1 Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5329, USA
2 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5317, USA
3 Developmental Genetics Program, Skirball Institute, New York University Medical Center, 540 First Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA
4 Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, 920 East 58th St, Chicago, IL 60637-1432, USA
5 Laboratoire de Biologie du Developpement, Institut Jacques Monod, 2, place Jussieu, 75251 Paris, Cedex 05, France
6 EMBL, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
7 Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5329, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: tazuke{at}stanford.edu)
Accepted 1 March 2002
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Drosophila, Gap junction, Innexin, Oogenesis, Spermatogenesis
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In many cases, intimate interactions between germline and somatic support cells are required for normal germ cell behavior and differentiation, but the signaling pathways involved are not yet known. For example, in mammals, somatic cumulus cells regulate the cell cycle program of maturing oocytes (reviewed by Tsafiri, 1978). In Drosophila, interactions between germline and somatic cells are crucial for proper germ cell migration and gonad formation during embryogenesis (Moore et al., 1998
; Boyle and Dinardo, 1995
), and for germline sex determination (Cline and Meyer, 1996
). In Drosophila males, both the early stages of spermatogonial differentiation (Kiger et al., 2000
; Tran et al., 2000
) and the transition from spermatogonia to spermatocytes (Matunis et al., 1997
) require information from surrounding somatic cyst cells.
Other modes of intercellular signaling, in addition to ligand/receptor-based mechanisms, may also be important for close range interactions between germline and somatic support cells. We show that a germline-specific gap junction protein encoded by the zero population growth (zpg) locus of Drosophila plays a crucial role in early germ cell differentiation and survival. The Zpg protein localizes to the surface of early germ cells and in some stages appears especially concentrated at the interface between germline and somatic support cells. Lack of zpg function leads to failure to differentiate and loss of spermatogonia in males and dividing germline cysts in females. Strikingly, germline stem cells were present in zpg males and newly eclosed zpg females, although female germ line stem cells were lost with age. Thus, stem cells and early germ cells initiating differentiation require zpg function.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Mapping and molecular cloning of zpg
The zpg1 allele was mapped to 20.9±1.9 m.u. proximal to the visible marker ru by meiotic recombination between ru and h, and to the 65A-65C1 interval by deficiency complementation tests. zpg was uncovered by Df(3L)Zn47, Df(3L)CH12 and Df(3L)CH20. A 3 kb genomic region (proximal) to the P-lacZ insert in zpg3 was cloned by plasmid rescue (Cooley et al., 1988) and used to screen a Drosophila genomic
EMBL3 library (Tamkun et al., 1992
) and a
ZAP Drosophila testis cDNA library (gift of T. Hazelrigg, Columbia University). P-element-mediated germline transformation was carried out using a 6.15 Kb BamHI-HindIII fragment cut from a Drosophila genomic phage clone and subcloned into pCasper-4 (Rubin and Spradling, 1982
). Two independent transformed lines were tested. In each case the tiny testis, small ovary and male and female fertility phenotypes of zpgz-5352/Df(3L)Zn47 animals were rescued by a single copy of the transgene insert.
The genomic region and the candidate cDNAs were sequenced on both strands by dideoxy chain termination (Sanger et al., 1977) using T3 and T7 primers and genomic region specific oligonucleotides (PAN facility, Stanford, CA). Unless otherwise stated, all molecular techniques were performed as described elsewhere (Sambrook et al., 1989
). An ovary cDNA, GM13027, from the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (http://www.fruitfly.org/), matching the predicted transcript CG10125 (FlyBase), was obtained from ResGen. The amino acid sequence of the predicted protein was used to search nucleotide sequence databases translated in all reading frames (tBLASTn). Sequence alignments were generated using the ClustalW Multiple Sequence Alignment (Thompson et al., 1994
) and Boxshade programs.
