Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution, 260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kbarton{at}stanford.edu)
SUMMARY
For nearly a century, the plant hormone auxin has been recognized for its effects on post-embryonic plant growth. Now recent insights into the molecular mechanism of auxin transport and signaling are uncovering fundamental roles for auxin in the earliest stages of plant development, such as in the development of the apical-basal (shoot-root) axis in the embryo, as well as in the formation of the root and shoot apical meristems and the cotyledons. Localized surges in auxin within the embryo occur through a sophisticated transcellular transport pathway causing the proteolytic destruction of key transcriptional repressors. As we discuss here, the resulting downstream gene activation, together with other, less well-understood regulatory pathways, establish much of the basic body plan of the angiosperm embryo.
Introduction
The plant hormone auxin was identified originally from the effects it had
on modulating plant growth (see Went,
1974). Among the classically studied auxin effects are plant
tropic responses (growth toward or away from environmental signals) and apical
dominance (repression of branch outgrowth by cells at the shoot tip). Plant
growth in response to gravity and light requires asymmetrically distributed
auxin across the stem or root. This causes one side to grow more than the
other. Similarly, the production of auxin by the `apically dominant' shoot
tip, followed by its transport down through the stem, represses the outgrowth
of lateral buds.
It has taken longer to recognize and understand the role auxin plays in the
development of cell or organ types in the embryo. This is partly because the
plant embryo is safely, and for many experimental purposes, inaccessibly,
tucked away inside the ovule. It is also because we have had, until recently,
a very limited understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie auxin
action. Despite these difficulties, the profound effects of auxin on in
vitro-cultured plant tissues have suggested that auxin had the power not just
to regulate growth but also to dictate the fate of a cell. Skoog and Miller's
famous experiments showed that the ratio of auxin to cytokinin in the growth
medium determined whether roots or shoots developed from cultured cell
clusters (Skoog and Miller,
1957). The concentration of auxin in the medium could also be
manipulated to cause cultured Zinnia mesophyll cells to develop into xylem
cells (Fukuda and Komamine,
1980
).
In 2000, Geldner and colleagues
(Geldner et al., 2000) wrote a
short review entitled, `Is there a role for auxin in early embryogenesis?'
Around that time, researchers were finding that molecules involved in early
embryonic development bore similarities to molecules involved in auxin signal
transduction. These were the first hints of a molecular mechanism for auxin
action in embryonic development. Five years later, the answer to Geldner et
al.'s question is an emphatic `yes'. In this review, we discuss some of the
more recent experiments linking auxin to important events in the development
of the early embryo. These include the establishment of the root apical
meristem at the basal end of the embryo and the partitioning of the apical
portion of the embryo into cotyledons (seed leaves) and shoot apical meristem.
We begin with brief summaries of the mechanism of auxin action and of
wild-type embryogenesis.
Auxin activity and transport
Auxin activates transcription by destroying transcriptional repressors
Auxin refers to any of a group of chemically related small molecules, which
includes indole acetic acid and indole butyric acid. Our knowledge of auxin
action comes chiefly from experiments in which exogenous auxin has been
applied to cells, and from the study of mutants unable to respond normally to
exogenously applied auxin. Auxin application causes rapid changes in
transcription (Abel and Theologis,
1996; Hagen and Guilfoyle,
2002
) through the destruction of AUX/IAA transcriptional
repressors (Gray et al., 2001
;
Zenser et al., 2001
)
(Fig. 1). Auxin does this by
binding to and activating the TIR1 F-box component of the SCFTIR1
E3 ubiquitin ligase, which then ubiquitinates AUX/IAA proteins, targeting them
for destruction by the proteosome
(Dharmasiri et al., 2005
;
Kepinski and Leyser, 2005
)
(see also Moon et al., 2004
).
AUX/IAA proteins contain potent transcriptional repression domains but do not
bind DNA on their own. Instead, AUX/IAA proteins dimerize with AUXIN RESPONSE
FACTOR (ARF) DNA-binding transcriptional activators and prevent them from
activating transcription (Tiwari et al.,
2001
; Tiwari et al.,
2004
). Upon auxin-mediated degradation of an AUX/IAA factor, the
ARF protein is free to activate transcription from its target promoter.
Microarray analysis of auxin-treated tissues shows that there are several
hundred genes that are regulated at the transcriptional level by auxin
(Zhao et al., 2003;
Goda et al., 2004
;
Nemhauser et al., 2004
). Among
the wide variety of gene products regulated by auxin are those involved in
cell elongation, consistent with the known role of auxin on growth. Induced
genes also include many of the AUX/IAA genes, indicating the potential for a
negative-feedback loop in which auxin action is self-limiting.
|
ARFs bind to TGTCTC auxin response elements (auxREs), which lie upstream of
auxin-activated genes. A synthetic reporter, DR5, consisting of multiple
tandem repeats of this sequence upstream of either ß-glucuronidase (GUS)
or green fluorescent protein (GFP), is frequently used to detect auxin
activity in plant cells (Ulmasov et al.,
1997a; Ulmasov et al.,
1997b
). The DR5 reporter is strongly activated in protoplasts
(dissociated plant cells from which the cell wall has been removed) treated
with auxin in the presence of ARFs with transcriptional activation domains
(Tiwari et al., 2003
).
