1 Division of Developmental Neurobiology, MRC National Institute for Medical
Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK
2 INSERM U.382, Developmental Biology Institute of Marseille (CNRS-INSERM-Univ.
Mediterranee) Marseille, France
3 Stowers Institute for Medical Research, 1000 East 50th Street, Kansas City, MO
64110, USA
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
rek{at}stowers-institute.org)
Accepted 13 August 2003
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Hox genes, Hindbrain, Neurogenesis, Neuronal patterning, Neuronal migration, Gene regulation, Neural development, Segmentation, Mouse
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The segmental structure of the hindbrain is particularly suited for studies
aimed at elucidating the link between AP and DV specification in the CNS. The
hindbrain is transiently divided into a series of lineage restricted and
morphologically distinct repeats, the rhombomeres (r1 to r8), each of which
generates a similar set of neurons (Fraser
et al., 1990; Lumsden and
Keynes, 1989
). However, the number, distribution and
specialisation of these neurons are rhombomere-specific
(Lumsden and Krumlauf, 1996
).
The specific identity of each rhombomere is imposed by the differential
expression of Hox genes (Trainor and
Krumlauf, 2000
). During neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation,
homeobox containing genes (i.e. Phox2b, Isl1), mammalian homologs of
the Drosophila proneural genes, and members of the Notch signalling
pathway are expressed in rhombomere specific longitudinal stripes
(Davenne et al., 1999
;
Kusumi et al., 2001
;
Osumi et al., 1997
;
Pattyn et al., 1997
). By
analogy to the patterns seen in the spinal cord, these longitudinal domains
are believed to prefigure sites of generation and differentiation of defined
neuronal subtypes (Davenne et al.,
1999
; Lumsden and Krumlauf,
1996
; Tanabe and Jessell,
1997
). Together these AP and DV expression patterns in the
hindbrain appear to form a grid of distinct coordinates, onto which is
superimposed the temporally and spatially ordered generation of specific
neuronal subtypes.
Hindbrain motoneuron progenitors are born next to the floorplate and
differentiate in a rhombomere-specific pattern
(Lumsden and Keynes, 1989)
into three functional classes: the somatomotor (sm) neurons, which innervate
muscles of the body; the branchiomotor (bm) neurons, which innervate the
muscles derived from the pharyngeal arches; and the visceromotor (vm) neurons,
which innervate the sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia. Each rhombomere
will generate specific subtype(s) of motoneurons according to its AP level.
Trigeminal (V) motoneurons are derived from r2/r3 and exclusively
differentiate into the bm class. The abducens (VI) motoneurons, which are
derived from r5, are composed exclusively from sm neurons. By contrast, facial
(VII) motoneurons, derived from r4/r5, belong to both the bm and vm classes.
According to their functional subclass, cranial motoneurons migrate to form
nuclei in specific DV positions. In the mouse, motoneurons from r2 migrate
dorsally to contribute to the Vth motor nucleus on the pial surface of the
hindbrain. The abducens motoneurons assemble into nuclei close to their
birthplace on the ventricular side of r5. The bm neurons derived from r4
undergo a complex migration moving caudally and laterally through r5 and r6 to
form the VIIth motor nucleus on the pial side of in the posterior hindbrain
(Auclair et al., 1996
;
Covell and Noden, 1989
;
Garel et al., 2000
;
McKay et al., 1997
;
Studer et al., 1996
).
Mutational analyses of Hox genes involved in the early segmental patterning
of the hindbrain such as kreisler and Krox20 show that these genes
have a profound impact on subsequent neuronal development
(Cordes and Barsh, 1994;
Manzanares et al., 1999
;
Schneider-Maunoury et al.,
1997
). Mutation of Hox genes also leads to later defects in
neuronal patterning. Targeted inactivation of Hoxa1 results in
partial loss of r4 and r5, defects in the development of the facial
motoneurons and in malformations of several cranial nerves
(Carpenter et al., 1993
;
Gavalas et al., 1998
;
Mark et al., 1993
). Loss of
Hoxb1 leads to early changes in the identity of r4 and impairs the
development of facial motoneurons (Gaufo
et al., 2000
; Goddard et al.,
1996
; Studer et al.,
1996
). Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 also synergise in early
patterning of the r4 territory (Gavalas et
al., 1998
; Studer et al.,
1998
) as well as the generation of the r4-derived neural crest
(Di Rocco et al., 2001b
).
Hoxa2 controls the identity to the r4-derived neural crest cells, r2
and r3 patterning and axonal pathfinding of a subset of the trigeminal
motoneurons (Gavalas et al.,
1997
; Gendron-Maguire et al.,
1993
; Rijli et al.,
1993
). Hoxa2 and Hoxb2 have unique and
overlapping roles in controlling neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation in
multiple segments (Davenne et al.,
1999
). Furthermore, in chick, ectopic expression of Hoxb1
and Hoxa2 can confer specific motoneuron identities in the rostral
hindbrain (Bell et al., 1999
;
Jungbluth et al., 1999
).
Although the phenotypes described above demonstrate that Hox genes play a role
in neuronal development, it has not been shown whether they can directly
instruct developing neurons to modify their behaviour, or if their influence
is simply an indirect consequence of their ability to pattern the environment
(Gavalas et al., 1998
;
Helmbacher et al., 1998
;
Manzanares et al., 1999
;
Studer et al., 1996
).
Auto-, cross- and para-regulatory interactions among Hox genes contribute
to the establishment and maintenance of their segmental expression patterns
(Gould et al., 1997;
Maconochie et al., 1997
;
Manzanares et al., 2001
). For
example, regulatory analyses have defined a hierarchy of direct interactions
among the Hoxa1, Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 genes that control their
segmental expression. Initially Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 are
activated in neural tissue by retinoic acid
(Dupé et al., 1997
;
Marshall et al., 1994
;
Studer et al., 1998
). The
subsequent maintenance of Hoxb1 expression in r4 is dependent upon a
highly conserved auto- and cross-regulatory element (r4 ARE)
(Pöpperl et al., 1995
).
First Hoxa1 transactivates Hoxb1 expression by binding to the
Hoxb1 r4 ARE in cooperation with co-factors (Pbx, Sox, Oct)
(Di Rocco et al., 2001a
;
Di Rocco et al., 1997
) and
then Hoxb1 continues to maintain its own expression
(Pöpperl et al., 1995
;
Studer et al., 1998
;
Studer et al., 1996
).
Similarly, the subsequent upregulation of Hoxb2 expression in r4 is
directly mediated by Hoxb1, through binding to an r4specific enhancer
at the 5' of the Hoxb2 locus
(Ferretti et al., 2000
;
Maconochie et al., 1997
). This
regulatory hierarchy provides a mechanism for the synergy between
Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 in patterning the r4 territory and formation
of r4-derived crest (Di Rocco et al.,
2001b
; Gavalas et al.,
1998
; Studer et al.,
1998
; Studer et al.,
1996
).
To understand if this coordinated series of direct regulatory interactions also plays a role in neuronal patterning, we compared neurogenesis, neuronal differentiation and motoneuron migration in hindbrains lacking Hoxa1, Hoxb1 or Hoxb2. Our comparative analysis revealed many similarities in the defects arising during neurogenesis and differentiation in r4 and differences in the relative degrees of severity correlate with their relative position in the hierarchy. Together these observations support the idea that these genes function in common pathways not only during the early phase of segmental patterning, but also in subsequent neuronal differentiation.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Whole-mount in situ hybridisation
The following mouse cDNA templates were used: Hoxb1, Hoxb2, Math3, Phox2b,
Gata2, Isl1, Lhx4, Er81, Met and Cad8. Antisense digoxigenin-labelled
riboprobes were synthesised from linearised templates by the incorporation of
digoxigenin-labelled UTP (Boehringer) using T3, T7 or SP6 polymerase.
Processing of the embryos and hybridisation with 500 ng ml1
of the probe was as previously described
(Gavalas et al., 1998).
