Departments of Ophthalmology and Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
*Authors for correspondence (e-mail: ericbirg{at}phy.ucsf.edu or dws{at}itsa.ucsf.edu)
Accepted May 11, 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Axon pathfinding, Ephrins, Extracellular domains, Retinal axons, Reverse signaling, Mouse
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
During development, retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons from all regions of the retina grow to the center of the retina where they exit through the optic disc to form the optic nerve. This precise axon pathfinding to the optic disc has been shown to involve netrin 1 (Deiner et al., 1997), Ig family cell adhesion molecules (Brittis et al., 1995; Ott et al., 1998), and more recently, EphB receptor tyrosine kinases (Birgbauer et al., 2000). In double mutant mice lacking both EphB2 and EphB3 receptors, RGC axons show pathfinding errors characterized by failure to exit at the optic disc and by abnormal axon growth into the opposite half of the retina (Birgbauer et al., 2000). Several aspects of this phenotype, however, are not easily explained by the traditional model of EphB proteins acting as guidance receptors. For example, pathfinding errors were found from dorsal but not ventral retinal axons, even though EphB3 expression appears uniform along the dorsoventral axis (Birgbauer et al., 2000) and ventral retina expresses higher levels of the EphB2 receptor (Henkemeyer et al., 1994; Holash and Pasquale, 1995; Henkemeyer et al., 1996; Birgbauer et al., 2000). In addition, in EphB3 mutant animals, the presence of a truncated EphB2 receptor lacking the cytoplasmic kinase domain but containing an intact extracellular domain eliminated the pathfinding errors seen in EphB2 EphB3 double null mutant animals (Birgbauer et al., 2000), indicating an unexpected kinase-independent role for EphB ECDs in retinal axon guidance.
Previous biochemical experiments have shown that EphB receptor extracellular domains (ECDs) can trigger ephrin phosphorylation in ephrin-expressing cells, suggesting the occurrence of reverse signaling during Eph/ephrin interactions (Holland et al., 1996; Brückner et al., 1997). Cell mixing experiments have implicated both reverse as well as forward signaling for efficient sorting of hindbrain cells (Mellitzer et al., 1999; Xu et al., 1999). Given the ability of EphB ECDs to promote reverse signaling, and the observation that in EphB mutant mice the affected dorsal retinal axons normally express ephrins and grow through an EphB environment on their way to the optic disc, we wished to investigate whether retinal growth cones navigate by responding to EphB ECDs as guidance cues. This model was tested directly by using EphB1, B2 and B3 ECDs in both substratum choice assays and by local delivery of protein to growth cones via a micropipette.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Retinal explants
Explants were obtained from dorsal or ventral retinas of E14 mouse embryos harvested from anesthetized C57/Bl6 timed pregnant mice (day of appearance of the vaginal plug is E0). Explants were grown overnight (16-24 hours) on polylysine- (1 mg/ml) and laminin-coated coverglass dishes at 37°C in 5% CO2 with F12 medium containing N2 supplement (Gibco). Laminin (Gibco or EHS cell purified, gift from L. Reichardt) was used at the minimum concentration needed to support good outgrowth (2-10 µg/ml, depending on the lot).
Binding of EphBECD-Fc proteins to retinal axons
E14 retinal explants were cultured overnight to allow neurite outgrowth. Non-specific binding sites were blocked by adding BSA (1 mg/ml in F12 medium) to explant cultures and incubating for 30 minutes at 37°C. Following washes with Ringers solution, cultures were incubated with 10 µg/ml EphB-ECDs or Fc control protein in Ringers solution containing BSA (1 mg/ml) for 60 minutes at 4°C. Cultures were washed and then fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde and binding was detected using Cy3-conjugated anti-human IgG (Fc-specific) antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, catalog #109-165-098).
