1 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA and 2 Department of Neurology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA
Address correspondence to Douglas S.F. Ling, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, SUNY Downstate Medical School, 450 Clarkson Ave., Box 29, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA. Email: dling{at}downstate.edu.
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Key Words: aniracetam cortex cyclothiazide EPSC IPSC synaptic inhibition
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Inhibition is also important in the regulation of cognitive operations, possibly by governing the timing of synaptic inputs (McBain et al., 1999). Although inhibition's exact role in higher cortical functions remains unresolved, converging lines of evidence indicate that local inhibitory circuits are critical for information processing, particularly during memory and other cognitive tasks (Rao et al., 2000
; Constantinidis et al., 2002
). Selective alterations in GABAergic inhibition in specific cortical subregions are associated with cognitive disorders such as schizophrenia and Alzheimer's Disease (Solodkin et al., 1996
; Benes and Beretta, 2001
; Zhong et al., 2003
). For example, schizophrenia subjects appear to have gene expression defects in a particular subclass of prefrontal cortex GABA neurons, which could directly contribute to the pathophysiology of cognitive decline characterizing this disease (Hashimoto et al., 2003
). Moreover, it was recently demonstrated that administering GABA receptor agonists improves visual cortical dysfunction in aged monkeys, lending further support to the concept that loss of GABAergic inhibition underlies age-related decline in cortical function, and that restoration of GABA function might have therapeutic value for cognitive disorders (Leventhal et al., 2003
). If agents that modulate GABAergic inhibition can improve cognition, could nootropics act through such a mechanism as well?
The actions of AMPAR modulators on GABA inhibition have not been well-studied. Field recordings in hippocampal slices suggest that two nootropic agents, BDP-12 and IDRA 21, enhance disynaptic inhibitory events in CA1 pyramidal cells, presumably by acting on AMPARs on presynaptic interneurons (Arai et al., 1996a,b
). However, the action of nootropics on local circuits remains largely unknown. We previously reported that inhibitory interneurons in neocortex, unlike those in hippocampus, can be driven solely and maximally by non-NMDA (AMPA/kainate) ionotropic glutamatergic transmission, independent of the level of NMDA receptor-mediated transmission (Ling and Benardo, 1995
). Based upon these data, we posit that a major effect of nootropic agents in neocortex is enhancement of downstream GABAergic inhibition. To explore this possibility, we compared the effects of three non-NMDA receptor modulators on fast inhibitory and excitatory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs and EPSCs): (i) aniracetam, a pyrrolidinone which slows AMPA and kainate receptor desensitization and deactivation, possibly by slowing channel closing (Tang et al., 1991
; Hestrin, 1992
); (ii) cyclothiazide, a benzothiazide which is a potent, selective inhibitor of AMPAR desensitization that may act by stabilizing a closed channel state (Partin et al., 1993
); and (iii) concanavalin A (Con A), a lectin which strongly and irreversibly blocks kainate receptor desensitization, but has only weak effects on AMPARs (Partin et al., 1993
). Our findings indicate that positive modulation of AMPAR-mediated excitation enhances fast inhibitory strength, augmenting both the maximal magnitude and duration of fast GABAergic IPSCs in target pyramidal cells. The results of this study have important implications for the role of GABA inhibition in normal cognition and in the pathophysiology of degenerative states that target memory and higher cortical function, and perhaps can serve to focus future therapeutic interventions.
![]() |
Materials and Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cortical slices were prepared from 18- to 30-day old SpragueDawley rats (80100 g) as previously described (Ling and Benardo, 1999). Rats were anesthetized by intramuscular injection of ketamine (87 mg/kg) and xylazine (13 mg/kg), then killed by decapitation. The brains were quickly removed and placed in cold physiological saline. Coronal slices (300400 µm) were cut with a Vibratome tissue slicer (Vibratome Co., St Louis, MO) and then transferred to an antechamber where they rested submerged in warm (35.5 ± 1°C), oxygenated (95% O25% CO2) physiological saline. Slices were allowed to incubate for at least 1h prior to recording. Following incubation, a single slice was transferred to a recording chamber placed on the stage of an upright microscope (Zeiss Axioskop, Carl Zeiss, Inc., Thornwood, NY), and perfused with warm (3435°C) oyxgenated saline at
5 ml/min. Normal, external physiological saline contained 124 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 26 mM NaHCO3, 1.6 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2 and 10 mM glucose, and was continuously bubbled with a mixture of 95% O25% CO2 (pH between 7.35 and 7.4). All drugs were delivered directly through the perfusate. Stocks of aniracetam and cyclothiazide were prepared in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). Dilutions were made before each experiment and the highest concentration of DMSO used was 0.1%. Aniracetam, cyclothiazide, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxalone-2,3-dione (CNQX) and 3-(RS)-2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP) were obtained from Tocris Cookson (Ballwin, MO). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St Louis, MO).
