Division of Molecular Embryology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: niehrs{at}dkfz-heidelberg.de)
Accepted August 2, 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Anteroposterior neuraxis, AP, ß-catenin, Gastrulation, Head organizer, Long-range signalling, Morphogen gradient, Neural patterning, Neuroectoderm, Nieuwkoop, Spemann, Transformer, Wnt protein, Xenopus
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Among the candidate transformers, Wnts have recently been implicated as endogenous antagonists of the head organizer (Niehrs, 1999). Consistent with the distinct inducing activities of anterior mesendoderm and chordamesoderm noted by Spemann and Mangold, inhibitors of transforming growth factors ß (TGFßs) and Wnts, which are thought to mediate inductions by the organizer, are differentially expressed along the AP axis of the organizer and its derivatives (Harland and Gerhart, 1997; De Robertis et al., 2000). Notably, Wnt inhibitors are expressed predominantly in the anterior mesendoderm (Niehrs, 1999; De Robertis et al., 2000; Kiecker and Niehrs, 2001). In line with these inhibitors regulating AP neural patterning, co-injection of Wnt and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) inhibitors on the ventral side of Xenopus embryos induces ectopic heads including forebrain structures while BMP inhibitors only induce ectopic trunk including spinal cord (Glinka et al., 1997). Thus, a distinguishing feature of the head organizer is the repression of Wnt signalling (Niehrs, 1999).
Other data support the idea that Wnts antagonize the head organizer and have posteriorizing properties. Overexpression of various Wnts (Christian and Moon, 1993; McGrew et al., 1995; Fredieu et al., 1997; McGrew et al., 1997; Saint-Jeannet et al., 1997; Chang and Hemmati-Brivanlou, 1998b; McGrew et al., 1999; Gamse and Sive, 2001), the Wnt pathway components ß-catenin and XTcf3 (McGrew et al., 1995; Darken and Wilson, 2001; Hamilton et al., 2001) or treatment with the artificial activator of the Wnt pathway lithium chloride (Fredieu et al., 1997) all lead to repression of anterior and concomittant induction of posterior neural markers in Xenopus. Conversely, overexpression of secreted Wnt antagonists anteriorizes Xenopus and zebrafish embryos (Itoh et al., 1995; Hoppler et al., 1996; Leyns et al., 1997; Deardorff et al., 1998; Glinka et al., 1998; Hsieh et al., 1999a; Fekany-Lee et al., 2000; Hashimoto et al., 2000; Shinya et al., 2000). A posteriorizing role for Wnts has also been suggested from studies on transgenic mice expressing Wnt8 (Pöpperl et al., 1997). Furthermore, mice mutant for Wnt3A (Takada et al., 1994), the nuclear transducers of Wnt signalling Lef1 and Tcf1 (Galceran et al., 1999) and the Wnt co-receptor LRP6 (Pinson et al., 2000) show posterior truncations, indicating a requirement for Wnt signalling in posterior structures. Finally, inhibition of Wnt signalling is required for formation of anterior neural structures as evidenced by interference with inhibitors of Wnt signalling: both inhibition of the secreted Wnt antagonist Dkk1 in Xenopus (Glinka et al., 1998; Kazanskaya et al., 2000), as well as inactivation of the Wnt repressors tcf3 and axin1 in the zebrafish headless and masterblind mutants, respectively, lead to microcephalic embryos (Kim et al., 2000; Heisenberg et al., 2001).
These properties make Wnts likely candidates for Nieuwkoops posteriorizing factor. Thus, we investigated whether an endogenous Wnt signalling gradient could act as transformer in AP neural patterning during gastrulation, i.e. before the well-established function of Wnts during the pattern-refinement phase of neural development (Patapoutian and Reichardt, 2000; Wilson and Rubenstein, 2000). We show that dose-dependent Wnt signalling is both necessary and sufficient for AP patterning of the neuraxis, and that it occurs in a direct and long-range fashion. Furthermore, we reveal an AP activity gradient of Wnt/ß-catenin signalling across the presumptive neural plate. Our results implicate a morphogen gradient of Wnt/ß-catenin signalling as a component of Nieuwkoops transformer.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Embryos and explants
Microinjections, conjugation and grafting of animal caps were performed in agarose-coated dishes containing 1x modified Barths solution (MBS). Microsurgical operations were performed using eyebrow knives. For ectodermal grafts (Fig. 5, Fig. 6), a small piece of ectoderm was cut from the pigmented donor embryo, and a hole of the same shape and size was cut into the presumptive neural plate of the albino host. The graft was positioned in the recipients hole with gentle pressure and transferred to culture dishes after 20 minutes of healing. Explants and operated embryos were cultured at 15°C in plastic dishes coated with HEMA (poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate)) in 0.5x MBS. Explantation of early (stage 13) neuroectoderm for luciferase assays (Fig. 7C) was performed in 1x Ca2+- and Mg2+-free modified Barths solution (CMFB). The presumptive neural plate was excised and cut into four AP slices together with the underlying tissue. After few minutes, the ectoderm disadhered and could easily be separated from the underlying material. Ectodermal explants were collected in 1x MBS and processed for luciferase assay.
|
|
|
RT-PCR and luciferase assay
RT-PCR analysis was carried out as described previously (Gawantka et al., 1995) using gene-specific primer pairs for Bf1 (Bourguignon et al., 1998), En2 (Hemmati-Brivanlou et al., 1991), H4, muscle actin, Otx2, sia, Xbra (Glinka et al., 1998), Krox20, NCAM2 (Hemmati-Brivanlou et al., 1994) and Xnr3 (Smith et al., 1995). Reporter gene assays on embryonic explants were performed using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega).
Constructs
The expression construct for the activated form of Xenopus ß-catenin lacking the N-terminal 90 amino acids was cloned by oligonucleotide-mediated loop-out mutagenesis (Sambrook et al., 1989), using pCS2+Xßcat-GFP (Miller and Moon, 1997) to yield the plasmid pCS2+Xßcat*-GFP.
In situ hybridization and ß-catenin immunostaining
In situ hybridization was carried out using standard procedures (Gawantka et al., 1995; Hollemann et al., 1998b). All embryos and explants were photographed following immersion in 80% glycerol/"phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The embryos in Fig. 5D were bleached by illumination in 30% H2O2/methanol/water (1:1:1). ß-catenin staining on mid-gastrula embryo halves was performed as reported previously (Schneider et al., 1996) using a rabbit ß-catenin antibody (generous gift from H. Steinbeisser). Stained halves were treated with Murrays clear, mounted on glass slides and pictures were taken using a Zeiss Axioplan microscope, a Sony Power HAD 3CCD color video camera and the Adobe Photoshop software. Eight consecutive pictures were recorded along the AP axis within the presumptive neural plate, each window typically containing 25 to 40 cells within the analysed ectodermal layer. Grey values were determined for all nuclei using the NIH Image software, the grey value of the cytoplasmic background was subtracted and the resulting densities were averaged for individual pictures.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
To confirm that this posteriorization was due to XWnt8 in the conditioned medium, we also performed XWnt8 treatment in the presence of MFz8-CRD, a secreted form of the ligand-binding domain of mouse Frizzled8, which binds to XWnt8 and acts as Wnt antagonist (Deardorff et al., 1998; Hsieh et al., 1999b). MFz8-CRD abolished the ability of XWnt8 to induce Krox20, indicating that posteriorization was due to Wnt signalling (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, posteriorization by XWnt8 was not accompanied by mesoderm induction, as indicated by the absence of muscle actin expression, and hence occurred in a direct fashion (Fig. 1B,C).
