1 Department of Biology, Loyola University of Chicago, 6525 N. Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60626, USA
2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Loyola University of Chicago, 6525 N. Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60626, USA
3 Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
* Present address: Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
Author for correspondence (e-mail: fpicket{at}luc.edu)
Accepted 19 April 2002
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Arabidopsis thaliana, Fate map, Embryogenesis
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Extensive histological characterization of the embryogenesis of the dicotyledenous plant Arabidopsis thaliana has permitted some generalizations to be made regarding early patterns of cell division. The first zygotic cell division is usually asymmetric, creating an apical cell that eventually gives rise to the above ground portion of the shoot and a basal cell that contributes to the formation of the root meristem and the extraembryonic suspensor (Barton and Poethig, 1993; Mansfield and Briarty, 1991
). Mutational analysis and hormone treatment experiments suggest that at this early stage the plant hormone auxin may act to help specify the unique fates of the apical and basal cell (Hamann et al., 1999
). The apical and basal cells bear a number of signs indicating asymmetric fate specification, including different stain affinity in histological sections, and distinct patterns of cell division in daughter cells (Mansfield and Briarty, 1991
; Mansfield et al., 1991
).
The first division of the apical cell is anticlinal, occurring parallel to the long axis of the embryo. Following three mixed anticlinal and periclinal (perpendicular to the long embryonic axis) divisions in the daughters of the apical cells, a 16 cell embryo is produced displaying the first tissue differentiation with the establishment of the presumptive epidermis, the protoderm. Further divisions result in production of a spherical, globular stage embryo. The transition between globular and heart stage embryos results in a switch from radial symmetry to bilateral symmetry as the two cotyledon primordia emerge. As the cotyledons continue organogenesis, the hypocotyl begins to elongate to form the torpedo stage embryo; continuing cell elongation and division eventually causes the embryo to curve and fold over upon itself prior to seed set. Following seed germination the bilaterally symmetric seedling, with two cotyledons located across the shoot apical meristem (SAM) from each other, emerges from the seed coat (Mansfield and Briarty, 1991; Medford et al., 1992
).
Lineage-based approaches can be used to determine if the daughters of early embryonic cells show invariant or variable patterns of contribution to later-arising organs (Christianson, 1986; Dawe and Freeling, 1991
; Steffensen, 1968
; Woodrick et al., 2000
). This report describes a fate mapping experiment with Arabidopsis following the lineage contributions of the daughter cells of the first two embryonic apical cells. A transgene system was used to create genetic chimeras with some cells containing the ß-glucuronidase (GUS) marker gene and other cells in which the marker is removed. Excision of the marker occurs following the induction of Cre recombinase activity by cellular heat shock. A main goal of this study is to gain insight into whether early patterns of cell division predict the potential developmental contributions of apical daughter cells. If embryonic fate axes are specified prior to or during early divisions, it is likely that daughters of the first two apical cells will display stereotypic patterns of contribution to adult organogenesis. The fate map revealed that the physical orientation of the first anticlinal apical cell mitosis predicts the approximate location of the sagittal longitudinal plane (the plane of symmetry across which the two cotyledons reflect each other) in the post-germination seedling. However, lineage restrictions were not seen, suggesting that external cues, or a combination of internal and external cues, orient division planes during early apical mitoses.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Developmental staging of embryos
Expanding siliques were sectioned to establish the time after fertilization that two-apical-cell embryos were present. All embryos scored were F1s derived from LoxAA13 x HCN3-3 crosses. Preliminary studies suggested that siliques collected 2 days after fertilization should contain embryos with two apical cells, thus siliques were collected during this period, fixed, stained, sectioned and examined using light microscopy as previously described (Torres-Ruiz and Jurgens, 1994). After determining that 2-day-old siliques contained embryos of the appropriate stage, the effect of heat shock at this point on later embryogenesis was examined. Siliques containing embryos allowed to develop for 6 days after heat shock and control siliques containing 8-day-old embryos that had never been heat shocked were fixed, sectioned and stained. Light microscopy was used to establish the relative stage of embryonic development in heat shocked and non-shocked seed pods.
