1 Department of Entomology, 5429 Boyce Hall, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
2 Department of Cell Biology/Neuroscience, 5429 Boyce Hall, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
*Author for correspondence: (e-mail: adams{at}mail.ucr.edu)
Accepted 24 October 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Ecdysis, Drosophila, Behavioral sequence, Transgene, Ecdysis-triggering hormone
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Ecdysis is controlled by a genetic program specifying a precisely timed developmental sequence. Among the genes involved are those encoding peptide hormones that activate central pattern generators for pre-ecdysis and ecdysis behaviors (Truman, 1992; Zitnan et al., 1999). A foundation for studies of ecdysis behavior was provided by Truman and colleagues, who discovered that ecdysis in Saturniid moths is triggered by a peptide factor from the brain (Truman and Riddiford, 1970), later identified as eclosion hormone (EH) (Truman, 1992). Recently, we showed that EH causes secretion of ecdysis-triggering hormones (ETHs) from endocrine Inka cells (Zitnan et al., 1996; Kingan et al., 1997), which act on the CNS to trigger centrally patterned pre-ecdysis and ecdysis behaviors.
As direct gene products, many peptide signaling molecules provide a link between gene expression and behavior. Orchestration of the ecdysis behavioral sequence depends on coordinated induction and suppression of genes essential to its properly timed initiation. This includes induction of ETH gene expression in Inka cells and CNS sensitivity to ETH 1-2 days before ecdysis (Zitnan et al., 1999; Zitnan and Adams, 2000). The timing of ecdysis initiation is accomplished by ecdysteroid suppression of secretory competence in Inka cells until the animal is ready to perform the behavioral sequence and escape the old cuticle (Kingan and Adams, 2000). Once ecdysteroids drop to low levels during the hours preceding ecdysis, peptide hormones, including ETHs, eclosion hormone and CCAP, are released to initiate the behavioral sequence (Zitnan et al., 1996; Ewer et al., 1997; Gammie and Truman, 1997; Zitnan et al., 1999). Orchestration of ecdysis behavior therefore depends on coordinated expression of genes that are involved in peptide signaling.
Each of these peptides is capable of initiating ecdysis, but it has remained unclear to what extent they play obligatory roles. To test the hypothesis that ETH is required for ecdysis, we sought to use genetic tools in Drosophila to delete its gene, eth (Park et al., 1999). We describe genetic null Drosophila mutants carrying micro-deletions in the eth locus. The consequences of this selective hormonal deficit are severe, and include failure both to inflate the new respiratory system and to perform the ecdysis behavioral sequence. Virtually all animals fail to survive the first ecdysis. These findings establish an obligatory role for eth and its gene products, and demonstrate how lack of a specific chemical signal results in a lethal behavioral deficit.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
The transgene eth3-egfp was constructed in a pCaSpeR4 vector kindly provided by Dr Carl Thummel (Thummel and Pirrotta, 1991). The eth3-egfp includes 382 bp of sequence immediately upstream of the eth open reading frame. This sequence containing a putative ecdysteroid response element (see Fig. 4C) extends to the 13 bp after the stop codon of 5' upstream gene orc4 (GenBank Accession Number AF139063) (Chesnokov et al., 1999). The construct was designed for a fusion protein; egfp sequence starts right after the third putative amidation site GRR in the eth (see Fig. 4C). Standard procedures for the egg injection and crossings were used for the transformation (Ashburner, 1989). A transformed line expressing egfp was obtained. Inverse PCR determined an insertion of the transgene in the 2nd chromosome 58F7, intergenic space between CG11605 and CG3550.
Observation of ecdysis behavior and injection of ETH peptides
Eggs were collected overnight on apple-juice agar plates supplemented with a few granules of yeast. Observations were made under a stereomicroscope after transfer of larvae to a fresh apple-juice agar plate or a yeast-agar plate. Physiology and behaviors prior to ecdysis were recorded on videotape using a Sony CCD camera. The videotape was analyzed with the software program Observer (Noldus) when necessary. In some experiments, living larvae were positioned in a drop of tap water between a slide glass and a cover glass and observed with a compound microscope.
Injections of DmETH1 into staged animals immobilized on sticky tape were made using a microelectrode needle (2 µm tip opening) attached to a Picospritzer. The needle was inserted laterally through the region of abdominal segment 6 and 7 from back. Injection volumes were determined following calibration of drops under paraffin oil, and adjusted to
10 pl. Injected larvae were transferred immediately to an agar plate with a wet brush.
Microscopy and immunohistochemistry
We raised rabbit antisera against the C terminus of DrmETH1, which contains a PRXamide motif. Peptides were conjugated to KLH using EDC (1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride) (Hermanson, 1995). An antiserum raised against Manduca PETH (MasPETH) was previously described (Zitnan et al., 1999).
