Low pulse pressure is independently related to elevated natriuretic peptides and increased mortality in advanced chronic heart failure
Adriaan A. Voors1,*,
Colin J. Petrie2,
Mark C. Petrie2,
Andrew Charlesworth3,
Hans L. Hillege1,
Felix Zijlstra1,
John J. McMurray2 and
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen1
1Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
2Clinical Research Initiative in Heart Failure, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
3Nottingham Clinical Trial Data Center, Isaac Newton Center, Highfields Science Park, University Boulevard, Nottingham, UK
Received 17 June 2004; revised 28 February 2005; accepted 17 March 2005; online publish-ahead-of-print 15 April 2005.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +31 50 3612355; fax: +31 50 3614391. E-mail address: a.a.voors{at}thorax.azg.nl
 |
Abstract
|
---|
Aims An increased pulse pressure (PP) has consistently predicted increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular risk patients and mild chronic heart failure (CHF). In contrast, a decreased PP was related to increased mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. However, the predictive value of PP in patients with advanced CHF is not known.
Methods and results PP was analysed for its effect on mortality, adjusting for other modifiers of risk, using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of data collected from 1901 patients with New York Heart Association Class III or IV CHF (mean age 65 and mean ejection fraction 0.26). Natriuretic peptides were measured in a subgroup. Multivariable Cox-regression analysis demonstrated that lower PP was associated with an increased mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.91 per 10 mmHg; 0.930.99], independent of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and other well known prognostic markers. In patients with a PP below the median value of 45 mmHg, PP was a stronger predictor of mortality than MAP (HR for PP 0.80 per 10 mmHg; 0.640.99). In patients with a PP above the median value of 45 mmHg, MAP was a stronger predictor of mortality than PP (HR for MAP 0.83 per 10 mmHg increase; 0.720.95). In addition, lower PP was independently related to increased atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP).
Conclusion In patients with advanced CHF, low PP is an independent predictor of mortality. In addition, low PP was related to increased levels of ANP and BNP.
Key Words: Pulse pressure Chronic heart failure Natriuretic peptides Blood pressure Mortality Mean arterial pressure
 |
Introduction
|
---|
An elevated pulse pressure (PP) consistently predicts increased cardiovascular risk in a variety of populations. In normal and hypertensive populations, an increased PP is a risk factor for coronary heart disease, chronic heart failure (CHF), and cardiovascular mortality.17 In patients who have undergone percutaneous or surgical revascularization, a high PP predicts total mortality.8 Similarly, in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) after myocardial infarction, an increased PP predicts total and cardiovascular mortality and re-infarction.9 A high PP in these patients is caused by a decreased aortic elasticity probably due to advanced atherosclerosis and is therefore related to an adverse outcome.
The prognostic value of PP in patients with CHF is less clear. In the first study to look at the relationship between PP and outcome, the SOLVD investigators found that a high PP predicted adverse outcome.10 However, a significant proportion of patients in the SOLVD trials did not have CHF, but asymptomatic LVSD. Approximately one-third of patients had New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II or III CHF. In contrast, in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure, low PP appeared to be an independent predictor of mortality.11 In these patients, a low PP probably reflects a decreased cardiac function and is therefore related to an increased mortality. The aim of the current study is to examine the predictive value of PP on mortality in patients with stable but advanced CHF (NYHA Class III or IV).
 |
Methods
|
---|
Patients
All patients of the present study had been part of the Prospective Randomized study of Ibopamine on Mortality and Efficacy (PRIME)-II study.12 Blood pressure was measured at the randomization visit, as per the usual practice of the participating centres.
