1 Neurodevelopmental Disorders Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Program in Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0435, USA
2 Departments of Anatomy and of Biochemistry and Biophyics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0452, USA
3 Departments of Pathology and Microbiology, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA
* Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Present address: Department of Microbiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032, USA
Authors for correspondence (e-mail: samuelp{at}itsa.ucsf.edu and marctl{at}stanford.edu)
Accepted 27 June 2002
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Hippocampus, Neuronal migration, Chemokine, Dentate granule cell, Mouse
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
It is now clear that the dentate gyrus is one of the few sites in the rodent brain that undergoes continued neurogenesis throughout life with continued production of granule cell neurons from precursor cells that reside at the border between the dentate granule cell layer and the hilus (the subgranular zone SGZ) (Altman and Bayer, 1990a; Altman and Das, 1965a
; Gage, 2000
; Pleasure et al., 2000b
). Recent experiments have shown that dentate granule cell neurogenesis is increased by physical activity and the performance of learning paradigms and that continued dentate neurogenesis is likely to be necessary for the ability to perform specific types of learning tasks (Gould et al., 1999
; Kempermann et al., 1997
; Shors et al., 2001
; van Praag et al., 1999
).
During development, an important event in the formation of the dentate granule cell layer is the migration of cells from the dentate neuroepithelium to take up residence in the dentate gyrus anlage. Traditional neuroanatomical methods have shown that the early stages of migration consist of a mixture of postmitotic neurons and precursor cells that form the primary dentate granule cell layer and populate the hilus (Altman and Bayer, 1990a; Altman and Bayer, 1990b
; Pleasure et al., 2000b
). As development proceeds, the precursor cells in the hilus proliferate and produce large numbers of granule cells through the first month of postnatal life before settling in the SGZ and gradually reducing their output of new granule cells to a lower basal rate through adulthood (Altman and Bayer, 1990a
; Altman and Bayer, 1990b
; Altman and Das, 1965a
; Altman and Das, 1965b
; Pleasure et al., 2000b
).
We have been examining factors that regulate the development of the dentate granule cell lineage in order to better understand the developmental organizing principles that govern the initial migration of granule cells to the dentate gyrus. As part of these studies, we have become particularly interested in the regulation of the initial migration of cells that populate the dentate anlage from the neuroepithelium because perturbations in these initial events are likely to have dramatic consequences for the later organization of the dentate gyrus. Indeed, analysis of Neurod1 mutants (previously known as ß2 and NeuroD) bears out this assumption. These mice have a defect in the initial production of granule cells that leads to the failure to properly form a morphologically distinct dentate gyrus (Liu et al., 2000; Miyata et al., 1999
). This early failure to produce granule cells leads to a lifelong absence of these cells even though certain features of the mutant phenotype are rescued by later developmental expression of closely related homologs of Neurod1 (Liu et al., 2000
). In addition, the formation of heterotopic clusters of granule-like cells in the Neurod1 mutant mice, which have some histological similarities to the dentate gyri of individuals with epilepsy (Houser, 1990
; Houser et al., 1992
), are associated with limbic epilepsy in these mice (Liu et al., 2000
).
Recent studies have shown that a chemokine, SDF1, regulates migration of cerebellar granule neurons (Klein et al., 2001; Ma et al., 1998
; Zou et al., 1998
). In the cerebellum, SDF1 is believed to act as an attractant, not allowing the granule cells to leave the zone of high SDF1 expression until the appropriate developmental timepoint. These studies have shown direct effects of SDF1 on regulating granule cell chemotaxis in dissociated cell cultures, but there have been no studies showing direct regulation of migratory behavior in assays closely related to the in vivo situation (Klein et al., 2001
).
In this study we examine the migratory behavior of cells from the neuroepithelium to the dentate anlage using several techniques both in vivo and in vitro. From these studies we are able to show the normal migratory route of these cells, the time that cells take to reach the dentate gyrus and to validate a robust assay for migration of these cells in vitro. Using this assay and mutant mice, we show that SDF1, a chemokine, directly regulates migration of dentate granule cells and that mice without SDF1 receptors have granule cell migration abnormalities.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In situ hybridization
A 584 bp coding fragment of the murine CXCR4 cDNA and a 180 bp coding fragment of murine SDF1 gene obtained by PCR were cloned into Bluescript (ks) (Promega Life Sciences, Madison, WI) and used for probe synthesis after confirmatory sequence was obtained. In situ hybridization of E14.5 and E18.5 wild-type tissue sections with digoxigenin probes was performed as described (Pleasure et al., 2000b). Other chemokine and chemokine receptors examined were: ligands, MDC, eotaxin, TECK, ELC, Rantes, SLC, TARC, neurotactin, MCP3, MCP5, MIP1
, MIP1ß and MIP3
; receptors, CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3, CXCR5, CX3CR1, CCXCKR, CCR1, CCR2A, CCR2B, CCR4, CCR5, CCR6, CCR7 and CCR9.
Prox1 antisera
The Prox1 antiserum was generated against the C-terminal 15 amino acids of mouse Prox1 (completely conserved between mouse and human) in New Zealand White rabbits exactly as described previously (Torii et al., 1999). The rabbits were immunized every 3 weeks and the titer checked by ELISA. After the fifth boost, the antiserum was specific for dentate granule cells in adult mouse brain sections.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 40 µm free-floating sections (E18.5 and P0) or on 12 µm cryostat sections mounted onto glass slides (all other ages). Free-floating sections were preincubated in 5% normal serum of the species in which the secondary antibody was raised, 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.3% TX in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature, and subsequently incubated with the primary antisera for 24-36 hours at 4°C in 2% normal serum and 0.3% TX in PBS. The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-Prox1 (diluted 1:5000), rabbit anti-Phosphohistone-H3 (diluted 1:1000; Upstate Biotechnology) and rabbit anti-nestin (gift of R. McKay; diluted 1:1000). Sections were then incubated in biotinylated secondary antibodies (Vector; diluted 1:200) and processed by the ABC histochemical method (Vector). The sections were then mounted onto Superfrost Plus slides (Fisher), dried, dehydrated and coverslipped with Permount (Fisher). In each experiment, sections from homozygous mutants and their heterozygous littermates were processed together. Primary antiserum omission controls and normal mouse, rabbit and goat serum controls were used to confirm further the specificity of the immunohistochemical labeling. Immunohistochemistry was performed on cryostat sections on glass slides using essentially the same protocol.
Generation of pseudotyped retroviruses
Retroviral plasmid vectors (nlslacZ or PLAP) with internal CMV promoters were transfected into the 293GPG stable packaging line to produce pseudotyped retrovirus (Ory et al., 1996). Virus was collected over 5-6 days and concentrated by ultracentrifugation to produce high-titer retroviral stocks. Virus was titered by infection of NIH3T3 cells as described by others (Ory et al., 1996
).
In utero intraventricular injections
All experimental animals were treated according to protocols approved by the University of California, San Francisco. Briefly, time-pregnant rats were fully anesthetized with ketamine (90 mg/kg), xylazine (5mg/kg) and acetylpromazine (2.5 mg/kg) intramuscularly. A 2 cm vertical midline incision was made through the abdomen to expose the uterus. A fiber-optic transilluminator was used to identify the cerebral ventricles of fetuses and each embryo in the litter received approximately 1 µl of the retroviral solution (containing 1x108 infective particles/µl and 0.1 mg/ml polybreme) injected intraventricularly via Hamilton syringe with a 30-gauge needle. The uterus was replaced into the abdominal space and the abdominal muscle and skin was then closed using 3-0 silk suture. The animal was then given an analgesic (buprenorphine 0.01 mg/kg for rats) to minimize peri-operative wound pain and monitored for recovery.
Animals were allowed to survive for various length of time and then the embryos were harvested as described above. A select group of animals were allowed to deliver pups. Tissue was harvested from these animals at various postnatal time-points as described above. To visualize cells, tissue was embedded in 5% agarose and cut on a vibrating microtome into 50 µm sections. The tissue was then processed for X-gal histochemistry to detect the ß-gal marker, counterstained with nuclear Fast Red, mounted onto Superfrost Plus slides (Fisher), dried, dehydrated and coverslipped with Permount (Fisher). For tissue infected with retrovirus expressing PLAP, alkaline phosphatase (AP) histochemistry was performed (Leighton et al., 2001) and the tissue was mounted onto superfrost slides (Fisher) and mounted with Aquamount.
We performed several types of controls to be sure that the patterns of distribution of labeled cells represent true migration rather than artefact. Retroviral particles lose infectivity within hours at 37°C and therefore continued infection of cells at the ventricular zone at long periods after introduction into the ventricles seems unlikely. However, to rule out this senario further, we incubated retrovirus at 37°C for 12 hours and then injected the virus into ventricles of E18 embryos. After 3 days, no infected cells in the ventricular zone or migratory route were found in any of the embryos (n=5), confirming the idea that labeling of cells in the ventricular zone occurs soon after introduction of the virus into the ventricles. Additionally, to ensure that cells infected with nlslacZ- and PLAP-expressing viruses behaved similarly, a small number of embryos were injected with a mixture of the two retroviruses and allowed to develop for 3 days in utero. Serial sections from these embryos were processed for X-gal and AP histochemistry. Migratory patterns for both viruses appeared similar, indicating that cells infected with either virus behaved similarly.
Slice culture
The slice migration assay was performed as described previously (Anderson et al., 1997). Briefly, brains from E15.5 CD-1 mouse embryos were embedded in 4% low-melting agarose and 250 µm sections cut in the coronal plane on a Leica VT-1000 vibrating microtome. The slices were transferred to polycarbonate culture membranes and cultured at 37°C.
In a small number of cultures, 50 nl of nlslacZ virus (1x108 virions/ml titer with 0.1 mg/ml polybreme) was injected into the ventricular zone of the hippocampus using a pulled glass microcapillary tube and picospritzer (General Valve). Cultures were allowed to develop for 24-96 hours in vitro and then processed for X-gal histochemistry.
