1 Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Medical School, Suita 565-0871, Japan
3 Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
* Present address: Department of Neurosurgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama 710-8602, Japan
Author for correspondence (e-mail: rkageyam{at}virus.kyoto-u.ac.jp)
Accepted 27 November 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Amacrine cell, bHLH, Homeobox, Pax6, Retina, Mouse
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Recent studies have demonstrated that basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH)- and homeobox-type transcription factors contribute to the intrinsic properties of retinal precursors. (Kageyama and Nakanishi, 1997; Lee, 1997
; Cepko, 1999
; Livesey and Cepko, 2001
). These transcription factors regulate determination and differentiation of multiple cell types. For example, the bHLH gene NeuroD (Neurod1 Mouse Genome Informatics) and the homeobox gene Crx regulate generation of photoreceptors (Furukawa et al., 1997
; Furukawa et al., 1999
; Freund et al., 1997
; Chen et al., 1997
; Morrow et al., 1999
). Similarly, the bHLH genes Mash1 and Math3 (Ascl1 and Atoh3, respectively Mouse Genome Informatics) and the homeobox gene Chx10 are required for specification of bipolar cells (Burmeister et al., 1996
; Tomita et al., 2000
; Hatakeyama et al., 2001
). Interestingly, co-expression of Mash1 or Math3 with Chx10 efficiently induces bipolar cell genesis, whereas misexpression of either Mash1/Math3 or Chx10 alone cannot (Hatakeyama et al., 2001
). These results suggest that combinations of bHLH and homeobox genes may be important for specification of cell types. These transcription factor codes for cell fate specification are, however, only beginning to be elucidated.
Amacrine cells, interneurons present in the INL and GCL, make synapses onto bipolar cell terminals and ganglion cell dendrites, and modulate the synaptic connection between bipolar and ganglion cells (Kolb, 1997). There are multiple morphologically and functionally distinct subtypes of amacrine cells. Some of them are located in the GCL (displaced amacrine cells), while others are in the inner region of the INL. It has been shown that the bHLH gene NeuroD and the paired-type homeobox gene Pax6 are expressed by differentiating amacrine cells (Jones et al., 1998
; Morrow et al., 1999
; Nishina et al., 1999
). However, mutation for NeuroD or Pax6 does not reduce amacrine cell genesis (Morrow et al., 1999
; Marquardt et al., 2001
) and, therefore, their functions are not yet known.
We have found that the bHLH gene Math3 is also transiently expressed by differentiating amacrine cells and that mice deficient for both Math3 and NeuroD completely lack amacrine cells. Strikingly, the cells that fail to differentiate into amacrine cells do not die, but adopt the ganglion and Müller glial cell fates in the double-mutant retina. In addition, we found that, although Math3 or NeuroD alone could not induce amacrine cell genesis, they could do so when Pax6 or Six3 is co-expressed. These data provide evidence that the bHLH genes Math3 and NeuroD are essential but not sufficient for amacrine cell genesis and that combinations of bHLH and homeobox genes are important for cell type specification.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Construction of retroviruses
For construction of CLIG-Math3, CLIG-NeuroD, CLIG-Pax6 and CLIG-Six3, cDNAs for bHLH and homeobox factors were cloned into the EcoRI site of pCLIG, which directs expression of the cloned genes together with enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) from the upstream long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter (Hojo et al., 2000). For construction of CLIG-Pax6-Math3, CLIG-Pax6-NeuroD, CLIG-Pax6-Mash1, CLIG-Six3-Math3 and CLIG-Six3-NeuroD, the bHLH genes were cloned into the BsrGI and ClaI sites of pCLIG-Pax6 and pCLIG-Six3, which are located in the 3' region of GFP gene, so that GFP gene is fused in frame with each bHLH gene. Retroviral DNAs were transfected with LipofectAMINE (Gibco-BRL) into
2mp34, an ecotropic packaging cell line (Yoshimatsu et al., 1998
). The supernatant was collected 2 days later and concentrated with Centricon Plus-20 (Millipore), as described previously (Ishibashi et al., 1994
; Tsuda et al., 1998
; Ohtsuka et al., 1999
).
Retinal explant culture
The retinal explant culture was performed, as described previously (Tomita et al., 1996). Briefly, the neural retina without pigment epithelium was placed on a Millicell chamber filter (Millipore: diameter 30 mm, pore size 0.4 µm) with the ganglion cell layer upwards. The chamber was transferred to a six-well culture plate. Each well contained 1 ml of culture medium (50% MEM with Hepes, 25% Hanks solution, 25% heat-inactivated horse serum, 200 µM L-glutamine and 5.75 mg/ml glucose). Explants were cultured at 34°C in 5% CO2, and the medium was changed every other day.
