1 MRC Centre for Developmental Neurobiology, Kings College London, Guys Campus, New Hunts House, London SE1 1UL, UK
2 International Institute of Genetics and Biophysics, CNR, Via G. Marconi 12, 80125, Naples, Italy
3 IST-National Institute for Cancer Research, Università di Genova, Largo Benzi, 16132 Genova, Italy
4 Dipartimento di Oncologia Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Genova, Largo Benzi, 16132 Genova, Italy
* These authors contributed equally to this work
Author for correspondence (e-mail: antonio.simeone{at}kcl.ac.uk)
Accepted May 8, 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Otx2, Translational control, 3' UTR, Visceral endoderm, Epiblast, Brain evolution, Mouse
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Otx1 and Otx2 animal models (Otx1 knockout; Otx2 knockout; Otx1/Otx2 double mutant) have indicated that these two genes play a key role in brain and sense organ development. Indeed, Otx1 is required for corticogenesis and the differentiation of visual and acoustic sense organ structures (Acampora et al., 1996), while Otx2 for early specification of the neuroectoderm fated to become the fore-mid and rostral hindbrain (Acampora et al., 1995; Matsuo et al., 1995; Ang et al., 1996). Both Otx genes are required for brain regionalisation and patterning (Acampora et al., 1997; Suda et al., 1997).
Further studies on chimaeric embryos and mouse models have allowed the uncoupling of Otx2 requirements and assigned them to two distinct phases and cell types: early induction of anterior neural patterning, under visceral endoderm (VE) control, and its subsequent maintenance, mediated by epiblast-derived cells such as axial mesendoderm (ame) and anterior neuroectoderm (ane) (Acampora et al., 1998b; Rhinn et al., 1998; Acampora and Simeone, 1999; Beddington and Robertson, 1999).
In particular, the analysis of embryos in which Otx2 is replaced with a human Otx1 cDNA has also revealed that while the human OTX1 mRNA is transcribed in both the VE and epiblast, the human OTX1 protein is synthesised only in the VE. This VE-restricted translation was sufficient to recover Otx2 requirements for the specification of anterior neural patterning and proper organisation of the primitive streak, but it failed to maintain anterior patterning (Acampora et al., 1998b).
This unexpected phenomenon has suggested the possibility that a differential post-transcriptional control may exist between VE and epiblast, and that the Otx2 replaced region, including 200 bp of the 5' untranslated region (UTR), the entire coding region, introns and the 3' UTR, may contain regulatory elements required for epiblast-restricted translation of Otx2 mRNA. To address this issue, we have generated a mouse model that carries a 300 bp long insertion of exogenous DNA from the phage into the 3' UTR of Otx2 with the aim of perturbing its post-transcriptional control.
We report that 65% of the homozygous Otx2/Otx2
embryos exhibited head abnormalities with exencephaly and microcephaly, while 100% of embryos carrying one copy of the mutated allele in an Otx2 null background (Otx2
/-) showed a severe reduction of the rostral brain. A detailed analysis has revealed that, when compared with the wild type, the Otx2
mRNA was properly distributed in the embryo, its level was slightly reduced, while the amount of protein was drastically diminished in epiblast, ame and ane, owing to an impairment of its ability to form efficient polyribosome complexes. Interestingly, alignment of Otx2-3' UTR sequences from several species has revealed a 140 bp long element that is conserved only in vertebrate Otx2 genes.
These findings provide experimental evidence that, in mouse, proper brain development requires accurate translational control of Otx2 in epiblast cells and their derivatives in order to establish Otx2-dependent maintenance properties of forebrain and midbrain territory. Furthermore, we also hypothesise that the establishment of this type of translational control seems to correlate with the transition to a more complicated vertebrate brain, that of gnathostomes (jawed vertebrates).
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Mouse production and genotyping
Two independent positive clones were injected into C57BL/6 blastocysts and the resulting chimaeric males back-crossed to B6/D2 F1 females. Genotyping was performed by PCR using two primers specific for the wild-type allele (open arrowheads in Fig. 1A; sense primer, AGATCATCCTGGACTTGGAG; antisense primer, CCCTTTCCTTGCTAAAGTTTCC) and two primers specific for the sequence (black arrowheads in Fig. 1A; sense primer, AACTGCAGTGTACAGCGGTCA; antisense primer, GGATCCCCATAATGCGGCT). These primers amplify two DNA fragments 234 and 300 bp long, respectively (Fig. 1C).
RNAse protection assay
RNAse protection was performed as previously described (Simeone et al., 1993). In order to analyse Otx2 and wild-type Otx2 mRNA in the same assay, we used a 200 bp long PCR fragment that contained 15 bp of the
sequence and 185 bp further upstream in the Otx2 sequence (probe c in Fig. 1A). Phosphorimager scanning was performed to quantify RNA levels. For the in vitro synthesised Otx2
RNA (see Fig. 5B), we used as template a 1.5 kb clone containing the
tag and the entire Otx2 coding sequence.
|
Polysome gradients and RNA purification
Sucrose gradients were performed essentially as described (Loreni and Amaldi, 1992). Gradients were collected in nine fractions of 1 ml each. An ultarviolet (254 nm) absorbance profile of the gradient was produced by ribosomal RNA while flowing through a spectrophotometer, in order to assign to each fraction the number of ribosomes bound to mRNA. Gels were processed for phosphorimager scanning and polysome gradient profiles were determined by calculating the values of each fraction as percentage of the total hybridisation signal.
