1 Departamento de Ciencias Morfológicas y Biología Celular y Animal, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz 06071, Spain
2 Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rue da Quinta Grande, 6 Oeiras, Portugal
3 Department of Anatomy and Physiology, The Wellcome Trust Biocentre, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK
4 Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, Santander 39008, Spain
5 Departamento de Anatomía y Biología Celular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander 39011, Spain
6 Instituto Cajal, CSIC, Dr Arce 37, Madrid 28002, Spain
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: hurlej{at}unican.es)
Accepted March 29, 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Apoptosis, BMP, FGF receptors, Snail, MSX2, Syndactyly, Chick, Duck
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Chondrogenesis and cell death are both controlled by BMPs (Zou and Niswander, 1996; Zou et al., 1997; Macias et al., 1997; Kawakami et al., 1996; Yokouchi et al., 1996) and each of these opposing effects appears to be related to the stage of differentiation of the mesoderm. The undifferentiated limb mesoderm undergoes apoptosis when the cells are exposed to BMPs, but if the cells have initiated aggregation into the prechondrogenic blastemas, BMPs induce growth and differentiation through the receptor BMPR1B (Merino et al., 1998). In addition, it has been found recently that interdigital BMPs play a key role in regulating the morphological identity of the digits (Dahn and Fallon, 2000). Three members of the BMP family (BMP2, BMP4 and BMP7) are widely distributed in the limb bud including the mesoderm of the ANZ, PNZ and INZs, which are destined to die and also in the proliferating mesoderm of the progress zone and in the AER (Francis-West et al., 1995). Thus, a key question to be answered is why the apoptotic effect of BMPs is restricted spatially and temporally to the zones of cell death. The presence in the limb mesoderm of the BMP antagonist Gremlin in a fashion complementary to that of BMPs may contribute to limit the spatial distribution of cell death within the limb bud (Merino et al., 1999).
FGFs have been identified as the signals responsible for mesodermal proliferation (Martin, 1998) but there is also evidence that FGFs are involved in the regulation of cell death. Exogenous administration of FGFs into the areas of physiological cell death inhibits apoptosis (Macias et al., 1996) and co-administration of FGFs with BMPs into the limb mesoderm blocks the apoptotic effect observed when BMPs are administered alone (Gañan et al., 1996; Buckland et al., 1998). In addition, syndactyly, a phenotype characteristic of defective programmed cell death, is observed in mutants with disruption in the FGF signaling pathway (Muenke et al., 1994; Wilkie et al., 1995b; Yamaguchi and Rossant, 1995; Partanen et al., 1998; Heymer and Ruther, 1999). Furthermore, local application of FGF into developing interdigital duck webs potentiates the apoptotic effect of exogenous administered BMPs (Gañan et al., 1998). These results suggest that FGFs might be at the same time survival factors and signals required for cell death. But, how FGFs may exert these apparently opposite functions awaits clarification.
We have investigated the possible function of FGFs in the regulation of the areas of programmed cell death in the developing avian limb. Our findings confirm the role of FGFs as survival factors for the limb mesoderm and provide evidence for a role of FGFs in the control of the BMP-signaling pathway responsible for establishing the areas of cell death.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Experimental manipulation of the limbs
The function of FGFs in the control of cell death was studied by analyzing the effects of local administration of FGFs (FGF2; R&D Systems) and FGF inhibitors (SU5402, Calbiochem; and PD173074/SB-402451, a generous gift from Glaxo Smith Kline) into the limb tissues using as carriers heparin acrylic (Sigma) and ion exchange (AG1-X2, Bio-Rad) beads, respectively. The possible interactions between FGFs and BMP signaling were explored by implanting together, or at different time intervals, beads incubated in FGFs or in SU5402, and beads incubated in BMP7 (a gift from Creative Biomolecules, Hopkinton) or in a BMP antagonist (Noggin or Gremlin; both generously donated by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown). For these purposes the eggs were windowed at the desired stages and the right limb bud was exposed. Beads incubated in the different factors (1 hour at room temperature) or in PBS or DMSO (controls) were implanted into the limb mesoderm. The effects on the ANZ and PNZ were examined by implanting the beads in the anterior or posterior margin mesoderm of the chick wing bud at stages 20-22. The effects on the INZ were studied by implanting the beads in the third interdigital space of chick (stages 28 or 29) or duck embryos (8.5 days of incubation).
