1 Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 679 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
2 Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, and Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: xiang{at}cabm.rutgers.edu)
Accepted 26 April 2002
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Barhl1, Homeobox, Transcription factor, Cochlea, Sensory hair cells, Organ of Corti, Deafness
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Despite the rapid advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing early development of inner ear hair cells, relatively little is known about the molecular bases that maintain these delicate sensory cells. Barhl1 is a mammalian homolog of the Drosophila BarH1 and BarH2 genes, which encode homeodomain proteins that are required for determination of external sensory organs and for normal eye morphogenesis (Higashijima et al., 1992a; Higashijima et al., 1992b
; Kojima et al., 1991
; Bulfone et al., 2000
). In the developing central nervous system, Barhl1 has been shown to be primarily expressed in migrating neurons that settle in specific domains within the diencephalon, rhombencephalon and spinal cord (Bulfone et al., 2000
). In this study, we have analyzed the spatial and temporal expression patterns of Barhl1 and investigated its role by gene targeting during development of the mouse inner ear. We found that in the inner ear, Barhl1 was expressed in all hair cells, but more abundantly in the cochlear outer hair cells. Targeted deletion of Barhl1 caused degeneration of cochlear hair cells that was progressive in space and time in the organ of Corti, resulting in severe to profound hearing loss. Our data indicate that Barhl1 plays an essential role in the maintenance of cochlear hair cells, whereas it has no or little role in the specification and differentiation of these cells.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Auditory brainstem responses
Free field auditory brainstem responses were recorded from Barhl1+/+, Barhl1+/ and Barhl1/ mice in a double-walled, sound-isolation booth (Industrial Acoustics, Baltimore, MD). Acoustic stimuli and presentation were as follows. Broadband and pure tone stimuli were presented at a rate of 10 per second. These stimuli had a 5 mseconds duration with a 1 mseconds rise/fall time. Electrical activity was recorded for 20 ms after the stimulus presentation and 500 responses were averaged. Tone stimuli consisted of 4 kHz, 8 kHz, 16 kHz and 32 kHz pips. Clicks were produced by 2 V pulses of alternating polarity having 100 µseconds duration. Stimulus levels were varied randomly. All auditory stimuli were calibrated against a constant voltage delivered to the speaker and recorded with a free field microphone (Bruel & Kjær, Norcross, GA). ABR stimuli were created with Tucker-Davis Technologies Real-Time Processor Visual Design Studio. The evoked potential was digitized with Tucker-Davis Technologies Real-Time Processors and thresholds were calculated with Matlab v.6.0 Release 12. Threshold responses were defined as the sound pressure level in which the peak amplitude of the evoked response (latency, 2.5-7.5 mseconds) was greater than two standard deviations above the averaged background activity prior to stimulus onset (15-20 mseconds). Threshold differences between mouse groups were statistically determined by ANOVA (StatView v5).
In situ hybridization and histochemistry
RNA in situ hybridization was performed as described (Sciavolino et al., 1997) using digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes prepared following the manufacturers protocol (Roche Diagnostics). X-gal staining for ß-galactosidase activity was conducted as previously described (Ben-Arie et al., 2000
). All labeled sections were counterstained with Fast Red. Whole-mount organs of Corti were labeled with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin following the manufacturers protocol (Molecular Probes).
Semi-thin sections and scanning electron microscopy
Semi-thin sections of inner ears for light microscopy were prepared and stained with Toluidine Blue as described (Xiang et al., 1997). Scanning electron microscopy of the organs of Corti was carried out as described (OMalley et al., 1995
).
