1 Nina Ireland Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, Department of
Psychiatry, LPPI, University of California, San Francisco, 401 Parnassus, Box
0984, San Francisco, CA 94143-0984, USA
2 Center for Basic Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical
Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
3 GSF National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of
Experimental Genetics, Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, D-85764 Neuherberg,
Germany
4 Department of Biological Chemistry, UCLA School of Medicine, 33-257 CHS, Box
951737, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1737, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jlrr{at}cgl.ucsf.edu)
Accepted 12 August 2002
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Mash1, Dlx2, Dll1, Telencephalon, Notch signaling, LGE, Striatum, Radial glia, Neurogenesis, Mouse
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Several lines of evidence suggest that the timing of cell fate
specification and differentiation in the vertebrate nervous system is
regulated through a process of lateral inhibition mediated by Notch signaling
(Chitnis and Kintner, 1996;
Henrique et al., 1997
;
Lewis, 1996
). Notch is a
cell-surface receptor that is activated by contact with a DSL ligand
(Delta, Serrate, Lag2). In mammals, there are four Notch genes
(Notch1-Notch4) and five DSL ligand genes (Dll1, Dll3, Dll4,
Jag1 and Jag2) (Lindsell et
al., 1996
). Ligand-induced Notch signaling involves proteolytic
cleavage of Notch, which releases its intracellular domain (Notch-IC) and
allows its translocation to the nucleus. Notch-IC directly modulates the
function of a transcription factor known as CSL [CBF1 (Rbpsuh
Mouse Genome Informatics) Suppressor of Hairless (SuH), Lag1]. During
neurogenesis, Notch activation of CSL induces the expression of WRPW-bHLH
transcription factors that inhibit neuronal differentiation (e.g. HES genes or
Drosophila Enhancer of Split) and represses the expression of
proneural bHLH transcription factors (e.g. Mash1 or
Achaete-Scute in Drosophila)
(Artavanis-Tsakonas et al.,
1995
; de la Pompa et al.,
1997
; Robey,
1997
). Thus, an increase in Notch signaling within a progenitor
cell biases it not to differentiate, whereas a decrease in Notch signaling
facilitates its maturation.
There are several classes of proneural bHLH genes expressed in the
mammalian telencephalon, including an Achaete-Scute homolog
Mash1 (Ascl1 Mouse Genome Informatics),
atonal homologs neurogenin 1, neurogenin 2 and Olig2
(Ma et al., 1997;
Fode et al., 2000
;
Takebayashi et al., 2000
;
Nieto et al., 2001
).
Mash1 is primarily expressed in the progenitor zones of the
subcortical telencephalon (Lo et al.,
1991
; Guillemot and Joyner,
1993
; Porteus et al.,
1994
), where in mice it is required for the generation of
early-born neurons (Casarosa et al.,
1999
; Horton et al.,
1999
). Casarosa et al.
(Casarosa et al., 1999
) showed
that Mash1 is required for the expression of Dll1 and
Dll3 at E12.5, and therefore Notch signaling (and Hes5
expression) is reduced in the Mash1 mutants. Their BrdU birthdating
analysis demonstrates that early-born neurons (postmitotic at
E10.5) are
reduced in the subcortical telencephalon. However, Horton et al.
(Horton et al., 1999
) found
that the subcortical telencephalon in Mash1 mouse mutants exhibits
precocious expression of a marker of early neurogenesis (ß-III-tubulin)
at E11.0. These apparently contradicting observations could reflect
cell-autonomous and non cell-autonomous affects of Mash1 functions.
To test this possibility, we have compared the phenotypes of the
Mash1 and Dll1 mutants at E10.5.
Although Mash1 is required for early neurogenesis in the
subcortical telencephalon (Casarosa et al.,
1999; Horton et al.,
1999
), the Dlx1 and Dlx2 homeobox genes are
required in mice for late neurogenesis in the same tissue
(Anderson et al., 1997a
). DLX1
and DLX2 are co-expressed in subsets of progenitor cells
(Eisenstat et al., 1999
) where
they have partially redundant functions in controlling the differentiation of
a secondary proliferative zone called the subventricular zone (SVZ)
(Anderson et al., 1997a
). In
the Dlx1/2 mutants, late-born neurons fail to mature fully; however,
when the mutant SVZ cells are dissociated and grown in culture, they are able
to proceed at least partially along their differentiation program
(Anderson et al., 1997a
). These
observations point to the possibility that the block in neurogenesis may
involve misregulation of cell-cell communication, perhaps through the Notch
signaling pathway.
To gain insights into the temporal regulation of progenitor cell fate specification in the developing telencephalon at the cellular level, we have examined the effect of Mash1, Dll1 and Dlx1/2 mutations on Notch signaling and differentiation. We provide evidence that: (1) Dll1 mediates Notch signaling prevents precocious differentiation of progenitors; (2) Mash1 has a cell-autonomous function in the development of a subset of early telencephalic progenitors and a non-cell autonomous function in mediating lateral inhibition through positively regulating Notch signaling; (3) Dlx1 and Dlx2 negatively regulate Notch signaling to properly specify a later subset of neuronal progenitors and promote their terminal differentiation.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In situ RNA hybridization
cDNA plasmids used for in situ hybridization analysis were obtained from
the following people: Gerry Weinmaster (Notch1, Notch3, Dll1, Jag1,
Hes1 and Hes5), Brian Crenshaw (Brn4; Pou3f4
Mouse Genome Informatics), Ming Tsai (COUP-TF1), Brian Condie
(Gad67; Gad1 Mouse Genome Informatics), Charles Gerfen
[dopamine receptor 2 (D2r; Drd2 Mouse Genome Informatics)],
Francois Guillemot (Mash1), Steve Potter (Gsh2), Heiner
Westphal (Lhx2). Dlx2, Dlx5 and Dlx6 are from the
Rubenstein laboratory (Liu et al.,
1997). In situ RNA hybridization on frozen sections was carried
out using 35S-labeled antisense-riboprobes as described
(Sussel et al., 1999
).
Photographs were taken using darkfield optics on an Olympus SZH10
microscope.
Immunofluorescence
Production and characterization of the DLX2 antibody is described
(Eisenstat et al., 1999;
Porteus et al., 1994
). The
mouse monoclonal MASH1 antibody was a gift from Dr David Anderson and was also
purchased from Pharmingen (Cat #556604). Rabbit polyclonal MASH1 antibody was
generated in Dr Jane Johnson's laboratory.
Phosphorylated histone 3 (PH3) (rabbit IgG; Upstate Biotech), MAP2 (mouse IgG; Sigma: #M1406), GABA (rabbit IgG; Sigma #A2052), RC2 (mouse IgM; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), PCNA (mouse IgG; Novocastra), GAD65(mouse IgG; Pharmingen # 69221A), ß-III-tubulin (mouse IgG; Promega: #G7121), GFAP (rabbit IgG; Sigma). For MASH1 and PCNA doubling-labeling, the sections were first treated in boiling 10 mM sodium citrate before blocking in 5% normal goat serum (Gibco)/phosphate buffered saline (PBS)/0.1%TritonX-100. Primary antibodies were diluted in the same buffer and incubated overnight at 4°C. The sections were rinsed in PBS, then incubated with secondary antibodies at 1:200-300 dilution for 1 hour at room temperature, then rinsed in PBS and finally were mounted with Vectashield mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Labs #H1200). The secondary antibodies were conjugated with either Alexa-488 or Alexa-596 (Molecular Probes). The fluorescent images were photographed or electronically captured with Spot II imaging camera using a Nikon Optiphot 2 microscope.
Primary cell culture
For acute dissociation of E10.5 or E11.5 wild type (CD1 and C57B6)
subcortical cells, embryos were dissected in cold PBS, the mesenchyme
surrounding the telencephalon was carefully removed and only subcortical
region of the telencephalon was isolated (note it also includes some ventral
and lateral pallial mantle cells). The tissue was trypsinized for 30 minutes
at 37°C in 500 µl; an equal volume of neurobasal medium (Gibco)
containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; UCSF Cell Culture Facility) was added
to arrest the trypsinization. The cells were then dissociated by tituration,
rinsed twice in neurobasal medium with 1% FBS and plated at concentration of
1x105 cells/50 µl in a well coated with poly-D-lysine
(Tissue-Tek II slide chambers, Nalgene). After the cells were allowed to
adhere for 30-60 minutes, the medium was withdrawn and the cells were fixed in
4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature. The cells were then
rinsed in PBS and analyzed with antibodies as described above.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
At E10.5, the VZ and MZ are apparent, whereas the SVZ has not appeared as a
distinct layer. By E11.5, a layer of subventricular PH3+ cells (a M-phase
marker) (Hendzel et al., 1997)
are more coherently arranged, and can be distinguished as a SVZ
(Fig. 1H), which persists as
development proceeds (Sheth and Bhide,
1997
).
|
|
|
Then, by E9.75 MASH1 and DLX2 expression in the LGE is detectable in
the VZ (Bulfone et al., 1993
)
(data not shown). MASH1+/DLX2- progenitors only appear in the VZ
(Fig. 1A,F); we have named
these Type 2 progenitors (P2).
MASH1+/DLX2+ cells are also only apparent in the progenitor layers (Fig. 1A,F); the MASH1+/DLX2+ nuclei are scattered within the VZ and are concentrated in the position of the SVZ (Fig. 1A,F). We have named these Type 3 progenitors (P3).
At E10.5, DLX2+ postmitotic cells (MAP2+, PCNA-) cells are found superficial to the VZ; we refer to these early born neurons as N1 cells (Fig. 1A-D). All GAD65-expressing cells at E10.5 express DLX2 but not MASH1 (Fig. 1E, and data not shown). From E11.5, there are many postmitotic neurons in the MZ that are DLX2- and we refer to these late-born neurons as N2 cells (Fig. 1I).
In the following sections, we use this descriptive analysis as a foundation to interpret the roles of Mash1 and Dlx2 during early steps of cell fate specification and differentiation in the subcortical telencephalon.
Premature acquisition of late progenitor properties and a reduction
in early neurogenesis in the subcortical telencephalon of Mash1
mutants
A previous study reported that neurons born around E10.5 were reduced in
the subcortical telencephalon of E18.5 Mash1 mutants
(Casarosa et al., 1999).
However, Horton et al. (Horton et al.,
1999
) found precocious expression of a differentiating neuronal
marker (ß-III-tubulin) in the ventricular zone of the Mash1
mutants at E11. These apparently contradicting observations may reflect
cell-autonomous and non cell-autonomous aspects of Mash1 function. To
evaluate this possibility, we re-examined the phenotype of Mash1
mutants at E10.5 and compared these results with the phenotype of
Dll1 mutants.
At E10.5, Mash1 mutants show molecular defects in both the proliferative and postmitotic zones. The mutant subcortical telencephalon has a hypoplastic mantle zone based on the reduction MAP2+ and GABA+ cells (Fig. 2A,A',B,B'). These defects were not associated with increased levels of apoptosis (not shown). By E11.5 subcortical neurogenesis is detectable in the LGE, but remains abnormal in the MGE, based on the low level of MAP2 expression (Fig. 2D,D'). Note that although MAP2 expression is low in the mutant MGE at E11.5, GABA expression is now present (Fig. 2E,E'). GABA expression appears to mark an earlier step in differentiation than MAP2 expression.