Human recombinant FGF2 and BMP7 were diluted in PBS at a concentration of 0.5 mg/ml; human recombinant Noggin and Gremlin diluted in PBS were employed at 1 mg/ml; SU5402 and PD173074 were diluted in DMSO and employed at 4 mg/ml and 2 mg/ml, respectively.
In some experiments FGF2 was substituted for FGF4 or FGF8, and BMP7 for BMP2. No significant changes in the observed effects were apparent from these substitutions.
Morphology, cell death and cell proliferation
The morphology of the limbs following the different treatments was studied in whole-mount specimens after cartilage staining with Alcian Green as described previously (Gañan et al., 1996) and by scanning electron microscopy. The pattern of cell death was analyzed by vital staining with Neutral Red (see Macias et al., 1997) and by Tdt-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) in paraffin sections following the instructions of the manufacturer (Boehringer Mannheim).
Cell proliferation was analyzed by anti-bromodeoxyuridine immunolabeling. For this purpose 100 µl of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) solution (100 µg/µl) was pipetted directly over the limb. After 30 minutes of further incubation, the embryos were fixed in 70% ethanol. The autopod was then dissected free, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin wax. Immunocytochemistry to detect BrdU incorporation was carried out in tissue sections according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Becton Dickinson) using anti-BrdU and rhodamine-conjugated secondary antibody.
Micromass cultures
High density (2x107 cells/ml) micromass cultures were set up from stage 25 progress zone leg bud mesoderm. Cells were incubated in serum free medium (DMEM) for 5 days and the medium was changed daily. After 24 hours of incubation, SU5402 at 50, 200, 500 or 800 ng/ml, BMP7 at 50 ng/ml or Noggin at 100 ng/ml were added to the medium. The chondrogenic outcome of control untreated and cultures treated with different combinations of SU5402, BMP7 and Noggin was evaluated by Alcian Blue staining or by studying the expression of the type II collagen gene by whole-mount in situ hybridization. In all cases SU5402 was added 12 hours before BMP7 to ensure that FGF signaling was blocked prior to the administration of BMP7.
Probes and in situ hybridization
The probes for BMP2, -4 and -7, and Fgf-8 were provided by P. Francis-West and J. C. Izpisua-Belmonte. MSX2 was provided by A. Kuroiwa; type II collagen was provided by W. Upholt. Probes for FGF receptor genes 1, 2 and 3 were provided by J. M. Richman. Fgf12 was provided by I. Muñoz-Sanjuan. For Snail we employed a chick probe corresponding to nucleotides 258-767 (Sefton et al., 1998).
In situ hybridization of control and treated limbs was performed in whole-mount specimens and in tissue sections. For whole mount, samples were treated with 10 µg/ml of proteinase K for 20-30 minutes at 20°C. Hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probes was performed at 68°C. Reactions were developed with BCIP/NBT substrate or with purple AP substrate (Boehringer Mannheim). Micromass cultures were processed in the same way, but proteinase K treatment was performed at 7 µg/ml for 8 minute at 20°C. For in situ hybridization in tissue sections, we employed paraffin wax sections (8 µm) and radioactive probes labeled with 35S.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
These results are indicative for a role of FGFs in the control of interdigital cell death. Potential candidates of the FGF family involved include FGF8, expressed in the AER until the stages of interdigital cell death (Fig. 2A; Gañan et al., 1998) and FGF12 (FHF-1), which is expressed in the interdigital mesoderm (Fig. 2B;Muñoz-Sanjuan et al., 1999).
|
Exogenous FGFs potentiate apoptosis in INZ
To further analyze the potential influence of FGFs in apoptosis we studied the effects of exogenous FGFs in the interdigital mesoderm. FGF-beads implanted in the interdigital mesoderm at stage 28 or 29, caused an initial inhibition of programmed cell death detectable by 12 hours after the treatment (8/8; Fig. 3A,B). However, a dramatic increase in cell death was apparent 24 hours or later after the application of FGF-beads (12/12; Fig. 3C,D). This feature was particularly evident in the duck interdigits where in physiological conditions cell death is restricted to the most distal mesoderm (12/12; Fig. 3E,F). As in physiological conditions dying cells were TUNEL positive and during the first 30 hours exhibited a characteristic distribution at some distance from the bead (Fig. 3G, see also Fig. 8A). Analysis of cell proliferation by BrdU assay revealed an intense inhibition of cell proliferation in the zone of cell death coincidently with the onset of apoptosis (Fig. 3H).
