1 Cancer Research UK (ICRF), London Research Institute, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields,
London WC2A 3PX, UK
2 Laboratoire de Génétique et Physiologie du Développement,
CNRS-INSERM-Université de la Méditerranée-AP de
Marseille, Campus de Luminy Case 907, F-13288 Marseille, Cedex 09,
France
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: helen.mcneill{at}cancer.org.uk)
Accepted 7 November 2002
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Planar polarity, Adhesion, Drosophila, Eye, Atrophin, Fat
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Studies primarily in the fly have implicated a Frizzled (Fz) signaling
pathway as being central to the control of PP (Adler and Lee, 2001). Analysis
of clones of fz mutant cells reveals both cell autonomous and
non-autonomous defects in PP. This has led to the suggestion that Fz, a
seven-pass transmembrane receptor (Adler et
al., 1990; Park et al.,
1994
) is involved in both the reception of a PP signal and in its
transmission to adjacent cells. Recent work has demonstrated that Fz is part
of an asymmetrically localized signaling complex, which also contains the
signaling protein Dishevelled and the atypical cadherin, Flamingo
(Axelrod, 2001
;
Das et al., 2002
;
Strutt et al., 2002
;
Strutt, 2001
;
Tree et al., 2002
;
Usui et al., 1999
). How Fz
signaling activity is controlled is not clear.
A well-studied system for understanding the control of PP is the fly eye
(Wolff and Ready, 1993). The
fly eye is composed of
800 photoreceptor clusters called ommatidia, each
composed of eight photoreceptors, R1-R8, as well as a number of accessory
cells (Fig. 1A). Ommatidia are
organized into dorsal and ventral fields of mirror-image planar polarity,
which meet at the equator (Fig.
1A,C). PP develops in the eye imaginal disc shortly after
ommatidial preclusters assemble. Preclusters in the dorsal and ventral fields
rotate 90° in opposite directions away from the equator, producing mirror
image fields. Genetic studies have suggested that fz is necessary for
interpreting and communicating a PP signal that is thought to emanate from the
equator. fz has also been implicated in controlling R3 cell fate
(Zheng et al., 1995
).
Intensive work has suggested that photoreceptors R3 and R4 are crucial in
directing the rotation of preclusters. In addition it has been shown that the
member of the R3/R4 pair with higher Notch activity will take on the R4 fate.
This decision directs precluster rotation
(Cooper and Bray, 1999
;
Fanto and Mlodzik, 1999
;
Tomlinson and Struhl,
1999
).
|
The atypical cadherins Fat (Ft) and Dachsous (Ds) act upstream of
fz, and may control Fz activity during the development of PP. Two
separate models have been proposed to explain how Fat and Ds control planar
polarity in the eye. In one model, Fat controls Fz activity, and biases the
equatorially localized cell to an R3 fate
(Yang et al., 2002). In
another model, ft inhibits equator formation, and this inhibition is
relieved, through an unknown mechanism, at the presumptive equator
(Rawls et al., 2002
).
We have isolated several new ft alleles in a screen to identify
genes involved in cell adhesion and planar polarity in the eye
(Fig. 1B). To understand how
ft functions in PP, we conducted a yeast two-hybrid screen to
identify proteins that bind the cytoplasmic domain of Fat. One protein
identified by this screen was Drosophila Atrophin (Atro; also known
as Grunge), which is the sole Drosophila homolog of human Atrophins
(Erkner et al., 2002;
Zhang et al., 2002
). Mutations
in Atrophin 1 cause dentatorubal-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA)
(Koide et al., 1994
;
Nagafuchi et al., 1994
), a
progressive neurodegenerative disease associated with ataxia, epilepsy,
myoclonus and choreoathetosis. Atro is a nuclear protein that has been
recently shown to act as a transcriptional co-repressor with roles in
segmentation and dorsoventral patterning. Significantly, Atro has also been
shown to control PP in the eye and the wing
(Zhang et al., 2002
).
We show here that Fat and Atro physically interact, display strong genetic interactions, and control similar processes in development. Our analysis of ft and Atro clones in the eye reveals alterations in planar polarity at the polar border of the clone as well as equatorial rescue of mutant tissue. In addition, our mosaic analysis of these clones demonstrates that both ft and Atro are needed specifically in the R3 cell. We also show that Atro (like ft) controls expression of four-jointed (fj), a gene that can control PP. These data lead us to propose that ft and Atro act at least twice in the development of PP; initially to control PP gradients and later in R3 fate decisions.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Fly stocks and genetics
For the screen, male w; 40FRT flies were mutagenized with ethyl
methyl sulphonate using standard procedures. These flies were crossed to
females hsFlp,w; 40FRT, their progeny heat-shocked to induce clones
and then screened for clones that had smooth edges. Mitotic clones were
generated by the Flp/FRT technique with either hsFlp or eyFlp and marked in
imaginal discs by Ubi-GFP (Rawls et al.,
2002; Yang et al.,
2002
). Mutant alleles used were ftGRV,
ftfd, ft1,dsUAO71, Atro11,
Atro35, Atroj5A3 and m
0.5-lacZ
(described in FlyBase), UAS-Atro flies were a gift from Tian Xu.
ftalb and ftso were obtained in our
clone shape screen and shown to be ft alleles by complementation
analysis. ftchance was generated by imprecise excision of
an adjacent P element (H. M., unpublished).
Immunohistochemistry and histology
Third instar imaginal discs were fixed in PLP
(Fanto and Mlodzik, 1999).
