1 Program in Developmental Biology, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada
2 Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
3 Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
4 Cornell Theory Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
5 OSI Pharmaceuticals, Uniondale, NY 11553, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: lipshitz{at}sickkids.ca)
Accepted 4 February 2002
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: hindsight, Eye, Drosophila, Planar polarity, Jun kinase, Epithelial integrity, F-actin, Morphogenesis
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
One of the developmental events initiated shortly after specification of clusters of presumptive R cells is establishment of planar polarity in the imaginal disc epithelium. In a process regulated by so-called tissue polarity genes, each of the R-cell precursor clusters senses the direction of the furrow progression and receives polarity information from its more mature neighbors (reviewed by Mlodzik, 1999). The R-cell cluster rotates through 90°, so that the R3/R4 pair, which initially faced the furrow, comes to face the dorsal or ventral pole of the disc. This rotation occurs in opposite directions in the dorsal and ventral halves of the disc, creating an axis of global mirror image symmetry known as the equator. Each cluster also loses its initial bilateral symmetry and becomes chiral as the R4 cell loses contact with the R8 cell and moves to a more equatorial position. The Jun kinase (JNK) signaling pathway has been shown to play a prominent role in creating the distinction between R3 and R4 cell fates during the establishment of planar polarity in the eye (Weber et al., 2000
). When an activated form of the JUN transcription factor is expressed in the R3 and R4 precursor cells, it gives rise to a symmetrical, a misrotated or a chirally reversed ommatidium (Weber et al., 2000
).
During pupal stages, the apical faces of the R cells undergo a stereotypical series of interactions that are associated with the expansion of the apical surface downwards to meet the cone cell plate at the floor of the ommatidium (Longley and Ready, 1995; Sang and Ready, 2002
). The apical surface of each R cell is mechanically anchored to the cone cell plate prior to further deepening of the retina (Cagan and Ready, 1989a
; Longley and Ready, 1995
). As terminal differentiation occurs, a photosensitive organelle the rhabdomere forms at the apical surface of each R cell and eventually spreads down the entire cell length. The apical faces of the interacting R cells, which are enriched for F-actin, Armadillo, DE-cadherin and Crumbs, are dynamically rearranged during photoreceptor morphogenesis (Sang and Ready, 2002
). It is not clearly understood what molecules direct the longitudinal expansion of the apical surface or of its rhabdomere, although recent evidence suggests a role for eyes closed, which encodes the p47 co-factor of a p97 ATPase that is implicated in membrane fusion, in regulation of photoreceptor morphogenesis (Sang and Ready, 2002
).
The hindsight (hnt) gene (peb FlyBase) encodes a nuclear zinc-finger protein with all of the hallmarks of a transcription factor (Yip et al., 1997). In the embryo, hnt function is required for germband retraction (Lamka and Lipshitz, 1999
; Yip et al., 1997
), dorsal closure (Reed et al., 2001
) and tracheal morphogenesis (Wilk et al., 2000
). Expression of the hnt gene is required in the amnioserosa to downregulate JNK signaling in that tissue and to create a sharp distinction between the epidermal and amnioserosal tissue (Reed et al., 2001
). In hnt mutants, the expression of the JUN target genes, decapentaplegic (dpp) and puckered (puc), persists inappropriately in the amnioserosa, leading to failure of dorsal closure (Reed et al., 2001
). The leading edge cells of the epidermis neither undergo appropriate cell shape changes nor accumulate apicolateral F-actin or phosphotyrosine-containing proteins characteristic of the focal complex seen in wild-type embryos at the boundary between the leading edge and the amnioserosa (Reed et al., 2001
). In addition to a role in regulating JNK signaling during dorsal closure, HNT function is necessary for the maintenance of tracheal epithelia (Wilk et al., 2000
). In hnt mutants the tracheal system initially develops normally but, by stage 15, the epithelium loses its integrity and forms sacs and vesicles. The mutants also lack apical extracellular structures known as taenidia, suggesting that terminal differentiation of the tracheal cells is defective (Wilk et al., 2000
).