TUNEL assay
Embryos fixed in 4% PFA were embedded in 20% (w/v) gelatin and sectioned
using a Leica vibratome at 50 µm. The TUNEL reaction was carried out on the
sections as described (Maden et al.,
1997) and peroxidase staining as described
(Di Rocco et al., 2001b
).
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Expression patterns of Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 between 10.5
and 14.5 dpc
Analysis of Hoxa1, Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 expression patterns
have previously been performed between 7.5 and 10.5 dpc, spanning the stages
when the hindbrain is being segmentally patterned
(Frohman et al., 1990;
Murphy et al., 1989
;
Murphy and Hill, 1991
;
Wilkinson et al., 1989
). To
understand the potential roles that these genes may play during neurogenesis
and neuronal differentiation, we extended this analysis to include later
developmental stages. We focused our attention on Hoxb1 and
Hoxb2, as Hoxa1 is no longer expressed in the hindbrain by
8.5 dpc (Murphy and Hill,
1991
).
The early expression of Hoxb1 was uniform throughout r4, but underwent dynamic changes between 9.5-12.5 dpc. Then expression became upregulated in paired ventral and dorsal longitudinal stripes (Fig. 1A,B). By 11.5 dpc, the ventral r4 domain had further segregated into two separate columns, a narrow one next to the floorplate and a broader column that curved away from the midline (Fig. 1B). By 12.5 dpc, Hoxb1 expression in the hindbrain began to be downregulated and was not detectable at subsequent stages (Fig. 1C and data not shown).
|
Altered patterns of Math3 and Phox2b expression
suggest a defect in the generation of r4 neurons
To analyse Hoxa1, Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 mutants for
neurogenesis defects, we examined the expression of two genes that are
expressed in early neuronal precursors in the hindbrain. The atonal-related
gene Math3 is upregulated in early post-mitotic precursors
(Takebayashi et al., 1997),
and the paired homeobox gene Phox2b is expressed in both
proliferating precursors and post-mitotic neurons
(Dubreuil et al., 2000
;
Pattyn et al., 2000
;
Pattyn et al., 1997
). In the
wild-type hindbrain, Math3 and Phox2b are each expressed in
three longitudinal columns with defined AP positions
(Fig. 2A,E) (see also
Davenne et al., 1999
)).
Although it has not been established whether these columns overlap, we have
termed them the ventral (Vc), medial (Mc) and dorsal (Dc) columns to refer to
their respective DV positions (Fig.
2A, white arrows).
|
In addition to this ventral pattern, expression was also prominent in paired medial (Mc) and dorsal (Dc) columns for both Math3 and Phox2b. While the Mc population for each gene included r2 to r6, the dorsal column extended from r4 caudally, and therefore both columns overlapped in r4, r5 and r6 (Fig. 2A,E,I, black bar). Although Math3 expression in the dorsal column was more clearly visualised at 11.5 dpc than at 10.5 dpc, the Phox2b positive column was prominent at both 10.5 and 11.5 dpc (compare Fig. 2A with 2E,I; and data not shown).
In Hoxb1 mutants, Math3 and Phox2b expression
was downregulated at both 10.5 and 11.5 dpc in the ventral, medial and dorsal
columns of r4 compared with wild-type littermates, and, therefore, the r4
expression pattern now closely resembled that of r2 and r3 (compare
Fig. 2A with 2B, 2E with 2F, and 2I with
2J). These altered expression patterns support the notion that the
earlier homeotic transformation of r4 into r2 persists into the period of
neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation
(Studer et al., 1996).
Neurogenesis appeared less severely affected in Hoxb2 compared
with Hoxb1 mutants. Although Math3 and Phox2b
expression was reduced in the ventral r4 domain at 10.5 dpc when compared with
wild-type r4, it nevertheless remained stronger than in the neighbouring r3
and r5 domains (Fig. 2C) (see
Davenne et al., 1999). By 11.5
dpc, the reduction of Math3 expression in r4 had become more evident
(Fig. 2G and data not shown).
While Math3 expression was reduced throughout the ventral r4 domain
in 2/7 mutants (Fig. 2G), in
3/7 mutants upregulation was restricted to the posterior half of r4, and no
Math3 up-regulation at all could be detected in ventral r4 in 2/7
Hoxb2 mutants (data not shown). The dorsal and medial columns had
also receded caudally, as seen in Hoxb1 mutants at that stage. The
observation that neurogenesis defects in Hoxb2 mutants were generally
milder than in Hoxb1 mutants and more prominent at later stages
raised the possibility that only later-born neurons were affected (see
below).
In Hoxa1 mutants, the r4 domain is compressed to a very narrow
stripe of cells (del Toro et al.,
2001) and r5 is reduced and incorporated in r6
(Dollé et al., 1993
;
Mark et al., 1993
) to form a
territory termed here rx (Fig.
2D,H,L). Accordingly, the r4-specific upregulation of
Math3 and Phox2b expression is lost in Hoxa1
mutants (Fig. 2D,H,L; white
arrowheads), and the medial and dorsal columns were shortened along the AP
axis, so that they now overlapped by only one rhombomere rather than three
rhombomeres width, as normally seen (compare
Fig. 2A with 2D and 2E with
2H). Thus, the initial segmental patterning defects of
Hoxa1 mutants are paralleled by corresponding defects in subsequent
neurogenesis patterns.
In summary, loss of Hoxb1, Hoxb2 or Hoxa1 impaired hindbrain neurogenesis in areas where their regulatory interactions have previously been shown to regulate segmental patterning. The region most severely affected was ventral r4, where motoneurons are formed, consistent with the observation that facial nerve development is disrupted in these mutants.
Patterns of GATA2 expression suggest defects in the
formation of r4 efferent neurons
Specification of r4 efferent neurons depends upon the presence of the
zinc-finger transcription factor Gata3. In turn, Gata3
expression in r4 is controlled by Gata2, a transcription factor of
the same family that is expressed in ventral r4 between 8.5 and 10.5 dpc. The
ventral-most expression domain of Gata2 in r4 corresponds to the
efferent motoneurons in this territory
(Pata et al., 1999;
Varela-Echavarria et al.,
1996
). Expression of Gata2 in ventral r4 depends upon
Hoxb1 (Nardelli et al.,
1999
; Pata et al.,
1999
) and accordingly, was completely lost in Hoxb1
mutants (Fig. 2N)
(Pata et al., 1999
) and
reduced in Hoxb2 mutants (Fig.
2O). The ventral-most domain of Gata2 expression was
strongly reduced, but not abolished in Hoxa1 mutants
(Fig. 2P). By contrast, the
dorsal domain of Gata2 expression, which corresponds to V2
interneurons (Ericson et al.,
1997
; Zhou et al.,
2000
), was not affected in any of the mutants.
(Fig. 2N-P). These phenotypes
are consistent with the idea that in Hoxb1 mutants there is a more
complete transformation of an r4 to r2 identity than in Hoxb2
mutants, and that in Hoxa1 mutants the r4 territory is reduced, but
not lost.
Defects in hindbrain motoneuron migration in Hoxa1, Hoxb1 and Hoxb2
mutants between 10.5 and 12.5 dpc
To begin to understand how the observed changes in neurogenesis patterns
impacted on subsequent development of hindbrain neurons, we decided to follow
the migration patterns of postmitotic cranial motoneurons in our Hox mutants.
All postmitotic motoneurons in the hindbrain and the spinal cord are
characterised by the early expression of the LIM homeodomain protein Isl1
(Ericson et al., 1992;
Karlsson et al., 1990
;
Tsuchida et al., 1994
). In
wild-type hindbrains motoneuron differentiation was initiated at 10.5 dpc in
all rhombomeres, with elevated levels in r2 and r4
(Fig. 3A). Interestingly, at
this stage the difference in Isl1 expression levels between r4 and r2
appeared smaller than the difference observed in Phox2b and
Math3 expression levels between the two rhombomeres (compare
Fig. 2A,I with
Fig. 3A). This suggests that at
this stage not all committed Math3+ r4 motoneurons have fully
differentiated into postmitotic Isl1+ motoneurons. At 10.75 dpc
(Fig. 3B), prospective
trigeminal motoneurons began to migrate dorsally and half a day later they
started coalescing to form the trigeminal motor nucleus
(Fig. 3C) next to the exit
point of the trigeminal nerve. Migration of the trigeminal motoneurons
appeared to be complete by 11.5 dpc (Fig.
