Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: ejrobert{at}fas.harvard.edu)
Accepted June 21, 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Smad1, Extra-embryonic tissues, Primordial germ cells, BMP, Mouse
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Inductive interactions between the tissue layers of the early embryo govern formation of the early body plan and control numerous processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation and migration (Beddington and Robertson, 1999). Members of the transforming growth factor ß (TGFß) family of growth factors regulate many of these aspects of post-implantation development (Goumans and Mummery, 2000). TGFß ligands can be divided into two groups in accordance with biological and structural criteria: BMP/GDF and TGFß/activin/nodal (Kingsley, 1994). Experiments in the mouse have underscored the diverse roles these classes of molecules play during development. Chimera analysis and loss-of-function studies have shown that nodal signaling is important in guiding the formation of both the anteroposterior (AP) and left-right axis (Schier and Shen, 2000). Loss of BMP4 function results in gastrulation defects, with many embryos failing to form sufficient mesoderm (Winnier et al., 1995). Those embryos surviving beyond gastrulation display truncated and disorganized posterior structures, including extra-embryonic mesoderm derivatives and entirely lack primordial germ cells (PGCs) (Lawson et al., 1999; Winnier et al., 1995). Similarly, loss of BMP2 function also disturbs early developmental processes and causes defective development of the amnion, chorion, and heart, implicating BMP2 in the formation of both extra-embryonic and embryonic mesodermal derivatives (Zhang and Bradley, 1996).
TGFß ligands signal via heteromeric complexes composed of type I and type II cell-surface serine/threonine kinase receptors (Massague, 1998). In the ligand-induced complex, the type II receptors phosphorylate and activate type I receptors. Activated type I receptors in turn phosphorylate Smad family members, which constitute the only known substrates of the type I receptors (Massague, 1998). To date, nine mammalian Smads have been identified, which fall into three classes based on biological and structural criteria: pathway-specific Smads, common Smads and inhibitory Smads (Whitman, 1998). Thus, in response to TGFß-mediated signaling the pathway-specific Smads, including Smad1, 2, 3, 5 and 8, are selectively phosphorylated at their C termini by specific type I receptors. Once phosphorylated, the pathway-specific Smads complex with the common Smad, Smad4, and translocate into the nucleus where, via interaction with DNA-binding proteins such as OAZ and FAST, they direct specific transcriptional responses (Wotton et al., 1999). Considerable biochemical and embryological evidence has shown that the pathway-specific Smads act as the intracellular mediators for distinct classes of ligands. Smad2 and Smad3 are phosphorylated by the TGFß type I and activin type IB receptors (Macias-Silva et al., 1996; Zhang et al., 1996), whereas Smad1, Smad5 and Smad8 are activated by BMP type I receptors (Hoodless et al., 1996; Kawai et al., 2000; Nishimura et al., 1998). Moreover in Xenopus animal cap assays, Smad2 induces dorsal mesoderm in a manner similar to overexpression of activin and nodal (Graff et al., 1996; Suzuki et al., 1997), whereas Smad1 and Smad5 causes formation of ventral mesoderm, a response evoked by Bmp2 and Bmp4 (Baker and Harland, 1996; Graff et al., 1996).
Given the high degree of homology shared by members of the Smad family, it has been of interest to understand the extent to which they function interchangeably in vivo. The function of Smad proteins has been addressed in the mouse using gene targeting approaches and has shown that highly related Smad proteins can have diverse roles in the normal animal. Thus, Smad2 plays a central role in AP axis formation and Smad2-deficient embryos are abnormal at gastrulation (Heyer et al., 1999; Nomura and Li, 1998; Waldrip et al., 1998; Weinstein et al., 1998), ultimately forming only extra-embryonic mesoderm derivatives. By contrast, despite sharing 92% amino acid identity with Smad2, Smad3-deficient mice show only impaired immune functions and a predisposition to colon cancer (Yang et al., 1999b; Zhu et al., 1998). As yet, it is unclear whether the differences in phenotype are due to distinct responses mediated by either Smad or whether they are reflective of their unique expression patterns.
To date, the role of only a single BMP-specific Smad, Smad5, has been studied in the mouse. Smad5 mutants die by 10.5 dpc and display multiple embryonic and extra-embryonic phenotypes, including gut, cardiac and laterality defects, as well as increased mesenchymal apoptosis, and lack of forebrain tissue (Chang et al., 1999; Chang et al., 2000; Yang et al., 1999b). These defects are consistent with a generalized abrogation of BMP signaling; however, the relatively late onset of these phenotypes, in comparison with those observed for Bmp2 and Bmp4 mutations, suggests that other BMP-regulated Smads such as Smad1 or Smad8 must contribute in transducing BMP signals during early embryogenesis.
In the present study, we have explored the role of Smad1, a second member of the BMP signaling pathway, in the mouse. Similar to Smad5 mutants, Smad1-/- embryos die at 10.5 dpc. However the phenotypes of the two mutations are largely non-overlapping. Thus, unlike Smad5-/- embryos, loss of Smad1 does not prevent the formation and patterning of the embryo proper. Rather, from early post-gastrulation stages onwards, Smad1 mutants exhibit pronounced defects in the morphogenesis and proliferation of extra-embryonic tissues, which collectively result in embryonic lethality. These defects include overgrowth of the posterior visceral endoderm (VE), as well as the extra-embryonic ectoderm and mesoderm of the chorion. Surprisingly, loss of Smad1 has the opposite growth effect on the allantois, leading to a dramatic reduction in the size and patterning of this tissue and concomitant failure to form the umbilical connection to the placenta. In addition Smad1-deficient embryos display a marked reduction in the number of primordial germ cells (PGCs) at 8.5 dpc. Thus, our data demonstrate that Smad1 pathways play a pivotal role in controlling the proliferation and morphogenesis of the extra-embryonic tissues during early mammalian development.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The Smad1RobPC allele was generated by inserting a loxP and EcoRI site into the StuI site of the 4.5 kb EcoRI/BamHI 5' arm. The 3' arm was constructed by inserting a loxP-flanked PGK-hygro cassette into the MluI site of the 5.8 kb BamHI/HindIII fragment. A 3' MCI-tk cassette was added. Drug-resistant ES-cell clones were screened by Southern blot using a 3' external probe (as above) and an internal hygro probe. Three of 700 clones were correctly targeted and two were used to produce germline chimeras. Heterozygous Smad1RobPC mice were mated to mice carrying a Protamine-Cre transgene (OGorman et al., 1997). Heterozygous males carrying the transgene were mated to MF1 females. Because Cre-mediated recombination leads to three potential configurations of the Smad1RobPC locus, the progeny were screened by Southern blot analysis. EcoRI- and BamHI-digested tail DNA samples were probed with the 3' external probe, hygro probe and 5' internal probe to identify animals carrying the Smad1Robcn allele.
