Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: volkerh{at}mcdb.ucla.edu)
Accepted September 5, 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Dpp signaling, Hh signaling, Drosophila, Brain, Eye, Optic lobe
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Previous studies by us and others have revealed that the ectodermal domain that gives rise to the anterior brain and visual system in Drosophila are laid out in a manner that bears strong resemblance to the topology of the anterior neural plate in vertebrates (summarized in Fig. 1). Whereas the ventral nerve cord and basal part of the brain (deuterocerebrum, tritocerebrum) are derived from the segmented ventral neurectoderm, the precursors of the anterior brain (protocerebrum) and visual system map to a dorsal position within the head of the embryo. As in vertebrates, the anlagen of the eye and optic lobe come from a mid-dorsal position and only secondarily migrates laterally away from the midline (Green et al., 1993; Dumstrei et al., 1998; Namba and Minden, 1999). The pars intercerebralis, which, similar to the vertebrate hypothalamus, constitutes the neuroendocrine compartment of the insect brain (Mobbs, 1985), also maps to a medial part of the protocerebral neurectoderm (Younossi-Hartenstein et al., 1996; Zacharias et al., 1993). The Drosophila Otx and Tlx homologs, orthodenticle (otd; oc FlyBase) and tailless (tll) are expressed in a nearly overlapping pattern in the anterior brain anlage (Hirth et al., 1995; Younossi-Hartenstein et al., 1997). Expression of the Six3/6 homolog, sine oculis (so), defines an unpaired dorsomedial domain that includes all components of the visual system, including larval and adult eye, as well as optic lobe, and thereby serves as a marker for the eye field (Cheyette et al., 1994; Daniel et al., 1999).
The conservation in anterior brain and eye field topology prompts the question of whether the signaling pathways that specify different fates within this domain also play a similar role in Drosophila. The Drosophila homologs of Shh and BMP4, Hh and Dpp, act as morphogens in numerous different larval and embryonic contexts, notably dorsoventral patterning of the trunk region of the germ band, anteroposterior patterning within individual segments, and cross-germ layer signaling during mesoderm and endoderm cell fate specification (Raftery and Sutherland, 1999; Goodrich and Scott, 1998). Hh and Dpp have been studied in great detail in the development of the compound eye, where they are required for the initiation of ommatidial cell determination (Ma et al., 1993; Heberlein et al., 1993). We have analyzed the role of Dpp and Hh in the embryonic head neurectoderm, a structure that is topologically much more similar to the vertebrate eye field than the eye disc is. Thus, the Drosophila eye disc develops from a small group of set aside cells derived from the embryonic eye field (Fig. 1). The disc gives rise to photoreceptors and support cells only, not to any component of the central nervous system. By contrast, the embryonic eye field, like its vertebrate counterpart, is the origin of the entire visual system (photoreceptors and neurons) and anterior brain. Results pertaining to the function of the Hh and Dpp gradients in partitioning the embryonic eye field may be more readily comparable with corresponding processes in the vertebrate head.
Our data show that Dpp is expressed at the blastoderm stage in the dorsal head. High levels of Dpp are required in the dorsal head epidermis. Reduction of Dpp function results in a cyclops phenotype where mid-dorsal head epidermis is transformed into dorsolateral structures, i.e. eye/optic lobe tissue. Absence of Dpp causes the transformation of both head epidermis and visual structures into protocerebral neuroblasts. Regulatory genes that are required for eye/optic lobe fate, including sine oculis (so) and eyes absent (eya; cli FlyBase), are regulated in their respective domains by Dpp. Hh and its receptor/inhibitor, Patched (Ptc) are expressed in a transverse stripe along the posterior boundary of the eye field. Hh triggers the expression of determinants for larval eye (atonal) and adult eye (eyeless) in those cells of the eye field that are close to the Hh source. Eya and So, induced by Dpp, are epistatic to the Hh signal. Loss of Ptc, as well as overexpression of Hh, results in the ectopic induction of larval eye tissue in the dorsal midline (cyclops). We discuss the similarities between vertebrate systems and Drosophila in regard to the fate map of the eye field and the role of Dpp and Hh in this structure.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Immunohistochemistry
Embryos were dechorionated and fixed in 4% formaldehyde containing PT (1% PBS, 0.3% Triton X-100) with heptane. Embryos were then devitellinized in methanol and stored in ethanol before labeling with antibody, following the standard procedure (Ashburner, 1989). Expression of ß-galactosidase (ß-gal) in enhancer trap lines was detected with a monoclonal anti-ß-galactosidase antibody (Sigma) at a dilution of 1:1000. A monoclonal anti-FasII (Grenningloh et al., 1991) antibody was used at a 1:1000 dilution to detect FasII (Fas2 FlyBase). Monoclonal antibody mAb22C10 (Zipursky et al., 1984) (Iowa Hybridoma Bank) was used at a dilution of 1:200, and monoclonal antibody 1SN (kindly provided by Dr P. Chambon) was used at a 1:100 dilution to detect Snail. A polyclonal anti-pMAD PS1 antibody (kindly provided by Dr T. Tabata) (Aurelio and Cohen, 2000) was used at a 1:1000 dilution to detect phosphorylated Mad, and a polyclonal antibody AbN (kindly provided by Dr T. Kornberg) (Aza-Blanc et al., 1997) was used at a 1:1000 dilution to detect Ci.