Overexpression experiments were also performed in slice cultures using focal electroporation to ectopically express SDF1 using an approach similar to that described previously (Marin et al., 2001; Stühmer et al., 2002
). SDF1
expression construct was generated by cloning the 180 bp of coding sequence into the pSecTag-A (Invitrogen) vector backbone, sequenced and confirmed by western blot analysis. Slice cultures were placed on a piece of agarose gel laying on an platinum electrode. Another piece of agarose soaked in 1 mg/ml DNA [GFP (Marin et al., 2001
) or SDF1/GFP] was placed on a second electrode and allowed to contact the surface of the hippocampus. Three square wave electrical pulses of 20-80 V lasting 50 mseconds each were delivered across the electrodes. The cultures were then allowed to develop in vitro for 96 hours and were fixed with 4% PFA, cryoprotected and resectioned to 20 µm sections on a cryostat. Sections were then double immunostained with mouse anti-GFP (Molecular Probes; diluted 1:2000), and either rabbit anti-Prox1 or rabbit anti-nestin antibodies. Using this approach, others have found correspondence of expression for GFP and an additional expression construct to be greater than 95% when individual cells are counted (Stühmer et al., 2002
).
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Studies using retroviruses injected into the in utero ventricular system have been used for lineage analysis and to transduce functional molecules into dividing cells in the ventricular zone (Grove et al., 1992; Parnavelas et al., 1991
; Rakic, 1988
; Walsh and Cepko, 1993
). The retroviruses used in this approach are only capable of infecting dividing cells and the viral genome is inherited as a lineage marker. We decided to exploit features of this system to label cells in the migratory stream to the dentate gyrus (Fig. 1A). After injection of retrovirus encoding a nuclear-localization signal containing lacZ (nlslacZ) into rat embryos at various times (the rats were then allowed to survive to P15), we found extensive labeling of dentate granule neurons after injection on E16, E18 and E20 (Fig. 1C-E). When we examined the relative distributions of cells in the hippocampal formation that are either in the dentate granule cell layer, the pyramidal cell layer or elsewhere, we observed that injections on E18 were the most efficient at labeling dentate granule neurons (Fig. 1B). In order to determine if this approach would be useful to examine cells during migration, we examined rats at shorter intervals after initial retroviral injection. These experiments showed the presence of many labeled cells in the migratory stream from the ventricular zone to the dentate gyrus (Fig. 1F-H). We conclude that intraventricular retroviral injections at E18 are most efficient for introduction of a heritable label into a cohort of cells migrating to the dentate gyrus. As we found that the numbers of cell infected tended to vary widely from animal to animal, probably because of variability of the number of progenitor cells labeled in the ventricular zone, we analyzed the percentages of different cell types labeled in each animal in order to compare different animals rather than the actual number of cells (Fig. 1B). Using this approach, the percentages of glial cells, granule neurons and pyramidal neurons labeled were highly reproducible from animal to animal under the same conditions.
|
|
In brains from animals infected with PLAP retrovirus 2 or 3 days before (Fig. 2E), PLAP-expressing cells of several different morphology types were apparent. Many cells had the characteristic morphology of radial glial cells with long processes in contact with the ventricular zone and stretching into the dentate migratory pathway, even sometimes reaching all the way to the dentate gyrus (Fig. 2E). These cellular processes emanated from a wider region of ventricular zone above and below the dentate notch that all collected together into the migratory pathway. The ventricular and subventricular zone also contained clusters of round cells likely to be dividing precursor cells (Fig. 3E), as described previously (Altman and Bayer, 1990b). Last, in the dentate gyrus of older animals we saw numerous differentiated granule neurons (Fig. 2F-H). We also observed stellate cells in the SGZ of the more mature dentate gyrus, which are likely to be astrocyte-like cells that are the resident multipotential precursor that continue to produce granule cells in the dentate gyrus throughout life (Fig. 2H) (Seri et al., 2001
). Future studies will more fully characterize the morphology and cell-type of migrating cells using cell-type-specific markers.
|
Specifically, we adopted slice culture protocols previously shown to allow faithful long-range migration of interneurons from the basal ganglia to the cortex and hippocampus in developing mouse embryonic cortical slices (Anderson et al., 1997; Marin et al., 2001
; Pleasure et al., 2000a
). To make analysis of these slices straightforward and reproducible, we used an antibody to Prox1 [Prox1 is a divergent homeobox gene specifically expressed in differentiated granule cells (Chen et al., 2000
; Cheng et al., 2001
; Liu et al., 2000
; Pleasure et al., 2000b
)] because this assay does not depend on subjective dye or virus placement. Comparing the staining for Prox1 in brain sections taken from mouse brains at several embryonic ages (after making a conversion for shifting from the use of rats in the retroviral studies to mice for the remainder of the studies) showed good correspondence with the staining for Prox1 in the dentate gyrus that formed in slice explants (Fig. 3A-F). To be certain that this continued accumulation of Prox1 in the dentate gyrus represents continued migration of cells to the dentate rather than just continued proliferation or maturation of cells that had migrated to the dentate prior to explanting, we performed focal injections of nlslacZ retrovirus into the migratory stream in slice explants (Fig. 3G-I). These injected explants showed migration of cells from the dentate subventricular zone through the migratory pathway to the dentate gyrus with timing similar to that observed in the in vivo intraventricular experiments presented above. Thus, we conclude that slice explants are a viable and robust system for observing dentate migration in vitro.
