1 Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6058, USA
2 Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Life Science Building, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York, NY, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: granatom{at}mail.med.upenn.edu)
Accepted March 17, 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Movies available on-line
Key words: Spiral fiber, Mauthner, Hindbrain, Swimming, Turning movements, Axon guidance, Neural development, Zebrafish
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Genetic studies mainly in the invertebrate Caenorhabditis elegans have provided several examples in which specific neuronal cell types or their synaptic connections contribute to a neural circuit that underlies a defined behavior (e.g. Bargmann et al., 1993; McIntire et al., 1993). For example, mutations in the gene unc-4 change the synaptic VA motoneuron input from AVA interneurons, which are responsible for reverse motions, to inputs from AVB interneurons, which mediate forward movements (Miller et al., 1992; White et al., 1992). This has demonstrated a functional role for AVA interneurons in backward movements of C. elegans. In vertebrates, studies that aim to correlate individual neuronal cell types with a defined behavior present a more difficult task, in part because of the enormous complexity of the nervous system. Traditionally, electrophysiology and lesion experiments have been used to examine the role of individual cell types for defined behaviors, such as locomotor behavior (for reviews see: Bate, 1999; Grillner and Wallen, 1999). In the mouse, a variety of mutants with locomotor defects have been studied, including reeler (Alter et al., 1968; DArcangelo et al., 1995; Hirotsune et al., 1995), lurcher (Le Marec et al., 1997; Zuo et al., 1997) and staggerer (Hamilton et al., 1996; Lalonde, 1987). Although the genes mutated in these mice have been identified, it still remains a formidable task to understand the functional contribution of the affected neural cell types for the particular motor behavior they control.
The zebrafish is emerging as an excellent genetic model system in which to study the assembly and the function of neural circuits that underlie locomotor behavior (Bate, 1999; Fetcho and Liu, 1998). As in other developing vertebrates, zebrafish embryos and larvae display a well-defined set of developmentally regulated, stereotypical locomotor behaviors (Eaton et al., 1977; Kimmel et al., 1974; Saint-Amant and Drapeau, 1998). Most of the neural circuits controlling embryonic and larval motor behaviors are thought to reside in the spinal cord and in the hindbrain (Saint-Amant and Drapeau, 2000). A large number of the neuronal cell types in the larval hindbrain and spinal cord can reliably be identified by their stereotyped position, morphology and axonal trajectories (Bernhardt et al., 1990; Kimmel et al., 1982; Metcalfe et al., 1986). In recent years, several powerful methods to study neural circuits in the zebrafish have been adapted or developed, including electrophysiological recordings from identified neurons (Ribera and Nusslein-Volhard, 1998; Hatta and Korn, 1998), optical monitoring of neural activity in intact embryos (Fetcho and OMalley, 1995) and laser-ablation of individual neurons (Liu and Fetcho, 1999). These methods, combined with the large collection of locomotor defective mutants (Granato et al., 1996), provide a unique opportunity to study the genetic, molecular and cellular basis of neural circuits that underlie locomotion in vertebrates.
We have sought genes required for assembly and function of neural circuits that control defined locomotor behaviors. To identify mutants in which the absence of a distinct neuronal population or of its axonal trajectories correlates with specific motor defects, we examined a collection of mutants with presumed defects in the neural circuitry that underlies locomotion (Granato et al., 1996). We have now used high-speed video microscopy to show that mutant space cadet larvae fail to activate high-speed turning movements properly, such as the escape response. Using a trans-synaptic labeling approach, we demonstrate that space cadet larvae lack axonal connections between hindbrain spiral fiber neurons and the postsynaptic Mauthner neuron, a central circuit component that controls fast turning movements. Moreover, severing spiral fiber axons in wild-type larvae causes space cadet-like locomotor defects, providing functional evidence that spiral fiber neurons play a vital role in the circuitry controlling fast turning movements. Finally, analysis of retinal ganglion cell axons provides compelling evidence that the space cadet gene functions in pathfinding of spiral fiber axons, integrating these neurons into the Mauthner cell circuits. These studies provide a rare example in vertebrates in which a defined motor behavior is directly correlated with a small population of identified hindbrain neurons.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
High-speed behavioral analysis
Escape responses were elicited by a small tap to the head with a polished glass probe. The trials were recorded with a high-speed camera that captures images digitally at 1000 frames/s (EG&G Reticon, Sunnyvale, CA), and the data were analyzed as described previously (Liu and Fetcho, 1999). Turn duration and the time between turns were determined by counting frames (1 frame=1 msecond).
Anterograde DiI labeling of retinal ganglion cell axons
120 hours post fertilization (hpf), old larvae were fixed and pressure injected with DiI (Molecular Probes) dissolved in dimethylformamide (0.25%). Images were recorded using a LSM Zeiss confocal microscope.
