Max-Planck-Institute of Immunobiology, Stuebeweg 51, 79108 Freiburg, Germany
e-mail: schlake{at}immunbio.mpg.de
Accepted 19 April 2005
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Fgfr2, Igfbp5, Hair follicle, Hair medulla, Hair shaft structure, Differentiation, Mouse
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Various fibroblast growth factors and their receptors FGFR1-FGFR4 show
complex expression patterns within the mature hair follicle and, thus, appear
to play an important role in follicle biology
(Nakatake et al., 2001;
Rosenquist and Martin, 1996
;
Suzuki et al., 2000
). Genetic
inactivation of Fgf5 generates mice with significantly elongated
hairs due to an extended growth period during the hair cycle
(Hebert et al., 1994
). The
cognate receptor, FGFR1, is exclusively expressed by the dermal papilla, which
is thought to play a pivotal role in all aspects of hair follicle biology.
Fgf7 (Kgf) and Fgf10 are the only members of the
fibroblast growth factor family that are known to be expressed in the dermal
papilla (Rosenquist and Martin,
1996
; Suzuki et al.,
2000
). Ablation of Fgf7 leads to a matted and unkempt
appearance of older mice, whereas Fgf10-deficient mice show no
obvious hair phenotype (Guo et al.,
1996
; Suzuki et al.,
2000
).
FGF7 and FGF10 efficiently and specifically bind to FGFR2-IIIb, one of
several diverse protein variants with distinct binding characteristics encoded
by the Fgfr2 gene (Igarashi et
al., 1998; Ornitz et al.,
1996
). To interfere with FGFR2-IIIb signalling, various approaches
have been used. Ectopic expression of a membrane-bound or soluble
dominant-negative form of FGFR2-IIIb early during embryonic development causes
reduced numbers of hair follicles (Celli et
al., 1998
; Werner et al.,
1994
). Mice deficient for Fgfr2-IIIb also suffer from
reduced numbers of hair follicles. In addition, hair morphogenesis is retarded
and follicles of transplanted mutant skin give rise to a single hair type
characterised by a very thin hair shaft lacking any regular arrangement of air
cells (Petiot et al.,
2003
).
By ways of experimental design, previous reports mostly dealt with the function of FGFs in morphogenesis and did not address their role in the mature hair follicle. To explore the role of signals from the dermal papilla in the mature hair follicle and for hair growth, I sought to interfere with the action of FGF7 and FGF10 by expressing a soluble dominant-negative form of FGFR2-IIIb in the mature follicle. I demonstrate that the hair coat of Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice has a silky appearance and the number of columns of medulla cells is reduced in a dose-dependent manner. All structural defects and the accompanying changes in global expression patterns are restricted to the hair medulla. I show that transgenic expression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 in the hair follicle largely phenocopies the effects seen in Foxn1:dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice. Our studies implicate signalling via FGFR2-IIIb in the control of the structure of the hair medulla via suppression of Igfbp5 expression.
![]() |
Materials and methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Details of the Foxn1 promoter construct
The 30 kb Foxn1 promoter fragment that has been used in the
present study covers all upstream sequences between the gene encoding a
Na+-dependent dicarboxylate transporter and the first coding exon
of Foxn1, which is exon 2
(Schorpp et al., 1997). Thus,
it contains both alternative promoters that are used for proper gene
expression in thymic epithelium and skin
(Schorpp et al., 1997
).
Extensive expression analyses did not reveal any difference in the temporal
and spatial expression profiles of the Foxn1 promoter fragment and
the endogenous gene (Fig. 1D
and inset therein; C. C. Bleul and T. Boehm, personal communication). A proper
temporal expression pattern of the Foxn1 promoter, which is important
for the interpretation of some results of the present study is further
demonstrated by transgenic lines that express Dkk1 under the control
of the Foxn1 promoter (T.S., unpublished). In a previous study it has
been shown that ectopic expression of Dkk1 under the control of the
cytokeratin 14 promoter abolishes any hair follicle induction
(Andl et al., 2002
). In
contrast to these mice, Foxn1::Dkk1 transgenic mice do not develop
follicles but guard hair follicles (data not shown), clearly indicating that
the Foxn1 promoter fragment is activated at later stages during
epithelial differentiation, as it is true for the endogenous promoter. As a
consequence, no interference with guard hair follicle induction does
occur.
Details of promoter selection for expressing Igfbp5
Whereas dnFgfr2-IIIb is transgenically expressed in the hair
cortex, it induces a dramatic increase in Igfbp5 expression in the
medulla. Although both proteins, dnFGFR2-IIIb and IGFBP5, are secreted and,
thus, the location of their expression domains should be not that important,
an ideal promoter to investigate the consequences of elevated levels of
Igfbp5 expression in Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice
would give rise to medium to strong expression in the hair shaft medulla.
