Laboratoire de génétique et de physiologie du développement (LGPD), Developmental Biology Institute of Marseille (IBDM), CNRS-INSERM-Université de la méditerranée-AP de Marseille, Campus de Luminy, Case 907, 13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France
* Present address: Trophos SA, Bat CCIMP-Case 931, Campus de Luminy, 13009 Marseille, France
Author for correspondence (e-mail: pourquie{at}ibdm.univ-mrs.fr)
Accepted 11 December 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Chick, Segmentation clock, Segmentation, Cyclic gene expression, hairy, lunatic fringe
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In chick, the somitic series initiates just caudal to the otic vesicle (Hinsch and Hamilton, 1956; Huang et al., 1997
). Anterior to this somitic series, the paraxial mesoderm is termed the head or cephalic mesoderm. This mesoderm is laid down before, and is continuous with, the somitic series with which it shares some characteristics. Like the somites, the major derivatives of head mesoderm are some bones and skeletal muscle fibres of the face and of the branchial arches (Couly et al., 1993
; Couly et al., 1992
; Noden, 1986
). During embryonic development, head mesoderm precursors are transiently found in the rostral streak, in the same territory as the somite precursors (Nicolet, 1971
; Psychoyos and Stern, 1996
). Therefore, no discontinuity in the mode of production of the two territories in the streak is observed. Head mesoderm, however, exhibits several characteristics distinct from somitic mesoderm. For example, development of the head mesoderm derived muscles is subject to a different genetic control than that of trunk muscles (Hacker and Guthrie, 1998
; Tajbakhsh et al., 1997
). Furthermore, unlike somitic tissue, head mesoderm does not give rise to any dermis, which at the head level is provided by the neural crest (Couly and Le Douarin, 1988
).
Somitogenesis has been shown to involve a molecular oscillator called the segmentation clock, which acts in presomitic cells (Palmeirim et al., 1997). This molecular clock has been identified in fish, chick and mouse and controls the periodic expression of cyclic genes, which are, so far, all related to the Notch pathway. The cyclic genes include vertebrate hairy homologues, such as c-hairy1 and c-hairy2, HES1, HES7 or Her1, the glycosyl transferase lunatic fringe (Aulehla and Johnson, 1999
; Forsberg et al., 1998
; McGrew et al., 1998
), and the Notch ligand DeltaC (Jiang et al., 2000
). Expression of these genes appears as a dynamic wave, which sweeps across the whole PSM once during each somite formation. One proposed role for the segmentation clock is to modify periodically the activation of the Notch pathway in order to generate the somite boundaries (Pourquie, 1999
).
So far, all studies describing the dynamic expression of the cycling genes have been performed in embryos already containing several formed somites. Nothing is known about the onset of the oscillations during embryogenesis. We have undertaken a detailed study of the expression pattern of the c-hairy1, c-hairy2 and lunatic fringe mRNAs from gastrulation to the beginning of somite formation in the chick embryo. We observed a cyclic expression of these genes as soon as the paraxial mesoderm territory (which includes the head and somitic mesoderm territories) ingresses from the epiblast into the primitive streak. Oscillations of c-hairy2 and lunatic fringe expression are detected in the whole presumptive territory of the paraxial mesoderm in the rostral primitive streak which includes the pool of somitic stem cells from which the paraxial mesoderm originates (Nicolas et al., 1996; Stern et al., 1992
). Therefore, somitic cells do not only experience 12 pulses of hairy and lunatic fringe expression prior to their segmentation as originally proposed (Palmeirim et al., 1997
), but rather the number of cycles may correlate with the future regional level of the cells along the anteroposterior (AP) body axis. This observation strongly suggests that the segmentation clock might be linked to the AP patterning system of the axis. Furthermore, during its formation, head mesoderm undergoes only two pulses of hairy and lunatic fringe expression. Therefore, as most head segmentation models describe at least five head segments, our data do not support a link between such mesodermal head segments and the segmentation clock. This suggests that metamery of the paraxial mesoderm of the head and of the body rely on different molecular mechanisms.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Whole-mount in situ hybridisation and histology
The c-hairy1, c-hairy2 and lunatic fringe probes were produced as described in (Jouve et al., 2000; McGrew et al., 1998
; Palmeirim et al., 1997
). Embryos and explants were fixed overnight at 4°C in 4% formaldehyde-2mM EGTA, rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), dehydrated through a methanol series and stored in 100% methanol at 20°C. Whole-mount in situ hybridisation was performed according to the procedure described previously (Henrique et al., 1995
). Embryos were photographed as wholemounts in PBT (PBS, 0.1% Tween 20) using a Leica MZ10 stereomicroscope.