Electrophysiological Recording and Analysis
Whole-cell recordings were obtained from layer V pyramidal cells in cortical slices, visualized and accessed using infrared differential interference contrast (IR-DIC) optics with a x60 water immersion objective. Patch electrodes were pulled to tip resistances of 25 M and filled with a solution composed of (in mM): 130 Cs-methanesulfonate, 2 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 10 EGTA, 10 HEPES, 2 Na-ATP and 10 QX-314, pH 7.25, adjusted with CsOH. Cesium was used to block potassium currents, including slow GABAB IPSCs. QX-314 was included to block voltage-dependent sodium currents and thus reduce cell-spiking. Currents were recorded under voltage-clamp with a Warner PC-501A patch clamp amplifier (Warner Instrument Corp., Hamden, CT). Critieria for cell acceptability were the same as previously detailed (Ling and Benardo, 1995
). Cells accepted for study had resting input resistances of
100 M
(typically
150 M
) and access resistances
20 M
(typically <15 M
). Cells were discarded if access resistance increased significantly (>20%) during the experiment. Membrane holding potentials were not corrected for the junction potential between bath and pipette solutions (
9 mV). Signals were digitized at 47 kHz via a 14-bit PCM interface (VR-10B Digital Data Recorder, Instrutech Corp., Elmont, NY) and stored on VHS videotape for posthoc analysis. Recorded data were filtered off-line at 15 kHz (3 dB, four pole Bessel) and digitally sampled at 520 kHz with pCLAMP 8.0 software (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) running on a PC/AT-compatible Pentium-based microcomputer.
Synaptic currents were evoked by extracellular stimulation with tungsten electrodes placed in layer VI, lateral to the recording electrode. Cathodal shocks (210 V; 200 µs) were delivered through a stimulus isolation unit (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) at a low frequency of 0.1 Hz. Total charge flux, defined as the integral of the current trace, was calculated from the point of current onset to its decay back to baseline using piecewise approximations of IPSC integrals with 0.5 ms bins. Because of the variability in IPSC values between neurons, inputoutput plots were constructed using averaged normalized values and relative stimulus intensities (i.e. adjusted such that 0 V represents threshold stimulus) (Ling and Benardo, 1995).
Spontaneous miniature synaptic currents were detected and measured using Mini Analysis software (Synaptosoft, Inc., Decatur, GA), which identifies spontaneous events on the basis of several criteria including threshold amplitude and the area under each event (Ling and Benardo, 1999). As a routine check, we visually inspected all spontaneous events detected by the software and rejected any which did not exhibit the general shape expected for synaptic currents. Background peak-to-peak noise was measured from quiescent sections of records (i.e., devoid of spontaneous events) and ranged from 2 to 5 pA.