3D). In contrast to the trigeminal motoneurons, facial motoneurons
began their caudal migration at 11.25 dpc
(Fig. 3C). Subsequently, they
followed a curved path around the prospective abducens motor nucleus into a
medial position of the pial side of the r6 territory where they form the
facial motor nucleus (Fig.
3D,E,I,M) (Auclair et al.,
1996
; Studer et al.,
1996
). We initiated the analysis of motoneuron migration in our
Hox mutants at 11.25 dpc, a time when most trigeminal motoneurons have
completed their dorsal migration, but r4 motoneurons are migrating
caudally.
|
The dorsally migrating motoneurons detected in all three mutants appear to
form an ectopic motor nucleus, first identified in the Hoxb1 mutants
at a position anterior to the normal facial motor nucleus
(Goddard et al., 1996;
Studer et al., 1996
).
Accordingly, we extended the analysis of Isl1 expression to later
stages of hindbrain development. At 12.5 dpc, r4 motoneurons migrated from the
ventricular aspect of ventral r4 and r5 to a medial position at the pial side
of r6 (Fig. 3I,M) to form the
facial motor nucleus (Altman and Bayer,
1982
; Auclair et al.,
1996
). During their migration, they assumed a caudal course with a
dorsolateral deviation travelling in a loop around the sixth motor nucleus
(Altman and Bayer, 1982
;
Auclair et al., 1996
;
Goddard et al., 1996
;
Studer et al., 1996
).
Accordingly, at this stage the abducens motor nucleus is not distinguishable
in whole mounts as the facial motoneurons migrate over the same area.
At 12.5 dpc only a few caudally migrating r4 motoneurons, which had not
reached the pial side of the hindbrain, were seen in Hoxa1 mutants
(compare Fig. 3J,N). Their
course of migration was shortened due to the overall reduction of the caudal
hindbrain length in these mutants (Mark et
al., 1993). Small ectopic nuclei were also detected
(Fig. 3N), suggesting that the
laterally migrating motoneurons detected earlier had indeed assumed a
trigeminal-like behaviour. They were positioned between the trigeminal nuclei
and the area where facial motor nuclei normally resided (compare
Fig. 3N with 3M). Their AP
position was variable between different embryos and even between the left and
right side of the same embryo (Fig.
3N). Despite the low number of the r4-derived motoneurons the
abducens motor nucleus could not be detected (see also below), and this is in
accordance with the observation that the r5 territory is nearly eliminated in
these mutants (Dollé et al.,
1993
; Mark et al.,
1993
). No r4-derived motoneurons were observed in the ventricular
area of Hoxb1 mutants at 12.5 dpc, while r5-derived abducens
motoneurons were now clearly visible (Fig.
3K,O). In these mutants, no facial motor nuclei were formed in the
appropriate site (compare Fig. 3O with
3M). Instead, ectopic nuclei were observed in more anterior
positions (Fig. 3O) (see
Studer et al., 1996
)). In
Hoxb1 mutants, ectopic nuclei invariably resided in an area about
half way between the normal positions of the trigeminal and facial motor
nuclei. They were larger than the Hoxa1 ectopic nuclei but remained
smaller than the trigeminal nuclei. In all but one of six cases examined,
Hoxb2 mutants formed correctly positioned facial motor nuclei
(Fig. 3L,P and data not shown).
However, the number of caudally migrating pool of facial motoneurons was
variable and reduced in most cases (compare
Fig. 3I,O with 3L,P).
Hoxb2 mutants showed variability with respect to the number and
position of ectopic nuclei, which always resided between the trigeminal and
facial nuclei. Importantly, there was an inverse correlation between the size
of the normally positioned facial nuclei and the number/size of the ectopic
nuclei (compare Fig. 3Q-T).
These results revealed a striking commonality of phenotypes among the three mutants examined. Motoneurons derived from the r4 of Hoxb1 mutants appear to be misspecified and follow an r2 migratory pathway. By contrast, in Hoxa1 and Hoxb2 mutants r4 derived motoneurons display both trigeminal and facial migratory behaviours, suggesting there are mixed identities or a partial transformation. In all mutants, ectopic motoneurons migrated dorsally to the r4/r5-derived vm neurons, suggesting that they retained a bm neuron identity.
Hoxb1 requires Hoxb2 for complete specification of facial motoneuron
identity
Facial motoneurons depend upon Hoxb1 for correct specification.
The presence of two migratory populations in Hoxb2 mutants could be
explained by two alternative possibilities. Either cumulative levels of
Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 activity may be necessary in all cells for
robust specification of fbm fate or, alternatively, Hoxb2 may be
necessary to specify a subset of facial motoneurons. In the first case,
molecular markers of fbms would be similarly affected, whereas in the second
case they would be differentially affected. To address this issue we used
riboprobes for Lhx4 and Er81, which are expressed during the
late phase of facial motor nucleus development. Lhx4, a LIM
homeobox-containing transcription factor, has been implicated in assigning
motoneuron subtype identities in the spinal cord
(Sharma et al., 1998), whereas
Er81, an Ets transcription factor, has been implicated in the
formation of functional circuits between proprioceptive afferent neurons and
motoneurons of the spinal cord (Arber et
al., 2000
).
At 14.5 dpc Lhx4 was expressed in the trigeminal as well as the superior salivatory motor nucleus and the forming facial motor nucleus (Fig. 4A). By contrast, Er81 was expressed in the facial motor nucleus (Fig. 4C). We examined the expression of these transcription factors in Hoxb2 mutant embryos in order to determine whether any of the populations they mark was specifically affected. Expression of both markers was reduced in the forming facial motor nucleus, suggesting that the reduction of the nucleus was not due to preferential loss of a specific subpopulation (Fig. 4B,D). Lhx4 (Fig. 4B), but not Er81 (Fig. 4D), was expressed in the ectopic motoneurons. The position of the Lhx4+ ectopic cells is similar to that of the Isl1+ ectopic cells, and this is consistent with the idea that these motoneurons have acquired a trigeminal identity. Therefore, Hoxb2 does not specify a subset of fbms, but rather the total dose of Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 activity is important for full fbm specification.
|
All bm and vm neurons in the hindbrain express Phox2b at 10.5 dpc (Pattyn et al., 1997b) (Fig. 3A). At 12.5 dpc Phox2b expression persists only in trigeminal and facial motoneurons (Fig. 5A,D). To determine whether ectopic nuclei retained features of either of these neurons, we examined the expression of Phox2b in Hoxb1 (Fig. 5B,E) and Hoxb2 (Fig. 5C,F) mutants. In both mutants Phox2b expression was retained in the ectopic motoneurons, suggesting that they had either a trigeminal or facial-like identity. The presence of laterally located neurons expressing Phox2b at that stage precluded an unambiguous analysis in the Hoxa1 mutants in which the length of the hindbrain, and thus that of the Phox2b+ neuron-free area, is reduced.
|
|
To further examine the identity of the ectopic nuclei, we analysed
expression of cadherin 8 (Cad8) (Korematsu
and Redies, 1997), a member of the Ca2+ dependent
surface adhesion molecules (Takeichi et
al., 1997
). The mouse Cad8 is expressed in the facial,
but not the trigeminal motor nucleus from 12.5 dpc into postnatal life
(Korematsu and Redies, 1997
).
In wild-type hindbrains, Cad8 is expressed in the r1, r2 and r3
territories in a broad ventral stripe and in the facial motor nucleus
(Fig. 6C,F). At 12.5 dpc there
is also a narrow, longitudinal stripe of expression next to the floorplate in
r1 and r2 but not r3 (Fig. 6C).
At 13.5 dpc, this stripe extended into the r3 territory
(Fig. 6F).