Primary antibodies were used as follows: rabbit anti-Atro
(Erkner et al., 2002
) (1:100),
rat anti-Elav (DHSB, 1:1000), mouse anti-ß-Gal (Promega 1:1000), rabbit
anti-Bar (gift from Dr Saigo, 1:1000) and mouse anti-Pros (DSHB
1:10).
Secondary antibodies were from Jackson Laboratories. After staining, discs
were mounted in Vectastain and analyzed with a Zeiss confocal microscope.
Adult eye sections were prepared as previously described
(Yang et al., 1999
). Wings
were dehydrated in a 70% ethanol:30% glycerol solution and mounted in DPX (EMS
sciences)
Biochemical analysis
For the GST pull-down assay the ft fragment was amplified by PCR
and cloned in-frame with the N-terminal FLAG tag provided in the vector pFTX9.
FLAG-Fat was then synthesized by in vitro translation using the TNT system
(Promega). GST-Atro was produced by PCR amplification of a fragment starting
at tyrosine 1639 and ending at the stop codon using primers with XhoI
sites. After digestion with XhoI this fragment was cloned into pGex
5x. GST and the GST-Atro fusion were produced in BL21-DE3 bacteria
(Invitrogen), extracted in PBS with excess of bacterial-specific protease
inhibitors cocktail (Sigma) and purified using glutathione-coupled beads
(Pharmacia).
For binding assays, equal amounts of FLAG-Fat were added to
pre-equilibrated beads containing 5 µg of GST fusions in HMK buffer
(Zhang et al., 2002) in 400
µl and were rotated at 4°C overnight. Beads were recovered, washed in
HMK and analyzed by SDS-PAGE gels followed by western blotting with ECL
chemoluminescence (Amersham). The following primary antibodies were used:
mouse anti-FLAG (Sigma 1:2000), rabbit anti-Atro (1:500) and rabbit anti-GST
(a gift from F. Miralles, 1:10000). HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were
from Amersham.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
ft and ds control ommatidial polarity
Fat and Ds have been shown to have roles in PP in the eye, wing and abdomen
(Casal et al., 2002), and it
has been proposed that Ds binding to Fat modulates Fat function. Consistent
with this proposal, we see that homozygous loss of either ft or
ds randomizes PP (Fig.
1D,E).
A striking feature of clones of homozygous ft cells is that
disruptions in PP are restricted to polar regions of the clone. In addition,
entirely wild-type ommatidia on the polar side of the clone frequently show PP
inversions (white arrow, Fig.
1F). Loss of ft does not disrupt polarity of wild-type
tissue on the equatorial side of the clone, and in fact ft mutant
tissue can be phenotypically rescued by adjacent wild-type tissue on the
equatorial side of the clone (Rawls et
al., 2002; Yang et al.,
2002
) (Fig.
1F).
Although loss of ds and ft throughout the eye produces similar PP defects, they have distinct clonal phenotypes. In ds clones, ommatida with disrupted polarity are primarily located on the equatorial region of the clone, and genotypically wild-type ommatida at the equatorial border of ds clones are often inverted in the dorsoventral axis. Remarkably, ommatidia at the polar edge of ds clones always adopt the correct polarity (Fig. 1G), suggesting that ds mutants can phenotypically rescued by wild-type tissue on the polar side of the clone.
Mosaic analysis of ft mutant clones has demonstrated a strong bias
for the cell that retains ft function to become the R3 cell, whereas
there is a bias for retaining ds function in the R4 cell
(Rawls et al., 2002;
Yang et al., 2002
).
The cytoplasmic domain of Fat binds the transcriptional repressor
Atro
To gain insight into how Fat controls PP, we searched for proteins that
bind the cytoplasmic domain of Fat. We performed a yeast two-hybrid screen,
using two different fragments of the Fat intracellular domain as baits to
screen a Drosophila embryonic cDNA library. The bait for the first
screen was a 160 amino acid fragment, close to the C terminus, whereas a
non-overlapping fragment close to the transmembrane domain (green and black
arrows; Fig. 2A) was used for
the second screen. Both of these fragments cover regions of high homology to a
human homolog of Fat (data not shown). Drosophila Atrophin
(Atro) was isolated in the first screen, and specifically interacted
with the Fat bait 1 (green arrow) but not with bait 2. Atro encodes a
large protein of >200 kDa, with nuclear localization signals, putative
DNA-binding and chromatin remodeling domains located at its N-terminus, and a
region of particularly high homology to human Atrophins at the C terminus
(Fig. 2A)
(Erkner et al., 2002;
Zhang et al., 2002
).
Atro is also known as Grunge. Atrophins have been shown to
act as transcriptional repressors in Drosophila and in tissue culture
studies (Wood et al., 2000
;
Zhang et al., 2002
).