|
|
When FGF-beads were implanted in the interdigital regions, BMPs were up-regulated intensely (11/12; Fig. 4A-C). As described previously in the chick epiblast (Streit and Stern, 1999), up-regulation of BMPs occurred at some distance from the bead forming a characteristic crescent-like domain of expression concentric to the bead (see Fig. 4B).
|
Regulation of MSX2 and cell death mediated by FGFs
It has been shown that apoptosis by BMPs requires the expression of the homeobox-containing gene MSX2 in the limb mesoderm (reviewed by Chen and Zhao, 1998). Hence, we have studied the possibility that this gene is the target of FGFs in the control of interdigital cell death. Implantation of FGF-beads into the limb mesoderm expanded the domain of MSX2 (7/7; Fig. 5A,B). This effect was observed 12 hours or later after the treatment and was more noticeable in the duck webs where expression of MSX2, as interdigital apoptosis, is physiologically restricted to the most distal region of the interdigit (Fig. 5C,D). Interestingly, blockage of FGF signaling by SU5402 was accompanied by severe downregulation of MSX2 in the interdigits detectable 10 hours or later after the treatment (7/8; Fig. 5E). Considering that, in spite of the inhibition of cell death, the interdigits treated with SU5402 maintain a considerable level of BMP expression it seems likely that FGFs control cell death through the regulation of MSX2. Moreover, we have also found evidence for a major role of BMPs in MSX2 gene expression. BMP-beads were potent upregulators of MSX2 (not shown) whereas Noggin- or Gremlin-beads (Fig. 5F) downregulated MSX2 gene expression. In addition, coimplantation of FGF- and Noggin-beads reduced considerably the induction of MSX2 by FGFs (Fig. 5G), indicating that the induction of MSX2 by FGFs requires BMP sgnalling. However, BMP treatments failed to increase the expression of MSX2 in interdigits previously treated with the FGF inhibitor (Fig. 5H). Together all these findings indicate that MSX2 gene expression requires the action of both FGFs and BMPs.
|
Snail transcripts are present in the wing and leg bud mesoderm throughout the whole period studied here. At stages 25-26 Snail is expressed in the anterior and posterior margins of the zeugopod and in the autopodial region (Fig. 6A). From stage 27 Snail is expressed at the tip of the growing digits, in the perichondrium of the developing phalanges, excluding the zones of joint formation, and is strongly expressed in interdigital domains, which correlates closely with the areas of interdigital cell death (Fig. 6B-D).
|
In view of the positive correlation between Snail expression and cell death, we analyzed the regulation of this gene in the limb by FGFs and BMPs. Indeed, we first analyzed whether the increase in cell death induced by the interdigital application of FGF-beads modifies the expression of this gene. Under these experimental conditions, Snail expression was upregulated (Fig. 6,F,J). This upregulation was particularly dramatic in the duck interdigit (Fig. 6F) showing a close correlation with the increase in the areas of cell death (Figs 6F and 3F). Implantation of BMP-beads was also followed by upregulation of Snail (Fig. 6H). In addition, the physiological expression of this gene was downregulated locally following implantation of beads bearing a BMP antagonist (Noggin or Gremlin; Fig. 6I). Both effects were detected very quickly (between 2 and 5 hours after the implantation of the beads) and preceded the induction and inhibition of cell death induced respectively by BMPs and by BMP antagonists. To check whether this effect was mediated by BMPs, FGF-beads were implanted together with a Noggin-bead. Under these conditions, the effects of FGF-beads were inhibited in the mesoderm close to the Noggin-bead (Fig. 6G) indicating that, as observed for MSX2, upregulation of the expression of this gene by FGF requires the presence of BMPs. Also as observed for MSX2, interdigital expression of Snail was intensely downregulated by treatments with SU5402 (Fig. 6K), and this inhibition could not be abolished by the subsequent application of a BMP-bead (Fig. 6L).
Regulation of cell death in the ANZ and PNZ by FGFs
To check whether the involvement of FGFs was a specific feature of INZs or if it represented a common mechanism controlling cell death in the limb bud, experiments were performed in the anterior and posterior mesoderm of the early wing bud. For this purpose FGF-beads were implanted into stage 20-22 wing buds. In agreement with previous studies (Riley et al., 1993; Akita et al., 1996; Nikbakht and McLachlan, 1999) FGF treatments caused a significant mesodermal overgrowth around the bead and was followed by alterations in the cartilages of the zeugopod and by the formation of extra cartilaginous elements in the zone of bead application detectable 3-4 days after treatment (Fig. 7A-C).
|
Also, as observed in INZs the mesodermal domains of Snail (Fig. 8B), MSX2 (Fig. 8C) and BMP2 (Fig. 8D), BMP4 (Fig. 8E-F) and BMP7 (Fig. 8G-H) were increased by the application of FGF-beads. Furthermore, in accordance with the negative influence of BMPs on the maintenance of the AER (Gañan et al., 1998; Pizette and Niswander, 1999), the increased expression of BMPs was accompanied by flattening of the AER in the zone close to the bead (Fig. 8I).
