1 Unité de Biostatistiques du Département d'Information Médicale, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 162 avenue Lacassagne 69003 Lyon and 2 INSERM U-407, Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, BP 12, 69921 Oullins Cedex, France
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: contralateral ovulation/dominant follicle/follicular phase length/hormonal profile/ultrasound
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
A renewed interest for side of ovulation arose with evidence that, in infertile women, the dominant follicles in contralateral ovulation are `healthier' than those of ipsilateral one (Fukuda et al., 1996), that corpus luteum affects the diameters of follicles in the ipsilateral ovary during the luteal phase (Fukuda et al., 1997
), and that contralateral ovulation shortens the follicular phase length (Fukuda et al., 1996
, 1998
). Unfortunately, many of the above-cited human studies implicated infertile women and lacked confirmation studies in normally fertile women.
Recently, Quidel Corporation (San Diego, CA, USA) established a bank of first morning void specimens and collected clinical, hormonal, as well as ultrasound data on a sizeable number of cycles in normally fertile women. These data were used in this study to assess whether ovulation alternates consistently from right to left ovary in successive cycles, and whether the site of ovulation affects the size of the follicles, the length of the cycles or the hormonal profiles, these latter parameters being indirect criteria for adequate follicle growth.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The protocol was written for a multi-centre collaborative study under the auspices of Claude Bernard University, Lyon (France). The subjects were recruited from eight centres: Aix-en-Provence, Dijon, and Lyon (France); Milano and Verona (Italy); Düsseldorf (Germany); Liège (Belgium); and Madrid (Spain).
Subjects
The following criteria had to be fulfilled before a subject was admitted into the study: ostensibly healthy menstruating women with two intact ovaries, aged 1845 years inclusive, with previous menstrual cycle lengths of 2434 days inclusive, and experience in natural family planning methods (basal body temperature and signs of cervical mucus). Subjects were excluded if they met at least one of the following criteria: women with frequent anovulatory cycles; women on programmes to stimulate hormonal responses for fertility reasons; women on oral, transdermal or other hormonal contraceptives, or on an abortive drug programme (<3 months); women on hormonal replacement therapy; women with abnormal cyclespolycystic ovarian disease, ovarian cyst, or luteal defect; women with special medical circumstanceshysterectomy, tubal ligation(s), pelvic inflammatory disease, history of fertility problems; women with special habits or circumstances such as runners, breastfeeding, post-partum (<3 months).
The age span of the women was large. This choice was made to cover the largest part of the reproductive life, at the price of an increased heterogeneity of the group.
Keeping with these criteria, 205 cycles were analysed and 81 women, aged 1942 years (mean 32.3) were observed during at least two consecutive ovulatory cycles. Therefore, being free from any illness that might cause subfertility, these women were considered as normally fertile. Besides, 54 out of 81 (66%) were of proven fertility having had at least one child before the study.
Ultrasound investigation
To monitor ovulation, transvaginal (58%) or transabdominal ultrasound were performed after the onset of fertile type cervical mucus observed at the opening of the vagina (Hilgers et al., 1978) and/or luteinizing hormone (LH) surge detected by a rapid assay (Bluetest Ovulation test, Quidel). It may be difficult to find dominant follicles by transabdominal ultrasound. This difficulty was partially circumvented by the repetition of ultrasound examinations by the same investigator for each woman.
Scanning was first performed on alternate days as long as the follicle size was less than 16 mm. Once 16-mm follicles were observed, scanning was performed on a daily basis until the presumed day of ovulation. The dominant follicle was defined as the cystic structure having the greatest diameter. The side of ovulation was that of the ovary bearing the dominant follicle. The day of ovulation was defined as the day of maximum follicular enlargement followed the next day by evidence of rupture. All ovulations were documented by a sonogram of the dominant follicle collapse. The length of the follicular phase was the delay from the onset of menses to the ultrasound-estimated day of ovulation, inclusive. The length of the luteal phase was the delay from the first day with evidence of follicle rupture to the day preceding the onset of the following menses, inclusive.
Hormonal assays
Daily collected early morning urine samples were assayed for quantitative detection of oestrone-3-glucuronide (E1-3-G) and pregnanediol-3-glucuronide (Pd-3
-G) by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) as well as that of FSH and LH by time-resolved fluorometric immunosorbent assays (Delfia). Average hormonal concentrations were estimated at three periods of the cycle; at days 3 ± 1 for the early follicular phase, at the ultrasound estimated day of ovulation ±1 for the peri-ovulatory phase, and at ultrasound estimated day of ovulation +5, +7 and +9 for the luteal phase.