The chemokine SDF1 is a candidate regulatory factor for granule cell migration
To find potential molecular cues that regulate dentate granule cell migration, we examined the expression of a number of known chemotactic molecules and their receptors in the developing dentate gyrus just before the onset of dentate migration in mice (E14.5) (Fig. 4A) and while it is well under way (P0) (Fig. 4B). We also thought that candidates for regulation of dentate migration came from previous studies showing that several axon-guidance molecules (including netrin 1, Slit1 and Slit2) are all expressed at varying levels in the neuroepithelium that generates the dentate gyrus (Barallobre et al., 2000; Nguyen Ba-Charvet et al., 1999
; Shu and Richards, 2001
; Tuttle et al., 1999
). We reasoned that these molecules would then be candidate chemorepellants that might drive migration toward the dentate anlage; however, we were unable to find any defects in dentate gyrus formation in mouse mutants for netrin 1 (or its receptor DCC) or Slit1/Slit2 double mutants (data not shown). Although this does not rule out potential functions of these molecules in the development of the dentate gyrus, it does imply that they are not required for the prenatal phases of granule cell migration.
|
Granule cell migration is disrupted in SDF1-receptor mutants
We examined the hippocampal region of Cxcr4 mutants at E18.5 using the antibody to Prox1, as this is a time at which dentate granule cell migration is at its height from the ventricular zone. In these mutants (n=4/4), we observed the presence of numerous Prox1-expressing cells in ectopic locations near the ventricular zone, adjacent to the fimbria, or in the migratory stream towards the dentate anlage (Fig. 5A,B). This is consistent with a defect in migration of developing dentate granule neurons to the dentate gyrus. These cells would then differentiate and begin to express the dentate specific marker before arrival in the dentate gyrus. We cannot, however, from these data alone exclude a role for SDF1 in preventing the premature expression of Prox1 outside the dentate anlage, rather than affecting migration, but experiments using ectopic expression of SDF1 (discussed later) tend to argue against this possibility. It is also, in principle, possible that loss of SDF1 signaling leads to survival of Prox1-positive cells that would normally undergo cell death outside the dentate anlage, although previous studies showing a very low level of cell death in the dentate gyrus at this developmental timepoint make this unlikely (Galceran et al., 2000). To determine whether dividing, migrating dentate precursor cells are also affected in the Cxcr4 mutants we examined the distribution of Phosphohistone-H3, which reveals the distribution of cells in M-phase (Fig. 5C,D). In heterozygous animals, there was extensive labeling of cells in the dentate subventricular zone, migratory stream and within the hilar tertiary matrix, while in the mutants the number of labeled cells was dramatically decreased in all three of these areas. This finding, which is in agreement with others recently published findings (Lu et al., 2002
), is consistent with SDF1 being a mitogen for dentate precursor cells. Interestingly, Phosphohistone-H3 staining is unchanged in other areas of the hippocampal ventricular zone (Fig. 5C,D), supporting the specificity of SDF1 action within the dentate region. In addition, the uniform decrease in the numbers of dividing cells within the subventricular zone, migratory stream and tertiary matrix without selective accumulation of dividing cells that are unable to reach the dentate gyrus implies that SDF1 is likely not a chemoattractant for precursor cells. This distinction between the actions of SDF1 on precursor cells (which will presumably generate both dentate granule neurons and glial cells) and newly differentiated granule neurons is quite interesting and worth further study in the future. Finally, we examined whether SDF1 was acting primarily on radial glial processes, with the granule cell migration defect arising secondarily. This seemed unlikely as CXCR4 does not appear to be expressed by radial glial cells whose cell bodies are in the ventricular zone. We indeed found that the distribution of radial glial fibers in the dentate, assessed using nestin antibodies, was normal (Fig. 5E-F), consistent with the effect of SDF1 being on granule cells rather than radial glial cells.
|
SDF1 directly regulates migration of dentate granule neurons
If SDF1 directly regulates migration of dentate granule cells, it could be operating to provide directional cues used for migration or as a non-directional motogenic (or chemokinetic) factor that stimulates the cells to migrate using other directional cues present in the tissue, as shown for HGF in interneuron migration (Powell et al., 2001) (Fig. 6A). We reasoned that if SDF1 is a motogen, then generalized ectopic expression of SDF1 in the hippocampus should not affect migration or should even speed up migration of granule cells to the dentate (Fig. 6A). However, if SDF1 is a chemattractant molecule, then generalized expression would destroy the normal gradient of SDF1 in the migratory stream and might lead to failed migration of some Prox1-expressing cells (Fig. 6A). As granule cells migrate on radial glial cells (Nowakowski and Rakic, 1979
; Nowakowski and Rakic, 1981
; Rickmann et al., 1987
), we thought it possible that SDF1 might act as a polarity cue that determined the direction of migration on radial glial cells, but that it was unlikely that we would divert substantial numbers of cells from their normal migratory pathway to completely ectopic positions.
|
To ensure that the disruption of granule cell migration that we observed was both reliable and significant, we quantified the percentages of Prox1-positive granule cells that reached the dentate apex in GFP electroporated and GFP/SDF1 electroporated experimental conditions (we used percentages of cells rather than raw numbers of cells as the number of Prox1-positive cells present in a section varied based on anatomic level and exact section plane). For this analysis, we counted representative sections from five different slice experiments for each condition and found that following GFP electroporation 93% (±4%) of Prox1-positive cells reached the dentate anlage, while in the GFP/SDF1 electroporated slices and average of only 52% (±3%) of Prox1-positive cells reached the dentate (a total of 690 cells were counted from GFP slices and 752 from GFP/SDF1 slices, P<0.00000002).
