1 Embryology Unit, Childrens Medical Research Institute, Locked Bag 23, Wentworthville, NSW 2145, Australia
2 Department of Molecular Genetics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston TX 77030, USA
3 Laboratory of Developmental Biology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Osaka University, 565 Osaka, Japan
4 Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinae Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: ptam{at}cmri.usyd.edu.au)
Accepted June 18, 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Gastrula organizer, Node, Axial mesoderm, Cell movement, Cell fate, Mouse embryo
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In the early-streak (ES) stage mouse embryo, cells that are fated for the axial mesoderm are localized to a region of the posterior epiblast within 50-100 µm of the embryonic-extraembryonic junction of the gastrula (Lawson et al., 1991; Tam et al., 1997a). At the late-streak (LS) stage, the progenitors of the notochord are found in the node located at the anterior end of the primitive streak (Sulik et al., 1994; Beddington, 1994). Consistent with the properties of the organizer of fish, frog and bird embryos, cells at these two sites of the mouse gastrula can induce a new neural axis when they are transplanted as an intact tissue fragment to an ectopic site in the late-gastrulation embryo, and they self-differentiate to form the axial mesoderm of the new body axis (Beddington, 1994; Tam et al., 1997a). These two cell populations are thus regarded as the organizer of the gastrula embryo: the early-gastrula organizer (EGO) and the node (or Hensens node) (Viebahn, 2001) which may be the equivalent of the late-gastrula organizer in other vertebrate embryos (Camus and Tam, 1999). Cells of the organizer at these two stages of gastrulation display different developmental fates regarding their relative contribution to different anteroposterior segments of the axial mesoderm, to other types of mesoderm and to the gut endoderm (Beddington, 1994; Sulik et al., 1994; Tam et al., 1997a). Furthermore, cells in the EGO and the node express different combinations of organizer-specific genes (Camus and Tam, 1999; Davidson and Tam, 2000). These findings suggest that, although the EGO and the node possess similar organizing activity, there may be significant difference in the composition or the lineage potency of the cell population at different phases of gastrulation.
In the mouse, very little is known about the ontogeny and cellular composition of the organizer, and the morphogenetic movement of the organizer derivatives in the gastrulating embryo. The development of the organizer and the allocation of cells to the axial mesoderm are more extensively studied in the chick embryo, which, like the mouse, gastrulates and forms germ layers by the ingression of cells at the primitive streak. In the early chick gastrula, precursor cells of Hensens node reside first in the region of the Koller sickle in the posterior blastoderm. During gastrulation, these precursors, which express the GSC gene and are morphologically distinct from the overlying blastoderm and the underlying hypoblast (Izpisua-Belmonte et al., 1993), are displaced anteriorly with the advancing primitive streak (Lawson and Schoenwolf, 2001). In the mouse, cells of the EGO, which is localized in the posterior epiblast but away from the primitive streak, also express Gsc activity (Filosa et al., 1997). At the early-streak stage (HH stage 2-3), the tissues in the anterior primitive streak of the chick embryo can only induce the formation of a new primitive streak when transplanted to ectopic sites and do not induce any neural tissue or a complete body axis (Lemaire et al., 1997). By contrast, the mouse EGO can induce an incomplete axis, but lacks anterior characteristics (Tam et al., 1997a). In the chick, after the meeting of the advancing GSC-expressing cell population and the epiblast cells in the central part of the blastoderm, both cell populations are incorporated into the nascent Hensens node. The combined cell population then acquires the ability to induce the formation of a neural axis complete with anterior and posterior characteristics (Storey et al., 1992; Lemaire et al., 1997; Izpisua-Belmonte et al., 1993). Whether the equivalent organizer of the mouse embryo at a comparable stage of gastrulation will induce an axis has not been tested. After the chick primitive streak has attained its full length, GSC-expressing cells that are destined for the prechordal plate and the anterior head process leave Hensens node and extend anteriorly in a tight column along the midline of the embryo. This movement of the axial mesoderm differs from that of the paraxial and lateral mesoderm, which first migrate laterally out of the primitive streak and then anteriorly towards the cranial end of the embryo (Psychoyos and Stern, 1996). The departure of the GSC-expressing cells seems to coincide with the loss of the ability of Hensens node to induce a full neural axis (Storey et al., 1992). The change in inductive potential of Hensens node and its predecessor parallels the gain of GSC activity, as well as the arrival of the incoming GSC-expressing population from the Koller sickle to the node and the departure of the head process mesoderm (Izpisua-Belmonte et al., 1993). Similarly, the absence of Gsc activity from the node (Belo et al., 1998) is associated with the inability of the node to induce a complete neural axis (Beddington, 1994). It is not known, however, whether this may be correlated with the passage of the head process mesoderm. At the end of gastrulation in the chick, the primitive streak regresses and the node moves posteriorly and concomitantly lays down the notochord in its wake (Catala et al., 1996). Although the precursors of the axial mesoderm are derived mainly from the organizer in the chick recent evidence suggests that cells located outside of the organizer regions can contribute to the axial mesoderm, these cells first migrate into the organizer region and then anteriorly to form the midline (Joubin and Stern, 1999). It is not known if this occurs in the mouse.
