Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, Programs in Neuroscience, Genetics, Human Genetics, and Developmental Biology, 1550 4th Street, San Francisco, CA 94158-2722, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: hbaier{at}itsa.ucsf.edu)
Accepted 14 April 2005
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Retinal ganglion cell, Tectum, Transgenic, Mutant, Axon guidance, brn3c, pou4f3, Zebrafish
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Most of the molecular players listed above have been identified through
biochemical purification or by candidate gene approaches. A forward-genetic
screen provides an alternative strategy to reveal novel genes (or new
functions for known genes) in an unbiased manner. A previous anatomical screen
for retinotectal projection defects in zebrafish used fluorescent lipophilic
dyes to trace RGC axons as they navigated to the tectum. Two carbocyanine
dyes, DiI and DiO, were injected at different locations into the retina of
larval zebrafish, thus labeling separate subpopulations of RGCs terminating in
topographically distinct regions of the tectum
(Baier et al., 1996;
Karlstrom et al., 1996
;
Trowe et al., 1996
). This
large-scale screen uncovered 114 mutations, in about 35 genes, disrupting
either the pathfinding of axons from the eye to the tectum or the retinotopic
map. Although some of the more specific mutations, such as gna, woe
and nev, still await molecular identification, most of the genes have
now been cloned (Culverwell and Karlstrom,
2002
). Unsurprisingly, retinotectal pathfinding was found to
depend on proper brain patterning (Hedgehog signaling, syu, igu, con, dtr,
uml and yot; Nodal signaling, cyc; homeodomain
transcription factors, noi) and on components of the extracellular
matrix (bal, gpy and sly). A small minority of mutations was
found to disrupt specific signaling pathways within the retinal growth cones,
such as those mediated by Slit/Robo (ast)
(Fricke et al., 2001
), heparan
sulfate proteoglycans (box and dak)
(Lee et al., 2004
) or
PAM/highwire (esr) (D'Souza et
al., 2005
).
Although productive with regard to isolating retinotectal mutants, this first screen was laborious and intrinsically limited to finding only a subset of interesting phenotypes. Important organizing principles of retinotectal connectivity, such as neuropil assembly and laminar targeting of RGC axons could not be investigated with the screening method employed. As a consequence, the factors that assemble the characteristic architecture of optic tract and tectum and coordinate the development of the visual system are still elusive. We expect that disruption of some of these factors may lead to relatively subtle anatomical alterations, whose detection and analysis require sensitive methods. As structural changes of the CNS will ultimately influence its function, mutations in the human homologs of these genes might turn out to be responsible for neurological and psychiatric diseases.
We have developed a screening strategy aimed at discovering specific
disruptions of retinotectal architecture. Enhancer sequences from the
zebrafish brn3c gene were used to drive membrane-targeted GFP in a
distinct subset of RGCs. GFP-based forward-genetic screens have been employed
extensively in Drosophila and C. elegans, and more recently
in zebrafish (Lawson et al.,
2003). The use of a genetically encoded label overcomes the
limitations of dye injections. First, the screening assay is rapid, because
fish do not need to be aldehyde fixed and injected. Second, the labeling is
robust and reproducible among fish, thus allowing the detection of even subtle
abnormalities. Finally, the GFP label allows the observation of the same fish
at multiple stages of development. We tested the suitability of the
Brn3c:mGFP transgenic line in a screen of 233 ENU-mutagenized F2
families. Our relatively small-scale effort (three investigators, 1 year)
detected 13 novel phenotypes, including ones in which the retinotectal
projection is delayed or disorganized. These new mutants should add to a
cellular and molecular understanding of the processes that generate precise
neuronal connections in the visual system and other parts of the nervous
system.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cloning of zebrafish brn3b and brn3c
A 168 bp brn3b fragment was cloned from zebrafish cDNA by
degenerate PCR. Further parts of the sequence were obtained using degenerate
primers targeted to conserved regions at the 5' and 3' ends of the
brn3b sequence. At least two clones from independent PCR reactions
were sequenced. Primers to the resulting consensus sequence of these fragments
were used to identify genomic PAC clones in a pooled PAC library available
from RZPD (Berlin, Germany) (Amemiya and
Zon, 1999). Three clones contained brn3b. The remaining
brn3b sequence was obtained by direct sequencing from PAC clones
BUSMP706A1597Q2 and BUSMP706N19174Q2 from RZPD. The GenBank Accession Number
for brn3b is AF395831.
Zebrafish full-length brn3c was identified as for brn3b,
except that primers for nested PCR were designed based on a partial cDNA
sequence published previously (Sampath and
Stuart, 1996). The GenBank Accession Numbers for full-length
brn3c and its first intron are AY995217 and AY995218. The forward
primers were 5'-GGC AAT ATA TTC AGC GGC TTT G-3' and 5'-GCT
AAA CTC CTC GTA TTG TTA C-3'. The reverse primers were 5'-GTA TCT
TCA GGT TGG CGA GAG-3' and 5'-GGA GGA AAT GTG GTC GAG
TAG-3'. Three positive PAC clones were identified.
Construction of the Brn3c:mGFP transgenic vector
The brn3c-containing PACs were characterized by restriction
digests and Southern hybridization. A 7.5 kb BspEI fragment was
identified that contained part of the brn3c-coding region and 6 kb of
upstream sequence. It was subcloned from PAC clone BUSMP706K02247Q2 and
partially sequenced. The PAC sequences, together with a 5' RACE product,
yielded the remaining parts of the zebrafish brn3c sequence and
identified the putative translation start. The 6 kb promoter fragment was
cloned into pG1, a GFP expression vector (kindly provided by C.-B. Chien, MPI
Tübingen). For membrane targeting, the sequence encoding the first 20
amino acids of zebrafish GAP43 (Kay et
al., 2004) was generated from two overlapping oligonucleotides,
which also contained a Xenopus ß-globin ribosomal binding site.
