Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, NICHD/NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: chitnisa{at}mail.nih.gov)
Accepted 19 February 2002
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Midbrain-hindbrain boundary, Trigeminal ganglia, Neural crest, Patterning, Compartment, Morpholino, Zebrafish
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Analysis of Iro function in many developmental contexts and different model systems has now defined a broader role for these genes during development. During early development, these genes appear to have a role in defining the identity of large territories. In Drosophila their early expression defines dorsal eye, head and mesothorax territories (Cavodeassi et al., 1999; Cavodeassi et al., 2000
; Diez del Corral et al., 1999
). Later, the Iro genes have a role in the subdivision of such large territories into subdomains. For example, while they have an early role in defining the entire notum, later the Iro genes are required to specify the identity of the lateral notum where they are essential for expression of proneural genes and sensory bristle formation (Diez del Corral et al., 1999
).
Analysis of Iro function in Xenopus has shown that these genes have similar roles in vertebrate development. The early expression of Xiro1 and Xiro2 in the dorsal ectoderm at the beginning of gastrulation and the effects of ectopic expression of Xiro1 are consistent with an early role in establishment of neural fate in a large territory of the dorsal ectoderm (Gomez-Skarmeta et al., 2001). At a later stage, expression of Xiro1 and Xiro2 becomes restricted to two stripes within the neural plate that extend caudally from midbrain-hindbrain boundary (MHB). Expression of Xiro1 and Xiro2 in this restricted domain along with Xiro3 suggests a late role in determining the expression of the proneural gene Xenopus achaete-scute homolog 3 (XASH3) in a specific subdomain of the neural tube where neuronal precursors may be generated (Bellefroid et al., 1998
; Gomez-Skarmeta et al., 1998
). These studies suggest that vertebrate Iro genes function to establish cell fate in the neural plate in a manner that is similar to Drosophila. However, loss-of-function studies have not defined how Iro genes contribute to development of specific territories in the neurectoderm during development.
In this study, we have examined roles of two zebrafish Iro genes: iro1 and a novel Iro family member, iro7. We focus on two related issues, the role of these genes in neurogenesis and their role in determining the development of a large territory in the neurectoderm. We characterized their ability to induce expression of the proneural gene, neurogenin1 (ngn1) and examined how a knockdown of these genes affects the development of tissues within an anteroposterior compartment defined by their early expression. Finally, by exploiting repressor or activator fusions, we determine how these homeodomain proteins affect transcription of target genes.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Identification of iro1 and iro7
iro1 was cloned during a random in situ based screen. iro7 was initially identified as an EST (fc24a10) as an unknown Iro family gene. To obtain the 5' region of iro7, 5' RACE was performed using a tailbud cDNA library made by the SMART RACE cDNA amplification kit (Clontech). Sequences were deposited in GenBank under Accession Numbers AF414133 (iro7) and AF414134 (iro1). Sequence alignment was analyzed by J. Heins method with PAM250 residue weight table using DNASTAR software. iro7 was mapped on the LN54 radiation hybrid panel (Hukriede et al., 1999) using the primers 5'-AAATCTGACGAGGAGGATGAGGAAGAAGAG-3' and 5'-TTCATTGACTTTGTTTGAGAAGGTCGTGTG-3'.
Whole mount in situ hybridization, antibody or ß-galactosidase staining
For iro1, full-length cDNA was used as a template for making RNA probe (XhoI/T7). For iro7, the 3' region of a cDNA containing approximately 750 bp was used for making RNA probe (SalI/SP6). Zebrafish gbx1 was found by EST search (fj77a06) and the coding fragment was subcloned into pCRIITOPO for RNA probe synthesis (NotI/SP6). Other plasmids that have been used to make in situ probes have been published previously: otx2 (Li et al., 1994; Mori et al., 1994
), pax2.1 (pax2a Zebrafish Information Network) (Krauss et al., 1991
), hoxb1b (Alexandre et al., 1996
), ngn1 (neurod3 Zebrafish Information Network) (Blader et al., 1997
; Kim et al., 1997
), fkd6 (foxd3 Zebrafish Information Network) (Odenthal and Nusslein-Volhard, 1998
), krox20 (egr2 Zebrafish Information Network) (Oxtoby and Jowett, 1993
), huC (elavl3 Zebrafish Information Network) (Good, 1995
; Kim et al., 1996
) and gata2 (Detrich et al., 1995
). Double in situ using digoxigenin- and fluorescein-labeled RNA probes and antibody staining were performed as described (Itoh and Chitnis, 2001
; Jowett, 2001
). To detect ß-galactosidase activity, embryos co-injected with various synthesized mRNA, were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C and stained by either X-gal or salmon-ß-D-galactoside (Biosynth).