Details of inclusion and exclusion criteria have been previously published.12 In brief, 1906 patients with advanced CHF (NYHA Class IIIIV) were randomized to ibopamine, an oral dopamine agonist, or placebo. The primary endpoint of the study was all cause mortality. Patients were aged 1880 and already received optical medical treatment with argiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors (if tolerated), diuretics, and when indicated digoxin and vasodilators. Evidence of left ventricular dysfunction had to be demonstrated by one or more of the following techniques: (i) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% (measured by radio nuclide or contrast ventriculography or by echocardiography), (ii) left ventricular internal end-diastolic diameter >60 mm or a fractional shortening <20% on echocardiography, or (iii) cardiothoracic (CT) ratio on chest X-ray >0.50. All patients gave written informed consent before inclusion in the study.
Measurement of plasma neurohormones
In the PRIME-II study, 427 patients were enrolled in The Netherlands. From these 427 patients, 372 patients agreed to participate in a pre-defined neurohormonal substudy. Blood was collected from an intravenous cannula after patients had rested in the supine position for >30 min. Samples were poured into chilled 10 mL tubes containing EDTA (19 mg) and aprotinin (1000 kIU). The tubes were centrifuged within 30 min (4°C, 10 min, 2000 g) and the plasma was separated and stored in polyethylene tubes at 70°C. Samples were transported on dry ice to the Core Laboratory at the University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, where all measurements were performed. Measurement of ANP (normal value: 1535 pmol/L) was performed after SepPak extraction, with commercially available radioimmunoassay kits from the Nichols Institute, Wijchen, The Netherlands.13 Plasma NT-ANP (normal value 150500 pmol/L) was measured using a radioimmunoassay kit (Biotop, Oulu, Finland). NT-proBNP was measured using a radioimmunoassay kit with reagents including antibody, standards, and radio label. The assay uses 50 µL of unextracted plasma and has a standard range of 601000 pmol/L. All samples giving results of >900 pmol/L were re-analysed in appropriate dilutions with physiological salt. In 12 consecutive assays, variability was 14, 11, 4, and 4% at concentrations of 131, 199, 293, and 901 pmol/L, respectively. BNP was determined by a commercially available immunoradiometric assay (Shionoria, Osaka, Japan).
Statistics
For comparisons between baseline characteristics of patients below and above the median PP of 45 mmHg, Student's t-test (PROC TTEST, SAS Institute Inc., Chicago, IL, USA),
2, or Fisher's exact (PROC FREQ, SAS Institute Inc.) test were used. Differences between survival curves as presented in Figure 1 were calculated using univariable logrank survival analysis (PROC LIFETEST, SAS Institute Inc.). In addition, a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model (PROC PHREG, SAS Institute Inc.) was used, including well known prognostic markers of mortality in CHF patients.14 Beside PP, the following variables were included: mean arterial blood pressure (1/3xsystolic blood pressure+2/3xdiastolic blood pressure), age, LVEF, functional New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class, heart rate, body weight, diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate (Cockcroft-GaultGFRc=[(140age in years)x(body weight in kg)]/(72xserum creatinine in mg/dL)), use of ibopamine, ACE-inhibitors, or beta-blockers.
The assumption of linearity was tested by fractional polynomials (SASA software version 11.5, and STATA version 8.2, Stata Corp. 2004). Linearity was found in all variables. Possible interactions were tested among PP, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, age, and heart rate. No correction has been made for multiple hypothesis testing as this, because of the small sample and endpoint size, was an exploratory study searching for parameters requiring confirmation in subsequent adequately powered studies. To distinguish between patients with and without a probably increased aortic stiffness, a subgroup analysis was performed in patients with a PP above and below the median PP of 45 mmHg.
A separate analysis was done to establish factors predicting the levels of ANP and BNP. All variables presented in Table 1 were univariably tested in a linear regression model (PROC REG, SAS Institute Inc.). Variables with a P-value <0.1 in the univariable analysis were included into a mutivariable linear regression model (PROC REG, SAS Institute Inc.). All tests were two-sided. Data are presented as mean value±standard errors of the mean. A P-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
 |
Results
|
---|
A total of 1906 patients were included in the original study. Measurements of systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure were missing in five patients. The present analysis was performed on the remaining 1901 patients. Mean follow-up was 11.2 (range 036) months. KaplanMeier survival analysis demonstrated that overall 1 year mortality was 22.5%. Baseline characteristics of the patient population are presented in Table 1. There were substantial differences between patients with lower and higher PP (Table 1). Patients with a PP below the median value of 45 mmHg had a significantly lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure, were younger, more often male, had a lower LVEF, a higher heart rate, were less symptomatic, less diabetes, and had a better renal function.