For both Smad1 alleles, embryos from 9.5 dpc onwards were genotyped by Southern blot analysis of yolk-sac DNA. Younger embryos derived from Smad1Robm1 heterozygous intercrosses were genotyped by PCR with the Smad1-specific primers 5'- GTCGAACAGTGTACGCCAAGC-3' and 5'-CCTGTTTCCACCC-AAGGAGTC-3', and with neo-specific primers 5'-CGTCTGATGCC-GCCGTGTTCC-3' and 5'-CTTCGCCCAATAGCAGCCAGTCC-3'.
Northern and western blot analysis
Total RNA was extracted from individual 9.5 dpc embryos using the TRIzol method (Gibco/BRL). Fifteen micrograms of total RNA were size fractionated on a 1.3% agarose-formaldehyde gel, transferred onto GeneScreen Plus (NEN Research Products), and probed with a 32P random-primed 700 bp EcoRI/HindIII fragment, comprised mostly of Smad1 3' UTR. For Western blot, embryos or COS cells, were lysed in sample buffer (0.0625 M Tris-HCL, pH 6.8, 2.0% SDS, 5.0% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.002% Bromophenol Blue, 10.0% glycerol) and sonicated. Lysates (20 µg) were fractionated by SDS-PAGE using 12% separating gels, transferred onto nitrocellulose and membranes incubated overnight with an anti-Smad1 antibody (Upstate, 1:500) that recognized amino acids 147-258 of human Smad1. The secondary antibody was a bioatinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (ICN, 1:150,000). Finally, filters were incubated with streptavidin/HRP conjugate (Phar Mingen, 1:1000) and HRP detected using an ECL kit (Amersham, IL).
Histology and in situ hybridization
Embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 4°C overnight, followed by dehydration through a graded ethanol series. Embryos were cleared in xylene, embedded in Fibrowax (BDH Laboratory Supplies, England) and sectioned at 8µm. Sections were collected on Tespa-treated glass slides and stained with Hematoxylin and eosin using standard procedures.
Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed as described (Wilkinson, 1992). Antisense probes specific for AFP (Waldrip et al., 1998), Sox2 (Conlon et al., 1994), T (Wilkinson et al., 1990), eomesodermin (Russ et al., 2000), Bmp4 (Jones et al., 1991), Fgf8 (Crossley and Martin, 1995) and Fgf4 (Wilkinson et al., 1988) were used as described. Embryos were post-fixed in 4% PFA, photographed, dehydrated in ethanol, cleared in xylenes, embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 8 µm. Sections were dewaxed using standard procedures, mounted in Cytoseal and photographed using Normarski optics.
Radioactive in situ hybridization was performed as described (Jones et al., 1991). The probes used include a full-length Smad1 (Waldrip et al., 1998) and the proline-rich linker domain of Smad5 (Meersseman et al., 1997). The Smad8 probe is a 437 bp clone that corresponds to the linker region (kindly provided by G. Chu). Sections were photographed using a Leitz DMR microscope and Fugichrome Velvia color slide film.
Visualization of PGCs
Primordial germ cells were visualized and counted according to Lawson et al. (Lawson et al., 1999). Genotype was assessed by PCR analysis of yolk-sac DNA.
Generation and analysis of chimeric embryos
Blastocysts, recovered from Smad1Robm1 intercrosses were injected with 10-15 wild-type KT4 ES cells (Tremblay et al., 2000). After transfer into pseudopregnant foster females, the manipulated embryos were recovered at 7.5 dpc, fixed and stained for ß-galactosidase activity.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Loss of Smad1 results in embryonic lethality by 10.5 dpc
Although Smad1 heterozygous mice were normal and fertile, no live born Smad1Robm1 or Smad1Robcn homozygous mice were produced from heterozygous matings (Table 1), and both alleles result in identical embryonic lethal phenotypes. Timed matings from heterozygous intercrosses were used to determine the onset of lethality. With death described as the presence of necrotic cells and lack of a beating heart, Smad1-null embryos were dead or dying by 10.5 dpc and failed to establish a functional placental connection. Because other mutations with defects in placentation also die at a similar developmental stage (Gurtner et al., 1995; Kwee et al., 1995; Luo et al., 1997; Yang et al., 1995), the lethality of the Smad1 mutation is likely attributable to this defect.
|
|
Defects in extra-embryonic ectoderm and mesoderm formation
At the onset of gastrulation, epiblast cells move towards and ingress through the primitive streak to form mesoderm. Fate-mapping studies have shown that precursors of the extra-embryonic mesoderm are located in the proximal portion of the epiblast and are the first cell population to traverse the streak (Lawson et al., 1991). Extra-embryonic mesoderm emerges as a bulge of tissue that displaces the overlying extra-embryonic ectoderm. This bulge of cells, together with a slower growing anterior bulge, cavitates to form the posterior and anterior amniotic folds. These folds eventually fuse, forming a physical barrier between the embryo proper and the extra-embryonic tissues. A second consequence of this proximal migration of extra-embryonic mesoderm is the displacement of the extra-embryonic ectoderm, the precursor of the chorion that overlies the epiblast. These coordinated morphogenetic movements lead to the emergence of the chorion as a distinct anteriorly tilting disk that is displaced proximally towards the ectoplacental cone (EPC) and eventually fuses with the ventral surface of the developing placenta. In Smad1 mutants, this process is abnormal. While the amniotic folds form and the extra-embryonic mesoderm migrates to the line the VE, the chorion is erratically folded within the exocoelomic cavity (Fig. 2J). Despite the incorrect placement and folding of the chorion at this stage, the composition of this tissue is histologically normal and the chorionic ectoderm is lined with mesoderm (Fig. 2K).