Only a rudimentary facial motor nucleus could be detected in some Hoxa1 mutants at 13.5 dpc and none could be detected in Hoxb1 mutants at either 12.5 or 13.5 dpc. In contrast to the Isl1 expression analysis, the Cad8 probe did not label the r4-derived ectopic nuclei in either Hoxa1 or Hoxb1 mutants (Fig. 6D,G,E,H), supporting the idea that they lacked facial identity. The early caudal expansion of the r3 territory in Hoxa1 mutants was also detected at these stages by means of Cad8 expression (compare Fig. 6D with 6C, and 6G with 6F). The extent of the expansion was variable and not always the same on the left and right sides of the same embryo (compare Fig. 6D with 6C, and 6G with 6F), in accordance with similar observations at earlier stages. In Hoxb1 mutants, Cad8 expression was normal in r1-r3, but upregulated in r4 at 12.5 dpc, resembling the r1/r2 expression pattern (compare Fig. 6E with 6C).
Taken together, these observations suggest that patterning defects in the r3-r5 territories persist well into the phase of neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation. As a direct consequence, r4 and r4-derived motoneurons, which migrate ectopically, have adopted an r2 and trigeminal-like identity, respectively.
Ectopic motor nuclei are lost by 14.5 dpc through cell death
Given that in these mutants there is no corresponding transformation of
their innervation targets, namely the second arch
(Goddard et al., 1996;
Studer et al., 1996
), we
wondered whether this mismatch would eventually lead to apoptotic cell death
of these neurons because of lack of proper trophic support. To analyse whether
the ectopic motoneurons were cleared by cell death, we performed TUNEL assays
at 12.5 dpc on hindbrain sections of wild-type and Hoxb1 mutant
embryos, which displayed the most prominent r4-derived ectopic nuclei. Ectopic
cell death was detected in Hoxb1 mutants at positions corresponding
to the AP level of ectopic motoneurons (compare
Fig. 7A with 7B). We then
analysed the fate of motoneurons at later stages in wild-type and mutant
embryos by Isl1 expression analysis.
|
In Hoxa1 mutants no ectopic nuclei were observed at these stages;
however, a rudimentary facial motor nucleus of variable size was retained in
most, but not all cases (Fig.
7D,H). This observation could explain disagreements among earlier
reports on the presence or lack of the facial nucleus in these mutants
(Carpenter et al., 1993;
Mark et al., 1993
). In both
Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 mutants, the ectopic nuclei were still
detectable at 13.5 dpc, but not at 14.5 dpc (compare
Fig. 7E,F with 7I,J,
respectively). In agreement with the Isl1 expression at earlier
stages, the facial motor nucleus was absent in Hoxb1 mutants, but
present, albeit variably reduced, in all Hoxb2 mutants examined. The
abducens motor nucleus (VIm) was present in Hoxb1 and Hoxb2
mutants (compare Fig. 7E,I and 7F,J with
the wild type in 7C,G). This nucleus could not be detected in
Hoxa1 mutants, and was consistent with the loss of r5 in these
mutants (7D,H).
Taken together, these results suggest that Isl1+ ectopic nuclei are not retained to any significant extent beyond 13.5 dpc in any of the mutants examined. This is in agreement with the idea that due to their switch in identity, they are unable to respond to trophic support from their innervation targets in the second arch and die by apoptosis. We therefore decided to investigate whether a block in the apoptotic pathway could extend the presence of these nuclei in the hindbrain.
The presence of the ectopic nuclei can be extended by a block in the
apoptotic pathway
Bax, a member of the Bcl2 family, is necessary for the programmed cell
death of many neurons. Facial motoneurons in Bax knockout mice show
increased numbers at birth and sympathetic neurons from these mice can survive
for long periods in culture without trophic support. Thus, this mutation
blocks the apoptotic pathway induced from lack of trophic support
(Deckwerth et al., 1998). To
test whether it was possible to extend the survival of the ectopic motoneurons
we crossed this mutation (Deckwerth et
al., 1998
) into the Hoxb1 mutant genetic background.
Loss of Bax function extended the survival of ectopic motor nuclei in the hindbrains of Hoxb1 mutants to 14.5 dpc (compare Fig. 8C with 8D). Interestingly, we also found excess numbers of motoneurons in the ventral domain of the caudal hindbrain of Bax-null mutants between 12.5 and 14.5 dpc (compare Fig. 8A with 8C and data not shown). Their ventral position indicated that they were specified as sm neurons and therefore did not contribute to the IX and X/XI motor nerves, which are mixed branchiomotor and visceromotor nerves.
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Common roles for Hoxb1 and Hoxb2
Rhombomeric and neuronal patterning defects were milder in the
Hoxb2 mutants, compared with Hoxb1/
embryos. Furthermore, there were no r4-derived phenotypes in Hoxb2
mutants that were not detected in Hoxb1 mutants. This is consistent
with Hoxb2 being a direct transcriptional target of Hoxb1
(Maconochie et al., 1997) and
raises a number of possibilities concerning the precise regulatory and
functional relationships between Hoxb1 and Hoxb2. Hoxb2 may
act synergistically with Hoxb1 by regulating either distinct target
genes or a set of common target genes in r4, so that their combined activities
are required for the normal differentiation of r4-derived motoneurons. An
alternative mechanism whereby Hoxb2 may synergise with Hoxb1
would be through a role for Hoxb2 in maintaining Hoxb1
expression.
To begin to distinguish between these possibilities, we monitored the r4
status in the Hoxb2 mutants by assaying Hoxb1 expression and
the expression of a the r4-specific transgene (HL5/lacz), which is
known to be a direct target of Hoxb1
(Marshall et al., 1994;
Popperl et al., 1995
).
Endogenous Hoxb1 expression (Fig.
9A-F) and staining for the HL5/lacZ transgene
(Fig. 9G-O) are initiated in
the r4 of Hoxb2 mutants (Fig.
3B) but are not maintained at appropriate levels in later stages.
This demonstrates a direct or indirect requirement for Hoxb2 in maintaining
Hoxb1 expression in r4 (Fig.
9P). The observation that Hoxb1 expression is initiated
normally in Hoxb2 mutants, but is not maintained properly could
explain the mixed behaviour of facial motoneurons. Those r4 motoneuron
progenitors that retain sufficient Hoxb1 activity adopt a normal fbm
identity, while the rest adopt trigeminal motoneuron characteristics. We
favour the idea that the effect of Hoxb2 on Hoxb1 expression
is most probably indirect, through regulation of general aspects of r4
identity. Hoxb2 cannot bind the Hoxb1 r4 regulatory element in vitro,
although it is possible that Hoxb2 may bind to an as yet unidentified
Hoxb1 r4 regulatory element. In vivo, ectopic expression of
Hoxb2 does not ectopically activate Hoxb1, whereas
Hoxb1 does transactivate Hoxb2
(Maconochie et al., 1997
).
|
To understand the fate of these motoneurons, we followed their migratory
behaviour by monitoring Isl1 expression
(Ericson et al., 1997;
Osumi et al., 1997
) at
different stages in all three mutants examined. The migratory pattern and
final location of this population resembled that of r2-derived motoneurons.
The size of the ectopic nucleus and the loss or reduction of the correctly
migrating fbm population varied among the mutants in a manner that resembled
an allelic series. The Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 phenotypes could be
explained by a strong or weak transformation, respectively, of r4 into r2. The
Hoxa1 phenotype was consistent with a partial transformation of r4
into r2 and concurrent loss of cell sorting at the r4/r3 interface.
Presumptive r4 cells that failed to activate Hoxb1 were specified as
r2-like cells and intermingled with r3 cells
(Helmbacher et al., 1998
).
This is consistent with the presence of cells with an r2 identity in this
region (del Toro et al., 2001
;
Helmbacher et al., 1998
).
Therefore, the trigeminal-like ectopic nuclei observed in the Hoxa1
mutants (Mark et al., 1993
)
(this study) appeared to be the progeny of misspecified presumptive r4 cells.