Nuclear and cytoplasmic RNAs were isolated with a similar procedure from 10.5 d.p.c. heads. Nuclei were lysed in 400 µl of 2% SDS and 1 µg/ml proteinase K.
Immunohistochemistry
For immunohistochemistry, embryos were processed as previously reported (Acampora et al., 1998b). Otx2/Otx2
were generated by intercrossing surviving Otx2
/Otx2
mice. A total of 20 Otx2+/-, 20 Otx2
/Otx2
and 14 Otx2
/- embryos was analysed.
In situ hybridisation and probes
In situ hybridisation experiments on sections and whole embryos were performed as previously described (Hogan et al., 1994; Simeone, 1999).
Probes for Wnt1, BF1 (Foxg1 Mouse Genome Informatics), Fgf8, Six3, Gbx2, Cer-l (Cer1 Mouse Genome Informatics) and Lim1 (Lhx1 Mouse Genome Informatics) were the same previously described (Acampora et al., 1997; Acampora et al., 1998b). The Chd probe spanned nucleotide 145 to 2016 of the full-length mouse cDNA. The probe (probe d in Fig. 1A) was a PCR fragment corresponding to the
DNA insertion. The Otx2 probe employed in in situ hybridisation experiments on gastrulating wild-type embryos was probe (a) in Fig. 1A. The Otx2 probe for whole-mount in situ hybridisation was a murine fragment containing the entire coding sequence.
Sequence analysis
Bestfit analysis between zebrafish (Li et al., 1994; Accession Number U14592) and mouse Otx2-3' UTRs highlighted the conserved element of 140 bp. FastA (GCG program package, EMBL, Heidelberg) search performed on the GenEMBL and GenBank EST databases with the 140 bp element retrieved the same region from human (Accession Number AC023079, chromosome 14) and rat Otx2 genes, only. No significant homology was detected with any other sequence.
By using Stringsearch program from the GCG package, the Otx2 cDNA sequences from sea urchin (Sakamoto et al., 1997; Accession Number AB011526), Ascidia (Wada et al., 1996; Accession Number D84062), Amphioxus (Williams and Holland, 1998; Accession Number AF043740), lamprey (Ueki et al., 1998; Accession Number AB012299) and Xenopus (Blitz and Cho, 1995; Accession Number U19813) were identified. The Xenopus Otx2-3' UTR sequence was incomplete and was extended through a series of homology searches (ESTs AI031472 and AI031473) and cDNA sequencing. Drosophila otd mRNA has been reported by Filkenstein et al. (Filkenstein et al., 1990), and in the genome clone accession number AE003444. Chicken Otx2 mRNA was cloned and sequenced.
The Otx2-3' UTR regions from the different species were analysed with the Bestfit program from the GCG package and the BioEdit program.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Head abnormalities in Otx2 mutants
Morphology of Otx2 mutant embryos was analysed at 8, 10.5 and 16 d.p.c. At 8 d.p.c. no obvious abnormalities were detected in Otx2
/Otx2
and Otx2
/- embryos (data not shown). At 10.5 d.p.c. 65% of the Otx2
/Otx2
embryos exhibited brain abnormalities (Table 1). Phenotypic sorting showed that 54% of them (Table 1) presented moderate brain defects with exencephaly, lack of closure of neural tube (Fig. 2B) or microcephaly with midbrain and forebrain reduction (Fig. 2C), and 11% of them displayed severe brain defects (Table 1) with heavy reduction of forebrain and midbrain (data not shown). No obvious abnormalities were detected on the residual Otx2
/Otx2
embryos and 10% of Otx2
/Otx2
mutants were viable and fertile, even though they exhibited reduction in fertility and, occasionally, abnormal motor activity.
|
|
Furthermore, in all the Otx2/- embryos heavy abnormalities in the maxillary process and mandibular arch, as well as in their derivatives, were observed (Fig. 2D,E,I,J).
OTX2 protein was specifically reduced in epiblast and its derivatives
The morphology of Otx2/- embryos has led us to suspect that during gastrulation Otx2
mRNA and/or protein may be affected. Hence, Otx2 and Otx2
transcripts and proteins were analysed at early streak (6.5 d.p.c.) and late streak/early headfold stages (7.75 d.p.c.) in wild-type, Otx2+/-, Otx2
/Otx2
and Otx2
/- embryos (Fig. 3).
|
When compared with wild-type and Otx2+/- embryos, distribution of Otx2 mRNA appeared unaffected in the epiblast and VE at 6.5 d.p.c. (compare Fig. 3A,B with 3C,D), as well as in ane and ame at 7.75 d.p.c. (compare Fig. 3E,F with 3G,H). Immunodetection of adjacent sections was performed with an anti-OTX2 polyclonal antibody (
-OTX2) (Mallamaci et al., 1996; Acampora et al., 1998b). The specificity of this antibody to OTX proteins has been previously assessed (Acampora et al., 1998b). At 6.5 d.p.c., in wild-type (Fig. 3A') and Otx2+/- (Fig. 3B') embryos, the OTX2 protein was detected with a similar strength in the epiblast and VE, even if in Otx2+/- embryos it appeared uniformly reduced.