As Atro has been shown to act as a transcriptional repressor in the nucleus, while Fat is located at the cell membrane, such an interaction was unexpected. We confirmed the interaction between Fat and Atro through pull-down experiments, using a GST-Atro fusion protein, and in vitro translated, Flag-tagged Fat protein. A fragment of Fat, corresponding to yeast bait 1, binds specifically to a GST-Atro fusion protein, but not to GST alone (Fig. 2B). These data confirm our yeast 2-hybrid interaction, and provides additional support for a biochemical interaction between Atro and Fat.
ft and Atro show strong genetic interactions
To determine if the biochemical interaction between Fat and Atro is
important in vivo, we looked for genetic interactions between ft and
Atro, and found strong dominant genetic interactions. Heteroallelic
combinations of a number of ft alleles are viable. Removal of one
copy of Atro in this background severely compromises viability
(Table 1). By contrast, loss of
one copy of Atro in a wild-type background has no obvious effect on
morphology or viability. This dominant heteroallelic lethality provides strong
evidence for the biological importance of the interaction between Fat and
Atro. To investigate if ft and Atro also show genetic
interactions in PP, we have sectioned eyes from the few escapers obtained from
crosses maintained at 18°C, and see consistent but subtle PP defects in
ftGRV/ft1; Atro35/+ heteroallelic
combinations. The eyes of ftGRV/ft1 flies and
Atro35/+ flies raised at the same temperature are entirely
wild type (data not shown).
|
When using a different allele of Atro, Atro11, flies emerge in normal mendelian ratios for all genotypes; however, we observed a dramatic shortening of the adult flies' lifespan when one copy of the Atro11 allele is present; ftGRV/ft1; Atro11/+ flies have severely decreased viability, with most flies dying between day 4 and 8. As a result of this, a dramatic drop in viability is observed (Fig. 2C). A similarly shaped curve is obtained for ftchance/ft1; Atro11/+ flies. Interestingly ftGRV/ft1; Atro11/+ flies appear to have motor deficits as their general motility and climbing behaviors are severely reduced.
Atro is expressed in the eye disc and is found both in the nucleus
and the cytoplasm
Atro has been shown to act as a transcriptional co-repressor in vivo in
Drosophila (Zhang et al.,
2002) and has been reported as a ubiquitously expressed nuclear
protein (Zhang et al., 2002
;
Erkner et al., 2002
). To gain
some insight into how Atro might interact with a transmembrane protein such as
Fat, we investigated its distribution in the eye imaginal disc using an
affinity-purified antibody raised against the last 14 amino acids of the
protein. This antibody reveals distinct nuclear staining in all photoreceptors
behind the morphogenetic furrow, as well as in cells in front of the furrow
(Fig. 2D). This staining is
lost in Atro mutant clones (white arrow;
Fig. 2E), confirming the
specificity of the antibody. Reconstructed orthogonal views of confocal
sections through imaginal discs that contain Atro- clones
confirms that both the nuclear and non-nuclear staining is lost in
Atro clones, indicating that Atro protein is normally present both in
the cytoplasm and inside the nucleus (Fig.
2F). Human Atrophins are also present in both the nucleus and in
the cytoplasm (Schilling et al.,
1999
).
Atro clones, like ft clones, disrupt PP on the
polar border of the clone
Atro has been reported to affect PP in the eye
(Zhang et al., 2002), but the
nature of these defects have not been investigated in depth. To understand how
Fat and Atro function in PP, we analyzed the planar polarity defects in
Atro mutant clones in greater detail.
In Atro- clones, as in ft- clones, we find non-autonomous alterations in polarity only on the polar border of the clone. Wild-type ommatidia at the polar border of dorsal Atro clones adopt a ventral appearance (Fig. 3A, white arrow), while wild-type and mosaic ommatidia at the equatorial border of the clone have normal polarity. Inside the clone there are significant defects in photoreceptor differentiation, suggesting that Atro has other roles in the eye in addition to the control of planar polarity. Analysis of homozygous clones of weaker Atro alleles, induced by insertion of a P element, shows very similar phenotypes (not shown).
|
Atro, like ft, is specifically required in the R3
photoreceptor
ft has been reported to be specifically required in the R3
photoreceptor (Yang et al.,
2002). We assayed the requirements for Atro in different
photoreceptors using clones of homozygous Atro cells generated in a
heterozygous background. Because there are no strict lineage relationships
among ommatidial cells, the ommatidia along the clonal border are composed of
random combinations of Atro+ and Atro-
cells. Among these combinations were mosaic ommatidia in which only one member
of the R3/R4 precursor pair possesses functional Atro.
Atro+ ommatidia can be identified by the presence of black
pigment granules in the photoreceptor rhabdomeres
(Fig. 3B,C). In virtually all
cases in which an ommatidium that was located on the polar border of the clone
and had incorrect polarity was mosaic for Atro in the R3/R4 cell
pair, the R3 photoreceptor retained Atro (black arrows
Fig. 3B). This mosaic bias
suggests that Atro is preferentially required in the R3 cell.
A careful quantitative analysis of these mosaic ommatidia
(Table 2) shows a general bias
for retaining the Atro function in all the anterior photoreceptors as
previously reported for ft by Rawls et al.
(Rawls et al., 2002). However,
both in ommatidia that retained the correct polarity and inverted ommatidia,
the bias for R3 is very strong and is significantly higher than that observed
for the other anterior photoreceptors, R1 and R2.
|
In addition, in viable heteroallelic combinations of Atro (Fig. 3E, black arrows) we frequently see symmetric ommatidia, mostly of the R4/R4 achiral subtype. Conversely, when a wild-type form of Atrophin is transiently overexpressed in the eye imaginal disc under the control of the sevenless enhancer alongside alteration in the degree of rotation and the polarity of several ommatidia many elongated symmetric ommatidia of the R3/R3 achiral subtype are observed (Fig. 3D). These phenotypes have been described for mutants in fz and Notch and strongly support the notion that Atro biases the R3/R4 cell fate choice towards R3.
