1 Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
2 Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Transplantation of islets is an important approach to the treatment of diabetes. Although recent changes in immunosuppression and other facets of the transplant procedure have improved results (1,2), cells in the islets after transplantation frequently undergo apoptosis, and islet function is compromised. Thus, more islets are needed for each transplant, leading to a greater shortage of islets.
Data from others and ourselves show that the induced expression of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) in recipients, which leads to the expression of HO-1 in islets as well as elsewhere, has salutary effects in terms of sustaining graft survival (3,4). These findings have been interpreted to suggest that the expression of HO-1 protects the islet cells from apoptosis as well as suppresses the proinflammatory response of the recipient (5,6).
HO-1 degrades heme into three products: carbon monoxide (CO), biliverdin, and Fe++. Biliverdin is converted to bilirubin by biliverdin reductase, and Fe++ stimulates an iron pump that removes free iron from the cells as well as leads to the upregulation of ferritin, an iron-binding protein. Each of these products has protective (antiapoptotic and/or anti-inflammatory) properties, and one or more of them likely accounts for the protection afforded by HO-1 in any given situation (79).
There is accumulating evidence that in the majority of the disease models in which HO-1 is beneficial, administration of exogenous CO can substitute for HO-1 action (1013). That is, if HO-1 is absent or its action blocked, the administered CO will have the "same" effects as if HO-1 were expressed. Based on these findings, we tested the effects on islet graft survival of CO administration to the donor and the recipient, or to either one alone. Unexpectedly, treatment of only the donor with CO led to prolonged islet graft survival in the untreated recipient and tolerance in those untreated recipients carrying long-term (>100 day) surviving islets. Furthermore, the proinflammatory response normally seen in the islets after transplantation was markedly suppressed. This novel finding, which quite likely contributes in a significant manner to the prolongation of survival and recipient tolerance, was unexpected. Because CO has a very short half-life, the only effect can be on the islets themselves. Thus, the lack of a proinflammatory response mounted by the recipient must somehow relate to changes that CO effects in the transplanted islets.
![]() |
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Islet isolation and transplantation.
Islets were isolated from DBA/2 donors by collagenase V (Sigma) digestion and purification on density gradients, as described elsewhere (14). Islets (400500 equivalents) for the experiments in which HO-1 was induced and 350400 islet equivalents for the experiments with CO were transplanted under the left kidney capsule of the diabetic recipients. Glucose levels were measured twice weekly after transplantation using an Accu-Chek Glucometer (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). Glucose levels of <200 mg/dl were considered normoglycemic. Grafts are deemed rejected when two consecutive daily nonfasting glucose levels were >300 mg/dl after a period of primary graft function.
Cobalt protoporphyrin-IX and CO treatment.
Cobalt protoporphyrin-IX (CoPP; MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA) was used to induce HO-1 expression in the donors and the recipients. CoPP was dissolved in 0.1 N sodium hydroxide, and the pH was adjusted to 7.4 with hydrochloride acid. Treatment of the donors involved a single dose of CoPP at 20 mg/kg given 24 h before harvesting the islets, whereas treatment of the recipients involved injections of CoPP at 20 mg/kg every 48 h from day 1 to day +7 (4). Administration of CO was performed in a chamber containing 250 parts per million (ppm) CO. Treatments were for 20 h in the donors and continuously from day 1 till day 13 in the recipients. Isolated islets were also cultured in CO-saturated medium for 24 h after their isolation and before transplantation. "Saturation" of the medium was achieved by bubbling CO into the medium for 10 min before the islets were placed into the medium and then culturing in a 1% CO and 5% CO2 atmosphere. For studies involving HO-1 induction and cytokine expression, the islets were transplanted immediately after isolation. In those cases in which either donors or recipients were treated with CO, the islets were cultured for 24 h in CMRL medium with 10% serum in 5% CO2 at 37°C after isolation and before transplantation.
Tolerance test.
The kidney under which the initial islets were transplanted was removed from a number of animals that had islets surviving long term (>100 days), and then islets syngeneic with the original donor (DBA/2) were transplanted under the other kidney without further treatment. If those second transplanted islets also survived >100 days without further treatment, the recipients were considered tolerant. Antigen-specific tolerance was assessed by transplanting islets of a third-party donor (DBA/1, H-2q) that does not share either class I or class II antigens with the original donor.
Graft collection for cytokine determination.
Islet grafts were collected at 1, 3, 7, 10, 15, and 20 days after islet transplantation. Under anesthesia, the left kidney of the mouse was exposed; grafts can be identified as a whitish area under the kidney capsule. The graft was excised along with the adherent capsule and was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen for the extraction of total cellular RNA.
RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis.
Total cellular RNA was extracted using an RNA kit (Qiagene, Charworth, CA). Then, 1 µg of total RNA was transcribed to cDNA in the presence of murine leukemia virus transcriptase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The reaction was performed in a final volume of 100 µl containing 1 x RT buffer containing 5.5 mmol/l MgCl2, 0.5 mmol/l each dNTP, 0.4 units/µl RNase inhibitor, 2.5 µmol/l random hexamers, and 3.125 units/µl reverse transcriptase. Samples were held at 25°C for 10 min and incubated at 48°C for 30 min. Reverse transcriptase was inactivated by heating at 95°C for 5 min, and cDNA samples were stored at 15 to 25°C.
Quantitation of gene expression by real-time RT-PCR.
Real-time RT-PCR was performed using the ABI Prism 7700 sequence detection system. Materials used in real-time RT-PCR were purchased from Applied Biosystems unless otherwise stated. RT reactions were set up in a total volume of 25 µl by using 2 x Taqman Universal PCR Master Mix containing 5 mmol/l MgCl2, 200 µmol/l of dNTP, 0.05 units/µl AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase, 0.01 units/µl AmpErase UNG, and a passive reference dye, ROX. Each cDNA sample was analyzed in duplicate in the presence of 1 x commercially available assay-on-demand primers together with FAM-labeled fluorogenic probes (Applied Biosystems) specially designed for each target gene. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase expression of each sample was performed in parallel by using the predeveloped primer and VIC-labeled fluorogenic probe to standardize the amount of sample cDNA added to the reaction. Freshly isolated islet mRNA was analyzed each time and used as a calibrator. The PCR ran for 2 min at 50°C, 10 min at 95°C, and for 40 cycles composed of an incubation at 95°C for 15 s plus another at 60°C for 1 min. Relative quantification of all target genes was analyzed based on a comparative CT method. The amount of target gene, normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and relative to the calibrator, is calculated based on the manufacturers instructions (available from Applied Biosystems website for the comparative CT method at http://www.appliedbiosystems.com/support/apptech/#rt_pcr).
RT-PCR analysis.
HO-1 induction in islets was detected by RT-PCR after CoPP injection. Primers for HO-1 were 5'-TGAAGGAGGCCACCAAGGAGGT (forward primer) and 5'-AGGTCACCCAGGTAGCGGGT (reverse primer). ß-Actin was used as an internal control. Primers for ß-actin were 5'-GCCATCCTGCGTCTGGACCTGG (forward primer) and 5'-TACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCCACA (reverse primer). The amplification condition were as follows: 5 min at 94°C followed by multiple cycles of 94°C, 55°C, and 72°C at 1 min each, 23 cycles for HO-1 and 20 for ß-actin to allow cDNA amplification in the linear range.
Western blot.
Protein samples (40 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were incubated with rabbit antiHO-1 (StressGen, San Diego, CA) and mouse anti-tubulin (Sigma) antibodies, followed by peroxidase-labeled secondary antibodies. Signals were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, U.K).
Immunohistochemistry.
Islet grafts were immersed in freezing medium (Tris-buffered saline; American Mastertech Scientific, Lodi, CA) together with a portion of the kidney and snap-frozen in precooled 2-methylbutanol in liquid nitrogen. Then 5-µm sections were dried at room temperature for 30 min and fixed in cold acetone for 3 min, followed by immunohistochemistry staining with peroxidase. The antibody F4/80 (Serotec, Oxford, U.K.) was used to detect the presence of macrophages in the graft. The secondary antibody was biotinylated anti-rat antibody (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA). Avidin-biotin complexhorseradish peroxidase (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) and 3,3'-diaminobenzidine substrates were used to develop the color (Vector). Counter-staining with hematoxylin was preformed after dehydration, and slides were covered with Cytoseal 280 mounting medium (American Mastertech Scientific) for observation.
Statistical analyses.
Kaplan-Meier survival curves were performed by using the Statview software, and the statistical difference was assessed by the log-rank test. Values of P < 0.05 were considered as significant. Survival data are expressed as mean survival time (MST) ± SE. Differences between cytokines expression were compared for statistical significance by Students t test.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
It has been shown in the past that inducing expression of HO-1 in the recipient leads to prolongation of islet allograft survival (4). We show in this study that CO can "substitute" for HO-1 in this regard: treatment of only the recipient with CO leads to prolongation of islet allograft survival. HO-1 expression or CO may have beneficial effects based on their anti-inflammatory and/or antiapoptotic effects on inflammatory, immune, or other cells. It has previously been shown that expression of HO-1 in, or CO treatment of, monocyte-macrophages, which are often implicated in islet cell destruction, suppresses the proinflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide while at the same time boosting the anti-inflammatory effects (increased expression of interleukin [IL]-10) both in vitro and in vivo (1718). It has also been demonstrated that HO-1 expression or CO can suppress the T-cell immune response (19,20). We demonstrate here that treatment of only the donor, by either induction of HO-1 or administration of CO, also leads to prolonged survival of islets in the recipient, with tolerance in those recipients carrying transplanted islets for >100 days. There is accumulating evidence that expression of HO-1 in the donor organ can be critical to the survival of a graft after transplantation. In a mouse-to-rat transplantation model, in which the recipient is treated with the immunosuppressive agent cyclosporin A plus briefly with cobra venom factor to block complement action, a mouse heart graft survives indefinitely. However, if the graft is from a mouse deficient in HO-1 (a HO-1/ mouse), the graft is rejected as though there was no immunosuppression. Because the wild-type donor and the HO-1/ donor differ by only this one gene, this finding is critical evidence for the importance of HO-1 expression in the donor in at least some transplant situations (21,22). More recently it has been shown that induction of HO-1 in an allogeneic donor organ can facilitate the survival of that organ after transplantation (23,24). These findings, however, do not necessarily indicate that it is the effect of HO-1 on the donor organ that has any role in promoting survival. Expression of HO-1 in the heart after transplantation could lead to the secretion into the blood of the recipient of products of HO-1 action, such as CO and bilirubin, which could have anti-inflammatory or antiapoptotic effects on various cells in the recipient. The same is true of our studies of islet graft survival in which HO-1 was induced in only the donor: we have found HO-1 still being expressed 6 days after a single dose of CoPP.
The most unexpected finding of our present studies was the observation that treatment of only the donor with CO can lead to long-term survival of the islet graft in the recipient and tolerance in those recipients in which the islets survive for >100 days. CO treatment of only the donor led to a significant percentage of the islet allografts surviving long term in untreated recipients, suggesting that the CO-induced change in the islets themselves led to survival of those islets. It seems exceedingly unlikely that the CO used for treatment of only the donor would still be able to exert any effects in the recipient, given the very short half-life of CO. We thus focus our discussion on the CO-treated donors.
Our rationale for treatment of only the donor was in part based on studies of the fate of organs or tissues from brain-dead donors that manifested signs of inflammation even during the time in situ in the donor (25,26). Brain death led to macrophage infiltration and significant augmentation of macrophage-associated inflammatory molecules such as IL-1ß and -6, TNF-, and MCP-1 in rat islets (27). It seemed possible that the stress of all the procedures involved in removal of islets from a donor and the manipulations that they undergo before transplantation might also initiate inflammation (28). Thus, to the extent that one might suppress this inflammatory response by treatment of the donor, one might decrease a subsequent rejection response (29).
After transplantation to allogeneic recipients without treatment, islets become a nidus for a strong proinflammatory environment. Activated macrophages become resident in the islets and produce proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-, IL-1ß, and others. These cytokines can induce perforin/granzyme B and Fas/Fas L expression by the cytotoxic T-cells and lead to ß-cell apoptosis. We demonstrate in this study that treatment of the donor with CO suppresses this proinflammatory response in the islets after transplantation. There are several possible reasons why suppression of the proinflammatory response might lead to islet survival.
First, it is known that various cytokines just mentioned and others such as NO can be directly toxic to ß-cells. By limiting the proinflammatory response, these toxic molecules are very significantly neutralized. Second, some of the cytokines/chemokines produced in the islets after transplantation help to recruit host cells into the islets. For example, fewer macrophages were noted in islets obtained from donors treated with CO than in those from controls, consistent with reduced levels of MCP-1, a chemokine that attracts cells such as macrophages to the site of inflammation. Finally, as is inherent in the danger hypothesis (30,31), we speculate that the decreased inflammation in islets after transplantation results in a decreased rejection response. The mechanisms involved in the establishment of tolerance need elucidation. Furthermore, we propose that in the presence of the decreased proinflammatory and rejection responses, the effects of protective genes such as bcl-2, which was present in the islets after transplantation in those cases in which the donor was given CO, shifts the balance from rejection to tolerance.
But why should CO treatment of the donor decrease the inflammatory response in the islets after transplantation? One possible contributing factor may be the antiapoptotic effects of CO treatment on islets (3). Such an effect would likely still obtain after transplantation, even though the islets were only exposed in the donor. Thus, the debris of dying islets that would ordinarily lead to inflammation would be decreased and the inflammatory response suppressed. Second, treatment of the islets in the donor with CO will suppress a proinflammatory response by resident macrophages to later stresses, including the isolation procedure. Although it is not known how long the antiapoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects of CO persist after treatment, the ability of short-term CO exposure to suppress reactions that normally develop over many hours suggests that such a mechanism might be discovered (32,33). We propose that the suppression of the inflammatory response and of apoptosis are key to allowing survival when only the donor is treated.
The mechanisms underlying the ability of HO-1 or CO to prolong islet graft survival and to induce tolerance deserve further study. Studies of the effects of HO-1 expression or CO administration in antigen-presenting cells or T-cells are only now beginning but may be involved in the results presented herein. Given the above results, it would seem that induction of HO-1 or administration of CO might be useful clinically for islet transplantation. Induction of HO-1, however, has the disadvantage that individuals vary in terms of the strength of their HO-1 induction to a given stimulus dependent on polymorphisms in the promoter of the HO-1 gene (34).
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
M.P.S. is currently affiliated with the Gulbenkian Institute of Science, Oeiras, Portugal.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Hongjun Wang, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 99 Brookline Ave., RN #361, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail: hwang3{at}bidmc.harvard.edu
Received for publication June 18, 2004 and accepted in revised form January 28, 2005
CoPP, cobalt protoporphyrin-IX; HO-1, heme oxygenase-1; IL, interleukin; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; MST, mean survival time; TNF-, tumor necrosis factor-
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|