The Functional -374 T/A RAGE Gene Polymorphism Is Associated With Proteinuria and Cardiovascular Disease in Type 1 Diabetic Patients

Kim Pettersson-Fernholm1,2, Carol Forsblom1,2, Barry I. Hudson3,4, Markus Perola5,6, Peter J. Grant3, and Per-Henrik Groop1,2 for the FinnDiane Study Group

1 Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
2 Folkhälsan Research Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
3 Academic Unit of Molecular Vascular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, U.K.
4 Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York
5 Department of Molecular Medicine, National Public Health Institute, Biomedicum, Helsinki, Finland
6 Department of Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, California


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
The hyperglycemic milieu in diabetes results in the formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) that predominantly act through specific receptors, particularly the receptor for AGEs (RAGE). Two functional polymorphisms in the promoter of the RAGE gene (-429 T/C and -374 T/A) and one in the AGE binding domain in exon 3 (G82S) were studied in 996 Finnish type 1 diabetic patients. In patients with poor metabolic control (HbA1c >9.5%), the AA genotype of the -374 T/A polymorphism was more common in those with a normal albumin excretion rate than in those with proteinuria (30 vs. 10%, P = 0.01). We observed less coronary heart disease (6 vs. 14%, P < 0.05), acute myocardial infarction (2 vs. 14%, P = 0.01), and peripheral vascular disease (2 vs. 14%, P < 0.05) in patients with the AA genotype of the -374 T/A polymorphism than in those with the TT + TA genotype. Thus, the association between the RAGE -374 T/A homozygous AA genotype and cardiovascular disease as well as albumin excretion in type 1 diabetic patients with poor metabolic control suggests a gene-environment interaction in the development of diabetic nephropathy and cardiovascular complications.

Elevated arterial blood pressure, proteinuria, progressive decline in renal function, and high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are clinical characteristics of nephropathy in type 1 diabetic subjects (1,2). The chronic hyperglycemia associated with this condition results in formation and accumulation of irreversible advanced glycation end products (AGEs) that cause a plethora of adverse effects, resulting in dysfunction of the vasculature (3). These include changes in lipid metabolism, platelet function, and extracellular matrix composition (4), effects shown to be mediated by specific AGE binding receptors. The candidate receptor most likely to be involved in these processes is the receptor for AGEs (RAGE). Blockade of AGE/RAGE binding prevents the underlying cellular changes associated with vascular disease and the formation of atherosclerosis in animal models of diabetes (5,6). RAGE is normally expressed at low levels in the vasculature; however, studies of human subjects and animal models of diabetes reveal major upregulation of RAGE in the presence of vascular disease (7,8). The role for RAGE in diabetic renal disease is emphasized by animal models engineered to overexpress RAGE, which develop diabetic nephropathy more rapidly than their nontransgenic counterparts (9).

The role for a genetic influence on the pathogenesis is supported by studies that show familial clustering of diabetic nephropathy (10,11), although few genes have been identified as having a role in this disorder. The upregulation and pathogenic effects of RAGE in diabetic vascular disease highlight the RAGE gene as a candidate for involvement in the pathogenesis of nephropathy. The gene for RAGE is located on chromosome 6p21.3 near the HLA locus (12), and at least 30 polymorphisms have been identified (1316). Most of the polymorphisms are rare coding changes or located in noncoding regions, including introns and the 5' flanking region. Three polymorphisms have been highlighted in studies that include two common functional polymorphisms (-429 T/C and -374 T/A) in the promoter region and a common coding change of a Gly to Ser at amino acid 82. The -429 T/C and -374 T/A polymorphisms were shown to have a marked effect on transcriptional activity (14), with the G82S occurring in the AGE binding domain. Whether these functional polymorphisms play a role in the development of diabetic nephropathy or other complications in type 1 diabetes has not been established. Therefore, we studied these three polymorphisms in 996 type 1 diabetic patients with and without diabetic nephropathy.