Retrograde labeling of reticulospinal neurons
Reticulospinal neurons were labeled retrogradely (Moens et al., 1996) with 3x103 Mr tetramethylrhodamine-dextran (Molecular Probes). Analysis of labeled reticulospinal neurons was carried out using an LSM confocal microscope (Zeiss).
Antibody staining
Antibody staining was performed as previously described (Zeller and Granato, 1999) with few modifications. The following primary antibodies were used: 3A10 (1:50, Hatta, 1992, kindly provided by Dr T. Jessell) or zn-5 (1:500, which recognizes DM-GRASP (Fashena and Westerfield, 1999); Antibody Facility, University of Oregon). Stained embryos and larvae were viewed using Nomarski optics on a Zeiss Axioplan microscope. Images were acquired using a digital camera (Progress 3012, Kontron), saved on a Macintosh computer and processed with Adobe PhotoShop 4.0.1 software. For confocal microscopy, Alexa 488 or 594-conjugated secondary antibodies were used (Molecular Probes).
Brain lesions
120 hpf larvae were anesthetized in 0.04% tricaine (3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester, Sigma) and positioned with the dorsal side upwards into rectangular wells made with 1.2% agarose in 0.3x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) on a glass slide using a plastic mold. Using a sharpened tungsten needle (tip diameter 1 µm, Fine Science Tools), different brain regions were separated along or across the midline. The anterior and the posterior extent of the otic vesicle, as well as the position of the two otoliths within the otic vesicle were used as landmarks. Operated larvae were transferred to Ringers solution and their swimming patterns were analyzed 2 to 16 hours later. The larvae were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 3A10 to assess the precise extent of the cuts.
Trans-synaptic labeling of spiral fiber neurons
A solution of 25% calcium green dextran (3x103 Mr CGD, Molecular Probes, in 10% Hanks) was pressure injected into the ventral spinal cord of 4 dpf larvae to label the Mauthner soma. Larvae with CGD-labeled Mauthner cells were identified 24 hours later using a fluorescence dissecting scope, and neurobiotin (Vector Laboratories, 10% in 10% Hanks) was pressure injected into one labeled Mauthner soma. Successful targeting of the Mauthner soma resulted in a CGD-mediated increase in fluorescence. After 12 to 16 hours, neurobiotin-labeled cells were visualized using either the ABC Vectastain kit combined with nickel intensified DAB (Vector Laboratories), or with the TSA fluorescein system (NEN). Control injections of neurobiotin adjacent to the Mauthner soma did not label neurons away from the injection site.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
To analyze the behavioral defects in more detail, we used a high-speed camera (1,000 frames/second) and recorded locomotor patterns of individual space cadet larvae and their wild-type siblings. We focused our analysis on stimulus induced escape responses, because their kinematics have been described in great detail (Eaton et al., 1977; Liu and Fetcho, 1999). For both space cadet and wild-type larvae, we compared the angular velocity and duration of the initial turn (Fig. 1A1-A4,B1-B4), and the angular velocity of the counter turn (Fig. 1A5,A6,B5,B6). In cases where there were successive turns towards the same side (Fig. 1B7,B8), we examined the angular velocity of the second turn and the interval from the peak of the initial turn to initiation of the second turn. We concentrated on the angular velocities because these parameters are most indicative of the high-performance turns exhibited in normal escape behaviors (Liu and Fetcho, 1999). The results are summarized in Table 1. In wild-type siblings, all trials (n=60 from six animals) yielded a stereotypic escape response with kinematic parameters comparable with values previously determined for wild-type larvae (Liu and Fetcho, 1999). In contrast, space cadet mutant larvae exhibited three types of responses (63 trials from nine animals, Table 1). In 70% of the trials, space cadet larvae responded with a single turn escape response, with similar kinematic parameters to those exhibited by their wild-type cohorts. Although the angular velocity was slightly slower than in wild-type larvae (19.57±0.7°/mseconds in space cadet larvae versus 21.89±0.4°/mseconds in wild-type), these values are within the range of normal escape responses. In 30% of the trials, space cadet larvae responded with double turns two successive large turns in the same direction. In 78% of these double turns, performance was markedly reduced, as evidenced by a decrease in the angular velocities of the initial turn, counter turn and the second turn. In contrast, in 22% of the double turn episodes, both turns were high-speed with kinematic parameters similar to those of wild-type escape responses (19.78±0.5°/mseconds for the first turn and 23.43±0.4°/mseconds for the second turn). Thus, the ability of space cadet larvae to perform wild-type-like escape responses indicates that mutations in the space cadet gene may not affect the execution of the escape response but may regulate the occurrence of high-speed turning movements.
