1 Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire CNRS/INSERM/ULP, B.P. 163, 67404 Illkirch Cédex, C.U. de Strasbourg, France
2 Department of Anatomy, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland
These authors contributed equally to this work
Authors for correspondence
Accepted 23 November 2001
![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key words: Spermatogenesis, TLF, TBP, Chromatin, Chromocenter, HP1, Mouse, Rat
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
TBP has a bipartite structure with a variable N-terminal domain and a highly conserved C-terminal core domain. The core domain of TBP folds into a saddle-like structure (Kim and Burley, 1994; Kim et al., 1993
) which is responsible for DNA binding, and interaction with TFIIA, TFIIB and TAFs (Liu et al., 1998
; Nikolov et al., 1995
; Tan et al., 1996
). Two proteins with strong sequence similarity to the core domain of TBP have been described. The first, Drosophila melanogaster TRF1, is expressed in a tissue-specific fashion and functions as both a RNA polymerase II and polymerase III transcription factor (Hansen et al., 1997
; Holmes and Tjian, 2000
; Takada et al., 2000
). At present the gene for this has been described only in Drosophila.
A second protein with high homology to the TBP core domain has received various names; TLF, TRF2, TLP and TRP (Maldonado, 1999; Moore et al., 1999
; Ohbayashi et al., 1999
; Rabenstein et al., 1999
; Teichmann et al., 1999
; Wieczorek et al., 1998
). The TLF (TBP-like factor) gene is found in most metazoans (Dantonel et al., 1999
) and multiple sequence alignments show that TLFs contain two direct repeats, which are well conserved between all TBP-type factors. Despite this sequence similarity, TLF does not bind classical TATA elements (Dantonel et al., 1999
; Moore et al., 1999
), but does interact with TFIIA and TFIIB. Transfection, and overexpression studies in cells and in in vitro experiments, have shown that TLF associates stably with TFIIA and can act as a repressor or activator of RNA polymerase II transcription (Moore et al., 1999
; Ohbayashi et al., 2001
; Teichmann et al., 1999
).
The physiological function of TLF was first addressed using RNAi in Caenorhabditis elegans where TLF appears to function as an essential RNA polymerase II transcription factor (Dantonel et al., 2000; Kaltenbach et al., 2000
). Injected embryos die at an early stage of embryogenesis before the onset of morphogenesis. Similar results have been obtained using antisense strategies in Xenopus laevis (Veenstra et al., 2000
) and in the zebrafish Danio rerio (Muller et al., 2001
). These studies underscored a critical role of TLF in the embryogenesis of these species. It has been suggested that TLF may act as a surrogate for TBP at specific promoters whose expression is required at the onset of zygotic transcription in the developing embryos. However, as it has been demonstrated recently, the situation is radically different in mammals. Indeed, using homologous recombination, it has been shown that mouse TLF is not required for embryogenesis, but that it is essential for spermatogenesis (Martianov et al., 2001
; Zhang et al., 2001b
).
Spermatogenesis is a cyclic process in which diploid spermatogonia differentiate into mature haploid spermatozoa. Spermatogonia committed for differentiation give rise to spermatocytes which undergo two meiotic divisions, to generate haploid round spermatids. During the process of spermiogenesis the haploid round spermatids undergo an elongation phase in which they are sculptured into the shape of mature spermatozoa. This entails a major biochemical and morphological restructuring of the germ cell in which the majority of the somatic histones are replaced by protamines to pack the DNA into the sperm cell nucleus. In the absence of TLF, round step 7 haploid spermatids die through apoptosis as the transition to elongated spermatids begins. Rare elongating spermatids remain beyond this stage but rapidly degenerate such that no spermatids survive beyond step 13. Hence, TLF is essential for the differentiation of male germ cells. These results highlighted the non-redundant function of TBP and TLF in mammals and solicited further investigations aimed at identifying their distinct roles.