Unfortunately, no such promoter is available to date. Among characterised
promoter fragments, the involucrin promoter is the best suited to express
Igfbp5 transgenically. Although it also gives rise to expression in
the inner root sheath and differentiating layers of the epidermis, it is the
only promoter fragment that drives expression in the medulla. Typically, the
levels of transgene expression using the involucrin promoter are lower than
that with the Foxn1 promoter (see Fig. S1A,B in the supplementary
material). Furthermore, the reduction in the number of medulla columns was
also observed in a transgenic line with lower Igfbp5 expression than
in the other lines (see Fig. S1C,D in the supplementary material). Thus, a
non-physiological effect in Igfbp5 transgenic mice is unlikely. In
addition, no promoter that will offer any advantage when compared with the
involucrin promoter fragment is available.
Histology, immunohistochemistry, TUNEL assay and in situ hybridisation
Back skin representing the first (P10) or second (P31) growth phase of the
hair cycle was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, paraffin embedded, and sectioned
at 6 µm for Hematoxylin and eosin staining, immunohistochemistry, TUNEL
assay or in situ hybridisation. To address cell proliferation in hair
follicles, skin sections were dewaxed, microwaved in 10 mM sodium citrate, and
incubated with rat monoclonal anti-mouse Ki67 (DakoCytomation) as the primary
antibody. Detection was performed with biotinylated goat anti-rat Ig
(Pharmingen) and StreptABComplex/HRP (DakoCytomation). TUNEL assays were
carried out using the In Situ Cell Death Detection, POD kit (Roche).
Essentially, non-radioactive in situ hybridisations were performed as
previously described (Bleul and Boehm,
2000). Both sense and antisense strands of gene-specific fragments
were used as probes. These fragments were generated by PCR using the following
gene-specific primers (fragment size is indicated): arachidonate 8(S)
lipoxygenase, nucleotides 2050-2069 and nucleotides 2573-2592 in Y14696 (543
bp); involucrin, nucleotides 121-140 and nucleotides 1303-1322 in NM_008412
(1202 bp); K6hf, nucleotides 1715-1734 and nucleotides 2424-2443 in
NM_133357 (729 bp); Sh3d19, nucleotides 2542-2561 and nucleotides
3264-3283 in NM_012059 (742 bp); Pai2, nucleotides 550-569 and
nucleotides 1240-1259 in X16490 (710 bp); Foxq1, nucleotides 900-919
and nucleotides 1663-1682 in NM_008239 (783 bp); Dsc2, nucleotides
2212-2231 and nucleotides 2703-2722 in NM_013505 (511 bp); Hb4,
nucleotides 1744-1763 and 2424-2443 in AY028607 (700 bp); NM_183187,
nucleotides 1928-1947 and nucleotides 2672-2691 (764 bp); and Igfbp5,
nucleotides 2021-2040 and nucleotides 3175-3194 in NM_010518 (1174 bp). For
Fgfr2, a fragment that comprises the coding region was used to
generate gene-specific probes.
Microarray experiment and data analysis
To isolate single hair follicles, back skin of 10-day-old mice was cut into
small pieces from which individual hair follicles were prepared using fine
forceps. For each microarray hybridisation, about 300 hair follicles from
three different mice were sampled and total RNA was isolated and converted to
labelled cRNA. Mouse Genome 430 2.0 microarrays were hybridised with labelled
probes as recommended by the manufacturer (Affymetrix). Further details are
given below. The microarray data have been deposited in the Gene Expression
Omnibus database (Accession Number GSE2463).
The major goal of the microarray analysis was to examine whether dnFgfr2-IIIb transgene expression mainly affects the medulla. From each mouse, about 100 hair follicles were isolated and divided into two pools of about 50 follicles each, and subjected to the preparation of total RNA using Trizol (Sigma). For each genotype (wild type and transgenic), three mice of independent litters were subjected to the procedure of hair follicle isolation at postnatal day 10. After separate RNA isolation steps, RNAs from mice of the same genotype were pooled and used to generate labelled cRNA according to the Affymetrix protocol. Each cRNA was hybridised to a single Mouse Genome 430 2.0 microarray. Data analysis was performed using the Affymetrix GCOS software; for scaling, the target intensity (TGT) was set to 100.
By pooling RNA samples from 2x50 follicles each from three different
mice, inter-individual variations as well as small differences between single
follicles are expected to be eliminated
(Kendziorski et al., 2005). In
my experience, differences between individuals or samples are the major source
of false-positive (and false-negative) results in microarray hybridisations.