Substratum choice assay
A mixture of EphBECD-Fc or Fc control protein (5-7 µg/ml), laminin (5-10 µg/ml), and Cy3-conjugated antibody as a fluorescent marker (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch) was prepared in PBS, and 1 µl drops were placed on polylysine-coated, glass coverslips dishes (Lab-Tek) for 2 hours at 37°C (humidified). After washing with PBS, laminin (same concentration as above) was applied uniformly over the entire surface for 2 hours at 37°C. Retinal explants from E14 dorsal or ventral retina were seeded onto prepared dishes and cultured overnight at 37°C and then fixed with paraformaldehyde. For quantitation, neurites were stained with Texas-Red Phalloidin (Molecular Probes), and only explants with neurites intersecting a border of laminin and EphB-ECD or Fc protein (with laminin) were selected for analysis. Neurites that reached the border were scored as either crossing over and growing onto the ECD or Fc substratum (non-responding), or stopping at the border or turning away from the border (responding). (Neurites that grew substantially over the border but then stopped or turned on the substratum were scored as non-responding based on their behavior at the border.) A baseline response rate without any border present was established by marking virtual spots on the uniform laminin only substratum in a similar size and position as EphB-ECD or Fc containing spots. A second observer then quantified the apparent response rate of axons turning or stopping at the virtual border (labeled none in Fig. 3). The total response rate (Fig. 3A) was calculated by summing up all the axons responding to a given border condition, while the mean response rate per explant (Fig. 3B) was obtained by calculating the percentage of responding axons for each explant and then calculating the mean for all explants encountering a given border condition. There were 267-630 axons (19-39 explants) quantified per substratum border for dorsal retina, and 111-265 axons (9-17 explants) for ventral retina. Statistical tests were performed separately for dorsal and ventral retinal explant neurites using 2 analysis for total response rate and two-sample T-test for mean explant response rate.
|
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Retinal neurites, when confronted with substratum containing Fc protein, appeared unaffected and grew onto the Fc control region in a pattern resembling that of growth on laminin alone (Fig. 2A,C). EphB-ECD containing substratum regions elicited a different pattern of neurite outgrowth characterized by the turning away of axons from the border region and reduced axon growth in the substratum region containing EphB-ECDs (Fig. 2B,D). This difference in response to EphB-ECDs versus Fc control was robust, and individual explants of a given condition all showed similar behavior. We quantified the results for each substratum type by examining all axon encounters with substratum borders and counting the number of axons that turned or stopped (responding axons). The number of responding axons was then expressed as a percentage of all axon encounters for that substratum type to derive an axon response rate (Fig. 3A). In 10 separate experiments involving all substrata, 2,148 axons encountering a border were analyzed from 151 explants (see Materials and Methods). In control conditions with Fc protein alone, most axons freely crossed the border (Fig. 3A), but a few appeared to turn or stop, most likely reflecting the natural curved growth of retinal axons on laminin (see Fig. 2A-D) or simply the recent arrival of particular growth cones at the border. This apparent Fc response rate was comparable to a response rate of axons simply growing on the laminin substratum in which a virtual border was drawn (Fig. 3A, none), indicating that Fc protein had little or no influence on retinal axon behavior in this assay.
|
Since there is some variability between individual explants in the amount of axon outgrowth and the number of axons encountering a border, we also quantified the results based on response rate per explant. The mean response rate per explant (Fig. 3B) for all three EphB ECDs was significantly higher than for Fc control (P0.05). Analysis by mean explant response rate showed dorsal explants to be slightly more responsive than ventral explants to EphB1-ECD (P=0.03) but, by this analysis, not statistically more sensitive to EphB2-ECD (P=0.3). Thus, the substratum choice assays, analyzed both by pooling all axon encounters for a given substratum type or by averaging the response rate of individual explants, showed that retinal axons avoided substrata containing the extracellular domains of any of the three EphB proteins tested.