At the same stage, in contrast with a robust expression of the Otx2 mRNA, the OTX2
protein levels became selectively reduced in the epiblast cells, while they remained high in the VE (Fig. 3C',D'), an important internal control in these experiments.
At 7.75 d.p.c., the general scenario did not change. Indeed, while the Otx2 mRNA distribution appeared to be normal (compare Fig. 3E,F with 3G,H), the OTX2
protein diminished. In particular, the staining of Otx2
/Otx2
embryos was similar to that of Otx2+/- and weaker than that of wild-type embryos (compare Fig. 3G',K with 3F',J and 3E',I), while in Otx2
/- (Fig. 3H',L) it appeared to be severely decreased. In all the 7.75 d.p.c. Otx2
/- embryos (n=6), the OTX2
-positive cells were localised in the rostralmost neuroectoderm and displayed heterogeneity in the strength of the signal (Fig. 3L).
Next, the OTX2 protein level was assessed by performing western blot assays on independent pools of wild-type, Otx2+/-, Otx2
/Otx2
and Otx2
/- embryos at 7.5 d.p.c. (see also Materials and Methods). Very similar results were obtained in these experiments, indicating that the amounts of OTX2
protein in Otx2
/Otx2
and Otx2
/- embryos were, respectively, 40% and 20% of the one measured in wild-type embryos (Fig. 4A-C), and 90% and 40% of that detected in Otx2+/- embryos (Fig. 4A-C).
|
Reduced ability of Otx2 mRNA to form efficient polyribosome complexes
In order to determine the molecular events that were impaired in the post-transcriptional control of the Otx2 mRNA, we studied whether the Otx2
mRNA was efficiently transcribed, processed and translated in heterozygous Otx2
/Otx2 embryos. Otx2
and wild-type mRNAs were simultaneously detected by using the probe c (Fig. 1A and see also Materials and Methods). RNAse protection experiments were performed to detect total, cytoplasmic and nuclear transcripts that were quantified by phosphorimager scanning.
Compared with the wild-type Otx2 mRNA, total, cytoplasmic and nuclear Otx2 mRNA levels had decreased by approximately 20% (Fig. 5A), suggesting that this decrease cannot alone be sufficient to explain both OTX2
protein decrease and phenotypic abnormalities. Moreover, as nuclear and cytoplasmic Otx2
mRNAs underwent a similar reduction, nucleo-cytoplasmic export and processing should be unaffected. On this basis, the quantitative reduction should be ascribed to perturbation in transcription and/or stabilisation of the Otx2
mRNA. In this context, however, actinomycin D experiments performed in the Otx2
/Otx2 ES cell line did not reveal any difference in half life between the wild-type and the Otx2
mRNAs (t1/2=90 minutes) (data not shown). From these data, we suspect that the targeting vector may interfere with transcription of Otx2 mRNA.
Next, we analysed the ability of Otx2 and Otx2 cytoplasmic mRNAs to form polyribosome complexes, in order to assess whether the translation of the Otx2
mRNA was impaired. Cytoplasmic extracts from 10.5 d.p.c. heads were fractionated on sucrose gradients (see Materials and Methods). In a pilot experiment, in vitro synthesised Otx2
RNA was added to a wild-type cytoplasmic extract to give a negative control. ß-actin and wild-type Otx2 were analysed in the same assay. According to the length of the ß-actin (350 amino acid) and OTX2 (289 amino acid) proteins,
50% of the ß-actin and Otx2 mRNAs was concentrated in the first two fractions, corresponding to the ones that contained polyribosome complexes with >10 and 8-10 ribosomes respectively, while
70% of the in vitro synthesised Otx2
RNA was concentrated in fractions that contained the 40S and 60S subunits (Fig. 5B).
The same experiment was performed on Otx2/Otx2 embryos at 7.75 d.p.c. and 10.5 d.p.c. (Fig. 5C,D). Interestingly, while ß-actin and Otx2 mRNAs were correctly distributed, only
25% of the Otx2
mRNA was detected in the first two fractions.
The percentage of Otx2 and Otx2 mRNAs detected in the third fraction was similar (Fig. 5C,D), while the percentage of Otx2
mRNA in the second fraction was remarkably inferior. This suggests that the Otx2
mRNA was affected in its ability to form the most efficient polyribosome complexes. Altogether, these data indicate that the reduced level of OTX2
protein is largely due to an impairment of Otx2
mRNA translation.
Proper onset and abnormal maintenance of forebrain and midbrain territory in Otx2 mutants
In order to characterise the morphological defects of Otx2 mutant embryos, the expression patterns of several diagnostic genes were analysed.
At 6.5 d.p.c., the expression of Otx2, cer-l, Lim1 and goosecoid (Gsc) (not shown) revealed no abnormalities either in the AVE or the primitive streak of Otx2
/Otx2
(data not shown) and Otx2
/- (Fig. 6B,D,F) embryos, thus indicating that none of the Otx2-dependent VE impairments were evident (Acampora et al., 1995; Acampora et al., 1998b; Matsuo et al., 1995; Ang et al., 1996; Rhinn et al., 1998).
|
In all the Otx2/Otx2
(data not shown) and Otx2
/- (Fig. 6H,J,L,N,P) embryos, all these markers were correctly expressed and retained their spatial relationships. Therefore, despite the selective depletion of OTX2
protein in the epiblast, ane and ame, the OTX2
protein synthesised in the VE was sufficient to promote normal specification of early anterior pattern.
Morphological abnormalities of Otx2/Otx2
and Otx2
/- embryos became evident at 8.5-8.75 d.p.c., and were obvious at 10.5 d.p.c. Forebrain and midbrain regional identities along the rostral CNS were assessed at 8.5 d.p.c. and 10.5 d.p.c. by analysing the expression of Otx2 (forebrain and midbrain territory (Figs 7A, 8A)), Fgf8 and Gbx2 (the isthmic primordium at the mid-hindbrain boundary (MHB) (Figs 7D,G, 8D,G)), Wnt1 (the midbrain (Fig. 7J)) and BF1 (the forebrain (Figs 7M, 8M)).
|
|
In Otx2/- embryos, the expression patterns were more abnormal. The Otx2 expression domain was smaller (Fig. 7C), and unable to antagonise anterior spread of Fgf8 and Gbx2 transcripts that were remarkably anteriorised within the Otx2 expression domain (Fig. 7F,I). Wnt1 was expressed in the rostralmost neuroectoderm (Fig. 7L) and BF1 expression was not detected in the anterior neuroectoderm (Fig. 7O). At 10.5 d.p.c., in Otx2
/Otx2
, Otx2
was expressed in a smaller domain (Fig. 8B); Fgf8 (Fig. 8E) and Gbx2 (Fig. 8H) were slightly expanded within the posterior domain of Otx2 expression; and BF1 was detected in a smaller domain of the presumptive telencephalon (Fig. 8K). In Otx2
/- embryos, Otx2
(Fig. 8C) was transcribed along the rostralmost neuroectoderm; Fgf8 (Fig. 8F) and Gbx2 (Fig. 8I) transcripts were detected along an extended area largely overlapping the Otx2
positive domain; and BF1 (Fig. 8R) was never detected, thus indicating the lack of forebrain region.
These findings indicate that impairment of Otx2 translational control in epiblast-derived cells (ane and ame) is reflected in severe abnormalities of rostral CNS.
A highly conserved sequence in the Otx2-3' UTR of vertebrates
Our data indicated that the insertion interfered with translational control of Otx2
mRNA but they did not help in identifying potential regulatory elements within the Otx2-3' UTR.
For this purpose, a computer screening analysis for conserved sequences within the 3' UTR was performed. For most 3' UTRs, the sequence became available only recently (see Materials and Methods). Strikingly, from this analysis it appeared that a 140 bp long sequence element was fully conserved in all the Otx2-3' UTRs of gnathostomes such as human, mouse, chicken, frog and zebrafish and a vestigial portion (26 bp long) was present in lamprey, an agnathan vertebrate (Fig. 9A-C).
|
Hence, the insertion between the stop codon and the conserved element might have affected the stability and/or the formation of secondary structure(s) required for the binding of regulatory factor(s) or for the assembly of efficient polyribosome complexes. Therefore, sequence analysis has revealed a highly conserved element in the Otx2-3' UTRs of gnathostome vertebrates having a common plan of brain organisation. We propose that this element may represent a positive regulator acquired during evolution and promoting or enhancing translation of Otx2 mRNA in epiblast or neuronal progenitor cells. In this context, the vestigial conservation of the lamprey Otx2-3' UTR may represent a transient and still evolutionary unstable condition.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
This second phase is mediated by vertical signal(s) from the ame directed to the overlying neuroectoderm and planar signals from local organising centres such as the anterior neural ridge and the isthmic organizer (IsO) operating in the plane of the neuroectoderm (Martinez et al., 1991; Crossley et al., 1996; Shimamura and Rubenstein, 1997; Beddington and Robertson, 1999; Stern, 2001; Wurst and Bally-Cuif, 2001).
A precise hierarchy of transcriptional events regulate the sequential activation of genes controlling the formation of body plan as well as the fate of different cell types. This final event is mediated by molecular interactions generating gradients of morphogenetic signals (De Robertis et al., 2000). Translational control plays a leading role in regulating fate decisions during cell differentiation and embryonic development (Curtis et al., 1995; Dubnau and Struhl, 1996; Gavis et al., 1996; Rivera-Pomar et al., 1996; Preiss and Hentze, 1999; Ostareck et al., 2001). In Drosophila oogenesis and early embryogenesis, translational regulation has been shown to be essential for the generation of protein gradients and determination of both the embryonic axis and cell fate (Curtis et al., 1995; Gavis et al., 1996). Interactions between 5' and 3' UTR sequences represent a constant and important molecular aspect of this control.
Nevertheless, to our knowledge no examples of such translational control have so far been provided during early decisions regarding specification and maintenance of early anterior patterning in mouse.