The sequences were 5'-G GAA TTC CAC GAA ACC ATG CTG TGC TGC ATC AGA AGA
ACT AAA CCG GTT GAG AAG-3' and 5'-TCC CCC GGG CTG CAG CTG ATC GGA
CTC TTC ATT CTT CTC AAC CGG TTT AGT-3'. The oligonucleotides were fused,
filled in with Klenow Polymerase, and cloned into the PstI and
EcoRI site of the brn3c promoter. The resulting pTR56 vector
was used to generate transgenic zebrafish (see below).
Generation of transgenic fish
The insert from vector pTR56 was excised by digestion with NotI
and separated from the vector backbone by agarose gel electrophoresis. The DNA
was extracted and eluted in 10 mM triethanolamine (Tris, pH 7.5). Prior to
injection, the DNA was diluted in water containing 0.05% Phenol Red (Sigma) to
10-20 ng/µl. Injected embryos were raised to sexual maturity and crossed to
identify founder fish. The embryos from these crosses were scored for their
GFP expression and raised. This effort led to the production of several stable
lines, one of which was used in this study. The official designation of this
line is TG(Brn3c:GAP43-GFP)s356t
(http://www.zfin.org).
Mutagenesis
To efficiently induce random point mutations in the zebrafish genome, we
followed published protocols (van Eeden et
al., 1999). Briefly, adult male TL fish were treated three to five
times at weekly intervals with ENU (3.0 mM, 1 hour). Four weeks after the last
treatment, they were outcrossed to produce up to 200 F1 fish per male. These
F1 fish were crossed to Brn3c:mGFPs356t carriers to
generate F2 families. Six or more pairs of random crosses were set up between
siblings for each F2 family. In total, 233 F2 families were screened.
Screening assay
Embryos (3 dpf) and larvae (6 dpf) were embedded in 2.5% methylcellulose in
E3 medium (5 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl2, 33 mM
MgSO4) and screened under a Leica MZ25 fluorescence-equipped
dissecting microscope with 100x magnification. Embryos with obvious
morphological defects prior to 3 dpf were discarded. We scored the presence of
retinal fibers in the tectum (particularly at 3 dpf), the trajectory of
GFP-positive fibers in the optic tract, the width and shape of the optic
tract, the density of tectal innervation, the size and shape of the tectal
neuropil, the layer structure of the tectum, and the appearance of the RGC
axonal meshwork in the tectal neuropil. Crosses in which a quarter of the F3
progeny showed a mutant phenotype were repeated. Two or three such re-tests
were carried out before a mutant was considered a real candidate. In these
cases, one or both of their parents were outcrossed to unrelated
Brn3c:mGFP carriers to establish a mutant stock. The mutation was
recovered in the next generation through random pairwise crosses. All mutants
described in this report have been propagated as heterozygous stocks for at
least three generations.
Immunohistochemistry
Mutant embryos/larvae were obtained by crosses of heterozygous carriers.
Anaesthetized embryos/larvae were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in
phosphate-buffered saline. To enhance permeability, PFA-fixed larvae older
than 3 dpf were incubated in 0.1% collagenase in PBS. Incubation times for 3
dpf and 5 dpf were 45 minutes and 2 hours, respectively. For horizontal
sections, embryos/larvae were cryoprotected in 30% sucrose/0.02% azide/PBS,
embedded in OCT (Tissue-Tek, Sakura), and sectioned at 12 µm horizontally
on a cryostat. The following antibodies and concentrations were used for
whole-mount immunohistochemistry: anti-GFP, 1:40,000 (Molecular Probes); zn5,
1:1000 (Antibody Facility, University of Oregon); anti-acetylated tubulin,
1:2000 (Sigma); zpr-1, 1:200 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University
of Iowa); anti-phosphohistone H3, 1:500 (Upstate Biotechnology); and
anti-parvalbumin, 1:1200 (Chemicon). TUNEL-based cell death assays were
carried out according to manufacturer's instructions (In Situ Cell Death
Detection Kit - Fluorescein, Roche).
Labeling of the retinotectal projection with carbocyanine dyes
Fish were deeply anesthetized in 0.016% tricaine (Sigma) and fixed in 4%
PFA in PBS for 2-24 hours. They were embedded in 1% agarose in 0.5x PBS)
and pressure injected with dye solution using a PV-820 pressure injector
(World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL). The carbocyanine dye DiI
(1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine
perchlorate, Molecular Probes D-282) was dissolved either in
N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) for fixed larvae or in ethanol for live larvae to
a concentration of 2% (m/v). DiO
(1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethyloxacarbocyanine
perchlorate, Molecular Probes D-275) was dissolved in chloroform (2% m/v). To
visualize the retinotectal map, DiI and/or DiO were injected into the eyes of
larvae and imaged 12-24 hours later.
Confocal imaging
Larvae were embedded in a 0.5x20 mm imaging chamber (CoverWell, Grace
Bio-labs) in 1.2% low melting point agarose dissolved in E3 medium containing
0.8% norepinephrine and 0.016% tricaine. For immunohistochemistry, the left
eye was removed and stained embryos/larvae were mounted laterally in 70%
glycerol in PBS. Confocal image stacks were acquired using either a BioRad
1024M or a Zeiss 510 META laser-scanning microscope. Long working distance
objectives, 20x (air, NA 0.5) and 40x (water, NA 0.8), were used.
To reconstruct axons and their arbors, a series of optical planes were
collected (z-stack) and collapsed into a single image (maximum
intensity projection) or rendered in three dimensions to provide views of the
image stack at different angles. The step size for each z-stack was
chosen upon calculation of the theoretical z-resolution of the
objective used (typically 0.5-1 µm).
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
Brn3c:mGFP labels a distinct subset of RGCs with defined target specificity
We next asked if the Brn3c:mGFP transgene could be used to
visualize the architecture of the retinotectal projection in zebrafish larvae.