To gain further insight into the molecular function that TLF plays in the differentiation program of male germ cells, we have examined in detail the pattern of TLF expression during spermatogenesis and compared it with that of TBP. Our results show marked differences in temporal regulation of TBP and TLF as well as differences in their intracellular location. In particular, TLF is strongly expressed in late pachytene spermatocytes, suggesting that it has a function prior to the apoptosis of the haploid cells. A detailed analysis of the germ cell phenotype in TLF/ (Tlp/) mice shows that is indeed the case since defective acrosome formation is observed in early stage spermatids. Our results also reveal an unexpected role of TLF in chromatin organisation. Strikingly, early stage spermatids of TLF-deficient mice are characterised by fragmentation of the chromocenter, a condensed structure formed by the association of centromeric heterochromatin (Hoyer-Fender et al., 2000; Brinkley et al., 1986
; Zalensky et al., 1993
). Wild-type spermatids contain a single chromocenter, while in TLF/ spermatids the single center is fragmented into multiple structures. These results show that TLF plays an essential role in proper chromatin organisation in developing male germ cells. Disorganisation of chromatin domains in the early round spermatids could lead to defects in gene expression and chromosomal packaging in the elongated spermatids and therefore be the primary cause of differentiation arrest and apoptosis of TLF/ spermatids.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Immunoblots and immunohistochemistry
Rat seminiferous tubule segments at defined stages were isolated using the transillumination-assisted microdissection method (Parvinen and Hecht, 1981) and pooled to obtain 4-5 cm, equivalent to 4-5 mg of wet weight of tissue. Protein extracts were made by shearing the tubule segments in 2x boiling Laemmli buffer containing 10 mM ß-mercaptoethanol. The extracts were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and staining with Coomassie Blue stain to normalise each preparation. Immunoblotting and chemiluminescence detection were performed by standard methods. Immunohistochemistry was performed on fixed sectioned seminiferous tubules or from squash preparations of microdissected tubules from wild-type or TLF mutant mice as previously described (Martianov et al., 2001
; Nantel et al., 1996
). Antibodies against TBP, TLF and CREM are as previously described (Brou et al., 1993
; Delmas et al., 1993
; Martianov et al., 2001
). The anti-HP1
, 2HP1-1H5 and anti-fibrillarin antibodies are also as described previously (Fomproix et al., 1998
; Nielsen et al., 2001
).
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Low expression of TBP and TLF was observed in 1- to 2-week-old immature testes (Fig. 1A, lanes 2-3). At three weeks, a strong increase in expression of both TBP and TLF was observed, reaching levels similar to those observed at 4 weeks and in the adult (lanes 3-5). The increase in expression correlates with the accumulation of late pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids, which occurs at this time. This observation is consistent with previous reports of TBP overexpression in meiotic and post-meiotic cells (Persengiev et al., 1996; Schmidt and Schibler, 1995
) with the fact that TBP and TLF overexpression precedes that of the haploid cell-specific CREM activator (Fimia et al., 2001
) (Fig. 1A). Hence, TLF is overexpressed in both late meiotic and post-meiotic cells.
|
Spermatogenesis occurs in synchronised waves within the seminiferous epithelia. The cycle is divided into 12 stages in mouse and 14 stages in rat, where each stage comprises a mix of cells in given developmental steps. We isolated individual segments from rat seminiferous tubuli corresponding to each developmental stage by transillumination-assisted microdissection (Parvinen and Hecht, 1981) and examined the accumulation of TBP and TLF proteins at each stage by western blotting using specific monoclonal antibodies (Brou et al., 1993
; Lescure et al., 1994
; Martianov et al., 2001
). TBP was detected at each stage with highest expression seen at stage VII (Fig. 1C, lanes 5-6). In contrast, TLF accumulation was weak at stage I, but increased through stages II-VI to peak at stage VII before again decreasing through stages VIII-XIV (Fig. 1C). As a control, strong expression of the CREM
,
1 and
2 isoforms was observed from stages IV-VIII (Fig. 1C, lanes 3-7).