These results show that Wnt protein can posteriorize anterior neuroectoderm in a dose-dependent manner, specifying with increasing dose forebrain (Bf1), midbrain (Otx2, not Bf1), mid-hindbrain (En2) and hindbrain (Krox20), respectively. The modulation of marker gene expression occurs over a 10-fold concentration range.
We tested if Wnts also elicit dose-dependent responses in solid tissue and whether the responses occur as a function of the distance from a local Wnt source. We performed animal cap sandwich experiments similar to those used by Gurdon and colleagues (Gurdon et al., 1994). Animal caps were taken from albino embryos injected with noggin mRNA (Smith and Harland, 1992) and were used as anterior neuralized responding tissue. These caps were conjugated with animal caps from pigmented embryos injected with Xwnt3A mRNA (Christian et al., 1991) or Xwnt8 DNA as sources of posteriorizing Wnt protein (Fig. 2A). The conjugates were allowed to develop until control embryos reached neural plate stage and expression of neural markers was analysed by in situ hybridization. The use of albino and pigmented animal caps allowed easy identification of the Wnt-responding tissue. Cell mixing of pigmented with albino cells was negligible under these conditions, as shown previously (Gurdon et al., 1994), and this was also confirmed by lineage tracing with colloidal gold labelled caps (not shown).
|
Next we tested the requirement for Wnt signalling during AP neural patterning in vivo. To modulate Wnt signalling, embryos were injected either with low or high doses of Xdkk1 mRNA, encoding a secreted Wnt antagonist (Glinka et al., 1998), or with the plasmid pCSKA-Xwnt8 (Christian and Moon, 1993) to drive Wnt expression after the midblastula transition (MBT; Fig. 3A). Early neural marker gene expression, including Xanf1 (presumptive forebrain) (Zaraisky et al., 1992), Otx2 (presumptive fore- and midbrain), Gbx2 (presumptive hindbrain and anterior spinal cord) (von Bubnoff et al., 1996) and HoxD1 (presumptive posterior hindbrain and spinal cord) (Kolm and Sive, 1997), was analysed at late gastrula stage when AP neural patterning is already overt. Expression of a low XDkk1 dose shifted the expression of HoxD1 and Gbx2 posteriorly, and expanded Otx2 and Xanf1 ventroposteriorly (Fig. 3A, compare b-b''' with c-c'''). At high XDkk1 doses, HoxD1 and Gbx2 became repressed, Otx2 remained expanded while Xanf1 showed further ventral expansion (Fig. 3A, d-d'''). Comparable results were obtained with the secreted Wnt antagonist NXFz8 (Deardorff et al., 1998) (not shown). Conversely, injection of pCSKA-Xwnt8 left HoxD1 unchanged, expanded Gbx2, restricted Otx2 anteriorly and repressed Xanf1. These results (summarized in Fig. 3B) show (1) that Wnt signalling is required for expression of spinal cord and hindbrain markers already at gastrula stage, (2) that presumptive forebrain specification is inhibited by endogenous Wnt signalling in the ventroposterior, and (3) that endogenous Wnt signalling is not uniformly distributed but graded, with peak levels in the posterior (Fig. 3A, c) and lowest levels in the anterior (Fig. 3A, a''). Thus, the presumptive neural plate is under control of posteriorizing Wnt signalling at late gastrula stage.
|
|
In order to test if also more posterior marker gene expression requires Wnt signalling and to rule out the possibility that the effect of Xdkk1-expressing implants is due to an indirect effect via underlying mesoderm, we grafted cells expressing the intracellular Wnt inhibitor Xgsk3ß (Itoh et al., 1995) into the presumptive posterior neural plate. Uninjected control grafts expressed HoxD1 indicating that transplantation does not interfere with posterior neural gene expression per se (Fig. 5D, a,a'). By contrast, GSK3ß grafts located in the presumptive spinal cord failed to express HoxD1, an effect best seen after bleaching of the pigment of the grafted cells (Fig. 5D, b'). This suggests that Wnt signalling is autonomously required for the specification of posterior (trunk) nervous system.
An important question raised by the preceding experiments is if the observed long-range effects (Fig. 2B,C, Fig. 5B) are due to a direct action of diffusing Wnt protein acting as morphogen or if they occur via a relay mechanism. To distinguish between a direct and an indirect mechanism, we asked whether an implant expressing an intracellular component of the Wnt pathway is also able to affect neural patterning. We chose a constitutively active form of ß-catenin (Xßcat*) (Barth et al., 1997) to activate the Wnt pathway in a cell-autonomous fashion. First, we titrated Xßcat* and Xwnt3A mRNAs to activate Wnt/ß-catenin signalling. In an axis duplication assay similar frequencies of induced secondary embryonic axes were achieved at an Xßcat*/Xwnt3A mRNA ratio of 10:1 (Fig. 6A). When this mRNA ratio was used in animal cap assays, both mRNAs induced the immediate early Wnt target genes siamois (sia) (Brannon and Kimelman, 1996; Carnac et al., 1996) and Xenopus nodal-related 3 (Xnr3) (McKendry et al., 1997) to similar levels by RT-PCR (Fig. 6B).
Implanted cells injected with XWnt3A repressed the forebrain marker Bf1 (Fig. 6C, a,b) and induced the posterior markers En2 and Krox20 ectopically at some distance from the implant in the host neural plate (Fig. 6C, a',b',a'',b''). By contrast, cells expressing Xßcat* induced no changes in marker gene expression in the host embryo (Fig. 6C, c-c'') even at highest doses of Xßcat* (20 ng/animal cap; not shown). We conclude that the long-range effect of XWnt3A on AP neural patterning is direct.
Gbx2 and the posterior-dorsolateral neural marker Pax3 (Bang et al., 1997) were expressed in both, Xwnt3A- and Xßcat*-expressing grafts themselves, but not in control grafts (not shown). For Xßcat*, Gbx2 and Pax3 expression were not detectable in adjacent albino tissue, indicating cell-autonomous posteriorization. Thus, both types of grafted cells can acquire comparable AP positional values.