Immunochemical analysis
For immunohistochemistry, retinal explants were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes on ice, treated with 25% sucrose for 30 minutes, embedded in OCT compound (Miles) and sectioned (16 µm thickness). For immunocytochemistry, explants were dissociated, as previously described (Morrow et al., 1998; Hatakeyama et al., 2001
). The samples were then preincubated with a blocking solution [5% normal goat serum and 0.1% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)] for 1 hour and then incubated overnight at room temperature or for 2 days at 4°C in 1% goat serum and 0.1% Triton X-100 with the following antibodies: rabbit anti-GFP (Medical and Biological Laboratories), mouse anti-Myc (Invitrogen), rabbit anti-Myc (Medical and Biological Laboratories), rabbit anti-calbindin (Chemicon), mouse anti-HPC1/syntaxin (Sigma), rat anti-Thy1.2 (Pharmingen), mouse anti-p75 (Promega), mouse anti-protein kinase C (PKC) (Amersham), rabbit anti-neurofilament (NF) (Chemicon), rabbit anti-rhodopsin (LSL), mouse anti-glutamine synthetase (GS) (Chemicon), mouse anti-vimentin (Histofine), mouse anti-Ki67 (Pharmingen) and rabbit anti-ß-galactosidase (Cortex Biochem). Retinal cell types were determined by the morphology, location and by using the following antibodies: anti-Thy1.2 and anti-p75 (ganglion cells), anti-calbindin and anti-HPC1 (amacrine cells), anti-PKC (bipolar cells), anti-calbindin and anti-NF (horizontal cells), anti-GS, anti-vimentin (Müller glia), and anti-rhodopsin (rods). To detect cell death, TUNEL assay was performed with a detection kit (Boehringer-Mannheim). Fluorescently labeled preparations were imaged using a Carl Zeiss confocal microscope.
X-gal staining
Retinal explants cultured for 2 weeks were fixed with 0.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS at 4°C for 1 hour and stained with 1 mg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactoside, 35 mM potassium ferricyanide, 35 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.02% Nonidet P-40 and 0.01% deoxycholate in PBS. Frozen sections were prepared at 16 µm thickness.
In situ hybridization
In situ hybridization was performed as previously described (Hojo et al., 2000). Probes for Math3 (Takebayashi et al., 1997
), NeuroD (Lee et al., 1995
) and Math5 (Atoh7 Mouse Genome Informatics) (Brown et al., 1998
) were labeled with digoxigenin.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Loss of amacrine cells and concomitant increase of ganglion and Müller glial cells in Math3-NeuroD double-mutant retina
Although Math3 is transiently expressed by differentiating amacrine cells, our previous data have shown that retinal development proceeds normally in the absence of Math3 (Tomita et al., 2000). It has previously been reported that amacrine cell differentiation is delayed in NeuroD-deficient retina although the final number is not affected (Morrow et al., 1999
). These results raise the possibility that Math3 and NeuroD might be functionally redundant for amacrine cell genesis. To investigate this possibility, mice that lack both Math3 and NeuroD were generated. Because most of the double-mutant mice died soon after birth, retinal explants were prepared from E17.5 embryos and cultured for 2 weeks to examine the postnatal development of the mutant retina. Retinal explants were also prepared from wild-type, Math3/ and NeuroD/ embryos for comparison. After 2 weeks of culture, the three cellular layers, the GCL, INL and ONL, were formed in Math3/-NeuroD/ retinal explants as in the wild type (Fig. 2A, parts a-d). Whereas the absolute cell number of the ONL was slightly reduced in NeuroD/ and Math3//NeuroD/ retina (Fig. 2A, parts c,d, Fig. 2B, parts c,d and Fig. 3A, green bars), that of the other layers was not significantly affected in the mutant retina (Fig. 3A). As rod genesis is known to be decreased in the absence of NeuroD (Morrow et al., 1999
), the decrease of the ONL cell number in the double-mutant retina may be due to NeuroD deficiency. In the INL of wild-type, Math3/ and NeuroD/ retina, amacrine cells (calbindin+, HPC1+) were normally generated (Fig. 2D, parts a-c, black arrowheads; Fig. 2E, parts a-c; Fig. 3B,C, red bars). By contrast, in the double-mutant retina, amacrine cells (including displaced amacrine cells in the GCL) were completely missing (Fig. 2D, part d, asterisks, Fig. 2E, part d and Fig. 3B,C, asterisks), although the total number of the INL and GCL cells was not affected (Fig. 3A). Strikingly, ganglion cell number (Thy1.2+, p75+) was significantly increased not only in the GCL but also ectopically in the INL of the double-mutant retina (Fig. 2F, part d, Fig. 2G, part d and Fig. 3B,C, black bars). Furthermore, Müller glial cells (vimentin+, glutamine synthetase+) were slightly increased in the double-mutant retina (Fig. 2H, part d, Fig. 2I, part d and Fig. 3C, blue bar), whereas bipolar and horizontal cells were normally generated (Fig. 2C, part d, Fig. 2D, part d, white arrowhead, and Fig. 3C). Thus, the double-mutant retina displayed the lack of amacrine cells and concomitant increase of ganglion and Müller glial cells.
|
|
Because the absolute number of ganglion cells was significantly increased in Math3//NeuroD/ retina, we next examined whether the optic nerves, which contain the axons of ganglion cells, were thickened in the double-mutant embryos. The area of the optic nerve section was increased about 1.7-fold in the double mutant embryos (Fig. 4B) compared with the wild type (Fig. 4A). In addition, the NF-positive axon bundles of ganglion cells were increased in the double mutant optic nerve (Fig. 4C-E). These results are consistent with the increase of the ganglion cell number in Math3//NeuroD/ retina.
|
|
Math5 expression is increased in Math3//NeuroD/ retina
It has previously been shown that the bHLH gene Math5 is essential for ganglion cell genesis (Brown et al., 2001; Wang et al., 2001
). As the ganglion cell number was significantly increased in Math3//NeuroD/ retina, Math5 expression was next compared between the wild-type and double-mutant retina. At E17.5, Math5 was expressed weakly by subsets of cells in the ventricular zone of the wild-type retina (Fig. 6E). By contrast, in the double-mutant retina, Math5 expression was significantly upregulated (Fig. 6F), suggesting that this upregulation may lead to the increase of the ganglion cell number. These results also suggest that, in the wild-type retina, Math5 expression is downregulated by Math3 and NeuroD.
|
Misexpression of Math3 or NeuroD alone does not induce amacrine cell genesis
The above observation, that the normal number of amacrine cells were generated in the mouse retina lacking either Math3 or NeuroD whereas no amacrine cells were generated in the double-mutant retina, indicates that these two bHLH genes are functionally redundant for amacrine cell genesis. In order to determine whether either Math3 or NeuroD is sufficient for amacrine cell genesis, each gene was misexpressed with retrovirus in the retinal explant cultures. We used a replication-incompetent retrovirus, CLIG, which directs expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a marker from the upstream LTR promoter (Fig. 7A) (Hojo et al., 2000). Math3 or NeuroD cDNA was inserted into the upstream of the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) so that both the bHLH and GFP genes were expressed bicistronically (Fig. 7A). Virus was applied to retinal explants, which were prepared from mouse embryos at E17.5. After 2 weeks of culture, by which time most retinal cells finished differentiation, the fates of the virus-infected cells were determined by monitoring GFP-positive cells. When the control virus CLIG was applied, approximately 81±0.6% of the virus-infected cells became rods in the ONL while the other cells differentiated mostly into bipolar and Müller glial cells in the INL (Fig. 7B, part a, Fig. 7C), as previously described (Turner and Cepko, 1987
). By contrast, when CLIG-Math3 or CLIG-NeuroD was applied, almost all virus-infected cells became rods, the most preferred cell fate during this culture period (Fig. 7B, parts b,c, Fig. 7C). However, Math3 or NeuroD alone did not promote amacrine cell genesis under this condition (Fig. 7B, part b,c, Fig. 7C), although NeuroD has previously been shown to increase it slightly when misexpressed in the postnatal rat retina (Morrow et al., 1999
). These results indicate that Math3 or NeuroD alone is not sufficient for amacrine cell genesis. Interestingly, misexpression of these bHLH genes almost completely inhibited gliogenesis (Fig. 7C), as previously described (Brown et al., 1998
; Morrow et al., 1999
; Bae et al., 2000
; Cai et al., 2000
; Hatakeyama et al., 2001
).