All data throughout this report are expressed as means ± SE.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Whole-cell recordings of isolated IPSCs were obtained from layer V neocortical pyramidal cells by clamping cells at the empirically determined EPSC reversal potential (0 mV), while EPSCs were likewise recorded at the IPSC reversal (
75 mV) (Ling and Benardo, 1995
). The addition of aniracetam (2.55.0 mM) to the perfusion solution induced an increase in the peak magnitude and duration of evoked EPSCs (Fig. 1A), consistent with the drug's previously reported effects on excitation (Ito et al., 1990
; Tang et al., 1991
). Aniracetam also enhanced the strength of evoked IPSCs (Fig. 1A), raising the amplitude of the maximal IPSC by 24.9 ± 5.7% (n = 6 cells). This was reflected in the IPSC inputoutput relationship, which revealed that aniracetam enhanced IPSC amplitude over the entire range of stimulus intensities applied (Fig. 1C). At the lowest strength stimulus that evoked maximal IPSCs, the EPSC/IPSC ratio of peak amplitude was increased by 22.4 ± 3.2% (Fig. 1B; P < 0.05, Student's paired t-test), suggesting an augmentation of excitation over inhibition. However, peak amplitude is only one measure of synaptic strength, as changes in IPSC kinetics and, in turn, total charge surely influence the efficacy of inhibition. We calculated the effects of aniracetam on the total charge carried by synaptic currents, taken as the area under each event. In the presence of aniracetam, the total charge carried by evoked IPSCs was increased at all stimulus intensities (Fig. 1C), with a mean increase of 216.4 ± 15.3% (from 24.4 ± 4.0 to 70.8 ± 6.7 pC). At the same time, the total charge flux of EPSCs was raised by 52.5 ± 13.5% (from 43.2 ± 13.6 to 61.2 ± 14.3 pC). Consequently, the ratio of EPSC/IPSC charge transfer was decreased by 47.8 ± 7.7% (Fig. 1B; P < 0.05) at the lowest strength stimulus that evoked maximal IPSCs. At the highest stimulus intensity applied (i.e. 10 V), the charge transfer ratio was likewise reduced (by 28.0 ± 6.2%). However, it is important to note that all IPSCs were recorded at
0 mV holding potentials and thus likely overestimate the values that would be observed at normal cell resting potentials. Nonetheless, these findings suggest that aniracetam induces significant changes in inhibitory synaptic strength.
|
Effect of Aniracetam on Monosynaptic IPSCs
However, other effects by aniracetam at postsynaptic or presynaptic loci could not be ruled out. For example, aniracetam-induced augmentation of maximal IPSCs could partly arise from direct modulation of GABA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission. Accordingly, we examined the effects of aniracetam on evoked monosynaptic IPSCs (mono-IPSCs), which represent pharmacologically isolated GABA receptor-mediated postsynaptic events recruited via direct electrical activation of inhibitory interneurons in the absence of excitatory synaptic drive. MonoIPSCs were evoked during blockade of excitatory transmission with saline containing the EAA receptor blockers, CNQX and CPP. Subsequent exposure to aniracetam (2.55.0 mM) failed to change the peak amplitude of mono-IPSCs (Fig. 2A) over the entire range of stimuli applied (Fig. 2B; n = 4). However the decay time was prolonged at all stimulus intensities, resulting in a 68.8 ± 8.2% increase in the total charge carried by mono-IPSCs (Fig. 2B, right panel). This alteration in mono-IPSC decay kinetics suggested that aniracetam also directly enhances GABAergic transmission. However, the magnitude of this facilitation was much less than that observed with polysynaptic IPSCs (i.e. in the absence of EAA blockers), suggesting that aniracetam-induced enhancement of fast inhibition is predominantly mediated through actions on excitatory drive to interneurons.
|
To further assess possible direct effects of aniracetam on GABA-mediated transmission, we examined miniature IPSCs (mIPSCs) recorded in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX, 110 µM, Fig. 3A), as mIPSCs are thought to arise from the spontaneous release of single vesicles of transmitter and thus report responses at individual synaptic terminals. Exposure of slices to aniracetam caused a 72.3 ± 10.8% increase in the mean decay time of mIPSCs (n = 6, P < 0.5, from 6.8 ± 0.9 to 12.1 ± 2.2 ms), but had no effect on the mean peak amplitude or rise time (Fig. 3B). The average mIPSC frequency was also unchanged, suggesting that the prolongation of mIPSCs by aniracetam resulted from direct actions on postsynaptic GABAA receptors.
|
Exposure of slices to cyclothiazide (50100 µM) increased the peak amplitude of evoked EPSCs, confirming its positive modulatory effects on AMPAR-mediated currents (Yamada and Tang, 1993) (Fig. 4A). Cyclothiazide also enhanced evoked inhibitory events in a manner similar to that of aniracetam, increasing the peak amplitude and duration of maximal IPSCs (Fig. 4A) by 25.0 ± 1.7 and 107.1 ± 0.9%, respectively (n = 4 cells). This was likewise reflected in the IPSC inputoutput relationships, which showed that cyclothiazide enhanced IPSC peak amplitude and total charge over the entire range of stimuli applied (Fig. 4C). At the lowest strength stimulus that evoked maximal IPSCs, the EPSC/IPSC ratio of peak amplitude was increased 27.7 ± 3.1%, but the ratio of total charge transfer was decreased by 34.3 ± 11.8 % (Fig. 4B, P < 0.5). At the highest intensity stimulus applied, the charge transfer ratio was reduced by 16.2 ± 5.9%.
|
|
In separate experiments, slices were exposed to bathing solutions containing Con A (0.3 mg/ml) to assess potential contributions from kainate receptor activity. Although it is generally accepted that kainate receptors do not appear to have a primary role in excitatory synaptic transmission, it was important to consider them, as recent studies have implicated kainate receptors as mediators of EPSCs in specific neuronal populations, most notably hippocampal inhibitory interneurons (Cossart et al., 1998; Frerking et al., 1998
). Con A has been shown to preferentially inhibit kainate receptor desensitization, with only weak effects on AMPARs. Exposure of slices to Con A had no effect on either the amplitude or duration of evoked EPSCs (Fig. 6), confirming that AMPAR are the prime (perhaps sole) mediators of excitatory transmission to cortical principal cells. Con A also failed to alter recruitment of evoked IPSCs, as reflected in IPSC inputoutput plots of peak amplitude and total charge (Fig. 6B, n = 4 cells), suggesting that positive modulation of kainate receptors is insufficient to potentiate either the magnitude or time course of fast inhibitory events. This finding reinforces the hypothesis that the primary excitatory drive to inhibitory circuits in the deep layers of neocortex is mediated by AMPARs. These results cannot preclude the existence of kainate receptors on neocortical interneurons, but the actions of synaptically released glutamate on kainate receptors does not appear to be a prominent factor in regulating fast IPSC recruitment.
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
AMPAR Desensitization and Deactivation and Modulation of Evoked GABA Inhibition
We previously found that the magnitude of synaptically driven fast IPSCs plateaus at levels of stimulation where glutamatergic excitation continues to increase, and that this limit was unaltered by changes in NMDA receptor-mediated excitatory drive (e.g. by magnesium-free medium) (Ling and Benardo, 1995). However, if interneurons do not possess significant functional NMDA receptors, as we have suggested (Ling and Benardo, 1995
), then changes in the efficacy of NMDA receptor-mediated transmission would have little or no effect on synaptic excitation of interneurons. On the other hand, enhancement of AMPAR-driven currents could lead to increased synaptic excitation in interneurons and, in turn, augmented IPSCs in synaptically connected pyramidal cells, as was observed in the present study.
Previous investigations have shown that increased synchronous firing among inhibitory interneurons can lead to enhancements in the size of population inhibitory events (Michelson and Wong, 1994; Benardo, 1997
). Thus, alterations in the kinetics of AMPAR-mediated excitation could result in an extension of the IPSC maximum. Theoretical studies of hippocampal circuits suggests that synchronous firing of cell aggregates is determined, in part, by the kinetics of synaptic events in individual cells (Wang and Buzsáki, 1996
; Baker et al., 2002
). Rapid desensitization or deactivation of AMPARs would promote fast decay of excitatory synaptic inputs to cells (Trussell and Fischbach, 1989
), resulting in less coordinated firing within cell aggregates as individual cells are activated within narrow time windows, leading to states in which some neurons are turning off just as others are turning on. This limits the number of cells that are able to fire in precise synchrony. However, if the time course of excitatory inputs to interneurons was prolonged, the window of probability for coordinated firing among interneurons would increase. In addition, due to significant electrotonic coupling (Benardo, 1997
; Deans et al., 2001
), the inhibitory neuronal network can function as a high-fidelity throughput system, further fostering synchronous interneuronal firing. Thus, we postulate that blockade of interneuronal AMPAR desensitization or deactivation induces more synchronized firing of the coupled interneuronal network. This would lead to more simultaneous release of GABA and, in turn, larger ensemble GABA IPSCs in target pyramidal cells, increasing the amplitude of fast GABA-mediated events.