The analysis of a previous mouse mutant where Otx2 is replaced with human OTX1 has suggested differential post-transcriptional control of the OTX1 mRNA between the VE and epiblast cells that is maintained during subsequent development of the rostral neuroectoderm. The lack of OTX proteins in epiblast and neuroectoderm is invariably reflected in the lack of forebrain and midbrain identity (Acampora et al., 1998b; Acampora and Simeone, 1999).
This led us to hypothesise that the Otx2 replaced region might contain regulatory elements required for its post-transcriptional control (mRNA processing and/or translation). Alternatively, as in OTX1 mutants the Otx2 locus was heavily engineered, abnormal non physiological molecular events affecting RNA stability, processing, transport or translation may be responsible for the lack of human OTX1 protein.
To settle this important issue, we have generated a mouse model carrying a 300 bp long insertion of exogenous DNA of the phage within the Otx2-3' UTR, with the aim of perturbing Otx2 post-transcriptional control in the epiblast and derived tissues. Our findings have indicated that translation of Otx2
mRNA is markedly impaired in the epiblast and neuroectoderm of mutant embryos but not in the VE.
Transcription was only slightly reduced and processing and nucleo/cytoplasmic export of Otx2 mRNA appeared unaffected. The relevance of this impairment in translational control was highlighted by head abnormalities detected in Otx2
/Otx2
and Otx2
/- embryos.
Otx2 is one of the genetic determinants that plays a significant role in patterning the rostral neuroectoderm (reviewed by Simeone, 1998; Simeone, 2000; Acampora and Simeone, 1999; Stern 2001; Wurst and Bally-Cuif, 2001) and, indeed, from late gastrula/early somite stage onward, it performs this role by both positioning the IsO at the MHB and conferring appropriate competence to neural tissue responding to inductive signals from the IsO (Simeone, 2000; Wurst and Bally-Cuif, 2001; J. P. M.-B. and A. S., unpublished).
This Otx2-dependent function is highly sensitive to variations in protein level. Indeed, reduction below a critical threshold or ectopic gain of OTX2 protein correspond to reduction or increase in the size of forebrain and midbrain territory, respectively (Simeone, 2000; Wurst and Bally-Cuif, 2001). Otx1-/-; Otx2+/- double mutants display transformation of midbrain and posterior diencephalon in an expanded metencephalon (Acampora et al., 1997); in hOtx12/hOtx12 embryos, the entire forebrain and midbrain are replaced with the metencephalon (Acampora et al., 1998b), while, by contrast, mice expressing Otx2 under En1 transcriptional control move the MHB posteriorly and increase the extent of the posterior midbrain (Broccoli et al., 1999).
We have shown that Otx2 mutants (Fig. 2C) exhibit two additional hypomorphic phenotypes: Otx2
/Otx2
mutants were similar to Otx1-/-; Otx2+/- double mutants or revealed a moderate anterior repositioning of the MHB and additional abnormalities affecting the size and the shape of forebrain, as well as the closure of neural tube (Figs 2B and 8); 90% of Otx2
/- mutants was almost headless (Fig. 2D). Even a relatively small reduction of OTX2 protein below a critical threshold corresponding to a normal single copy was phenotypically translated in head abnormalities. Indeed, compared with Otx2+/- embryos that are viable and fertile, Otx2
/Otx2
showed a 10% reduction in the OTX2 protein and 65% of them revealed head abnormalities.
Therefore, these results provide evidence that Otx2 may have developed a regulatory mechanism that allows its efficient translation in epiblast and derived tissues. This positive control has permitted the availability of a critical amount of OTX2 protein sufficient and necessary to maintain and/or stabilise early forebrain and midbrain regional identities.
Impaired translation of Otx2 mRNA in epiblast but not in VE
The aim of this work has been to demonstrate the existence and molecular nature of the Otx2 post-transcriptional control acting in epiblast and neuronal progenitors, in order to finely regulate the appropriate amount of OTX2 protein. We have demonstrated that a sequence perturbation in the 3' UTR affects the ability of the Otx2 mRNA to form efficient polyribosome complexes. Indeed, the Otx2
mRNA is able to bind ribosomes but exhibits an intrinsic difficulty to be complexed with the expected number of ribosomes. Indeed, when compared with the sharp and abundant (
40%) peak of the wild-type Otx2 mRNA, only
20% of the Otx2
mRNA is distributed in the same fraction containing the most efficient number of ribosomes and
80% is spread in those fractions containing fewer ribosomes or single ribosome subunits. Moreover, the Otx2
mRNA is not sequestered into translationally silent ribonucleic particles and is not concentrated in the fraction corresponding to the 40S.
This profile suggests that the progressive recruitment of ribosomes is affected. In this context, formation of the small ribosomal subunit-initiation factor complex or scanning of the 5' UTR by the complex before the identification of the AUG initiator codon might be affected. The presence of secondary structures in the 5' UTR sequence might interfere or delay ribosome scanning (Curtis et al., 1995; Preiss and Hentze, 1999).
In this context, the Otx2-5' UTR sequence may potentially give rise to stable stem-loop structures (data not shown). Nevertheless, as the only structural abnormality in the Otx2 transcription unit affects the 3' UTR, an eventual impairment in ribosomal scanning should imply that the 3' and 5' UTRs interact with each other to relieve the structural block. This being the case, our findings are more compatible with a reduced efficiency of the 3' UTR in interacting with the 5' UTR. This may explain why efficient polyribosome complexes are assembled but in a reduced number. Additional impairment caused by the
DNA insertion may involve the correct formation of RNA secondary structure(s) that interact with factor(s) necessary to control polyadenylation or cellular localisation of the mRNA (Curtis et al., 1995; Preiss and Hentze, 1999). These factors may operate as translational repressors or enhancers. Nevertheless, while further experiments are required to address which translational control mechanism is affected, our data have provided direct evidence that VE and epiblast cells possess differential translational control properties with respect to the Otx2
mRNA. This phenomenon is particularly intriguing because it is revealed only when a mutant Otx2 mRNA is analysed. Indeed, the wild-type Otx2 mRNA is translated in all the cells in which it is transcribed, thus indicating that the translational control highlighted in the Otx2
mutants is normally bypassed. This implies that VE cells should possess a translational control machinery that is able to translate Otx2 mRNA independently from its sequence complexity, whereas epiblast cells should be provided with a different translational control machinery competent to translate only the wild-type Otx2 mRNA.
This observation is also strengthened by previous mouse models replacing Otx2 with OTX1 cDNA, or lacZ or Drosophila otd cDNA (Acampora et al., 1995; Acampora et al., 1998b; D. A. and A. S., unpublished). However, it cannot be excluded that translational control of Otx2 mRNA might be affected also in the VE. Nevertheless VE-restricted property mediated by OTX2 appeared unaffected. When compared with epiblast cells, this might be due to a more efficient accumulation of OTX2 protein or to a higher rate of Otx2 gene transcription.
Translational control of Otx2 and vertebrate brain evolution
Compared with other genes translationally regulated to perform important decisions during embryonic development and/or cell differentiation (Curtis et al., 1995; Dubnau and Struhl, 1996; Rivera-Pomar et al., 1996; Preiss and Hentze, 1999; Ostareck at al., 2001), the Otx2 translational control should be considered from a different perspective: it might represent an acquired gain of function that has eluded epiblast-restricted negative translational control. As a consequence, the forebrain and midbrain maintenance property has been conferred to neuronal precursor cells.
The direct correlation between efficient translation of Otx2 mRNA in neuronal progenitor cells and maintenance of forebrain and midbrain territory may have important evolutionary implications. Stabilisation of forebrain and midbrain territory, and appropriate OTX2 protein level may be a direct consequence of efficient translational control acquired during evolution. Should this be the case, it is conceivable that regionalisation of forebrain and midbrain territory, and translational control of Otx2 mRNA appear contemporary and are inseparable. Therefore, this control should have been established or improved when an elaborated brain with obvious regionalisation appears during evolution. Indeed, the architectural components of the vertebrate brain (telencephalon, diencephalon and mesencephalon) are much less clear in protochordates, including cephalochordates and tunicates (Kuhlenbeck, 1973; Nieuwenhuys, 1998).
On this basis, it may be argued that the original and more primitive function of Otx2 was probably restricted to VE-like cells, in order to instruct proper gastrulation and to contribute to activation of specification of the anterior neuroectoderm but not to its maintenance. Moreover, as suggested by Otx2-null embryos, OTX2 protein was required in VE cells also to mediate Otx2 transcriptional activation in epiblast cells. (Acampora et al., 1995). Therefore, it is conceivable that the invariable transcription of Otx2 in the anterior neuroectoderm of protochordates and chordates is the consequence of its primary function in the primitive endoderm (Wada et al., 1996; Williams and Holland, 1996; Williams and Holland, 1998; Reichert and Simeone, 1999). Epiblast restricted translation of Otx2 mRNA might represent a secondary regulatory event that is coincident to and responsible for a deep modification of fate and morphogenesis of anterior neuroectoderm. This event, together with other important molecular modifications involving gene duplication and diversification, recruitment of new genetic functions into pre-existing developmental pathways and the establishment of new developmental pathways, may have greatly contributed to define and refine the basic genetic program underlying the evolution of the vertebrate brain.
Accordingly, modification of Otx2 translational control might have contributed to the evolution of the mammalian brain; for example, by increasing the extent of neuroectodermal territory recruited to form the brain. This event might involve an improvement of proliferative activity of early neuronal progenitors (Acampora et al., 1998a; Acampora et al., 1999) and/or the positioning of the MHB (Acampora et al., 1997; Acampora et al., 1998b; Suda et al., 1997). Interestingly, computer analysis has indicated that the Otx2-3' UTR of all gnathostome vertebrates analysed retains a highly conserved 140 bp long element (> 80% of identity) whereas in lamprey, the length of the conserved element is reduced to 26 bp. No significant homology is detected in the Otx2-3' UTR from protochordates, echinoderms and insects or with any other sequence.
This structural conservation is evident only in those species possessing a regionalised brain (vertebrate brain), and our in vivo data do not exclude that the Otx2 positive translational control may be functionally related to the conserved element. Accordingly, it is tempting to speculate that it may represent the vertebrate positive regulatory element that, by mediating epiblast-restricted translational control of Otx2 mRNA, has contributed to instruct brain morphogenesis. Forthcoming mouse models will experimentally address this crucial issue.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Acampora, D., Mazan, S., Lallemand, Y., Avantaggiato, V., Maury, M., Simeone, A. and Brûlet, P. (1995). Forebrain and midbrain regions are deleted in Otx2-/- mutants due to a defective anterior neuroectoderm specification during gastrulation. Development 121, 3279-3290.