|
|
|
The increase in amacrine cell number by Pax6 and Math3/NeuroD could be the result of proliferation of amacrine cells and apoptosis of other cell types rather than conversion of precursors to the amacrine cell fate at the expense of other cell types. To distinguish between these possibilities, proliferation and death of virus-infected cells were analyzed at days 3, 7 and 14 of the cultures. Cell proliferation was examined by Ki67, a nuclear antigen expressed by proliferating cells. The majority of the cells infected with CLIG, CLIG-Pax6-Math3 or CLIG-Pax6-NeuroD were negative for Ki67 at all the time points (data not shown), indicating that Pax6 and Math3/NeuroD did not promote cell proliferation. To determine the extent of cell death, the retinal explants were subjected to a TUNEL assay. The majority of the virus-infected cells were TUNEL negative at all the time points (data not shown). These results suggest that the amacrine cell genesis induced by Pax6 and Math3/NeuroD was not the result of proliferation of amacrine cells or apoptosis of other cell types, but most probably of conversion of precursors towards the amacrine cell fate at the expense of other cell types.
Co-expression of Math3 or NeuroD with Six3 also promotes amacrine cell genesis
It was recently reported that Pax6 mutation lost the multipotentiality of retinal progenitor cells, resulting in production of only amacrine cells (Marquardt et al., 2001), suggesting that Pax6 is not essential for amacrine cell genesis. In this mutant retina, the homeobox gene Six3 as well as NeuroD are expressed (Marquardt et al., 2001
), raising the possibility that Six3 is also involved in amacrine cell genesis. To test this possibility, Six3 was misexpressed with or without Math3/NeuroD (Fig. 10A). Six3 alone was not sufficient for amacrine cell genesis (Fig. 10B, part a, Fig. 10C, part a). However, co-expression of Six3 with Math3 or NeuroD generated amacrine cells (Fig. 10B, parts b,c, arrowheads; Fig. 10C, part a). These results suggest that Pax6 and Six3 are redundant for amacrine cell fate specification. Interestingly, Math3 induced horizontal cell genesis more efficiently than amacrine cell genesis, while NeuroD predominantly induced amacrine cell genesis (Fig. 10C), suggesting that Math3 and NeuroD have distinct activities in retinal cell fate specification.
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Neuronal versus glial fate determination and neuronal subtype specification by bHLH genes
The phenotype similar but opposite to the Math3/NeuroD double mutation was observed in the retina lacking the bHLH gene Math5 in mouse and its ortholog in zebrafish, which shows a fate switch from ganglion cells to amacrine cells (Kay et al., 2001; Wang et al., 2001
). Thus, Math5 regulates ganglion versus amacrine cell fate, suggesting that this bHLH gene is involved in the neuronal subtype specification rather than the neuronal versus glial cell fate decision. By contrast, the retina lacking Mash1 and Math3 exhibits a fate switch from bipolar cells to Müller glial cells, indicating that Mash1 and Math3 regulate neuronal versus glial fate determination in the retina (Tomita et al., 2000
). Our present data show that Math3-NeuroD double mutation leads to increase of both ganglion cells and Müller glia at the expense of amacrine cells, suggesting that Math3 and NeuroD regulate both neuronal subtype specification and neuronal versus glial fate determination. Although these bHLH genes seem to have distinct activities, we speculate that the two types of fate switches, neurons to glia and neuronal subtype changes, may simply reflect the different competence of retinal precursors. Because ganglion cell genesis overlaps with amacrine cell genesis but not with Müller glial cell genesis (Young, 1985
), it is likely that the cells that would differentiate into ganglion cells have a potential to become amacrine cells but not others (Fig. 11A). Thus, in the absence of Math5, the cells that fail to differentiate into ganglion cells may predominantly become amacrine cells. Likewise, as bipolar and Müller glial cells are the last cell types to be generated, the cells that fail to differentiate into bipolar cells may have the only choice to become Müller glia in the absence of Mash1 and Math3 (Fig. 11A). By contrast, as amacrine cell genesis overlaps with both ganglion and Müller glial cell genesis (Young, 1985
), the cells that fail to differentiate into amacrine cells may have a potential to become both ganglion and Müller glial cells and thereby adopt these two fates in the absence of Math3 and NeuroD (Fig. 11A). Thus, the two types of fate switches, neurons to glia and neuronal subtype changes, might mostly reflect the competence of retinal precursors, and it is likely that the cells that are blocked from differentiation to a particular cell type may simply adopt alternatively available cell fates.
|
Previous studies have demonstrated that NeuroD regulates only the neuronal differentiation/maturation step but not the determination step of most of the nervous system (Lee et al., 1995; Miyata et al., 1999
; Liu et al., 2000a
; Liu et al., 2000b
; Schwab et al., 2000
; Kim et al., 2001
). However, our data indicate that NeuroD also regulates the neuronal versus glial fate choice in the retina like other bHLH-type neuronal determination genes such as Mash1 and Math3 and the genes for Ngns (Tomita et al., 2000
; Nieto et al., 2001
; Sun et al., 2001
). This finding is consistent with the previous report by Morrow et al. (Morrow et al., 1999
). Thus, NeuroD has both differentiation and determination activities, depending on the regions of the nervous system.