The extent of DR5 reporter activity is often used as an indicator of the
active auxin present in a given cell. Two observations suggest that DR5
activity alone is not a sufficient way to measure intracellular auxin
activity. First, in the presence of ARFs with transcriptional repression
domains, the DR5 reporter is repressed in protoplasts
(Tiwari et al., 2003). High
levels of such ARFs in a cell could theoretically compete with activating ARFs
for the auxREs. Second, the DR5 reporter requires the plant growth regulator
brassinolide for full activity (Nemhauser
et al., 2004
). Moreover, high levels of brassinolide can activate
DR5 in the apparent absence of changes in auxin levels
(Nakamura et al., 2003
). Thus,
high or low levels of brassinolide within a cell could potentially confound
the readout of the DR5 reporter. These findings show the need to use
additional experimental methods to confirm findings based on DR5 activity. In
some cases, a combination of microdissection and mass spectrometry has been
used to measure auxin levels (e.g. Friml
et al., 2002a
; Friml et al.,
2004
). Although such measurements have limited spatial resolution,
they tend to support the results obtained with the DR5 reporter.
Immunolocalization following crosslinking of IAA to protein has also been
developed as a technique to directly visualize the distribution of auxin
(Moctezuma, 1999
;
Friml et al., 2003
;
Benkova et al., 2003
).
PIN proteins regulate the asymmetric transcellular transport of auxin
Auxin is transported from its site of synthesis to its site of action by a
transcellular mechanism (Fig.
1). Directional auxin transport is mediated by the combined action
of auxin influx carriers and auxin efflux carriers. The auxin expelled from
one cell is taken up by the next cell in line, which expels it from its
opposite end, and so forth.
Extracellular auxin is thought to be transported across the membrane and
into the cell by the AUX1 protein, a member of the auxin amino acid permease
(AAAP) family of proton-driven transporters
(Bennet et al., 1996;
Swarup et al., 2001
). The AUX1
influx carrier may be asymmetrically localized. In some cells, AUX1 is present
on the cell surface opposite to the efflux carrier
(Swarup et al., 2001
)
(Fig. 1). In other cases, it is
lateral to and on the same surface as the efflux carrier
(Reinhardt et al., 2003
). The
latter configuration could allow the auxin flow to be `focussed' to a single
column of cells by promoting the reuptake of auxin effluxed laterally, thus
preventing auxin from affecting neighboring cell columns. aux1
mutants, although resistant to the effects of exogenous auxin, have not been
reported to have embryonic pattern defects. If, indeed, auxin influx is
required for embryonic development, it occurs via a second, redundant permease
family member or an alternative mechanism for importing auxin into the
cell.
Members of the PIN family of membrane proteins are thought to play an
important role in auxin efflux from the cell
(Gälweiler et al., 1998;
Chen et al., 1998
;
Friml et al., 2002a
;
Friml et al., 2002b
;
Müller et al., 1998
;
Luschnig et al., 1998
;
Friml et al., 2003
).
Arabidopsis plants homozygous for mutations in several of the
PIN genes show phenotypes consistent with auxin transport defects.
Arabidopsis pin1 mutants fail to produce flowers, as is seen in
wild-type plants treated with the auxin transport inhibitor naphthylphthalamic
acid (NPA) (Okada et al.,
1991
; Gälweiler et al.,
1998
). pin2 and pin3 mutants display abnormal
tropisms (Chen et al., 1998
;
Müller et al., 1998
;
Luschnig et al., 1998
;
Friml et al., 2002b
).
pin mutants show reduced auxin transport, as determined by direct
measurement or as inferred by the expanded pattern of auxin accumulation in
them. PIN proteins are polarly localized, typically localizing to one or two
of the six faces of the nearly brick-shaped plant cell. Their location
correlates well with the expected direction of auxin transport. PIN proteins
are continuously recycled to and from the cell surface via an endosomal
compartment in a process that requires the GNOM membrane-associated ARF-GEF
(guanine nucleotide-exchange factor on ADP-ribosylation factor G) protein
(Steinmann et al., 1999
;
Geldner et al., 2003
). This
recycling could allow the rapid redistribution of PIN proteins in response to
changing environmental stimuli, such as changes in light or gravity.
It is not known whether PIN proteins themselves export auxin from the cell
or whether they promote efflux by interacting with an auxin efflux
transporter. The Arabidopsis multidrug resistance (MDR)-like ABC
transporter proteins MDR and PGP are candidates for auxin efflux transporters.
They are required for auxin transport and for normal tropisms in
Arabidopsis seedlings (Noh et
al., 2001), and also bind directly to the auxin transport
inhibitor NPA.
The MDR transporters also affect PIN localization, as these are
mislocalized in mdr mutants (Noh
et al., 2003). Additional factors influencing PIN localization are
flavonoids, a family of secondary metabolites
(Peer et al., 2004
), and the
PINOID kinase (Friml et al.,
2004
). PINOID kinase activity appears to direct the PIN proteins
to the apical end of the cell, while lack of PINOID kinase function directs
the PIN proteins to the basal end of the cell. The target for the PINOID
kinase is as yet unknown.
Arabidopsis embryogenesis
All parts of the Arabidopsis seedling cotyledons, shoot apical meristem (SAM), hypocotyl, vascular cylinder, root apical meristem and root cap are present in primordial form in the heart-stage Arabidopsis embryo (Fig. 2) (for a review, see Laux, 2004). Thus, the most dramatic steps in pattern formation occur prior to this, as the embryo develops from zygote to transition stage.
|
The vast majority of the embryo derives from the apical cell. The first
three rounds of cell division in this lineage, the first two longitudinal and
the third transverse, result in an octant-stage embryo that is divided equally
into top (apical domain) and bottom (central domain) halves
(Fig. 2B). The spatially
restricted expression patterns of the WOX homeobox-containing genes
clearly distinguish these domains and precede their overt differentiation
(Haecker et al., 2004).
WOX9 and WOX2 mRNAs are expressed in the apical and central
domains, respectively, of the octant embryo (apical cell lineage), whereas
WOX8 mRNA is expressed in the hypophysis and suspensor (basal cell
lineage). The apical domain of the octant-stage embryo gives rise to
cotyledons and the SAM, while the central domain gives rise to the hypocotyl
and most of the root and root meristem.
The root meristem contains stem cells (also called initials) for the root cortical and endodermal layers, for the root epidermis and lateral root cap, for the vascular cylinder, and for the central root cap (columella). These stem cells are arranged around a small group of very slowly dividing cells called the quiescent center. The quiescent center and the central root cap with its associated stem cells derive from the hypophyseal lineage all other parts of the root meristem derive from the central domain.
Approximately four more rounds of division generate a larger late globular embryo. This subsequently transitions from a globular-shaped (radially symmetrical) to a heart-shaped (bilaterally symmetrical) embryo, with the outgrowth of the two cotyledon primordia flanking the SAM.
Surges of auxin in the early embryo
Four members of the PIN family of auxin efflux facilitators are expressed
in the embryo PIN1, PIN3, PIN4 and PIN7
(Friml et al., 2002a;
Friml et al., 2003
). They are
expressed in different places and at different times during embryonic
development. The temporally and spatially controlled sequence of expression of
the PIN proteins appears to be responsible for the dynamic and shifting
pattern of auxin accumulation observed in the embryo, as principally
determined using the DR5 reporter. In the early embryo, auxin flows upward,
away from the extraembryonic suspensor and into the embryo proper. By the
heart stage, auxin has reversed course and flows to the developing root.
Experiments in which these flows are disrupted show that auxin may play
important roles in the development of the apical/basal axis.
PIN7 and PIN1 are the earliest PIN genes
expressed in the embryo (Friml et al.,
2003). PIN7 protein is found at the apical membrane of the basal
cell in the two-cell embryo and at the apical membrane in suspensor cells
until the 32 cell stage. This localization pattern suggests a role for PIN7 in
transporting auxin from the basal cell to the apical cell. In support of this,
the DR5 reporter is expressed in the apical cell in wild-type embryos. When
auxin transport inhibitors were applied to embryos, or to a pin7
mutant, the DR5 reporter was instead expressed in the basal cell
(Friml et al., 2003
).
By contrast, PIN1 protein is localized in a non-polar fashion throughout
the embryo proper, from the one-cell stage until the 32-cell stage, when it
becomes polarly localized to the basal ends of the provascular cells
(Steinmann et al., 1999;
Friml et al., 2003
). At the
same time, PIN7 protein switches to the basal ends of suspensor cells, PIN4
protein begins to accumulate in the hypophyseal lineage and in vascular
initials, and auxin accumulation, as detected by DR5 expression, shifts
downward into the hypophysis and suspensor
(Friml et al., 2002a
;
Friml et al., 2003
). In the
absence of either pin1 or pin4, DR5 remains expressed in the
globular embryo proper. Thus, the combined action of PIN1, PIN4 and,
probably, PIN7 appears to reverse auxin flow in the globular-stage
embryo, causing it to be exported from the embryo proper and to accumulate at
the basal pole.
PIN3 mRNA expression is detected at the root pole of the
heart-stage embryo (Friml et al.,
2003). Given the late appearance of PIN3 mRNA in the
heart-stage embryo after all pattern elements are present, it seems unlikely
that PIN3 plays a role in early apical basal pattern formation in the
wild-type embryo.
What role do these auxin surges play in embryogenesis and, more
specifically, in apical-basal pattern formation? Mutants lacking PIN1,
PIN4 or PIN7 show abnormal cell division patterns in the cells
to which the auxin is expected to be targeted by the respective PIN protein:
the apical cell and the hypophysis in pin7 mutants
(Friml et al., 2003); the
hypophysis in pin1 mutants (Friml
et al., 2003
); and the columella initials and hypophysis in
pin4 mutants (Friml et al.,
2002a
). Changes in the expression of cell-specific reporters
consistent with cell fate changes in the embryo have been seen in
pin7 mutants (Friml et al.,
2003
). However, in all cases, the reporters used were related to
auxin metabolism, so it is not possible to determine whether these changes
represented changes in developmental fates or in auxin homeostasis. It should
now be possible to repeat these experiments using the WOX genes as
markers for embryonic cell fates.
The defects in pin single mutants are rather subtle and the embryos ultimately recover to become near normal embryos. Only when the pin mutations are combined in double, triple and quadruple mutant combinations are more severe defects seen. The most severely affected multiple mutants develop as ball-shaped embryos without any clear evidence of apical-basal polarity. Thus, the PIN proteins appear to act redundantly. Consistent with this, severe gnom mutants are defective in the endosomal recycling of PIN proteins and also develop into ball-shaped seedlings. The recycling defect in gnom mutants presumably affects all members of the family of PIN proteins.
Because the different PIN proteins are expressed at different
times and in different locations, the substitution of one PIN family
member by another is not simple. Indeed, auxin accumulation in the predicted
sink cells appears to be abolished in pin1 and pin7 mutants
(Friml et al., 2003).
Nevertheless, the embryo appears to be able to re-establish the correct
pattern, perhaps by re-establishing the auxin gradient after the globular
stage. Support for such reorganization is found in the recent observations by
Blilou et al. (Blilou et al.,
2005
). These authors found that, in embryos mutant for a subset of
PIN family members, the remaining functional PIN proteins altered
their distribution.