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
To investigate in vivo the role of Barhl1 during inner ear development, we generated a targeted Barhl1 deletion in mice, by replacing the Barhl1-coding region with the lacZ reporter gene (Fig. 1I-K). The absence of an in situ hybridization signal for Barhl1 in the inner ear of homozygous mutant mice confirmed that the mutation is a null allele (data not shown). In embryonic and postnatal mice heterozygous for the Barhl1 deletion, lacZ expression was detected in hair cells of the organ of Corti as well as the vestibular apparatus, faithfully recapitulating the endogenous Barhl1 expression pattern (Fig. 1D-G). In adult mice heterozygous or homozygous for the deletion, we observed continued lacZ expression in these hair cells (Fig. 3H,L,P and data not shown), suggesting that Barhl1 expression is persistent in the adult inner ear. Interestingly, as visualized by ß-galactosidase staining, Barhl1 was highly expressed in the cochlear outer hair cells but exhibited a much weaker expression level in the cochlear inner hair cells and vestibular hair cells (Fig. 1F-H).
|
To quantitatively assess hearing loss in Barhl1 null mutants, we measured evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) in 1-, 3- and 10-month-old Barhl1/ and control mice (Fig. 2; Table 1). As shown in Fig. 2A, Barhl1+/+ mice showed ABR potentials consistent in sensitivity, form and latency with many strains of mice with normal hearing (Zheng et al., 1999). No significant difference was observed between Barhl1+/+ and Barhl1+/ mice in ABR thresholds (Fig. 2B,C). By contrast, Barhl1/ mice had elevated thresholds at all frequencies tested (Fig. 2C and data not shown), and some mice did not respond to any auditory stimuli. The number of Barhl1/ mice that did not respond to broadband clicks showed a marked increase with age (three out of 10 at 3 months but seven out of 10 at 10 months; Table 1), indicating that hearing loss in Barhl1/ mice was progressive. When Barhl1/ mice responded to sound, there were threshold shifts ranging from 20-55 dB SPL, depending on the auditory stimulus and age (Fig. 2B,C). The threshold values of Barhl1+/+ and Barhl1+/ mice were significantly lower than those of the responding null mutants (P<0.02). Interestingly, at one month of age, we found that eight out of 10 Barhl1/ mice did not respond to the 4 kHz stimulus, whereas nearly all responded to 8, 16 and 32 kHz stimuli, albeit with higher thresholds (Table 1). Thus, young Barhl1/ mice exhibited a preferential loss of low-frequency hearing. Consistent with progressive hearing loss, up to half of the null mice also lost responsiveness to higher frequency stimuli by 3 months of age (Table 1).
|
|
We next followed the fate of cochlear hair cells in Barhl1/ and control Barhl1+/ mice by staining whole-mount organs of Corti with X-gal and with phalloidin, a toxin that binds to the actin-rich stereocilia bundles of hair cells. From P0 to P5, no obvious abnormalities were observed in cochlear hair cells of the null mice. At P6 in the mutant, however, the outer hair cells in the apical turn of the organ of Corti started to show overt misalignment and disorganization (Fig. 3E,F). This phenomenon spread into the middle turn by P16-P19, when many of the outer hair cells from the apical and middle turns degenerate in the mutant (Fig. 3G,K; Fig. 4A-C,E-G). By about two months of age, only some residual outer hair cells remained in the apical and middle turns in the mutant, whereas the basal turn of the organ of Corti was still largely intact, except for the loss of occasional outer hair cells (Fig. 3H,L,P; Fig. 4I-L). This apical-to-basal progression of outer hair cell degeneration correlates with the observation that Barhl1/ mice display preferential low-frequency hearing loss at early ages (Table 1). In spite of the progressive loss of outer hair cells, no obvious loss of cochlear inner hair cells and vestibular hair cells was observed in the null mice by two months of age (Fig. 3E-P; Figs 4, 5). Therefore, the absence of Barhl1 does not appear to affect the initial production and differentiation of inner ear hair cells, instead, it can cause progressive degeneration of cochlear outer hair cells, following an apical-to-basal gradient.