An alternative, but not mutually exclusive, possibility is that AMPAR modulators uncover silent interneurons (Ling and Benardo, 1999). We previously reported that blockade of GABA uptake had no effect on the maximal IPSC amplitude and suggested, as have others (Segal and Barker, 1984
; Dingledine and Korn, 1985
), that this was because peak IPSC conductance is dependent only on the number of interneurons that are activated and not on GABA clearance (Ling and Benardo, 1998
). If allosteric modulation of AMPA receptorionophore complexes by nootropics enhances excitation to levels sufficient to fire subthreshold, putatively silent interneurons, then the observed alteration of the IPSC inputoutput relationship (see Fig. 1C) could result.
The prolongation of mono-IPSC decay time by aniracetam suggests that it also exerts direct effects on GABAA receptor-mediated transmission, independent of AMPAR modulation. Since monosynaptic IPSCs arise from the direct electrical activation of interneurons (i.e. independent of feed-forward synaptic drive), there are at least two possible explanations for aniracetam-induced prolongation of mono-IPSCs: (i) increased release of GABA from inhibitory cells; and (ii) direct modulation of postsynaptic GABAA receptors on target pyramidal cells. The piracetam-related agents, including aniracetam, enhance the activity of L-type, low threshold, voltage-gated calcium channels (Yoshii and Watabe, 1994); this could promote interneuron bursting, leading to extended depolarization of synaptic terminals, increased GABA release and, in turn, prolonged pyramidal cell IPSCs (Ling and Benardo, 1998
). Direct facilitation of GABA release by aniracetam represents another possibility, as aniracetam has been reported to enhance neurotransmitter release in other cortical subregions (Shirane and Nakamura, 2001
; Togashi et al., 2002
; Yu and Cai, 2003
). However, our finding that aniracetam did not alter the frequency of TTX-insensitive mIPSCs is evidence against a presynaptic site of action (Hill et al., 1998
; Perrais and Ropert, 1999
). Previous studies using cultured neurons have shown that some pyrrolidinone nootropic agents interact directly with GABAA receptors, leading to alterations in receptor desensitization and GABA-mediated currents (Huang et al., 1996
). Although aniracetam reportedly exhibits low activity at this locus (Nabeshima et al., 1990
), altered desensitization of pyramidal cell GABAA receptors by aniracetam could lead to prolongation of fast IPSCs (Vicini et al., 1986
; Bai et al., 1999
) without necessarily affecting mIPSC frequency, amplitude or rise time.
Implications of AMPAR Modulation of GABAergic Inhibition
Inhibition is critical to the regulation of synaptic activity, serving to check the spread of excitation (Connors and Amitai, 1993) and isolate synaptic potentiation to particular dendritic domains (Holmes and Levy, 1997
). As such, GABAergic systems are pivotal in regulating the level of neuronal excitability within the cortex (Miles and Wong, 1987
; Alger, 1991
) and, in turn, normal brain physiology. The importance of this kind of control is clear from studies showing that blockade of fast inhibition releases excitatory transmission through recurrent pathways (Traub and Wong, 1982
; Connors, 1984
), often inducing synchronous paroxysmal firing and excitotoxicity. Deficits in inhibition are not limited to seizure disorders, as there is increasing evidence that the genesis of Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder may, in part, be a consequence of diminished GABA function, due to either the loss of cortical interneurons (Solodkin et al., 1996
; Benes and Beretta, 2001
) or reduced excitatory synaptic drive to inhibitory circuits (Deakin and Simpson, 1997
; Zhong et al., 2003
). Further augmentation of GABAergic transmission allows intrinsic inhibitory mechanisms to keep pace with escalating excitation and to compensate for declines in inhibitory function (Yang and Benardo, 1998
). Well-known modulators of inhibition include agents which prolong or enhance the actions of GABA on pyramidal cells; these have found applications as effective anticonvulsants, mood stabilizers, sedatives and tranquilizers, examples of which are valproate, phenobarbital and clonazepam (Vicini et al., 1986
; Hashimoto et al., 2003
).