Intermixing at the r3/r4 interface may lead to patterning defects in a subset
of r3. This could explain the presence of ectopic motoneurons projecting via
the trigeminal motor root in the brainstem of
Hoxa1/ pups
(del Toro et al., 2001
).
Cells of presumptive r4 able to activate Hoxb1 give rise to the
correctly migrating fbms in Hoxa1 mutants. Consistent with this, we
found a severely reduced facial motor nucleus in some but not all
Hoxa1 mutant embryos. Therefore, the Hoxa1 r4 motoneuron
phenotype is fundamentally similar to that of Hoxb1 mutants, with the
exception of a subset of r4 cells that are properly specified because of later
activation of Hoxb1 expression. These observations are consistent
with a strong, but not absolute, requirement of Hoxa1 for the
activation of Hoxb1 (Studer et
al., 1996).
Transformation and changes in neuronal differentiation
The migratory patterns of the presumptive fbms in all three mutants
suggested a transformation of their territory of origin (r4) towards an r2
identity. To further investigate the extent of this transformation we analysed
patterns of neurogenesis and neural differentiation in these mutants and the
results are summarized in Fig.
10. The r4 territory in the Hoxb1 mutants assumed aspects
of an r2 identity from an early stage in development
(Studer et al., 1996). This
altered specification persisted in later stages, as expression of both
Phox2b and Math3 followed an r2-like pattern along the full
DV extent of the rhombomere. Furthermore, using Gata2
(Nardelli et al., 1999
;
Pata et al., 1999
) as a marker
for the whole complement of r4 efferent motoneurons, we found that expression
was reduced in ventral r4 and resembled that in the r2 territory. The
presumptive r4 territory in the Hoxb1 mutants may have retained some
aspects of r4 identity since expression of Epha2, an early marker of
this territory, is not lost (Studer et
al., 1998
) and expression of Hoxb2 is downregulated but
not abolished (Maconochie et al.,
1997
). Therefore, some neuronal progenitors may still be born
following an r4-specific program, but loss of Hoxb1 may result in
their early removal by cell death as observed
(Gaufo et al., 2000
). The
reduction of the superior salivatory nucleus, that is primarily derived from
r5 (Jacob and Guthrie, 2000
;
McKay et al., 1997
), in
Hoxb1 mutants is consistent with early patterning defects found in
the r5 territory of these mutants. Signals derived from r4 may be necessary
for correct patterning of this and other rhombomeres
(Maves et al., 2002
;
Studer et al., 1996
;
Walshe et al., 2002
).
|
Molecular analysis confirmed that the initial changes in segmental identity
persisted at later stages in hindbrain development. Ectopic motor nuclei in
both Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 mutants retained expression of
Phox2b, suggesting that they were specified as branchiomotoneurons.
Similarly, the loss of Cad8 expression, which is characteristic of
fbms at their final position (Garel et
al., 2000; Korematsu and
Redies, 1997
), and ectopic expression of the tyrosine kinase
receptor Met (Caton et al.,
2000
) were consistent with an r4 to r2 transformation. Ectopic
expression of Cad8 in the ventral r4 territory of the Hoxb1
mutants in an r2-specific pattern suggested that both cell-autonomous (see
above) as well as non cell-autonomous defects may contribute in the
misspecification of the r4-derived motoneurons. The caudal extension of
Cad8 expression was smaller in Hoxa1 mutants, in agreement
with a partial transformation of r4 into r2.
The Hoxb2 motoneuron phenotype represented a milder version of the Hoxb1 phenotype, as only a subpopulation of the presumptive fbms assumed migration and gene expression patterns corresponding to a trigeminal-like identity. Expression of Lhx4 and Er81 support the idea that the ectopic motoneurons have undergone an r4 to r2 change in identity. Their expression was similarly affected in the correctly specified fbms, suggesting a general, late Hoxb2 requirement for fbm specification. This implies that loss of Hoxb2 might reduce the total level of Hoxb activity to threshold levels resulting in a variable phenotype due to the stochastic variation of gene expression. This situation would not affect specific fbm subpopulation(s).
The migratory behaviour of r4 motoneurons and molecular analysis strongly
suggested an r4 to r2 transformation of this territory in the mutants
examined. How can we account for the anterior change in r4 identity in these
Hox mutants? Hoxa2 is the most likely candidate for mediating this
transformation. Its ectopic expression can induce the generation of trigeminal
motoneurons (Bell et al., 1999)
and it is still expressed in presumptive r4 in the absence of Hoxb1
expression (Di Rocco et al.,
2001b
). Therefore, in the absence of Hoxb1 and the
subsequent lack of Hoxb2 upregulation, Hoxa2 is the only
gene expressed at a high level in presumptive r4, leading to
transformation.
Loss of ectopic misspecified motoneurons by programmed cell
death
The ectopic motoneuron population in the Hoxb1 mutants can be
readily detected by the Isl1 riboprobe as a robust population until
12.5 dpc. Its size was rapidly reduced thereafter and became undetectable by
14.5 dpc. The detection of ectopic cell death in the same region suggested
that this population was eliminated by cell death. Accordingly, by genetically
blocking the apoptosis pathway through crossing Hoxb1 mutants into a
Bax/ background
(Deckwerth et al., 1998) we
extended the survival of this ectopic population. Programmed cell death is
used extensively to sculpt the central nervous system
(deLapeyriere and Henderson,
1997
; Pettmann and Henderson,
1998
). Its role in the hindbrain is underscored by the persistence
of ectopic motoneurons in the r6 to r7/r8 region in the Bax mutant
background. The higher than normal levels of cell death detected during early
r4 development in the Hoxb1 mutants
(Gaufo et al., 2000
) could
reflect normal patterns of cell death consistent with the transformation of
that segment into an r2 identity.
The re-specified motoneurons in r4 of the Hoxb1 mutants still
projected their axons exclusively to the second arch (A.G. and R.K.,
unpublished). Therefore, their respecification towards an r2 identity is not
sufficient to change the pathfinding of their axonal projections. This is
consistent with the finding that heterotopically transplanted trigeminal bms
in the chick were unable to pathfind correctly to the first branchial arch and
projected inappropriately to the second arch
(Jacob and Guthrie, 2000).
Consequently, as the regional identity of the second pharyngeal arch has not
changed in Hoxb1 mutants, the motoneurons generated in r4, which
possess an r2 identity, innervate what they perceive as inappropriate muscle
targets (Goddard et al., 1996
;
Studer et al., 1996
). It will
be interesting to determine whether these motoneurons would be rescued in a
Hoxa2 mutant genetic background where the second arch has assumed a
first arch identity (Gendron-Maguire et
al., 1993
; Rijli et al.,
1993
).
As target-derived neurotrophic factors play an essential role in regulating
motor and sensory neuron survival
(deLapeyriere and Henderson,
1997; Oppenheim,
1996
), it is very likely that the demise of the ectopic
motoneurons in the Hoxb1 mutants was due to the lack of neurotropic
support. Mice lacking cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) form fbms that
do not migrate out of r4 or even laterally within r4
(Ohshima et al., 2002
). In
these Cdk5 mutant mice, the motoneurons have the correct r4 identity,
and they remain in r4 like the motoneurons in Hoxb1 mutants
(Ohshima et al., 2002
). In
both Cdk5 and Hoxb1 mutants, axons project into the second
pharyngeal arch, but unlike Hoxb1 mutants the fbms in the
Cdk5 mutants survive to birth when the mice die. This illustrates
that staying in the r4 territory is not a problem for motoneuron survival and
implies that the reason for the programmed cell death of the ectopic
motoneurons in Hoxb1 mutants is a mismatch between motoneuron and
target tissue identity.
Effectors of Hox genes in neurogenesis and neuronal
specification
The results presented here demonstrated a variable r4 to r2 transformation,
in the mutants examined, which persists at late stages of hindbrain
neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation. Hox expression patterns and
therefore the AP identity of neuronal progenitors have a direct bearing on the
expression patterns of transcription factors such as Pax6, Nkx2.2 and
Phox2b that are involved in the specification of neuronal subtypes
(Davenne et al., 1999;
Gaufo et al., 2000
) (this
study). The hindbrain and the spinal cord are patterned along their DV axis by
the action of signalling centres that reside at the roof plate, the notochord
and the floor plate (Jessell,
2000
; Lee and Jessell,
1999
; Liem et al.,
1997
). Retinoic acid has been also implicated in the specification
of a late-born subset of motoneurons
(Pierani et al., 1999
).
