Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kuopio University Hospital, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kuivasaa{at}hytti.uku.fi
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: embryo transfer/endometriosis/infertility/IVF and ICSI outcome/pregnancy
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Several studies have shown that women with endometriosis have a lower ovarian response to gonadotrophins (Azem et al., 1999; Al-Azemi et al., 2000
; Aboulghar et al., 2003
). In addition, Al-Azemi et al. (2000)
found that women with endometriosis needed more HMG ampoules per cycle, while the control group of tubal factor subjects maintained a constant ovarian response over the five analysed cycles. One reason for a reduced ovarian response may be previous ovarian resection. Aboulghar et al. (2003)
investigated women with severe endometriosis who had had previous surgical treatment and found that these patients had a significantly higher withdrawal rate than the control group with tubal infertility. Of the endometriosis patients, 29.7% discontinued because of poor ovarian response, the corresponding rate for tubal factor patients being only 1.1%. In contrast, in a study carried out by Donnez et al. (2001)
, preceding vaporization of the internal cyst wall of endometriomas did not impair ovarian function; there were no differences in ovarian response to stimulation between women with endometriosis and women with tubal infertility.
Data on the impact of endometriosis on the results of IVF treatment are controversial. Olivennes et al. (1995) found that pregnancy rates were no different from those of women with tubal infertility, whereas Bergendal et al. (1998)
found that patients with endometriosis had a reduced response to ovarian stimulation, a lower number of oocytes and a reduced fertilization rate, but not a reduced pregnancy rate. In a recent meta-analysis of 22 published studies (Barnhart et al., 2002
) the conclusion was that women with endometriosis have a reduced pregnancy rate (<35%) compared with that in women with tubal infertility. In addition, other indicators, such as circulating estradiol levels, numbers of retrieved oocytes, and decreased fertilization and implantation rates, have shown similar results (Azem et al., 1999
). Furthermore, the severity of endometriosis is likely to affect the outcome of assisted reproduction, women with stage III and IV disease having lower fertilization rates compared with those with stages I and II. Overall, the data from the study carried out by Barnhart et al. (2002)
suggest that endometriosis affects infertility not only by distorting normal pelvic anatomy but also by having effects on developing follicles, oocytes and embryos.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether or not the stage of endometriosis affects the outcome of IVF, and the specific aim was to look at the cumulative pregnancy and live-born rates after four treatment cycles using women with tubal infertility as a control group. Such data would be useful for patient counselling.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
A standard long IVF protocol with GnRH agonist and gonadotrophins was used. Buserelin (Suprecur®; Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, Germany) or nafarelin (Synarela®; Syntex Nordica AB Södertälje, Sweden) were started for down-regulation on the cycle days 2022. When ovarian suppression was confirmed by ultrasound, recombinant FSH (rFSH, Gonal-F®, Laboratories Serono; or Puregon®, Organon, Oss, The Netherlands) or HMG (Menogon®; Ferring, The Netherlands) was used for controlled ovarian stimulation. Treatment was adapted according to the response followed by sonography and carried out in an identical manner in the study and control groups. Doses of gonadotrophins were individually adjusted (range 150300 IU) depending on patients age, weight and ovarian response. When the largest one to three follicles reached a minimum diameter of 1820 mm, HCG (Profasi®, Ares-Serono; or Pregnyl®, Organon, 500010 000 IU) was administered. Oocyte retrieval was performed 3436 h later, using vaginal ultrasonography and the ova were fertilized on the same day. The luteal phase was supplemented with vaginal progesterone (Lugesteron®, Leiras, Finland) started from the day before embryo transfer and continued until either a serum pregnancy test result was negative or gestational sac was confirmed on ultrasonography.
ICSI was used according to our practice in all cases when there were only minimal findings to explain infertility and women had undergone unsuccessful inseminations before IVF-treatment was started, orjust in casewhen there was severe endometriosis. If the number of oocytes retrieved was >10, ICSI was used in half of them. When all treatment cycles were pooled, ICSI was used in 68, 44 and 37% of oocytes of the women with stage I/II, III/IV endometriosis or tubal infertility, respectively.