For cryosections, embryos stained in whole mount were embedded in gelatine-sucrose as described elsewhere (Chedotal et al., 1996) and serial 25 µm sections were cut using a Leica cryostat. Some stained embryos were also embedded in albumin gelatine as described elsewhere (Chedotal et al., 1996
) and sectioned at 50 µm using a Leica Vibratome. Sections were observed using a Leica DM equipped with Nomarski optics.
In vitro culture of chick explants
Chick embryos ranging from stage HH3 to HH7 were used throughout this study. Different types of explants were cultured on albumin agar plates. These plates were prepared using albumin collected from eggs incubated for 2 days, and stirred for 15 minutes, then a solution of NaCl was added to obtain a final concentration of 150 mM. This albumin-NaCl solution was added to an 0.6% agar solution at 1:1 ratio. This solution was pre warmed at 50°C, before being poured into 35 mm culture dishes (Sundin and Eichele, 1992). Different types of explants were precisely delimited, excised and disposed directly on albumin agar plate with their dorsal side up. Explants were then cultured for different time periods (from 1 hour to 4.5 hours) in a humidified atmosphere at 38°C and then fixed to be processed for in situ hybridisation. Using this technique, half-embryos were observed to develop as in New cultures up to the 10-15 somite stage.
In the first series of experiments, embryos were divided into two halves by cutting across the germ layers in the middle of the primitive streak. One half was immediately fixed. The other was cultured as described above.
In the second series of experiments, embryos were also divided sagittally, and in one of the two halves, the caudal part was removed and fixed immediately. Both halves, the entire and the truncated one, were incubated for the same period of time.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The expression profiles of c-hairy1, c-hairy2 and lunatic fringe are similar in the paraxial mesoderm and its prospective territory in the streak. To demonstrate this, we bisected the primitive streak along the AP axis in embryos from stage HH3 to HH4. Both halves were then fixed immediately, one was probed for c-hairy2 or c-hairy1 expression, and the other for lunatic fringe. The same expression pattern was observed in the paraxial mesoderm and its presumptive territory in both halves for each of the three genes (data not shown).
By contrast, expression of the three genes differs in the other embryonic tissues. For example, c-hairy1 is strongly expressed in the forming neural plate, making expression in the underlying paraxial mesoderm difficult to observe in whole-mount embryos (data not shown). This led us to focus our analysis upon the c-hairy2 and lunatic fringe genes, in which mesodermal expression could easily be observed using whole-mount in situ hybridisation.
Onset of the dynamic expression of the cyclic genes in the prospective paraxial mesoderm correlates with ingression of its precursors into the primitive streak
Between stages HH2 and HH3, the presumptive territory of the paraxial mesoderm has been mapped to the epiblast lateral to the primitive streak (Bortier and Vakaet, 1992; Hatada and Stern, 1994
). At these stages, no expression of either c-hairy2 or lunatic fringe is detected in this area (Fig. 1A,H asterisks and data not shown). The strong expression of lunatic fringe that persists up to stage HH4 is seen in the neural plate (Fig. 1H,I).
|
The chevron of expression reaches the anterior part of the primitive streak at the pit of Hensens node, at stage HH4 when presumptive paraxial mesoderm cells (head and somite mesoderm) are detected in this region of the primitive streak (Psychoyos and Stern, 1996) (Fig. 1F,M,Q,R). At this stage, a second chevron of expression appears in the mid-primitive streak region, i.e. in the presumptive territory of the paraxial mesoderm (Fig. 1F,G,M,N). Analysis of transverse sections reveals that this chevron is located in the same tissue layers as the first one (data not shown). Its centre is formed by cells of the primitive streak and immediately adjacent mesoderm and epiblast, while its lateral extensions are exclusively in the epiblast.