As expected, the most significant effect of SU5402-beads at early stages of development was the impairment of limb outgrowth. Implantation of SU5402-beads in the progress zone mesoderm at stages 20-22 caused a rapid degeneration of the AER followed by limb truncation.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Signaling by FGFs occurs through different tyrosine kinase receptors (FGFR1-4; Wilkie et al., 1995a). In the avian limb bud three FGF receptor genes (1,2 and 3) exhibit a specific pattern of expression in association with the different stages of cartilage differentiation (Noji et al., 1993; Szebenyi et al., 1995). Here we show that FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR3 are expressed in the autopodial mesoderm in a pattern compatible with a role in the control of cell death. Furthermore, permanent inhibition of cell death and syndactyly was induced by local treatment with SU5402. SU5402 inhibits FGF signaling by interacting with the catalytic domain of FGF receptors (Mohammadi et al., 1997). The specificity of this FGF inhibitor is supported by the absence of inhibitory effect (insulin and EGF receptors) or by the weak inhibitory effect (PDGF receptor) on other tested receptors with tyrosine kinase activity (Mohammadi et al., 1997). In addition, we have observed here that the chondrogenic promoting effect of BMPs is not affected by SU5402 excluding a potential direct effect on BMP signaling. In previous studies it has been found that syndactyly is a common result of spontaneous or induced mutations in FGFR1 (Partanen et al., 1998; Muenke et al., 1994) and FGFR2 (Wilkie et al., 1995b; Cohen and Kreiborg, 1995) in both mouse and humans (Apert and Pfeiffer syndromes), thus suggesting a role of these receptors in the control of interdigital apoptosis. However, those mutations appear to mediate a gain-of-function of the receptors (Yu et al., 2000; Zhou et al., 2000) rather than inhibiting FGF signaling. Therefore, syndactyly in those mutants might be explained by the inhibitory effect on cell death observed in our experiments shortly after the exogenous application of FGFs (see below). In this study the expression and regulation of FGFR3 in the interdigits is suggestive of a positive function of this receptor in programmed cell death. Constitutive activation of FGFR3 causes apoptosis in chondrocytes (Legeai-Mallet et al., 1998). In addition, owing to the inhibitory effect on cell proliferation mediated by FGFR3 (Sahni et al., 1999), the upregulation of this gene observed here following treatments with BMPs might explain the cell cycle arrest associated with interdigital apoptosis. This interpretation is reinforced by the down- and up-regulation of FGFR3 caused after short and long term treatments with FGFs, which are accompanied by inhibition and increased cell death, respectively.
In agreement with previous studies (MacCabe et al., 1991; Macias et al., 1996; Gañan et al., 1996; Buckland et al., 1998; Ngo-Muller and Muneoka, 2000) we have observed that FGFs are able to temporally inhibit cell death in the ANZ, PNZ and INZ. However, the initial inhibitory effect is later followed by potentiation of apoptosis in the treated mesoderm. Noggin was very potent in blocking this process of cell death, indicating that BMPs, as in physiological conditions, were the mediators of the apoptosis induced by FGFs. Furthermore, the inhibition of interdigital cell death and subsequent syndactyly observed after blocking FGF signaling by treatment with SU5402 indicates that FGFs are physiologically required for programmed cell death. In addition, the absence of cell death in the interdigits treated with SU5402, in spite of the maintenance of considerable levels of BMP gene expression, indicates that BMPs alone are not sufficient to induce cell death.
Our findings point to a cooperative role of FGFs with BMPs in the regulation of genes implicated in the molecular cascade responsible for apoptosis. We have identified MSX2 and Snail as candidate genes associated with apoptosis whose expression requires the combined action of FGFs and BMPs.