In situ hybridization
Embryos were dechorionated and fixed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 5% formaldehyde and 50 mM EGTA and stored in ethanol. They were then treated with xylene and fixed for a second time in PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 and 5% formaldehyde. The embryos were then hybridized with probes synthesized using digoxigenin-labeled UTP (Boehringer) according to standard protocol (Tautz and Pfeifle, 1989). Embryos labeled with DNA probes were treated with Proteinase K (50 µg/ml) followed by glycine (2 mg/ml) before hybridization. The digoxigenin-labeled probes described below were hybridized to fixed embryos in buffer containing 50% formamide at 55°C. Anti-digoxigenin antibody (Boehringer) was used according to the manufacturers instructions to detect hybridized probe, after which the embryos were dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in epon. Alternatively embryos were washed and incubated with a second antibody for immunohistochemistry after in situ hybridization.
Probes
cDNA containing otd (Finkelstein and Perrimon, 1990) (kindly provided by Dr J. Lengyel) was linearized with KpnI and used as template to make the otd RNA probe. cDNA containing dpp (St Johnston and Gelbart, 1987) (kindly provided by Dr E. Bier) was linearized with HindIII and used as template to make the dpp RNA probe. A sog RNA probe was kindly provided by Dr A. Courey. cDNA containing br (Jazwinska et al., 1999) (kindly provided by Dr S. Roth) was linearized with EcoRI and used as template to make the br RNA probe. pKS-race (Rusch and Levine, 1997) (kindly provided by Dr M. Levine) was digested with HindIII and used as template to make the race RNA probe. pBS:eya I (Bonini et al., 1993) (kindly provided by Dr F. Pignoni) plasmid linearized with SalI and used as template to make the eya RNA probe. cDNA containing intermediate neuroblasts defective (ind) (Weiss et al., 1998) (kindly provided by Dr M. Scott) was linearized with HindIII and used as template to make the ind RNA probe. tc1 pBS containing tll (Pignoni et al., 1990; Steingrímsson et al., 1991), was digested with EcoRI to make DNA probe and linearized with SalI to make the RNA probe. Plasmid pBS-pF3k (Cheyette et al., 1994) linearized with BamHI and used as template to synthesize the so RNA probe. cDNA containing hh (Lee et al., 1994) (kindly provided by Dr J. Lengyel) was linearized with KpnI and used as template to make the hh RNA probe. pBSK-ptc (Goodrich and Scott, 1998) (kindly provided by Dr J. Hooper) was linearized with HindIII and used as template to make the ptc RNA probe. cDNA containing ey (Quiring et al., 1994) (kindly provided by Dr F. Pignoni) was linearized with SalI and used as template to make the ey RNA probe.
Temperature shift experiments
hs-GAL4; UAS-dpp, da-GAL4; UAS-dpp and hs-hh AN14 embryos were collected for 2 hours at 25°C, and shifted to 37°C at 2, 4 and 6 hours post-fertilization. Embryos were heatshocked for 2 hours and allowed to develop at 25°C until stage 16 of embryogenesis, at which time, they were fixed for subsequent staining. hhts2 embryos were collected for 2 hours at either 18°C (for upshift experiments) or 29°C (for downshift experiments), and shifted either up or down at 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-fertilization. Completion of embryogenesis takes 42 hours at 18°C, 16 hours at 29°C and 22 hours at 25°C. To compensate for timing differential, a ratio of these hours were used.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Protocerebral neurectoderm
The lateral part of the head neurectoderm produces the neuroblasts that form the central protocerebrum, the major compartment of the insect brain that includes associative centers such as the mushroom bodies and central complex. A narrow domain within the dorsomedial protocerebrum is the anlage of the so-called pars intercerebralis (Zacharias et al., 1993; Younossi-Hartenstein et al., 1996), which contains clusters of neuroendocrine cells producing various neuropeptides (Mobbs, 1985; Taghert, 1999) (Fig. 2A,E). The neuroendocrine neurons project their axons in a peripheral nerve that leaves the brain and reaches the corpora cardiaca (arrow in Fig. 2E), a neurohemal organ located close to the heart (Hartenstein et al., 1994) (Fig. 2D,E). The pars intercerebralis-corpora cardiaca system is highly reminiscent of the vertebrate hypothalamus-pituitary axis, and this similarity extends to the embryonic origin of the corpora cardiaca. Thus, the corpora cardiaca arise as invaginations from the foregut. Their embryonic origin has been well documented in Manduca sexta (Copenhaver and Taghert, 1991); in Drosophila, we have evidence that the corpora cardiaca, along with precursors of the stomatogastric (i.e. autonomic) nervous system, also invaginate from the foregut (Fig. 2F).
Visual primordium
The visual primordium, defined molecularly by the expression of so, is wedged in between the midline ectoderm and the protocerebral neurectoderm in the posterior head (Fig. 2A). During gastrulation and germband extension, cells of the visual primordium move laterally and are subdivided into the larval and adult eye primordia and the inner and outer optic lobe (Fig. 2A) (Green et al., 1993; Cheyette et al., 1994; Daniel et al., 1999). The optic lobe and larval eye form a triangular placode that invaginates. The posterior lip of this invagination, marked by the expression of FasII, represents the primordium of the lamina and medulla (outer optic lobe; Fig. 2A,G); the anterior lip, marked by expressing the homeobox gene ind (not shown), gives rise to the lobula complex (inner optic lobe) (Fig. 2A). The larval eye, or Bolwigs organ, labeled by FasII and mAb22C10, develops at the lateralmost tip of the optic lobe placode. The cells that will become the eye imaginal disc (adult eye) are anterior and dorsal to the optic lobe placode (Daniel et al., 1999) and can be recognized by the expression of eyeless (ey; see Fig. 9E).