We describe the role of HNT during eye development. We show that the HNT protein is expressed in all of the photoreceptor cell precursors in developing eye discs. Examination of a hnt temperature-sensitive allele and analyses of chimeras carrying patches of cells homozygous for lethal hnt alleles suggest that there are at least five functions of HNT during eye development. First, HNT is necessary immediately posterior to the morphogenetic furrow for the correct morphology and arrangement of cells in the ommatidial precluster (which contains the R8, R2, R5, R3 and R4 precursor cells), as well as for the specification of the R2, R5, R3 and R4 precursor cells. Second, HNT function is necessary in the outer R cells for the establishment of correct chirality and rotation of the ommatidia. This tissue polarity function may involve downregulation of the JNK signaling cascade by HNT. Third, HNT function is required to maintain ommatidial structure and integrity during the mid-pupal stage. Fourth, HNT function is required in each R cell to accomplish apical-basal extension of the cell and its rhabdomere as the adult retina is assembled in the pupal period. Finally, HNT function is required for the separation of the rhabdomeres of neighboring cells that occurs during the late pupal period. Thus, HNT possesses both eye-specific functions (precluster patterning) and general functions (regulation of the F-actin-based cytoskeleton, regulation of JNK-mediated processes, control of tissue integrity) in development. We speculate that regulation of a single molecular pathway involving cell-cell or cell-extracellular matrix adhesion, or communication, underlies all of these functions.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
FLP-induced clones in the eye disc
Clones were induced in the eye according to standard protocols (Harrison and Perrimon, 1993; Xu and Rubin, 1993
). First instar larvae were heat-shocked for 1.5 hours in a waterbath at 38.5°C. Larval eye discs were dissected from third instar larvae and double antibody stained with the antibody of interest and
-HNT, the latter enabling identification of clones. Scars were scored in the adult or pupa and these were found at a frequency of approximately 50% among the class of flies that had the genotype required for a FLP-induced event.
Immunohistochemistry, histochemistry, X-Gal staining, histology and microscopy
Antibody staining of eye discs was carried out using standard protocols (Wolff, 2000). Primary antibodies used were: mouse
-HNT monoclonal (27B8 1G9 at 1:25 dilution) (Yip et al., 1997
); rabbit
-ß-Galactosidase (
-ß-gal; 1:1000; Cappel); mouse
-Phosphotyrosine monoclonal (
-PY; 1:500, Upstate Biotechnology), mouse
-Boss monoclonal (at 1:1000 dilution) (Van Vactor et al., 1991
); rabbit
-Spalt (at 1:500 dilution) (Barrio et al., 1999
), mouse
-Glass monoclonal (at 1:5 dilution) (Moses and Rubin, 1991
). All secondary antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:250 and were obtained from Jackson Immunoresearch: these were horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated goat
-mouse antibody, HRP-conjugated goat
-rabbit antibody, FITC-conjugated goat
-mouse antibody and TRITC-conjugated goat
-mouse antibody. Visualization of F-actin using FITC-conjugated phalloidin (Sigma) was according to Wolff (Wolff, 2000
). X-Gal staining was carried out as described elsewhere (Wolff, 2000
). For double staining with the
-HNT antibody, the discs were first fixed in 4% formaldehyde in 1xphosphate-buffered saline (PBS) on ice. The X-Gal staining was then carried out overnight. Afterwards, the discs were washed thoroughly and then placed in primary
-HNT antibody. The rest of the protocol was carried out as for antibody staining. Cell death was detected using an Apoptag S1760 direct detection kit (Intergen). Standard methods were used to prepare histological sections of adult eyes (Tomlinson and Ready, 1987
). A Zeiss Axioplan microscope was used for light microscopy and images were captured with a Spot digital camera (Diagnostic Instruments). A Zeiss Axiovert 100 microscope with LSM510 software was used for laser confocal microscopy. Images were processed and displayed using Photoshop software (Adobe). Samples were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using standard methods (Ready et al., 1976
). A Hitachi S570 microscope was used to view the eyes.
Heat treatments
For the Notch experiment, Nts1 larvae were shifted to 32°C for 24 hours as described elsewhere (Cagan and Ready, 1989b). Third instar larval discs were then dissected and stained with the
-HNT antibody. For temperature shift experiments, 1 hour hntpeb egg collections were raised at either 18°C or 29°C and then shifted either up or down at 12 hour intervals. Once adult flies had eclosed, their eyes were scored for external roughness under a dissecting microscope.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
In a Notchts1 mutant in which the function of the NOTCH receptor has been reduced, neural hypertrophy occurs in the discs (Cagan and Ready, 1989b). In Notchts1 discs, HNT protein is expressed in the supernumerary neuronal precursor cells (compare Fig. 1G with 1H). Thus, HNT expression in neuronal precursor cells is a read-out of sensory neuron specification. This experiment also demonstrates that wild-type Notch function is not required for HNT expression.