An AP gradient of Wnt/ß-catenin signalling in the presumptive neural plate
We have shown that dose-dependent Wnt signalling is both necessary and sufficient for AP patterning of neural fates and that Wnts affect neuroectoderm in a direct, long-range fashion. This raises the crucial question of whether there is indeed an endogenous Wnt/ß-catenin signalling gradient in the presumptive neural plate that can be directly detected. To analyse endogenous Wnt/ß-catenin signalling, we made use of the Wnt-responsive luciferase reporter construct TOP-Flash, carrying Tcf-binding sites, which are directly activated by the Tcf/ß-catenin complex (Korinek et al., 1997). The reporter was microinjected into the four animal blastomeres of eight-cell embryos, whose descendants populate predominantly ectoderm. Injected embryos were divided into four AP slices at the end of gastrulation. A gradient of reporter activation was detected for TOP-Flash, increasing 2.4-fold from the anterior towards the posterior of the late gastrula (Fig. 7A). We did not observe this gradient of reporter activation with FOP-Flash, an altered TOP-Flash construct in which the Tcf-binding sites are inactivated by point mutations (Korinek et al., 1997), suggesting that the graded activation of TOP-Flash was due to proper activation of the reporter via Lefs/Tcfs. Because the animal blastomeres of eight-cell stage Xenopus embryos do not give rise to ectoderm exclusively, the graded TOP-Flash activation could still reflect a gradient of Wnt signalling within the mesendoderm rather than in the ectoderm. Thus, we isolated AP slices of presumptive neural plates and performed the reporter experiment with these neuroectodermal explants. In line with the results using whole embryos, a graded activation of TOP-Flash could be observed with the explants, increasing approx. twofold from anterior to posterior (Fig. 7B). Some representative neuroectodermal explants were assayed by in situ hybridization for expression of the paraxial mesodermal marker XmyoD (Hopwood et al., 1989). No XmyoD expression was detected in the explants confirming the absence of mesodermal contamination (not shown).
However, measuring a Wnt signalling gradient by a reporter assay may not reflect acute levels of pathway activation because of the accumulation of luciferase protein between MBT and late gastrula stage. Thus, we analysed Wnt signalling in a more direct way. Upon Wnt pathway activation, ß-catenin is known to translocate to the nucleus (Wodarz and Nusse, 1998). To visualize Wnt pathway activation in situ, we therefore detected nuclear ß-catenin immunochemically in the presumptive neural plate of mid-gastrula embryos. Because there are few AP morphological landmarks at this stage, we cut gastrulae sagittally into left and right halves, and analysed them in parallel by in situ hybridization for the early posterior marker Gbx2 and by ß-catenin staining (Schneider et al., 1996; Rowning et al., 1997). Pictures of ß-catenin staining were taken at eight consecutive AP levels within the presumptive neural plate (Fig. 8A). At the anterior-most levels (Fig. 8A,B, numbers 7 and 8), corresponding to future cement gland and forebrain territories, we detected no nuclear but only plasma membrane localization of ß-catenin (Fig. 8B). Towards the posterior, ß-catenin was seen increasingly localized to the nucleus. Densitometric analysis revealed a sixfold gradient of nuclear localization of ß-catenin between the anterior- and posterior-most levels, with the region expressing Gbx2 showing intermediate to peak levels which are maintained up to the blastopore (Fig. 8C). We conclude that there is an AP gradient of endogenous Wnt/ß-catenin pathway activation in the presumptive neural plate of the Xenopus gastrula.
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Wnt/ß-catenin signalling establishes a transforming gradient
We present three lines of evidence that different doses of Wnt signalling are sufficient to provide AP positional information to neural cells. First, experiments employing soluble protein show that different doses of XWnt8 can specify at least three distinct neural fates at increasing dose. Second, in animal cap conjugates an organized AP neural pattern is induced by a local Wnt source. Third, Wnt expressing grafts induce an ectopic AP neural pattern in the anterior neuroectoderm of host embryos in a direct fashion. Evidence that Wnts may have graded effects on neural patterning also comes from overexpression of the Wnt effector Dishevelled in Xenopus animal caps, which leads to induction of increasingly posterior neural markers with increasing dose (Itoh and Sokol, 1997). Furthermore, we show by titrations with Wnt antagonists that different doses of Wnt signalling are required for AP neural patterning during gastrulation.
Soluble XWnt8 protein specifies forebrain, midbrain and hindbrain fates with increasing concentrations in animal cap cells neuralized by dissociation (Fig. 1). These inductions occur at 2-20 nM concentrations, which is consistent with the binding constant (9 nM) of Wnt8 for Frizzled receptors (Bhanot et al., 1996; Hsieh et al., 1999b). To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of dose-dependent Wnt signalling effects with any Wnt protein. It should be noted, however, that neural induction of animal cap cells by dissociation may not be comparable with neural induction in the embryo, which may involve instructive FGF and early Wnt/ß-catenin signalling (Baker et al., 1999; Harland, 2000; Streit et al., 2000; Wilson et al., 2000; Wilson et al., 2001). Yet, similar to mammalian stem cells, dissociated animal cap cells may provide a powerful system to reconstitute neural differentiation in vitro by applying recombinant Wnt protein in combination with other growth factors.
Thresholds to different doses of Wnt/ß-catenin signalling are also suggested by animal cap conjugate experiments (Fig. 2), where an organized AP pattern is induced as a function of the Xwnt3A mRNA dose and of the distance from the Wnt source. XWnt3A and XWnt8 are both able to posteriorize neural fates in these conjugates at long range, suggesting that a variety of type I Wnts signalling via ß-catenin (Wodarz and Nusse, 1998) are able to elicit these effects.
In vivo, we show that the presumptive neural plate of the late gastrula embryo is under control of a Wnt signalling gradient between future forebrain and spinal cord. This gradient is detected (1) by the pattern with which marker gene expression reacts after injection of Wnt antagonists and XWnt8 (Fig. 3), (2) by the graded activation of a Wnt-responsive reporter (Fig. 7), and (3) by the graded nuclear accumulation of ß-catenin (Fig. 8). The orientation of the gradient, with peak levels in the posterior and lowest levels in the anterior, is consistent with the predicted properties of a transformer gradient proposed by Nieuwkoop and colleagues. In the late gastrula, the gradient appears to specify rather crude AP levels, because Gbx2 and HoxD1 are co-repressed at high XDkk1 doses. This crude pattern is refined at neurula stage when two Wnt thresholds for Krox20 expression in rhombomeres 3 and 5 can be detected. A similar refinement of an initially crude response to a morphogen, which gives rise to distinct thresholds at later stages, has been described for Activin (Green et al., 1994; Wilson and Melton, 1994) and may depend on secondary cell-cell communication.