Neuronal subtype specification by bHLH genes requires proper homeobox genes
Although Math3 and NeuroD are essential for amacrine cell genesis, misexpression of these bHLH genes alone only induced rod genesis. However, previous analysis has demonstrated that misexpression of NeuroD alone is able to induce an approx. twofold increase in amacrine cell number (Morrow et al., 1999). This discrepancy could be due to different experimental conditions: in vivo retina of postnatal rats (Morrow et al., 1999
) and in vitro retinal explants prepared from mouse embryos (this study). As retinal precursors are known to display different competence as development proceeds, further analysis with retinas of various developmental stages would be necessary to determine to what extent bHLH genes alone can specify the retinal neuronal subtypes.
Even though Math3 and NeuroD alone can induce amacrine cell genesis under some conditions, their effect is still rather small (Morrow et al., 1999). However, they can more efficiently specify the correct neuronal subtypes when the homeobox gene Pax6 or Six3 is co-expressed. Interestingly, Math3 exhibits preference of the horizontal cell fate over the amacrine cell fate, whereas NeuroD exhibits the opposite. Math3 expression is observed only transiently in amacrine cells, but permanently in horizontal cells, while NeuroD is expressed by amacrine cells but not by horizontal cells. Thus, the preference of cell types by these bHLH genes well reflects their expression patterns, and these data clearly demonstrate that bHLH genes are involved in neuronal subtype specification in addition to simply making the neuronal versus glial fate choice. The involvement of bHLH genes in neuronal subtype specification has been shown in both invertebrates and vertebrates. In Drosophila, the bHLH genes scute and atonal promote external sensory and chordotonal organs, respectively, and atonal mutation is not rescued by scute (Chien et al., 1996
). Domain swapping experiments indicate that the basic region is responsible for the specificity of the neuronal subtypes (Chien et al., 1996
). Similarly, in mice that have Mash1 gene at the Ngn2 locus, Mash1 partially rescues Ngn2 mutation but confers a different identity on rescued neurons (Fode et al., 2000
).
Although combinations of Math3/NeuroD and Pax6/Six3 efficiently induced amacrine cell genesis, still many cells failed to express mature neuronal markers. At E17.5, when retrovirus was applied, rods are the most preferred cell type, and it is possible that retrovirus-mediated misexpression of bHLH and homeobox genes is not sufficient to override the rod fate specification. Such cells could halt during terminal differentiation and fail to express mature neuronal markers. It is also possible that additional factors may be necessary to convert the cell fates more efficiently.
Interestingly, Mash1 does not induce any cell types when Pax6 is co-expressed. As Mash1 can induce bipolar cell genesis when Chx10 is co-expressed (Hatakeyama et al., 2001), it is likely that proper combinations with homeobox genes are essential for bHLH genes to specify the correct neuronal subtypes. The current model for the transcription factor codes for the retinal cell type specification is as follows: rods and cones, NeuroD and Crx (Furukawa et al., 1997
; Freund et al., 1997
; Chen et al., 1997
; Morrow et al., 1999
); horizontal cells, Math3 and Pax6/Six3 (this study); bipolar cells, Math3/Mash1 and Chx10 (Burmeister et al., 1996
; Tomita et al., 2000
; Hatakeyama et al., 2001
); amacrine cells, Math3/NeuroD and Pax6/Six3 (Morrow et al., 1999
) (this study); ganglion cells, Math5 (Brown et al., 1998
; Wang et al., 2001
); and Müller glia, Hes1/Hes5/Hesr2 and Rax/Chx10 (Fig. 11B) (Furukawa et al., 2000
; Hojo et al., 2000
; Hatakeyama et al., 2001
; Satow et al., 2001
). However, this list is still incomplete. For example, in Math3/ retina, horizontal cells develop normally, and it remains to be determined which bHLH gene compensates for Math3 in horizontal cell development. One of the candidate genes is Ngn2, which is expressed in the developing retina (Gradwohl et al., 1996
; Sommer et al., 1996
). Homeobox genes are also functionally redundant. For example, Crx and Pax6 are not essential for neuronal subtype specification. In Crx-deficient retina, rods are born but only their outer segments are not formed, suggesting that Crx is essential for maturation of rods (Furukawa et al., 1999
). It is possible that a related homeobox gene Otx2 may compensate Crx for the earlier stages of rod genesis. Similarly, in Pax6-deficient retina, amacrine cells are generated and it is likely that Six3 compensates Pax6 for amacrine cell genesis (Marquardt et al., 2001
) (this study). Thus, double-mutation analysis of homeobox genes is necessary to clarify their functions in neuronal subtype specification.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Bae, S.-K., Bessho, Y., Hojo, M. and Kageyama, R. (2000). The bHLH gene Hes6, an inhibitor of Hes1, promotes neuronal differentiation. Development 127, 2933-2943.