Retinal growth cones are directly inhibited by EphB ECDs
To investigate whether this avoidance behavior reflected growth cone responses to an inhibitory activity, we used time-lapse video microscopy to examine the effects of soluble EphB-ECDs applied locally by micropipettes onto individual growth cones. The application method was similar to that used by others to examine growth cone signaling responses (Zheng et al., 1994; Ming et al., 1997; de la Torre et al., 1997). Fc control protein application typically did not affect retinal axon extension or growth cone motility (Fig. 4A; see also video in supplementary materials on the web at http://www.ucsf.edu/neurosc/faculty/Sretavan/Eph-timelapse.html). In contrast, EphB-ECD delivery to growth cones resulted in significant changes in growth cone behavior. The most common response was a loss of lamellipodia and filopodia accompanied by retraction of the growth cone, characteristic of growth cone collapse (Fig. 4B; see video on web site). A second but less common behavior was a cessation of growth cone motility with maintenance of lamellipodia and filopodia (Fig. 4C; see video on web site). This freeze response was accompanied by continued movement of cytoplasmic material from the axon into the base of the growth cone (Fig. 4C, white arrowheads). Less frequently axon elongation stopped, or slowed down, but the growth cone remained motile, or the growth cone turned away from the pipette (Table 1). Compared to the major response of growth cone collapse, which was seen at a much higher frequency following EphB-ECD treatment, the other types of growth cone behaviors were not observed at high enough frequency to be certain of their specificity as true responses to EphB-ECD treatment.
|
|
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Effects on laminin substratum
The inhibitory effects of EphB-ECDs were observed with retinal neurites growing on a laminin substratum. Recent studies have suggested that growth cone responses to cues could be dependent on the specific growth substratum (Hopker et al., 1999), and therefore the responses to EphB-ECDs in the context of other substrata will be important to examine. However, we do consider that laminin is a relevant substratum for examining retinal growth cone responses to EphB-ECDs. First, laminin is a potent neurite growth promoting factor for retinal axons in vitro. Second, RGC axons in vivo normally grow through a region rich in laminin to reach the optic disc (Cohen et al., 1987; Liesi and Silver, 1988; Hopker et al., 1999), suggesting that laminin is a natural substratum for these axons. Lastly, as retinal axons traverse this laminin-rich region, their growth cones are also in a position to come into contact with EphB ECDs, leading us to infer that the inhibitory effect of EphB ECDs on retinal neurites growing on laminin likely reflects an in vivo situation.
Reverse signaling and role of ephrins
Previous biochemical studies in cell lines have shown that EphB-ECD binding to transmembrane B-ephrins can trigger ephrin phosphorylation (Brückner et al., 1997; Holland et al., 1996), indicating a potential for reverse signaling from receptor through ligand. Cell sorting experiments in zebrafish (Mellitzer et al., 1999) have shown that signaling through Ephs and ephrins can proceed bidirectionally to produce a biological response, suggesting that restrictions on cell mixing in the hindbrain (Fraser et al., 1990; Birgbauer and Fraser, 1994) are mediated by bidirectional Eph/ephrin signaling (Xu et al., 1999). In this study, we have demonstrated that EphB extracellular domains can act in axon guidance, providing experimental evidence for the previous suggestion, based on genetic studies, that important aspects of anterior commissure and retinal axon guidance operate by a reverse signaling mechanism (Henkemeyer et al., 1996; Birgbauer et al., 2000). Although we have not shown that this effect is specifically mediated by B-ephrins as in a true reverse signaling paradigm, B-ephrins are the only known partners of EphB proteins (Eph Nomenclature Committee, 1997; Gale et al., 1996) and have highly homologous cytoplasmic domains consistent with a conserved role in signaling (Holland et al., 1996; Torres et al., 1998).
