Attitudes of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers towards twins and single embryo transfer

Anja Pinborg1,3, Anne Loft1, Lone Schmidt2 and Anders Nyboe Andersen1

1 The Fertility Clinic, University of Copenhagen. Rigshospitalet, and 2 Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Panum Institute, Denmark

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: The Fertility Clinic, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. e-mail: apinborg{at}rh.dk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to study attitudes towards twins and single embryo transfer (SET) among IVF/ICSI-twin mothers with 3 to 4-year old children. METHODS: A national survey was conducted by questionnaire (n = 1769). The study population consisted of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers (n = 266), and the two control groups of IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers (n = 764) and non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers (n = 739), all giving birth in Denmark in 1997. The overall response rate was 81%. RESULTS: More IVF/ICSI-twin mothers (84.7%) preferred twins as their first child compared with IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers (62.3%) and non-IVF twin mothers (60.0%). The IVF/ICSI-twin mothers had a significantly higher wish for twins (OR = 4.4, 95% CI 2.8–6.9) compared with the non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers. Though relatively few IVF/ICSI-twin mothers (23.4%) and IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers (17.3%) agreed to SET, delivery of a child with very low birth weight (VLBW) (<1500 g) was predictive of high acceptance of SET (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.2–6.9). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that IVF/ICSI-twin mothers have a greater wish for twins compared with non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers. Despite the fact that only a quarter of IVF/ICSI mothers agreed to SET, delivery of a child with VLBW and hence high morbidity was predictive of high acceptance of SET. The implementation of elective SET requires extensive counselling of the infertile couples and legislation including strict selection criteria may also be used to facilitate this process.

Key words: attitudes/IVF/mothers/single embryo transfer/twins


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The twinning rate has increased during the latest decades in most European countries. In Denmark the twinning rate increased from 1.02 per 100 pregnancies in 1980 to 1.67 in 1994. This change particularly occurred among primiparous women >30 years of age, in whom the adjusted twinning rate increased 3-fold (Westergaard et al., 1997Go). About a third of the increase in the frequency of twin births is due to the increasing age of the mothers in the general population, another third is caused by IVF, and the remaining third probably because of ovarian stimulation (Bergh et al., 1999Go). The data from European Registers collected by the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) for the year 1998 showed that 23.9% of IVF or ICSI deliveries in Denmark were twin deliveries (Nygren and Andersen, 2001Go).

Twin pregnancies carry additional risk to mother and child and increase the health economic costs (Wølner-Hanssen and Rydhstroem, 1998Go; Keith et al., 2000Go). Although register-based and case–control studies on the outcome of IVF pregnancies have shown that singleton IVF pregnancies are at a slightly increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality, twin pregnancies are the main factor in the poorer perinatal outcome compared with spontaneous pregnancies (Bergh et al., 1999Go; Dhont et al., 1999Go; Westergaard et al., 1999Go). Moreover IVF children have an increased risk of developing cerebral palsy and a higher hospitalization rate mainly due to the high twinning rate (Ericson et al., 2002Go; Strömberg et al., 2002Go). Hence increased concern about embryo transfer policy is being expressed and single embryo transfer (SET) is being intensively discussed in many European countries. In 1997 The Danish National Board of Health recommended that only two embryos should be transferred per treatment cycle. In Scandinavia the triplet pregnancy rate has been minimized, but overall the twin pregnancy rate has remained the same (Nygren and Andersen, 2001Go). However, the multiple pregnancy rate in Helsinki University Central Hospital in Finland has been reduced from 24% in 1998 to 8% in 2001 after the implementation of elective SET as their daily practice (Tiitinen et al., 2002Go).