For whole-mount CNS or trachea staining, the tissues were dissected in PBS (130 mM NaCl, 7 mM Na2HPO4, 3 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.4) and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C or 2 hours at room temperature. After two 15 minute washes with PBST (1% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)) and 1 hour blocking with 5% normal goat serum in PBST, the tissues were incubated with primary antisera (1:500 dilution for anti-DrmETH1 and anti-DrmETH2 or 1:2,000 for anti-MasPETH) for 2 days. After a wash with PBST (4 times for 15 minutes), tissue was incubated for 24 hours in Cy-3-labeled goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:500, Jackson). The tissue was mounted on a slide glass in 90% glycerol after four 15 minute washes with PBST. DAPI staining was at 5 ng/ml in PBST for 5 minutes. Colocalization of ETH and EGFP in the 2eth3egfp transgenic line (see Fig. 3A) was determined by confocal microscopy (Zeiss). We used an antiserum against ETH (described as above), a mouse monoclonal anti-GFP against EGFP (Clontech, Palo Alto, California), and a goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) conjugate (Alexa Fluor 488) that was highly cross-absorbed (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oregon).
|
|
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Visible morphological changes become apparent 1 hr prior to ecdysis, including the appearance of new mouth hooks and vertical plates (Fig. 1A) (Jürgens and Hartenstein, 1993). The first event is sclerotization of new mouth hooks adjacent to the old structures, referred to double mouth hooks. About 30 minutes later, new vertical plates appear, leading to double vertical plates (dVP). We chose dVP as a reference point (time zero) to which all other events are related.
|
|
Ecdysis behavior begins 25 minutes after dVP, with one or two forward head thrust movements, which detaches old mouthparts and plants them in the substrate (Fig. 1B). The forward movement also coincides with shedding of old tracheal linings through segmental spiracular pits (Fig. 1B) (Keilin, 1944). Upon planting the old mouthparts onto the substrate, the forward thrust is followed by three to five vigorous backward thrusts to detach the old posterior spiracles (Fig. 1A,B). The behavior is interrupted by a 2-5 minute rest period, and is completed by a forward, lateral turning escape movement, freeing the animal from the old cuticle. Some variation in this pattern was observed, in which subunits of the ecdysis behavior were repeated or even entire recapitulations of the behavioral sequence were observed.
The patterned behavior just described is also accompanied by some irregular behaviors prior to anterior-posterior contractions (A-P) with large variations between individuals and time of onset. These are (1) swinging head, (2) dorso-ventral contractions and (3) alternating anterior and posterior peristaltic squeezing.
Ecdysis from second to third instar follows a similar pattern. Even the time of behavioral onset is similar, with the exception that double mouth hooks appear at 104 minutes relative to dVP, (Table 1, n=7), instead of 30 minutes as observed in the 1st to 2nd instar ecdysis (n=8, P<0.01; Students t-test).
ETH-IR is expressed in Inka cells and disappears at ecdysis
Immunohistochemical staining using antisera raised against DrmETH1 revealed segmentally repeated cells in both larval and adult stages (Fig. 2A-C,E). These cells appear to be homologous to Inka cells previously identified in M. sexta (Zitnan et al., 1996), and henceforth are referred to by the same name. We observed an identical staining pattern using an antiserum raised against the C-terminus of the M. sexta peptide, MasPETH (Zitnan et al., 1999) (Fig. 2I,J). In larvae, cells exhibiting ETH-like immunoreactivity (ETH-IR) occur along each of the two dorsal tracheal trunks at the main branch points of transverse connectives (Fig. 2) (Manning and Krasnow, 1993). A total of seven Inka cell pairs occur consistently in each tracheal metamere Tr1 and Tr4 through Tr9 (Manning and Krasnow, 1993) in the larval stage. In adults, cells showing ETH-IR also occur at homologous positions (Fig. 5B,E,F,J), but vary in shape and location. Depletion of ETH-IR is observed at each larval ecdysis.
|
Specific expression of the chimeric transgene 2eth3-egfp in Inka cells
To examine the cellular expression pattern of eth (Park et al., 1999), we constructed a fly line carrying the chimeric transgene 2eth3-egfp. This transgene occurs on the 2nd chromosome and contains the sequence of eth up to the 3rd amidation site with chimeric egfp encoding the enhanced green fluorescent protein (see Fig. 4D). EGFP fluorescence in 2eth3-egfp flies is observed in both larval and adult stages, but is confined to the constellation of Inka cells showing ETH-IR (Fig. 2, Fig. 3). No EGFP fluorescence occurs in any other cell or tissue in larvae or adults. These data are consistent with cell-specific expression of eth. Observations under laser confocal microscopy revealed an identical distribution of EGFP fluorescence and ETH-IR in Inka cells of wandering 3rd instar (Fig. 3A), suggesting that EGFP and processed ETHs are located in the same subcellular compartments.
In 1st instar larvae, peak EGFP fluorescence occurs at dVP, and declines sharply to 16±3% of peak emission just before tracheal inflation (Fig. 3B). A further drop of EGFP emission to 11±3% occurs by the squeezing wave stage. Loss of EGFP fluorescence suggests that ETH is released naturally in vivo during the time interval between dVP and tracheal collapse.
Injection of ETHs induces premature tracheal inflation and ecdysis-related behaviors
The peptides DrmETH1 and DrmETH2, which trigger adult ecdysis (Park et al., 1999), were injected into late first instar larvae to assess their ability to induce ecdysis at this stage of development. Injection of DrmETH1 (0.01 to 10 fmol) at the double mouth hooks stage induced the premature appearance of physiological and behavioral events outlined in Fig. 1. The first response to peptide injection was premature tracheal collapse and inflation, with a latency of 3 minutes and 4 minutes, respectively, followed by pre-ecdysis and ecdysis behaviors. Weak anterior-posterior contractions were observed in 33% of injected animal (six out of 18). Strong squeezing waves occurred in all injected animals, with an average latency of 14±2 minutes. Ecdysis behavior consisting of forward thrust, backward thrust and turning escape movements appeared with a latency of 24±3 minutes (Fig. 5).