Indeed, the noise generated by chip-to-chip variations or by differences in
probe preparations is very low (Wodicka et
al., 1997
). As the preparation of single hair follicles is
extremely laborious and time-consuming, I deliberately accepted the
possibility of a small number of false positive and false negative
hybridisation results due to a single hybridisation, but according to previous
publications and my own experience, mainly transcripts with signals next to
the detection limit are affected (Wodicka
et al., 1997
). Because of their low level of expression, their
independent verification via in situ hybridisation is very difficult and
almost impossible. Thus, they would not aid to support the starting
hypothesis. Nevertheless, the microarray results clearly demonstrate the
reliability and validity of the data obtained through the chosen strategy. For
none of the selected genes was a discrepancy between microarray data and
independent verification approaches found (see Results).
To limit the number of extracted genes, I chose a fourfold change in expression as the threshold. Furthermore, I eliminated some seemingly upregulated genes from the final list, as the increased expression levels were a direct effect of the transgenic construct and not caused by transgene expression. These genes encode some immunoglobulins (which falsely appear to be increased in expression due to the use of a dnFGFR2-IIIb/IgG fusion construct) and a sodium-dependent dicarboxylate transporter (expressed at elevated levels because its very 3'-end is part of the Foxn1 promoter fragment). As expected, the aberrant transcription of this intragenic region does not have any effect in transgenic mice, as indicated by various transgenic lines using the Foxn1 promoter (data not shown). Finally, I chose a microarray signal intensity of 120 as a further threshold to eliminate the majority of false positive targets. This value is close to the actual and reliable detection limit and was empirically determined in a large set of microarray analyses (data not shown).
The decrease in the number of hair medulla columns in Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice does not cause an artificial increase in the number of downregulated genes, when an at least a twofold change in expression is taken as the minimal threshold. This is demonstrated by a simple calculation: about 70% of all follicles contain only a single column of medulla cells. Most of the remaining hair follicles possess a medulla with two cell columns. Thus, the average number of medulla columns is 1.3: [(70x1) + (30x2)]/100. Taking into account that some hair follicles contain more than two columns of medulla cells, the correct value for the average number of medulla columns might be in the range of 1.4-1.5. Consequently, a general reduction of the number of medulla columns to 1 will produce only a 1.5-fold decrease in expression levels. As upregulated genes are affected by the same effect, genes that are only slightly increased in expression might be undetectable with the microarray approach. Thus, upregulated genes might be slightly under-represented among identified target genes. This effect is inherent to the specific biological situation of wild-type and dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice and independent of microarray and data analysis.
A few targets with slightly enhanced expression levels in transgenic mice might be not detected because of the general reduction of the number of hair medulla columns. In addition, the analysis of hair follicles does not allow the identification of every gene that is expressed in more domains than the medulla but that is downregulated only in the latter compartment. This is demonstrated by a simple calculation. As already mentioned, the average number of medulla columns is about 1.4-1.5. Assuming that, for example, at least four cells of any inner root sheath (IRS) layer are needed to wrap 1.5 cells of the hair medulla (which is actually a very conservative assumption), wild-type expression in the medulla has to be 2.7-fold higher when compared with the IRS and expression in the medulla has to be completely lacking in the transgenic follicle to obtain at least a twofold change in expression in a microarray analysis (relative expression level in wild-type follicle: 4x1 + 1.5x2.7=8; relative expression level in transgenic follicle lacking expression in the medulla: 4x1 + 1.5x0=4). Thus, a significant difference in endogenous expression levels of distinct domains is essential to identify a decrease that is restricted to the medulla. Furthermore, the enhanced expression must occur in the medulla.
What can be expected if there is no significant difference in expression levels among distinct domains? For four IRS cells versus 1.5 medulla cells, one would obtain relative signal intensities of 4x1 + 1.5x1=5.5 for wild-type versus 4x1 + 1.5x0=4 for transgenic hair follicles that lack any medullary expression. Thus, the decrease in signal intensities would be in the range of 1.38-fold. A more realistic assumption of about 6 IRS cells that are needed to wrap 1.5 medulla cells would give a 1.25-fold decrease (6x1 + 1.5x1=7.5 versus 6x1 + 1.5x0=6).
For K6hf and K17, expression in the medulla might be enhanced when compared with the companion layer (Fig. 3E and data not shown). Nevertheless, the appearance of in situ hybridisation patterns such as in Fig. 3E can be misleading if interpreted simply by eye. Whereas the medulla is visible as a broad structure, the companion layer appears as a very thin band. In actual fact, the intensities of staining are not that different in both compartments. In addition, expression is far from being absent in the transgenic hair follicle. Thus, both effects, moderately enhanced expression in the medulla of wild-type follicles when compared with the companion layer and significant expression in transgenic medullae, might compensate each other. Actually, our microarray analysis revealed a 1.3-fold decrease in the expression of K6hf and K17. Likewise, quantitative RT-PCR did not show any significant difference in expression in wild-type and transgenic skin (transgenic versus wild type: -1x for K6hf; -1.5x for K17).