HNT is required for R cell fate specification and ommatidial cluster morphogenesis
To understand the role of HNT during eye development, we undertook a phenotypic analysis of the viable hntpebbled (hntpeb) mutant, which has a temperature-sensitive rough eye phenotype (Fig. 2) (Yip et al., 1997). In addition, we analyzed three lethal, antibody-null alleles of hnt: hntXE81 and hntEH704a, which behave as genetic nulls, and hntXO01, which behaves as a strong hypomorph (Yip et al., 1997
). The lethal hnt mutations fail to complement the hntpeb rough eye phenotype (Fig. 2C) (Yip et al., 1997
). To examine the consequences of removing HNT function in the eye disc we generated patches (clones) of cells homozygous for the lethal hnt alleles using the FLP/FRT recombination system (Golic, 1991
).
|
|
We next examined early cluster morphology using the -phosphotyrosine antibody (
-PY) that highlights all cell membranes, particularly those of the R cells (Fig. 3F). The
-PY antibody outlines the arc stages in row one at the posterior edge of the furrow [the normal developmental progression in cluster morphology is reviewed by Wolff and Ready (Wolff and Ready, 1991
)]. In hnt mutant patches the arcs appear to form normally and at evenly spaced intervals (Fig. 3F). Within the hnt mutant tissue, the earliest defects involve cluster shape and cell number at the five cell precluster stage (Fig. 3F). In mutant patches, the definitive preclusters usually have the normal number of cells (five; R8, R2, R5, R3, R4) but, occasionally (i.e. in fewer than 5% of the preclusters), there are missing cells or additional cells with high levels of
-PY staining. More strikingly, some of the preclusters either have cells misarranged relative to one another or the cluster does not rotate properly.
Glass is normally expressed in all presumptive R cells (Moses and Rubin, 1991). In eye discs from hntpeb larvae, most precluster cells express Glass (compare Fig. 3G with 3H), indicating they have attained a photoreceptor identity. However (Fig. 3H), some of these preclusters are missing Glass-positive cells (22%, n=46), have displaced cells (30%, n=46) or have additional posterior cells (17%, n=46). The frequency of these defects in Glass staining is five- to tenfold higher than the frequency of preclusters with missing or additional cells as assayed using
-PY. A likely explanation for this difference in frequencies is that the correct number of cells is recruited into definitive preclusters in hnt mutants but that these cells have a reduced ability to achieve presumptive R cell fate.
To examine whether specification of individual R cell fates proceeds normally in hnt mutants, we used three markers that label the early R cells. These are the -Boss antibody, which labels determined R8 cells beginning three rows posterior to the furrow (Van Vactor et al., 1991
); the rhomboid enhancer trap, rhoPX81, which is expressed strongly in R8, R2 and R5, beginning two rows posterior to the furrow (Freeman et al., 1992
); and the
-Spalt antibody, which labels the nuclei of the R3 and R4 precursor cells, beginning two rows posterior to the furrow (Barrio et al., 1999
). In hnt patches, Boss accumulates in all R8 cells; however, there is a delay of one to two rows relative to the adjacent wild-type tissue and Boss levels are often reduced (Fig. 4A, arrowheads). These results suggest that, although the mutant R8 cell in each precluster is eventually properly determined, the Boss ligand is either not tightly localized to the apical surface of the R8 cell or there are lower amounts of it in the cell.
|
The -Spalt antibody, which labels the R3 and R4 precursor cells, also shows aberrant staining within hnt patches (Fig. 4D,E). In 57% of clusters, only one cell stains with
-Spalt antibody (n=145 clusters). When two nuclei stain, often they are at different planes relative to one another (84% versus 0% in the adjacent wild-type tissue). This result implies that the mutant R3 or R4 precursor cell is mis-shapen or aberrantly positioned in the cluster. In 67% of the clusters the cells fail to rotate correctly.
In summary, our results show that specific furrow markers persist posterior to the furrow in hnt mutants, that there is a delay in specification of preclusters as cells exit the furrow, that there are morphological defects in the preclusters, that recruitment of cells into specific R cell fates does not occur and that there are planar polarity defects in hnt mutants.
HNT function is required to establish planar polarity in the developing eye
The mutant phenotypes we observed in the developing eye disc suggested that HNT plays a role in establishing planar polarity. To define this role at single cell resolution, we analyzed genetically mosaic ommatidia along the borders of hnt mutant patches in the adult eye. In wild-type ommatidia, each R cell occupies a distinctive position within the trapezoidal array of rhabdomeres (Fig. 5). The hnt mosaic ommatidia showed polarity defects, including reversed chirality (56%, n=43 defective ommatidia; see Fig. 5A classes II, V and VI), misrotation (44%; see Fig. 5A classes III-VI) and loss of R3/R4 asymmetry (30%; see Fig. 5A classes VII and VIII). The polarity defects within hnt patches are restricted to mosaic ommatidia; we did not see any cases where the genetically wild-type ommatidia adjacent to mosaic ommatidia are misoriented. Thus, HNT implements a local function in coordinating polarity establishment within an ommatidium.
