1 Unidad de Medicina Materno-Fetal and 2 Unidad de Reproducción, Instituto Universitario IVI, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad (IVI), Plaza de la Policía Local, 3, Valencia 46015, Spain. Email: jbellver{at}ivi.es
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words:
assisted reproduction/Down's syndrome screening/first trimester/free hCG/pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Although ultrasonography is the essential part of the early screening strategy, additional biochemical parameters are also recommended as these are independent of the ultrasound markers and increase the detection rates (Spencer et al., 1999). The application of such biochemical markers to pregnancies achieved by assisted reproduction techniques has not been fully investigated. Accumulated data from the second trimester screening showed that maternal serum levels of hCG, AFP and uE3 seem to be modified in assisted reproduction pregnancies, leading to an increased false positive rate for trisomy 21 (Barkai et al., 1996
; Lam et al., 1999
; Räty et al., 2001
; Maymon and Shulman, 2002
; Räty et al., 2002
; Hui et al., 2003
). The reliability of first trimester biochemical screening in assisted reproduction pregnancies remains controversial. Data on this issue are still relatively scarce and previously published works are usually focused only in a particular assisted reproduction procedure (Liao et al., 2001
; Wojdemann et al., 2001
; Orlandi et al., 2002
; Maymon and Shulman, 2002
, 2004
; Ghisoni et al., 2003
; Lai et al., 2003
). Therefore, the question of whether adjustments of the biochemical levels are, or are not, necessary to maintain a low false positive rate when screening assisted reproduction pregnancies remains unanswered.
In the present study, we wish to report our experience on biochemical first trimester screening in pregnancies obtained by various assisted reproduction procedures compared to those conceived naturally. In this work we present data on pregnancies conceived by all types of assisted reproductive techniques, including pregnancies following ovum donation and a large sample of pregnancies achieved by ICSI.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
A total of 498 pregnancies conceived naturally and 556 obtained using assisted reproductive techniques were studied. They all corresponded to singleton pregnancies with normal fetuses. Patients were divided into groups according to the type of conception (Table I): natural, ovulation induction (with or without partner or donor intrauterine insemination), IVF, ICSI, ovum donation with IVF and ovum donation with ICSI. As previous reports had shown some differences in the biochemical markers of Down's syndrome between IVF or ICSI (Lam et al., 1999; Liao et al., 2001
; Orlandi et al., 2002
), we assessed separately both procedures. In cases of combination of both methods in a single patient, we assessed whether the transferred embryos came only from IVF or ICSI. When they came from only one procedure, the patient was included in the corresponding group, but when pregnancy was achieved after the transfer of embryos derived from both procedures the patient was excluded from the study.
|
The statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 10.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical data were expressed as number and percentage and compared using 2-analysis. Continuous data were expressed as mean (SD) or median (interquartile range) depending on whether data were or were not normally distributed respectively. Continuous data were analysed using parametric (Student's t-test and analysis of variance) or non-parametric tests (MannWhitney and KruskalWallis tests), where appropriate. P<0.05 was considered significant.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In our population of normal fetuses, comparison between naturally conceived pregnancies (n=498) and those obtained with assisted reproductive techniques (n=556) showed no significant differences in the maternal serum levels of fhCG [1.02 (0.88) versus 1.11 (0.92) MoM respectively] and PAPP-A [1.13 (0.88) versus 1.16 (0.84) MoM respectively].
A detailed comparison of fhCG and PAPP-A maternal serum levels between the different types of conception is shown in Figures 1 and 2 respectively. Slight differences were apparent when comparing separately individual techniques. Hence, with respect to f
hCG, IVF pregnancies showed lower levels (0.83 MoM) compared to ICSI (1.13 MoM) and both ovum donation groups (1.20 MoM) (P<0.02). Pregnancies obtained after ovum donation with ICSI showed slightly increased f
hCG levels (1.20 MoM) compared to natural conceptions (1.02 MoM) (P<0.04) or the ovulation induction group (0.98 MoM) (P<0.05). Pregnancies following ovum donation with IVF showed no difference in f
hCG values (1.20 MoM) compared to pregnancies obtained by ovum donation with ICSI (1.20 MoM). When considering both ovum donation pregnancies together (IVF and ICSI), f
hCG levels (1.20 MoM) were higher than those found in naturally conceived pregnancies (1.02 MoM) (P<0.02). Regarding PAPP-A levels, only pregnancies conceived by ovulation induction showed slightly higher values (1.26 MoM) than IVF pregnancies (1.06 MoM) (P<0.05). When analysing all the conceptions together (natural, ovulation induction, IVF, ICSI, ovum donation/IVF and ovum donation/ICSI), no differences were found in f
hCG or PAPP-A levels (KruskalWallis test).