When informing and counselling the infertile couples about the number of embryos to be transferred, knowledge of patient’s attitudes and expectations towards twins and SET is of great importance. Previous studies have shown that prior to treatment the attitudes towards multiple pregnancy and various pregnancy complications differ between fertile and non-fertile women. A questionnaire survey with a response rate of only 15% (582 out of 3800 couples) noted that a desire for conception of twins was expressed by 67–90% (Gleicher et al., 1995Go). Three other studies showed that infertile women found multiple pregnancy and the associated risks more acceptable than fertile women (Leiblum et al., 1990Go; Goldfarb et al., 1996Go; Grobman et al., 2001Go). Despite the intensive debate no studies have investigated attitudes among women with a history of infertility and experience with their own twins. Recently, the impact of patient’s choice for single or double embryo transfer on pregnancy and twinning rates was published by a Belgian group (De Neuborg et al., 2002Go). The present study was a Danish national cohort study undertaken to advance our understanding of women’s attitudes towards twins and SET, thereby promoting the counselling process and the implementation of elective SET.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study is part of a larger national register-based cohort study designed to assess the long-term morbidity of all twin children born after IVF or ICSI in Denmark from 1995 to 2000. To supplement and validate the register data on long-term morbidity we generated a national survey by questionnaire, which was sent to all IVF/ICSI mothers who gave birth in 1997. In addition to questions on morbidity we constructed 10 questions assessing women’s perceptions of singletons versus twins and their attitudes towards SET. Fathers were not questioned. This paper presents the data on women’s attitudes.

The Danish Medical Birth Registry, which records all pregnancies and births in Denmark was used to identify all women giving birth to twins from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1997. Since January 1, 1994 it has been compulsory to report each initiated IVF or ICSI cycle to the Danish IVF Registry in the National Board of Health (Andersen et al., 1999Go). The personal identification number of the women was cross-linked with the Danish IVF registry to identify the IVF/ICSI treated women. This enabled a separation of the twin mothers into two groups, namely the study population of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers and the control group of non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers. The control group of IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers was identified in the same way. The non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers with a history of other types of assisted reproductive treatment [ovarian stimulation with/without intrauterine insemination(IUI)] prior to their delivery, could not be identified through the IVF registry, but were identified by the questionnaire. Addresses were found through The Danish Central Population Registry (CPR). Eleven women had emigrated, one had died, and addresses of five women were not found in the CPR.

In October 2001, 1769 questionnaires were mailed to the study group consisting of all women giving birth to IVF/ICSI-twins in Denmark in 1997 (n = 266) and to the two control groups consisting of all IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers (n = 764) and all non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers (n = 739) giving birth in Denmark in 1997. After two requests 1436 questionnaires were received resulting in an overall response rate of 81% [IVF/ICSI-twin mothers 89% (n = 236), IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers 83% (n = 634) and non-IVF twin mothers 77% (n = 566)]. The children were 3–4 years old when the women received the questionnaire. Women with stillborn children or children who died within the first 3 years of life also received a questionnaire. Child deaths were reported by 15 IVF/ICSI-twin mothers (in 12 cases one twin died and in three cases both twins died), eight IVF/ICSI-singletons mothers and 11 non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers (in eight cases one twin died and in three cases both twins died). Demographic questions were addressed regarding the woman’s age, length of infertility, parity, the number of prior children, social position and divorce rate.

Pilot test
The questionnaire was pilot-tested in summer 2001 among 39 women giving birth in 1998 after treatment with IUI. These participants were invited to comment on the questions and the response categories and on any important theme which had not been addressed. The pilot test showed good distribution of scores across the different response categories. The statements concerning twins were finally constructed based on the written responses in the pilot test.

Questionnaire
The survey comprised several types of questions. The first section ascertained demographic information and infertility history. In addition to age, parity and social position, mothers were asked about their history of infertility and fertility treatment in relation to their delivery in 1997. Social position was measured in a standardized method including seven items about school education, vocational training and job position and categorized into six social classes I to V and VI (receiving social benefits) (Hansen, 1984Go). In the analyses the groups were merged into three different groups: High (I + II), medium (III + IV), and low social class (V + VI). A minor group was outside classification due to leave, sickness or unemployment.

The second and third section of the survey covered the pregnancy, delivery and children’s morbidity. In the fourth section of the survey we sought to determine patients perceptions towards twins and attitudes towards SET. This section consisted of 10 items especially designed for this research. To provide a point of comparison, the women were briefly advised on the additional risk a twin pregnancy carries to mother and child (no risk estimates were given) and informed that nearly 40% of all children born after IVF treatment are twins. In the first two items the participants were asked, both prior to pregnancy and again after their delivery in 1997, whether they found either a singleton or twins most desirable. The following items contained different statements about twins and singletons; respondents preferring ‘twins’ were asked to mark the statements regarding why they preferred twins, and respondents preferring ‘a singleton’ were asked to mark the statements regarding why they preferred a singleton.