Analysis of hair and hair shaft structures
Hair was plucked from 4-week-old mice and single hair shafts were sorted to
determine the composition of the hair coat. For the comparison of overall hair
lengths and for the analysis of the internal structure of hair shafts, a Zeiss
dissecting microscope and a Zeiss light microscope were used, respectively.
Photographs were taken using a Sony and a Nikon digital camera,
respectively.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
To elucidate the role of FGF signals from the dermal papilla in mature hair
follicles, I sought to interfere with endogenous FGFR2-IIIb signalling by
expressing a dominant-negative form of this receptor (dnFGFR2-IIIb). As no
strong promoter fragment for expression in the hair matrix or the dermal
papilla is available, I chose the Foxn1 promoter, which produces
strong expression in the hair cortex (C. C. Bleul and T. Boehm, unpublished;
details are given in Materials and methods). Furthermore, I used a soluble
form of dnFGFR2-IIIb, which is more potent than the membrane-bound variant, to
overcome the possible limitations of ectopic expression distant from the
dermal papilla (Celli et al.,
1998).
|
Mice of the low expressing line #53 develop normally and their appearance is unaltered when compared with wild-type littermates. On the contrary, transgenic mice of lines #8 and #42 can be distinguished from their wild-type littermates as soon as the hair shafts emerge through the epidermis. Although these mice develop normally and the formation of the hair coat is neither accelerated nor retarded, the pelage has a bright and silky appearance and the skin is visible for a longer period during pelage formation (Fig. 1E-H).
To test whether the observed effect is specific for FGFR2-IIIb-mediated
signalling, I generated transgenic mice that express a soluble
dominant-negative form of FGFR1-IIIc as a control. FGF1 which is also
expressed in the hair follicle binds with high affinity to FGFR1-IIIc as well
as FGFR2-IIIb, while FGF7 and FGF10 exclusively bind to FGFR2-IIIb
(Igarashi et al., 1998;
Ornitz et al., 1996
). Three
independent transgenic lines expressed dnFgfr1-IIIc at high to very
high levels. Nevertheless, none of them revealed a phenotype similar to
Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice (T. Schlake, unpublished). This
shows that the phenotype observed in Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb mice is
specifically due to impaired FGFR2 signalling.
Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice have reduced hair medullae
To clarify the reason for the altered hair coat appearance, I first
investigated the composition of the pelage. In wild-type mice, four different
hair types can be found with characteristic frequencies. Whereas about 65-70%
of all hairs are of the zigzag type with three or four sharp bends within the
hair shaft, 30% are straight hairs known as awl. The guard hairs are also
straight but significantly longer than awl hairs and occur at a frequency of
about 1-3%. Auchene hairs form only a minor fraction, with a frequency of
about 0.1%, and have a single sharp bend within their hair shaft.
Interestingly, Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice possess all four
hair types at normal frequencies (data not shown). Furthermore, the hair
length is not affected (Fig.
2A-C).
The internal structure of the hair shaft is a further distinctive feature of different hair types. Zigzag hairs have a single column of medulla cells, whereas guard hairs contain two columns. Awl and auchene hairs have two or more columns of medulla cells, with two and three predominating. Under the light microscope, each column of medulla cells is visible as a ladder-like structure because of the regular arrangement of air spaces within the medulla. When I investigated the internal structure of transgenic hairs, I noted the complete absence of hairs with more than one column of medulla cells in lines #8 and #42 (Fig. 2B and data not shown). Furthermore, light microscopy of hair shafts revealed an altered differentiation of the medulla, as the regular spacing of air cells is disturbed or even missing. Interestingly, the structure of hair shafts is also affected in the low expressing line #53. In this line zigzag hairs have a normal appearance; however, guard hairs contain only one column of medulla cells and awl and auchene hairs possess one or two columns (Fig. 2C). This clearly indicates that the observed effect of transgene expression is dose dependent. In histological sections, the altered structure of hair medullae manifests itself in an abnormally dense packing of cells and the lack of vacuoles (Fig. 2D,E).
I next asked whether the absence of more than one column of medulla cells might be due to an apoptosis-driven reduction of medulla-forming cells. Detailed analysis of hair follicle sections failed to identify TUNEL-positive cells in the medulla (Fig. 2F,G), suggesting that the reduced medulla structure must be the result of reduced proliferation of progenitor cells. Unfortunately, analysis of cell proliferation specifically in the medulla is hampered by the fact that the medulla is only one of several epithelial compartments in the hair follicle, most of which are unaffected by dnFgfr2-IIIb expression. Thus, proliferative compartments in wild-type and transgenic hair follicles are largely indistinguishable (Fig. 2H,I). However, in some follicles of wild-type mice proliferating cells located next to the dermal papilla, i.e. medulla representing progenitors, appear to extend more distally than all other precursor cells (Fig. 2H). This could not be found in transgenic follicles and, thus, might support the hypothesis of a reduced proliferation rate of medulla progenitors in Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb hair bulbs.
|
Transgene expression does not cause an early and general differentiation
defect in the medulla, because, for example, arachidonate 8(S) lipoxygenase
transcript levels are indistinguishable in wild-type and transgenic hair
follicles (Fig. 3A,B). I also
analysed the expression of the transcription factor Foxq1. It is
expressed in the hair medulla and is of special interest because a mutation in
the Foxq1 gene is responsible for the satin mutation
(Hong et al., 2001). Satin
mice are characterised by a silky appearance and hairs that are thinner than
normal, which is highly reminiscent of the Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb
phenotype. Nevertheless, gene expression studies revealed no difference
between wild-type and transgenic hair follicles, again excluding a generally
toxic effect of the transgene on gene transcription in the medulla
(Fig. 3K,L).
Ectopic expression of dnFgfr2-IIIb exclusively affects the hair medulla
The above results suggested that the hair medulla is the only follicular
compartment affected in Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice. If this
were so, the observed effects must be mediated by interference specifically
with endogenous FGFR2 signalling, as FGFR2 is the only FGF receptor that is
expressed in cells of the medulla or progenitors thereof
(Rosenquist and Martin, 1996).
Thus, to exclude a transgene effect on compartments other than the medulla and
to elucidate the molecular basis of the observed phenotype in more detail, I
sought to identify further genes affected on the transcriptional level in
transgenic mice.
|
|
Ectopic expression of Igfbp5 phenocopies Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb-mediated reduction of medulla columns
I next asked how transgene expression might translate into the observed
phenotype and sought to delineate a hierarchy of molecular events. In this
context, Igfbp5 appeared to be the most interesting and promising
candidate for several reasons. First, Igfbp5 is the only gene among
those identified whose product is involved in intercellular signalling. Thus,
it might transduce initial signals to remote regions. Second, IGFBP5 can act
as an antagonist of IGF, which is known to have mitogenic functions, and might
thereby be capable of reducing cell proliferation. Third, endogenous
Igfbp5 transcript levels differ between distinct types of follicles
(Fig. 4G,I), indicating a
possible relationship to the number of medulla columns. In contrast to the
wild-type situation, all transgenic hair follicles show strong Igfbp5
expression in the medulla that might be responsible for a general one-column
medulla (Fig. 4H,J).
To address the role of Igfbp5 in mediating the
Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic effect, transgenic mice that
ectopically express Igfbp5 were developed. For this, I employed an
involucrin promoter fragment (a detailed discussion of promoter selection is
presented in the Materials and methods). Among available promoters it is the
only one that also drives gene expression in the medulla, which is the domain
of increased Igfbp5 expression in dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic
mice (Carroll et al., 1993).
All four independent transgenic lines revealed moderate-to-strong transgene
expression and an abnormal appearance of their hair coat (T.S., unpublished).
Nevertheless, their pelage is neither bright nor silky. A detailed analysis of
their hair coat demonstrated that Igfbp5 transgenic mice possess all
major hair types with normal frequencies. The hair shafts are significantly
reduced in length and, most interestingly, contain only one column of medulla
cells (Fig. 5). Within the
medulla, the spacing of air cells is, however, very regular.
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The known ligands of FGFR2-IIIb are FGF1, FGF3, FGF7 and FGF10
(Igarashi et al., 1998;
Ornitz et al., 1996
). Of
these, all but FGF3 are expressed in the hair follicle
(Rosenquist and Martin, 1996
;
Suzuki et al., 2000
). Whereas
FGF1 is expressed in the epithelial compartment of the hair follicle, FGF7 and
FGF10 are secreted by cells of the dermal papilla. Ablation of Fgf7
or Fgf10 has only mild or no effects, respectively, on the hair coat,
which is probably due to redundant functions and to their co-expression
(Guo et al., 1996
;
Suzuki et al., 2000
). Mice
deficient for Fgfr2-IIIb or ectopically expressing dominant-negative
forms of the FGFR2-IIIb protein prior to follicle induction produce
significantly fewer hair follicles than wild-type littermates, indicating a
role of FGF signalling in follicle morphogenesis
(Celli et al., 1998
;
Petiot et al., 2003
;
Werner et al., 1994
).