Mean PP was 47 (range 11135) mmHg. PP quartiles were:
55 mmHg (Q1; n=506), 4555 mmHg (Q2; n=496), 3545 mmHg (Q3; n=430), and
35 mmHg (Q4; n=469). Survival in each quartile of PP is presented in Figure 1. Survival in the first three quartiles were similar (Q1: 62.9%; Q2: 65.1%; and Q3: 65.5%). Patients with a PP
35 mmHg had a significantly lower survival (Q4: 48.1%; logrank: P=0.0005).
Univariate analysis
Univariate predictors of mortality were increased age (P<0.0001), lower LVEF (P=0.01), use of digoxin (P=0.0001), non-use of ACE-inhibitor (P=0.0001), non-use of nitrates (P=0.04), non-use of vasodilators (P=0.008), non-use of betablockers, use of ibopamine (P=0.01), ischaemic cause of heart failure (P=0.009), diabetes (P=0.0005), increased NYHA class (P<0.0001), increased heart rate (P=0.004), lower body weight (P<0.0001), lower glomerular filtration rate (P<0.0001), lower systolic blood pressure (P<0.0001), lower diastolic blood pressure (P=0.0009), lower mean arterial pressure (MAP) (P<0.0001), and PP (P=0.0002).
Multivariable analysis
Multivariable (independent) predictors of mortality are presented in Table 2. Both lower PP [hazard ratio (HR) 0.91 per 10 mmHg; 0.930.99] and lower MAP (HR 0.87 per 10 mmHg; 0.790.96) were independently related to increased mortality. Other significant prognostic markers were LVEF, heart rate, NYHA Class, glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, the use of ibopamine, and the non-use of ACE-inhibitors or betablockers (Table 2).
Table 3 demonstrates that in patients with a PP below the median value of 45 mmHg, PP was stronger associated with mortality than MAP. In contrast, in patients with a PP equal to or above the median value of 45 mmHg, MAP was stronger associated with mortality than PP (Table 4).
Natriuretic peptides
From the 427 patients that were included in The Netherlands, 372 patients agreed to participate in a pre-defined neurohormonal substudy. Both N-ANP, BNP, and NT-BNP were significantly increased in patients with a PP<45 mmHg (Figure 2). This relation remained statistically significant after adjustment for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, and other possible confounders as described in Table 1, except for ANP. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that, together with glomerular filtration rate and LVEF, PP (on a continuous scale) was the strongest predictor of both BNP (P=0.0009), NT-BNP (P=0.005), and N-ANP (P=0.005).
 |
Discussion
|
---|
This is the first study of the prognostic value of PP in patients with advanced CHF. A low PP is independently associated with increased mortality in this population. In patients with a PP below the median value of 45 mmHg, the magnitude of the excessive risk conferred by a low PP even exceeds that of mean arterial blood pressure, which is a well recognized indicator of poor prognosis.1517 Notably, in patients with a PP <45 mmHg, mean arterial blood pressure was a better predictor of mortality than PP. In addition, elevated natriuretic peptides were significantly and independently related to lower PP.