The role of ARF and AUX/IAA proteins in embryogenesis
The auxin surges that occur during embryogenesis are predicted to result in
the local degradation of AUX/IAA proteins, with the consequent activation of
ARF-regulated genes, resulting in local gene activation in the embryo. Studies
of Arabidopsis mutants in this pathway have led to an understanding
of the role auxin plays in the developing embryo. Indeed, gain-of-function,
degradation-resistant mutant alleles of the BODENLOS/IAA12
(BDL) gene, and loss-of-function mutant alleles of the
MONOPTEROS/ARF5 (MP) gene cause embryos to develop without
roots and with much of their hypocotyls missing (Hardtke et al., 1998;
Hamann et al., 2002). Several
lines of evidence support the hypothesis that these particular factors
function as an interacting pair in the embryo. For example, BDL and
MP are co-expressed in the early globular embryo and can interact to
form heterodimers, and the overexpression of MP can suppress the
gain-of-function bodenlos phenotype
(Hardtke et al., 2004
).
MP is highly related to the NONPHOTOTROPIC HYPOCOTYL/ARF7
(NPH4) gene (Harper et al.,
2000; Hardtke et al.,
2004
). Both ARFs have transcription activation domains and are
expressed in overlapping expression domains. Although the single mp
mutant lacks basal structures and has reduced vasculature, the single
nph4 mutant shows no morphological abnormalities but instead shows
defects in auxin-dependent hypocotyl cell expansion. Double mutants homozygous
for both mp and nph4 show a more severe embryonic defect
than mp single mutants, indicating that nph4 plays a role in
embryo development that is normally masked by wild-type MP function.
Conversely, when `weak' mutants of mp were generated by RNAi, these
had hypocotyls that showed defects in auxin-dependent cell expansion. Thus,
MP plays a role in tropic responses to environmental stimuli that
involve auxin.
These observations fit with a model in which PIN7-directed auxin flow into the embryo proper causes the degradation of BODENLOS. This allows MP and NPH4 proteins to activate, as yet, unknown target genes in the embryo proper. Because the early basal defects seen in mp mutants primarily affect the hypophysis where MP, NPH4 and BDL are not expressed, changes in target gene expression in the apical and central domains are predicted to have a cell non-autonomous effect on the hypophyseal lineage. Alternatively, because protein localization data are not available for these gene products, it is possible that the MP, NPH4 and BDL proteins are transported into the hypophyseal cell, where the entire pathway could act to directly influence the development of this lineage.
Arabidopsis plants mutant for other components of auxin-mediated
signaling also have defects in the hypophyseal lineage. These include plants
with mutations in the CUL1/AXR6 gene, which encodes the CULLIN
subunit of the auxin-regulated SCFTIR1 ubiquitin E3 ligase
(Hobbie et al., 2000;
Hellman et al., 2003
).
The role of auxin in establishing and maintaining the root stem cell niche
The root apical meristem is fully organized and functional by the end of
embryogenesis and is a site of high auxin accumulation that is important for
stem cell function. The AP2 domain-containing transcription factor genes
PLETHORA1 (PLT1) and PLETHORA2 (PLT2) act
redundantly to promote the development of the root stem cell niche
(Aida et al., 2004;
Blilou et al., 2005
). In the
absence of PLT1 and PLT2 function, the hypophyseal lineage
divides abnormally and fails to express markers for the quiescent center. The
quiescent center is a small group of slowly dividing cells that is located
adjacent to the root initials (the root stem cells) and is required for the
activity of these stem cells. PLT1 and PLT2 are expressed in
the basal end of the embryo, and their expression is dependent upon
MP and NPH4 function. Moreover, PLT1 and
PLT2 transcription is induced following auxin treatment, and the
ectopic expression of PLT1 and PLT2 promotes root formation
in the absence of auxin. Taken together, these data suggest a pathway in which
prolonged auxin signaling, acting through MP and NPH4 ARFs, promotes the
formation and development of root stem cells by activating the
PLETHORA genes. The substantial delay between auxin treatment and
PLT activation suggests that the action of auxin on PLT
transcription is not direct, but rather proceeds through intermediate
steps.
The PLT genes in turn are required for the normal accumulation of
PIN proteins (Blilou et al.,
2005). Thus, the auxin signaling and PLT accumulation are
connected in a positive-feedback loop. This loop is thought to stabilize the
size and position of the root apical meristem.
The importance of auxin for the survival of the root meristem can be seen
in situations where the direction of auxin transport is altered. In mutants
overexpressing the PINOID kinase gene, PIN proteins are localized
apically instead of basally (Friml et al.,
2004). In these mutants, auxin flow is inappropriately directed up
and away from the root meristem. The result of this is the cessation of stem
cell activity in the root meristem, which can be prevented if the
PINOID-overexpressing plants are grown in the presence of auxin transport
inhibitors.
Subdivision of the apical domain is affected by auxin
So far, this review has described the role of auxin in developmental events that occur in the basal portion of the embryo. Several lines of evidence show that auxin plays a role in the apical domain as well.
The two cotyledons and the SAM develop from the apical half of the globular
embryo (Fig. 3). At the late
globular stage, the two cotyledon primordia grow rapidly relative to the
slow-growing cleft region between them, giving the embryo its characteristic
heart shape. The cleft region consists of the (central) SAM primordium and the
(lateral) intercotyledonary zones, which will form the `separation' between
the two cotyledons. The outgrowth of the intercotyledonary zones is suppressed
by the redundantly acting CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON1 and 2
(CUC1 and CUC2) gene products, which belong to the larger
family of plant-specific NAC domain transcription factors and probably mediate
their action through the transcriptional control of downstream genes
(Aida et al., 1997;
Aida et al., 1999
;
Takada et al., 2001
). When
both CUC1 and CUC2 are mutant, embryos develop a single
cup-shaped cotyledon that encircles the apical pole of the embryo.
|
These observations suggest a model in which auxin is transported away from
the intercotyledonary regions and towards the cotyledonary domains, where it
directs degradation of an AUX/IAA repressor, which then allows MP/NPH4 ARF
activity to repress CUC gene transcription
(Fig. 3). The repression of
CUC RNA accumulation by MP/NPH4 need not be direct. This model for
early leaf/cotyledon development is supported by observations that DR5
activity accumulates at the site of future cotyledons, and by experiments in
which auxin applied to the shoot apical meristem causes the outgrowth of leaf
primordia at the site of application, as well as by the analysis of PIN
protein localization and auxin transport in wild-type leaf primordia
(Benkova et al., 2003;
Reinhardt et al., 2003
).
Other lines of evidence indicate a role for auxin in patterning the
cotyledonary and intercotyledonary regions of the embryo apex. Embryos treated
with exogenous auxin or auxin transport inhibitors develop cup-shaped
cotyledons (Liu et al., 1993;
Hadfi et al., 1998
;
Aida et al., 2004
), as do
triple and quadruple pin mutants
(Friml et al., 2003
), and
single mutants of the gnom ARF-GEF required for PIN protein
localization.
Combinatorial effects of auxin action
This review has described evidence that supports a role for auxin in key embryonic developmental events. Auxin, of course, does not act alone but rather in the environment of other regulators of plant growth and development. The complexities of these interactions will probably be important for a more complete understanding of the role of auxin in embryo development.
Recent work has highlighted several ways in which auxin action interacts with other plant hormones, such as brassinosteroids, gibberellins or ethylene, tissue-specific transcription factors and small regulatory RNAs (microRNAs).
Brassinosteroids are important for cell expansion. Exogenously added
brassinosteroids were found to induce expression of the auxin responsive
DR5:GUS reporter (Bao et al.,
2004). Brassinosteroids appear to have this effect by positively
regulating auxin transport. Nemhauser et al. found that auxin-responsive
promoters and brassinosteroid-responsive promoters share a common element that
requires brassinosteroid synthesis for its expression
(Nemhauser et al., 2004
).
Gibberellins regulate many aspects of plant growth, including the
elongation of the stem and root. The response of root growth to gibberellins
was found to be influenced by auxin (Fu
and Harberd, 2003). Gibberellin normally acts by destabilizing
nuclear DELLA proteins. DELLA proteins (named for the presence of a conserved
amino acid sequence) are thought to be transcriptional repressors that repress
gibberellic acid (GA)-inducible genes. Auxin derived from the shoot and
transported to the root was found to enhance the gibberellin-induced
destabilization of DELLA proteins.
The ability of ethylene, another hormone involved in seedling elongation,
to inhibit auxin activity has recently been explained by its ability to
destabilize the ARF2 proteins (Li et al.,
2004). Finally, auxin appears to rapidly repress cytokinin
biosynthesis (Nordström et al.,
2004
).
Transcription factors also can have different effects, depending on the
presence of auxin in the cellular environment. The WUSCHEL homeobox protein,
when ectopically expressed in roots, can induce the formation of embryos, but
only if exogenous auxin is added to the growth medium
(Gallois et al., 2004).
Small RNAs are also likely to influence the auxin pathway of signaling, as
many of the genes involved in auxin control are also controlled by microRNAs.
These include members of the TIR, ARF and CUC gene families
(Reinhart et al., 2002;
Mallory et al., 2004
). Thus,
small RNAs have the potential to either counteract (TIF, ARF) or reinforce
(CUC) the auxin signal by altering the stability of particular mRNAs in the
auxin pathway. ARF17 has also been recently confirmed to be a
microRNA-targeted mRNA. Plants expressing an ARF17 cDNA that encodes
a wild-type ARF17 protein but carries silent mutations preventing it from
being recognized by microRNA 160 (mir160) accumulate higher levels of ARF17
protein and show alterations in the levels of auxin-regulated transcripts
(Mallory et al., 2005
). Some
embryos carrying this transgene developed extra or split cotyledons,
indicating a role for mir160 in partitioning the apical domain of the embryo.
Guo et al. (Guo et al., 2005
)
found evidence that mir164, a microRNA that targets member of the NAC
domain-containing family of genes, is regulated by auxin. The CUC
genes described above belong to this family. This finding suggests that auxin
could act by targeting RNA destruction, as well as bringing about protein
destruction. However, Mallory et al. found no evidence of auxin-induced
changes in the levels of mir160 or mir164
(Mallory et al., 2005
),
casting some doubt on this result.
Is auxin a morphogen?
A morphogen is generally thought of as a chemical whose concentration
varies in space, and for which varying threshold concentrations direct
qualitatively different cellular responses or fates. In many ways, auxin
appears to be in a good position to dictate cell fates in the embryo in a
concentration-dependent manner. Through regulated transport, it can accumulate
in a spatially asymmetric concentration gradient. It acts as a transcriptional
regulator. Varying concentrations of auxin could result in different degrees
of IAA/AUX degradation, thus releasing variable amounts of ARF protein that
could then activate downstream targets in an ARF concentration-dependent
manner. [For a more complete discussion of auxin as a possible morphogen, see
the reviews by Bhalerao and Bennett
(Bhalerao and Bennett, 2003),
and by Friml (Friml, 2003
).]
However, a direct correspondence between the cellular auxin concentration
gradient and the development of discrete cell types or regions in the embryo
has yet to be proved. We cannot rule out that auxin, although required for the
execution of key developmental decisions, does not on its own specify distinct
cell fates but rather provides a permissive environment in which other factors
act as the sought after morphogens. In part, this is because it is technically
very difficult to accurately measure auxin levels in situ and in real time.
