Section of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA
*Corresponding author (e-mail: asantiago{at}ucdavis.edu)
Accepted 13 May 2002
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Ephrins, Eph receptors, Cell migration, Neural crest, Melanoblasts, Chicken
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The mechanisms responsible for dictating the timing and patterning of neural crest migration are not well understood, although one aspect of pattern regulation in the ventral pathway has been clarified. Specifically, the Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and their ephrin ligands have been shown to be essential for the segmental migration of neural crest cells (Krull et al., 1997; Wang and Anderson, 1997
). Studies of the expression of Eph receptors and ephrins in the somites show that in the avian embryo EphB3 is expressed by ventrally migrating neural crest cells, and Ephrin-B1 is expressed in the posterior half of the somites, whereas in rodents, ephrin-B2 is transcribed in the posterior somite and EphB2 is expressed by neural crest cells. The interaction between the Eph receptors expressed by ventrally migrating neural crest cells and the ephrin ligands expressed in the posterior sclerotome mediate a repulsive response that restricts the migration of the cells to the anterior half of each somite. However, as there is normal migration of trunk neural crest cells in the homozygous double mutants of EphB2 and EphB3 (Wang and Anderson, 1997
), it is likely that other EphB receptors are expressed by neural crest cells that compensate for the loss of EphB2 function. In addition, mice lacking ephrin-B2 have a normal pattern of neural crest migration (Wang et al., 1998
; Adams et al., 1999
). This may be due to the presence of functionally redundant guidance cues in the somites. Other cases of Eph-ephrin mediated repulsive behaviour have been reported. For example, these molecules restrict cell or neuronal growth cone movement, thereby preventing cells or axons from entering inappropriate territories in the embryo (Dottori et al., 1998
; Drescher et al., 1995
; Helmbacher et al., 2000
; Henkemeyer et al., 1994
; Imondi et al., 2000
; Nakamoto et al., 1996
; Orioli et al., 1996
; Park et al., 1997
; Smith et al., 1997
). The repulsive response is believed to be mediated by rearrangements in the cytoskeleton that lead to the collapse of growth cones in neuronal cells (Meima et al., 1997
).
A still unresolved question is how neural crest cells are directed along the dorsolateral migratory pathway. Migration into the dorsolateral path depends upon the lineage specification of the cells. Immunolabelling experiments show that neural crest cells are specified as melanoblasts prior to entering the dorsolateral path and that they are the only neural crest cells that migrate dorsolaterally (Kitamura et al., 1992; Reedy et al., 1998
). Neural crest cells from the ventral pathway do not have the ability to invade the dorsolateral path, as demonstrated by grafting non-melanoblast neural crest cells into a host embryo whose endogenous neural crest cells have begun to migrate dorsolaterally (Erickson and Goins, 1995
). In contrast, when melanoblasts are grafted into a young host whose endogenous crest cells are only migrating ventrally, the melanoblasts will immediately migrate dorsolaterally. Taken together, these experiments demonstrate that only melanoblasts, and no other neural crest cells, possess the ability to migrate dorsolaterally.
We wanted to identify the cues in the dorsolateral path that initially inhibit the ventrally migrating crest from entering that space, but yet later allow melanoblasts to migrate along this pathway. The expression of two inhibitory factors in the dermomyotome, chondroitin sulphate glycoconjugates, and peanut agglutinin (PNA)-binding glycoproteins, correlate with the initial inhibition of neural crest entry into the dorsolateral pathway (Oakley et al., 1994). Loss of these two markers by ablation of the dermomyotome allows neural crest cells to enter the dorsolateral path precociously (Erickson et al., 1992
; Oakley et al., 1994
). Furthermore, the expression of these molecules is downregulated at the time that neural crest cells initiate migration along the dorsolateral pathway. These results suggest that neural crest cells might be transiently inhibited from migrating on the dorsolateral path because of the expression of chondroitin-6-sulfate proteoglycan and PNA-binding molecules. However, these results cannot explain how melanoblasts grafted into the early embryo can overcome the dorsolateral barrier. Transmembrane ephrins have also been reported to be present along the dorsolateral pathway at the time neural crest cells are migrating (Krull et al., 1997
; Wang and Anderson, 1997
), suggesting that ephrins might repel ventrally migrating neural crest cells from the dorsolateral path.
In the present study, we confirm that the dorsolateral path is filled with ephrins at the time when neural crest cells move exclusively ventrally. When we perturb Eph receptor function in neural crest cells in trunk explants, the early migrating neural crest disperse dorsolaterally, demonstrating that ephrins block early dorsolateral migration. Surprisingly, we found that transmembrane ephrins are also expressed along the dorsolateral pathway during melanoblast migration and that melanoblasts express several EphB receptors. If Eph receptor function is blocked in vivo at the time when melanoblasts are migrating, this subpopulation of neural crest cells fail to migrate into the dorsolateral pathway. Moreover, in vitro cell migration assays demonstrate that ephrins promote melanoblast migration, not inhibit it. These results show that transmembrane ephrins actively promote the migration of neural crest cells into the dorsolateral path. Adhesion and motility assays suggest that engagement of ephrin-B ligands by EphB receptors promote melanoblast motility by increasing their adhesion to fibronectin.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cultured neural crest cells (see below) were incubated with Fc alone or ephrin-B1-Fc for 1 hour at room temperature. Cells were rinsed in PBS and fixed in 4% PFA for 10 minutes. Bound ephrin-Fc was detected using AP-conjugated goat anti-Fc, and AP activity was detected by incubation with NBT/BCIP (Sigma), as described above.