Point mutations of EMS-induced zpg alleles were identified by sequencing bulk PCR products amplified from genomic DNA from zpg homozygotes or zpg/Df(3L)Zn47 flies using gene specific primers. Sequences were aligned and analyzed using Sequencher (Gene Codes) and MacVector (Oxford Molecular Group) DNA analysis software.
RNA blot analysis
RNA from whole adult flies and adult flies lacking germline (progeny of oskarCE3/oskar301 females) was isolated by homogenization in TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturers instructions. Poly(A)+ RNA was selected in batch on oligo dT-cellulose beads (Pharmacia). The isolated RNAs (approximately 4-6 µg of poly(A)+ RNA per sample) were then separated on a 1.2% agarose gel with formaldehyde, transferred onto Hybond nylon membrane (Amersham) in 10x SSPE, and fixed to the membrane by u.v. crosslinking (Stratagene Stratalinker model 2400). Probes were labeled using Rediprime II (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) from gel-purified DNA fragments. Probes were: zpg [cDNA insert from GM13027 (ResGen)]; and rp49 (PCR product using T7 and T3 universal primers from a pBluescript clone containing an rp49 cDNA).
In situ hybridization
In situ hybridization to embryos and whole adult Drosophila testes was carried out as described previously (Tautz and Pfeifle, 1989) with modification for RNA probes (Klingler and Gergen, 1993
). Single-stranded riboprobes were generated from the linearized GM13027 cDNA using the Genius System (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
Anti-Zpg peptide antibody and other antibody reagents
Owing to multiple homologous regions among the eight innexin family members in the Drosophila genome (Flybase, 1999; Curtin et al., 1999
), polyclonal antisera were raised in rabbits (Zymed) against a Zpg-specific oligopeptide representing amino acid residues 345-367 of the predicted Zpg protein. The resulting anti-Zpg antisera were used at 1:2500-1:5000 for immunofluorescence.
Mouse anti--Spectrin (1:5) and mouse anti-Fasciclin III (1:10) were obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Gene Bank (Iowa), and Rabbit anti-Vasa (1:5000) was provided by R. Lehmann. Rat anti-Drosophila E-cadherin (1:20) was provided by T. Uemura (Oda et al., 1993
). As secondary antibodies, FITC/TRITC-conjugated anti-rabbit, anti-mouse or anti-rat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) were used at 1:200 after overnight pre-absorption with 0-24 hour fixed embryos.
Immunofluorescence
Adult ovaries were dissected in Drosophila Ringers, fixed with 4% formaldehyde/PBS for 15 minutes at room temperature, rinsed three times in PBT (PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100), then blocked for 1 hour with 10% normal goat serum in PBT before incubation with primary antibodies. Larval and adult testes were dissected in testis buffer and processed as squashed preparations on glass slides as described elsewhere (Hime et al., 1996). Samples were incubated overnight at 4°C in primary antibody, washed extensively in PBT, blocked with PBTB (PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.3% BSA) for 1 hour at room temperature, incubated with secondary antibody at 37°C for 2 hours, washed extensively in PBT, stained with 1 µg/ml DAPI for 5 minutes and mounted in VECTASTAIN for examination by epifluorecence on a Zeiss Axiophot microscope. Images were recorded by CCD camera (Princeton Instruments, Trenton, NJ; IPLab Software, Spectrum Software Signal Analytics) or a BioRad MRC-100 confocal imaging system connected to a Zeiss Axioskop microscope (except Fig. 7E, which was obtained with Leica TCS NT imaging software for a Leica DM RBE confocal microscope). All images were processed with Adobe Photoshop (Mountain View, CA).
