1 Mammalian Development Laboratory, University of Oxford, Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK
2 Department of Anatomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison Medical School, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: gary.uy{at}zoo.ox.ac.uk)
Accepted 13 May 2002
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Trophoblast stem cell, FGF4, Extra-embryonic ectoderm, Chorionic ectoderm, Ectoplacental cavity, Chorioallantoic placenta, Mouse, Embryo, Epithelium
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Multi-potency of the pTE (Gardner et al., 1973) and uni-directionality of the terminal differentiation of its derivatives (Johnson and Rossant, 1981
; Carney et al., 1993
) underpin expansion of the trophoblast lineage in mouse development. Central to this issue during post-implantation development is the mechanism of growth control of the immediate derivative of the pTE, the extra-embryonic ectoderm (ExE). That trophoblasts present in the chorioallantoic placenta are believed to originate exclusively from the pTE (Gardner et al., 1973
; Copp, 1978
; Dyce et al., 1987
; Gardner, 1996
) suggests that cells derived from this trophectodermal sub-region retain an extensive capacity for self-renewal. This has been confirmed in vitro with the isolation and characterisation of multi-potent fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF4)-dependent trophoblast stem cells (TSCs) derived from dissociated early-streak [
6.5 dpc (days post coitum)] ExEs (Tanaka et al., 1998
). Therefore, progenitor cells which can give rise to TSCs in vitro, appear to exist until at least the onset of gastrulation.
Hence, TSC progenitors are vitally important in elucidating mechanisms responsible for the expansion of the undifferentiated diploid trophoblast population during development. At the molecular level, the derivation of FGF4-dependent TSCs corroborates other studies that implicate Fgf4 (Niswander and Martin, 1992; Rappolee et al., 1994
; Feldman et al., 1995
; Brison and Schultz, 1996
) and its candidate receptor, Fgfr2 (Arman et al., 1998
; Haffner-Krausz et al., 1999
), as components of the ICM-derived signal mediating pTE growth. However, it is not currently known whether TSC progenitors are retained in the chorionic ectoderm (ChE), the derivative of the ExE, as late as 8.5 dpc, although this trophoblast derivative still appears to be morphologically undifferentiated and contains diploid mitotic cells (Barlow and Sherman, 1972
; Rossant and Ofer, 1977
). Until the spatial and temporal distribution of these mitotic cells is better understood, a complete portrait of the mechanisms responsible for extensive proliferation in the ExE/ChE, especially its TSC population, will remain elusive.
Although experimental manipulation of blastocysts has demonstrated that the ICM, the precursor tissue of the embryo proper, maintains mitoses in pTE by virtue of close contact (Gardner and Johnson, 1972; Gardner et al., 1973
; Ansell and Snow, 1975
; Goldstein et al., 1975
), it is presently unknown whether expansion of the ExE is also mediated by close contact with the post-implantation derivative of the ICM, the epiblast. Tanaka et al. (Tanaka et al., 1998
) proposed that in the early-streak ExE, TSC progenitors may be limited to a discrete stratum abutting the Fgf4-expressing epiblast (Niswander and Martin, 1992
), owing to the presumed necessity of close contact for the reception of an FGF4 signal.
This hypothesis is questionable, as two observations on the growth of the nascent conceptus appear inconsistent with it. First, while pTE proliferation in the blastocyst is regionally limited to those cells in close contact with the ICM, owing to its small size, a similar confinement of growth effected by a local centre of ExE cells in close contact with the epiblast appears at odds with development of the considerably larger ExE. Second, growth of ChE continues steadily despite being separated from the embryo proper by the exocoelomic cavity (Kaufman, 1992).
Interestingly, growth of TSCs depend on the soluble and diffusible FGF4 protein (DelliBovi et al., 1987; Galzie et al., 1997
) and a presumably soluble and diffusible feeder-derived factor(s) in vitro (Tanaka et al., 1998
), suggesting that TSC progenitors might also be dependent on the fluid-filled proamniotic and, later, the ectoplacental cavity (EPCav) as a source of trophoblast growth promoting substances in vivo. To investigate this hypothesis, the occurrence and persistence of TSC progenitors in trophoblast tissues was examined at, and well beyond, the early-streak stage (approximately 6.5-9.0 dpc).