|
|
Given the previously reported role of JNK signaling in establishing planar polarity in the eye (Weber et al., 2000) and the planar polarity defects in hnt mutants reported here, we tested for genetic interactions between JNK pathway mutants and hntpeb. Two alleles of jun (jun1, a hypomorph, and jun2, a genetic null) and two alleles of basket (bsk1 and bsk2) act as dose-sensitive suppressors of the hntpeb photoreceptor defects, as assayed in histological sections. hntpeb/Y; jun1/+ eyes show 31% wild-type ommatidia (n=775) versus 17% in hntpeb/Y control siblings (n=340), and hntpeb/Y; jun2/+ eyes have 26% wild-type ommatidia (n=750) versus 15% in controls (n=207). hntpeb/Y; bsk1/+ eyes show 11% wild-type ommatidia (n=828) versus 7% in controls (n=509), and hntpeb/Y; bsk2/+ have 11% wild-type ommatidia (n=957) versus 8% in controls (n=606). When polarity defects are scored in those ommatidia with wild-type numbers of R cells, from hntpeb/Y; bsk1/+ eyes, 14% show polarity defects versus 21% in hntpeb/Y controls, whereas in hntpeb/Y; bsk2/+ eyes, 17% show polarity defects versus 40% in hntpeb/Y controls. The direction of these genetic interactions in the eye is consistent with a role for HNT in downregulating JNK signaling.
In summary, we have shown here that HNT function is required to establish planar polarity in the eye and have presented genetic evidence that this role may be accomplished by downregulation of JNK signaling.
HNT function is required for morphogenesis of the pupal retina and for maintenance of retinal epithelial integrity
In eyes from hntpeb flies raised at the restrictive temperature, the facets in the eye are misaligned, with occasional ommatidial fusions (2.8%) and a small percentage of bristle displacements and bristle size defects (Fig. 2B, Fig. 6A). Transverse sections of eyes from hntpeb flies reveal many photoreceptor cell abnormalities (Fig. 6C versus 6B). Although some ommatidia contain extra apical central cells (Fig. 6C, white arrowhead; 12%, n=820 ommatidia), the most common defect is missing photoreceptor cells (Fig. 6C, black arrowheads), including missing outer cells (43%), missing central cells (1%), or missing outer and central R cells (11%).
|
To ascertain whether the loss of R cells is a secondary consequence of increased programmed cell death we stained mutant patches for apoptotic cells. hnt patches show normal levels of cell death relative to adjacent wild-type eye tissue during late larval stages (data not shown). Thus, cells that are not specified correctly in the preclusters do not die but are reincorporated into the pool of undifferentiated cells in the eye disc. In addition, during early-to-mid pupal stages, there is no increased apoptosis in patches of hnt mutant cells relative to adjacent wild-type cells (data not shown; P5, 12.5-25 hour APF and P8, 47-57 hour APF at 25°C, were tested). These results imply that the loss of hnt mutant R cells from the retinal epithelium is not a secondary consequence of cell death.
We used the adult eye mosaics described above to ask which R cells require HNT function to maintain the integrity of the retinal epithelium during pupal development. An examination of 94 patches led to the identification of 71 genetically mosaic ommatidia. Typically, in wild-type controls, one medium-sized patch yields about 10 mosaic ommatidia; we would therefore have expected over 900 mosaic ommatidia in our experiment. The more than tenfold under-representation of mixed ommatidia along the borders of hnt clones suggests that many of them formed but subsequently lost their integrity. By quantifying the genotypes of R-cell subtypes in surviving mixed-genotype ommatidia, we were able to establish which R cells required HNT function in order for an ommatidium to be wild type with respect to photoreceptor number and internal arrangement (n=59, Fig. 5A classes I-VI). Our analyses show that there must be at least five hnt+ R cells of any subtype within the ommatidium for maintenance of its integrity in the retinal epithelium.
Beyond its role in maintenance of epithelial integrity, HNT function is also required for normal rhabdomere structure. In a wild-type adult eye, the R1-R6 cell bodies and their rhabdomeres extend over the full apical-to-basal extent of the ommatidial column (schematized in Fig. 7A). In eyes from hntpeb flies some of the photoreceptor cells (4.2%) have enlarged rhabdomeres when viewed in individual histological sections. Such an apparent enlargement could result from failure in apical-to-basal extension of the cell and its rhabdomere. In order to study morphological defects in individual hnt mutant adult R cells, we made serial sections through genetically mosaic ommatidia containing cells homozygous for hnt alleles. Mutant rhabdomeres fail to extend the normal length of the ommatidial column, indicating that hnt cells often have shortened cell bodies (Fig. 7A, left side). This phenotype is R cell autonomous, as all R cells with defective rhabdomeres are also mutant for hnt. During the late pupal period (110 hour APF), the rhabdomeres of the individual R cells within an ommatidium separate from each other to give the canonical trapezoidal pattern found in the adult (Cagan and Ready, 1989a). An additional defect found in serial sections of hnt genetic mosaic ommatidia is failure of rhabdomere separation (Fig. 7A, right side): rhabdomere separation is often normal in the apical region of the ommatidium but, as one proceeds basally, one can observe failure of the rhadomere of a hnt mutant cell to separate from its wild-type neighbor (Fig. 7A, right side).