Constructs
iro1 and iro7 cDNA fragments encoding full-length protein were subcloned into the pCS2+ vector. To generate En-iro7HD and VP16-iro7HD, we amplified a fragment by PCR with primers 5'-CCGCTCGAGCCGTATCACCAAGCTCTCCTCGGA-3' and 5'-GCTCTAGATTTTCCTTTGGACGCCCAGCT-3'. The amplified fragment was digested with XhoI and XbaI, and subcloned into pCS2-En or pCS2-VP16 (Kawahara et al., 2000). To make
N-iro1 and
N-iro7 constructs that lacked the morpholino antisense oligo (MO1 or MO7)-binding site, fragments were amplified by PCR using primers: 5'-CGGGATCCATGGAGGGAAGCTCGGACAACAGCGCA-3' and 5'-GCTCTAGAAGAAATTGTCTTCAAAGCGCGTTGTG-3' for the
N-iro1 construct, 5'-CGGGATCCAACTTCTTCATGGACAGAAACATCAACATG-3' and 5'-CGTCTAGAAGTTGACTTTGTTTGAGAAGGTCGTGTGT-3' for the
N-iro7 construct, and they were subcloned in the BamHI/XbaI sites of the pCS2+ vector.
mRNA and morpholino antisense oligo injection
For microinjection of mRNA, constructs were linearized and transcribed with SP6 RNA polymerase using the mMessage mMachine Kit (Ambion). For injection of wild type iro1, iro7, En-iro7HD and VP-iro7HD mRNA, we injected those mRNA into embryos at the16-64 cells stage to prevent gastrulation defects.
Morpholinos (Gene Tools) were resuspended in DEPC water and stored at 20°C. The sequences of the morpholinos used were 5'-GCGTGGAGAGGACGGCATTACACCC-3' for iro1 and 5'-GCAAACCCCGTTGATGAAGCAGGCA-3' for iro7. The oligos were injected into one- to two-cell stage embryos.
In vitro translation
Iro1 and Iro7 protein were synthesized in the presence or absence of morpholino for iro1 or iro7 using TNT coupled reticulocyte lysate systems (Promega). Proteins were made from CS2+ iro1 and CS2+ iro7 plasmid (0.5 µg each) and labeled with [35S] methionine. After the translation reaction was complete, reaction mixtures were subject to SDS-PAGE. The dried gel was exposed to X-ray film.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The two uncharacterized Iro genes were identified as iro1 and iro7 based on a comparison of their sequences with previously identified members of the Iro family. Comparison of iro1 with other members of family indicates that iro1 is the Irx1 ortholog with overall amino acid similarity of 47.6% and 44.0%, to Xiro1 and mouse Irx1, respectively. Zebrafish iro1 was independently characterized by another group that came to the same conclusion (Wang et al., 2001). However, iro7 has a sequence that is very divergent from the six previously described Irx orthologs and so has been designated as iro7. It has also recently been independently characterized by Lecaudy et al. (Lecaudy et al., 2001
).
iro7 may be a novel paralogue of iro1 and iro3 in zebrafish
Analysis of the human and mouse genome has suggested that there are a total of six Iroquois (Irx) family members in mammals (Ogura et al., 2001; Peters et al., 2000
). The six murine genes are in two tightly linked complexes with three genes in each cluster: Irx1, Irx2 and Irx4 are on chromosome 13 and form the IrxA cluster, while their respective paralogues Irx3, Irx5 and Irx6, are on chromosome 8 and form the IrxB cluster (Peters et al., 2000
).
Phylogenetic analysis of the six murine Irx genes was facilitated by comparing their amino acid sequence in two relatively conserved domains, the N-terminal and homeodomain region [Fig. 1A (shown in blue), Fig. 1B] and the Iro box domain [Fig. 1A (shown in green), Fig. 1C]. We compared these two regions in the six murine Irx genes with corresponding domains of zebrafish iro1, iro3, iro5 and iro7 (Fig. 1B,C). We found that zebrafish iro1, iro3 and iro5 have most similarity (Fig. 1D, shown in red) with their mouse orthologs Irx1, Irx3 and Irx5, while the next best similarity (Fig. 1D, shown in blue) is with mouse paralogs Irx3, Irx1 and Irx2, respectively. However, iro7 is less similar to other members except in the homeodomain (Fig. 1B, broken line) and Iro box (Fig. 1C).
|
Expression patterns of iro1 and iro7
Expression of iro1 and iro7 begins around the dome stage. Whole-mount in situ hybridization shows that iro1 is almost undetectable at the dome stage, while in some embryos iro7 is widely expressed at low levels (Fig. 2A,J). By the shield stage, their expression becomes more clearly defined and both genes are expressed in a similar pattern in two distinct domains of the embryo. They are expressed in the dorsal epiblast where their expression includes the prospective neurectoderm (Lecaudey et al., 2001; Wang et al., 2001
) and adjacent to the lateral margin in the hypoblast where their expression is excluded from the shield (Fig. 2B,K).
|
|
Consistent with a role for Iro genes in controlling the expression of vertebrate proneural genes, iro1 and iro7 are expressed in partially overlapping patterns that cover many domains of ngn1 expression in the neurectoderm at the tailbud stage (Fig. 3I,M). iro1 and iro7 expression extends laterally outside the neurectoderm to include domains of ngn1 expression in developing trigeminal placodes (Fig. 3I,M, arrowhead). Just medial to this domain, expression of iro1 and iro7 overlaps with expression of fkd6, a marker of premigratory neural crest cells (Odenthal and Nusslein-Volhard, 1998) (Fig. 3J,N). In the caudal neurectoderm, expression of iro1, but not iro7, overlaps with ngn1, where this proneural gene defines longitudinal proneuronal domains where early neurons differentiate (Fig. 3I).