|
|
The role of Dpp signaling in head patterning
Loss, reduction and overexpression of Dpp in the head ectoderm results in a phenotype that can be most easily interpreted by assuming that similar to what has been postulated for the trunk, there is a graded requirement for Dpp at dorsomedial and dorsolateral levels. Reduction of Dpp function, as seen in the dpp hypomorph dppE87, or embryos lacking sog, results in a highly characteristic cyclops phenotype. The dorsal epidermis that normally forms the dorsal pouch is absent, as evidenced by the loss of expression of the gene race that normally appears in the amnioserosa and dorsomedial head epidermis (Rusch and Levine, 1997) (Fig. 4A,B). Head epidermis is replaced by ectopic optic lobe and larval eye tissue (Fig. 4C-F) which are exposed at the surface because head involution fails to occur. The pattern of protocerebral neuroblasts, visualized by anti-Sna antibody, is unchanged in dppE87 (data not shown), unlike the situation in dpp-null embryos where neuroblast levels are strongly increased (see below). These findings imply that, similar to the amnioserosa of the trunk, the epidermal midline ectoderm of the head requires the highest levels of Dpp. Reduction of Dpp results in the transformation of the midline to dorsolateral structures that, in the head, are represented by the visual primordium.
|
|
Overexpression of dpp by using the heat-inducible driver line hs-Gal4 resulted in a phenotype very similar to the one described for da-Gal4-driven UAS-dpp. Applying 2 hour heat pulses at different stages of development support the idea that the phenocritical period of Dpp action is around the onset of gastrulation. Thus, a high number of embryos heat pulsed between 3 and 5 hours post fertilization showed the characteristic dorsalization phenotype described above. Later heat pulses had no effect on head patterning.
Effect of Dpp on early gene expression patterns in the head
The above described phenotypic effects observed in mid- and late-stage mutant embryos indicate that dorsal epidermal and visual system fates, in particular those of the posterior optic lobe and larval eye, are not expressed in dpp loss of function. It is likely that these abnormalities are the result of changes in early head gene expression. This was followed in detail by assaying the expression of several regulatory genes known to be required for the normal development of the visual primordium, including otd (Finkelstein and Perrimon, 1990), tll (Pignoni et al., 1990), so (Cheyette et al., 1994) and eya (Bonini et al., 1993) in dpp-null mutants (Fig. 6).
|
tll
tll appears in the protocerebral ectoderm, including the head midline ectoderm. Only later does expression spread to cover part of the visual primordium. In embryos that lack Dpp, expression is expanded from the beginning to include the entire dorsal head. As for otd, expression also persists in the head midline ectoderm (Fig. 6D).
so
so is expressed in a transverse stripe spanning the dorsal midline (Fig. 6E). This unpaired domain defines the eye field. Around gastrulation, so expression ceases in the dorsal midline and becomes restricted to the bilateral visual primordia. In addition to the visual system, so appears in the anlage of the stomatogastric nervous system (SNS) and head mesoderm. In a dpp-null fly, so is never expressed in the anlage of the visual system (Fig. 6F), although expression in the SNS and head mesoderm is unchanged.
eya
eya is normally expressed in a complex pattern that essentially consists of three domains located in the anlage of the SNS, the anterior protocerebrum and the anlage of the visual system (Fig. 6G). In dpp-null embryos, eya expression in the primordia of the visual system and SNS is absent from the beginning (Fig. 6H). The anterior protocerebral expression is narrowed.
The observed downregulation of head gap genes and early eye genes in the dorsal midline is an indirect effect of Dpp mediated by the Dpp target zerknuellt (zen). Previous studies have demonstrated that high levels of Dpp in the dorsal midline upregulate and focus the expression of zen in the amnioserosa and, further anteriorly, in the dorsomedial head epidermis (Rusch and Levine, 1997). An RNA in situ probe revealed expression of zen in the early eye field of a stage 5-7 embryo (Fig. 7A). Assaying the expression of head gap and early eye genes in a zen-null mutant background demonstrates that Zen acts as a repressor of these genes. Whereas in wild type, after an initial unpaired expression straddling the dorsal midline, tll, so and eya are turned off in the dorsal midline, they continue to be expressed in this domain in a zen mutant (Fig. 7D,E). At later stages, lack of zen results in a cyclops phenotype (Fig. 7B).
|
|
Loss of hh results in a strong reduction of the head midline epidermis, a reduction in the size of the brain and optic lobe, and the total absence of the larval and adult eye primordium (Fig. 9C,F,H). The requirement of Hh for the formation of the larval eye has been recently reported by Suzuki and Saigo (Suzuki and Saigo, 2000). Our temperature-sensitive shift experiments of hhts2 embryos indicate that the phenocritical period for Hh function in Bolwigs organ development is between 4 and 7 hours. Aside from the larval eye, the primordium of the compound eye, which is marked from stage 12 onward by the expression of eyeless (ey), is also affected by the loss of hh. Heatshock induced overexpression of hh, as well as loss of ptc, causes an increase in larval eye neurons and optic lobe precursors (Fig. 9B,D). Interestingly, ectopic Hh activity is able to induce optic lobe and Bolwigs organ tissue in the head midline and thereby generate a cyclops phenotype similar to the condition described above for partial reduction of dpp. Applying heatshocks at different times of development indicates that the phenocritical period for the Hh induced cyclops is early, between 2.5 and 5 hours. Thus, heat pulses administered during this time caused fusion of the optic lobe and, at a lower frequency, larval eye without increasing the number of optic lobe and larval eye cells significantly. By contrast, later heat pulses (after 5 hours) led to larval eye/optic lobe hyperplasia but no concomitant cyclops phenotype (data not shown).