Our work addresses the following questions, which have been raised by our current knowledge of the mouse gastrula organizer: (1) Is a population of organizer cells with comparable axis inductive property, genetic activity and cell fates present in the embryo between the early and late stage of gastrulation? (2) Does the mouse organizer always contain the full complement of progenitors of the entire axial mesoderm? (3) Which migratory route is taken by the cells that are destined for the axial mesoderm?
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
For assessing the differentiation of the transplanted cells, mice expressing a lacZ reporter gene that has been integrated into the Gsc locus (GsclacZ)(Rivera-Perez et al., 1999) were used. The GsclacZ mice were crossed to the B5/EGFP mice to produce compound transgenic mice that widely express the EGFP transgene in the embryonic tissues but express only GsclacZ activity when the cells differentiate into the prechordal mesoderm and the foregut endoderm of embryos at the early-somite stage.
Embryo collection, micro-manipulation and culture
Pregnant mice were dissected at 6.5, 7.0 and 7.5 days post coitus to collect embryos at the ES, mid-streak (MS) and LS-to-early bud (EB) stages, respectively (Downs and Davies, 1993). Isolated fragments of tissues from the organizer were dissected from embryos that provided cells for fate mapping and cell tracking experiment. For the ES and MS stage embryos, the tissue fragments were further dissected to remove any adherent visceral endoderm. For the EB stage embryo, the node was isolated by trimming away the neighboring primitive streak and germ layer tissues. The tissue fragment was then broken up into clumps of 5-20 cells for transplantation.
Host ARC/s strain embryos that matched the developmental stage of the donor embryo were used as recipients of cell transplantation. They were dissected free of the decidual tissues and parietal yolk sac, and kept in culture until manipulation. Cell clumps from donor embryos were grafted to orthotopic sites in the host embryo using a Leitz micromanipulator under a Wild M3Z dissecting microscope (Kinder et al., 2000). After grafting, embryos were photographed (see below) and incubated for 1 hour in the chamber of NUNC culture slides to allow the incorporation of the graft in either RS medium (for ES and MS stage embryos) or DR75 medium (for LS and EB stage embryos)(Sturm and Tam, 1993). ES and MS stage embryos were then cultured individually in eight-well NUNC slides in RS (100% rat serum) or DRH (25% DMEM, 50% rat serum, 25% human cord serum) medium under 5% CO2 in air. LS and EB stage embryos were cultured individually in roller bottles in DR75 medium in 5% CO2, 5% O2 and 90% CO2 (Sturm and Tam, 1993).
Combined cell grafting and dye labeling of MS stage embryo
To track the movement of specific cell populations in the MS embryo, cells were tagged either by the EGFP transgene or the carbocyanine dye (DiI: 1,1-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate, Molecular Probes). Transgenic cells were isolated from the mid-gastrula organizer (MGO) of the B5X strain and grafted orthotopically to the MGO region of the host embryo. After culturing the host embryo for 1 hour to allow the grafted cells to be incorporated into the host tissues, the mesoderm adjacent to the MGO was labelled by microinjecting a small volume (0.25-0.5 µl) of a 0.05% dye solution. The embryos were photographed immediately after labeling to record the position of the EGFP-expressing cells and the dye-labeled mesoderm (see below). The host embryos were cultured for 36 hours to the early-somite stage, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight and examined for the distribution of the fluorescent cells using fluorescence microscopy (Quinlan et al., 2000).
