More evidence-based data are required for a consensus on the aetiology of the so-called Brugada Syndrome

B Martini*

Department of Cardiology, Boldrini Hospital, 36016 Thiene, Vicenza, Italy

* Corresponding author: +390445368537; fax: +390445388630
E-mail address: bmartini{at}tiscali.it

Received 30 October 2002; revised 8 July 2003; accepted 31 July 2003

Dear Editor

In the Consensus Report,1‘Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for the Brugada Syndrome’ the authors assume that this is mainly a functional syndrome related to abnormal repolarization. Although it is popular to classify this syndrome as a channelopathy, it should be noted that SCN5A genetic abnormalities are present in only 10–30% of these patients, and in other populations without the syndrome, as recently reported by Splawski. The presence of the SCN5A mutations, neither explains nor exclude, the presence of structural cardiac abnormality. In addition, the Sudden Unexplained Death Syndrome (SUDS) and Brugada syndrome share the same ECG pattern; however, the SCN5A mutation could not be found in families with this inherited condition described by Sangwatanaroj. The only careful systematic autopsy study of 18individuals who died of SUDS, performed by Kirshner in 1986 showed pathological changes, primarily in the conduction system in virtually all of the hearts. There is other evidence of structural heart disease reported in patients with a typical ‘Brugada ECG’. There have been several studies, including our own, that have clearly shown that this ECG pattern (related to a depolarization abnormality), is present in some patients with concealed forms of right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia.2Recently, Corrado et al. found that 5% of patients who died suddenly and had autopsied proven ARVC/D had ST segment elevation in the right precordial leads.3Also, Takagi et al. showed wall motion abnormalities by electron beam tomography in the right ventricular outflow tract (n=17) and inferior wall (n=7) in 21 of 26 patients with the Brugada syndrome.4Although functional explanations for these abnormalities have been suggested, it will require autopsy data to determine the true cause of these abnormalities.

The elegant experiments of Antzelevitch with in vitro perfused wedged preparationsof canine hearts must be confirmed by clinical evidence, particularly anatomic studies, so that we can better understand whether these ECG abnormalities have an organic or functional basis or can be due to a combination of both.5

References

  1. Wilde AAM, Antzelevitch C, Borggrefe M et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for the Brugada syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:1648–1654.[Free Full Text]
  2. Martini B, Nava A, Thiene G et al. Ventricular fibrillation without apparent heart disease: description of six cases. Am Heart J. 1989;118:1203–1220.[Medline]
  3. Corrado D, Basso C, Buja GF et al. Right Bundle Branch Block, ST-segment elevation, and sudden death in young people. Circulation. 2001;103:710–717.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Takagi M, Aihara N, Kuribayashi S et al. Localized right ventricular morphological abnormalities detected by electron-beam computed tomography represent arrhythmogenic substrates in patients with the Brugada syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:1032–1041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Antzelevitch C, Brugada P, Brugada J et al. Brugada Syndrome: 1992–2002, A Historical Perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1665–1671.[CrossRef][Medline]




This Article
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My Personal Archive
Download to citation manager
Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Martini, B
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Martini, B