These results show that TBP and TLF have a similar developmental onset of expression, but that they are differentially expressed at different stages of the spermatogenic cycle.
Expression of TLF is dynamic and cell specific, while TBP is ubiquitous
The monoclonal antibodies against TBP and TLF were used to examine the expression and localisation of the corresponding proteins at different stages of differentiation, by immunohistochemistry. We first compared their expression profiles in sectioned seminiferous tubules from wild-type mice. TLF expression is cell-specific and is not visible in any of the randomly sectioned tubuli, indicating that it is dynamically regulated during the cycle (Fig. 2A). In contrast, expression of TBP is much more homogeneous as it is present at all stages in all cell types with the exception of the more mature elongating spermatids (Fig. 2A). We also examined TBP expression in the seminiferous tubules from TLF/ mice to investigate whether its expression was altered in the absence of TLF. As expected, no TLF expression could be seen in the tubuli from the mutant animals. TBP was however expressed in all remaining cell types similar to that observed in wild-type tubuli (Fig. 2B).
|
At stage V, nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of TLF in pachytene spermatocytes was observed. TLF was also expressed in step 5 haploid round spermatids, predominantly in the nucleus (Fig. 3A). In contrast, no TLF expression was observed in the maturing elongated spermatids at this stage. TBP was strongly expressed in the nucleus of both the pachytene spermatocytes and the round spermatids, but like TLF no expression was seen in the elongated spermatids. At stage VII, a similar, but not identical situation is observed. Expression of TLF is now predominantly, but not exclusively, nuclear in both the pachytene spermatocytes and step 7 round spermatids (Fig. 3B). Strong nuclear expression of TBP is also seen in these cell types at this stage. Interestingly, although no expression of TLF is seen in the now almost mature step 16 spermatozoon, perinuclear expression of TBP can be seen (see also below).
|
Strikingly, as the elongating spermatids mature, a strong nuclear/perinuclear expression of TLF is observed beginning at stage XI and becoming stronger at stage XII (Fig. 4A,B). TLF expression persists in step 13 and 14 elongating spermatids and becomes cytoplasmic (Fig. 4C,D). In contrast, no TBP is expressed in the elongating spermatids at this time. TBP is however strongly expressed in the early step 1-2 haploid round spermatids and in the pachytene spermatocytes. Little or no expression of TLF is seen in these cell types at this stage.
|
|
|
|
Histological analysis revealed that the acrosome was asymmetric in TLF/ spermatids since the darker acrosomic granule, normally situated in the middle, was found at the edge of the acrosome system (Fig. 7D). Electron microscopy indicated that the acrosomal granules did not coalesce in stage II-III spermatids of TLF/ mice, but were found in the cytoplasm in an asymmetric position, on the outer membrane of the nucleus, or invaginated in the nucleus (Fig. 8B-E compared with wild-type Fig. 8A). In the rare surviving elongating spermatids at stages IX-XI, acrosomes were vacuolated and/or not properly associated with the head (Fig. 8G,I compared with wild type, F,H). Hence, TLF deficiency causes acrosomal abnormalities in round spermatids before the onset of apoptosis.
|
In early stage I-II spermatids, the anti-fibrillarin antibody reveals the presence of 2-3 small nucleoli per nucleus, while staining of DNA with Hoechst revealed the presence of a single dense staining chromocenter in the middle of the nucleus, as previously described (Fig. 9A) (Brinkley et al., 1986; Hoyer-Fender et al., 2000
; Zalensky et al., 1993
). The merged image substantiates that the nucleoli and the chromocenter are distinct structures in spermatids. While the nucleolar staining in the TLF/ spermatids was comparable to wild type, the Hoechst staining clearly shows that the chromocenter is incompletly condensed and fragmented. Instead of one single center, three or more smaller structures are visible. This result is confirmed by electron microscopic examination. In wild-type spermatids, a single chromatin condensation in the center of the nucleus is observed along with a very small and dense nucleolus as observed in the fibrillarin staining (Fig. 8J). In mutant spermatids, several less dense and more peripheral condensations are observed analogous to that observed with Hoechst staining (Fig. 8K).