Concurrent with the defect in MZ maturation (lack of N1 neurogenesis), the VZ shows a molecular defect suggesting an acceleration of differentiation at E10.5 and E11.5. In the Mash1 mutant, DLX2 is expressed in the majority of VZ cells, whereas in the wild type, DLX2 expression is less extensive (Fig. 2C,C'). These ectopic DLX2+ cells have properties of proliferating precursors as they are PCNA+ (Fig. 2F,F'). In addition, there is a reduction in RC2 expression (Fig. 2I,I').
The VZ also expresses SVZ markers such as Gad67, Dlx5, Dlx6, Brn4
and Six3 (Fig.
3E,E',G,G',H,H', and data not shown), consistent
with the results at E12.5 of Casarosa et al.
(Casarosa et al., 1999). These
observations suggest that in the absence of Mash1, there is premature
maturation of early progenitors (P1 and P2) to later progenitors (P3).
However, the precocious acquisition of later progenitor cell fate is not
complete as the VZ maintains some neuroepithelial characteristics, such as
positioning of the M-phase nuclei near the ventricle
(Fig. 2H,H').
|
Previous analysis of the Mash1 mutant at E12.5 showed that it has
reduced expression of Dll1 and Hes5
(Casarosa et al., 1999). To
determine whether the abnormalities that we observe at E10.5 are associated
with misregulated Notch signaling, we studied expression of Dll1, Jag1,
Hes1, Hes5, Notch1, Notch2 and Notch3 at E10.5 and E11.5
(Fig. 3; data not shown). At
E10.5, while the expression of the Notch genes appears normal
(Fig. 3A,A'; data not
shown), expression of Dll1 was at background levels in the MGE, and
was greatly reduced in the LGE (Fig.
3B,B'). At this age, Jag1 expression, which is
concentrated between the MGE and LGE, appears relatively normal
(Fig. 3D,D').
To assess whether the reduction in Dll1 expression resulted in
reduced levels of Notch signaling, we studied the expression of Hes1
and Hes5; these bHLH genes are effectors of Notch signaling
(Ohtsuka et al., 1999).
Hes5 expression was reduced in the mutant subcortical telencephalon
at E10.5 and E11.5, indicating that Notch signaling was indeed reduced by the
lack of Mash1 (Fig.
3C,C',I,I'). The low levels of Hes1 expression made it
difficult to assess whether its expression was altered in Mash1
mutants (Fig. 3F,F').
These findings suggest that an early function of Mash1 in the subcortical telencephalon is to regulate the rate at which early progenitors differentiate into late progenitors. In Mash1 mutants, early progenitors (P1 and P2) precociously take on the molecular features of the late progenitors (P3). One possibility is that MASH1-dependent expression of Dll1 in P2 and P3 progenitors mediates lateral inhibition that prevents precocious maturation of neighboring progenitors. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effect of losing Dll1-mediated Notch signaling in Dll1 mutants.
Dll1 mutants have reduced Notch signaling yet maintain N1
neurogenesis
Dll1 mutants die around E11.5
(Hrabe de Angelis et al.,
1997). At earlier ages, forebrain development appears to be
relatively normal (Fig. 4),
lacking increased levels of apoptosis (data not shown), allowing us to analyze
subcortical development between E10.5-E11. Like the Mash1 mutants,
Dll1 mutants have reduced Hes5 expression in the subcortical
telencephalon (Fig.
4A,A'), suggesting decreased Notch signaling. In addition,
they have reduced expression of RC2 (Fig.
4F,F'), implying accelerated differentiation of the
progenitor cells.
|
Unlike Mash1 mutants, Dll1 mutants have N1 neurogenesis
based on several criteria. At E10.5, the distribution of MASH1 and DLX2
expressing cells in the VZ is similar to wild-type littermates, although the
thickness of this zone is reduced (Fig.
4B,B'), whereas the mantle zone of both the LGE and MGE have
an abundance of MASH1-/DLX2+ cells (Fig.
4B,B'). In addition, there are mantle zone cells with robust
expression of GABA and ß-III- tubulin
(Fig. 4D,D',E,E').
However, early differentiation is not equal in the LGE and MGE; the LGE shows
much more expression of MAP2 than does the MGE
(Fig. 4C,C'). A similar
difference in LGE/MGE development is seen in the Mash1 mutant at
E11.5 (Fig. 2D,D').
Casarosa et al. (Casarosa et al.,
1999) also observed MGE hypoplasia at E12.5. We are uncertain why
the MGE is more severely affected than the LGE in both of Mash1 and
Dll1 mutants.
From these observations we hypothesize that in the absence of Dll1 function, early VZ progenitors (P1 and P2) precociously differentiate. Mash1 mutants share this phenotype. However, unlike Mash1 mutants, Dll1 mutants produce early-born neurons (N1). These observations suggest that Mash1 is required cell autonomously for the generation of N1 cells. Dll1 and Mash1 mutants also differ in that DLX2 is more widely expressed in the VZ of Mash1 mutants (compare Fig. 2C,C' with Fig. 4B,B'; see Discussion).
Acquisition of the late progenitor properties in Mash1 mutants is
correlated with precocious DLX2 expression in the VZ. A previous study showed
that Dlx1 and Dlx2 are required for the generation of
late-born neurons (Anderson et al.,
1997a). Thus, Dlx1, Dlx2 and Mash1 appear to
have complementary roles in the temporal control of neuronal specification and
differentiation. Towards understanding the mechanisms underlying these
observations, we examined whether Dlx1 and Dlx2 regulated
Mash1 expression and/or Notch signaling in the subcortical
telencephalon.
Loss of Dlx1 and Dlx2 function leads to an expanded
domain of Notch signaling in the SVZ of the subcortical telencephalon
Previously, we have demonstrated that Dlx1/2 mutants have defects
in the differentiation of subcortical neurons produced after E12.5
(Anderson et al., 1997a
;
Marin et al., 2000
). However,
when E15.5 mutant SVZ cells were dissociated and cultured in vitro, they were
able to proceed in their differentiation program
(Anderson et al., 1997a
),
suggesting that cell-cell contact may have blocked their differentiation.
Thus, we examined whether this phenotype was related to a defect in Notch
signaling.
Unlike in the Mash1 mutant, the production of early-born neurons (N1) appears normal in the Dlx1/2 mutants at E10.5, based on expression of GABA and MAP2 (Fig. 5A,A',B,B', and data not shown). The VZ of the Dlx1/2 mutant also shows normal molecular properties at E11.5 based on the expression of RC2 and genes in the Notch signaling pathway (Notch1, Notch3, Dll1, Hes1, Hes5 and Mash1) (Fig. 5C,C',D,D',E,E',F,F' and data not shown).
|
While early progenitor specification (P1 and P2) and early neurogenesis (N1) appear to be normal in Dlx1/2 mutants, molecular defects in late progenitors (P3) become apparent with the onset of SVZ formation. Subtle increases in the expression of Dll1, Hes5 and Mash1 are detected as early as E11.5 (Fig. 5D,D',E,E',F,F'). The molecular defects in the late progenitors become more obvious at later stages, such that the SVZ shows an expanded domain of Mash1, Dll1, Hes5 and Notch1 expression at E15.5 (Fig. 6A,A',D,D',E,E',F,F'). These phenotypes persist through P0, when these animals die.
|
The ectopic MASH1+ cells in the Dlx1/2 mutants are mitotically active, based on their expression of PCNA (Fig. 6A,A'). As shown by the increased expression of Hes5 (Fig. 6E,E'), the expanded Notch1 and Dll1 expression results in elevated Notch signaling. These observations together suggest that one of the key functions of Dlx1/2 in promoting late neurogenesis is through downregulating Notch signaling, perhaps by repressing Mash1 expression. Note that expression of Notch3 and Hes1 is not appreciably changed in the mutant (Fig. 6B-C'), suggesting that unique combinations of receptor/ligand interactions may lead to expression of different effector molecules (Hes1 versus Hes5, for example) (see Discussion).
Consistent with the expanded Notch signaling domain, Dlx1/2 mutant
SVZ cells express high levels of transcription factors that are normally
restricted primarily to the VZ, such as COUP-TF1, Gsh1, Gsh2 and
Lhx2 (Fig.
6G-H', data not shown)
(Anderson et al., 1997a). The
persistent expression of VZ markers is associated with reduced expression of
SVZ markers such as Dlx5, Dlx6, SCIP/Oct6 and Six3
(Anderson et al., 1997a
;
Zerucha et al., 2000
) (data
not shown). While the expression of general neuronal markers (MAP2 and
ß-III-tubulin) is maintained in the Dlx1/2 mutants
(Fig. 6I,I',K,K', and not shown), the block in differentiation affects expression of neuronal
sub-type genes, such as the dopamine receptor 2 (Drd2) and
Darrp (Fig.
6J,J') (Anderson et al.,
1997a
). Thus, we suggest that Dlx1/2 function is required
to specify and differentiate P3 progenitors by repressing the genes that are
normally expressed in VZ progenitor cells (e.g. Mash1, Gsh1/2, Lhx2,
COUP-TF1) and by activating genes expressed in the SVZ (e.g. Dlx5,
Dlx6 and SCIP/Oct6) and MZ (e.g. Drd2).
Recent studies show that ectopic Notch signaling, either through
constitutively active Notch1 (Notch-IC) expression or through treatment with
soluble Dll1, predisposed neuronal progenitors to take on a glial
fate (Morrison et al., 2000;
Tanigaki et al., 2001
). In
addition, ectopic expression of Notch-IC leads to the generation of radial
glia in the mammalian telencephalon
(Gaiano et al., 2000
). As
Dlx1/2 mutants show ectopic Notch signaling, we studied whether
radial glia are also affected in these mutants. Although the early expression
of RC2 is normal in the Dlx1/2 mutants
(Fig. 5C,C'), we find
persistent expression of RC2 and nestin at E18.5
(Fig. 6L,L', and data not
shown), when the radial glial scaffolding appears to have mostly collapsed in
the wild-type animals. This phenotype is consistent with the ectopic Notch
signaling observed in these animals (Fig.
6D-F'), and it suggests that there is an accumulation of
radial glia cells in the Dlx1/2 mutants.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
MASH1 and DLX2 expression define subsets of subcortical
progenitors
Previous studies have identified primary and secondary progenitor
populations in the LGE (Halliday and
Cepko, 1992; Bhide,
1996
; Sheth and Bhide,
1997
). We show that MASH1 and DLX2 expression can be used to
define subsets of LGE progenitors. Combinatorial expression of these
transcription factors, in conjunction with the expression of proliferation and
differentiation markers, provides evidence for at least three types of
progenitors in the ventricular zone (P1, MASH1-/DLX2-; P2, MASH1+/DLX2-; P3,
MASH1+/DLX2+) (Figs 1,
7).