RGCs project axons to ten target areas in zebrafish, of which the tectum is
the largest. These areas have been referred to as retinal arborization fields
(AFs) and are numbered according to their proximodistal position along the
optic tract (Burrill and Easter,
1994). The tectum was named AF-10, being the most distal
retinorecipient area. Brn3c:mGFP-expressing axons were found to
strongly innervate the tectum and, more sparsely, AF-6, AF-7 and AF-8
(Fig. 2A,D). GFP-labeled fibers
are almost completely absent from AF-4, AF-5 and AF-9, and were not detected
in AF-1, AF-2 and AF-3 (Fig.
2A-C; data not shown).
In the tectum of adult cyprinids, four major retinorecipient layers have
been described: the stratum opticum (SO), the stratum fibrosum et
griseum superficiale (SFGS), the stratum griseum centrale (SGC)
and the boundary zone between stratum album centrale and stratum
periventriculare (SAC/SPV) (Meek,
1983; Vanegas and Ito,
1983
; von Bartheld and Meyer,
1987
). Whole-eye DiI fills reveal that these four retinorecipient
layers are already present in 6 dpf larvae. The same four layers are seen in a
Shh:GFP transgenic line (Neumann
and Nuesslein-Volhard, 2000
), in which many RGC axons are
unselectively labeled (Roeser and Baier,
2003
) (Fig. 2E).
The most superficial layer, the SO, is about 10 µm thick, densely labeled
and begins at the rostral pole of the tectum. The layer below, the SFGS, is 30
µm thick and is divided into three sublaminae. The two deeper layers, SGC
and SAC/SPV, are more sparsely innervated. At 6 dpf, these two layers extend
further caudally than the two superficial layers. In zebrafish larvae, unlike
birds and mammals, axons enter their target layer right at the entrance of the
tectum; only a subset of the fibers projects to the SO and these are not seen
`diving down' into the tectum terminating in the deeper layers (data not
shown).
In contrast to Shh:GFP and DiI fills, the vast majority of Brn3c:mGFP-labeled axons project to the SFGS, and here only to the two deeper sublaminae (Fig. 2F). The projection to SO is very sparse. The paucity of Brn3:mGFP axons in SO suggests that only a small subset of the axons in SO originate from Brn3c:mGFP-expressing RGCs (Fig. 2G). SGC and SAC/SPV do not receive Brn3c:mGFP-labeled input. In summary, these labeling studies show that the Brn3c:mGFP transgene labels a distinct subpopulation of RGCs with restricted target specificity (Fig. 2H). Therefore, Brn3c:mGFP reveals details of the retinotectal architecture that would be masked by an unselective RGC stain. We employed this line next in a small-scale screen in search of new retinotectal mutants.
Overview of the screen
For the screen, we mutagenized the spermatogonia of 17 adult male zebrafish
with ENU and outcrossed them to non-mutagenized females. The mutation rate was
determined to be about 0.3% per gene per haploid genome. We used the
pigmentation gene sandy (tyrosinase) as the specific locus for its
easily detectable phenotype (Page-McCaw et
al., 2004). The F1 fish were then crossed to Brn3c:mGFP
carriers to generate 233 F2 families. A total of 1303 crosses were screened by
visual inspection of the GFP-labeled retinotectal projection. Based on the
varying number of crosses per individual F2 family (average 5.6, corresponding
to 0.8 genomes), we calculated that our screen encompassed 168 genomes
(Mullins et al., 1994
).
The screen was carried out on F3 progeny at 3 dpf and again at 6 dpf. These
two developmental stages are particularly informative for revealing
perturbations in the retinotectal projection. In wild type, RGC axons reach
the anteroventral boundary of the tectum at 48 hpf. One day later, at 72 hpf
(3 dpf), RGC axon arbors reach the posterodorsal boundary of the tectum and
completely cover the tectum (Stuermer,
1988). Thus, screening at 3 dpf enabled us to uncover mutations
disrupting the initial stages of the retinotectal projection. Between 3 dpf
and 6 dpf, RGC axonal arbors elaborate synaptic connections with tectal
neurons. Screening at 6 dpf thus allowed us to discover mutations affecting
the refinement and maintenance of the retinotectal projection.
Progeny of crosses from 65 F2 families initially showed a putative mutant phenotype and were re-screened by mating the same pair and scoring their F3 progeny again. Less than one third of these (21) were confirmed and outcrossed to Brn3c:mGFP transgenic wild type. All but two mutants were recovered in the next generation. However, six were considered unspecific upon closer inspection and discarded. The discarded mutants had smaller tecta or smaller eyes, owing to degeneration or early developmental problems. All mutants were sectioned at 6 dpf and examined histologically using DAPI to highlight cytoarchitecture of retina and tectum, in conjunction with anti-GFP. Two mutations with similar phenotypes were found to be alleles of the same gene by complementation analysis. As described below, we discovered 13 mutations in 12 genes, which have been grouped into five classes (Table 1). All mutants are recessive, completely penetrant with respect to their axon phenotype and are transmitted in Mendelian ratios. Their phenotypes uncover largely unexplored processes in the assembly of neural architecture.
|
To test whether only the Brn3c-expressing subpopulation was reduced, we stained the 3 dpf retina with zn5 and HuC antibodies, which label all RGCs (zn5) or RGCs and amacrine cells (HuC). This experiment showed that most RGCs are absent in ddl mutants (Fig. 3G-J). Amacrine cells are also reduced in number (data not shown). DAPI staining further suggested that photoreceptors are undifferentiated, but overall retinal lamination is unaffected (Fig. 3K,L). The ciliary margin of this mutant is enlarged (Fig. 3I-L) and anti-phospho-histone H3 labeling demonstrated an increase in the number of mitotically active progenitors in this region (Fig. 3M,N). At 3 dpf, ddl mutants have normal body morphology and are indistinguishable from their wild-type siblings, except for their retina phenotype. After 3 dpf, the eye is visibly smaller, and the swimbladder fails to inflate. At about 3.5 dpf, the hearts of ddl mutants begin to show arrhythmia, suggestive of a conductivity defect. At 4 dpf, mutants can be sorted based on pericardial edema; they die at around 6 dpf.