Unfortunately, this early effect hampers the analysis and interpretation of
the role of Fgfr2-IIIb in the mature hair follicle. The use of the
Foxn1 promoter that is active in the differentiating hair cortex
limits transgene expression to the time after follicular induction and the
first morphogenetic steps (for further details on the Foxn1 promoter,
see Materials and methods). Obviously, transgene expression in primary hair
follicles does not interfere with later inductive waves, as the number of hair
follicles is normal (see hair follicle densities in Figs
1,
2,
3,
4 and data not shown) and all
hair types are present.
|
|
The pelage of mice consists of four distinct hair types that are induced in
consecutive waves. Very little is known about the establishment and
maintenance of different hair follicles. EDAR signalling is somehow involved
in the generation of zigzag hairs, as mice with a disruption of this pathway,
as well as transgenic animals overexpressing EDA1, lack zigzag hairs while
having about normal numbers of follicles
(Cui et al., 2003;
Mustonen et al., 2003
;
Sundberg, 1994a
;
Sundberg, 1994b
;
Zhang et al., 2003
). It is
unknown whether this transformation occurs during follicle induction or in the
mature follicle. Our data unequivocally show that at least some distinctive
features of hair follicle types are determined in the mature hair follicle. As
the activity of the Foxn1 promoter truly reflects the spatial and
temporal expression pattern of the endogenous locus and, thus, starts rather
late in follicular morphogenesis (for details see Materials and methods),
transgene expression cannot have an effect on the induction of at least guard
hair follicles. Nevertheless, Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice
develop guard hairs with only one column of medulla cells instead of two.
Interestingly, transgenic expression of dnFGFR2-IIIb and genetic
inactivation of the transcription factor FOXQ1 cause very similar hair
phenotypes (Hong et al.,
2001), suggesting the possibility of a direct link. Expression
studies in Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice, however, revealed no
differences in Foxq1 transcript levels. It is still possible that
FGFR2-IIIb signalling affects FOXQ1-mediated transcription on the
translational or post-translational level. At least some members of the large
family of forkhead box (FOX) proteins are post-translationally modified
(Nakae et al., 1999
).
Unfortunately, no specific antibody for FOXQ1 is yet available. As expression
of Fgfr2 in the follicle starts earlier, i.e. more proximal than that
of Foxq1, and the domains of transcriptional activity only overlap
very slightly, a regulation of Fgfr2 expression by FOXQ1 can be
excluded.
All genes that are affected in Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice
are expressed in the hair medulla, suggesting that the identified target genes
lie in a genetic pathway directly controlled by Fgfr2-IIIb. Several
structural genes are reduced in expression in Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb
transgenic mice. Among them, basic hair keratin 4 (HB4; KRT2-16 - Mouse Genome
Informatics) is a highly interesting candidate. HB4 is the first hard keratin
for which an expression in the hair medulla is demonstrated. In humans,
HB4 is expressed in filiform papillae of tongue but is completely
absent from the hair follicle (Langbein et
al., 2001). Furthermore, human hair shafts lack any air spaces
although they usually contain a medulla. Thus, Hb4 may be one of the
genes that are responsible for the characteristic structure of murine hair
shafts, i.e. a regular pattern of air spaces, which is missing in
Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice. ALDH1A3 catalyses the last step
in retinoic acid synthesis. Previous reports have demonstrated specific
expression in the hair follicle (Everts et
al., 2004
; Niederreither et
al., 2002
). Reduced levels of retinoic acid caused by the lack of
ALDH1A3 may account for some effects in Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb
transgenic hair follicles. Snai3 encodes a member of the Snail
protein family (Kataoka et al.,
2000
). As a transcriptional regulator, SNAI3 might mediate some
consequences of dnFgfr2-IIIb transgene expression. Interestingly, a
previous report has suggested a link between FGF-signalling and the action of
Snail proteins (Savagner et al.,
1997
).
Among target genes, Igfbp5 is the most interesting one, as IGFBPs
act as stimulators or inhibitors of the mitogen IGF depending on environmental
conditions (Clemmons, 1992). An
antagonistic effect of IGFBP5 on endogenous IGF signalling would be compatible
with the increased Igfbp5 expression and the reduced number of
medulla columns in Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice. The strong
expression of Igfbp5 in the medulla of transgenic hair follicles when
compared with wild-type tissue indicates that, for unknown reasons, the
innermost cells of the hair shaft are prone to high Igfbp5 gene
activity. Obviously, signalling via FGFR2-IIIb is needed to suppress this
default expression pattern.