The allantois emerges as a bud of extra-embryonic mesoderm that is continuous with the most posterior aspect of the primitive streak. As the bud expands and projects into the exocoelomic cavity, the proximal portion enlarges via mitosis and cavitation to produce a loosely scattered mesothelium capable of chorioallantoic fusion (Downs, 2000; Ellington, 1985), while the distal cells at the base of the allantois remain densely packed and continuous with the streak. In comparison with wild-type littermates at 7.5-8.5 dpc, the allantois of Smad1-mutant embryos fails to elaborate and remains as a compact mass of extra-embryonic mesoderm continuous with the streak (Fig. 2F-M). Unlike the twisting of the mutant epiblast, the growth of the allantois never recovers and thus by 9.5 dpc, three types of allantois-like structures have developed (Fig. 3). The mutant allantois can develop into a balloon-like structure containing peripheral blood-filled vessels (Fig. 3A) or a dense structure filled with compact mesenchyme and small blood-filled sacs (Fig. 3B). In a fraction of the mutants, the allantoic rudiment occasionally forms a tenuous connection with the chorionic surface of the placenta, but fails to efficiently invade (Fig. 3D).
|
Molecular characterization of tissue defects
To more carefully analyze the tissue defects in Smad1 mutant embryos, we used a panel of molecular markers. To establish whether the defects observed in early mesodermal populations originate from defects in the morphogenesis of the primitive streak, Brachyury (T) expression was assessed. In wild-type embryos, T marks the entire PD axis of the streak and nascent mesoderm (Wilkinson et al., 1990; Fig. 4A). By contrast, Smad1 mutants exhibited discontinuous and less intense T expression (Fig. 4B,C). Fgf8, a marker of the primitive streak and the base of the allantois, was also examined (Crossley and Martin, 1995). Although expression levels in the streak were comparable with those in wild-type littermates, posterior views of 7.0 dpc mutants demonstrates that the streak is irregularly twisted (Fig. 4D). In many mutants, we noted that the proximal-most domain of Fgf8 expression lay within the VE folds, presumably demarcating the base of the allantois (Fig. 4D,E). To confirm this possibility, we assessed Fgf3 expression, a marker for extra-embryonic mesoderm (Wilkinson et al., 1988). As with Fgf8, cells within the VE folds express Fgf3 confirming that extra-embryonic mesoderm migrates into the pockets of VE (Fig. 4F,G).
|
|
To determine the extent of embryonic lineage formation as well as the fate of extra-embryonic ectoderm at later stages, we examined Sox2 expression in late headfold embryos. Sox2 is normally expressed in the neuroectoderm, definitive endoderm and throughout the extra-embryonic ectoderm (Wood and Episkopou, 1999). In Smad1 mutants, while the embryonic expression pattern is normal, the extra-embryonic expression pattern is highly aberrant. Unlike wild-type embryos, a Sox2-positive projection extends from the posterior proximal edge of the embryonic region towards the EPC (Fig. 5D,E,E'). Proximal sections of Sox2-labeled embryos also reveals the presence of a copious amount of erratically folded chorionic ectoderm (Fig. 5E''). Collectively, our analyses show that loss of Smad1 severely perturbs the growth and morphogenesis of the chorion.
Expression patterns of Smad1, Smad5 and Smad8
BMP signals can be transmitted by Smad1, Smad5 and Smad8 (Chen et al., 1997; Hoodless et al., 1996; Kawai et al., 2000; Macias-Silva et al., 1998). To establish any correlation between tissue abnormalities seen in Smad1 mutants and the pattern of expression of BMP-transducing Smads, we compared the expression pattern of all three genes from early stages onwards. At 6.5 dpc Smad1 is highly expressed in the VE, and at much lower levels in the early epiblast (Fig. 6A). After the initiation of gastrulation, Smad1 is expressed at high levels throughout the embryonic and extra-embryonic mesoderm and VE, with lower levels detected in epiblast tissue and chorion (Fig. 6B). By comparison, Smad5 is expressed at low levels throughout the pre-gastrulation embryos but is markedly upregulated by 7.25 dpc in the entire embryonic and extra-embryonic mesoderm and epiblast (Fig. 6D-E)(Chang et al., 1999). Smad8 is not expressed above background levels at 6.5 dpc (Fig. 6G). By 7.25 dpc, Smad8 is expressed at the highest levels in the VE, amnion and allantois with lower levels apparent in the posterior streak and chorion (Fig. 6H). Thus, all three BMP-transducing Smads are co-expressed in the extra-embryonic mesoderm populations at 7.25 dpc, while only Smad1 and Smad8 are abundantly expressed in the VE. By 8.5 dpc, all three genes are uniformly and ubiquitously expressed in the embryo (Fig. 6C,F,I). These results demonstrate that while Smad1 is uniquely expressed in the early VE, by the onset of gastrulation all tissues express multiple BMP-transducing Smads.