We believe that these observations are most consistent with SDF1 providing a chemoattractive cue that is interpreted primarily as a migration polarity signal, presumably with migration also constrained by radial glial processes. These data also exclude a role for SDF1 in preventing ectopic differentiation of Prox1-positive cells outside the dentate gyrus and make it unlikely that SDF1 acts solely as a motogenic (or chemokinetic) factor.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The relationship of granule cell migration to radial migration in other cortical regions is supported by the phenotype of mice with defects in the reelin pathway. Reelin has been proposed to be a stop signal for radially migrating cells that, when absent, results in severe neocortical abnormalities with inversion of the normal laminar pattern (Frotscher, 1998). In the dentate gyrus, reelin-expressing Cajal-Retzius cells are perfectly positioned in the upper dentate blade to be supplying such a stop signal to halt the further migration of granule cells along radial glial fibers (Alcantara et al., 1998
). Mice with defective reelin signaling have ectopic granule cells within the dentate gyrus and an ill-formed dentate granule cell layer but do not have ectopic granule cells outside the immediate region of the dentate gyrus (Stanfield and Cowan, 1979a
; Stanfield and Cowan, 1979b
; Trommsdorff et al., 1999
). These findings are most consistent with a short-range function for reelin as the proposed stop signal.
Until now, there have been no studies elucidating the identity of chemoattractant or repellent cues for granule cell migration. For this reason, we felt the need to develop a robust in vitro assay that could be used to determine the molecular underpinnings of this process. As we have show in this study, dentate granule cell migration is a process quite amenable to the use of assays developed to analyze the migration of other cell types in the developing cortex and hippocampus. To validate this assay, we first showed that a molecular marker of dentate granule neurons, Prox1, is initially expressed at the protein level while granule cells are en route to the dentate anlage. This marker may then be used as a robust indicator of the efficacy of granule cell migration. Using retroviruses that infect granule cell precursors in contact with the ventricular zone, we determined the embryonic time frame during which granule cell migration is at its maximal level, in order to decide the best embryonic age to develop our in vitro assay. Coronal brain slices taken at this time support continued proliferation and migration of dentate granule cells and are amenable to manipulation by focal electroporation-mediated gene transfer.
Analysis of the expression of several guidance molecules known to regulate neuronal migration revealed several plausible candidates for regulatory cues for dentate migration, but analysis of mutants for all of these failed to show any evidence of migration defects. The chemokine SDF1 and its receptor CXCR4 are also expressed in domains, suggesting a possible role in granule cell migration, but in this case we did observe evidence of a defect in granule cell migration in mice mutant in the receptor. Furthermore, using our slice explant assay, we showed that SDF1 is likely to be acting as a chemoattractant for the migrating neurons.
Chemokines in neuronal migration
The chemokines are a large family of peptide ligands that act through G-protein coupled seven-transmembrane spanning receptors (Gale and McColl, 1999). Most of these factors were discovered and studied most intensively because of their role in regulating the chemotaxis of hematopoetic lineage cells (Gale and McColl, 1999
). There have been a few studies that have implicated specific chemokines in regulating the migration of cells of neural origin (Hesselgesser et al., 1997
; Klein et al., 2001
; Ma et al., 1998
; Zou et al., 1998
). The most frequently studied of these has been SDF1, because of the realization after production of SDF1 mutants and mutants of its only known receptor (CXCR4) that these mice have cerebellar abnormalities, consistent with a migration regulatory role for SDF1 (Ma et al., 1998
; Zou et al., 1998
). In the cerebellum, SDF1 is expressed in the meninges and keeps the dividing cerebellar granule cell precursors in the external granule cell layer (EGL) from leaving the EGL prematurely (Klein et al., 2001
; Lu et al., 2001
; Ma et al., 1998
; Zou et al., 1998
). At the appropriate developmental time, these cells lose their responsiveness to SDF1, leave the EGL and radially migrate through the Purkinje cell layer to the internal granule cell layer (IGL) (Klein et al., 2001
; Lu et al., 2001
; Ma et al., 1998
; Zou et al., 1998
). Thus, in the cerebellum, SDF1 actively prevents cerebellar granule neurons from migrating too early by acting as a chemoattractant, whereas in the hippocampus, SDF1 appears to act as a diffusible cue to attract granule cells to the dentate gyrus. In both cases SDF1 acts molecularly as an attractant but the difference in biological response elicited is regulated by the distribution of SDF1.
It is unclear at this point whether SDF1 is involved in regulating migration in other groups of radially migrating cells. Although SDF1 is expressed in Cajal-Retzius cells in the neocortex (data not shown), its receptor is not expressed at high levels in the ventricular zone in cortical regions outside the hippocampus at the time of active radial migration (data not shown); therefore we do not foresee a major role of SDF1 in regulating radial migration of other cortical neurons. The function of SDF1 in the remainder of the cortex is therefore not yet clear, but CXCR4 does begin to appear in the intermediate zone later in embryogenesis, perhaps indicating a role in other phases of cortical development. It is interesting and perhaps not coincidental that the migration of cerebellar granule cells and dentate granule cells are both regulated by SDF1. Other than their similar morphology these cells have been thought to share certain aspects of their developmental program and have been observed to express some shared markers (Hatten et al., 1997; Yang et al., 1996
). In addition, both cerebellar and dentate granule cells express large amounts of astrotactin, a molecule that plays a contact-dependent regulatory role in radial migration (Zheng et al., 1996
), and both types of granule cells migrate along radial glial fibers that have the unusual feature of early expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein compared to radial glia elsewhere in the cortex (Dahl et al., 1985
; Liu et al., 2000
). Thus, although derived from distinct CNS regions, cerebellar and dentate granule cells may share a number of developmentally important characteristics, including their responsiveness to SDF1.
Recent observations regarding the function of SDF1 in the cerebellum and in leukocyte chemotaxis may also have important implications for future studies of migration in the developing hippocampus. In the cerebellum, despite the continued presence of SDF1 in the meninges adjacent to the EGL, granule cells still migrate radially to the IGL at the appropriate developmental stage. Why do these cells choose to leave a chemoattractive source? Flanagan and colleagues have recently shown that an ephrin ligand-binding protein expressed in migrating cerebellar granule neurons acts to silence CXCR4 signaling (Lu et al., 2001). In addition, signaling via the Slit family of ligands has been shown to regulate responsiveness of leukocytes to SDF1 (Wu et al., 2001
). As Eph receptors, Ephrin ligands, Slits and Slit receptors are all expressed in the developing hippocampus, future studies will focus on whether SDF1-CXCR4 signaling is also modulated by these factors in dentate granule cell migration.
Despite the defect in dentate granule cell migration in the Cxcr4 mutant mice, many Prox1-expressing cells do reach the dentate anlage and form a dentate granule cell layer. Thus, SDF1 may be but one of several directional cues directing granule cell migration. Such cues might include Slits, Ephrins, other chemokines or other positive factors known to regulate radial type migration, such as reelin and integrins. It is also possible that there are multiple pools of granule cells: those that require CXCR4 signaling and others that do not. Future studies will help determine whether there is heterogenity of responses of different dentate cell populations (e.g. the differences between the mitogenic response of precursor cells versus the chemoattractant response of the differentiated neurons), and what other factors collaborate with SDF1 to effect accurate guidance.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Alcantara, S., Ruiz, M., DArcangelo, G., Ezan, F., de Lecea, L., Curran, T., Sotelo, C. and Soriano, E. (1998). Regional and cellular patterns of reelin mRNA expression in the forebrain of the developing and adult mouse. J. Neurosci. 18, 7779-7799.
Altman, J. and Bayer, S. A. (1990a). Migration and distribution of two populations of hippocampal granule cell precursors during the perinatal and postnatal periods. J. Comp. Neurol. 301, 365-381.[Medline]
Altman, J. and Bayer, S. A. (1990b). Mosaic organization of the hippocampal neuroepithelium and the multiple germinal sources of dentate granule cells. J. Comp. Neurol. 301, 325-342.[Medline]
Altman, J. and Das, G. D. (1965a). Autoradiographic and histological evidence of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis in rats. J. Comp. Neurol. 124, 319-335.[Medline]
Altman, J. and Das, G. D. (1965b). Post-natal origin of microneurones in the rat brain. Nature 207, 953-956.[Medline]
Anderson, S. A., Eisenstat, D. D., Shi, L. and Rubenstein, J. L. (1997). Interneuron migration from basal forebrain to neocortex: dependence on Dlx genes. Science 278, 474-476.
Barallobre, M. J., Del Rio, J. A., Alcantara, S., Borrell, V., Aguado, F., Ruiz, M., Carmona, M. A., Martin, M., Fabre, M., Yuste, R. et al. (2000). Aberrant development of hippocampal circuits and altered neural activity in netrin 1-deficient mice. Development 127, 4797-4810.
Barres, B. A. (1999). A new role for glia: generation of neurons! Cell 97, 667-670.[Medline]
Chen, H., Bagri, A., Zupicich, J. A., Zou, Y., Stoeckli, E., Pleasure, S. J., Lowenstein, D. H., Skarnes, W. C., Chedotal, A. and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (2000). Neuropilin-2 regulates the development of selective cranial and sensory nerves and hippocampal mossy fiber projections. Neuron 25, 43-56.[Medline]
Cheng, H. J., Bagri, A., Yaron, A., Stein, E., Pleasure, S. J. and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (2001). Plexin-a3 mediates semaphorin signaling and regulates the development of hippocampal axonal projections. Neuron 32, 249-263.[Medline]
Dahl, D., Crosby, C. J., Sethi, J. S. and Bignami, A. (1985). Glial fibrillary acidic (GFA) protein in vertebrates: immunofluorescence and immunoblotting study with monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. J. Comp. Neurol. 239, 75-88.[Medline]
Eckenhoff, M. F. and Rakic, P. (1984). Radial organization of the hippocampal dentate gyrus: a Golgi, ultrastructural, and immunocytochemical analysis in the developing rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 223, 1-21.[Medline]
Eckenhoff, M. F. and Rakic, P. (1988). Nature and fate of proliferative cells in the hippocampal dentate gyrus during the life span of the rhesus monkey. J. Neurosci. 8, 2729-2747.[Abstract]
Frotscher, M. (1998). Cajal-Retzius cells, Reelin, and the formation of layers. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8, 570-575.[Medline]
Gage, F. H. (2000). Mammalian neural stem cells. Science 287, 1433-1438.
Galceran, J., Miyashita-Lin, E. M., Devaney, E., Rubenstein, J. L. and Grosschedl, R. (2000). Hippocampus development and generation of dentate gyrus granule cells is regulated by LEF1. Development 127, 469-482.
Gale, L. M. and McColl, S. R. (1999). Chemokines: extracellular messengers for all occasions? BioEssays 21, 17-28.[Medline]
Gould, E., Beylin, A., Tanapat, P., Reeves, A. and Shors, T. J. (1999). Learning enhances adult neurogenesis in the hippocampal formation. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 260-265.[Medline]
Grove, E. A., Kirkwood, T. B. and Price, J. (1992). Neuronal precursor cells in the rat hippocampal formation contribute to more than one cytoarchitectonic area. Neuron 8, 217-229.[Medline]
Hartfuss, E., Galli, R., Heins, N. and Gotz, M. (2001). Characterization of CNS precursor subtypes and radial glia. Dev. Biol. 229, 15-30.[Medline]
Hatten, M. E., Alder, J., Zimmerman, K. and Heintz, N. (1997). Genes involved in cerebellar cell specification and differentiation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7, 40-47.[Medline]
Hesselgesser, J., Halks-Miller, M., DelVecchio, V., Peiper, S. C., Hoxie, J., Kolson, D. L., Taub, D. and Horuk, R. (1997). CD4-independent association between HIV-1 gp120 and CXCR4: functional chemokine receptors are expressed in human neurons. Curr. Biol. 7, 112-121.[Medline]
Houser, C. R. (1990). Granule cell dispersion in the dentate gyrus of humans with temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain Res. 535, 195-204.[Medline]
Houser, C. R., Swartz, B. E., Walsh, G. O. and Delgado-Escueta, A. V. (1992). Granule cell disorganization in the dentate gyrus: possible alterations of neuronal migration in human temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. Supplement 9, 41-49.
Kempermann, G., Kuhn, H. G. and Gage, F. H. (1997). More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. Nature 386, 493-495.[Medline]
Klein, R. S., Rubin, J. B., Gibson, H. D., DeHaan, E. N., Alvarez-Hernandez, X., Segal, R. A. and Luster, A. D. (2001). SDF-1 alpha induces chemotaxis and enhances Sonic hedgehog-induced proliferation of cerebellar granule cells. Development 128, 1971-1981.
Leighton, P. A., Mitchell, K. J., Goodrich, L. V., Lu, X., Pinson, K., Scherz, P., Skarnes, W. C. and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (2001). Defining brain wiring patterns and mechanisms through gene trapping in mice. Nature 410, 174-179.[Medline]
Liu, M., Pleasure, S. J., Collins, A. E., Noebels, J. L., Naya, F. J., Tsai, M. J. and Lowenstein, D. H. (2000). Loss of BETA2/NeuroD leads to malformation of the dentate gyrus and epilepsy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 865-870.
Lu, Q., Sun, E. E., Klein, R. S. and Flanagan, J. G. (2001). Ephrin-B reverse signaling is mediated by a novel PDZ-RGS protein and selectively inhibits G protein-coupled chemoattraction. Cell 105, 69-79.[Medline]
Lu, M., Grove, E. A. and Miller, R. J. (2002). Abnormal development of the hippocampal dentate gyrus in mice lacking the CXCR4 chemokine receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7090-7095.
Ma, Q., Jones, D., Borghesani, P. R., Segal, R. A., Nagasawa, T., Kishimoto, T., Bronson, R. T. and Springer, T. A. (1998). Impaired B-lymphopoiesis, myelopoiesis, and derailed cerebellar neuron migration in CXCR4- and SDF-1-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9448-9453.
Malatesta, P., Hartfuss, E. and Gotz, M. (2000). Isolation of radial glial cells by fluorescent-activated cell sorting reveals a neuronal lineage. Development 127, 5253-5263.
Marin, O., Yaron, A., Bagri, A., Tessier-Lavigne, M. and Rubenstein, J. L. (2001). Sorting of striatal and cortical interneurons regulated by semaphorin-neuropilin interactions. Science 293, 872-875.
Miyata, T., Maeda, T. and Lee, J. E. (1999). NeuroD is required for differentiation of the granule cells in the cerebellum and hippocampus. Genes Dev. 13, 1647-1652.
Nguyen Ba-Charvet, K. T., Brose, K., Marillat, V., Kidd, T., Goodman, C. S., Tessier-Lavigne, M., Sotelo, C. and Chédotal, A. (1999). Slit2-Mediated chemorepulsion and collapse of developing forebrain axons. Neuron 22, 463-473.[Medline]
Noctor, S. C., Flint, A. C., Weissman, T. A., Dammerman, R. S. and Kriegstein, A. R. (2001). Neurons derived from radial glial cells establish radial units in neocortex. Nature 409, 714-720.[Medline]
Nowakowski, R. S. and Rakic, P. (1979). The mode of migration of neurons to the hippocampus: a Golgi and electron microscopic analysis in foetal rhesus monkey. J. Neurocytol. 8, 697-718.[Medline]
Nowakowski, R. S. and Rakic, P. (1981). The site of origin and route and rate of migration of neurons to the hippocampal region of the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 196, 129-154.[Medline]
Ory, D. S., Neugeboren, B. A. and Mulligan, R. C. (1996). A stable human-derived packaging cell line for production of high titer retrovirus/vesicular stomatitis virus G pseudotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 11400-11406.