The embryos were graded according to their morphology and cleavage stage. A scale of 15 was used, with class 1 being the best embryos. In this class, embryo cells are evenly sized, the blastomeres regularly shaped without fragments and the zona is intact. In class 2, the embryos are slightly non-homogeneous, the maximum fragmentation rate is 20% and the zona is solid. In class 3, the blastomeres are uneven in size and the fragmentation rate is 2050%. In class 4, the fragmentation rate is >50%. Embryos of class 5 are not valid for transfer.
Serum hCG concentrations were assayed 16 days after transfer to verify pregnancy. Thus, absolute pregnancy rate (detection of HCG) was reported. The assay was a Roche Diagnostics Elecsys HCG+b assay, involving use of the Roche Elecsys 2010 system (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Clinical pregnancy was confirmed by the presence of gestational sac on vaginal ultrasonography.
For comparison, the results of four similar studies identified through a Medline search were used to pool the outcome results. The search strategy was based on the key words endometriosis and IVF. Studies of a similar design (tubal infertility patients as a control group and patients with classified endometriosis as a study group) were included.
Statistical analyses were carried out with SPSS version 11.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistically significant differences were determined using the 2-test, Fishers exact test or Students t-test, as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
The overall pregnancy rate per fresh embryo transfer was 31.7%, and of these pregnancies, 66.4% resulted in live-born infants in a total of 392 cycles analysed in this study. These rates are comparable to those achieved in our unit in general. Detailed results are shown in Table II. Pregnancy rates after all four fresh embryo transfers were not significantly different in women with minimal to mild endometriosis and in the reference group. When compared against the reference group, the pregnancy rate in women with moderate to severe endometriosis was significantly lower (P = 0.009). There were no significant differences in miscarriage rate between the groups. One pregnancy was terminated because of a fetal structural anomaly (anencephaly).
Women with stage III/IV endometriosis had the highest overall drop-out rate from the treatment (52.2%). The drop-out rate was 38.7% in women with milder endometriosis and the corresponding rate was 44.8% in women with tubal factor infertility. There were no significant differences between these numbers. We recorded no differences in the mean numbers of oocytes yielded or the mean ages of women continuing their treatment cycles versus those who dropped out (data not shown).
Figure1 shows the cumulative live birth results. The cumulative pregnancy and live-born rates resulting from four IVF treatments without frozen embryo transfers were 64.5 and 51.6% in women with stage I/II endometriosis, 44.8 and 32.8% in women with stage III/IV endometriosis and 69.0 and 40.2% in the reference group respectively. With frozen embryo transfers included, the equivalent rates were 67.7 and 55.8% in women with stage I/II endometriosis, 56.7 and 40.3% in women with stage III/IV endometriosis and 81.6 and 43.7% in the reference group respectively.
|
Finally, we compared the present results with those of four earlier studies having similar study design (Table III). The pooled data showed that the mean number of oocytes obtained per cycle and the pooled fertilization rate were significantly lower in women with endometriosis. Similarly, according to the pooled results, women with stage III/IV endometriosis also had a significantly lower pregnancy rate than the reference group, 14.3 versus 28% (P < 0.001). The corresponding rate was 23.1% in women with stage I/II endometriosis (P = 0.183). Women with minimal to mild endometriosis had a better live-birth rate (20.0%) than women with moderate to severe endometriosis (11.4%) or women with tubal factor infertility (18.7%).
|
(B) Fertilization rates (FR, %)
OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; NA = not applicable.
(C) Pregnancy rates (PR, %)
|
OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; NA = not applicable.
(D) Live birth rates (LBR, %)
|
OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; NA = not applicable.