However, there is no evidence for variable activity of these centers that
could explain AP specific patterns of neurogenesis and neuronal
differentiation. Therefore, the Hox-based system of AP specification is a
plausible candidate for imparting AP specific patterns of neurogenesis and
neuronal differentiation.
Hox genes could influence the decisions made by neural progenitors cells in
several ways. The late columnar expression of Hox genes
(Davenne et al., 1999;
Gaufo et al., 2000
;
Graham et al., 1991
) (this
study) implies a direct role for subsets of Hox genes in the specification of
particular subsets of neuronal progenitors. Hox proteins could be modulating
the response of neuronal precursors to neural tube patterning signals by
regulating the expression of all or some of the components of the
corresponding signal transduction machinery. They may also be directly
modulating the transcription rate of genes involved in neurogenesis and
neuronal specification. Phox2b could be such a target as it is
necessary for the generation of all bm and vm neurons in the hindbrain
(Pattyn et al., 2000
) and it
is clearly downregulated in the r4 of both Hoxb1 and Hoxb2
mutants. It has also been shown that Phox2b positively regulates exit
from the cell cycle (Dubreuil et al.,
2000
) and therefore this may provide an indirect venue for Hox
genes to influence the exit from the cell cycle. In both Hoxb1 and
Hoxb2 mutants, the generation of neuronal precursors has been
reduced, as suggested by the Math3 downregulation, and this could
also be due to effects on cell cycle regulation.
Motoneuron specification defects are manifested in the mutants examined
here, by incorrect migratory routes and inappropriate expression of molecular
markers. The onset of caudal migration of the fbms is affected in these
mutants, possibly through the incorrect expression of cell-surface receptors
that may guide the migration of these cells
(Bloch-Gallego et al., 1999;
Brose and Tessier-Lavigne,
2000
; Jessen et al.,
2002
). Presumably, the subsequent crosstalk between caudally
migrating facial bm neurons and their environment could correctly determine
further steps along their differentiation pathway
(Garel et al., 2000
;
Studer, 2001
) without the
direct involvement of either Hoxb1 or Hoxb2. However, these
migratory properties are not enough to determine facial identity as opposed to
trigeminal identity as caudal migration in the chick does not occur to the
same extent (Bell et al., 1999
;
Jacob and Guthrie, 2000
;
Jacob et al., 2000
).
In summary, this study has revealed the important roles that the regulatory cascade involving Hoxa1, Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 plays in governing processes such as neurogenesis, migratory behaviour and specification in r4 of the developing hindbrain. This work highlights both unique and common functions of these genes. It is unlikely that they exert their activity in r4 by controlling a single downstream effector; therefore, they most likely have common regulatory input into multiple aspects of the decisions that pattern neuronal cells. Delineating these inputs and their effectors will be an important challenge for the future.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
Present address: MRC Center for Developmental Neurobiology, 4th Floor New
Hunt's House, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK
Present address: Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London,
Bath Street, London EC1V 9EL, UK
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Altman, J. and Bayer, S. (1982). Development of the Cranial Nerve Ganglia and Related Nuclei in the Rat. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Arber, S., Ladle, D. R., Lin, J. H., Frank, E. and Jessell, T. M. (2000). ETS gene Er81 controls the formation of functional connections between group Ia sensory afferents and motor neurons. Cell 101,485 -498.[Medline]
Auclair, F., Valdes, N. and Marchand, R. (1996). Rhombomere-specific origin of branchial and visceral motoneurons of the facial nerve in the rat embryo. J. Comp. Neurol. 369,451 -461.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bell, E., Wingate, R. and Lumsden, A. (1999).
Homeotic transformation of rhombomere identity after localized Hoxb1
misexpression. Science
284,2168
-2171.
Bloch-Gallego, E., Ezan, F., Tessier-Lavigne, M. and Sotelo,
C. (1999). Floor plate and netrin-1 are involved in the
migration and survival of inferior olivary neurons. J.
Neurosci. 19,4407
-4420.
Brose, K. and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (2000). Slit proteins: key regulators of axon guidance, axonal branching, and cell migration. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 95-102.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carpenter, E. M., Goddard, J. M., Chisaka, O., Manley, N. R.
and Capecchi, M. R. (1993). Loss of Hoxa-1
(Hox-1.6) function results in the reorganization of the murine hindbrain.
Development 118,1063
-1075.
Caton, A., Hacker, A., Naeem, A., Livet, J., Maina, F., Bladt,
F., Klein, R., Birchmeier, C. and Guthrie, S. (2000).
The branchial arches and HGF are growth-promoting and chemoattractant for
cranial motor axons. Development
127,1751
-1766.
Chisaka, O., Musci, T. and Capecchi, M. (1992). Developmental defects of the ear, cranial nerves and hindbrain resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene Hox-1.6.Nature 355,516 -520.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cordes, S. P. and Barsh, G. S. (1994). The mouse segmentation gene kr encodes a novel basic domain-leucine zipper transcription factor. Cell 79,1025 -1034.[Medline]
Covell, D. A., Jr and Noden, D. M. (1989). Embryonic development of the chick primary trigeminal sensory-motor complex. J. Comp. Neurol. 286,488 -503.[Medline]
Davenne, M., Maconochie, M., Neun, R., Brunet, J.-F., Chambon, P., Krumlauf, R. and Rijli, F. (1999). Hoxa2 and Hoxb2 control dorsoventral patterns of neuronal development in the rostral hindbrain. Neuron 22,677 -691.[Medline]
Deckwerth, T. L., Easton, R. M., Knudson, C. M., Korsmeyer, S. J. and Johnson, E. M., Jr (1998). Placement of the BCL2 family member BAX in the death pathway of sympathetic neurons activated by trophic factor deprivation. Exp. Neurol. 152,150 -162.[CrossRef][Medline]
del Toro, E. D., Borday, V., Davenne, M., Neun, R., Rijli, F. M.
and Champagnat, J. (2001). Generation of a novel
functional neuronal circuit in Hoxa1 mutant mice. J.
Neurosci. 21,5637
-5642.
deLapeyriere, O. and Henderson, C. E. (1997). Motoneuron differentiation, survival and synaptogenesis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7,642 -650.[CrossRef][Medline]
Di Rocco, G., Mavilio, F. and Zappavigna, V.
(1997). Functional dissection of a transcriptionally active,
target-specific Hox-Pbx complex. EMBO J.
16,3644
-3654.
Di Rocco, G., Gavalas, A., Popperl, H., Krumlauf, R., Mavilio,
F. and Zappavigna, V. (2001a). The recruitment of
SOX/OCT complexes and the differential activity of HOXA1 and HOXB1 modulate
the Hoxb1 auto-regulatory enhancer function. J. Biol.
Chem. 276,20506
-20515.
Di Rocco, G., Gavalas, A., Popperl, H., Krumlauf, R., Mavilio, F. and Zappavigna, V. (2001b). The recruitment of SOX/OCT complexes and the differential activity of HOXA1 and HOXB1 modulate the Hoxb1 auto-regulatory enhancer function. J. Biol. Chem. 1,1 .[CrossRef]
Dollé, P., Lufkin, T., Krumlauf, R., Mark, M., Duboule,
D. and Chambon, P. (1993). Local alterations of
Krox-20 and Hox gene expression in the hindbrain suggest
lack of rhombomeres 4 and 5 in homozygote null Hoxa-1 (Hox-1.6)
mutant embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90,7666
-7670.
Dubreuil, V., Hirsch, M., Pattyn, A., Brunet, J. and Goridis,
C. (2000). The Phox2b transcription factor coordinately
regulates neuronal cell cycle exit and identity.
Development 127,5191
-5201.