The clinical characteristics of the four patient groups are shown in Table 1. In the entire cohort, the frequencies of the homozygous mutant genotype for the -429 T/C, -374 T/A, and G82S polymorphisms were 2, 13, and 1%, respectively. The -374 T/A and G82S polymorphisms were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in all four groups, whereas the -429 T/C deviated significantly from equilibrium ({chi}2 = 20.8, P < 0.0001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Clinical characteristics of 996 type 1 diabetic patients included in the study

 
No difference in genotypes or allele frequencies was observed between the four groups. The AA genotype frequency of the -374 T/A polymorphism was 15% in patients with normoalbuminuria compared with 12% in those with proteinuria (P = NS). However, in patients with poor metabolic control, the AA genotype of the -374 T/A polymorphism was more common in subjects with normal albumin excretion than in those with proteinuria (Table 2). The HbA1c level did not affect the genotype frequencies of the 429 T/C and G82S polymorphisms (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Patients with the homozygous mutant genotype (AA) of the RAGE -374 T/A polymorphism according to HbA1c level

 
In the entire cohort, 106 patients had manifest cardiovascular disease (CVD). CVD was less common in those with the AA genotype than in those with the TT and TA genotypes of the -374 T/A polymorphism. In addition, patients with the AA genotype had less coronary heart disease (CHD) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (both included in the CVD variable) and less peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (not included in the CVD variable) (Table 3). Furthermore, the AA genotype of the -374 T/A polymorphism was associated with CVD in a multiple logistic regression analysis (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 Genotype distribution and macrovascular complications of the -374 T/A polymorphism in the entire cohort

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4 Multiple backward stepwise logistic regression analysis of CVD in the whole cohort (R = 0.40, n = 987)

 
The single nucleotide polymorphisms were in tight linkage disequilibrium with each other (P < 0.0001), but since we had no linkage phase information due to the study setting, we analyzed whether a specific genotype combination would associate with the analyzed phenotypes using the program MENDEL (17). Such an association would suggest a specific risk-increasing "haplotype block" (18) behind the findings, which could then contain the possible undetected causative variant. In this analysis by MENDEL option 12, the distributions of all the alleles as a set of three markers are analyzed together for each phenotype. The statistical significance of the difference in these distributions is tested using a Monte Carlo simulation approximation to Fisher’s exact test. Genotypes of the case and control subjects are permuted, and a distribution of the possible genotypes is generated. The program identifies the cell with the largest deviation in allele frequency from what is expected and tests the significance of this deviation with a permutation test. The alleles observed in both samples are included in the distributions under analysis. Phase-known haplotypes are not required to identify a difference in the distributions. The exact test allows for sparse and zero counts in cells of the distributions. No specific predisposing genotype combination was found, which suggests that the -374 T/A variation might be the actual causative variant and not in mere linkage disequilibrium with the actual variant.

Our results show an association between the -374 T/A AA genotype of the RAGE promoter and CVD as well as albumin excretion in type 1 diabetic patients with poor metabolic control. These results indicate that the AA genotype may have a protective role against some diabetic complications, particularly in those with poor metabolic control. Our results are, however, at conflict with a recent study by Poirier et al. (16) showing no association between diabetic nephropathy and the -374 T/A polymorphism. In that study, the sample size was smaller and the effect of poor glycemic control was not studied. Additionally, Poirier et al. showed a weak association between diabetic nephropathy and the -1,152 C/A polymorphism. However, recent data demonstrates that this is not a polymorphism but a gene-pseudogene difference (19). It is possible that our result is a type I statistical error. However, first, the A allele of the -374 T/A polymorphism alters transcription of the RAGE gene that, with evidence for involvement of RAGE in macrovascular disease, supports the existence of an association. Second, our a priori hypothesis postulated that any protective gene effect would be stronger in patients with a normal albumin excretion rate (AER) despite decades of poor metabolic control. The results of the current study support the existence of a gene (RAGE)-environment (glycation) interaction that may explain some of the associations between poor glycemic control and development of nephropathy. Third, the risk of a false positive association is further diminished by the distribution of the -374 T/A genotypes in the patients with manifest CVD. We found less CVD in those with the AA genotype than in those with the T genotype. This potentially protective AA genotype was again predominantly present in those with metabolic control above the median HbA1c value (data not shown). Furthermore, in analyzing the prevalence of PVD separately, there was, again, a significantly lower prevalence of the homozygous AA genotype in those with manifest PVD. Finally, the AA genotype of the -374 T/A polymorphism was independently associated with CVD in a multiple logistic regression analysis. Taken together, these results suggest that the -374 homozygous AA genotype is a marker for less atherosclerosis in type 1 diabetic patients.