Brown, N. L., Kanekar, S., Vetter, M. L., Tucker, P. K., Gemza, D. L. and Glaser, T. (1998). Math5 encodes a murine basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor expressed during early stages of retinal neurogenesis. Development 125, 4821-4833.
Brown, N. L., Patel, S., Brzezinski, J. and Glaser, T. (2001). Math5 is required for retinal ganglion cell and optic nerve formation. Development 128, 2497-2508.
Burmeister, M., Novak, J., Liang, M.-Y., Basu, S., Ploder, L., Hawes, N. L., Vidgen, D., Hoover, F., Goldman, D., Kalnins, V. I. et al. (1996). Ocular retardation mouse caused by Chx10 homeobox null allele: impaired retinal progenitor proliferation and bipolar cell differentiation. Nat. Genet. 12, 376-384.[Medline]
Caffé, A. R., Visser, H., Jansen, H. G. and Sanyal, S. (1989). Histotypic differentiation of neonatal mouse retina in organ culture. Curr. Eye Res. 8, 1083-1092.[Medline]
Cai, L., Morrow, E. M. and Cepko, C. L. (2000). Misexpression of basic helix-loop-helix genes in the murine cerebral cortex affects cell fate choices and neuronal survival. Development 127, 3021-3030.
Cepko, C. L. (1999). The role of intrinsic and extrinsic cues and bHLH genes in the determination of retinal cell fates. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 37-46.[Medline]
Chen, S., Wang, Q.-L., Nie, Z., Sun, H., Lennon, G., Copeland, N. G., Gilbert, D. J., Jenkins, N. A. and Zack, D. J. (1997). Crx, a novel Otx-like paired-homeodomain protein, binds to and transactivates photoreceptor cell-specific genes. Neuron 19, 1017-1030.[Medline]
Chien, C., Hsiao, C.-D., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (1996). Neuronal type information encoded in the basic helix-loop-helix domain of proneural genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13239-13244.
Fode, C., Ma, Q., Casarosa, S., Ang, S.-L., Anderson, D. J. and Guillemot, F. (2000). A role for neural determination genes in specifying the dorsoventral identity of telencephalic neurons. Genes Dev. 14, 67-80.
Freund, C. L., Gregory-Evans, C. Y., Furukawa, T., Papaioannou, M., Looser, J., Ploder, L., Bellingham, J., Ng, D., Herbrick, J.-A. S., Duncan, A. et al. (1997). Cone-rod dystrophy due to mutations in a novel photoreceptor-specific homeobox gene (CRX) essential for maintenance of the photoreceptor. Cell 91, 543-553.[Medline]
Furukawa, T., Morrow, E. M. and Cepko, C. L. (1997). Crx, a novel otx-like homeobox gene, shows photoreceptor-specific expression and regulates photoreceptor differentiation. Cell 91, 531-541.[Medline]
Furukawa, T., Morrow, E. M., Li, T., Davis, F. C. and Cepko, C. L. (1999). Retinopathy and attenuated circadian entrainment in Crx-deficient mice. Nat. Genet. 23, 466-470.[Medline]
Furukawa, T., Mukherjee, S., Bao, Z.-Z., Morrow, E. M. and Cepko, C. L. (2000). rax, Hes1, and notch1 promote the formation of Müller glia by postnatal retinal progenitor cells. Neuron 26, 383-394.[Medline]
Gowan, K., Helms, A. W., Hunsaker, T. L., Collisson, T., Ebert, P. J., Odom, R. and Johnson, J. E. (2001). Crossinhibitory activities of Ngn1 and Math1 allow specification of distinct dorsal interneurons. Neuron 31, 219-232.[Medline]
Gradwohl, G., Fode, C. and Guillemot, F. (1996). Restricted expression of a novel murine atonal-related bHLH protein in undifferentiated neural precursors. Dev. Biol. 180, 227-241.[Medline]
Harris, W. A. (1997). Cellular diversification in the vertebrate retina. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7, 651-658.[Medline]
Hatakeyama, J., Tomita, K., Inoue, T. and Kageyama, R. (2001). Roles of homeobox and bHLH genes in specification of a retinal cell type. Development 128, 1313-1322.