After being presented with the recommendation on the transfer of only two embryos in ART from The Danish National Board of Health, the respondents were asked to rank their attitudes towards one, double or triple embryo transfer in the following three items. The response categories in these items were a five point Likert scale from (1) agree to (5) disagree. Responses of agree and partly agree were considered affirmative to the questions and responses of partly disagree and disagree were seen as a rejection. In Denmark, the first three IVF/ICSI treatments are provided free of charge in the Public Health System; in the last items the respondents were asked whether they would agree to SET, if they were offered more than the three normally reimbursed IVF/ICSI treatments. A version of the questionnaire in English is available from the first author, A.P.

Statistics
The results were analysed by SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 10.0. Statistical significance was defined as a probability value of P < 0.05. Differences of the means of continuous parametric data were analysed with the use of Student’s t-test. To compare differences of frequencies between groups, {chi}2-analyses were used. All analyses were carried out separately for all three groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine predictors of respondent’s wishes for twins and attitudes towards SET. IVF/ICSI-twin mothers were studied versus non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers and in separate analyses IVF/ICSI-twin mothers versus IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers. Women who did not consider the items were excluded from the analyses. The following predicting variables were entered into the models: maternal age, parity, social position and birth weight. Mortality was not entered as a predictor, because the numbers were too small. In the analysis with IVF/ICSI-twin mothers versus IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers duration of infertility and IVF versus ICSI were also entered. The outcome measure was the wish for twins and agreement to SET. We used backwards elimination and excluded predictor variables which were not significantly associated with the outcome measure. The participants were separated into four age groups: <30, 30–34, 35–39 and >40 years, parity was entered as a binary variable either 0 or >1 deliveries before the delivery in 1997; infertility length was separated into three groups: 0–5 years, 6–10 years and >10 years; birth weight was separated in three groups: >2500 g, 1500–2499 g and <1500 g; and finally social position was separated in three groups: high, medium and low.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Non-respondents analysis
Data on all women who did not respond to the questionnaire were collected from The Danish Medical Birth Registry and The Danish Registry of Courses of Death. Maternal age, parity, gestational age and child mortality for respondents and non-respondents are shown in Table I. Separate analyses for respondents versus non-respondents were conducted in all three groups. The age of the women was calculated on the date of delivery. No significant differences were seen in age, parity and prematurity rate between respondents and non-respondents either in the IVF/ICSI-twin group nor in the IVF/ICSI-singleton group. In the IVF/ICSI-singleton group versus the mean birth weight was significant, lower among non-respondents compared with respondents. Also, in the control twin group the mean birth weight was lower and moreover the proportion of children born <37 completed weeks of gestation was higher among non-respondents compared with respondents. In the IVF/ICSI-twin group no significant difference was found in mortality rate between respondents (18/472) and non-respondents (2/66). On the contrary, mortality rates between respondents and non-respondents differed significantly in the two control groups. In the IVF/ICSI-singleton group the mortality rate was 8/634 for respondents and 8/136 for non-respondents (P = 0.001) and in the control twin group the rate was 14/1132 for respondents and 21/364 for non-respondents (P < 0.001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Maternal characteristics and obstetrical outcome for respondents and non-respondents in all three groups. Data are means
 
Maternal characteristics
Demographic data are presented in Table II. Age and parity distribution of the IVF/ICSI-twin mothers differed strikingly from that of non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers, IVF/ICSI-twin mothers being older and with lower parity. Conversely, IVF/ICSI-twin mothers were younger and more were multiparous compared with IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers. After stratification for maternal age and parity, no trend for social position was seen between women in the study group and the control groups. The crude percentages of divorce or separation were 7.3, 6.9 and 13.3% for IVF/ICSI-twin mothers, IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers and non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers respectively. After adjustment for maternal age and parity, no differences in separation or divorce rate were observed in IVF/ICSI-twin mothers versus the control groups. No difference was seen in duration of infertility between IVF/ICSI-twin and singleton mothers. Of the IVF/ICSI-twin mothers, 19.1% had received ICSI treatment compared with 23.1% of the IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers, no significant difference was found. In the non-IVF/ICSI-twin group, 17.3% had a history of ovarian stimulation with or without IUI prior to their delivery in 1997.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Demographic characteristics of the three cohorts (respondents only)
 
