1 Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht and 2 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
3 To whom the correspondence should be addressed. Email: e.r.klinkert{at}azu.nl
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: antral follicles/gonadotrophin dose/IVF/poor response/randomized study
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Patients who respond poorly during IVF treatment are known to have poorer pregnancy prospects than normal responders (Pellicer et al., 1987), although poor responders without other evidence of diminished ovarian reserve have reasonable pregnancy rates (Lashen et al., 1999
; Biljan et al., 2000
). To improve the recruitment and development of the follicles, most clinicians increase the dose of gonadotrophins in the next cycle in case of a poor response. The debate as to whether or not a dose increase has any value in the treatment of poor responders is still ongoing (Land et al., 1996
; Lashen et al., 1998
; Khalaf et al., 2002
).
To optimize ovarian stimulation in a first IVF cycle, it is important to recognize potentially poor responders. Age and basal FSH are two commonly used markers to predict the ovarian response in IVF. Older patients and patients with elevated basal FSH levels are known to be at risk of developing a poor response during IVF treatment (Scott et al., 1989; Marcus and Brinsden, 1996
; Ron-El et al., 2000
). These patients can be designated as expected poor responders.
However, several studies have shown that the antral follicle count (AFC) is a better predictor of poor response than age and basal FSH, because it shows a better correlation with the number of oocytes at oocyte retrieval (Tomas et al., 1997; Chang et al., 1998
; Frattarelli et al., 2000
; Nahum et al., 2001
; Hsieh et al., 2001
; Bancsi et al., 2002
). The AFC also provided the best reflection of reproductive age in normal fertile volunteers (Scheffer et al., 2003
) and a recent meta-analysis comparing the AFC with basal FSH confirmed the superiority of the former (Hendriks et al., 2004
).
Measuring the number of antral follicles on ultrasound just prior to the start of the stimulation with gonadotrophins is a simple procedure, with a good intra- and inter-observer reproducibility (Scheffer et al., 2002). It provides important information on what to expect from the subsequent IVF treatment. When a low number of antral follicles is found, the patient is at high risk of developing a poor response in IVF.
Several publications have suggested that the AFC could be used to optimize stimulation protocols in IVF (Ng et al., 2000; Kupesic et al., 2003
; Popovic-Todorovic et al., 2003
). In the present study the AFC was used to identify patients who were at risk of developing a poor response during their first IVF treatment. These expected poor responders were asked to participate in a randomized controlled trial comparing the standard starting dose of 150 IU of rFSH with the double dose of 300 IU. The aim of this trial was to determine whether this group of patients would benefit from a higher starting dose of gonadotrophins.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The AFC was used for the selection of patients, because it was shown to be the best single predictor of poor ovarian response (Bancsi et al., 2002). Addition of basal FSH to the prediction model slightly improves the error rate (87% correct predictions versus 80% when only the AFC is used). However, we wished to screen all first cycle IVF patients for a low AFC in order to assess their eligibility for the study, without deviating from our standard protocol. As a baseline ultrasound before initiation of stimulation is part of our routine protocol and measurement of basal FSH is not, the expectation of poor response was based on the AFC alone.
Patients with <5 antral follicles prior to the start of the IVF stimulation were considered to be at risk of developing a poor response during their first IVF treatment. When <5 antral follicles of 25 mm were present, a recount was done by a second investigator who was not involved in this trial. After confirmation of the low count by the second investigator, the patient was asked to participate in the trial.
The threshold between 4 and 5 antral follicles of 25 mm was based on the study by Tomas et al. (1997) where patients with <5 follicles measuring 25 mm were classified as patients with inactive ovaries. After studying different threshold levels in our own database of AFC, a threshold of <5 follicles appeared to have the lowest error rate for the prediction of poor response (Bancsi et al., 2004
).
Poor response was defined as the collection of <4 oocytes at oocyte retrieval or cancellation due to an insufficient reaction to the stimulation with gonadotrophins (<3 follicles on ultrasound). This definition is based on the assumption that at least four oocytes are needed to have an average of two embryos available for transfer, given a mean fertilization rate of 5060% in IVF (Bancsi et al., 2002). Although there are other possible definitions, many studies use the same definition (Dor et al., 1992
; van Hooff et al., 1993
; Hanoch et al., 1998
; Hugues and Cedrin, 1998
; Surrey et al., 1998
; Pinkas et al., 2000
; El Toukhy et al., 2002
). It appears to be the most widely used definition of poor response.