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Planar polarity
Our results obtained from mosaic analysis of hnt alleles clearly demonstrate that HNT function is necessary in all of the outer R cells in the developing eye disc, particularly in the R3, R4 and R6 precursor cells, for correct planar polarity. A role for the R3 and R4 precursor cells in establishing planar polarity in the eye has previously been proposed on the basis of analyses of the JNK pathway in this process (Weber et al., 2000). Those experiments could not rule out a role for other outer R precursor cells, which also express the JUN transcription factor (Bohmann et al., 1994
; Weber et al., 2000
). hindsight must now be added to the list of genes, such as strabismus (Wolff and Rubin, 1998
), that regulate planar polarity and have a clearly described role in all of the outer R cells.
The fact that all of the symmetrical ommatidia along the borders of hnt clones are of the R3/R3 conformation suggests that HNT function is necessary for correct R4 fate and orientation. It has been suggested that, owing to its closer proximity to the polarizing signal from the equator, a stronger activation of the JNK pathway occurs in the R3 precursor cell (Weber et al., 2000). Activated JUN would then be responsible for the upregulation of the target gene, Delta, in the R3 precursor cell relative to the R4 precursor cell (Weber et al., 2000
). As our results in the eye (this study) and results in the embryo (Reed et al., 2001
) imply that HNT is necessary for downregulating JNK function, we propose that the wild-type function of HNT is to downregulate JNK activity in the R4 precursor cell. Such downregulation would enhance JNK signaling differences between the R3 and R4 cells. In the absence of the HNT gene product, JNK signaling would be inappropriately elevated in the R4 precursor cell, thereby upregulating the transcription of JNK targets such as Delta, leading that cell to behave more like a R3 precursor cell. Consistent with this model, we have found that Delta hypomorphs act as enhancers of the hntpeb rough eye phenotype (A. T. P., R. Wilk and H. D. L., unpublished). R3/R3 symmetric clusters are observed both when the R4 cell is mutant for hnt and the R3 precursor is hnt+, and when the R3 cell is mutant for hnt and the R4 precursor is hnt+. In the latter case, the above model would lead one to expect normal R3/R4 clusters. As only R3/R3 clusters are observed, we speculate that HNT can affect the R4 precursor cell when expressed only in the neighboring R3 precursor cell (i.e. that there may be some communication feedback between these cells leading to local non-autonomy of the hnt phenotype).
The early morphological and fate determination defects and the later planar polarity defects seen in hnt eyes may be causally connected. We have shown that specification of the early outer R cell precursors (R2, R5, R3 and R4) is often disrupted in hnt tissue. It has been established that early disruption of R3 and R4 fate can perturb planar polarity (e.g. in the seven-up mutant) (Fanto et al., 1998). This result suggests that accurate interpretation of extrinsic polarity signals may require each R cell to already be properly determined. We have also shown that the relative positioning of outer R cells within a precluster is frequently deviant in hnt mutants before precluster rotation. Therefore the relative distance to the equator, or to a neighboring cluster, may also be crucial for differential reading of the polarity signal by pairs of outer cells within the cluster (R3 versus R4, R2 versus R5).
The F-actin-based cytoskeleton
Our previous analyses have shown that that HNT function in the amnioserosa is required for the assembly and/or maintenance of focal complexes in adjacent epithelial cells along the leading edge of the dorsal ectoderm (Reed et al., 2001). We have demonstrated that these F-actin rich structures, which also accumulate high levels of
-PY reactive proteins, are required for morphogenetic events during normal dorsal closure. In wild-type eye discs, F-actin is enriched at the apical tips of presumptive R cells in ommatidial preclusters. This apical F-actin forms part of a tightly localized signaling complex enriched for receptor and ligand molecules such as Sevenless (Banerjee et al., 1987
; Tomlinson et al., 1987
), Boss (Van Vactor et al., 1991
), Notch (Fehon et al., 1991
) and Delta (Kooh et al., 1993
). Here, we have shown that, in late larval eye discs, hnt mutant R cells have reduced F-actin at their apical tips. Furthermore, although the R8 precursor cell is correctly determined in hnt mutant patches, the Boss ligand is less concentrated at the apical tips of some of the hnt R8 cells. The F-actin phenotype seen in hnt patches in larval eye discs occurs late and is therefore probably not a direct cause of disruption of the apical signaling complex in the eye disc. However, the defects in F-actin accumulation may be a marker indicative of perturbed cytoarchitecture in the apical region of the mutant R cell. Such a perturbation would have serious consequences for correct R cell specification, which requires intimate contacts between adjacent R cells for proper intercellular signaling.