The wish for twins
Responses to ‘the wish for twins or singleton, as the outcome of the first delivery’ are shown in Table III. Firstly, separate comparisons of women, who did not consider, were conducted between IVF/ICSI-twin mothers and control groups. In both control groups significantly more women did not consider the item, compared with the study group. Secondly, we compared the wish for twins versus singletons among those who considered. Significantly more IVF/ICSI-twin mothers assessed twins as the most desirable, if they were to have the first child compared with both IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers and non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers. Of the 15 IVF/ICSI-twin mothers with dead children, seven preferred twins, one preferred a singleton and seven did not consider the item. Among the eight IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers with dead children, three preferred twins, two singletons and three did not consider. Among the non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers, who had experienced child death, one preferred twins, four preferred singletons and six did not consider.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. The distribution of responses to the item, ‘wish for twins or singleton as the first child’, in the three cohorts. The first part of the table presents women, who ‘did consider’ versus women, who ‘did not consider’ the item. The last part presents women who preferred twins versus singletons among those who considered the item
 
Multivariate logistic regression analysis on the wish for twins was computed in two separate analyses: one for IVF/ICSI-twin mothers and non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers, and one for IVF/ICSI-twin mothers and IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers. Women who did not consider the item were excluded from the analyses. The following confounders were entered into the analysis with IVF/ICSI-twin mothers and non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers: maternal age, parity, social position, birth weight and IVF/ICSI treatment versus no treatment. In the final model the only independent predictive factor of ‘wish for twins’ was IVF/ICSI treatment. In IVF/ICSI-twin mothers odds ratio (OR) = 4.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8–6.9 for ‘wish for twins’ compared with non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers. In the second multivariate logistic regression analysis IVF/ICSI-twin mothers and IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers were studied. Maternal age, parity, social position and birth weight were entered as confounders and moreover IVF versus ICSI, twins versus singleton and duration of infertility were entered. In the final model, the only independent predictive factor of wish for twins in IVF/ICSI-twin mothers and IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers was being a twin mother (OR = 3.6, 95% CI 2.3–5.6).

Reasons to prefer either twins or singletons are listed in Table IV. The majority of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers responded that they preferred twins as their first child because ‘it could be their only opportunity of having two children’ and that ‘twins are a joy to each other’. Among the few IVF/ICSI-twin mothers, who would have preferred a singleton as their first child, the most common reason was that ‘it is difficult for the mother to have twins’. Very few of the IVF/ICSI-twin mothers would have preferred a singleton because of the additional risk in a twin pregnancy or because ‘it is difficult for a child to be a twin’. The non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers differed from the IVF/ICSI-twin mothers as less preferred twins as their first child because ‘twins are a joy to each other’ (P < 0.001) and less preferred twins because ‘it could be their only possibility of having two children’ (P < 0.001). Also more non-IVF/ICSI- twin mothers preferred a singleton because ‘it is difficult to become a mother of two children at the same time’ (P < 0.001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. The distribution of responses to reasons for preferring either twins or a singleton in the three cohorts. (Mothers could give more than one response to each question)
 
SET
Reponses to acceptance of SET are presented in Table V. Two-thirds of women, who underwent IVF/ICSI treatment, disagreed to SET; no significant difference was observed between IVF/ICSI-twin and singleton mothers. Of the 15 IVF/ICSI-twin mothers with dead children, two agreed to SET, 10 disagreed and three were ‘neither nor’. Among the eight IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers with dead children, two agreed to SET, five disagreed and three were ‘neither nor’. A majority of the IVF/ICSI-twin mothers responded affirmative to double embryo transfer (82.3%) and few mothers responded affirmative to triple embryo transfer (9.7%). The corresponding figures for IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers were 85.3 and 18.4%. Giving the offer of more than the three normally reimbursed IVF or ICSI treatments, 21.2% women in the IVF/ICSI-twin group and 18.5% women in the IVF/ICSI-singleton group would change their minds and agree to SET. In both IVF/ICSI groups, they would then have a minimum of three additional treatments (IVF/ICSI-twin group, mean 2.95 ± 1.01; IVF/ICSI-singleton group, mean 3.00 ± 0.97).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table V. Acceptance of single embryo transfer (SET) among IVF/ICSI-twin and IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers. The first part of the table presents women, who ‘did consider’ versus women, who ‘did not consider’ the item. The last part presents women who considered the item
 