Our results raise the question as to how altered transcription of the RAGE promoter region can affect susceptibility to CVD and proteinuria in type 1 diabetic patients. In such patients, the levels of AGEs are elevated in those with nephropathy and highest in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (20). Investigation of sites of AGE accumulation reveal, in both human and animal models of diabetes, that upregulation of RAGE occurs. Infusion of soluble RAGE, the extracellular truncated domain into diabetic mice engineered to develop accelerated atherosclerosis, prevents the development of disease of the vasculature (6). This implicates the regulation of RAGE as a crucial event in the pathogenesis of vascular disease in diabetes. Altered transcription induced by the -374 T/A polymorphism could therefore affect these processes, leading to a reduced level of RAGE and a different disease outcome.

In conclusion, the association between the RAGE -374 T/A homozygous AA genotype and CVD as well as albumin excretion in type 1 diabetic patients with poor metabolic control suggests a gene-environment interaction in the development of diabetic nephropathy and cardiovascular complications.


    RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects.
This study is part of the ongoing Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy (FinnDiane) Study, a comprehensive, multicenter, nationwide project with the aim to phenotype 25% of all adult patients with type 1 diabetes in Finland. The first 1,006 patients of the FinnDiane cohort with an ascertained renal status were recruited from 20 referral centers between 1994 and 1999. The patients were required to be C-peptide negative (<0.3 nmol/l) and to have permanent insulin treatment initiated before 35 years of age, within 1 year of diabetes diagnosis. Six patients with residual C-peptide secretion and four with evidence of nondiabetic kidney disease were excluded. The renal status was based on the AER in at least three consecutive overnight or 24-h urine collections. The patients with a normal AER (<20 µg/min or <30 mg/24 h, n = 321) were required to have a diabetes duration >15 years to ensure their renal status. A total of 166 patients had microalbuminuria (AER 20–200 µg/min or 30–300 mg/24 h), 325 proteinuria (AER >200 µg/min or >300 mg/24 h), and 184 ESRD. ESRD patients were either on dialysis (n = 44) or had a kidney transplant (n = 140). The years of renal replacement therapy initiation and diabetic nephropathy diagnosis were obtained from medical records. Information about CVD, including CHD, AMI, and stroke, was also obtained from medical records. All patients with PVD had bypass surgery performed on either leg. Information about CVD, AMI, antihypertensive treatment, or stroke in the parents was given by the proband using a questionnaire. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects participating in the study. The protocol followed the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by all local ethics committees.

Assays.
Serum and urine creatinine levels for calculation of creatinine clearance were measured at a central laboratory by a modified Jaffé reaction using a Hitachi 911 E Automatic Analyzer (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). Urinary albumin concentration was measured with radioimmunoassay (RIA) (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) and serum C-peptide concentrations with a Human C-peptide RIA kit (Linco Research, St Charles, MO). HbA1c was measured using standardized assays in each referral center (normal range 4.0–6.0%). Serum HDL, LDL, and total cholesterol and triglycerides were analyzed using routine standardized laboratory methods at each center.

Genotyping.
The polymorphisms of the RAGE gene were determined from DNA extracted from peripherally drawn blood samples. Genotyping, by an investigator unaware of the phenotypes, was performed using regular PCR. For the amplification of the region containing the -429 T/C and -374 T/A polymorphisms, we used previously described primers (14) with an added biotinylated F5' end. The genotypes of the -429 T/C and -374 T/A polymorphisms were determined using a solid-phase minisequencing method (21), with the reverse minisequencing primers 5'-AGGAGAGAAACCTGTTTGGA-3' and 5'-CTGTTGTCTGCAAGGGTGCA-3', respectively. We used the previously described G82S primers (13) with a biotinylated R5' end using a forward minisequencing primer: 5'-TGGCTCGTGTCCTTCCCAACG-3'. Linkage disequilibrium analyses were performed by the LinkDos and Genepop package (version 1.2).