|
|
Gradient degeneration of cochlear inner hair cells in Barhl1 null mice
While the gradual loss of cochlear outer hair cells can partly explain the elevated ABR thresholds in Barhl1/ mice (Fig. 2), it fails to explain the profound deafness in some of the null mice (Table 1). As cochlear inner hair cells are the primary auditory sensors and they express Barhl1 (Fig. 1), we investigated in older animals whether the absence of Barhl1 also resulted in degeneration of inner hair cells. In Barhl1/ mice at the age of 6 months, phalloidin labeling of whole-mount organs of Corti revealed a near complete loss of outer hair cells in the apical and middle turns, but similar to those at early ages (Figs 3, 4, 5), inner hair cells as well as most of the basal outer hair cells still remained (data not shown). By contrast, at 10 months of age, inner hair cells in the basal turn of the mutant organ of Corti were completely absent (Fig. 6E,F) and many of them in the middle turn were missing (Fig. 6C,D), even though the apical turn still retained most of the inner hair cells (Fig. 6A,B). Thus, inner hair cells in the mutant organ of Corti also display progressive degeneration, albeit a delayed one relative to that of outer hair cells. Notably, the loss of inner hair cells follows a basal to apical gradient, which is opposite to that of outer hair cells. The progressive degeneration of outer hair cells in the null cochlea appeared to be complete by 10 months of age, as these cells in the entire organ of Corti, including the most persistent ones in the basal turn all disappeared (Fig. 6). Therefore, the extensive loss of both outer and inner hair cells in the cochlea well correlates with our observation that all Barhl1-null mice become profoundly or severely deaf by 10 months of age (Fig. 2B; Table 1).
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Although all inner ear hair cells are mechanoreceptors, different hair cell types in the inner ear have different functions with distinct morphologies, cellular structures, innervation patterns and physiological properties. For example, the cochlear hair cells are auditory sensors while the vestibular hair cells mediate balance by detecting head movement and position. Moreover, the cochlear and vestibular hair cells are further divided into different subtypes with distinct functions. In the cochlea, the inner hair cells are sensory receptors that provide the principal afferent innervation, while the outer hair cells function as both sensors and mechanical feedback amplifiers (Dallos, 1992; Hudspeth, 1989
). There is evidence to suggest that the differentiation and maintenance of inner and outer hair cells are differentially regulated. For example, the Bronx Waltzer mice and Beethoven homozygous mutants exhibit a preferential loss of inner hair cells (Whitlon et al., 1996
; Vreugde et al., 2002
). In Barhl1/ mice, we found that the onset of degeneration of cochlear inner hair cells was delayed for more than half a year relative to that of the outer hair cells, further lending support for the notion that inner and outer hair cells are differentially maintained. In fact, these two hair cell types appear to require different levels of Barhl1 for their maintenance as a significantly higher level of Barhl1 expression is seen in the outer hair cells (Fig. 1).
In the cochlea, hair cells also display region specificity and frequency selectivity. Along the longitudinal axis of the organ of Corti, ciliary bundles of hair cells display a gradation in length and their electrical properties also vary (Dallos, 1992; Hudspeth, 1989
). Thus, there is an apical-to-basal gradient of sensitivity toward low to high frequencies of sound (Dallos, 1992
; Hudspeth, 1989
). Given these region-specific properties, the observed degeneration gradients of inner and outer hair cells in Barhl1/ mice may simply manifest a differential requirement for Barhl1 in different hair cells distributed along the longitudinal axis of the organ of Corti. Because the expression of Barhl1 itself does not display a gradient in cochlear hair cells, it is possible that Barhl1 may control the expression of a molecule(s) that is expressed in a gradient in cochlear hair cells and is required for their maintenance. It has recently been shown that there are indeed molecules whose expression exhibits gradients in cochlear hair cells. For example, both the potassium channel KCNQ4 and neurotrophin BDNF display developmental gradient expression patterns in cochlear hair cells along the longitudinal axis (Beisel et al., 2000
; Farinas et al., 2001
). KCNQ4, in particular, shows a basal-to-apical expression gradient in inner hair cells and an apical-to-basal expression gradient in outer hair cells (Beisel et al., 2000
), corresponding to the two reciprocal degeneration gradients of inner and outer hair cells in the Barhl1 null cochlea. However, mutations in the human KCNQ4 gene often lead to a preferential high-frequency hearing loss, whereas Barhl1/ mice exhibit a preferential low-frequency hearing loss at early ages (Beisel et al., 2000
; Kubisch et al., 1999
; Marres et al., 1997
; Talebizadeh et al., 1999
) (Table 1).