Using Ivl::Igfbp5 transgenic mice, I could demonstrate that elevated levels of Igfbp5 expression are sufficient to reduce the number of medulla columns. This strongly supports the idea that the inhibition of Igfbp5 gene expression is causally linked to the production of hair shafts with more than one medulla column in wild-type hair follicles. The present data do not exclude the possibility that genes other than Igfbp5 might contribute to the reduction of medulla column numbers in Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic mice. As Ivl::Igfbp5 transgenic hair shafts still possess a regular pattern of air spaces and the transgenic hair coat has no silky appearance, Ivl::Igfbp5 transgenic mice are only a partial phenocopy of Foxn1::dnFgfr2-IIIb transgenic animals. Expression levels in Ivl::Igfbp5 transgenic mice suggest that this is not due to insufficient Igfbp5 expression, indicating that the control of the number of medulla columns and the regulation of medulla differentiation can be genetically separated.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material for this article is available at
http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/132/13/2981/DC1
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Andl, T., Reddy, S. T., Gaddapara, T. and Millar, S. E. (2002). WNT Signals are required for the initiation of hair follicle development. Dev. Cell 2, 643-653.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bleul, C. C. and Boehm, T. (2000). Chemokines define distinct microenvironments in the developing thymus. Eur. J. Immunol. 30,3371 -3379.[CrossRef][Medline]
Botchkarev, V. A., Botchkareva, N. V., Roth, W., Nakamura, M., Chen, L. H., Herzog, W., Lindner, G., McMahon, J. A., Peters, C., Lauster, R. et al. (1999). Noggin is a mesenchymally derived stimulator of hair-follicle induction. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 158-164.[CrossRef][Medline]
Botchkarev, V. A., Botchkareva, N. V., Sharov, A. A., Funa, K., Huber, O. and Gilchrest, B. A. (2002). Modulation of BMP signaling by noggin is required for induction of the secondary (nontylotrich) hair follicles. J. Invest. Dermatol. 118, 3-10.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carroll, J. M., Albers, K. M., Garlick, J. A., Harrington, R.
and Taichman, L. B. (1993). Tissue- and stratum-specific
expression of the human involucrin promoter in transgenic mice.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90,10270
-10274.
Celli, G., LaRochelle, W. J., Mackem, S., Sharp, R. and Merlino,
G. (1998). Soluble dominant-negative receptor uncovers
essential roles for fibroblast growth factors in multi-organ induction and
patterning. EMBO J. 17,1642
-1655.
Clemmons, D. R. (1992). IGF binding proteins: regulation of cellular actions. Growth Regul. 2, 80-87.[Medline]
Cui, C. Y., Durmowicz, M., Ottolenghi, C., Hashimoto, T.,
Griggs, B., Srivastava, A. K. and Schlessinger, D. (2003).
Inducible mEDA-A1 transgene mediates sebaceous gland hyperplasia and
differential formation of two types of mouse hair follicles. Hum.
Mol. Genet. 12,2931
-2940.
Everts, H. B., King, L. E., Jr, Sundberg, J. P. and Ong, D. E. (2004). Hair cycle-specific immunolocalization of retinoic acid synthesizing enzymes Aldh1a2 and Aldh1a3 indicate complex regulation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 123,258 -263.[CrossRef][Medline]
Guo, L., Degenstein, L. and Fuchs, E. (1996). Keratinocyte growth factor is required for hair development but not for wound healing. Genes Dev. 10,165 -175.[Abstract]
Headon, D. J. and Overbeek, P. A. (1999). Involvement of a novel Tnf receptor homologue in hair follicle induction. Nat. Genet. 22,370 -374.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hebert, J. M., Rosenquist, T., Götz, J. and Martin, G. R. (1994). FGF5 as a regulator of the hair growth cycle: evidence from targeted and spontaneous mutations. Cell 78,1017 -1025.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hong, H. K., Noveroske, J. K., Headon, D. J., Liu, T., Sy, M. S., Justice, M. J. and Chakravarti, A. (2001). The winged helix/forkhead transcription factor Foxq1 regulates differentiation of hair in satin mice. Genesis 29,163 -171.[CrossRef][Medline]
Igarashi, M., Finch, P. W. and Aaronson, S. A.
(1998). Characterization of recombinant human fibroblast growth
factor (FGF)-10 reveals functional similarities with keratinocyte growth
factor (FGF-7). J. Biol. Chem.
273,13230
-13235.
Kataoka, H., Murayama, T., Yokode, M., Mori, S., Sano, H.,
Ozaki, H., Yokota, Y., Nishikawa, S. I. and Kita, T. (2000).
A novel Snail-related transcription factor Smuc regulates basic
helix-loop-helix transcription factor activities via specific E-box motifs.
Nucleic Acids Res. 28,626
-633.
Kendziorski, C., Irizarry, R. A., Chen, K. S., Haag, J. D. and
Gould, M. N. (2005). On the utility of pooling biological
samples in microarray experiments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 102,4252
-4257.
