1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne and Reproductive Services, Royal Womens Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3053 and 2 Prince Henrys Institute of Medical Research, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Professorial Unit, Royal Womens Hospital, 132 Grattan Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia. E-mail: garrettc{at}unimelb.edu.au
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: automated image analysis/male contraception/spermatogenic suppression/sperm morphometry
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
To develop better targeted and more effective MHC regimens it may also help to establish whether men who fail to suppress to azoospermia represent those for whom spermatogenesis is only partially shut down, or whether these men exhibit the hypospermatogenesis pattern of a general reduction in all germ cell elements with normal maturation. There have been conflicting reports of reduced sperm function in T-induced oligospermic samples (Wu and Aitken, 1989; Liu et al., 1995
; Wang et al., 1997
), but pregnancies have been reported in male contraceptive trials in men with severe oligospermia during the suppression and efficacy (<5 x 106 sperm/ml) phases (WHO, 1996
). The site of the disruption to spermatogenesis and the fertilizing capacity of sperm in T-induced oligospermic samples may be reflected in specific changes in sperm morphology during suppression. Automated image analysis offers reproducible quantification of many morphological characteristics of sperm, providing a particularly sensitive tool for identification of treatment or exposure-induced changes within an individual, or changes within an individual sample resulting from a procedure or physiological process. The sensitivity of our sperm morphometry system has been demonstrated previously by the identification of morphometric selectivity in the human spermzona pellucida binding process (Garrett and Baker, 1995
; Garrett et al., 1997
). This system was used in the present study to examine the detail of morphometric changes during T-induced suppression of spermatogenesis.
In terms of the mechanism of MHC action, both semen analysis and the stereological assessment of testicular tissue can be used to understand the regression of spermatogenesis. Testicular biopsies indentify T-induced impairment of spermatogonial development as an observed decline in type B followed by type Ap spermatogonial number (McLachlan et al., 2002). However, there must also be a major disruption at sperm release in both acute and chronic MHC-induced gonadotropin withdrawal, since control numbers of elongated spermatids are seen in the epithelium after 6 weeks of T treatment when the number of sperm in the ejaculate is reduced to severe oligospermic levels (Zhengwei et al., 1998b
; McLachlan et al., 2002
). Indeed, the general rapid loss of sperm in the ejaculate does not reflect the lesion in spermatogonial development but is consistent with a major disruption to the later processes of spermiogenesis or spermiation (Meriggiola et al., 1996
; Turner et al., 2003
).
Because spermatogenesis occurs at a constant rate and the timing of the cell division is known, the site and type of gonadotrophin-induced disruption to spermatogenesis may be inferred from the time course of changes in semen analysis, including the appearance of immature cells in the ejaculate. The present work seeks to quantify the observed time course of these T-induced changes, particularly with respect to sperm concentration and morphology, and thus facilitate analysis and interpretation of the different patterns of suppression response. To this end, we have chosen the simplest mathematical model consistent with known physiological information to fit the measured decline in sperm concentration. The rate of disappearance of sperm from the ejaculate following vasectomy has been measured and indicates a classical exponential decrease, with each successive ejaculation expelling 70% of sperm remaining distal to the point of vasectomy (Figure 1) (Freund and Davis, 1969
). Similarly, sperm concentration in successive ejaculations over a 24-h period has been found to decrease approximately exponentially, with
50% clearance per ejaculation (Bedford, 1994
). By analogy, if evidence points to an acute T-induced shutdown of spermatogenesis at a specific stage in the cycle, a model to quantify the experimental time course for sperm concentration would describe an exponential decrease from the baseline level, commencing at a time-dependent on treatment response time, epididymal transit time and the site of disruption to spermatogenesis. Also, given that it is known from stereological evaluation that all tubules within an individual do not necessarily respond homogeneously to T treatment (Zhengwei et al., 1998b
), the exponential decay would asymptote toward a value directly related to the overall degree of suppression or completeness of disruption to sperm production. The time course would only asymptote to zero in the case of suppression to azoospermia. The model parameters extracted from the fit to the data therefore include the rate or half-life of the decline from baseline, the lag time describing the delay to onset of decline, and the asymptotic value of the decline. As there is no evidence to suggest otherwise, for our model and interpretation of results we assume that exogenous T does not influence the rate of spermatogenesis or the mechanism of sperm clearance.
|
Concerning the expected pattern of change for other semen variables such as motility and morphology, two patterns can be postulated. If the T-induced decline in sperm production is due to a rapid shutdown of spermatogenesis in a proportion of seminiferous tubules, sperm in the post-treatment ejaculate would represent a combination of sperm from reduced but normal continuous production and normal sperm suffering from progressive degradation or ageing during the flushing process. The resultant time course would be strongly dependent on the proportion of sperm in each category. Alternatively, if the induced sperm suppression mimics the situation of oligospermia as seen commonly in subfertile men where semen variables are universally poor, then one would expect a simultaneous decline in morphology and motility with concentration.
This study involved examining changes in semen variables in the Melbourne participants in two MHC trials: a multicentre intramuscular T (IM-T) trial conducted by the WHO (1996) and a more recent T-implant trial (McLachlan et al., 2000). A relatively low T dose (800 mg) was chosen for the T-implant trial to provide incomplete spermatogenic suppression in some men, in order to test for improvement in contraceptive efficacy by co-treatment with a 5
-reductase inhibitor (finasteride), commenced at the second implant at 3 months. The expected slower and minimal response to the low-dose T-implant, together with more frequent sampling in this trial, provided the opportunity to examine morphometric changes during suppression of spermatogenesis that had not been possible in the previous IM-T trial.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Semen data for 33 Melbourne participants in a multicentre male contraceptive study undertaken by the WHO (1996) were re-analysed for comparison with the T-implant data. In the WHO study, two pretreatment samples were required to meet the same concentration criterion of >20 x 106/ml, but subjects were treated with weekly intramuscular injections of 200 mg TE and samples were requested every 2 weeks after 25 days abstinence. A mean of seven samples/subject were analysed for the period up to 91 days from the first T injection.
Results from the 85 patients selected for sperm concentration between of 310 x 106/ml from a previous study of subfertile couples (Garrett et al., 2003) were used in the comparison of sperm morphometry between pathological and induced oligospermia.
Semen analysis
Semen specimens were collected by masturbation. Semen volume, sperm concentration, total and progressive motility, and viability were measured by standard techniques (WHO, 1992). Total count for an ejaculate is the product of semen volume and sperm concentration.
For morphology assessment, the semen samples were washed with 0.9% NaCl to remove the viscous seminal plasma and re-suspended to a standard concentration of 80 x 106/ml. Air-dried smears were fixed with ethanol and stained using the Shorr method (Jeulin et al., 1986
) and cover-slipped for protection. The morphology assessment of a sample was performed manually by an experienced observer using a modified strict application of the WHO criteria (WHO, 1992
), with particular emphasis on the normality of the acrosome region (Liu and Baker, 1994
). Where the sperm concentration exceeded 3 x 106/ml, the morphometry of each sample was also assessed using our fully automated image analysis system (Garrett and Baker, 1995
). In all cases 200 sperm were assessed per sample. The morphology was expressed as a percent normal (%N) and the morphometry as a set of means and standard deviations for each of the 32 morphometric parameters, in addition to a percent conformity (%C) of sperm with parameters within 2.5 SD of a reference set of normal means (Garrett and Baker, 1995
).
Data analysis
Morphometric differences before and after T-implant. In general, automated morphometric analysis could not be carried out on samples with sperm concentrations <3 x 106/ml. For the T-implant subjects, changes in each sperm morphometry parameter were evaluated by paired t-test on the difference between the mean baseline value and the mean of the last two analysable samples collected post-implant. Owing to the large number of morphometric parameters (n = 32), statistical significance for difference was set using the Bonferroni correction to P < 0.05/32 = 0.0016 in this analysis. An increase in the sperm misidentification rate for this fully automated system is anticipated for samples with low sperm concentrations, since they are usually associated with an increase in the ratio of debris to sperm in the smear. Thus, to check that the morphometric changes observed following suppression of sperm production were not an assessment artefact, these data were also analysed after application of an additional more stringent debris filter in the image analysis which eliminated all imaged objects with area <4.5 µm2.
Morphometry was not performed for the IM-T trial.
Time course for semen variables. The hypothetical time course is parameterized by the equations and illustrated by the graph depicted in Figure 2. The parameter c represents the baseline value of the semen variable Y, whilst b is the parameter defining the minimum value to which this variable asymptotes following treatment at time t = 0. Thus, a non-zero value of b for sperm concentration or total count indicates incomplete suppression of sperm production. The parameter t0 defines the time lag from treatment to the onset of the exponential decrease observed in semen variable Y. The parameter a describes the rate of decrease of Y with time, where the half-life for the decay is related by = ln(2)/a. A zero value of a indicates no change in Y with time.
|
Using unweighted least squares fitting between this model and the measured data for each subject, a set of the time course parameters a, b, c and t0 can be established for each of the semen variables. The values of the deduced parameters are expected to differ between subjects and between semen variables. Particularly in the case of sperm concentration and total count, the time course analysis is expected to be influenced by the variability in the frequency of ejaculation between sample collections. For the ideal application of the model, semen analysis measurements would correspond to sequential ejaculates. Extra ejaculations between the samples analysed would have greatest influence early in the suppression phase, biasing the deduced results to a higher decay rate and, to a lesser extent, shorter lag time than if sequential ejaculations were measured. The effect on parameters b and c would be minimal. The influence of extra ejaculations is expected to be higher in the IM-T study because samples were only analysed every 2 weeks.
For each subject in both the IM-T and T-implant trials, a set of time course parameters was extracted for sperm concentration, total count, total motility and viability. In addition, for the T-implant trial the time course of the morphometry and morphology assessments of %C and %N were also available for analysis. Azoospermic samples obtained within the 91 day study period were included in the fit to the model for sperm concentration and total count but not for other semen variables. Differences between the time course parameters a, t0 and the non-dimensional ratio b/c for each of the semen variables were evaluated using paired t-tests. Relationships between the time course parameters were also examined by linear regression analysis.
Ethics
The study was approved by The Royal Womens Hospital Research and Ethics Committees and the subjects consented to the research on their gametes.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
For the same morphometric parameters, differences between the means for 85 infertility patients with 310 x 106/ml sperm concentration and the means for the baseline samples for the 24 T-implant subjects are included for comparison in Table I. For all the parameters listed in Table I except nA, the patient oligospermic samples show a greater difference from baseline compared with the induced oligospermic samples. This is particularly evident for the optical density derived parameters that are related to acrosome region of the head (Bill, e90). The optical density anterior length parameter (ZaL) had the greatest percentage difference for the oligospermia patients compared with baseline values, but did not show significant change during T-induced suppression.
Time course for semen variables
Representative time course data and fitted curves for sperm concentration and the morphometric %C assessment for four subjects after 800 mg T-implant are shown in Figure 4. One subject in the T-implant trial exhibited no suppression of sperm concentration in the model fitting procedure (a = 0) and was not included in subsequent analysis of the model parameters. The means and standard errors for the parameters of the fitted time course for each of the semen variables measured in the T-implant trial (n = 24) are listed in Table II and summarized graphically in Figure 5. The mean results for the fits to the time course data for the 33 subjects in the IM-T trial are included in Table II. Since the absolute values of the parameters b and c cannot be directly compared between semen variables, the ratio b/c (%), which is a measure of the degree of suppression, is also included in Table II.
|
|
|
The mean sum of least squares for the fit to the model for the total of 57 subjects was compared with the mean sum for a simpler vasectomy clearance model with no lag time (t0 = 0) or residual spermatogenesis (b = 0). The physiological model of this study provided the better fit but because of the wide variability of the data the improvement in goodness of fit did not quite reach significance (P = 0.07).
The t0 values for normal morphology (%N), normal morphometry (%C) and sperm viability were significantly different (P < 0.005) from those for sperm concentration and total count. Both %N and %C assessments of the T-implant trial showed similar lag times that were significantly longer than the corresponding times for sperm concentration and total count (Table II). In both T-implant and IM-T trials, sperm viability had the longest mean delay to onset of decline and sperm motility exhibited an intermediate delay.
In both trials, the mean degree of suppression was significantly greater for sperm concentration and total count compared with the other measured semen variables. Suppression of sperm concentration and total count was also significantly greater for IM-T subjects (b/c = 3%) compared with T-implant subjects (b/c = 15%). Only viability measurements showed a significantly different rate of decay from other semen variables, indicating a comparatively slow decline with time. Good agreement was observed between all fitted time course parameters for the manual and computer-assessed morphology data.
For sperm concentration there was no significant correlation between the baseline time course parameter (c), and either the rate (a) or degree (b/c) of suppression after treatment. Nor was there any relationship between the rate and degree of suppression. A significant negative linear relationship was found between the lag time parameter t0 and the baseline c, in both T-implant and IM-T trials (Figure 6). Lag time was not related to either rate or degree of suppression. Similar results were obtained for the total sperm count parameters. For all measured semen variables, the mean lag time to onset of decline was shorter for the subjects treated with intramuscular injection of 200 mg TE than for those treated with 800 mg T implant (Table II), but the differences were not significant by t-test.
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The minimal changes measured for specific sperm morphometry parameters after T-implant support the contention that spermatogenisis is disrupted at spermiation, although the increase in the ratio of seminal debris to sperm in sequential samples as the sperm number declines introduces the possibility that the measured changes are an artefact of the progressive increase in the computer misidentification rate of sperm. However, the observed morphometry changes remained after an additional size threshold was applied as a more stringent debris filter. In addition, the substantial agreement between the changes in the computer assessment %C and the manual morphology assessment %N indicates that the decrease in %C is unlikely to be simply related to an increase in misidentification rate of sperm using the automated system.
In the rat, T-induced gonadotrophin suppression disrupts maturation of round to elongated spermatids and is accompanied by the sloughing of round spermatids into the genital tract (ODonnell et al., 1996). This does not occur in the human, since round spermatid number in the semen has been reported to decrease in parallel with sperm concentration during T-induced suppression of spermatogenesis (Zhengwei et al., 1998a
). While our automated morphometric analysis system cannot detect immature sperm specifically, there was no evidence of an increase in neck area or width that would be expected if sperm with cytoplasmic droplets were more prevalent in semen after T treatment. In fact, the observed decrease in head size parameters, particularly those related to the region of the low optical density at the anterior of the head, are consistent with chromatin condensation associated with an increasingly mature sperm population in samples collected during the suppression phase (Bedford et al., 1973
).
Although it is known from stereological evaluation that a major site of disruption to spermatogenesis with gonadotrophin suppression in man is at the spermatogonial stage, the relatively rapid decline of sperm in the ejaculate indicates that later stages must also be affected. The lag time to onset of this decline results from the time required for absorption of the exogenous androgen, suppression of gonadotrophins, the site of disruption to spermatogenesis and the transit time of sperm through the genital tract. The relative time courses for these processes are indicated schematically in Figure 7. Time course data for several semen variables were fitted to a mathematical model representing a delayed but rapid disruption to spermatogenesis.
|
Because of the variability in the data a variety of models could fit the data in a statistical sense, but we chose to fit a model based on the physiology. The assumption of an exponential decrease is supported by both post-vasectomy and rapid multiple ejaculation data for sperm concentration and total count, which have evacuation of sperm reserves at a rate defined by a deduced half-life of between 0.6 and 0.9 ejaculations (Freund and Davis, 1969; Bedford, 1994
). The use of time rather than ejaculation number in our model assumes a regular and universal frequency of ejaculation, which is not practical with human subjects. Variations in the subjects ejaculation frequency would contribute to fluctuations about the general trends (Figure 4) and would not be expected to have a major effect on the mean results for the parameters of the model, but could bias results towards shorter half-life values. However, the mean rate of decrease of sperm concentration or total sperm count (a = 0.15) converts to a 4.6-day half-life and is of the order of one abstinence period (25 days), consistent with the approximately one ejaculation half-life indicated by the vasectomy and rapid multiple ejaculation data. This similarity in rates of decline also suggests that the T-induced disruption at spermiation is a relatively sharp discontinuity, represented schematically in Figure 7 as a step function. Individuals were found to exhibit varying degrees of suppression of sperm concentration with lag times ranging from
0 to 60 days after T-implant and from 0 to 42 days after IM-T. While this heterogeneity may reflect variation in sperm-epididymal transit times or disruption at different sites in the spermatogenic process, it could merely result from differences in ejaculation timing, variable proportions of residual sperm expelled per emission or errors of measurement influencing the model fitting procedure. In some cases the scatter of the data is large relative to the decline in concentration and the least squares fitting is relatively flat across all values of lag time, as in the extreme case of the 60-day lag time (bottom graph Figure 4). Selective removal of such data would tighten the deduced estimates of time course parameters but would lose objectivity.
Striking between subject differences in the degree of spermatogenic inhibition have been observed in stereological studies (Zhengwei et al., 1998b; McLachlan et al., 2002
). Our model takes into account this variability in the degree of disruption by allowing the change in semen variables to asymptote to a value other than zero. The lack of relationship between the lag time (t0) or rate of decline (a) with the degree of suppression (b/c) for sperm concentration is consistent with a common disruption site in a varying proportion of tubules in each subject.
The 35 day shorter lag time to onset of decline in sperm concentration and total count following IM-T injection compared with T-implant is not statistically significant, but a longer period to induce effective gonadotrophin suppression is not unexpected for the implant study. It is possible that a higher frequency of extra ejaculations within the 2-week collection interval in the IM-T study may account for the difference. Lower frequency of ejaculation immediately after T-implant owing to abdominal soreness would similarly influence the results but is considered unlikely. IM-T is expected to affect gonadotrophin secretion within a day, since plasma T levels are very high by this time and 24-h infusion of T affects secretion of LH and FSH within this period (Anderson and Wu, 1996; Wang et al., 1998
). Thus,
12 days of the lag time for suppression of sperm concentration and total count can be attributed to a combination of the epididymal transit time and the time taken for cells to proceed from the final site of major disruption in the spermatogenic process to spermiation.
Indirect estimates of sperm transit time in the human epididymis based on stereological studies of testes after castration vary from 26 to 1923 days (Rowley et al., 1970; Amann and Howards, 1980
; Johnson and Varner, 1988
). Rowley et al. used radiolabelling and X-ray irradiation as markers to measure transit times. They found that on average, most sperm took
12 days to transit the genital tract, with a 121 day variation within the individual (Rowley et al., 1970
). Our deduced lag time to onset of suppression therefore appears to be of the order of the sperm-epididymal transit time. We have also found an inverse relationship between lag time and baseline sperm concentration (Figure 5). Johnson and Varner (1988)
reported longer sperm-epididymal transit times in men with low daily sperm production rates compared with those in men with high daily sperm production rates.
The fact that the mean lag time is found to be equivalent to the sperm-epididymal transit time suggests a significant disruption to sperm production at spermiation, the final stage of spermatogenesis. Testicular biopsies reveal that T-induced gonadotrophin suppression produces a major disruption in spermatogenesis at the transition from type A to type B spermatogonia (Zhengwei et al., 1998b). However, if this were the sole lesion, the observed time lag should include an additional 42-day delay associated with the continued development of germ cells previously produced from spermatogonia and already present in the seminiferous epithelium (Clermont, 1963
). If the major disruption occurred, as in the rat, during maturation of round to elongated spermatids (human stage IIIIV) without affecting later stages, a lag time of
16 days longer than the transit time would be expected (ODonnell et al., 1994
).
To develop better targeted and more efficient MHC regimes it is of a general interest to establish whether men who fail to suppress to azoospermia represent those for whom spermatogenesis is only partially disrupted, or whether these men exhibit the hypospermatogenesis pattern of general impairment of sperm function. The morphometry changes during T-induced suppression are significant, but not large compared with the corresponding differences observed between the means for infertile patients with oligospermia and the baseline values of the study subjects. In particular, differences in the optical density derived parameters for the patient samples were two to four times greater than those for the T suppressed samples, with the greatest difference for the patients observed in the ZaL parameter, which was not found significantly different for the trial subjects. These optical density parameters (Bill, e90, ZaL) are related to the acrosome region of the head and have previously been identified as important factors for natural fertility (Garrett et al., 2003).
There are conflicting reports about sperm quality during T-induced oligospermia. Early work using the zona-free hamster oocyte penetration assay suggested that induced suppression of spermatogenesis caused defective sperm maturation and in-vitro fertilizing capacity (Wu and Aitken, 1989). Interpretation of the results of the work is confounded by false-negative results at low sperm concentrations, which the authors claimed to circumvent by increasing oocyte number and mathematically correcting to a constant motile sperm concentration. A more recent study did not confirm these results (Wang et al., 1997
). In addition, the ability of sperm to bind and penetrate the zona pellucida of human oocytes was not found to be severely impaired in T-induced oligospermic samples (Liu et al., 1995
). Pregnancies at sperm concentrations of <5 x 106/ml during treatment of men with gonadotrophin deficiency and during male contraceptive trials also suggests significant fertilizing capacity of sperm in men with oligospermia associated with low gonadotrophin levels (Burger and Baker, 1984
; WHO, 1996
). The specific morphometric changes observed in sperm during the suppression phase in this study were consistent with induced oligospermia representing partial spermiation failure with normal sperm aging during the flushing process.
In summary, modelling the time course of change in semen variables, including sperm morphometry, during the T-induced suppression of spermatogenesis has provided general support for a rapid disruption to spermatogenesis at spermiation in all or a majority of seminiferous tubules. The effect of the disruption is observed in the semen as an exponential decline in sperm concentration and total count, commencing after a treatment lag time commensurate with T delivery and sperm epididymal transit. The less marked and significantly longer lag times for the decline in the other semen variables are consistent with this concept that sperm in post-treatment semen are from unaffected tubules and clearance of residual sperm in the genital tract.
![]() |
Acknowledgements |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Anderson RA and Wu FC (1996) Comparison between testosterone enanthate-induced azoospermia and oligozoospermia in a male contraceptive study. II. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of once weekly administration of testosterone enanthate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81,896901.[Abstract]
Bedford JM (1994) The status and the state of the human epididymis. Hum Reprod 9,21872199.[Abstract]
Bedford JM, Bent MJ and Calvin H (1973) Variations in the structural character and stability of the nuclear chromatin in morphologically normal human spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 33,1929.[ISI][Medline]
Burger HG and Baker HWG (1984) Therapeutic considerations and results of gonadotropin treatment in male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Ann N Y Acad Sci 438,447453.[ISI][Medline]
Clermont Y (1963) The cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in man. Am J Anat 112,3551.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Freund M and Davis JE (1969) Disappearance rate of spermatozoa from the ejaculate following vasectomy. Fertil Steril 20,163170.[ISI][Medline]
Garrett C and Baker HWG (1995) A new fully automated system for the morphometric analysis of human sperm heads. Fertil Steril 63,13061317.[ISI][Medline]
Garrett C, Liu DY and Baker HWG (1997) Selectivity of the human sperm-zona pellucida binding process to sperm head morphometry. Fertil Steril 67,362371.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Garrett C, Liu DY, Clarke GN, Rushford DD and Baker HWG (2003) Automated semen analysis: zona pellucida preferred sperm morphometry and straight-line velocity are related to pregnancy rate in subfertile couples. Hum Reprod 18,16431649.
Handelsman DJ, Conway AJ and Boylan LM (1992) Suppression of human spermatogenesis by testosterone implants. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75,13261332.[Abstract]
Handelsman DJ, Conway AJ, Howe CJ, Turner L and Mackey MA (1996) Establishing the minimum effective dose and additive effects of depot progestin in suppression of human spermatogenesis by a testosterone depot. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81,41134121.[Abstract]
Jeulin C, Feneux D, Serres C, Jouannet P, Guillet-Rosso F, Belaisch-Allart J, Frydman R and Testart J (1986) Sperm factors related to failure of human in-vitro fertilization. J Reprod Fertil 76,735744.
Johnson L and Varner DD (1988) Effect of daily spermatozoan production but not age on transit time of spermatozoa through the human epididymis. Biol Reprod 39,812817.
Liu DY and Baker HWG (1994) Acrosome status and morphology of human spermatozoa bound to the zona pellucida and oolemma determined using oocytes that failed to fertilize in vitro. Hum Reprod 9,673679.[Abstract]
Liu DY, Johnston R and Baker HWG (1995) Ability of spermatozoa to bind to the zona pellucida during oligozoospermia induced with testosterone during a male contraceptive trial. Int J Androl 18 (Suppl 1),3944.
McLachlan RI, McDonald J, Rushford D, Robertson DM, Garrett C and Baker HWG (2000) Efficacy and acceptability of testosterone implants, alone or in combination with a 5alpha-reductase inhibitor, for male hormonal contraception. Contraception 62,7378.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
McLachlan RI, ODonnell L, Stanton PG, Balourdos G, Frydenberg M, de Kretser DM and Robertson DM (2002) Effects of testosterone plus medroxyprogesterone acetate on semen quality, reproductive hormones, and germ cell populations in normal young men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87,546556.
Meriggiola MC, Bremner WJ, Paulsen CA, Valdiserri A, Incorvaia L, Motta R, Pavani A, Capelli M and Flamigni C (1996) A combined regimen of cyproterone acetate and testosterone enanthate as a potentially highly effective male contraceptive. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81,30183023.[Abstract]
ODonnell L, McLachlan RI, Wreford NG and Robertson DM (1994) Testosterone promotes the conversion of round spermatids between stages VII and VIII of the rat spermatogenic cycle. Endocrinology 135,26082614.[Abstract]
ODonnell L, McLachlan RI, Wreford NG, de Kretser DM and Robertson DM (1996) Testosterone withdrawal promotes stage-specific detachment of round spermatids from the rat seminiferous epithelium. Biol Reprod 55,895901.[Abstract]
Rowley MJ, Teshima F and Heller CG (1970) Duration of transit of spermatozoa through the human male ductular system. Fertil Steril 21,390396.[ISI][Medline]
Turner L, Conway AJ, Jimenez M, Liu PY, Forbes E, McLachlan RI and Handelsman DJ (2003) Contraceptive efficacy of a depot progestin and androgen combination in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88,46594667.
Wang C, Leung A, Superlano L, Steiner B and Swerdloff RS (1997) Oligozoospermia induced by exogenous testosterone is associated with normal functioning residual spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 68,149153.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Wang C, Berman NG, Veldhuis JD, Der T, McDonald V, Steiner B and Swerdloff RS (1998) Graded testosterone infusions distinguish gonadotropin negative-feedback responsiveness in Asian and white mena Clinical Research Center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83,870876.
WHO (1990) Contraceptive efficacy of testosterone-induced azoospermia in normal men. World Health Organization Task Force on methods for the regulation of male fertility. Lancet 336,955959.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
WHO (1992) Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and SpermCervical Mucus Interaction. 3rd edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
WHO (1996) Contraceptive efficacy of testosterone-induced azoospermia and oligozoospermia in normal men. Fertil Steril 65,821829.[ISI][Medline]
Wu FC and Aitken RJ (1989) Suppression of sperm function by depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and testosterone enanthate in steroid male contraception. Fertil Steril 51,691698.[ISI][Medline]
Zhengwei Y, Wreford NG, Bremner WJ, Matsumoto AM, Anawalt BA and McLachlan RI (1998a) Immature spermatids are not prevalent in semen from men who are receiving androgen-based contraceptive regimens. Fertil Steril 69,8995.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Zhengwei Y, Wreford NG, Royce P, de Kretser DM and McLachlan RI (1998b) Stereological evaluation of human spermatogenesis after suppression by testosterone treatment: heterogeneous pattern of spermatogenic impairment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83,12841291.
Submitted on January 28, 2005; resubmitted on May 15, 2005; accepted on June 6, 2005.
|