The development of in vivo auxin sensors will be important in helping to solve
this problem, as will a better understanding of which target genes are
directly regulated by auxin in the embryo. If the next five years see as many
advances in this field as the past five years have, the debate about whether
auxin acts as a morphogen will have been resolved, as will, no doubt, other,
as-yet unimagined, questions.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
P.D.J. was a DOE-Energy Biosciences Fellow of The Life Sciences Research Foundation.
REFERENCES
Abel, S. and Theologis, A. (1996). Early genes
and auxin action. Plant Physiol.
111, 9-17.
Aida, M., Ishida, T., Fukaki, H., Fujisawa, H. and Tasaka,
M. (1997). Genes involved in organ separation in Arabidopsis:
an analysis of the cup-shaped cotyledonmutant. Plant
Cell 9,841
-857.
Aida, M., Ishida, T. and Tasaka, M. (1999).
Shoot apical meristem and cotyledon formation during Arabidopsis
embryogenesis: interaction among the CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON and
SHOOT MERISTEMLESS genes. Development
126,1563
-1570.
Aida, M., Beis, D., Heidstra, R., Willemsen, V., Blilou, I., Galinha, C., Nussaume, L., Noh, Y.-S., Amasino, R. and Scheres, B. (2004). The PLETHORA genes mediate patterning of the Arabidopsis root stem cell niche. Cell 119,109 -120.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bao, F., Shen, J., Brady, S. R., Muday, G. K., Asami, T. and
Yang, Z. (2004). Brassinosteroids interact with auxin to
promote lateral root development in Arabidopsis. Plant
Physiol. 134,1624
-1631.
Benkova, E., Michniewicz, M., Sauer, M., Teichmann, T., Seifertova, D., Jurgens, G. and Friml, J. (2003). Local, efflux-dependent auxin gradients as a common module for plant organ formation. Cell 115,591 -602.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bennet, M. J., Marchant, A., Green, H. G., May, S. T., Ward, S. P., Millner, P. A., Walker, A. R., Schultz, B. and Feldmann, K. A. (1996). Arabidopsis AUX1 gene: A permease-like regulator of root gravitropism. Science 273,948 -950.[Abstract]
Bhalerao, R. P. and Bennett, M. J. (2003). The case for morphogens in plants. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 939-943.[CrossRef][Medline]
Blilou, I., Xu, J., Wildwater, M., Willemsen, V., Paponov, I., Friml, J., Heidstra, R., Aida, M., Palme, K. and Scheres, B. (2005). The PIN auxin efflux facilitator network controls growth and patterning in Arabidopsis roots. Nature 433, 39-44.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chen, R., Hilson, P., Sedbrook, J., Rosen, E., Caspar, T. and
Masson, P. H. (1998). The Arabidopsis thaliana
AGRAVITROPIC1 gene encodes a component of the polar auxin transport
efflux carrier. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95,15112
-15117.
Dharmasiri, N., Dharmasiri, S. and Estelle, M. (2005). The F-Box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 435,441 -445.[CrossRef][Medline]
Friml, J. V. (2003). Auxin transport shaping the plant. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6, 7-12.[CrossRef][Medline]
Friml, J., Benkova, E., Blilou, I., Wisniewska, J., Hamann, T., Ljung, K., Woody, S., Sandberg, G., Scheres, B., Jürgens, G. et al. (2002a). AtPIN4 mediates sink-driven auxin gradients and root patterning in Arabidopsis. Cell 108,661 -673.[CrossRef][Medline]
Friml, J., Wisniewska, J., Benkova, E., Mendgen, I. and Palme, K. (2002b). Lateral relocation of auxin efflux regulator PIN3 mediates tropism in Arabidopsis. Nature 415,806 -809.[Medline]
Friml, J., Vieten, A., Weijers, D., Schwarz, H., Hamann, T., Offringa, R. and Jurgens, G. (2003). Efflux-dependent auxin gradients establish the apical-basal axis of Arabidopsis.Nature 426,147 -153.[CrossRef][Medline]
Friml, J., Yang, X., Michniewicz, M., Weijers, D., Quint, A.,
Tietz, O., Benjamins, R., Ouwerkerk, P. B. F., Ljung, K., Sandberg, G. et
al. (2004). A PINOID-dependent binary switch in apical-basal
PIN polar targeting directs auxin efflux. Science
306,862
-865.
Fu, X. and Harberd, N. P. (2003). Auxin promotes Arabidopsis root growth by modulating gibberellin response. Nature 421,740 -743.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fukuda, H. and Komamine, A. (1980). Establishment of an experimental system for the tracheary element differentiation from single cells isolated from the mesophyll of Zinnia elegans. Plant Physiol. 52,57 -60.
Furutani, M., Vernoux, T., Traas, J., Kato, T., Tasaka, M. and
Aida, M. (2004). PIN-FORMED1 and PINOID regulate boundary
formation and cotyledon development in Arabidopsis embryogenesis.
Development 131,5021
-5030.
Gallois, J.-L., Nora, F. R., Mizukami, Y. and Sablowski, R.
(2004). WUSCHEL induces shoot stem cell activity and
developmental plasticity in the root meristem. Genes
Dev. 18,375
-380.
Gälweiler, L., Guan, C., Müller, A., Wisman, E., Mendgen, K., Yephremov, A. and Palme, K. (1998). Regulation of polar auxin transport by AtPIN1 in Arabidopsis vascular tissue. Science 28,2226 -2230.[CrossRef]
Geldner, N., Hamann, T. and Jürgens, G. (2000). Is there a role for auxin in early embryogenesis? Plant Growth Reg. 32,187 -191.[CrossRef]
Geldner, N., Anders, N., Wolters, H., Keicher, J., Kornberger, W., Muller, P., Delbarre, A., Ueda, T., Nakano, A. and Jürgens, G. (2003). The Arabidopsis GNOM ARF-GEF mediates endosomal recycling, auxin transport, and auxin-dependent plant growth. Cell 112,219 -230.[CrossRef][Medline]
Goda, H., Shinichiro, S., Asami, T., Shozo, F., Shimada, Y. and
Yoshida, S. (2004). Comprehensive comparison of
auxin-regulated genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.