|
vrt mutants exhibit the most severe delay. Once reaching the boundary of the tectum, RGC axons stall (Fig. 4A,B). After 4 dpf, the axons resume their growth into the tectum, which they eventually cover completely (Fig. 4C-F). Prior to 3 dpf, RGC differentiation and axon pathfinding are normal and on schedule (Fig. 4G,H). The number of RGCs, expressing GFP or stained with the zn5 antibody, is identical to wild type, and their axons follow the normal path across the midline and towards the tectum. This suggests that the vrt mutation specifically impairs one particular stage of axon growth: the entry into the tectum. Interestingly, the optic tract is noticeably wider in vrt mutants. The thickening of the optic tract could be the result of reduced fasciculation or of excessive backbranching by axons that are stalled at the anterior pole of the tectum. vrt mutants lack a swimbladder and die at around 10 dpf.
|
Lamination of retinal input is disrupted in dragnet (drg) mutants
We identified two alleles, drgs510 and
drgs530, of a gene important for targeting retinal axons
to the appropriate tectal layer. drgs530 results in a
somewhat weaker phenotype than drgs510. In wild-type
zebrafish larvae, most axons extend directly into a specific layer at the
entrance of the tectum and remain confined to the chosen layer (data not
shown). Brn3c:mGFP-labeled RGCs project mostly to the two deep
sublaminae of the SFGS, and the SO is only lightly labeled (see
Fig. 2F,G;
Fig. 6A,C). In drg
mutants, this pattern of laminar targeting is perturbed
(Fig. 6B,D). Ectopic fascicles,
2-4 µm in diameter, are observed in the SO, apparently displaced from the
SFGS. GFP-labeled axons travel between the two layers. The entire tectum is
innervated in this mutant, and both tectal cytoarchitecture (by DAPI
histology; data not shown) and retinotopic mapping are intact
(Fig. 6E,F). The lamination
defects are detectable as early as 3.5 dpf and are specific to the tectum.
Sublaminar targeting of amacrine processes and of RGC dendrites in the inner
plexiform layer of the retina is normal, as shown by anti-parvalbumin and
anti-GFP double-labeling (Fig.
6G-N). The only other detectable phenotype of drg mutants
is an opaque lens after 5 dpf, caused by overgrowth by epithelial cells
(Fig. 6G,H). drg
mutants are fully viable as adults.
Neuropil boundaries dissolve in fuzzy wuzzy (fuzz), beyond borders (beyo) and breaking up (brek) mutants
In fuzzs531, beyos578 and
breks574 mutants, the retinotectal projection forms on
time and is initially indistinguishable from wild type, but the density of
axon arbors is reduced after 5 dpf. Optic tracts are of normal width and show
the characteristic branching pattern, as the RGC fibers enter the tectum. This
suggests that the normal complement of axons is present, but that their arbors
are smaller or have fewer branches. The borders of the retinotectal fiber zone
are less well demarcated (`fuzzy') in these mutants, with axons and growth
cones frequently straying outside the neuropil area
(Fig. 7). Tectal
cytoarchitecture is unaltered, as determined by DAPI staining. In
brek mutants, the GFP label in the tectal neuropil becomes punctate
after 4 dpf, sometimes as late as 6 dpf, indicating that axons are
disintegrating in this mutant (see Fig. S1 in the supplementary material). In
a substantial proportion of fish, axon degeneration is uneven, with one region
of the tectum initially more affected than another, although a time-course
analysis showed that the temporal pattern is inconsistent between animals
(n=6). We could not detect an excessive number of TUNEL-positive
cells in the mutant retina at 5 dpf, suggesting that axon retraction is not
secondary to RGC death in the retina (data not shown). The axon degeneration
phenotype is not seen in fuzz or beyo. In beyo
mutants, the inner plexiform layer of the retina is misshaped at the margins,
bending distally to the outer nuclear layer (see Fig. S2 in the supplementary
material), and the telencephalon is reduced (data not shown). All three
mutants do not inflate their swimbladders and die as young larvae.
|
|
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
We designed our new GFP-based screen to find phenotypes that would have
escaped discovery in the earlier screen
(Karlstrom et al., 1996;
Trowe et al., 1996
) or would
have been difficult to analyze in sufficient detail using carbocyanine tracing
alone (Burrill and Easter,
1994
; Kaethner and Stuermer,
1992
; Stuermer,
1988
). We concentrated on mutations disrupting the fine
architecture and temporal coordination of the retinotectal projection, taking
advantage of the highly reproducible label afforded by a genetically encoded
reporter, by its stability, and by its cell-type specific expression pattern.
Although the scale of our new screen was less than one-tenth of the original
retinotectal screen, it was very productive in detecting specific phenotypes.
The previous screen had enriched for mutants with pleiotropic phenotypes. As a
result, of the 114 mutants described, all but eight (7%) die as young larvae,
indicating pervasive, non-visual defects. For comparison, of the 13 new
mutants, five are adult viable (39%) and most of them show few if any
phenotypes outside the visual system (Table
1).
|
|
In wild type, the first RGC axons enter the tectum at 48 hpf and reach its
posterior end within the next 24 hours
(Stuermer, 1988). The larvae
display their first visual reflexes at around the same time, suggesting that
synaptogenesis is rapid (Easter and
Nicola, 1996
). We discovered three genes, vrt, tard and
late, important for keeping innervation of the tectum on this tight
schedule. In these mutants, axons stall at the anterior end of the tectum and
invade it after a substantial delay. The mutations may disrupt extracellular
signals that regulate innervation of the tectum, or a component of the
transduction machinery that transmits these signals inside the growth cone and
links them to the cytoskeleton. Blocking FGF signaling in the Xenopus
retinotectal projection results in a bypass phenotype, where RGC axons grow
around the tectum (McFarlane et al.,
1996
; Walz et al.,
1997
). This is different from the stalled growth we observed here
in zebrafish vrt mutants. Alternatively, one or more of these genes
may encode a factor required for axon elongation, such as a cytoskeletal or
motor protein. Strikingly, the defects are only transient - by 6 dpf, the
retinotectal projection has recovered - and appear to be specific to the optic
tract/tectum boundary along the visual pathway. Although a retinotectal map
forms eventually, these mutants remain completely (vrt) or partially
blind (tard, late) (T.X., unpublished). It will be interesting to
find out if these persistent visual impairments are secondary to the delayed
innervation or caused by a direct effect on visual functions by the respective
gene products.