Model for EphB ECD function in RGC axon guidance to the optic disc
This study, along with our previous analysis of retinal pathfinding errors in EphB2 EphB3 double mutant animals (Birgbauer et al., 2000), leads to a model for Eph/ephrin reverse signaling during axon guidance in the retina (see Fig. 6). We previously found that retinal axons in EphB2 EphB3 double mutant mice exhibited guidance defects as they approached the optic disc, characterized by abnormal defasciculation and aberrant growth into the opposite half of the retina (Birgbauer et al., 2000). Unexpectedly, these pathfinding errors were seen in axons from dorsal but not ventral retina despite the fact that dorsal retina normally expresses lower levels of these receptors than ventral retina (Henkemeyer et al., 1994; Holash and Pasquale, 1995; Henkemeyer et al., 1996; Birgbauer et al., 2000). This paradox can now be explained by proposing that as dorsal RGC axons grow in the ventral direction towards the optic disc, they normally encounter and respond to increasing levels of extracellular domains of EphB proteins acting as guidance cues rather than as receptors. The high degree of axon fasciculation as they approach the disc may reflect their behavior in this increasingly inhibitory environment. The high levels of EphB proteins that are normally found in the ventral half of the retina would serve as a corrective mechanism so that any dorsal RGC axons that may have grown aberrantly into the ventral retina would be inhibited and prevented from growing further. Loss of both EphB2 and EphB3 proteins in null mutants would remove these inhibitory constraints, resulting in dorsal axon defasciculation and bypass at the optic disc as well as aberrant dorsal retinal axon growth into the ventral half of the retina. In this model, the absence of the EphB2 cytoplasmic kinase domain would not affect pathfinding to the disc or lead to aberrant axon growth into the ventral retina since the inhibition intrinsic to the ECD remains intact (Birgbauer et al., 2000).
|
It is also worth noting that while EphB3 is important in retinal axon pathfinding in vivo, in our in vitro assays it produced a reduced effect compared to EphB1 and EphB2. It is possible that this is related to the method of production and purification of the EphB3ECD-Fc protein. However, it is also possible that there are additional activities of EphB3 that are not revealed by our in vitro assays.
Dual function of Ephs and ephrins in axon pathfinding
Several lines of evidence now suggest that both Eph and ephrin molecules serve a dual function as receptors and ligands in a number of developmental events. Intriguingly, in the visual system, RGC axons appear to express both Ephs and ephrins (Marcus et al., 1996; Holash et al., 1997; Braisted et al., 1997; Connor et al., 1998; Hornberger et al., 1999; Birgbauer et al., 2000) leading to the possibility that Ephs and ephrins may serve as both receptors and ligands within the same cell. In the retina, RGC axons navigate to the optic disc in response to EphB proteins acting as guidance cues, while in the visual target, the superior colliculus, RGC axons have been shown to respond to ephrins, likely using EphA proteins as guidance receptors, during the formation of the retinotopic map (Wilkinson, 2000). Although EphA and EphB proteins may differ in their direction of signaling, recent studies have suggested that the EphA/ephrin-A system may also show reverse signaling (Davy et al., 1999; Davy and Robbins, 2000; Huai and Drescher, 2001; Knoll et al., 2001), and therefore EphA as well as EphB proteins may act both as receptors and guidance cues. Thus, there arises the intriguing possibility that a given axon may regulate Eph/ephrin signaling such that either forward or reverse signaling is utilized for pathfinding at different points along the pathway.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Birgbauer, E., Cowan, C. A., Sretavan, D. W. and Henkemeyer, M. (2000). Kinase independent function of EphB receptors in retinal axon pathfinding to the optic disc from dorsal but not ventral retina. Development 127, 1231-1241.
Birgbauer, E. and Fraser, S. E. (1994). Violation of cell lineage restriction compartments in the chick hindbrain. Development 120, 1347-1356.
Braisted, J. E., McLaughlin, T., Wang, H. U., Friedman, G. C., Anderson, D. J. and OLeary, D. D. M. (1997). Graded and lamina-specific distributions of ligands of EphB receptor tyrosine kinases in the developing retinotectal system. Dev. Biol. 191, 14-28.[Medline]
Brittis, P. A., Lemmon, V., Rutishauser, U. and Silver, J. (1995). Unique changes of ganglion cell growth cone behavior following cell adhesion molecule perturbations: a time-lapse study of the living retina. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 6, 433-449.[Medline]
Brown, A., Yates, P. A., Burrola, P., Ortuno, D., Vaidya, A., Jessell, T. M., Pfaff, S. L., OLeary, D. D. M. and Lemke, G. (2000). Topographic mapping from the retina to the midbrain is controlled by relative but not absolute levels of EphA receptor signaling. Cell 102, 77-88.[Medline]
Brückner, K., Pasquale, E. B. and Klein, R. (1997). Tyrosine phosphorylation of transmembrane ligands for Eph receptors. Science 275, 1640-1643.