Prior to E9.5, there are only MASH1-/DLX2- cells (P1 progenitors) in the subcortical telencephalon. Then, MASH1 expression is induced in the VZ, which is rapidly followed by DLX2 expression; their expression marks the appearance of P2 (MASH1+/DLX2-) and P3 (MASH1+/DLX2+) progenitors. From E10.5, P3 cells (MASH+/DLX2+) accumulate as a layer intercalated between the VZ and MZ; these cells are postulated to be the incipient SVZ. By E12.5, an additional population of MASH-/DLX2+ cells accumulates between the SVZ and the MZ (not shown); these might represent another type of progenitor cells (P4).
Prior to E10.5, DLX2+ neurons are generated that have migrated to the MZ, where they express GABA, GAD65, GAD67, MAP2 and ß-III-tubulin (Fig. 1A-D and not shown). These cells are the early born neurons (N1) and we propose that they are derived from the VZ progenitors (either P1 or P2). From E11.5, the next wave of neurons (N2) are generated, and their appearance coincides with increased RC2 expression in the VZ and the emergence of the SVZ progenitors. We suggest that N2 neurons are mainly generated from P3 progenitors. Formal lineage analysis is needed to test this model.
The presence of primary (VZ) and secondary (SVZ) progenitor zones is
reminiscent of the developing CNS of invertebrates. In Drosophila,
neuroblasts are the primary neuroepithelial cells. Neuroblasts produce
ganglion mother cells, which (like SVZ cells) have a reduced mitotic potential
(Doe et al., 1998).
Evidence for cell autonomous and non-autonomous functions of
Mash1
Previous reports demonstrated that Mash1 is required for early
neurogenesis (Casarosa et al.,
1999; Horton et al.,
1999
; Marin et al.,
2000
) and for Notch signaling via regulating Dll1 and
Dll3 expression (Casarosa et al.,
1999
). The previous evidence that Mash1 mutants have
reduced Notch signaling in progenitor cells was based on analysis at E12.5 and
later ages (Casarosa et al.,
1999
). This is several days after the initiation of Mash1
expression in neural progenitors (E9.75), and after the formation of the
postulated P1, P2 and P3 progenitors. We found that by E10.5, Mash1
mutants have reduced expression of Dll1 and Hes5
(Fig. 3B,B',C,C').
The decreased Hes5 expression is likely to be due to reduced Notch
signaling caused by reduced Dll1 expression.
To determine directly the contribution that the reduced Dll1 expression plays in the Mash1-/- phenotype, we compared subcortical development in Mash1 and Dll1 mutants at E10-E11 (Figs 2, 3, 4). This comparison provided evidence that Mash1 has at least two functions between E10-E11. The first is a Dll1-independent role in promoting the production of P2 progenitors and N1 neurons. The second is a Dll1- (and perhaps Delta3-) dependent role in preventing adjacent progenitors from differentiating.
Mash1 mutants produce very few MAP2+, GABA+ N1 neurons at E10.5
(Fig. 2A,A',B,B'). This is consistent with the BrdU birth dating results showing a reduction in
the number of subcortical neurons leaving the mitotic cycle at E10.5
(Casarosa et al., 1999).
However, Dll1 mutants produce N1 neurons
(Fig.
4B,B',D,D',E,E'). Thus, we propose that
Mash1 expression is autonomously required in P2 progenitors to
generate N1 neurons in the LGE (Fig.
7).
Dll1 and Mash1 mutants also differ in that DLX2 is more widely expressed in the VZ of Mash1 mutants (compare Fig. 2C,C' with Fig. 4B,B'). This finding could be due to the persistent expression of another Notch ligand (such as Delta3), in the Dll1 mutants and not the Mash1 mutants. It could also be explained if MASH1 has an autonomous function in preventing premature maturation of VZ cells.
We suggest that the reduction in Delta-mediated lateral inhibition
increases the rate at which progenitor cells differentiate in both the
Dll1 and Mash1 mutants. In Dll1 mutants, thinning
of the VZ (which contains P1, P2 and P3 cells) is accompanied by increased
mantle zone, consistent with the precocious differentiation of the neural
progenitors. In Mash1 mutants, early progenitors appear to become
depleted based on the nearly ubiquitous expression of DLX2 in the VZ at E10.5
and E11.5 (Fig. 2C,C').
In addition, at E10.5 and E11.5, cells expressing SVZ markers (such as
Gad67 and Dlx5) are now present in the VZ
(Fig.
3E,E',G,G',H,H' and data not shown); expression
of these markers increases at later stages
(Casarosa et al., 1999;
Horton et al., 1999
).
Therefore, the reduction in lateral inhibition accelerates the generation of
later progenitors, similar to what has been observed in vertebrate retinal
development (Dorsky et al.,
1997
; Henrique et al.,
1997
). While early progenitors differentiate into more mature
progenitor cells (based on the expression of DLX2, Dlx5 and
Gad67), they appear to maintain a neuroepithelial structure, because
the VZ has periventricular M-phase nuclei at E11.5
(Fig. 2H,H').
Dlx1 and Dlx2 are required to downregulate Notch
signaling
Previous analysis of Dlx1/2 mutants showed that early LGE and MGE
neurogenesis was largely unperturbed, whereas the differentiation of neurons
born after E12.5 was reduced (Anderson
et al., 1997a
; Marin et al.,
2000
). The abnormal differentiation led to a block in radial and
tangential migration that results in the accumulation of partially
differentiated neurons in periventricular ectopia
(Anderson et al., 1997a
;
Anderson et al., 1997b
;
Marin et al., 2000
). However,
dissociation of mutant SVZ cells facilitated further differentiation in vitro,
suggesting that cell-contact mediated inhibition may have contributed to the
phenotype (Anderson et al.,
1997a
).