Quail neural crest cultures and immunofluorescence
Fertile Japanese quail eggs (Coturnix japonica) from the Animal Sciences Department (University of California, Davis) were incubated in a humidified 37°C incubator until they reached stage 13. Neural tubes at somite level I to VIII (between the last-formed somite to the eight from the last-formed somite) were dissected from embryos and separated from surrounding tissues, including ectoderm, somite and notochord, after a brief digestion in Pancreatin (Gibco). Cleaned neural tubes were transferred to 35-mm tissue culture dishes (Falcon) and maintained in Hams F12 medium (Gibco), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 3% 10-day chick embryo extract and 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco). Cultures enriched for neuroblasts and glioblasts (early outgrowths) but deficient in melanoblasts were obtained by removing the neural tube 13 hours after explantation (Reedy et al., 1998). Melanoblast clusters were isolated from the dorsal neural tube 30 hours after explantation, as previously described (Loring et al., 1981
).
For immunocytochemistry, neural crest cells were plated on glass coverslips coated with fibronectin or Fc fusion ligands (Davy and Robbins, 2000). Cells were then fixed in 4% PFA for 10 minutes at room temperature and permeabilised in 0.1% Triton X-100, 2% BSA in PBS. For staining of the actin cytoskeleton, cells were incubated for 30 minutes in rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin (Sigma) as recommended by the supplier. Focal adhesion proteins were detected with the VIN-11-5 anti-vinculin antibody (1:100; Sigma). Cy2-conjugated secondary antibody (1:100; Jackson ImmunoResearch) was used to detect the primary antibody.
RT-PCR analysis
cDNAs were isolated from cultured neural crest cells by using a Cells-to-cDNA kit (Ambion). Lysis buffer was added to neural crest cultures and incubated for 5 minutes. DNase I was added to cell lysates and incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C followed by incubation for 5 minutes at 75°C to inactivate the DNase I activity. First-strand cDNA synthesis was primed with random decamers or oligo(dT) using MMLV-reverse transcriptase. The following primers (Operon) were used for PCR: EphB1, sense primer 5'-AGGGTGGGAAGAAGTGAGTG-3' and antisense primer 5'-TCATCAACCTGCCACCAAAG-3'; for EphB2, sense primer 5'-AGGGGAGTTTGGTGAGGTGT-3', and antisense primer 5'-CCCGGTGCACGTAGTTCATA-3'; for EphB3, sense primer 5'-AGGAGAGTTTGGTGAGGTGTG-3' and antisense primer 5'-CTCGGTGCACGTAGTTCATC-3'; for GAPDH, sense primer 5'-GATGGGTGTCAACCATGAGAAA-3' and antisense primer 5'-ATCAAAGGTGGAAGAATGGCTG-3'. Amplification of cDNAs was performed using 25 cycles with denaturation at 95°C for 1 minute, annealing at 50°C for 1 minute, and extension at 72°C for 1 minute. Final amounts of reagents in the reaction were 1 µg/ml each primer, 10 mM dNTPs and 1.5 mM MgCl2 in a final volume of 50 µl.
Whole-mount in situ hybridisation
Antisense and sense EphB1, EphB2, EphB3, EphB5 and EphA4 probes were produced by linearization of plasmid (kind gifts from Dr Elena Pasquale, The Burnham Institute, La Jolla, CA) with appropriate restriction enzymes, followed by in vitro transcription with T7 RNA polymerase. In situ hybridisation was performed as previously described (Nieto et al., 1996), with the following modifications. White leghorn chicken embryos (California Golden Eggs, Sacramento) stages 14-23 (Hamburger and Hamilton, 1951
) were collected in cold PBS and extraembryonic tissues were removed. Embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and dehydrated in a graded series of PBT-methanol. Embryos were bleached with 6% hydrogen peroxide, rehydrated and treated with 5 µg/ml proteinase K for 15-30 minutes, depending on the embryonic stages. Hybridisation was carried out at 70°C in hybridisation buffer for 36 hours. An alkaline phosphatase-mediated color reaction was carried out using BM Purple (Boehringer Mannheim). Control hybridisation experiments using sense probes were performed for all the receptor genes and did not produce any specific signals (data not shown). Stained embryos were embedded in OCT. Frozen sections were stained with HNK-1 antibody to detect neural crest cells. Cy2-conjugated goat anti mouse IgG+IgM (Jackson Immunoresearch) was used as a secondary antibody.
Trunk explants
The trunks of stage-12 chick embryos were excised at the level of the most posterior 6 somites, as previously described (Krull et al., 1995; Krull and Kulesa, 1998
). When older embryos were employed, segments from the thoracic level, equivalent in length to the stage-12 pieces, were excised and cultured. Explants were preincubated in a solution of ephrin-B1-Fc (10 µg/ml) or control human Fc fusion proteins and grown for 24 to 36 hours on Millicell polycarbonate membranes (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 tissue culture incubator. Explants were then fixed in 4% PFA and immunostained with the monoclonal HNK-1 antibody (supernatant prepared from the cell line obtained from ATCC) to determine the distribution of neural crest cells, and a secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:1000; Promega).