Ciossek, T., Lerch, M. M. and Ullrich, A. (1995). Cloning, characterization, and differential expression of MDK2 and MDK5, two novel receptor tyrosine kinases of the eck/eph family. Oncogene 11, 2085-2095.[Medline]
Cohen, J., Burne, J. F., McKinlay, C. and Winter, J. (1987). The role of laminin and the laminin/fibronectin receptor complex in the outgrowth of retinal ganglion cell axons. Dev. Biol. 122, 407-418.[Medline]
Connor, R. J., Menzel, P. and Pasquale, E. B. (1998). Expression and tyrosine phosphorylation of Eph receptors suggest multiple mechanisms in patterning of the visual system. Dev. Biol. 193, 21-35.[Medline]
Davy, A., Gale, N. W., Murray, E. W., Klinghoffer, R. A., Soriano, P., Feuerstein, C. and Robbins, S. M. (1999). Compartmentalized signaling by GPI-anchored ephrin-A5 requires the Fyn tyrosine kinase to regulate cellular adhesion. Genes Dev. 13, 3125-3135.
Davy, A. and Robbins, S. M. (2000). Ephrin-A5 modulates cell adhesion and morphology in an integrin-dependent manner. EMBO J. 19, 5396-5405.
de la Torre, J. R., Hopker, V. H., Ming, G. L., Poo, M. M., Tessier-Lavigne, M., Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. and Holt, C. E. (1997). Turning of retinal growth cones in a netrin-1 gradient mediated by the netrin receptor DCC. Neuron 19, 1211-1224.[Medline]
Deiner, M. S., Kennedy, T. E., Fazeli, A., Serafini, T., Tessier-Lavigne, M. and Sretavan, D. W. (1997). Netrin-1 and DCC mediate axon guidance locally at the optic disc: loss of function leads to optic nerve hypoplasia. Neuron 19, 575-589.[Medline]
Eph Nomenclature Committee (1997). Unified nomenclature for Eph family receptors and their ligands, the ephrins. Cell 90, 403-404.[Medline]
Feldheim, D. A., Kim, Y. I., Bergemann, A. D., Frisen, J., Barbacid, M. and Flanagan, J. G. (2000). Genetic analysis of ephrin-A2 and ephrin-A5 shows their requirement in multiple aspects of retinocollicular mapping. Neuron 25, 563-574.[Medline]
Fraser, S., Keynes, R. and Lumsden, A. (1990). Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 344, 431-435.[Medline]
Gale, N. W., Holland, S. J., Valenzuela, D. M., Flenniken, A., Pan, L., Ryan, T. E., Henkemeyer, M., Strebhardt, K., Hirai, H., Wilkinson, D. G. et al. (1996). Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses and are reciprocally compartmentalized during embryogenesis. Neuron 17, 9-19.[Medline]
Henkemeyer, M., Marengere, L. E., McGlade, J., Olivier, J. P., Conlon, R. A., Holmyard, D. P., Letwin, K. and Pawson, T. (1994). Immunolocalization of the Nuk receptor tyrosine kinase suggests roles in segmental patterning of the brain and axonogenesis. Oncogene 9, 1001-1014.[Medline]
Henkemeyer, M., Orioli, D., Henderson, J. T., Saxton, T. M., Roder, J., Pawson, T. and Klein, R. (1996). Nuk controls pathfinding of commissural axons in the mammalian central nervous system. Cell 86, 35-46.[Medline]
Holash, J. A. and Pasquale, E. B. (1995). Polarized expression of the receptor protein tyrosine kinase Cek5 in the developing avian visual system. Dev. Biol. 172, 683-693.[Medline]