|
|
Allocation to the germ cell lineage is thought to occur shortly before PGCs can first be identified as a cluster of strongly alkaline phosphatase (AP)-positive cells at the base of the allantois (Ginsburg et al., 1990; Lawson and Hage, 1994). Around 8.5 dpc, the PGCs intercalate into the hindgut epithelium and migrate anteriorly. We collected Smad1-deficient embryos at 9.0-9.5 dpc and assayed for PGC formation by staining for endogenous AP activity. While wild-type and heterozygous littermates between 13 and 26 somites all had similar numbers of PGCs (n=80-250), the number observed in mutant embryos was significantly reduced (Fig. 8A-C). Of the 14 similarly staged mutants, six out of 14 (43%) had no PGCs, five out of 14 (36%) had fewer than ten and three out of 14 (21%) had less than 25. These results suggest that loss of Smad1 affects either the initial specification of the PGC precursor population in the proximal epiblast or survival and/or proliferation of the allocated PGC population. Further support for the role of Smad1 in the early specification of PGCs comes from the analysis of PGC numbers at the late headfold (LHF)-stage, when early PGCs are visible as a cluster at the base of the allantois. Consistent with the deficit of PGCs in later embryos, HF-stage Smad1-/- either lack or contain less than three PGCs (data not shown). An alternative explanation is that the severe posterior streak defects in Smad1-null embryos compromise local signals within the extra-embryonic lineages that may play a role in the allocation of the PGC precursors to the germline or affect their immediate survival. To control for this possibility, we examined PGC formation in Smad2-deficient embryos. Smad2 mutants embryos do not form a recognizable primitive streak, and by 8.0 dpc the entire epiblast transforms into extra-embryonic mesoderm (Waldrip et al., 1998). In spite of these profound cellular disturbances, we found that the majority of Smad2-deficient embryos (20/25) collected at 8.5 dpc contained PGCs. Several Smad2 mutants formed abundant PGCs, many of which were concentrated in darkly stained clusters (Fig. 8D,E). The remaining Smad2 mutants (5/25) exhibited a more severe phenotype, and completely lacked AP-positive cells (data not shown). Collectively, these data suggest that the formation of PGCs from the proximal epiblast can proceed even in the absence of normal gastrulation movements. Therefore, as opposed to a secondary consequence of aberrant gastrulation, the deficit of PGCs in Smad1 mutant embryos most probably reflects a direct requirement for Smad1 in transducing extra-embryonic ectoderm-derived BMP signals
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Smad1-mutant embryos are readily identified as early as 7.0 dpc, owing to the localized overgrowth of the VE adjacent to the posterior embryonic/extra-embryonic boundary. Despite the localized tissue disturbance, Smad1 transcripts are uniformly expressed throughout the VE (Fig. 6A-C). Intriguingly, Bmp2 is asymmetrically expressed at the onset of gastrulation (Ying and Zhao, 2001), with the highest levels in the VE overlying the proximal regions of the primitive streak. However, the VE defects seen in Smad1-/- embryos cannot be attributed to the attenuation of BMP2 signaling alone, because embryos lacking BMP2 do not exhibit this phenotype (Zhang and Bradley, 1996). Bmp4 and Bmp8b are expressed in tissues adjacent to the affected VE population, but neither molecule nor other components of the BMP signaling pathway are known to be asymmetrically distributed. In contrast cerberus-like (Cer1), an antagonist of both BMP and Nodal signaling (Piccolo et al., 1999) is confined to the VE overlying the anterior side of the embryo. While Cer1 is not essential for development (Belo et al., 2000; Shawlot et al., 2000; Simpson et al., 1999), the anterior expression of Cer1 as well as that of other antagonists, such as dickkopf1and lefty1 (Glinka et al., 1998; Meno et al., 1999), suggests a mechanism that limits the levels of activated Smad1 anteriorly. Given the expression patterns of the antagonists and the BMP ligands during early gastrulation, it is likely that the uniform expression of Smad1 in the VE is converted to a posterior activity gradient. Our data is consistent with this Smad1 activity playing an important role in negatively regulating posterior VE growth.
The overgrowth of the VE in Smad1-deficient embryos is causally associated with a pronounced twisting of the epiblast and mesoderm tissue along the PD axis. Thus, we find that neither defect is rescued in chimeric embryos in which the epiblast derivatives are largely wild type, suggesting that this phenotype results from the lack of Smad1 in extra-embryonic tissues, most likely the VE where Smad1 is highly expressed (Fig. 6A-C). Remarkably, the morphogenetic disturbances are relatively transient, as judged by whole-mount, histological and molecular criteria, and all mutant embryos regain bilateral symmetry by 8.0 dpc. Interestingly the correction of the phenotype is coincident with formation of the definitive endoderm, the cell population that displaces the VE. Thus, one likely explanation for the recovery of bilateral symmetry is that the replacement of the VE by the emerging definitive endoderm, which is specified normally in Smad1-/- embryos, relieves the mechanical restrictions imposed by the VE. Interestingly, loss of function of other transcription factors expressed in the VE result in altered epiblast morphology (Acampora et al., 1995; Ang et al., 1996; Ang and Rossant, 1994; Shawlot and Behringer, 1995). In these cases, abnormal morphogenesis of VE causes a constriction at the embryonic/extra-embryonic boundary. Chimera analysis confirms that these defects reside in the extra-embryonic tissues, further supporting the idea that defects in the VE secondarily impact epiblast morphogenesis (Dufort et al., 1998; Rhinn et al., 1998; Shawlot et al., 1999). Importantly, unlike Smad1 mutants, these mutations are more severe and disturb the formation of the primary embryonic axis and are often associated with defects in the definitive endoderm.
In Smad1 mutants, T expression is severely perturbed during early/mid-streak stages, but is present at normal levels by 7.5- 8.0 dpc (Fig. 4A-C; data not shown). T is normally uniformly expressed in nascent mesoderm forming along the entire length of the primitive streak. However in the absence of Smad1, we find reduced and intermittent T expression. Strikingly, at these early stages, other streak and mesoderm markers, including Fgf8, Fgf3 and eom are also expressed in an irregular pattern, indicative of the disrupted PD axis noted above, but in contrast to T, these markers are expressed at wild-type levels (Fig. 4D; data not shown). One possibility for the selective reduction of T expression is that Smad1 is involved in the activation of early T expression. Indeed, in T mutants and T chimeras allantois formation is impaired, and resembles what we describe here for Smad1-deficient embryos (Rashbass et al., 1991; Wilson et al., 1993). A recent report has suggested that SIP1, a novel zinc-finger/homeodomain protein, can interact with both activated Smads and target gene promoters. Interestingly, SIP1 binding motifs have been identified in the Xenopus T homolog (Verschueren et al., 1999), providing evidence in support of a Smad1-mediated pathway regulating T transcription.
Previous gene targeting experiments have underscored the importance of BMP signaling in the formation of the allantois. Embryos that lack Bmp4 form a rudimentary allantois (Lawson et al., 1999), while in Bmp2 mutants, allantois formation is slightly delayed (Zhang and Bradley, 1996). Embryos that lack Bmp8b, a member of the 60A subgroup of BMP ligands, have a shortened allantois attributed to developmental delay (Ying et al., 2000). Other members of the 60A subgroup are not uniquely important for allantois formation, but in Bmp5/7 double mutant embryos the allantois is reduced in size, developmentally delayed and often unable to fuse with the chorion (Solloway and Robertson, 1999). Interestingly, despite the robust co-expression of Smad1, Smad5 and Smad8 in the allantois (Fig. 6) and adjacent tissues, loss of either Smad1 or Smad5 results in distinct allantois phenotypes. Smad5-deficient embryos show a marked delay in allantois development, and in severely affected mutants the allantois fails to fuse with the chorion and may become displaced onto the amnion (Chang et al., 1999; Yang et al., 1999a). Loss of Smad1 has a more pronounced impact on allantois formation. Thus, at 8.0 dpc, while control littermates have produced an extended allantois composed of differentiated cell populations (Fig. 2H,L,M) in Smad1-deficient embryos the allantois forms a compact mass of cells that is continuous with the primitive streak (Fig. 2F,G,I-K). By 9.5 dpc, the Smad1-/- allantois develops into an unpatterned mass of tissue containing vascular endothelium and red blood cells (Fig. 3). Taken together, these results suggest that although allantois-like tissue is specified during gastrulation, the allantois rudiment that forms in Smad1 mutants is defective in proliferation and patterning. These results are provocative because neither the Smad1 or the Smad5 loss-of-function mutation fully recapitulate the allantois phenotype of any one BMP mutant, suggesting that a single BMP activates multiple Smads. Furthermore, these distinct phenotypes suggest that Smad1 and Smad5 play discrete roles in the development of the allantois; Smad5 signals govern the timing of development and migration, while Smad1 signals direct proliferation and patterning.
Elegant cell marking experiments have demonstrated that the progenitors of the allantois and the primordial germ cells are located in the proximal region of the epiblast, close to the embryonic/extra-embryonic junction (Lawson and Hage, 1994). BMP4 and BMP8b, synthesized in the extra-embryonic ectoderm, are required for the generation of this precursor population (Lawson et al., 1999; Ying et al., 2000), and recent embryological experiments suggest that the BMP ligands act directly on the epiblast (Lawson et al., 1999). Consistent with these findings, we show that Smad1 is expressed at low levels within the epiblast (Fig. 6A), and that Smad1 mutants have drastically reduced numbers of PGCs. The simplest explanation for the marked impact on PGC formation in Smad1 mutants is that cells of the proximal epiblast are severely impaired in their ability to transduce extra-embryonic ectoderm produced BMP4/BMP8b signals. Consequently, very few to no cells are specified as PGC precursors. Furthermore, the presence of PGCs in about 50% of Smad1 mutants suggests that the requirement for Smad1 is not absolute, and that Smad5, which is also expressed at low levels in the epiblast, may partially compensate for the absence of Smad1 in some cells. Whether loss of Smad5 also impairs PGC development has yet to be reported.
A two-step model for the production of PGCs has been proposed, based on the estimation that allocation to the germ cell lineage occurs around 7.2 dpc, after the precursor population emerges from the posterior primitive streak in the nascent extra-embryonic mesoderm (Lawson et al., 1999). In this model, BMP4/BMP8b produced by the extra-embryonic ectoderm specifies a population of PGC and allantois progenitor cells in the proximal epiblast. A second signal originating in or adjacent to the proximal streak then instructs these precursor cells into either an allantois or PGC lineage. The abundant expression of Smad1 in the posterior streak, extra-embryonic mesoderm and VE, suggests that Smad1 may be a component of this putative second signal, responding to locally high levels of BMP2 produced by the posterior VE, or BMP4 synthesized in the newly formed extra-embryonic mesoderm. To refine our understanding of the tissue-specific requirements for Smad1 that underlie these events, a future goal will be to exploit the conditional allele to selectively remove Smad1 from different tissue compartments of the early embryo.
A unique aspect of the Smad1 phenotype, not shared by other mutations in BMP pathway genes, is our finding that Smad1 is required for growth and morphogenesis of the chorion. The chorion, composed of both extra-embryonic ectoderm and mesoderm, is an essential component of the mature placenta. Coincident with gastrulation, the extra-embryonic ectoderm and an accompanying layer of extra-embryonic mesoderm, move proximally towards the EPC. This proximal movement and regulated growth appears to be an intrinsic property of the chorion, as in embryos that lack most epiblast derivatives or are defective in allantois morphogenesis, chorion development proceeds normally (Chang et al., 1999; Gurtner et al., 1995; Kwee et al., 1995; Waldrip et al., 1998; Yang et al., 1995; Yang et al., 1999a). Thus, the chorion defects observed in Smad1 mutant embryos are likely to be due to a requirement for Smad1 activity in this tissue. Interestingly, as is the case with the posterior VE, the chorion represents a second site in the embryo where loss of Smad1 results in massive overgrowth of cells, implicating Smad1 pathways in regulating the growth of these specific tissues. Because Smad1 is expressed in both the mesodermal and ectodermal components of the chorion, it remains to be determined whether Smad1 signals in the extra-embryonic ectoderm regulate the growth of the extra-embryonic mesoderm or vice versa.
In addition to appropriate specification and differentiation of distinct cell types, the coordinated growth and morphogenesis of various tissue layers is also an important feature of the developing embryo. BMP signaling pathways have been shown to participate in controlling the growth of the embryo. In the present study, we have uncovered a role for Smad1 in regulating the formation and proliferation of the chorion, allantois and VE, as well as PGCs. Interestingly, Smad1 acts to inhibit growth of the chorion and VE, while Smad1 activities promote growth of the allantois and formation of PGCs. Recent reports demonstrate the widespread expression of Smad1 during later embryogenesis (Dick et al., 1998; Huang et al., 2000) and BMP signaling pathways make important contributions to developing organ systems such as the eyes, lungs and kidneys (Bellusci et al., 1996; Dudley et al., 1999; Dudley et al., 1995; Weaver et al., 1999). Future experiments should aim to explore the unique contribution of Smad1 to these later processes, using the conditional allele to bypass the early extra-embryonic defects.
Note added in proof
A defect in primorial germ cell development was recently reported by Chang and Matzuk (
Chang, H. and Matzuk, M. M. (2001). Smad5 is required for mouse primordial germ cell development. Mech. Dev. 104, 61-67[Medline][Medline]
).
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Acampora, D., Mazan, S., Lallemand, Y., Avantaggiato, V., Maury, M., Simeone, A. and Brulet, P. (1995). Forebrain and midbrain regions are deleted in Otx2-/- mutants due to a defective anterior neuroectoderm specification during gastrulation. Development 121, 3279-3290.[Medline]
Ang, S. L. and Rossant, J. (1994). HNF-3 beta is essential for node and notochord formation in mouse development. Cell 78, 5615-5674.
Ang, S. L., Jin, O., Rhinn, M., Daigle, N., Stevenson, L. and Rossant, J. (1996). A targeted mouse Otx2 mutation leads to severe defects in gastrulation and formation of axial mesoderm and to deletion of rostral brain. Development 122, 243-252.
Baker, J. C. and Harland, R. M. (1996). A novel mesoderm inducer, Madr2, functions in the activin signal transduction pathway. Genes Dev. 10, 1880-1889.
Beddington, R. S. and Robertson, E. J. (1989). An assessment of the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells in the midgestation mouse embryo. Development 105, 733-737.[Abstract]
Beddington, R. S. and Robertson, E. J. (1999). Axis development and early asymmetry in mammals. Cell 96, 195-209.[Abstract]
Bellusci, S., Henderson, R., Winnier, G., Oikawa, T. and Hogan, B. L. (1996). Evidence from normal expression and targeted misexpression that bone morphogenetic protein (Bmp-4) plays a role in mouse embryonic lung morphogenesis. Development 122, 1693-1702.[Medline]
Belo, J. A., Bachiller, D., Agius, E., Kemp, C., Borges, A. C., Marques, S., Piccolo, S. and De Robertis, E. M. (2000). Cerberus-like is a secreted BMP and nodal antagonist not essential for mouse development. Genesis 26, 265-270.
Chang, H., Huylebroeck, D., Verschueren, K., Guo, Q., Matzuk, M. M. and Zwijsen, A. (1999). Smad5 knockout mice die at mid-gestation due to multiple embryonic and extraembryonic defects. Development 126, 1631-1642.[Medline]
Chang, H., Zwijsen, A., Vogel, H., Huylebroeck, D. and Matzuk, M. M. (2000). Smad5 is essential for left-right asymmetry in mice. Dev. Biol. 219, 71-78.
Chen, Y., Bhushan, A. and Vale, W. (1997). Smad8 mediates the signaling of the ALK-2 receptor serine kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 12938-12943.[Medline]
Ciruna, B. G. and Rossant, J. (1999). Expression of the T-box gene Eomesodermin during early mouse development. Mech. Dev. 81, 199-203.
Conlon, F. L., Lyons, K. M., Takaesu, N., Barth, K. S., Kispert, A., Herrmann, B. and Robertson, E. J. (1994). A primary requirement for nodal in the formation and maintenance of the primitive streak in the mouse. Development 120, 1919-1928.[Medline]
Crossley, P. H. and Martin, G. R. (1995). The mouse Fgf8 gene encodes a family of polypeptides and is expressed in regions that direct outgrowth and patterning in the developing embryo. Development 121, 439-451.
Dick, A., Risau, W. and Drexler, H. (1998). Expression of Smad1 and Smad2 during embryogenesis suggests a role in organ development. Dev. Dyn. 211, 293-305.
Downs, K. M. (2000). Growth in the pre-fusion murine allantois. Anat. Embryol. 202, 323-331.[Medline]
Dudley, A. T., Lyons, K. M. and Robertson, E. J. (1995). A requirement for bone morphogenetic protein-7 during development of the mammalian kidney and eye. Genes Dev. 9, 2795-2807.[Medline]
Dudley, A. T., Godin, R. E. and Robertson, E. J. (1999). Interaction between FGF and BMP signaling pathways regulates development of metanephric mesenchyme. Genes Dev. 13, 1601-1613.[Abstract]
Dufort, D., Schwartz, L., Harpal, K. and Rossant, J. (1998). The transcription factor HNF3beta is required in visceral endoderm for normal primitive streak morphogenesis. Development 125, 3015-3025.
Dziadek, M. and Adamson, E. (1978). Localization and synthesis of alphafoetoprotein in post-implantation mouse embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 43, 289-313.
Ellington, S. K. (1985). A morphological study of the development of the allantois of rat embryos in vivo. J. Anat. 142, 1-11.[Medline]
Ginsburg, M., Snow, M. H. and McLaren, A. (1990). Primordial germ cells in the mouse embryo during gastrulation. Development 110, 521-528.
Glinka, A., Wu, W., Delius, H., Monaghan, A. P., Blumenstock, C. and Niehrs, C. (1998). Dickkopf-1 is a member of a new family of secreted proteins and functions in head induction. Nature 391, 357-362.[Abstract]
Goumans, M. J. and Mummery, C. (2000). Functional analysis of the TGFbeta receptor/Smad pathway through gene ablation in mice. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 44, 253-265.[Medline]
Graff, J. M., Bansal, A. and Melton, D. A. (1996). Xenopus Mad proteins transduce distinct subsets of signals for the TGF beta superfamily. Cell 85, 479-487.[Medline]
Gurtner, G. C., Davis, V., Li, H., McCoy, M. J., Sharpe, A. and Cybulsky, M. I. (1995). Targeted disruption of the murine VCAM1 gene: essential role of VCAM-1 in chorioallantoic fusion and placentation. Genes Dev. 9, 1-14.[Medline]
Hancock, S. N., Agulnik, S. I., Silver, L. M. and Papaioannou, V. E. (1999). Mapping and expression analysis of the mouse ortholog of Xenopus Eomesodermin. Mech. Dev. 81, 205-208.[Abstract]
Heyer, J., Escalante-Alcalde, D., Lia, M., Boettinger, E., Edelmann, W., Stewart, C. L. and Kucherlapati, R. (1999). Postgastrulation Smad2-deficient embryos show defects in embryo turning and anterior morphogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 12595-12600.[Medline]
Hoodless, P. A., Haerry, T., Abdollah, S., Stapleton, M., OConnor, M. B., Attisano, L. and Wrana, J. L. (1996). MADR1, a MAD-related protein that functions in BMP2 signaling pathways. Cell 85, 489-500.