Transfilter chemotaxis assay
Chemotaxis chambers (Chemicon), in which upper and lower wells were separated by an 8-µm pore-size polycarbonate membrane precoated on the bottom side with fibronectin, were used in the transfilter migration assays. Prior to their addition to the bottom well, purified Fc or ephrin-B1-Fc fusion proteins (10 µg/ml) were preclustered by incubation with 100 µg/ml of polyclonal goat anti-human IgG-Fc (Jackson) for 1 hour at room temperature in complete culture medium. The upper wells were filled with medium containing neural crest cells at a concentration of 2x106 cells/ml. Plates were incubated for 6 hours at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. After migration, cells were then scraped from the upper side of the filter membrane in order to visualize only those cells that had migrated through the filter. Migratory cells were stained (Quantitative Cell Migration Assay kit; Chemicon), solubilised and quantified by optical density (OD) measurements at 550 nm.
Cell attachment assay
Microtiter plates were coated with fibronectin (10 µg/ml) alone, ephrin-B1-Fc or human-Fc fusion proteins (10 µg/ml) alone or in combination with fibronectin as described by Davy and Robbins (Davy and Robbins, 2000). Adhesion assays were performed essentially as described by Hertzler and McClay (Hertzler and McClay, 1999
). Briefly, coated plates were treated with BSA (40 µg/ml) to block any nonspecific background binding. Each well received 2.5x104 to 1x105 cells resuspended in F12 culture medium containing 10% fetal calf serum. Plates were sealed and immediately spun at 500 rpm for 3 minutes to attach 100% of the cells to the substratum. After 5 minutes at 37°C, the plates were inverted and spun again to remove non-adhering cells. Bound cells were stained and quantified by OD measurements at 550 nm. Three independent experiments with all variables in triplicate were performed. Results of three representative experiments are shown.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
|
To confirm the presence of Eph receptor proteins for ephrin-B ligands in early outgrowths and melanoblasts, we labelled neural crest cultures with soluble ephrin-B1-Fc-tagged fusion proteins. Specific cell surface-labelling of melanoblasts by ligand-Fc, but not control Fc proteins, was detected (Fig. 4C,D). In agreement with a previous report (Krull et al., 1997), early outgrowths were also found to bind ephrin-B1-Fc, which indicates the expression of EphB receptors (Fig. 4A,B).
|
Treatment of stage-12 explants with soluble ephrin-B1-Fc disrupts the segmental migration of neural crest cells, so that cells are found in both the anterior and posterior somite. Transverse sections confirmed the presence of cells in the anterior and posterior sclerotome (Krull et al., 1997). Neural crest cells were also found in the dorsolateral pathway, whereas in the controls, cells were only migrating ventromedially (Fig. 5A, B; Table 1). These results suggest that the early migratory neural crest cells are prevented from taking the dorsolateral pathway by the inhibitory action of the transmembrane ephrins present in this region. Conversely, when soluble ephrins are added at the onset of melanoblast migration in stage-18 explants, the migration of the cells into the dorsolateral path is inhibited (Fig. 5C; Table 2). In control explants, neural crest cells are observed in the dorsolateral pathway (Fig. 5D; Table 2) in a pattern identical to what would be observed in an intact embryo. These latter results suggest that transmembrane ephrins promote the migration of melanoblasts into the dorsolateral pathway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Ephrin-B ligands prevent early migratory neural crest cells from invading the dorsolateral pathway
The ephrin-B family of transmembrane ligands has been implicated in the segmental guidance of chick trunk neural crest cells through the somites. These ligands are expressed in regions that early migratory neural crest cells avoid, such as the posterior half of the sclerotome (Krull et al., 1997; Wang and Anderson, 1997
). We show that ephrin-B ligands are also present in the dorsolateral pathway when neural crest cells are migrating ventrally, and both in vitro and in vivo assays suggest that they prevent early migratory neural crest cells from invading the dorsolateral path. First, transfilter assays confirm that transmembrane ephrins can act as cell repellants for early migratory neural crest cells, and reduce adhesion to the substratum in an adhesion assay. Conversely, addition of soluble ephrin-B to chick trunk explants results in the inappropriate migration of early neural crest cells into the dorsolateral pathway. Together these results show that ephrin-B produced by the dermomyotome acts as a repulsive cue for early migratory crest, and blocks their migration into the dorsolateral pathway.
Ephrins are unlikely to act by themselves as other molecules that have been demonstrated to inhibit neural crest cell migration in vitro are distributed in the dorsolateral pathway. Specifically, PNA-binding proteins and chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan expression patterns in the chick trunk suggest a barrier function (Oakley et al., 1994; Pettway et al., 1996
). F-spondin is an extracellular matrix molecule that is also produced by barrier tissues. Consistent with an inhibitory role for this protein, blocking F-spondin activity using function-blocking antibodies also results in the inappropriate migration of early neural crest cells into the dorsolateral pathway (Debby-Brafman et al., 1999
). Semaphorins are molecules whose inhibitory activity in vitro has also been suggested to restrict migration of neural crest cells to the anterior somite (Eickholt et al., 1999
). They are promising candidates for blocking the dorsolateral pathway as well, since they are expressed along this path during the early stages of neural crest cell migration (our unpublished results). It is likely that ephrin-B ligands operate in concert with these molecules to prevent early migratory cells from invading the dorsolateral pathway.