It has been proposed that MSX2 is required for BMP-mediated apoptosis (Graham et al., 1994; Chen and Zhao, 1998). Furthermore, experimental misexpression of MSX2 in the limb bud induces apoptosis (Ferrari et al., 1998). In agreement with these findings, this study has shown that inhibition of interdigital cell death following blockage of FGF signaling by SU5402 is accompanied by intense downregulation of MSX2. Furthermore, our results indicate that both FGFs and BMPs are required for the induction and maintenance of MSX2 expression. While both FGFs and BMPs alone are able to intensely upregulate MSX2 gene expression in the intact limb, these individual effects are blocked in treatments with FGFs in combination with Noggin and in treatments with BMPs in combination with SU5402.
The mechanism responsible for the initial inhibition of cell death by FGFs remained elusive in this study. Since members of the Snail family of zinc finger transcription factors have been identified as antiapoptotic factors conserved in C. elegans (Metzstein and Horvitz, 1999) and in vertebrates (Inukai et al., 1999) we analyzed whether Snail was also involved in this process in the chick. Our observations strongly suggest that Snail plays a role in apoptosis in the developing limb. However, all our findings point to a positive role of this gene in apoptosis. Snail transcripts are present in the limb mesoderm at the same stages as ANZ and PNZ, and precise interdigital domains are also observed that closely coincide with the appearance of interdigital cell death. Furthermore, in duck interdigits, characterized by reduced extension of interdigital cell death, Snail expression is restricted to the zones of cell death instead of being increased as would be expected if it were an antiapoptotic factor. Moreover, in both the chick limb and duck interdigits, all treatments performed to increase cell death were accompanied by a parallel induction of Snail expression while expression was inhibited by interdigital application of SU5402 in correlation with the inhibition of cell death. In addition, we have also observed that BMPs and FGFs regulate the expression of this gene in a similar fashion to that described above for MSX2. The most likely explanation for a role of Snail in apoptosis is its potent activity in decreasing cell adhesion through the repression of the expression of cadherins (Cano et al., 2000). Cell survival requires an appropriate cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix adhesion (Lin and Bissell, 1993) and apoptosis following a loss of cell adhesion has been observed in epithelial cells and non-epithelial cells (Martin-Bermudo et al., 1998; Sakai et al., 2000). The interdigital regions exhibit specific domains of expression of different cadherins (Kimura et al., 1995; Kitajima et al., 1999; Inoue et al., 1997) and prior to cell death contain a highly organized network of extracellular matrix (Hurle et al., 1994) which is disrupted concomitantly with the onset of cell death (Hurle and Fernandez-Teran, 1983). In consequence, expression of Snail in the interdigital regions may regulate changes in cell adhesion which must necessarily occur during involution of the interdigital tissue.
In conclusion, this study shows that FGF signaling is necessary for apoptosis during limb development. In its absence, BMPs are not sufficient to induce cell death indicating that the establishment of the apoptotic areas requires the presence of the two signaling pathways. In addition, we have identified MSX2 and Snail as potential players in the apoptotic cascade whose expression requires the convergence of the signals mediated by both FGFs and BMPs. Thus, our study unravels a putative functional link between these two signaling pathways in the control of morphogentic outgrowth of the limb.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Akita, K., Francis-West, P. and Vargesson, N. (1996). The ectodermal control in chick limb development: Wnt-7a, shh, Bmp-2 and Bmp-4 expression and the effect of FGF-4 on gene expression. Mech. Dev. 60, 127-137.[Medline]
Buckland, R. A., Collinson, J. M., Graham, E., Davidson, D. R. and Hill, R. E. (1998). Antagonistic effects of FGF4 on BMP induction of apoptosis and chondrogenesis in the chick limb bud. Mech. Dev. 71, 143-150.[Medline]
Cano, A., Perez-Moreno, M. A., Rodrigo, I., Locascio, A., Blanco, M.J., del Barrion, M.G., Portillo, F. and Nieto, M. A. (2000). The transcription factor Snail controls epithelial-mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 76-83.[Medline]
Chen, Y. and Zhao, X. (1998). Shaping limbs by apoptosis. J. Exp. Zool. 282, 691-702.[Medline]
Cohen, M. M. Jr. and Kreiborg, S. (1995). Hands and feet in the Apert syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. 57, 82-96.[Medline]
Dahn, R. D. and Fallon, J. F. (2000). Interdigital regulation of digit identity and homeotic transformation by modulated BMP signaling. Science 289, 438-441.