During the final stages of primitive streak extension (stage HH4/4+), the first chevron continues its anterior movement and reaches the territory of the forming axial prechordal mesoderm, which becomes positive for c-hairy2, but not for lunatic fringe (Fig. 1F,G,M,N). The second chevron continues its anterior progression until it finally reaches the Hensens node region at stage HH4+ (Fig. 1G and data not shown).
To further confirm this expression sequence, we cultured bilaterally bisected avian embryos in vitro (n=101). One half was fixed immediately and the other half was cultured on an albumin agar plate for different periods of time. Both halves were then hybridised with the probe for lunatic fringe, and the expression patterns on the two sides were compared (Fig. 2A-D). This analysis confirms the chevron progression shown in Fig. 1. It also indicates that, in vitro, the first chevron takes approximately 5 hours to complete its progression, whereas the second chevron achieves its migration along the rostral streak in about an hour (Fig. 2I).
|
Onset of somitic mesoderm production correlates with a change in cyclic gene expression
When the second chevron reaches the level of Hensens node at stage HH4+, a new domain of c-hairy2 and lunatic fringe expression appears in the mid-streak region and in two lateral domains of adjacent mesoderm (Fig. 3A). This expression domain moves anteriorly while narrowing, until it reaches the level of Hensens node (stage HH4+/5-) where it remains transiently as two bilateral stripes of expression in the paraxial mesoderm lateral to the node (Fig. 3B). According to fate maps, these two stripes of expression delimit the rostral most extent of the PSM at that stage and thus map the level of the presumptive first somite (Psychoyos and Stern, 1996) (C. J., T. I. and O. P., unpublished).
|
This dynamic expression sequence was confirmed using the half-embryo culture system described above (n=74). The expression in the primitive streak and in the two lateral domains of mesoderm takes 1 hour to progress anteriorly to the most anterior region of the primitive streak to form the two lateral stripes around Hensens node (Fig. 2E-H,I). Under these experimental conditions, at stage HH5, one complete wave is achieved in 1.5 hours.
Surprisingly, expression of c-hairy2 and lunatic fringe does not appear simultaneously in the whole presumptive territory of the paraxial mesoderm in the primitive streak. Rather, it is initiated in the caudal half of the rostral primitive streak and then moves rostrally to the rostral-most part of the streak and Hensens node (Fig. 2G,H and Fig. 3). Thus, the waves of cyclic gene expression undergo an anterior to posterior progression in the streak, reminiscent of the behaviour of the first two chevrons.
Cyclic gene expression oscillates in the paraxial mesoderm progenitors in the rostral primitive streak
This complex expression profile of c-hairy2 and lunatic fringe was further analysed in detail in transverse sections (Fig. 4). At the stage when c-hairy2 expression appears as two lateral mesodermal stripes flanking Hensens node (stage HH4+), the node itself, the primitive streak and the ingressed mesoderm immediately lateral to the streak are negative for c-hairy2 (Fig. 4B-D). Indeed, the c-hairy2 expression domain observed in whole-mount embryos is mainly localised to the epiblast (Fig. 4A-E). At this stage c-hairy2 expression in the paraxial mesoderm is essentially restricted to these two rostral stripes (Fig. 4B), and no expression is observed in the rostral primitive streak. A similar expression pattern in the streak and the paraxial mesoderm is observed for lunatic fringe at the same stage (Fig. 3B,D,F,H).