Acampora, D., Mazan, S., Avantaggiato, V., Barone, P., Tuorto, F., Lallemand, Y., Brûlet, P. and Simeone, A. (1996). Epilepsy and brain abnormalities in mice lacking Otx1 gene. Nat. Genet. 14, 218-222.[Medline]
Acampora, D., Avantaggiato, V., Tuorto, F. and Simeone, A. (1997). Genetic control of brain morphogenesis through Otx gene dosage requirement. Development 124, 3639-3650.
Acampora, D., Avantaggiato, V., Tuorto, F., Barone, P., Reichert, H., Finkelstein, R. and Simeone, A. (1998a). Murine Otx1 and Drosophila otd genes share conserved genetic functions required in invertebrate and vertebrate brain development. Development 125, 1691-1702.
Acampora, D., Avantaggiato, V., Tuorto, F., Briata, P., Corte, G. and Simeone, A. (1998b). Visceral endoderm-restricted translation of Otx1 mediates recovering of Otx2 requirements for specification of anterior neural plate and proper gastrulation. Development 125, 5091-5104.
Acampora, D., Avantaggiato, V., Tuorto, F., Barone, P., Perera, M., Choo, D., Wu, D., Corte, G. and Simeone, A. (1999). Differential transcriptional control as the major molecular event in generating Otx1-/- and Otx2-/- divergent phenotypes. Development 126, 1417-1426.
Acampora, D. and Simeone, A. (1999). Understanding the roles of Otx1 and Otx2 in controlling brain morphogenesis. Trends Neurosci. 22, 116-122.[Medline]
Ang, S.-L., Jin, O., Rhinn, M., Daigle, N., Stevenson, L. and Rossant, J. (1996). Targeted mouse Otx2 mutation leads to severe defects in gastrulation and formation of axial mesoderm and to deletion of rostral brain. Development 122, 243-252.
Beddington, R. S. and Robertson, E. J. (1999). Axis development and early asymmetry in mammals. Cell 96, 195-209.[Medline]
Biltz, I. L. and Cho, K. W. (1995). Anterior neuroectoderm is progressively induced during gastrulation: the role of the Xenopus homebox gene orthodenticle. Development 121, 993-1004.
Broccoli, V., Boncinelli, E. and Wurst, W. (1999). The caudal limit of Otx2 expression positions the isthmic organizer. Nature 401, 164-168.[Medline]
Crossley, P. H., Martinez, S. and Martin, G. R. (1996). Midbrain development induced by FGF8 in the chick embryo. Nature 380, 66-68.[Medline]
Curtis, D., Lehmann, R. and Zamore, P. D. (1995). Translational regulation in development. Cell 81, 171-178.[Medline]
De Robertis, E. M. and Sasai, Y. (1996). A common plan for dorsoventral patterning in the Bilateria. Nature 380, 37-40.[Medline]
De Robertis, E. M., Larraìn, J., Oelgeschläger, M. and Wessely, O. (2000). The stablishment of Spemmans organizer and patterning of the vertebrate embryo. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1, 171-181.[Medline]
Dubnau, J. and Struhl, G. (1996). RNA recognition and translational regulation by a homeodomain protein. Nature 379, 694-699.[Medline]
Finkelstein, R., Smouse, D., Capaci, T. M., Spradling, A. C. and Perrimon, N. (1990). The orthodenticle gene encodes a novel homeodomain protein involved in the development of the Drosophila nervous system and ocellar visual structures. Genes Dev. 4, 1516-1527.[Abstract]
Gavis, E. R., Lunsford, L., Bergsten, S. E. and Lehmann, R. (1996). A conserved 90 nucleotide element mediates translational repression of nanos RNA. Development 122, 2791-2800.
Hogan, B., Beddington, R., Costantini, F. and Lacy, E. (1994). In Manipulating the Mouse Embryo. A Laboratory Manual. 2nd edn. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Holland, P. W. H. (1999). The future of evolutionary developmental biology. Nature 402 Suppl., C41-C44.[Medline]
Kuhlenbeck, H. (1973). The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates. Basel: Karger.