Statistical analysis
Statistical comparisons were performed using unpaired Student's t-test for continuous variables (length of cycle, follicle diameter, hormonal concentrations) and 2 test for categorical variables, i.e. to study the relation between the follicular phase length and the ovulation side. The statistical analysis relative to the side of ovulation was based on the binomial distribution, assuming that in normal circumstances there is a 50% chance of ovulation occurring in either ovary.
All analyses were performed using S-plus statistical package (MathSoft, Inc., Seatle, WA, USA). Significance was defined as P < 0.05 in all analyses.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Follicular phase length and lengths of other phases of the cycle
When the follicular phase was <13 days (n = 26), 46% (n = 12) of the cycles showed contralateral ovulation while in cycles with a follicular phase 13 days (n = 93), contralateral ovulation occurred in 53% of the cycles (n = 49), which was not significant. Therefore, short follicular phases could not be associated with change of ovulation side.
The follicular phase length in contralateral ovulation (14.59 ± 0.33 days, mean ± SEM) did not differ significantly from that of ipsilateral ovulation (14.59 ± 0.37 days). Similarly, as shown in Table II, it was not possible to demonstrate statistically significant differences for other lengths of the cycle phases.
|
Dominant follicle
The mean diameter of the dominant follicle in the contralateral ovulation cycles was 21.78 ± 0.68 mm, which did not differ significantly from ipsilateral cycles (21.73 ± 0.50, P = 0.95). It can therefore be concluded that a former ipsilateral ovulation did not inhibit the current dominant follicle growth.
Hormonal profiles
The urinary concentrations of E1-3-G, Pd-3-G, FSH, and LH in early follicular, peri-ovulatory and luteal phase are shown in Table II
. No significant differences were found for any of these hormones at any of the three phases. Therefore, it could be assumed that (i) during the early follicular phase high residual progesterone concentrations secreted by the regressing former corpus luteum were not associated with contralateral ovulation; (ii) during the peri-ovulatory phase, since hormonal concentrations reflect follicular growth, the fact that no differences were found in these concentrations between former ipsilateral and contralateral ovulation suggests no difference in the current process of follicular growth; (iii) during the luteal phase, since hormonal concentrations reflect the evolution of a follicle into a corpus luteum, the lack of difference in hormone concentrations suggested no difference in follicle transformation.
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In one study on intermenstrual pain (Marinho et al., 1982), this symptom seemed to occur on the same side as follicular rupture in 86% of the subjects. However, an earlier more extended work on the same symptom in 10 women over 2052 cycles (Vollman, 1977
) has shown that in successive cycles the percentage distribution of localization of this pain fluctuates irregularly and without any systematic pattern, which is consistent with the present results.
In infertile women, the duration of the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle was shown to be shorter when ovulations alternated between the two ovaries compared to when ovulation occurred in the same ovary (Potashnik et al., 1987; Fukuda et al., 1996
, 1998
). Moreover, analysing follicular fluids before assisted reproduction treatments, both in natural cycles and during ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate, it was suggested (Fukuda et al., 1996
) that contralateral dominant follicles are healthier than ipsilateral ones (more successful fertilizations, cleavage, transfers, and pregnancy rates). They suggested that this could be a consequence of a negative effect of the corpus luteum on neighbouring follicular growth during the luteal phase of the previous cycle (Fukuda et al., 1997
).
In the normal population of this study, no differences were observed in follicular phase length, dominant follicle size, or urinary hormonal profiles in relation to the side of ovulation in the previous cycle. This suggests that in normally fertile women the growth of selectable follicles is similar in both ovaries independently of the presence or absence of a corpus luteum in the ipsilateral ovary during the previous cycle.
Recently it was shown (Lass et al., 1997) that ovulation induction with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone/human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization in patients with a solitary ovary was not associated with better results with the left than with the right ovary. They questioned a previous observation (Potashnik et al., 1987
) of predominance of the right ovary in spontaneous cycles in women treated for infertility. These authors answered writing that spontaneous ovulation being a purely physiological event, the delicate balance is interrupted by drug-induced down-regulation and ovarian stimulation (Potashnik et al., 1998
) and thus, the two observations may not be opposed. More generally, care must be taken when comparing the results of the current study obtained in normally fertile women with those concerning infertile women with or without hormonal treatment.
In conclusion, the data suggest that in normally fertile women the side of ovulation, the length, and the hormonal profile of a given cycle are independent of the side of ovulation in the previous cycle. However, only lengths and urinary hormonal profiles were studied, and it may be that more subtle differences between ipsilateral and contralateral ovulation might have some implication on conception probability.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
Notes |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Clark, J.R., Dierschke, D.J. and Wolf, R.C. (1978) Hormonal regulation of ovarian folliculogenesis in rhesus monkey: I. Concentration of serum luteinizing hormone and progesterone during laparoscopy and patterns of follicular development during successive menstrual cycles. Biol. Reprod., 17, 779783.
Di Zerega, G.H., Lynch, A. and Hodgen G.D. (1981) Initiation of asymmetrical ovarian estradiol secretion in the primate ovarian cycle after lutectomy. Endocrinology, 108, 12331236.[ISI][Medline]
Fukuda, M., Fukuda, K., Yding Andersen, C. and Byskov, A.G. (1996) Contralateral selection of dominant follicle favours pre-embryo development. Hum. Reprod., 11, 19581962.[Abstract]
Fukuda, M., Fukuda, K., Yding Andersen, C. and Byskov, A.G. (1997) Does corpus luteum locally affect follicular growth negatively? Hum. Reprod., 12, 10241027.[ISI][Medline]
Fukuda, M., Fukuda, K., Yding Andersen, C. and Byskov, A.G. (1998) Contralateral ovulation shortens follicular phase length and favours pre-embryo development during ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate. Hum. Reprod., 11, 15901594.
Hilgers, T.W., Abraham, G.E. and Cavanaugh, D. (1978) Natural family planning. I. The peak symptom and estimated day of ovulation. Obstet. Gynecol., 52, 575582.[Abstract]
Gougeon, A. and Lefèvre, B. (1984) Histological evidence of alternating ovulation in women. J. Reprod. Fertil., 70, 713.[Abstract]
Goodman, A.L. and Hodgen, G.D. (1979) Between-ovary interaction in the regulation of follicle growth, corpus luteum function, and gonadotropin secretion in the primate ovarian cycle. I. Effects of follicle cautery and hemiovariectomy during the follicular phase in Cynomolgus monkeys. Endocrinology, 104, 13041309.[ISI][Medline]
Hartman, C.G. (1932) Studies in the reproduction of the monkey Macacus (Pithecus) Rhesus, with special reference to menstruation and pregnancy. Carnegie Contrib. Embryol., 23, 17.
Katz, Z., Schwartz, Z. and Lancet, M. (1986) Constant ovulation on the side of an occluded tube treated with human menopausal gonadotropin. Fertil. Steril., 45, 717718.[ISI][Medline]
Lass, A., Croucher, C., Lawrie, H. et al. (1997) Right or left ovarywhich one is better? Hum. Reprod., 12, 17301731.[Abstract]
Lenton, E.A., Landgren, B.M., Sexton, L. and Harper, R. (1984) Normal variation in the length of the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle: effect of chronological age. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 91, 681684.[ISI][Medline]
Marinho, A.O., Sallam, H.N., Goessens, L. et al. (1982) Ovulation side and occurrence of mittelschmerz in spontaneous and induced ovarian cycles. Br. Med. J., 284, 632.[ISI][Medline]
Morse, A.H. and Van Wagenen, G. (1936) Observations upon ovulation in primates. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 32, 8236.
Potashnik, G., Insler, V. and Meizner, I. (1987) Frequency, sequence, and side of ovulation in women menstruating normally. Br. Med. J., 294, 219.
Potashnik, G., Insler, V. and Meizner, I. (1998) Side of ovulation in spontaneous cycles and during stimulation for in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod., 13, 244.[ISI][Medline]
Vollman, R.F. (1977) The Menstrual Cycle. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
Wallach, E.E., Virutamasen, P. and Wright, K.H. (1973) Menstrual cycle characteristics and side of ovulation in the rhesus monkey. Fertil. Steril., 24, 715721.[ISI][Medline]
Werlin, L.B., Weckstein, L., Weathersbee, P.S. et al. (1986) Ultrasound: a technique useful in determining the side of ovulation. Fertil. Steril., 46, 814817.[ISI][Medline]
Zuckerman, S. and Parkes, A.S. (1932) The menstrual cycle of the primates. Part V. The cycle of the baboon. Proc. Zool. Soc., 102, 13943.
Submitted on August 26, 1999; accepted on December 15, 1999.