Multivariate logistic regression analysis was computed to examine predictors of agreement to SET in IVF/ICSI-twin mothers and IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers. The following predicting variables were entered into the model: maternal age, parity, social position, birth weight, IVF versus ICSI, twins versus singletons and duration of infertility. In the final model two independent significant predictors were found; delivery of at least one child with very low birth weight (VLBW) was independently predictive of agreement to SET (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.2–6.9) and >5 years of infertility was independently predictive of disagreement to SET (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4–0.9). Among those women (n = 34), who delivered at least one child with VLBW, 82% (n = 28) were twin mothers and 18% (n = 6) were singleton mothers. Maternal age, parity, social position, IVF versus ICSI and twins versus singleton had no impact on women’s acceptance of SET.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study was a national questionnaire survey based on compulsory reporting to the Danish IVF Registry and The Danish Medical Birth Registry. The study showed that 84.7% of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers and 62.3% of IVF/ICSI-singleton mothers would have preferred twins as their first delivery outcome compared with 60.0% of the non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers. The respondents were mothers with 3–4 year old children, hence having their own experience with pregnancy and upbringing of twins or singletons. Previous studies regarding attitudes towards twin pregnancies were carried out with patients during active infertility treatment and were undertaken in single clinics with fewer participants (Leiblum et al., 1990Go; Gleicher et al., 1995Go; Goldfarb et al., 1996Go; Grobman et al., 2001Go). Consistent with our findings, all these reports have noted that infertile women looked favourably upon the conception of twins.

Our results show that twin mothers in general had positive preferences towards twins and that IVF/ICSI-twin mothers were significantly more positive towards twins compared with non-IVF/ICSI-twin mothers. These results demonstrate that a majority of the twin mothers seem willing to accept eventual risks and complications together with the social and physical strain. One could argue that women, and especially women who undergo IVF/ICSI treatment, easily convince themselves of the ‘quality’ of their offspring, even if there are serious or minor problems, because they love their children. Presumably more correctly, they minimize twin complications both perinatally and postnatally. This problem is illustrated in a recent paper on perspectives of patients and health care professionals on blastocyst transfer (Hartshorne and Lilford, 2002Go). This study showed that it is still possible to convince couples to have a blastocyst transfer, notwithstanding the fact that most recent studies have showed absolutely no superiority of day 5 transfer. The wish for a child is so strong that infertile couples are willing to try almost everything.

Women who experienced child deaths were also included in the present study. The numbers are too small to make statistical comparisons meaningful, but the crude numbers showed that most of these women in the two IVF/ICSI groups had preferred twins and were against SET. It is noteworthy however that in the non-IVF/ICSI group three out of four women had preferred a singleton.

No differences were seen between respondents and non-respondents in the IVF/ICSI-twin group (Table I). On the contrary non-respondents in the two control groups (IVF/ICSI-singletons and non-IVF/ICSI-twins) had significant poorer perinatal outcome and higher child mortality compared with respondents. The high response rate in IVF/ICSI-twin mothers, even in women with poor outcomes, could be explained by the fact that these women felt an obligation to complete the questionnaire due to the interest in the future of their offspring. Since the IVF/ICSI-twin mothers had the most positive preferences towards twins, the unequal distribution of pregnancy outcome and mortality among respondents versus non-respondents in the control groups will not alter the conclusion.

In contrast with the clinician’s view of a twin pregnancy as a high-risk pregnancy and even as a complication in ART (Hazekamp et al., 2000Go), very few twin mothers (3.8–6.4%) considered the additional risks of twin pregnancies to be a problem. We think this is due to insufficient information, or women minimizing or even denying the additional risk involved in twin pregnancies. We have to clarify that this study presents women who were counselled and underwent IVF/ICSI treatment during 1996 and 1997. At that time dual embryo transfer had just replaced triple embryo transfer in Denmark. Obviously, the couples did not receive thorough information on the additional risk in twins at embryo transfer and no further risk estimates were included in this questionnaire.