|
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
Wild-type function of zpg was also required for differentiation of early germ cells in females. The tiny ovaries from newly eclosed zpg mutant females lacked the strings of developing egg chambers characteristic of wild type (Fig. 3A,B). Instead, germaria from freshly eclosed females commonly contained only a few germ cells, which appeared as single cells at the apical tip of the germarium, located where female germline stem cells and cystoblasts reside (Fig. 3C,D, arrow). As in the male, female germ line stem cells and cystoblasts can be identified by spherical spectrin rich structures, spectrosomes, while the mitotically amplifying interconnected cysts contain branching fusomes (Fig. 3E). The germ cells remaining in zpg null mutant germaria had spherical spectrosomes rather than branched fusomes, suggesting stem cell or cystoblast identity (Fig. 3F, arrow). Occasionally, in freshly eclosed females, structures resembling egg chambers were observed (one per 2.9 ovaries, n=58 ovaries) further down the ovary, which contained abnormal number of germ cells that appeared to be degenerating (data not shown).
|
|
|
The zpg locus encodes a 1.6 kb transcript detected in poly A+ mRNA from whole adult males and females but not from agametic animals (Fig. 5A). Consistent with the transcript being germline dependent, in situ hybridization to embryos revealed that zpg mRNA was concentrated in germ plasm and in the pole cells of wild-type embryos, from the syncitial blastoderm stage through gonad formation (Fig. 5C,D). Zpg protein was also detected in pole cells and primordial germ cells throughout embryogenesis (data not shown). In wild-type testes, zpg mRNA was detected in the spermatogonial region near the apical tip (Fig. 5B, arrow). The level of zpg mRNA decreased sharply to background at the transition from spermatogonia to spermatocytes.
|
|
In female germline stem cells, Zpg protein also appeared to localize to a small plaque adjacent to the spectrosome at the interface between female germline stem cells and somatic apical cap cells (Fig. 7F,I,J,L,M arrows), under conditions where less overall anti-Zpg staining was detected. In an experiment where wild-type ovaries were stained with anti--Spectrin and anti-Zpg antibodies, this dot was detected in 258 of the 289 stem cells scored from 10 different ovaries. The small plaque of anti-Zpg staining next to the spectrosome at the tip of the germarium was not detected in germ cells from zpgz-5352/DfZn47 third adult ovaries (data not shown), confirming the specificity of the antibody.
The position of the spot of Zpg detected just apical to the spectrosome in female germline stem cells by immunofluorescence suggested the possibility that there are gap junctions between the female germline stem cells and the overlying somatic cap cells. The presence of gap junctions in early female germ cells was confirmed by ultrastructural studies. In two separate sets of serial sections through the spectrosome region of female germline stem cells, gap junctions with the characteristic 2x109 m (20 Å) intermembrane spacing were clearly evident between female germline stem cells and adjacent apical cap cells (Fig. 8A-C, arrow). We do not know whether these gap junctional structures between female germline stem cells and apical cap cells correspond to the spots of Zpg detected adjacent to the spectrosome by immunofluorescence, although their relative positions were the same. In addition, we observed that the intercellular space between germline stem cells and apical cap cells directly abutting the spectrosome was large (>200 Å; >2x108 m) and filled with lanthanum when stained with this substance (Fig. 8B, arrowheads). The components of this distinctive space are not known, although the space was characteristic of the five germaria studied by electron microscopy. Adherens junction were also seen between germline stem cells and apical cap cells (Fig. 8C). Gap junctions were also observed at the ultrastructural level between adjacent germline stem cells, between cystoblasts, between cysts, between cystoblasts and inner sheath cells, and between adjacent nurse cells (data not shown). A cluster of multiple gap junction structures was visible by electron microscopy between follicle cells and underlying nurse cells in developing egg chambers (data not shown), consistent with the patch of Zpg staining at the base of each follicle cell observed by immunofluorescence light microscopy. As already stated, we do not know whether these gap junctional structures contain Zpg protein.