Analysis of gene expression
In situ hybridization
Whole-mount mRNA in situ hybridization for the genes Otx2, Sox2, Cer1, Chrd and Hnf3ß was performed to determine the location of the organizer at different gastrulation stages and during axis induction experiments. The protocol used for in situ hybridization was as described by Wilkinson and Nieto (Wilkinson and Nieto, 1993) with the following modifications: the Ampliscribe kit (Epicentre Technologies) was used in conjunction with Dig-11-UTP (Roche) to synthesize RNA probes, SDS was used instead of CHAPS in the hybridization solution and post-hybridization washes. Only 5x SSC was used in the hybridization solution, whereas post hybridization washes carried out at 70°C and excluded formamide. No RNA digestion was performed after hybridization.
Immunohistochemistry for HNF3ß
Immunostaining was carried out on whole ES stage embryos using a rabbit anti-HNF3ß antibody at a dilution of 1:2000 (Davies et al., 1991). Staining of the tissues was visualized by reaction with the streptavidin-biotin reagent (ABC kit, Vector Laboratory) and diaminobenzidine.
Detection of lacZ transgene activity
The expression of the lacZ transgene was assessed by histochemical reaction with X-gal reagent. ES to early-somite stage embryos containing either GsclacZ or HMG-lacZ-expressing cells were fixed for 5 minutes in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), followed by staining overnight at 37°C in X-gal staining solution. Stained embryos were re-fixed in 4% PFA, photographed and processed for wax embedding. Serial 8 µm sections were counterstained with nuclear fast red. The localization and the number of X-gal-stained cells in the host tissues were scored.
Fluorescence microscopy of EGFP-expressing cells and DiI-labeled cells
Experimental embryos that contained EGFP-expressing or DiI-labeled cells were examined by fluorescence microscopy (Quinlan et al., 2000). Immediately after cell grafting and at 6 hour intervals until the embryo developed to the early neural plate stage (after 12, 24 and 30 hours of in vitro development for EB, MS and ES embryos, respectively), the embryo was taken out of the culture vessel and placed in a phosphate-buffered (PB1) medium for fluorescence imaging. The EGFP fluorescence was recorded using a SPOT 2 digital camera (SciTech, Melbourne, VIC) attached to a Lieca MZFLIII fluorescence microscope with a GFPIII filter set (adsorption at 495 nm). For each imaging session, a color bright field image and a monochrome high-resolution fluorescent image were taken consecutively. For dual EGFP and DiI detection, a third image was captured using a Rhodamine filter (absorption at 574 nm) after the bright field and the green fluorescence image. The pictures were superimposed to compose an image showing the location of the EGFP-expressing cells in the early neural plate embryo, using the image manipulation software that operates the digital camera and Photoshop 5.5 (Adobe). After photography, the embryos were then returned to the culture vessel until the next time point for imaging. After the last imaging session at the early neural plate stage, the embryos were further cultured until they reached the early somite stage. They were then harvested and fixed in 4% PFA for histological analysis of the distribution of the graft-derived HMG-lacZ transgenic cells in the embryonic tissues. Combined EGFP and DiI fluorescent specimens were examined by fluorescence microscopy at 36 hours and using an Olympus Fluoview FV300 confocal microscope using the Ar+HeNe lasers, and GFP and Rhodamine filters. Confocal images of the same specimen were collated using the Fluoview application software to assemble composite pictures showing the dual fluorescence.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
In the ES embryo, Hnf3ß and GsclacZ expression demarcates the EGO, which occupies a 50 µm domain in the mid region of the posterior epiblast between the junction of the epiblast with the extra-embryonic tissues and the distal tip of the cup-shaped embryo (Fig. 5A, regions III and IV). Donor posterior epiblast (encompassing all four regions) cells that co-express the HMG-lacZ and EGFP transgenes were grafted to the regions I, II, III or IV (Fig. 5A) in the posterior epiblast. The precise position of the graft was determined immediately after grafting by visual inspection of the distance of the EGFP-expressing cells to the junction of the epiblast and the extra-embryonic tissues. When the host embryos were examined after 48 hours of in vitro development (Fig. 5B), 31% of the embryos with cells transplanted to region III contained graft-derived cells in the anterior and trunk axial mesoderm (Fig. 5E). In embryos with cells transplanted to region IV, graft-derived cells were mostly found in the embryonic heart. These findings suggest that the EGO contains a heterogenous population of progenitor cells, some of which may differentiate into cranial or heart mesoderm as well as somitic mesoderm. Epiblast cells in regions I and II outside the EGO domain contributed significantly to the axial prechordal mesoderm and foregut endoderm, as would be expected of the organizer, suggesting that a significant population of progenitors for organizer derivatives is present outside the EGO at early gastrulation and are yet to be incorporated into the gastrular organizer. The epiblast lateral to the EGO does not contain any precursors of organizer tissues. Their descendants were found in the heart and cranial mesenchyme and not in any axial mesoderm (Fig. 5G).