Parnavelas, J. G., Barfield, J. A., Franke, E. and Luskin, M. B. (1991). Separate progenitor cells give rise to pyramidal and nonpyramidal neurons in the rat telencephalon. Cerebral Cortex 1, 463-468.[Abstract]
Parnavelas, J. G. and Nadarajah, B. (2001). Radial glial cells. are they really glia? Neuron 31, 881-884.[Medline]
Pleasure, S. J., Anderson, S., Hevner, R., Bagri, A., Marin, O., Lowenstein, D. H. and Rubenstein, J. L. (2000a). Cell migration from the ganglionic eminences is required for the development of hippocampal GABAergic interneurons. Neuron 28, 727-740.[Medline]
Pleasure, S. J., Collins, A. E. and Lowenstein, D. H. (2000b). Unique expression patterns of cell fate molecules delineate sequential stages of dentate gyrus development. J. Neurosci. 20, 6095-6105.
Powell, E. M., Mars, W. M. and Levitt, P. (2001). Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor is a motogen for interneurons migrating from the ventral to dorsal telencephalon. Neuron 30, 79-89.[Medline]
Rakic, P. (1988). Specification of cerebral cortical areas. Science 241, 170-176.[Medline]
Rakic, P. and Nowakowski, R. S. (1981). The time of origin of neurons in the hippocampal region of the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 196, 99-128.[Medline]
Rickmann, M., Amaral, D. G. and Cowan, W. M. (1987). Organization of radial glial cells during the development of the rat dentate gyrus. J. Comp. Neurol. 264, 449-479.[Medline]
Seri, B., Garcia-Verdugo, J. M., McEwen, B. S. and Alvarez-Buylla, A. (2001). Astrocytes give rise to new neurons in the adult mammalian hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 21, 7153-7160.
Shors, T. J., Miesegaes, G., Beylin, A., Zhao, M., Rydel, T. and Gould, E. (2001). Neurogenesis in the adult is involved in the formation of trace memories. Nature 410, 372-376.[Medline]
Shu, T. and Richards, L. J. (2001). Cortical axon guidance by the glial wedge during the development of the corpus callosum. J. Neurosci. 21, 2749-2758.
Stanfield, B. B. and Cowan, W. M. (1979a). The development of the hippocampus and dentate gyrus in normal and reeler mice. J. Comp. Neurol. 185, 423-459.[Medline]
Stanfield, B. B. and Cowan, W. M. (1979b). The morphology of the hippocampus and dentate gyrus in normal and reeler mice. J. Comp. Neurol. 185, 393-422.[Medline]
Stühmer, T., Anderson, S. A., Ekker, M. and Rubenstein, J. L. (2002). Ectopic expression of the Dlx genes induces glutamic acid decarboxylase and Dlx expression. Development 129, 245-252.
Torii, M., Matsuzaki, F., Osumi, N., Kaibuchi, K., Nakamura, S., Casarosa, S., Guillemot, F. and Nakafuku, M. (1999). Transcription factors Mash-1 and Prox-1 delineate early steps in differentiation of neural stem cells in the developing central nervous system. Development 126, 443-456.
Trommsdorff, M., Gotthardt, M., Hiesberger, T., Shelton, J., Stockinger, W., Nimpf, J., Hammer, R. E., Richardson, J. A. and Herz, J. (1999). Reeler/Disabled-like disruption of neuronal migration in knockout mice lacking the VLDL receptor and ApoE receptor 2. Cell 97, 689-701.[Medline]
Tuttle, R., Nakagawa, Y., Johnson, J. E. and OLeary, D. D. (1999). Defects in thalamocortical axon pathfinding correlate with altered cell domains in Mash-1-deficient mice. Development 126, 1903-1916.
van Praag, H., Kempermann, G. and Gage, F. H. (1999). Running increases cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the adult mouse dentate gyrus. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 266-270.[Medline]
Walsh, C. and Cepko, C. L. (1993). Clonal dispersion in proliferative layers of developing cerebral cortex. Nature 362, 632-635.[Medline]
Wu, J. Y., Feng, L., Park, H. T., Havlioglu, N., Wen, L., Tang, H., Bacon, K. B., Jiang, Z., Zhang, X. and Rao, Y. (2001). The neuronal repellent Slit inhibits leukocyte chemotaxis induced by chemotactic factors. Nature 410, 948-952.[Medline]
Yang, X. W., Zhong, R. and Heintz, N. (1996). Granule cell specification in the developing mouse brain as defined by expression of the zinc finger transcription factor RU49. Development 122, 555-566.
Zheng, C., Heintz, N. and Hatten, M. E. (1996). CNS gene encoding astrotactin, which supports neuronal migration along glial fibers. Science 272, 417-419.[Abstract]
Zou, Y. R., Kottmann, A. H., Kuroda, M., Taniuchi, I. and Littman, D. R. (1998). Function of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in haematopoiesis and in cerebellar development. Nature 393, 595-599.[Medline]