Royal Edinburgh Hospital, UK
National Centre for Register-based Research, Denmark
Informational and Statistics Division Scottish Office, UK
Royal Edinburgh Hospital, UK.
Correspondence: Dr Andrew M. McIntosh, Department of Psychiatry, Kennedy Tower, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, EH10 5HF, UK. Tel: +44(0) 131 537 6274; fax: +44(0) 131 537 6531; e-mail: andrew.mcintosh{at}ed.ac.uk
This project was funded by the Medical Research Council.
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Method Subjects at high risk of schizophrenia were compared with people with first-episode schizophrenia and with healthy volunteers. Consenting mothers of subjects were interviewed using a standardised questionnaire for the recall of OCs, and OCs were also measured from records collected at the time of pregnancy and delivery.
Results High-risk subjects and first-episode patients had higher rates of OCs recalled by their mother than controls, but hospital records showed no differences in OCs between groups. The number of OCs recalled by mothers of the high-risk group was not related to whether the mother had schizophrenia or not, but was related to the maternally rated abnormal childhood behaviour as measured by the Child Behaviour Checklist.
Conclusions These results suggest that studies that rely on maternal recall alone are susceptible to bias. The excess of OCs recalled by the mother could be related to abnormal behaviour in their child rather than maternal illness, family history or psychotic symptoms.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Obstetric data from the Edinburgh High Risk Study provides opportunities for the clarification of these issues. Complications were recorded from the mothers of people with schizophrenia, healthy individuals at high risk of schizophrenia for genetic reasons and healthy controls at no additional risk. Maternal recall data were compared with contemporaneous health service data collected around the time of pregnancy and delivery.
![]() |
METHOD |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
A further control group aged 16-24 years was recruited from patients admitted to psychiatric care in the Edinburgh area with a new diagnosis of schizophrenia. The diagnosis of first-episode schizophrenia according to DSMIV criteria was confirmed with the Operational Checklist for Psychiatric Disorders (OPCRIT; McGuffin et al, 1991) of hospital case notes and structured psychiatric interviews. Subjects with a family history of schizophrenia were excluded from this group.
All participants were interviewed using the Present State Examination (PSE-9; Wing et al, 1974) to see if they were currently symptomatic. The PSE is a semi-structured clinical interview in which a set of standard questions is asked and augmented by a set of additional questions when necessary. The questions are used to clarify the presence or absence of 140 symptom items that are defined in the text of the PSE and an accompanying glossary. High-risk subjects were further classified on the basis of the PSE into two groups: those who had experienced psychotic symptoms in the first years of the study; and those without such symptoms (Miller et al, 2002).
Assessment of obstetric complications
Each participant's history of obstetric complications was assessed in the
same way. After informed consent had been obtained, the mother of each
participant was identified wherever possible and invited either to attend for
interview or to take part in a telephone interview (depending on their
preference). Participants and their mothers were also asked to give consent
for examination of their obstetric histories from health service records. For
the period from 1971 to 1978 inclusive, obstetric histories were taken from
Scottish Morbidity Record data (SMR2 or SMR[M]) collected nationally at the
time of pregnancy and confinement by the Information and Statistics Division
of the National Health Service in Scotland. The linkage involved probability
matching (Kendrick & Clarke,
1993), which pulls together records belonging to the same
individual with 98-99% accuracy.
Each obstetric complication, from both sources, was elicited using a standard questionnaire developed from other published reports (Parnas et al, 1982; Lewis et al, 1989; McCreadie et al, 1992; McNeil & Sjöström, 1995). Obstetric data were rated using the McNeilSjöström scale for obstetric complications (McNeil & Sjöström, 1995) and scored according to a standard protocol after the investigators (S.H., A.M.M.) had undertaken a period of training in the use of this instrument. The other historical and personal details of each subject were also recorded using hospital case notes and face-to-face interviews with the participants.
The NcNeilSjöström scale categorises obstetric complications according to six severity levels. Level one refers to complications that are not harmful or relevant and level two refers to complications that are not likely to be harmful or relevant. These complications were therefore excluded from further consideration as they described comparatively trivial complications of pregnancy (e.g. haemorrhoids, back pain, heartburn). Complications of pregnancy, labour and delivery and of the neonatal period were all recorded individually. Pregnancy complications were also further classified as occurring in the first, second or third trimesters of pregnancy.
The McNeilSjöström scale was used as the principal measure of obstetric complications as it includes the greatest number of complications of potential relevance to the aetiology of schizophrenia. It is likely to be the most sensitive instrument available now and makes fewer assumptions than other commonly used scales.
Statistical analysis
Demographic, neuropsychological and other patient details were compared
between groups to examine whether there were any systematic differences.
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for continuous data,
Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used for ranked ordinal data and chi-squared
(2) was used where data were categorical. Two-tailed
significance testing was used throughout. Where data were not normally
distributed, descriptive statistics were presented as medians and
interquartile ranges rather than means and standard deviations.
Obstetric complications on the McNeilSjöström scale with a severity score of three or more were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Software, 1999). The numbers of obstetric complications using this scale were compared between high-risk subjects, first-episode patients and healthy controls using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Where a significant association was found, correction was made for multiple hypotheses testing using the Bonferroni correction.
Where a significantly higher mean number of obstetric complications was found in the high-risk group than in controls, two subsequent further analyses were conducted. The first compared the mean number of obstetric complications for those high-risk subjects in whom the mother was herself affected with those in whom the mother was unaffected. Second, the number of obstetric complications was compared between groups of high-risk subjects where the individual had displayed some psychotic symptoms (not amounting to a diagnosis of schizophrenia; Lawrie et al, 2001) with those who were not showing symptoms. Both analyses were conducted using a MannWhitney U-test.
The relationship of obstetric complications to the degree of genetic risk
to schizophrenia was examined using two methods of assessing genetic
liability: a continuous measure described elsewhere
(Lawrie et al, 2001)
and a categorical measure of genetic risk according to whether high-risk
individuals had two or more first-degree relatives affected, one first-degree
relative and one or more second-degree relative affected, or two or more
second-degree relatives affected. The numbers of obstetric complications were
compared between these three high-risk groups by means of a Kruskal-Wallis
test with correction for multiple hypothesis testing. Spearman's rank
correlation coefficients were used to compare the continuous measure of
genetic risk with numbers of obstetric complications, and 2
tests of significance were also calculated for each correlation reported.
Maternal recall bias was examined by comparing obstetric complications between high-risk subjects, controls and first-episode patients using a repeated measures ANOVA for each scale. Where data were not normally distributed, a rank transformation was applied (Conover & Iman, 1981, 1982). For the McNeilSjöström scale, the dependent variable used was the frequency of obstetric complications rated as severity level 3 or greater. The dependent variable had two levels: obstetric complications rated by maternal recall and those rated from health service data.
Maternal assessment of childhood behaviour at age 11 and 16 years was recorded at interview using the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach, 1991). The scale is a 120-item checklist, which generates 8 syndrome scales (social withdrawal, somatic complaints, anxietydepression, social problems, attention problems, delinquent behaviour; aggressive behaviour and other problems). Mothers were asked to complete the CBCL for their child. The relationship of this measure to the number of obstetric complications recalled by mothers was investigated using Spearman's correlation coefficient.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
Maternal recall data
The total number of obstetric complications recalled by mothers was
greatest for subjects at high-risk of schizophrenia compared with patients
with first-episode schizophrenia which was, in turn, greater than for normal
controls (Table 2;
Fig. 1; P=0.007). This
finding was also significant after a Bonferroni correction. In addition, the
number of obstetric complications occurring in the first and second trimesters
of pregnancy and in the neonatal period was greater in high-risk subjects
compared with controls, although these findings were not robust to controlling
for multiple hypothesis testing.
|
|
No differences in obstetric complications (as recalled by mothers) were found between high-risk subjects whose mother had a diagnosis of schizophrenia (n=34) and high-risk subjects whose mother had no diagnosis of schizophrenia (n=99, P=0.85; Table 3). Similarly, no relationship was found between the total number of obstetric complications and either the discrete (P=0.44) or continuous (P=0.77) measures of genetic liability to schizophrenia used in the study. No associations were found between either measure of genetic liability and any period of pregnancy, once correction for multiple testing had been performed (see Table 4).
|
|
Comparison of maternal recall with health service data
The total number of obstetric complications, rated from health service
data, did not differ between the groups for any single period of pregnancy
either before or after correction for multiple hypothesis testing. The total
number of obstetric complications over the entire pregnancy, delivery and
neonatal period also did not differ between the three groups.
