1 European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
2 Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Present address: Exilixis Inc., 170 Harbor Way, PO Box 511, South San Francisco, CA 94083-0511, USA
* These authors contributed equally to the work
Author for correspondence (e-mail: cohen{at}embl-heidelberg.de)
Accepted June 11, 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: msh, apterous, Differentiation, Identity, Selector gene, Drosophila melanogaster, Wing, Dorsoventral patterning
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Selector genes act in different ways in anterior-posterior (AP) and dorsal-ventral (DV) subdivision of the wing. AP subdivision of Drosophila limbs is mediated by the activity of the engrailed and invected genes (García-Bellido and Santamaria, 1972; Morata and Lawrence, 1975; Tabata et al., 1995; Zecca et al., 1995). engrailed and invected are responsible for all three compartment-specific properties. Posterior cells lacking engrailed and invected are able to cross the AP compartment boundary and they differentiate anterior structures. When located in the posterior compartment, mutant cells interact with normal posterior cells to induce an ectopic signaling center. engrailed and invected have overlapping although distinct functions in this process. Posterior cells lacking engrailed alone have milder defects than cells lacking both genes, suggesting engrailed and invected have partially overlapping functions. However, misexpression of engrailed or invected alone in anterior cells revealed distinct activities (Simmonds et al., 1995). Misexpression of engrailed in anterior cells induced an ectopic signaling center and a change in the mixing properties of the cells, but it caused only a mild defect in compartment identity. In contrast, misexpression of invected in anterior cells only induced a change in compartment identity. Thus, although both engrailed and invected are required to specify posterior cell fate, invected seems to play a stronger role in this process.
DV subdivision of the Drosophila wing is mediated by the activity of apterous in dorsal cells (Diaz-Benjumea and Cohen, 1993; Blair et al., 1994). apterous activity is required and sufficient for locating the signaling center along the DV compartment boundary, for maintaining the lineage restriction boundary and for conferring dorsal cell fate. Dorsal cells lacking apterous activity or ventral cells misexpressing apterous induce an ectopic signaling center and are able to cross the DV lineage restriction boundary. Cells expressing apterous differentiate dorsal structures and cells lacking apterous differentiate ventral structures. Here we show that apterous confers dorsal identity through regulation of the homeobox gene muscle segment homeobox (msh). msh is expressed in dorsal cells in the embryonic neuroectoderm and muscle precursors (DAlessio and Frasch, 1996; Isshiki et al., 1997; Lu et al., 2000). In the wing disc, msh is expressed in dorsal cells under the control of Apterous activity. msh is both necessary and sufficient to confer dorsal fate in wing development. msh is the gene affected by the dominant mutation Dorsal wing (Tiong et al., 1995).
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Antibodies
Anti-dLMO was raised in rats (Milán et al., 1998); rabbit anti-ß-gal (Cappel).
Genotypes of larvae used for genetic mosaic analysis
f36 hs-FLP (I); FRT 82 msh68/FRT 82 P(f+).
Clones were marked in the adult wings by the forked phenotype. Clones were induced by heat shock at 38°C for 1 hour in second instar larvae (60 hours after egg laying).
![]() |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
The alula is located in the posterior compartment (Fig. 1A). It produces a single row of long thin bristles along the margin on the ventral surface. The dorsal surface of the alula lacks bristles (Fig. 1B).
The adult wing differentiates five longitudinal veins. L1 is located on both dorsal and ventral sides of the wing margin and L2-L5 veins are located in the wing blade (Fig. 1A). Veins L2-L5 are asymmetrical on the dorsal and ventral surfaces of the wing. One side contains more rows of tightly packed cells ("corrugated vein"). The opposite side is thinner ("ghost vein"). Corrugated veins consist of three rows of strongly pigmented and densely packed cells. Ghost veins consist of a single row of cells. Longitudinal veins L3, L5 and the distal tip of L4 are dorsally corrugated. Veins L2 and proximal L4 are ventrally corrugated (illustrated at bottom of Fig. 1B).
