Section of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Correspondence: E-mail: spjubco{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk
* This editorialis based on a presentation at the 10th Congress of the
International Federation of Psychiatric Epidemiology, 1013 September
2004, Bristol, UK.
Schizophrenia occurs in national populations with an annual prevalence of 1.4 to 4.6 per 1000 and incidence rates of 1642 per 100 000 (Jablensky, 2000). Although the incidence rates vary between countries by a factor of less than 3, wider ranges of variation are found among population subgroups within single countries. In the UK, for example, incidence rate ratios of 4 or above have been estimated both for the lowest social class in the indigenous White population and for Black immigrant groups. These data provide the most compelling evidence yet to hand for the role of socio-economic factors in aetiology.
SCHIZOPHRENIA AND SOCIAL CLASS
Half a century ago the links between schizophrenia and socio-economic status were highlighted by research in the USA and Britain. By the mid-1960s the relevance of low socio-economic status had been confirmed by a range of studies, some focused on the urban ecology of mental disorders, others on social class differences in prevalence and incidence rates, course and outcome of illness, and patterns of medical treatment and care. A concentration of cases in low-status occupations was confirmed by area surveys and national statistics. Case rates repeatedly displayed class differentials, whether the categories were based solely on occupation, or incorporated other criteria such as education and district of residence.
An analysis for the General Register Office (Brooke, 1959) covered first admissions for schizophrenia in England and Wales in the quinquennium 194953. On average there were some 3000 new cases annually among men aged 20 years or over, corresponding to a national rate of 21 per 100 000. For single men (the great majority), the rate in social class V was 4.1 times as high as in social class I, and for the ever-married 3.5 times as high.
Prevalence studies over the same period showed that this relative excess was compounded by a worse clinical prognosis and a greater accumulation of chronic illness among the poor. Lower-class patients with schizophrenia were more likely to be brought to treatment by the police or social agencies, to be compulsorily admitted, to receive physical treatment or custodial care only and to become long-stay cases (Cooper, 1961).
The observed social class gradient in schizophrenia generated a good deal of controversy. Initially it was thought to be causal in nature (the environmental breeder hypothesis), especially as some researchers reported similarly skewed distributions in the families of origin. Soon, however, contrary evidence began to emerge. Goldberg & Morrison (1963), making use of birth register data, compared the occupations of men aged 2534 years with a first admission for schizophrenia with those of their fathers at about the same age. They found a large excess of class V cases among the patients, but for the fathers the socio-economic status distribution was similar to that of the general population. Examination of the patient group revealed a pattern of poor scholastic and work achievement, and a career decline beginning typically in adolescence. Therefore, it appeared that the affected men had not been socially disadvantaged from birth, but suffered from functional impairments that had handicapped them at school and in early working life. This study, although not definitive, led many psychiatrists to conclude that premorbid social drift by itself (the selective social drift hypothesis) provided a sufficient explanation of the epidemiological findings. Partly in consequence, progress in identifying environmental risk factors drew almost to a halt.
In the intervening years, low socio-economic status has shown no decline in importance as a public-health risk factor in the UK. As social inequality has increased in British society, so class differentials in mortality and morbidity have grown more pronounced (Whitehead et al, 1992). Whether class-specific rates for psychotic illness have also diverged nationally is unclear, although certainly local area rates continue to differ widely according to socio-economic level.
Although the importance of selective social drift stands confirmed, some more recent findings have drawn attention back to the environmental breeder hypothesis. First, the broad association is now thought to be characteristic of modern urban society, and much weaker in rural communities, suggesting that features of big-city life may be causally implicated (Eaton et al, 2000). A number of studies support the notion that clustering of schizophrenia in decaying inner-city areas is not simply a consequence of geographic drift or segregation, but that being born or brought up in such areas is in itself a risk factor for the condition (Harrison et al, 2001). Second, data from an ongoing national cohort study in Sweden (Hjern et al, 2004) show convincingly that social adversity in childhood is associated with an increased risk of developing schizophrenia (S. Wicks, personal communication, 2004). Third, interest in environmental causes has been reawakened by evidence from a different quarter: the high rates of psychotic illness found among AfricanCaribbean and other Black immigrants in the UK.
SCHIZOPHRENIA AND IMMIGRANT STATUS
Evidence of a high frequency of schizophrenia in the Black immigrant population in the UK was first noted in the 1960s, and has been confirmed in reports from different parts of Britain. Casecontrol studies making use of population denominators from the 1991 or 2001 UK census to estimate standardised incidence rates for schizophrenia in different ethnic groups have underpinned the earlier findings (for review, see Jarvis, 1998; Sharpley et al, 2001). Standardised rate ratios have varied widely, partly because of widely differing estimates for the comparison groups, and methodological differences between the studies are too great to permit pooling of the data. Nevertheless, in overview they suggest an approximately fourfold increase of risk in the target population. Preliminary findings of a multicentre British collaboration, the Aetiology and Ethnicity in Schizophrenia and Other Psychoses (ÆSOP) study, provide a rate ratio of 6.8 (95% CI 5.68.3) for psychosis in AfricanCaribbean people compared with White (Fearon et al, 2004).