The size of the iro1 and iro7 expression domain is expanded by exaggerated Wnt signaling
iro1 and iro7 are expressed in a caudal compartment of the anterior neurectoderm that includes the prospective MHB domain, the adjacent neural crest and trigeminal neurons. In maternal zygotic (MZ) hdl mutants, failure to repress Wnt target genes adequately in the anterior neurectoderm leads to exaggerated Wnt signaling and a rostral expansion of the trigeminal neurons, the MHB domain and cranial neural crest, identified by expression of ngn1, pax2.1 and fkd6, respectively (Kim et al., 2000) (Fig. 4C,D). Examination of MZ hdl mutants reveals expansion of the iro1 and iro7 expression domain (Fig. 4A, B), which becomes evident by 75% epiboly (data not shown). It is likely that this expansion predominantly reflects a shift in the rostral boundary of iro1 and iro7 expression, as the expression of hindbrain markers krox20 (Fig. 4D) and gbx1 (data not shown) is not appreciably altered in hdl mutants. A similar expansion of iro1 and iro7 expression was observed in masterblind (mbl) mutants (data not shown) that are also characterized by exaggerated Wnt signaling, in this case due to a mutation in axin, which normally promotes degradation of ß-catenin, an effector of Wnt signaling (Heisenberg et al., 2001
). These observations suggest that the size of the iro1 and iro7 expression domain is determined by the level of Wnt signaling in the anterior neurectoderm.
|
|
iro7 can induce expression of ngn1 as either an activator or repressor
As a morpholino directed against iro7 reduced expression of ngn1 in the trigeminal ganglia, we examined if ectopic expression of iro1 and iro7 promotes expression of this proneural gene. Initially it was difficult to interpret the effects of ectopic iro1 and iro7 expression because widespread expression of those mRNA caused severe gastrulation defects. This problem was overcome by injecting single cells relatively late in development to restrict the domain of ectopic expression. Embryos injected with 50 pg iro1 or iro7 mRNA at the 16-to 64-cell stage and assayed at the tailbud stage revealed that both Iro genes could induce expression of ngn1 in the neurectoderm ectoderm (Fig. 5D, data not shown) and the ventral ectoderm where this proneural gene is normally not expressed (iro1: 95%, n=19; iro7: 100%, n=24) (Fig. 5L,M).
To determine if iro1 and iro7 induce ngn1 expression by acting as activators or repressors, we made engineered forms of iro7, expected to exclusively repress or activate Iro target genes. Plasmids encoding chimeric transcription factors (En-iro7HD and VP-iro7HD) were made by combining domains encoding the repressor domain of Engrailed (En) or the activation domain of VP16 (VP) with a fragment of the iro7 homeodomain (iro7-HD) (Fig. 5K) (Conlon et al., 1996; Kessler, 1997
). Though the chimeric constructs contained the iro7 homeodomain, it was expected that the fusion proteins would bind target sequences for other Iro family members because of over 86% similarity between Iro genes in the homeodomain.
The effects of En-iro7HD and VP-iro7HD on ngn1 expression were surprising: both repressor and activator forms of iro7 were capable of inducing ectopic ngn1 expression and the pattern of ectopic ngn1 induced was unique in each case. Like iro1 and iro7, 50 pg of En-iro7HD mRNA effectively induced ngn1 expression in the ventral ectoderm (96%, n=27) (Fig. 5N). However, in contrast to the widespread or patchy expression induced by iro1 and iro7, respectively (Fig. 5L,M), ngn1 expression induced by En-iro7HD in the ventral ectoderm was typically in a discrete salt-and-pepper pattern (Fig. 5N). Injection of 50 pg of VP-iro7HD mRNA had very different effects. It was ineffective at inducing ectopic ngn1 in the ventral ectoderm but was able to induce widespread ectopic ngn1 expression within the neurectoderm (100%, n=24) (Fig. 5O). These data suggest that both activator and repressor forms of iro7 can induce ectopic ngn1 but they may achieve this by slightly different mechanisms in the ventral and dorsal ectoderm.
Previous studies have shown that Xiro1 can function as a repressor to inhibit BMP expression and neuralize the ectoderm (Gomez-Skarmeta et al., 2001). One possibility is that iro1, iro7 and the repressor En-iro7HD induce ngn1 expression in the ventral ectoderm by inhibiting BMP signaling and neuralizing the ectoderm. Consistent with this possibility iro1, iro7 and En-iro7HD can inhibit expression of a BMP target gene, gata2 in the ventral ectoderm (iro1: 85%, n=39; iro7: 93%, n=30; En-iro7HD: 77%, n=30) (Fig. 5 P-S).
iro1 and iro7 are necessary but not sufficient for determination of neural crest fate
The expression of iro1 and iro7 in a compartment that defines where trigeminal neurons, the neural crest and the MHB domain are located raised the possibility that these Iro genes not only have a role in determination of trigeminal neurons but they also regulate development of adjacent tissues in this compartment. To test this hypothesis, we examined the effects of iro1 and iro7 morpholinos on development of the cranial neural crest and the MHB domain.
Embryos injected with 10 ng MO1 showed a small decrease in fkd6 expression, while injection of 10 ng MO7 resulted in little change; however, when 5 ng of MO1 and MO7 each were simultaneously injected, there was a clear reduction of fkd6 expression in the neural crest (88%, n=25) (Fig. 6B-D). The specificity of this effect was revealed by the observation that the morpholinos never affected axial expression of fkd6 (Fig. 6D). In addition, the reduction in fkd6 expression induced by MO1 and MO7 was suppressed by co-injection of modified iro1 and iro7 transcripts (Niro1/7) that lacked the N terminal sequences that the morpholinos were targeted against (Fig. 6E, arrowhead). These observations suggest that the overlapping expression of iro1 and iro7 determines the fate of fkd6-expressing neural crest cells in a partially redundant manner. Embryos injected with 50 pg of wild-type iro1 or iro7 mRNA, however, did not show much ectopic fkd6 expression suggesting that while expression of iro1 and iro7 is necessary for fkd6 expression, it is not sufficient to induce its expression (Fig. 6H,I). Activator and repressor forms of iro7 revealed that they have opposite effects on neural crest formation: 50 pg of En-iro7HD mRNA induced a small increase in fkd6 expression (Fig. 6J, arrowhead), while 50 pg of VP-iro7HD mRNA reduced expression of this neural crest marker (82%, n=33) (Fig. 6K). These observations suggest iro1 and iro7 act as repressors to determine formation of the cranial neural crest.
|
|
As with injection of iro1 mRNA, injection of 50 pg of En-iro7HD mRNA initiates ectopic expression of pax2.1 and fgf8, but not wnt1 (pax2.1: 94%, n=17; fgf8: 82%, n=17) (Fig. 7J). By contrast, injection of 50 pg VP-iro7HD mimics the combined effects of the two morpholinos. It prevents formation of the isthmus or the constriction between midbrain and hindbrain (Fig. 7L), and inhibits expression of pax2.1, fgf8 and wnt1, genes that mark the isthmic organizer at 24 hpf (pax2.1: 100%, n=28; fgf8: 89%, n=19; wnt1: 83%, n=6) (Fig. 7K,M and data not shown). These data suggest that iro1 and iro7 are likely to function as repressors in initiating establishment of the MHB domain and the isthmic organizer.
Expansion of the MHB domain and adjacent tissues in hdl mutants is dependent on the function of iro1 and iro7
Expansion of the MHB domain and the adjacent trigeminal ganglia and neural crest correlates with early expansion of iro1 and iro7 in hdl and mbl mutants, and establishment of these tissues appears normally dependent on iro1 and iro7 function (Fig. 4A-E). These observations suggest that expansion of the MHB domain and adjacent tissues is due to the early expansion of iro1 and iro7 gene expression in mutants with exaggerated Wnt signaling. To test this hypothesis, we examined expression of pax2.1 and fkd6 in MZ hdl mutants injected with MO1 and MO7, and ngn1 in mutants injected with MO7 alone. The anterior expanded expression of pax2.1 (100%, n=19), fkd6 (95%, n=21) and ngn1 (100%, n=16) was inhibited in morpholino-injected embryos, supporting the hypothesis that expansion of the MHB domain and adjacent tissues is dependent on expanded expression of iro1 and iro7 in mutants with exaggerated Wnt signaling (Fig. 5H,I, Fig. 6F,G, Fig. 7F).
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
iro1 and iro7 are essential for development of an anteroposterior territory
An unexpected finding was the observation that a knockdown of iro1 and iro7 function not only affected ngn1 expression in the trigeminal placode it also affected formation of adjacent neural crest cells and the MHB domain. Each of these tissues is a derivative of a different ectodermal compartment, epidermal, neural crest and neural, respectively, whose individual fates are determined by a number of signaling pathways that determine dorsoventral fate including BMP signaling (Chitnis, 1999; Marchant et al., 1998
; Nguyen et al., 1998
). All three domains, however, are contained within the anteroposterior compartment of the ectoderm where iro1 and iro7 are initially expressed. Together, these observations suggest that iro1 and iro7 are not just involved in regulating neurogenesis but are also essential for normal development of an anteroposterior compartment of the dorsal ectoderm. This conclusion is consistent with the emerging view that Iro genes, both in the fly and vertebrates are required at early stages of development to define large territories (Cavodeassi et al., 2001
). However, this is the first loss-of-function study to define how Iro genes contribute to development of a large territory in the ectoderm during early vertebrate development.