|
|
To investigate if mutations in the space cadet gene affect axonal trajectories throughout the nervous system or more specifically a defined subset of hindbrain commissural axons, we examined various axonal trajectories throughout the nervous system. We focused on the hindbrain, where an exceptionally detailed map of the reticulospinal neurons is available (Metcalfe et al., 1986). We labeled reticulospinal neurons retrogradely with rhodamine dextran, and at 120 hpf examined the trajectories of 12 classes of reticulospinal neurons, of which five extend axons contralaterally (see Table 2). Analysis of reticulospinal neurons in space cadet larvae (n=41) did not reveal any significant differences in cell number or axonal trajectories, when compared with wild-type larvae (see Table 2 and Fig. 2G,H). Similarly, 3A10-positive commissural axons of presumptive CoPA interneurons in the spinal cord (n=30; data not shown) and 3A10 positive trajectories in the midbrain of space cadet mutants (n=200, Fig. 2J) were indistinguishable from those in wild-type larvae (n=50, Fig. 2I). We conclude that the space cadet gene, rather than being an essential component for the development of many commissural trajectories, exhibits a function that is specific for a selective set of commissural axons, including two rhombomere 3 commissures.
|
|
|
|
Rhombomere 3 commissures contain axons of the spiral fiber neurons
We next examined the identity of the neurons whose axons cross the midline in the two rhombomere 3 commissures. Two observations suggested that these axons might synapse on the Mauthner neuron within the region of the axon cap. First, in wild-type larvae, development of the two commissures in rhombomere 3 temporally correlated with development of 3A10 reactivity in the Mauthner axon cap (Fig. 3). Second, in space cadet mutants both the two rhombomere 3 commissures and 3A10 reactivity in the axon cap region were reduced or abolished (Fig. 2). We therefore asked which neurons are located rostral to the Mauthner neuron and extend commissural axons synapsing on the Mauthner neuron within the region of the axon cap. Studies in the adult goldfish have identified three different classes of neurons that form synapses within this region: commissural PHP neurons, collateral PHP neurons, and spiral fiber neurons (reviewed by Faber et al., 1989; Zottoli and Faber, 2000). However, only spiral fiber somata are located at a distance (300-700 µM) rostrally to the Mauthner cell (Scott et al., 1994). In adult goldfish, the soma of spiral fiber neurons are located rostral to the axon cap, from where they extend thin axons crossing the midline in a commissure at the level of the cell bodies. After crossing, goldfish spiral fiber axons project first caudally and, at the level of the Mauthner cell, laterally into the axon cap (Scott et al., 1994). Thus, based on their soma position and their commissural axonal pathways reported in adult goldfish, spiral fiber neurons appeared to us as a good candidate for the neuronal cell type affected in the hindbrain of space cadet mutants.
To determine if spiral fiber neurons are affected in space cadet mutants, we sought to visualize these neurons and their axonal trajectories. In zebrafish larvae, only the characteristic spiraling endings of spiral fiber axons have been identified (Eaton et al., 1977; Kimmel et al., 1981). In the absence of markers that label spiral fiber axons and somata, we took advantage of observations made in adult fish, namely that these neurons communicate with the Mauthner cell through electrical synapses containing gap junctions (Nakajima and Kohno, 1978). Mauthner cells were labeled retrogradely by injecting a fluorescent indicator, calcium green dextran (CGD), into the ventral spinal cord (Fig. 5A). Labeling the Mauthner neurons with CGD allowed us to target selectively the Mauthner soma for injection of neurobiotin, a small tracer able to pass through gap junctions (Fig. 5B; for details see Material and Methods). In wild-type larvae, neurobiotin injection in one of the two Mauthner cells labeled distinct sets of ipsilateral and contralateral neurons (Fig. 5C). The identity of most neurons located at the same level and caudally to the Mauthner cells is unclear, but these neurons might include those known to form gap junctions on the ventral Mauthner cell dendrite (Nakajima and Kohno, 1978). In 42% of the injected wild-type larvae (n=111), we observed two groups of labeled cell bodies, located rostrally and on the contralateral side of the injected Mauthner neuron (Fig. 5C,E). Each of the two groups contained 10-14 labeled cell bodies, extending thin axons that cross the midline at the level of their cell bodies, thus forming two distinct commissures in rhombomere 3 (arrows in Fig. 5C,E). After crossing the midline, the two commissures fuse and project caudally to the Mauthner cell. Thus, based on their soma positions, axonal trajectories and because they are dye coupled with Mauthner neurons, we conclude that the two groups of neurobiotin labeled, rostral commissural neurons correspond to spiral fiber neurons.