Ephrin-B ligands promote the migration of melanoblasts
In this report we show that ephrin-B expression is not downregulated when neural crest cells advance through the dorsolateral path (see also Koblar et al., 2000). Furthermore, previous studies show that when clusters of melanoblasts are placed into a young chick embryo at the time when neural crest cells are only migrating ventrally, the grafted cells invade the dorsolateral pathway precociously (Erickson and Goins, 1995
), which we know is filled with ephrins. In the chick, ephrin-B1 remains expressed in the posterior half of the somite and along the dermomyotome at late stages of neural crest cell migration (Koblar et al., 2000
). In addition, melanoblasts express several EphB receptors, including EphB3, which are also expressed by early migratory cells and are known to mediate a repulsive response that restricts early migratory neural crest cells to the anterior somite. These observations are not consistent with melanoblast migration being inhibited by ephrins, and instead suggest the ephrin-B ligands expressed in the dorsolateral path positively regulate melanoblast migration. Three independent assays were used to investigate this possibility.
Embryonic explants have been very useful in studies of cell migration and axon guidance (Krull and Kulesa, 1998). We disrupted the Eph/ephrin signalling by adding soluble ligand to trunk explants. Blocking receptor activation has a significant effect on the migration of melanoblast cells, as these cells are no longer found migrating on the dorsolateral pathway. This is direct evidence that ephrin-B promotes neural crest cell migration into the dorsolateral pathway.
To further substantiate this conclusion, we used a chemotaxis assay in which addition of soluble ephrin-B ligand inhibits the migration of early migratory cells as expected, but promotes the transfilter migration of melanoblasts. Ephrin-A1 has been shown to be a chemoattractant for endothelial cells (Pandey et al., 1995). Given that ephrins are cell-surface-associated molecules, it is not certain that there is a soluble form of ephrin in the embryo to generate a chemotactic gradient. However, a recent study by Hattori and collegues (Hattori et al., 2000
) demonstrated that ADAM-10 metalloprotease cleaves ephrin-A2 to generate a soluble form of this ligand. The in vivo proteolytic processing of these ephrins by ADAMs would result in the release of ligand fragments that may form a chemotactic gradient. Consistent with this, data from our lab shows that ADAM10 is highly expressed along the dorsolateral pathway during melanoblast migration (R. J. Hall and C. A. Erikson, personal communication). Studies are underway to determine the role of this metalloprotease in the regulation of neural crest cell migration.
Our data demonstrate that ephrin-B, as a soluble protein, is a chemotactic signal for melanoblasts, but does not rule out the possibility that neural crest cells migrating along the dorsolateral pathway are responding to an adhesive substratum of membrane-bound ephrin-B. Consistent with this, we show that engagement of EphB receptors by substratum-adsorbed ephrin-B ligands promotes melanoblast attachment to fibronectin. Signal transduction pathways downstream of the EphB receptors may lead to an increase in cell adhesion by modulating integrin affinity and/or interactions between integrins and intracellular proteins that are required for adhesion. Previous studies show that ephrin-A ligands can modulate integrin function leading to an increase adhesion of fibroblasts to fibronectin (Davy and Robbins, 2000). Also, ephrin-B ligands have been reported to promote endothelial cell attachment to extracellular matrix components through
vß3 and
5ß1 integrins (Huynh-Do et al., 1999
). Neural crest cells express several fibronectin receptors, including
vß3 and
5ß1 (Testaz et al., 1999
). In our study, these integrins could be involved in the increased adhesion via EphB engagement. Other molecules, such as F-spondin, PNA-binding glycoproteins and chondroitin sulphate glycoconjugates, are also expressed in the dermomyotome and display inhibitory effects in vitro (Davies et al., 1990
; Debby-Brafman et al., 1991
; Oakley et al., 1994
). Guidance of melanoblasts along the dorsolateral pathway might therefore result from a composite of the effects of repellent and attractant signals. Subtle differences in the concentration of these molecules would be instrumental in creating specific substratum conditions favouring the migration of melanoblasts into the dorsolateral pathway.
There are several examples in other systems where ephrins have been implicated in cell adhesion events. In the retinotectal system, EphB2 and ephrin-B1 are expressed in dorsoventral gradients in a manner inconsistent with a role in repulsion; axons from the ventral retina express EphB2 and project to the dorsal tectum, which expresses high levels of ephrin-B1 protein (Holash and Pasquale, 1995; Braisted et al., 1997
). Furthermore, EphB2/EphB3 double-mutant mice display cleft palate (Orioli et al., 1996
) and neural folds fail to adhere in the dorsal midline in ephrin-A5 null mice (Holmberg et al., 2000
), suggesting involvement of these molecules in cell-cell adhesion. Finally, activation of certain Eph receptors can promote cell-cell adhesion, and adhesion to a substratum in myeloid cells (Bohme et al., 1996
) and retinal cells (Holash et al., 1997
), respectively. Similarly, activation of EphB receptors in endothelial cells with clustered soluble ephrin-B upregulates cell adhesion, which triggers assembly of endothelial cells in culture to form a capillary network (Stein et al., 1998
; Adams et al., 1999
).
The binding of early migratory cells to ephrin-B results in cell rounding, substantial reduction of stress fibers and a nearly complete loss of vinculin localisation, suggesting a loss of focal adhesions. In contrast, binding of melanoblasts to ephrin-B results in the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, notably the generation of numerous F-actin-containing microspikes, which terminate in small focal contacts. Microspikes are structures usually found at the leading edge of migratory fibroblasts, epithelial cells and neuronal growth cones, where they are actively involved in cell migration (Adams, 1997; Fischer et al., 1997
; Yamashiro et al., 1998
). The small focal adhesions present in microspikes formed in melanoblasts upon contact with ephrin-B could be important in promoting adhesion to extracellular matrix proteins such as fibronectin and providing the traction force necessary to direct cells along the dorsolateral pathway. This is in agreement with the observation that nascent (small) focal contacts in extending lamellipodia generate strong forces responsible for driving cell migration (Beningo et al., 2001
).
Ephrins in neural crest cell guidance
To our knowledge, this is the first report of transmembrane ephrins promoting neural crest cell migration. Furthermore, the results presented here show that ephrin-B ligands act as bifunctional guidance cues. They first prevent early migratory neural cells from invading the dorsolateral path, and then later stimulate the migration of melanoblasts into this pathway. A related situation occurs in cortical neurons that project through different layers of the cerebral cortex. Here, ephrin-A5 repels neurons from layers 2/3 and 5 of the cortex, but induces sprouting of axons from deeper layers (Castellani et al., 1998).
The mechanism by which Eph receptors and ephrins trigger different cellular responses in the neural crest cells is not known. Presumably one important downstream signalling target is the cytoskeleton, since the ephrin-B ligand induces the formation of actin microspikes in melanoblasts and not in the early migratory crest. The formation of microspikes is regulated by the activation of Rac/Rho/Cdc42 family of small GTPases (Hall, 1998; Nobes and Hall, 1998
), and therefore it seems likely that the activation of the Eph receptor acts downstream on these small GTPases in melanoblasts. Indeed, Ephexin, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), and several SH2-domain-containing proteins such as Src, Nck, and RasGAP, which bind activated Eph receptors, are components of signal transduction pathways that control the polymerization of the actin cytoskeleton via the Rac/Rho/Cdc42 family of GTPases (Bruckner and Klein, 1998
; Holland et al., 1998
; Shamah et al., 2001
). Why the two signalling pathways diverge functionally in melanoblasts and the early migratory neural crest is unknown. One possibility is that they may be regulated by interactions with different Eph receptors and or/coreceptors, resulting in the assembly of receptor complexes with different signalling properties. Consistent with this, the EphB3/ephrin-B1 receptor-ligand complex appears to be responsible for the repulsive response that restricts neural crest cell entry into the posterior half-sclerotome. At later stages of development, ephrin-B1 produced by the dermomyotome (Koblar et al., 2000
), may form a complex with EphB3 and/or other EphB receptors. Even though by in situ hybridisation Eph receptor expression is seen in the dorsal neural tube and in regions corresponding to the pathway taken by melanoblasts, we could not confirm that HNK-1-positive cells express multiple Eph receptors in situ. Interestingly, the formation of hetero-receptor complexes between members of the EphB family upon ephrin-B1 stimulation has recently been described (Freywald et al., 2002
).
Variation in receptor structure may also underlie differences in function. In favour of this, a truncated isoform of EphA7 can block the repulsive interaction mediated by full-length EphA7, shifting the cellular response from repulsion to adhesion (Holmberg et al., 2000). Different isoforms encoded by alternatively spliced mRNAs have also been identified for several EphB receptors. For example, a variant form of EphB3 with a juxtamembrane insertion of 15 amino acids has been isolated (Sajjadi and Pasquale, 1993
). Different isoforms of EphB2 are transcribed in the chicken: a truncated form lacking the kinase domain and a form that has an insertion of 16 amino acids in the juxtamembrane region (Sajjadi and Pasquale, 1993
; Connor and Pasquale, 1995
). It is not known whether neural crest cells express any of these variants. We are presently investigating what modulates the nature of the distinct cellular responses observed between these subpopulations of neural crest cells.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Adams, J. C. (1997). Characterization of cell-matrix adhesion requirements for the formation of fascin microspikes. Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 2345-2363.
Adams, R. H., Wilkinson, G. A., Weiss, C., Diella, F., Gale, N. W., Deutsch, U., Risau, W. and Klein, R. (1999). Roles of ephrinB ligands and EphB receptors in cardiovascular development: demarcation of arterial/venous domains, vascular morphogenesis, and sprouting angiogenesis. Genes Dev. 13, 295-306.
Baker, R. K., Vanderboom, A. K., Bell, G. W. and Antin, P. B. (2001). Expression of the receptor tyrosine kinase gene EphB3 during early stages of chick embryo development. Mech. Dev. 104, 129-132.[Medline]
Becker, N., Seitanidou, T., Murphy, P., Mattei, M. G., Topilko, P., Nieto, M. A., Wilkinson, D. G., Charnay, P. and Gilardi-Hebenstreit, P. (1994). Several receptor tyrosine kinase genes of the Eph family are segmentally expressed in the developing hindbrain. Mech. Dev. 47, 3-17.[Medline]
Beningo, K. A., Dembo, M., Kaverina, I., Small, J. V. and Wang, Y. L. (2001). Nascent focal adhesions are responsible for the generation of strong propulsive forces in migrating fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 153, 881-888.
Bohme, B., VandenBos, T., Cerretti, D. P., Park, L. S., Holtrich, U., Rubsamen-Waigmann, H. and Strebhardt, K. (1996). Cell-cell adhesion mediated by binding of membrane-anchored ligand LERK-2 to the EPH-related receptor human embryonal kinase 2 promotes tyrosine kinase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 24747-24752.
Braisted, J. E., McLaughlin, T., Wang, H. U., Friedman, G. C., Anderson, D. J. and OLeary, D. D. (1997). Graded and lamina-specific distributions of ligands of EphB receptor tyrosine kinases in the developing retinotectal system. Dev. Biol. 191, 14-28.[Medline]
Bronner-Fraser, M. (1986). Analysis of the early stages of trunk neural crest migration in avian embryos using monoclonal antibody HNK-1. Dev. Biol. 115, 44-55.[Medline]
Bruckner, K. and Klein, R. (1998). Signaling by Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8, 375-382.[Medline]
Castellani, V., Yue, Y., Gao, P. P., Zhou, R. and Bolz, J. (1998). Dual action of a ligand for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases on specific populations of axons during the development of cortical circuits. J. Neurosci. 18, 4663-4672.
Connor, R. J. and Pasquale, E. B. (1995). Genomic organization and alternatively processed forms of Cek5, a receptor protein-tyrosine kinase of the Eph subfamily. Oncogene. 11, 2429-2438.[Medline]
Davies, R. J., Cook, G. M. W., Stern, C. D. and Keynes, R. J. (1990). Isolation from chick somites of a glycoprotein fraction that causes collapse of dorsal root ganglion growth cones. Neuron 4, 11-20.[Medline]
Davy, A. and Robbins, S. M. (2000). Ephrin-A5 modulates cell adhesion and morphology in an integrin-dependent manner. EMBO J. 19, 5396-5405.
Debby-Brafman, A., Burstyn-Cohen, T., Klar, A. and Kalcheim, C. (1999). F-Spondin, expressed in somite regions avoided by neural crest cells, mediates inhibition of distinct somite domains to neural crest migration. Neuron 22, 475-488.[Medline]
Dottori, M., Hartley, L., Galea, M., Paxinos, G., Polizzotto, M., Kilpatrick, T., Bartlett, P. F., Murphy, M., Kontgen, F. and Boyd, A. W. (1998). EphA4 (Sek1) receptor tyrosine kinase is required for the development of the corticospinal tract. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13248-13253.
Dresher, U., Kremoser, C., Handwerker, C., Loshinger, J., Noda, M. and Bonhoeffer, F. (1995). In vitro guidance of retinal ganglion cell axons by RAGS, a 25 kDa tectal protein related to ligands for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 82, 359-370.[Medline]
Eickholt, B. J., Mackenzie, S. L., Graham, A., Walsh, F. S. and Doherty, P. (1999). Evidence for collapsin-1 functioning in the control of neural crest migration in both trunk and hindbrain regions. Development 126, 2181-2189.
Erickson, C. A., Duong, T. D. and Tosney, K. W. (1992). Descriptive and experimental analysis of the dispersion of neural crest cells along the dorsolateral path and their entry into ectoderm in the chick embryo. Dev. Biol. 151, 251-272.[Medline]
Erickson, C. A. and Goins, T. L. (1995). Avian neural crest cells can migrate in the dorsolateral path only if they are specified as melanocytes. Development 121, 915-924.
Fischer, D., Tucker, R. P., Chiquet-Ehrismann, R. and Adams, J. C. (1997). Cell-adhesive responses to tenascin-C splice variants involve formation of fascin microspikes. Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 2055-2075.
Freywald, A., Sharfe, N. and Roifman, C. M. (2002). The kinase-null EphB6 receptor undergoes transphosphorylation in a complex with EphB1. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 3823-3828.
Gale, N. W., Holland, S. J., Valenzuela, D. M., Flenniken, A., Pan, L., Ryan, T. E., Henkemeyer, M., Strebhardt, K., Hirai, H., Wilkinson, D. G., Pawson, T., Davis, S. and Yancopoulos, G. D. (1996a). Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses and are reciprocally compartmentalized during embryogenesis. Neuron 17, 9-19.[Medline]
Gale, N. W., Flenniken, A. M., Wang, H., Compoton, D. C., Jenkins, N., Davis, S., Anderson, D. J., Wilkinson, D. G. and Yancopoulos, G. D. (1996b). Elk-L3, a novel transmembrane ligand for the Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases, expressed in embryonic floor plate, roof plate and hindbrain segments. Oncogene. 13, 1343-1352.[Medline]
Hall, A. (1998). Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science 279, 509-514.
Hamburger, V. and Hamilton, H. L. (1951). A series of normal stages in development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol. 88, 49-92.
Hattori, M., Osterfield, M. and Flanagan, J. G. (2000). Regulated cleavage of a contact-mediated axon repellent. Science 289, 1360-1365.
Helmbacher, F., Schneider-Maunoury, S., Topilko, P., Tiret, L. and Charnay, P. (2000). Targeting of the EphA4 tyrosine kinase receptor affects dorsal/ventral pathfinding of limb motor axons. Development 127, 3313-3324.
Henkemeyer, M., Marengere, L. E., McGlade, J., Olivier, J. P., Conlon, R. A., Holmyard, D. P., Letwin, K. and Pawson, T. (1994). Immunolocalisation of the Nuk receptor tyrosine kinase suggests roles in segmental patterning of the brain and axonogenesis. Oncogene 9, 1001-1014.[Medline]
Hertzler, P. L. and McClay, D. R. (1999). Alpha SU2, an epithelial integrin that binds laminin in the sea urchin embryo. Dev. Biol. 207, 1-13.[Medline]
Hirano, S., Tanaka, H., Ohta, K., Norita, M., Hoshino, K., Meguro, R. and Kase, M. (1998). Normal ontogenic observations on the expression of Eph receptor tyrosine kinase, Cek8, in chick embryos. Anat. Embryol. 197, 187-197.[Medline]
Holash, J. A. and Pasquale, E. B. (1995). Polarized expression of the receptor protein tyrosine kinase Cek5 in the developing avian visual system. Dev. Biol. 172, 683-693.[Medline]
Holash, J. A., Soans, C., Chong, L. D., Shao, H., Dixit, V. M. and Pasquale, E. B. (1997). Reciprocal expression of the Eph receptor Cek5 and its ligand(s) in the early retina. Dev. Biol. 182, 256-269.[Medline]
Holland, S. J., Peles, E., Pawson, T. and Schlessinger, J. (1998). Cell-contact-dependent signalling in axon growth and guidance: Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase B. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8, 117-127.[Medline]
Holmberg, J., Clarke, D. L. and Frisen, J. (2000). Regulation of repulsion versus adhesion by different splice forms of an Eph receptor. Nature 408, 203-206.[Medline]
Huynh-Do, U., Stein, E., Lane, A. A., Liu, H., Cerreti, D. P. and Daniel, T. O. (1999). Surface densities of ephrin-B1 determine EphB1-coupled activation of cell attachment through vß3 and
5ß1 integrins. EMBO J. 18, 2165-2173.
Imondi, R., Wideman, C. and Kaprielian, Z. (2000). Complementary expression of transmembrane ephrins and their receptors in the mouse spinal cord: a possible role in constraining the orientation of longitudinally projecting axons. Development 127, 1397-1410.
Irving, C., Nieto, M. A., DasGupta, R., Charnay, P. and Wilkinson, D. G. (1996). Progressive spatial restriction of Sek-1 and Krox-20 gene expression during hindbrain segmentation. Dev. Biol. 173, 26-38.[Medline]
Kitamura, K., Takiguchi-Hayashi, K., Sezaki, M., Yamamoto, H. and Takeuchi, T. (1992). Avian neural crest cells express a melanogenic trait during early migration from the neural tube: observations with the new monoclonal antibody, MEBL-1. Development 114, 367-378.[Abstract]
Koblar, S. A., Krull, C. E., Pasquale, E. B., McLennan, R., Peale, F. D., Cerretti, D. P. and Bothwell, M. (2000). Spinal motor axons and neural crest cells use different molecular guides for segmental migration through the rostral half-somite. J. Neurobiol. 42, 437-447.[Medline]
Krull, C. E., Collazo, A., Fraser, S. E. and Bronner-Fraser, M. (1995). Segmental migration of trunk neural crest: time-lapse analysis reveals a role for PNA-binding molecules. Development. 121, 3733-3743.
Krull, C. E., Lansford, R., Gale, N. W., Collazo, A., Marcelle, C., Yancopoulos, G. D., Fraser, S. E. and Bronner-Fraser, M. (1997). Interactions of Eph-related receptors and ligands confer rostrocaudal pattern to trunk neural crest migration. Curr. Biol. 8, 571-180.
Krull, C. E. and Kulesa, P. M. (1998). Embryonic explant and slice preparations for studies of cell migration and axon guidance. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 36, 145-159.[Medline]
Kury, P., Gale, N., Connor, R., Pasquale, E. and Guthrie, S. (2000). Eph receptors and ephrin expression in cranial motor neurons and the branchial arches of the chick embryo. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 15, 123-140.[Medline]
Le Douarin, N. M. and Kalcheim, C. (1999). The Neural Crest. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Loring, J., Glimelius, B., Erickson, C. A. and Weston, J. A. (1981). Analysis of developmentally homogeneous neural crest cell populations in vitro. I. Formation, morphology and differentiative behavior. Dev. Biol. 82, 86-94.[Medline]
Loring, J. F. and Erickson, C. A. (1987). Neural crest cell migratory pathways in the trunk of the chick embryo. Dev. Biol. 121, 220-236.[Medline]
Meima, L., Kljavin, I. J., Moran, P., Shih, A., Winslow, J. W. and Caras, I. W. (1997). AL-1-induced growth cone collapse of rat cortical neurons is correlated with REK7 expression and rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton. Eur. J. Neurosci. 9, 177-188.[Medline]
Nakamoto, M., Cheng, H.-J., Friedman, G. C., McLaughlin, T., Hansen, M. J., Yoon, C. H., OLeary, D. D. M. and Flanagan, J. G. (1996). Topographically specific effects of Elf-1 on retinal axon guidance in vitro and retinal axon mapping in vivo. Cell 86, 755-766.[Medline]
Nieto, M. A., Patel, K. and Wilkinson, D. G. (1996). In situ hybridisation analysis of chick embryos in whole mount and tissue sections. Methods Cell Biol. 51, 219-235.[Medline]
Nobes, C. D. and Hall, A. (1999). Rho GTPases control polarity, protrusion, and adhesion during cell movement. J. Cell Biol. 144, 1235-1244.
Oakley, R. A., Lasky, C. J., Erickson, C. A. and Tosney, K. W. (1994). Glycoconjugates mark a transient barrier to neural crest migration in the chicken embryo. Development 120, 103-114.
Orioli, D., Henkemeyer, M., Lemke, G., Klein, R. and Pawson, T. (1996). Sek4 and Nuk receptors cooperate in guidance of commissural axons and in palate formation. EMBO J. 15, 6035-6049.[Abstract]
Pandey, A., Shao, H., Marks, R. M., Polverini, P. J. and Dixit, V. M. (1995). Role of B61, the ligand for the Eck receptor tyrosine kinase, in TNF-alpha-induced angiogenesis. Science 268, 567-569.[Medline]
Park, S., Frisen, J. and Barbacid, M. (1997). Aberrant axonal projections in mice lacking EphA8 (Eek) tyrosine protein kinase receptors. EMBO. J. 16, 3106-3114.
Pasquale, E. B. (1991). Identification of chicken embryo kinase 5, a developmentally regulated receptor-type tyrosine kinase of the Eph family. Cell Regul. 2, 523-534.[Medline]
Pettway, Z., Domowicz, M., Schwartz, N. B. and Bronner-Fraser M. (1996). Age-dependent inhibition of neural crest migration by the notochord correlates with alterations in the S103L chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan. Exp. Cell. Res. 225, 195-206.[Medline]
Reedy, M. V., Faraco, C. D. and Erickson, C. A. (1998). The delayed entry of thoracic neural crest cells into the dorsolateral path is a consequence of the late emigration of melanogenic neural crest cells from the neural tube. Dev. Biol. 200, 234-246.[Medline]
Rickmann, M., Fawcett, J. W. and Keynes, R. J. (1985). The migration of neural crest cells and the growth of motor axons through the rostral half of the chick somite. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 90, 437-455.[Medline]
Sajjadi, F. G. and Pasquale, E. B. (1993). Five novel avian Eph-related tyrosine kinases are differentially expressed. Oncogene 8, 1807-1813.[Medline]
Schmidt, C., Christ, B., Maden, M., Brand-Saberi, B. and Patel, K. (2001). Regulation of EphA4 expression in paraxial and lateral plate mesoderm by ectoderm-derived signals. Dev. Dyn. 220, 377-386.[Medline]
Serbedzija, G. N., Bronner-Fraser, M. and Fraser, S. E. (1989). A vital dye analysis of the timing and pathways of avian trunk neural crest cell migration. Development. 106, 809-816.[Abstract]
Shamah, S., Lin, M., Goldberg, J., Estrach, S., Sahin, M., Hu, L., Bazalakova, M., Neve, R., Corfas, G., Debant, A. and Greenberg, M. (2001). EphA receptors regulate growth cone dynamics through the novel guanine nucleotide exchange factor Ephexin. Cell 105, 233-244.[Medline]
Smith, A., Robinson, V., Patel, K. and Wilkinson, D. G. (1997). The EphA4 and EphB1 receptor tyrosine kinases and ephrin-B2 ligand regulate targeted migration of branchial neural crest cells. Curr. Biol. 7, 561-570.[Medline]
Stein, E., Lane, A. A., Cerretti, D. P., Schoecklmann, H. O., Schroff, A. D., Van Etten, R. L. and Daniel, T. O. (1998). Eph receptors discriminate specific ligand oligomers to determine alternative signaling complexes, attachment, and assembly responses. Genes Dev. 12, 667-678.
Swartz, M. E., Eberhart, J., Pasquale, E. B. and Krull, C. E. (2001). EphA4/ephrin-A5 interactions in muscle precursor cell migration in the avian forelimb. Development 128, 4669-4680.
Teillet, M. A., Kalcheim, C. and Le Douarin, N. M. (1987). Formation of the dorsal root ganglia in the avian embryo: segmental origin and migratory behavior of neural crest progenitor cells. Dev. Biol. 120, 329-347.[Medline]
Testaz, S., Delannet, M. and Duband, J. L. (1999). Adhesion and migration of avian neural crest cells on fibronectin require cooperating activities of multiple integrins of the ß1 and ß3 families. J. Cell Sci. 112, 4715-4728.
Wang, H. U. and Anderson, D. J. (1997). Eph family transmembrane ligands can mediate repulsive guidance of trunk neural crest migration and motor axon outgrowth. Neuron 18, 383-396.[Medline]
Wang, H. U., Chen, Z. F. and Anderson, D. J. (1998). Molecular distinction and angiogenic interaction between embryonic arteries and veins revealed by ephrin-B2 and its receptor Eph-B4. Cell 93, 741-753.[Medline]
Yamashiro, S., Yamakita, Y., Ono, S. and Matsumura, F. (1998). Fascin, an actin-bundling protein, induces membrane protrusions and increases cell motility of epithelial cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 993-1006.
Zhou, J. X., Wang, B., Kalo, M. S., Zisch, A. H., Pasquale, E. B. and Ruoslahti, E. (1999). An Eph receptor regulates integrin activity through R-Ras. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 13813-13818.