The timing of DrmETH1 injection was critical for successful ecdysis. All animals (n=10) injected at the dVP stage underwent successful ecdysis. However injections performed earlier, for example at double mouth hooks, induced tracheal collapse and inflation, anterior-posterior contractions, squeezing waves and repeated bouts of ecdysis behavior that were unsuccessful in shedding the mouthparts, leading ultimately to death (Fig. 5). These observations indicate that precise timing of events in the ecdysis sequence is critical for successful ecdysis.
DrmETH2 injections were less effective in eliciting tracheal dynamics and behaviors. At relatively high doses (10 fmol), DrmETH2 induced tracheal collapse and inflation with a latency of 3 minutes and 4 minutes, respectively, and ecdysis behaviors with a latency of 34±5 minutes (n=12, Fig. 5). Strikingly, DrmETH2 (10 fmol) elicits neither anterior-posterior contractions nor squeezing waves. Lower doses of DrmETH2 (1 fmol) induced tracheal collapse and inflation with latencies of 4 minutes and 5 minutes, but had no behavioral effects (n=12).
Excision of eth leads to respiratory and behavioral deficits and lethality
To test whether ETH is required for ecdysis, gene deletions were generated by imprecise excisions of EP(2)1065 (Rorth, 1996), a P-element located 1427 bp downstream of the eth polyA site (Fig. 4A). These efforts led to creation of three deletion lines, eth27, eth25b and eth196, all of which possess small excisions near or including eth (Fig. 4B). The eth27 line has a deletion from the P-element site in the 5' untranslated region of reg-5 (rhythmically expressed gene 5) (McNeil et al., 1998) up to the 3' untranslated region of eth, 22 bp downstream of the eth stop codon. This deletion did not disturb the coding sequence of eth, thus serving as a useful negative control for other deletions. The eth25b deletion removes virtually the entire eth sequence, extending from the original P-element site up to the eth-coding region, leaving only part of the signal sequence (MRIITVLSV) (Park et al., 1999). The eth196 deletion occurs from the P-element site through eth to the middle of the adjacent gene orc4, (origin recognition complex 4) (Chesnokov et al., 1999).
Loss of eth in both eth25b and eth196 lines causes recessive lethality, while eth27 has no obvious phenotype (Table 2). The fact that genotype eth25b/eth196 also showed the same ecdysis deficiency phenotype suggests that the eth deletions cause this phenotype, rather than other unknown aberrations (Table 2). Lethality is associated with ecdysis deficiencies, whereby double mouthhooks and dVP indicate failure to shed the old mouthparts. These animals show a shrunken body appearance, thick trachea and partial ecdysis of old cuticle both exteriorly and within the tracheal system. We refer to the phenotype resulting from eth-deletion as buttoned-up, which describes an inability to extricate old mouthhooks and vertical plates from the new sclerotized structures.
|
Null mutants are rescued by ETH Injection
We found that properly timed injection of DrmETHs rescue ecdysis deficiencies in mutant flies and promotes successful ecdysis. Injection of DrmETH1 ( 1 fmol) into either eth25b or eth196 larvae at the dVP stage restores all missing steps in the ecdysis sequence (Table 2). Specifically, DrmETH1 injections induced tracheal collapse and inflation of trachea (3 and 4 minutes after the injection, respectively, n=10). Thereafter, pre-ecdysis behaviors appeared, including weak anterior-posterior movements (7±2 minutes) followed by strong squeezing waves (9±2 minutes). A set of typical ecdysis behaviors, including forward and backward thrusts and forward escape, occurred at 18±2 minutes after injection. Rescued flies that succeeded in passing to the 2nd instar succumbed at the transition to the 3rd instar, owing to unsuccessful ecdysis.
Though mutants injected with DrmETH1 showed a normal ecdysis behavioral sequence, some individuals were unsuccessful in completing ecdysis. Approximately 25% of eth25b and 41% of eth196 flies failed to successfully shed the old cuticle (Table 2). Rescued eth25b mutants show no further mortality during the 2nd instar, but rescued eth196 mutants show significant mortality during the early 2nd instar; accumulated mortality rises from 41% to 73% (lethal phase i in the 2nd instar, see Table 2). The elevated mortality observed for eth196 mutants during the 2nd instar may result from partial deletion of the upstream gene orc4 (Fig. 4B). Maternally deposited orc4 mRNA (Chesnokov et al., 1999) could promote survival enough the early 1st instar, but be insufficient for development through the early 2nd instar. Further examination of this question requires genetic rescue of the eth196 line.