|
Mutations in the space cadet gene affect axonal pathfinding
Our analysis shows that in space cadet mutants, two rhombomere 3 commissures, which contain spiral fiber axons, fail to develop (Fig. 3). This axonal defect suggested to us that the space cadet gene might play a role in axonal pathfinding. However, the 3A10 antibody staining of spiral fiber commissures was restricted to the axons and therefore did not reveal the number and location of their somata (Fig. 2). In the absence of additional spiral fiber specific molecular markers, we cannot exclude the possibility that the axonal defects arise as a consequence of an earlier defect, e.g. a defect of spiral fiber neuron survival or specification. Our initial analysis of the space cadet nervous system had revealed axonal defects in two classes of neurons: hindbrain spiral fiber neurons described above and retinal ganglion cell (RGC) neurons. Consequently, we examined the development of RGC neurons to determine if the space cadet gene plays a role primarily in neural survival, neural specification, axonal outgrowth or axonal pathfinding.
DiI labeling of space cadet RGC axons revealed striking pathfinding defects. In wild-type larvae, RGC axons exit the eye at about 34 hpf (Stuermer, 1988). Axons from both eyes cross each other at the ventral midline of the diencephalon to form the optic chiasm before projecting to the contralateral optic tectum. Upon reaching the contralateral tectal lobe, retinal axons project topographically to form a precise map of the visual world within the brain. At 120 hpf, retinotectal trajectories can be readily visualized in fixed larvae by DiI labeling. In all wild-type larvae examined (n=350), all RGC axons crossed the midline and projected to the contralateral tectum (Fig. 6A). In space cadet larvae (n=456), retinal ganglion axons displayed three pathfinding errors which varied in their penetrance. In space cadet larvae, RGC axons either failed to exit the eye (0-20%, 10% average; data not shown), exited the eye but stalled at or near the midline (0-20%, 10% average; Fig. 6C), or projected aberrantly to the ipsilateral tectum (20-64%, 40% average; Fig. 6B). Thus, in a significant fraction of larvae, RGC axons projected bilaterally, similar to the phenotype observed in a small group of zebrafish mutants with retinotectal pathfinding defects (Class I; Karlstrom et al., 1996). To determine if the RGC axonal phenotypes were caused by lack of RGC specification or by progressive RGC degeneration, we examined the well-defined histology of the retina as well as the differentiation of RGCs in space cadet mutants (Dowling, 1987; Larison and Bremiller, 1990; Trevarrow et al., 1990). Histological sections of space cadet larvae (Fig. 6E) revealed that the organization of the different retinal layers as well as the cellular morphology within the RGC layer was indistinguishable from those observed in the wild-type retinae (6D). Moreover, the expression of DM-GRASP protein in space cadet retinal ganglion cells (Fig. 6F) was indistinguishable from the pattern and levels observed in wild-type retinae (Fig. 6G). In summary, our analysis indicates that mutations in the space cadet gene do not overtly affect RGC specification or survival, but suggests a role for space cadet in axonal pathfinding.
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Analysis of the space cadet swimming phenotype reveals an essential role for spiral fiber neurons
In space cadet mutants, aberrant turning movements correlate with axonal defects of spiral fiber neurons. Spiral fiber neurons were first described in adult catfish in 1915 by Barthelmez (Barthelmez, 1915), and later in adult goldfish by Bodian, as fibers forming irregular spirals around the axon neck (Bodian, 1937). Histological characteristics of spiral fiber neurons include (1) somata located rostrally to the Mauthner cell, (2) thin, commissural axons, (3) projections into the region of the axon cap where they spiral around the Mauthner axon, and (4) gap junctions with the Mauthner axon (Scott et al., 1994). Our trans-synaptic labeling approach visualizes several populations of neurons that are synaptically connected via gap junctions with the Mauthner neuron. Two groups of these synaptically coupled neurons display histological characteristics consistent with them being spiral fiber neurons (Fig. 6).
Our analysis of the space cadet phenotype reveals a role for spiral fiber neurons in controlling fast turning movements. Three lines of evidence suggest that the space cadet swimming phenotype is caused by defective spiral fiber neurons. First, we find that in 100% of space cadet mutants two 3A10-positive rhombomere 3 commissures are absent (Fig. 2F), or project ipsilaterally rather than crossing the midline (K. L. and M. G., unpublished). Second, severing these two commissures in wild-type larvae evokes unilateral tail flips, similar to those observed in space cadet mutants. Third, the two 3A10-positive rhombomere 3 commissures contain axons of spiral fiber neurons, and in space cadet mutants these axons fail to make synaptic contacts with their target, the Mauthner neuron. Although we examined in detail many identified cell types in the hindbrain (Fig. 2, Table 2), it is possible that the 3A10-positive commissures in rhombomere 3 contain axons of a second, unidentified class of neurons, and that defects in these neurons elicit the space cadet phenotype. In summary, our results demonstrate that in space cadet larvae spiral fiber axons are affected, and that the temporal onset and spatial localization of this defect correlates very strongly with aberrant swimming patterns, suggesting that indeed defective spiral fiber trajectories are responsible for the space cadet swimming phenotype.