Patterning of the neurectoderm by Wnt signaling mediated by Iro genes
Wnt signaling patterns the neurectoderm along the anteroposterior axis (Patapoutian and Reichardt, 2000). During early gastrulation, regulation of Wnt signaling plays an essential role in establishing forebrain, eye, midbrain and MHB territories in the anterior neuroectoderm (Bally-Cuif et al., 1995
; Glinka et al., 1998
; Heisenberg et al., 2001
; Kim et al., 2000
). Genes that determine the fate of the most rostral tissues in the anterior neurectoderm are dependent on mechanisms that repress Wnt signaling, while genes expressed in relatively caudal domains are dependent on relatively high levels of Wnt signaling. Ineffective repression of Wnt target genes in hdl mutants or reduced destruction of a Wnt effector in mbl mutants leads to exaggerated Wnt signaling in the anterior neurectoderm (Heisenberg et al., 2001
; Kim et al., 2000
). Increased Wnt signaling in hdl and mbl mutants is accompanied by a rostral expansion of iro1 and iro7 expression, suggesting that, as recently reported for Xiro1 in Xenopus (Gomez-Skarmeta et al., 2001
), Wnt signals regulate the size of the territory where these Iro genes are expressed. Loss-of-function studies in wild-type and hdl mutant backgrounds suggest that the territory of iro1 and iro7 expression not only defines the region within which trigeminal neurons, neural crest and the MHB domain are formed but the function of these Iro genes is essential for the development of these tissues. These observations suggest that Wnt signaling defines the identity of a caudal compartment of the anterior neurectoderm through the function of iro1 and iro7.
iro1 and iro7 are essential for establishment of the isthmic organizer
The isthmus is a specialized tissue with secondary organizer properties formed at the boundary between the midbrain and hindbrain. It eventually becomes the source of Wnt and FGF signals, and is essential for normal anteroposterior patterning of the adjacent midbrain and anterior hindbrain (Rhinn and Brand, 2001; Wurst and Bally-Cuif, 2001
). Inhibition of iro1 and iro7 function with morpholinos leads to loss of the isthmus and patterning defects that suggest iro1 and iro7 have an essential role in establishing a functional isthmic organizer.
Interactions between pax2.1, wnt1 and fgf8 play an early role in establishing and maintaining the isthmic organizer at the boundary of gbx2 and otx2 expression domains (Bally-Cuif et al., 1995; Lun and Brand, 1998
; Reifers et al., 1998
; Schwarz et al., 1997
; Wurst and Bally-Cuif, 2001
). While it is not yet clear how iro1 and iro7 regulate formation of the isthmic organizer, our data suggests that they have a relatively early role, as they are expressed in the midbrain-hindbrain domain before otx2 and gbx1. They may also function by a mechanism that is independent of otx2 and gbx1, because rostral expansion of Iro genes in hdl mutants is not accompanied by any noticeable change in otx2 and gbx1 expression (data not shown).
In contrast, reduced iro1 and iro7 function results in loss of pax2.1, the earliest marker described so far for the MHB domain in zebrafish. Furthermore, while ectopic expression of iro1 induces expression of pax2.1 and fgf8, expression of iro1 and iro7 remains unaffected in mutants where the function of pax2.1 (noi) and fgf8 (ace) is lost (data not shown). Together, these observations suggest a relatively early role for Iro genes in initiation of pax2.1 expression and establishment of the MHB domain. While iro1 and iro7 are required to initiate pax2.1 expression, they are not required for the initial expression of wnt1 or fgf8. This suggests that wnt1 and fgf8 expression in the MHB may be established independently by alternative pathways, as has been suggested by previous studies (Lun and Brand, 1998; Rhinn and Brand, 2001
; Wurst and Bally-Cuif, 2001
).
Does iro7 act as a repressor or an activator?
Iroquois homeoproteins have been suggested to act as either activators or repressors in different experimental model systems and developmental contexts. In Drosophila neurogenesis, ara and caup can bind to the promoter of the achaete-scute proneural genes and function as activators (Gomez-Skarmeta et al., 1996). However, Xiro1 functions as a repressor to inhibit BMP expression and neuralize the ectoderm (Gomez-Skarmeta et al., 2001
). Our study suggests that in the context of neural crest and MHB formation, iro1 and iro7 are likely to function as repressors, because formation of these structures is inhibited by the combination of morpholinos and by the VP-iro7HD fusion.
In the context of neurogenesis and induction of ngn1 expression, the interpretation is complicated by the observation that both the activator and repressor forms of iro7 induce expression of ngn1. However, the repressor form is more effective at inducing ngn1 expression in the ventral ectoderm, while the activator form only induces widespread ngn1 expression dorsally in the neurectoderm. Furthermore, the repressor form of iro7 induces ngn1 expression in a salt-and-pepper pattern, while iro1 and VP-iro7HD induce ngn1 in a relatively broad domain. One potential explanation for these differences is that Iro genes can act as both activators and repressors and induce ngn1 expression by different mechanisms in the ventral and dorsal ectoderm. As repressors, Iro genes may indirectly induce ngn1 expression by inhibiting expression of BMPs and neuralizing the ectoderm. This possibility is supported by the ability of iro1, iro7 and En-iro7HD to suppress expression of gata2, a BMP target gene. ngn1 induced in such a manner might more easily be regulated be lateral inhibition and eventually acquire a salt-and-pepper pattern (Ma et al., 1996). However, in the dorsal ectoderm, which is already neuralized, Iro genes may function as activators to directly induce expression of ngn1 in a much broader domain. Such a scenario would explain why En-iro7HD induces ngn1 expression a salt-and-pepper pattern in the ventral ectoderm and VP-iro7HD induces ngn1 in a broad domain in the neurectoderm. Wild-type iro1 may function both as a repressor and activator to induce broad expression of ngn1 in the ventral ectoderm: as a repressor, it could neuralize the ventral ectoderm; as an activator, it could induce broad expression of ngn1 in this domain.