The distribution of obstetric complications rated at a severity level of 3 or greater was analysed using a histogram and normal probability plot. Data clearly deviated from the normal distribution, and therefore a rank transformation was applied. Using a repeated measures ANOVA, there was a significant interaction between the number of obstetric complications (classified by McNeilSjöström scale as having a severity of 3 or more) recalled by the mother and those rated from health service data according to the group membership of the individual (high-risk, first-episode, control; d.f.=2, F=3.51, P=0.033; Fig. 2).
|
Relationship of obstetric data to premorbid behaviour
Childhood behaviour at age 11 and 16 years was rated by the consenting
mothers of all three groups using the CBCL. If the number of obstetric
complications recalled by the mother was related to perceived abnormal
childhood behaviour, an explanation for the apparent maternal recall bias
found in this study might be provided. Childhood behaviour at age 11 and its
correlation with maternally rated obstetric complications was examined using
Spearman's correlation coefficient.
Maternally rated obstetric complications were related to somatic complaints (r=0.25, P=0.019), anxietydepression (r=0.27, P=0.01), social problems (r=0.24, P=0.024), delinquent behaviour (r=0.23, P=0.031) and aggressive behaviour (r=0.32, P=0.002) of children at age 11. They were also related to anxietydepression (r=0.24, P=0.03) and aggressive behaviour (r=0.25, P=0.02) of children aged 16. Hospital-record-rated obstetric complications were not related to any of the measures of childhood behaviour.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The current study measured obstetric complications with a sensitive instrument (McNeil & Sjöström, 1995), using both maternal recall and contemporaneous health service records in a well-balanced population consisting of the mothers of patients with first-episode schizophrenia, high-risk subjects and healthy controls. We were thus able to directly examine the possibility of maternal recall bias in the obstetric histories of high-risk subjects as well as a sample of patients experiencing their first-episode of schizophrenia.
Main findings
The number of maternally rated obstetric complications (classified by the
McNeilSjöström scale) of potential relevance to the aetiology
of schizophrenia was greater in subjects at high-risk of schizophrenia than in
patients with first-episode schizophrenia, which was, in turn, greater than in
healthy controls. Health service data revealed no overall differences in
obstetric complications (classified by the McNeilSjöström
scale as of potential relevance to the aetiology of schizophrenia) between
high-risk subjects, first-episode patients and normal controls. The number of
obstetric complications was not related to whether or not the high-risk
subject was the child of a mother with schizophrenia or not, or to whether the
affected proband displayed subclinical psychotic symptoms. Although the number
of maternally rated obstetric complications was elevated for those at
increased genetic risk of schizophrenia, the degree of genetic risk was not
associated with the number of obstetric complications found in the high-risk
group.
A repeated measures ANOVA found differentially higher maternal recall of obstetric complications among the high-risk subjects and first-episode patients compared with the normal controls than would have been expected from health service data. This finding is highly suggestive of maternal recall bias. Furthermore, the number of obstetric complications recalled by the mother was related to measures of abnormal childhood behaviour at age 11 and 16. It is possible that concern about the child's behaviour can affect the mother's recall of obstetric events. The fact that these behaviours have been shown to predict the onset of schizophrenia in these high-risk subjects (Miller et al, 2002) is of interest in the general context of the relationship between maternal recall of obstetric events and the development of schizophrenia. It is possible that mothers could be sensitised to recall adverse obstetric events or make false recollections simply because they know that their child is at enhanced risk of developing schizophrenia in the future, and obstetric complications could be a more acceptable explanation for any abnormal behaviour in their offspring as they might perceive these events to be out of their control.
Strengths and limitations
This study compared obstetric complications in subjects at high-risk of
schizophrenia with groups balanced for age, socio-economic status and gender.
The degree to which the groups were balanced for age was exceptionally close,
although the groups were less similar for gender and socio-economic status.