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In addition to the overall outcome of the IVF/ICSI treatment, several interesting observations can be drawn from this study. First, women with moderate to severe endometriosis were treated earlier than women with less severe disease, although their infertility history was a few months shorter. Second, women with moderate to severe endometriosis discontinued infertility treatment more often than the other women. Third, the outcome of IVF/ICSI treatment was relatively constant within each group, independent of the order of the treatment cycle. Fourth, the rate of multiple pregnancies was highest in women with stage I/II endometriosis.
The present results also have several clinical implications. The AFS classification is useful in predicting the outcome of infertility treatment and can be used for counselling purposes. Women with endometriosis should be treated in good time, especially when a woman has an active disease. The present results also support the idea of using single embryo transfer in women with stage I/II endometriosis, whereas the observed low pregnancy rate in women with stage III/IV disease requires further studies before deciding on an optimal policy in these cases. On the other hand, difficulties such as painful stimulation and challenging puncture, encountered by patients with endometriosis in the IVF treatment would favour the use of two-embryo transfer.
Martikainen et al. (2001) investigated one- versus two-embryo transfer after IVF/ICSI. In that study the cause of infertility was not taken into consideration. The outcome was that two-embryo transfer did not result in a significantly better pregnancy rate than single embryo transfer; 47.1 versus 32.4%. Since our endometriosis III/IV group showed lower single and multiple pregnancy rates than the other groups, it is possible to draw the conclusion that their endometrial receptivity had deteriorated. However, on the basis of the results of a study by Diaz et al. (2000)
, this conclusion is not necessarily valid. In that study there were 25 women with stage III/IV endometriosis and 33 women with other causes of infertility. When oocytes from a single donor were donated to recipients in both groups, pregnancy, implantation and miscarriage rates were not found to be affected in women with endometriosis when compared with the control group. Further studies are therefore needed to address the issue of whether single embryo transfer should be recommended to women with moderate to severe endometriosis.
All in all, we found that women with stage III/IV endometriosis had worse IVF/ICSI results compared with women with less severe disease or women with tubal infertility.
Women with impaired ovarian reserve were excluded from our IVF programmes and this may somewhat bias the results. However, the effect of such bias would rather underestimate than overestimate the outcome difference between women with stage I/II and III/IV endometriosis. Overall, these limited clinical data support the idea of some kind of defective implantation. Even though the same numbers of good quality embryos were transformed, the implantation rate per embryo (data shown before) and pregnancy rate appeared to be lower among women with moderate to severe endometriosis compared to the controls. The frequency of multiple pregnancies also seemed to be lower. An explanation for the present results is beyond the scope of this study, but may be related to mechanisms related to angiogenesis, the immune system, and/or endometrial receptivity (Bergqvist et al., 1997; Toya et al., 2000
).
Clinically, ovarian resection is one possible explanation for the present results, but on the other hand, the need for operative treatment also reflects more severe disease. In a study by Tinkanen and Kujansuu (2000) there were 100 women with stage III/IV endometriosis with a history of surgery for ovarian endometriosis or with prevailing ovarian endometriosis. The patients were divided into two groups, 55 women with no ovarian endometriosis and 45 women with recurrent endometrioma. The pregnancy rate was 38% in the endometrioma group and 22% in the group without endometriomas. The results of the study suggest that the presence of ovarian endometriosis does not reduce fertilization or implantation rates, but the radical nature of resection could reduce ovarian capacity.
According to our data, 40.3% of women with stage III/IV endometriosis gave birth after one to four IVF/ICSI treatments. The success trend (Figure 1) is rising slowly, but the inconvenience caused by ovarian stimulation may be a limiting factor, especially when the activity of the illness increases along the course of treatments. However, more patients need to be studied to attain better predictability of the treatment success.
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Al-Azemi M, Bernal AL, Steele J, Gramsbergen I, Barlow D and Kennedy S (2000) Ovarian response to repeated controlled stimulation in in-vitro fertilization cycles in patients with ovarian endometriosis. Hum Reprod 15, 7275.
American Society for Reproductive Medicine (1997) Revised classification of endometriosis: 1996 Fertil Steril 67, 817821.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Arici A, Oral E, Bukulmez O, Duleba A, Olive DL and Jones EE (1996) The effect of endometriosis on implantation: results from the Yale University in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril 65, 603607.[ISI][Medline]
Azem F, Lessing JB, Geva E, Shahar A, Lerner-Geva L, Yovel I and Amit A (1999) Patients with stages III and IV endometriosis have a poorer outcome of in vitro fertilizationembryo transfer than patients with tubal infertility. Fertil Steril 72, 11071109.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Barnhart K, Dunsmoor-Su R and Coutifaris C (2002) Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 77, 11481155.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Bergendal A, Naffah S, Nagy C, Bergqvist A, Sjoblom P and Hillensjo T (1998) Outcome of IVF in patients with endometriosis in comparison with tubal-factor infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 15, 530534.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Bergqvist A, Brunkwall J and Ploman F (1997) Concentrations of prostaglandin F2alpha in follicular fluid from women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 12, 17891793.[Abstract]
Brosens J, Verhoeven H, Campo R, Gianaroli L, Gordts S, Hazekamp J, Hagglund L, Mardesic T, Varila E, Zech J et al (2004) High endometrial aromatase P450 mRNA expression is associated with poor IVF outcome. Hum Reprod 19, 352356.
Cahill DJ, Wardle PG, Maile LA, Harlow CR and Hull MG (1997) Ovarian dysfunction in endometriosis-associated and unexplained infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 14, 554557.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Diaz I, Navarro J, Blasco L, Simon C, Pellicer A and Remohi J (2000) Impact of stage IIIIV endometriosis on recipients of sibling oocytes: matched casecontrol study. Fertil Steril 74, 3134.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Donnez J, Wyns C and Nisolle M (2001) Does ovarian surgery for endometriomas impair the ovarian response to gonadotropin? Fertil Steril 76, 662665.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Huang HY, Lee CL, Lai YM, Chang MY, Chang SY and Soong YK (1997) The outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer therapy in women with endometriosis failing to conceive after laparoscopic conservative surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4, 299303.[ISI][Medline]
Martikainen H, Tiitinen A, Tomas C, Tapanainen J, Orava M, Tuomivaara L, Vilska S, Hyden-Granskog C, Hovatta O; Finnish ET Study Group (2001) One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study. Hum Reprod 16, 19001903.
Matson PL and Yovich JL (1986) The treatment of infertility associated with endometriosis by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 46, 432434.[ISI][Medline]
Navarro J, Garrido N, Remohi J and Pellicer A (2003) How does endometriosis affect infertility? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 30, 181192.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Olivennes F, Feldberg D, Liu HC, Cohen J, Moy F and Rosenwaks Z (1995) Endometriosis: a stage by stage analysisthe role of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 64, 392398.[ISI][Medline]
Pellicer A, Oliveira N, Ruiz A, Remohi J and Simon C (1995) Exploring the mechanism(s) of endometriosis-related infertility: an analysis of embryo development and implantation in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 10(Suppl 2), 9197.[Abstract]
Selam B and Arici A (2000) Implantation defect in endometriosis: endometrium or peritoneal fluid. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 55, 121128.[Medline]
Spalding H, Perälä J, Martikainen H, Tekay A and Jouppila P (1998) Assessing tubal patency with transvaginal salpingosonography after the reversal of tubal ligation for female sterilization. Hum Reprod 13, 28192822.
Tinkanen H and Kujansuu E (2000) In vitro fertilization in patients with ovarian endometriomas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79, 119122.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Toya M, Saito H, Ohta N, Saito T, Kaneko T and Hiroi M (2000) Moderate and severe endometriosis is associated with alterations in the cell cycle of granulosa cells in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 73, 344350.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Submitted on February 20, 2005; resubmitted on May 21, 2005; accepted on May 24, 2005.
|