Competence factors restrict AP patterning by Wnt signalling
Although the titrations with Wnt antagonists (Fig. 4, Fig. 5) reveal a dose-dependent requirement for Wnt signalling, the gradual expansion of more anterior markers such as Bf1 and Otx2 is in contrast to the thresholds observed in dissociated animal cap cells responding to different doses of XWnt8 protein (Fig. 1). For example, in the in vitro experiments, populations of cells expressing only Bf1 and Otx2 or only Krox20 are observed at different Wnt doses. Extrapolating from the in vitro results one might expect that in vivo the entire neural plate expresses Krox20 when Wnts, or Bf1 when Wnt antagonists are overexpressed. However, such a complete respecification of the neural plate is never observed in vivo, rather the changes in marker gene expression respect specific boundaries. This is most obvious for Bf1 in Fig. 4, whose anterior stripe of expression only becomes broader but not significantly thicker with increasing doses of Wnt inhibitors. Similarly, after implantation of Xdkk1-expressing cells as in Fig. 5C (panel a), ectopic Bf1 expression is never seen to extend into the midline but straddles the dorsal neural plate posteriorly. This suggests that factors in addition to Wnts restrict the competence of cells to express anterior markers. Obvious candidates for such modifiers are RA, Sonic Hedgehog, Nodals, BMPs and FGFs, which have been implicated in neural patterning (Lumsden and Krumlauf, 1996; Pownall et al., 1996; Sasai and De Robertis, 1997; Chang and Hemmati-Brivanlou, 1998a; Isaacs et al., 1998; Pownall et al., 1998; Gamse and Sive, 2000; Ribisi et al., 2000; Wilson and Rubenstein, 2000). To test if the inhibition of these factors abolishes this restriction of competence we implanted cells co-expressing Xdkk1 and either mouse Hip1, cerberus-short, noggin or FGF receptor-1 and FGF receptor-4a ectodomains into the neural plate, which encode inhibitors of Hedgehog, Nodal, BMP and FGF signalling, respectively (Zimmerman et al., 1996; Ye et al., 1998; Chuang and McMahon, 1999; Piccolo et al., 1999; Streit et al., 2000). None of these growth factor antagonists in conjunction with XDkk1 was able to expand Bf1 expression into the entire neural plate (not shown). Similarly, inhibition of RA signalling by injecting the host embryos with XCYP26 mRNA, encoding a RA degrading enzyme (Hollemann et al., 1998a), did not allow Xdkk1-expressing grafts to expand Bf1 expression further, despite a posterior shift of hindbrain markers induced by XCYP26 (not shown). The restriction of competence for anterior markers to become expressed posteriorly may occur via factors other than those tested. Alternatively, this/these factor(s) may be active before early gastrula, the stage of grafting. An ectodermal prepattern regulating the expression of Otx2 has also been identified in the zebrafish central nervous system. This initial AP prepattern depends on a differential competence of the epiblast and is not imposed by organizer-derived signals (Koshida et al., 1998). We observed the same phenomenon in our experiments, where Otx2 expression never expanded into the ventroposterior ectoderm even at high XDkk1 dose (Fig. 3A, d'').
Clearly then, a morphogen gradient of Wnt/ß-catenin signalling is not sufficient to account for all AP patterning of the neural plate and indeed other signalling molecules, such as RA (Ruiz i Altaba, 1993; Kolm and Sive, 1997) and FGFs (Slack and Isaacs, 1994; Cox and Hemmati-Brivanlou, 1995; Doniach, 1995; Kengaku and Okamoto, 1995; Lamb and Harland, 1995; Holowacz and Sokol, 1999; Ribisi et al., 2000) have been implicated in posteriorization. FGFs are potent posteriorizing agents and FGF8 mediates effects of the isthmic organizer (Pownall et al., 1996; Isaacs et al., 1998; Pownall et al., 1998; Rhinn and Brand, 2001). However, the posteriorizing effects of FGFs can be reversed with Wnt antagonists, suggesting that they may be mediated through Wnts at least partially (McGrew et al., 1997; Kazanskaya et al., 2000). A direct requirement for RA signalling during early neural patterning has been demonstrated in the hindbrain but not in anterior head structures (Blumberg et al., 1997; Kolm et al., 1997; Hollemann et al., 1998a; Gavalas and Krumlauf, 2000; Niederreither et al., 2000; Dupé and Lumsden, 2001). Thus, hindbrain and spinal cord patterning are regulated by FGF, RA and Wnt signalling.
An endogenous AP gradient of Wnt/ß-catenin signalling in the presumptive neural plate
A major finding of our study is the discovery of a Wnt/ß-catenin signalling gradient across the presumptive gastrula neural plate. How is this gradient established? Several Wnts are expressed in the Xenopus gastrula, including Xwnt3A, Xwnt5A, Xwnt7B, Xwnt8, Xwnt8B and Xwnt11 (Fig. 9B, a). Xwnt3A and Xwnt8 are expressed in chordamesoderm and lateroventral mesoderm, respectively (Fig. 9A) (Christian and Moon, 1993; McGrew et al., 1997; Bang et al., 1999), both of which harbour posteriorizing activity in Xenopus, zebrafish and chick (Hemmati-Brivanlou et al., 1990; Doniach and Musci, 1995; Bang et al., 1997; Muhr et al., 1997; Woo and Fraser, 1997). As we show that Wnts are able to signal at long range, XWnt3A and XWnt8 may diffuse from these sources to set up a concentration gradient. Xwnt5A and Xwnt11, although expressed in the gastrula, are unlikely to be posteriorizing because they do not appear to signal via ß-catenin (Ku and Melton, 1993; Moon et al., 1993; Sokol, 2000). Xwnt7B and Xwnt8B are both expressed maternally and may contribute to posteriorization (Cui et al., 1995; Chang and Hemmati-Brivanlou, 1998b). Thus, the signalling gradient probably involves multiple Wnts. A Wnt signalling-free zone is maintained by Wnt antagonists secreted within the anterior neuroectoderm and from adjacent anterior mesendoderm, including Cerberus, Dkk1, Frzb1, Crescent/Frzb2 and Sfrp2 (Bouwmeester et al., 1996; Leyns et al., 1997; Glinka et al., 1998; Piccolo et al., 1999; Bradley et al., 2000; Pera and De Robertis, 2000) (Fig. 9B, b). As these factors are potentially diffusible, they may also contribute to the establishment of a Wnt activity gradient. In conclusion, we suggest that the Xenopus AP neuraxis is patterned by a Wnt activity gradient formed in the presumptive neuroectoderm of the Xenopus gastrula by the interplay between posteriorizing Wnts and Wnt antagonists expressed in the anterior (Fig. 9C).
|
The formation of the Wnt/ß-catenin signalling gradient resembles formation of the BMP morphogen gradient involved in DV patterning. BMP2, BMP4, BMP7 and BMP7R are expressed in overlapping domains in the gastrula and an activity gradient is formed by the diffusion of multiple BMP antagonists secreted from Spemanns organizer (Harland and Gerhart, 1997; Barth et al., 1999; Dale and Wardle, 1999). Thus, the BMP and Wnt morphogen gradients regulate patterning in the Xenopus gastrula, providing DV and AP positional information, respectively (Fig. 9D, a). Interestingly, a system of orthogonal Decapentaplegic and Wingless morphogen gradients regulate AP and DV patterning of the Drosophila wing imaginal disc, respectively (Fig. 9D, b) (Strigini and Cohen, 1999). This raises the possibility that orthogonal BMP-Wnt gradients represent an evolutionarily conserved module that specifies bilateral symmetry.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Baker, J. C., Beddington, R. S. and Harland, R. M. (1999). Wnt signaling in Xenopus embryos inhibits bmp4 expression and activates neural development. Genes Dev. 13, 3149-3159.