Dupé, V., Davenne, M., Brocard, J., Dollé, P.,
Mark, M., Dierich, A., Chambon, P. and Rijli, F.
(1997). In vivo functional analysis of the
Hoxa1 3' retinoid response element (3' RARE).
Development 124,399
-410.
Ensini, M., Tsuchida, T., Belting, H.-G. and Jessell, T.
(1998). The control of rostrocaudal pattern in the developing
spinal cord: Specification of motor neuron subtype identity is initiated by
signals from paraxial mesoderm. Development
125,969
-982.
Ericson, J., Thor, S., Edlund, T., Jessell, T. M. and Yamada, T. (1992). Early stages of motor neuron differentiation revealed by expression of homeobox gene Islet-1. Science 256,1555 -1560.[Medline]
Ericson, J., Rashbass, P., Schedl, A., Brenner-Morton, S., Kawakami, A., van Heyningen, V., Jessell, T. M. and Briscoe, J. (1997). Pax6 controls progenitor cell identity and neuronal fate in response to graded Shh signaling. Cell 90,169 -180.[Medline]
Ferretti, E., Marshall, H., Pöpperl, H., Maconochie, M.,
Krumlauf, R. and Blasi, F. (2000). Segmental
expression of Hoxb2 in r4 requires two distinct sites that facilitate
co-operative interactions and ternary complex formation between Perp, Pbx and
Hox proteins. Development
127,155
-166.
Fraser, S., Keynes, R. and Lumsden, A. (1990). Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 344,431 -435.[CrossRef][Medline]
Frohman, M. A., Boyle, M. and Martin, G. R. (1990). Isolation of the mouse Hox-2.9 gene; analysis of embryonic expression suggests that positional information along the anterior-posterior axis is specified by mesoderm. Development 110,589 -607.[Abstract]
Garel, S., Garcia-Dominguez, M. and Charnay, P.
(2000). Control of the migratory pathway of facial branchiomotor
neurones. Development
127,5297
-5307.
Gaufo, G. O., Flodby, P. and Capecchi, M. R.
(2000). Hoxb1 controls effectors of sonic hedgehog and Mash1
signaling pathways. Development
127,5343
-5354.
Gavalas, A., Davenne, M., Lumsden, A., Chambon, P. and Rijli,
F. (1997). Role of Hoxa-2 in axon pathfinding and
rostral hindbrain patterning. Development
124,3693
-3702.
Gavalas, A., Studer, M., Lumsden, A., Rijli, F., Krumlauf, R.
and Chambon, P. (1998). Hoxa1 and
Hoxb1 synergize in patterning the hindbrain, cranial nerves and
second pharyngeal arch. Development
125,1123
-1136.
Gendron-Maguire, M., Mallo, M., Zhang, M. and Gridley, T. (1993). Hoxa-2 mutant mice exhibit homeotic transformation of skeletal elements derived from cranial neural crest. Cell 75,1317 -1331.[Medline]
Goddard, J., Rossel, M., Manley, N. and Capecchi, M.
(1996). Mice with targeted disruption of Hoxb1 fail to
form the motor nucleus of the VIIth nerve. Development
122,3217
-3228.
Gould, A., Morrison, A., Sproat, G., White, R. and Krumlauf, R. (1997). Positive cross-regulation and enhancer sharing: two mechanisms for specifying overlapping Hox expression patterns. Genes Dev. 11,900 -913.[Abstract]
Graham, A., Maden, M. and Krumlauf, R. (1991). The murine Hox-2 genes display dynamic dorsoventral patterns of expression during central nervous system development. Development 112,255 -264.[Abstract]
Helmbacher, F., Pujades, C., Desmarquet, C., Frain, M., Rijli,
F., Chambon, P. and Charnay, P. (1998). Hoxa1
and Krox20 synergize to control the development of rhombomere 3.
Development 125,4739
-4748.
Jacob, J. and Guthrie, S. (2000). Facial
visceral motor neurons display specific rhombomere origin and axon pathfinding
behavior in the chick. J. Neurosci.
20,7664
-7671.
Jacob, J., Tiveron, M. C., Brunet, J. F. and Guthrie, S. (2000). Role of the target in the pathfinding of facial visceral motor axons. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 16, 14-26.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jessell, T. M. (2000). Neuronal specification in the spinal cord: inductive signals and transcriptional codes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1,20 -29.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jessen, J. R., Topczewski, J., Bingham, S., Sepich, D. S., Marlow, F., Chandrasekhar, A. and Solnica-Krezel, L. (2002). Zebrafish trilobite identifies new roles for Strabismus in gastrulation and neuronal movements. Nat. Cell Biol. 4,610 -615.[Medline]
Jungbluth, S., Bell, E. and Lumsden, A. (1999).
Specification of distinct motor neuron identities by the singular activities
of individual Hox genes. Development
126,2751
-2758.
Karlsson, O., Thor, S., Norberg, T., Ohlsson, H. and Edlund, T. (1990). Insulin gene enhancer binding protein Isl-1 is a member of a novel class of proteins containing both a homeo- and a Cys-His domain. Nature 344,879 -882.[CrossRef][Medline]
Korematsu, K. and Redies, C. (1997). Restricted expression of cadherin-8 in segmental and functional subdivisions of the embryonic mouse brain. Dev. Dyn. 208,178 -189.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kusumi, K., Dunwoodie, S. L. and Krumlauf, R. (2001). Dynamic expression patterns of the pudgy/spondylocostal dysostosis gene Dll3 in the developing nervous system. Mech. Dev. 100,141 -144.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lee, K. and Jessell, T. (1999). The specification of dorsal cell fates in the vertebrate central nervous system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22,261 -294.[CrossRef][Medline]
Liem, K. F., Jr, Tremml, G. and Jessell, T. M. (1997). A role for the roof plate and its resident TGFbeta-related proteins in neuronal patterning in the dorsal spinal cord. Cell 91,127 -138.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lumsden, A. and Keynes, R. (1989). Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain. Nature 337,424 -428.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lumsden, A. and Krumlauf, R. (1996). Patterning
the vertebrate neuraxis. Science
274,1109
-1115.
Maconochie, M., Nonchev, S., Studer, M., Chan, S.-K., Pöpperl, H., Sham, M.-H., Mann, R. and Krumlauf, R. (1997). Cross-regulation in the mouse HoxB complex: the expression of Hoxb2 in rhombomere 4 is regulated by Hoxb1.Genes Dev. 11,1885 -1896.[Abstract]
Maden, M., Graham, A., Gale, E., Rollinson, C. and Zile, M.
(1997). Positional apoptosis during vertebrate CNS development in
the absence of endogenous retinoids. Development
124,2799
-2805.
Maina, F. and Klein, R. (1999). Hepatocyte growth factor, a versatile signal for developing neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 2,213 -217.[CrossRef][Medline]
Manzanares, M., Trainor, P., Nonchev, S., Ariza-McNaughton, L., Brodie, J., Gould, A., Marshall, H., Morrison, A., Kwan, C.-T., Sham, M.-H. et al. (1999). The role of kreisler in segmentation during hindbrain development. Dev. Biol. 211,220 -237.[CrossRef][Medline]
Manzanares, M., Bel-Vialer, S., Ariza-McNaughton, L., Ferretti, E., Marshall, H., Maconochie, M. K., Blasi, F. and Krumlauf, R. (2001). Independent regulation of initiation and maintenance phases of Hoxa3 expression in the vertebrate hindbrain involves auto and cross-regulatory mechanisms. Development 128,3595 -3607.[Medline]
Mark, M., Lufkin, T., Vonesch, J.-L., Ruberte, E., Olivo, J.-C.,
Dollé, P., Gorry, P., Lumsden, A. and Chambon, P.
(1993). Two rhombomeres are altered in Hoxa-1 mutant
mice. Development 119,319
-338.