Axon-axon interactions are important for assembling a highly organized
neural structure and for maintaining its integrity. As the optic tract merges
with the anterior border of the tectal neuropil, retinal axons are ordered
into a stereotyped set of fascicles (von
Bartheld and Meyer, 1987). About ten thin fascicles emanate from
two thicker branches, the dorsal (medial) and the ventral (lateral) brachia of
the optic tract, which mainly contain axons of ventral and dorsal RGCs,
respectively. These fascicles continue their course within the tectal neuropil
and around its margins. Axons leaving these fascicles branch to form arbors
near their termination zone. Confocal analysis further demonstrates that fiber
distribution in the neuropil is not homogeneous, suggesting that adhesion
between branches of neighboring arbors produces a fine-meshed grid. Thus,
Brn3c:mGFP labeling showed an intricate organization of axons and
arbors in the wild-type tectum, which, to our knowledge, has not been the
subject of previous analysis and whose functional significance is unknown.
Our screen discovered two mutants with optic tract phenotypes, clearly
different from box and dak
(Lee et al., 2004), and four
with putative neuropil adhesion phenotypes. In vrt mutants, RGC axons
appear diffuse and invade the tectum in several broad bundles. In
coma mutants, the central-most fascicles are depleted of axons, and
the marginal fascicles, at the dorsal and ventral edges of the optic tract,
are expanded instead. Neuropil organization is also disrupted in coma
mutants, where most axons are bundled around the margins of the neuropil and
the few internal fascicles are seen meandering within the neuropil. In
bluk, blin and clew mutants, the regularly spaced axon
meshwork in the tectum is diffuse. The corresponding genes may encode adhesion
molecules or factors that influence branching. For example, cadherins
(Elul et al., 2003
;
Inoue and Sanes, 1997
;
Liu et al., 1999
;
Miskevich et al., 1998
;
Riehl et al., 1996
;
Stone and Sakaguchi, 1996
;
Treubert-Zimmermann et al.,
2002
) and immunoglobulin superfamily molecules, such as L1 and
NCAM (Lyckman et al., 2000
;
Rathjen et al., 1987
;
Thanos et al., 1984
;
Vielmetter et al., 1991
;
Yamagata et al., 1995
), are
expressed by both RGC axons and their targets in a variety of vertebrates and
could therefore underlie some of the recognition events that underlie fascicle
formation, axon arbor organization or synapse stabilization.
Many areas in the vertebrate CNS are layered, and laminar targeting by
axons is thought to be crucial for synaptic specificity
(Sanes and Yamagata, 1999).
Although a DiI tracing study in larval zebrafish made only cursory mention of
tectal layers (Burrill and Easter,
1994
), our confocal analysis of the Brn3c:mGFP and the
Shh:GFP transgenic lines demonstrates that exactly four well-defined
retinorecipient layers exist at 6 dpf. In adult teleost species, four major
layers of retinal fibers have been described
(Reperant and Lemire, 1976
;
Vanegas and Ito, 1983
;
von Bartheld and Meyer, 1987
),
with very similar characteristics to the layers we saw in the larvae. We have
therefore adopted the nomenclature developed for the adult structures. Only
the SFGS, receives substantial input from Brn3c:mGFP-expressing RGCs,
and not all the axons that innervate these layers are GFP positive. Retinal
axons in the SO and in the two deeper layers, SGC and SAC/SPV, are labeled in
Shh:GFP fish and by whole-eye DiI fills, but not at all (SGC,
SAC/SPV) or very little (SO) in Brn3c:mGFP fish. Brn3c:mGFP
provides one of the first examples of a marker differentially expressed among
RGCs with different laminar specificity.
The layer-specificity of retinal afferents is formed and maintained by
molecular cues in the tectum, such as N-cadherin
(Inoue and Sanes, 1997;
Miskevich et al., 1998
;
Yamagata et al., 1995
),
DM-GRASP (Yamagata et al.,
1995
), neuropilin (Feiner et
al., 1997
; Takagi et al.,
1995
) and Ephrin B molecules
(Braisted et al., 1997
).
Furthermore, patterning genes such pax7
(Thompson et al., 2004
) and
grg4 (Nakamura and Sugiyama,
2004
) may have a role in patterning the layers of the mammalian
superior colliculus. We identified an apparently novel gene, drg,
which is important for specifying SFGS and SO layer identities. In
drg mutants, retinal axons travel between the SO and SFGS, often in
thick fascicles. The SO appears more extensively innervated. These
observations suggest that axons that would normally project to the SFGS are
misrouted to the SO. The drg gene might encode an adhesion molecule
expressed in the SFGS, or a repellent factor present in the SO. Alternatively,
the mutation may disrupt transduction of layer-specific cues inside retinal
growth cones. The drg mutant is viable and therefore offers the
opportunity to study the fate of the mistargeted axons in later life.
Although a great deal is known about molecules that guide axons to the
tectum and align their arbors retinotopically within it, it is not clear what
confines them to the tectal neuropil. In wild type, many retinal axons grow
around the tectum in thick bundles, from which individual axons or small
fascicles depart into the center of the neuropil. The Brn3c:mGFP
labeling allowed us to identify three mutants, fuzz, beyo and
brek, in which this organization has broken down. The neuropil edges
are less well demarcated, and axons overshoot the borders. This description is
superficially reminiscent of the zebrafish acerebellar/fgf8
(ace) mutant, which lacks the midbrain-hindbrain boundary and has an
enlarged tectum (Jaszai et al.,
2003; Picker et al.,
1999
), although the phenotypes of our new mutants do not match the
comparatively severe defects of ace. Repellent factors, such as
Ephrin A3 (Hirate et al.,
2001
), Ephrin B2a (Wagle et
al., 2004
) and Tenascin (Becker
et al., 2003
; Perez and
Halfter, 1994
; Yamagata et
al., 1995
), as well as adhesion molecules
(Demyanenko and Maness, 2003
),
may play a role in demarcating neuropil boundaries, so these genes represent
plausible candidates for fuzz, beyo and brek.
