1 Ultrasound Unit in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv 64239 and 2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel 4 The two first authors contributed equally to this work.
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: osnate{at}post.tau.ac.il
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: catheter loading/laboratory model/mock embryo transfer/transferred matter
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The embryos are transferred into the uterine cavity within a liquid medium following a variety of protocols that vary between clinics. The liquid medium containing the embryos is placed near the distal end of the catheter and separated by air buffer zones to avoid spillage of the embryos (Kan et al., 1999). The rest of the catheter and the syringe are filled either with air (i.e. volumes ranging between 30 and 100 µl) or with a combination of air and liquid media. Replacing the air within the transferred matter with a similar volume of liquid increased the rates of implantation and pregnancy (Meldrum et al., 1987
). It has been advised that while transfer volumes >60 µl may result in expulsion of the embryos through the cervix into the vagina (Poindexter et al., 1986
), volumes of 30 µl may avoid any occurrence of embryo expulsion from the uterus (Mansour et al., 1994
). Recently, it was also suggested that transferred volumes <10 µl as well as the presence of air bubbles may have a negative influence on the implantation rate (Ebner et al., 2001
). In order to avoid ectopic pregnancies, which were recognized as a potential risk of IVF, it was recommended to transfer volumes <30 µl (Yovich et al., 1985
; Nazari et al., 1993
; Marcus and Brinsden, 1995
; Baba et al., 2000
; Ebner et al, 2001
; Bilalis et al., 2002
).
Intrauterine embryo transport after ET is also determined by the pattern of mixing between the transferred media and the uterine fluid, which have different viscosities. While the transferred liquid has a viscosity similar to that of water, the uterine fluid is expected to have a relatively higher viscosity, but information for humans is not available. This assumption may be supported by recent research of the rheological characterization of uterine fluid of mares, which revealed that the gel-like uterine fluid has a viscosity of 1000 centipoise (please note that in SI units 1 Ns/m2 = 103 centipoise) that decreases with increased shear rate or pressure (Allen et al., 2002
). Another study with human cervical mucus revealed minimal values of 15002500 centipoise during ovulation and
105 centipoise during the secretory phase (Karni et al., 1971
). Nevertheless, clinical experiments with a transferred medium of larger viscosities (e.g. 100 times the viscosity of water) did not show an increase in implantation rates (Menezo et al., 1989
).
Once the embryo enters the uterus via normal or assisted reproduction, it is conveyed with the intrauterine fluid motions which are induced and controlled by myometrial contractions for 23 days until implantation occurs (Eytan and Elad, 1999). Clinical studies of ultrasound-guided ET procedures revealed that the introduction of the catheter into the uterine cavity interfered with normal uterine peristalsis and induced irregular contractions that may push the embryo away from the implantation site (Woolcott and Stanger, 1997
; Fanchin et al., 1998
; Lesny et al., 1998
; Ghazzawi et al., 1999
; Ijland et al., 1999
). It has been speculated that withdrawal of the catheter results in movements of the air bubble towards the cervix, which could expel the embryos from the uterus (Poindexter et al., 1986
; Lesny et al., 1998
; Schoolcraft et al., 2001
). In this study, we developed an ET model to investigate the dispersion of the transferred volume within a mock uterine cavity for various protocols of ET in order to study the post-ET positioning of the transferred embryos.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
Each of these cases was simulated three times to ensure reproducibility of the results. The following terminology will be used: transferred volume represents the overall transferred volume of liquid with air, and transferred liquid represents the overall transferred liquid without air.
Analysis of the dynamic expansion of the transferred matter
The potential intrauterine positioning of the embryos during the ET process was analysed from the tracing of the transferred coloured liquid which contains the embryos in a real ET procedure. The recorded digital images of the mock ET simulations revealed a typical distribution of the coloured transferred liquid (Figure 3). For each experiment, we analysed consecutive images, which represent a rate of 10 images/s. First, the image size was calibrated by measuring the distance between the screws that hold the Perspex boards at both sides of the cervix in the uterine model (Figures 2a and 3). Then, the region of interest was determined from the last image in the sequence which included the largest spatial dispersion of the transferred matter (Figure 4a). The same region of interest was extracted from all the images in order to reduce the processing time of the dynamic analysis.
|
|
where Ai, xi and yi are the black area and coordinates of each pixel, respectively, and xc and yc are the coordinates of the centre of the area (Figure 4c). Since all the pixels of a digital image have the same area, Equation 1 may be reduced to
The centre of the area of a two-dimensional shape is equivalent to the centre of mass of a three-dimensional object. The coordinates of the centre of the area were calculated for each region in the image (Figure 4c).