Marshall, H., Studer, M., Pöpperl, H., Aparicio, S., Kuroiwa, A., Brenner, S. and Krumlauf, R. (1994). A conserved retinoic acid response element required for early expression of the homeobox gene Hoxb-1. Nature 370,567 -571.[CrossRef][Medline]
Maves, L., Jackman, W. and Kimmel, C. B. (2002). FGF3 and FGF8 mediate a rhombomere 4 signaling activity in the zebrafish hindbrain. Development 129,3825 -3837.[Medline]
McKay, I., Lewis, J. and Lumsden, A. (1997). Organization and development of facial motor neurons in the kreisler mutant mouse. Eur. J. Neurosci. 9,1499 -1506.[Medline]
Megason, S. G. and McMahon, A. P. (2002). A
mitogen gradient of dorsal midline Wnts organizes growth in the CNS.
Development 129,2087
-2098.
Muroyama, Y., Fujihara, M., Ikeya, M., Kondoh, H. and Takada,
S. (2002). Wnt signaling plays an essential role in neuronal
specification of the dorsal spinal cord. Genes Dev.
16,548
-553.
Murphy, P. and Hill, R. E. (1991). Expression of the mouse labial-like homeobox-containing genes, Hox 2.9 and Hox 1.6, during segmentation of the hindbrain. Development 111, 61-74.[Abstract]
Murphy, P., Davidson, D. R. and Hill, R. E. (1989). Segment-specific expression of a homeobox-containing gene in the mouse hindbrain. Nature 341,156 -159.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nardelli, J., Thiesson, D., Fujiwara, Y., Tsai, F. Y. and Orkin, S. H. (1999). Expression and genetic interaction of transcription factors GATA-2 and GATA-3 during development of the mouse central nervous system. Dev. Biol. 210,305 -321.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ohshima, T., Ogawa, M., Takeuchi, K., Takahashi, S., Kulkarni,
A. B. and Mikoshiba, K. (2002). Cyclin-dependent
kinase 5/p35 contributes synergistically with Reelin/Dab1 to the positioning
of facial branchiomotor and inferior olive neurons in the developing mouse
hindbrain. J. Neurosci.
22,4036
-4044.
Oppenheim, R. W. (1996). Neurotrophic survival molecules for motoneurons: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron 17,195 -197.[Medline]
Osumi, N., Hirota, A., Ohuchi, H., Nakafuku, M., Iimura, T.,
Kuratani, S., Fujiwara, M., Noji, S. and Eto, K.
(1997). Pax-6 is involved in the specification of hindbrain motor
neuron subtype. Development
124,2961
-2972.
Pata, I., Studer, M., van Doorninck, J. H., Briscoe, J., Kuuse,
S., Engel, J. D., Grosveld, F. and Karis, A. (1999).
The transcription factor GATA3 is a downstream effector of Hoxb1 specification
in rhombomere 4. Development
126,5523
-5531.
Pattyn, A., Morin, X., Cremer, H., Goridis, C. and Brunet, J.
F. (1997). Expression and interactions of the two closely
related homeobox genes Phox2a and Phox2b during
neurogenesis. Development
124,4065
-4075.
Pattyn, A., Hirsch, M., Goridis, C. and Brunet, J. F.
(2000). Control of hindbrain motor neuron differentiation by the
homeobox gene Phox2b. Development
127,1349
-1358.
Pettmann, B. and Henderson, C. E. (1998). Neuronal cell death. Neuron 20,633 -647.[Medline]
Pierani, A., Brenner-Morton, S., Chiang, C. and Jessell, T. (1999). A sonic hedgehog-independent, retinoid activated pathway of neurogenesis in the ventral spinal cord. Cell 97,903 -915.[Medline]
Pöpperl, H., Bienz, M., Studer, M., Chan, S., Aparicio, S., Brenner, S., Mann, R. and Krumlauf, R. (1995). Segmental expression of Hoxb1 is controlled by a highly conserved autoregulatory loop dependent upon exd/Pbx. Cell 81,1031 -1042.[Medline]
Rijli, F. M., Mark, M., Lakkaraju, S., Dierich, A., Dolle, P. and Chambon, P. (1993). A homeotic transformation is generated in the rostral branchial region of the head by disruption of Hoxa-2, which acts as a selector gene. Cell 75,1333 -1349.[Medline]
Schneider-Maunoury, S., Seitanidou, T., Charnay, P. and Lumsden,
A. (1997). Segmental and neuronal architecture of the
hindbrain of Krox-20 mouse mutants.
Development 124,1215
-1226.
Sharma, K., Sheng, H. Z., Lettieri, K., Li, H., Karavanov, A., Potter, S., Westphal, H. and Pfaff, S. L. (1998). LIM homeodomain factors Lhx3 and Lhx4 assign subtype identities for motor neurons. Cell 95,817 -828.[Medline]
Simon, H., Hornbruch, A. and Lumsden, A. (1995). Independent assignment of antero-posterior and dorso-ventral positional values in the developing chick hindbrain. Curr. Biol. 5,205 -214.[Medline]
Studer, M. (2001). Initiation of facial
motoneurone migration is dependent on rhombomeres 5 and 6.
Development 128,3707
-3716.
Studer, M., Lumsden, A., Ariza-McNaughton, L., Bradley, A. and Krumlauf, R. (1996). Altered segmental identity and abnormal migration of motor neurons in mice lacking Hoxb-1.Nature 384,630 -635.[CrossRef][Medline]
Studer, M., Gavalas, A., Marshall, H., Ariza-McNaughton, L.,
Rijli, F., Chambon, P. and Krumlauf, R. (1998).
Genetic interaction between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 reveal new roles
in regulation of early hindbrain patterning.
Development 125,1025
-1036.
Takahashi, M. and Osumi, N. (2002). Pax6 regulates specification of ventral neurone subtypes in the hindbrain by establishing progenitor domains. Development 129,1327 -1338.[Medline]
Takebayashi, K., Takahashi, S., Yokota, C., Tsuda, H.,
Nakanishi, S., Asashima, M. and Kageyama, R. (1997).
Conversion of ectoderm into a neural fate by ATH-3, a vertebrate basic
helix-loop-helix gene homologous to Drosophila proneural gene atonal.
EMBO J. 16,384
-395.
Takeichi, M., Uemura, T., Iwai, Y., Uchida, N., Inoue, T., Tanaka, T. and Suzuki, S. C. (1997). Cadherins in brain patterning and neural network formation. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 62,505 -510.[Medline]
Tanabe, Y. and Jessell, T. (1997). Diversity and patterning inthe developing spinal cord. Science 274,1115 -1123.[CrossRef]
Trainor, P. and Krumlauf, R. (2000). Patterning the cranial neural crest: Hindbrain segmentation and Hox gene plasticity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 116-124.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tsuchida, T., Ensini, M., Morton, S. B., Baldassare, M., Edlund, T., Jessell, T. M. and Pfaff, S. L. (1994). Topographic organization of embryonic motor neurons defined by expression of LIM homeobox genes. Cell 79,957 -970.[Medline]
Varela-Echavarria, A., Pfaff, S. L. and Guthrie, S. (1996). Differential expression of LIM homeobox genes among motor neuron subpopulations in the developing chick brain stem. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 8,242 -257.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vesque, C., Maconochie, M., Nonchev, S., Ariza-McNaughton, L., Kuroiwa, A., Charnay, P. and Krumlauf, R. (1996). Hoxb-2 transcriptional activation by Krox-20 in vertebrate hindbrain requires an evolutionary conserved cis-acting element in addition to the Krox-20 site. EMBO J. 15,5383 -5896.[Abstract]
Walshe, J., Maroon, H., McGonnell, I. M., Dickson, C. and Mason, I. (2002). Establishment of hindbrain segmental identity requires signaling by FGF3 and FGF8. Curr. Biol. 12,1117 -1123.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wilkinson, D. G., Bhatt, S., Cook, M., Boncinelli, E. and Krumlauf, R. (1989). Segmental expression of Hox-2 homeobox-containing genes in the developing mouse hindbrain. Nature 341,405 -409.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhou, Y., Yamamoto, M. and Engel, J. D. (2000).
GATA2 is required for the generation of V2 interneurons.
Development 127,3829
-3838.