Consistent with these characteristics, we show that Dlx1/2 mutants exhibit increased levels of Hes5 expression, implying that differentiation may be blocked due to increased levels of Notch signaling (Fig. 5E,E'). At E11.5 Dll1 and Mash1 expression are elevated in the SVZ (Fig. 5D,D',E,E'); these abnormalities become more severe at later stages (Fig. 6D,D',H,H'). As MASH1 and DLX2 are co-expressed in some progenitors (P3), a potential mechanism underlying this phenotype would be that Dlx1 and Dlx2 repress Mash1 expression (directly or indirectly) as P3 cells mature. In Dlx1/2 mutants, failure to downregulate Mash1 expression would lead to elevated levels of Dll1 expression; this, in turn, would increase Notch signaling and Hes5 expression in adjacent cells.
The elevations in Notch signaling are correlated with the persistent
expression of some VZ markers in the SVZ (e.g. Notch1, Hes5 Gsh2,
COUP-TF1 and Lhx2) (Fig.
6) (Anderson et al.,
1997a). In addition, the radial glial marker, RC2, is more highly
expressed in the mutant LGE at E18.5 (Fig.
6L,L'). This is consistent with the observation that
increases in Notch signaling results in the generation/maintenance of radial
glia (Gaiano et al., 2000
;
Tanigaki et al., 2001
).
Evidence that activation of different Notch receptors may be
differentially coupled to Hes1 and Hes5 expression and
function
DLX1 and DLX2 are the first homeobox transcription factors reported to
downregulate Notch signaling. However, although loss of Dlx1/2
function leads to an upregulation of Hes5 expression
(Fig. 5F,F',
Fig. 6E,E'), Hes1 expression is not appreciably altered
(Fig. 6B,B').
Furthermore, although there is increased Notch1 expression throughout
the mutant SVZ (Fig.
6F,F'), Notch3 expression remains restricted to the
VZ (Fig. 6C,C'). The
following models could explain this differential effect on the expression of
Notch3 and Hes1 versus Notch1 and Hes5.
Notch3 receptor activation may specifically lead to Hes1
expression in early VZ progenitors (P1 cells). When P2 and P3 cells form, they
upregulate Dll1 expression, which signals through Notch1 to
induce Hes5. Alternatively, DELTA1 binds to either NOTCH1 or NOTCH3,
but activation of Hes5 is mediated only through the Notch1
receptor. Thus, in the Dlx1/2 mutants, where early P1 and P2 fates
appear normal, Notch3 and Hes1 expression are normal.
However, specification and differentiation of P3 cells are abnormal in
Dlx1/2 mutants, leading to ectopic Notch1 and Hes5
expression.
The distinct roles of Notch3/Hes1 and Notch1/Hes5 are
supported by more restricted expression of Notch3 (Irvin et al.,
2001) (Fig. 6), and differences
between Notch1 and Notch3 functions
(Beatus et al., 1999).
Furthermore, Hes1 and Hes5 have been shown to play
differential roles in the development of the inner ear
(Zine et al., 2001
) and
olfactory epithelium (Cau et al.,
2000
). Additional studies are needed to determine whether there
are different ligand specificities for Notch1 and Notch3
receptors and/or different signal-transduction cascades downstream of
Notch1 and Notch3 in the developing telencephalon.
bHLH and homeobox genes function together in the temporal regulation
of cell fate specification and differentiation
We present evidence that Mash1 and Dlx1and2 regulate
development of temporally distinct sets of LGE-derived neurons (see model in
Fig. 7). We suggest that
Mash1 has a cell-autonomous function in the formation of the N1
neurons. In addition, Mash1, through controlling Delta
expression, has a non cell-autonomous function in regulating the rate at which
adjacent progenitors mature. Thus, in the absence of Mash1 or
Dll1, VZ progenitors receive reduced Notch signaling, and therefore
precociously acquire later progenitor fate or become postmitotic (Figs
2,
3,
4,
7). On the contrary,
Dlx1/2 function is required to reduce Notch signaling for
differentiation of SVZ progenitors. Thus, in the absence of Dlx1/2
function, Notch signaling persists and differentiation is impeded (Figs
5,
6,
7). The model presented in
Fig. 7 suggests that P1, P2 and
P3 are sequential cell states. An alternate model would have P1 cells
separately generate P2 and P3 states. Lineage analysis will be needed to
determine the relationships between the postulated progenitor cells.
Although Mash1 and Dlx1/2 mutants affect distinct
populations of LGE neurons, we suggest that bHLH and homeobox genes function
coordinately to regulate differentiation at all stages of LGE development.
Thus, although DLX1 and DLX2 are expressed in early neurons, their function
does not appear to be essential in the early lineage. Dlx5 and
Dlx6 are candidate genes for compensating for Dlx1 and
Dlx2 function at early stages, as expression of these genes is
preserved in N1 cells in Dlx1/2 mutants (data not shown)
(Anderson et al., 1997a).
Furthermore, although Mash1 function is essential for early LGE
lineages, it is expressed throughout the period of LGE neurogenesis. While at
this point little is known about the later functions of Mash1, there
is evidence that it does regulate the properties of LGE progenitor cells at
E15.5 and E18.5, as these show elevated expression of GABA
(Fig. 2K,K',L,L').
In addition, perhaps other bHLH genes, such as Olig2, may compensate
for Mash1 function at later stages
(Takebayashi et al., 2000
).
Thus, future studies should focus on testing the function of other homeobox
and bHLH transcription factors in the temporal control of differentiation in
the subcortical telencephalon.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Anderson, S. A., Qiu, M., Bulfone, A., Eisenstat, D. D., Meneses, J., Pedersen, R. and Rubenstein, J. L. (1997a). Mutations of the homeobox genes Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 disrupt the striatal subventricular zone and differentiation of late born striatal neurons. Neuron 19,27 -37.[Medline]
Anderson, S. A., Eisenstat, D. D., Shi, L. and Rubenstein, J.