Holash, J. A., Soans, C., Chong, L. D., Shao, H., Dixit, V. M. and Pasquale, E. B. (1997). Reciprocal expression of the Eph receptor Cek5 and its ligand(s) in the early retina. Dev. Biol. 182, 256-269.[Medline]
Holland, S. J., Gale, N. W., Mbamalu, G., Yancopoulos, G. D., Henkemeyer, M. and Pawson, T. (1996). Bidirectional signalling through the EPH-family receptor Nuk and its transmembrane ligands. Nature 383, 722-725.[Medline]
Hopker, V. H., Shewan, D., Tessier-Lavigne, M., Poo, M.-m. and Holt, C. (1999). Growth-cone attraction to netrin-1 is converted to repulsion by laminin- 1. Nature 401, 69-73.[Medline]
Hornberger, M. R., Dutting, D., Ciossek, T., Yamada, T., Handwerker, C., Lang, S., Weth, F., Huf, J., Wessel, R., Logan, C. et al. (1999). Modulation of EphA receptor function by coexpressed ephrinA ligands on retinal ganglion cell axons. Neuron 22, 731-742.[Medline]
Huai, J. and Drescher, U. (2001). An ephrin-A-dependent signaling pathway controls integrin function and is linked to the tyrosine phosphorylation of a 120-kDa protein. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 6689-6694.
Knoll, B., Zarbalis, K., Wurst, W. and Drescher, U. (2001). A role for the EphA family in the topographic targeting of vomeronasal axons. Development 128, 895-906.
Liesi, P. and Silver, J. (1988). Is astrocyte laminin involved in axon guidance in the mammalian CNS? Dev. Biol. 130, 774-785.[Medline]
Marcus, R. C., Gale, N. W., Morrison, M. E., Mason, C. A. and Yancopoulos, G. D. (1996). Eph family receptors and their ligands distribute in opposing gradients in the developing mouse retina. Dev. Biol. 180, 786-789.[Medline]
Mellitzer, G., Xu, Q. and Wilkinson, D. G. (1999). Eph receptors and ephrins restrict cell intermingling and communication. Nature 400, 77-81.[Medline]
Ming, G. L., Song, H. J., Berninger, B., Holt, C. E., Tessier-Lavigne, M. and Poo, M.-m. (1997). cAMP-dependent growth cone guidance by netrin-1. Neuron 19, 1225-1235.[Medline]
Orioli, D., Henkemeyer, M., Lemke, G., Klein, R. and Pawson, T. (1996). Sek4 and Nuk receptors cooperate in guidance of commissural axons and in palate formation. EMBO J. 15, 6035-6049.[Abstract]
Ott, H., Bastmeyer, M. and Stuermer, C. A. (1998). Neurolin, the goldfish homolog of DM-GRASP, is involved in retinal axon pathfinding to the optic disk. J. Neurosci. 18, 3363-3372.
Raper, J. A. and Kapfhammer, J. P. (1990). The enrichment of a neuronal growth cone collapsing activity from embryonic chick brain. Neuron 2, 21-29.
Torres, R., Firestein, B. L., Dong, H., Staudinger, J., Olson, E. N., Huganir, R. L., Bredt, D. S., Gale, N. W. and Yancopoulos, G. D. (1998). PDZ proteins bind, cluster, and synaptically colocalize with Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands. Neuron 21, 1453-1463.[Medline]
Wilkinson, D. G. (2000). Topographic mapping: organising by repulsion and competition? Curr. Biol. 10, R447-R451.[Medline]
Xu, Q., Mellitzer, G., Robinson, V. and Wilkinson, D. G. (1999). In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins. Nature 399, 267-271.[Medline]
Zheng, J. Q., Felder, M., Connor, J. A. and Poo, M.-M. (1994). Turning of nerve growth cones induced by neurotransmitters. Nature 368, 140-144.[Medline]