Ferrari, D., Lichtler, A.C., Pan, Z., Dealy, C. N., Upholt, W. B. and Kosher, R. A. (1998). Ectopic expression of Msx2 in posterior limb bud mesoderm impairs limb morphogenesis while inducing Bmp4 expression, inhibiting cell proliferation, and promoting apoptosis. Dev. Biol. 197, 12-24.[Medline]
Francis-West, P. H., Robertson, K. E., Ede, D. E., Rodriguez, C., Izpisúa-Belmonte, J. C., Houston, B., Burt, D. W., Gribbin, C., Brickell, P. M. and Tickle, C. (1995) Expression of genes encoding bone morphogenetic proteins and sonic hedgehog in Talpid (ta3) limb buds: their relationships in the signaling cascade involved in limb patterning. Dev. Dyn. 203, 187-197.[Medline]
Gañan, Y., Macias, D., Duterque-Coquillaud, M., Ros, M. A. and Hurle, J. M. (1996). Role of TGFßs and BMPs as signals controlling the position of the digits and the areas of interdigital cell death in the developing chick limb autopod. Development 122, 2349-2357.
Gañan, Y., Macias, D., Basco, R. D., Merino, R. and Hurle J. M. (1998). Morphological diversity of the avian foot is related with the pattern of msx gene expression in the developing autopod. Dev. Biol. 196, 33-41.[Medline]
Graham, A., Francis-West, P., Brickel, P. and Lumsden, A. (1994). The signaling molecule BMP4 mediates apoptosis in the rhombencephalic neural crest. Nature 372, 684-686.[Medline]
Hamburger, V. and Hamilton, H. L. (1951). A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol. 88, 49-92.
Heymer, J. and Ruther, U. (1999). Syndactyly of Ft/+ mice correlates with an imbalance in Bmp4 and Fgf8 expression. Mech. Dev. 88, 173-181.[Medline]
Hurle, J. M. and Fernandez-Teran, M. A. (1983). Fine structure of the regressing interdigital membranes during the formation of the digits of the chick embryo leg bud. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 78, 195-209.[Medline]
Hurle, J. M., Corson, G., Daniels, K., Reiter, R. S., Sakai, L. Y. and Solursh, M. (1994). Elastin exhibits a distinctive temporal and spatial pattern of distribution in the developing chick limb in association with the establishment of the cartilaginous skeleton. J. Cell. Sci. 107, 2623-2634.
Hurle, J. M., Ros, M. A., Climent, V., Garcia-Martinez, V. (1996). Morphology and significance of programmed cell death in the developing limb bud of the vertebrate embryo. Micros. Res. Tech. 34, 236-246.[Medline]
Inoue, T., Chisaka, O., Matsunami, H. and Takeichi, M. (1997). Cadherin-6 expression transiently delineates specific rhombomeres, other neural tube subdivisions, and neural crest subpopulations in mouse embryos. Dev. Biol. 183, 183-194.[Medline]
Inukai, T., Inoue, A., Kurosawa, H., Goi, K., Shinjyo, T., Ozawa, K., Mao, M., Inaba, T. and Loo, A. T. (1999). SLUG, a ces-1-related zinc finger transcription factor gene with antiapoptotic activity, is a downstream target of the E2A-HLF oncoprotein.Mol. Cell 4, 343-352.[Medline]
Isaac, A., Cohn, M. J., Ashby,P., Ataliotis, P., Spicer, D. B., Cooke, J. and Tickle, C. (2000). FGF and genes encoding transcription factors in early limb specification. Mech. Dev. 93, 41-48.[Medline]
Kawakami, Y., Ishikawa, T., Shimabara, M., Tanda, N., Enomoto-Iwamoto, M., Iwamoto, M., Kuwana, T., Ueki, A., Noji, S. and Nohno, T. (1996). BMP signaling during bone pattern determination in the developing limb. Development 122, 3557-3566.
Kimura. Y., Matsunami, H., Inoue, T., Shimamura, K., Uchida, N., Ueno, T., Miyazaki. T. and Takeichi, M. (1995). Cadherin-11 expressed in association with mesenchymal morphogenesis in the head, somite, and limb bud of early mouse embryos. Dev. Biol. 169, 347-358.[Medline]
Kitajima, K., Koshimizu, U. and Nakamura, T. (1999). Expression of a novel type of classic cadherin, PB-cadherin in developing brain and limb buds. Dev. Dyn. 215, 206-214.[Medline]
Legeai-Mallet, L., Benoist-Lasselin, C., Delezoide, A. L., Munnich, A. and Bonaventure, J. (1998).Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 mutations promote apoptosis but do not alter chondrocyte proliferation inthanatophoric dysplasia. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13007-13014.