As in situ identification of TSC progenitors is not possible through either morphological or molecular methods, their whereabouts were addressed in two ways. First, the TSC colony and cell line forming potential of whole dissociated ExE/ChE tissue versus dissociated fractions at the early- and late-streak stages (6.5-7.5 dpc) was assessed. The persistence of TSC potential was also examined in whole dissociated ChEs at successive stages beyond the late-streak stage (
7.5-9.0 dpc). Second, the number of proliferating cells was identified in histological sections of mitotically arrested ChEs, as TSC progenitors must be included among such mitoses. Our results indicate that TSC progenitors are not confined to a discrete stratum of ExE in close contact with the epiblast, as had been previously suggested (Tanaka et al., 1998
). Instead, a model implicating the EPCav in the sustained growth of TSC progenitors is proposed.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Recovery of blastocysts and post-implantation conceptuses was carried out at room temperature in mouse tubal fluid (MTF)-Hepes medium (Gardner and Sakkas, 1993) or DMEM-based dissecting medium (Lawson et al., 1986
), respectively, using established methods (Hogan et al., 1994
). Post-implantation conceptuses were staged as detailed elsewhere (Downs and Davies, 1993
) or according to the number of somite pairs.
TSC cultures and lines were established from tissues (see below) dissociated by pronase rather than trypsin, as the former produces more complete dissociation (Gwatkin, 1973). Cells were seeded on a confluent feeder monolayer in conditions previously described (Tanaka et al., 1998
), with the following modifications. Upon the derivation of some TSC lines, TSC medium was supplemented with 25 ng FGF1/ml (R and D, Minneapolis, MN; 232-FA) instead of FGF4, and cultures were re-fed every 3 days. A TSC culture was classified as a TSC line if it required expansion in tissue culture flasks. No TSC line was classified as such before 2 months of continuous culture. TSC lines were karyotyped as described elsewhere (Hogan et al., 1994
). Whole conceptuses and separated extra-embryonic regions (ExRs) (Fig. 1) were isolated (see below) and cultured for 10-20 hours in 1 ml or 0.5 ml roller culture medium, respectively, containing equal parts rat serum and bicarbonate buffered DMEM (Lawson et al., 1986
), according to established methods (Cockcroft, 1990
).
|
Whole ExE/ChE tissues were then dissociated first by incubation at 37°C in pre-equilibrated drops of 0.25% (w/v) pronase (Calbiochem, Nottingham, UK; 537088) in Ca2+/Mg2+-free Tyrodes saline for approximately 10 minutes and then in Ca2+-free ovum culture (OC) medium containing 0.02% (w/v) EGTA for 30 minutes, in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air, as described earlier for the dissociation of epiblast (Gardner and Davies, 2000). Finally, tissues were dissociated in separate TSC culture wells by repeated aspiration through a glass pipette heat-polished to an inner diameter of
30 µm (early- and late-streak ExE/ChEs) or 100 µm (ChEs beyond the late-streak stage) made as holding pipettes (Gardner and Davies, 2000
). Dissociation resulted mainly in single cells, however, two, three and four multi-cell aggregates were also produced.
Following removal of the extra-embryonic visceral endoderm, some early-streak ExEs were microdissected into thirds, and late-streak ChEs into halves, along their proximodistal axis with a glass needle, as illustrated in Fig. 1. Upon incubation in pronase and OC medium, fractionated ExEs were first transferred to pre-equilibrated drops of TSC medium for 10 minutes, then dissociated by repeated aspiration as above. Dissociated cells from individual ExE thirds were then transferred to TSC culture wells and counted as they settled onto the feeder monolayer. Any multi-cell aggregates were recorded as single cells.
Tissue situated immediately out of contact with the proamniotic cavity in early-streak conceptuses was isolated (EPC/ExE transition tissue; Fig. 1) and, after a 5 minute incubation in individual pre-equilibrated drops of 0.25% trypsin/EDTA, was repeatedly aspirated through a glass pipette heat polished to an inner diameter of 30 µm. Then, tissues were explanted in separate TSC culture wells. This method served only to loosen cell contacts and did not achieve full cell dissociation.
For the Trypan Blue exclusion test, after dissociation of ExE/ChE tissues as above, groups of five same stage tissues were pooled in 50 µl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then transferred to 15 µl of 0.4% Trypan Blue solution (Sigma, T-8154) for 10 minutes at room temperature. Next, as much of the drop as possible was transferred under the coverslip of a haemocytometer and the mean percentage (number of stained cells/total cells x 100%) of blue cells from each sample was taken from at least 10 large squares of the haemocytometer coverslip.
Preparation of allantoises
Whole 4 somite pair (s.p.) and 8 s.p. allantoises were removed intact as described earlier (Downs and Gardner, 1995). Allantoises recovered from ROSA26 heterozygous mice were retained. Some of these were then divided into distal (tip) and proximal (base) halves at the 4 s.p. stage using a glass needle (Downs and Harmann, 1997
). Whole allantoises or their distal tips were pooled in groups of four and explanted in individual TSC culture wells the day before TSC lines were dissociated and co-cultured with them.
ChE median and perimeter tissue was dissected from individual 6 s.p. ChEs with glass needles. With the ChE lying flat in the bacteriological dish, its median tissue was taken to be its central region, where it had made contact with the EPC. The remaining tissue was considered to be the permineter of the ChE and was isolated with several cuts. Perimeter segments from individual conceptuses were pooled, dissociated by pronase and plated in TSC culture as usual.