However, GABA-enhancing drugs can also produce cognitive impairments, such as amnesia, that presumably result from amplified GABAergic inhibition impeding normal cortical function (Costa and Guidotti, 1996). As cognition-enhancers, nootropic agents clearly avoid these deleterious effects. Our data suggest that nootropic-induced amplification of inhibition is counterbalanced by the concurrent augmentation of glutamatergic synaptic excitation, and may serve to promote cognitive performance by providing the inhibitory levels needed to efficiently regulate heightened excitatory drive. This dual enhancement of excitation and inhibition may also give rise to additional therapeutic benefits, as evidenced by studies showing that nootropic agents potentiate the anticonvulsant actions of antiepileptic agents (Hawkins and Mellanby, 1986
; Mondadori and Schmutz, 1986
; Paulus et al., 1991
) while countering memory disturbances caused by epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs (Mondadori and Schmutz, 1986
; Pohle et al., 1997
).
AMPAR modulators increase inhibitory efficacy in neocortical layer V pyramidal cells by extending the operational limit on GABAAergic IPSC amplitude and prolonging IPSC duration. Given such effects, perhaps we should include these nootropic agents amongst the list of drugs that modulate inhibition. Moreover, these findings suggest that their therapeutic value may well be mediated through alterations of downstream GABAergic inhibition, and not solely through the direct modification of excitation, as previously thought. The possibility of endogenous modulation of desensitization states is also interesting to consider, allowing for another level of dynamic control of local circuit activity.
Although it is possible that nootropic-enhanced AMPAR-mediated events might be capable of overcoming the concomitant augmentation of inhibition, the temporal extension of IPSCs and resulting increases in total charge may promote more efficient filtering of excitatory events, especially those mediated by NMDA receptors. However, it remains unknown whether a key function provided by the GABAergic system is control of NMDA activity, which is somehow lost in diseases targeting cognitive function, and which may be replaced by nootropic agents.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Arai A, Kessler M, Rogers G, Lynch G (1996a) Effects of memory-enhancing drug on DL-alpha-amino-3-hyrdoxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor currents and synaptic transmission in hippocampus. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 278:627638.[Abstract]
Arai A, Guidotti A, Costa E, Lynch G (1996b) Effect of the AMPA receptor modulator IDRA 21 on LTP in hippocampal slices. Neuroreport 7:22112215.[ISI][Medline]
Bai D, Pennefather PS, MacDonald JF, Orser BA (1999) The general anesthetic propofol slows deactivation and desensitization of GABAA receptors. J Neurosci 19:1063510646.
Baker P, Pennefather PS, Orser BA, Skinner FK (2002) Disruption of coherent oscillations in inhibitory networks with anesthetics: role of GABAA receptor desensitization. J Neurophysiol 88:28212833.
Bellingham MC, Walmsley B (1999) A novel presynaptic inhibitory mechanism underlies paired pulse depression at a fast central synapse. Neuron 23:159170.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Benardo LS (1997) Recruitment of GABAergic inhibition and synchronization of inhibitory interneurons in rat neocortex. J Neurophysiol 77:31343144.
Benes FM, Berretta S (2001) GABAergic interneurons: implications for understanding schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 25:127.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Connors BW (1984) Initiation of synchronized neuronal bursting in neocortex. Nature 310:685687.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Connors BW, Amitai Y (1993) Generation of epileptiform discharge by local circuits of neocortex. In: Epilepsy: model, mechanisms, and concepts (Schwartzkroin PA, ed.), pp. 388423. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Constantinidis C, Williams GV, Goldman-Rakic PS (2002) A role for inhibition in shaping the temporal flow of information in prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 5:175180.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Cossart R, Esclapez M, Hirsch JC, Bernard C, Ben-Ari Y (1998) GluR5 kainate receptor activation in interneurons increases tonic inhibition of pyramidal cells. Nat Neurosci 1:470478.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Costa E, Guidotti A (1996) Benzodiazepines on trial: a research strategy for their rehabilitation. Trends Pharmacol Sci 17:192200.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Danysz W (2002) CX-516 Cortex pharmaceuticals. Curr Opin Invest Drugs 3:10811088.[Medline]
Deakin JF, Simpson MD (1997) A two-process theory of schizophrenia: evidence from studies in post-mortem brain. J Psychiat Res 31:277295.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Deans MR, Gibson JR, Sellitto C, Connors BW, Paul DL (2001) Synchronous activity of inhibitory networks in neocortex requires electrical synapses containing connexin36. Neuron 31:477485.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Diamond JS, Jahr CE (1995) Asynchronous release of synaptic vesicles determines the time course of the AMPA receptor-mediated EPSC. Neuron 15:10971107.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Dingledine R, Korn SJ (1985) Gamma-aminobutyric acid uptake and the termination of inhibitory synaptic potential in the rat hippocampal slice. J Physiol (Lond) 366:387409.[Abstract]
Frerking M, Malenka RC, Nicoll RA (1998) Synaptic activation of kainate receptors on hippocampal interneurons. Nat Neurosci 1:479486.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Granger R, Deadwyler S, Davis M, Moskovitz B, Kessler M, Rogers G, Lynch G (1996) Facilitation of glutamate receptors reverses an age-associated memory impairment in rats. Synapse 22:332337.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Hashimoto T, Volk DW, Eggan SM, Mirnics K, Pierri JN, Sun Z, Sampson AR, Lewis DA (2003) Gene expression deficits in a subclass of GABA neurons in the prefrontal cortex of subjects with schizophrenia. J Neurosci 23:63156326.
Hawkins CA, Mellanby JH (1986) Piracetam potentiates the antiepileptic action of carbamazepine in chronic experimental limbic epilepsy. Acta Neurol Scand 74 (suppl 109):117121.[ISI]
Hestrin S (1992) Activation and desensitization of glutamate-activated channels mediating fast excitatory synaptic currents in the visual cortex. Neuron 9:991999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Hill MW, Reddy PA, Covey DF, Rothman SM (1998) Contribution of subsaturating GABA concentrations to IPSCs in cultured hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 18:51035111.
Holmes WR, Levy WB (1997) Quantifying the role of inhibition in associative long-term potentiation in dentate granule cells with computational models. J Neurophysiol 78:103116.
Huang CS, Ma JY, Marszalec W, Narahashi T (1996) Effects of nootropic drug nefiracetam on the GABAA receptor-channel complex in dorsal root ganglion neurons. Neuropharmacology 35:12511261.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Isaacson JS, Nicoll RA (1991) Aniracetam reduces glutamate receptor desensitization and slows the decay of fast excitatory synaptic currents in the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:1093610940.
Ito I, Tanabe S, Kohda A, Sugiyama H (1990) Allosteric potentiation of quisqualate receptors by a nootropic drug aniracetam. J Physiol (Lond) 424:533543.[Abstract]
Leventhal AG, Wang Y, Pu M, Zhou Y, Ma Y (2003) GABA and its agonists improved visual cortical function in senescent monkeys. Science 300:812815.
Ling DSF, Benardo LS (1995) Recruitment of GABAA inhibition in rat neocortex is limited and not NMDA-dependent. J Neurophysiol 74:23292335.
Ling DSF, Benardo LS (1998) Synchronous firing of inhibitory interneurons results in saturation of fast GABAA IPSC magnitude but not saturation of fast inhibitory efficacy in rat neocortical pyramidal cells. Synapse 28:91102.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Ling DSF, Benardo LS (1999) Restrictions on inhibitory circuits contribute to limited recruitment of fast inhibition in rat neocortical pyramidal cells. J Neurophysiol 82:17931807.
McBain CJ, Freund TF, Mody I (1999) Glutamatergic synapses onto hippocampal interneurons: precision timing without lasting plasticity. Trends Neurosci 22:228235.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Michelson HB, Wong RKS (1994) Synchronization of inhibitory neurones in the guinea-pig hippocampus in vitro. J Physiol (Lond) 477:3545.[Abstract]
Miles R, Wong RKS (1987) Inhibitory control of local excitatory circuits in the guinea-pig hippocampus. J Physiol (Lond) 388:611629.[Abstract]
Mondadori C, Schmutz M (1986) Synergistic effects of oxiracetam and piracetam in combination with antiepileptic drugs. Acta Neurol Scand 74 (suppl 109):113116.[ISI]
Nabeshima T, Noda Y, Tohyama K, Itoh J, Kameyama T (1990) Effects of DM-9384 in a model of amnesia based on animals with GABAergic neuronal dysfunction. Eur J Pharmacol 178:143149.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Partin KM, Patneau DK, Winters CA, Mayer ML, Buonanno A (1993) Selective modulation of desensitization of AMPA versus kainate receptors by cyclothiazide and concanavalin A. Neuron 11:10691082.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Paulus W, Ried S, Stodieck SRG, Schimdt D (1991) Abolition of photoparoxysmal response in progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Eur Neurol 31:388390.[ISI][Medline]
Perrais D, Ropert N (1999) Effect of zolpidem on miniature IPSCs and occupancy of postsynaptic GABAA receptors in central synapses. J Neurosci 19:578588.