The intersection of Dpp and Hh signaling in the head
The finding that both loss of Hh and Dpp cause the absence of visual structures, and ectopic expression of Hh and partial loss of Dpp cause transformation of head midline epidermis into visual primordium, begs the question of how the two signaling pathways interact. In Drosophila compound eye development, hh expression is required to turn on dpp expression (Heberlein et al., 1993). To establish whether a regulatory relationship exists between Hh and Dpp signaling, we looked for the expression of dpp and pMAD in the background of hh loss of function, as well as hh, ptc and Cubitus interruptus (Ci) expression in the background of dpp loss of function. In a recent study (Dorfman and Shilo, 2001), it has been shown that cells in which Dpp signaling is activated can be visualized by an antibody against phosphorylated MAD (pMAD) protein. Dpp RNA expression (not shown) and pMAD are normal in a stage 5-9 hh-null background (Fig. 10B), indicating that Hh is not required to activate Dpp signaling in the embryonic head.
|
Taken together, our findings suggest that no direct interaction exists between Hh and Dpp signaling, and that the antagonistic effect of Hh and Dpp on the formation of visual structures is most probably based upon an indirect interaction between the two signaling pathways that involves the expression of the eye genes so and eya (see Discussion).
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In the head region, highest levels of Dpp are required to promote mid dorsal fates (head epidermis, analogous to amnioserosa in the trunk). The activation of screw is involved in this process, similar to its role in the dorsomedial trunk (T. C. and V. H., unpublished). Intermediate Dpp levels promote dorsolateral fates (visual primordium). Low levels of Dpp are reached in the protocerebral neurectoderm and are permissive for the formation of protocerebral neuroblasts. Several of the regulatory genes expressed in the anterior brain and eye field may be direct targets of Dpp signaling. Our findings show that so, eya and omb are activated by Dpp in the visual primordium. These regulatory genes initiate the fate of visual structures, in particular larval eye and outer optic lobe. It has recently been shown that eya and so are also targets of Dpp signaling in the eye imaginal disc (Curtiss and Mlodzik, 2000).
The secondary restriction of so (and other genes with bilateral expression domains developing from unpaired domains, including tll and otd) is effected by the Dpp target zen in the dorsal midline. This homeobox gene is expressed as a response to peak levels of Dpp in the dorsal midline, including amnioserosa and, in the head of the embryo, in the dorsomedial head epidermis primordium (Rusch and Levine, 1997) (this study). We show that loss of zen, similar to reduction of Dpp, results in the absence of amnioserosa and head epidermis, and a cyclops phenotype. Scanning electron microscopy of zen mutants (Wakimoto et al., 1984) has demonstrated the absence of an optic lobe invagination and has led the authors to believe erroneously that the optic lobe itself is deleted. However, the formation of a cyclopic, mid-dorsal optic lobe also results in the absence of an invagination visible at the surface, which explains why this phenotype was overlooked.
In concurrence with the recent report by Suzuki and Saigo (Suzuki and Saigo, 2000) our data show that Hh is positively required for the visual system. Loss of this gene causes the absence of the larval eye, as well as the adult eye primordium. This phenotype is reminiscent of the later requirement of Hh for the initiation of cell differentiation in the larval eye imaginal disc (Ma et al., 1993). Increased expression of Hh, as well as absence of the inhibitor of Hh function, Ptc, results in a cyclops phenotype. Given that mutants in both Dpp and Hh signaling cause abnormalities in the embryonic visual system, the possibility exists that both pathways interact. However, the findings of this study provide no evidence for this possibility. Expression of ptc and hh are normal in early dpp-null embryo, and the cytoplasmic localization of Ci, an indicator of Hh signaling, was also present in a dpp null. Likewise, expression of dpp and pMAD was undisturbed in a Hh-null embryo.
In view of these results, we speculate that the interaction between Dpp and Hh is indirect and requires the function of so, eya and possibly other early eye genes: According to this model (Fig. 11), Dpp activates so and eya in the eye field. Slightly later, expression of so and eya is lost dorsomedially, owing due to repression by Zen at this level. In a second step, the expression of Hh (which comes on later than Dpp) triggers larval eye fate in cells close to the Hh source. The response of a cell to Hh, that is, its expression of ato, depends on its previously expressing so and eya. Finally, Ptc inhibits the range of Hh action, similar to its alleged function in the trunk and imaginal discs.
|
(1) In wild type, Hh can activate larval eye only in cells expressing so and eya. No larval eye develops in the dorsal midline because so is down regulated in this region rapidly, and Hh has no opportunity to overcome the ptc mediated inhibition and induce visual system at an early stage when so is still present in the dorsal midline.
(2) In ptc, Hh is able to induce larval eye fate in the dorsal midline because it is not inhibited at the early stage when so is still expressed dorsomedially.
(3) Heatshock-induced Hh expression at an early stage (stage 5; around 3 hours) has the same effect, overcoming the ptc-mediated inhibition and inducing larval eye dorsomedially
(4) If the level of Dpp is reduced (in dpp null heterozygote, or dpp hypomorph), so and eya are stably expressed in the dorsal midline, as zen, which normally inhibits the early eye genes, is not expressed. As a result Hh can induce larval eye dorsomedially.
(5) In the cyclops phenotype that results from reduction of Dpp, the visual primordium develops as a double crested placode that spans the dorsal midline. In this placode, the posterior crest is formed by larval eye cells, in line with the tenet that Hh induces larval eye fate in the cells next to the Hh source (posteriorly). The anterior crest, which is further away from the Hh source, constitutes posterior optic lobe (see Fig. 4D).
(6) In the cyclops phenotype induced by loss of Ptc or overexpression of Hh, larval eye cells are increased in number, compared with the Dpp reduction induced cyclops. At the same time, posterior optic lobe cells are reduced in number.
Conserved origins and genes: the topology of the anterior brain anlage and eye field in flies and vertebrates
The topology in which different derivatives of the anterior brain anlage are laid out in the early embryo exhibits considerable similarity. To appreciate this similarity, one needs to remember that the neurectoderm of insects does not invaginate (Fig. 12A). As a result, early embryonic tissues located in the dorsal midline (i.e. the head midline ectoderm) of the fly embryo remain where they are, i.e. mid-dorsally, whereas in vertebrates, they form the ventral midline of the neural tube. This inverse topology may explain in part why dorsomedial structures in Drosophila share several functional and molecular similarities with the ventral forebrain in vertebrates. For example, both give rise to neuroendocrine centers (the pars intercerebralis of the insect brain, hypothalamus of vertebrates). In both vertebrates and insects, cells that start out as epithelial placodes in the foregut anlage anteriorly adjacent to the eye field, form neurohemal structures (anterior pituitary in vertebrates, corpora cardiaca in insects) (Copenhaver and Taghert, 1991) (this study) that become innervated by the neuroendocrine neurons derived from the midventral/mid-dorsal brain. The topological similarity between the eye field in Drosophila and vertebrates extends to the location of the eye. In both systems, the eye maps close to the midline and genetic manipulations affecting the midline result in the fusion of the eyes (cyclopia) (Chiang et al., 1996; Pera and Kessel, 1997).
|
Irrespective of which of the two aforementioned hypotheses regarding topology of the neural fate map will turn out to be correct, the high degree of conservation of signaling pathways and regulatory genes controlling the patterning of the fate map in Drosophila and vertebrates emphasizes how close the body plans manifested during early embryogenesis still are. Dpp/BMP and Hh/Shh signaling are centrally involved in head patterning in both systems, and could have exerted this role already in the bilaterian ancestor. However, it is also true that the impact of Dpp and Hh signaling on midline and eye structures seems very different in chordates and arthropods, which makes the independent recruitment of the two signaling pathways into head patterning in these phyla a distinct possibility. In chordates, loss of Hh results in a cyclops phenotype and holoprosencephaly, as high levels of Hh are required for hypothalamus and optic stalk. Hh positively regulates Pax2, a regulatory gene expressed in and required for the optic stalk (Ekker et al., 1995; MacDonald et al., 1995; Hallonet et al., 1999). In the Drosophila embryo, excess function of Hh causes cyclopia. Moreover, Hh has a positive effect on the Pax6 homolog, eyeless; ey expression requires the presence of the Hh signal.
The effect of BMPs/Dpp on early eye formation maybe more similar than the role of Shh/Hh signaling. In Drosophila, both at the early embryonic and larval stage, Dpp promotes eye formation and differentiation (Heberlein et al., 1993) (this study). Vertebrate BMPs are expressed in the dorsal neural tube and are required for dorsal cell fates in the spinal cord, brain and eye (Liem et al., 1995; Furuta et al., 1997; Dudley et al., 1995). In mouse, BMP2, BMP4, BMP5, BMP6, BMP6 and BMP7 are expressed in the dorsal telencephalon, a region that gives rise to the choroid plexus and dorsomedial walls of the cerebral cortex (hippocampus) and diencephalon. At a later stage, BMP7 is also expressed in the retina. Mice homozygous for BMP2 and BMP4 die long before fate changes in the forebrain can be scored (Zhang and Bradley, 1996). BMP7 homozygotes show a late embryonic phenotype that includes degeneration of the retina (Dudley et al., 1995).
When comparing the expression pattern of conserved regulatory genes, such as otd, tll, so and many others (Arendt and Nuebler-Jung, 1996; Hartenstein and Reh, 2001) in anterior brain and eye development of fruit flies and vertebrates, one is also struck by the high number of similarities. These similarities indicate that the bilaterian ancestor might have possessed a head in which photoreceptors, various brain structures and neuroendocrine cells were laid out in a way reminiscent of the one found in present day taxa. This obviously does not imply the existence of complex organs, such as the eye, pituitary or brain structures. What it does imply is that the bilaterian ancestor had an anterior neurectoderm in which clusters of cells with the basic properties of photoreceptors, pigment cells, neuroendocrine cells or central neurons were positioned in a pattern reminiscent of the modern pattern formed by the progenitors of these structures in different animals. During evolution, these cell types diversified further and became shaped by morphogenetic movements into more complex organs. For example, in the chordates (including urochordates and cephalochordates), the anterior neurectoderm invaginated to form a tube that included all cells with the fate of photoreceptors, pigment cells and target neurons. In vertebrates these cells then evaginated as the optic cup, induced lens and other structures from the outer ectoderm and formed an eye. In the evolutionary line leading to arthropods, cells with the fate of photoreceptors and pigment cells were separated at an early developmental stage from cells destined to become optic target neurons. The former remained in the outer ectoderm and became organized into a compound eye, while the latter delaminated along with other neural stem cells to form the brain. The stage is set for comparative studies of eye morphogenesis and gene expression that will elucidate in more detail how a simple visual system changed into the various types of eyes we can observe in extant animal groups.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Adelmann, H. B. (1936). The problem of cyclopia. Pt. II. Q. Rev. Biol. 11, 284-304.