The function of spiral fiber neurons
Studies in adult goldfish have implicated spiral fiber neurons as part of the presynaptic neural circuits controlling the excitability of the Mauthner cell (Scott et al., 1994). The Mauthner cell in teleost fish and amphibians is part of a brainstem escape network, which acts as a sensory integration system receiving input from many sensory systems to generate high-speed turning movements in response to aversive stimuli (Fig. 7A; Eaton et al., 1991). Afferent sensory projections to the Mauthner cell arise from several systems, including the vestibular system, through VIII nerve axons (Faber et al., 1989). The excitability of the Mauthner cell is thought to be controlled by a presynaptic inhibitory network including commissural and collateral PHP neurons (Fig. 7A; reviewed by Faber et al., 1989; Zottoli and Faber, 2000). Both groups of neurons form synapses on the Mauthner cell within a highly specialized region, the axon cap, where they produce electrical and chemical inhibition. A third class of neurons known to develop synapses within the region of the axon cap are the spiral fiber neurons (Fig. 7A; Nakajima and Kohno, 1978). Initially hypothesized to inhibit the Mauthner cell electrically, more recent, electrophysiological studies in adult goldfish suggest that spiral fiber neurons mediate directly excitation of the Mauthner neuron (Scott et al., 1994). In addition, spiral fibers have been proposed to activate PHP neurons, thereby providing indirectly inhibition to the Mauthner cell (Fig. 7A; Scott et al., 1994). Therefore, spiral fiber neurons have been identified as prime candidates in determining sensitivity of the Mauthner neuron to activation (Scott et al., 1994).
|
Our analysis provides evidence for a second function of spiral fiber neurons, which is to ensure that high-speed turning movements do not occur spontaneously or at low stimulus levels, but only in response to strong stimuli, such as the appearance of predators. In wild-type fish, sensory inputs, e.g. from the vestibular system through the VIIIth nerve, activate the Mauthner cell and, similar to the situation in goldfish, may also activate PHP neurons, which in turn inhibit the Mauthner cell (Fig. 7A; Faber and Korn, 1978). The consequence of this arrangement is that at weak stimulus strengths, PHP-mediated inhibition dominates, but at higher sensory input strength, this inhibition is overcome (Faber and Korn, 1978). Because of their axonal defects, space cadet spiral fiber axons might fail to synapse and activate PHP neurons (Fig. 7B), thereby decreasing the overall levels of PHP-mediated inhibition impinging onto the Mauthner cell. The reduced levels of inhibition may allow weak sensory stimuli to activate the Mauthner cell (Fig. 7B), thereby causing the spurious turning movements we observe in space cadet mutants. Thus, we propose that spiral fiber neurons play an essential role modulating the excitability of postsynaptic targets, i.e. the Mauthner cell.
Our analysis does not allow us to distinguish whether spiral fiber neurons control turning movements exclusively through the Mauthner cell, or they influence additional hindbrain neurons. Laser ablation experiments have demonstrated that high-speed escape responses are controlled by at least three paired reticulospinal neurons, the Mauthner cells and two additional pairs of hindbrain neurons, MiD2cm and MiD3cm (Liu and Fetcho, 1999). It is therefore conceivable that spiral fiber neurons influence multiple hindbrain neurons, and that the space cadet swimming phenotype might involve more neurons than the Mauthner cell (Fig. 7). Consistent with this view is the decrease in angular velocity (15.3°/mseconds slow double turns, Table 1), which also occurs after killing Mauthner, MiD2cm and MiD3cm (13-14°/mseconds), but not Mauthner alone (23°/mseconds; Fig. 6, Liu and Fetcho, 1999). Furthermore, we find that in wild-type larvae, some 3A10-positive spiral fiber axons extend caudally from the Mauthner cell, providing further evidence that spiral fiber neurons influence additional synaptic targets (K. L. and M. G., unpublished).