Culture of ChEs in the absence of the EPC
EPCs were removed from whole late-streak conceptuses with a glass needle, thereby exposing the EPCav. In those conceptuses in which the EPC was not removed, the EPCav was punctured with a glass needle whose tip was broken by pressing it against the floor of a bacteriological dish containing roller culture medium. After breaking through the ChE, roller culture medium was gently blown into the EPCav until the ChE expanded slightly, when the glass needle was withdrawn. Operated conceptuses were then cultured in roller culture conditions for up to 20 hours (see above). After culture, ChEs were dissociated by pronase as usual and plated in separate TSC culture wells.
Production of TSC chimaeras
Chimaeras were produced by blastocyst injection of 15-20 ROSA26+/TSCs as described elsewhere (Gardner and Davies, 2000). TSC cultures and conceptuses were photographed in a dissecting microscope with Tungsten corrected film (64T; Kodak).
Mitotic index
Colcemid arrest, histology and photography of histological sections were carried out as previously detailed (Downs and Bertler, 2000). The mitotic index of ChE was calculated at the early-bud through late-headfold stages, as these were the only stages when cells of the ChE could be distinguished from those of the EPC.
In situ single cell microinjection
Individual ExE cells of 7.0 dpc conceptuses were labelled with
4% 10 kDa Fluorescein-dextran-lysine (Molecular Probes, Eugene OR) made up in 0.1 M KCl and delivered using the apparatus described elsewhere (Gardner et al., 1992
) by inducing a high-frequency oscillation voltage across the electrode resistance (Mobbs et al., 1987
). As visualisation of ExE cells through the overlying visceral endoderm was poor, the tissue was first isolated by dissection of isolated ExRs that had been incubated in 0.5% trypsin/2.5% pancreatin in Ca2+/Mg2+-free Tyrodes saline for up to 11 minutes at 4°C.
RNA analysis
Primers for the diploid trophoblast markers Fgfr2 and Cdx2, in addition to ß-actin (positive control) were designed to span a large intron of genomic DNA in order to ensure that amplifiable cDNA, but no genomic DNA was present in each tissue sample. Thus, any DNA contamination could be easily detected as the larger band when the PCR products were separated by 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis. The primers and PCR conditions were as follows:
ß-actin forward, 5' GGC CCA GAG CAA GAG AGG TAT CC 3'; ß-actin reverse, 5' ACG CAC GAT TTC CCT CTC AGC 3' (annealing temperature 68°C for 10 cycles followed by 64°C for 25 cycles; size of product, 460 bp).
Fgfr2 forward, 5' GAC AAG CCC ACC AAC TGC ACC 3'; Fgfr2 reverse, 5' CGT CCC CTG AAG AAC AAG AGC 3' (annealing temperature 66°C for 10 cycles followed by 63°C for 30 cycles; size of product, 217bp).
Cdx2 forward, 5' GCA GTC CCT AGG AAG CCA AGT GA 3'; Cdx reverse, 5' CTC TCG GAG AGC CCA AGT GTG 3' (annealing temperature 67°C for 10 cycles followed by 65°C for 30 cycles; size of product, 162 bp).
These unpublished sequences were kindly provided by Tilo Kunath. The specificity of the primer sequences was verified by a BLAST search.
Statistical analysis
Data were analysed for statistical significance (P<0.05) using a two-way Students t-test, with a 95% confidence interval, assuming equal variances.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
To confirm the long-lived mitotic potential of TSC colonies obtained from each ExE/ChE fraction, those from each ExE/ChE segment were repeatedly passaged to form TSC lines. Similar frequencies of TSC lines were obtained from each ExE third and ChE half (Table 1). In contrast to the TSC colony-positive ExE and ChE, none of the 18 EPC/ExE transition tissues an area presumably rich in diploid trophoblast, yet which does not exhibit an epithelial morphology (Fig. 1) retained an undifferentiated morphology during culture and when passaged, none produced TSC colonies (Table 1).
To determine if each region of the ExE contributed similar numbers of TSC colonies, dissociated ExE cells seeded for the data in Table 1 were counted before plating. The mean frequency of TSC colonies obtained from dissociated TSC colony positive thirds was calculated as a percentage of the number of cells plated. Although the percentage of TSC colonies did not vary significantly between regions within experiments, nonetheless, when data between experiments were compared, a significantly higher proportion of mid compared with distal or proximal thirds was TSC colony positive (Table 2). This might be explained by the possibility that, upon microdissection of the ExE/ChE, more cells happened to be mitotically active at the time of isolation in the mid-portion than in either of the other two thirds. Cell counts were not made on dissociated ChE tissue because the numbers were too large to allow this to be carried out with acceptable accuracy.
|
|
|
|
The failure of previous in situ hybridisation analyses to detect expression of diploid trophoblast markers: Eomes (Ciruna and Rossant, 1999), Cdx2 (Beck et al., 1995
) and Err2 (Pettersson et al., 1996
) in the ChE beyond the early-headfold stage might suggest that TSC potential exhibited by ChE cells in vitro beyond this stage (Fig. 3A) occurs in cells that do not normally posses this potential in vivo. Hence, expression of Cdx2, in addition to that of Fgfr2, a gene apparently necessary for the maintenance of TSC progenitors (Kunath et al., 2001
), was assessed by sensitive RT-PCR in the 9 s.p. extra-embryonic region (ExR). Given the sensitivity of RT-PCR to detect transcripts from as little as a single cell (Dixon et al., 2000
), this region was classified as the ExR, as it was not possible to be sure that isolated ChE was devoid of contaminating extra-embryonic visceral endoderm or mesoderm cells. The ExE/EPC transition region was not assayed as a negative control as it is presumably rich in diploid cells, as these cells are present in the EPC core and ExE (Ilgren, 1981
). Transcripts were detected from both late-streak (positive control) and 9 s.p. ExRs for each gene analysed (Fig. 4A). As these markers are purported to be diploid trophoblast specific in the ExR on the basis of mutational and expression analyses (Kunath et al., 2001
), it was assumed that the ChE was the source of the transcripts, rather than potentially contaminating extra-embryonic visceral endoderm and/or mesoderm.
|
Of 27 blastocysts transferred to the uterus, 24 (88.9%) were recovered between late-streak and early-headfold stages of which four (16.7%) were chimaeric. In the chimaeras, donor cells contributed exclusively to trophoblast tissues, including the ChE, EPC and secondary TGCs of the parietal yolk sac. However, the number of blue patches varied from in excess of a dozen (Fig. 4C) to as few as two (data not shown).
The role of the allantois in the persistence of cells with TSC potential
The mean frequency of TSC colonies began to decline between the 4 and 5 s.p. stages which is when the allantois begins to fuse with the chorion (Downs and Gardner, 1995). This observation raised the possibility that the allantois might inhibit TSC potential in the ChE. To test the role of the allantois in inhibiting TSC potential, three series of experiments were carried out.
In series 1, allantoises that had not yet made physical contact with the ChE were removed from conceptuses by aspiration at the 4 s.p. stage. These otherwise intact conceptuses were then roller cultured for 10 hours (Table 4). Wherever possible, intact late-streak conceptuses were cultured in parallel as positive controls. Two exceptional 4 s.p. experimental ChEs in this series failed to develop beyond the 4 s.p. stage, while the remaining 25 ChEs developed to a final stage of between 5-7 s.p.. After culture, ChEs were dissociated as usual and plated to examine TSC colony forming potential. Intact ChEs initially at the late-streak stage provided a significantly higher mean frequency of TSC colonies than ChEs initially at 4 s.p. (Table 4), suggesting that factors other than allantoic contact with the chorion leads to diminution in TSC forming potential over time.
|
In series 3, whole 4 s.p. and 8 s.p. allantoises as well as 4 s.p. allantois distal tips were isolated from conceptuses heterozygous for the ROSA26-ß-geo transgene and explanted under TSC conditions on a feeder monolayer on which they began to spread after 1 day. Cells of a TSC line derived from a wild-type ExE at the early-streak stage were then seeded directly on this flattened allantoic tissue (Fig. 5). Altogether, four cultures were established from whole 4 s.p. allantoises, six cultures from whole 8 s.p. allantoises and four cultures from 4 s.p. allantois tips. As a result of co-culture, TSC proliferation did not appear to be impaired as for the duration of the culture period, undifferentiated flattened TSC colonies continued to grow in the presence of allantois explants (Fig. 5). Together, the results in these three series suggest that TSC potential is lost independently of the presence of the allantois.
|
It was found that in early-allantoic bud specimens, where the chorion had not made any contact with the EPC, the mitotic index was as high throughout the ChE (Fig. 6A), as it was in the contact-free regions of more advanced specimens (Fig. 6B and 19.5±2.1; Table 5). By contrast, once the median ChE had contacted the EPC so that the EPCav was occluded locally, its mitotic index was significantly lower (7.4±1.1; Table 5) than in the peripheral regions that had not made contact with the EPC (17.2±1.6; Table 5).
|
|
|
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The apparent non-coherence of ExE growth invites the suggestion that TSC progenitors originate in the proximal third adjacent to the epiblast, and become displaced distally upon division. However, this is unlikely as the ExE third abutting the epiblast, a region intensely expressing the diploid markers: Cdx2 (Beck et al., 1995), Err2 (Pettersson et al., 1996
) and Eomes (Ciruna and Rossant, 1999
) did not produce a significantly higher percentage of TSC colonies (Table 2) or lines (Table 1) than either of the other two thirds under identical conditions, as might be expected if maintenance of TSC progenitors depend on such contact. Moreover, TSC lines could be isolated from the distal ChE at the late-streak stage,
1 day after the ExE loses contact with the epiblast (Table 1).