Kulessa, H., Turk, G. and Hogan, B. L. (2000).
Inhibition of Bmp signaling affects growth and differentiation in the anagen
hair follicle. EMBO J.
19,6664
-6674.
Langbein, L., Rogers, M. A., Winter, H., Praetzel, S. and
Schweizer, J. (2001). The catalog of human hair keratins. II.
Expression of the six type II members in the hair follicle and the combined
catalog of human type I and II keratins. J. Biol.
Chem. 276,35123
-35132.
Laurikkala, J., Pispa, J., Jung, H. S., Nieminen, P., Mikkola, M., Wang, X., Saarialho-Kere, U., Galceran, J., Grosschedl, R. and Thesleff, I. (2002). Regulation of hair follicle development by the TNF signal ectodysplasin and its receptor Edar. Development 129,2541 -2553.[Medline]
Mustonen, T., Pispa, J., Mikkola, M. L., Pummila, M., Kangas, A. T., Pakkasjarvi, L., Jaatinen, R. and Thesleff, I. (2003). Stimulation of ectodermal organ development by Ectodysplasin-A1. Dev. Biol. 259,123 -136.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nakae, J., Park, B. C. and Accili, D. (1999).
Insulin stimulates phosphorylation of the forkhead transcription factor FKHR
on serine 253 through a Wortmannin-sensitive pathway. J. Biol.
Chem. 274,15982
-15985.
Nakatake, Y., Hoshikawa, M., Asaki, T., Kassai, Y. and Itoh, N. (2001). Identification of a novel fibroblast growth factor, FGF-22, preferentially expressed in the inner root sheath of the hair follicle. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1517,460 -463.[Medline]
Niederreither, K., Fraulob, V., Garnier, J. M., Chambon, P. and Dolle, P. (2002). Differential expression of retinoic acid-synthesizing (RALDH) enzymes during fetal development and organ differentiation in the mouse. Mech. Dev. 110,165 -171.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ornitz, D. M., Xu, J., Colvin, J. S., McEwen, D. G., MacArthur,
C. A., Coulier, F., Gao, G. and Goldfarb, M. (1996). Receptor
specificity of the fibroblast growth factor family. J. Biol.
Chem. 271,15292
-15297.
Petiot, A., Conti, F. J., Grose, R., Revest, J. M.,
Hodivala-Dilke, K. M. and Dickson, C. (2003). A crucial role
for Fgfr2-IIIb signalling in epidermal development and hair follicle
patterning. Development
130,5493
-5501.
Rosenquist, T. A. and Martin, G. R. (1996). Fibroblast growth factor signalling in the hair growth cycle: expression of the fibroblast growth factor receptor and ligand genes in the murine hair follicle. Dev. Dyn. 205,379 -386.[CrossRef][Medline]
Savagner, P., Yamada, K. M. and Thiery, J. P.
(1997). The zinc-finger protein slug causes desmosome
dissociation, an initial and necessary step for growth factor-induced
epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Cell Biol.
137,1403
-1419.
Schorpp, M., Hofmann, M., Dear, T. N. and Boehm, T. (1997). Characterization of mouse and human nude genes. Immunogenetics 46,509 -515.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sundberg, J. P. (1994a). The downless (dl) and sleek (Dlslk) mutations, chromosome 10. In Handbook of Mouse Mutations with Skin and Hair Abnormalities (ed. J. P. Sundberg), pp. 241-246. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Sundberg, J. P. (1994b). The tabby (ta), tabby-c (Tac), and tabby-J (TaJ) mutations, chromosome X. In Handbook of Mouse Mutations with Skin and Hair Abnormalities (ed. J. P. Sundberg), pp.455 -462. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Suzuki, K., Yamanishi, K., Mori, O., Kamikawa, M., Andersen, B., Kato, S., Toyoda, T. and Yamada, G. (2000). Defective terminal differentiation and hypoplasia of the epidermis in mice lacking the Fgf10 gene. FEBS Lett. 481, 53-56.[CrossRef][Medline]
Werner, S., Smola, H., Liao, X., Longaker, M. T., Krieg, T., Hofschneider, P. H. and Williams, L. T. (1994). The function of KGF in morphogenesis of epithelium and reepithelialization of wounds. Science 266,819 -822.[Medline]
Wodicka, L., Dong, H., Mittmann, M., Ho, M. H. and Lockhart, D. J. (1997). Genome-wide expression monitoring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Biotechnol. 15,1359 -1367.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang, M., Brancaccio, A., Weiner, L., Missero, C. and Brissette, J. L. (2003). Ectodysplasin regulates pattern formation in the mammalian hair coat. Genesis 37, 30-37.[CrossRef][Medline]
|