Essential role for Barhl1 in the maintenance of cochlear hair cells
In the developing mouse inner ear, Barhl1 commences its expression in hair cells at E14.5, at least 2 days after the onset of hair cell production (Ruben, 1967). Thus, it is unlikely that Barhl1 is involved in the initial specification and generation of inner ear hair cells. Using a series of hair cell markers, we have demonstrated in Barhl1-null mice that this is indeed the case. First, all cochlear hair cells appear to be present in Barhl1-null mice at early postnatal stages, as revealed by ß-galactosidase staining (Fig. 3F,J,N). Second, these hair cells in Barhl1-null mice can express several other maker molecules, including Math1, Brn3c, myosin VI and myosin VIIa (Fig. 3A-D and data not shown). Because in the inner ear, Brn3c and myosins VI and VIIa have been shown to be expressed only by differentiating and differentiated hair cells and not by their progenitors (Xiang et al., 1998
), lacZ-positive cells in the cochlea of Barhl1-null mice must be able to differentiate in the absence of Barhl1. In fact, we observed by SEM and phalloidin labeling that both inner and outer hair cells in the null organ of Corti can undergo extensive differentiation to acquire ciliary bundles (Figs 4, 5, 6). The ensuing progressive loss of cochlear hair cells in Barhl1-null mice indicates a crucial role for Barhl1 in the maintenance of these sensory cells. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that it may also have some limited role in their terminal differentiation.
Recent studies have identified Math1 and Brn3c as two positive transcriptional regulators that control the development of inner ear hair cells. The absence of Math1 in mice causes a failure to generate both cochlear and vestibular hair cells and Brn3c deletion leads to the formation of immature hair cells (Bermingham et al., 1999; Erkman et al., 1996
; Xiang et al., 1997
; Xiang et al., 1998
). Thus, the late onset of hair cell defects in the Barhl1/ inner ear suggests that Barhl1 is likely to act genetically downstream of Math1 and Brn3c during inner ear development. Notably, Brn3c appears to be required primarily for the maintenance of newly generated hair cells, as Brn3c-null mice quickly lose the majority of their inner ear hair cells during late embryonic and perinatal stages (Erkman et al., 1996
; Xiang et al., 1997
; Xiang et al., 1998
). Whereas in Barhl1-null mice, cochlear hair cells degenerate over a time course of many months, suggesting an essential role for Barhl1 in the long-term survival of these cells. It is interesting to note that both Barhl1 and its Drosophila BarH homologs play a functionally conserved role in sensorineural development (Higashijima et al., 1992a
; Higashijima et al., 1992b
; Kojima et al., 1991
). However, Barhl1 is primarily involved in the maintenance of sensory cells whereas BarH genes play a principal role at the stages of determination and differentiation in Drosophila (Higashijima et al., 1992a
; Higashijima et al., 1992b
; Kojima et al., 1991
).
Barhl1-null mice as a unique deafness model
Hearing impairments represent the most prevalent category of clinically important childhood sensory disorders, affecting approx. one in 1000 children (Brown and Steel, 1994; Steel, 1995
; Steel and Kros, 2001
). Although no human deafness locus has yet been mapped to the region of the Barhl1 gene on chromosome 9q34 (Bulfone et al., 2000
; Lander et al., 2001
; Venter et al., 2001
), our studies identify a candidate gene for human deafness disorders. While a number of deafness genes have been identified in the mouse and human in the past few years (Avraham, 1998
; Fekete, 1999
; Kelsell et al., 1997
; Kubisch et al., 1999
; Steel and Bussoli, 1999
; Steel and Kros, 2001
), Barhl1-null mice represent a new class of mouse models for non-syndromic, autosomal recessive forms of deafness, which are usually sensorineural and congenital (Brown and Steel, 1994
; Fekete, 1999
; Steel, 1995
; Steel and Bussoli, 1999
; Steel and Kros, 2001
). Because Barhl1-null mice exhibit region-specific progressive loss of cochlear hair cells, they may also offer a novel model for studying mechanisms leading to the differential frequency hearing loss associated with some deafness disorders. For example, mutations in the KCNQ4 gene often cause a preferential loss of high-frequency hearing in humans (Beisel et al., 2000
; Kubisch et al., 1999
; Marres et al., 1997
; Talebizadeh et al., 1999
). Similarly, the gene responsible for age-related hearing loss (Ahl) in C57BL/6J mice has a preferential effect on high-frequency hearing (Johnson et al., 1997
; White et al., 2000
).
As mammalian inner ear hair cells normally do not regenerate, sustained hearing may crucially depend on a mechanism of preventive maintenance and damage repair of cochlear hair cells. Such a mechanism may gradually fail with aging, as age-related deafness affects more than 60% of the population aged over 70 (Davis, 1989). The Barhl1 mutant mice display unique features as a model for age-related progressive hearing loss, including late-onset and region-specific degeneration. These characteristics may reflect a crucial requirement for Barhl1 in the lifelong maintenance of cochlear hair cells. Conceivably, a molecular understanding of this requirement will provide significant insights into the pathology of age-related deafness.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Adam, J., Myat, A., le Roux, I., Eddison, M., Henrique, D., Ish-Horowicz, D. and Lewis, J. (1998). Cell fate choices and the expression of Notch, Delta and Serrate homologues in the chick inner ear: parallels with Drosophila sense-organ development. Development 125, 4645-4654.
Avraham, K. B. (1998). Hear come more genes! Nat. Med. 4, 1238-1239.[Medline]
Avraham, K. B., Hasson, T., Steel, K. P., Kingsley, D. M., Russell, L. B., Mooseker, M. S., Copeland, N. G. and Jenkins, N. A. (1995). The mouse Snells waltzer deafness gene encodes an unconventional myosin required for structural integrity of inner ear hair cells. Nat. Genet. 11, 369-375.[Medline]
Beisel, K. W., Nelson, N. C., Delimont, D. C. and Fritzsch, B. (2000). Longitudinal gradients of KCNQ4 expression in spiral ganglion and cochlear hair cells correlate with progressive hearing loss in DFNA2. Mol. Brain Res. 82, 137-149.[Medline]
Ben-Arie, N., Hassan, B. A., Bermingham, N. A., Malicki, D. M., Armstrong, D., Matzuk, M., Bellen, H. J. and Zoghbi, H. Y. (2000). Functional conservation of atonal and Math1 in the CNS and PNS. Development 127, 1039-1048.
Bermingham, N. A., Hassan, B. A., Price, S. D., Vollrath, M. A., Ben-Arie, N., Eatock, R. A., Bellen, H. J., Lysakowski, A. and Zoghbi, H. Y. (1999). Math1: an essential gene for the generation of inner ear hair cells. Science 284, 1837-1841.
Brown, S. D. and Steel, K. P. (1994). Genetic deafnessprogress with mouse models. Hum. Mol. Genet. 3, 1453-1456.[Abstract]
Bulfone, A., Menguzzato, E., Broccoli, V., Marchitiello, A., Gattuso, C., Mariani, M., Consalez, G. G., Martinez, S., Ballabio, A. and Banfi, S. (2000). Barhl1, a gene belonging to a new subfamily of mammalian homeobox genes, is expressed in migrating neurons of the CNS. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 1443-1452.
Dallos, P. (1992). The active cochlea. J. Neurosci. 12, 4575-4585.[Medline]
Davis, A. C. (1989). The prevalence of hearing impairment and reported hearing disability among adults in Great Britain. Int. J. Epidemiol. 18, 911-917.[Abstract]
Erkman, L., McEvilly, R. J., Luo, L., Ryan, A. K., Hooshmand, F., OConnell, S. M., Keithley, E. M., Rapaport, D. H., Ryan, A. F. and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1996). Role of transcription factors Brn-3.1 and Brn-3.2 in auditory and visual system development. Nature 381, 603-606.[Medline]
Farinas, I., Jones, K. R., Tessarollo, L., Vigers, A. J., Huang, E., Kirstein, M., de Caprona, D. C., Coppola, V., Backus, C., Reichardt, L. F. et al. (2001). Spatial shaping of cochlear innervation by temporally regulated neurotrophin expression. J. Neurosci. 21, 6170-6180.