Statistical analysis.
Descriptive data are expressed as means ± SE or median value (range), unless otherwise stated. Categorical variables were compared using the {chi}2 test. Normally distributed continuous variables were tested with Student’s t test, while nonnormally distributed variables were logarithmically transformed or assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test. To evaluate the independent association between categorical variables and CVD or diabetic nephropathy, a multiple logistic regression model was used with a means substitution of absent data. All statistical analyses were also performed separately for each sex, but since there were no differences between sexes, data were pooled. Analyses were carried out using a Statistica 4.1 statistical package (Statistica, Tulsa, OK). A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was supported by grants from the Finnish Medical Society, the Wilhelm and Else Stockmann Foundation, the Perklén Foundation, the Liv och Hälsa Foundation, and the American Heart Association Western States Affiliate award (ref. 0120121).

We acknowledge Tarja Vesisenaho, our laboratory technician, Minna Levander, who performed the genotyping, and research fellow Dr. Johan Fagerudd for their valuable contributions. We also acknowledge the physicians and nurses in each center participating in the collection of patients: Central Finland Central Hospital: A. Halonen, A. Koistinen, P. Koskiaho, M. Laukkanen, J. Saltevo, M. Tiihonen; Central Hospital of Aland Islands: A-C. Blomqvist, M. Forsen, H. Granlund, B. Nyroos; Central Hospital of Kanta-Hame: P. Kinnunen, A. Orvola, T. Salonen, A. Vähänen; Central Hospital of Kymenlaakso: R. Paldanius, M. Riihelä, L. Ryysy; Central Hospital of Lansi-Pohja: P. Nyländen, A. Sademies; Central Ostrobothnian Hospital District: S. Anderson, B. Asplund, U. Byskata, T. Virkkala; City of Turku Health Center: I. Hämäläinen, H. Virtamo, M. Vähätalo; Kainuu Central Hospital: S. Jokelainen, P. Kemppainen, A.-M. Mankinen, M. Sankari; Lapland Central Hospital: L. Hyvärinen, S. Severinkangas, T. Tulokas; Mikkeli Central Hospital: A. Gynther, R. Manninen, P. Nironen, M. Salminen, T. Vänttinen; North Karelian Hospital: U.-M. Henttula, A. Rissanen, H. Turtola, M. Voutilainen; Paijat-Hame Central Hospital: H. Haapamäki, A. Helanterä, H. Miettinen; Satakunta Central Hospital: M. Juhola, P. Kunelius, M-L. Lahdenmäki, P. Pääkkönen, M. Rautavirta; Savonlinna Central Hospital: T. Pulli, P. Sallinen, H. Valtonen, A. Vartia; Seinajoki Central Hospital: E. Korpi-Hyövälti, T. Latvala, E. Leijala; South Karelia Hospital District: T. Hotti, R. Härkönen, U. Nyholm, R. Vanamo{dagger}; Tampere University Hospital: I. Ala-Houhala, T. Kuningas, P. Lampinen, M. Määttä, H. Oksala, T. Oksanen, K. Salonen, H. Tauriainen, S. Tulokas; Turku Health Center: I. Hämäläinen, H Virtamo, M Vähätalo; Turku University Central Hospital: M. Asola, K. Breitholz, R. Eskola, K. Metsärinne, U. Pietilä, P. Saarinen, R. Tuominen, S. Äyräpää; Vasa Central Hospital: S. Bergkulla, U. Hautamäki, V.-A. Myllyniemi, I. Rusk.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Per-Henrik Groop, Folkhälsan Research Center, Biomedicum Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8 (C318b), POB 63, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: per-henrik.groop{at}folkhalsan.fi.

Received for publication 24 June 2002 and accepted in revised form 19 November 2002.

AER, albumin excretion rate; AGE, advanced glycation end product; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; CHD, coronary heart disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; RAGE, receptor for AGEs; RIA, radioimmunoassay.