|
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In both sexes, the Zpg protein was detected on the surface of germ cells where they interface with adjacent somatic cells. Gap junctions have been observed at the ultrastructural level between germ cells and associated somatic cells in both sexes in insects including Drosophila (Szöllösi and Marcaillou, 1980; Huebner, 1981
; Adler and Woodruff, 2000
). We propose that hemichannels made of Zpg on the surface of germ cells dock with hemichannels made of other innexin isoforms on the surface of somatic cells to form functional gap junctions. Of the eight innexins in the Drosophila genome (Curtin et al., 1999
; Phelan and Starich, 2001
), ogre, inx2, and inx3 have been found to be expressed in follicle cells (Stebbings et al., 2002
). Although the expression pattern of other innexins in testes has not been reported, we found that inx2 message was expressed at the apical tip of the testis and follicle cells of egg chambers (S. I. T. and M. T. F., unpublished). Furthermore, ESTs matching inx2, inx5 and ogre transcripts are found in adult testis cDNA library (Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project, http://www.fruitfly.org/), suggesting that, in both sexes, other innexins are expressed in the Drosophila gonad, in addition to zpg. Heterotypic gap junctions between germline and soma, which are required for gametogenesis, are reminiscent of connexin-derived gap junctions in the mammalian gonad. The mammalian connexin Cx37 (Gja4 Mouse Genome Informatics), which is expressed on the mouse oocyte surface, is thought to form a heterotypic channel with a gap junction hemichannel containing Cx43 (Gja1 Mouse), which is expressed on the surrounding somatic cumulus cells (Sutovsky et al., 1993
; Juneja et al., 1999
). Mice with targeted disruption of Cx37 have defects in follicular growth with premature granulosa cell luteinization, resulting in infertility (Simon et al., 1997
). Zpg protein was also detected on the surfaces between adjacent germ cells, where it may form a hemichannel together with other innexin isoforms possibly expressed in germ cells in small amounts to give rise to functional gap junctions between adjacent germ cells. Alternatively, the Zpg protein at the interface between adjacent germ cells may not form functional channels.
The requirement for zpg function appears to be different in germ cells occupying the stem cell niche than in dividing cyst cells or spermatogonia, as stem cells were initially present in newly eclosed zpg-null animals. The striking loss of early germ cells at the onset of gamete differentiation in zpg-null animals raises the possibility that gap junctions may mediate passage of small molecule nutrients or signals from the surrounding somatic cells that are required for germ cell differentiation or survival. Gap junctional intercellular communication could be required for early stages of gamete differentiation, with germ cells undergoing cell death if unable to follow the normal differentiation program properly. The observation that spectrin-rich structures remained spherical and never reached the branched fusome stage, even in clustered germ cells resembling mitotic spermatogonia or cyst cells, suggests that the earliest stages of gamete differentiation are defective in zpg-null gonads. The spectrin-rich structures in the clustered zpg-null spermatogonia were larger than the usual spherical spectrosomes and often had abnormal morphology, suggesting that the differentiation program may have initiated but failed to complete. Although zpg germ cells did not accumulate, no striking increase in Acridine Orange staining was detected in zpg gonads (data not shown), suggesting that zpg germ cells maybe rapidly lost after the onset of differentiation. Furthermore, the small number of germ cells present in a zpg mutant gonad was not due to failure in mitosis, as germline stem cells appeared to divide at the same frequency in newly eclosed zpg null mutant females as in wild type (L. G. and R. L., unpublished).
Interactions between early germ cells and somatic cells are known to play an essential role in early germ cell differentiation in both sexes. In males, for example, normal differentiation of spermatogonia from male germline stem cells requires a functional EGFR signaling pathway in the surrounding somatic cells (Kiger et al., 2000; Tran et al., 2000
). Later, after mitotic amplification of spermatogonial cells, activation in somatic cyst cells of a receptor in the TGFß signaling pathway is essential for germ cells to transition from the mitotic amplification program to spermatocyte growth, meiosis and spermiogenesis (Matunis et al., 1997
). In neither case have the crucial signals from somatic support cells to the germ cells they enclose been identified. Our data on the mutant phenotype and the molecular identity of zpg gene product raise the possibility that crucial small molecule nutrients or signals regulating Drosophila germ cell differentiation and survival may be transmitted via gap junctions. Intriguingly, in mammals, gap junction permeability is regulated by EGFR pathway signaling via phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic tails of connexins by MAPK (Warn-Cramer et al., 1998
). Activation of the EGFR in somatic cyst cells could signal to germ cells by changing the permeability of gap junctions for small molecule second messengers between germline and soma.
Gap junctions in the Drosophila gonad may also mediate transfer of small molecule nutrients between germline and soma. Mammalian follicle cells have been shown to take up and phosphorylate labeled nucleotides from the culture medium, then release them to the oocyte (Heller and Schultz, 1980), possibly via gap junctional intercellular channels. In developing egg chambers, Zpg protein was especially concentrated at the interface between each follicle cell and the underlying germ cell, consistent with the observation of gap junctions between germ cells and follicle cells of other insects by electron microscopy. Because Zpg function is required during the earlier steps of oogenesis, we could not determine the precise function of Zpg-derived gap junctions in egg chambers. However, electrical coupling and permeability to Lucifer Yellow dye, both characteristics of gap junctions, have been observed between germ cells and follicle cells in Drosophila and other insects (Woodruff, 1979
; Huebner, 1981
; Adler and Woodruff, 2000
). Thus, it is possible that insect follicle cells also function to contribute to the growth of the oocyte by the uptake, metabolic conversion and intercellular transfer of small molecules via gap junctions.
Gap junctional communication between female germline stem cells and somatic apical cap cells may play a role in long term stem cell maintenance at the tip of the ovariole. Under specific staining conditions, zpg protein in female germline stem cells localized to a distinct dot adjacent to the spectrosome at the side where the germline stem cells abut the somatic apical cap cells. The terminal filament and cap cells at the apical tip of the germarium regulate germline stem cell behavior (Lin and Spradling, 1993), in part through a signaling pathway involving the TGFß homolog, decapentaplegic (dpp) (Xie and Spradling, 1998
; Xie and Spradling, 2000
). The loss of female germline stem cells with age in zpg mutants raises the possibility that gap junctional communication dependent on zpg might also be required to mediate signaling from apical cap cells for stem cell maintenance. Alternatively, gap junctions containing zpg may help maintain female germline stem cells in their niche by contributing to mechanical adhesion between stem cells and the apical cap cells (Watt, 2001
), perhaps in conjunction with the adherens junctions observed adjacent to gap junctions between germline stem cells and adjoining cap cells (Fig. 8C) (A. P. M., unpublished).
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Adler, E. L. and Woodruff, R. I. (2000). Varied effects of 1-octanol on gap junctional communication between ovarian epithelial cells and oocytes of Oncopeltus fasciatus, Hyalophora cecropia, and Drosophila melanogaster. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 43, 22-32.[Medline]
Austin, J. and Kimble, J. (1987). glp-1 is required in the germ line for regulation of the decision between mitosis and meiosis in C. elegans. Cell 51, 589-599.[Medline]
Berry, L. W., Westlund, B. and Schedl, T. (1997). Germ-line tumor formation caused by activation of glp-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans member of the Notch family of receptors. Development 124, 925-936.
Boyle, M. and DiNardo, S. (1995). Specification, migration and assembly of the somatic cells of the Drosophila gonad. Development. 121, 1815-1825.
Bruzzone, R., White, T. W. and Paul, D. L. (1996). Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling. Eur. J. Biochem. 238, 1-27.[Abstract]
Cline, T. W. and Meyer, B. J. (1996). Vive la diffèrence: males vs females in flies vs worms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 30, 637-702.[Medline]
Cooley, L., Kelley, R. and Spradling, A. (1988). Insertional mutagenesis of the Drosophila genome with single P elements. Science 239, 1121-1128.[Medline]
Curtin, K. D., Zhang, Z. and Wyman, R. J. (1999). Drosophila has several genes for gap junction proteins. Gene 232, 191-201.[Medline]
Erdelyi, M., Michon, A. M., Guichet, A., Glotzer, J. B. and Ephrussi, A. (1995). Requirement for Drosophila cytoplasmic tropomyosin in oskar mRNA localization. Nature 377, 524-527.[Medline]
FlyBase (1999). The FlyBase database of the Drosophila genome projects and community literature. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 106-108.
