1 Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2 Division of Developmental Biology, Childrens Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: mwhitman{at}hms.harvard.edu)
Accepted May 16, 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In addition to regulation of Smad2 phosphorylation by the expression of activin-like ligands and their antagonists, the responsiveness of embryonic cells to activin-like ligands is also temporally regulated. Ectopic Vg1, Xnr1 and derrière all fail to activate Smad2 phosphorylation until after the midblastula transition, and the onset of responsiveness to these ligands is independent of transcription. Furthermore, the timing of cellular responsiveness differs for Xnr1 and derrière, and these distinct temporal patterns of responsiveness can be correlated with their distinctive phenotypic effects. These observations suggest that the timing of endogenous activin-like signaling is a determinant of patterning in the early Xenopus embryo.
Key words: Smad, Phosphorylation, TGFß, Nodal, Mesoderm induction, Signal transduction, Xenopus laevis
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Signal transduction by TGFß superfamily ligands, including the activin-like ligands and BMPs, is mediated by type I and type II transmembrane receptors and by their intracellular transducers, the Smad proteins (reviewed in Massagué, 1998). In the Xenopus embryo, activin-like signals induce phosphorylation and activation of Smad2 and Smad2exon3 (here referred to collectively as Smad2 for simplicity), while BMP signals phosphorylate and activate Smad1 (Faure et al., 2000; reviewed in Whitman, 1998). Activin-like ligands and activity have been shown to be present maternally (Asashima et al., 1991; Fukui et al., 1994; Oda et al., 1995; Weeks and Melton, 1987), and earlier embryological work has suggested that mesoderm induction is initiated before the MBT (Jones and Woodland, 1987) and hence before the onset of zygotic transcription (Newport and Kirschner, 1982). However, using antibodies specific for the C-terminally phosphorylated, activated forms of the Smads (phosphoSmads), we found that endogenous phosphorylation of Smad2 is not detected before the MBT, and that the onset of Smad2 phosphorylation requires zygotic transcription (Faure et al., 2000). Direct examination of endogenous Smad2 phosphorylation provides a means to assess how regulation of ligand generation and responsiveness to ligands are associated with early steps in mesodermal patterning.
In the embryo, both primary germ layer formation and expression of zygotic activin-like ligands require the activity of the maternal transcription factor VegT. Maternal VegT (originally cloned as VegT, Brat or Xombi) is localized to the presumptive mesendoderm (Horb and Thomsen, 1997; Lustig et al., 1996b; Stennard et al., 1999; Zhang and King, 1996). Depletion of maternal VegT results in greatly decreased expression of dorsal and general mesendodermal genes (Kofron et al., 1999; Xanthos et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 1998), indicating that maternal VegT is required endogenously for formation of both mesoderm and endoderm. Depletion of maternal VegT also significantly reduces zygotic expression of the activin-like ligands Xnrs 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6, and derrière (Kofron et al., 1999; Takahashi et al., 2000). Conversely, overexpression of VegT in animal caps induces expression of each of these ligands, as well as of mesendodermal genes (Chang and Hemmati-Brivanlou, 2000; Clements et al., 1999; Takahashi et al., 2000; Yasuo and Lemaire, 1999). Maternal VegT cell-autonomously activates expression of endodermal genes and of activin-like ligands; activin-like ligands in the endoderm maintain endodermal gene expression and non cell-autonomously induce mesoderm (Chang and Hemmati-Brivanlou, 2000; Clements et al., 1999; Xanthos et al., 2001; Yasuo and Lemaire, 1999). In addition to cell-autonomous activation of activin-like ligands by VegT, expression of several ligands appears also to be regulated non cell-autonomously by positive cross- or autoregulatory loops. For example, transcription of Xnr1 and mouse nodal are stimulated by Smad2 activation via a conserved enhancer regulated by the maternal transcription factor FAST (FoxH1) (Osada et al., 2000; Saijoh et al., 2000), and derrière transcription can also be stimulated by signals that activate Smad2 (Sun et al., 1999). Moreover, a zygotic form of VegT (also known as Antipodean) (Stennard et al., 1996; Stennard et al., 1999) is induced by Smad2 activation through FAST (Lustig et al., 1996b; Stennard et al., 1996; Stennard et al., 1999; Sun et al., 1999; Watanabe and Whitman, 1999), providing an additional potential positive feedback loop for activation of Smad2. While maternal VegT is clearly essential for the zygotic transcription of activin-like ligands, the role of maternally expressed activin-like ligands and of positive feedback loops acting downstream of maternal VegT in the development of localized patterns of Smad2 activation remains to be determined.
Attenuation of activin-like signaling, as well as its activation, is likely to be an important component of mesendodermal patterning. Two endogenous antagonists of activin-like ligands, antivin and cerberus, have been identified in the early embryo and appear to function in anterior patterning (Bouwmeester et al., 1996; Thisse and Thisse, 1999). Antivin opposes the mesoderm-inducing activities of nodal-related ligands in Xenopus, zebrafish and mouse (Cheng et al., 2000; Meno et al., 1999; Tanegashima et al., 2000; Thisse and Thisse, 1999); increasing doses of antivin progressively delete posterior fates in zebrafish (Thisse et al., 2000). Cerberus, a multifunctional inhibitor of the nodal-related ligands, BMPs and Wnts, induces ectopic heads, hearts and livers in Xenopus (Bouwmeester et al., 1996; Glinka et al., 1997; Hsu et al., 1998; Piccolo et al., 1999). Both antivin and cerberus require activin-like signaling for endogenous expression and can be induced by overexpression of Xnr1/Xnr2 (Agius et al., 2000; Cheng et al., 2000; Piccolo et al., 1999; Tanegashima et al., 2000; Zorn et al., 1999). This suggests that they are regulated as local feedback inhibitors of the Smad2 signaling pathway. The effect of these negative feedback loops on attenuation of the endogenous Smad2 signaling pathway has not been directly addressed.
Activin-like ligands are defined functionally by their common ability to induce both mesodermal and endodermal genes and tissues. While the receptors mediating the action of these different ligands have not been definitively established, several lines of evidence from both Xenopus and mouse indicate that ALK4 (ActRIB) is the major type I receptor responsible for Smad2 phosphorylation downstream of the activin-like ligands (Armes and Smith, 1997; Chang et al., 1997; Gu et al., 1998; Yeo and Whitman, 2001). A model in which Smad2 and ALK4 serve as downstream transducers of a range of activin-like ligands is complicated, however, by experiments demonstrating that different activin-like ligands carry out distinct functions in early Xenopus development. In embryos depleted of maternal VegT, Xnr1 rescues head formation, while derrière rescues trunks but not heads (Kofron et al., 1999). Consistent with these observations, overexpression of a dominant inhibitory form of Xnr2, cm-Xnr2, results in a preferential loss of anterior tissues (Osada and Wright, 1999), while overexpression of a comparable dominant inhibitor of derrière, cm-derrière, blocks formation of posterior tissues (Sun et al., 1999). While phenotypic assays demonstrate that Xnr1/Xnr2 and derrière carry out distinct functions in anterior-posterior patterning, how these ligands might use the same signaling pathway to achieve different effects on embryonic patterning is not known.
We have used anti-phosphoSmad2 antibodies to investigate mechanisms that regulate endogenous activin-like signaling in the early Xenopus embryo. We find that Smad2 activation moves in a wave from the dorsal side to the ventral side of both mesoderm and endoderm. The localized maternal transcriptional regulators VegT and ß-catenin are responsible for the initiation of this wave on the dorsal side of the prospective mesendoderm just after the MBT. Negative feedback mediated through the Smad2 and FAST-dependent activation of the ligand antagonists antivin and cerberus subsequently attenuates Smad2 phosphorylation, also starting from the dorsal side. Initiation and attenuation on the ventral side occur later and require VegT but not dorsal signaling. Finally, different activin-like ligands induce Smad2 phosphorylation at different developmental stages, and this timing difference may explain their differing phenotypic effects. We propose that timing, as well as dose, of activin-like signaling is a crucial determinant of early developmental patterning in the Xenopus embryo.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Dissections were carried out in 0.7x MMR. Where indicated, animal caps were dissected by stage 9, before significant pregastrulation movements (Bauer et al., 1994). For dorsal-ventral dissections, ventral midlines were marked with Nile Blue (Peng, 1991) at the four cell stage to allow accurate identification before gastrulation. Caps or explants were cultured in 0.7x MMR and were washed in 0.1x MMR before freezing at -80°C for storage.
Ventralization of embryos with short wave ultraviolet (u.v.) light (254 nm) was performed with a hand-held illuminator (Kao and Danilchik, 1991). During the first third of the first cell cycle, vegetal bottoms of healthy, fertilized embryos were exposed through Saran Wrap to light for 1 to 2 minutes based on calibration that gave an average dorso-anterior index (DAI) at late tailbud stage approaching zero (Kao and Elinson, 1988; Scharf and Gerhart, 1983). To prevent nonspecific or toxic effects, only u.v.-treated embryos that showed first and second cleavages within five minutes of those of untreated embryos were analyzed by western blotting (Cooke and Smith, 1987).
Antisense depletion in oocytes
Oocytes were depleted of maternal VegT mRNA by the injection of an antisense oligonucleotide complementary to VegT mRNA, as previously described (Xanthos et al., 2001). Oocytes were cultured for 36 hours and then matured and fertilized by the host transfer technique (Zuck et al., 1998). For rescue of VegT depletion, VegT or activin mRNA was injected into the vegetal poles of VegT-depleted oocytes just prior to maturation.
In vitro transcription
Capped mRNAs were synthesized in vitro using the SP6 mMessage mMACHINE kit (Ambion).
RT-PCR
Total RNA, extracted from whole embryos or dissected explants by the proteinase K/phenol method, was reverse transcribed for PCR reactions that were performed as previously reported (LaBonne and Whitman, 1994; Watanabe and Whitman, 1999). The following primers were used: zygotic VegT/Antipodean (Stennard et al., 1999); Xnr1 (Lustig et al., 1996a); derrière (F, GGTACTGAGGCACTATGAAG; R, TGTGTTTCATCCAGCAGCTC); antivin (F, GCAGGGGCCCATTTCGTAA; R, GGCCCTCCACATCCCTTTGA); cerberus (Bouwmeester et al., 1996); ODC (as described in Xenopus Molecular Marker Resource, http://vize222.zo.utexas.edu/); and EF1 (Hemmati-Brivanlou and Melton, 1994).
Antibodies
Affinity-purified anti-phosphoSmad2 and anti-phosphoSmad1 antibodies were prepared as described (Persson et al., 1998; Faure et al., 2000). Anti-Smad2 antibody was obtained from Transduction Labs and anti-actin antibody was obtained from Sigma. Secondary antibodies were goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP antibodies (Boehringer Mannheim) and donkey anti-mouse IgG-HRP F(ab')2 fragments (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories).
Western blot analysis
Embryos and explants were homogenized in modified RIPA buffer as described (Faure et al., 2000). Preparation of samples and analysis of lysates by western blotting were performed as previously described; Smads run between the 50 kDa and 75 kDa protein markers (Faure et al., 2000). Cytoskeletal actin serves as a loading control for equivalent cellular volume (Tannahill and Melton, 1989). For embryos, 1/4 to 1/8 equivalent was loaded per lane. Two to three animal caps were loaded per lane.
Immunohistochemistry
Embryos were fixed in MEMFA (0.1 M MOPS pH 7.4, 2 mM EGTA pH 8, 1 mM MgSO4, 3.7% formaldehyde) for 3 hours. For cross and longitudinal sections, embryos were rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) after fixation and then were soaked in PBS plus 0.3 M sucrose. Next, embryos were embedded in 2% low melt agarose (NuSieve GTG agarose, FMC BioProducts) in PBS plus 0.3 M sucrose and were bisected in a Petri dish under PBS with a disposable micoscalpel (Feather Safety Razor). Bisected embryos were then stored in methanol overnight. Embryos were serially rehydrated into PBS and PBT (PBS, 2 mg/ml BSA, 0.1% Triton X-100) for blocking, incubation with primary and secondary antibodies, and washes as previously reported (Faure et al., 2000). Staining was developed with ImmunoPure Metal-enhanced DAB Substrate Kit (Pierce), as per manufacturers instructions. The anti-phosphoSmad2 antibody was less sensitive for immunohistochemistry than for western blot analysis, therefore immunohistochemistry is only shown at stages when the phosphoSmad2 signal was detectable by this technique. Images were captured with NIH Image software on a Kodak DCS420 camera attached to a Zeiss Axiophot microscope.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Inhibitors of activin-like ligands attenuate Smad2 activation
The phenotypic effects of ectopic expression of antivin and cerberus strongly indicate that they can antagonize signaling by activin-like ligands. To directly demonstrate the activities of antivin and cerberus with respect to Smad signaling, we expressed these inhibitors in embryos, and then examined endogenous phosphorylation of Smad2 and BMP-regulated Smad1 from late blastula to late gastrula stages (Fig. 1D). Antivin inhibits endogenous phosphorylation of Smad2 but not of Smad1, while cerberus inhibits Smad2 phosphorylation at all stages and Smad1 phosphorylation only at early gastrula stages. As cerberus binds Wnts, nodals and BMPs at distinct sites (reviewed by Piccolo et al., 1999), recovery of phosphorylated Smad1 at late gastrula stages suggests that, as development proceeds, cerberus may be titrated by continuous production of BMPs, different BMP ligands that do not bind cerberus may become active or cerberus itself may become modified in its ability to inhibit Smad1. That both antivin and cerberus entirely inhibit endogenous phosphoSmad2 signaling indicates that, either directly or indirectly, these inhibitors can fully antagonize the function of activin-like ligands in the early embryo.