This could have reduced the reliability of the study findings. As with all
casecontrol studies, confounding may be a significant problem, but some
of the main potential confounders were controlled for. Uncorrected confounders
of potential relevance include: neuro-developmental genes; maternal compliance
with obstetric care; substance misuse; and diet. Complications were also rated
by investigators who were not blind to group assignment, and it is possible
that this limitation exaggerated the differences between groups. However, the
standardised questionnaire employed in this study is likely to have collected
reliable data (Cantor-Graae et al,
1998). The rating of obstetric complications from SMR data has
obvious advantages as this information is collected prospectively and is
unlikely to be subject to differential bias between the three subject groups.
However, such information is dependent on the efforts of health service staff
and its accuracy and interrater reliability are uncertain. It is likely that
any errors in health service data would be random and equally distributed
between the groups. Non-systematic errors, and the resulting reduction in
power, could therefore have obscured between-group differences in terms of the
obstetric complications rated from health service data, although such errors
are unlikely to account for the interaction of obstetric complications by
group found using a repeated measures ANOVA.
Comparison with other studies
Studies that use data collected prospectively at the time of pregnancy and
delivery often fail to find an association between obstetric complications and
schizophrenia (Byrne et al,
2000; Kendell et al,
2000). This fact suggests that studies relying on maternal recall
could be biased. Several studies have examined the possibility of maternal
recall bias (O'Callaghan et al,
1990; Cantor-Graae et
al, 1998; Buka et
al, 2000) with varying results. In the first of these studies
(O'Callaghan et al,
1990), 21 mothers (17 with schizophrenia and four other probands)
were interviewed to ascertain obstetric histories by maternal recall.
Maternity hospital records were also inspected and generally the level of
agreement (on the LewisMurray scale) was high. In cases where the
maternity records and maternal recall differed, there was a tendency for
mothers to recall obstetric complications that could not be confirmed in
hospital records. Although the study has many strengths, the numbers involved
were small, and no control group was recruited for comparison purposes. To
restrict the obstetric complications of interest to those present in the
LewisMurray scale might have excluded complications of potential
relevance to schizophrenia and reduced the power to detect maternal recall
bias. The second study (Cantor-Graae et
al, 1998) obtained obstetric information from structured
maternal interview and from hospital records in 45 mothers of probands with
schizophrenia and 34 control mothers using the McNeilSjöström
obstetric complications scale. Considerable discrepancies were observed
between interviews and maternal records, irrespective of maternal group. No
significant differences were found between patients and control mothers in
error type or for recall of selected events, but there was a tendency for
mothers of probands with schizophrenia to under-report labour and delivery
complications. This study included a control group as well as a much broader
range of potentially relevant complications, as in the present study. The
third study to systematically examine recall bias in the mothers of probands
with schizophrenia (Buka et al,
2000) used the Pregnancy History Inventory to rate the obstetric
histories of 28 mothers of individuals with schizophrenia and 28 control
mothers by both maternal recall and from maternity records. That study,
similar to the study by Cantor-Graae et al
(1998), showed that mothers of
affected probands tended to underestimate the frequency of obstetric
complications compared with controls. The obstetric histories were, however,
elicited solely by telephone interview, a fact which could have limited their
accuracy. The current study is the first, as far as we are aware, to find
maternal recall bias in subjects at high risk of schizophrenia and relate the
degree of bias to measures of abnormal childhood behaviour in otherwise
healthy individuals.
The finding of maternal recall bias in the obstetric histories of the mothers of subjects with schizophrenia suggests that studies that use maternal recall alone could be biased. Studies that rely on maternal recall alone are relatively common outside Scandinavian countries and their inclusion in the meta-analytical reviews in this area (Geddes & Lawrie, 1995; Verdoux et al, 1997; Geddes et al, 1999) might have falsely elevated the summary effect size.
![]() |
Clinical Implications and Limitations |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
LIMITATIONS
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Buka, S.L, Goldstein, J. M., Seidman, L. J., et al (2000) Maternal recall of pregnancy history: accuracy and bias in schizophrenia research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26, 335-350.[Medline]
Byrne, M., Browne, R., Mulryan, N., et al
(2000) Labour and delivery complications and schizophrenia.