Hojo, M., Ohtsuka, T., Hashimoto, N., Gradwohl, G., Guillemot, F. and Kageyama, R. (2000). Glial cell fate specification modulated by the bHLH gene Hes5 in mouse retina. Development 127, 2515-2522.
Ishibashi, M., Moriyoshi, K., Sasai, Y., Shiota, K., Nakanishi, S. and Kageyama, R. (1994). Persistent expression of helix-loop-helix factor HES-1 prevents mammalian neural differentiation in the central nervous system. EMBO J. 13, 1799-1805.[Abstract]
Jasoni, C. L. and Reh, T. A. (1996). Temporal and spatial pattern of MASH-1 expression in the developing rat retina demonstrates progenitor cell heterogeneity. J. Comp. Neurol. 369, 319-327.[Medline]
Jeon, C.-J., Strettoi, E. and Masland, R. H. (1998). The major cell populations of the mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 18, 8936-8946.
Jones, S. E., Jomary, C., Grist, J., Thomas, M. R. and Neal, M. J. (1998). Expression of Pax-6 mRNA in the retinal degeneration (rd) mouse. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 252, 236-240.[Medline]
Kageyama, R. and Nakanishi, S. (1997). Helix-loop-helix factors in growth and differentiation of the vertebrate nervous system. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7, 659-665.[Medline]
Kay, J. N., Finger-Baier, K. C., Roeser, T., Staub, W. and Baier, H. (2001). Retinal ganglion cell genesis requires lakritz, a zebrafish atonal homolog. Neuron 30, 725-736.[Medline]
Kim, W.-Y., Fritzsch, B., Serls, A., Bakel, L. A., Huang, E. J., Reichardt, L. F., Barth, D. S. and Lee, J. E. (2001). NeuroD-null mice are deaf due to a severe loss of the inner ear sensory neurons during development. Development 128, 417-426.
Kolb, H. (1997). Amacrine cells of the mammalian retina: neurocircuitry and functional roles. Eye 11, 904-923.[Medline]
Lee, J. E., Hollenberg, S. M., Snider, L., Turner, D. L., Lipnick, N. and Weintraub, H. (1995). Conversion of Xenopus ectoderm into neurons by NeuroD, a basic helix-loop-helix protein. Science 268, 836-844.[Medline]
Lee, J. E. (1997). Basic helix-loop-helix genes in neural development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7, 13-20.[Medline]
Livesey, F. J. and Cepko, C. L. (2001). Vertebrate neural cell-fate determination: lessons from the retina. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 109-118.[Medline]
Liu, M., Pleasure, S. J., Collins, A. E., Noebels, J. L., Naya, F. J., Tsai, M.-J. and Lowenstein, D. H. (2000a). Loss of BETA2/NeuroD leads to malformation of the dentate gyrus and epilepsy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 865-870.
Liu, M, Pereira, F. A., Price, S. D., Chu, M., Shope, C., Himes, D., Eatock, R. A., Brownell, W. E., Lysakowski, A. and Tsai, M.-J. (2000b). Essential role of BETA2/NeuroD1 in development of the vestibular and auditory systems. Genes Dev. 14, 2839-2854.
Marquardt, T., Ashery-Padan, R., Andrejewski, N., Scardigli, R., Guillemot, F. and Gruss, P. (2001). Pax6 is required for the multipotent state of retinal progenitor cells. Cell 105, 43-55.[Medline]
Miyata, T., Maeda, T. and Lee, J. E. (1999). NeuroD is required for differentiation of the granule cells in the cerebellum and hippocampus. Genes Dev. 13, 1647-1652.
Morrow, E. M., Belliveau, M. J. and Cepko, C. L. (1998). Two phases of rod photoreceptor differentiation during rat retinal development. J. Neurosci. 18, 3738-3748.
Morrow, E. M., Furukawa, T., Lee, J. E. and Cepko, C. L. (1999). NeuroD regulates multiple functions in the developing neural retina in rodent. Development 126, 23-36.