msh is required to confer dorsal identity
The msh gene belongs to the msh/Msx family of homeobox genes involved in dorsal cell fate specification in the Drosophila neuroectoderm (DAlessio and Frasch, 1996; Isshiki et al., 1997). As msh is expressed in the dorsal compartment of the wing disc (DAlessio and Frasch, 1996; Lu et al., 2000), we investigated whether msh is also involved in dorsal identity specification in the Drosophila wing. For this purpose, we generated msh mutant clones in the wing and assessed the DV identity of the bristles located along the AWM, in the alula and the DV corrugation of longitudinal veins in mutant cells. Clones mutant for msh had no aberrant phenotype in the ventral surface of the wing. When mutant for msh, the dorsal anterior wing margin differentiated ventral bristles. A single row of thin bristles interspersed with chemosensory bristles in every fifth position was observed (Fig. 1C: red arrows indicate ventral mechanosensory bristles; blue arrows indicate interspersed chemosensory bristles). Thus, the anterior wing margin differentiated a ventral pattern of bristles symmetrically on both surfaces.
When covered with mutant cells, the dorsal surface of the alula differentiated bristles (compare Fig. 1B and C). This reflects transformation to a ventralized cell fate. Absence of msh activity also induced a change in the pattern of corrugation of the longitudinal veins. In wild-type wings, veins L2 and L4 differentiated as ghost veins on the dorsal surface. When mutant for msh, these veins are corrugated and differentiate three rows of strongly pigmented cells (not shown), thus mimicking a ventral-like pattern. Veins L3 and L5 were corrugated on the dorsal surface (black arrows in Fig. 1C, bottom). When mutant for msh, they lost pigmentation and consisted of a single row of aligned cells (red arrows in Fig. 1C). Thus veins differentiated ventral characteristics in the dorsal surface when mutant for msh (Fig. 1C, bottom). We conclude that msh is required in the dorsal compartment of the Drosophila wing to confer dorsal cell identity. In the absence of msh, symmetric wings were observed which differentiated ventral characteristics on both surfaces (Fig. 1C).
msh is a target gene of Apterous sufficient to specify dorsal fate
Apterous is expressed in dorsal cells and is required to confer dorsal cell identity. We therefore determined whether msh expression in the dorsal compartment is regulated by Apterous activity. msh mRNA and msh-lacZ reporter genes were expressed in the dorsal compartment of the wing disc (Fig. 2A,E). msh mRNA was expressed at a low level throughout the dorsal compartment, except in the region of the anterior margin where it was expressed at higher level. Ectopic expression of Apterous in the ventral compartment under control of dppGal4 induced ectopic expression of msh mRNA at a level comparable to the overall low dorsal level (asterisk, Fig. 2B). In apterous mutant discs msh expression was lost from dorsal cells of the reduced wing pouch (Fig. 2C), but expression in the anterior mesopleura (arrows) and hinge region remained. Finally, overexpression of dLMO, a repressor of Apterous activity in the Drosophila wing (Milán et al, 1998), repressed expression of the msh-lacZ reporter gene (compare Fig. 2E and F). These results indicate that msh is indeed a target of Apterous.
|
|
|
We have compared msh mRNA levels in wild-type and Dlw1/+ wing discs. msh mRNA levels were reduced throughout the wing pouch in discs heterozygous for Dlw1 (compare Fig. 2A and D). Owing to the low levels of expression in the mutant discs it was not possible to evaluate whether there was significant ectopic expression in ventral cells. We note that the low level of msh expression in the Dlw1 background may explain the loss of function characteristics exhibited by the Dlw1 allele in homozygous mutant clones (Tiong et al., 1995). Dlw1/Dlw1 mutant clones located in the dorsal surface of the wing differentiated ventral structures. Thus, Dlw1 caused a dominant transformation of ventral cells to dorsal identity when heterozygous and an opposite transformation of dorsal cell to ventral identity when homozygous mutant in clones.
Interestingly, the dominant mutation Drop, which affects eye development, has been recently shown to be a gain-of-function allele of msh (Mozer, 2001). Drop mutants contain lesions in the same region as Dlw mutants (i.e. upstream of the msh transcription start site) and ectopic expression of msh in the eye phenocopies the Drop phenotype. However, Mozer (2001) was not able to find detectable misexpression of msh in Drop mutants. Thus, undetectably low levels of msh misexpression in eye and wing seem to be associated with the dominant adult phenotypes associated with the Dlw and Drop alleles of msh.
msh confers dorsal identity without affecting dorsal signaling properties
Apterous activity is required to confer dorsal identity and dorsal-type signaling properties. Fringe and Serrate expression in dorsal cells induce a cascade of short-range interactions between dorsal and ventral compartments that lead to the expression of the organizing molecule Wingless along the DV compartment boundary (reviewed by Irvine and Vogt, 1997; Strigini and Cohen, 1999). The results reported above suggest that msh confers dorsal identity without affecting DV signaling. In order to verify that this is the case, we have analyzed the ability of msh to restore dorsal identity and dorsal signaling properties in the absence of Apterous activity.