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Distinct expression patterns of TLF and TBP in male germ cells
Expression of TBP and TLF genes is strongly upregulated with the appearance of pachytene spermatocytes and haploid spermatids at post-natal week 3-4, slightly earlier than the upregulation of the transcriptional activator CREM, which is restricted to haploid cells (Foulkes et al., 1992). High expression of TBP and TLF in late pachytene spermatocytes is confimed by RNase protection using purified pacyhtene cells. Our present results are in agreement with those previously obtained showing a developmental upregulation of TBP and TLF expression (Schmidt and Schibler, 1995
; Zhang et al., 2001a
). However, while it has been shown that TLF mRNA is expressed in pachytene and round spermatids (Martianov et al., 2001
; Zhang et al., 2001a
), it has previously been suggested that TBP mRNA upregulation and overexpression was specific to round spermatids (Schmidt and Schibler, 1995
). The results on mRNA expression and immunofluorescence (see below) shown here indicate that TBP is also strongly overexpressed in late pachytene spermatocytes and is not restricted to haploid cells (see also Persengiev et al., 1996
).
The differences in TBP and TLF expression are highlighted when the respective proteins are detected by immunofluorescence. TBP is present in all cell types, although it is expressed at much higher levels in pachytene spermatocytes and haploid round spermatids compared to zygotene and leptotene spermatocytes. This is in agreement with the high mRNA expression seen in the pachytene spermatocytes and confirms that TBP overexpression begins in late meiotic cells. TBP levels decrease as the spermatids elongate, but surprisingly, perinuclear TBP can be detected again in almost mature spermatozoon. This late expression may be due to the translation of stored mRNA, as is often the case for transcripts in germ cells (for a review, see Steger, 1999). Alternatively, it is possible that TBP molecules are present at all stages during the elongation phase, but are shielded from the antibody by the condensed chromatin.
TLF presents a more dynamic pattern of expression. It is first present in stage IV-V pachytene spermatocytes, where it is both cytoplasmic and nuclear, before becoming restricted to the nucleus at later stages. This result differs from that reported by Zhang et al. (Zhang et al., 2001a) where TLF mRNA was first detected only in stage VIII pachytene spermatocytes. The onset of expression is clearly prior to this stage. TLF expression decreases sharply in early round spermatids, but reappears in stage IV spermatids and persists during the early elongation steps. By step 10 little TLF is visible, but it reappears in a perinuclear and eventually cytoplasmic location at steps 12-14.
This expression pattern suggests that TLF functions at multiple steps in the differentiation pathway and not only in step 7 spermatids when apoptosis takes place. The results of the histological analysis presented here provide evidence that this is indeed the case. We observe severe acrosomal defects in early stage spermatids. These defects include aberrant localisation and lack of coalescence of the acrosomal granules and vacuolisation. Despite these abnormalities, we did not observe defects in expression of genes involved in acrosome formation, such as proacrosin binding protein (Martianov et al., 2001), Tpx-1 and Sp56 (data not shown). A more thorough analysis of TLF/ spermatids will be required to identify the changes in gene expression responsible for these defects.