Lin, C. Q. and Bissell, M. J. (1993). Multi-faceted regulation of cell differentiation by extracellular matrix. FASEB J. 7, 737-743.
MacCabe, J. A., Blaylock, J. R., Latimer, J. L. and Pharris, J. L. (1991). Fibroblast growth factor and culture in monolayer rescue mesodermal cells destined to die in the developing avian wing. J. Exp. Zool. 257, 208-213.[Medline]
Macias, D., Gañan, Y., Ros, M. A. and Hurle, J. M. (1996). In vivo inhibition of programmed cell death by local administration of FGF-2 and FGF-4 in the interdigital areas of the embryonic leg bud. Anat. Embryol. 193, 533-541.[Medline]
Macias, D, Gañan, Y., Sampath, T. K., Piedra, M. E., Ros, M. A. and Hurle, J. M. (1997). Role of BMP-2 and OP-1 (BMP-7) in programmed cell death and skeletogenesis during chick limb development. Development 124, 1109-1117
Macias, D., Gañan, Y., Rodriguez-Leon, J., Merino, R. and Hurle, J. M. (1999). Regulation by members of the transforming growth factor beta superfamily of the digital and interdigital fates of the autopodial limb mesoderm. Cell Tiss. Res. 296, 95-102.[Medline]
Martin, G. (1998). The roles of FGFs in the early development of vertebrate limbs. Gen. Dev. 12, 1571-1586.
Martin-Bermudo, M. D., Dunin-Borkowski, O. M. and Brown, N. H. (1998). Modulation of integrin activity is vital for morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 41, 1073-1081.
Merino, R., Gañan, Y., Macias, D., Economides, A. N., Sampath, K. T. and Hurle, J. M. (1998) Morphogenesis of digits in the avian limb is controlled by Fgfs, TGFßs, and Noggin through BMP signaling. Dev. Biol. 200, 35-45.[Medline]
Merino, R., Rodriguez-Leon, J., Macias, D., Gañan, Y., Economides, A. N. and Hurle, J. M. (1999). The BMP antagonist Gremlin regulates outgrowth, chondrogenesis and programmed cell death in the developing limb. Development 126, 5515-5522.
Metzstein, M. M. and Horvitz, H. R. (1999). The C. elegans cell death specification gene ces-1 encodes a snail family zinc finger protein. Molecular Cell 4, 309-319.[Medline]
Mohammadi, M., McMahon, G., Sun, L., Tang, C., Hirth, P. Yeh, B. K., Hubbard, S. R. and Schlessinger J. (1997). Structures of the tyrosine kinase domain of fibroblast growth factor receptor in complex with inhibitors. Science 276, 955-960.
Mohammadi, M., Froum, S., Hamby, J. M., Schroeder, M. C., Panek, R. L., Lu, G. H., Eliseenkova, A. V., Green, D., Schlessinger J. and Hubbard, S. R. (1998). Crystal structure of an angiogenesis inhibitor boud to the FGF receptor tyrosine kinase domain. EMBO J. 17, 5896-5904.
Muenke, M., Schell, U., Hehr, A, Robin, N. H., Losken, H. W., Schinzel, A., Pulleyn, L. J., Rutland, P., Reardon, W., Malcolm, S. and Winter, R. M. (1994). A common mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene in Pfeiffer syndrome. Nat. Genet. 8, 269-274.[Medline]
Muñoz-Sanjuan, I., Simandl, B. K., Fallon, J. F. and Nathans, J. (1999). Expression of chicken fibroblast growth factor homologous factor (FHF)-1 and of differentially spliced isoforms of FHF-2 during development and involvement of FHF-2 in chicken limb development. Development 126, 409-421.
Ngo-Muller, V. and Muneoka, K. (2000). Influence of Fgf4 on digit morphogenesis during limb development in the mouse. Dev. Biol. 219, 224-236.[Medline]
Nikbakht, N. and McLachlan, J. C. (1999). Restoring avian digits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1101-1104.
Niswander, L. and Martin, G. (1993). FGF-4 and Bmp-2 have opposite effects on limb outgrowth. Nature 361, 68-71.[Medline]
Noji, S., Koyama, E., Myokai, F., Nohno. T., Ohuchi, H., Nishikawa, K. and Taniguchi, S. (1993). Differential expression of three chick FGF receptor genes, FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR3, in limb and feather development. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 383B, 645-654.