Reliance on in situ hybridisation patterns of diploid trophoblast markers as a means of demarcating the TSC progenitor domain in the ExE is questionable as expression of these genes is downregulated beyond the late-streak stage (Beck et al., 1995; Pettersson et al., 1996
; Tanaka et al., 1998
; Ciruna and Rossant, 1999
) when TSC colonies were observed to increase in number in the present study (Fig. 3A,B). Recently, it was reported that Nodal signalling in the epiblast, which is believed to occur in response to induction from markers in the abutting proximal ExE, maintains expression of the diploid trophoblast markers Bmp4 and Eomes in this region via a feedback mechanism (Brennan et al., 2001
). Moreover, conceptuses bearing a null mutation in Bmp4, which is intensely expressed in ExE cells adjacent to the epiblast in undisturbed conceptuses, fail to form primordial germ cells (Lawson et al., 1999
). Thus, available evidence suggests these ExE markers are involved in embryonic differentiation rather than in the maintenance of TSC progenitors in the region of ExE adjacent to the epiblast.
That EPC/ExE transition tissue never yielded undifferentiated colonies following dissociation (Table 1) implies that TSC potential is absent distal to the arbitrary boundary of EPC tissue that coincides with the point of insertion of Reicherts membrane (Snell and Stevens, 1966). This is consistent with the irreversible uptake of large latex particles in this region of the EPC, which is claimed to be a property of differentiated trophoblast (Rassoulzadegan et al., 2000
). Collectively, available evidence suggests that the TSC niche probably spans the entire ExE/ChE. This is perhaps not surprising as Fgfr2, the candidate receptor for FGF4 signalling in diploid trophoblast, is uniformly expressed throughout the ExE/ChE, until at least the 8.0 dpc stage (Orr-Urtreger et al., 1991
) and, along with Cdx2, Fgfr2 was detected in the ChE until at least the 9 s.p. stage by non-quantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 4A). Indeed, FGFR2-mediated signalling is necessary for the genesis and maintenance of columnar epithelia in embryoid bodies (Li et al., 2001
) and thus may be involved in the longevity of other embryonic epithelia such as the ExE/ChE.
Interestingly, two changes in ChE morphology seem to relate to the relative decline of TSC potential in the ChE median versus perimeter. The first was deduced from a previous study (Downs, 2002): the median ChE while initially flattened, adopts a folded morphology upon EPCav occlusion in this region, whereas a flattened morphology persists in the peripheral ChE regions, where the EPCav is not yet occluded. This is consistent with the observation that the EPC/ExE transition region, a population of diploid trophoblast that does not exhibit an epithelial morphology, failed to provide undifferentiated TSC colonies (Table 1). Moreover, although dissociated pre-trophectoderm cells of the third day compacted morula can yield TSC lines, in order to do so, they must first differentiate into vesiculated trophectoderm (G. D. U., unpublished). Cumulatively, these observations indicate that the epithelial morphology promotes or facilitates TSC potential. The second observation of note is the disappearance of the EPCav itself (Fig. 6).
The striking temporal and spatial correspondence between decline of TSC potential (Fig. 7) and ChE mitoses (Table 5) with occlusion of the EPCav rather than ChE union with the allantois (Fig. 5 and Table 4) raises the intriguing possibility that TSC progenitors are negatively regulated by the disappearance of the EPCav rather than by the presence of the allantois, a tissue that has been previously reported to promote differentiation in the ChE (Hernandez-Verdun and Legrand, 1975; Voss et al., 2000
). It is worth noting in this context that the ExE shares a common cavity with the epiblast, the proamniotic cavity, during its rapid growth. Even with the formation of the amnion when this is no longer the case, the ChE lines part of the former proamniotic cavity and thus, the EPCav remains a relic of the former proamniotic cavity.
Although it is tempting to assign TSC potential of the ChE to mitotic cells directly facing the EPCav (Figs 6, 8), caution is warranted because the tissue appears to be pseudostratified (Tamarin and Boyde, 1976) and like its precursor ExE (Fig. 2 and Table 3), is likely to grow non-coherently. Hence, the apical location of mitotic cells may be attributable to loss of contact with the basal lamina, as has been demonstrated for other transient embryonic epithelia such as epiblast (Gardner and Cockroft, 1998
). Nevertheless, other evidence is consistent with dependence of ChE proliferation on EPCav fluid.
|
Expansion of the proamniotic and ectoplacental cavities is thought to be driven by the high osmotic pressure of the fluids they contain. One molecule believed to play a role in generating the necessary osmotic pressure is the glycosaminoglycan, hyaluronan (HA), which is evidently secreted from the epiblast into the proamniotic and ectoplacental cavities (Brown and Papaioannou, 1993). It is therefore conceivable that other molecules, including components of the FGF4 signalling system could also be made available to the ExE/ChE by this means. FGF4 is not only secreted, soluble and diffusible (DelliBovi et al., 1987
; Galzie et al., 1997
) but its transcripts are very abundant in the epiblast until the onset of gastrulation (Niswander and Martin, 1992
).
