tests were performed. Motile sperm selected by swim-up were incubated with actin monoclonal antibody (A-mAb, 1:100) for 2 h, then anti-mouse IgG Dynabeads were used to detect sperm-bound A-mAb. Sperm capacitation was increased by phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) and decreased by bicarbonate-free medium. RESULTS: The proportion of sperm with exposed actin increased with time for up to 2 h incubation. Bicarbonate-free medium significantly decreased the proportion of sperm with exposed actin. PMA significantly enhanced this phenomenon. Sperm bound to zona pellucida (ZP) had a significantly higher proportion with exposed actin than did sperm remaining in medium. Of the 79 samples studied, an average of 9.4% (range 1–27%) of motile sperm had exposed actin after 2 h incubation and this was significantly correlated with sperm normal morphology and ZP binding. CONCLUSION: Exposure of actin on the surface of the sperm head during in vitro culture may be related to membrane modification during sperm capacitation and hence may be a useful marker for this subpopulation of sperm.

Key words: actin/capacitation/morphology motility/sperm–ZP binding


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In fertile men, each ejaculate may contain over several hundred million motile sperm, of which only one is required to fertilize an oocyte and produce a pregnancy. While it is unknown what proportion of motile sperm in the human ejaculate has fertility potential, our recent study showed that on average ~14% of motile sperm are capable of interacting with the zona pellucida (ZP) of human oocytes in vitro (Liu et al., 2003Go). This suggests that the majority of sperm in the ejaculate may not be capable of fertilizing an oocyte. This may be one reason why standard semen analysis results do not provide accurate information about male fertility. Thus, new tests or markers for sperm fertilizing ability are needed to identify subpopulations of sperm with the potential to fertilize.

Actin is a major cytoskeletal protein present in all mammalian cells which plays an important role in regulating cell shape, migration and cellular interaction with extracellular matrices through reversible transformations between monomeric G-actin and filamentous F-actin (Cooper, 1991Go; Aderem, 1992Go). In human sperm, actin has been identified in the acrosome, post-acrosomal area, neck and principal piece of the tail (Clarke et al., 1982Go; Virtanen et al., 1984Go; Ochs and Wolf, 1985Go; Fouquet and Kann, 1992Go). Castellani-Ceresa et al. (1993)Go showed that actin is mainly in the monomeric form in uncapacitated boar sperm and that it polymerizes to filamentous actin after capacitation. In several other mammalian species including humans, actin polymerization in sperm plays an important role during capacitation and the acrosome reaction (AR) (Brener et al., 2003Go; Cabello-Agueros et al., 2003Go). Inhibition of actin polymerization with cytochalasin D blocks guinea-pig and human sperm penetration into zona-free hamster oocytes (Rogers et al., 1989Go). Castellani-Ceresa et al. (1993)Go also found that cytochalasin D inhibits boar fertilization in vitro.

In endocrine and secretory cells, the actin network plays an important role in the regulation of exocytosis (Koffer et al., 1990Go; Burgoyne et al., 1991Go; Dudani and Ganz, 1996Go). Our previous work using dual-fluorescent stains for actin and acrosomal contents on the same human sperm showed that actin was abundant in the acrosomal region and that it was lost following the AR (Liu et al., 1999Go). Blocking actin polymerization in human sperm with cytochalasin B or D or an anti-actin monoclonal antibody (A-mAb) inhibited the ZP-induced AR (Liu et al., 1999Go, 2002Go). From such evidence it is suggested that actin plays an important role in the human acrosome reaction (Spungin et al., 1995Go; Liu et al., 1999Go).