Despite the similarity of the PP deficits, Atro clones do display some differences when compared with ft clones. As mentioned above, Atro is required for the survival or correct specification of photoreceptors. Ommatidia within the clones often appear to have lost one or more outer photoreceptors, and in many cases they have more than one inner photoreceptor with smaller rhabdomeres (Fig. 3A,E, yellow arrows).
Loss of either Atro or ft disrupts planar polarity
in the eye disc
The autonomous and non-autonomous defects in ft clones are first
detectable in the eye imaginal disc, using antibodies against Bar, a marker
for R1 and R6 (Higashijima et al.,
1992) (Fig. 4A).
Ommatidia with a dorsal orientation are indicated with red arrows; ventral
orientation is indicated with blue arrows. Although PP is disrupted throughout
much of the ft clones, there is often a striking rescue of ommatidial
orientation on the equatorial border of the ft clone. This has led to
the proposal that a ft-dependant signal is carried for one or two
ommatidial rows from the Ft+ cells outside the clone
(Rawls et al., 2002
). This
phenotype is reversed in ds clones, where there is a clear rescue of
the mutant ommatidia at the polar border, whereas the polarity defects spread
into the wild-type tissue for up to two rows at the equatorial border of the
clone (Fig. 4B)
|
We investigated Atro function in the eye imaginal disc, using the polarity
marker, E(spl)m0.5 (Cooper
and Bray, 1999
). In wild-type ommatidia E(spl)m
0.5
is expressed in the polar cell, which becomes specified as R4. Atro
mutant clones (marked by loss of GFP) show disruptions of the regular pattern
of planar polarity, as revealed by the position of the R4 marker within an
ommatidium. Within Atro- ommatidial clusters the cell
expressing the R4 marker frequently occupied the position normally taken by
the equatorial cell (black arrows), indicating that these ommatidia had
switched their dorsoventral PP (Fig.
4C). Strikingly, there are non-autonomous disruptions in PP in the
wild-type tissue on the polar border of the clone. The alteration of
ommatidial polarity in Atro- ommatidia and in surrounding
tissue is diagramed in the adjacent panel
(Fig. 4C'). It is clear
that Atro clones (like ft clones) show an equatorial rescue
of normal PP within the clone, and non-autonomous disruptions of planar
polarity at the polar border of the clone.
We also saw, at lower penetrance, alterations in the ability of Atro photoreceptors to commit to the R3 cell versus R4 cell fate in the imaginal disc. Fifteen percent of ommatidia in Atro35 clones show additional photoreceptors with an R4 cell marker, suggesting that these ommatidia have adopted an R4/R4 fate. Only 2% of Atro ommatidia have lost the R4 cell marker, which may suggest they have adopted an R3/R3 fate. In flies with the weaker, viable combination of Atro alleles (Atro35/Atro11), the same tendency is seen, though less strongly: Out of 610 ommatidia analyzed for expression of the R4 marker, 49 were of the R4/R4 class and five were of the R3/R3 type (data not shown). This tendency of Atro ommatidia to adopt an R4/R4 configuration is seen throughout clones, without any evidence for equatorial rescue. Together, these data support a cell-autonomous function for Atro in R3 fate determination.
Atro and ft are required to repress four-jointed in
the eye
ft has been shown to repress expression of fj, which
encodes a type II transmembrane/secreted protein, expressed in a graded
fashion from the equator towards the pole of the eye imaginal disc
(Fig. 4D) (Brodsky and Steller, 1996;
Buckles et al., 2001
;
Villano and Katz, 1995
;
Yang et al., 2002
;
Zeidler et al., 1999
;
Zeidler et al., 2000
).
fj has been implicated in the regulation of ommatidial polarity,
based on the observation that reversals of ommatidial polarity occur along the
polar border of fj mutant clones. In addition ectopic expression of
Fj in clones can also produce reversals of ommatidial polarity. Together these
data suggest that ommatidia can recognize and polarize to a gradient of Fj
protein.
Atro has been shown to act as a transcriptional repressor
(Zhang et al., 2002). To see
if the ability of ft to repress fj could be mediated by
Atro, we examined Atro- clones using
fj-lacZ to monitor changes in fj transcription. We found
that loss of Atro (Fig.
4E), like loss of ft
(Yang et al., 2002
) results in
an increase in fj transcription, demonstrating that Atro is needed
for the proper regulation of the ft target fj.
Atro has additional roles in PR specification not seen in
ft clones
Atro adult clones have clear disruptions in photoreceptor
specification and/or survival (Fig.
3A). These defects include loss of outer photoreceptors and extra
inner photoreceptors. To determine if Atro is functioning in cell
fate decisions important for photoreceptor specification, we stained
Atro mutant clones with antibodies that recognized specific subsets
of photoreceptors. Loss of outer photoreceptors is a common feature of
Atro mutant clones in the adult, therefore we examined expression of
Bar, a marker for the R1 and R6 outer photoreceptors. In
Atro- clones Bar staining is variable, and at times only
one cell expresses Bar (Fig.
5A, yellow arrowheads). Ommatidia in adult Atro clones
often also have extra inner photoreceptors. To investigate if these extra
inner photoreceptors represented extra R7-like cells, we examined
Atro clones for Prospero, which is expressed in the R7 cell and in
cone cells (Kauffmann et al.,
1996). In Atro clones, additional photoreceptor cells
express Prospero (Fig. 5B, white arrows), compared with surrounding heterozygous tissue, suggesting that
in the absence of Atro, outer photoreceptors were transformed into
R7-like photoreceptors [defects that we never find in ft clones (data
not shown)]. Therefore Atro is needed for fate specification for both
inner and outer photoreceptor classes.
|
Another difference between ft and Atro function lies in the control of growth. Loss of ft leads to a loss of growth control, which is reflected in the greater size of mutant tissue (marked by the loss of GFP) compared with the twin spot, which has two copies of the GFP marker (yellow arrows; Fig. 5D) and is brighter than the surrounding heterozygous tissue. By contrast, Atro- clones (Fig. 5C) are similar in size to their twin spot, suggesting that they lack the tumor suppressor phenotype of ft clones.