However, although spatiotemporal expression patterns are available for Fgf4 (Niswander and Martin, 1992; Rappolee et al., 1994
; Brison and Schultz, 1996
) and its candidate receptor, Fgfr2 (Orr-Urtreger et al., 1991
; Orr-Urtreger et al., 1993
), there is relatively little information on the distribution of proteoglycans that could enable FGF4 to function as a ligand. Some insight pertaining to the latter issue is available in other systems. Proteoglycans have been detected in human follicular fluid (Eriksen et al., 1999
), and heparan sulfate in particular, which is secreted by granulosa cells in vitro (Yanagishita and Hascall, 1979
), has been shown to occur in both human (Eriksen et al., 1997
) and bovine follicular fluid (Bellin and Ax, 1987
).
Finally, it is important to consider that EPCav fluid and blastocoelic fluid of the blastocyst may be distinct. Clearly, the fate of the mural trophectoderm, in contact with blastocoelic fluid, is to differentiate into TGCs. This discrepancy might be explained by the fact that blastocoelic fluid does not emanate from embryonic tissues. Rather, it consists mainly of water, whose purpose is to achieve cavitation of the morula (Watson, 1992). Collectively, the results of this study challenge the notion that physical contact with embryonic tissue is essential for the proliferation of undifferentiated diploid trophoblast upon the formation of the egg cylinder. Although involvement of extra-embryonic endoderm or mesoderm cannot be discounted at this juncture, the possibility that trophoblast growth is controlled via factors contained within EPCav clearly warrants further investigation.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Ansell, J. D. and Snow, M. H. (1975). The development of trophoblast in vitro from blastocysts containing varying amounts of inner cell mass. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 33, 117-185.
Arman, E., Haffner-Krausz, R., Chen, Y., Heath, J. K. and Lonai, P. (1998). Targeted disruption of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor 2 suggests a role for FGF signaling in pregastrulation mammalian development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 5082-5087.
Barlow, P. W. and Sherman, M. I. (1972). The biochemistry of differentiation of mouse trophoblast: studies on polyploidy. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 27, 447-465.[Medline]
Barlow, P. W. and Sherman, M. I. (1974). Cytological studies on the organization of DNA in giant trophoblast nuclei of the mouse and the rat. Chromosoma 47, 119-131.[Medline]
Beck, F., Erler, T., Russell, A. and James, R. (1995). Expression of Cdx-2 in the mouse embryo and placenta: possible role in patterning of the extra-embryonic membranes. Dev. Dyn. 204, 219-227.[Medline]
Bellin, M. E. and Ax, R. L. (1987). Purification of glycosaminoglycans from bovine follicular fluid. J. Dairy Sci. 70, 1913-1919.[Medline]
Bower, D. J. (1987). Chromosome organisation in polyploid mouse trophoblast nuclei. Chromosoma 95, 76-80.[Medline]
Brennan, J., Lu, C. C., Norris, D. P., Rodriguez, T. A., Beddington, R. S. and Robertson, E. J. (2001). Nodal signalling in the epiblast patterns the early mouse embryo. Nature 411, 965-969.[Medline]
Brison, D. R. and Schultz, R. M. (1996). RT-PCR-based method to localize the spatial expression of genes in the mouse blastocyst. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 44, 171-178.[Medline]
Brown, J. J. and Papaioannou, V. E. (1993). Ontogeny of hyaluronan secretion during early mouse development. Development 117, 483-492.
