How should we evaluate an open artery in STEMI patients?

Stefan Agewall*

Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, S 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden

* Corresponding author. Tel: +46 8 585 817 33; fax: +46 8 585 867 10. E-mail address: stefan.agewall{at}karolinska.se

This editorial refers to ‘Ageing, impaired myocardial perfusion, and mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty’{dagger} by G. De Luca et al., on page 662, and ‘Combined prognostic utility of ST-segment recovery and myocardial blush after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction’{ddagger} by P. Sorajja et al., on page 667

Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. After plaque rupture and intracoronary thrombus formation, ischaemia causes damage to myocytes and coronary microcirculation soon after occlusion. In the 1980s, mortality reduction with thrombolytic therapy generated a new standard of care for medical treatment of patients with STEMI. However, fibrinolytic therapy is limited by inadequate epicardial patency, and subsequently it has been shown that mechanical revascularization of the infarct-related coronary artery offers an even greater clinical benefit to patients with STEMI. Thus, the goal of reperfusion treatment in patients with STEMI is to re-establish a patent infarct-related epicardial artery as soon as possible.

The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) group has categorized epicardial coronary flow into four grades (0–3) to standardize the angiographic characterization of reperfusion. The restoration of TIMI flow grade 3 (normal epicardial flow) in patients with STEMI is associated with improved survival and enhanced recovery of left ventricular function. This observation has led to the ‘Open artery theory’ explanation that restoration of TIMI flow grade 3 has been used as the gold standard for reperfusion success.

However, the angiographic picture only gives an acute image of the flow in the epicardial artery and, therefore, a normal TIMI flow grade does not necessarily mean that microvascular flow and myocardial perfusion have been normalized. When epicardial reperfusion occurs and blood flow to the infarct area is regained, reperfusion injury is caused by neutrophil infiltration, free radicals, and activation of the complement system. Especially after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it is reasonable to believe that microemboli are pushed away distally, causing microvascular obstruction limiting distal tissue perfusion even after opening of the epicardial artery. Distal embolization in patients treated with primary angioplasty is visible on the coronary angiogram in ~15% of patients.1 Embolization is related to reduced myocardial reperfusion, more extensive myocardial damage, and a poor prognosis. Thus, it is a very significant oversimplification to only evaluate the TIMI flow of the epicardial artery in STEMI patients. The clinical importance of distal tissue perfusion has been demonstrated in several studies that have used surrogate markers such as ST-segment resolution, myocardial contrast echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging.24 After primary PCI, TIMI-3 is restored in >90% of the patients with STEMI, whereas distal microvascular flow and myocardial perfusion are normalized to a much less degree. The lack of myocardial reperfusion in spite of restored TIMI-3 flow has been called the ‘no-reflow’ phenomenon. It is therefore clearly appreciated that an open epicardial artery is a necessary but insufficient condition of a distal perfusion.

The higher mortality rate observed in older patients with STEMI has been explained by a higher frequency of comorbidities, such as previous atheroclerotic disease, higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, and impaired left ventricular function. In the study by De Luca et al.,5 reperfusion was evaluated by the use of ST-segment resolution and myocardial blush in patients with STEMI, treated with primary PCI. They observed a clear and significant relationship between age and reperfusion even after adjustment for baseline confounding factors. Because myocardial perfusion is strongly associated with survival, this is an important observation. However, the CADILLAC study group3 did not observe any difference between different age groups for angiographic procedural success, post-procedural TIMI-3 flow, or ST-segment resolution. Despite the different outcome of these reports, the CADILLAC group also reported an association between age and increased mortality. Furthermore, the rates of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular event were inversely related to ST-segment resolution. We still do not know why ageing is associated with such a poor outcome in patients with STEMI, but older patients more often have a complex coronary anatomy, which may be associated with a higher risk for distal embolization. It has also been shown that ageing is associated with poor endothelial and microcirculation function, which may contribute to a poor myocardial perfusion after revascularization by PCI. Thus, the report from the CADILLAC study group and the report by De Luca et al. confirm age as a risk factor for mortality and MACE and ST-segment resolution as a predictor of a better outcome in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI. We can conclude that an open epicardial artery is not good enough; also, the distal microvascular flow and myocardial perfusion must be re-established.

How should an open artery be evaluated in clinical practice?

The ST-elevation on the ECG is caused by myocytes, deprived of oxygen, and therefore, ATP-dependent transmembrane ion gradients are lost. An ST-segment recovery quantifies the reversal of this condition and has proved to be one of the most predictive measures of cellular response to reperfusion. ST-segment recovery in STEMI patients represents both reversal of ischaemia and interruption of infarction. Therefore, serial or continuous ECG assessments over time provide a non-invasive modality for tracking the status of epicardial patency. Recanalization of the epicardial artery can be recognized by >50% ST-segment recovery. The extent of ST-segment recovery in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI or thrombolysis provides prognostic information.4,6 Continuous monitoring of ST-segment resolution appears to be more advantageous than assessing ST-segment resolution at multiple time points, because it can be used to determine the exact time of reperfusion and to detect intermittent reocclusion that often occurs after fibrinolysis.

The myocardial blush, an angiographic measure believed to reflect microvascular flow, relates to the contrast opacification of the myocardial bed subtended by the infarct artery. The myocardial blush scale has been found to relate to the enzymatic infarct size in patients after primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction7 and to have a better predictive value for long-term mortality than Killip class, TIMI grade flow, and left ventricular ejection fraction.

In contrast to many other methods of microvascular flow assessment, both restoration of myocardial blush and ST-segment recovery are readily available in clinical practice. In another report from the CADILLAC study group, clinical outcome in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI were assessed as a function of ST-segment resolution and myocardial blush.8 The authors report a strong correlation between ST-segment resolution and myocardial blush; however, the results were discordant in ~40% of the patients. Both ST-segment resolution and myocardial blush were associated with death, whereas only ST-segment resolution was an independent predictor for death. Other studies have reported that both ST-segment resolution and myocardial blush are independent predictors for death.9 A well-known knowledge is that time is muscle. All efforts should be made to shorten door-needle time as much as possible in patients with STEMI. Therefore, the observation by De Luca et al.10 that time to treatment is associated with the extent of ST-segment resolution, myocardial blush grade, and 1 year mortality is logical.

In conclusion, we know that the Open artery theory is not the only explanation in patients with STEMI. We also need to evaluate microvascular flow and myocardial perfusion. Restoration of myocardial blush and ST-segment recovery are readily available in clinical practice and both methods predict outcome. In clinics without angiographic facilities, ST-segment recovery should be assessed after treatment with thrombolysis.

In the future, efforts should be aimed at improving myocardial perfusion, beyond epicardial recanalization, to further improve the outcome of patients with STEMI. This may be achieved by a combination of a well-performed percutaneous angioplasty and adjunctive pharmacological treatment. Markers of myocardial perfusion, such as myocardial blush and ST-segment recovery, may be used as surrogate study endpoints in clinical trials. Compared with the standard clinical endpoint, mortality, the use of these surrogate endpoints in trials analysing the effect of strategies designed to improve myocardial perfusion after treatment of STEMI patients may allow a reduction of required patient numbers.

Footnotes

{dagger} doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi110 Back

{ddagger} doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi167 Back

References

  1. Henriques JP, Zijlstra F, Ottervanger JP et al. Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1112–1117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Vant'Hof AWJ, Liem A, deBoer M-J et al. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial blush frade. Circulation 1998;97:2302–2306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Prasad A, Stone GW, Aymong E et al. Impact of ST-segment resolution after primary angioplasty on outcomes after myocardial infarction in elderly patients: an analysis from the CADILLAC trial. Am Heart J 2004;147:669–675.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. de Lemos JA, Antman EM, Giugliano RP et al. ST-segment resolution and infarct-related artery patency and flow after thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 14 investigators. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:299–304.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. De Luca G, van t'Hof AWJ, Ottervanger JP et al. Ageing, impaired myocardial perfusion and mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. Eur Heart J 2005;26:662–666. First published on January 28, 2005, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi110.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Corbalan R, Larrain G, Nazzal C et al. Association of nonivasive markers of coronary artery reperfusion to assess microvascular obstruction in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:342–346.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  7. Stone GW, Peterson MA, Lansky AJ et al. Impact of normalized myocardial perfusion after successful angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:591–597.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Sorajja P, Gersh BJ, Costantino C et al. Combined prognostic utility of ST-segment recovery and myocardial blush after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2005;26:667–674. First published on February 25, 2005, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Haager PK, Christott P, Heussen N et al. Prediction of clinical outcome after mechanical revascularization in acute myocardial infarction by markers of myocardial reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:532–538.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. De Luca G, van't Hof AW, de Boer MJ et al. Time-to-treatment significantly affects the extent of ST-segment resolution and myocardial blush in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1009–1013.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related articles in EHJ:

Ageing, impaired myocardial perfusion, and mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty
Giuseppe De Luca, Arnoud W.J. van 't Hof, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Jan C.A. Hoorntje, A.T. Marcel Gosselink, Jan-Henk E. Dambrink, Menko-Jan de Boer, and Harry Suryapranata
EHJ 2005 26: 662-666. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Combined prognostic utility of ST-segment recovery and myocardial blush after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
Paul Sorajja, Bernard J. Gersh, Costantino Costantini, Michael G. McLaughlin, Peter Zimetbaum, David A. Cox, Eulogio Garcia, James E. Tcheng, Roxana Mehran, Alexandra J. Lansky, David E. Kandzari, Cindy L. Grines, and Gregg W. Stone
EHJ 2005 26: 667-674. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Full Text (PDF)
All Versions of this Article:
26/7/634    most recent
ehi217v1
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Related articles in EHJ
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My Personal Archive
Download to citation manager
Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Agewall, S.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Agewall, S.