134,1555
-1573.
Gray, W. M., Kepinski, S., Rouse, D., Leyser, O. and Estelle, M. (2001). Auxin regulates SCF TIR1-dependent degradation of AUX/IAA proteins. Nature 414,271 -276.[CrossRef][Medline]
Guilfoyle, T. and Hagen, G. (2001). Auxin response factors. J. Plant Growth Regul. 10,281 -291.[CrossRef]
Guo, H.-S., Xie, Q., Fei, J.-F. and Chua, N.-H.
(2005). MicroRNA directs mRNA cleavage of the transcription
factor NAC1to downregulate auxin signals for Arabidopsis lateral root
development. Plant Cell
17,1376
-1386.
Hadfi, K., Speth, V. and Neuhaus, G. (1998).
Auxin-induced developmental patterns in Brassica juncea embryos.
Development 125,879
-887.
Haecker, A., Gross-Hardt, R., Geiges, B., Sarkar, A.,
Breuninger, H., Herrman, M. and Laux, T. (2004). Expression
dynamics of WOX genes mark cell fate decisions during early embryonic
patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development
131,657
-668.
Hagen, G. and Guilfoyle, T. (2002). Auxin-responsive gene expression: genes, promoters and regulatory factors. Plant Mol. Biol. 49,373 -385.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hamann, T., Benkova, E., Bäurle, I., Kientz, M. and
Jürgens, G. (2002). The ArabidopsisBODENLOS
gene encodes an auxin response protein inhibiting MONOPTEROS-mediated embryo
patterning. Genes Dev.
16,1610
-1615.
Hardtke, C. S. and Berleth, T. (1998). The
Arabidopsis gene MONOPTEROS encodes a transcription factor mediating embryo
axis formation and vascular development. EMBO J.
17,1405
-1411.
Hardtke, C. S., Ckurshumova, W., Vidaurre, D. P., Singh, S. A.,
Stamatioiu, G., Tiwari, S. B., Hagen, G., Guilfoyle, T. J. and Berleth, T.
(2004). Overlapping and non-redundant functions of the
Arabidopsis auxin response factors MONOPTEROS and
NONPHOTOTROPIC HYPOCOTYL4. Development
131,1089
-1100.
Harper, R. M., Stowe-Evans, E. L., Luesse, D. R., Muto, H.,
Tatematsu, K., Watahiki, M. K., Yamamoto, K. and Liscom, E.
(2000). The NPH4 locus encodes the auxin response factor ARF7, a
conditional regulator of differential growth in aerial Areabidopsis tissue.
Plant Cell 12,757
-770.
Hellman, H., Hobbie, L., Chapman, A., Dharmasiri, S.,
Dharmasiri, N., del Pozo, C., Reinhardt, D. and Estelle, M.
(2003). Arabidopsis AXR6 encodes CUL1 implicatiing SCF
E3 ligases in auxin regulation of embryogenesis. EMBO
J. 22,3314
-3325.
Hobbie, L., McGovern, M., Hurwitz, L. R., Pierro, A., Liu, N.
Y., Bandyopadhyay, A. and Estelle, E. (2000). The axr6
mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana define a gene involved in auxin
response and early development. Development
127, 23-32.
Kepinski, S. and Leyser, O. (2005). The Arabidopsis F-Box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 435,446 -451.[CrossRef][Medline]
Laux, T., Würschum, T. and Breuninger, H.
(2004). Genetic regulation of embryonic pattern formation.
Plant Cell 16,S190
-S202.
Li, H., Johnson, P., Stepanova, A., Alonso, J. M. and Ecker, J. R. (2004). Convergence of signaling in the control of differential cell growth pathways in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 7,193 -204.[CrossRef][Medline]
Liscum, E. and Reed, J. W. (2002). Genetics of AUX/IAA and ARF action in plant growth and development. Plant Mol. Biol. 49,387 -400.[CrossRef][Medline]
Liu, C., Xu, Z. and Chua, N.-H. (1993). Auxin
polar transport is essential for the establishment of bilateral symmetry
during early plant embryogenesis. Plant Cell
5, 621-630.
Luschnig, C., Gaxiola, R. A., Grisafi, P. and Fink, G. R.
(1998). EIR1, a root-specific protein involved in auxin
transport, is required for gravitropism in Arabidopsis thaliana.Genes Dev. 12,2175
-2187.
Mallory, A. C., Dugas, D. V., Bartel, D. P. and Bartel, B. (2004). MicroRNA regulation of NAC-domain targets is required for proper formation and separation of adjacent embryonic, vegetative and floral organs. Curr. Biol. 14,1035 -1046.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mallory, A., Bartel, D. and Bartel, B. (2005).
Micro-RNA directed regulation of Arabidopsis AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR17
is essential for proper development and modulates expression of early auxin
response genes. Plant Cell
17,1360
-1375.
Moctezuma, E. (1999). Changes in auxin patterns
in developing gynophores of the peanut plant (Arachis hypogaeai L.).
Ann. Bot. 83,235
-242.
Moon, J., Parry, G. and Estelle, M. (2004). The
ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and plant development. Plant
Cell 16,3181
-3195.
Müller, A., Guan, C. H., Gälweiler, L., Tanzler, P.,
Huijser, P., Marchant, A., Parry, G., Bennett, M., Wisman, E. and Palme,
K. (1998). AtPIN2 defines a locus of Arabidopsis for
root gravitropism control. EMBO J.