Nieto, M., Schuurmans, C., Britz, O. and Guillemot, F. (2001). Neural bHLH genes control the neuronal versus glial fate decision in cortical progenitors. Neuron 29, 401-413.[Medline]
Nishina, S., Kohsaka, S., Yamaguchi, Y., Handa, H., Kawakami, A., Fujisawa, H. and Azuma, N. (1999). PAX6 expression in the developing human eye. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 83, 723-727.
Ohtsuka, T., Ishibashi, M., Gradwohl, G., Nakanishi, S., Guillemot, F. and Kageyama, R. (1999). Hes1 and Hes5 as Notch effectors in mammalian neuronal differentiation. EMBO J. 18, 2196-2207.
Roztocil, T., Matter-Sadzinski, L., Alliod, C., Ballivet, M. and Matter, J.-M. (1997). NeuroM, a neural helix-loop-helix transcription factor, defines a new transition stage in neurogenesis. Development 124, 3263-3272.
Satow, T., Bae, S.-K., Inoue, T., Inoue, C., Miyoshi, G., Tomita, K., Bessho, Y., Hashimoto, N. and Kageyama, R. (2001). The basic helix-loop-helix gene hesr2 promotes gliogenesis in mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 21, 1265-1273.
Schwab, M. H., Bartholomae, A., Heimrich, B., Feldmeyer, D., Druffel-Augustin, S., Goebbels, S., Naya, F. J., Zhao, S., Frotscher, M., Tsai, M.-J. and Nave, K.-A. (2000). Neuronal basic helix-loop-helix proteins (NEX and BETA2/NeuroD) regulate terminal granule cell differentiation in the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 20, 3714-3724.
Sommer, L., Ma, Q. and Anderson, D. J. (1996). neurogenins, a novel family of atonal-related bHLH transcription factors, are putative mammalian neuronal determination genes that reveal progenitor cell heterogeneity in the developing CNS and PNS. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 8, 221-241.[Medline]
Sparrow, J. R., Hicks, D. and Barnstable, C. J. (1990). Cell commitment and differentiation in explants of embryonic rat neural retina: comparison with the developmental potential of dissociated retina. Dev. Brain Res. 51, 69-84.[Medline]
Sun, Y., Nadal-Vicens, M., Misono, S., Lin, M. Z., Zubiaga, A., Hua, X., Fan, G. and Greenberg, M. E. (2001). Neurogenin promotes neurogenesis and inhibits glial differentiation by independent mechanisms. Cell 104, 365-376.[Medline]
Takebayashi, K., Takahashi, S., Yokota, C., Tsuda, H., Nakanishi, S., Asashima, M. and Kageyama, R. (1997). Conversion of ectoderm into a neural fate by ATH-3, a vertebrate basic helix-loop-helix gene homologous to Drosophila proneural gene atonal. EMBO J. 16, 384-395.
Tomita, K., Ishibashi, M., Nakahara, K., Ang, S.-L., Nakanishi, S., Guillemot, F. and Kageyama, R. (1996). Mammalian hairy and Enhancer of split homolog 1 regulates differentiation of retinal neurons and is essential for eye morphogenesis. Neuron 16, 723-734.[Medline]
Tomita, K., Moriyoshi, K., Nakanishi, S., Guillemot, F. and Kageyama, R. (2000). Mammalian achaete-scute and atonal homologs regulate neuronal versus glial fate determination in the central nervous system. EMBO J. 19, 5460-5472.
Tsuda, H., Takebayashi, K., Nakanishi, S. and Kageyama, R. (1998). Structure and promoter analysis of Math3 gene, a mouse homolog of Drosophila proneural gene atonal. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6327-6333.
Turner, D. L. and Cepko, C. L. (1987). A common progenitor for neurons and glia persists in rat retina late in development. Nature 328, 131-136.[Medline]
Wang, S. W., Kim, B. S., Ding, K., Wang, H., Sun, D., Johnson, R. L., Klein, W. H. and Gan, L. (2001). Requirement for math5 in the development of retinal ganglion cells. Genes Dev. 15, 24-29.
Yoshimatsu, T., Tamura, M., Kuriyama, S. and Ikenaka, K. (1998). Improvement of retroviral packaging cell lines by introducing the polyomavirus early region. Hum. Gene Ther. 20, 161-172.
Young, R. W. (1985). Cell differentiation in the retina of the mouse. Anat. Rec. 212, 199-205.[Medline]