We have shown that, in the pupal retina, the concentration of F-actin in the apical tips of the R cell clusters is depleted in hnt mutant eye tissue. Still later, less F-actin accumulates in the extended rhabdomeres. F-actin and associated proteins in the apical surfaces of the photoreceptors play a key role in the initiation of rhabdomere morphogenesis (Cagan and Ready, 1989a; Longley and Ready, 1995
; Sang and Ready, 2002
). In addition, F actin is a component of the rhabdomere terminal web, a structure that anchors the rhabdomere membranes along the length of the differentiating R cell and prevents them from collapsing into the R-cell cytoplasm (Chang and Ready, 2000
). When the function of Drac1, which regulates F-actin arrangement, is disrupted, the rhabdomere membranes spool out into the cytoplasm (Chang and Ready, 2000
). Interestingly, in addition to its role in rhabdomere morphogenesis, Drac1 is thought to signal through the JNK cascade and, like HNT, is necessary earlier on for the establishment of planar polarity in the eye (Fanto et al., 2000
) and for dorsal closure of the embryo (Harden et al., 1995
; Harden et al., 1999
; Reed et al., 2001
). The pupal photoreceptor phenotype that we observe in hnt R cells, where rhabdomeres do not extend fully in the apicobasal axis, is qualitatively different from that seen for a dominant negative Drac1 allele (Chang and Ready, 2000
).
We speculate that the depletion of F-actin in hnt mutant R cells may affect morphogenetic events that precede rhabdomere terminal web maturation. For example, there may be defects in extension of the specialized membrane down the length of the R cell or in closure of cone cells over the highly constricted R cell apices (Cagan and Ready, 1989a; Longley and Ready, 1995
; Sang and Ready, 2002
). The morphogenetic parallels between closure of the leading edge epidermal cells over the constricted amnioserosa of the embryo and closure of the cone cells over the constricted R cell apices in the pupal eye are striking. Furthermore, both require assembly and function of F-actin-rich complexes at the boundary between the two cell types involved.
Maintenance of epithelial integrity
We have shown that hnt mutant R cells are unable to maintain their integrity within the retinal epithelium during retinal differentiation and morphogenesis in pupal discs. By analogy, the hnt phenotype in the tracheal system is first seen at stage 14, when the overtly normal tracheal epithelium begins to disintegrate, forming sacs and vesicles from the collapsed dorsal trunk and branches (Wilk et al., 2000). In hnt hypomorphs, a specific proportion of the cells in the amnioserosa fall out of the epithelium during dorsal closure (B. A. Reed and H. D. L., unpublished). Thus, HNT function is required for maintenance of the integrity of the epithelia in which it is expressed.
In the eye, loss of integrity occurs in clusters containing fewer than five out of eight HNT-expressing R cells. We speculate that delamination of clusters may occur because they lack a threshold level of apical F-actin required for inter-photoreceptor communication and/or adhesion. For example, if hnt mutant R cells fail to form focal contacts with the overlying cone cells, a genetically mosaic R cell cluster could slip basally, eventually falling out of the epithelium before consolidation of the fenestrated membrane during the pupal period.
In the eye, patches of tissue mutant for certain of the integrins (myospheroid and inflated) have missing R cells or R cells with shortened rhabdomeres (Zusman et al., 1993; Zusman et al., 1990
). Detailed studies have shown that integrins are expressed in the cone and pigment cells and that the mutant phenotypes may trace their origin to a structural defect in the cone cell plate at the retinal floor (Longley and Ready, 1995
). HNT is not expressed in cone or pigment cells and there is no gross defect in the retinal floor beneath hnt mutant eye tissue. However, as we observe an F-actin defect and it is known that extracellular engagement of adhesion molecules physically links F-actin bundles with the cell surface to provide structural integrity, further studies to examine possible requirements of HNT for extracellular matrix production or function may be revealing.
Conclusions
Our results clearly implicate HNT in regulation of several types of cellular events that are common to the different contexts in which it functions. These include establishment or maintenance of the morphology of individual cells within an epithelium, as well as maintenance of the integrity of the epithelium per se (this study) (Lamka and Lipshitz, 1999; Reed et al., 2001
; Wilk et al., 2000
). There are also shared molecular correlates of these HNT functions. In particular, HNT is required for establishment of localized F-actin- and phosphotyrosine-rich complexes in the leading edge epidermal cells, as well as in the photoreceptor cells (this study) (Reed et al., 2001
). We have also presented evidence that HNT functions to regulate two JNK signaling dependent processes, planar polarity in the eye and dorsal closure of the embryo (this study) (Reed et al., 2001
), possibly by downregulating JNK signaling in time and space. Whether the functions of HNT in different tissues and at different times during development derive from control of the same molecular pathway will await genetic and molecular analysis of the genes regulated by HNT.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Banerjee, U., Renfranz, P. J., Hinton, D. R., Rabin, B. A. and Benzer, S. (1987). The sevenless+ protein is expressed apically in cell membranes of developing Drosophila retina; it is not restricted to cell R7. Cell 51, 151-158.[Medline]
Barrio, R., de Celis, J. F., Bolshakov, S. and Kafatos, F. C. (1999). Identification of regulatory regions driving the expression of the Drosophila spalt complex at different developmental stages. Dev. Biol. 215, 33-47.[Medline]
Benlali, A., Draskovic, I., Hazelett, D. J. and Treisman, J. E. (2000). act up controls actin polymerization to alter cell shape and restrict Hedgehog signaling in the Drosophila eye disc. Cell 101, 271-281.[Medline]
Blackman, R. K., Sanicola, M., Raftery, L. A., Gillevet, T. and Gelbart, W. M. (1991). An extensive 3' cis-regulatory region directs the imaginal disk expression of decapentaplegic, a member of the TGF-beta family in Drosophila. Development 111, 657-666.[Abstract]
Bohmann, D., Ellis, M. C., Staszewski, L. M. and Mlodzik, M. (1994). Drosophila Jun mediates ras-dependent photoreceptor determination. Cell 78, 973-986.[Medline]
Boulianne, G. L., de la Concha, A., Campos-Ortega, J. A., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (1991). The Drosophila neurogenic gene neuralized encodes a novel protein and is expressed in precursors of larval and adult neurons. EMBO J. 10, 2975-2983.[Abstract]
Cagan, R. L. and Ready, D. F. (1989a). The emergence of order in the Drosophila pupal retina. Dev. Biol. 136, 346-362.[Medline]
Cagan, R. L. and Ready, D. F. (1989b). Notch is required for successive cell decisions in the developing Drosophila retina. Genes Dev. 3, 1099-1112.[Abstract]
Chang, H.-Y. and Ready, D. F. (2000). Rescue of photoreceptor degeneration in rhodopsin-null Drosophila mutants by activated Rac1. Science 290, 1978-1980.
Fanto, M., Mayes, C. A. and Mlodzik, M. (1998). Linking cell-fate specification to planar polarity: determination of the R3/R4 photoreceptors is a prerequisite for the interpretation of the Frizzled mediated polarity signal. Mech. Dev. 74, 51-58.[Medline]
Fanto, M., Weber, U., Strutt, D. I. and Mlodzik, M. (2000). Nuclear signaling by Rac and Rho GTPases is required in the establishment of epithelial planar polarity in the Drosophila eye. Curr. Biol. 10, 979-988.[Medline]
Fehon, R. G., Johansen, K., Rebay, I. and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. (1991). Complex cellular and subcellular regulation of Notch expression during embryonic and imaginal development of Drosophila: implications for Notch function. J. Cell Biol. 113, 657-669.[Abstract]
Freeman, M., Kimmel, B. E. and Rubin, G. M. (1992). Identifying targets of the rough homeobox gene of Drosophila: evidence that rhomboid functions in eye development. Development 116, 335-346.
Golic, K. G. (1991). Site-specific recombination between homologous chromosomes in Drosophila. Science 252, 958-961.[Medline]
Harden, N., Loh, H. Y., Chia, W. and Lim, L. (1995). A dominant inhibitory version of the small GTP-binding protein Rac disrupts cytoskeletal structures and inhibits developmental cell shape changes in Drosophila. Development 121, 903-914.
Harden, N., Ricos, M., Ong, Y. M., Chia, W. and Lim, L. (1999). Participation of small GTPases in dorsal closure of the Drosophila embryo: distinct roles for Rho subfamily proteins in epithelial morphogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 112, 273-284.
Harrison, D. A. and Perrimon, N. A. (1993). Simple and efficient generation of marked clones in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 13, 424-433.
Hou, X. S., Goldstein, E. S. and Perrimon, N. (1997). Drosophila Jun relays the Jun amino-terminal kinase signal transduction pathway to the Decapentaplegic signal transduction pathway in regulating epithelial cell sheet movement. Genes Dev. 11, 1728-1737.[Abstract]
Huang, F., Dambly-Chaudiere, C. and Ghysen, A. (1991). The emergence of sense organs in the wing disc of Drosophila. Development 111, 1087-1095.[Abstract]
Kiehart, D. P., Galbraith, C. G., Edwards, K. A., Rickol, W. L. and Montague, R. A. (2000). Multiple forces contribute to cell sheet morphogenesis for dorsal closure in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 149, 471-490.
Kockel, L., Zeitlinger, J., Staszewski, L. M., Mlodzik, M. and Bohmann, D. (1997). Jun in Drosophila development: redundant and nonredundant functions and regulation by two MAPK signal transduction pathways. Genes Dev. 11, 1748-1758.[Abstract]
Kooh, P. J., Fehon, R. G. and Muskavitch, M. A. (1993). Implications of dynamic patterns of Delta and Notch expression for cellular interactions during Drosophila development. Development 117, 493-507.
Lamka, M. L. and Lipshitz, H. D. (1999). Role of the amnioserosa in germ band retraction of the Drosophila melanogaster embryo. Dev. Biol. 214, 102-12.[Medline]
Longley, R. L., Jr and Ready, D. F. (1995). Integrins and the development of three-dimensional structure in the Drosophila compound eye. Dev. Biol. 171, 415-433.[Medline]
Mlodzik, M. (1999). Planar polarity in the Drosophila eye: a multifaceted view of signaling specificity and cross-talk. EMBO J. 18, 6873-6879.
Moses, K. and Rubin, G. M. (1991). Glass encodes a site-specific DNA-binding protein that is regulated in response to positional signals in the developing Drosophila eye. Genes Dev. 5, 583-593.[Abstract]
Penton, A., Selleck, S. B. and Hoffmann, F. M. (1997). Regulation of cell cycle synchronization by decapentaplegic during Drosophila eye development. Science 275, 203-206.
Ready, D. F., Hanson, T. E. and Benzer, S. (1976). Development of the Drosophila retina, a neurocrystalline lattice. Dev. Biol. 53, 217-240.[Medline]
Reed, B. H., Wilk, R. and Lipshitz, H. D. (2001). Downregulation of Jun kinase signaling in the amnioserosa is essential for dorsal closure of the Drosophila embryo. Curr. Biol. 11, 1098-1108.[Medline]
Sang, T.-K. and Ready, D. F. (2002). Eyes closed, a Drosophila p47 homolog, is essential for photoreceptor morphogenesis. Development 129, 143-145.
Shellenbarger, D. L. and Mohler, J. D. (1975). Temperature-sensitive mutations of the Notch locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 81, 143-162.
Sluss, H., Han, Z., Barrett, T., Davis, R. J. and Ip, Y. T. (1996). A JNK signal transduction pathway that mediates morphogenesis and an immune response in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 10, 2745-2758.[Abstract]
Thomas, B. J., Gunning, D. A., Cho, J. and Zipursky, S. L. (1994). Cell cycle progression in the developing Drosophila eye: roughex encodes a novel protein required for the establishment of G1. Cell 77, 1003-1014.[Medline]
Tomlinson, A. (1985). The cellular dynamics of pattern formation in the eye of Drosophila. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 89, 313-331.[Medline]
Tomlinson, A., Bowtell, D. D. L., Hafen, E. and Rubin, G. M. (1987). Localization of the sevenless protein, a putative receptor for positional information, in the eye imaginal disc of Drosophila. Cell 51, 143-150.[Medline]
Tomlinson, T. and Ready, D. (1987). Neuronal differentiation in the Drosophila ommatidium. Dev. Biol. 120, 366-376.
Van Vactor, D. L., Jr, Cagan, R. L., Krämer, H. and Zipursky, S. L. (1991). Induction in the developing compound eye of Drosophila: multiple mechanisms restrict R7 induction to a single retinal precursor cell. Cell 67, 1145-1155.[Medline]
Weber, U., Paricio, N. and Mlodzik, M. (2000). Jun mediates Frizzled-induced R3/R4 cell fate distinction and planar polarity determination in the Drosophila eye. Development 127, 3619-3629.
Wilk, R., Reed, B. H., Tepass, U. and Lipshitz, H. D. (2000). The hindsight gene is required for epithelial maintenance and differentiation of the tracheal system in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 219, 183-196.[Medline]
Wolff, T. (2000). Histological techniques for the Drosophila eye. Part 1: Larva and pupa. In Drosophila Protocols (ed. W. Sullivan M. Ashburner and R. S. Hawley), pp. 201-227. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Wolff, T. and Ready, D. F. (1991). The beginning of pattern formation in the Drosophila compound eye: the morphogenetic furrow and the second mitotic wave. Development 113, 841-850.[Abstract]
Wolff, T. and Ready, D. F. (1993). Pattern formation in the Drosophila retina. In The Development of Drosophila melanogaster, Vol. 2, pp. 1277-1325. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Wolff, T. and Rubin, G. M. (1998). Strabismus, a novel gene that regulates tissue polarity and cell fate decisions in Drosophila. Development 125, 1149-1159.
Xu, T. and Rubin, G. M. (1993). Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues. Development 117, 1223-1237.
Yip, M. L. R., Lamka, M. L. and Lipshitz, H. D. (1997). Control of germ-band retraction in Drosophila by the zinc-finger protein HINDSIGHT. Development 124, 2129-2141.
Zusman, S., Patel-King, R. S., Ffrench-Constant, C. and Hynes, R. O. (1990). Requirements for integrins during Drosophila development. Development 108, 391-402.[Abstract]
Zusman, S., Grinblat, Y., Yee, G., Kafatos, F. C. and Hynes, R. O. (1993). Analyses of PS integrin functions during Drosophila development. Development 118, 737-750.