17,6903
-6911.
Nakamura, A., Higuchi, K., Goda, H., Fujiwara, M. T. and Sawa,
S. (2003). Brassinolide induces IAA5, IAA19, and
DR5, a synthetic auxin response element in Arabidopsis implying a
cross talk point of brassinosteroid and auxin signaling. Plant
Physiol. 133,1
-11.
Nemhauser, J. L., Mockler, T. C. and Chory, J. (2004). Interdependency of brassinosteroid and auxin signaling in Arabidopsis. PLOS Biol. 2,1460 -1471.[CrossRef]
Noh, B., Murphy, A. S. and Spalding, E. P.
(2001). Multidrug resistance-like genes of Arabidopsis required
for auxin transport and auxin-mediated development. Plant
Cell 13,2441
-2454.
Noh, B., Bandyopadhyay, A., Peer, W. A., Spalding, E. and Murphy, A. S. (2003). Enhanced gravi-and phototropism in plant mdr mutants mislocalizing the auxin efflux protein PIN1. Nature 423,999 -1002.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nordström, A., Tarkowski, P., Tarkowska, D., Norbaek, R.,
Åstot, C., Dolezol, K. and Sandberg, G. (2004). Auxin
regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: A
factor of potential importance for auxin-cytokinin-regulated development.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA
101,8039
-8044.
Okada, K., Ueda, J., Komaki, M. K., Bell, C. J. and Shimura,
Y. (1991). Requirement of the auxin polar transport system in
early stages of Arabidopsis floral bud formation. Plant
Cell 3,677
-684.
Okushima, Y., Overvoorde, P. J., Arima, K., Alonso, J. M., Chan,
A., Chang, C., Ecker, J. R., Hughes, B., Lui, A., Nguyen, D. et al.
(2005). Functional genomic analysis of the AUXIN RESPONSE
FACTOR gene family members in Arabidopsis thaliana: Unique and
overlapping functions of ARF7 and ARF19. Plant
Cell 17,444
-463.
Peer, W. A., Bandyopadhyay, A., Blakeslee, J. J., Makam, S. N.,
Chen, R. J., Masson, P. H. and Murphy, A. S. (2004).
Variation in expression and protein localization of the PIN family of auxin
efflux facilitator proteins in flavonoid mutants with altered auxin transport
in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell
16,1898
-1911.
Reinhardt, D., Pesce, E.-R., Stieger, P., Mandel, T., Baltensperger, K., Bennett, M., Traas, J., Friml, J. and Kuhlemeier, C. (2003). Regulation of phyllotaxis by polar auxin transport. Nature 426,255 -260.[CrossRef][Medline]
Reinhart, B. J., Weinstein, E. G., Rhoades, M. W., Bartel, B.
and Bartel, D. P. (2002). MicroRNAs in plants.
Genes Dev. 16,1616
-1626.
Skoog, F. and Miller, C. O. (1957). Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 11,118 -131.
Steinmann, T., Geldner, N., Grebe, M., Mangold, S., Jackson, C.
L., Paris, S., Gälweiler, L., Palme, K. and Jürgens, G.
(1999). Coordinated polar localization of auxin efflux carrier
PIN1 by GNOM ARF GEF. Science
286,316
-318.
Swarup, R., Friml, J., Marchant, A., Ljung, K., Sandberg, G.,
Palme, K. and Bennett, M. (2001). Localization of the auxin
permease AUX1 suggests two functionally distinct pathways operate in the
Arabidopsis root apex. Genes Dev.
15,2648
-2653.
Takada, S., Hibara, K., Ishida, T. and Tasaka, M.
(2001). The CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON1 gene of
Arabidopsis regulates shoot apical meristem formation.
Development 128,1127
-1135.
Tatematsu, K., Kumagai, S., Muot, H., Sato, A., Watahiki, M. K.,
Harper, R. M., Liscum, E. and Yamamoto, K. T. (2004).
MASSAGU2 encodes AUX/IAA19, an auxin-regulated protein that functions together
with the transcriptional activator NPH4/ARF7 to regulate differential growth
responses of hypocotyl and formation of lateral roots in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant Cell 16,379
-393.
Tiwari, S. B., Wang, X.-J., Hagen, G. and Guilfoyle, T. J.
(2001). AUX/IAA proteins are active repressors, and their
stability an activity are modulated by auxin. Plant
Cell 13,2809
-2822.
Tiwari, S. B., Hagen, G. and Guilfoyle, T.
(2003). The roles of ausin response factor domains in
auxin-responsive transcription. Plant Cell
15,533
-543.
Tiwari, S. B., Hagen, G. and Guilfoyle, T. J.
(2004). Aux/IAA proteins contain a potent transcriptional
repression domain. Plant Cell
16,533
-543.
Ulmasov, T., Hagen, G. and Guilfoyle, T. J.
(1997a). ARF1, a transcription factor that binds to auxin
response elements. Science
276,1865
-1868.
Ulmasov, T., Murfett, J., Hagen, G. and Guilfoyle, T.
(1997b). Aux/IAA proteins repress expression of reporter genes
containing natural and highy active synthetic auxin response elements.
Plant Cell 9,1963
-1971.
Went, F. (1974). Reflections and speculations. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 25, 1-27.[CrossRef]
Zenser, N., Ellsmore, A., Leasure, C. and Callis, J.
(2001). Auxin modulates the degradation rate of AUX/IAA proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98,11795
-11800.
Zhao, Y., Dai, X., Blackwell, H. E., Schreiber, S. L. and Chory,
J. (2003). SIR1, an upstream component in auxin signaling
identified by chemical genetics. Science
301,1107
-1110.