Our study demonstrates the feasibility of a sensitive screen for subtle anatomical disruptions in the vertebrate brain. The genetically encoded GFP reporter provides resolution superior to carbocyanine dyes and pan-RGC markers. Our small-scale effort helped to discover larval- and adult-viable zebrafish mutants with changes in the patterning of retinotectal connections. Using Brn3c:mGFP, or similar lines, it should be possible to perform a saturated screen for genes assembling the optic tectum and other areas of the vertebrate brain.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material for this article is available at
http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/132/13/2955/DC1
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Amemiya, C. T. and Zon, L. I. (1999). Generation of a zebrafish P1 artificial chromosome library. Genomics 58,211 -213.[CrossRef][Medline]
Baier, H., Klostermann, S., Trowe, T., Karlstrom, R. O.,
Nüsslein-Volhard, C. and Bonhoeffer, F. (1996). Genetic
dissection of the retinotectal projection. Development
123,415
-425.
Becker, C. G., Schweitzer, J., Feldner, J., Becker, T. and
Schachner, M. (2003). Tenascin-R as a repellent guidance
molecule for developing optic axons in zebrafish. J.
Neurosci. 23,6232
-6237.
Biederer, T., Sara, Y., Mozhayeva, M., Atasoy, D., Liu, X.,
Kavalali, E. T. and Sudhof, T. C. (2002). SynCAM, a synaptic
adhesion molecule that drives synapse assembly.
Science 297,1525
-1531.
Braisted, J. E., McLaughlin, T., Wang, H. U., Friedman, G. C., Anderson, D. J. and O'Leary, D. D. (1997). Graded and lamina-specific distributions of ligands of EphB receptor tyrosine kinases in the developing retinotectal system. Dev. Biol. 191, 14-28.[CrossRef][Medline]
Burrill, J. D. and Easter, S. S., Jr (1994). Development of the retinofugal projections in the embryonic and larval zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio). J. Comp. Neurol. 346,583 -600.[CrossRef][Medline]
Culverwell, J. and Karlstrom, R. O. (2002). Making the connection: retinal axon guidance in the zebrafish. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 13,497 -506.[CrossRef][Medline]
DeCarvalho, A. C., Cappendijk, S. L. and Fadool, J. M. (2004). Developmental expression of the POU domain transcription factor Brn-3b (Pou4f2) in the lateral line and visual system of zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 229,869 -876.[CrossRef][Medline]
Deiner, M. S., Kennedy, T. E., Fazeli, A., Serafini, T., Tessier-Lavigne, M. and Sretavan, D. W. (1997). Netrin-1 and DCC mediate axon guidance locally at the optic disc: loss of function leads to optic nerve hypoplasia. Neuron 19,575 -589.[CrossRef][Medline]
Demyanenko, G. P. and Maness, P. F. (2003). The
L1 cell adhesion molecule is essential for topographic mapping of retinal
axons. J. Neurosci. 23,530
-538.
Dickson, B. J. (2002). Molecular mechanisms of
axon guidance. Science
298,1959
-1964.
Dingwell, K. S., Holt, C. E. and Harris, W. A. (2000). The multiple decisions made by growth cones of RGCs as they navigate from the retina to the tectum in xenopus embryos. J. Neurobiol. 44,246 -259.[CrossRef][Medline]
Drescher, U., Bonhoeffer, F. and Muller, B. K. (1997). The Eph family in retinal axon guidance. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7,75 -80.[CrossRef][Medline]
D'Souza, J., Hendricks, M., Le Guyader, S., Subburaju, S.,
Grunewald, B., Scholich, K. and Jesuthasan, S. (2005).
Formation of the retinotectal projection requires Esrom, an ortholog of PAM
(protein associated with Myc). Development
132,247
-256.
Easter, S. S., Jr and Nicola, G. N. (1996). The development of vision in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Dev. Biol. 180,646 -663.[CrossRef][Medline]
Elul, T. M., Kimes, N. E., Kohwi, M. and Reichardt, L. F.
(2003). N- and C-terminal domains of beta-catenin, respectively,
are required to initiate and shape axon arbors of retinal ganglion cells in
vivo. J. Neurosci. 23,6567
-6575.
Erkman, L., McEvilly, R. J., Luo, L., Ryan, A. K., Hooshmand, F., O'Connell, S. M., Keithley, E. M., Rapaport, D. H., Ryan, A. F. and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1996). Role of transcription factors Brn-3.1 and Brn-3.2 in auditory and visual system development. Nature 381,603 -606.[CrossRef][Medline]
Erkman, L., Yates, P. A., McLaughlin, T., McEvilly, R. J., Whisenhunt, T., O'Connell, S. M., Krones, A. I., Kirby, M. A., Rapaport, D. H., Bermingham, J. R. et al. (2000). A POU domain transcription factor-dependent program regulates axon pathfinding in the vertebrate visual system. Neuron 28,779 -792.[CrossRef][Medline]
Feiner, L., Koppel, A. M., Kobayashi, H. and Raper, J. A. (1997). Secreted chick semaphorins bind recombinant neuropilin with similar affinities but bind different subsets of neurons in situ. Neuron 19,539 -545.[CrossRef][Medline]
Flanagan, J. G. and Vanderhaeghen, P. (1998). The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21,309 -345.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fricke, C., Lee, J. S., Geiger-Rudolph, S., Bonhoeffer, F. and
Chien, C. B. (2001). astray, a zebrafish roundabout homolog
required for retinal axon guidance. Science
292,507
-510.