Finally, one striking feature of ft clones is their round and smooth appearance, which is visible in clones in the adult, and in the eye imaginal disc (Fig. 1B, Fig. 5D). Although Atro clones do not appear smooth in the adult, Atro clones in the eye disc appear strikingly smooth when they are located anterior to the morphogenetic furrow (Fig. 5C, white arrow). Comparison with the twin spot (yellow arrow), confirms that this effect is specific to loss of Atro. This smoothness is lost after progression of the furrow, when ommatidial differentiation commences (marked by Elav staining in red), suggesting that Atro acts specifically in a pre-furrow adhesion process that is lost upon neuronal differentiation.
ft and Atro act together in other tissues
There are a number of similarities in mutant phenotypes that suggest that
Atro and ft function together at several stages in
development. Atro is expressed ubiquitously throughout embryonic and larval
development, and is also maternally contributed
(Erkner et al., 2002;
Zhang et al., 2002
).
ft is also maternally contributed, and is expressed in most cells in
the embryo and the larva. Clones of ftGRV in the wing
produce blisters where the dorsal and ventral surfaces of the wing fail to
fuse (Fig. 5F) (Garoia et al.,
2000). Small clones of Atro have been reported to result in swirls of
wing hairs and in notching when they touch the dorsoventral border
(Zhang et al., 2002
). We
observed these defects, and in addition we noted that when we induced
Atro35 clones earlier in development, these clones also
formed blisters that are similar to those found in ft clones
(Fig. 5G). Thoracic clones of
Atro disrupt thorax closure
(Zhang et al., 2002
)
(Fig. 5J). Loss of ft
in clones also disrupts thorax closure
(Fig. 5I). Taken together,
these data suggest that Fat and Atro may function together many times during
development.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
ft and Atro bias towards an R3 fate
Mosaic analysis of ft mutant clones demonstrated a strong bias for
the cell that retains ft function to become the R3 cell
(Rawls et al., 2002;
Yang et al., 2002
). This has
been interpreted to indicate that Fat directly biases the cell to become an R3
cell (Yang et al., 2002
). We
find that Atro clones also show a bias for the R3 cell to retain Atro
function, supporting the model that Atro, like Fat, works in R3 fate
determination.
However, an extensive mosaic analysis found that all anterior cells (R1, R2
and R3) tend to be ft+, and all posterior cells (R4, R5
and R6) tend to be ft-
(Rawls et al., 2002). Rawls et
al. suggested that this bias is due to spatial considerations, cells that are
polar in the precluster, undergo a 90° rotation, leaving them in a
posterior position in the adult. At the polar border of ft clones,
ommatidia rotate in the opposite direction to wild type, therefore the bias is
reversed, leading to an increase in ft- anterior cells.
Therefore, they concluded that additional data was required to show that
ft function is specifically needed in R3. To determine if ft
and Atro are specifically required in the R3 photoreceptor, we have
undertaken mosaic analysis of Atro, ft and wild-type clones. We find
that in wild-type clones, marked only by white, ommatidia at the
polar border of the clone show a weak preference for posterior photoreceptors
to be wild-type (60.75±4.7%; P over A). This bias is strictly due to
the spatial constraints of recruitment in clones. In ft clones, we
find that at the equatorial border (where polarity is unaltered) there is no
discernable difference between anterior photoreceptors subclass types; 85% of
all photoreceptors that retain ft are anterior class. The increase
from
61% to 85% is probably due to the adhesive properties of
ft, which result in smooth edged clones.
By contrast, at the polar border, which is where planar polarity is altered, there is a marked tendency for ft function to be retained specifically in the R3 photoreceptor; 100% of R3 cells retained ft, whereas only 83% of all anterior photoreceptors retained ft. Our mosaic analysis of Atro clones showed that the bias introduced by PP alterations at the polar border of clones (similar to ft) introduces a general bias for anterior photoreceptors. However, again, the bias is stronger in the R3 cell than for other anterior photoreceptors. This increased bias in the R3 photoreceptor over the other anterior class member suggests that ft and Atro are important in R3 fate.
The conclusion that Atro function is important for the R3 cell fate is also strongly supported by our observation that loss of Atro often results in symmetric ommatidia with two R4 cells. This is reflected by the increase in R4/R4 ommatidia seen in Atro clones in the eye disc marked by expression of the R4 marker, md-lacZ. In addition the overexpression of Atro in R3 and R4 generates symmetric ommatidia with two R3 cells. Together, these data support the proposal that Atro is needed for the R3 fate.
The non-autonomous nature of the PP defects associated with ft and Atro mutant clones could have presented some problems to mosaic analysis. We might have expected that non-autonomous alterations in polarity would equally affect all photoreceptors, yet our data clearly show enhanced requirements for ft and Atro function in the R3 photoreceptor over other photoreceptors. In addition, the proposal that Atro is needed for the R3 cell fate is supported by our analysis of the R4 marker in eye discs. Interestingly, the tendency to lose the R3 cell fate in Atro clones is seen throughout the clone, and does not appear to participate in the phenomena of equatorial rescue or polar nonautonomy.
Because Fz is also needed for R3 fate decisions, it has been suggested that
Fat positively affects Fz signaling (Yang
et al., 2002). Our observation that Atro acts with Fat and also
biases towards the R3 fate suggests that the regulation of Fz by Fat may not
be direct. We propose instead that Atro is necessary for the
ft-dependent bias to an R3 cell fate and for the production of a
diffusible PP molecule that controls Fz activity.
The proposal that Fat increases Fz activity, and thereby biases a cell
towards the R3 fate (Yang et al.,
2002), does not explain the non-autonomous disruptions of
wild-type tissue on the polar side of ft and Atro clones, or
the rescue of ft and Atro mutant tissue from wild-type
tissue on the equatorial side of the clone. There are several models that
could explain the non-autonomous disruptions of planar polarity. One model
suggests that planar polarity is established through a `domino effect'. This
model is suggested by the striking accumulation of planar polarity components,
such as Fz and Dsh on the distal edge of every cell in the wing (reviewed by
McNeill, 2002
). This
observation, coupled with genetic data that suggests that high Fz activity on
one side of the cell forces low Fz activity on the other side, leads to a
model in which accumulation or loss of polarity in a cell leads to templating
of that state onto the next cell, non-autonomously propogating PP defects.
However in the eye, Fz and Dsh only show differential distribution on a subset
of ommatidial precursor cells, and, importantly, intervening cells show no
altered accumulation. These data argue against a simple templating model for
PP in the eye.
An alternative model proposed by Rawls et al.
(Rawls et al., 2002) suggests
that the juxtapositioning of ft+ and
ft- tissue contributes to midline determination and
emphasizes the role of Fat in inhibiting DV signaling away from the equator.
This inhibition would be relieved at the equator by an unidentified molecule
that would inhibit Fat function. If this model was correct, a small
ft clone should mimic the situation at the equator, where Fat
function is predicted to be locally inhibited. We would therefore expect to
find an ectopic equator in the middle of the clone. Instead, however, we
observe the opposite phenotype, as the ommatidia on the two sides of the clone
point towards the middle of the clone, rather than away from it.
A model for the function of ft, ds and Atro in
establishing ommatidial polarity
We believe that the model that best explains both the equatorial rescue and
polar nonautonomy of ft and Atro clones is that Fat and Atro
together control expression of a planar polarity morphogen, here called
`factor X'. We imagine that factor X is in a gradient with high levels at the
equator and low levels at the poles, thus all ommatidia will appear to `point'
down this gradient (see Fig.
6). If Fat and Atro are essential to the production of factor X,
then the ft/Atro mutant tissue will be void of factor X, producing a
sink in the gradient. The gradient will still be pointing in the same
direction initially, thus the wild-type polarity of ommatidia at the
equatorial side of the clone and `equatorial rescue' seen in ft and
Atro clones. For ommatidia at the polar edge of the clone, the
gradient will be reversed, and ommatidia will point in the opposite direction.
The gradient will also be disrupted outside of the clone, leading to
inversions of the polarity of wild-type tissue on the polar side of the clone
and `polar nonautonomy' seen in these mutant clones. In large clones, there
will be a region in the center of the clone where there is no detectable
factor X, and as a result polarity will be randomized. All of these
predictions are met in ft and Atro clones. Loss of Ds, which
inhibits Fat function, should increase factor X. As predicted by this model,
ds clones show disruptions in wild-type tissue on the equatorial side
of the clone, and rescue of mutant tissue on the polar side of the clone.
Without ft or ds function there would be no gradient and,
consistent with this prediction, we see complete loss of planar polarity in
eyes that are homozygous for strong alleles of ft or ds.
|
A gradient of Wg protein (which is high at the poles and low at the
equator) initially establishes a gradient of Ds protein over the eye field
(Yang et al., 2002). This
gradient of Ds protein in turn produces a gradient of Fat activity, which, we
believe, creates a gradient of Atro activity. We propose that each cell will
produce factor X at a level that is proportionate to the level of Atro
activity, which varies according to the position of that cell in the
ds and ft activity gradients. Our model assumes that Factor
X is a short-range diffusible molecule, which provides polarity information to
ommatidial preclusters to direct their rotation. As Fat has been shown to be
upstream of Fz, we speculate that the Atro-dependant Factor X is a ligand for
Fz.
Atro and ft also act in different pathways
Both ft and Atro also act in other, apparently unrelated,
pathways. One of the prominent features of ft mutant larvae is the
loss of growth control, which leads to dramatically overgrown discs
(Bryant et al., 1988) and
mutant clones that are markedly larger than their sister twin spots (see
Fig. 5D). However,
Atro- clones do not display overgrowth in the eye,
suggesting that ft restricts growth via an Atro-independent pathway.
In addition, in the adult eye Atro clones (unlike ft clones)
show severe defects in photoreceptor number and type, suggesting Atro has
additional roles in photoreceptor specification and/or survival that are not
shared by Fat. One particularly surprising result was our finding that
Atro- clones are markedly smooth before the furrow, and
that this smoothness is lost after the furrow passes. This suggests that Atro
may function in a cell adhesion process that is lost upon cell
differentiation.