In apGal4/apUGO35 flies, the wing margin is reduced and the wing is considerably smaller than normal owing to reduced Apterous activity (compare Figs 5A and 1A). In the example shown, the margin was absent entirely. When present, margin bristles have ventral identity in this genotype. Expression of msh in apGal4/apUGO35;uas-msh flies did not restore outgrowth of the wing. The few margin bristles observed in the dorsal surface of these wings had dorsal identity (Fig. 5B). Growth and wing margin formation can be restored in the apGal4/apUGO35 mutant background by expression of Fringe under apGal4 control (genotype: apGal4/apUGO35; EP-fng, see also) (Milán and Cohen, 1999; OKeefe and Thomas, 2001). In these wings, both surfaces differentiated ventral structures: the AWM and the alula differentiated ventral bristles on both surfaces and the pattern of vein corrugation was ventral (Fig. 5C). Co-expression of msh with EP-fringe conferred dorsal differentiation in the bristles of the dorsal AWM in these rescued wings (Fig. 5D). We also noted that overexpression of msh in dorsal cells reduced the size of the dorsal wing pouch, induced differentiation of ectopic bristles in the wing blade and affected vein differentiation. This was also observed in apGal4/+; uas-msh/+ flies (Fig. 5E) and presumably reflect defects caused by higher than normal Msh levels in dorsal cells. Note that the endogenous levels of msh expression in the wing pouch are quite low (Fig. 2A). These results suggest that developmental regulation of Msh protein levels may be crucial for proper wing development and differentiation of patterning elements. All these results indicate that msh confers dorsal identity without affecting dorsal signaling properties.
|
![]() |
Concluding remarks |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Blair, S. S., Brower, D. L., Thomas, J. B. and Zavortink, M. (1994). The role of apterous in the control of dorsoventral compartmentalization and PS integrin gene expression in the developing wing of Drosophila. Development 120, 1805-1815.
Calleja, M., Moreno, E., Pelaz, S. and Morata, G. (1996). Visualization of gene expression in living adult Drosophila. Science 274, 252-255.
Cohen, B., McGuffin, M. E., Pfeifle, C., Segal, D. and Cohen, S. M. (1992). apterous: a gene required for imaginal disc development in Drosophila encodes a member of the LIM family of developmental regulatory proteins. Genes Dev. 6, 715-729.[Abstract]
DAlessio, M. and Frasch, M. (1996). msh may play a conserved role in dorsoventral patterning of the neuroectoderm and mesoderm. Mech. Dev. 58, 217-31.[Medline]
Diaz-Benjumea, F. J. and Cohen, S. M. (1993). Interaction between dorsal and ventral cells in the imaginal disc directs wing development in Drosophila. Cell 75, 741-752.[Medline]
Diaz-Benjumea, F. J. and Cohen, S. M. (1995). Serrate signals through Notch to establish a Wingless-dependent organizer at the dorsal/ventral compartment boundary of the Drosophila wing. Development 121, 4215-4225.
García-Bellido, A. and Santamaria, P. (1972). Developmental analysis of the wing disc in the mutant engrailed of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72, 87-104.
Garcia-Bellido, A., Ripoll, P. and Morata, G. (1973). Developmental compartmentalisation of the wing disk of Drosophila. Nature 245, 251-253.
Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L., del Corral, R. D., de la Calle-Mustienes, E., Ferre-Marco, D. and Modolell, J. (1996). Araucan and caupolican, two members of the novel iroquois complex, encode homeoproteins that control proneural and vein-forming genes. Cell 85, 95-105.[Medline]
Hinz, U., Giebel, B. and Campos-Ortega, J. A. (1994). The basic-helix-loop-helix domain of Drosophila lethal of scute protein is sufficient for proneural function and activates neurogenic genes. Cell 76, 77-87.[Medline]
Irvine, K. and Wieschaus, E. (1994). fringe, a boundary specific signalling molecule, mediates interactions between dorsal and ventral cells during Drosophila wing development. Cell 79, 595-606.[Medline]
Irvine, K. D. and Vogt, T. F. (1997). Dorsal-ventral signaling in limb development. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 867-876.[Medline]
Isshiki, T., Takeichi, M. and Nose, A. (1997). The role of the msh homeobox gene during Drosophila neurogenesis: implication for the dorsoventral specification of the neuroectoderm. Development 124, 3099-3109.