|
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive techniques, placental hormonal production during the second trimester might be modified (Räty et al., 2001, 2002
; Maymon and Jauniaux, 2002
; Hui et al., 2003
), leading to changes in Down's syndrome detection and false positive rates.
Different theories have arisen so far on the impact of assisted reproductive techniques on placental hormonal production. Initial theories suggested that either the multiple corpus lutea generated after a controlled ovarian stimulation, or an early multiple implantation site (not detectable by ultrasound), could be responsible for the elevated second trimester maternal serum hCG levels reported in these pregnancies (Frishman et al., 1997; Wald et al., 1999
; Maymon and Jauniaux, 2002
; Räty et al., 2002
). However, similar changes were later found in pregnancies achieved by ovum donation or embryo freezingthawing procedures, in which no ovarian stimulation is carried out, demonstrating that different mechanisms might be involved (Maymon and Shulman, 2001
; Maymon and Jauniaux, 2002
; Perheentupa et al., 2002
; Räty et al., 2002
; Shulman and Maymon, 2003
). Currently, it is believed that hormonal changes could be due to an abnormal feto-placental unit metabolism caused by the assisted reproductive techniques or by the infertility itself (Räty et al., 2002
; Maymon and Jauniaux, 2002
; Hui et al., 2003
). Hence, a delayed placental or fetal maturation could lead to the release of amounts of placental hormones in the second trimester similar to those of previous stages of pregnancy, resulting in higher serum levels for f
hCG and lower serum levels for AFP than expected in this trimester (Hui et al., 2003
).
Interestingly, most hormonal changes reported in pregnancies achieved by assisted reproductive techniques have been described in the second trimester. However, data on first trimester biochemical screening in assisted reproduction pregnancies is still limited (Table II). Previous series have focused mainly on a particular technique and the number of assisted reproduction pregnancies studied has not been very large (Table II).
|
As many programmes of first trimester Down's syndrome screening have been developed in unselected populations that mainly included naturally conceived singleton pregnancies, we will focus on the comparison between assisted reproduction pregnancies and natural conceptions based on our results and those of others (Table II). In our study, measurements of biochemical parameters were performed using the Kryptor system.
For pregnancies achieved by ovulation induction, fhCG and PAPP-A levels seem to be largely unaffected. For IVF pregnancies, the issue remains controversial with respect to f
hCG as the reported levels have been found either increased or unaffected. Previous studies (Liao et al., 2001
) that encountered higher f
hCG levels in IVF pregnancies compared to natural conceptions suggested several options to deal with these changes. One option would simply be to say that there could be a small increase (of
1%) in the false positive rate when screening IVF pregnancies (Liao et al., 2001
). Another option would be to make an adjustement dividing the measured MoM by the median MoM obtained in IVF pregnancies (Wald et al., 1999
; Liao et al., 2001
). As some pregnancies are obtained after a combined procedure of IVF/ICSI, it would be important to distinguish accurately between both techniques because in our study and that of Liao et al. (2001)
f
hCG levels behaved differently in both procedures. In most previous studies, lower PAPP-A values have been observed in IVF pregnancies (Table II). Our own results showed a non-significant trend towards such decreased values.
For ICSI pregnancies, fhCG and PAPP-A levels seem to be generally unaffected (Table II). To the best of our knowledge, we have provided the largest series of ICSI pregnancies reported so far.
In our study, no differences were observed between the group of assisted reproduction pregnancies as a whole and natural conceptions. Most authors have previously reported similar results, describing a false positive rate for Down's syndrome in first-trimester not different or only slightly increased (0.91.9%) in assisted reproductive techniques compared with natural conceptions (Liao et al., 2001; Wojdemann et al., 2001
; Orlandi et al., 2002
; Maymon and Shulman, 2002
; Ghisoni et al., 2003
). However, no previous study included cases of first trimester screening in ovum donation pregnancies. In our study, higher levels of serum f
hCG were found in ovum donation pregnancies (both in IVF and ICSI procedures). Our results are in agreement with those previously reported in the second trimester (Maymon and Shulman, 2001
). These findings could lead to a higher false positive rate in first-trimester Down's syndrome screening in ovum donation pregnancies, but in these cases probably the younger age of the donors largely compensates for this effect, as shown in Table I. In Spain, only women aged 1835 years are allowed to act as donors, and the mean donor age in our centre was 25 years. This could certainly account for the low false positive rates found in our ovum donation pregnancies.
Our preliminary data on preimplantation genetic diagnosis, frozen embryos and use of sperm retrieved by testicular biopsy showed lack of influence of these factors on the biochemical markers. Larger series are needed to validate or refute these results due to the small sample sizes we present.
In summary, data accumulated so far suggest that first trimester biochemical markers either do not need any adjustments (e.g. in pregnancies obtained after ovulation induction and ICSI), or have very little impact (e.g. IVF pregnancies) or no impact (e.g. ovum donation/IVF pregnancies) on the false positive rates. Therefore, first trimester combined ultrasonographic and biochemical screening for Down's syndrome seems feasible in assisted reproduction pregnancies.
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Brizot ML, Snidjers RJM, Bersinger NA, Kuhn P and Nicolaides KH (1994) Maternal serum pregnancy associated placental protein A and fetal nuchal translucency thickness for the prediction of fetal trisomies in the first trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 84, 918922.
Brizot ML, Snidjers RJM, Butler J, Bersinger NA and Nicolaides KH (1995) Maternal serum hCG and fetal nuchal translucency thickness for the prediction of fetal trisomies in the first trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102, 12271232.
Canick J, Knight GJ, Palomaki GE, Haddow JE, Cuckle HS and Wald NJ (1988) Low second trimester maternal serum unconjugated oestriol in pregnancies with Down's syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 95, 330333.[ISI][Medline]
Cicero S, Bindra R, Rembouskos G, Spencer K and Nicolaides KH (2003) Integrated ultrasound and biochemical screening for trisomy 21 at 11 to 14 weeks. Prenat Diagn 23, 306310.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Frishman GN, Canick JA, Hogan JW, Hackett RJ, Kellner LH and Saller DN Jr (1997) Serum triple-marker screening in in vitro fertilization and naturally conceived pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 90, 98101.
Ghisoni L, Ferrazzi E, Castagna C, Levi Setti PE, Masini AC and Pigni A (2003) Prenatal diagnosis after ART success: the role of early combined screening tests in counselling pregnant patients. Placenta 24, S99S103.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Hui PW, Tang MHY, Lam YH, Ng EHY, Yeung WSB and Ho PC (2003) Maternal serum hCG and alpha-fetoprotein levels in pregnancies conceived after IVF or ICSI with fresh and frozen-thawed embryos. Hum Reprod 18, 572575.
Lai TH, Chen SC, Tsai MS, Lee FK and Wei CF (2003) First-trimester screening for Down syndrome in singleton pregnancies achieved by intrauterine insemination. J Assist Reprod Genet 20, 327331.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Lam YH, Yeung WSB, Tang MHY, Ng EHY, So WWK and Ho PC (1999) Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotrophin in pregnancies conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and convencional in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 14, 21202123.
Liao AW, Heath V, Kametas N, Spencer K and Nicolaides KH (2001) First- trimester screening for trisomy 21 in singleton pregnancies achieved by assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 16, 15011504.