Huang, S., Flanders, K. C. and Roberts, A. B. (2000). Characterization of the mouse smad1 gene and its expression pattern in adult mouse tissues. Gene 258, 43-53.[Medline]
Jones, C. M., Lyons, K. M. and Hogan, B. L. (1991). Involvement of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 (BMP-4) and Vgr-1 in morphogenesis and neurogenesis in the mouse. Development 111, 531-542.[Medline]
Kawai, S., Faucheu, C., Gallea, S., Spinella-Jaegle, S., Atfi, A., Baron, R. and Roman, S. R. (2000). Mouse smad8 phosphorylation downstream of BMP receptors ALK-2, ALK-3, and ALK-6 induces its association with Smad4 and transcriptional activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 271, 682-687.[Abstract]
Kingsley, D. M. (1994). The TGF-beta superfamily: new members, new receptors, and new genetic tests of function in different organisms. Genes Dev. 8, 133-146.[Medline]
Kwee, L., Baldwin, H. S., Shen, H. M., Stewart, C. L., Buck, C., Buck, C. A. and Labow, M. A. (1995). Defective development of the embryonic and extraembryonic circulatory systems in vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) deficient mice. Development 121, 489-503.[Medline]
Lawson, K. A. and Hage, W. J. (1994). Clonal analysis of the origin of primordial germ cells in the mouse. Ciba Found. Symp. 182, 68-84.
Lawson, K. A., Meneses, J. J. and Pedersen, R. A. (1991). Clonal analysis of epiblast fate during germ layer formation in the mouse embryo. Development 113, 891-911.[Medline]
Lawson, K. A., Dunn, N. R., Roelen, B. A., Zeinstra, L. M., Davis, A. M., Wright, C. V., Korving, J. P. and Hogan, B. L. (1999). Bmp4 is required for the generation of primordial germ cells in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 13, 424-436.[Abstract]
Luo, J., Sladek, R., Bader, J. A., Matthyssen, A., Rossant, J. and Giguere, V. (1997). Placental abnormalities in mouse embryos lacking the orphan nuclear receptor ERR-beta. Nature 388, 778-782.
Macias-Silva, M., Abdollah, S., Hoodless, P. A., Pirone, R., Attisano, L. and Wrana, J. L. (1996). MADR2 is a substrate of the TGFbeta receptor and its phosphorylation is required for nuclear accumulation and signaling. Cell 87, 1215-1224.[Medline]
Macias-Silva, M., Hoodless, P. A., Tang, S. J., Buchwald, M. and Wrana, J. L. (1998). Specific activation of Smad1 signaling pathways by the BMP7 type I receptor, ALK2. J Biol Chem 273, 25628-25636.[Medline]
Massague, J. (1998). TGF-beta signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 753-791.
Meersseman, G., Verschueren, K., Nelles, L., Blumenstock, C., Kraft, H., Wuytens, G., Remacle, J., Kozak, C. A., Tylzanowski, P., Niehrs, C. et al. (1997). The C-terminal domain of Mad-like signal transducers is sufficient for biological activity in the Xenopus embryo and transcriptional activation. Mech. Dev. 61, 127-140.[Medline]
Meno, C., Gritsman, K., Ohishi, S., Ohfuji, Y., Heckscher, E., Mochida, K., Shimono, A., Kondoh, H., Talbot, W. S., Robertson, E. J. et al. (1999). Mouse Lefty2 and zebrafish antivin are feedback inhibitors of nodal signaling during vertebrate gastrulation. Mol. Cell 4, 287-298.[Medline]
Nishimura, R., Kato, Y., Chen, D., Harris, S. E., Mundy, G. R. and Yoneda, T. (1998). Smad5 and DPC4 are key molecules in mediating BMP-2-induced osteoblastic differentiation of the pluripotent mesenchymal precursor cell line C2C12. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1872-1879.[Medline]
Nomura, M. and Li, E. (1998). Smad2 role in mesoderm formation, left-right patterning and craniofacial development. Nature 393, 786-790.
OGorman, S., Dagenais, N. A., Qian, M. and Marchuk, Y. (1997). Protamine-Cre recombinase transgenes efficiently recombine target sequences in the male germ line of mice, but not in embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 14602-14607.[Medline]
Piccolo, S., Agius, E., Leyns, L., Bhattacharyya, S., Grunz, H., Bouwmeester, T. and De Robertis, E. M. (1999). The head inducer Cerberus is a multifunctional antagonist of Nodal, BMP and Wnt signals. Nature 397, 707-710.
Rashbass, P., Cooke, L. A., Herrmann, B. G. and Beddington, R. S. P. (1991). A cell autonomous function of Brachyury in T/T embryonic stem cell chimaeras. Nature 353, 348-351.[Medline]
Rhinn, M., Dierich, A., Shawlot, W., Behringer, R. R., Le Meur, M. and Ang, S. L. (1998). Sequential roles for Otx2 in visceral endoderm and neuroectoderm for forebrain and midbrain induction and specification. Development 125, 845-856.[Medline]
Robertson, E., Bradley, A., Kuehn, M. and Evans, M. (1986). Germ-line transmission of genes introduced into cultured pluripotential cells by retroviral vector. Nature 323, 445-448.
Russ, A. P., Wattler, S., Colledge, W. H., Aparicio, S. A., Carlton, M. B., Pearce, J. J., Barton, S. C., Surani, M. A., Ryan, K., Nehls, M. C. et al. (2000). Eomesodermin is required for mouse trophoblast development and mesoderm formation. Nature 404, 95-99.[Medline]
Schier, A. F. and Shen, M. M. (2000). Nodal signaling in vertebrate development. Nature 403, 385-389.[Medline]
Shawlot, W. and Behringer, R. R. (1995). Requirement for Lim1 in head-organizer function. Nature 374, 425-430.[Medline]
Shawlot, W., Wakamiya, M., Kwan, K. M., Kania, A., Jessell, T. M. and Behringer, R. R. (1999). Lim1 is required in both primitive streak-derived tissues and visceral endoderm for head formation in the mouse. Development 126, 4925-4932.[Medline]
Shawlot, W., Min Deng, J., Wakamiya, M. and Behringer, R. R. (2000). The cerberus-related gene, Cerr1, is not essential for mouse head formation. Genesis 26, 253-258.
Simpson, E. H., Johnson, D. K., Hunsicker, P., Suffolk, R., Jordan, S. A. and Jackson, I. J. (1999). The mouse Cer1 (Cerberus related or homologue) gene is not required for anterior pattern formation. Dev. Biol. 213, 202-206.[Medline]
Solloway, M. J. and Robertson, E. J. (1999). Early embryonic lethality in Bmp5;Bmp7 double mutant mice suggests functional redundancy within the 60A subgroup. Development 126, 1753-1768.[Medline]
Suzuki, A., Chang, C., Yingling, J. M., Wang, X. F. and Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. (1997). Smad5 induces ventral fates in Xenopus embryo. Dev. Biol. 184, 402-405.
Tremblay, K. D., Hoodless, P. A., Bikoff, E. K. and Robertson, E. J. (2000). Formation of the definitive endoderm in mouse is a Smad2-dependent process. Development 127, 3079-3090.[Medline]
Verschueren, K., Remacle, J. E., Collart, C., Kraft, H., Baker, B. S., Tylzanowski, P., Nelles, L., Wuytens, G., Su, M. T., Bodmer, R. et al. (1999). SIP1, a novel zinc finger/homeodomain repressor, interacts with Smad proteins and binds to 5'-CACCT sequences in candidate target genes. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20489-20498.
Waldrip, W. R., Bikoff, E. K., Hoodless, P. A., Wrana, J. L. and Robertson, E. J. (1998). Smad2 signaling in extraembryonic tissues determines anterior-posterior polarity of the early mouse embryo. Cell 92, 797-808.
Weaver, M., Yingling, J. M., Dunn, N. R., Bellusci, S. and Hogan, B. L. M. (1999). Bmp signaling regulates proximal-distal differentiation of endoderm in mouse lung development. Development 126, 4005-4015.[Medline]
Weinstein, M., Yang, X., Li, C., Xu, X., Gotay, J. and Deng, C. X. (1998). Failure of egg cylinder elongation and mesoderm induction in mouse embryos lacking the tumor suppressor smad2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9378-9383.
Whitman, M. (1998). Smads and early developmental signaling by the TGFbeta superfamily. Genes Dev. 12, 2445-2462.
Wilkinson, D. G. (1992). In Situ Hybridization: A Practical Approach. London: Oxford University Press.
Wilkinson, D. G., Peters, G., Dickson, C. and McMahon, A. P. (1988). Expression of the FGF-related proto-oncogene int-2 during gastrulation and neurulation in the mouse. EMBO J. 7, 691-695.[Abstract]
Wilkinson, D. G., Bhatt, S. and Herrmann, B. G. (1990). Expression pattern of the mouse T gene and its role in mesoderm formation. Nature 343, 657-659.[Abstract]
Wilson, V., Rashbass, P. and Beddington, R. S. P. (1993). Chimeric analysis of T (Brachyury) gene function. Development 117, 1321-1331.[Medline]
Winnier, G., Blessing, M., Labosky, P. A. and Hogan, B. L. M. (1995). Bone morphogenetic protein-4 is required for mesoderm formation and patterning in the mouse. Genes Dev. 9, 2105-2116.
Wood, H. B. and Episkopou, V. (1999). Comparative expression of the mouse Sox1, Sox2 and Sox3 genes from pre- gastrulation to early somite stages. Mech. Dev. 86, 197-201.[Abstract]
Wotton, D., Lo, R. S., Lee, S. and Massague, J. (1999). A Smad transcriptional corepressor. Cell 97, 29-39.[Medline]
Yang, J. T., Rayburn, H. and Hynes, R. O. (1995). Cell adhesion events mediated by alpha 4 integrins are essential in placental and cardiac development. Development 121, 549-560.[Medline]
Yang, X., Castilla, L. H., Xu, X., Li, C., Gotay, J., Weinstein, M., Liu, P. P. and Deng, C. X. (1999a). Angiogenesis defects and mesenchymal apoptosis in mice lacking SMAD5. Development 126, 1571-1580.
Yang, X., Letterio, J. J., Lechleider, R. J., Chen, L., Hayman, R., Gu, H., Roberts, A. B. and Deng, C. (1999b). Targeted disruption of SMAD3 results in impaired mucosal immunity and diminished T cell responsiveness to TGF-beta. EMBO J. 18, 1280-1291.
Ying, Y. and Zhao, G. Q. (2001). Cooperation of endoderm-derived BMP2 and extraembryonic ectoderm-derived BMP4 in primordial germ cell generation in the mouse. Dev Biol 232, 484-492.
Ying, Y., Liu, X. M., Marble, A., Lawson, K. A. and Zhao, G. Q. (2000). Requirement of Bmp8b for the generation of primordial germ cells in the mouse. Mol. Endocrinol. 14, 1053-1063.[Medline]
Yoshimizu, T., Obinata, M. and Matsui, M. (2001). Stage-specific tissue and cell interactions play key roles in mouse germ cell specification. Development 128, 481-490.
Zhang, H. and Bradley, A. (1996). Mice deficient for BMP2 are nonviable and have defects in amnion/chorion and cardiac development. Development 122, 2977-2986.
Zhang, Y., Feng, X., We, R. and Derynck, R. (1996). Receptor-associated Mad homologues synergize as effectors of the TGF- beta response. Nature 383, 168-172.
Zhu, Y., Richardson, J. A., Parada, L. F. and Graff, J. M. (1998). Smad3 mutant mice develop metastatic colorectal cancer. Cell 94, 703-714.[Medline]