Fekete, D. M. (1996). Cell fate specification in the inner ear. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6, 533-541.[Medline]
Fekete, D. M. (1999). Development of the vertebrate ear: insights from knockouts and mutants. Trends Neurosci. 22, 263-269.[Medline]
Higashijima, S., Kojima, T., Michiue, T., Ishimaru, S., Emori, Y. and Saigo, K. (1992a). Dual Bar homeo box genes of Drosophila required in two photoreceptor cells, R1 and R6, and primary pigment cells for normal eye development. Genes Dev. 6, 50-60.[Abstract]
Higashijima, S., Michiue, T., Emori, Y. and Saigo, K. (1992b). Subtype determination of Drosophila embryonic external sensory organs by redundant homeo box genes BarH1 and BarH2. Genes Dev. 6, 1005-1018.[Abstract]
Hudspeth, A. J. (1989). How the ears works work. Nature 341, 397-404.[Medline]
Johnson, K. R., Erway, L. C., Cook, S. A., Willott, J. F. and Zheng, Q. Y. (1997). A major gene affecting age-related hearing loss in C57BL/6J mice. Hear. Res. 114, 83-92.[Medline]
Kelley, M. W., Xu, X. M., Wagner, M. A., Warchol, M. E. and Corwin, J. T. (1993). The developing organ of Corti contains retinoic acid and forms supernumerary hair cells in response to exogenous retinoic acid in culture. Development 119, 1041-1053.
Kelsell, D. P., Dunlop, J., Stevens, H. P., Lench, N. J., Liang, J. N., Parry, G., Mueller, R. F. and Leigh, I. M. (1997). Connexin 26 mutations in hereditary non-syndromic sensorineural deafness. Nature 387, 80-83.[Medline]
Kojima, T., Ishimaru, S., Higashijima, S., Takayama, E., Akimaru, H., Sone, M., Emori, Y. and Saigo, K. (1991). Identification of a different-type homeobox gene, BarH1, possibly causing Bar (B) and Om(1D) mutations in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 4343-4347.[Abstract]
Kubisch, C., Schroeder, B. C., Friedrich, T., Lutjohann, B., El-Amraoui, A., Marlin, S., Petit, C. and Jentsch, T. J. (1999). KCNQ4, a novel potassium channel expressed in sensory outer hair cells, is mutated in dominant deafness. Cell 96, 437-446.[Medline]
Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., Doyle, M., FitzHugh, W. et al. (2001). Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860-921.[Medline]
Lanford, P. J., Lan, Y., Jiang, R., Lindsell, C., Weinmaster, G., Gridley, T. and Kelley, M. W. (1999). Notch signalling pathway mediates hair cell development in mammalian cochlea. Nat. Genet. 21, 289-292.[Medline]
Marres, H., van Ewijk, M., Huygen, P., Kunst, H., van Camp, G., Coucke, P., Willems, P. and Cremers, C. (1997). Inherited nonsyndromic hearing loss. An audiovestibular study in a large family with autosomal dominant progressive hearing loss related to DFNA2. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 123, 573-577.[Medline]
OMalley, B. W., Jr, Li, D. and Turner, D. S. (1995). Hearing loss and cochlear abnormalities in the congenital hypothyroid (hyt/hyt) mouse. Hear. Res. 88, 181-189.[Medline]
Partanen, J., Schwartz, L. and Rossant, J. (1998). Opposite phenotypes of hypomorphic and Y766 phosphorylation site mutations reveal a function for Fgfr1 in anteroposterior patterning of mouse embryos. Genes Dev. 12, 2332-2344.
Ruben, R. T. (1967). Development of the inner ear of the mouse: a radioautographic study of terminal mitoses. Acta Otolaryngol. 220 Suppl., 4-44.