L. (1997b). Interneuron migration from basal forebrain to
neocortex: dependence on Dlx genes. Science
278,474
-476.
Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., Matsuno, K. and Fortini, M. E. (1995). Notch signaling, Science 268,225 -232.[Medline]
Beatus, P., Lundkvist, J., Oberg, C. and Lendahl, U.
(1999). The notch 3 intracellular domain represses notch
1-mediated activation through Hairy/Enhancer of split (HES) promoters.
Development 126,3925
-3935.
Bhide, P. G. (1996). Cell cycle kinetics in the embryonic mouse corpus striatum. J. Comp. Neurol. 374,506 -522.[CrossRef][Medline]
Briscoe, J. and Ericson, J. (2001). Specification of neuronal fates in the ventral neural tube. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11,43 -49.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bulfone, A., Kim, H. J., Puelles, L., Porteus, M. H., Grippo, J. F. and Rubenstein, J. L. R. (1993). The mouse Dlx-2 (Tes-1) gene is expressed in spatially restricted domains of the forebrain, face and limbs in midgestation mouse embryos. Mech. Dev. 40,129 -140.[CrossRef][Medline]
Casarosa, S., Fode, C. and Guillemot, F.
(1999). Mash1 regulates neurogenesis in the ventral
telencephalon. Development
126,525
-534.
Cau, E., Gradwohl, G., Casarosa, S., Kageyama, R. and Guillemot,
F. (2000). Hes genes regulate sequential stages of
neurogenesis in the olfactory epithelium. Development
127,2323
-2332.
Chenn, A., Braisted, J. E., McConnell, S. K. and O'Leary, D. D. M. (1997). Development of the cerebral cortex: mechanisms controlling cell fate, laminar and areal patterning, and axonal connectivity. In Molecular and CellularApproaches to Neural Development (ed. W. M. Cowan, T. M. Jessell and S. L. Zipursky). pp. 440-473. New York, Oxford University Press.
Chitnis, A. and Kintner, C. (1996). Sensitivity
of proneural genes to lateral inhibition affects the pattern of primary
neurons in Xenopus embryos. Development
122,2295
-2301.
de la Pompa, J. L., Wakeham, A., Correia, K. M., Samper, E.,
Brown, S., Aguilera, R. J., Nakano, T., Honjo, T., Mak, T. W., Rossant, J. and
Conlon, R. A. (1997). Conservation of the Notch signalling
pathway in mammalian neurogenesis. Development
124,1139
-1148.
Doe, C. Q., Fuerstenberg, S. and Peng, C. Y. (1998). Neural stem cells: from fly to vertebrates. J. Neurobiol. 36,111 -127.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dorsky, R. I., Chang, W. S., Rapaport, D. H. and Harris, W. A. (1997). Regulation of neuronal diversity in the Xenopus retina by Delta signalling, Nature 385, 67-70.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eisenstat, D. D., Liu, J. K., Mione, M., Zhong, W., Yu, G., Anderson, S. A., Ghattas, I., Puelles, L. and Rubenstein, J. L. (1999). DLX-1, DLX-2, and DLX-5 expression define distinct stages of basal forebrain differentiation. J. Comp. Neurol. 414,217 -237.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fode, C., Ma., Q., Casarosa, S., Ang, S. L., Anderson, D. J. and
Guillemot, F. (2000). A role for neural determination genes
in specifying the dorsoventral identity of telencephalic neurons.
Genes Dev. 14,67
-80.
Gaiano, N., Nye, J. S. and Fishell, G. (2000). Radial glial identity is promoted by Notch1 signaling in the murine forebrain. Neuron 2,395 -404.
Guillemot, F. and Joyner, A. L. (1993). Dynamic expression of the murine achaete-scute homologue mash-1 in the developing nervous system. Mech. Dev. 42,171 -185.[CrossRef][Medline]
Guillemot, F., Lo, L. C., Johnson, J. E., Auerbach, A., Anderson, D. J. and Joyner, A. L. (1993). Mammalian achaete-scute homolog 1 is required for the early development of olfactory and autonomic neurons. Cell 75,463 -476.[Medline]
Halliday, A. L. and Cepko, C. L. (1992). Generation and migration of cells in the developing striatum. Neuron 9,15 -26.[Medline]
Henrique, D., Hirsinger, E., Adam, J., le Roux, I., Pourquié, O., Ish-Horowicz, D. and Lewis, J. (1997). Maintenance of neuroepithelial progenitor cells by Delta-Notch signalling in the embryonic chick retina. Curr. Biol. 7, 661-670.[Medline]
Hendzel, M. J., Wei, Y., Mancini, M. A., van Hooser, A., Ranalli, T., Brinkley, B. R., Bazett-Jones, D. P. and Allis, C. D. (1997). Mitosis specific phosphorylation of histone H3 initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation. Chromosoma 106,348 -360.[CrossRef][Medline]
Horton, S., Meredith, A., Richardson, J. A. and Johnson, J. E. (1999). Correct coordination of neuronal differentiation events in ventral forebrain requires the bHLH factor MASH1. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 14,355 -369.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hrabe de Angelis, M., McIntyre, J. and Gossler, A. (1997). Maintenance of somite borders in mice requires the Delta homologue DII1. Nature 386,717 -721.[CrossRef][Medline]
Irvine, D. K., Zurcher, S. D., Nguyen, T., Weinmaster, G. and Kornblum, H. I. (2001). Expression patterns of Notch1, Notch2, and Notch3 suggest multiple functional roles for the Notch-DSL signaling system during brain development. J. Comp. Neurol. 436,167 -181.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jessell, T. M. (2000). Neuronal specification in the spinal cord: inductive signals and transcriptional codes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1,20 -29.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lewis, J. (1996). Neurogenic genes and vertebrate neurogenesis. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6, 3-10.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lindsell, C. E., Boulter, J., diSibio, G., Gossler, A. and Weinmaster, G. (1996). Expression patterns of Jagged, Delta1, Notch1, Notch2, and Notch3 genes identify ligand-receptor pairs that may function in neural development. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 8, 14-27.[CrossRef][Medline]
Liu, J. K., Ghattas, I., Liu, S., Chen, S. and Rubenstein, J. L. (1997). Dlx genes encode DNA-binding proteins that are expressed in an overlapping and sequential pattern during basal ganglia differentiation. Dev. Dyn. 210,498 -512.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lo, L. C., Johnson, J. E., Wuenschell, C. W., Saito, T. and Anderson, D. J. (1991). Mammalian achaete-scute homolog 1 is transiently expressed by spatially-restricted subsets of early neuroepithelial and neural crest cells. Genes Dev. 5,1524 -1537.[Abstract]
Ma, Q., Sommer, L., Cserjesi, P. and Anderson, D. J.