The role of the space cadet gene in the assembly of neural circuits
The CNS defects observed in mutant larvae suggests a role for the space cadet gene in axonal pathfinding. In space cadet mutants spiral fiber axons are absent (Fig. 2), or project ipsilaterally rather than crossing the midline (K. L. and M. G., unpublished). Similarly, retinal ganglion cell axons fail to exit the eye, stall around the midline, or select an inappropriate path at the midline (data not shown; Fig. 6B,C), demonstrating that mutations in the space cadet gene affect pathfinding of a small set of commissural neurons. In recent years several components of a sophisticated system guiding commissural axons towards and across the CNS midline have been identified (reviewed in: Terman and Kolodkin, 1999; Van Vactor and Flanagan, 1999). Mutations in any of these midline guidance genes, such as unc-6/netrin, unc-40/DCC, commissureless, robo and slit, affect axonal trajectories of many if not most commissural neurons (Hedgecock et al., 1990; Rothberg et al., 1990; Seeger et al., 1993). In contrast, our analyses using three different antibodies (zn-5, anti-acetylated tubulin and 3A10) reveal that most commissural trajectories in the space cadet forebrain, midbrain, hindbrain and spinal cord appear unaffected (Fig. 2 and data not shown). Thus, different from the phenotypes observed in midline gene mutants, our analysis of the space cadet phenotype reveals axonal defects in only a small set of commissural neurons, including retinal ganglion cells and spiral fiber neurons. Several explanations can account for a selective axonal phenotype. For example, space cadet activity might be necessary for pathfinding of many commissural trajectories, but the two available space cadet mutations represent only partial loss-of-function alleles. Alternatively, other genes with similar function may partially substitute for the absence of space cadet activity. Although we cannot exclude that the space cadet gene product still retains some of its activity, or that other genes partially compensate for space cadet, we favor the idea that space cadet function is dedicated to pathfinding of late developing commissures.
The commissural neuronal cell types affected in space cadet mutants share two features. First, axonogenesis of RGC and spiral fiber neurons occurs late in development. Most commissural trajectories, including those of commissural spinal interneurons, commissural reticulospinal neurons and those of commissural neurons projecting in major axonal tracts of the brain develop between 17 and 28 hpf (Bernhardt et al., 1990; Chitnis and Kuwada, 1990; Wilson et al., 1990). In contrast, retinal ganglion cell axons leave the eye only around 32-34 hpf (Stuermer, 1988), while 3A10-positive spiral fiber neurons begin axonogenesis around 72 hpf (Fig. 3). Second, RGC and spiral fiber growth cones, rather than extending on existing trajectories, pioneer a new path. In the zebrafish, RGC growth cones establish their own commissural path adjacent to, but separate from, the postoptic commissure (Wilson et al., 1990). As determined by 3A10 immunoreactivity, presumptive spiral fiber axons do not follow any existing hindbrain commissural tracts, but appear to establish new paths across the midline (Fig. 3). Thus, space cadet might not be part of the well-studied midline guidance system, but might play a role for pathfinding of a small set of commissural neurons extending their axons late. Consistent with this notion, we have mapped space cadet to a small genomic region, in which no midline guidance genes have been reported (K. L. and M. G., unpublished). In summary, our data provide compelling evidence that the space cadet gene plays an essential role for RGC and spiral fiber growth cones to pioneer late commissural pathways.
Our studies provide direct evidence that spiral fiber neurons, first described more than 80 years ago, play a vital role in the circuits controlling high-speed turning movements. To our knowledge, the analysis of the space cadet mutant phenotype is one of the few examples in vertebrates that provides compelling evidence for the functional role of a defined neuronal cell type for a well-studied behavior. Future studies are required to elucidate the precise mechanisms by which spiral fiber neurons contribute to the circuits underlying high-speed turning movements. Similarly, studies to uncover the molecular identity of the space cadet gene are underway to reveal the mechanism by which space cadet activity guides retinal ganglion cell and spiral fiber axons.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Albright, T. D., Jessell, T. M., Kandel, E. R. and Posner, M. I. (2000). Neural science: a century of progress and the mysteries that remain. Neuron 25, Suppl., S1-55.[Medline]
Alter, M., Liebo, J., Desnick, S. O. and Strommer, B. (1968). The behavior of the reeler neurological mutant mouse. Neurology 18, 289.
Bargmann, C. I., Hartwieg, E. and Horvitz, H. R. (1993). Odorant-selective genes and neurons mediate olfaction in C. elegans. Cell 74, 515-27.[Medline]
Barthelmez, G. W. (1915). Mauthners cell and the nucleus motorius tegmenti. J. Comp. Neurol. 25, 87-128.
Bate, M. (1999). Development of motor behaviour. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 670-5.[Medline]
Bernhardt, R. R., Chitnis, A. B., Lindamer, L. and Kuwada, J. Y. (1990). Identification of spinal neurons in the embryonic and larval zebrafish. J. Comp. Neurol. 302, 603-616.[Medline]
Bodian, D. (1937). The structure of the vertebrate synapse. A goldfish study. J. Comp. Neurol. 68, 117-159.
Chitnis, A. B. and Kuwada, J. Y. (1990). Axonogenesis in the brain of zebrafish embryos. J. Neurosci. 10, 1892-1905.[Abstract]
DArcangelo, G., Miao, G. G., Chen, S. C., Soares, H. D., Morgan, J. I. and Curran, T. (1995). A protein related to extracellular matrix proteins deleted in the mouse mutant reeler. Nature 374, 719-723.[Medline]
Dowling, J. (1987). The Retina. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Eaton, R. and Farley, R. D. (1973). Development of the Mauthner neurons in embryos and larvae of zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. Copeia 4, 673-682.
Eaton, R. C., Bombardieri, R. A. and Meyer, D. L. (1977). The Mauthner-initiated startle response in teleost fish. J. Exp. Biol. 66, 65-81.[Abstract]
Eaton, R. C., DiDomenico, R. and Nissanov, J. (1991). Role of the Mauthner cell in sensorimotor integration by the brain stem escape network. Brain Behav. Evol. 37, 272-285.[Medline]
Eaton, R. C., Farley, R. D., Kimmel, C. B. and Schabatach, E. (1977). Functional development in the Mauthner cell system of embryos and larvae of the zebrafish. J. Neurobiol. 8, 151-172.[Medline]
Faber, D. S., Fetcho, J. R. and Korn, H. (1989). Neuronal networks underlying the escape response in goldfish. General implications for motor control. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 563, 11-33.[Medline]
Faber, D. S. and Korn, H. (1978). Electrophysiology of the Mauthner cell. Basic properties, synaptic mechanisms, and associated networks. In Neurobiology of the Mauthner Cell (ed. D. F. H. Korn), pp. 47-131. New York: Raven Press.
Fashena, D. and Westerfield, M. (1999). Secondary motoneuron axons localize DM-GRASP on their fasciculated segments. J. Comp. Neurol. 406, 415-424.[Medline]
Fetcho, J. R. and Liu, K. S. (1998). Zebrafish as a model system for studying neuronal circuits and behavior. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 860, 333-345.
Fetcho, J. R. and OMalley, D. M. (1995). Visualization of active neural circuits in the spinal cord of intact zebrafish. J. Neurophysiol. 73, 399-406.
Granato, M., van Eeden, F. J. M., Schach, U., Trowe, T., Brand, M., Furutani-Seiki, M., Haffter, P., Hammerschmidt, M., Heisenberg, C.-P., Jiang, Y.-J. et al. (1996). Genes controlling and mediating locomotion behaviour of the zebrafish embryo and larva. Development 123, 399-413.
Grillner, S. and Wallen, P. (1999). On the cellular bases of vertebrate locomotion. Prog. Brain Res. 123, 297-309.[Medline]
Hamilton, B. A., Frankel, W. N., Kerrebrock, A. W., Hawkins, T. L., FitzHugh, W., Kusumi, K., Russell, L. B., Mueller, K. L., van Berkel, V., Birren, B. W. et al. (1996). Disruption of the nuclear hormone receptor RORalpha in staggerer mice. Nature 379, 736-739.[Medline]
Hatta, K. and Korn, H. (1998). Physiological properties of the Mauthner system in the adult zebrafish. J. Comp. Neurol. 395, 493-509.[Medline]
Hedgecock, E. M., Culotti, J. G. and Hall, D. H. (1990). The unc-5, unc-6, and unc-40 genes guide circumferential migrations of pioneer axons and mesodermal cells on the epidermis in C. elegans. Neuron 4, 61-85.[Medline]
Hirotsune, S., Takahara, T., Sasaki, N., Hirose, K., Yoshiki, A., Ohashi, T., Kusakabe, M., Murakami, Y., Muramatsu, M., Watanabe, S. et al. (1995). The reeler gene encodes a protein with an EGF-like motif expressed by pioneer neurons. Nat. Genet. 10, 77-83.[Medline]
Karlstrom, R. O., Trowe, T., Klostermann, S., Baier, H., Brand, M., Crawford, A. D., Grunewald, B., Haffter, P., Hoffman, H., Meyer, S. U. et al. (1996). Zebrafish mutations affecting retinotectal axon pathfinding. Development 123, 427-438.
Kimmel, C. B., Patterson, J. and Kimmel, R. J. (1974). Development and behavioral characteristics of the startle response in the zebrafish. Dev. Psychobiol. 7, 47-60.[Medline]
Kimmel, C. B., Powell, S. L. and Metcalfe, W. K. (1982). Brain neurons which project to the spinal cord in young larvae of the zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio). J. Comp. Neurol. 205, 112-127.[Medline]
Kimmel, C. B., Sessions, S. K. and Kimmel, R. J. (1981). Morphogenesis and synaptogenesis of the zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio) Mauthner neuron. J. Comp. Neurol. 198, 101-120.[Medline]
Lalonde, R. (1987). Motor abnormalities in staggerer mutant mice. Exp. Brain Res. 68, 417-420.[Medline]
Larison, K. D. and Bremiller, R. (1990). Early onset of phenotype and cell patterning in the embryonic zebrafish retina. Development 109, 567-576.[Abstract]
Le Marec, N., Caston, J. and Lalonde, R. (1997). Impaired motor skills on static and mobile beams in lurcher mutant mice. Exp. Brain Res. 116, 131-138.[Medline]
Liu, K. S. and Fetcho, J. R. (1999). Laser ablations reveal functional relationships of segmental hindbrain neurons in zebrafish. Neuron 23, 325-335.[Medline]
McIntire, S. L., Jorgensen, E. and Horvitz, R. H. (1993). Genes required for GABA function in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 364, 334-337.[Medline]
Metcalfe, W. K., Mendelson, B. and Kimmel, C. B. (1986). Segmental homologies among reticulospinal neurons in the hindbrain of the zebrafish larva. J. Comp. Neurol. 251, 147-159.[Medline]
Miller, D. M., Shen, M. M., Shamu, C. E., Burglin, T. R., Ruvkun, G., Dubois, M. L., Ghee, M. and Wilson, L. (1992). C. elegans unc-4 gene encodes a homeodomain protein that determines the pattern of synaptic input to specific motor neurons. Nature 355, 841-845.[Medline]
Moens, C. B., Yan, Y.-L., Appel, B., Force, A. G. and Kimmel, C. B. (1996). valentino: a zebrafish gene required for normal hindbrain segmentation. Development 122, 3981-3990.
Nakajima, Y. and Kohno, K. (1978). Fine structure of the Mauthner cell: Synaptic topography and comparative study. In Neurobiology of the Mauthner Cell. (ed. D. F. H. Korn), pp. 133-166. New York: Raven Press.
Ribera, A. B. and Nusslein-Volhard, C. (1998). Zebrafish touch-insensitive mutants reveal an essential role for the developmental regulation of sodium current. J. Neurosci. 18, 9181-9191.
Rothberg, J. M., Jacobs, J. R., Goodman, C. S. and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. (1990). slit: an extracellular protein necessary for development of midline glia and commissural axon pathways contains both EGF and LRR domains. Genes Dev. 4, 2169-2187.[Abstract]
Saint-Amant, L. and Drapeau, P. (2000). Motoneuron activity patterns related to the earliest behavior of the zebrafish embryo. J. Neurosci. 20, 3964-3972.
Saint-Amant, L. and Drapeau, P. (1998). Time course of the development of motor behaviors in the zebrafish embryo. J. Neurobiol. 37, 622-632.[Medline]
Scott, J. W., Zottoli, S. J., Beatty, N. P. and Korn, H. (1994). Origin and function of spiral fibers projecting to the goldfish Mauthner cell. J. Comp. Neurol. 339, 76-90.[Medline]
Seeger, M., Tear, G., Ferres-Marco, D. and Goodman, C. S. (1993). Mutations affecting growth cone guidance in Drosophila: genes necessary for guidance toward or away from the midline. Neuron 10, 409-426.[Medline]
Serafini, T., Colamarino, S. A., Leonardo, D. E., Wang, H., Beddington, R., Skarnes, W. C. and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (1996). Netrin-1 is required for commissural axon guidance in the developing vertebrate nervous system. Cell 87, 1001-1014.[Medline]
Stuermer, C. A. (1988). Retinotopic organization of the developing retinotectal projection in the zebrafish embryo. J. Neurosci. 8, 4513-4530.[Abstract]
Terman, J. R. and Kolodkin, A. L. (1999). Attracted or repelled? Look within. Neuron 23, 193-200.[Medline]
Trevarrow, B., Marks, D. L. and Kimmel, C. B. (1990). Organization of hindbrain segments in the zebrafish embryo. Neuron 4, 669-679.[Medline]
Van Vactor, D. and Flanagan, J. G. (1999). The middle and the end: slit brings guidance and branching together in axon pathway selection. Neuron 22, 649-652.[Medline]
White, J. G., Southgate, E. and Thomson, J. N. (1992). Mutations in the Caenorhabditis elegans unc-4 gene alter the synaptic input to ventral cord motor neurons. Nature 355, 838-841.[Medline]
Wilson, S. W., Ross, L. S., Parrett, T. and Easter, S. J. (1990). The development of a simple scaffold of axon tracts in the brain of the embryonic zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. Development 108, 121-145.[Abstract]
Zeller, J. and Granato, M. (1999). The zebrafish diwanka gene controls an early step of motor growth cone migration. Development 126, 3461-3472.
Zottoli, S. J. and Faber, D. (2000). The Mauthner cell: what has it taught us? The Neuroscientist 6, 26-38.
Zuo, J., De Jager, P. L., Takahashi, K. A., Jiang, W., Linden, D. J. and Heintz, N. (1997). Neurodegeneration in Lurcher mice caused by mutation in delta2 glutamate receptor gene. Nature 388, 769-773.[Medline]