Also patients who were normally excluded from IVF treatment at our centre because of age (4146 years) or basal FSH (>15 IU/l) could enter this study provided they had <5 follicles on ultrasound. The other inclusion criteria were: a regular spontaneous menstrual cycle of 2535 days, the presence of both ovaries and written informed consent.
Although there are indications that the bioavailability of gonadotrophins is lower in obese women (Chan et al., 2003), there is no conclusive evidence that body mass index (BMI) is a predictive factor of ovarian response (Popovic-Todorovic et al., 2003
). Therefore patients with a high BMI were not excluded from participation in the present study.
Fifty-three women were recruited for this study (Figure 1). In one patient the second investigator could not confirm the poor response AFC category and this patient was not randomized. All patients who were eligible for the study agreed to participate. From these patients, baseline parameters such as age, basal FSH, BMI, cause and duration of infertility were collected from their medical record. They were randomized by opening a sealed envelope that contained information on the starting dose: 150 IU of rFSH (standard dose, group I) or 300 IU of rFSH (study dose, group II). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.
|
The stimulation was monitored using transvaginal ultrasonography and estradiol measurements. In patients who were stimulated with the standard dose of 150 IU of rFSH, the dose was doubled after 7 days of stimulation if the estradiol level was <200 pmol/l or after 10 days if the estradiol level was <500 pmol/l, based on our clinical practice. In group II (starting dose of 300 IU) the dose remained fixed. hCG [10 000 IU; Profasi; Serono Benelux] was administered 36 h before the transvaginal oocyte collection. If the follicular growth was considered to be insufficient or not present at all, the cycle was cancelled.
The maximum number of embryos replaced was two in women aged <38 years and three in older women. The luteal phase was supported by hCG [Profasi; Serono Benelux] or micronized progesterone (Progestan; Nourypharma BV, The Netherlands). A more detailed description of the protocol used in our centre was published previously (van Kooij et al., 1996).
Statistical analysis
The primary endpoint of this study was the number of oocytes collected at retrieval. Secondary outcome measures were poor response and ongoing pregnancy. We defined ongoing pregnancy as the presence of fetal heart activity on ultrasound at 12 weeks of gestation.
The two treatment groups were compared using the MannWhitney U-test and the 2-test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference between the number of oocytes per group was estimated with linear regression. In the actual analysis the P-value for this test closely resembled the result of the MannWhitney U-test, meaning that there was no great violation of the assumption of normal distribution. Statistics Package for Social Sciences for Windows, version 10.0 (SPSS Inc., USA) was used for data analysis.
The study was designed to detect a difference of two oocytes with a standard deviation of 3.5 oocytes. For this purpose a total number of 50 cases was needed (power of 80% and a significance level of 5%).
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Most patients underwent a conventional IVF treatment. Five patients were indicated for an IVF/ICSI procedure. Twenty-six patients received 150 IU (group I) and 26 received 300 IU of rFSH at the start of the stimulation (group II). The two groups were comparable regarding patient characteristics (Table I). In nine of the patients who started with 150 IU, the dose had to be increased to 300 IU due to an insufficient response. Despite this dose adjustment, all these patients remained poor responders according to the definition we applied.
|
|
There were no cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in the study group. The highest number of oocytes collected was 10, in two patients in group I. The highest estradiol level on the day of the hCG administration was 12 750 pmol/l (group II).
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
This study was designed to detect at least a difference of 2 oocytes in favour of the high stimulation group, but in fact we found slightly fewer oocytes in this group. To detect this difference, 25 oocyte retrievals in each arm were needed. Because 11 low responders did not proceed to oocyte retrieval, there is a risk that this study became underpowered and conclusions only speculative. However, eight of the 11 patients who were cancelled (three in group I and five in group II) showed absolutely no follicular growth or estradiol rise in response to prolonged stimulation. We can therefore assume that an oocyte retrieval in these patients would have led to the collection of 0 oocytes. If we include these patients in the analysis, the mean number of oocytes is 0.5 lower in group II (n=25) compared to group I (n=24), 95% CI of 2.0 to 0.9. Since there was no tendency at all towards a better response in the high dose group, extension of the sample size was not meaningful in our opinion. We believe that the power of the present study may still be sufficient to prove that the use of a higher starting dose is very unlikely to be beneficial in the type of patients we investigated.
To our knowledge this is the first published randomized controlled trial to compare two different starting doses of gonadotrophins in expected poor responders. There is one randomized study on doubling the dose of hMG in poor responders during the course of an IVF treatment cycle (van Hooff et al., 1993). In this study the hMG dose of 225 IU was continued or doubled after 5 days of stimulation in 47 randomized patients with estradiol levels <500 pmol/l. Doubling the hMG dose did not alter the IVF outcome. Also in our study, increasing the dose from 150 to 300 IU had no effect. In our opinion a strategy of increasing the dose during stimulation is therefore not useful.
Theoretically the follicular response might only improve when expected poor responders are stimulated with a high dose of gonadotrophins right from the start of the stimulation, thereby ensuring stimulation of the entire follicular cohort. The results of our study show that neither response nor the probability of pregnancy improved.
The conclusion of the present study is in line with the outcome of several retrospective studies on dose increase in patients with a poor response in the previous cycle (Karande et al., 1990; Pantos et al., 1990
; Manzi et al., 1994
; Land et al., 1996
; Lashen et al., 1998
). In a retrospective analysis performed in our centre, it was shown that expected poor responders have poor cumulative pregnancy rates in IVF (Klinkert et al., 2004
). In that study, expected poor responders were defined as patients aged >41 years and/or patients with elevated FSH levels >15 IU/l. Despite a dose increase after the poor results in the first cycle, most of these patients remained poor responders in the subsequent cycles. Stimulation with high doses of gonadotrophins seems to be unrewarding in these patients, since the outcome of the treatment remains poor. However, since poor responders who achieved a pregnancy in their first treatment cycle by definition were not included in these retrospective studies, definite conclusions are impossible.
In two randomized trials comparing low and high starting doses of gonadotrophins in an unselected IVF population, it was concluded that only young patients benefit from a higher starting dose (Out et al., 2000; Yong et al., 2003
). Since the ovarian reserve in these patients is usually sufficient, their ovaries have the capability to respond to a higher dose by increasing the number of growing follicles in the FSH-sensitive cohort. In contrast, patients of advanced age or with elevated FSH levels or with a low AFC are likely to have a diminished ovarian reserve. These patients respond poorly to ovarian hyperstimulation, because the number of FSH-sensitive follicles is limited. In such patients aggressive stimulation is not expected to increase the number of follicles because there are simply too few. Several alternative stimulation protocols, such as the flare-up protocol, have been suggested for the treatment of poor responders in IVF. However, the efficacy of such alternative regimes has never been established in large-scale prospective randomized trials (Surrey and Schoolcraft, 2000
; Tarlatzis et al., 2003
) and in our opinion any strategy in patients with a diminished ovarian reserve is bound to fail.
The patients participating in the present study are expected to respond poorly during their first IVF stimulation because they have a low AFC. But although the AFC appears to be the best predictor of ovarian response during IVF treatment that is available to date, this test is obviously not perfect. Despite the low AFC, one-third of the patients had a normal response to the ovarian hyperstimulation, according to the definition used. Apparently not all recruited FSH-sensitive follicles were already visible in these patients at the time the AFC was performed. However, the median number of oocytes collected in the so-called normal responders was only 5, ranging from 4 to 10, indicating that the response in most of these patients was very moderate. Moreover, it is unlikely that the presence of patients with a normal response despite a low AFC has a predominant effect on the outcome of this study. Since it is a randomized trial, the distribution of these patients over the two groups is only determined by chance.
Basal FSH values obtained during the infertility work-up were significantly higher in the poor responders, therefore we wondered whether addition of basal FSH and/or age to the AFC would have improved the prediction of poor response in our study group. To evaluate this we performed a post hoc regression analysis. Univariate analysis of these two variables showed no significant association with poor response [odds ratio for FSH 1.10 (CI 0.981.22; P=0.10) and for age 1.02 (0.871.20; P=0.85)]. In a multivariate analysis they were both not selected, indicating that their additional value probably would have been limited.
In conclusion, this study suggests that using a high dose of gonadotrophins in patients with an expected poor response in IVF is unrewarding, since both response and ongoing pregnancy rate cannot be expected to improve. Although difficult to perform, a larger study is recommended to confirm these conclusions.
![]() |
Notes |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD and te Velde ER (2004) Impact of repeated antral follicle counts on the prediction of poor ovarian response in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 81, 3541.[ISI]
Biljan MM, Buckett WM, Dean N, Phillips SJ and Tan SL (2000) The outcome of IVF-embryo transfer treatment in patients who develop three follicles or less. Hum Reprod 15, 21402144.
Chan CC, Ng EH, Chan MM, Tang OS, Lau EY, Yeung WS and Ho PC (2003) Bioavailability of hCG after intramuscular or subcutaneous injection in obese and non-obese women. Hum Reprod 18, 22942297.
Chang MY, Chiang CH, Hsieh TT, Soong YK and Hsu KH (1998) Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 69, 505510.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Dor J, Seidman DS, Ben Shlomo I, Levran D, Karasik A and Mashiach S (1992) The prognostic importance of the number of oocytes retrieved and estradiol levels in poor and normal responders in in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 9, 228232.[ISI][Medline]
El Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Hart R, Taylor A and Braude P (2002) Young age does not protect against the adverse effects of reduced ovarian reservean eight year study. Hum Reprod 17, 15191524.
Frattarelli JL, Lauria-Costab DF, Miller BT, Bergh PA and Scott RT (2000) Basal antral follicle number and mean ovarian diameter predict cycle cancellation and ovarian responsiveness in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Fertil Steril 74, 512517.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Hanoch J, Lavy Y, Holzer H, Hurwitz A, Simon A, Revel A and Laufer N (1998) Young low responders protected from untoward effects of reduced ovarian response. Fertil Steril 69, 10011004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Hendriks DJ, Mol BWJ, Bancsi LFJMM, te Velde ER and Broekmans FJM (2004) The antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis and comparison to basal FSH. Fertil Steril, in press.
Hsieh YY, Chang CC and Tsai HD (2001) Antral follicle counting in predicting the retrieved oocyte number after ovarian hyperstimulation. J Assist Reprod Genet 18, 320324.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Hugues JN and Cedrin DI (1998) Revisiting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols and management of poor ovarian responses to gonadotrophins. Hum Reprod Update 4, 83101.
Karande VC, Jones GS, Veeck LL and Muasher SJ (1990) High-dose follicle-stimulating hormone stimulation at the onset of the menstrual cycle does not improve the in vitro fertilization outcome in low-responder patients. Fertil Steril 53, 486489.[ISI][Medline]
Khalaf Y, el Toukhy T, Taylor A and Braude P (2002) Increasing the gonadotrophin dose in the course of an in vitro fertilization cycle does not rectify an initial poor response. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 103, 146149.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Klinkert ER, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW and te Velde ER (2004) A poor response in the first in vitro fertilization cycle is not necessarily related to a poor prognosis in subsequent cycles. Fertil Steril 81, 12471253.[ISI][Medline]
Kupesic S, Kurjak A, Bjelos D and Vujisic S (2003) Three-dimensional ultrasonographic ovarian measurements and in vitro fertilization outcome are related to age. Fertil Steril 79, 190197.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Land JA, Yarmolinskaya MI, Dumoulin JC and Evers JL (1996) High-dose human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation in poor responders does not improve in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 65, 961965.[ISI][Medline]
Lashen H, Ledger W, Lopez BA, Evans B and Barlow D (1998) Superovulation with a high gonadotropin dose for in vitro fertilization: is it effective? J Assist Reprod Genet 15, 438443.[ISI][Medline]
Lashen H, Ledger W, Lopez-Bernal A and Barlow D (1999) Poor responders to ovulation induction: is proceeding to in-vitro fertilization worthwhile? Hum Reprod 14, 964969.
Manzi DL, Thornton KL, Scott LB and Nulsen JC (1994) The value of increasing the dose of human menopausal gonadotropins in women who initially demonstrate a poor response. Fertil Steril 62, 251256.[ISI][Medline]
Marcus SF and Brinsden PR (1996) In-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in women aged 40 years and over. Hum Reprod Update 2, 459468.
Nahum R, Shifren JL, Chang Y, Leykin L, Isaacson K and Toth TL (2001) Antral follicle assessment as a tool for predicting outcome in IVFis it a better predictor than age and FSH? J Assist Reprod Genet 18, 151155.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Ng EH, Tang OS and Ho PC (2000) The significance of the number of antral follicles prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian responses in an IVF programme. Hum Reprod 15, 19371942.
Out HJ, Braat DD, Lintsen BM, Gurgan T, Bukulmez O, Gokmen O, Keles G, Caballero P, Gonzalez JM, Fabregues F et al. (2000) Increasing the daily dose of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon) does not compensate for the age-related decline in retrievable oocytes after ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 15, 2935.
Pantos C, Thornton SJ, Speirs AL and Johnston I (1990) Increasing the human menopausal gonadotropin dosedoes the response really improve? Fertil Steril 53, 436439.[ISI][Medline]
Pellicer A, Lightman A, Diamond MP, Russell JB and DeCherney AH (1987) Outcome of in vitro fertilization in women with low response to ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 47, 812815.[ISI][Medline]
Pinkas H, Orvieto R, Avrech OM, Rufas O, Ferber A, Ben Rafael Z and Fisch B (2000) Gonadotropin stimulation following GnRH-a priming for poor responders in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer programs. Gynecol Endocrinol 14, 1114.[ISI][Medline]
Popovic-Todorovic B, Loft A, Lindhard A, Bangsboll S, Andersson AM and Andersen AN (2003) A prospective study of predictive factors of ovarian response in standard IVF/ICSI patients treated with recombinant FSH. A suggestion for a recombinant FSH dosage normogram. Hum Reprod 18, 781787.
Ron-El R, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Schachter M, Kasterstein E and Friedler S (2000) Outcome of assisted reproductive technology in women over the age of 41. Fertil Steril 74, 471475.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJ, Bancsi LF, Habbema JD, Looman CW and te Velde ER (2002) Quantitative transvaginal two- and three-dimensional sonography of the ovaries: reproducibility of antral follicle counts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 20, 270275.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, Blankenstein M, Fauser BC, teJong FH and teVelde ER (2003) The number of antral follicles in normal women with proven fertility is the best reflection of reproductive age. Hum Reprod 18, 700706.
Scott RT, Toner JP, Muasher SJ, Oehninger S, Robinson S and Rosenwaks Z (1989) Follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3 are predictive of in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 51, 651654.[ISI][Medline]
Surrey ES and Schoolcraft WB (2000) Evaluating strategies for improving ovarian response of the poor responder undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Fertil Steril 73, 667676.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Surrey ES, Bower J, Hill DM, Ramsey J and Surrey MW (1998) Clinical and endocrine effects of a microdose GnRH agonist flare regimen administered to poor responders who are undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 69, 419424.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Tarlatzis BC, Zepiridis L, Grimbizis G and Bontis J (2003) Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 9, 6176.
Templeton A, Morris JK and Parslow W (1996) Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Science 348, 14021406.
Tomas C, Nuojua-Huttunen S and Martikainen H (1997) Pretreatment transvaginal ultrasound examination predicts ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophins in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 12, 220223.[Abstract]
van Hooff MH, Alberda AT, Huisman GJ, Zeilmaker GH and Leerentveld RA (1993) Doubling the human menopausal gonadotrophin dose in the course of an in-vitro fertilization treatment cycle in low responders: a randomized study. Hum Reprod 8, 369373.[Abstract]
van Kooij RJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD, Dorland M and te Velde ER (1996) Age-dependent decrease in embryo implantation rate after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 66, 769775.[ISI][Medline]
Wood C, McMaster R, Rennie G, Trounson A and Leeton J (1985) Factors influencing pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 43, 245250.[ISI][Medline]
Yong PY, Brett S, Baird DT and Thong KJ (2003) A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 150 IU and 225 IU of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (Gonal-F*) in a fixed-dose regimen for controlled ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 79, 308315.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Submitted on January 5, 2004; resubmitted on September 7, 2004; accepted on November 19, 2004.