|
Waves of expression in the primitive streak are independent of a propagatory signal
Cell-labelling experiments indicate that the anteriorwards progression of the chevrons of cyclic genes expression along the primitive streak is unlikely to result from massive forward cell movements (Psychoyos and Stern, 1996) (C. J. and O. P., unpublished). Another possibility is that chevron migration along the streak is caused by the propagation of a signal originating in the posterior part of the embryo spreading and activating expression of the hairy and lunatic fringe genes in successively more anterior cells. We have tested this possibility by creating a physical discontinuity in the streak. We divided embryos at stage HH3+/4 sagittally, and in one of the two halves the caudal part was removed and fixed immediately to see where the gene was expressed at the onset of the experiment (n=192). Both halves, the entire and the truncated one, were cultured for the same period of time. Then the three parts were hybridised with the probe for lunatic fringe. The same expression pattern was observed in truncated and control halves, even after extended culture (Fig. 5A-E). Therefore, progression of lunatic fringe expression along the primitive streak does not rely on a posteriorly derived signal being propagated along the primitive streak.
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Precursors of the head mesoderm are already detected in the rostral streak at stage HH3+ and some of these remain up to stage HH4+, whereas precursors of the somitic paraxial mesoderm are found in the streak slightly later, i.e. mostly from stage HH4 onwards (see Fig. 1Q) (Nicolet, 1971; Psychoyos and Stern, 1996
). After the head mesoderm progenitors have left the streak, from stage 4+/5 on, cells leaving the primitive streak will participate in somite formation. In contrast to the head mesoderm (Fig. 6, pink) which undergoes a striking anteriorwards extension, the somitic mesoderm (Fig. 6, green) appears to be laid down in an anterior to posterior fashion, correlating with the onset of the regression movements of the streak.
|
The number of pulses of expression in paraxial mesoderm cells correlates with their position along the AP axis
Previous studies of c-hairy1, c-hairy2 and lunatic fringe expression have not addressed the status of the clock in the presumptive territory of somites in the streak and the tail bud, i.e. before entry of these cells into the PSM. In this study, we have observed that once the presumptive territory of the paraxial mesoderm becomes resident in the rostral primitive streak, it starts to undergo pulses of gene expression similar to those observed in the PSM of older embryos.
Single-cell injection studies in the chick embryo and a retrospective clonal analysis performed in the mouse embryo have led to the hypothesis that somites are populated by the descendants of a small number of stem cells located in the rostral primitive streak (Nicolas et al., 1996; Stern, 1992
). These stem cells remain resident in the streak and later in the tail bud, and generate all the cells that contribute to the somites. Our observations from histological sections of the primitive streak demonstrate that the streak cells undergo pulses of cyclic gene expression (Fig. 4 and data not shown, see also Fig. 3). Therefore, if the somitic stem cells are located in the streak, they should be continually experiencing pulses of cyclic gene expression.
According to this model, the number of oscillations undergone by the PSM descendants of the stem cells in the primitive streak will be directly correlated with their future position along the AP body axis. We observed that the production of the first somite is preceded by the two chevron-like waves of cyclic gene expression associated with the production of head mesoderm. If the whole paraxial mesoderm including both head and somitic mesoderm is derived from the same stem cell pool, then cells of somite number x will have undergone x+2 oscillations in the primitive streak corresponding to the number of formed somites plus the first two waves. Such a counting mechanism might play a fundamental role in AP regionalisation of the body axis. These results are in agreement with recent studies that suggest a link between the segmentation clock and spatiotemporal activation of Hox genes (Dubrulle et al., 2001; Zakany et al., 2001
).
Asynchronous oscillations in the precursors of the medial and lateral paraxial mesoderm
In the PSM of two-day old embryos, the wave of cyclic gene expression occurs in a caudorostral direction and results in cells of progressively more anterior character activating these genes during one cycle (Palmeirim et al., 1997). We show that the first two waves of cyclic gene expression, which appear as chevrons migrating along the primitive streak, also undergo a caudal-to-rostral progression in the embryo. However, given the fate of the embryonic territories in the streak, this progression does not cause cells of progressively more anterior character but of progressively more axial character to activate these genes: the chevrons progressively cross the prospective extra-embryonic, lateral plate and paraxial mesoderm to end their migration in the most axial territories, i.e. the prechordal mesoderm and the notochord.