Higgins, D. G. and Sharp, P. M. (1988). CLUSTAL: a package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene 73,237 -244.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hindges, R., McLaughlin, T., Genoud, N., Henkemeyer, M. and O'Leary, D. D. (2002). EphB forward signaling controls directional branch extension and arborization required for dorsal-ventral retinotopic mapping. Neuron 35,475 -487.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hirate, Y., Mieda, M., Harada, T., Yamasu, K. and Okamoto, H. (2001). Identification of ephrin-A3 and novel genes specific to the midbrain-MHB in embryonic zebrafish by ordered differential display. Mech. Dev. 107, 83-96.[CrossRef][Medline]
Inoue, A. and Sanes, J. R. (1997).
Lamina-specific connectivity in the brain: regulation by N-cadherin,
neurotrophins, and glycoconjugates. Science
276,1428
-1431.
Jaszai, J., Reifers, F., Picker, A., Langenberg, T. and Brand,
M. (2003). Isthmus-to-midbrain transformation in the absence
of midbrain-hindbrain organizer activity. Development
130,6611
-6623.
Kaethner, R. J. and Stuermer, C. A. (1992). Dynamics of terminal arbor formation and target approach of retinotectal axons in living zebrafish embryos: a time-lapse study of single axons. J. Neurosci. 12,3257 -3271.[Abstract]
Karlstrom, R. O., Trowe, T., Klostermann, S., Baier, H., Brand,
M., Crawford, A. D., Grunewald, B., Haffter, P., Hoffmann, H., Meyer, S. U. et
al. (1996). Zebrafish mutations affecting retinotectal axon
pathfinding. Development
123,427
-438.
Kay, J. N., Finger-Baier, K. C., Roeser, T., Staub, W. and Baier, H. (2001). Retinal ganglion cell genesis requires lakritz, a Zebrafish atonal Homolog. Neuron 30,725 -736.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kay, J. N., Roeser, T., Mumm, J. S., Godinho, L., Mrejeru, A.,
Wong, R. O. and Baier, H. (2004). Transient requirement for
ganglion cells during assembly of retinal synaptic layers.
Development 131,1331
-1342.
Lawson, N. D., Mugford, J. W., Diamond, B. A. and Weinstein, B.
M. (2003). Phospholipase C gamma-1 is required downstream of
vascular endothelial growth factor during arterial development.
Genes Dev. 17,1346
-1351.
Lee, J. S., von der Hardt, S., Rusch, M. A., Stringer, S. E., Stickney, H. L., Talbot, W. S., Geisler, R., Nüsslein-Volhard, C., Selleck, S. B., Chien, C. B. et al. (2004). Axon sorting in the optic tract requires HSPG synthesis by ext2 (dackel) and extl3 (boxer). Neuron 44,947 -960.[CrossRef][Medline]
Liu, Q., Marrs, J. A. and Raymond, P. A. (1999). Spatial correspondence between R-cadherin expression domains and retinal ganglion cell axons in developing zebrafish. J. Comp. Neurol. 410,290 -302.[CrossRef][Medline]
Liu, W., Khare, S. L., Liang, X., Peters, M. A., Liu, X., Cepko,
C. L. and Xiang, M. (2000). All Brn3 genes can
promote retinal ganglion cell differentiation in the chick.
Development 127,3237
-3247.
Liu, Y., Berndt, J., Su, F., Tawarayama, H., Shoji, W., Kuwada,
J. Y. and Halloran, M. C. (2004). Semaphorin3D guides retinal
axons along the dorsoventral axis of the tectum. J.
Neurosci. 24,310
-318.
Lyckman, A. W., Moya, K. L., Confaloni, A. and Jhaveri, S. (2000). Early postnatal expression of L1 by retinal fibers in the optic tract and synaptic targets of the Syrian hamster. J. Comp. Neurol. 423,40 -51.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mann, F., Ray, S., Harris, W. and Holt, C. (2002). Topographic mapping in dorsoventral axis of the Xenopus retinotectal system depends on signaling through ephrin-B ligands. Neuron 35,461 -473.[CrossRef][Medline]
McFarlane, S., Cornel, E., Amaya, E. and Holt, C. E. (1996). Inhibition of FGF receptor activity in retinal ganglion cell axons causes errors in target recognition. Neuron 17,245 -254.[CrossRef][Medline]
McLaughlin, T., Hindges, R. and O'Leary, D. D. (2003). Regulation of axial patterning of the retina and its topographic mapping in the brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13, 57-69.[CrossRef][Medline]
Meek, J. (1983). Functional anatomy of the tectum mesencephali of the goldfish. An explorative analysis of the functional implications of the laminar structural organization of the tectum. Brain Res. 287,247 -297.[Medline]
Miskevich, F., Zhu, Y., Ranscht, B. and Sanes, J. R. (1998). Expression of multiple cadherins and catenins in the chick optic tectum. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 12,240 -255.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mullins, M. C., Hammerschmidt, M., Haffter, P. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1994). Large-scale mutagenesis in the zebrafish: in search of genes controlling development in a vertebrate. Curr. Biol. 4,189 -202.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nakamura, H. and Sugiyama, S. (2004). Polarity and laminar formation of the optic tectum in relation to retinal projection. J. Neurobiol. 59,48 -56.[CrossRef][Medline]
Neuhauss, S. C., Biehlmaier, O., Seeliger, M. W., Das, T.,
Kohler, K., Harris, W. A. and Baier, H. (1999). Genetic
disorders of vision revealed by a behavioral screen of 400 essential loci in
zebrafish. J. Neurosci.
19,8603
-8615.
Neumann, C. J. and Nuesslein-Volhard, C.
(2000). Patterning of the zebrafish retina by a wave of sonic
hedgehog activity. Science
289,2137
-2139.
Page-McCaw, P. S., Chung, S. C., Muto, A., Roeser, T., Staub, W., Finger-Baier, K. C., Korenbrot, J. I. and Baier, H. (2004). Retinal network adaptation to bright light requires tyrosinase. Nat. Neurosci. 7,1329 -1336.[CrossRef][Medline]
Perez, R. G. and Halfter, W. (1994). Tenascin protein and mRNA in the avian visual system: distribution and potential contribution to retinotectal development. Perspect. Dev. Neurobiol. 2,75 -87.[Medline]
Picker, A., Brennan, C., Reifers, F., Clarke, J. D., Holder, N.
and Brand, M. (1999). Requirement for the zebrafish
mid-hindbrain boundary in midbrain polarisation, mapping and confinement of
the retinotectal projection. Development
126,2967
-2978.