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
|
When the transferred liquid was identical to that within the uterine model (i.e. glycerin, case IV), the final structure of the transferred matter within the cavity was an air bubble with the transferred liquid spread around its circumference (Figure 8a). In this case, the transferred liquid remained at the vicinity of the catheter tip, its area remained fairly constant (Figure 8c) and the centre of the area revealed a movement of 1 mm towards the fundus (Figure 8b). The dispersion of the transferred liquid was limited to the circumference of the air bubble.
|
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The ultimate goal of ET is to bring the embryo close to the fundal wall in order to provide optimal conditions for implantation in the uterine wall. The present results revealed that an air bubble had been developed and remained near the catheter tip while the transferred liquid was transported towards the cervix. The coloured liquid which represents potential locations of the embryos could not propagate forward because of that air bubble and, thus, it expanded backward towards the cervix. The liquid volume which includes the embryos in a real ET procedure was very small (e.g. 3 µl); however, the two liquid volumes merged from the onset of injection, thus the embryos could be found anywhere in the area where the transferred volume had been dispersed. The coloured liquid sometimes demonstrated an asymmetric geometry, a possible result of the catheter being slightly curved. In these cases, the air bubble did not coincide with the axis of the catheter and, consequently, the injected liquid was forced into non-identical regions at the side. Asymmetric marks were observed in all simulations of case II when the air bubble had a volume of 200 µl (Figure 6) since it did not remain along the catheters axis.
The spreading pattern of the transferred matter within the uterine cavity was highly dependent on the volume of air and the viscosity of the liquid within both the uterine cavity and the catheter. The air bubble is stable due to the surface tension that results from the viscosity of the liquids. Because of glycerins high viscosity (e.g. 1880 centipoise), the air bubble remained near the tip of the catheter. In our simulations, the viscosity of the injected saline (e.g. 1 centipoise) was much lower than that of glycerin, thus the injected liquid could not push the air bubble or the glycerin forward and the liquid was pushed backwards (Figures 57). When the injected liquid had the same viscosity as the liquid within the cavity (as in case IV), the transferred liquid accumulated around the air bubble (Figure 8). Since the viscosity of P-1 is about twice that of saline, the transferred liquid spread less from the catheter tip, 7.5 mm towards the cervix compared with 8 mm in the case of saline. The movement of the centre of the mass of the coloured liquid was larger in the case of P-1 (e.g. 34 mm compared with 2.5 mm in saline) since it spread towards the sides, giving rise to wider marks. The spreading pattern of the transferred liquid indicates that the viscosity of the transferred liquid should be as close as possible to the uterine fluid in order to avoid the dispersion of the transferred liquid with the embryos towards the cervix.
Menezo et al. (1989) reported that increasing the viscosity of the transferred matter from 2 to 120 mPa/s did not improve the outcome of ET. It may be that the viscosities used by Menezo et al. (1989
) were too low compared with the uterine fluid and, thus, the distribution of the transferred volume within the uterine cavity was similar to the shape of cases I and III (Figures 5 and 7), yielding a similar outcome of ET. Based on the present simulations, it may well be that investigation of the effect of the viscosity of the transferred liquid on the implantation rate requires much higher viscosities.
The volume of 100 µl of air was responsible for the formation of one air bubble (Figure 5). When the transferred air was substituted by liquid (i.e. saline in case V), the transferred liquid remained in the vicinity of the tip of the catheter (Figure 9), which will bring the embryos closer to the fundus in a real ET. A better ET outcome is achieved when the catheter is positioned 515 mm from the fundus, a position that ensures that the embryos reach the fundus to implant there (Lesny et al., 1998; Schoolcraft et al., 2001
; Mansour and Aboulghar, 2002
). Consequencely, one may increase the liquids volume in the transferred matter and probably reduce the air volume which is responsible for the embryos being spread towards the cervix. Mansour et al. (1994
) showed that the presence of two 5 µl air bubbles on both sides of 15 µl of transferred liquid did not induce the expulsion of the transferred matter through the cervix as long as the total volume did not increase. Our observations support this result since in none of the simulations was the transferred liquid ever expelled from the uterine model.
When all the transferred volume is composed of liquid, however, the embryos may be distributed throughout a larger region (Figure 9). On the other hand, it may be beneficial to use air in the transferred liquid since it is more quickly absorbed by the uterine tissue than the liquid. Nevertheless, our model could not simulate the rate of absorbance or disappearance of the air. Using a larger volume of air (e.g. 200 µl) resulted in a larger bubble which almost doubled the distance the embryos moved towards the cervix (Figure 6), a finding which supports the reports that implantation and pregnancy rates increased when the amount of air and total transferred volume were reduced (Meldrum et al., 1987; Ebner et al., 2001
). Accordingly, the transferred volumes of air should be small enough to avoid the transport of the embryos into the cervix. It should be noted that a small volume of air at the edge of the catheter load (Figure 2b) was required to avoid liquid spillage while the catheter was inserted into the uterine model (Ebner et al., 2001
).
The transferred matter was injected at a constant velocity in all the experimental protocols of this study, and the area of the coloured liquid increased linearly, as demonstrated in Figures 5c, 6c and 7c. In contrast, when the injected liquid was glycerin (i.e. the viscosity was similar to that of the uterine fluid), the total area of the dispersed liquid remained fairly constant at 6 mm2 (Figure 8c). The area of the transferred liquid was smaller than in cases IIII since the transferred liquid distributed around the air bubble and lost its dark colour and, as a consequence, could not be detected by the algorithm of this study.
The uterine model in this work was rigid and, therefore, could not simulate uterine contractions, which were suggested as the mechanism responsible for pushing the embryo towards the site of implantation. Mathematical models demonstrated that normal uterine contractions induce intrauterine fluid flow which results in embryo transport (Eytan and Elad, 1999). However, increased uterine contractions, which may occur during insertion of the catheter, have been suggested to be responsible for reduced rates of implantation (Fanchin et al., 1998
). In a recent computer simulation of ET within a channel with oscillating walls, we demonstrated that the injection velocity as well as uterine wall peristalsis significantly affect the trajectories of the embryos (Yaniv et al., 2003
). In this study, the speed of injection of the transferred matter was limited to a single velocity of 20 µl/s due to system limitations. The effect of the speed of injection on the distribution of the transferred matter within the uterine cavity should be investigated further.
In our uterine model, the final shape of the transferred matter was attached to the tip of the catheter, which may not be the case in a real ET. The presence of uterine peristalsis may transport the transferred matter forward towards the fundus. These contractions may also separate the transferred liquid and the air or mix the transferred matter with the uterine fluid in a way that helps the embryo reach the fundal area during the time window for implantation. Baba et al. (2000) reported that embryos were implanted at the area where they were initially placed, which may imply that transferred embryos have not been transported away by uterine contractions. In addition, clinical experience has shown that withdrawal of the catheter may create a negative pressure which may pull out the embryos from the uterine cavity (Mansour and Aboulghar, 2002
). This observation may be supported by the present findings that the transferred volume remained in the vicinity of the catheter tip. A fast withdrawal of the catheter may pull out the embryos through the cervix and the vagina.
In summary, ET is a mechanical procedure, in which two materials (e.g. liquid and air) are transferred in sequence into the uterine cavity which is filled with a more viscous fluid. This study showed that the composition of the transferred volume determines the spreading pattern of the transferred matter within the uterine cavity and, accordingly, controls the transport of the embryos. A better understanding of the transport of embryos within the transferred matter, the ultimate viscosity and absorbance of the transferred matter in the uterine cavity will improve the protocols for ET procedures and increase the success rates of embryo implantation and pregnancies.
![]() |
Acknowledgements |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Baba K, Ishihara O, Hayashi N, Saitoh M, Taya J and Kinoshita K (2000) Where does the embryo implant after embryo transfer in humans? Fertil Steril 73,123125.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Bilalis D, Marangou SA, Polidoropoulos N, Sissi P, Argyrou M, Doriza S, Davies S, Antonakopoulos A and Mastrominas M (2002) Use of different loading techniques for embryo transfer increasing the risk of ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod (Abstract Book, P-479), 17, 162.
Ebner T, Yaman C, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Polz W and Tews G (2001) The ineffective loading process of the embryo transfer catheter alters implantation and pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 76,630632.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Edwards RG, Fishel SB, Cohen J, Fehilly CB, Purdy JM, Slater JM, Steptoe PC and Webster JM (1984) Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J In vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer, 1,323.[Medline]
Eytan O and Elad D (1999) Analysis of intra-uterine fluid motion induced by uterine contractions. Bull Math Biol 61,221238.[CrossRef][ISI]
Fanchin R, Righini C and Olivennes F (1998) Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 13,19681974.[Abstract]
Ghazzawi IM, Hasani SA, Karaki R and Souso S (1999) Transfer technique and catheter choice influence the incidence of transcervical embryo expulsion and outcome of IVF. Hum Reprod 14,677682.
Ijland MM, Hoogland HJ, Dunselman GA, Lo CR and Evers JL (1999) Endometrial wave direction switch and the outcome of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 71,476481.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Kan AK, Abdalla HI, Gafar AH, Nappi L, Ogunyemi BO, Thomas A and Ola-ojo OO (1999) Embryo transfer: ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch. Hum Reprod 14,12591261.
Karni Z, Polishuk WZ, Adoni A and Diament Y (1971) Newtonian viscosity of the cervical mucus during the menstrual cycle. Int J Fertil 16,185188.[ISI][Medline]
Kovacs GT (1999) What factors are important for successful embryo transfer after in-vitro fertilization? Hum Reprod 14,590592.
Lesny P, Killick SR, Tetlow RL, Robinson J and Maguiness SD (1998) Embryo transfercan we learn anything new from the observation of junctional zone contraction? Hum Reprod 13,15401546.[Abstract]
Mansour RT and Aboulghar MA (2002) Optimizing the embryo transfer technique. Hum Reprod 17,11491153.
Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI and AminYM (1994) Dummy embryo transfer using methylene blue dye. Hum Reprod 9,12571259.[Abstract]
Marcus SF and Brinsden PR (1995) Analysis of the incidence and risk factor associated with ectopic pregnancy following in-vitrofertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 10,199203.[Abstract]
Meldrum DR, Chetkowski R, Steingold KA, deZeigler D, Cedras MH and Hamilton M (1987) Evolution of a highly successful in vitro fertilizationembryo transfer program. Fertil Steril 48,8693.[ISI][Medline]
Menezo Y, Arnal F, Humeau C, Durcet L and Nicollet B (1989) Increased viscosity in transfer medium does improve the pregnancy rates after embryo replacement. Fertil Steril 52,680682.[ISI][Medline]
Nazari A, Askari HA, Check JH and OShaughnessy A (1993) Embryo transfer technique as a cause of ectopic pregnancy in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 60,919921.[ISI][Medline]
Poindexter AN, Thompson DJ, Gibbons WE, Findley WE, Dodson MG and Young RL (1986) Residual embryos in failed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 46,262267.[ISI][Medline]
Schoolcraft WB, Surrey ES and Gardner DK (2001) Embryo transfer: technique and variables affecting success. Fertil Steril 76,863870.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Woolcott R and Stanger J (1997) Potentially important variables identified by transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 12,963966.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Yaniv S, Elad D, Jaffa AJ and Eytan O (2003) Biofluid aspects of embryo transfer. Ann Biomed Eng 31,12551262.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Yovich JL, Turner SR and Murphy AJ (1985) Embryo transfer technique as a cause of ectopic pregnancy in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 44,318321.[ISI][Medline]
Submitted on September 3, 2003; accepted on December 4, 2003.
|