Identification of genetic chimeras
Staining to visualize the presence of GUS|GUS+ genetic chimeras was performed on plants grown in axenic culture. Seed were surface sterilized, stratified at 4°C and grown as previously described (Woodrick et al., 2000). Plants with five to seven true leaves were harvested and submerged in a solution containing 1 mg/ml X-glucuronide (DDC Diagnostics Inc.) in 50 mM NaPO4, 0.2% sodium dodecyl sulfate at pH 7.0 and then vacuum infiltrated for 20 minutes (Bossinger and Smyth, 1996
). The vacuum was quickly released and infiltrated plants were incubated in partially vented tubes overnight at 37°C. Plants were removed from incubation and transferred through two rinses of 70% v/v ethanol before final storage in 70% ethanol. Chimeric and non-chimeric plants were counted and individual chimeras were transferred to vials for scoring of GUS-negative (GUS) sector extent. The pattern of sector sharing between leaves and cotyledons was assayed by arranging chimeric plants on the surface of an agar pad (1% w/v agar in water) and individual videocaptures were taken of all plants.
Developmental landmarks and sector assignment
In accordance with current practice in Arabidopsis fate mapping, all clonal plants identified were mapped onto model seedlings with the same phyllotaxy because handedness is thought to be randomly specified (Furner and Pumfrey, 1992; Irish and Sussex, 1992
). For this study clockwise (rightward spiral) phyllotactic handedness was used as a standard, and the identity of cotyledons 1 and 2 (C1 and C2) and true leaves 1 through 4 (L1-L4) were assigned, based on phyllotactic position as previously described (Woodrick et al., 2000
). The left and right side of each leaf is designated with the leaf placed tip up in relation to the viewer and with the adaxial (upper) leaf surface facing the viewer.
The extent of GUS clonal sectors in mature plants was determined by analyzing each half cotyledon and each half leaf for both the cotyledons and for true leaves 1 through 4. Leaves were visually divided down the midline and then scored for the extent of GUS sectors. Thus, any cotyledon or leaf was placed into one of four phenotypic classes; non-sectored, sector limited to the left margin, sector limited to the right margin or GUS throughout. Sectors that crossed the midline of the leaf but failed to include all of the area of the leaf blade were scored as affecting only the half of the blade that was completely GUS. However, the vast majority of GUS|GUS+ sectored leaves had GUS sectors that stopped at or about the midline of the leaf.
Fate distance calculation and multidimensional scaling
Pair-wise developmental distances were calculated by assaying the frequency that GUS sectors were shared between any two left and/or right marginal regions of the twelve marginal regions present in the cotyledons and first four true leaves. A total of 5799 sector sharing events between any two leaf margins were scored in 319 GUS|GUS+ chimeras. Developmental distances were calculated using the following previously derived equation (Furner and Pumfrey, 1992).
| (1) |
Using this equation, different marginal regions that never shared a GUS sector would produce a D value of 100 while those that always shared a GUS sector would produce a D value of 0. Sector distribution within and between organs was scored by indicating if the left and/or right marginal regions were included in the GUS sector. Thus, for example, a sector including the left side of cotyledon 1 is designated as a C1L sector while a sector including the right side of leaf 1 is designated as an L1R sector. A sector-sharing event between these two regions is designated as a C1L-L1R sharing event and is added to this event category. Data for all 319 chimeras were stored in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and spreadsheet cell equations and macros were used to calculate all pair-wise distances.
To identify total similarity between the sets of distances associated with each marginal region, metric multidimensional scaling incorporating prinicipal components analysis (MDS/PCA) was performed (Johnson and Wichern, 1992). A data matrix incorporating the number of sector events for each margin and the number of sector-sharing events between all possible margins was generated. This matrix was then used with the MDS/PCA procedure available in SAS, v8.1 (SAS Institute, Inc.). This analysis reduced the distance matrix into the two primary dimensions (principal components) containing the most variation based on all pair-wise distances. These primary dimensions were determined for each marginal region and plotted to scale. The two primary dimensions identify two axes that provide the nearest simulation (lowest stress model) of the total inter-item proximities seen in the 12 dimensional space occupied by the 12 marginal regions assayed in this study. The lowest stress model displays excellent monotonic goodness of fit with the original data set with stress values ranging from 1.3% to 2.3%.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
GUS sector size distribution
Plants derived from heat-shocked embryos were grown in axenic culture until four to six true leaves were produced and were then stained for GUS activity and assayed for GUS sector size and extent. The extent of any GUS sector was scored independently in six organs, the two cotyledons and the first four true leaves. For each of these organs, each half of the organ was also scored independently. Thus each plant was divided into 12 separate left and right marginal regions, and a GUS sector on an apical chimera could have included between one and 11 organ margins. For the 319 chimeras utilized in this study, GUS sectors were found that affected the entire range of organ margins. However, the most common chimeras had between five and seven GUS organ margins (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). The majority of sectors were entire and adjacent, affecting marginal regions of physically adjacent organs, however clones were also seen in which sectors were non-adjacent and GUS sectors were split by regions of GUS+ tissue. An analysis of the adjacency of sectors in the eight margins found on the cotyledons and first two true leaves indicated that plants with two to six GUS margins consistently produced a minority of individuals with interrupted, non-adjacent GUS sectoring (Fig. 4). In total approximately 14% of plants showed non-adjacent sectoring.