Carney, E. W., Prideaux, V., Lye, S. J. and Rossant, J. (1993). Progressive expression of trophoblast-specific genes during formation of mouse trophoblast giant cells in vitro. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 34, 357-368.[Medline]
Ciruna, B. G. and Rossant, J. (1999). Expression of the T-box gene eomesodermin during early mouse development. Mech. Dev. 81, 199-203.[Medline]
Cockcroft, D. L. (1990). Dissection and culture of postimplantation embryos. In Postimplantation Mammalian Embryos: A Practical Approach (ed. A. J. Copp and D. L. Cockcroft), pp. 15-40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Copp, A. J. (1978). Interaction between inner cell mass and trophectoderm of the mouse blastocyst. I. A study of cellular proliferation. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 48, 109-125.[Medline]
Cross, J. C. (2000). Genetic insights into trophoblast differentiation and placental morphogenesis. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 11, 105-113.[Medline]
DelliBovi, P., Curatola, A. M., Kern, F. G., Greco, A., Ittmann, M. and Basilico, C. (1987). An oncogene isolated by transfection of Kaposis sarcoma DNA encodes a growth factor that is a member of the FGF family. Cell 50, 729-737.[Medline]
Dixon, A. K., Richardson, P. J., Pinnock, R. D. and Lee, K. (2000). Gene-expression at the single-cell level. Trends Phamacol. Sci. 21, 65-70.[Medline]
Downs, K. M. (2002). Early placental ontogeny in the mouse. Placenta 23, 116-131.[Medline]
Downs, K. M. and Davies, T. (1993). Staging of gastrulating mouse embryos by morphological landmarks in the dissecting microscope. Development 118, 1255-1266.
Downs, K. M. and Gardner, R. L. (1995). An investigation into early placental ontogeny: allantoic attachment to the chorion is selective and developmentally regulated. Development 121, 407-416.
Downs, K. M. and Harmann, C. (1997). Developmental potency of the murine allantois. Development 124, 2769-2780.
Downs, K. M. and Bertler, C. (2000). Growth in the pre-fusion murine allantois. Anat. Embryol. 202, 323-331.[Medline]
Dyce, J., George, M., Goodall, H. and Fleming, T. P. (1987). Do trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse blastocyst maintain discrete lineages? Development 100, 685-698.[Abstract]
Eriksen, G. V., Malmstrom, A. and Uldbjerg, N. (1997). Human follicular fluid proteoglycans in relation to in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 68, 791-798.[Medline]
Eriksen, G. V., Carlstedt, I., Morgelin, M., Uldbjerg, N. and Malmstrom, A. (1999). Isolation and characterization of proteoglycans from human follicular fluid. Biochem. J. 340, 613-620.[Medline]
Feldman, B., Poueymirou, W., Papaioannou, V. E., DeChiara, T. M. and Goldfarb, M. (1995). Requirement of FGF-4 for postimplantation mouse development. Science 267, 246-249.[Medline]
Friedrich, G. and Soriano, P. (1991). Promoter traps in embryonic stem cells: a genetic screen to identify and mutate developmental genes in mice. Genes Dev. 5, 1513-1523.[Abstract]
Galzie, Z., Kinsella, A. R. and Smith, J. A. (1997). Fibroblast growth factors and their receptors. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 75, 669-685.[Medline]
Gardner, D. K. and Sakkas, D. (1993). Mouse embryo cleavage, metabolism and viability: role of medium composition. Hum. Reprod. 8, 288-295.[Abstract]
Gardner, R. L. (1996). Clonal analysis of growth of the polar trophectoderm in the mouse. Hum. Reprod. 11, 1979-1984.[Abstract]
Gardner, R. L. and Johnson, M. H. (1972). An investigation of inner cell mass and trophoblast tissues following their isolation from the mouse blastocyst. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 28, 279-312.[Medline]
Gardner, R. L. and Cockroft, D. L. (1998). Complete dissipation of coherent clonal growth occurs before gastrulation in mouse epiblast. Development 125, 2397-2402.
Gardner, R. L. and Davies, T. J. (2000). Mouse chimeras and the analysis of development. Methods Mol. Biol. 135, 397-424.[Medline]
Gardner, R. L., Papaioannou, J. E. and Barton, S. C. (1973). Origin of the ectoplacental cone and secondary giant cells in mouse blastocysts reconstituted from isolated trophoblast and inner cell mass. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 30, 561-572.[Medline]
Gardner, R. L., Meredith, M. R. and Altman, D. G. (1992). Is the anterior-posterior axis of the fetus specified before implantation in the mouse? J. Exp. Zool. 264, 437-443.[Medline]
Goldstein, L. S., Spindle, A. I. and Pedersen, R. A. (1975). X-ray sensitivity of the preimplantation mouse embryo in vitro. Radiat. Res. 62, 276-287.[Medline]
Gwatkin, R. B. L. (1973) Pronase. In Tissue Culture, Methods and Applications (ed. P. F. Kruse and M. K. Patterson), pp. 3-5. New York: Academic Press.
Haffner-Krausz, R., Gorivodsky, M., Chen, Y. and Lonai, P. (1999). Expression of Fgfr2 in the early mouse embryo indicates its involvement in preimplantation development. Mech. Dev. 85, 167-172.[Medline]
Hernandez-Verdun, D. and Legrand, C. (1975). In vitro study of chorionic and ectoplacental trophoblast differentiation in the mouse. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 34, 633-644.[Medline]
Hogan, B., Beddington, R., Constantini, F. and Lacy, E. (1994). Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. New York: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press.