Lethality could be reversed also by injection of DrmETH2 at relatively high doses ( 10 fmol). These treatments partially rescued behavioral deficits in eth25b flies, including induction of tracheal collapse, inflation of trachea and ecdysis. However, DrmETH2 injections failed to induce anteroposterior contractions and squeezing waves (Fig. 5). Lower doses of DrmETH2 (
1 fmol) induced tracheal collapse and inflation of new trachea, but were not effective in eliciting either pre-ecdysis or ecdysis behaviors.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In this paper, we used Drosophila genetics to test the hypothesis that ETH is necessary in the regulation of ecdysis. Excision of eth, the gene encoding DrmETH, resulted in profound deficits in the developmental steps culminating in ecdysis, and 98% mortality at the first larval ecdysis. To properly characterize the effects of genetic deletion, we performed a thorough analysis of normal ecdysis, characterized the epitracheal endocrine system in Drosophila, and showed it to be the likely source of ETH.
The epitracheal endocrine system and ecdysis in Drosophila
During the hour preceding ecdysis of 1st instar Drosophila larvae, three main events occur: sclerotization of new mouthparts, tracheal dynamics and a defined behavioral sequence. Appearance of the new mouthparts, including mouthhooks and vertical plates, precedes ETH release, and no disruption of these events occurs in eth flies. However subsequent events are triggered by ETH release from a system of Inka cells homologous to those previously described in moths (Zitnan et al., 1996; Adams and Zitnan, 1997; Zitnan et al., 1999).
Inka cells of Drosophila express the gene eth and contain the peptide ETH. Expression of eth is evident in transformed Drosophila carrying the chimeric transgene eth3-egfp, where EGFP fluorescence and ETH-like immunoreactivity are colocalized in Inka cells. No other cells exhibit EGFP fluorescence, although some CNS neurons also show ETH-IR. The most intense EGFP fluorescence is observed as larvae approach the first ecdysis, whereas neither EGFP fluorescence nor ETH-IR is detected during embryonic development or early 1st instar. This, together with the observation that no hatching deficiency occurs in eth mutants (data not shown), indicates that ETHs are probably not required for early development, including the patterned behavior associated with egg hatching (Hartenstein et al., 1997). EGFP fluorescence and ETH-IR are observed throughout the adult stage, suggesting possible mating or reproductive functions.
ETH triggers tracheal collapse and inflation. This conclusion is indicated by two observations. First, EGFP fluorescence in Inka cells sharply declines just minutes before these events. As the subcellular distribution of EGFP fluorescence and ETH-IR in Inka cells is identical, we conclude that EGFP and processed ETHs are sorted into secretory granules of Inka cells (Klein et al., 1999), and that these peptides are co-released. Second, injection of either DrmETH1 or DrmETH2 into wild-type larvae or eth- mutants induces tracheal collapse and air inflation within minutes. These observations strongly implicate ETH in the control of tracheal dynamics before ecdysis.
It is notable that Inka cells and associated components of the epitracheal endocrine system are situated directly on tracheal tubes (Zitnan et al., 1996). While it has been recognized for some time that ETHs act directly on the CNS to elicit centrally patterned behaviors, this report documents for the first time functions for these peptides in respiratory physiology. What is the functional significance of Inka cell placement directly on tracheal tubes? We speculate that their location in some way senses the readiness of the respiratory system to switch over from old to new trachea in preparation for pre-ecdysis and ecdysis behaviors. Whether the Inka cells indeed have such a sensory function remains to be demonstrated.
The mechanism of tracheal inflation is not known, but we hypothesize that dissolved gas is liberated as a consequence of fluid movement out of the tracheal lumen. The hydrophobic surface of the cuticle lining the tracheal tube may then facilitate a reverse capillary force to complete air filling (Wigglesworth, 1979). This is the first indication that these processes are under hormonal control. Further work is needed to define the signaling steps involved in this process.
Upon completion of tracheal inflation, a behavioral sequence ensues consisting of pre-ecdysis and ecdysis behaviors. These behaviors and successful ecdysis are triggered upon injection of DrmETH1, consistent with our earlier study showing that ETH injection induces premature eclosion behavior in the pharate adult (Park et al., 1999). It is striking that the same chemical signal initiates two quite different behaviors separated by two metamorphic molts.
A previous immunohistochemical study detected myomodulin-like-IR in tracheal cells of Drosophila and members of other insect groups (OBrien and Taghert, 1998). Immunoreactivity in these peritracheal cells also disappears at ecdysis, whose pattern and distribution suggest they could be the Inka cells described in this study. However, subsequent biochemical analyses of Inka cells in M. sexta (Zitnan et al., 1999) and Bombyx mori (D. Zitnan and M. E. A., unpublished) provide no evidence for the presence of myomodulin or related peptides in Inka cells, so the antigen(s) and functional significance of peritracheal cells and myomodulin-like IR in ecdysis remains unclear.
ETH is both necessary and sufficient for ecdysis
Our results show that DrmETH1 is sufficient to evoke the ecdysis sequence in larval Drosophila, as was previously observed for adult Drosophila and for MasETH in M. sexta and BomETH in B. mori (Zitnan et al., 1996; Adams and Zitnan, 1997; Park et al., 1999; Zitnan et al., 1999). The lethal phenotype observed in eth deletion mutants provides confirmation that, in Drosophila, ETH is necessary for ecdysis. The same physiological and behavioral deficiencies occur in both eth25b and eth196 lines, where tracheal collapse and inflation are delayed for hours, and pre-ecdysis behaviors are absent. Ecdysis behavior is abnormal and occurs prematurely, soon after the dVP stage. These physiological and behavioral deficits contribute to the buttoned-up phenotype.
It is remarkable that tracheal dynamics and the behavioral sequence absent in eth mutants can be completely restored by injection of DrmETH1. Animals rescued by injection of DrmETH1 shed the cuticle normally and develop through the second instar, although a higher mortality is observed in eth196 mutants. As this line also has a significant deletion of the adjacent orc4 gene, it may suffer additional defects may account for this. The deletion phenotype and its facile rescue by injection of DrmETH1 provide the best evidence thus far that this blood-borne peptide is a necessary signal in the orchestration of key developmental events culminating in ecdysis. Interestingly, DrmETH2 injection also rescues the buttoned up phenotype, but without triggering pre-ecdysis behaviors. It therefore appears that the pre-ecdysis behaviors we have described here in Drosophila larvae are not crucial for completion of ecdysis.
An obvious physiological consequence of eth deletion is failure of the respiratory system to inflate on schedule. This is consistent with our finding that ETH injection regulates collapse of old trachea and inflation of new trachea, and confirms that this peptide plays a vital signaling function for tracheal dynamics associated with ecdysis. Significantly, tracheal collapse and inflation are markedly delayed, but not eliminated in eth larvae. Therefore ETH may act indirectly through downstream regulatory processes, which eventually succeed in mediating tracheal inflation. One candidate signal for tracheal inflation is eclosion hormone. Adult Drosophila that lack functional eclosion hormone neurons fail to inflate the tracheal system properly upon adult eclosion and are reported to be insensitive to ETH (Baker et al., 1999).
The actual causes of lethality observed in eth larvae could be a combination of factors, including respiratory and behavioral deficits. Lack of tracheal inflation and incomplete shedding of the old tracheal lining would obviously compromise respiratory functions. Failure to shed old mouthparts at the appropriate time is likely the main factor in production of the buttoned-up phenotype. This condition appears in null mutants, as well as in wild-type flies upon premature injection of DrmETH1. In either case, the buttoned-up phenotype prevents complete ecdysis and further ingestion of food. All of these factors could be jointly involved in the lethality observed.
Of special significance is the fact that eth deletion mutants engage in a premature ecdysis-like behavior. Although quite variable and different from authentic ecdysis (see Results section for more details), these sporadic bouts gradually became more similar to authentic ecdysis more than 2 hours after dVP. Animals were able to shed the old cuticle partially, albeit with buttoned-up mouthhooks. The early appearance of ecdysis-like behavior provides further evidence that ETH not only triggers ecdysis, but delays its onset until the appropriate time. Decapitation or removal of cephalic or thoracic ganglia accelerates ecdysis, supporting the hypothesis that ETH activates both excitatory and inhibitory centers in the CNS (Baker et al., 1999; Zitnan and Adams, 2000), with inhibition functioning to delay ecdysis until the appropriate time. In the absence of ETH, these inhibitory centers may not be triggered, leading to premature ecdysis or ecdysis-like behavior.
Functional diversity of ETHs in Drosophila
The eth gene encodes three predicted amidated peptides: DrmETH1, DrmETH2 and DrmETH-AP. Two of these peptides, DrmETH1 and DrmETH2 have biological activity in both larval and adult stages (Park et al., 1999) (this work). In wild-type larvae, injection of DrmETH1 elicits the entire sequence of ecdysis-related events, although for reasons not yet clear the A-P phase of pre-ecdysis is rather weak. Similarly, DrmETH1 alone rescues the entire sequence in eth- mutants, including tracheal dynamics, A-P (weak), SW and ecdysis (Fig. 5). DrmETH2 also elicits tracheal dynamics and ecdysis behavior, but only at higher doses ( 10 fmol). This peptide fails to trigger pre-ecdysis (A-P and SW). Lower doses of DrmETH2 (
1 fmol) induce only tracheal dynamics, without pre-ecdysis or ecdysis. With regard to relative potency, these findings are consistent with our earlier work showing that DrmETH1 is more active than DrmETH2 in triggering adult eclosion (Park et al., 1999). However, no functional differences were apparent in that study.
Given that DrmETH1 is sufficient to trigger the entire sequence, the functional role of DrmETH2 is unclear. It might have been expected that DrmETH2 is involved in pre-ecdysis behavior, given that DrmETH1 injection elicits only weak A-P contractions. However, DrmETH2 fails to elicit pre-ecdysis at all, yet elicits tracheal collapse and air filling at lower doses than are needed to generate ecdysis behavior. The higher potency of this peptide in eliciting tracheal collapse and air filling suggests that it may regulate tracheal dynamics in a way that has thus far escaped our attention. It is also possible that, as eth is expressed in the adult stage, DrmETH2 plays some role in mating or reproduction. Further work is needed to resolve these issues.
In M. sexta, the ETH gene also encodes three peptides, PETH, ETH and ETH-AP (Zitnan et al., 1999). PETH induces only pre-ecdysis I, whereas ETH triggers pre-ecdysis II and ecdysis. It is also known that injection of ETH into naive animals elicits all three behavioral steps, including pre-ecdysis I, pre-ecdysis II and ecdysis (Zitnan et al., 1996). We would therefore predict that, if the ETH gene were deleted in M. sexta, ETH alone might be sufficient to rescue the missing behavioral sequence, leaving the role (necessity) of PETH similarly unclear. It might be possible to approach this issue using RNAi followed by injection of each peptide.
The phenotype of eth null mutants resulted in 98-100% lethality at the first larval ecdysis. This is striking in comparison with the phenotype of EH-cell knockout flies that showed only 50% lethality in larval stages, uncoordinated behaviors during adult eclosion and accumulated lethality of
70% (McNabb et al., 1997; Baker et al., 1999). Similarly, ablation of CCAP-cells leads to no obvious defects during larval stages but major lethality at pupation (Ewer et al., 2001). McNabb et al. (McNabb et al., 1997) and Baker et al. (Baker et al., 1999) proposed that ETH acts through central release of EH, because although wild-type flies showed premature eclosion behavior upon injection of ETH, EH-cell knockout flies are insensitive to ETH. Furthermore, CCAP is seen as a downstream signal whose release is caused by EH (Gammie and Truman, 1997).
If EH is an obligatory signal downstream of ETH as suggested by Truman and colleagues (Ewer et al., 1997; McNabb et al., 1997; Baker et al., 1999) why is the larval mortality of eth animals shown in this study so much higher than that of EH knockouts? Analysis of behavioral phenotypes in larval ecdysis of CCAP-cell knockout and EH-cell knockout flies may provide invaluable information to aid in the understanding of the roles of each peptide and signaling cascade for the ecdysis.
The cascade of peptides involved in regulation of insect ecdysis is growing. It is clear that ETH participates in a complex cascade that includes EH (Truman, 1992), and crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) (Gammie and Truman, 1997). These molecules appear to be broadly conserved among Lepidoptera, Drosophila and other insects, and may be expandable to other arthropods such as crustaceans (Phlippen et al., 2000). A conceptual framework for the peptide signaling cascade regulating ecdysis has been provided by studies of Manduca sexta (Ewer et al., 1997; Gammie and Truman, 1999; Zitnan et al., 1999; Zitnan and Adams, 2000) and Drosophila (McNabb et al., 1997). It is thought that a positive feedback pathway between peripheral secretion of EH from the CNS and ETH from Inka cells elevates circulating levels of both peptides (Ewer et al., 1997). Elevated levels of ETH acting on downstream targets within the CNS recruit sequential pre-ecdysis and ecdysis behaviors. Among these targets are CCAP-containing neurons, which activate the central pattern generator for ecdysis behavior (Gammie and Truman, 1997).
Ecdysis provides an excellent model system for analysis of a chemically coded behavioral sequence (Bicker and Menzel, 1989). The behavioral deficits associated with eth deletion provide a particularly clear illustration of behavioral failure in the absence of the requisite signaling molecule. It is remarkable that complete rescue of the behavior occurs on simple injection of ETH. These findings indicate that the performance of innate, stereotypic behavioral sequences may depend on achieving proper levels of peptides and other endogenous signals in the nervous system so as to activate and bias central pattern generators appropriate to developmental and sensory context (Bicker and Menzel, 1989; Harris-Warrick and Marder, 1991; Marder and Calabrese, 1996). Other specific examples of how peptides may function as behavioral orchestrators in vivo include egg-laying, feeding and maternal behaviors (Stanley and Leibowitz, 1985; De Bono and Bargmann, 1998; Lucas et al., 1998; Waggoner et al., 2000).
Genes required for Drosophila ecdysis
Several developmental mutants of Drosophila display phenotypes defined by molting deficiencies. Many of these display double mouth hooks, suggesting a defect in an aspect of the ecdysis program. Many if not most of these phenotypes result from defective events upstream of ETH signaling, and it seems likely that may result in ETH deficiency and the buttoned-up phenotype described here.
Mutations that lead to the double mouthhooks phenotype fall into three general categories: ecdysone synthesis and secretion, downstream transcriptional signaling and peptide processing enzymes. Ecdysone synthesis mutants include ecd (ecdysoneless) (Belinski-Deutsch et al., 1983), dare (defective in avoidance of repellents) (Freeman et al., 1999) and itpr (IP-3 receptor) (Venkatesh and Hasan, 1997). Transcription factors regulated by ecdysone signaling include EcR-B (ecdysteroid receptor B) (Schubiger et al., 1998; Li and Bender, 2000), USP (ultraspiracle) (Perrimon et al., 1985; Li and Bender, 2000), ßFTZ-F1 (ftz transcription factor 1) (Yamada et al., 2000) and crc (cryptocephal) (Hewes et al., 2000). Finally, mutants displaying the buttoned-up phenotype carrying defective peptide processing enzymes are amontillado, which encodes the enzyme prohormone convertase 2, are deficient in larval molting (Gooding et al., 2000). Some also are deficient in hatching behavior. Mutations of PHM (peptidylglycine -hydroxylating monooxygenase), which is required for
-amidation at the C-terminal end, also generate a buttoned-up phenotype (Jiang et al., 2000). It will be interesting to determine whether many if not most of the above mutations lead to ETH deficiency.The eth deletion mutant and the eth reporter fly line 2eth-egfp also provide opportunities to investigate roles for ecdysone in regulation of expression, processing and secretion of ETH, and its downstream pathways up to ecdysis behavior.
Conclusions
Ecdysis in Drosophila is an excellent model for understanding a genetically programmed, hormonally driven sequence of physiological and behavioral events. Physiological studies using large lepidopteran insects, such as Manduca sexta, have advanced our understanding of ecdysis-related behaviors. Our studies of the Drosophila system complement these findings with the use of genetic tools. Deletion of eth has demonstrated the obligatory role of ETH in the performance of a behavioral sequence vital to the survival of the animal. Further studies are under way to define genes for upstream regulators of the expression and secretion of the ETH, as well as those regulating the ETH receptor and downstream cellular and molecular targets within the central nervous system.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Adams, M. D., Celniker, S. E., Holt, R. A., Evans, C. A., Gocayne, J. D., Amanatides, P. G., Scherer, S. E., Li, P. W., Hoskins, R. A., Galle, R. F. et al. (2000). The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287, 2185-2195.
Adams, M. E. and Zitnan, D. (1997). Identification of ecdysis-triggering hormone in the silkworm Bombyx mori. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 230, 188-191.[Medline]
Ashburner, M. (1989). Drosophila. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
Baker, J. D., McNabb, S. L. and Truman, J. W. (1999). The hormonal coordination of behavior and physiology at adult ecdysis in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 3037-3048.
Belinski-Deutsch, S., Busson, D., Lamour-Audit, C., Porcheron, P., Moriniere, M. and Berreur, P. (1983). Relations between ecdsyteroid levels and pupal development in the ecd-1 temperature-sensitive mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 29, 509-514.
Bicker, G. and Menzel, R. (1989). Chemical codes for the control of behaviour in arthropods. Nature 337, 33-39.[Medline]
Chesnokov, I., Gossen, M., Remus, D. and Botchan, M. (1999). Assembly of functionally active Drosophila origin recognition complex from recombinant proteins. Genes Dev. 13, 12891296.
De Bono, M. and Bargmann, C. I. (1998). Natural variation in a neuropeptide Y receptor homolog modifies social behavior and food response in C. elegans. Cell 94, 679-689.[Medline]
Ewer, J., Del Campo, M. and Park, J. (2001). Neuroendocrine control of larval ecdysis. In A. Dros. Res. Conf. 42, 813.
Ewer, J., Gammie, S. C. and Truman, J. W. (1997). Control of insect ecdysis by a positive-feedback endocrine system: Roles of eclosion hormone and ecdysis triggering hormone. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 869-881.
Freeman, M. R., Dobritsa, A., Gaines, P., Segraves, W. A. and Carlson, J. R. (1999). The dare gene: Steroid hormone production, olfactory behavior, and neural degeneration in Drosophila. Development 126, 4591-4602.
Gäde, G., Hoffmann, K. H. and Spring, J. H. (1997). Hormonal regulation in insects: Facts, gaps, and future directions. Physiol. Rev. 77, 963-1032.
Gammie, S. C. and Truman, J. W. (1997). Neuropeptide hierarchies and the activation of sequential motor behaviors in the hawkmoth, Manduca sexta. J. Neurosci. 17, 4389-4397.
Gammie, S. C. and Truman, J. W. (1999). Eclosion hormone provides a link between ecdysis-triggering hormone and crustacean cardioactive peptide in the neuroendocrine cascade that controls ecdysis behavior. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 343-352.
Gooding, H., Choksi, S. and Bender, M. (2000). Identification of mutants in the Drosophila prohormone convertase gene amontillado (amon). In A. Dros. Res. Conf. 41, 42.
Harris-Warrick, R. M. and Marder, E. (1991). Modulation of neural networks for behavior. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 39-57.[Medline]
Hartenstein, K., Sinha, P., Mishra, A., Schenkel, H., Torok, I. and Mechler, B. M. (1997). The congested-like tracheae gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a member of the mitochondrial carrier family required for gas-filling of the tracheal system and expansion of the wings after eclosion. Genetics 147, 17551768.
Hermanson, G. T. (1995). Bioconjugate Techniques. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hewes, R. S., Schaefer, A. M. and Taghert, P. H. (2000). The cryptocephal gene (ATF4) encodes multiple basic-leucine zipper proteins controlling molting and metamorphosis in Drosophila. Genetics 155, 1711-1723.
Jiang, N., Kolhekar, A. S., Jacobs, P. S., Mains, R. E., Eipper, B. A. and Taghert, P. H. (2000). PHM is required for normal developmental transitions and for biosynthesis of secretory peptides in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 226, 118-136.[Medline]
Jürgens, G. and Hartenstein, V. (1993). The terminal regions of the body pattern. In The development of Drosophila melanogaster, vol. 2 (ed. M. Bate and A. Martines Arias), pp. 687-746. New York: Cold Spring Harnor Laboratory Press.
Keilin, D. (1944). Respiratory systems and respiratory adaptations in larvae and pupae of Diptera. Parasitology 36, 1-65.
Kingan, T. G. and Adams, M. E. (2000). Ecdysteroids regulate secretory competence in Inka cells. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 3011-3018.
Kingan, T. G., Gray, W., Zitnan, D. and Adams, M. E. (1997). Regulation of ecdysis-triggering hormone release by eclosion hormone. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 3245-3256.
Klein, C., Kallenborn, H. G. and Radlicki, C. (1999). The Inka cell and its associated cells: Ultrastructure of the epitracheal glands in the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar. J. Insect Physiol. 45, 65-73.[Medline]
Li, T.-R. and Bender, M. (2000). A conditional rescue system reveals essential functions for the ecdysone receptor (EcR) gene during molting and metamorphosis in Drosophila. Development 127, 2897-2905.
Lucas, B. K., Ormandy, C. J., Binart, N., Bridges, R. S. and Kelly, P. A. (1998). Null mutation of the prolactin receptor gene produces a defect in maternal behavior. Endocrinology 139, 4102-4107.
Manning, G. and Krasnow, M. A. (1993). Development of the Drosophila tracheal system. In The Development of Drosophila melanogaster. Vol. 2 (ed. M. Bate and A. Martines Arias), pp. 609-685. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Marder, E. and Calabrese, R. L. (1996). Principles of rhythmic motor pattern generation. Physiol. Rev. 76, 687-717.
McNabb, S. L., Baker, J. D., Agapite, J., Steller, H., Riddiford, L. M. and Truman, J. W. (1997). Disruption of a behavioral sequence by targeted death of peptidergic neurons in Drosophila. Neuron 19, 813-823.[Medline]
McNeil, G. P., Zhang, X., Genova, G. and Jackson, F. R. (1998). A molecular rhythm mediating circadian clock output in Drosophila. Neuron 20, 297-303.[Medline]
OBrien, M. A. and Taghert, P. H. (1998). A peritracheal neuropeptide system in insects: release of myomodulin-like peptides at ecdysis. J. Exp. Biol. 201, 193-209.
Park, Y., Zitnan, D., Gill, S. S. and Adams, M. E. (1999). Molecular cloning and biological activity of ecdysis-triggering hormones in Drosophila melanogaster. FEBS Lett. 463, 133-138.[Medline]
Perrimon, N., Engstrom, L. and Mahowald, A. P. (1985). Developmental genetics of the 2C-D region of the Drosophila X chromosome. Genetics 111, 23-41.
Phlippen, M. K., Webster, S. G., Chung, J. S. and Dircksen, H. (2000). Ecdysis of decapod crustaceans is associated with a dramatic release of crustacean cardioactive peptide into the haemolymph. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 521-536.
Piston, D. W., Patterson, G. H. and Knobel, S. M. (1999). Quantitative imaging of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Meth. Cell. Biol. 58, 31-48.[Medline]
Rorth, P. (1996.). A modular misexpression screen in Drosophila detecting tissue-specific phenotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 12418-12422.
Schubiger, M., Wade, A. A., Carney, G. E., Truman, J. W. and Bender, M. (1998). Drosophila EcR-B ecdysone receptor isoforms are required for larval molting and for neuron remodeling during metamorphosis. Development 125, 2053-2062.
Stanley, B. G. and Leibowitz, S. F. (1985). Neuropeptide Y injected in the paraventricular hypothalamus: a powerful stimulant of feeding behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 3940-3943.[Abstract]
Sullivan, W., Ashburner, M. and Hawley, R. S. (2000). Drosophila protocols. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Thummel, C. S. and Pirrotta, V. (1991). Technical Notes: New pCaSpeR P-element vectors. Drosophila Information Newsletter 2.
Truman, J. W. and Riddiford, L. M. (1970). Neuroendocrine control of ecdysis in Silkmoth. Science 167, 1624-1626.
Truman, J. W. (1992). The eclosion hormone system of insects. Prog. Brain Res. 92, 361-374.[Medline]
Van Gelder, R. N. and Krasnow, M. A. (1996). A novel circadianly expressed Drosophila melanogaster gene dependent on the period gene for its rhythmic expression. EMBO J. 15, 1625-1631.[Abstract]
Venkatesh, K. and Hasan, G. (1997). Disruption of the IP-3 receptor gene of Drosophila affects larval metamorphosis and ecdysone release. Curr. Biol. 7, 500-509.[Medline]
Waggoner, L. E., Hardaker, L. A., Golik, S. and Schafer, W. R. (2000). Effect of a neuropeptide gene on behavioral states in Caenorhabditis elegans egg-laying. Genetics 154, 1181-1192.
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1979). The physiology of insect tracheoles. In Advances in Insect Physiology. Vol. 17 (ed. M. J. Berridge, J. E. Treherne and V. B. Wigglesworth), pp. 85-148. Orlando, FL; London, UK: Academic Press.
Yamada, M.-a., Murata, T., Hirose, S., Lavorgna, G., Suzuki, E. and Ueda, H. (2000). Temporally restricted expression of transcription factor betaFTZ-F1: Significance for embryogenesis, molting and metamorphosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Development 127, 5083-5092.
Zitnan, D. and Adams, M. E. (2000). Excitatory and inhibitory roles of central ganglia in initiation of the insect ecdysis behavioural sequence. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 1329-1340.
Zitnan, D., Kingan, T. G., Hermesman, J. and Adams, M. E. (1996). Identification of ecdysis-triggering hormone from an epitracheal endocrine system. Science 271, 88-91.[Abstract]
Zitnan, D., Ross, L. S., Zitnanova, I., Hermesman, J. L., Gill, S. S. and Adams, M. E. (1999). Steroid induction of a peptide hormone gene leads to orchestration of a defined behavioral sequence. Neuron 23, 1-20.[Medline]