Rathjen, F. G., Wolff, J. M., Frank, R., Bonhoeffer, F. and Rutishauser, U. (1987). Membrane glycoproteins involved in neurite fasciculation. J. Cell Biol. 104,343 -353.[Abstract]
Reperant, J. and Lemire, M. (1976). Retinal projections in cyprinid fishes: a degeneration and radioautographic study. Brain Behav. Evol. 13,34 -57.[Medline]
Riehl, R., Johnson, K., Bradley, R., Grunwald, G. B., Cornel, E., Lilienbaum, A. and Holt, C. E. (1996). Cadherin function is required for axon outgrowth in retinal ganglion cells in vivo. Neuron 17,837 -848.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roeser, T. and Baier, H. (2003). Visuomotor
behaviors in larval zebrafish after GFP-guided laser ablation of the optic
tectum. J. Neurosci. 23,3726
-3734.
Sampath, K. and Stuart, G. W. (1996). Developmental expression of class III and IV POU domain genes in the zebrafish. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 219,565 -571.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sanes, J. R. and Yamagata, M. (1999). Formation of lamina-specific synaptic connections. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9,79 -87.[CrossRef][Medline]
Serafini, T. (1999). Finding a partner in a crowd: neuronal diversity and synaptogenesis. Cell 98,133 -136.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stone, K. E. and Sakaguchi, D. S. (1996). Perturbation of the developing Xenopus retinotectal projection following injections of antibodies against beta1 integrin receptors and N-cadherin. Dev. Biol. 180,297 -310.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stuermer, C. A. (1988). Retinotopic organization of the developing retinotectal projection in the zebrafish embryo. J. Neurosci. 8,4513 -4530.[Abstract]
Takagi, S., Kasuya, Y., Shimizu, M., Matsuura, T., Tsuboi, M., Kawakami, A. and Fujisawa, H. (1995). Expression of a cell adhesion molecule, neuropilin, in the developing chick nervous system. Dev. Biol. 170,207 -222.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thanos, S., Bonhoeffer, F. and Rutishauser, U.
(1984). Fiber-fiber interaction and tectal cues influence the
development of the chicken retinotectal projection. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 81,1906
-1910.
Thompson, J., Lovicu, F. and Ziman, M. (2004). The role of Pax7 in determining the cytoarchitecture of the superior colliculus. Dev. Growth Differ. 46,213 -218.[CrossRef][Medline]
Treubert-Zimmermann, U., Heyers, D. and Redies, C.
(2002). Targeting axons to specific fiber tracts in vivo by
altering cadherin expression. J. Neurosci.
22,7617
-7626.
Trowe, T., Klostermann, S., Baier, H., Granato, M., Crawford, A.
D., Grunewald, B., Hoffmann, H., Karlstrom, R. O., Meyer, S. U., Muller, B. et
al. (1996). Mutations disrupting the ordering and topographic
mapping of axons in the retinotectal projection of the zebrafish, Danio
rerio. Development
123,439
-450.
van Eeden, F. J., Granato, M., Odenthal, J. and Haffter, P. (1999). Developmental mutant screens in the zebrafish. Methods Cell Biol. 60,21 -41.[Medline]
Vanegas, H. and Ito, H. (1983). Morphological aspects of the teleostean visual system: a review. Brain Res. 287,117 -137.[Medline]
Vielmetter, J., Lottspeich, F. and Stuermer, C. A. (1991). The monoclonal antibody E587 recognizes growing (new and regenerating) retinal axons in the goldfish retinotectal pathway. J. Neurosci. 11,3581 -3593.[Abstract]
von Bartheld, C. S. and Meyer, D. L. (1987). Comparative neurology of the optic tectum in ray-finned fishes: patterns of lamination formed by retinotectal projections. Brain Res. 420,277 -288.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wagle, M., Grunewald, B., Subburaju, S., Barzaghi, C., Le Guyader, S., Chan, J. and Jesuthasan, S. (2004). EphrinB2a in the zebrafish retinotectal system. J. Neurobiol. 59, 57-65.[CrossRef][Medline]
Walz, A., McFarlane, S., Brickman, Y. G., Nurcombe, V.,
Bartlett, P. F. and Holt, C. E. (1997). Essential role of
heparan sulfates in axon navigation and targeting in the developing visual
system. Development 124,2421
-2430.
Wang, S. W., Mu, X., Bowers, W. J., Kim, D. S., Plas, D. J., Crair, M. C., Federoff, H. J., Gan, L. and Klein, W. H. (2002). Brn3b/Brn3c double knockout mice reveal an unsuspected role for Brn3c in retinal ganglion cell axon outgrowth. Development 129,467 -477.[Medline]
Xiang, M., Zhou, L., Macke, J. P., Yoshioka, T., Hendry, S. H., Eddy, R. L., Shows, T. B. and Nathans, J. (1995). The Brn-3 family of POU-domain factors: primary structure, binding specificity, and expression in subsets of retinal ganglion cells and somatosensory neurons. J. Neurosci. 15,4762 -4785.[Abstract]
Yamagata, M., Herman, J. P. and Sanes, J. R. (1995). Lamina-specific expression of adhesion molecules in developing chick optic tectum. J. Neurosci. 15,4556 -4571.[Abstract]
Yamagata, M., Weiner, J. A. and Sanes, J. R. (2002). Sidekicks: synaptic adhesion molecules that promote lamina-specific connectivity in the retina. Cell 110,649 -660.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zuber, M. X., Strittmatter, S. M. and Fishman, M. C. (1989). A membrane-targeting signal in the amino terminus of the neuronal protein GAP-43. Nature 341,345 -348.[CrossRef][Medline]