Atro is a transcriptional repressor
Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) is a dominantly inherited
neuronal degenerative disease characterized by the variable combination of
ataxia, choreoathetosis, myoclonus, epilepsy and dementia. This disease is
caused by the expansion of a polyglutamine tract within the Atrophin 1 protein
(Koide et al., 1994;
Nagafuchi et al., 1994
). Atro
is the sole fly homolog of human atrophins. Atro has been shown to act as a
transcriptional co-repressor in vivo in Drosophila
(Zhang et al., 2002
). Atro
interacts genetically with even skipped, a transcriptional repressor,
and is required for the in vivo repressive activity of even skipped.
The transcriptional repressor activity of Atro has been localized to the
highly conserved C-terminal region of Atro. This C-terminal region can bind to
Evenskipped in vitro and interacts with the minimal repression domain of
Evenskipped (Zhang et al.,
2002
).
We have shown here that the intracellular domain of Fat binds the C-terminal domain of Atro. The cytoplasmic expression of Atro and its interaction with Fat raises the possibility that instead of acting as a simple co-repressor, Atro functions in a more complex manner. Other transcriptional co-repressors are known to be converted to transcriptional activators upon cell signaling, and future work will determine if the interaction of Fat with Ds alters the transcriptional activity of Atro.
Owing to the fact that Atro binds the cytoplasmic domain of Fat, we favor a model in which Atro acts downstream of Fat, possibly relaying a Fat-dependant signal to the nucleus. However, the similarity of the ft and atro loss-of-function phenotypes makes classical epistasis experiments difficult, therefore we cannot exclude a model in which Atro acts upstream of ft. Examination of the amount or subcellular distributions of Fat and Atro, suggest that Atro does not control Fat expression or localization, nor does ft control the levels or subcellular localization of Atro (data not shown).
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a novel interaction between a cell adhesion molecule, Fat, and a nuclear corepressor, Atro, which work together in the control of planar polarity in the fly eye. We show that Atro is essential for the regulation of a previously identified ft target, fj, and acts in R3 cell fate determination. Based on these data, we propose that Fat and Atro act together to control the production of a diffusible planar polarity signal and to bias photoreceptors towards the R3 cell fate.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Aldler, P. N. and Lee, H. (2001). Frizzled signaling and cell-cell interactions in planar polarity. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13,635 -640.[CrossRef][Medline]
Adler, P. N., Vinson, C., Park, W. J., Conover, S. and Klein,
L. (1990). Molecular structure of frizzled, a Drosophila
tissue polarity gene. Genetics
126,401
-416.
Axelrod, J. and McNeill, H. (2002). Coupling planar cell polarity signaling to morphogenesis. The Scientific World 2,434 -454.
Axelrod, J. D. (2001). Unipolar membrane
association of Dishevelled mediates Frizzled planar cell polarity signaling.
Genes Dev. 15,1182
-1187.
Brodsky, M. H. and Steller, H. (1996). Positional information along the dorsal-ventral axis of the Drosophila eye: graded expression of the four-jointed gene. Dev. Biol. 173,428 -446.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bryant, P. J., Huettner, B., Held, L. I., Jr, Ryerse, J. and Szidonya, J. (1988). Mutations at the fat locus interfere with cell proliferation control and epithelial morphogenesis in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 129,541 -554.[Medline]
Buckles, G. R., Rauskolb, C., Villano, J. L. and Katz, F. N.
(2001). Four-jointed interacts with dachs, abelson and enabled
and feeds back onto the Notch pathway to affect growth and segmentation in the
Drosophila leg. Development
128,3533
-3542.
Casal, J., Struhl, G. and Lawrence, P. (2002). Developmental compartments and planar polarity in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 12,1189 .[CrossRef][Medline]
Clark, H. F., Brentrup, D., Schneitz, K., Bieber, A., Goodman, C. and Noll, M. (1995). Dachsous encodes a member of the cadherin superfamily that controls imaginal disc morphogenesis in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 9,1530 -1542.[Abstract]
Cooper, M. T. and Bray, S. J. (1999). Frizzled regulation of Notch signalling polarizes cell fate in the Drosophila eye. Nature 397,526 -530.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dahmann, C. and Basler, K. (2000). Opposing transcriptional outputs of Hedgehog signaling and engrailed control compartmental cell sorting at the Drosophila A/P boundary. Cell 100,411 -422.[Medline]
Das, G., Reynolds-Kennedy, J. and Mlodzik, M. (2002). The atypical cadherin Flamingo links Frizzled and Notch signaling in Planar Polarity Establishment in the Drosophila eye. Dev. Cell 2,1 -20.[Medline]
Erkner, A., Roure, A., Charroux, B., Delaage, M., Holway, N.,
Core, N., Vola, C., Angelats, C., Pages, F., Fasano, L. and Kerridge, S.
(2002). Grunge, related to human Atrophin-like proteins, has
multiple functions in Drosophila development.
Development 129,1119
-1129.
Fanto, M. and Mlodzik, M. (1999). Asymmetric Notch activation specifies photoreceptors R3 and R4 and planar polarity in the Drosophila eye. Nature 397,523 -526.[CrossRef][Medline]
Garoia, F., Guerra, D., Pezzoli, M., Lopez-Varea, A., Cavicchi, S. and Garcia-Bellido, A. (2002). Cell behavior of Drosophila Fat cadherin mutations in wing development. Mech. Dev. 94, 95-109.[CrossRef]
Higashijima, S., Kojima, T., Michiue, T., Ishimaru, S., Emori, Y. and Saigo, K. (1992). Dual Bar homeo box genes of Drosophila required in two photoreceptor cells, R1 and R6, and primary pigment cells for normal eye development. Genes Dev. 6, 50-60.[Abstract]
Kauffmann, R. C., Li, S., Gallagher, P. A., Zhang, J. and Carthew, R. W. (1996). Ras1 signaling and transcriptional competence in the R7 cell of Drosophila. Genes Dev. 10,2167 -2178.[Abstract]
Koide, R., Ikeuchi, T., Onodera, O., Tanaka, H., Igarashi, S., Endo, K., Takahashi, H., Kondo, R., Ishikawa, A., Hayashi, T. et al. (1994). Unstable expansion of CAG repeat in hereditary dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA). Nat Genet. 6,9 -13.[Medline]
Lawrence, P. A., Casal, J. and Struhl, G.
(1999). The hedgehog morphogen and gradients of cell affinity in
the abdomen of Drosophila. Development
126,2441
-2449.
Mahoney, P. A., Weber, U., Onofrechuk, P., Biessmann, H., Bryant, P. J. and Goodman, C. S. (1991). The fat tumor suppressor gene in Drosophila encodes a novel member of the cadherin gene superfamily. Cell 67,853 -868.[Medline]
McNeill, H. (2002). Planar polarity: location, location, location. Curr. Biol. 12,R449 -R451.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagafuchi, S., Yanagisawa, H., Ohsaki, E., Shirayama, T., Tadokoro, K., Inoue, T. and Yamada, M. (1994). Structure and expression of the gene responsible for the triplet repeat disorder, dentatorubral and pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA). Nat Genet. 8,177 -182.[Medline]
Park, W. J., Liu, J. and Adler, P. N. (1994). The frizzled gene of Drosophila encodes a membrane protein with an odd number of transmembrane domains. Mech Dev. 45,127 -137.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rawls, A., Guinto, J. B. and Wolff, T. (2002). The cadherins, Fat and Dachsous, regulate dorsal/ventral signaling in the Drosophila eye. Curr. Biol. 12,1021 -1026.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schilling, G., Wood, J. D., Duan, K., Slunt, H. H., Gonzales, V., Yamada, M., Cooper, J. K., Margolis, R. L., Jenkins, N. A., Copeland, N. G. et al. (1999). Nuclear accumulation of truncated atrophin-1 fragments in a transgenic mouse model of DRPLA. Neuron 24,275 -286.[Medline]
Strutt, D. I. (2001). Asymmetric localization of frizzled and the establishment of cell polarity in the Drosophila wing. Mol. Cell 7,367 -375.[Medline]
Strutt, D., Johnson, R., Cooper, K. and Bray, S. (2002). Asymetric localization of Frizzled and the determination of Notch-dependent cell fate in the Drosophila eye. Curr Biol. 12,813 -824.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tomlinson, A. and Struhl, G. (1999). Decoding
vectorial information from a gradient: sequential roles of the receptors
Frizzled and Notch in establishing planar polarity in the Drosophila eye.
Development 126,5725
-5738.
Tree, D., Schulman, J., Rousset, R., Scott, M., Gubb, D. and Axelrod, J. D. (2002). Prickle mediates feedback amplification to generate asymmetric planar cell polarity signaling. Cell 109,371 -381.[Medline]
Usui, T., Shima, Y., Shimada, Y., Hirano, S., Burgess, R. W., Schwarz, T. L., Takeichi, M. and Uemura, T. (1999). Flamingo, a seven-pass transmembrane cadherin, regulates planar cell polarity under the control of Frizzled. Cell 98,585 -595.[Medline]
Villano, J. L. and Katz, F. N. (1995).
four-jointed is required for intermediate growth in the proximal-distal axis
in Drosophila. Development
121,2767
-2777.
Wolff, T. and Ready, D. (1993). Pattern formation in the Drosophila retina. In The Development of Drosophila melanogaster, pp. 1277-1325. Cold Sping Harbor, NY: Cold Sping Harbor Laboratory Press.
Wood, J. D., Nucifora, F. C., Jr, Duan, K., Zhang, C., Wang, J.,
Kim, Y., Schilling, G., Sacchi, N., Liu, J. M. and Ross, C. A.
(2000). Atrophin-1, the dentato-rubral and pallido-luysian
atrophy gene product, interacts with ETO/MTG8 in the nuclear matrix and
represses transcription. J. Cell Biol.
150,939
-948.
Yang, C., Axelrod, J. D. and Simon, M. A. (2002). Regulation of Frizzled by Fat-like cadherins during planar polarity signaling in the Drosophila compound eye. Cell 108,675 -688.[Medline]
Yang, C. H., Simon, M. A. and McNeill, H.
(1999). mirror controls planar polarity and equator formation
through repression of fringe expression and through control of cell
affinities. Development
126,5857
-5866.
Zeidler, M. P., Perrimon, N. and Strutt, D. I. (1999). The four-jointed gene is required in the Drosophila eye for ommatidial polarity specification. Curr. Biol. 9,1363 -1372.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zeidler, M. P., Perrimon, N. and Strutt, D. I. (2000). Multiple roles for four-jointed in planar polarity and limb patterning. Dev. Biol. 228,181 -196.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang, S., Xu, L., Lee, J. and Xu, T. (2002). Drosophila atrophin homolog functions as a transcriptional corepressor in multiple developmental processes. Cell 108, 45-56.[Medline]
Zheng, L., Zhang, J. and Carthew, R. W. (1995).
frizzled regulates mirror-symmetric pattern formation in the Drosophila eye.
Development 121,3045
-3055.