Macri JN, Kasturi RV, Krantz DA, Cook EJ, Moore ND, Young JA, Romero K and Laresen JW (1990) Maternal serum Down syndrome screening: free beta protein is a more effective marker than human chorionic gonadotrophin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163, 12481253.[ISI][Medline]
Maymon R and Jauniaux E (2002) Down's syndrome screening in pregnancies after assisted reproductive techniques: an update. Reprod Biol Med Online 4, 285293.
Maymon R and Shulman A (2001) Comparison of triple serum screening and pregnancy outcome in oocyte donation versus IVF pregnancies. Hum Reprod 16, 691695.
Maymon R and Shulman A (2002) Serial first- and second-trimester Down's syndrome screening tests among IVF- versus naturally-conceived singletons. Hum Reprod 17, 10811085.
Maymon R and Shulman A (2004) Integrated first- and second-trimester Down syndrome screening test among unaffected IVF pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 24, 125129.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Maymon R, Dreazen E, Rozinsky S, Bukovsky I, Weinraub Z and Herman A (1999) Comparison of nuchal translucency measurement and mid-gestation serum screening in assisted reproduction versus naturally conceived singleton pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 19, 10071011.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Nicolaides KH (2004) Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191, 4567.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Orlandi F, Rossi C, Allegra A, Krantz D, Hallahan T, Orlandi E and Macri J (2002) First trimester screening with free -hCG, PAPP-A and nuchal translucency in pregnancies conceived with assisted reproduction. Prenat Diagn 22, 718721.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Perheentupa A, Ruokonen A, Tuomivaara L, Ryynanen M and Martikainen H (2002) Maternal serum beta-HCG and alpha-fetoprotein concentrations in singleton pregnancies following assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 17, 794797.
Räty R, Virtanen A, Koskinen P, Anttila L, Laitinen P, Tiitinen A and Ekblad U (2001) Maternal serum -hCG levels in screening for Down syndrome are higher in singleton pregnancies achieved with ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination than in spontaneous singleton pregnancies. Fertil Steril 76, 10751077.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Räty R, Virtanen A, Koskinen P, Anttila L, Forsström J, Laitinen P, Mörsky P, Tiitinen A and Ekblad U (2002) Serum free -hCG and alpha-fetoprotein levels in IVF, ICSI and frozen embryo transfer pregnancies in maternal mid-trimester serum screening for Down's syndrome. Hum Reprod 17, 481484.
Shulman A and Maymon R (2003) Mid-gestation Down syndrome screening test and pregnancy outcome among unstimulated assisted-conception pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 23, 625628.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Spencer K, Souter V, Tul N, Snidjers R and Nicolaides KH (1999) Screening program for trisomy 21 at 1014 weeks using fetal nuchal translucency, maternal serum free -human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13, 231237.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Spencer K, Ong C, Skentou H, Liao AW and Nicolaides KH (2000a) Screening for trisomy 13 by fetal nuchal translucency and maternal serum free beta hCG and PAPP-A at 1014 weeks of gestation. Prenat Diagn 20, 411416.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Spencer K, Tul N and Nicolaides KH (2000b) Maternal serum free beta hCG and PAPP-A in fetal sex chromosome defects in the first trimester. Prenat Diagn 20, 390394.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Spencer K, Liao A, Skentou H, Cicero S and Nicolaides KH (2000c) Screening for triploidy by fetal nuchal translucency and maternal serum free beta hCG and PAPP-A at 1014 weeks of gestation. Prenat Diagn 20, 495499.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Tul N, Spencer K, Noble P, Chan C and Nicolaides KH (1999) Screening for trisomy 18 by fetal nuchal translucency and maternal serum free beta hCG and PAPP-A at 1014 weeks of gestation. Prenat Diagn 19, 10351042.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Wald NJ, White N, Morris JK, Huttly WJ and Canick JA (1999) Serum markers for Down's syndrome in women who have had in vitro fertilisation: implications for antenatal screening. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106, 13041306.[ISI][Medline]
Wojdemann KR, Larsen SO, Shalmi A, Sundberg K, Christiansen M and Tabor A (2001) First trimester screening for Down syndrome and assisted reproduction: no basis for concern. Prenat Diagn 21, 563565.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Submitted on March 22, 2005; resubmitted on April 21, 2005; accepted on May 2, 2005.
|