This dynamic behaviour in the streak appears to be maintained during later oscillations of the cycling genes, as later waves are also characterised by a streak-expressing domain that moves rostrally (Fig. 3 and data not shown). In addition to this streak domain, from the third wave onwards, dynamic expression is seen in the descendants of these streak precursors that form the PSM. This mesodermal expression domain moves rostrally to finally form two stripes of expression lateral to Hensens node. This wave-like expression in cells of progressively more anterior character is similar to the one originally described for the PSM (Fig. 3) (Palmeirim et al., 1997). Apart for the first wave, oscillations in the precursors of the rostral streak and in the PSM, occur with the same periodicity in the streak and in the PSM.
Somites can be subdivided into a medial and a lateral moiety on the basis of their origin during gastrulation (Psychoyos and Stern, 1996; Selleck and Stern, 1991
) and of their fate (Ordahl and Le Douarin, 1992
). DiI injection experiments have shown that at these stages, the presumptive territory of the medial part of the prospective somites is found in more anterior territories of the streak associated with the Hensens node, whereas the lateral part of the somites is found more caudally in the rostral streak. Thus, the dynamic expression pattern we observe in the streak suggests a differential regulation of the cyclic genes in the precursors of the medial and lateral somitic halves. Surprisingly, this differential expression in the streak is not maintained, as no difference in cycling gene expression is seen in the precursors of the lateral and medial somites in the PSM. Thus, the rostrocaudal dynamics of the expression domain of the cyclic genes in the streak suggest a desynchronisation of the pulses between the progenitors of the medial and lateral somitic domains.
Analysis of the first pulses of expression of the cyclic genes suggests the existence of only two head segments
In the vertebrate head, segmented structures include the brain, the cranial nerves, the branchial arches and clefts, the visceral pouches, and the aortic arches (Kimmel et al., 1988). Muscles and bones of the branchial arches, which derive from head mesoderm and neural crest, respectively, obey this segmental arrangement (Kontges and Lumsden, 1996
). In the brain, segments are defined either on morphological grounds or by criteria such as gene expression. These brain segments are known as neuromeres, and are comprised of prosomeres anteriorly and rhombomeres in the hindbrain (Lumsden and Krumlauf, 1996
; Rubenstein et al., 1994
). The mechanisms implicated in hindbrain segmentation are clearly different from those of somitogenesis and are reminiscent of those used during fly segmentation. The branchial arches, their associated muscles and bones, and the neural structures that innervate them are generally thought to belong to the same segmentation series as the rhombomeres (Kontges and Lumsden, 1996
).
How does head segmentation relate to body segmentation? One possibility is that the somitic series extends into the head (Goodrich, 1930; Neal, 1918
). This hypothesis implies that, as in invertebrates, anterior segments are modified segments of an original common metameric series. An argument in favour of such an idea comes from the fact that in the cephalochordate, Amphioxus, somites extend to the anterior tip of the head, reflecting perhaps an ancestral condition of primitive vertebrates (Holland et al., 1997
). Moreover, in elasmobranch fishes, classical anatomical descriptions report the existence of head somites located anterior to the otic vesicle (Balfour, 1878
; Goodrich, 1930
). It was thus proposed that the paraxial mesoderm of the head (the cephalic or head mesoderm) is segmented into head somites (Gilland and Baker, 1993
).
A second conceptually similar hypothesis proposed the existence of mesodermal head segments, known as somitomeres in several vertebrate species (Meier, 1981). Under the scanning electron microscope, these segments appear as a series of concentrically organised cells. The number of these mesodermal head segments varies, depending on the studies and on the species considered. For example, Meier reported the existence of seven preotic somitomeres in chick embryos (Meier, 1981
), while frogs were reported as having only four (Jacobson, 1988
). Existence of the somitomeres is, however, highly controversial (Freund et al., 1996
; Kuratani et al., 1999
).