Bang, A. G., Papalopulu, N., Kintner, C. and Goulding, M. D. (1997). Expression of Pax-3 is initiated in the early neural plate by posteriorizing signals produced by the organizer and by posterior non-axial mesoderm. Development 124, 2075-2085.
Bang, A. G., Papalopulu, N., Goulding, M. D. and Kintner, C. (1999). Expression of Pax-3 in the lateral neural plate is dependent on a Wnt-mediated signal from posterior nonaxial mesoderm. Dev. Biol. 212, 366-380.[Medline]
Barth, A. I., Pollack, A. L., Altschuler, Y., Mostov, K. E. and Nelson, W. J. (1997). NH2-terminal deletion of ß-catenin results in stable colocalization of mutant ß-catenin with adenomatous polyposis coli protein and altered MDCK cell adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 136, 693-706.
Barth, K. A., Kishimoto, Y., Rohr, K. B., Seydler, C., Schulte-Merker, S. and Wilson, S. W. (1999). Bmp activity establishes a gradient of positional information throughout the entire neural plate. Development 126, 4977-4987.
Beddington, R. S. P. and Robertson, E. J. (1999). Axis development and early asymmetry in mammals. Cell 96, 195-209.[Medline]
Bhanot, P., Brink, M., Samos, C. H., Hsieh, J.-C., Wang, Y., Macke, J. P., Andrew, D., Nathans, J. and Nusse, R. (1996). A new member of the frizzled family from Drosophila functions as a Wingless receptor. Nature 382, 225-230.[Medline]
Blitz, I. L. and Cho, K. W. Y. (1995). Anterior neuroectoderm is progressively induced during gastrulation: the role of the Xenopus homeobox gene orthodenticle. Development 121, 993-1004.
Blumberg, B., Bolado, J. J., Moreno, T. A., Kintner, C., Evans, R. M. and Papalopulu, N. (1997). An essential role for retinoid signaling in anteroposterior neural patterning. Development 124, 373-379.
Bourguignon, C., Li, J. and Papalopulu, N. (1998). XBF-1, a winged helix transcription factor with dual activity, has a role in positioning neurogenesis in Xenopus competent ectoderm. Development 125, 4889-4900.
Bouwmeester, T., Kim, S.-H., Sasai, Y., Lu, B. and De Robertis, E. M. (1996). Cerberus is a head-inducing secreted factor expressed in the anterior endoderm of Spemanns organizer. Nature 382, 595-601.[Medline]
Bradley, L. C., Snape, A., Bhatt, S. and Wilkinson, D. G. (1993). The structure and expression of the Xenopus Krox-20 gene: conserved and divergent patterns of expression in rhombomeres and neural crest. Mech. Dev. 40, 73-84.[Medline]
Bradley, L., Sun, B., Collins-Racie, L., LaVallie, E., McCoy, J. and Sive, H. (2000). Different activities of the frizzled-related proteins frzb2 and sizzled2 during Xenopus anteroposterior patterning. Dev. Biol. 227, 118-132.[Medline]
Brannon, M. and Kimelman, D. (1996). Activation of Siamois by the Wnt pathway. Dev. Biol. 180, 344-347.[Medline]
Carnac, G., Kodjachbachian, L., Gurdon, J. B. and Lemaire, P. (1996). The homeobox gene siamois is a target of the wnt dorsalization pathway and triggers organiser activity in the absence of mesoderm. Development 122, 3055-3065.
Chang, C. and Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. (1998a). Cell fate determination in embryonic ectoderm. J. Neurobiol. 36, 128-151.[Medline]
Chang, C. and Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. (1998b). Neural crest induction by Xwnt7B in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 194, 129-134.[Medline]
Christian, J. L. and Moon, R. T. (1993). Interactions between Xwnt-8 and Spemann organizer signaling pathways generate dorsoventral pattern in the embryonic mesoderm of Xenopus. Genes Dev. 7, 13-28.[Abstract]
Christian, J. L., Gavin, B. J., McMahon, A. P. and Moon, R. T. (1991). Isolation of cDNAs partially encoding four Xenopus Wnt-1/int-1-related proteins and characterization of their transient expression during embryonic development. Dev. Biol. 143, 230-234.[Medline]
Chuang, P. T. and McMahon, A. P. (1999). Vertebrate Hedgehog signalling modulated by induction of a Hedgehog-binding protein. Nature 397, 617-621.[Medline]
Cox, W. G. and Hemmati-Brivanlou, B. A. (1995). Caudalization of neural fate by tissue recombination and bFGF. Development 121, 4349-4358.
Cui, Y., Brown, J. D., Moon, R. T. and Christian, J. L. (1995). Xwnt-8b: a maternally expressed Xenopus Wnt gene with a potential role in establishing the dorsoventral axis. Development 121, 2177-2186.
Dale, L. and Wardle, F. C. (1999). A gradient of BMP activity specifies dorsal-ventral fates in early Xenopus embryos. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 319-326.[Medline]
Darken, R. S. and Wilson, P. A. (2001). Axis induction by Wnt signaling: Target promoter responsiveness regulates competence. Dev. Biol. 234, 42-54.[Medline]
De Robertis, E. M., Larrain, J., Oelgeschläger, M. and Wessely, O. (2000). The establishment of Spemanns organizer and patterning of the vertebrate embryo. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1, 171-181.[Medline]
Deardorff, M. A., Tan, C., Conrad, L. J. and Klein, P. S. (1998). Frizzled-8 is expressed in the Spemann organizer and plays a role in early morphogenesis. Development 125, 2687-2700.
Doniach, T. (1995). Basic FGF as an inducer of anteroposterior neural pattern. Cell 83, 1067-1070.[Medline]
Doniach, T. and Musci, T. J. (1995). Induction of anteroposterior neural pattern in Xenopus: evidence for a quantitative mechanism. Mech. Dev. 53, 403-413.[Medline]
Dupé, V. and Lumsden, A. (2001). Hindbrain patterning involves graded responses to retinoic acid signalling. Development 128, 2199-2208.
Durston, A. J., Timmermans, J. P., Hage, W. J., Hendriks, H. F., de Vries, N. J., Heideveld, M. and Nieuwkoop, P. D. (1989). Retinoic acid causes an anteroposterior transformation in the developing central nervous system. Nature 340, 140-144.[Medline]
Fekany-Lee, K., Gonzalez, E., Miller-Bertoglio, V. and Solnica-Krezel, L. (2000). The homeobox gene bozozok promotes anterior neuroectoderm formation in zebrafish through negative regulation of BMP2/4 and Wnt pathways. Development 127, 2333-2345.
Fredieu, J. R., Cui, Y., Maier, D., Danilchik, M. V. and Christian, J. L. (1997). Xwnt-8 and lithium can act upon either dorsal mesodermal or neuroectodermal cells to cause a loss of forebrain in Xenopus embryos. Dev. Biol. 186, 100-114.[Medline]
Galceran, J., Farinas, I., Depew, M. J., Clevers, H. and Grosschedl, R. (1999). Wnt3a/like phenotype and limb deficiency in Lef1/Tcf1/ mice. Genes Dev. 13, 709-717.
Gamse, J. and Sive, H. (2000). Vertebrate anteroposterior patterning: the Xenopus neurectoderm as a paradigm. BioEssays 22, 976-986.[Medline]
Gamse, J. T. and Sive, H. (2001). Early anteroposterior division of the presumptive neurectoderm in Xenopus. Mech. Dev. 104, 21-36.[Medline]
Gavalas, A. and Krumlauf, R. (2000). Retinoid signalling and hindbrain patterning. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 380-386.[Medline]
Gawantka, V., Delius, H., Hirschfeld, K., Blumenstock, C. and Niehrs, C. (1995). Antagonizing the Spemann organizer: role of the homeobox gene Xvent-1. EMBO J. 14, 6268-6279.[Abstract]
Gilbert, S. F. and Saxén, L. (1993). Spemanns organizer: models and molecules. Mech. Dev. 41, 73-89.[Medline]
Glinka, A., Wu, W., Onichtchouk, D., Blumenstock, C. and Niehrs, C. (1997). Head induction by simultaneous repression of Bmp and Wnt signalling in Xenopus. Nature 389, 517-519.[Medline]
Glinka, A., Wu, W., Delius, H., Monaghan, P. A., Blumenstock, C. and Niehrs, C. (1998). Dickkopf-1 is a member of a new family of secreted proteins and functions in head induction. Nature 391, 357-362.[Medline]
Gould, S. E. and Grainger, R. M. (1997). Neural induction and antero-posterior patterning in the amphibian embryo: past, present and future. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 53, 319-338.[Medline]
Green, J. B. and Smith, J. C. (1990). Graded changes in dose of a Xenopus activin A homologue elicit stepwise transitions in embryonic cell fate. Nature 347, 391-394.[Medline]
Green, J. B. A., Smith, J. C. and Gerhard, J. C. (1994). Slow emergence of a multithreshold response to activin requires cell-contact-dependent sharpening but not prepattern. Development 120, 2271-2278.
Gurdon, J. B., Harger, P., Mitchell, A. and Lemaire, P. (1994). Activin signalling and response to a morphogen gradient. Nature 371, 487-492.[Medline]
Hamilton, F. S., Wheeler, G. N. and Hoppler, S. (2001). Difference in XTcf-3 dependency accounts for change in response to ß-catenin-mediated Wnt signalling in Xenopus blastula. Development 128, 2063-2073.
Harland, R. (2000). Neural induction. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 357-362.[Medline]
Harland, R. M. and Gerhart, J. (1997). Formation and function of Spemanns organizer. Annu. Rev. Dev. Biol. 13, 611-667.[Medline]
Hashimoto, H., Itoh, M., Yamanaka, Y., Yamashita, S., Shimizu, T., Solnica-Krezel, L., Hibi, M. and Hirano, T. (2000). Zebrafish Dkk1 Functions in Forebrain Specification and Axial Mesendoderm Formation. Dev. Biol. 217, 138-152.[Medline]
Heisenberg, C. P., Houart, C., Take-Uchi, M., Rauch, G. J., Young, N., Coutinho, P., Masai, I., Caneparo, L., Concha, M. L., Geisler, R., Dale, T. C., Wilson, S. W. and Stemple, D. L. (2001). A mutation in the Gsk3-binding domain of zebrafish Masterblind/Axin1 leads to a fate transformation of telencephalon and eyes to diencephalon. Genes Dev. 15, 1427-1434.
Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. and Harland, R. M. (1989). Expression of an engrailed-related protein is induced in the anterior neural ectoderm of early Xenopus embryos. Development 106, 611-617.[Abstract]
Hemmati-Brivanlou, A., Stewart, R. M. and Harland, R. M. (1990). Region-specific neural induction of an engrailed protein by anterior notochord in Xenopus. Science 250, 800-802.[Medline]
Hemmati-Brivanlou, A., de la Torre, J. R., Holt, C. and Harland, R. M. (1991). Cephalic expression and molecular characterization of Xenopus En-2. Development 111, 715-724.[Abstract]
Hemmati-Brivanlou, A., Kelly, O. G. and Melton, D. A. (1994). Follistatin, an antagonist of activin, is expressed in the Spemann organizer and displays direct neuralizing activity. Cell 77, 283-295.[Medline]
Hollemann, T., Chen, Y., Grunz, H. and Pieler, T. (1998a). Regionalized metabolic activity establishes boundaries of retinoic acid signalling. EMBO J. 17, 7361-7372.
Hollemann, T., Panitz, F. and Pieler, T. (1998b). In situ hybridization techniques with Xenopus embryos. In Comparative Methods Approach to the Study of Oocytes and Embryos (ed. J. D. Richter), pp. 279-290. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holowacz, T. and Sokol, S. (1999). FGF is required for posterior neural patterning but not for neural induction. Dev. Biol. 205, 296-308.[Medline]
Hoppler, S., Brown, J. D. and Moon, R. T. (1996). Expression of a dominant-negative wnt blocks induction of MyoD in Xenopus embryos. Genes Dev. 10, 2805-2817.[Abstract]
Hopwood, N. D., Pluck, A. and Gurdon, J. B. (1989). MyoD expression in the forming somites is an early response to mesoderm induction in Xenopus embryos. EMBO J. 8, 3409-3417.[Abstract]
Hsieh, J. C., Kodjabachian, L., Rebbert, M. L., Rattner, A., Smallwood, P. M., Samos, C. H., Nusse, R., Dawid, I. B. and Nathans, J. (1999a). A new secreted protein that binds to Wnt proteins and inhibits their activities. Nature 398, 431-436.[Medline]
Hsieh, J. C., Rattner, A., Smallwood, P. M. and Nathans, J. (1999b). Biochemical characterization of Wnt-frizzled interactions using a soluble, biologically active vertebrate Wnt protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3546-3551.
Isaacs, H. V., Pownall, M. E. and Slack, J. M. (1998). Regulation of Hox gene expression and posterior development by the Xenopus caudal homologue Xcad3. EMBO J. 17, 3413-3427.