TLF is essential for heterochromatin organisation in haploid cells
In normal mammalian spermatids, the centromeric heterochromatin of each chromosome is condensed into a single chromocenter structure (Brinkley et al., 1986; Zalensky et al., 1993
). This structure contains the known heterochromatin associated protein M31 (HP1ß) (Hoyer-Fender et al., 2000
) and was found to serve as an organiser for the subsequent packaging of DNA in a well defined chromosomal topology in the sperm cell nucleus (Meyer-Ficca et al., 1998
; Zalensky et al., 1995
). We show here that the structuring of the chromocenter is disrupted in TLF/ spermatids. Instead of a single center, multiple smaller structures are observed. The heterochromatin-associated protein HP1
is localised uniquely at the chromocenter in wild-type spermatids and is found in each of the smaller bodies in mutant spermatids, confirming that they correspond to heterochromatic foci. These results demonstrate that TLF is essential for the formation of the chromocenter and thus for heterochromatin organisation in spermatids.
TLF may regulate heterochromatin topology directly and/or indirectly. TLF is present in late meiotic cells where it may control the expression of genes required for chromocenter formation in early spermatids. The chromocenter is a structure unique to haploid spermatids and at present the proteins responsible for its formation are not known. The finding of differentially expressed genes in wild-type and TLF mutant spermatids may facilitate the identification of proteins involved in this process. In addition, TLF may play a more structural role. This is suggested by the fact that TLF is present in heterochromatic structures in late meiotic cells where it may act to facilitate subsequent condensation. However, TLF is not expressed in very early spermatids when the chromocenter is formed rendering unlikely the possibility that it participates directly in chromocenter formation. However, in later stage spermatids, TLF is localised, although not uniquely, to the chromocenter. TBP, in contrast, is excluded from the transcriptionally silent heterochromatin in both pachytene spermatocytes and haploid spermatids consistent with its role as a transcription factor. The presence of TLF in both the heterochromatic and euchromatic compartments suggests that it may have a dual role, both as a classical transcription factor and as a structural factor as we suggested previously (Martianov et al., 2001).
The fragmentation of the chromocenter and the resulting aberrant heterochromatin organisation may provoke altered gene expression during maturation of round spermatids. It may also interfere with DNA condensation and packaging at the elongation phase of spermiogenesis. Either one of these possibilities or a combination of both may lead to the differentiation arrest and apopotosis at the transition from round to elongating spermatids seen in TLF/ mice. Together our results show that TLF plays an essential role in spermatid heterochromatin organisation and that in the absence of TLF, the disorganisation of heterochromatin is the principle cause of spermiogenesis arrest.
It has been suggested that TLF acts as a surrogate transcription factor for TBP (for a review, see Berk 2000; Verrijzer, 2001
). While this may be the case, our findings reveal a novel facet of TLF function. Here we have established a direct link between TLF and chromatin organisation which reasonably explains the drastic spermatogenesis phenotype observed in TLF-deficient mice. It remains to be established whether the important TLF function seen in early embryos in C. elegans, zebrafish and Xenopus can be ascribed to its ability to act as a modulator of chromatin structuring and/or as a classical transcription factor. Indeed, although this possibility was not investigated, the strong conservation of TLF suggests that its molecular properties have been maintained during evolution.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Abou-Haila, A. and Tulsiani, D. R. (2000). Mammalian sperm acrosome: formation, contents, and function. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 379, 173-182.[Medline]