Li, Y., Allende, M. L., Finkelstein, R. and Weinberg, E. S. (1994). Expression of two zebrafish orthodenticle-related genes in the embryonic brain. Mech. Dev. 48, 229-244[Medline]
Loreni, F. and Amaldi, F. (1992). Translational regulation of ribosomal protein synthesis in Xenopus cultured cells: mRNA relocation between polysomes and RNA during nutritional shifts. Eur. J. Biochem. 205, 1027-1032.[Abstract]
Mallamaci, A., Di Blas, E., Briata, P., Boncinelli, E. and Corte, G. (1996). OTX2 homeoprotein in the developing central nervous system and migratory cells of the olfactory area. Mech. Dev. 58, 165-178.[Medline]
Martinez, S., Wassef, M. and Alvarado-Mallart, R.-M. (1991). Induction of a mesencephalic phenotype in the 2 day-old chick prosencephalon is preceded by the early expression of the homeobox gene en. Neuron 6, 971-981.[Medline]
Matsuo, I., Kuratani, S., Kimura, C., Takeda, N. and Aizawa, S. (1995). Mouse Otx2 functions in the formation and patterning of rostral head. Genes Dev. 9, 2646-2658.[Abstract]
Nieuwenhuys, R. (1998). Morphogenesis and general structure: In The Central Nervous System Of Vertebrates. Vol. 1 (ed. R. Nieuwenhuys, H. J. ten Donkelaar and C. Nicholson), pp. 159-228. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Ostareck, D. H., Ostareck-Lederer, A., Shatsky, I. N. and Hentze, M. W. (2001). Lipoxygenase mRNA silencing in erythroid differentiation: the 3' UTR regulatory complex controls 60S ribosomal subunit joining. Cell 104, 281-290.[Medline]
Pombal, M. A. and Puelles, L. (1999). Prosomeric map of the lamprey forebrain based on calretinin immunocytochemistry, Nissl stain, and ancillary markers. J. Comp. Neurobiol. 414, 391-422.[Medline]
Preiss, T. and Hentze, M. (1999). From factors to mechanisms: translation and translational control in eukaryotes. Curr. Opin. Gen Dev. 9, 515-521.[Medline]
Reichert, H. and Simeone, A. (1999). Conserved usage of gap and homeotic genes in patterning the CNS. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 589-595.[Medline]
Rhinn, M., Dierich, A., Shawlot, W., Behringer, R. R., Le Meur, M. and Ang, S.-L. (1998). Sequential roles for Otx2 in visceral endoderm and neuroectoderm for forebrain and midbrain induction and specification. Development 125, 845-856.
Rivera-Pomar, R., Niessing, D., Schmidt-Ott, U., Gehring, W.J. and Jäckle, H. (1996). RNA binding and translational suppression by bicoid. Nature 379, 746-749.[Medline]
Rubenstein, J. L. R., Shimamura, K., Martinez, S. and Puelles, L. (1998). Regionalization of the prosencephalic neural plate. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 445-477.[Medline]
Sakamoto, N., Akasaka, K., Mitsunaga-Nakatsubo, K., Takata, K., Nishitani, T. and Shimada, H. (1997). Two isoforms of orthodenticle-related proteins (HpOtx) bind to the enhancer element of sea urchin arylsulfatase gene. Dev. Biol. 181, 284-295.[Medline]
Shimamura, K. and Rubenstein, J. L. R. (1997). Inductive interactions direct early regionalization of the mouse forebrain. Development 124, 2709-2718.
Simeone, A., Acampora, D., Gulisano, M., Stornaiuolo, A. and Boncinelli, E. (1992). Nested expression domains of four homeobox genes in developing rostral brain. Nature 358, 687-690.[Medline]
Simeone, A., Acampora, D., Mallamaci, A., Stornaiuolo, A., DApice, M. R., Nigro, V. and Boncinelli, E. (1993). A vertebrate gene related to orthodenticle contains a homeodomain of the bicoid class and demarcates anterior neuroectoderm in the gastrulating mouse embryo. EMBO J. 12, 2735-2747.[Abstract]
Simeone, A. (1998). Otx1 and Otx2 in the development and evolution of the mammalian brain. EMBO J. 17, 6970-6978.
Simeone, A. (1999). Detection of mRNA in tissue sections with radiolabelled riboprobes. In In Situ Hybridization. A Practical Approach. 2nd edn (ed. D. G. Wilkinson), pp 69-86. Oxford: IRL, Oxford University Press.
Simeone, A. (2000). Positioning the isthmic organizer where Otx2 and Gbx2 meet. Trends Genet. 16, 237-240.[Medline]
Stern, C. (2001). Initial patterning of the central nervous system: how many organizers? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 92-98.[Medline]
Suda, Y., Matsuo, I. and Aizawa, S. (1997). Cooperation between Otx1 and Otx2 genes in developmental patterning of rostral brain. Mech. Dev. 69, 125-141.[Medline]
Tam, P. P. L. and Behringer, R. R. (1997). Mouse gastrulation: the formation of a mammalian body plan. Mech. Dev. 68, 3-25.[Medline]
Ueki, T., Kuratani, S., Hirano, S. and Aizawa, S. (1998). Otx cognates in a lamprey, Lampetra japonica. Dev. Genes Evol. 208, 223-228.[Medline]
Wada, S., Katsuyama, Y., Sato, Y., Itoh, C. and Saiga, H. (1996). Hroth an orthodenticle-related homeobox gene of the ascidian, Halocynthia roretzi: its expression and putative roles in the axis formation during embryogenesis. Mech. Dev., 60, 59-71.[Medline]
Williams, N. A. and Holland, P. W. H. (1996). Old head on young shoulders. Nature 383, 490.
Williams, N. A. and Holland, P. W. (1998). Gene and domain duplication in the chordate Otx gene family: insights from amphioxus Otx. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 600-607.[Abstract]
Wurst, W. and Bally-Cuif, L. (2001). Neural plate patterning: upstream and downstream of the isthmic organizer. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 99-108.[Medline]