The only previous study of the predictive value of PP that included patients with CHF was a retrospective analysis of the SOLVD trial.10 In contrast to the current study, a high PP predicted a worse clinical outcome. The most important difference between the SOLVD study and the current analysis is the NYHA class of the patients studied. The SOLVD analysis included patients from both the prevention and the treatment trials. Those in the prevention trial had asymptomatic LVSD (n=4228), whereas those in the treatment trial (n=2569) had predominantly NYHA Class II, with a minority of NYHA Class III, CHF. This was a study, therefore, of asymptomatic LVSD and mild CHF which is a markedly different population to those with advanced CHF in PRIME II. The SOLVD analysis did not present a detailed breakdown of the subgroup analysis between asymptomatic LVSD and symptomatic LVSD populations, but did state that there were similar results in both groups.10 In contrast to patients with mild CHF, it was recently demonstrated that a lower PP was related to increased mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure.11 Patients in the lowest tertile (PP<43 mmHg) had a 2.5 times increased mortality risk when compared with patients in the highest tertile (>59 mmHg).
There are several explanations for the apparent discrepancy of the predictive value of PP in different populations. PP is mainly determined by stroke volume and arterial compliance. When systolic left ventricular function and stroke volume are normal, an elevated PP is thought to principally reflect decreased aortic elasticity. The resulting increase in pulsatile load is thought to have an adverse effect on cardiac function and result in an increased risk of clinical events. In addition, arterial compliance is related to atherosclerosis, and a higher PP in patients with a normal cardiac function probably reflects more severe atherosclerosis. This scenario is thought to apply especially to hypertension and stable coronary heart disease.17
In patients with post myocardial infarction LVSD, asymptomatic LVSD, and mild CHF, PP is driven both by left ventricular dysfunction (decreased stroke volume and lower PP) and by a decreased aortic elasticity (higher PP). As a higher PP was related to cardiovascular events in these patients as well, the effects of a decreased aortic elasticity seem to be more important than the effects of a decreased stroke volume.810
In the present study, we analysed the effects of PP on mortality in advanced CHF patients. Obviously, the effects of a decreased stroke volume, reflected by a lower PP, become more important than a decreased aortic elasticity. This is further supported by the finding that the effects of PP were more pronounced in patients with a lower PP, probably reflecting a group of patients without a decreased aortic elasticity.
In 1989, Stevenson and Perloff18 demonstrated that proportional PP (systolicdiastolic blood pressure/systolic blood pressure) correlated well with cardiac index (r2=0.82). In patients with a proportional PP of <25%, sensitivity and specificity for a cardiac index <2.2 L/min/m2 were 91 and 83%, respectively. These findings were supported by the results of Shah et al.19 PP was the only multivariable predictor of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) >18 mmHg (wet patients) and a cardiac index of
2.2 L/min/m2 (cold patients). In a more recent study by Nohria et al.,20 event-free survival was significantly lower in the wet and cold patients when compared with the dry and warm patients. These data are in line with the present study, where increased natriuretic peptides fit well with the wet and cold profile.
Limitations of the study
It is important to note that this analysis is exploratory in nature and was not pre-specified in the PRIME II protocol. In particular, the separation between patients with higher and lower PP was a post hoc analysis. The data collected are in a clinical trial setting and we recognize that the findings require verification in prospective epidemiological studies of appropriate populations. Blood pressure measurement was not performed in a uniform manner. This may be regarded as a criticism, but reflects real-life practice. The PRIME II trial was carried out in the late 1990s before betablockers were standard CHF management and thus, the effect of betablockers on the predictive value of PP on mortality in advanced CHF is unknown.
 |
Conclusions
|
---|
PP provides a readily available, clinic, or bedside prognostic indicator in advanced CHF. Low PP independently predicts increased mortality. Moreover, low PP is independently related to increased natriuretic peptides.
 |
References
|
---|
- Darne B, Girerd X, Safar M, Cambien F, Guize L. Pulsatile versus steady component of blood pressure: a cross-sectional analysis and a prospective analysis on cardiovascular mortality. Hypertension 1989;13:392400.[Abstract]
- Franklin SS, Khan SA, Wong ND, Larson MG, Levy D. Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart disease? The Framingham heart study. Circulation 1999;100:354360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Benetos A, Safar M, Rudnichi A, Smulyan H, Richard JL, Ducimetieere P, Guize L. Pulse pressure: a predictor of long-term cardiovascular mortality in a French male population. Hypertension 1997;30:14101415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Fang J, Madhavan S, Cohen H, Alderman MH. Measures of blood pressure and myocardial infarction in treated hypertensive patients. J Hypertens 1995;13:413419.[ISI][Medline]
- Chae CU, Pfeffer MA, Glynn RJ, Mitchell GF, Taylor JO, Hennekens CH. Increased pulse pressure and risk of heart failure in the elderly. JAMA 1999;281:634639.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Vaccarino V, Holford TR, Krumholz HM. Pulse pressure and risk for myocardial infarction and heart failure in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:130138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kostis JB, Lawrence-Nelson J, Ranjan R, Wilson AC, Kostis WJ, Lacy CR. Association of increased pulse pressure with the development of heart failure in SHEP. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly (SHEP) Cooperative Research Group. Am J Hypertens 2001;14:798803.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Domanski MJ, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Mitchell GF, Faxon DP, Pitt B, Sopko G. Determinants and prognostic information provided by pulse pressure in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing revascularization. The Balloon Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Am J Cardiol 2001;87:675679.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Mitchell GF, Moye LA, Braunwald E, Rouleau JL, Bernstein V, Geltman EM, Flaker GC, Pfeffer MA. Sphygmomanometrically determined pulse pressure is a powerful independent predictor of recurrent events after myocardial infarction in patients with impaired left ventricular function. SAVE investigators. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement. Circulation 1997;96:42544260.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Domanski MJ, Mitchell GF, Norman JE, Exner DV, Pitt B, Pfeffer MA. Independent prognostic information provided by sphygmomanometrically determined pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:951958.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Aronson D, Burger AJ. Relation between pulse pressure and survival in patients with decompensated heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:785788.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Hampton JR, van Veldhuisen DJ, Kleber FX, Cowley AJ, Ardia A, Block P, Cortina A, Cserhalmi L, Follath F, Jensen G, Kayanakis J, Lie KI, Mancia G, Skene AM. Randomised study of effect of ibopamine on survival in patients with advanced severe heart failure. Second Prospective Randomised Study of Ibopamine on Mortality and Efficacy (PRIME II) Investigators. Lancet 1997;349:971977.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Boomsma F, Bhaggoe UM, Man In 't Veld AJ, Schalekamp MA. Comparison of N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and atrial natriuretic peptide in human plasma as measured with commercially available radioimmunoassay kits. Clin Chim Acta 1996;252:4149.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Bouvy ML, Heerdink ER, Leufkens HG, Hoes AW. Predicting mortality in patients with heart failure: a pragmatic approach. Heart 2003;89: 605609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Anguita M, Arizon JM, Bueno G, Latre JM, Sancho M, Torres F, Gimenez D, Concha M, Valles F. Clinical and hemodynamic predictors of survival in patients aged <65 years with severe congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:413417.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Cleland JG, Dargie HJ, Ford I. Mortality in heart failure: clinical variables of prognostic value. Br Heart J 1987;58:572582.[Abstract]
- Poole-Wilson PA, Uretsky BF, Thygesen K, Cleland JG, Massie BM, Ryden L. Mode of death in heart failure: findings from the ATLAS trial. Heart 2003;89:4248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Stevenson LW, Perloff JK. The limited reliability of physical signs for estimating hemodynamics in chronic heart failure. JAMA 1989;261: 884888.[Abstract]
- Shah MR, Hasselblad V, Stinnett SS, Gheorghiade M, Swedberg K, Califf RM, O'Connor CM. Hemodynamic profiles of advanced heart failure: association with clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes. J Card Fail 2001;7:105113.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Nohria A, Tsang SW, Fang JC, Lewis EF, Jarcho JA, Mudge GH, Stevenson LW. Clinical assessment identifies hemodynamic profiles that predict outcomes in patients admitted with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:17971804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]