Acceptance of SET was expressed by ~20% of the women in both IVF/ICSI groups. Further, one quarter of the women, who initially disagreed would accept SET if they were offered more than the three reimbursed treatments given in our country. Presumably, the use of less intensive ovarian stimulation protocols (Ingerslev et al., 2001Go) would facilitate agreement to SET, if patients were offered additional IVF/ICSI treatments. Further, the introduction of reimbursement of IVF/ICSI treatments prior to the second child could also advance the cause of SET.

Infertility of >5 years duration was predictive of low acceptance of SET. Even though SET in selected patients does not reduce the pregnancy rate (De Neuborg et al., 2002Go), the majority of these couples apparently think that SET may prolong their infertility period. Our results suggest that delivery of a child with VLBW and hence potentially higher morbidity is predictive of agreement to SET; when a woman has a VLBW infant the experienced risk will outweigh the arguments against SET. In a previous study which has illustrated the same problem, the authors found that after being confronted with actual probabilities of specified perinatal complications associated with a twin pregnancy, women were less keen to have a twin pregnancy (Grobman et al., 2001Go). Risks can be expressed in two different ways; the individual risk for the woman, who undergoes IVF treatment, and the attributive risk, the number of extra twins born each year in a population due to IVF. The first risk is of interest for the women, the latter for the society. As doctors we have an obligation also to take the attributive risk into account.

Prospective randomized SET trials in younger women with good quality embryos have shown that the twin birth rate can be reduced, while maintaining an ongoing pregnancy rate of 32–40% (Gerris et al., 1999Go; Martikainen et al., 2001Go; De Neuborg et al., 2002Go). In the light of the high pregnancy rates in these studies and the considerable risk of twin pregnancies, SET in selected patients should be the future goal. Our study showed that a majority of IVF/ICSI women, treated and counselled during 1996 or 1997, expressed a relatively low acceptance of SET (17–24%). However, 20% of the non-accepting women would agree to SET if they were offered more treatment cycles, but to do so they wanted at least three additional treatments. The women in the present study were not fully informed of the twin risk, nevertheless, the results indicate that mothers of children with potentially higher morbidity (children with VLBW) expressed a high acceptance of SET. The impact of this study is a reduction of the twin rate by implementation of elective SET, thereby minimizing the individual health risk of each IVF/ICSI child born. In this process extensive counselling, including exact risk estimates and information on SET pregnancy rates plays an essential role. Furthermore, reasonable selection criteria for SET are required. Through the process of counselling a fair amount of congruency between the thoughts of the patient and the doctor should be obtained. Two reports comparing health economical costs in SET versus double embryo transfer (DET) have shown that SET, if long-term morbidity is taken into account, is more cost-efficient (Wølner-Hanssen and Rydhstroem, 1998Go; De Sutter et al., 2002Go). Reimbursement of a limited number of additional IVF/ICSI treatment cycles and treatment cycles prior to the second child would also enhance the implementation of elective SET as our daily clinical practise. Legislative initiatives including strict selection criteria may perhaps be used to facilitate this process.


    Acknowledgements
 
The Danish Medical Research Council, Queen Elisabeth’s Children’s Hospital Research Fund and The Medical Research Fund of Copenhagen, The Faeroe Islands and Greenland approved the study.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Andersen, A.N., Westergaard, H.B. and Olsen, J. (1999) The Danish in vitro fertilisation (IVF) register. Dan. Med. Bull., 46, 357–360.[ISI][Medline]

Bergh, T., Ericson, A., Hillensjö, T., Nygren, K.G. and Wennerholm, U-B. (1999) Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982–95: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet, 354, 1579–1585.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

De Neuborg, D., Mangelschots, K., Van Royen, E., Vercruyssen, M., Ryckaert, G., Valkenburg, M., Barudy-Vasquez, J. and Gerris, J. (2002) Impact of patients’ choice for single embryo transfer of a top quality embryo versus double embryo transfer in the first IVF/ICSI cycle. Hum. Reprod., 17, 2621–2625.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