Arendt, D. and Nuebler-Jung, K. (1996) Common ground plans in early brain development in mice and flies. BioEssays 18, 255-259.[Medline]
Arora, K., Levine, M. S. and OConnor, M. B. (1994). The screw gene encodes a ubiquitously expressed member of the TGF-ß family required for specification of dorsal cell fates in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 8, 2588-2601.[Abstract]
Ashburner, M. (1989). Drosophila. A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Press.
Ashe, H. L. and Levine, M. (1999). Local inhibition and long-range enhancement of Dpp signal transduction by Sog. Nature 398, 427-431.[Medline]
Aurelio, A. T. and Cohen, S. M. (2000). Dpp gradient formation in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc. Cell 103, 971-980.[Medline]
Aza-Blanc, P. and Kornberg, T. B. (1999). Ci: a complex transducer of the Hedgehog signal. Trends Genet. 15, 458-462.[Medline]
Aza-Blanc, P., Ramírez-Weber, F., Laget, M., Schwartz, C. and Kornberg, T. B. (1997). Proteolysis that is inhibited by Hedgehog targets Cubitus interruptus protein to the nucleus and converts it to a repressor. Cell 89, 1043-1053.[Medline]
Bernier, G., Panitz, F., Zhou, X., Hollemann, T., Gruss, P. and Pieler, T. (2000). Expanded retina territory by midbrain transformation upon overexpression of Six6 (Optx2) in Xenopus embryos. Mech. Dev. 93, 59-69.[Medline]
Biehs, B., François, V. and Bier, E. (1996). The Drosophila short gastrulation gene prevents Dpp from autoactivating and suppressing neurogenesis in the neuroectoderm. Genes Dev. 10, 2922-2934.[Abstract]
Bonini, N. M., Leisserson, W. M. and Benzer, S. (1993). The eyes absent gene: genetic control of cell survival and differentiation in the developing Drosophila eye. Cell 72, 379-395.[Medline]
Campos-Ortega, J. A. and Hartenstein, V. (1985). The Embryonic Development of Drosophila melanogaster. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Cheyette, B. N. R., Green, P. J., Martin, K., Garren, H., Hartenstein, V. and Zipursky, S. L. (1994). The Drosophila sine oculis locus encodes a homeobox gene required for the development of the entire visual system. Neuron 12, 977-996.[Medline]
Chiang, C., Litingtung, Y., Lee, E., Young, K. E., Corden, J. L., Westphal, H. and Beachy, P. A. (1996). Cyclopia and defective axial patterning in mice lacking Sonic hedgehog gene function. Nature 383, 407-413.[Medline]
Copenhaver, P. F. and Taghert, P. (1991). Origins of the insect enteric nervous system: differentiation of the enteric ganglia from a neurogenic epithelium. Development 113, 1115-1132.[Abstract]
Curtiss, J. and Mlodzik, M. (2000). Morphogenetic furrow initiation and progression during eye development in Drosophila: the roles of decapentaplegic, hedgehog and eyes absent. Development 127, 1325-1336.
Dale, K., Sattar, N., Heemskerk, J., Clarke, J. D., Placzek, M. and Dodd, J. (1999). Differential patterning of ventral midline cells by axial mesoderm is regulated by BMP7 and chordin. Development 126, 397-408.
Daniel, A., Dumstrei, K., Lengyel, J. and Hartenstein, V. (1999). tailless and atonal control cell fate in the embryonic visual system. Development 126, 2945-2954.
Dorfman, R and Shilo, B. Z. (2001). Biphasic activation of the BMP pathway patterns the Drosophila embryonic dorsal region. Development 128, 965-972.
Domínguez, M. (1999). Dual role for Hedgehog in the regulation of the proneural gene atonal during ommatidia development. Development 126, 2345-2353.
Dudley, A. T., Lyons, K. M. and Robertson, E. J. (1995). A requirement for bone morphogenetic protein-7 during the development of the mammalian kidney and eye. Genes Dev. 9, 2795-2807.[Abstract]
Dumstrei, K., Nassif, C., Abboud, G., Aryai, A., Aryai, A. R. and Hartenstein, V. (1998). EGFR signaling is required for the differentation and maintenance of neural progenitors along the dorsal midline of the Drosophila embryonic head. Development 125, 3417-3426.
Ekker, S. C., Ungar, A. R., Greenstein, P., von Kessler, D. P., Porter, J. A., Moon, R. T. and Beachy, P. A. (1995). Patterning activities of vertebrate hedgehog proteins in the developing eye and brain. Curr. Biol. 5, 944-955.[Medline]
Finkelstein, R. and Perrimon, N. (1990). The orthodenticle gene is regulated by bicoid and torso and specifies Drosophila head development. Nature 346, 485-488.[Medline]
Forbes, A. J., Nakano, Y., Taylor, A. M. and Ingham, P. W. (1993). Genetic analysis of hedgehog signalling in the Drosophila embryo. Development 118 Suppl., 115-124.
François, V., Solloway, M., ONeill, J. W., Emery, J. and Bier, E. (1994). Dorsal-ventral patterning of the Drosophila embryo depends on a putative negative growth factor encoded by the short gastrulation gene. Genes Dev. 8, 2602-2616.[Abstract]
Furuta, Y., Piston, D. W. and Hogan, B. L. M. (1997). Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) as regulators of dorsal forebrain development. Development 124, 2203-2212.