Gönczy, P. and DiNardo, S. (1996). The germ line regulates somatic cyst cell proliferation and fate during Drosophila spermatogenesis. Development 122, 2437-2447.
Hackstein, J. H. (1991). Spermatogenesis in Drosophila. A genetic approach to cellular and subcellular differentiation. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 56, 151-169.[Medline]
Hall, D. H., Winfrey, V. P., Glaeuer, G., Hoffman, L. H., Furuta, T., Rose, K. L., Hobert, O. and Greenstein, D. (1999). Ultrastructural features of the adult hermaphrodite gonad of Caenorhabditis elegans: relations between the germline and soma. Dev. Biol. 212, 101-123.[Medline]
Heller, D. T. and Schultz, R. M. (1980). Ribonucleoside metabolism by mouse oocytes: metabolic cooperativity between fully-grown oocyte and cumulus cells. J. Exp. Zool. 214, 355-364.[Medline]
Hime, G. R., Brill, J. A. and Fuller, M. T. (1996). Assembly of ring canals in the male germ line from structural components of the contractile ring. J. Cell Sci. 109, 2779-2788.
Hong, C. C. and Hashimoto, C. (1995). An unusual mosaic protein with a protease domain, encoded by the nudel gene, is involved in defining embryonic dorsoventral polarity in Drosophila. Cell 82, 785-794.[Medline]
Huebner, E. (1981). Oocyte-follicle cell interaction during normal oogenesis and atresia in an insect. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 74, 95-104.[Medline]
Juneja, S. C., Barr, K. J., Enders, G. C. and Kidder, G. M. (1999). Defects in the germ line and gonads of mice lacking connexin 43. Biol. Reprod. 60, 1263-1270.
Kadyk, L. C. and Kimble, J. (1998). Genetic regulation of entry into meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 125, 1803-1813.
Kiger, A. A., White-Cooper, H. and Fuller, M. T. (2000). Somatic support cells restrict germline stem cell self-renewal and promote differentiation. Nature 407, 750-754.[Medline]
Kiger, A. A., Jones, D. L., Schulz, C., Rogers, M. B. and Fuller, M. T. (2001) Stem cell self-renewal specified by JAK-STAT activation in response to a support cell cue. Science 294, 2542-2545.
Klingler, M. and Gergen, J. P. (1993). Regulation of runt transcription by Drosophila segmentation genes. Mech. Dev. 43, 3-19.[Medline]
Lin, H. and Spradling. A. C. (1993). Germline stem cell division and egg chamber development in transplanted Drosophila germaria. Dev. Biol. 159, 140-152.[Medline]
Margolis, J. and Spradling. A. (1995). Identification and behavior of epithelial stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Development. 121, 3797-3807.
Matunis, E., Tran, J., Gönczy, P. and DiNardo, S. (1997). punt and schnurri regulate a somatically derived signal that restricts proliferation of committed progenitors in the germline. Development 124, 4383-4391.
Meng, X., Lindahl, M., Hyvönen, M. E., Parvinen, M., deRooij, D. G., Hess, M. W., Raatikainen-Ahokas, A., Sainio, K., Rauvala, H., Lakso, M. et al. (2000). Regulation of cell fate decision of undifferentiated spermatogonia by GDNF. Science 287, 1489-1493.
Moore, L. A., Broihier, H. T., Van Doren, M., Lunsford, L. B. and Lehmann, R. (1998). Identification of genes controlling germ cell migration and embryonic gonad formation in Drosophila. Development 125, 667-678.