Both activators and inhibitors of activin-like signaling are induced through the Smad2 signaling pathway by the maternal transcription factor FAST (FoxH1) (Osada et al., 2000; Saijoh et al., 2000; Watanabe and Whitman, 1999). To investigate the importance of FAST in regulating endogenous Smad2 phosphorylation, we examined the effect of expression of a dominant inhibitory FAST, FAST-En, on the expression of activin-like ligands, antagonists of these ligands, and total levels of Smad2 phosphorylation in the early embryo (Fig. 1E). To examine the role of FAST in positive feedback regulation of Smad2 phosphorylation, the effect of FAST-En on the expression of the zygotic ligands Xnr1 and derrière was examined. Endogenous expression of Xnr1 is highest at stage 10+ and decreases to basal levels thereafter, while endogenous expression of derrière is strongly detected from stage 10+ through to stage 11.5. Injection of FAST-En reduces Xnr1 expression to basal levels, but only partially inhibits derrière expression. Although the relative contributions of Xnr1 and derrière to endogenous activin-like signaling are not known, positive regulation through FAST appears to be more important for expression of Xnr1 than of derrière.
A role for FAST in negative feedback regulation of Smad2 signaling was investigated by examining the expression of the ligand inhibitors antivin and cerberus in the presence of FAST-En. Expression of both antivin and cerberus is greatly reduced in the presence of FAST-En, indicating that FAST plays a role in mediating negative as well as positive feedback regulation of activin-like signals. Despite its ability to substantially reduce the expression of the ligands Xnr1 and derrière, expression of FAST-En does not significantly affect total Smad2 phosphorylation at stage 10+, indicating that positive feedback through FAST-regulated targets is not required for maintenance of activin-like signaling. At later gastrula stages, when Smad2 phosphorylation has begun to be attenuated in control embryos, FAST-En expression results in an increase in Smad2 phosphorylation, suggesting that expression of FAST-regulated feedback inhibitors such as cerberus and antivin is essential for normal attenuation of Smad2 phosphorylation during gastrulation. That the net effect of the ectopic expression of FAST-En in embryos is an increase in Smad2 phosphorylation by mid-gastrulation suggests that the role of FAST in negative feedback regulation is more important than its role in positive feedback regulation in determining total levels of Smad2 phosphorylation in the gastrula stage embryo.
Endogenous activation of Smad2 is initiated and attenuated from the dorsal side of the Xenopus embryo
To visualize activin-like signaling at high spatial resolution, we examined bisected embryos by immunohistochemistry using the anti-phosphoSmad2 antibody (Fig. 2B,C). At stage 9.5, phosphorylated Smad2 is detected as a wedge in the dorsal vegetal region of the embryo but is discernible only faintly in the ventral region (Fig. 2D,E). By stage 9.75, phosphorylated Smad2 is maintained dorsally and is expanding across the embryo to the ventral side (Fig. 2F,G). While, at these late blastula stages, mesodermal cells and endodermal cells are difficult to distinguish, Smad2 phosphorylation appears to be present in both but may be more prominent in the endoderm. In the early gastrula at stage 10+, phosphorylated Smad2 appears equally distributed across the dorsal-ventral axis, with Smad2 phosphorylation present in the ventral mesoderm and dorsal involuting mesoderm but not in dorsal preinvoluting mesoderm (Fig. 2H,I). By stage 10.5, absence of phosphorylated Smad2 is apparent in the prospective deep anterior endoderm and in the dorsal involuting mesoderm (Fig. 2J,K). Faint staining in the stage 11.5 embryo is detected in ventral and posterior endodermal cells but is excluded from cells dorsal to the archenteron and in tissues now specified as anterior (Fig. 2L,M). Taken together, these findings reveal a wave of Smad2 activation in mesendodermal cells passing from the dorsal side of the embryo to the ventral side.
Dorsal-ventral prepattern directs region-autonomous temporal patterns of endogenous activin-like signaling
To examine activin-like signaling intrinsic to dorsal or ventral halves of the embryo, we bisected embryos at stage 8, before Smad2 phosphorylation appears, and harvested cultured halves from late blastula to late gastrula stages for examination of phosphorylation of Smad2 and expression of activin-like ligands and inhibitors. Equivalent material from ventral halves, dorsal halves and whole embryos was compared at each stage. To confirm the accuracy of dissections, ventral halves, dorsal halves and whole embryos were cultured to stage 30. Compared with sibling embryos (Fig. 3C), ventral halves develop no distinctive structures (Fig. 3A), while dorsal halves demonstrate dorsal axes and formation of posterior (tail) and anterior (eyes, cement gland) structures (Fig. 3B) (Kageura and Yamana, 1983).
|
Activin-like ligands and their inhibitors are also expressed region-autonomously in isolated dorsal and ventral halves (Fig. 3E). Zygotic ligands Xnr1 and derrière are detected strongly from stage 9.5 and stage 9, respectively, and are highest at stage 10+. Xnr1 expression resembles dynamic phosphorylation of Smad2 in that Xnr1 is initiated at higher levels on the dorsal side at stage 9.5, is equivalent in dorsal and ventral halves at stage 10+, and is attenuated more on the dorsal side at stage 10.5. Derrière expression differs from Smad2 phosphorylation and Xnr1 expression as derrière is expressed at higher levels in ventral halves at stage 9 and stage 9.5, and becomes equally distributed from stage 10+ through stage 11.5. The inhibitors antivin and cerberus also demonstrate distinct patterns of expression. Antivin is detected from stage 9.5, increases through stage 10.5, and then decreases abruptly by stage 11.5; from stage 10+, antivin levels are higher dorsally than ventrally. Cerberus is detected from stage 10+, increases through stage 11.5 and is expressed at much higher levels dorsally than ventrally at all stages. Antivin activity may contribute to attenuation of Smad2 phosphorylation in both dorsal and ventral tissues of the embryo (Cheng et al., 2000; Tanegashima et al., 2000), while cerberus function is localized to dorsal tissues (Bouwmeester et al., 1996; Schneider and Mercola, 1999; Zorn et al., 1999). In summary, despite equal distribution of maternal VegT across the dorsal-ventral axis of the early embryo (data not shown), region-autonomous expression of the zygotic ligands and the antagonists is integrated at the level of Smad2 phosphorylation and yields distinct patterns of activin-like signaling in dorsal and ventral embryo halves.