Casecontrol study using contemporaneous labour ward records.
British Journal of Psychiatry,
176,
531-536.
Cantor-Graae, E., Cardenal, S., Ismail, B., et al (1998) Recall of obstetric events by mothers of schizophrenic patients. Psychological Medicine, 28, 1239-1243.[CrossRef][Medline]
Conover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1981) Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. American Statistician, 35, 124-132.
Conover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1982) Analysis of covariance using the rank transformation. Biometrics, 38, 715-724.[Medline]
Geddes, J. R. & Lawrie, S. M. (1995) Obstetric complications and schizophrenia: a meta analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 786-793.[Abstract]
Geddes, J. R., Verdoux, H., Takei, N., et al (1999) Schizophrenia and complications of pregnancy and labor: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 25, 413-423.[Medline]
Goodman, R. (1988) Are complications of pregnancy and birth causes of schizophrenia? Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 30, 391-395.[Medline]
Hodges, A., Byrne, M. J., Grant, E, et al (1999) People at risk of schizophrenia. Sample characteristics of the first 100 cases in the Edinburgh High-Risk Study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 547-553.[Abstract]
Johnstone, E. C., Abukmeil, S. S., Byrne, M. J., et al (2000) Edinburgh high risk study findings after four years. Demographic, attainment and psychological issues. Schizophrenia Research, 46, 1-15.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kendell, R. E., McInneny, K., Juszczak, E., et al
(2000) Obstetric complications and schizophrenia. Two
casecontrol studies based on structured obstetric records.
British Journal of Psychiatry,
176,
516-522.
Kendrick, S. & Clarke, J. (1993) The Scottish Record linkage system. Health Bulletin, 51, 72-79.[Medline]
Lawrie, S.M., Whalley, H. C., Abukmeil, S. S., et al (2001) Brain structure, genetic liability and psychotic symptoms in subjects at high-risk of developing schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 49, 811-823.[Medline]
Lewis, S. W. & Murray, R. M. (1987) Obstetric complications, neurodevelopmental deviance and risk of schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 21, 413-422.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lewis, S. W., Owen, M. J. & Murray, R. M. (1989) Obstetric complications and schizophrenia: methodology and mechanisms. In Schizophrenia: Scientific Progress (eds S. C. Schulz & C. A. Tamminga), pp. 56-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCreadie, R. G., Hall, D. J., Berry, I. J., et al (1992) The Nithsdale schizophrenia surveys. X: Obstetric complications, family history and abnormal movements. British Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 799-805.[Abstract]
McGuffin, P., Farmer, A. & Harvey, I. (1991) A polydiagnostic application of operational criteria in studies of psychotic illness. Development and reliability of OPCRIT system. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 746-770.[Abstract]
McNeil, T. F. & Sjöström, K. (1995) McNeilSjöström Scale for Obstetric Complications. Malmö: Lund University.
Miller, P. M., Byrne, M. J., Hodges, A., et al (2002) Childhood behaviour, psychotic symptoms and psychosis onset in young people at high risk of schizophrenia: Early findings from Edinburgh High Risk Study. Psychological Medicine, 32, 173-179.[Medline]
O'Callaghan, E., Larkin, C. & Waddington, J. L. (1990) Obstetric complications in schizophrenia and the validity of maternal recall. Psychological Medicine, 20, 89-94.[Medline]
Parnas, J., Schulsinger, F., Teasdale, T. W., et al (1982) Perinatal complications and clinical outcome within the schizophrenia spectrum. British Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 416-420.[Abstract]
SPSS Software 1999. SPSS (10.0). Chicago, IL: SPSS Software.
Verdoux, H., Geddes, J. R., Takei, N., et al (1997) Obstetric complications and age at onset in schizophrenia: an international collaborative meta-analysis of individual patient data. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 1220-1227.[Abstract]
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorious, N. (1974) Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms: an Instruction Manual for the PSE and CATEGO Programme. London: Cambridge University Press.
Received for publication April 24, 2002. Revision received July 29, 2002. Accepted for publication July 31, 2002.
Related articles in BJP:
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |