1 Centre de Génétique Moléculaire, CNRS batiment 26, 1 Avenue de la Terrasse, F-91198 Gif Sur Yvette, France
2 National Institute of Health, Building 38A, Room B2N13E, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: nicolas.lartillot{at}cgm.cnrs-gif.fr)
Accepted 26 December 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
J. D. Lambert and L. M. Nagy (2001) Development 128, 45-56
Key words: Brachyury, Mollusc, Gastrulation, AP axis, Teloblast, Patella vulgata
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Most comparisons are based on the molecular analysis of the development of a few model systems, such as various vertebrates, the fly Drosophila melanogaster, and the worm Caenorhabditis elegans. These species belong to two of the three main groups of Bilateria that have been recognised by recent phylogenetic analyses (Aguinaldo et al., 1997; Adoutte et al., 2000
), i.e. the deuterostomes and the ecdysozoans. In contrast, the third major group, the lophotrochozoans (e.g. annelids, molluscs and platyhelminths), has remained one of the weak points of the molecular survey of metazoan development.
In spite of the diversity of their body plans, many lophotrochozoans share a highly conserved and well documented early embryogenesis known as spiral cleavage (Freeman and Lundelius, 1992). Spiral cleavage is mostly characterised by an invariant cell lineage, during which stem cells for the main germ layers are rapidly segregated. In addition, it most often leads to the development of a free swimming larva, of which the trochophore, observed in many molluscs, annelids and sipunculans, is the prototype (Nielsen, 2001
). Because of the conspicuous nature of the cellular aspects of spiral development, and its remarkable conservation at the interphyletic level, lophotrochozoans have been a major focus of interest in classical embryology.
One of the most important variations on the spiral theme is the difference between equal and unequal cleavage (Freeman and Lundelius, 1992). In unequal cleavers, one of the blastomeres of the 4-cell stage is larger than the others, and gives rise to most of the posterior part of the adult, so that the AP axis is specified as soon as the 4-cell stage in these species. In contrast, equal cleavers do not depart from the four-fold symmetry until later in the cleavage period (the 32-cell stage in Patella). Whether this symmetry corresponds to a true developmental equivalence between the four blastomeres of the 4-cell stage has been a long standing issue (Arnolds et al., 1983
; Martindale et al., 1985
). A large set of experiments conducted on Patella vulgata have convincingly shown that the four quadrants are indeed initially truly equipotent, until the 32-cell stage (van den Biggelaar, 1977
; van den Biggelaar and Guerrier, 1979
; Arnolds et al., 1983
; Kühtreiber et al., 1988
). At this point, the four-fold symmetry is broken through a purely stochastic event, namely the competition between the four vegetalmost cells, that leads to the determination of one of them (called 3D), as the posterior pole of all subsequent morphogenesis. The bilateralisation of the embryo is soon illustrated by specific departures of the cleavage morphology of certain cells from the default, four-fold symmetrical pattern (van den Biggelaar, 1977
). These developmental events following the election of 3D, in turn, most probably involve 3D as an important inductive centre, although there is little evidence to demonstrate the way in which 3D acts as an organiser in equal cleaving Spiralia (Martindale, 1986
; Damen and Dictus, 1996
).
The gene Brachyury was first identified in mouse, where it was recognised to have a fundamental role in gastrulation, axial patterning and tail formation (Beddington et al., 1992), and was then rapidly isolated in many other vertebrates (Papaioannou and Silver, 1998
). In all species, Brachyury is expressed transiently during gastrulation around the blastopore, in the involuting mesoderm and endoderm, and its expression is subsequently restricted to notochord and tailbud (Wilkinson et al., 1990
; Herrmann, 1991
; Kispert and Herrmann, 1994
; Smith et al., 1991
; Schulte-Merker et al., 1992
; Kispert et al., 1995
). Genetic evidence, both in mouse (Wilson et al., 1995
; Wilson and Beddington, 1997
) and in zebrafish (Schulte-Merker et al., 1994
; Melby et al., 1996
) indicates that Brachyury is required for gastrulation, axial specification and caudal morphogenesis. Homologues have been identified in many other metazoan phyla. In the other diverse deuterostome lineages where it has been studied, in particular urochordates (Corbo et al., 1997
; Yasuo and Satoh, 1998
; Bassham and Postlethwait, 2000
) echinoderms (Harada et al., 1995
; Peterson et al., 1999b
; Shoguchi et al., 1999
) and hemichordates (Tagawa et al., 1998
; Peterson et al., 1999a
), Brachyury orthologues are always expressed from the very early stages of gastrulation, in the blastopore area, and have recurrent connections with gastrulation, morphogenetic movements, mesoderm formation and posterior patterning. Similarly, in Drosophila, the expression of brachyenteron, the Brachyury homologue, is restricted to the posterior part of the embryo (Kispert et al., 1994
), and is involved in the morphogenesis of the caudal part of the gut (Singer et al., 1996
), and of the visceral mesoderm (Kusch and Reuter, 1999
). An orthologue of Brachyury has recently been identified in a lophotrochozoan, the unequally cleaving annelid Platynereis dumerilii, and its post-gastrulation expression profile is remarkably similar to that found in the larva of hemichordates (Arendt et al., 2001
): in both cases, Brachyury is expressed in the lower part of the stomodaeum, the posterior tip of the larva and the ventral midline, highlighting a possible homology between the larval body plans between protostomes and deuterostomes.
We have isolated a Brachyury orthologue in Patella vulgata, which we named PvuBra. We show that PvuBra is expressed in the trochophore larva of Patella following a pattern identical to that of its orthologue in Platynereis. We further observed that PvuBra is expressed much earlier in development, first in the 3D blastomere of the 32-cell stage, and then on the posterior side of the embryo before and throughout gastrulation. We also demonstrate that the expression of Brachyury in 3D is controlled by the ERK MAP kinase cascade, and that ERK activation confers to 3D the ability to organise all aspects of the bilaterally symmetrical cell cleavage patterns observed in the vegetal region of the embryo, between the moment of 3D election and the start of gastrulation. Finally, a comparative analysis of Brachyury expression and function is given, in which we propose that Brachyury expression illuminates the evolution of gastrulation and AP axis specification at the scale of the Bilateria.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cloning and sequencing of PvuBra
Degenerate primers specific to Brachyury were designed and used in a nested PCR on Patella vulgata genomic DNA. A 310 pb product was amplified and cloned. 8 clones were sequenced and found to have identical sequence. Primers were forward BRA1W (NGRRMFP, nucleotide sequence 5'-AYGGNMGNMGNATGTTYCC-3') and reverse BRA3C (PFAKAF, nucleotide sequence 5'- RAANSCYTTNGCRAANGG-3') for the first round of amplification; forward BRA2W (WKYVNGEW, nucleotide sequence 5'-TGGAARTAYGTNAAYGGNGARTGG-3') and reverse BRA4C (AYQNEE, nucleotide sequence 5'-YTCYTCRTTYTGRTANGC-3') for the second round of amplification; forward BRA2W and reverse BRA5C (QFIAVTA, nucleotide sequence 5'-GCNGTNACNGCNATRAAYTG-3') for the third round.
Next, PCR extensions were performed on a staged mass-zapped cDNA library (16 hours post first cleavage), kindly provided by L. Nederbragt and A. Van Loon (Van Loon et al., 1991) using non-degenerate primers corresponding to the sequence of the 310 bp PCR fragment and primers in the arm of the plasmid in which the cDNAs are cloned. In this way, we isolated a cDNA of 2019 bp, coding for a 450 amino acid protein, homologous to a T-box transcription factor. The 1.5 kb fragment corresponding to the 3' part of the gene was used to generate a RNA probe for in situ hybridisation. The full sequence is available on the EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database (sequence number AJ420986).
Alignment and phylogenetic analysis
Sequences of Brachyury homologues and other T-box genes were gathered using the NCBI PubMed database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). All sequences were aligned with clustalX (Thompson et al., 1997), and only the conserved T-domain was kept for subsequent analysis. Phylogeny reconstruction was performed by Maximum Likelihood quartet puzzling, using the software Tree-puzzle (Strimmer and von Haeseler, 1996
). We used the JTT substitution model (Jones et al., 1992
), and let rate heterogeneity across sites being modelled by two rate categories (one constant and one variable). 10,000 puzzling steps were performed, and branches supported in less than half of the quartet trees were collapsed.
In situ hybridisation and Hoechst staining
RNA in situ hybridisations were performed as described elsewhere (Lespinet et al., 2002), with the following modifications: probe concentration was raised to 1 µg/ml, and hybridisation was performed at 68°C. Anti-DIG antibody was used at a 1:200 dilution, and alkaline phosphatase staining was performed at 37°C. In some cases, following the in situ hybridisation, the embryos were stained with Hoechst (5 µg/ml in TBS-T; 10 minutes of incubation) to highlight the nuclei of their cells. A detailed protocol is available on request.
Immunolabelling
Embryos were fixed for 1 hour in 4% paraformaldehyde in Mops, at the appropriate stage, and then stored in methanol. Next, they were transferred progressively to MNT buffer (150 mM NaCl, 100 mM maleic acid, pH 7.5, 0.1% Tween 20), blocked for 1 hour in MNT + 3% BSA, incubated in anti-dpERK (Sigma), at a dilution of 1:1000, for 1 hour, rinsed four times 10 minutes in MNT + 3% BSA, incubated in biotin-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (Jackson), rinsed four times 10 minutes in MNT. The VectaStain Biotin-Avidin amplification system was used, and the embryos were then labelled with DAB (Sigma). Washings and fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde were used to stop the staining reaction.
ERK inhibition
Erk inhibition was performed as described by Lambert and Nagy (Lambert and Nagy, 2001).
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Fig. 1A shows the predicted amino acid sequence of the PvuBra fragment that we have isolated. This has been aligned with a sample of Brachyury orthologues, as well as a few other T-box genes. Only the part of the alignment corresponding to the conserved T-domain (Fig. 1A) has been used to perform a Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic analysis (quartet puzzling) (Strimmer and von Haeseler, 1996). The tree that has been obtained is shown on Fig. 1B. PvuBra clusters reliably with other metazoan Brachyury homologues, showing that we have isolated a Brachyury orthologue in Patella vulgata.
|
|
|
About 1 hour after the 64-cell stage (5 h.p.f.c., Fig. 3C,G), transcripts are weak in 4D and in M (Fig. 3C,G). 3c1 and 3d1 have divided, and their daughters weakly express PvuBra. Their sister cells, 3c2 and 3d2, closest to the vegetal pole, show a notably stronger expression, and their cleavage is delayed, compared to 3c1 and 3d1. 2d22 shows a strong expression. 2d21 has divided, and a weak signal can be detected in 2d212. 15 to 30 minutes later; M has divided, and the paired mesentoblasts (Ml and Mr) have sunk into the blastocoel (Fig. 3K).
Later on (6 h.p.f.c.), transcripts have completely disappeared from 4D and Ml and Mr. From now on, expression of PvuBra is restricted to 3c, 3d and 2d2 derivatives (Fig. 3D-H). 3c2 and 3d2 have eventually divided, with their spindles aligned with the presumptive left-right axis. Their daughter cells display a high level of transcripts. Between 3c2 and 3d2 daughter cells, two cells can be seen that express PvuBra and, more posteriorly and markedly displaced to the right of the embryo (to the left on the picture), a cell derived from 2d212 shows a very weak, but consistently detectable expression (Fig. 3D-H). These three cells derive from 2d2, although it is very difficult to determine their exact lineage and cleavage schedule. Our interpretation is that 2d2 behaves like a stem cell, that will bud off the cells of the ventral midline. Subsequently, we will call it the midline stem cell (m.s.c.; see Discussion).
Thus, right at the start of gastrulation, the pattern becomes stabilised as follows (Fig. 3D,H,L). Six cells, descended from 3c, 2d and 3d, show strong PvuBra expression, and constitute the posterior edge of the blastopore. In addition, two pairs of bilateral cells, posterior to the vegetal plate, and originating from 3c1 and 3d1, express PvuBra at lower levels. The 3d1 and 3c1 daughter cells, respectively on the left and right posterior side of the vegetal plate, express PvuBra at lower levels. On each side, the anteriormost cells (3c12 and 3d12) are stomodaeum founder cells, or stomatoblasts, as in Nereis (Wilson, 1892), whereas the posteriormost cells (3c11 and 3d11) will end up in the terminal posterior region, and will contribute to the anus. 3c11 and 3d11 will thus be called the terminal cells. More posteriorly, on the left, is a larger cell, displaying still lower levels of PvuBra transcripts, the midline stem cell.
During the first phase of gastrulation (Fig. 4A), PvuBra expression is nearly lost by the midline stem cell and the two lateral wings. In contrast, the cells of the posterior edge of the blastopore remain positive for PvuBra during the whole period. Often, a faint expression is seen in the nuclei of endodermal macromeres migrating to the apical pole (not shown).
|
In the young free swimming trochophore (13 h.p.f.c., Fig. 4C), PvuBra is expressed in a strip of ectoderm below the stomodaeum, continuous with a strand of stained cells along the ventral midline and, at the posterior tip of the embryo, in two bilateral cells (terminal cells). This pattern is reminiscent of that seen for the Brachyury homologue in the trochophore larva of Platynereis (Arendt et al., 2001). In 24 hour larvae, the expression on the midline and in the terminal region has faded away (Fig. 4D). The ectoderm below the stomodaeum still expresses PvuBra. Four cells in the posteriormost part of the dorsal mantle edge have started to transcribe PvuBra RNA.
The overall process can now be summarised as follows (Fig. 5). PvuBra is transiently expressed in 3D (Fig. 5A), and then rapidly propagates to neighbouring 3c, 3d and 2d2 derivatives (Fig. 5B). These latter cells cleave in an orderly and bilateral fashion (Fig. 5C,D), and their derivatives mark the posterior edge of the blastopore. Then, during gastrulation (Fig. 5E-G), the posterior edge, still expressing PvuBra, migrates anteriorly, over the vegetal plate. The anteriormost cells derived from 3c1 and 3d1, the lateral stomatoblasts, are carried along, and finally contribute to the stomodaeum. Meanwhile, the posteriormost cells derived from 3c1 and 3d1, the terminal cells, stay behind and contribute to the anus. During the whole period, the midline stem cell, derived from 2d21, lags posteriorly as well, and, following our interpretation, buds off the cells of the midline. In this way, the pattern seen in the young trochophore (Fig. 5H) is completely derived from three founder cells: 3c, 3d and 2d2. Cells on the ventral midline originate from 2d2, whereas both the anterior and the terminal domains of expression are made up of 3d and 3c derivatives, on the left and right, respectively.
|
Labelling is only seen between the 32- and the 40-cell stages, in 3D (Fig. 6A), as in Chaetopleura. Staining is observed throughout the cytoplasm and, somewhat more intensely, in the nucleus and at the boundary that 3D shares with the roof of the blastocoel (Fig. 6B). Weak labelling is also detected in the three other macromeres (not shown). No labelling is seen in any other cell of the embryo, until after gastrulation. As ERK MAP kinase is known to be a mediator of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signalling in metazoans (Bier, 1998), this strongly suggests that a RTK is involved in the process of 3D determination, and furthermore, that high level of ERK activity might be necessary to mediate a 3D fate. In embryos simultaneously labelled with anti-dpERK antibody and PvuBra antisense probe, PvuBra was always detected in 3D together with dpERK (not shown). Thus, ERK MAP kinase and PvuBra expression are activated concomitantly, at least within a 20-minute window. This is compatible with PvuBra being a target of ERK MAP kinase signalling.
|
Embryos were selected at the 2- and 4-cell stage, raised until the 32-cell stage, and kept in U0126 during the following 5 hours. Two alternative doses of U0126 were used: a medium dose as in Lambert and Nagy (10 µM) (Lambert and Nagy, 2001), and a high dose (50 µM). Next, the embryos were fixed at regular intervals, examined for their cell cleavage pattern and their PvuBra expression profile.
In all embryos treated with U0126, the exclusive contact of one of the macromeres with the blastocoel roof is still observed, although it is less conspicuous when a higher concentration of the drug is applied (not shown). This quantitative dose-response behaviour suggests that residual MAP kinase activity is still present: indeed, when medium doses of U0126 are used, some labelling of 3D can be detected with the anti-dp-ERK antibody (not shown). No such labelling could be observed at high doses of ERK inhibitor. Although 3D determination seems to occur, the pattern of the 6th and 7th cleavage is clearly equalised, in the sense that, in all four quadrants, third quartet macromeres and micromeres divide synchronously, according to the A and B quadrant pattern (Fig. 7A). This was true in more than 75% of the embryos, whatever the dose of U0126 that had been applied (n=40 and n=19, for medium and high dose, respectively).
|
The overall morphology of the 24-hour trochophore larvae is somewhat disturbed (Fig. 7D), but the main traits of the body plan are present: foot, prototroch, and apical organ (n=8). Furthermore, PvuBra is expressed on the ventral side of the larvae, although not restricted to the midline (Fig. 7D). This indicates that no gross axial and gastrulation defects have resulted from ERK inhibition.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Possible roles for PvuBra in Patella early development
Since PvuBra is expressed in 3D, and then in the mesentoblast 4d, which gives rise to most of the adult mesoderm, one may wonder about a possible role of PvuBra in mesoderm specification. In vertebrates, Brachyury is expressed in mesodermal and endodermal derivatives, and has been claimed to have a central role in mesoderm formation (Smith et al., 1991; Isaacs et al., 1994
). However, genetic studies in mouse (Beddington et al., 1992
) and zebrafish (Schulte-Merker et al., 1994
) have not clearly established that Brachyury is specifically required for mesoderm specification, and have instead raised the interesting alternative that Brachyury might be involved in the morphogenetic movements of gastrulation (Wilson et al., 1995
; Wilson and Beddington, 1997
; Melby et al., 1996
).
In Patella, PvuBra expression in the mesentoblast 4d is very transient. In addition, besides 4d, the 3a, 3c and 2b cells also have a mesodermal fate in Patella (Dictus and Damen, 1997), and they were never seen to express PvuBra. Thus, PvuBra is not panmesodermal, which suggests that it does not have a fundamental role in mesoderm formation in Patella. In contrast, the expression of PvuBra in 4d is reminiscent of what is observed in Drosophila: at the blastoderm stage, brachyenteron is expressed in a posterior ring around the embryo, only the ventral part of which is fated to mesoderm, the caudal visceral mesoderm (CVM) (Kusch and Reuter, 1999
), giving rise to the longitudinal visceral muscles (LVM) (San Martin and Bate, 2001
). Upon invagination, this anlage soon looses brachyenteron transcripts, but the protein remains stable in these cells for quite a long time thereafter, and is required for most of the aspects of LVM morphogenesis and signalling. Such a stability at the protein level cannot be excluded in Patellas mesentoblast, and for that reason, PvuBra protein detection should be implemented.
The pattern of expression of PvuBra on the posterior edge of the blastopore of Patella gastrulating embryos is consistent with a role of PvuBra in morphogenetic movements. Furthermore, the behaviour of the mitotic spindles of 3c and 3d, right after 3D determination, also suggests that PvuBra might be involved in the regulation of unequal cell cleavages. As radialisation experiments in Patella have shown, all asymmetries and asynchronies of cell cleavages in the dorsal quadrant after the 64-cell stage can be interpreted as departures from a spiral default state, which are induced, directly or indirectly, by 3D. Brachyury is expressed at the right place and time to be involved in such modulations of cell cleavage morphology.
MAP kinase and the induction of 3D in Patella vulgata
ERK MAP kinase is activated at a low level in the four macromeres of the early 32-cell stage embryo, and then at a much higher level in 3D. These observations suggest two distinct roles for ERK activation: it could be required for the process of symmetry breaking proper, and in addition, high levels of ERK activity in 3D might be necessary for determining 3Ds fate, and in particular, its organising properties in the pre-gastrula.
Inhibition of ERK signalling, even partial, leads to an equalised cell division pattern. The cleavage is equalised as far as we have been able to analyse it (up to the 88-cell stage). This strongly indicates that part of 3D organising function in Patella early development, i.e. the regulation of cell cleavage asymmetries, requires ERK activity in 3D. Very similar cell cleavage modifications have also been observed in Ilyanassa as a result of ERK inhibition, including the suppression of 3c- and 3d-specific mitotic behaviour as opposed to 3a and 3b, and the effect of ERK inhibition on 4d (Lambert and Nagy, 2001). All these alterations are more pronounced in Patella, where for instance 4d divides synchronously with, and cannot be distinguished from the three other micromeres of the third quartet. This is probably due to the fact that, in Patella, the cleavage is perfectly equal until the 32-cell stage, and thus offers the ideal background to observe the lack of its 3D mediated regulation. Otherwise, the overall impression is that the role of ERK in the regulation of cell cleavage induced by 3D is well conserved in gastropods, irrespective of the differences observed between equal and unequal cleavers.
In addition, in ERK-inhibited embryos, PvuBra transcription is suppressed in 3D, which shows that PvuBra is a target of the ERK signalling cascade in 3D. This is all the more likely to be a direct epistatic relationship as no time lag could be resolved between dpERK detection and PvuBra transcripts localisation. More importantly, the correlation between the 3D-specific suppression of PvuBra activation and the equalisation of the cleavage pattern raises the interesting possibility that PvuBra expression in 3D might mediate at least part of ERK-dependent regulations of cell cleavage patterns.
However, interference with ERK signalling does not lead to a phenotype as extreme as that observed in embryos treated with monensin: following such a treatment, embryos are completely equalised, and in particular, no 3D blastomere is specified (Kühtreiber et al., 1988). In contrast, in the case of ERK inhibition, a 3D macromere is still determined, even when high doses of U0126 are applied, as indicated by the exclusive contacts of one of the macromeres to the blastocoel roof. In addition, PvuBra is still expressed asymmetrically, in 3c and 3d but not in 3a nor 3b. It is quite possible that ERK inhibition be only partial. Another interpretation would be that part of 3D organising role, that of inducing PvuBra expression in 3c, 3d and 2d2, is independent of ERK activity in 3D. A way to test this possibility is to identify and interfere with the molecular signals emitted by 3D. In Ilyanassa, in contrast, ERK signalling has been shown to be required in most aspects of embryonic patterning attributed to the organising role of the D quadrant (Lambert and Nagy, 2001
). An important fact that might explain why the consequences of ERK inhibition in Ilyanassa are stronger than in Patella is that, in Ilyanassa, ERK is activated not only in 3D, but also in all blastomeres that require induction by 3D.
At any case, the experiments shown here demonstrate that different aspects of bilateral symmetry specification are differentially controlled in a spiral cleaving embryo: the regulation of cell cleavage timing and morphology requires high level of ERK signalling, whereas transcriptional regulation, except for 3D-specific PvuBra activation, seems to be partly independent of ERK, or to require only low levels of its activity. Surprisingly, ERK-inhibited embryos show substantial regulative abilities, and seem to accomplish a fairly complete gastrulation, as witnessed by their more or less normally patterned trochophore, in spite of the suppression of all the early bilateral cleavage patterns.
Finally, the combined involvement of the ERK MAP kinase signalling cascade and PvuBra in 3D induction in Patella raises interesting questions about a possible conservation of their interactions among Bilateria. Indeed, Brachyury is also activated by FGF in vertebrates (Smith et al., 1991), while in Drosophila, the Brachyury homologue brachyenteron is downstream of the Torso RTK (Singer et al., 1996
; Kusch and Reuter, 1999
). A crucial point here is to identify the RTK involved in the process of 3D election in Patella. Two likely candidates would be FGF and EGF receptors.
Brachyury as a marker of the blastopore
In the young trochophore, PvuBra is expressed in a domain encompassing the ectoderm right below the stomodaeum, as well as two bilateral terminal cells and, in-between, the ventral midline. This expression pattern is nearly identical to that of the orthologue of Brachyury in the young trochophore larvae of Platynereis (Arendt et al., 2001). In order to interpret this expression profile, it should be stressed that a different mode of gastrulation prevails in the two species. In Platynereis, gastrulation is amphistomous (as in Nereis) (Wilson, 1892
): when closing, the blastopore takes the shape of an 8, the anterior and posterior loop of which give birth to mouth and anus opening, respectively. Only in a second step is the ventral midline formed, by invasion of the space in-between the two loops by more lateral cells (Fig. 8). In Patella, in contrast, gastrulation is of a protostomous type, the blastopore giving rise to the mouth only, and the anus breaking through secondarily. However, results from classical comparative embryology tend to show that gastrulation was probably amphistomous in the common ancestor of the so-called protostomes (Nielsen, 2001
), so that Patellas protostomous gastrulation can be considered a secondary modification.
|
One can go further along this line of reasoning: indeed, as in Patella and Platynereis, Brachyury orthologues are expressed in the ventral part of the mouth and around the anus in the larvae of the hemichordate Ptychodera (Tagawa et al., 1998) and the echinoderm Asterina (Shoguchi et al., 1999
). By extension of our argument, this would tend to indicate, not only a one to one homology between foregut and hindgut in protostome and deuterostome larvae, as proposed previously (Arendt et al., 2001
), but also the important fact that amphistomy is ancestral to Bilateria (Jägersten, 1955
; Arendt and Nubler-Jung, 1997
; Technau, 2001
). One could suppose that, in the lineage leading to the last common ancestor of all Bilateria, Brachyury was expressed around the posterior half of the closed blastopore. There, its primitive function could have been in the regulation of morphogenetic movements of gastrulation and convergent extension, as well as the maintenance of the posterior growth zone.
Posterior functions of Brachyury among Bilateria
Another striking aspect of PvuBra expression profile is that it illuminates the progressive growth of the AP axis during gastrulation in Patella (see Fig. 5). PvuBra is expressed in 3D, and then in 2d2 which, according to our interpretation, behaves like a stem cell, budding off the cells of the ventral midline. This interpretation is mostly based on the assumption of cellular continuity of PvuBra expression, and awaits further experimental confirmation. Another report of stem cells for the ventral midline ectoderm was made by Robert (Robert, 1902), in Trochus, although in this case, not only 2d2, but also 2d12 contributes to the midline ectoderm. More generally, posterior stem cells, or teloblasts, are seen in other spiralians, such as annelids (Weisblat and Shankland, 1985
), where they give rise to most of the ectoderm and the mesoderm of the trunk. Significantly, these teloblasts are derived from the D quadrant exclusively. Thus, in spiralians, the D quadrant seems to play a conserved role in AP axis formation, in that it gives birth to the posterior growth zone*. The results we have obtained in Patella underline the teloblastic mode of AP axis formation that also prevails in molluscs and, more importantly, suggest that Brachyury might be involved in the developmental activity of the posterior pole.
On a broader scale, it appears that the progressive growth of the AP axis, in an anterior to posterior sequence, and through the activity of a posterior growth zone, is observed in diverse phyla across Bilateria as, for instance, in short-germ insects, polychaetes and chordates. In vertebrates, the posterior pole of the developing axis is the organiser, in the form of the superior lip of the blastopore of fish and frog, or the node of amniotes, and later on, the chordo-neural hinge of the tail bud. Brachyury is expressed in the vertebrate organiser during the major part of embryonic development, and genetic studies in mouse and fish show that this expression is necessary for AP axis formation (Wilson and Beddington, 1997; Melby et al., 1996
). Similarly, in Patella, as soon as the four-fold symmetry has been broken, PvuBra is a expressed in the D quadrant, and remains a marker of the posterior pole of the AP axis up to the end of larval development, until the whole axis is laid down. This striking similarity is in favour of the hypothesis that the progressive growth of the AP axis represents a conserved developmental process which, already in Urbilateria, would have taken the form of an organising posterior growth zone, controlled by a genetic system involving Brachyury, among others. This posterior pole would have evolved into the organiser of vertebrates, and into the set of teloblasts in Spiralia.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Adoutte, A., Balavoine, G., Lartillot, N., Lespinet, O., Prudhomme, B. and de Rosa, R. (2000). The new animal phylogeny: reliability and implications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4453-4456.
Aguinaldo, A. M., Turbeville, J. M., Linford, L. S., Rivera, M. C., Garey, J. R., Raff, R. A. and Lake, J. A. (1997). Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature 387, 489-493.
Arendt, D. and Nubler-Jung, K. (1997). Dorsal or ventral: similarities in fate maps and gastrulation patterns in annelids, arthropods and chordates. Mech. Dev. 61, 7-21.[Medline]
Arendt, D., Technau, U. and Wittbrodt, J. (2001). Evolution of the bilaterian larval foregut. Nature 409, 81-85.[Medline]
Arnolds, J. A., van den Biggelaar, J. A. M. and Verdonk, N. H. (1983). Spatial aspects of cell interactions involved in the determination of dorsoventral polarity in equally cleaving gastropods and regulative abilities of their embryos, as studied by micromere deletions in Lymnea and Patella. Rouxs Arch. Dev. Biol. 192, 75-85.[Medline]
Bassham, S. and Postlethwait, J. (2000). Brachyury (T) expression in embryos of a larvacean urochordate, Oikopleura dioica, and the ancestral role of T. Dev. Biol. 220, 322-332.
Beddington, R. S., Rashbass, P. and Wilson, V. (1992). Brachyury a gene affecting mouse gastrulation and early organogenesis. Development Suppl. 157-165.[Medline]
Bier, E. (1998). Localized activation of RTK/MAPK pathways during Drosophila development. BioEssays 20, 189-194.
Corbo, J. C., Levine, M. and Zeller, R. W. (1997). Characterization of a notochord-specific enhancer from the Brachyury promoter region of the ascidian, Ciona intestinalis. Development 124, 589-602.[Medline]
Damen, P. and Dictus, W. J. (1996). Organiser role of the stem cell of the mesoderm in prototroch patterning in Patella vulgata (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Mech. Dev. 56, 41-60.
DeRobertis, E. M. and Sasai, Y. (1996). A common plan for dorsoventral patterning in Bilateria. Nature 380, 37-40.[Medline]
Dictus, W. J. and Damen, P. (1997). Cell-lineage and clonal-contribution map of the trochophore larva of Patella vulgata (mollusca). Mech. Dev. 62, 213-226.[Medline]
Freeman, G. and Lundelius, J. W. (1992). Evolutionary implications ofthe mode of D quadrant specification in coelomates with spiral cleavage. J. Evol. Biol. 5, 205-247.[Medline]
Gabay, L., Seger, R. and Shilo, B. Z. (1997). MAP kinase in situ activation atlas during Drosophila embryogenesis. Development 124, 3535-3541.
Harada, Y., Yasuo, H. and Satoh, N. (1995). A sea urchin homologue of the chordate Brachyury (T) gene is expressed in the secondary mesenchyme founder cells. Development 121, 2747-2754.
Herrmann, B. G. (1991). Expression pattern of the Brachyury gene in whole-mount TWis/TWis mutant embryos. Development 113, 913-917.
Isaacs, H. V., Pownall, M. E. and Slack, J. M. (1994). eFGF regulates Xbra expression during Xenopus gastrulation. EMBO J. 13, 4469-4481.[Abstract]
Jägersten, G. (1955). On the early phylogney of the Metazoa. Zool. BiDr. Uppsala 30, 321-354.[Abstract]
Jones, D. T., Taylor, W. R. and Thornton, J. M. (1992). The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8, 275-282.
Kispert, A. and Herrmann, B. G. (1994). Immunohistochemical analysis of the Brachyury protein in wild-type and mutant mouse embryos. Dev. Biol. 161, 179-193.[Abstract]
Kispert, A., Herrmann, B. G., Leptin, M. and Reuter, R. (1994). Homologs of the mouse Brachyury gene are involved in the specification of posterior terminal structures in Drosophila, Tribolium, and Locusta. Genes Dev. 8, 2137-2150.[Medline]
Kispert, A., Ortner, H., Cooke, J. and Herrmann, B. G. (1995). The chick Brachyury gene: developmental expression pattern and response to axial induction by localized activin. Dev. Biol. 168, 406-415.[Abstract]
Kühtreiber, W. M., van Til, E. H. and van Dongen, C. A. M. (1988). Monensin interferes with the determination of the mesodermal cell line in embryos of Patella vulgata. Rouxs Arch. Dev. Biol. 197, 10-18.[Medline]
Kusch, T. and Reuter, R. (1999). Functions for Drosophila brachyenteron and forkhead in mesoderm specification and cell signalling. Development 126, 3991-4003.
Lambert, J. D. and Nagy, L. M. (2001). MAPK signaling by the D quadrant embryonic organizer of the mollusc Ilyanassa obsoleta. Development 128, 45-56.
Lespinet, O., Nederbragt, A. J., Cassan, M., Dictus, W. J. A. G., van Loon, A. E. and Adoutte, A. (2002). Characterization of two snail genes in the gastropod mollusc Patella vulgata. Implications for understanding the ancestral function of the snail-related genes in Bilateria. Dev. Genes. Evol. (in press).
Martindale, M. Q. (1986). The organizing role of the D quadrant in an equal-cleaving spiralian, Lymnea stagnalis, as studied by UV laser deletion of macromeres at intervals between third and fourth quartet formation. Int. J. Inv. Reprod. Dev. 9, 229-242.
Martindale, M. Q., Doe, C. Q. and Morrill, J. B. (1985). The role of animal-vegetal interaction with respect to the determination of dorsoventral polarity in the equal-cleaving spiralian, Lymnaea palustris. Rouxs Arch. Dev. Biol. 194, 281-295.
Melby, A. E., Warga, R. M. and Kimmel, C. B. (1996). Specification of cell fates at the dorsal margin of the zebrafish gastrula. Development 122, 2225-2237.
Nielsen, C. (2001). Animal Evolution. Interrelationships of the Living Phyla. Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Papaioannou, V. E. and Silver, L. M. (1998). The T-box gene family. BioEssays 20, 9-19.[Medline]
Peterson, K. J., Cameron, R. A., Tagawa, K., Satoh, N. and Davidson, E. H. (1999a). A comparative molecular approach to mesodermal patterning in basal deuterostomes: the expression pattern of Brachyury in the enteropneust hemichordate Ptychodera flava. Development 126, 85-95.[Medline]
Peterson, K. J., Harada, Y., Cameron, R. A. and Davidson, E. H. (1999b). Expression pattern of Brachyury and Not in the sea urchin: comparative implications for the origins of mesoderm in the basal deuterostomes. Dev. Biol. 207, 419-431.
Robert, A. (1902). Recherche sur le développement des Troques. Arch. Zool. Exp. 3e Série. 10, 269-538.[Medline]
San Martin, B. and Bate, M. (2001). Hindgut visceral mesoderm requires an ectodermal template for normal development in Drosophila. Development 128, 233-242.
Schulte-Merker, S., Ho, R. K., Herrmann, B. G. and Nusslein-Volhard, C. (1992). The protein product of the zebrafish homologue of the mouse T gene is expressed in nuclei of the germ ring and the notochord of the early embryo. Development 116, 1021-1032.
Schulte-Merker, S., van Eeden, F. J., Halpern, M. E., Kimmel, C. B. and Nusslein-Volhard, C. (1994). no tail (ntl) is the zebrafish homologue of the mouse T (Brachyury) gene. Development 120, 1009-1015.
Shoguchi, E., Satoh, N. and Maruyama, Y. K. (1999). Pattern of Brachyury gene expression in starfish embryos resembles that of hemichordate embryos but not of sea urchin embryos. Mech. Dev. 82, 185-189.
Singer, J. B., Harbecke, R., Kusch, T., Reuter, R. and Lengyel, J. A. (1996). Drosophila brachyenteron regulates gene activity and morphogenesis in the gut. Development 122, 3707-3718.[Medline]
Slack, J. M. W., Holland, P. W. H. and Graham, C. F. (1993). The Zootype and the phylotypic stage. Nature 361, 490-492.
Smith, J. C., Price, B. M., Green, J. B., Weigel, D. and Herrmann, B. G. (1991). Expression of a Xenopus homolog of Brachyury (T) is an immediate-early response to mesoderm induction. Cell 67, 79-87.[Medline]
Strimmer, K. and von Haeseler, A. (1996). Quartet Puzzling: A quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 964-969.[Medline]
Tagawa, K., Humphreys, T. and Satoh, N. (1998). Novel pattern of Brachyury gene expression in hemichordate embryos. Mech. Dev. 75, 139-143.
Technau, U. (2001). Brachyury, the blastopore and the evolution of the mesoderm. BioEssays 23, 788-794.[Medline]
Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. and Higgins, D. G. (1997). The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4876-4882.[Medline]
van den Biggelaar, J. A. (1977). Development of dorsoventral polarity and mesentoblast determination in Patella vulgata. J. Morphol. 154, 157-186.
van den Biggelaar, J. A. and Guerrier, P. (1979). Dorsoventral polarity and mesentoblast determination as concomitant results of cellular interactions in the mollusk Patella vulgata. Dev. Biol. 68, 462-471.[Medline]
Van Loon, A. E., Colas, P., Goedemans, H. J., Neant, I., Dalbon, P. and Guenier, P. (1991). The role of cyclins in the maturation of Patella vulgata oocytes. EMBO J. 10, 3343-3349.[Medline]
Weisblat, D. A. and Shankland, M. (1985). Cell lineage and segmentation in the leech. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Series B 312, 39-56.[Abstract]
Wilkinson, D. G., Bhatt, S. and Herrmann, B. G. (1990). Expression pattern of the mouse T gene and its role in mesoderm formation. Nature 343, 657-659.
Wilson, E. B. (1892). The cell-lineage of Nereis. A contribution to the cytogeny of the annelid body. J. Morphol. 6, 361-480.[Medline]
Wilson, V. and Beddington, R. (1997). Expression of T protein in the primitive streak is necessary and sufficient for posterior mesoderm movement and somite differentiation. Dev. Biol. 192, 45-58.
Wilson, V., Manson, L., Skarnes, W. C. and Beddington, R. S. (1995). The T gene is necessary for normal mesodermal morphogenetic cell movements during gastrulation. Development 121, 877-886.[Medline]
Yasuo, H. and Satoh, N. (1998). Conservation of the developmental role of Brachyury in notochord formation in a urochordate, the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi. Dev. Biol. 200, 158-170.