ß-Catenin alters timing of Smad2 activation
ß-Catenin is present as a maternal protein, is enriched in dorsal nuclei after cortical rotation, and is essential for the expression of dorsal-specific genes after MBT (Heasman et al., 1994; Larabell et al., 1997; Schneider et al., 1996; Wylie et al., 1996). To examine whether the dorsal localization of ß-catenin after cortical rotation is important in establishing the dorsal initiation of Smad2 phosphorylation, we examined how the inhibition of cortical rotation by u.v. treatment alters the timing of Smad2 phosphorylation, and whether ectopic local expression of ß-catenin can rescue the effects of u.v. treatment. The effectiveness of u.v. treatment and rescue with ß-catenin injection was assessed by culturing embryos to stage 40 and examining the resulting phenotypes (Fig. 4A). Embryos treated with u.v. light do not elongate and have no distinctive structures; localized ß-catenin injection into u.v.-treated embryos rescues the wild-type body plan (Guger and Gumbiner, 1995).
|
To determine whether u.v. treatment has some more general effect on the timing of signaling rather than a specific effect on Smad2 regulation, we also examined phosphorylation of Smad1 in the same wild-type, u.v.-treated and u.v.-treated/ß-catenin-rescued embryos (Fig. 4C). While the levels of phosphorylated Smad1 increase in u.v.-treated embryos in comparison with wild type and ß-catenin-rescued embryos, the timing of Smad1 phosphorylation is not altered. A general developmental delay therefore does not explain the differential timing of Smad2 phosphorylation. Rather, timing of Smad2 phosphorylation, but not Smad1 phosphorylation, is developmentally regulated by cortical rotation.
To determine whether ß-catenin changes the timing of VegT-induced Smad2 phosphorylation, we examined animal caps dissected before stage 9 and harvested from stage 9 to stage 11.5 (Fig. 4E). Uninjected animal caps do not contain detectable phosphorylation of Smad2 and ß-catenin alone is not sufficient to induce Smad2 phosphorylation. VegT induces Smad2 phosphorylation in animal caps by stage 10.5. When injected together, VegT and ß-catenin induce by stage 10+ levels of Smad2 phosphorylation seen with VegT alone at stage 10.5. These results demonstrate that ß-catenin accelerates the ability of VegT to induce phosphorylation of Smad2 in animal caps, but does not increase the maximal level of Smad2 phosphorylation.
Activin-like ligands induce distinct temporal profiles of Smad2 activation
We have previously shown that, while activin can induce Smad2 phosphorylation before MBT, processed and active maternal Vg1 (Thomsen and Melton, 1993) induces Smad2 phosphorylation only after MBT (Faure et al., 2000). To define responsiveness to zygotic activin-like ligands, we examined the activities of these ligands before or after MBT and in the presence or absence of -amanitin. While the constitutively active type I receptor ALK4* (Armes and Smith, 1997) can induce Smad2 phosphorylation before MBT, each of the zygotic activin-like ligands Xnrs 1, 2, 4 and derrière (Jones et al., 1995; Joseph and Melton, 1997; Lustig et al., 1996a; Sun et al., 1999) induces Smad2 phosphorylation only after MBT, not before (Fig. 5A). Furthermore, this Smad2 phosphorylation by the zygotic activin-like ligands after MBT is not affected by inhibition of zygotic transcription with
-amanitin (Fig. 5B). Both the zygotic activin-like ligands and the maternal ligand Vg1 therefore appear to be regulated by a post-transcriptional mechanism in their ability to induce Smad2 phosphorylation after MBT.
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Maternal VegT and Smad2 are present at similar levels dorsally and ventrally (data not shown; Faure et al., 2000), but both Smad2 phosphorylation (Fig. 3D) and expression of Xnr1, Xnr5, Xnr6, derrière (Fig. 3E; Agius et al., 2000; Sun et al., 1999; Takahashi et al., 2000) and also Xnr2 (Jones et al., 1995; Chris Wright, personal communication) begin earlier dorsally than ventrally. This suggests that additional maternal factors, differentially distributed or activated along the prospective dorsal-ventral axis, interact with VegT to generate this dorsal-ventral asymmetry in Smad2 regulation. ß-Catenin is a likely candidate for such a factor, as it is enriched in nuclei on the dorsal side, and injection of ß-catenin can rescue the early initiation of Smad2 phosphorylation in embryos in which cortical rotation has been prevented (Fig. 4B). Analysis of the Xnr1 promoter has shown that it contains both VegT- and ß-catenin-binding sites (Hyde and Old, 2000; Kofron et al., 1999). Antagonism of VegT function blocks activation of this promoter entirely (Hyde and Old, 2000), while antagonism of ß-catenin activity blocks Xnr1 expression at stage 9 but not at stage 9.5 (Agius et al., 2000). These observations are consistent with a model in which VegT and ß-catenin cooperate transcriptionally in the dorsal marginal zone to accelerate expression of activin-like ligands, and thus accelerate Smad2 phosphorylation. In addition to Xnr1, four more nodal-related ligands have been identified in the prospective mesendoderm that can act as mesoderm inducers (Xnr2, Xnr4, Xnr5 and Xnr6) (Jones et al., 1995; Joseph and Melton, 1997; Takahashi et al., 2000). Characterization of the regulation and contribution to local Smad2 phosphorylation of each of these ligands will be necessary to develop a complete picture of how this family of ligands participates in mesodermal patterning.
While ß-catenin can cooperate with VegT to accelerate the initiation of Smad2 phosphorylation when both are expressed in animal caps, ectopic expression of these two factors is not sufficient to recapitulate endogenous timing of Smad2 phosphorylation in the mesendoderm. Co-injection of ß-catenin with VegT induces Smad2 phosphorylation in animal caps at stage 10+ (Fig. 4E), but even high doses of both factors will not induce Smad2 phosphorylation earlier than stage 10+. Endogenous Smad2 phosphorylation begins significantly earlier than this, at stage 9, both in intact embryos or ß-catenin-rescued u.v.-treated embryos (Fig. 4B,E). This indicates that either animal caps contain regulators that delay Smad2 activation in the presence of ß-catenin and VegT relative to endogenous prospective mesendoderm, or that the prospective mesendoderm contains factors that accelerate Smad2 phosphorylation relative to the effects of ß-catenin and VegT alone.
A wave of Smad2 phosphorylation in the prospective mesendoderm: generation of the falling phase
Two inhibitors of activin-like ligands, antivin and cerberus, are rapidly induced by activin-like signaling through Smad2 and FAST. In the early gastrula stage embryo, the same combination of regulators that generates the dorsal rising phase of the wave of Smad2 phosphorylation across the marginal zone also results in the initiation of antivin and cerberus expression on the dorsal side. Antivin and cerberus proteins therefore accumulate to levels that antagonize activin-like signaling earlier on the dorsal side. Positive regulation by Smad2 activation is probably not the only mechanism that enhances dorsal expression of these inhibitors, as ß-catenin may also contribute directly to dorsal cerberus expression (Zorn et al., 1999). These observations suggest a relatively simple mechanism by which the activation, and subsequently the attenuation, of activin-like signaling begin from the dorsal side. Within this apparently simple model, however, puzzles regarding specific aspects of dose and timing remain. How are the rates of synthesis of activin-like ligands and inhibitors, and the affinities of each for the other calibrated so that the inhibitors accumulate rapidly enough to efficiently inhibit the ligands? Why does the expression of inhibitors not drop as soon as they begin to inhibit activin-like ligand activity? More quantitative analyses will be necessary to clarify how feedback regulation stably and reliably generates the observed wave of Smad2 signaling.
Is Smad2 signaling propagated across the dorsal-ventral or animal-vegetal axes?