Sciavolino, P. J., Abrams, E. W., Yang, L., Austenberg, L. P., Shen, M. M. and Abate-Shen, C. (1997). Tissue-specific expression of murine Nkx3.1 in the male urogenital system. Dev. Dyn. 209, 127-138.[Medline]
Shalaby, F., Rossant, J., Yamaguchi, T. P., Gertsenstein, M., Wu, X. F., Breitman, M. L. and Schuh, A. C. (1995). Failure of blood-island formation and vasculogenesis in Flk-1-deficient mice. Nature 376, 62-66.[Medline]
Steel, K. P. (1995). Inherited hearing defects in mice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29, 675-701.[Medline]
Steel, K. P. and Bussoli, T. J. (1999). Deafness genes: expressions of surprise. Trends Genet. 15, 207-211.[Medline]
Steel, K. P. and Kros, C. J. (2001). A genetic approach to understanding auditory function. Nat. Genet. 27, 143-149.[Medline]
Talebizadeh, Z., Kelley, P. M., Askew, J. W., Beisel, K. W. and Smith, S. D. (1999). Novel mutation in the KCNQ4 gene in a large kindred with dominant progressive hearing loss. Hum. Mutat. 14, 493-501.[Medline]
Tybulewicz, V. L., Crawford, C. E., Jackson, P. K., Bronson, R. T. and Mulligan, R. C. (1991). Neonatal lethality and lymphopenia in mice with a homozygous disruption of the c-abl proto-oncogene. Cell 65, 1153-1163.[Medline]
Vahava, O., Morell, R., Lynch, E. D., Weiss, S., Kagan, M. E., Ahituv, N., Morrow, J. E., Lee, M. K., Skvorak, A. B., Morton, C. C. et al. (1998). Mutation in transcription factor POU4F3 associated with inherited progressive hearing loss in humans. Science 279, 1950-1954.
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A. et al. (2001). The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304-1351.
Vreugde, S., Erven, A., Kros, C. J., Marcotti, W., Fuchs, H., Kurima, K., Wilcox, E. R., Friedman, T. B., Griffith, A. J., Balling, R. et al. (2002). Beethoven, a mouse model for dominant, progressive hearing loss DFNA36. Nat. Genet. 30, 257-258.[Medline]
White, J. A., Burgess, B. J., Hall, R. D. and Nadol, J. B. (2000). Pattern of degeneration of the spiral ganglion cell and its processes in the C57BL/6J mouse. Hear. Res. 141, 12-18.[Medline]
Whitlon, D. S., Gabel, C. and Zhang, X. (1996). Cochlear inner hair cells exist transiently in the fetal Bronx Waltzer (bv/bv) mouse. J. Comp. Neurol. 364, 515-522.[Medline]
Xiang, M., Gan, L., Li, D., Chen, Z. Y., Zhou, L., OMalley, B. W., Jr, Klein, W. and Nathans, J. (1997). Essential role of POU-domain factor Brn-3c in auditory and vestibular hair cell development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 9445-9450.
Xiang, M., Gao, W. Q., Hasson, T. and Shin, J. J. (1998). Requirement for Brn-3c in maturation and survival, but not in fate determination of inner ear hair cells. Development 125, 3935-3946.
Zhang, N., Martin, G. V., Kelley, M. W. and Gridley, T. (2000). A mutation in the Lunatic fringe gene suppresses the effects of a Jagged2 mutation on inner hair cell development in the cochlea. Curr. Biol. 10, 659-662.[Medline]
Zheng, J. L. and Gao, W. Q. (2000). Overexpression of Math1 induces robust production of extra hair cells in postnatal rat inner ears. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 580-586.[Medline]
Zheng, J. L., Shou, J., Guillemot, F., Kageyama, R. and Gao, W. Q. (2000). Hes1 is a negative regulator of inner ear hair cell differentiation. Development 127, 4551-4560.
Zheng, Q. Y., Johnson, K. R. and Erway, L. C. (1999). Assessment of hearing in 80 inbred strains of mice by ABR threshold analyses. Hear. Res. 130, 94-107.[Medline]
Zine, A., Aubert, A., Qiu, J., Therianos, S., Guillemot, F., Kageyama, R. and de Ribaupierre, F. (2001). Hes1 and Hes5 activities are required for the normal development of the hair cells in the mammalian inner ear. J. Neurosci. 21, 4712-4720.
Zine, A., van de Water, T. R. and de Ribaupierre, F. (2000). Notch signaling regulates the pattern of auditory hair cell differentiation in mammals. Development 127, 3373-3383.