(1997). Mash1 and neurogenin1 expression patterns define
complementary domains of neuroepithelium in the developing CNS and are
correlated with regions expressing notch ligands. J.
Neurosci. 17,3644
-3652.
Marin, O., Anderson, S. A. and Rubenstein, J. L.
(2000). Origin and molecular specification of striatal
interneurons. J. Neurosci.
20,6063
-6076.
Marin, O. and Rubenstein, J. L. (2002). Patterning, regionalization and cell differentiation in the forebrain. In Mouse Development, Patterning, Morphogenesis, and Organogenesis (ed. J. Rossant and P. P. L. Tam), pp.75 -106. San Diego: Academic Press.
Morrison, S. J., Perez, S. E., Qiao, Z., Verdi, J. M., Hicks, C., Weinmaster, G. and Anderson, D. J. (2000). Transient Notch activation initiates an irreversible switch from neurogenesis to gliogenesis by neural crest stem cells. Cell 101,499 -510.[Medline]
Nieto, M., Schuurmans, C., Britz, O. and Guillemot, F. (2001). Neural bHLH genes control the neuronal versus glial fate decision in cortical progenitors. Neuron 29,401 -413.[Medline]
Ohtsuka, T., Ishibashi, M., Gradwohl, G., Nakanishi, S.,
Guillemot, F. and Kageyama, R. (1999). Hes1 and Hes5 as notch
effectors in mammalian neuronal differentiation. EMBO
J. 18,2196
-2207.
Porteus, M. H., Bulfone, A., Liu, J. K., Lo, L. C. and Rubenstein, J. L. R. (1994). DLX-2, MASH-1, and MAP-2 expression and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation define molecularly distinct cell populations in the embryonic mouse forebrain. J. Neurosci. 44,6370 -6383.
Qiu, M., Bulfone, A., Ghattas, I., Meneses, J. J., Christensen, L., Sharpe, P. T., Presley, R., Pedersen, R. A. and Rubenstein, J. L. (1997). Role of the Dlx homeobox genes in proximodistal patterning of the branchial arches: mutations of Dlx-1, Dlx-2, and Dlx-1 and -2 alter morphogenesis of proximal skeletal and soft tissue structures derived from the first and second arches. Dev. Biol. 185,165 -184.[CrossRef][Medline]
Robey, E. (1997). Notch in vertebrates. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7, 551-557.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sheth, A. N. and Bhide, P. (1997). Concurrent cellular output from two proliferative populations in the early embryonic mouse corpus striatum. J. Comp. Neurol. 383,220 -230.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sussel, L., Marin, O., Kimura, S. and Rubenstein, J. L.
(1999). Loss of Nkx2.1 homeobox gene function results in a
ventral to dorsal molecular respecification within the basal telencephalon:
evidence for a transformation of the pallidum into the striatum.
Development 126,3359
-3370.
Takebayashi, H., Yoshida, S., Sugimori, M., Kosako, H., Kominami, R., Nakafuku, M. and Nabeshima, Y. (2000). Dynamic expression of basic helix-loop-helix Olig family members: implication of Olig2 in neuron and oligodendrocyte differentiation and identification of a new member, Olig3. Mech. Dev. 99,143 -148.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tanigaki, K., Nogaki, F., Takahashi, J., Tashiro, K., Kurooka, H. and Honjo, T. (2001). Notch1 and Notch3 instructively restrict bFGF-responsive multipotent neural progenitor cells to an astroglial fate. Neuron 2,45 -55.
van der Kooy, D. and Fishell, G. (1987). Neuronal birthrate underlies the development of striatal compartments. Brain Res. 401,155 -161.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zerucha, T., Stühmer, T., Hatch, G., Park, B. K., Long, Q.,
Yu, G., Gambarotta, A., Schultz, J. R., Rubenstein, J. L. and Ekker, M.
(2000). A highly conserved enhancer in the Dlx5/Dlx6 intergenic
region is the site of cross-regulatory interactions between Dlx genes in the
embryonic forebrain. J. Neurosci.
20,709
-721.
Zine, A., Aubert, A., Qiu, J., Therianos, S., Guillemot, F.,
Kageyama, R. and de Ribaupierre, F. (2001). Hes1 and Hes5
activities are required for the normal development of the hair cells in the
mammalian inner ear. J. Neurosci.
21,4712
-4720.