|
Morphogenetic movements of the cellular progeny of the gastrula organizer
Results of the cell fate analysis show that cells originating from the gastrula organizer that is localized in the posterior region of the embryo populate the axial mesoderm and endoderm in the most anterior part of the body axis. This prompts the question of what migratory pathways these cells may take to arrive at the axial destination during the morphogenesis of the germ layers at gastrulation. The recent application of EGFP transgenic mice to fate mapping (Kinder et al., 1999) allows an accurate migratory route to be determined in the same embryo for the whole duration of in vitro development.
Two divergent paths of movement of the EGO cells
EGO cells that express both the HMG-lacZ and EGFP transgenes were transplanted to posterior epiblast (Fig. 6A, 0 hour) of the ES embryo. The host embryos were examined immediately after cell transplantation to ascertain the correct positioning of the cells. Incorrectly grafted embryos were excluded from this study. Altogether 41 embryos were examined and the position of the grafted cells was tracked by frequent observation by fluorescence digital imaging (Fig. 6). Cells grafted to the EGO region were displaced anteriorly as the primitive streak elongated (towards the tip of the cup-shaped embryo) in the first 6 hours but cells remained clustered. Twelve hours after grafting, cells began to disperse so that some cells were found in the adjacent mesoderm and some stayed in the region that corresponds to the MGO of the MS embryo. In the next 6 hours (18 hours after grafting), these two streams of EGO-derived cells moved in concert anteriorly along the midline and in the paraxial mesoderm. When the embryos were examined at 24 and 30 hours after grafting, the EGO-derived cells were progressively displaced anteriorly and finally reached the most anterior point of the axis. Cells in the paraxial mesoderm moved at the same rate as the axial population, but were increasingly dispersed over a larger area in the cranial mesenchyme. By the early somite stage (48 hours after grafting), the EGO-derived cells (visualized by lacZ activity) were found in the axial mesoderm, foregut endoderm (of the head fold and the trunk) and the cranial mesenchyme (data not shown). However, we could not distinguish the relative contribution of the two streams of EGO-derived cells to the axial and non-axial tissues.
|
Movement of the MGO cells is restricted to the midline
Donor MGO cells were transplanted to region V/VI (Fig. 5C) of the MGO of the MS host embryo (Fig. 6E, 0 hour). During the first 6 hours after grafting, the MGO cells were displaced further to the distal region of the cup-shaped embryo and began to spread anteriorly from the anterior end of the primitive streak. In the next 4-9 hours (10 to 15 hours after grafting), cells from the MGO advanced anteriorly along the midline of the embryo and deposited a trail of cells anterior to the primitive streak. Finally, by 24 hours after grafting, the MGO-derived cells had reached the most anterior part of the embryonic axis and covered the midline of the entire axis from the node to the anterior neural ridge of the head fold. For the duration of the tracking experiments, the movement of the MGO-derived cells was restricted to the midline of the embryo, and only spread bilaterally after they reached the anterior margin of the neural plate. By the early-somite stage (36 hours after grafting), the MGO-derived cells (marked by ß-galactosidase activity) were found in the prechordal mesoderm, foregut, the notochord of the head and the trunk and the floor plate (data not shown).
Axial distribution of the node-derived cells
EGFP-expressing node derived cells that were grafted orthotopically (Fig. 7A) remained clustered in the node in the first 12 hours after grafting (Fig. 7B). However, the position of the node appeared to have been displaced posteriorly in the body axis. By 24 hours after grafting, node-derived cells were found in the notochord (Fig. 7C,D) and floor plate of the most posterior embryo and the anterior primitive streak (Fig. 7C). This pattern of cellular distribution is consistent with the notion that the node regresses and leaves a trail of descendants in the midline as the embryonic axis extends posteriorly.
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Different tissue progenitors are present in the organizer during gastrulation
Changes in the developmental fate of organizer cells may be brought about by changes in the lineage potency of a pool of pluripotent cells that act as a constant source of tissue progenitors during gastrulation, alternatively the organizer may progressively recruit multipotential progenitors from the epiblast outside the organizer region. Results of the lineage analysis show that the bulk of the descendants of the EGO and MGO are allocated to the derivatives of the organizer, and very few cells remain in the node. This suggests that primarily transient rather than resident cells populate the EGO and MGO. Some resident cells, however, are found in the node of the mouse embryo from late-gastrulation onwards (Beddington, 1994; Sulik et al., 1994, Bellomo et al., 1996; Tam et al., 1997a).
Within the EGO, as defined by the domain of Hnf3ß and GsclacZ expression, progenitors of the head process mesoderm and the foregut endoderm are localized in the anterior region, and those of the cranial mesoderm and the heart are in the posterior region. The EGO therefore contains a heterogenous population of tissue progenitors, not all of which will give rise to axial mesoderm. A demonstration of the heterogeneity of lineage progenitors is provided by the finding that some single-cell EGO clones can contribute exclusively to axial mesoderm and not to multiple tissue types (A. Camus and P. P. L. T., unpublished). A significant outcome of the cell fate analysis is that the EGO cells only make a very minor contribution to the node and the notochord of the trunk. Fate mapping of the epiblast cells in the vicinity of the EGO reveals that additional progenitors of the head process are found in the epiblast located anterior to the EGO. The epiblast that is lateral and posterior to the EGO contains the progenitors of cranial mesoderm and the extra-embryonic mesoderm, respectively, but no axial mesoderm (this study)(Kinder et al., 1999). No significant contribution to the node by the epiblast surrounding the EGO was observed. These findings suggest that the EGO and the adjacent epiblast contain mainly the precursors of the head process and that those of the node are either present as a minor component in and around the EGO or are localized elsewhere in the epiblast.
During early gastrulation, the primitive streak extends to reach the epiblast domain that seats the EGO. EGO cells are then incorporated into the primitive streak and are relocated anteriorly with the advancing primitive streak. Based on the relatively more anterior position of the MGO to the EGO, it is likely that the MGO would have incorporated both the EGO and the epiblast that is originally anterior to the EGO and contains the progenitors of the head process. An important implication of this result is that the head-inducing activity is indeed associated with the anterior mesendoderm. Such inducing activity is not detected while the precursor of the anterior mesendoderm is in the EGO, but only after it is incorporated, together with other precursors of the anterior mesendoderm into the MGO. Once these precursors have left the organizer region, the remaining cells no longer display anterior-inducing activity. This places the mouse gastrula organizer in line with the chick Hensens node, regarding the acquisition and dispensation of head-organizing activity (Storey et al., 1992; Lemaire et al., 1997; Izpisua-Belmonte et al., 1993). However, like the EGO, the MGO makes only a minor contribution to the notochord. The epiblast lateral to the MGO contains precursors of the somite and lateral mesoderm but not any axial mesoderm. Progenitors of the notochord are found in the anterior segment of the primitive streak tissue immediately posterior to the MGO (this study)(Kinder et al., 1999). By the early-bud stage, the bulk of the progenitors of the notochord are found in the node, but there may still be additional contribution to the notochord by the cells in the anterior region of the primitive streak (Kinder et al., 1999). Our findings therefore point directly to the possibility that the gastrula organizer is composed of a transitory rather than a permanent population of tissue precursors. These precursors are constantly recruited from outside the organizer to replenish the organizer population as cells are allocated to the various tissue lineages during gastrulation.
In the chick, a similar traffic of cells through the organizer has been described. Cells destined for the axial mesoderm are not all present in Hensens node but some are found in the anterior part of the primitive streak and in epiblast lateral to Hensens node (Psychoyos and Stern, 1996; Joubin and Stern, 1999; Lawson and Schoenwolf, 2001). Cell tracing studies show that cells from the lateral epiblast migrate through Hensens node before they are allocated to the axial and paraxial mesoderm. These findings have led to the concept that Hensens node does not define a population of cells with determined cell fates or molecular properties. Instead, the node marks a fixed spatial domain in the embryo to which cells are recruited and then acquire the organizing activity and/or lineage-specific characteristics (Joubin and Stern, 1999; Stern, 2001).
Precursors of the axial mesoderm and other somatic tissues take different migratory routes but move in a concerted manner
The idea that the gastrula organizer is a site of active cellular trafficking has been examined by tracking the movement of the organizer cells during gastrulation. Our data demonstrates that as the EGO cells move anteriorly with the advancing primitive streak, the precursors for non-axial tissues (such as the heart and cranial mesoderm) leave the organizer and ingress through the primitive streak to the mesoderm. These cells then take a migratory route lateral to the body axis and move with the rest of the cells in the mesoderm to the anterior region of the embryo (Fig. 8). Those EGO cells that are destined for the axial tissues are displaced along the midline of the embryo until they merge with the other axial precursors that are originally localized anterior to the EGO (Regions I, II in Fig. 5A,B) to form the MGO (Fig. 8). Cells that are allocated to the head process move out of the MGO and advance in a tight column along the midline. The axial cells, however, are not moving in isolation but are in step with the adjacent paraxial mesoderm cells (Fig. 8). Previous analysis of the apical cap of the ES embryo has demonstrated that the precursors of the midline head neuroectoderm are located in the distal epiblast of the early gastrula adjacent to the EGO (Quinlan et al., 1995; Tam et al., 1997a; Tam et al., 1997b). This implies that the floor plate of the brain has to be displaced anteriorly and may co-migrate with the head process mesoderm derived from the EGO and MGO (Tam et al., 1997b). The gastrula organizer reaches its most anterior position in the embryo by late gastrulation and thereafter appears to be displaced posteriorly as the embryonic axis elongates (this study)(Sulik et al., 1994). This apparent posterior movement is reminiscent of that in the chick where the primitive streak regresses towards the posterior embryo and the node lays down the notochord and floor plate in its wake (Catala et al., 1996). The remarkable similarity in the pattern of movement of the organizer and its derivatives in the avian and mouse embryo highlights a conserved morphogenetic process in the formation of the amniote body plan despite the differences in the fine details of the molecular and morphological characteristics of the organizer and the germ layers of the gastrulating embryo.
|
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Bachiller, D., Klingensmith, J., Kemp, C., Belo, J. A., Anderson, R. M., May, S. R., McMahon, J. A., McMahon, A. P., Harland, R. M., Rossant, J. and De Robertis, E. M. (2000). The organizer factors Chordin and Noggin are required for mouse forebrain development. Nature 403, 658-661.[Medline]
Beddington, R. S. P. (1994). Induction of a second neural axis by the mouse node. Development 120, 613-620.
Bellomo, D., Lander, A., Harragan, I. and Brown, N. A. (1996). Cell proliferation in mammalian gastrulation: the ventral node and notochord are relatively quiescent. Dev. Dyn. 205, 471-485.[Medline]
Belo, J. A., Bouwmeester, T., Leyns, L., Kertesz, N., Gallo, M., Follettie, M. and De Robertis, E. M. (1997). Cerberus-like is a secreted factor with neutralizing activity expressed in the anterior primitive endoderm of the mouse gastrula. Mech. Dev. 68, 45-57.[Medline]
Belo, J. A., Leyns, L., Yamada, G. and De Robertis, E. M. (1998). The prechordal midline of the chondrocranium is defective in Goosecoid-1 mouse mutants Mech. Dev. 72, 15-25.[Medline]
Blum, M., Gaunt, S. J., Cho, K. W., Steinbeisser, H., Blumberg, B., Bittner, D. and De Robertis, E. M. (1992). Gastrulation in the mouse: the role of the homeobox gene goosecoid. Cell 69, 1097-1106.[Medline]
Camus, A., Davidson, B. P., Billiards, S., Khoo, P., Rivera-Perez, J. A., Wakamiya, M., Behringer, R. R. and Tam, P. P. L. (2000). The morphogenetic role of midline mesendoderm and ectoderm in the development of the forebrain and the midbrain of the mouse embryo. Development 127, 1799-1813.
Camus, A. and Tam, P. P. L. (1999). The organizer of the gastrulating mouse embryo. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 45, 117-153.[Medline]
Catala, M., Teillet, M. A., De Robertis, E. M. and Le Douarin, M. L. (1996). A spinal cord fate map in the avian embryo; while regressing Hensens node lays down the notochord and floorplate thus joining the spinal cord lateral walls. Development 122, 2599-2610.
Davidson, B. P. and Tam, P. P. L. (2000). The node of the mouse embryo. Curr. Biol. 10, 617-619.
Davis, C. A., Holmyard, D. P., Millen, K. J. and Joyner, A. L. (1991). Examining pattern formation in mouse, chicken and frog embryos with an En-specific antiserum. Development 111, 287-298.[Abstract]
De Robertis, E. M., Larrain, J., Oelgeschlager, M. and Wessely, O. (2000). The establishment of Spemanns organizer and patterning of the vertebrate embryo. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1, 171-181.[Medline]
Downs, K. M. and Davies, T. (1993). Staging of gastrulating mouse embryos by morphological landmarks in the dissecting microscope. Development 118, 1255-1266.
Filosa, S., Rivera-Perez, J. A., Gomez, A. P., Gansmuller, A., Sasaki, H., Behringer, R. R. and Ang, S-L. (1997). Goosecoid and HNF-3beta genetically interact to regulate neural tube patterning during mouse embryogenesis. Development 124, 2843-2854.
Hadjantonakis, A-K., Gertsenstein, M., Ikawa, M., Okabe, M. and Nagy, A. (1998). Generating green fluorescent mice by germline transmission of green fluorescent ES cells. Mech. Dev. 76, 79-90.[Medline]
Harland, R. and Gerhart, J. (1997). Formation and function of Spemanns organizer. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13, 611-667.[Medline]
Hensen, V. (1876). Uber ein neues Strukturverhaltnis der quergestreiften muskelfaser. Arb Physiol. Inst. Kiel. 1868, 1-26.
Izpisua-Belmonte, J. C., De Robertis, E. M., Storey, K. G. and Stern, C. D. (1993). The homeobox gene goosecoid and the origin of organizer cells in the early chick blastoderm. Cell 74, 645-659.[Medline]
Jessell, T. M. (2000). Neural specification in the spinal cord: Inductive signals and transcriptional codes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1, 20-29.[Medline]
Joubin, K. and Stern, C. D. (1999). Molecular interactions continuously define the organizer during the cell movements of gastrulation. Cell 98, 559-571.[Medline]
Kinder, S. J., Tsang, T. E., Quinlan, G. A., Hadjantonakis, A. K., Nagy, A. and Tam, P. P. L. (1999). The orderly allocation of mesodermal cells to the extraembryonic structures and the anteroposterior axis during gastrulation of the mouse embryo. Development 126, 4691-4701.
Kinder, S. J., Tan, S.-S. and Tam, P. P. L. (2000). Cell grafting and fate mapping of the early-somite-stage mouse embryo. Methods Mol. Biol. 135, 425-438.[Medline]
Kinder, S. J., Tsang, T. E., Ang, S-L., Behringer, R. R. and Tam, P. P. L. (2001). Defects of the body plan of mutant embryos lacking Lim1, Otx2, or Hnf3ß activity. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 45, 347-355.[Medline]
Lane, M. C. and Keller, R. (1997). Microtubule disruption reveals that Spemanns organizer is subdivided into two domains by the vegetal alignment zone. Development 124, 895-906.
Lawson, A. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (2001). Cell populations and morphogenetic movements underlying formation of the avian primitive streak and organizer. Genesis 29, 188-195.[Medline]
Lawson, K. A., Meneses, J. J. and Pedersen, R. A. (1991). Clonal analysis of epiblast fate during germ layer formation in the mouse embryo. Development 113, 891-911.[Abstract]
Lemaire, L., Roeser, T., Izpisua-Belmonte, J. C. and Kessel, M. (1997). Segregating expression domains of two goosecoid genes during transition from gastrulation to neuralation in chick embryos. Development 124, 1443-1452.
Psychoyos, D. and Stern, C. D. (1996). Fate and migratory routes of primitive streak cells in the chick embryo. Development 122, 1523-1534.
Quinlan, G. A., Williams, E. A., Tan, S.-S. and Tam, P. P. L. (1995). Neuroectodermal fate of epiblast cells in the distal region of the mouse egg cylinder: Implication for body plan organization during early embryogenesis. Development 121, 87-98.
Quinlan, G. A., Davidson, B. P. and Tam, P. P. L. (2000). Lineage allocation during early embryogenesis. Mapping of the neural primordia and application to the analysis of mouse mutants. Methods Mol. Biol. 158, 227-250.
Rivera-Perez, J. A., Wakamiya, M. and Behringer, R. R. (1999). Goosecoid acts cell autonomously in mesenchyme-derived tissues during craniofacial development. Development 126, 3811-3821.
Spemann, H. and Mangold, H. (1924). Ueber induction von Embryonalanlagen durch inplantation Artfremder Organisatoren. Wilhem Roux Arch. Entw. Mech. 100, 599-638.
Stern, C. D. (2001). Initial patterning of the central nervous system: How many organizers? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 92-98.[Medline]
Storey, K. G., Crossley, J. M., De Robertis, E. M., Norris, W. E. and Stern, C. D. (1992). Neural induction and regionalisation in the chick embryo. Development 114, 729-741.[Abstract]
Sturm, K. and Tam, P. P. L. (1993). Isolation and culture of whole postimplantation embryos and germ layer derivatives. Methods Enzymol. 225, 164-190.[Medline]
Sulik, K., Dehart, D. B., Iangaki, T., Carson, J. L., Vrablic, T., Gesteland, K. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1994). Morphogenesis of the murine node and notochordal plate. Dev. Dyn. 201, 260-278.[Medline]
Tam, P. P. L. and Tan, S. S. (1992). The somitogenetic potential of cells in the primitive streak and the tail bud of the organogenesis-stage mouse embryo. Development 115, 703-715.
Tam, P. P. L., Steiner, K. A., Zhou, S. X. and Quinlan, G. A. (1997a). Lineage and functional analyses of the mouse organizer. CSH Symp. Quant. Biol. 62, 135-144.[Medline]
Tam, P. P. L., Quinlan, G. A. and Trainor, P. A. (1997b). The patterning of progenitor tissues for the cranial region of the mouse embryo during gastrulation and early organogenesis. Adv. Dev. Biol. 5, 137-200.
Tam. P. P. L. and Steiner, K. A. (1999). Anterior patterning by synergistic activity of the early gastrula organizer and the anterior germ layer tissues of the mouse embryo. Development 126, 5171-5179.
Tam, P. P. L., Gad, J., Kinder, S. J., Tsang, T. E. and Behringer, R. R. (2001). Morphogenetic tissue movement and the establishment of body plan during development from blastocyst to gastrula in the mouse. BioEssays 33, 508-517.
Tsang, T. E., Shawlot, W., Kinder, S. J., Kobayashi, A., Kwan, K. M., Schughart, K., Kania, A., Jessell, T. M., Behringer, R. R. and Tam, P. P. L. (2000). Lim1 activity is required for intermediate mesoderm differentiation in the mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 223, 77-90.[Medline]
Viebahn, C. (2001). Hensens node. Genesis 29, 96-103.[Medline]
Waddington, C. H. (1933). Induction by the primitive streak and its derivatives in the chick. J. Exp. Biol. 10, 38-46.
Waddington, C. H. (1936). Experiments on determination in the rabbit embryo. Arch. Biol. 48, 273-290.
Wetzel, R. (1925). Undersuchungen am Huhnerkeim. 1. uber die Untersuchungen des lebenden Keims mit neueren. Methoden, besonders der Vogtschen vitelen Farbmarkierung. Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwicklungsmech 106, 463-468.
Wilkinson, D. G. and Nieto, M. A. (1993). Detection of messenger RNA by in situ hybridization to tissue sections and wholemounts. Methods Enzymol. 225, 361-373.[Medline]
Wurst, W. and Bally-Cuif, L. (2001). Neural plate patterning: Upstream and downstream of the isthmic organizer. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 99-108.[Medline]
Zoltewicz, J. S. and Gerhart, J. C. (1997). The Spemann organizer of Xenopus is patterned along its anteroposterior axis at the earliest gastrula stage. Dev. Biol. 192, 482-491.[Medline]