Albright, S. R. and Tjian, R. (2000). TAFs revisited: more data reveal new twists and confirm old ideas. Gene 242, 1-13.[Medline]
Bell, B. and Tora, L. (1999). Regulation of gene expression by multiple forms of TFIID and other novel TAFII-containing complexes. Exp. Cell Res. 246, 11-19.[Medline]
Berk, A. J. (2000). TBP-like factors come into focus. Cell 103, 5-8.[Medline]
Brinkley, B. R., Brenner, S. L., Hall, J. M., Tousson, A., Balczon, R. D. and Valdivia, M. M. (1986). Arrangements of kinetochores in mouse cells during meiosis and spermiogenesis. Chromosoma 94, 309-317.[Medline]
Brou, C., Chaudhary, S., Davidson, I., Lutz, Y., Wu, J., Egly, J. M., Tora, L. and Chambon, P. (1993). Distinct TFIID complexes mediate the effect of different transcriptional activators. EMBO J. 12, 489-499.[Abstract]
Chiang, C. M., Ge, H., Wang, Z., Hoffmann, A. and Roeder, R. G. (1993). Unique TATA-binding protein-containing complexes and cofactors involved in transcription by RNA polymerases II and III. EMBO J. 12, 2749-2762.[Abstract]
Chomczynski, P., Qasba, P. and Topper, Y. J. (1986). Transcriptional and post-transcriptional roles of glucocorticoid in the expression of the rat 25,000 molecular weight casein gene. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 134, 812-818.[Medline]
Comai, L., Tanese, N. and Tjian, R. (1992). The TATA-binding protein and associated factors are integral components of the RNA polymerase I transcription factor, SL1. Cell 68, 965-976.[Medline]
Dantonel, J. C., Quintin, S., Lakatos, L., Labouesse, M. and Tora, L. (2000). TBP-like factor is required for embryonic RNA polymerase II transcription in C. elegans. Mol. Cell 6, 715-722.[Medline]
Dantonel, J. C., Wurtz, J. M., Poch, O., Moras, D. and Tora, L. (1999). The TBP-like factor: an alternative transcription factor in metazoa? Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 335-339.[Medline]
Delmas, V., van der Hoorn, F., Mellstrom, B., Jegou, B. and Sassone-Corsi, P. (1993). Induction of CREM activator proteins in spermatids: down-stream targets and implications for haploid germ cell differentiation. Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 1502-1514.[Abstract]
Fimia, G. M., Morlon, A., Macho, B., De Cesare, D. and Sassone-Corsi, P. (2001). Transcriptional cascades during spermatogenesis: pivotal role of CREM and ACT. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 179, 17-23.[Medline]
Fomproix, N., Gebrane-Younes, J. and Hernandez-Verdun, D. (1998). Effects of anti-fibrillarin antibodies on building of functional nucleoli at the end of mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 111, 359-372.
Foulkes, N. S., Borrelli, E. and Sassone-Corsi, P. (1991). CREM gene: use of alternative DNA-binding domains generates multiple antagonists of cAMP-induced transcription. Cell 64, 739-749.[Medline]
Foulkes, N. S., Mellstrom, B., Benusiglio, E. and Sassone-Corsi, P. (1992). Developmental switch of CREM function during spermatogenesis: from antagonist to activator. Nature 355, 80-84.[Medline]
Gangloff, Y., Romier, C., Thuault, S., Werten, S. and Davidson, I. (2001). The histone fold is a key structural motif of transcription factor TFIID. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 250-257.[Medline]
Green, M. R. (2000). TBP-associated factors (TAFIIs): multiple, selective transcriptional mediators in common complexes. Trends Biochem Sci 25, 59-63.[Medline]
Hampsey, M. (1998). Molecular genetics of the RNA polymerase II general transcriptional machinery. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 465-503.
Hampsey, M. and Reinberg, D. (1999). RNA polymerase II as a control panel for multiple coactivator complexes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 132-139.[Medline]
Hansen, S. K., Takada, S., Jacobson, R. H., Lis, J. T. and Tjian, R. (1997). Transcription properties of a cell type-specific TATA-binding protein, TRF. Cell 91, 71-83.[Medline]
Hernandez, N. (1993). TBP, a universal eukaryotic transcription factor? Genes Dev. 7, 1291-1308.[Medline]
Holmes, M. C. and Tjian, R. (2000). Promoter-selective properties of the TBP-related factor TRF1. Science 288, 867-870.
Hoyer-Fender, S., Singh, P. B. and Motzkus, D. (2000). The murine heterochromatin protein M31 is associated with the chromocenter in round spermatids and is a component of mature spermatozoa. Exp. Cell Res. 254, 72-79.[Medline]
Kaltenbach, L., Horner, M. A., Rothman, J. H. and Mango, S. E. (2000). The TBP-like factor CeTLF is required to activate RNA polymerase II transcription during C. elegans embryogenesis. Mol. Cell. 6, 705-713.[Medline]
Kim, J. L. and Burley, S. K. (1994). 1.9 A resolution refined structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of TATAAAAG. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1, 638-653.[Medline]
Kim, J. L., Nikolov, D. B. and Burley, S. K. (1993). Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element. Nature 365, 520-527.[Medline]
Lescure, A., Lutz, Y., Eberhard, D., Jacq, X., Krol, A., Grummt, I., Davidson, I., Chambon, P. and Tora, L. (1994). The N-terminal domain of the human TATA-binding protein plays a role in transcription from TATA-containing RNA polymerase II and III promoters. EMBO J. 13, 1166-1175.[Abstract]
Liu, D., Ishima, R., Tong, K. I., Bagby, S., Kokubo, T., Muhandiram, D. R., Kay, L. E., Nakatani, Y. and Ikura, M. (1998). Solution structure of a TBP-TAFII230 complex: protein mimicry of the minor groove surface of the TATA box unwound by TBP. Cell 94, 573-583.[Medline]
Maldonado, E. (1999). Transcriptional functions of a new mammalian TATA-binding protein- related factor. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12963-12966.
Martianov, I., Fimia, G. M., Dierich, A., Parvinen, M., Sassone-Corsi, P. and Davidson, I. (2001). Late arrest of spermiogenesis and germ cell apoptosis in mice lacking the TBP-like TLF/TRF2 gene. Mol. Cell 7, 509-515.[Medline]
Meistrich, M. L., Longtin, J., Brock, W. A., Grimes, S. R., Jr. and Mace, M. L. (1981). Purification of rat spermatogenic cells and preliminary biochemical analysis of these cells. Biol. Reprod. 25, 1065-1077.[Medline]
Meyer-Ficca, M., Muller-Navia, J. and Scherthan, H. (1998). Clustering of pericentromeres initiates in step 9 of spermiogenesis of the rat (Rattus norvegicus) and contributes to a well defined genome architecture in the sperm nucleus. J. Cell Sci. 111, 1363-1370.
Minc, E., Allory, Y., Worman, H. J., Courvalin, J. C. and Buendia, B. (1999). Localization and phosphorylation of HP1 proteins during the cell cycle in mammalian cells. Chromosoma 108, 220-234.[Medline]
Molina, C. A., Foulkes, N. S., Lalli, E. and Sassone-Corsi, P. (1993). Inducibility and negative autoregulation of CREM: an alternative promoter directs the expression of ICER, an early response repressor. Cell 75, 875-886.[Medline]
Moore, P. A., Ozer, J., Salunek, M., Jan, G., Zerby, D., Campbell, S. and Lieberman, P. M. (1999). A human TATA binding protein-related protein with altered DNA binding specificity inhibits transcription from multiple promoters and activators. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 7610-7620.
Muller, F., Lakatos, L., Dantonel, J., Strahle, U. and Tora, L. (2001). TBP is not universally required for zygotic RNA polymerase II transcription in zebrafish. Curr. Biol. 11, 282-287.[Medline]
Nantel, F., Monaco, L., Foulkes, N. S., Masquilier, D., LeMeur, M., Henriksen, K., Dierich, A., Parvinen, M. and Sassone-Corsi, P. (1996). Spermiogenesis deficiency and germ-cell apoptosis in CREM-mutant mice. Nature 380, 159-162.[Medline]
Nielsen, A. L., Oulad-Abdelghani, M., Ortiz, J. A., Remboutsika, E., Chambon, P. and Losson, R. (2001). Heterochromatin formation in mammalian cells: interaction between histones and HP1 proteins. Mol. Cell 7, 729-739.[Medline]
Nikolov, D. B., Chen, H., Halay, E. D., Usheva, A. A., Hisatake, K., Lee, D. K., Roeder, R. G. and Burley, S. K. (1995). Crystal structure of a TFIIB-TBP-TATA-element ternary complex. Nature 377, 119-128.[Medline]
Ohbayashi, T., Makino, Y. and Tamura, T. A. (1999). Identification of a mouse TBP-like protein (TLP) distantly related to the drosophila TBP-related factor. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 750-755.
Ohbayashi, T., Shimada, M., Nakadai, T. and Tamura, T. A. (2001). TBP-like protein (TLP/TLF/TRF2) artificially recruited to a promoter stimulates basal transcription in vivo. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 285, 616-622.[Medline]
Orphanides, G., Lagrange, T. and Reinberg, D. (1996). The general transcription factors of RNA polymerase II. Genes Dev. 10, 2657-2683.[Medline]
Parvinen, M. and Hecht, N. B. (1981). Identification of living spermatogenic cells of the mouse by transillumination-phase contrast microscopic technique for in situ analyses of DNA polymerase activities. Histochemistry 71, 567-579.[Medline]
Persengiev, S. P., Robert, S. and Kilpatrick, D. L. (1996). Transcription of the TATA binding protein gene is highly up-regulated during spermatogenesis. Mol. Endocrinol. 10, 742-747.[Abstract]
Rabenstein, M. D., Zhou, S., Lis, J. T. and Tjian, R. (1999). TATA box-binding protein (TBP)-related factor 2 (TRF2), a third member of the TBP family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4791-4796.
Schmidt, E. E. and Schibler, U. (1995). High accumulation of components of the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery in rodent spermatids. Development 121, 2373-2383.
Steger, K. (1999). Transcriptional and translational regulation of gene expression in haploid spermatids. Anat. Embryol. 199, 471-487.[Medline]
Takada, S., Lis, J. T., Zhou, S. and Tjian, R. (2000). A TRF1:BRF complex directs Drosophila RNA polymerase III transcription. Cell 101, 459-469.[Medline]
Tan, S., Hunziker, Y., Sargent, D. F. and Richmond, T. J. (1996). Crystal structure of a yeast TFIIA/TBP/DNA complex. Nature 381, 127-151.[Medline]
Teichmann, M., Wang, Z., Martinez, E., Tjernberg, A., Zhang, D., Vollmer, F., Chait, B. T. and Roeder, R. G. (1999). Human TATA-binding protein-related factor-2 (hTRF2) stably associates with hTFIIA in HeLa cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13720-13725.
Veenstra, G. J., Weeks, D. L. and Wolffe, A. P. (2000). Distinct roles for TBP and TBP-like factor in early embryonic gene transcription in xenopus. Science 290, 2312-2315.
Verrijzer, C. P. (2001). Transcription factor IID not so basal after all. Science 293, 2010-2011.
Wieczorek, E., Brand, M., Jacq, X. and Tora, L. (1998). Function of TAFII-containing complex without TBP in transcription by RNA polymerase II. Nature 393, 187-191.[Medline]
Zalensky, A. O., Allen, M. J., Kobayashi, A., Zalenskaya, I. A., Balhorn, R. and Bradbury, E. M. (1995). Well-defined genome architecture in the human sperm nucleus. Chromosoma 103, 577-590.[Medline]
Zalensky, A. O., Breneman, J. W., Zalenskaya, I. A., Brinkley, B. R. and Bradbury, E. M. (1993). Organization of centromeres in the decondensed nuclei of mature human sperm. Chromosoma 102, 509-518.[Medline]
Zhang, D., Penttila, T., Morris, P. L. and Roeder, R. G. (2001a). Cell- and stage-specific high-level expression of TBP-related factor 2 (TRF2) during mouse spermatogenesis. Mech. Dev. 106, 203-205.[Medline]
Zhang, D., Penttila, T. L., Morris, P. L., Teichmann, M. and Roeder, R. G. (2001b). Spermiogenesis deficiency in mice lacking the Trf2 gene. Science 292, 1153-1155.