Phosphorylation of Smad2 begins asymmetrically in a region of the late blastula that is both dorsal and vegetal and extends to encompass both ventral and marginal cells by the early gastrula stage. Both diffusion of ligands and local positive autoregulation (relay) of ligand expression have been suggested as mechanisms by which TGFß superfamily signals might be propagated across the embryo (Jones et al., 1996a; Reilly and Melton, 1996; Osada and Wright, 1999), but it is also possible that changing patterns of signal activation are mediated primarily by differentially timed, cell-autonomous expression of ligands. While tissue recombination experiments have demonstrated that patterning signals can be propagated both between vegetal and animal explants (Nieuwkoop, 1969), and between dorsal and ventral marginal zones (Slack and Forman, 1980; Ding et al., 1998b), it is not clear whether these propagated signals are the predominant ones mediating endogenous patterning. We find that Smad2 phosphorylation can be activated independently, and with distinct timing, in dorsal and ventral embryonic halves isolated at stage 8 (Fig. 3D,E). This indicates that the activation of Smad2 is region-autonomous across the dorsal-ventral axis, but does not rule out the possibility of more locally propagated signaling. The attenuation of Smad2 signaling by feedback inhibitors is likewise region-autonomous (Fig. 3D,E), again suggesting that these inhibitors are acting at most across relatively short distances rather than globally. The available resolution of dissections do not permit a clear answer to the question of whether Smad2 activating signals are propagated from the vegetal region into the marginal zone. What is clear, however, is that Smad2-activating signals do not propagate towards the animal pole beyond the blastocoel floor. In light of observations that several Smad2-activating ligands are positively autoregulatory, the interesting question is raised of how Smad2 phosphorylation is excluded from the prospective ectoderm. Identification of the mechanisms that inhibit the propagation of a positive feedback loop of Smad2-activating signaling into the animal pole will be an important aspect of understanding the mechanism of germ layer establishment.
Timing of endogenous activin-like signals may direct cell fate specification in the embryo
Can manipulation of the timing of Smad2 phosphorylation direct regionally distinct mesendodermal patterning? The observation that the timing of initiation of Smad2 phosphorylation is regulated across marginal and vegetal regions suggests, but does not in itself demonstrate, a role for this timing in axial patterning. Ectopic Xnr1 induces Smad2 phosphorylation to maximal levels by stage 9, while derrière does not induce maximal levels of phosphorylation until stage 10 (Fig. 5D,E); these differences correspond roughly to the timing of Smad2 phosphorylation in prospective dorso-anterior and ventro-posterior regions, respectively (Figs 2, 3D). Interestingly, Xnr1 is an effective inducer of relatively dorsal and anterior tissues, while derrière induces relatively ventral and posterior tissues and does not induce notochord or heads (Osada and Wright, 1999; Sun et al., 1999). Soluble activin ligand added to progressively older animal caps induces differentiation of progressively less dorsal tissues (Green et al., 1990), further supporting the idea that timing of the initiation of Smad2 phosphorylation is instructive for tissue differentiation. As for early activation of Smad2 signaling, early attenuation of Smad2 phosphorylation is associated with the induction of relatively dorso-anterior structures (Figs 2, 3D, 4B; Gritsman et al., 2000; Thisse et al., 2000), suggesting that signal attenuation, as well as signal onset, may play a role in patterning of the mesendoderm.
Is timing of responsiveness to ligands a point of developmental regulation?
Ectopic expression of activin, Xnr1 or derrière activates Smad2 phosphorylation at distinct developmental stages (Fig. 5D). This regulated timing of responsiveness to ectopic ligand expression may be conferred at the level of production of mature ligands, competence of cells to respond to ligands, or both. TGFß superfamily ligands must be dimerized and cleaved intracellularly for maturation (Lopez et al., 1992), thereby providing several potential points for regulation (Constam and Robertson, 1999). Recent work demonstrating that the biological activities of nodal orthologs in several species, but not activin, require co-receptors of the epidermal growth factor-cripto, FRL-1, criptic (EGF-CFC) family, raises the possibility that specific EGF-CFC-like molecules are limiting for Xnr1 or derrière signaling in early embryos (Chang and Whitman, 2001; Ding et al., 1998a; Gritsman et al., 1999). The appearance of responsiveness to ectopic nodal-related ligands and derrière is independent of zygotic transcription (Fig. 5B-E), indicating that regulation of EGF-CFC co-receptors, like FRL-1 (Kinoshita et al., 1995), or other limiting components occurs at the level of translation, proteolysis or other post-translational processing. Timing of responsiveness may be a critical mechanism by which different ligands use the same pathway to cause different effects on developmental patterning.
Models of early developmental patterning should consider temporal regulation of activin-like signals
Activin can act as a morphogen on animal cap cells, inducing ventral-to-lateral-to-dorsal mesodermal fates with increasing dose (Green et al., 1992). Activin-like signaling through Smad2 can also act synergistically with ß-catenin to induce organizer-specific markers (Crease et al., 1998; Cui et al., 1996; Sokol and Melton, 1992; Watabe et al., 1995). Based on these and related observations, two general models have been proposed for the role of activin-like signals in the dorsal-ventral patterning of the mesoderm. In one model (Agius et al., 2000), activin-like signals are postulated as a static gradient that decreases across the dorsal-ventral axis; the highest level dorsally presumably resulting from overlap with dorsally localized ß-catenin. In the alternative model (Clements et al., 1999; Crease et al., 1998), activin-like signaling is represented as evenly distributed across the dorsal-ventral axis of the marginal zone; this signal interacts with dorsal ß-catenin to regulate organizer gene expression. In contrast to these models, we find neither an even distribution nor a static gradient of activin-like signaling across the dorsal-ventral axis. Rather, we find that the dorsal-ventral distribution of Smad2 phosphorylation changes dramatically as gastrulation proceeds (Fig. 6). We propose that, while the magnitude of Smad2 phosphorylation may distinguish the primary germ layers (Faure et al., 2000), the timing of Smad2 phosphorylation determines the role of activin-like signaling in patterning across the dorsal-ventral and anterior-posterior axes.
|
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Agius, E., Oelgeschläger, M., Wessely, O., Kemp, C. and De Robertis, E. M. (2000). Endodermal Nodal-related signals and mesoderm induction in Xenopus. Development 127, 1173-1183.
Armes, N. A. and Smith, J. A. (1997). The ALK-2 and ALK-4 Activin receptors transduce distinct mesoderm inducing signals during early Xenopus development but do not co-operate to establish thresholds. Development 124, 3797-3804.
Asashima, M., Nakano, H., Uchiyama, H., Sugino, H., Nakamura, T., Eto, Y., Ejima, D., Nishimatsu, S., Ueno, N. and Kinoshita, K. (1991). Presence of activin (erythroid differentiation factor) in unfertilized eggs and blastulae of Xenopus laevis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 6511-6514.[Abstract]
Bauer, D. V., Huang, S. and Moody, S. A. (1994). The cleavage stage origin of Spemanns organizer: analysis of the movements of blastomere clones before and during gastrulation in Xenopus. Development 120, 1179-1189.
Bouwmeester, T., Kim, S., Sasai, Y., Lu, B. and De Robertis, E. M. (1996). Cerberus is a head-inducing secreted factor expressed in the anterior endoderm of Spemanns organizer. Nature 382, 595-601.[Medline]
Chang, C., Wilson, P. A., Mathews, L. S. and Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. (1997). A Xenopus type I activin receptor mediates mesodermal but not neural specification during embryogenesis. Development 124, 827-837.
Chang, C. and Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. (2000). A post-mid-blastula transition requirement for TGFbeta signaling in early endodermal specification. Mech. Dev. 90, 227-35.[Medline]
Cheng, A. M., Thisse, B., Thisse, C. and Wright, C. V. (2000). The lefty-related factor Xatv acts as a feedback inhibitor of nodal signaling in mesoderm induction and L-R axis development in Xenopus. Development 127, 1049-61.
Cho, K. W. and Blitz, I. L. (1998). BMPs, Smads and metalloproteases: extracellular and intracellular modes of negative regulation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 443-449.[Medline]
Clements, D., Friday, R. V. and Woodland, H. R. (1999). Mode of action of VegT in mesoderm and endoderm formation. Development 126, 4903-4911.
Cooke, J. and Smith, J. C. (1987). The midblastula cell cycle transition and the character of mesoderm in u.v.-induced nonaxial Xenopus development. Development 99, 197-210.[Abstract]
Constam, D. B. and Robertson, E. J. (1999). Regulation of bone morphogenetic protein activity by pro domains and proprotein convertases. J. Cell Biol. 144, 139-149.
Crease, D. J., Dyson, S. and Gurdon, J. B. (1998). Cooperation between the activin and Wnt pathways in the spatial control of organizer gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4398-403.
Cui, Y., Tian, Q. and Christian, J. L. (1996). Synergistic effects of Vg1 and Wnt signals in the specification of dorsal mesoderm and endoderm. Dev. Biol. 180, 22-34.[Medline]
Ding, J., Yang, L., Yan, Y. T., Chen, A., Desai, N., Wynshaw-Boris, A. and Shen, M. M. (1998a). Cripto is required for correct orientation of the anterior-posterior axis in the mouse embryo. Nature 395, 702-707.[Medline]
Ding, X., Hausen, P. and Steinbeisser, H. (1998b). Pre-MBT patterning of early gene regulation in Xenopus: the role of the cortical rotation and mesoderm induction. Mech. Dev. 70, 15-24.[Medline]
Eimon, P. M. and Harland, R. M. (1999). In Xenopus embryos, BMP heterodimers are not required for mesoderm induction, but BMP activity is necessary for dorsal/ventral patterning. Dev. Biol. 216, 29-40.[Medline]
Faure, S., Lee, M. A., Keller, T., ten Dijke, P. and Whitman, M. (2000). Endogenous patterns of TGFß superfamily signaling during early Xenopus development. Development 127, 2917-2931.
Fujisue, M., Kobayakawa, Y. and Yamana, K. (1993). Occurrence of dorsal axis-inducing activity around the vegetal pole of an uncleaved Xenopus egg and displacement to the equatorial region by cortical rotation. Development 118, 163-170.
Fukui, A., Nakamura, T., Uchiyama, H., Sugino, K. and Asashima, M. (1994). Identification of activins A, AB, and B and follistatin proteins in Xenopus embryos. Dev. Biol. 163, 279-281.[Medline]
Gerhart, J., Danilchik, M., Doniach, T., Roberts, S., Rowning, B. and Stewart, R. (1989). Cortical rotation of the Xenopus egg: consequences for the anteroposterior pattern of embryonic dorsal development. Development 107, 37-51.[Medline]
Glinka, A., Wu, W., Onichtchouk, D., Blumenstock, C. and Niehrs, C. (1997). Head induction by simultaneous repression of Bmp and Wnt signalling in Xenopus. Nature 389, 517-519.[Medline]
Graff, J. M. (1997). Embryonic patterning: to BMP or not to BMP, That is the question. Cell 89, 171-174.[Medline]
Green, J. B. A., Howes, G., Symes, K., Cooke, J. and Smith, J. C. (1990). The biological effects of XTC-MIF: quantitative comparison with Xenopus bFGF. Development 108, 173-183.[Abstract]
Green, J. B. A., New, H. V. and Smith, J. C. (1992). Responses of embryonic Xenopus cells to activin and FGF are separated by multiple dose thresholds and correspond to distinct axes of the mesoderm. Cell 71, 731-739.[Medline]
Gritsman, K., Zhang, J., Cheng, S., Heckscher, E., Talbot, W. S. and Schier, A. F. (1999). The EGF-CFC protein one-eyed pinhead is essential for nodal signaling. Cell 97, 121-132.[Medline]
Gritsman, K., Talbot, W.S. and Shier, A. F. (2000). Nodal signaling patterns the organizer. Development 127, 921-932.
Gu, Z. Y., Nomura, M., Simpson, B. B., Lei, H., Feijen, A., van den Rijnden-van Raaij, J., Donahoe, P. K. and Li, E. (1998). The type I activin receptor ActRIB is required for egg cylinder organization and gastrulation in the mouse. Genes Dev. 12, 844-857.
Guger, K. A. and Gumbiner, B. M. (1995). ß-Catenin has Wnt-like activity and mimics the Nieuwkoop signaling center in Xenopus dorsal-ventral patterning. Dev. Biol. 172, 115-125.[Medline]
Harland, R. and Gerhart, J. (1997). Formation and function of Spemanns Organizer. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 13, 611-667.[Medline]
Heasman, J. (1997). Patterning the Xenopus blastula. Development 124, 4179-4191.
Heasman, J., Crawford, A., Goldstone, K., Garner-Hamrick, P., Gumbiner, B., McCrea, P., Kintner, C., Noro, C. Y. and Wylie, C. (1994). Overexpression of cadherins and underexpression of ß catenin inhibit dorsal mesoderm induction in early xenopus embryos. Cell 79, 791-803.[Medline]
Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. and Melton, D. A. (1992). A truncated activin receptor dominantly inhibits mesoderm induction and formation of axial structures in Xenopus embryos. Nature 359, 609-614.[Medline]
Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. and Melton, D. A. (1994). Inhibition of activin receptor signaling promotes neuralization in Xenopus. Cell 77, 273-281.[Medline]
Henry, G. L., Brivanlou, I. H., Kessler, D. S., Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. and Melton, D. A. (1996). TGF-beta signals and a prepattern in Xenopus laevis endodermal development. Development 122, 1007-1015.
Horb, M. E. and Thomsen, G. H. (1997). A vegetally localized T-box transcription factor in Xenopus eggs specifies mesoderm and endoderm and is seential for embryonic formation. Development 124, 1689-1698.
Hsu, D. R., Economides, A. N., Wang, X., Eimon, P. M. and Harland, R. M. (1998). The Xenopus dorsalizing factor Gremlin identifies a novel family of secreted proteins that antagonize BMP activities. Mol. Cell 1, 673-683.[Medline]
Hyde, C. E. and Old, R. W. (2000). Regulation of the early expression of the Xenopus nodal-related 1 gene, Xnr1. Development 127, 1221-1229.
Jones, C. M., Kuehn, M. R., Hogan, B. L. M., Smith, J. C. and Wright, C. V. E. (1995). Nodal-related signals induce axial mesoderm and dorsalize mesoderm during gastrulation. Development 121, 3651-3662.
Jones, C. M., Armes, N. and Smith, J. C. (1996a). Signalling by TGF-beta family members: short range effects of Xnr-2 and BMP-4 contrast with the long-range effects of activin. Curr. Biol. 6, 1468-1475.[Medline]
Jones, C. M., Dale, L., Hogan, B. L., Wright, C. V. and Smith, J. C. (1996b). Bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4) acts during gastrula stages to cause ventralization of Xenopus embryos. Development 122, 1545-1554.
Jones, E. A. and Woodland, H. R. (1987). The development of animal cap cells in Xenopus: a measure of the start of an cap competence to form mesoderm. Development 101, 557-563.[Abstract]
Joseph, E. M. and Melton, D. A. (1997). Xnr4: a Xenopus nodal-related gene expressed in the Spemann organizer. Dev. Biol. 184, 367-372.[Medline]
Kageura, H. and Yamana, K. (1983). Pattern regulation in isolated halves and blastomeres of early Xenopus laevis. J Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 74, 221-234.[Medline]
Kao, K. and Danilchik, M. (1991). Generation of body plan phenotypes in early embryogenesis. In Methods in Cell Biology. Vol. 36 (ed. B. K. Kay and H. B. Peng). San Diego: Academic Press.
Kao, K. R. and Elinson, R. P. (1988). The entire mesodermal mantle behaves as Spemanns organizer in dorsoanterior enhanced Xenopus laevis embryos. Dev. Biol. 127, 64-77.[Medline]
Kimelman, D. and Griffin, K. J. (1998). Mesoderm induction: a postmodern view. Cell 94, 419-421.[Medline]
Kinoshita, N., Minshull, J. and Kirschner, M. W. (1995). The identification of two novel ligands of the FGF receptor by a yeast screening method and their activity in Xenopus development. Cell 83, 621-630.[Medline]
Kofron, M., Demel, T., Xanthos, J., Lohr, J., Sun, B., Sive, H., Osada, S., Wright, C., Wylie, C. and Heasman, J. (1999). Mesoderm induction in Xenopus is a zygotic event regulated by maternal VegT via TGFß growth factors. Development 126, 5759-5770.
LaBonne, C. and Whitman, M. (1994). Mesoderm induction by activin requires FGF-mediated intracellular signals. Development 120, 463-472.
Larabell, C. A., Torres, M., Rowning, B. A., Yost, C., Miller, J. R., Wu, M., Kimelman, D. and Moon, R. T. (1997). Establishment of the dorso-ventral axis in Xenopus embryos is presaged by early asymmetries in beta-catenin that are modulated by the Wnt signaling pathway. J. Cell Biol. 136, 1123-1136.
Lopez, A. R., Cook, J., Deininger, P. L. and Derynck, R. (1992). Dominant negative mutants of transforming growth factor-beta 1 inhibit the secretion of different transforming growth factor-beta isoforms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 1674-1679.[Abstract]
Lustig, K., Kroll, K., Sun, E., Ramos, R., Elmendorf, H. and Kirschner, M. (1996a). A Xenopus nodal-related gene that acts in synergy with noggin to induce secondary axis and notochord formation. Development 122, 3275-3282.
Lustig, K. D., Kroll, K., Sun, E. E. and Kirschner, M. W. (1996b). Expression cloning of a Xenopus T-related gene (Xombi) involved in mesodernal patterning and blastopore lip formation. Development 122, 4001-4012.
Massagué, J. (1998). TGF-ß signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 753-791.[Medline]
Meno, C., Gritsman, K., Ohishi, S., Ohfuji, Y., Heckscher, E., Mochida, K., Shimono, A., Kondoh, H., Talbot, W. S., Robertson, E. J., Schier, A. F. and Hamada, H. (1999). Mouse Lefty2 and zebrafish antivin are feedback inhibitors of nodal signaling during vertebrate gastrulation. Mol. Cell 4, 287-298.[Medline]
Newport, J. and Kirschner, M. (1982). A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. Characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula transition. Cell 30, 675-686.[Medline]
Nieuwkoop, P. D. (1969). The formation of mesoderm in urodelean amphibians. I. Induction by the endoderm. Wilhelm Roux Arch. EntwMech. Org. 162, 341-373.
Nieuwkoop, P. D. and Faber, J. (1967). Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
Oda, S., Nishimatsu, S., Murakami, K. and Ueno, N. (1995). Molecular cloning and functional analysis of a new activin beta subunit: a dorsal mesoderm-inducing activity in Xenopus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 210, 581-588.[Medline]
Osada, S. I. and Wright, C. V. (1999). Xenopus nodal-related signaling is essential for mesendodermal patterning during early embryogenesis. Development 126, 3229-3240.
Osada, S., Saijoh, Y., Frisch, A., Yeo, C.-Y., Adachi, H., Watanabe, M., Whitman, M., Hamada, H. and Wright, C. V. (2000). Activin/Nodal responsiveness and asymmetric expression of a Xenopus nodal-related gene converge on a FAST-regulated module in intron 1. Development 127, 2503-2514.
Peng, H. B. (1991). Solutions and protocols. In Methods in Cell Biology, Appendix A. Vol. 36 (ed. B. K. Kay and H. B. Peng). San Diego: Academic Press.
Persson, U., Izumi, H., Souchelnytskyi, S., Itoh, S., Grimsby, S., Engström, U., Heldin, C.-H., Funa, K. and ten Dijke, P. (1998). The L45 loop in type I receptors for TGF-ß family members is a critical determinant in specifying Smad isoform activation. FEBS Lett. 434, 83-87.[Medline]
Piccolo, S., Sasai, Y., Lu, B. and DeRobertis, E. (1996). Dorsoventral patterning in Xenopus: inhibition of ventral signals by binding of chordin to BMP-4. Cell 86, 589-598.[Medline]
Piccolo, S., Agius, E., Leyns, L., Bhattacharyya, S., Grunz, H., Bouwmeester, T. and De Robertis, E. M. (1999). The head inducer Cerberus is a multifunctional antagonist of Nodal, BMP and Wnt signals. Nature 397, 707-710.[Medline]
Reilly, K. M. and Melton, D. A. (1996). Short-range signaling by candidate morphogens of the TGF beta family and evidence for a relay mechanism of induction. Cell 86, 743-754.[Medline]
Saijoh, Y., Adachi, H., Sakuma, R., Yeo, C.-Y., Yashiro, K., Watanabe, M., Hashiguchi, H., Mochida, K., Ohishi, S., Kawabata, M. et al. (2000). Left-right asymmetric expression of lefty2 and nodal is induced by a signaling pathway that includes the transcription factor FAST2. Mol. Cell 5, 35-47.[Medline]
Sakai, M. (1996). The vegetal determinants required for the Spemann organizer move equatorially during the first cell cycle. Development 122, 2207-2214.
Scharf, S. R. and Gerhart, J. C. (1983). Axis determination in eggs of Xenopus laevis: a critical period before first cleavage, identified by the common effects of cold, pressure and ultraviolet irradiation. Dev. Biol. 99, 75-87.[Medline]
Schier, A. F. and Shen, M. M. (1999). Nodal signalling in vertebrate development. Nature 403, 385-389.
Schneider, V. A. and Mercola, M. (1999). Spatially distinct head and heart inducers within the Xenopus organizer region. Curr. Biol. 9, 800-809.[Medline]
Schneider, S., Steinbeisser, H., Warga, R. M. and Hausen, P. (1996). Beta-catenin translocation into nuclei demarcates the dorsalizing centers in frog and fish embryos. Mech. Dev. 57, 191-198.[Medline]
Sible, J. C., Anderson, J. A., Lewellyn, A. L. and Maller, J. L. (1997). Zygotic transcription is required to block a maternal program of apoptosis in Xenopus embryos. Dev. Biol. 189, 335-346.[Medline]
Slack, J. M. and Forman, D. (1980). An interaction between dorsal and ventral regions of the marginal zone in early amphibian embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 56, 283-299.[Medline]
Sokol, S. Y. and Melton, D. A. (1992). Interaction of Wnt and Activin in Dorsal Mesoderm Induction in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 154, 1-8.[Medline]
Stack, J. H. and Newport, J. W. (1997). Developmentally regulated activation of apoptosis early in Xenopus gastrulation results in cyclin A degradation during interphase of the cell cycle. Development 124, 3185-3195.
Steinbeisser, H., Fainsod, A., Niehrs, C., Sasai, Y. and De Robertis, E. M. (1995). The role of gsc and BMP-4 in dorsal-ventral patterning of the marginal zone in Xenopus: a loss-of-function study using antisense RNA. EMBO J. 14, 5230-5243.[Abstract]
Stennard, F., Carnac, G. and Gurdon, J. (1996). A Xenopus T-box gene, antipodean, encodes a vegetally-localized maternal mRNA that can trigger mesoderm formation. Development 122, 4179-4188.
Stennard, F., Zorn, A. M., Ryan, K., Garrett, N. and Gurdon, J. B. (1999). Differential expression of VegT and Antipodean protein isoforms in Xenopus. Mech. Dev. 86, 87-98.[Medline]
Sun, B. I., Bush, S. M., Collins-Racie, L. A., LaVallie, E. R., DiBlasio-Smith, E. A., Wolfman, N. M., McCoy, J. M. and Sive, H. L. (1999). derrière: a TGF-ß family member required for posterior development in Xenopus. Development 126, 1467-1482.
Takahashi, S., Yokota, C., Takano, K., Tanegashima, K., Onuma, Y., Goto, J. I. and Asashima, M. (2000). Two novel nodal-related genes initiate early inductive events in Xenopus Nieuwkoop center. Development 127, 5319-5329.
Tanegashima, K., Yokota, C., Takahashi, S. and Asashima, M. (2000). Expression cloning of Xantivin, a Xenopus lefty/antivin-related gene, involved in the regulation of activin signaling during mesoderm induction. Mech. Dev. 99, 3-14.[Medline]
Tannahill, D. and Melton, D. A. (1989). Localized synthesis of the Vg1 protein during early Xenopus development. Development 106, 775-785.[Abstract]
Thisse, C. and Thisse, B. (1999). Antivin, a novel and divergent member of the TGFß superfamily, negatively regulates mesoderm induction. Development 126, 229-240.
Thisse, B., Wright, C. V. and Thisse, C. (2000). Activin- and Nodal-related factors control antero-posterior patterning of the zebrafish embryo. Nature 403, 425-428.[Medline]
Thomsen, G. and Melton, D. (1993). Processed Vg1 protein is an axial mesoderm inducer in Xenopus. Cell 74, 433-441.[Medline]
Watabe, T., Kim, S., Candia, A., Rothbacher, U., Hashimoto, C., Inoue, K. and Cho, K. W. Y. (1995). Molecular mechanisms of spemanns organizer formation conserved growth factor synergy between Xenopus and mouse. Genes Dev. 9, 3038-3050.[Abstract]
Watanabe, M. and Whitman, M. (1999). FAST-1 is a key maternal effector of mesoderm inducers in the early Xenopus embryo. Development 126, 5621-5634.
Weeks, D. L. and Melton, D. A. (1987). A maternal mRNA localized to the vegetal hemisphere in Xenopus eggs codes for a growth factor related to TGF-ß. Cell 51, 861-867.[Medline]
Whitman, M. (1998). Smads and early developmental signaling by the TGFß superfamily. Genes Dev. 12, 2443-2453.
Wylie, C., Kofron, M., Payne, C., Anderson, R., Hosobuchi, M., Joseph, E. and Heasman, J. (1996). Maternal beta-catenin establishes a dorsal signal in early Xenopus embryos. Development 122, 2987-2996.
Xanthos, J. B., Kofron, M., Wylie, C. and Heasman, J. (2001). Maternal VegT is the initiator of a molecular network specifying endoderm in Xenopus laevis. Development 128, 167-180.
Yasuo, H. and Lemaire, P. (1999). A two-step model for the fate determination of presumptive endodermal blastomeres in Xenopus embryos. Curr. Biol. 9, 869-879.[Medline]
Yeo, C.-Y. and Whitman, M. (2001). Nodal signals to Smads through Cripto-dependent and Cripto-independent mechanisms. Mol. Cell 7, 949-957.[Medline]
Zhang, J. and King, M. L. (1996). Xenopus VegT RNA is localized to the vegetal cortex during oogenesis and encodes a novel T-box transcription factor involved in mesodermal patterning. Development 124, 4119-4129.
Zhang, J., Houston, D. W., King, M. L., Payne, C., Wylie, C. and Heasman, J. (1998). The role of maternal VegT in establishing the primary germ layers in Xenopus embryos. Cell 94, 515-24.[Medline]
Zimmerman, L. B., De Jesus-Escobar, L. M. and Harland, R. M. (1996). The Spemann organizer signal noggin binds and inactivates bone morphogenetic protein 4. Cell 86, 599-606.[Medline]
Zorn, A. M., Butler, K. and Gurdon, J. B. (1999). Anterior endomesoderm specification in Xenopus by Wnt/beta-catenin and TGF-beta signalling pathways. Dev. Biol. 209, 282-297.[Medline]
Zuck, M. V., Wylie, C. C. and Heasman, J. (1998). Maternal mRNAs in Xenopus embryos: an antisense approach. In A Comparative Methods Approach to the Study of Oocytes and Embryos (ed. J. Richter), pp. 341-354. Oxford: Oxford University Press.