When the number of proposed mesodermal head segments is compared with that of ectodermal head segments, such as branchial arches or neuromeres, no simple correlation is observed. In answer to this discrepancy, the existence of two independent segmentation series has been proposed. The first concerns the formation of somites from the mesoderm and the second includes ectodermal derivatives such as the branchial arches and the associated cranial nerves and brain structures (Gans and Northcutt, 1983; Stern, 1990
). A third possibility is that the whole head mesoderm corresponds to the first modified segment of the somitic series. This mesoderm would undergo a secondary segmentation imposed by the ectoderm of the branchial arches. Finally, a fourth viewpoint holds that the vertebrate head mesoderm is not in fact segmented and is part of a new structure that has evolved rostral to the somitic series. Such a proposal was put forward in the New Head hypothesis proposed by Gans and Northcutt (Gans and Northcutt, 1983
). In summary, although the issue has been intensively studied since the last century, no consensus on the existence or otherwise of vertebrate head somites has yet been reached.
If the head mesoderm did belong to the same metameric series as the somites, then its segmentation might be expected to be regulated by the same molecular machinery. Therefore, a reasonable expectation would be that the clock linked to segmentation might also operate during formation of the head mesoderm. As one oscillation of the clock, monitored as one wave of gene expression, corresponds to the production of one somite (Palmeirim et al., 1997), then such a correlation might also be expected for presumptive head segments. As segmentation proceeds in an anterior-to-posterior fashion, examination of the first oscillation cycles of gene expression should be informative with respect to the number of segments that form in the head mesoderm.
Production of head mesoderm by the primitive streak is completed by stage HH5, after which somitic mesoderm begins to be produced (Nicolet, 1971; Psychoyos and Stern, 1996
). Our observations of the c-hairy2 and lunatic fringe expression patterns in the paraxial mesoderm and its precursors indicate that between the time the head mesoderm territory ingresses within the streak (stage HH3) and the time it has left the streak (stage HH5), some cells will have experienced one pulse, and the last to leave will have experienced two pulses of gene expression. Therefore, it suggests that head mesoderm only experiences two pulses of cycling gene expression. This argues for the existence of only two segments in the head, which is at odds with head segmentation models (such as the somitomere model that proposes the existence of many more segments). Alternatively, it is also possible that head segments form independently of the segmentation clock or that the clock is active but drives a different set of, as yet unidentified, cycling genes.
The first pulse of cyclic genes expression correlates with the production of axial prechordal mesoderm, which gives rise to extrinsic ocular muscles (Couly et al., 1992; Wachtler et al., 1984
). This tissue maintains c-hairy2 but not lunatic fringe expression. Prechordal mesoderm, which forms at the rostral most tip of the notochord, shares with the paraxial mesoderm the ability to give rise to skeletal muscle, and could thus represent the first segment in the series (Fig. 7). The second pulse of cyclic gene expression coincides with the generation of the whole head mesoderm. In this case, the whole head mesoderm would represent the second segment in the series (Fig. 7). Evidence for such a subdivision of the anterior paraxial mesoderm in these two domains has been provided in lamprey and chick embryos (Adelman, 1922
; Kuratani et al., 1999
). According to this model, the first somite that lies caudal to the otic vesicle would represent the third segment in the series.
|
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Adelman, H. B. (1922). The significance of the prechordal plate: an interpretative study. Am. J. Anat. 31, 55-101.
Aulehla, A. and Johnson, R. L. (1999). Dynamic expression of lunatic fringe suggests a link between notch signaling and an autonomous cellular oscillator driving somite segmentation. Dev. Biol. 207, 49-61.[Medline]
Balfour, F. M. (1878). A Monograph on the Development of the Elasmobranch Fishes. London: Macmillan.
Bortier, H. and Vakaet, L. C. (1992). Fate mapping the neural plate and the intraembryonic mesoblast in the upper layer of the chicken blastoderm with xenografting and time-lapse videography. Development Suppl. 93-97.