De Sutter, P., Gerris, J. and Dhont, M. (2002) A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI. Hum. Reprod., 17, 2891–2896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dhont, M., Sutter, P.D., Ruyssinck, G., Martens, G. and Bekaert, A. (1999) Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: a case-control study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 181, 688–695.[ISI][Medline]

Ericson, A., Nygren, K.G., Otterblad Olauson, P. and Källén, B. (2002) Hospital care utilization of infants born after IVF. Hum. Reprod., 17, 929–932.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gerris, J., De Neubourg, D., Mangelschots, K., Van Royen, E., Van de Meerssche, M. and Valkenburg, M. (1999) Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum. Reprod., 14, 2581–2587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gleicher, N., Cambell, D.P., Chan, C.L., Karande, V., Rao, R., Balin, M. and Pratt, D. (1995) The desire for multiple births in couples with infertility problems contradicts present practice patterns. Hum. Reprod., 10, 1079–1084.[Abstract]

Goldfarb, J., Kinzer, D.J., Boyle, M. and Kurit, D. (1996) Attitudes of in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination couples toward multiple gestation pregnancy and multifetal pregnancy reduction. Fertil. Steril., 65, 815–820.[ISI][Medline]

Grobman, W.A., Milad, M.P., Stout, J. and Klock, S.C. (2001) Patient perceptions of multiple gestations: An assessment of knowledge and risk aversion. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 185, 920–924.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Hansen, E.J. (1984) Socialgrupper i Danmark (Social Class in Denmark). The Danish National Institute of Social Research, Copenhagen. 189 pp.

Hartshorne, G.M. and Lilford, R.J. (2002) Different perspectives of patients and health care professionals on the potential benefits and risks of blastocysts culture and multiple embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod., 17, 1023–1030.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hazekamp, J., Bergh, C., Wennerholm, U-B., Hovatta, O., Karlström, P.O. and Selbing, A. (2000) Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART. Hum. Reprod., 15, 1217–1219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ingerslev, H.J., Højgaard, A., Hindkjær, J. and Kesmodel, U. (2001) A randomized study comparing IVF in the unstimulated cycle with IVF following clomiphene citrate. Hum. Reprod., 16, 696–702.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Keith, L.G., Oleszczuk, J.J. and Keith, D.M. (2000) Multiple gestation: reflections on epidemiology, causes, and consequences. Int. J. Fertil. Womens Med., 45, 206–214.

Leiblum, S.R., Kemmann, E. and Taska, L. (1990) Attitudes toward multiple birth and pregnancy concerns in infertile and non-infertile women. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynecol., 11, 197–210.[ISI]

Martikainen, H., Tiitinen, A., Tomás, C., Tapainen, J., Orava, M., Tuomivaara, L., Vilska, S., Hydén-Granskog, C., Hovatta, O. and the Finish ET Study Group (2001) One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study. Hum. Reprod., 16, 1900–1903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nygren, K.G. and Andersen, A.N. (2001) Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1998. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum. Reprod., 16, 2459–2471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Strömberg, B., Dahlquist, G., Ericson, A., Finnström, O., Köster, M. and Stjernquist, K. (2002) Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population based study. Lancet, 359, 461–465.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Tiitinen, A., Halttunen, M., Unkila-Kallio, L. and Hyden-Granskog, C. (2002) Single embryo transfer-an effective method for reducing the multiple pregnancy rate. 18th Annual Meeting of ESHRE, Vienna, Austria. Hum. Reprod., 17 (Abstract Bk. 1), Abstract O-175.

Westergaard, H.B., Johansen, A.M.T., Erb, K. and Andersen, A.N. (1999) Danish National In-Vitro Fertilization Registry 1994 and 1995: a controlled study of birth, malformations and cytogenetic findings. Hum. Reprod., 14, 1896–1902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Westergaard, T., Wohlfahrt, J., Aaby, P. and Melbye, M. (1997) Population based study of rates of multiple pregnancies in Denmark, 1980–1994. Br Med. J., 314, 775–779[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wølner-Hanssen, P. and Rydhstroem, H. (1998) Cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos. Hum. Reprod., 13, 88–94.[Abstract]

Submitted on June 26, 2002; resubmitted on October 23, 2002; accepted on December 5, 2002.