Goodrich, L. V., Johnson, R. L., Milenkovic, L., McMahon, J. A. and Scott, M. P. (1996). Conservation of the hedgehog/patched signaling pathway from flies to mice: induction of a mouse patched gene by Hedgehog. Genes Dev. 10, 301-312.[Abstract]
Goodrich, L. V. and Scott, M. P. (1998). Hedgehog and patched in neural development and disease. Neuron 21, 1243-1257.[Medline]
Green, P., Hartenstein, A. Y. and Hartenstein, V. (1993). Embryonic development of the Drosophila visual system. Cell Tissue Res. 273, 583-598.[Medline]
Grenningloh, G., Rehm, E. J. and Goodman, C. S. (1991). Genetic analysis of growth-cone guidance in Drosophila: Fasciclin II functions as a neuronal recognition molecule. Cell 67, 45-57.[Medline]
Hallonet, M., Hollemann, T., Pieler, T. and Gruss, P. (1999). Vax1, a novel homeobox-containing gene, directs development of the basal forebrain and visual system. Genes Dev. 13, 3106-3114.
Hartenstein, V., Tepass, U. and Gruszynski-de Feo, E. (1994). The development of the Drosophila stomatogastric nervous system. J.Comp. Neurol. 350, 367-381.[Medline]
Hartenstein, V. and Reh, T. (2001) Homologies between vertebrate and invertebrate eyes. In: Drosophila eye development (ed. K. Moses). Berlin: Springer (in press).
Heberlein, U., Wolff, T. and Rubin, G. M. (1993). The TGF beta homolog dpp and the segment polarity gene hedgehog are required for propagation of a morphogenetic wave in the Drosophila retina. Cell 75, 913-926.[Medline]
Hirth, F., Therianos, S., Loop, T., Gehring, W. J., Reichert, H. and Furukubo-Tokunaga, K. (1995). Developmental defects in brain segmentation caused by mutations of the homeobox genes orthodenticle and empty spiracles in Drosophila. Neuron 15, 769-778.[Medline]
Holland, P. W. and Graham, A. (1995). Evolution of regional identity in the vertebrate nervous system. Perspect. Dev. Neurobiol. 3, 17-27.[Medline]
Hollemann, T., Bellefroid, E. and Pieler, T. (1998). The Xenopus homologue of the Drosophila gene tailless has a function in early eye development. Development 125, 2425-2432.
Jazwinska, A., Rushlow, C. and Roth, S. (1999). The role of brinker in mediating the graded response to Dpp in early Drosophila embryos. Development 126, 3323-3334.
Kablar, B., Vignali, R., Menotti, L., Pannese, M., Andreazzoli, M., Polo, C., Giribaldi, M. G., Boncinelli, E. and Barsacchi, G. (1996). Xotx genes in the developing brain of Xenopus laevis. Mech. Dev. 55, 145-158.[Medline]
Lee, J. J., Ekker, S. C., von Kessler, D. P., Porter, J. A., Sun, B. I. and Beachy, P. A. (1994). Autoproteolysis of Hedgehog protein biogenesis. Science 266, 1528-1537.[Medline]
Li, H. S., Tierney, C., Wen, L., Wu, J. Y. and Rao, Y. (1997). A single morphogenetic field gives rise to two retina primordia under the influence of the prechordal plate. Development 124, 603-615.
Liem, K. F., Tremml, G., Roelink, H. and Jessell, T. M. (1995). Dorsal differentiation of neural plate cells induced by BMP-mediated signals from epidermal ectoderm. Cell 82, 969-979.[Medline]
Ma, C., Zhou, Y., Beachy, P. A. and Moses, K. (1993). The segment polarity gene hedgehog is required for progression of the morphogenetic furrow in the developing Drosophila eye. Cell 75, 927-938.[Medline]
Macdonald, R., Barth, K. A., Xu, Q., Holder, N., Mikkola, I. and Wilson, S. (1995). Midline signaling is required for Pax gene regulation and patterning of the eyes. Development 121, 3267-3278.
Marigo, V., Scott, M. P., Johnson, R. L., Goodrich, L. V. and Tabin, C. J. (1996). Conservation in hedgehog signaling: induction of a chicken patched homolog by Sonic hedgehog in the developing limb. Development 122, 1225-1233.
Mathers, P. H., Grinberg, A., Mahon, K. A. and Jamrich, M. (1997). The Rx homeobox gene is essential for vertebrate eye development. Nature 387, 603-607.[Medline]
McMahon, A. P. (2000). More surprises in the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Cell 100, 185-188.[Medline]
Méthot, N. and Basler, K. (2001). An absolute requirement for Cubitus interruptus in Hedgehog signaling. Development 128, 733-742.
Minami, M., Kinoshita, N., Kamoshida, Y., Tanimoto, H. and Tabata, T. (1999). brinker is a target of Dpp in Drosophila that negatively regulates Dpp-dependent genes. Nature 398, 242-246.[Medline]
Mobbs, P. G. (1985). Brain structure. In Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology, vol. 5 (ed. G. A. Kerkut and L. I. Gilbert), pp. 299-370. Oxford: Pergamon.
Namba, R. and Minden, J. S. (1999). Fate mapping of Drosophila embryonic mitotic domain 20 reveals that the larval visual system is derived from a subdomain of a few cells. Dev. Biol. 212, 465-476.[Medline]
Oliver, G., Mailhos, A., Wehr, R., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A. and Gruss, P. (1995). Six3, a murine homologue of the sine oculis gene, demarcates the most anterior border of the developing neural plate and is expressed during eye development. Development 121, 4045-4055.
Pera, E. M. and Kessel, M. (1997). Patterning of the chick forebrain anlage by the prechordal plate. Development 124, 4153-4162.