Chedotal, A., Pourquié, O., Ezan, F., San Clemente, H. and Sotelo, C. (1996). BEN as a presumptive target recognition molecule during the development of the olivocerebellar system. J. Neurosci. 16, 3296-3310.
Couly, G. and Le Douarin, N. M. (1988). The fate map of the cephalic neural primordium at the presomitic to the 3-somite stage in the avian embryo. Development Suppl. 101-113.
Couly, G., Coltey, P. and Le Douarin, N. M. (1993). The triple origin of skull in higher vertebrates: a study in quail-chick chimeras. Development Suppl. 409-429.
Couly, G. F., Coltey, P. M. and Le Douarin, N. M. (1992). The developmental fate of the cephalic mesoderm in quail-chick chimeras. Development 114, 1-15.[Abstract]
Dubrulle, J., McGrew, M. J. and Pourquié, O. (2001). FGF signaling controls somite boundary position and regulates segmentation clock control of spatiotemporal Hox gene activation. Cell 106, 219-232.[Medline]
Forsberg, H., Crozet, F. and Brown, N. A. (1998). Waves of mouse Lunatic fringe expression, in four-hour cycles at two-hour intervals, precede somite boundary formation. Curr. Biol. 8, 1027-1030.[Medline]
Freund, R., Dorfler, D., Popp, W. and Wachtler, F. (1996). The metameric pattern of the head mesodermdoes it exist? Anat. Embryol. 193, 73-80.[Medline]
Gans, C. and Northcutt, R. G. (1983). Neural crest and the origin of vertebrates: a new head. Science 220, 268-274.
Gilland, E. and Baker, R. (1993). Conservation of neuroepithelial and mesodermal segments in the embryonic vertebrate head. Acta Anat. 148, 110-123.[Medline]
Goodrich, E. S. (1930). Studies on the Structure and Development of Vertebrates. London: Macmillan.
Hacker, A. and Guthrie, S. (1998). A distinct developmental programme for the cranial paraxial mesoderm in the chick embryo. Development 125, 3461-3472.
Hamburger, V. and Hamilton, H. L. (1992). A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo (1951). Dev. Dyn. 195, 231-272.[Medline]
Hatada, Y. and Stern, C. D. (1994). A fate map of the epiblast of the early chick embryo. Development 120, 2879-2889.
Henrique, D., Adam, J., Myat, A., Chitnis, A., Lewis, J. and Ish-Horowicz, D. (1995). Expression of a Delta homologue in prospective neurons in the chick. Nature 375, 787-790.[Medline]
Hinsch, C. W. and Hamilton, H. L. (1956). The developmental fate of the first somite in the chick embryo. Anat. Rec. 125, 225-246.
Holland, L. Z., Kene, M., Williams, N. A. and Holland, N. D. (1997). Sequence and embryonic expression of the amphioxus engrailed gene (AmphiEn): the metameric pattern of transcription resembles that of its segment-polarity homolog in Drosophila. Development 124, 1723-1732.
Huang, R., Zhi, Q., Ordahl, C. P. and Christ, B. (1997). The fate of the first avian somite. Anat. Embryol. 195, 435-449.[Medline]
Jacobson, A. G. (1988). Somitomeres: mesodermal segments of vertebrate embryos. Development Suppl. 209-220.
Jiang, Y. J., Aerne, B. L., Smithers, L., Haddon, C., Ish-Horowicz, D. and Lewis, J. (2000). Notch signalling and the synchronization of the somite segmentation clock. Nature 408, 475-479.[Medline]
Jouve, C., Palmeirim, I., Henrique, D., Beckers, J., Gossler, A., Ish-Horowicz, D. and Pourquie, O. (2000). Notch signalling is required for cyclic expression of the hairy-like gene HES1 in the presomitic mesoderm. Development 127, 1421-1429.
Kimmel, C. B., Sepich, D. S. and Trevarrow, B. (1988). Development of segmentation in zebrafish. Development Suppl. 197-207.
Kontges, G. and Lumsden, A. (1996). Rhombencephalic neural crest segmentation is preserved throughout craniofacial ontogeny. Development 122, 3229-3242.