|
|
|
In a separate analysis, multidimensional scaling was performed on a dissimilarity (distance) matrix generated from the sector sharing data to produce a graphical representation of patterns of covariation in distances between marginal regions. This analysis tested the internal consistency of the data set by comparing all pair-wise distances between marginal regions against each other and, based on how commonly different sector patterns were shared, generating new distance values. Multidimensional scaling identified two major axes (principal components) that together account for 93.7% of the variation in the pair-wise distances (Fig. 5). The major dimension (Dimension 1), accounting for 81.4% of variation in the data, separates the margins into two groups associated with each cotyledon. The minor dimension (Dimension 2), accounting for 12.3% of variation in the data, split each cotyledon-associated group of margins in two. Thus, four clusters of margins with highly covarying sets of distances were identified, Cluster 1 including C1L, L1R and L4L, Cluster 2 including C1R, L2L and L4R, Cluster 3 including C2L and L2R and Cluster 4 including C2R, L1L and L3L and R. One other dimension accounting for less than 3% of the variation in the data suggested a pattern of association involving the cotyledon margins (not shown). All other dimensions each accounted for less than 1% of total variation.
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Embryonic apical cell division and a fate axis
The regular pattern of relative cell placement and the highly stereotyped patterns of localized gene expression seen in globular stage and older Arabidopsis embryos has led to the suggestion that these embryos are partitioned into distinct organ and tissue anlage (for a review, see Jurgens, 2001). Although an embryo plan emerges during the globular stage, it is unclear whether this map is dependent on specific cell lineages and patterns of division established earlier in development, or instead is a result of pattern formation arising de novo during the globular stage (Long and Barton, 1998
). If early cells establish lineages that bias the organization of the globular stage fate map, it is likely that genetic chimeras induced during the initiation of the apical region of the embryo would produce daughters that have constrained patterns of contribution to the mature embryo and seedling.
Upon completion of embryogenesis and the germination of seed, the Arabidopsis seedling displays simple orthogonal double mirror symmetry in the longitudinal axis, with one plane of symmetry running down the center of the two cotyledons and the other plane falling between the cotyledons. The first plane has been referred to by other authors as the frontal longitudinal plane and the second as the sagittal longitudinal plane (Long and Barton, 1998). If patterns of early cell division correlate strongly with later globular stage developmental axis specification, it is likely that the plane of cell division producing the first apical cells would tend to establish either the frontal or the sagittal plane of the embryo. Alternatively, if globular stage pattern formation is independent of earlier cell lineages, no correlation should be seen between the establishment of cell lineages at the first apical cell division and later specification of developmental axes.
Using a data set of 319 chimeras generated by sector induction events applied during the one- or two-apical-cell stage, patterns of GUS sector sharing were surveyed and developmental distances were calculated between marginal regions of mature organs. The longest developmental distances in this study are seen when the organ margins under consideration lie across the sagittal longitudinal plane from each other. Comparing pair-wise developmental distances, any distance in which the sagittal longitudinal plane is crossed is large (Table 1) and the distances between the cotyledons were always among the largest seen in the seedling. This pattern indicates that the first apical cell division plane generates two populations of daughter cells with a strong tendency to contribute to portions of the globular embryo lying on one side or the other of the sagittal longitudinal plane. However, GUS clone sharing is seen between all marginal regions of the embryo (Fig. 2). Thus, any influence of the orientation of the first plane of apical cell division on the later partitioning of the embryo must not depend on strict lineage-dependent cell fate specification. This result supports the model that globular stage pattern formation depends on the de novo specification of organ and meristem anlagen. The first cell division appears to orient the first two apical cells such that their daughters tend to be incorporated into either cotyledon one or two and the physically adjacent regions of leaves 1 through 4. Thus, the orientation of the first apical cell division appears to predict the future sagittal plane and to partially constrain fate choices available to daughter cells. However, the relative positional identity of the first apical cells, or the position of the first, anticlinal apical cell wall, is unlikely to be strictly specified by mosaic determinants because sector sharing between organs lying across the sagittal plane from each other does occur.
This conclusion is supported by another fate mapping experiment previously performed in cotton. In contrast to the Arabidopsis embryo, which acquires a dermatogen after eight apical cells are formed, the cotton embryo acquires a dermatogen late in development, when the embryo proper has between 50 and 100 cells in total (Pollock and Jensen, 1964). Thus, a considerable period of cell division intervenes between the first apical cell division and the formation of a globular stage embryo. Semigametic cotton lines produce haplo-diploid and haploid-haploid two-apical-cell chimeras because of a failure of micro and megagametophyte pronuclear fusion in the zygote (Turcotte and Feaster, 1973
). Visible markers associated with this chimerism have been used to construct a cotyledonary fate map (Christianson, 1986
). Interestingly, in this experiment 86% of the recovered chimera sectors included 50% or more of the total organ area, and the largest class of chimeras displayed sectors covering 75% of total organ area. This indicates that most marked cell sectors outgrew their unmarked neighbors, contributing the bulk of cells to the embryo. However the resulting cotyledons produced by these embryos were normally shaped, sized and positioned. The cotton embryonic fate map suggests that dicot embryonic pattern formation events applied to cell populations primarily derived from one apical cell can result in normal embryogenesis. Thus, in both cotton and Arabidopsis, early patterns of cell division may constrain the relative position of daughter cells, influencing their ultimate fate specification, but their cell division lineage is unlikely to contribute directly to that fate determination.
The Organogenic fate map
The inter-marginal developmental distance matrix generated in this study plots the relative size and position of the anlagen for the cotyledons and true leaves 1 through 4. Not surprisingly, the specification events for the cotyledons mapped extremely distantly from each other (Table 1), probably due to their relative positions at distant points on the embryo and due to the fact that the apical cell daughters tend to contribute to half of the embryo. Each cotyledon appears to be much more likely to be completely derived from the daughters of one of the first two apical cells than to recruit cells derived from the daughters of both cells. Thus, developmental distances between these organs reflect both their true, relative positions and biases imposed by patterns and relative orientations of early cell divisions.
The sagittal plane increases the developmental distances between any margins that lie across the plane from each other, even if those margins occupy the same organ, as seen in the relatively large developmental distances seen between the left and right margins of leaf 1 (L1) and leaf 2 (L2) (Table 1). The left and right sides of L1 and L2 map on average twice as far apart as do these margins from adjacent margins of other true leaves and the cotyledons. Since the sagittal plane marks the midline of L1 and L2, it is interesting to note that the large intermarginal distances seen across these organs indicate that they have a strong tendency to draw founder cells from the daughters of both apical cells seen at the two-apical-cell stage. Leaves 3 and 4 arise on either side of the sagittal plane and show close mapping to adjacent regions of older organs, while also mapping distantly from any organ mapping to the other side of the sagittal plane.
An analysis of the covariation of developmental distances generated in this study also highlights the impact of the sagittal plane (Fig. 5). Multidimensional scaling and principal components (MDS/PCA) analysis assessed the covariation of all distances on a margin by margin basis. Thus this analysis demonstrated, for instance, that pair-wise developmental distances including margin C1L and any other margin covary most closely with pair-wise distances including margin L4L and any other margin. These analyses are useful because they address a key assumption of fate maps, that they produce probabilistic representations of the real relative physical positions of fate specification events. Thus, if two fate specification events occur in immediately adjacent regions of the embryo, they should first map closely together, and secondly map similar distances away from the cohort of all other mapped fate positions. The results of MDS analysis shown in the plot are broadly similar to the pattern of fate distances seen in the developmental distance table (Table 1 and Fig. 5), and highlight the strong tendency for organ margins on each side of the sagittal plane to have covarying distances. These analyses show that C1, L1R, L2L and L4 distances covary as do distances including C2, L1L, L2R and L3 marginal regions. On average, GUS sector sharing events within these groups are between 25 and 50% more likely than are sharing events between these groups.