Kim, J., Irvine, K. D. and Carroll, S. B. (1995). Cell recognition, signal induction and symmetrical gene activation at the dorsal/ventral boundary of the developing Drosophila wing. Cell 82, 795-802.[Medline]
Laufer, E., Dahn, R., Orozco, O. E., Yeo, C.-Y., Pisenti, J., Henrique, D., Abbott, U. K., Fallon, J. F. and Tabin, C. (1997). Expression of Radical fringe in limb-bud ectoderm regulates apical ectodermal ridge formation. Nature 386, 366-373.[Medline]
Lu, C., Rincon-Limas, D. E. and Botas, J. (2000). Conserved overlapping and reciprocal expression of msh/Msx1 and apterous/Lhx2 in drosophila and mice. Mech. Dev. 99, 177-181.[Medline]
Milán, M. and Cohen, S. M. (1999). Notch signaling is not sufficient to define the affinity boundary between dorsal and ventral compartments. Mol. Cell 4, 1073-1078.[Medline]
Milán, M., Diaz-Benjumea, F. and Cohen, S. M. (1998). Beadex encodes an LMO protein that regulates Apterous LIM-homeodomain activity in Drosophila wing development: a model for LMO oncogene function. Genes Dev. 12, 2912-2920.
Morata, G. and Lawrence, P. A. (1975). Control of compartment development by the engrailed gene in Drosophila. Nature 255, 614-617.[Medline]
Mozer, B.A. (2001). Dominant Drop mutants are gain-of-function alleles of the muscle segment homeobox gene (msh) whose overexpression leads to the Arrest of eye development. Dev. Biol. 15, 380-393.
OKeefe, D. D. and Thomas, J. B. (2001). Drosophila wing development in the absence of dorsal identity. Development 128, 703-710.
Panin, V. M., Papayannopoulos, V., Wilson, R. and Irvine, K. D. (1997). Fringe modulates Notch-ligand interactions. Nature 387, 908-913.[Medline]
Riddle, R. D., Ensini, M., Nelson, C., Tsuchida, T., Jessell, T. M. and Tabin, C. (1995). Induction of LIM homeobax gene Lmx1 by WNT7a establishes dorsoventral pattern in the vertebrate limb. Cell 83, 631-640.[Medline]
Rodriguez-Esteban, C., Schwabe, J. W., Pena, J. D., Rincon-Limas, D. E., Magallon, J., Botas, J. and Izpisua Belmonte, J.-C. (1998). Lhx2, a vertebrate homologue of apterous, regulates vertebrate limb outgrowth. Development 125, 3925-3934.
Rodriguez-Esteban, C., Schwabe, J. W. R., De la Pena, J., Foys, B., Eshelman, B. and Izpisua-Belmonte, J.-C. (1997). Radical fringe positions the apical ectodermal ridge at the dorsoventral boundary of the vertebrate limb. Nature 386, 360-366.[Medline]
Simmonds, A. J., Brook, W. J., Cohen, S. M. and Bell, J. B. (1995). Distinguishable functions for engrailed and invected in anterior-posterior patterning in the Drosophila wing. Nature 376, 424-427.[Medline]
Strigini, M. and Cohen, S. M. (1999). Formation of morphogen gradients in the Drosophila wing. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 335-344.[Medline]
Tabata, T., Schwartz, C., Gustavson, E., Ali, Z. and Kornberg, T. B. (1995). Creating a Drosophila wing de novo: the role of engrailed and the compartment border hypothesis. Development 121, 3359-3369.
Tiong, S. Y. K., Nash, D. and Bender, W. (1995). Dorsal wing, a locus that affects dorsoventral wing patterning in Drosophila. Development 121, 1649-1656.
Vogel, A., Rodriguez, C., Warnken, W. and Izpisua-Belmonte, J.-C. (1995). Dorsal cell fate specified by chick Lmx1 during vertebrate limb development. Nature 378, 716-720.[Medline]
Zecca, M., Basler, K. and Struhl, G. (1995). Sequential organizing activities of engrailed, hedgehog and decapentaplegic in the Drosophila wing. Development 121, 2265-2278.