Ilgren, E. B. (1981). On the control of the trophoblastic giant-cell transformation in the mouse: homotypic cellular interactions and polyploidy. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 62, 183-202.[Medline]
Johnson, M. H. and Rossant, J. (1981). Molecular studies on cells of the trophectodermal lineage of the postimplantation mouse embryo. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 61, 103-116.[Medline]
Kaufman, M. H. (1992). The Atlas of Mouse Development. London: Academic Press.
Kunath, T., Strumpf, D., Rossant, J. and Tanaka, S. (2001). Trophoblast stem cells. In Stem Cell Biology (ed. D. R. Marshak, R. L. Gardner and D. Gottlieb), pp. 267-287. New York: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press.
Lawson, K. A., Meneses, J. J. and Pedersen, R. A. (1986). Cell fate and cell lineage in the endoderm of the presomite mouse embryo, studied with an intracellular tracer. Dev. Biol. 115, 325-339.[Medline]
Lawson, K. A., Dunn, N. R., Roelen, B. A., Zeinstra, L. M., Davis, A. M., Wright, C. V., Korving, J. P. and Hogan, B. L. (1999). Bmp4 is required for the generation of primordial germ cells in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 13, 424-436.
Li, X., Chen, Y., Scheele, S., Arman, E., Haffner-Krausz, R., Ekblom, P. and Lonai, P. (2001). Fibroblast growth factor signaling and basement membrane assembly are connected during epithelial morphogenesis of the embryoid body. J. Cell Biol. 153, 811-822.
Mobbs, P., Becker, D., Williamson, R., Bate, M. and Warner, A. (1987). Techniques for dye injection and cell labelling. In Microelectrode Techniques: The Plymouth Workshop Handbook (ed. D. Ogden), pp. 361-387. Cambridge: The Company of Biologists.
Niswander, L. and Martin, G. R. (1992). Fgf-4 expression during gastrulation, myogenesis, limb and tooth development in the mouse. Development 114, 755-768.[Abstract]
Orr-Urtreger, A., Givol, D., Yayon, A., Yarden, Y. and Lonai, P. (1991). Developmental expression of two murine fibroblast growth factor receptors, flg and bek. Development 113, 1419-1434.[Abstract]
Orr-Urtreger, A., Bedford, M. T., Burakova, T., Arman, E., Zimmer, Y., Yayon, A., Givol, D. and Lonai, P. (1993). Developmental localization of the splicing alternatives of fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 (FGFR2). Dev. Biol. 158, 475-486.[Medline]
Pettersson, K., Svensson, K., Mattsson, R., Carlsson, B., Ohlsson, R. and Berkenstam, A. (1996). Expression of a novel member of estrogen response element-binding nuclear receptors is restricted to the early stages of chorion formation during mouse embryogenesis. Mech. Dev. 54, 211-223.[Medline]
Rappolee, D. A., Basilico, C., Patel, Y. and Werb, Z. (1994). Expression and function of FGF-4 in peri-implantation development in mouse embryos. Development 120, 2259-2269.
Rassoulzadegan, M., Rosen, B. S., Gillot, I. and Cuzin, F. (2000). Phagocytosis reveals a reversible differentiated state early in the development of the mouse embryo. EMBO J. 19, 3295-3303.
Rossant, J. and Ofer, L. (1977). Properties of extra-embryonic ectoderm isolated from postimplantation mouse embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 39, 183-194.[Medline]
Rossant, J. and Tamura-Lis, W. (1981). Effect of culture conditions on diploid to giant-cell transformation in postimplantation mouse trophoblast. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 62, 217-227.[Medline]
Snell, G. D. and Stevens, L. C. (1966). Early Embryology. In Biology of the Laboratory Mouse, 2nd edn (ed. E. L. Green), pp. 205-245. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tamarin, A. and Boyde, A. (1976). Three-dimensional anatomy of the 8-day mouse concepts: a study by scanning electron microscopy. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 36, 575-596.[Medline]
Tanaka, S., Kunath, T., Hadjantonakis, A. K., Nagy, A. and Rossant, J. (1998). Promotion of trophoblast stem cell proliferation by FGF4. Science 282, 2072-2075.
Varmuza, S., Prideaux, V., Kothary, R. and Rossant, J. (1988). Polytene chromosomes in mouse trophoblast giant cells. Development 102, 127-134.[Abstract]
Voss, A. K., Thomas, T. and Gruss, P. (2000). Mice lacking HSP90beta fail to develop a placental labyrinth. Development 127, 1-11.
Watson, A. J. (1992). The cell biology of blastocyst development. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 33, 492-504.[Medline]
Yanagishita, M. and Hascall, V. C. (1979). Biosynthesis of proteoglycans by rat granulosa cells cultured in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 254, 12355-12364.[Abstract]