Kuratani, S., Horigome, N. and Hirano, S. (1999). Developmental morphology of the head mesoderm and reevaluation of segmental theories of the vertebrate head: evidence from embryos of an agnathan vertebrate, Lampetra japonica. Dev. Biol. 210, 381-400.[Medline]
Lumsden, A. and Krumlauf, R. (1996). Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis. Science 274, 1109-1115.
McGrew, M. J., Dale, J. K., Fraboulet, S. and Pourquie, O. (1998). The lunatic fringe gene is a target of the molecular clock linked to somite segmentation in avian embryos. Curr. Biol. 8, 979-982.[Medline]
McGrew, M. J. and Pourquié, O. (1998). Somitogenesis: segmenting a vertebrate. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev 8, 487-493.[Medline]
Meier, S. (1981). Development of the chick embryo mesoblast: morphogenesis of the prechordal plate and cranial segments. Dev. Biol. 83, 49-61.[Medline]
Neal, H. V. (1918). Neuromeres and metameres. J. Morphol. 31, 293-315.
Nicolas, J. F., Mathis, L., Bonnerot, C. and Saurin, W. (1996). Evidence in the mouse for self-renewing stem cells in the formation of a segmented longitudinal structure, the myotome. Development 122, 2933-2946.
Nicolet, G. (1971). Avian gastrulation. Adv. Morphog. 9, 231-262.[Medline]
Noden, D. M. (1986). Origins and patterning of craniofacial mesenchymal tissues. J. Craniofac. Genet. Dev. Biol. Suppl. 2, 15-31.[Medline]
Ordahl, C. P. and Le Douarin, N. M. (1992). Two myogenic lineages within the developing somite. Development 114, 339-353.[Abstract]
Packard, D. S. J. and Jacobson, A. (1976). The influence of axial structures on chick somite formation. Dev. Biol. 53, 36-48.[Medline]
Palmeirim, I., Henrique, D., Ish-Horowicz, D. and Pourquié, O. (1997). Avian hairy gene expression identifies a molecular clock linked to vertebrate segmentation and somitogenesiss. Cell 91, 639-648.[Medline]
Pourquie, O. (1999). Notch around the clock. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 559-565.[Medline]
Psychoyos, D. and Stern, C. D. (1996). Fates and migratory routes of primitive streak cells in the chick embryo. Development 122, 1523-1534.
Rubenstein, J. L., Martinez, S., Shimamura, K. and Puelles, L. (1994). The embryonic vertebrate forebrain: the prosomeric model. Science 266, 578-580.[Medline]
Selleck, M. A. and Stern, C. D. (1991). Fate mapping and cell lineage analysis of Hensens node in the chick embryo. Development 112, 615-626.[Abstract]
Stern, C. D., Hatada, Y., Selleck, M. A. and Storey, K. G. (1992). Relationships between mesoderm induction and the embryonic axes in chick and frog embryos. Development Suppl. 151-156.
Stern, C. S. (1990). Two distinct mechanisms for segmentation? Semin. Dev. Biol. 1, 109-116.
Sundin, O. and Eichele, G. (1992). An early marker of axial pattern in the chick embryo and its respecification by retinoic acid. Development 114, 841-852.[Abstract]
Tajbakhsh, S., Rocancourt, D., Cossu, G. and Buckingham, M. (1997). Redefining the genetic hierarchies controlling skeletal myogenesis: Pax- 3 and Myf-5 act upstream of MyoD. Cell 89, 127-138.[Medline]
Wachtler, F., Jacob, H. J., Jacob, M. and Christ, B. (1984). The extrinsic ocular muscles in birds are derived from the prechordal plate. Naturwissenschaften 71, 379-380.[Medline]
Zakany, J., Kmita, M., Alarcon, P., De la Pompa, J.-L. and Duboule, D. (2001). Localized and transient transcription of Hox genes suggests a link between patterning and the segmentation clock. Cell 106, 207-217.[Medline]