Oda, H., Uemura, T., Shiomi, K., Nagafuchi, A., Tsukita, S. and Takeichi, M. (1993). Identification of a Drosophila homologue of alpha-catenin and its association with the armadillo protein. J. Cell Biol. 121, 1133-1140.[Abstract]
Ohta, H., Yomogida, K., Dohmae, K. and Nishimune, Y. (2000). Regulation of proliferation and differentiation in spermatogonial stem cells: the role of c-kit and its ligand SCF. Development 127, 2125-2131.
Phelan, P. and Starich, T. A. (2001). Innexins get into the gap. BioEssays 23, 388-396.[Medline]
Phelan, P., Stebbings, L. A., Baines, R. A., Bacon, J. P., Davies, J. A. and Ford, C. (1998). Drosophila Shaking-B protein forms gap junctions in paired Xenopus oocytes. Nature 391, 181-184.[Medline]
Rubin, G. M. and Spradling, A. C. (1982). Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science. 218, 348-353.[Medline]
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. and Coulson, A. R. (1977). DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5463-5467.[Abstract]
Simon, A. M., Goodenough, D. A., Li, E. and Paul, D. L. (1997). Female infertility in mice lacking connexin 37. Nature 385, 525-529.[Medline]
Stebbings, L. A., Todman, M. G., Phillips, R., Greer, C. E., Tam, J., Phelan, P., Jacobs, K., Bacon, J. P. and Davies, J. A. (2002). Gap junctions in Drosophila: developmental expression of the entire innexin gene family. Mech. Dev. (in press).
Sutovsky, P., Flechon, J. E., Flechon, B., Motlik, J., Peynot, N., Chesne, P. and Heyman, Y. (1993). Dynamic changes of gap junctions and cytoskeleton during in vitro culture of cattle oocyte cumulus complexes. Biol. Reprod. 49, 1277-1287.[Abstract]
Szöllösi, A. and Marcaillou, C. (1980). Gap junctions between germ and somatic cells in the testis of the moth, Anagasta kuehniella (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Cell Tissue Res. 213, 137-147.[Medline]
Tamkun, J. W., Deuring, R., Scott, M. P., Kissinger, M., Pattatucci, A. M., Kaufman, T. C. and Kennison, J. A. (1992). brahma: a regulator of Drosophila homeotic genes structurally related to the yeast transcriptional activator SNF2/SWI2. Cell 68, 561-572.[Medline]
Tautz, D. and Pfeifle, C. (1989). A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma. 98, 81-85.[Medline]
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. and Gibson, T. J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680.[Abstract]
Tran, J., Brenner, T. J. and DiNardo, S. (2000). Somatic control over the germline stem cell lineage during Drosophila spermatogenesis. Nature 407, 754-757.[Medline]
Tsafiri, A. (1978). Oocyte maturation in mammals. In Vertebrate Ovary (ed. R. E. Jones), pp. 409-442. New York/London: Plenum Press.
Tulina, N. and Matunis, E. (2001). Control of stem cell self-renewal in Drosophila spermatogenesis by JAK-STAT signaling. Science 294, 2546-2549.
Warn-Cramer, B. J., Cottrell, G. T., Burt, J. M. and Lau, A. F. (1998). Regulation of connexin-43 gap junctional intercellular communication by mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9188-9196.
Watt, F. M. (2001). Stem cell fate and patterning in mammalian epidermis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11, 410-417.[Medline]
White, T. W. and Bruzzone, R. (1996). Multiple connexin proteins in single intercellular channels: connexin compatibility and functional consequences. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 28, 339-350.[Medline]
Woodruff, R. I. (1979). Electrotonic junctions in cecropia moth ovaries. Dev. Biol. 69, 281-295.[Medline]
Xie, T. and Spradling, A. C. (1998). decapentaplegic is essential for the maintenance and division of germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Cell 94, 251-260.[Medline]
Xie, T. and Spradling, A. C. (2000). A niche maintaining germ line stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Science 290, 328-330.