Pohle W, Becker A, Grecksch G, Juhre A, Willenberg A (1997) Piracetam prevents pentylenetetrazol kindling-induced neuronal loss and learning deficits. Seizure 6:467474.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Rao SG, Williams GV, Goldman-Rakic PS (2000) Destruction and creation of spatial tuning by disinhibition: GABA(A) blockade of prefrontal cortical neurons engaged by working memory. J Neurosci 20:485494.
Segal M, Barker JL (1984) Rat hippocampal neurons in culture: properties of GABA-activated Cl ion conductance. J Neurophysiol 51:500515.
Shirane M, Nakamura K (2001) Aniracetam enhances cortical dopamine and serotonin release via cholinergic and glutamatergic mechanisms in SHRSP. Brain Res 916:211221.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Shors TJ, Servatius RJ, Thompson RF, Rogers G, Lynch G (1995) Enhanced glutamatergic neurotransmission facilitates classical conditioning in the freely-moving rat. Neurosci Lett 186:153156.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Solodkin A, Veldhuizen SD, Van Hoesen GW (1996) Contingent vulnerability of entorhinal parvalbumin-containing neurons in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 16:33113321.
Stäubli U, Rogers G, Lynch G (1994) Facilitation of glutamate receptors enhances memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:777781.
Tang C-M, Shi Q-Y, Katchman A, Lynch G (1991) Modulation of the time course of fast EPSCs and glutamate channel kinetics by aniracetam. Science 254:288290.[ISI][Medline]
Togashi H, Nakamura K, Matsumoto M, Ueno K, Ohashi S, Saito H, Yoshioka M (2002) Aniracetam enhances glutamatergic transmission in the prefrontal cortex of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Neurosci Lett 320:109112.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Traub RD, Wong RKS (1982) Cellular mechanism of neuronal synchronization in epilepsy. Science 216:745747.[ISI][Medline]
Trussell LO, Fischbach GD (1989) Glutamate receptor desensitization and its role in synaptic transmission. Neuron 3:209218.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Vicini S, Alho H, Costa E, Mienville JM, Santi MR, Vaccarino FM (1986) Modulation of gamma-aminobutyric acid-mediated inhibitory synaptic currents in dissociated cortical cell cultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:92699273.
Vyklicky L, Jr., Patneau DK, Mayer ML (1991) Modulation of excitatory synaptic transmission by drugs that reduce desensitization at AMPA/kainate receptors. Neuron 7:971984.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Wang X-J, Buzsáki G (1996) Gamma oscillation by synaptic inhibition in a hippocampal interneuronal network model. J Neurosci 16:64026413.
Yamada KA, Tang C-M (1993) Benzothiadiazides inhibit rapid glutamate receptor desensitization and enhance glutamatergic synaptic currents. J Neurosci 13:39043915.[Abstract]
Yang L, Benardo LS (1998) Removal of superficial inhibition releases hyperexcitability in middle and deep horizontal slices from rat somatosensory neocortex. Neurosci Lett 257:3336.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Yoshii M, Watabe S. (1994) Enhancement of neuronal calcium channel currents by the nootropic agent, nefiracetam (DM-9384), in NG108-15 cells. Brain Res 642:123131.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Yu S, Cai J (2003) Effects of aniracetam on extracellular levels of transmitter amino acids in the hippocampus of the conscious gerbils: an intracranial microdialysis study. Neurosci Lett 39:187190.[CrossRef]
Zhong P, Gu Z, Wang X, Jiang H, Feng J, Yan Z (2003) Impaired modulation of GABAergic transmission by muscarinic receptors in a mouse transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease. J Biol Chem 278:2688826896.
|