Itoh, K. and Sokol, S. Y. (1997). Graded amounts of Xenopus dishevelled specify discrete anteroposterior cell fates in prospective ectoderm. Mech. Dev. 61, 113-125.[Medline]
Itoh, K., Tang, T. L., Neel, B. G. and Sokol, S. Y. (1995). Specific modulation of ectodermal cell fates in Xenopus embryos by glycogen synthase kinase. Development 121, 3979-3988.
Kazanskaya, O., Glinka, A. and Niehrs, C. (2000). The role of Xenopus dickkopf1 in prechordal plate specification and neural patterning. Development 127, 4981-4992.
Kengaku, M. and Okamoto, H. (1995). bFGF as a possible morphogen for the anteroposterior axis of the central nervous system in Xenopus. Development 121, 3121-3130.
Kiecker, C. and Niehrs, C. (2001). The role of prechordal mesendoderm in neural patterning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 27-33.[Medline]
Kim, C.-H., Oda, T., Itoh, M., Jiang, D. I., Artinger, K., Chandrasekharappa, S. C., Driever, W. and Chitnis, A. B. (2000). Repressor activity of Headless/Tcf3 is essential for vertebrate head formation. Nature 407, 916-920.[Medline]
Kintner, C. R. and Melton, D. A. (1987). Expression of Xenopus N-CAM RNA in ectoderm is an early response to neural induction. Development 99, 311-325.[Abstract]
Kolm, P. J. and Sive, H. L. (1997). Retinoids and posterior neural induction: a reevaluation of Nieuwkoops two-step hypothesis. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 62, 511-521.[Medline]
Kolm, P. J., Apekin, V. and Sive, H. (1997). Xenopus hindbrain patterning requires retinoid signaling. Dev. Biol. 192, 1-16.[Medline]
Korinek, V., Barker, N., Morin, P. J., van Wichen, D., de Weger, R., Kinzler, K. W. and Vogelstein, B. (1997). Constitutive transcriptional activation by a ß-catenin-Tcf complexes in APC/colon carcinoma. Science 275, 1784-1787.
Koshida, S., Shinya, M., Mizuno, T., Kuroiwa, A. and Takeda, H. (1998). Initial anteroposterior pattern of the zebrafish central nervous system is determined by differential competence of the epiblast. Development 125, 1957-1966.
Krupnik, V. E., Sharp, J. D., Jiang, C., Robison, K., Chickering, T. W., Amaravadi, L., Brown, D. E., Guyot, D., Mays, G., Leiby, K. et al. (1999). Functional and structural diversity of the human Dickkopf gene family. Gene 238, 301-313.[Medline]
Ku, M. and Melton, D. A. (1993). Xwnt-11: a maternally expressed Xenopus wnt gene. Development 119, 1161-1173.
Lamb, T. M. and Harland, R. M. (1995). Fibroblast growth factor is a direct neural inducer, which combined with noggin generates anterior-posterior neural pattern. Development 121, 3627-3636.
Leyns, L., Bouwmeester, T., Kim, S.-H., Piccolo, S. and De Robertis, E. M. (1997). Frzb-1 is a secreted antagonist of wnt-signals expressed in the Spemann organizer. Cell 88, 747-756.[Medline]
Lumsden, A. and Krumlauf, R. (1996). Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis. Science 274, 1109-1115.
McGrew, L. L., Lai, C. J. and Moon, R. T. (1995). Specification of the anteroposterior neural axis through synergistic interaction of the Wnt signaling cascade with noggin and follistatin. Dev. Biol. 172, 337-342.[Medline]
McGrew, L. L., Hoppler, S. and Moon, R. T. (1997). Wnt and FGF pathways cooperatively pattern anteroposterior neural ectoderm in Xenopus. Mech. Dev. 69, 105-114.[Medline]
McGrew, L. L., Takemaru, K., Bates, R. and Moon, R. T. (1999). Direct regulation of the Xenopus engrailed-2 promoter by the Wnt signaling pathway, and a molecular screen for Wnt-responsive genes, confirm a role for Wnt signaling during neural patterning in Xenopus. Mech. Dev. 87, 21-32.[Medline]
McKendry, R., Hsu, S. C., Harland, R. M. and Grosschedl, R. (1997). LEF-1/TCF proteins mediate wnt-inducible transcription from the Xenopus nodal-related 3 promoter. Dev. Biol. 192, 420-431.[Medline]
Miller, J. R. and Moon, R. T. (1997). Analysis of the signaling activities of localization mutants of ß-catenin during axis specification in Xenopus. J. Cell Biol. 139, 229-243.
Moon, R. T., Campbell, R. M., Christian, J. L., McGrew, L. L., Shih, J. and Fraser, S. (1993). Xwnt-5A: a maternal Wnt that affects morphogenetic movements after overexpression in embryos of Xenopus laevis. Development 119, 97-111.
Moon, R. T., Brown, J. D. and Torres, M. (1997). Wnts modulate cell fate and behavior during vertebrate development. Trends Genet. 13, 157-162.[Medline]
Muhr, J., Jessell, T. M. and Edlund, T. (1997). Assignment of early caudal identity to neural plate cells by a signal from caudal paraxial mesoderm. Neuron 19, 487-502.[Medline]
Niederreither, K., Vermot, J., Schuhbaur, B., Chambon, P. and Dollé, P. (2000). Retinoic acid synthesis and hindbrain patterning in the mouse embryo. Development 127, 75-85.
Niehrs, C. (1999). Head in the Wnt the molecular nature of Spemanns head organizer. Trends Genet. 15, 314-319.[Medline]
Nieuwkoop, P. D. (1997). Short historical survey of pattern formation in the endo-mesoderm and the neural anlage in the vertebrates: the role of vertical and planar inductive actions. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 53, 305-318.[Medline]
Pannese, M., Polo, C., Andreazzoli, M., Vignali, R., Kablar, B., Barsacchi, G. and Boncinelli, E. (1995). The Xenopus homologue of Otx2 is a maternal homeobox gene that demarcates and specifies anterior body regions. Development 121, 707-720.
Patapoutian, A. and Reichardt, L. F. (2000). Roles of Wnt proteins in neural development and maintenance. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 392-399.[Medline]
Pera, E. M. and De Robertis, E. M. (2000). A direct screen for secreted proteins in Xenopus embryos identifies distinct activities for the Wnt antagonists Crescent and Frzb-1. Mech. Dev. 96, 183-195.[Medline]
Piccolo, S., Agius, E., Leyns, L., Bhattacharyya, S., Grunz, H., Bouwmeester, T. and De Robertis, E. M. (1999). The head inducer Cerberus is a multifunctional antagonist of Nodal, BMP and Wnt signals. Nature 397, 707-710.[Medline]
Pinson, K. I., Brennan, J., Monkley, S., Avery, B. J. and Skarnes, W. C. (2000). An LDL-receptor-related protein mediates Wnt signalling in mice. Nature 407, 535-538.[Medline]
Pöpperl, H., Schmidt, C., Wilson, V., Hume, C. R., Dodd, J., Krumlauf, R. and Beddington, R. S. P. (1997). Misexpression of Cwnt8c in the mouse induces an ectopic embryonic axis and causes a truncation of the anterior neuroectoderm. Development 124, 2997-3005.
Pownall, M. E., Tucker, A. S., Slack, J. M. and Isaacs, H. V. (1996). eFGF, Xcad3 and Hox genes form a molecular pathway that establishes the anteroposterior axis in Xenopus. Development 122, 3881-3892.
Pownall, M. E., Isaacs, H. V. and Slack, J. M. (1998). Two phases of Hox gene regulation during early Xenopus development. Curr. Biol. 8, 673-676.[Medline]
Rhinn, M. and Brand, M. (2001). The midbrain-hindbrain boundary organizer. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 34-42.[Medline]
Ribisi, S., Mariani, F. V., Aamar, E., Lamb, T. M., Frank, D. and Harland, R. M. (2000). Ras-mediated FGF signaling is required for the formation of posterior but not anterior neural tissue in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 227, 183-196.[Medline]
Rowning, B. A., Wells, J., Wu, M., Gerhart, J. C., Moon, R. T. and Larabell, C. A. (1997). Microtubule-mediated transport of organelles and localization of ß-catenin to the future dorsal side of Xenopus eggs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1224-1229.
Ruiz i Altaba, A. (1993). Induction and axial patterning of the neural plate: planar and vertical signals. J. Neurobiol. 24, 1276-1304.[Medline]
Saha, M. S. and Grainger, R. M. (1992). A labile period in the determination of the anterior-posterior axis during early neural development in Xenopus. Neuron 8, 1003-1014.[Medline]
Saint-Jeannet, J.-P., He, X., Varmus, H. and Dawid, I. B. (1997). Regulation of dorsal fate in the neuraxis by Wnt-1 and Wnt-3a. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 13713-13718.
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Sasai, Y. and De Robertis, E. M. (1997). Ectodermal patterning in vertebrate embryos. Dev. Biol. 182, 5-20.[Medline]
Schneider, S., Steinbeisser, H., Warga, R. M. and Hausen, P. (1996). ß-catenin translocation into nuclei demracates the dorsalizing centers in frog and fish embryos. Mech. Dev. 57, 191-198.[Medline]
Shibamoto, S., Higano, K., Takada, R., Ito, F., Takeichi, M. and Takada, S. (1998). Cytoskeletal reorganization by soluble Wnt-3a protein signalling. Genes Cells 3, 659-670.
Shinya, M., Eschbach, C., Clark, M., Lehrach, H. and Furutani-Seiki, M. (2000). Zebrafish Dkk1, induced by the pre-MBT Wnt signaling, is secreted from the prechordal plate and patterns the anterior neural plate. Mech. Dev. 98, 3-17.[Medline]
Slack, J. M. (1994). Inducing factors in Xenopus early embryos. Curr. Biol. 4, 116-126.[Medline]
Slack, J. M. and Isaacs, H. V. (1994). The role of fibroblast growth factors in early Xenopus development. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 22, 585-589.[Medline]
Smith, W. C. and Harland, R. M. (1992). Expression cloning of noggin, a new dorsalizing factor localized to the Spemann organizer in Xenopus embryos. Cell 70, 829-840.[Medline]
Smith, W. C., McKendry, R., Ribisi, S. J. and Harland, R. M. (1995). A nodal-related gene defines a physical and functional domain within the Spemann organizer. Cell 82, 37-46.[Medline]
Sokol, S. (2000). A role for Wnts in morpho-genesis and tissue polarity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, E124-E125.[Medline]
Stern, C. D. (2001). Initial patterning of the central nervous system: How many organizers? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 92-98.[Medline]
Streit, A., Berliner, A. J., Papanayotou, C., Sirulnik, A. and Stern, C. D. (2000). Initiation of neural induction by FGF signalling before gastrulation. Nature 406, 74-78.[Medline]
Strigini, M. and Cohen, S. M. (1999). Formation of morphogen gradients in the Drosophila wing. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 335-344.[Medline]
Takada, S., Stark, K. L., Shea, M. J., Vassileva, G., McMahon, J. A. and McMahon, A. P. (1994). Wnt-3a regulates somite and tailbud formation in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 8, 174-189.[Abstract]
von Bubnoff, A., Schmidt, J. E. and Kimelman, D. (1996). The Xenopus laevis homeobox gene Xgbx-2 is an early marker of anteroposterior patterning in the ectoderm. Mech. Dev. 54, 149-160.[Medline]
Wang, S., Krinks, M. and Moos, M. J. (1997). Frzb-1, an antagonist of Wnt-1 and Wnt-8, does not block signaling by Wnts3A, -5A, or -11. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 236, 502-504.[Medline]
Wilson, P. A. and Melton, D. A. (1994). Mesodermal patterning by an inducer gradient depends on secondary cell-cell communication. Curr. Biol. 4, 676-686.[Medline]
Wilson, S. I., Graziano, E., Harland, R., Jessell, T. M. and Edlund, T. (2000). An early requirement for FGF signalling in the acquisition of neural cell fate in the chick embryo. Curr. Biol. 10, 421-429.[Medline]
Wilson, S. W. and Rubenstein, J. L. (2000). Induction and dorsoventral patterning of the telencephalon. Neuron 28, 641-651.[Medline]
Wilson, S., Rydstrom, A., Trimborn, T., Willert, K., Nusse, R., Jessell, T. M. and Edlund, T. (2001). The status of Wnt signalling regulates neural and epidermal fates in the chick embryo. Nature 411, 325-330.[Medline]
Wodarz, A. and Nusse, R. (1998). Mechanisms of Wnt signaling in development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14, 59-88.[Medline]
Woo, K. and Fraser, S. E. (1997). Specification of the zebrafish nervous system by nonaxial signals. Science 277, 254-257.
Ye, W., Shimamura, K., Rubenstein, J. L., Hynes, M. A. and Rosenthal, A. (1998). FGF and Shh signals control dopaminergic and serotonergic cell fate in the anterior neural plate. Cell 93, 755-766.[Medline]
Zaraisky, A. G., Lukyanov, S. A., Vasiliev, O. L., Smirnov, Y. V., Belyavsky, A. V. and Kazanskaya, O. V. (1992). A novel homeobox gene expressed in the anterior neural plate of the Xenopus embryo. Dev. Biol. 152, 373-382.[Medline]
Zimmerman, L. B., De Jesús-Escobar, J.-E. and Harland, R. M. (1996). The Spemann organizer signal noggin binds and inactivates bone morphogenetic protein-4. Cell 86, 599-606.[Medline]