This phenomenon has aroused wide interest in possible underlying causes. Balanced reviews of the field have tended to favour a primarily social rather than a genetic explanation, on a number of grounds (Jarvis, 1998; Sharpley et al, 2001):
REAPPRAISING THE LINKS BETWEEN SOCIAL CLASS, IMMIGRANT STATUS AND SCHIZOPHRENIA
There are thus striking parallels, with regard both to schizophrenia rates and to social characteristics, between the lower-class indigenous groups highlighted in earlier psychiatric surveys and the AfricanCaribbean population of Britains inner cities today. Reliable partialling out of the variance in incidence rates between social class and ethnic differences in schizophrenia risk is only now becoming possible. In one Swedish cohort study, risk ratios for all ethnic minorities were diminished and among non-Europeans virtually eliminated by adjusting for socio-economic differences (Hjern et al, 2004). Although comparable data for the UK are not yet available, the parallels outlined above already call for a reappraisal of environmental factors in schizophrenia. Social drift theory alone does not explain the high rates found among Black immigrants, which must be due wholly or in part to environmental exposures. This conclusion lends support to the hypothesis that low socio-economic status is a risk factor for schizophrenia, and argues the need for a perspective that incorporates both social class and immigrant status.
Since the disorder may strike in families at any level of society, and is relatively uncommon at all levels, social disadvantage can be neither a sufficient nor a necessary cause, but must simply increase the probability of pathogenic exposures. What kinds of pathogen might be implicated? To date most attention has been focused on adversity in adult life, including unemployment and poverty, social isolation, and residence in inner-city areas characterised by poor housing, overcrowding, lack of defensible space, and high levels of crime and illicit drug use. Here, however, two problems arise. To begin with, the population groups most subject to such conditions namely, White people in the lowest socio-economic groups and Black immigrants to the UK appear not to have comparably large increases in risk for the common, non-psychotic forms of mental disorder. Second, the underlying vulnerability in schizophrenia seems to be determined in the earliest stages of life, pointing to the critical importance of harmful exposures at that time. A major challenge for psychiatric epidemiology will be, with the help of matched control and cohort studies, to ascertain the relative frequency of different developmental hazards among children born into the least privileged groups of society and to test their significance for schizophrenia and related psychoses.
REFERENCES
Brooke, E. M. (1959) A national study of schizophrenic patients in relation to occupation. In Second International Congress for Psychiatry, Zurich 1957: Congress Report, vol. 3, pp. 52 63. Zurich: Orelli Fussli.
Cooper, B. (1961) Social class and prognosis in schizophrenia. British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine, 15, 17 41.
Eaton, W. W., Mortensen, P. B. & Frydenberg, M. (2000) Obstetric factors, urbanization and psychosis. Schizophrenia Research, 43, 117 123.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fearon, P., Jones, P. B., Kennedy, N., et al (2004) Raised incidence of psychosis in all migrant groups in South London, Nottingham and Bristol: the ÆSOP Study. Schizophrenia Research, 67 (suppl. 1), 15 .[CrossRef]
Goldberg, E. M. & Morrison, S. L. (1963) Schizophrenia and social class. British Journal of Psychiatry, 108, 785 802.
Harrison, G., Gunnell, D., Glazebrook, C., et al
(2001) Association between schizophrenia and social
inequality at birth: casecontrol study. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 179, 346
350.
Hjern, A., Wicks, S. & Dalman, C. (2004) Social adversity contributes to high morbidity in psychoses in immigrants a national cohort study in two generations of Swedish residents. Psychological Medicine, 34, 1025 1033.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jablensky, A. (2000) Epidemiology of schizophrenia: the global burden of disease and disability. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 250, 274 285.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jarvis, E. (1998) Schizophrenia in British immigrants. Recent findings, issues and implications. Transcultural Psychiatry, 35, 39 74.
Rutter, M., Yule, E., Morton, J., et al (1975) Children of West Indian immigrantsIII. Home circumstances and family patterns. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 105 123.[Medline]
Sharpley, M. S., Hutchinson, G., Murray, R. M., et al
(2001) Understanding the excess of psychosis among the
AfricanCaribbean population in England. Review of current hypotheses.
British Journal of Psychiatry,
178 (suppl. 40), s60
s68.
Takei, N., Persaud, R., Woodruff, P., et al (1998) First episodes of psychosis in Afro-Caribbean and White people. An 18-year follow-up population-based study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 147 153.[Abstract]
Whitehead, M., Townsend, P. & Davidson, N. (eds) (1992) Inequalities in Health: The Black Report and The Health Divide. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Received for publication October 5, 2004. Revision received November 10, 2004. Accepted for publication November 10, 2004.
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Psychiatric Bulletin | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |