Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chiba University School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: gestational trophoblastic tumour/molar pregnancy/pregnancy outcome
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
On completion of HCG follow-up, many patients may attempt to conceive. However, both patients and their partners commonly express fears related to future pregnancies and risk of later episodes of gestational trophoblastic tumour (GTT). Therefore, data related to subsequent pregnancies are essential for the rational counselling of patients and their partners with regard to the probability of normal pregnancy in the future (Wenzel et al., 1992).
The current study was undertaken to determine the subsequent pregnancy outcome in patients who had experienced molar pregnancy of CM and PM.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
All patients were followed for at least 2 years, and 438 of the 891 patients (49.2%) had a total of 650 subsequent conceptions. The pregnancy outcomes were compared in patients with CM and PM. The interval to subsequent conception was calculated from the date of mole evacuation to the last menstrual period before the pregnancy.
Ten (1.1%) patients who had spontaneous resolution of HCG developed high-risk GTT based on modified Hammond's criteria (Hammond et al., 1973; Matsui et al., 2000
). All patients were treated with combination chemotherapy, and eight patients were alive and well at the last follow-up examination. The latent period to GTT development in these 10 patients ranged from 14 to 54 months.
Statistical analyses were performed by Welch's t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was followed by Scheffé's F-test and the 2 test.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
During follow-up, 10 patients (1.1%) developed secondary high-risk GTT after their serum HCG had regressed spontaneously to undetectable levels (Table III). All cases of high-risk GTT were diagnosed based on modified Hammond's criteria (Hammond et al., 1973
; Matsui et al., 2000
), and all patients were treated with methotrexate, etoposide and actinomycin D combination chemotherapy (Matsui et al., 2000
). The mean (± SD) latent period from evacuation of hydatidiform mole was 32.6 ± 12.6 months (range: 1454 months). Two patients (Cases 9 and 10) had normal pregnancy before the occurrence of high-risk GTT. Case 1 died within 4 weeks of the initiation of treatment, and Case 9 died of chemotherapy-related toxicity; the other eight patients were alive and with no evidence of disease at the last follow-up examination. The mean (± SD) new WHO score was 8.7 ± 3.6 (Kohorn et al., 2000
), while two patients (Cases 4 and 9) had scores of
6. In Case 9, secondary GTT (WHO score 3) occurred 35 months after evacuation of the mole, and 3 months after vaginal delivery of a live birth. Both patients with new WHO score of
6 were histologically diagnosed as having choriocarcinoma. The incidence of high-risk GTT in patients with and without subsequent pregnancies was 0.46% (2/438) and 1.8% (8/453) respectively (P = 0.1243).
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In the current series, the rates of term live birth, stillbirth, premature delivery, spontaneous abortion and congenital anomaly in patients who had experienced molar pregnancy were similar to the rates in the general Japanese population (Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1998) and those reported in the literature. In addition, no differences in these rates were observed between complete and partial mole cases. The rate of Caesarean section was lower than that reported previously (Berkowitz et al., 1994
; Kim et al., 1998
).
The only significant finding was that the patients had an increased risk of recurrent molar pregnancy in subsequent conceptions (1.4%). In Chiba Prefecture, the average incidence of hydatidiform mole was 2.94 per 1000 live births. Therefore, the recurrent molar pregnancy rate was 5-fold higher than the rate of molar pregnancy of the general population (Takamizawa et al., 1987). The increased risk of recurrent molar pregnancy in the current study was compatible with the values previously reported (Sand et al., 1984
; Ngan et al., 1988
; Berkowitz et al., 1994
, 1998
; Yapar et al., 1994
).
An increased risk of developing persistent GTT in subsequent repeat molar pregnancy has been reported (Federschneider et al., 1980; Bagshawe et al., 1986
; Ngan et al., 1988
; Berkowitz et al., 1994
, 1998
; Yapar et al., 1994
). However, all nine patients who had repeat molar pregnancy in the current series achieved spontaneous remission by evacuation of the mole alone. Although the reason for this discrepancy is unclear, a possible explanation is that patients with repeat mole were small, and six of these moles (66.7%) were only partial in nature.
Recently, the recommended period of contraception after molar pregnancy has been shortened, but the subsequent pregnancy outcome related to the waiting period in patients who had hydatidiform mole has not been reported (Kohorn, 1999). In the current authors' hospital, patients who had spontaneous resolution of HCG after evacuation of the mole alone were strongly encouraged to use reliable contraception until spontaneous resolution of serum HCG titres (<1 mIU/ml) were confirmed, and after at least three ovulatory cycles had been monitored by basal body temperature. Approximately one-quarter of the patients conceived within 6 months of mole evacuation, and the pregnancy outcome was comparable with that of the general Japanese population. Although the current study included only small patient numbers, and was retrospective in nature, these findings suggest that it may be safe to conceive after a waiting period shorter than 6 months.
The other fear concerning future pregnancy that is expressed by both patients and their partners is that of secondary development of GTT in subsequent pregnancies. Ten patients (1.1%) with spontaneous regression of HCG developed high-risk GTT after a period of 32.6 ± 12.6 months (range: 1454 months). Two patients had term live births before the onset of high-risk GTT. Although the genetic identities of the pregnancies responsible for high-risk GTT were unclear in these two cases (Osada et al., 1991), the incidence of high-risk GTT tended to be lower in patients who had new pregnancies before onset of high-risk GTT than in those who did not become pregnant (P = 0.1243). These results suggest that conception subsequent to evacuation of a mole may not influence the development of secondary GTT.
In conclusion, patients with complete and partial moles can anticipate a normal future reproductive outcome. Because most pregnancies that occur within 6 months from evacuation of the hydatidiform mole result in a favourable outcome, a waiting period until HCG concentrations are undetectable, and at least three ovulatory cycles are confirmed, may suffice. Repeat molar pregnancy is the only unfavourable event in subsequent pregnancy in patients with complete and partial moles, and the incidence is increased 5-fold compared with the general population. A subsequent pregnancy after hydatidiform mole may not affect the development of high-risk GTT.
![]() |
Notes |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Berkowitz, R.S., Bernstein, M.R., Laborde, O. et al. (1994) Subsequent pregnancy experience in patients with gestational trophoblastic disease New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, 19651992. J. Reprod. Med., 39, 228232.[ISI][Medline]
Berkowitz, R.S., Im, S.S., Bernstein, M.R. et al. (1998) Gestational trophoblastic disease. Subsequent pregnancy outcome, including repeat molar pregnancy. J. Reprod. Med., 43, 8186.[ISI][Medline]
Federschneider, J.M., Goldstein, D.P., Berkowitz, R.S. et al. (1980) Natural history of recurrent molar pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol., 55, 457459.[Abstract]
Hammond, C.B., Borchert, L.G., Tyrey, L. et al. (1973) Treatment of metastatic trophoblastic disease: good and poor prognosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 115, 451457.[ISI][Medline]
Kim, J.H., Park, D.C., Bae, S.N. et al. (1998) Subsequent reproductive experience after treatment for gestational trophoblastic disease. Gynecol. Oncol., 71, 108112.[ISI][Medline]
Kohorn, E.I. (1999) How soon is it safe to undertake pregnancy after trophoblastic tumor? Gynecol. Oncol., 73, 343344.[ISI][Medline]
Kohorn, E.I., Goldstein, D.P., Hancock, B.W. et al. (2000) Combining the staging system of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics with the scoring system of the World Health Organization for trophoblastic neoplasia. Report of working committee of the international society for the study of trophoblastic disease and International Gynecologic Cancer Society. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 10, 8488.[ISI][Medline]
Matsui, H., Iizuka, Y. and Sekiya, S. (1996) Incidence of invasive mole and choriocarcinoma following partial hydatidiform mole. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet., 53, 6364.[ISI][Medline]
Matsui, H., Suzuka, K., Iitsuka, Y. et al. (2000) Combination chemotherapy with methotrexate, etoposide, and actinomycin D for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors. Gynecol. Oncol., 78, 2831[ISI][Medline]
Ministry of Health and Welfare (1998) Maternal and child health statistics of Japan. Mothers' & Children's Health & Welfare Association, Tokyo.
Ngan, H.Y.S., Wong, L.C. and Ma, H.K. (1988) Reproductive performance of patients with gestational trophoblastic disease in Hong Kong. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 67, 1114.[ISI][Medline]
Osada, H., Kawata, M., Yamada, M. et al. (1991) Genetic identification of pregnancies responsible for choriocarcinomas after multiple pregnancies by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 165, 682688.[ISI][Medline]
Pastorfide, G.B. and Goldstein, D.P. (1973) Pregnancy after hydatidiform mole. Obstet. Gynecol., 42, 6770.[ISI][Medline]
Sand, P.K., Lurain, J.R. and Brewer, J.I. (1984) Repeat gestational trophoblastic disease. Obstet. Gynecol., 63, 140144.[Abstract]
Takamizawa, H., Matsui, H. and Inaba, N. (1987) Epidemiology of gestational trophoblastic disease. In Takagi, S., Friedberg, V., Haller, U., Knapstein, V.P.G. and Sevin, B.V. (eds), Gynecologic Oncology, Surgery and Urology. Central Foreign Books, Tokyo, pp. 236240.
Wenzel, L., Berkowitz, R., Robinson, S. et al. (1992) The psychological, social, and sexual consequences of gestational trophoblastic disease. Gynecol. Oncol., 46, 7481.[ISI][Medline]
Yapar, E.G., Ayhan, A. and Ergeneli, M.H. (1994) Pregnancy outcome after hydatidiform mole, initial and recurrent. J. Reprod. Med., 39, 297299.[ISI][Medline]
Submitted on September 5, 2000; accepted on February 23, 2001.