In a previous study of 17 sperm samples we found that ~10% of motile sperm had exposed actin detectable by second antibody-coated beads binding to an A-mAb after 2 h incubation in vitro and that there was wide variation between individual sperm samples (Liu et al., 2002Go). Immunofluorescence localization of the A-mAb in live capacitated sperm was in the equatorial segment and also, to a lesser extent, the anterior part of the acrosome. The A-mAb does not affect sperm–ZP binding but significantly reduces the ZP-induced AR after binding to the ZP. It is possible that exposure of actin on the surface of the sperm head is an integral part of the process of membrane modification during sperm capacitation or initiation of the AR. Therefore, assessment of the proportion of motile sperm exposing actin during in vitro culture may be a useful marker for sperm capacitation or other aspects of sperm fertilizing ability. In this study, we have used A-mAb and Dynabeads coated with a second anti-IgG antibody to determine the proportion of sperm exposing actin during in vitro culture and have related this to other sperm characteristics and sperm–ZP binding ability. We also varied conditions known to affect capacitation. We tested sperm in semen which were uncapacitated, or after washing and exposure to low bicarbonate to inhibit capacitation (Boatman and Robbins, 1991Go) or addition of phorbol myristate acetate to increase capacitation (Furuya et al., 1993Go; Zhang and Baker, 1997).


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Chemicals and culture medium
The A-mAb of IgG1 class was purchased from ICN Pharmaceuticals Inc. (USA) (Cat. No. 691002). This antibody reacts specifically with all known isoforms of human actin. Human tubal fluid (HTF; Irvine Scientific, USA) medium supplemented with 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA; Commonwealth Serum Laboratory, Australia) (HTF–BSA) was used as a culture medium for all the experiments. Dynabeads coated with anti-mouse IgG (anti-mIgG) were purchased from Dynal (Norway). Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) and Pisum sativum agglutinin conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (PSA–FITC) were from Sigma Chemical Company (USA). An irrelevant monoclonal antibody (4C7) with the same subclass (mouse IgG1) and protein concentration as the A-mAb (1 mg/ml) was used as a negative control whenever the A-mAb was used.

Human oocytes
Oocytes were used that showed no evidence of two or three pronuclei or cleavage at 48–60 h after insemination in conventional IVF. Any remaining cumulus and corona cells or sperm bound to the ZP from the IVF insemination were removed by repeated aspiration of the oocyte using a small glass pipette with an inner diameter (120 µm) slightly smaller than the oocyte diameter. Only morphologically normal and unfertilized oocytes with <10 sperm penetrating the ZP (from IVF insemination) were used for the tests. Degenerated, morphologically abnormal and spontaneously activated oocytes were not used.

Sperm samples and preparation
Semen was obtained by masturbation after 2–3 days of abstinence from 79 men who attended the infertility clinic for fertility assessment and had a sperm concentration >20 x 106/ml. Semen analysis was performed according to World Health Organization (1999)Go criteria using strict sperm morphology (Kruger et al., 1988Go). Motile sperm were selected by a swim-up technique with 1 h incubation as described previously (Liu and Baker, 1996aGo,bGo). The motile sperm were washed with 2 ml fresh HTF–BSA medium by centrifugation and then the sperm pellet was resuspended in fresh HTF–BSA medium to a sperm concentration of 2 x 106/ml for subsequent experiments.

All patients signed consent forms permitting use of their gametes (unfertilized oocytes and sperm samples) for research. The Royal Women Hospital Research and Ethics Committees approved the project.

Sperm–ZP interaction test
Motile sperm (2 x 106 in 1 ml medium) selected by swim-up were incubated with four oocytes in 4-well culture plates (Nunc, Denmark) for 2 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 in air. After this 2 h incubation period, each group of four oocytes was transferred to phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 2 mg/ml BSA. The oocytes were then washed by aspiration with a wide-bore glass pipette (inside diameter ~250 µm) to dislodge sperm loosely adherent to the surface of the ZP. The number of sperm bound tightly to the ZP was counted and recorded. Oocytes with >100 sperm bound were recorded as 100 since it is impossible to count the number accurately when it is >100. Binding of >100 sperm per ZP indicates normal ZP binding. The average number of sperm bound to four oocytes per test was used for statistical analysis.

All sperm bound to the surface of the ZP of the four oocytes were then removed by repeated vigorous aspiration with a narrow-bore glass pipette with an inner diameter (~120 µm) slightly smaller than that of the oocyte (Liu and Baker, 1996aGo,bGo). This procedure was performed on a glass slide with ~3–5 µl PBS containing 0.2% BSA and the dislodged sperm were then smeared in a limited area (~4 x 4 mm) of the slide which was marked with a diamond pen to help find the sperm under the microscope for acrosome assessment. After the pipetting there were usually no sperm remaining bound on the surface of the ZP. Our previous studies confirmed that this pipetting procedure does not affect acrosome status or damage the sperm, as most of them remain motile after removal from the ZP (Liu and Baker, 1994Go, 1996aGo).

In the above sperm–ZP binding experiments, there was no A-mAb added to the insemination medium. Parallel experiments for bead binding on the same sperm samples were performed as described below.

Assessment of acrosome status
The acrosome status of sperm which had been bound to the ZP was determined with fluorescein-labelled Pisum sativum agglutinin (PSA; Sigma Co., USA) as described previously (Cross et al., 1986Go; Liu and Baker, 1996aGo). Sperm smears were fixed in 95% ethanol for 30 min after air-drying and then stained using 25 µg/ml PSA in PBS for 2 h at 4°C. The slides were washed and mounted with distilled water and 200 sperm per sample were counted with a fluorescence microscope using excitation wavelengths of 450–490 nm and oil immersion at a magnification of x400. When more than half the head of a sperm was brightly and uniformly fluorescing, the acrosome was considered intact. Sperm with a fluorescing band at the equatorial segment or without fluorescence (a rare pattern) were considered acrosome-reacted.

Anti-mouse IgG Dynabead test
Dynabeads coated with anti-mouse IgG were used to detect A-mAb on the surface of sperm in the culture medium and after removal from the ZP. The Dynabeads were washed twice with 5 ml HTF–BSA medium and resuspended in the same medium at a concentration of ~4 x 108/ml.

To determine the effect of time of incubation on the exposure of actin on the surface of sperm, motile sperm (2 x 106/ml) were incubated with A-mAb (1:100) for 0, 30 min, 2 and 4 h. The sperm pellets were recovered and washed with 10 ml HTF–BSA medium three times. The sperm pellet was resuspended to 20 x 106/ml with HTF–BSA medium. Finally, 5 µl sperm suspension was mixed with 5 µl of Dynabeads and covered with a coverslip (22 x 22 mm). The percentage of motile sperm with one or more beads bound to the head was counted by scoring 400 motile sperm using a phase-contrast microscope at magnification of x400 (Figure 1).



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Examples of anti-mIgG-coated Dynabead binding to the heads of motile sperm after exposure to control 4C7 mAb (A) or anti-actin mAb (B, C, D). (A) No bead binding to sperm with control mAb. (B, C and D) One to four beads binding to the acrosomal or the equatorial regions of the sperm head. Photographed with original x400 magnification (bar=20 µm).

 
In order to assess actin exposure on sperm which had bound to the surface of the ZP, after 2 h incubation of oocytes with sperm (2 x 106/ml) and either A-mAb or control 4C7-mAb (1:100), the oocytes were transferred to HTF–BSA medium and washed with four changes of 1 ml medium. Sperm bound to the surface of the ZP were removed by aspiration with a small-bore pipette into ~4 µl of medium on a glass slide. Then 3 µl of anti-mIgG Dynabead (1.2 x 106) suspension was added, mixed with the sperm and covered with a small coverslip (~4 mm2). The percentage of sperm with one or more beads bound to the head was assessed by counting 100 motile sperm. Sperm recovered from the incubation medium were also washed three times with 10 ml HTF–BSA medium and 5 µl of the resuspended pellet (0.2 x 106 sperm) was mixed with 5 µl of the bead suspension (2 x 106) and covered with a coverslip. The percentage of sperm with beads bound was determined by counting 200 motile sperm.