{dagger} Deceased. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Parving HH, Smidt UM, Friisberg B, Bonnevie-Nielsen V, Andersen AR: A prospective study of glomerular filtration rate and arterial blood pressure in insulin-dependent diabetics with diabetic nephropathy. Diabetologia20 :457 –461,1981[Medline]
  2. Andersen AR, Christiansen JS, Andersen JK, Kreiner S, Deckert T: Diabetic nephropathy in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes: an epidemiological study. Diabetologia25 :496 –501,1983[Medline]
  3. Brownlee M: Glycation of macromolecules. In International Textbook of Diabetes Mellitus. 1st ed. Zimmet P, Ed. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons,1992 , p.669 –682
  4. Raj D, Choudhury D, Welbourne T, Levi M: Advanced glycation end-products: a nephrologist’s perspective. Am J Kidney Dis35 :365 –380,2000[Medline]
  5. Wautier JL, Zoukourian C, Chappey O, Wautier MP, Guillausseau PJ, Cao R, Hori O, Stern D, Schmidt AM: Receptor-mediated endothelial cell dysfunction in diabetic vasculopathy: soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products blocks hyperpermeability in diabetic rats. J Clin Invest97 :238 –243,1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Park L, Raman KG, Lee KJ, Lu Y, Ferran LJ Jr, Chow WS, Stern D, Schmidt AM: Suppression of accelerated diabetic atherosclerosis by the soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products. Nat Med4 :1025 –1031,1998[Medline]
  7. Brett J, Schmidt AM, Yan SD, Zou YS, Weidman E, Pinsky D, Nowygrod R, Neeper M, Przysiecki C, Shaw A, et al: Survey of the distribution of a newly characterized receptor for advanced glycation end products in tissues. Am J Pathol143 :1699 –1712,1993[Abstract]
  8. Sun M, Yokoyama M, Ishiwata T, Asano G: Deposition of advanced glycation end products (AGE) and expression of the receptor for AGE in cardiovascular tissue of the diabetic rat. Int J Exp Pathol79 :207 –222,1998[Medline]
  9. Yamamoto Y, Kato I, Doi T, Yonekura H, Ohashi S, Takeuchi M, Watanabe T, Yamagishi S, Sakurai S, Takasawa S, Okamoto H, Yamamoto H: Development and prevention of advanced diabetic nephropathy in RAGE-overexpressing mice. J Clin Invest108 :261 –268,2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus: Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care20 :1183 –1197,1997[Medline]
  11. Quinn M, Angelico MC, Warram JH, Krolewski AS: Familial factors determine the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with IDDM. Diabetologia39 :940 –945,1996[Medline]
  12. Sugaya K, Fukagawa T, Matsumoto K, Mita K, Takahashi E, Ando A, Inoko H, Ikemura T: Three genes in the human MHC class II region near the junction wth the class II: gene for receptor of advanced glycosylation end products, PBX2 homeobox gene and a notch homolog, human counterpart of mouse mammary tumor gene int-3. Genomics23 :408 –419,1994[Medline]
  13. Hudson B, Stickland M, Grant PJ: Identification of polymorphisms in the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) gene: prevalence in type 2 diabetes and ethnic groups. Diabetes47 :1155 –1157,1998[Free Full Text]
  14. Hudson B, Stickland M, Futers T, Grant PJ: Effects of novel polymorphisms in the RAGE gene on transcriptional regulation and their association with diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes50 :1505 –1511,2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kankova K, Záhejsky J, Marova I, Muzic J, Kuhrova V, Blazková M, Znojil V, Beránek M, Vácha J: Polymorphisms in the RAGE gene influence susceptibility to diabetes-associated microvascular dermatoses in NIDDM. J Diabetes Complications15 :185 –192,2001[Medline]
  16. Poirier O, Nicaud V, Vionnet N, Raoux S, Tarnow L, Vlassara H, Parving H-H, Cambien F: Polymorphism screening of four genes encoding advanced glycation end-product putative receptors: association study with nephropathy in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes50 :1214 –1218,2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Lange K, Weeks D, Boehnke M: Programs for pedigree analysis: MENDEL, FISHER, and dGENE (Letter). Genet Epidemiol5 :471 –472,1988[Medline]
  18. Daly MJ, Rioux JD, Schaffner SF, Hudson TJ, Lander ES: High-resolution haplotype structure in the human genome. Nat Genet29 :229 –232,2001[Medline]
  19. Hudson B, Stickland M, Grant PJ, Futers T: Characterization of allelic and nucleotide variation between the RAGE gene on chromosome 6 and a homologous pseudogene sequence to its 5' regulatory region on chromosome 3. Diabetes50 :2646 –2651,2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Makita Z, Yanagisawa K, Kuwajima S, Bucala R, Vlassara H, Koike T: The role of advanced glycosylation end-products in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant11 (Suppl. 5) :31 –33,1996[Medline]
  21. Syvänen A-C, Sajantila A, Lukka M: Identification of individuals by analysis of biallelic DNA markers, using PCR and solid-phase minisequencing. Am J Hum Genet52 :46 –59,1993[Medline]