The patterns of covariation in the distance data also may indicate that there is a closer total similarity between the distances generated between L3 and L4 margins and all other margins and distances that include the cotyledonary margins adjacent to L3 and L4. The covariation map suggests that L3 and L4 primordia may be physically more closely associated with adjacent cotyledons than indicated by the developmental distance data alone. Thus, MDS analysis of data derived from biological fate mapping experiments provides an additional approach to identify patterns of association between anlage, through visual inspection of a graphical representation of all transformed distances, than might be noted when fate distances alone are considered.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Barton, M. K. and Poethig, R. S. (1993). Formation of the shoot apical meristem in Arabidopsis thaliana: an analysis of development in the wild type and shoot meristemless mutant. Development 119, 823-831.
Bossinger, G. and Smyth, D. R. (1996). Initiation patterns of flower and floral organ development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 122, 1093-1102.
Christianson, M. L. (1986). Fate map of the organizing shoot apex in Gossypium. Amer. J. Bot. 73, 947-958.
Dawe, R. K. and Freeling, M. (1991). Cell lineage and its consequences in higher plants. Plant J. 1, 3-8.
Furner, I. J. and Pumfrey, J. E. (1992). Cell fate in the shoot apical meristem of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 115, 755-764.
Hamann, T., Mayer, U. and Jurgens, G. (1999). The auxin-insensitive bodenlos mutation affects primary root formation and apical-basal patterning in the Arabidopsis embryo. Development 126, 1387-95.
Irish, V. F. and Sussex, I. M. (1992). A fate map of the Arabidopsis embryonic shoot apical meristem. Development 115, 745-753.
Johnson, R. A. and Wichern, D. W. (1992). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Jurgens, G. (1992). Pattern formation in the flowering plant embryo. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2, 567-570.[Medline]
Jurgens, G. (2001). Apical-basal pattern formation in Arabidopsis embryogenesis. EMBO J. 20, 3609-3616.
Long, J. A. and Barton, M. K. (1998). The development of apical embryonic pattern in Arabidopsis. Development 125, 3027-3035.
Mansfield, S. G. and Briarty, L. G. (1991). Early embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. II. The developing embryo. Can. J. Bot. 69, 461-476.
Mansfield, S. G., Briarty, L. G. and Erni, S. (1991). Early embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. I. The mature embryo sac. Can. J. Bot. 69, 447-460.
Medford, J. I., Behringer, F. J., Callos, J. D. and Feldmann, K. A. (1992). Normal and abnormal development in the Arabidopsis vegetative shoot apex. Plant Cell 4, 631-643.
Poethig, S. and Sussex, I. M. (1985). The cellular parameters of leaf development in tobacco: A clonal analysis. Planta 165, 170-184.
Pollock, E. G. and Jensen, W. A. (1964). Cell development During early embryogenesis in Capsella and Gossypium. Amer. J. Bot. 51, 915-921.
Sieburth, L. E., Drews, G. N. and Meyerowitz, E. M. (1998). Non-autonomy of AGAMOUS function in flower development: use of a Cre/loxP method for mosaic analysis in Arabidopsis. Development 125, 4303-4312.
Steeves, T. A. and Sussex, I. M. (1989). Patterns in plant development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steffensen, D. M. (1968). A reconstruction of cell development in the shoot apex of maize. Amer. J. Bot. 55, 354-369.
Sturtevant, A. H. (1927). The claret mutant type of Drosophila simulans: a study of chromosome elimination and cell-lineage. Z. Wiss. Zool. 135, 323-356.
Szymkowiak, E. J. and Sussex, I. M. (1992). The internal meristem layer (L3) determines floral meristem size and carpel number in tomato periclinal chimeras. Plant Cell 4, 1089-1100.
Takahashi, T. and Komeda, Y. (1989). Characterization of two genes encoding small heat-shock proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet. 219, 365-372.[Medline]
Torres-Ruiz, R. A. and Jurgens, G. (1994). Mutations in the FASS gene uncouple pattern formation and morphogenesis in Arabidopsis development. Development 120, 2967-2978.
Turcotte, E. L. and Feaster, C. V. (1973). The origin of 2N and N sectors of chimeral Pima cotton plants. Crop Sci. 13, 111-112.
Woodrick, R., Martin, P. R., Birman, I. and Pickett, F. B. (2000). The Arabidopsis embryonic shoot fate map. Development 127, 813-820.