Piccolo, S., Sasai, Y., Lu, B. and De Robertis, E. (1996). Dorsoventral patterning in Xenopus: Inhibition of ventral signals by direct binding of chordin to BMP-4. Cell 86, 589-598.[Medline]
Pignoni, F., Baldarelli, R. M., Steingrímsson, E., Diaz, R. J., Patapoutian, A., Merriam, J. R. and Lengyel, J. A. (1990). The Drosophila gene tailless is expressed at the embryonic termini and is a member of the steroid receptor superfamily. Cell 62, 151-163.[Medline]
Quiring, R., Walldorf, U., Kloter, U. and Gehring, W. J. (1994). Homology of the eyeless gene of Drosophila to the Small eye gene in mice and Aniridia in humans. Science 265, 785-789.[Medline]
Raftery, L. A. and Sutherland, D. J. (1999). TGF-ß family signal transduction in Drosophila development: from Mad to Smads. Dev. Biol. 210, 251-268.[Medline]
Rusch, J. and Levine, M. (1997). Regulation of a dpp target gene in the Drosophila embryo. Development 124, 303-311.
Simeone, A., Acampora, D., Mallamaci, A., Stornaiuolu, A., DApice, M. R., Nigro, V. and Boncinelli, E. (1993). A vertebrate gene related to orthodenticle contains a homeodomain of the bicoid class and demarcates anterior neurectoderm in the gastrulating mouse embryo. EMBO J. 12, 2735-2745.[Abstract]
Steingrímsson, E., Pignoni, F., Liaw, G. J. and Lengyel, J. A. (1991). Dual role of the Drosophila pattern gene tailless in embryonic termini. Science 254, 418-421.[Medline]
St. Johnston, R. D. and Gelbart, W. M. (1987). Decapentaplegic transcripts are localized along the dorsal-ventral axis of the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 6, 2785-2791.[Abstract]
Suzuki, T. and Saigo, K. (2000). Transcriptional regulation of atonal required for Drosophila larval eye development by concerted action of eyes absent, sine oculis and hedgehog signaling independent of fused kinase and cubitus interruptus. Development 127, 1531-1540.
Taghert, P. H. (1999). FMRFamide neuropeptides and neuropeptide-associated enzymes in Drosophila. Microsc. Res. Tech. 45, 80-95.[Medline]
Tautz, D. and Pfeifle, C. (1989). A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals a translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma 98, 81-85.[Medline]
Thomas, P. and Beddington, R. (1996). Anterior primitive endoderm maybe responsible for patterning the anterior neural plate in the mouse embryo. Curr. Biol. 11, 1487-1496.
Wakimoto, B. T., Turner, F. R. and Kaufman, T. C. (1984). Defects in embryogenesis in mutants associated with the antennapedia complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 102, 147-172.[Medline]
Weiss, J. B., Von Ohlen, T., Mellerick, D. M., Dressler, G., Doe, C. Q. and Scott, M. P. (1998). Dorsoventral patterning in the Drosophila central nervous system: the intermediate neuroblasts defective homeobox gene specifies intermediate column identity. Genes Dev. 12, 3591-3602.
Wilson, P. A. and Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. (1995). Induction of epidermis and inhibition of neural fate by Bmp-4. Nature 376, 331-333.[Medline]
Younossi-Hartenstein, A. Y., Tepass, U. and Hartenstein, V. (1993). The embryonic origin of the primordia of the adult Drosophila head. Rouxs Arch. Dev. Biol. 203, 60-73.
Younossi-Hartenstein, A., Nassif, C. and Hartenstein, V. (1996). Early neurogenesis of the Drosophila brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 370, 313-329.[Medline]
Younossi-Hartenstein, A., Green, P., Liaw, G., Rudolph, K., Lengyel, J. and Hartenstein, V. (1997). Control of early neurogenesis of the Drosophila brain by the head gap genes tll, otd, ems, and btd. Dev. Biol. 182, 270-283.[Medline]
Younossi-Hartenstein, A. and Hartenstein, V. (2000a). The embryonic development of the dalyellid flatworm Gieysztoria superba. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 44, 499-506.[Medline]
Younossi-Hartenstein, A. and Hartenstein, V. (2000b). The embryonic development of the polyclad flatworm Imgogine mcgrathi Dev. Genes Evol. 210, 383-398.[Medline]
Younossi-Hartenstein, A., Ehlers, U. and Hartenstein, V. (2000). Embryonic development of the nervous system of the rhabdocoel flatworm Mesostoma lingua (Abildgaard, 1789). J. Comp. Neurol. 416, 461-476.[Medline]
Yu, R. T., McKeown, M., Evans, R. M. and Umesona, K. (1994). Relationship between Drosophila gene tailless and a vertebrate nuclear receptor Tlx. Nature 370, 375-379.[Medline]
Zacharias, D., Williams, J. L. D., Meier, T. and Reichert, H. (1993). Neurogenesis in the insect brain: cellular identification and molecular characterization of brain neuroblasts in the grasshopper embryo. Development 118, 941-955.
Zhang, H. and Bradley, A. (1996). Mice deficient for BMP2 are nonviable and have defects in amnion/chorion and cardiac development. Development 122, 2977-2986.
Zimmermann, L. B., De Jesus-Escobar, J. and Harland, R. M. (1996). The Spemann organizer signal noggin binds and inactivates bone morphogenetic protein-4. Cell 86, 599-606.[Medline]
Zipursky, S. I., Venkatesh, T. R., Teplow, D. B. and Benzer, S. (1984). Neuronal development in the Drosophila retina: monoclonal antibodies as molecular probes. Cell 36, 15-26.[Medline]
Zhou, X., Hollemann, T., Pieler, T. and Gruss, P. (2000). Cloning and expression of xSix3, the Xenopus homologue of murine Six3. Mech. Dev. 91, 327-330.[Medline]