Unresolved issues
This study has explored the role of iro1 and iro7 in neurogenesis and defined a new role for Iro genes in establishment of an ectodermal compartment following Wnt signaling in vertebrate development. However, many questions remain unanswered. Although ectopic expression of Iro genes can promote ngn1 expression, endogenous ngn1 expression is only observed in restricted subdomains of the normal Iro expression domain, suggesting that additional factors regulate ngn1 expression. Furthermore, when Iro genes induce ngn1 expression in a broad domain, they inhibit differentiation of neurons, suggesting that Iro genes also induce expression of factors that prevent differentiation [(Bellefroid et al., 1998; Gomez-Skarmeta et al., 1998
) and data not shown]. Clarification of the mechanisms that inhibit ngn1 expression and neuronal differentiation will be necessary to better understand how the Iro genes pattern early neurogenesis.
We have demonstrated that a knockdown of iro1 and iro7 prevents formation of the isthmic organizer at the MHB and it affects patterning in the forebrain and hindbrain. These effects may reflect functions for iro1 and iro7 independent of their role in MHB formation, as previous studies have shown that elimination of the isthmic organizer does not affect forebrain and hindbrain development in a similar manner (Lun and Brand, 1998; Reifers et al., 1998
). Further characterization of the changes in forebrain and hindbrain patterning are likely to reveal a relatively early role in the forebrain and a late role in the hindbrain when iro1 and iro7 are expressed together in these domains during development. Finally, while loss of iro1 and iro7 function prevents formation of the neural crest and the isthmic organizer, ectopic expression of these genes is not sufficient for the formation of these tissues. Identification of factors that work together with Iro genes to determine neural crest fate and MHB identity also remain important directions for future studies.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Alexandre, D., Clarke, J. D., Oxtoby, E., Yan, Y. L., Jowett, T. and Holder, N. (1996). Ectopic expression of Hoxa-1 in the zebrafish alters the fate of the mandibular arch neural crest and phenocopies a retinoic acid-induced phenotype. Development 122, 735-746.
Bally-Cuif, L., Cholley, B. and Wassef, M. (1995). Involvement of Wnt-1 in the formation of the mes/metencephalic boundary. Mech. Dev. 53, 23-34.[Medline]
Bao, Z. Z., Bruneau, B. G., Seidman, J. G., Seidman, C. E. and Cepko, C. L. (1999). Regulation of chamber-specific gene expression in the developing heart by Irx4. Science 283, 1161-1164.
Bellefroid, E. J., Kobbe, A., Gruss, P., Pieler, T., Gurdon, J. B. and Papalopulu, N. (1998). Xiro3 encodes a Xenopus homolog of the Drosophila Iroquois genes and functions in neural specification. EMBO J. 17, 191-203.
Blader, P., Fischer, N., Gradwohl, G., Guillemont, F. and Strahle, U. (1997). The activity of neurogenin1 is controlled by local cues in the zebrafish embryo. Development 124, 4557-4569.
Bosse, A., Stoykova, A., Nieselt-Struwe, K., Chowdhury, K., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A. and Gruss, P. (2000). Identification of a novel mouse Iroquois homeobox gene, Irx5, and chromosomal localisation of all members of the mouse Iroquois gene family. Dev. Dyn. 218, 160-174.[Medline]
Bosse, A., Zulch, A., Becker, M. B., Torres, M., Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L., Modolell, J. and Gruss, P. (1997). Identification of the vertebrate Iroquois homeobox gene family with overlapping expression during early development of the nervous system. Mech. Dev. 69, 169-181.[Medline]
Brand, M., Heisenberg, C. P., Jiang, Y. J., Beuchle, D., Lun, K., Furutani-Seiki, M., Granato, M., Haffter, P., Hammerschmidt, M., Kane, D. A. et al. (1996). Mutations in zebrafish genes affecting the formation of the boundary between midbrain and hindbrain. Development 123, 179-190.
Burglin, T. R. (1997). Analysis of TALE superclass homeobox genes (MEIS, PBC, KNOX, Iroquois, TGIF) reveals a novel domain conserved between plants and animals. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4173-4180.
Cavodeassi, F., Diez Del Corral, R., Campuzano, S. and Dominguez, M. (1999). Compartments and organising boundaries in the Drosophila eye: the role of the homeodomain Iroquois proteins. Development 126, 4933-4942.
Cavodeassi, F., Modolell, J. and Campuzano, S. (2000). The Iroquois homeobox genes function as dorsal selectors in the Drosophila head. Development 127, 1921-1929.
Cavodeassi, F., Modolell, J. and Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L. (2001). The iroquois family of genes: from body building to neural patterning. Development 128, 2847-2855.
Chitnis, A. B. (1999). Control of neurogenesis lessons from frogs, fish and flies. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 18-25.[Medline]
Christoffels, V. M., Keijser, A. G., Houweling, A. C., Clout, D. E. and Moorman, A. F. (2000). Patterning the embryonic heart: identification of five mouse Iroquois homeobox genes in the developing heart. Dev. Biol. 224, 263-274.[Medline]
Cohen, D. R., Cheng, C. W., Cheng, S. H. and Hui, C. C. (2000). Expression of two novel mouse Iroquois homeobox genes during neurogenesis. Mech. Dev. 91, 317-321.[Medline]
Conlon, F. L., Sedgwick, S. G., Weston, K. M. and Smith, J. C. (1996). Inhibition of Xbra transcription activation causes defects in mesodermal patterning and reveals autoregulation of Xbra in dorsal mesoderm. Development 122, 2427-2435.
Dambly-Chaudiere, C. and Leyns, L. (1992). The determination of sense organs in Drosophila: a search for interacting genes. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 36, 85-91.[Medline]
Detrich, H. W. 3rd, Kieran, M. W., Chan, F. Y., Barone, L. M., Yee, K., Rundstadler, J. A., Pratt, S., Ransom, D. and Zon, L. I. (1995). Intraembryonic hematopoietic cell migration during vertebrate development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 10713-10717.[Abstract]
Diez del Corral, R., Aroca, P., Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L., Cavodeassi, F. and Modolell, J. (1999). The Iroquois homeodomain proteins are required to specify body wall identity in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 13, 1754-1761.
Funayama, N., Sato, Y., Matsumoto, K., Ogura, T. and Takahashi, Y. (1999). Coelom formation: binary decision of the lateral plate mesoderm is controlled by the ectoderm. Development 126, 4129-4138.
Glinka, A., Wu, W., Delius, H., Monaghan, A. P., Blumenstock, C. and Niehrs, C. (1998). Dickkopf-1 is a member of a new family of secreted proteins and functions in head induction. Nature 391, 357-362.[Medline]
Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L., del Corral, R. D., de la Calle-Mustienes, E., Ferre-Marco, D. and Modolell, J. (1996). Araucan and caupolican, two members of the novel iroquois complex, encode homeoproteins that control proneural and vein-forming genes. Cell 85, 95-105.[Medline]
Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L., Glavic, A., de la Calle-Mustienes, E., Modolell, J. and Mayor, R. (1998). Xiro, a Xenopus homolog of the Drosophila Iroquois complex genes, controls development at the neural plate. EMBO J. 17, 181-190.
Gomez-Skarmeta, J., de La Calle-Mustienes, E. and Modolell, J. (2001). The Wnt-activated Xiro1 gene encodes a repressor that is essential for neural development and downregulates Bmp4. Development 128, 551-560.
Good, P. J. (1995). A conserved family of elav-like genes in vertebrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 4557-4561.[Abstract]
Goriely, A., Diez del Corral, R. and Storey, K. G. (1999). c-Irx2 expression reveals an early subdivision of the neural plate in the chick embryo. Mech. Dev. 87, 203-206.[Medline]
Heisenberg, C. P., Houart, C., Take-Uchi, M., Rauch, G. J., Young, N., Coutinho, P., Masai, I., Caneparo, L., Concha, M. L., Geisler, R. et al. (2001). A mutation in the Gsk3-binding domain of zebrafish Masterblind/Axin1 leads to a fate transformation of telencephalon and eyes to diencephalon. Genes Dev 15, 1427-1434.
Hukriede, N. A., Joly, L., Tsang, M., Miles, J., Tellis, P., Epstein, J. A., Barbazuk, W. B., Li, F. N., Paw, B., Postlethwait, J. H. et al. (1999). Radiation hybrid mapping of the zebrafish genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9745-9750.
Itoh, M. and Chitnis, A. B. (2001). Expression of proneural and neurogenic genes in the zebrafish lateral line primordium correlates with selection of hair cell fate in neuromasts. Mech. Dev. 102, 263-266.[Medline]
Jowett, T. (2001). Double in situ hybridization techniques in zebrafish. Methods 23, 345-358.[Medline]
Kawahara, A., Wilm, T., Solnica-Krezel, L. and Dawid, I. B. (2000). Antagonistic role of vega1 and bozozok/dharma homeobox genes in organizer formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 12121-12126.
Kessler, D. S. (1997). Siamois is required for formation of Spemanns organizer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 13017-13022.
Kim, C. H., Ueshima, E., Muraoka, O., Tanaka, H., Yeo, S. Y., Huh, T. L. and Miki, N. (1996). Zebrafish elav/HuC homologue as a very early neuronal marker. Neurosci. Lett. 216, 109-112.[Medline]
Kim, C. H., Bae, Y. K., Yamanaka, Y., Yamashita, S., Shimizu, T., Fujii, R., Park, H. C., Yeo, S. Y., Huh, T. L., Hibi, M. et al. (1997). Overexpression of neurogenin induces ectopic expression of HuC in zebrafish. Neurosci. Lett. 239, 113-116.[Medline]
Kim, C. H., Oda, T., Itoh, M., Jiang, D., Artinger, K. B., Chandrasekharappa, S. C., Driever, W. and Chitnis, A. B. (2000). Repressor activity of Headless/Tcf3 is essential for vertebrate head formation. Nature 407, 913-916.[Medline]
Krauss, S., Johansen, T., Korzh, V. and Fjose, A. (1991). Expression of the zebrafish paired box gene pax[zf-b] during early neurogenesis. Development 113, 1193-1206.[Abstract]
Kudoh, T. and Dawid, I. B. (2001). Role of the iroquois3 homeobox gene in organizer formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 7852-7857.
Kudoh, T., Tsang, M., Hukriede, N. A., Chen, X., Dedekian, M., Clarke, C. J., Kiang, A., Schultz, S., Epstein, J. A., Toyama, R. et al. (2001). A gene expression screen in zebrafish embryogenesis. Genome Res. (in press).
Lecaudey, V., Thisse, C., Thisse, B. and Schneider-Maunoury, S. (2001). Sequence and expression pattern of ziro7, a novel, divergent zebrafish iroquois homeobox gene. Mech. Dev. 109, 383-388.[Medline]
Leyns, L., Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L. and Dambly-Chaudiere, C. (1996). iroquois: a prepattern gene that controls the formation of bristles on the thorax of Drosophila. Mech. Dev. 59, 63-72.[Medline]
Li, Y., Allende, M. L., Finkelstein, R. and Weinberg, E. S. (1994). Expression of two zebrafish orthodenticle-related genes in the embryonic brain. Mech. Dev. 48, 229-244.[Medline]
Lun, K. and Brand, M. (1998). A series of no isthmus (noi) alleles of the zebrafish pax2.1 gene reveals multiple signaling events in development of the midbrain-hindbrain boundary. Development 125, 3049-3062.
Ma, Q., Kintner, C. and Anderson, D. J. (1996). Identification of neurogenin, a vertebrate neuronal determination gene. Cell 87, 43-52.[Medline]
Marchant, L., Linker, C., Ruiz, P., Guerrero, N. and Mayor, R. (1998). The inductive properties of mesoderm suggest that the neural crest cells are specified by a BMP gradient. Dev. Biol. 198, 319-329.[Medline]
McClintock, J. M., Carlson, R., Mann, D. M. and Prince, V. E. (2001). Consequences of Hox gene duplication in the vertebrates: an investigation of the zebrafish Hox paralogue group 1 genes. Development 128, 2471-2484.
Mori, H., Miyazaki, Y., Morita, T., Nitta, H. and Mishina, M. (1994). Different spatio-temporal expressions of three otx homeoprotein transcripts during zebrafish embryogenesis. Mol. Brain Res. 27, 221-231.[Medline]
Nguyen, M., Park, S., Marques, G. and Arora, K. (1998). Interpretation of a BMP activity gradient in Drosophila embryos depends on synergistic signaling by two type I receptors, SAX and TKV. Cell 95, 495-506.[Medline]
Odenthal, J. and Nusslein-Volhard, C. (1998). fork head domain genes in zebrafish. Dev. Genes Evol. 208, 245-258.[Medline]
Ogura, K., Matsumoto, K., Kuroiwa, A., Isobe, T., Otoguro, T., Jurecic, V., Baldini, A., Matsuda, Y. and Ogura, T. (2001). Cloning and chromosome mapping of human and chicken Iroquois (IRX) genes. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 92, 320-325.[Medline]
Oxtoby, E. and Jowett, T. (1993). Cloning of the zebrafish krox-20 gene (krx-20) and its expression during hindbrain development. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 1087-1095.[Abstract]
Patapoutian, A. and Reichardt, L. F. (2000). Roles of Wnt proteins in neural development and maintenance. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 392-399.[Medline]
Peters, T., Dildrop, R., Ausmeier, K. and Ruther, U. (2000). Organization of mouse Iroquois homeobox genes in two clusters suggests a conserved regulation and function in vertebrate development. Genome Res. 10, 1453-1462.
Reifers, F., Bohli, H., Walsh, E. C., Crossley, P. H., Stainier, D. Y. and Brand, M. (1998). Fgf8 is mutated in zebrafish acerebellar (ace) mutants and is required for maintenance of midbrain-hindbrain boundary development and somitogenesis. Development 125, 2381-2395.
Rhinn, M. and Brand, M. (2001). The midbrainhindbrain boundary organizer. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 34-42.[Medline]
Schwarz, M., Alvarez-Bolado, G., Urbanek, P., Busslinger, M. and Gruss, P. (1997). Conserved biological function between Pax-2 and Pax-5 in midbrain and cerebellum development: evidence from targeted mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 14518-14523.
Tan, J. T., Korzh, V. and Gong, Z. (1999). Expression of a zebrafish iroquois homeobox gene, Ziro3, in the midline axial structures and central nervous system. Mech. Dev. 87, 165-168.[Medline]
Wang, X., Emelyanov, A., Sleptsova-Friedrich, I., Korzh, V. and Gong, Z. (2001). Expression of two novel zebrafish iroquois homologues (ziro1 and ziro5) during early development of axial structures and central nervous system. Mech. Dev. 105, 191-195.[Medline]
Wurst, W. and Bally-Cuif, L. (2001). Neural plate patterning: upstream and downstream of the isthmic organizer. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 99-108.[Medline]