Partanen, J., Schwartz, L. and Rossant, J. (1998). Opposite phenotypes of hypomorphic and Y766 phosphorylation site mutations reveal a function for Fgfr1 in anteroposterior patterning of mouse embryos. Gen. Dev. 12, 2332-2344.
Pizette, S. and Niswander, L. (1999). BMPs negatively regulate structure and function of the limb apical ectodermal ridge. Development 126, 883-894.
Pizette, S. and Niswander, L. (2000). BMPs are required at two steps of limb chondrogenesis: formation of prechondrogenic condensations and their differentiation into chondrocytes. Dev. Biol. 219, 237-249[Medline]
Riley, B. B., Savage, M. P., Simandl, B. K., Olwin, B. B. and Fallon, J. F. (1993). Retroviral expression of Fgf-2 (b-FGF) affects patterning in chick limb bud. Development 118, 95-104.
Ros, M. A., Sefton, M. and Nieto, M. A. (1997). Slug, a zinc finger gene previously implicated in the early patterning of the mesoderm and the neural crest, is also involved in chick limb development. Development 124, 1821-1829.
Sahni, M., Ambrosetti, D. C., Mansukhani, A., Gertner, R., Levy, D. and Basilico, C. (1999). FGF signaling inhibits chondrocyte proliferation and regulates bone development through the STAT-1 pathway. Genes Dev. 13, 1361-1366.
Sakai, H., Kobayashi, Y., Sakai, E., Shibata, M. and Kato, Y. (2000). Cell adhesion is a prerequisite for osteoclast survival. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 270, 550-556.[Medline]
Sanz-Ezquerro, J. J. and Tickle, C. (2000). Autoregulation of Shh expression and Shh induction of cell death suggest a mechanism for modulating polarising activity during chick limb development. Development 127, 4811-4823.
Sefton, M., Sánchez, S. and Nieto, M. A. (1998). Conserved and divergent roles for members of the Snail family of transcription factors in the chick and mouse embryo. Development 125, 3111-3121.
Streit, A. and Stern, C. (1999). Establishment and maintenance of the border of the neural plate in the chick: involvement of FGF and BMP activity. Mech. Dev. 82, 51-66.[Medline]
Szebenyi, G., Savage M. P., Olwin, B. B. and Fallon, J. F. (1995). Changes in the expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor mark distinct stages of chondrogenesis in vitro and during chick limb skeletal patterning. Dev. Dyn. 204, 446-456.[Medline]
Wilkie, A. O. M., Morris-Key, G. M., Jones, E. Y. and Heath, J. K. (1995a). Functions of fibroblast growth factors and their receptor. Curr. Biol. 5, 500-507)[Medline]
Wilkie, A. O. M., Slaney, S. F., Oldrige, M., Poole, M. D., Ashworth, G. J., Hockley, A. D., Hayward, R. D., David, D. J., Pulleyn, L. J., Rutland, P., Malcolm, S., Winter, R. M. and Reardon, W. (1995b). Apert syndrome results from localized mutations of FGFR2 and is allelic with Crouzon syndrome. Nature Genet. 9, 165-172.[Medline]
Yamaguchi, T. P. and Rossant, J. (1995). Fibroblast growth factors in mammalian development. Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev. 5, 485-491.[Medline]
Yokouchi, Y., Sakiyama, J., Kameda, T., Iba, H., Suzuki, A., Ueno, N. and Kuroiwa, A. (1996). BMP-2/-4 mediate programmed cell death in chicken limb buds. Development 122, 3725-3734.
Yu, K., Herr, A. B., Waksman, G. and Ornitz, D. M. (2000). Loss of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 ligand-binding specificity in Apert syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14536-14541.
Zhou, Y. X., Xu, X., Chen, L., Li, C., Brodie, S. G. and Deng, C. X.(2000). A Pro250Arg substitution in mouse Fgfr1 causes increased expression of Cbfa1 and premature fusion of calvarial sutures. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 2001-2008.
Zou, H. and Niswander, L. (1996). Requirement for BMP signaling in interdigital apoptosis and scale formation. Science 272, 738-741.[Abstract]
Zou, H., Wieser, R., Massagué, J. and Niswander, L. (1997). Distinct roles of type I bone morphogenetic protein receptors in the formation and differentiation of cartilage. Genes Dev. 11, 2191-2203.
Zuñiga, A., Haramis, A.-P., McMahon, A. P. and Zeller, R. (1999). Signal relay by BMP antagonism control the SHH/FGF4 feedback loop in vertebrate limbs. Nature 401, 598-602.[Medline]