Effect of sperm capacitation conditions on sperm exposing actin
To determine whether capacitation state could affect the proportion of sperm exposing actin on the surface, motile sperm were incubated for 2 h in HTF–BSA medium containing 1:100 A-mAB with (test) or without (control) 15 µmol/l PMA (Furuya et al., 1993Go), or in bicarbonate-free medium (HTF–HEPES) to inhibit capacitation (Boatman and Robbins, 1991Go). The proportions of sperm with exposed actin were assessed and compared between the test and control groups. Uncapacitated sperm in semen (0.1 ml) were also directly incubated in medium (0.5 ml) containing 1:100 A-mAb for 2 h and the proportion of sperm with exposed actin was assessed.

Statistical analysis
The significance of the differences between sperm with exposed actin under the various conditions was examined by non-parametric (Friedman and Wilcoxon rank sum) tests. Correlations between the proportion of motile sperm with exposed actin and sperm characteristics were examined by the non-parametric Spearman test. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine which of the sperm test results were most significantly associated with the proportion of sperm with exposed actin.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Appearance of Dynabead binding to motile sperm exposing actin
The beads preferentially bound to the sperm head in the region of the acrosome, particularly the equatorial segment (Figure 1). Anti-mIgG beads did not bind to sperm incubated with control mAb (4C7). The bead binding results were highly reproducible for two observers assessing the same samples (mean difference 0.1%, SD 2%, n=35).

Time-course of A-mAb binding to human sperm
For all the experiments, motile sperm were preincubated for 1 h during swim-up preparation and also two subsequent washes before exposing sperm to the A-mAb. The time-course study showed that increasing the time of incubation of sperm with the A-mAb up to 2 h increased the percentage of sperm which bound beads. However, prolonging the incubation to 4 h did not result in any further increase in bead binding (Figure 2). Similar results were also obtained when sperm were incubated with A-mAb for 2 h or preincubated for 1.5 h and then incubated with A-mAb for 30 min (n=7, mean±SD, 8.2±5.4 versus 8.1±4.9%, not significant). We used 2 h incubation of sperm with the A-mAb for all subsequent experiments.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of time of incubation of sperm with anti-actin mAb on proportion of motile sperm with exposed actin. A bar graph of means with SEM error bars (n=23); Friedman test, all times: P<0.001; and Wilcoxon test: 0 versus 0.5 h: P<0.001; 0.5 versus 2 h: P<0.001; 0.5 versus 4 h: P<0.001; 2 versus 4 h: P=0.54 (not significant).

 
Effect of capacitation conditions on exposure of actin on the sperm
When sperm in semen were directly incubated with 1:100 dilution of A-mAb for 2 h, there was an average of only 0.2% (range 0–1%) of motile sperm with exposed actin. In contrast, incubation of motile sperm obtained by swim-up into culture medium with the same concentration of A-mAb for 2 h resulted in an average of 7.3% (range 4–14%) of sperm with exposed actin (n=12, P < 0.001). Furthermore, incubation of sperm in medium containing 15 µmol/l PMA significantly increased the proportion of sperm with exposed actin (Figure 3). On the other hand, when the same sperm were incubated in bicarbonate-free medium, only 3.6% of sperm reacted with the A-mAb, which was significantly lower than sperm incubated in HTF medium (Figure 3).



View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Comparison of the proportions of motile sperm with exposed actin after 2 h incubation of swim-up motile sperm in standard medium with or without (control) 15 µmol/l phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), or in bicarbonate-free medium (HEPES). Sperm samples from 12 men were exposed to each of these conditions. PMA significantly (P<0.001) increased the proportion of sperm exposing actin compared with control. Samples in semen (P<0.001) or incubated in HEPES medium (P<0.001) had significantly lower proportions of motile sperm with exposed actin compared with the control swim-up motile sperm in the medium (Wilcoxon test).

 
Exposure of actin on the surface of ZP-bound sperm
Dynabeads were bound to the heads of an average of 10.7% (range 3–25%) of motile sperm in the culture medium and 48% (range 10–81%) of sperm removed from the ZP after 2 h incubation (Figure 4). A significantly higher percentage of sperm removed from the ZP-bound A-mAb than did those remaining in the culture medium (Figure 4, P<0.001), and there was a significant correlation between the percentages (Spearman {rho}=0.68, P=0.008). That is, when sperm were incubated with the A-mAb and oocytes for 2 h, the proportion of sperm with exposed actin after recovery from the surface of the ZP was higher, but also related to the percentage of sperm with exposed actin in the culture medium.



View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Comparison of the proportions of motile sperm with exposed actin in the insemination medium and after binding to the zona pellucida (ZP) in the presence of the actin mAb (1:100). The ZP-bound sperm had a significantly higher proportion of sperm with exposed actin than did those in the insemination medium (n=21, Wilcoxon test P<0.001).

 
Relationship between the proportion of sperm exposing actin and sperm characteristics
The percentage of motile sperm with exposed actin was assessed by 2 h incubation with the A-mAb followed by exposure to anti-mIgG Dynabeads in 79 normospermic men (mean 9.4%, range 1–27%, Table I). There was a significant correlation between the percentages of sperm with exposed actin and sperm motility (Figure 5A), normal sperm morphology in semen (Figure 5B), and number of sperm bound per ZP (Figure 5C). The correlation between the proportion of sperm with beads bound and the ZP-induced AR was not statistically significant (n=55, Spearman {rho}=0.244, P=0.073).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Results of semen analysis, sperm–zona pellucida (ZP) binding and the proportion of motile sperm with anti-mouse IgG beads bound after sperm prepared by swim-up had been incubated with the anti-actin mAb for 2 h (sperm with exposed actin)

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. The proportions of motile sperm with exposed actin after 2 h incubation correlated with sperm motility (A, n=79, Spearman {rho}=0.269, P=0.017), normal sperm morphology in semen (B, n=79, Spearman {rho}=0.521, P<0.001) and sperm–zona pellucida binding (C, n=61, Spearman {rho}=0.537, P<0.001).

 
Multiple regression analysis showed that normal sperm morphology (regression coefficient=0.255, SE=0.067, P<0.001) and number of sperm bound/ZP (regression coefficient=0.069, SE=0.023, P=0.003) were the variables most significantly related to the percentage of sperm with binding to A-mAb and sperm motility was not significant when these two factors were included in the model.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The present study has shown that the proportion of sperm exposing actin on the surface as assessed with a primary anti-actin mAb and a secondary anti-IgG mAb attached to Dynabeads was related to the time of incubation during in vitro culture, the sperm capacitation state, sperm characteristics such as morphology, and the ability of sperm to bind to the ZP. This study therefore provides further evidence of the important role of actin in sperm function. Exposure of actin on the surface of motile sperm may provide a useful marker for the sub-population of sperm with potential to fertilize.

The beads bind exclusively to the sperm head, particularly the equatorial segment and acrosome and not the neck and tail of motile sperm. Our previous study using immunofluorescent labelling also showed that actin was exposed in the acrosome and equatorial segment on ~10% of motile sperm after 2 h incubation in standard culture conditions (Liu et al., 2002Go). We suspect that this pattern of exposure of actin on the sperm head is related to capacitation or the initiation of the acrosome reaction because the membrane vesiculation is believed to start immediately anterior to the equatorial segment (Yanagimachi, 1994Go). However, sperm with detectable actin exposure on the surface still had an intact acrosome with no structural damage of plasma and acrosomal membranes since these motile sperm did not stain with either Hoechst 33258 or propidium iodide (Liu et al., 2002Go, unpublished observation). It has been reported previously that capacitation induces actin polymerization in boar sperm (Castellani-Ceresa et al., 1993Go). It is possible that changes in the plasma membrane during capacitation may facilitate exposure of actin epitopes on sperm, as observed in this study. There are several precedents for actin exposure on the surface of the plasma membranes of somatic cells. For example, endothelial cell surface actin serves as a binding site for plasminogen, tissue plasminogen activator and lipoprotein (Dudani and Ganz, 1996Go). Also, Owne et al. (1978)Go reported the presence of actin on the surface of human B lymphocytes. The exact molecular state of the cell surface-exposed actin requires further study.

Our previous study showed that both Dynabead labelling and immunofluorescence can be used for detecting actin exposure on motile sperm, and similar results were obtained when the same samples were assessed by these two methods (Liu et al., 2002Go). We used Dynabead labelling instead of immunofluorescence in this study because the former is simpler and easier to score large numbers of motile sperm for a large number of samples. In this study, maximum binding was observed after 2 h incubation of sperm with A-mAb. Since sperm had been incubated for 1 h during the preparatory swim-up procedure, sperm had a total of 3 h incubation in vitro. During sperm capacitation, the sperm plasma membrane undergoes numerous biochemical and molecular modifications. The major changes include removal of cholesterol from the plasma membrane which alters membrane fluidity and subsequent sequential changes including an increase in bicarbonate uptake, activation of adenyl cyclase and protein kinase A and then an increase in protein tyrosine phosphorylation (Yanagimachi, 1994Go; Visconti and Kopf, 1998Go). Although various markers have been used for human sperm capacitation, the process has still not been well defined and the exact specificity of the markers is unclear. Capacitation conditions clearly affect the proportion of sperm exposing actin. Incubation of sperm with PMA, which promotes sperm capacitation, increased the proportion of sperm exposing actin. Incubation of sperm in bicarbonate-free medium, which inhibits the acrosome reaction, decreased the proportion of sperm exposing actin. Furthermore, the presence of seminal plasma reduced actin exposure on sperm. All of these observations are consistent with exposure of actin to the surface being related to the state of capacitation.

PMA also induces acrosomal ruffling which is dependent on actin polymerization events but not the PKC pathway. PMA-induced acrosomal ruffling can be inhibited by cytochalasin B or D (inhibitors of actin polymerization). PMA-induced acrosomal ruffling may also be related to PMA-enhanced sperm actin exposure observed in this study. Interestingly, although PMA induces acrosomal ruffling and enhances the ZP-induced AR, it is not capable of inducing the AR (Liu et al., 2002Go).

In this study we observed in normozoospermic men with unknown fertility that an average of only 10% of motile sperm exposed actin under standard capacitation conditions. Eisenbach (1999)Go found that only a small fraction of the sperm population (average 10%) was chemotactically responsive and he suggested that this was the subpopulation of capacitated sperm. Recently we showed that an average of 14% of motile sperm from fertile men and 4% from normozoospermic infertile men were capable of binding to the ZP in vitro with standard culture conditions (Liu et al., 2003Go). Therefore, capacitated sperm with exposed actin may reflect the small subpopulation of sperm which have the potential for specific interaction with the ZP.

There is a significant correlation between the percentage of motile sperm binding A-mAb after 2 h incubation and sperm motility and morphology in semen and sperm–ZP binding, which are important indicators for sperm fertilizing capacity. These results suggest that exposure of actin on the surface of the sperm head may reflect the functional competence of the sperm. In insemination medium, an average of 9.4% of motile sperm had exposed actin. In contrast, 44% of sperm, which had been attached to the ZP, had exposed actin. The proportion of sperm in insemination medium with exposed actin was highly correlated with the number of sperm bound/ZP. This relationship may indicate that (i) sperm with exposed actin are more capable of binding to the ZP, or (ii) more sperm expose actin during initiation of the ZP-induced AR following binding to the ZP. However, the actin exposed on the surface of sperm is unlikely to be directly involved as a sperm receptor for binding to the ZP since the addition of A-mAb to sperm and oocytes in culture medium does not inhibit sperm–ZP binding but does block the ZP-induced AR after the sperm have bound to the zona (Liu et al., 2002Go). Actin polymerization appears to be critical for the ZP-induced AR but not for sperm–ZP binding (Liu et al., 2002Go). A recent study showed that a newly identified sperm-specific protein, Haprin, plays an important role in the membrane fusion process during the initiation of the human AR via association with actin filaments and components of the SNARE regulatory complex (Kitamura et al., 2003Go). Antibodies to SNARE proteins can block the ionomycin-induced AR in bovine sperm in vitro (Ramalho-Santos et al., 2000Go).

In conclusion, this study has shown that an average of 9.4% of motile sperm expose actin on the surface of the head in the equatorial region and acrosome after 2 h incubation, and that the percentage is significantly correlated with sperm morphology in semen and the ability of sperm to bind to the ZP. The proportion of sperm with exposed actin is dependent upon capacitation conditions. Thus, the proportion of sperm exposing actin during in vitro culture may reflect the small subpopulation of sperm with fertilizing ability.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The authors thank Mingli Liu for technical assistance, the scientists in both Royal Women's Hospital and Melbourne IVF Laboratories for collecting the oocytes, and the scientists in the Andrology Laboratory for collecting sperm samples.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Aderem A (1992) Signal transduction and the actin cytoskeleton: the roles of MARCKS and profilin. Trends Biochem Sci 17, 438–443.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Boatman DE and Robbins RS (1991) Bicarbonate: carbon-dioxide regulation of sperm capacitation, hyperactivated motility and acrosome reaction. Biol Reprod 44, 806–813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brener E, Rubinstein S, Cohen G, Shternall K, Rivlin J and Breitbart H (2003) Remodelling of the actin cytoskeleton during mammalian sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction. Biol Reprod 68, 837–845.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Burgoyne RD, Handel SE and Morgan A (1991) Calcium, the cytoskeleton and calpactin (annexin II) in exocytotic secretion from adrenal chromaffin and mammary epithelial cells. Biochem Soc Trans 19, 1085–1090.[ISI][Medline]

Cabello-Agueros J, Hernandez-Gonzalez EO and Mujica A (2003) The role of F-actin cytoskeleton associated gelsolin in the guinea pig capacitation and acrosome reaction. Cell Motil Cytoskel 56, 94–108.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Castellani-Ceresa L, Mattioli M, Radaelli G, Barboni B and Brivio MF (1993) Actin polymerization in boar spermatozoa: fertilization is reduced with use of cytochalasin D. Mol Reprod Dev 36, 203–211.[ISI][Medline]

Clarke GN, Clarke FM and Wilson S (1982) Actin in human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 26, 319–327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cooper JA (1991) The role of actin polymerization in cell motility. Annu Rev Physiol 53, 585–605.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Cross NL, Morales P and Overstreet JW (1986) Two simple methods for detecting acrosome-reacted human sperm. Gamete Res 5, 213–226.

Dudani AK and Ganz PR (1996) Endothelial cell surface actin serves as a binding site for plasminogen, tissue plasminogen activator and lipoprotein (a). Br J Haematol 95, 168–178.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Eisenbach M (1999) Mammalian sperm chemotaxis and its association with capacitation. Dev Genet 25, 87–89.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Fouquet JP and Kann ML (1992) Species-specific localisation of actin in mammalian spermatozoa: fact or artifact? Microsc Res Tech 20, 251–258.[ISI][Medline]

Furuya S, Endo Y, Osumi K, Oba M and Suzuki S (1993) Effects of modulators of protein kinase C on human sperm capacitation. Fertil Steril 59, 1285–1290.[ISI][Medline]

Kitamura K, Tanaka H and Nishimune Y (2003) Haprin, a novel haploid germ cell-specific RING finger protein involved in the acrosome reaction. J Biol Chem 278, 44417–44423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Koffer A, Tatham PER and Gomperts D (1990) Changes in the state of actin during the exocytotic reaction of permeabilized rat mast cells. J Cell Biol 111, 919–927.[Abstract]

Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF and Oehninger S (1988) Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilisation. Fertil Steril 49, 112–117.[ISI][Medline]

Liu DY and Baker HWG (1994) Disordered acrosome reaction of sperm bound to the zona pellucida (ZP): a newly discovered sperm defect causing infertility with reduced sperm-ZP penetration and reduced fertilisation in vitro. Hum Reprod 9, 1694–1700.[Abstract]

Liu DY and Baker HWG (1996a) Relationship between the zona pellucida (ZP) and ionophore A23187 induced acrosome reaction and the ability of sperm to penetrate the ZP in men with normal sperm-ZP binding. Fertil Steril 66, 312–315.[ISI][Medline]

Liu DY and Baker HWG (1996b) A simple method for assessment of the human acrosome reaction of spermatozoa bound to the zona pellucida: lack of relationship with ionophore A23187-induced acrosome reaction. Hum Reprod 11, 551–557.[Abstract]

Liu DY, Martic M, Clarke GN, Dunlop ME and Baker HWG (1999) An important role of actin polymerization in the human zona pellucida-induced acrosome reaction. Mol Hum Reprod 5, 941–949.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liu DY, Martic M, Clarke GN, Grkovic I, Garrett C, Dunlop ME and Baker HWG (2002) An anti-actin monoclonal antibody inhibits the zona pellucida-induced acrosome reaction and hyperactivated motility of human sperm. Mol Hum Reprod 8, 37–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liu DY, Garrett C and Baker HWG (2003) Low proportions of spermatozoa can bind to the zona pellucida of human oocytes. Hum Reprod 18, 2382–2389.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ochs D and Wolf DP (1985) Actin in ejaculated human sperm cells. Biol Reprod 33, 1223–1226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Owne MJ, Auger J, Barber BH, Edwards AJ, Walsh FS and Crumpton MJ (1978) Actin may be present on the lymphocyte surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75, 4484–4488.[Abstract]

Ramalho-Santos J, Moreno RD, Sutovsky P, Chan AWS, Hewitson L, Wessel GM, Simerly CR and Schatten G (2000) SNAREs in mammalian sperm: possible implication for fertilization. Dev Biol 223, 54–69.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Rogers BJ, Bastias C, Coulson RL and Russell LD (1989) Cytochalasin D inhibits penetration of hamster eggs by guinea pig and human spermatozoa. J Androl 10, 275–282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Spungin B, Margalit I and Breitbart H (1995) Sperm exocytosis reconstructed in a cell-free system: evidence for the involvement of phospholipase C and actin filaments in membrane fusion. J Cell Sci 108, 2525–2535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Virtanen I, Bradley RA, Paasivuo R and Lehto VP (1984) Distinct cytoskeletal domains revealed in sperm cells. J Cell Biol 99, 1083–1091.[Abstract]

Visconti PE and Kopf GS (1998) Regulation of protein phosphorylation during sperm capacitation. Biol Reprod 59, 1–6.[Free Full Text]

World Health Organization (1999) WHO Laboratory Manual for Examination of Human Semen and Semen–Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–20.

Yanagimachi R (1994) Mammalian fertilisation. In Knobil E and Neill J (eds) The Physiology of Reproduction, 2nd edn. pp. 189–317.

Zhang Z and Baker HWG (1997) The effect of 12-myristate 13-acetate phorbol ester on human sperm hyperactivation. Fertil Steril 67, 1140–1145.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Submitted on September 23, 2004; resubmitted on November 23, 2004; accepted on December 7, 2004.





This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF )
All Versions of this Article:
20/4/999    most recent
deh716v1
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My Personal Archive
Download to citation manager
Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Liu, D.Y.
Articles by Baker, H.W.G.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Liu, D.Y.
Articles by Baker, H.W.G.