Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London
Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London
Correspondence: Dr Mike Slade, Health Services Research Department (Box PO29), Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF. Tel: +44 (0) 207 848 0795; fax: +44 (0) 207 277 1462; e-mail: m.slade{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Aims To test the hypotheses that: (a) higher patient-rated unmet need is associated with lower individual quality of life assessments by a patient over time; and (b) reduction in patient-rated unmet need precedes improvement in quality of life.
Method One hundred and one individuals using adult mental health services were asked to complete 6-monthly questionnaires, comprising quality of life (Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life, MANSA) and unmet need (Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule, CANSAS) assessments.
Results Seventy-three participants provided 240 separate pairs of consecutive assessments. Random effects regression models indicated an impact on current quality of life for both average level of unmet need (B= 0.23, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.17) and change in unmet need over the past month (B= 0.04, 95% CI 0.02).
Conclusions Changes in patient-rated unmet needs may cause changes in quality of life.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
METHOD |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Bollen (1989) proposed three criteria for establishing a causal relationship: association (the putative cause and effect have temporal and spatial contiguity), direction (cause precedes effect) and isolation (the effects of a cause are isolated from competing causes). Cross-sectional association and isolation in the relationship between needs and quality of life have been shown previously (Slade et al, 1999a; UK700 Group, 1999; Wiersma & van Busschbach, 2001; Hansson et al, 2003; Slade et al, 2004). The first aim of this study was to investigate whether association remains in longitudinal data. The hypothesis was that higher patient-rated unmet need is associated with lower individual quality of life assessments by a patient over time. The second aim was to investigate temporal precedence in the relationship between patient-rated unmet need and quality of life, with the aim of establishing direction in the relationship. The hypothesis was that reduction in patient-rated unmet need precedes improvement in quality of life.
Participants
The inclusion criteria were that patients had been on the case-load of any
of the eight community mental health teams in Croydon (South London) on 1 May
2001 for at least 3 months, and were aged between 18 and 64 years inclusive.
Croydon has a population of 319 000 and its population is nationally
representative. Approximately 3500 patients use community mental health teams
in Croydon. To ensure epidemiological representativeness, stratified random
sampling was used for sample selection. Identified prognostic factors were age
(tertiles), gender, ethnicity (White v. Black and minority ethnic),
clinical diagnosis (psychosis v. other) and community mental health
team (18). Men and women were equally represented in the base
population, but had different age distributions, with more women in the
highest tertile. The sample was therefore stratified by tertiles within
gender, to give six age gender combinations having approximately equal
proportions in the base population. Similarly, the distribution of patients
across the eight community mental health teams was not equal, so a
proportionately higher recruitment target was set for those dealing with more
patients than average. The sample was therefore carefully selected to ensure
that prognostic factors were in proportion to their representation in the base
population of Croydon mental health patients. This approach of equal sample
fractions allows straightforward analysis without weighting, since the sample
is fully representative of the base population. Participants were recruited
between May 2001 and December 2002.
Measures
Measures were chosen following application of pre-planned criteria to
assessments intended for routine clinical use
(Slade, 2002). Quality of life
was assessed using the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA;
Priebe et al, 1999),
a 16-item measure derived from the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile
(Oliver et al, 1997).
MANSA comprises 4 objective questions and 12 subjective questions. The
subjective items assess satisfaction with life as a whole, job (or sheltered
employment, or training/education, or unemployment/retirement), financial
situation, number and quality of friendships, leisure activities,
accommodation, personal safety, people that the individual lives with (or
living alone), sex life, relationship with family, physical health and mental
health. Each item is rated on a seven-point satisfaction scale, from
1=Couldnt be worse to 7=Couldnt be
better. The summary score used in this study is the mean of the 12
subjective items (range 1 to 7, the higher the score the better the quality of
life).
Unmet need was assessed using the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS; Slade et al, 1999b), a modified version of the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN; Phelan et al, 1995). The CANSAS assesses needs in 22 health and social domains: accommodation, food, looking after the home, self-care, daytime activities, physical health, psychotic symptoms, information (about condition and treatment), psychological distress, safety to self, safety to others, alcohol, drugs, company, intimate relationships, sexual expression, childcare, basic education, telephone, transport, money and benefits. For each domain, the possible ratings are unmet need (current serious problem, regardless of any help received), met need (no/moderate problem because of help given), no need or not known. Data reported here are from the patient-rated version: CANSASP. The summary unmet need score (CANSASP unmet) is the number of domains with an unmet need (range for both 022, low score better).
The National Adult Reading Test (Nelson, 1982) assesses premorbid IQ. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) is an 18-item interviewer-rated assessment of symptoms (summary score range 0126, low score better) (Overall & Gorham, 1988).
Procedures
All assessments were completed at baseline, through case-note audit and
staff and patient interviews. The aim of this study was to collect routine
outcome data, which involves patients self-rating the patient-rated measures
rather than the interviewer completing them through interview. Backward
chaining was used at baseline to train the patient to self-rate CANSASP
and MANSA at the baseline assessment. The first few questions of
CANSASP were completed by the researcher asking questions, giving a
verbal description of which rating is appropriate, giving a visual prompt by
pointing at the correct box to tick, and then ticking the box. These prompts
were then withdrawn in order, so that initially the patient was given the pen
but the questions and verbal and visual prompts were given so the patient only
had to tick the box, then the visual prompt was withdrawn, then the question
was asked but no verbal prompting was given, and finally no questions were
asked. A similar approach was used for MANSA where necessary. Following
baseline assessment, patients were randomly allocated to either the
intervention (n=101) or control (n=59) group. Data from the
intervention group only are reported here.
Those in the intervention group were asked to complete a postal questionnaire on a monthly basis. The postal questionnaire included CANSASP and MANSA. One month after baseline assessment (with the researcher), the first postal questionnaire was sent. Thereafter postal questionnaires were sent monthly for a further 4 months, and then follow-up assessments were made 2 months after the last postal questionnaire. At the follow-up assessment patients self-completed CANSASP and MANSA with no input from the researcher. Excluding the baseline assessment, which was completed with the active involvement of the researcher, six rounds of self-completed routine data were therefore obtained. Rounds 15 were 1 month apart, with 2 months between rounds 5 and 6.
Analysis
Differences between responders and non-responders were assessed using
2 and independent samples t-test analysis. A
longitudinal regression model was fitted, to assess the effects of both
cross-sectional and longitudinal associations
(Diggle et al, 2002).
The dependent variable was the MANSA at each round from 16 (i.e. a
maximum of six records per person). The mean patient-rated unmet need
(CANSASP unmet) over the six rounds was included to model the
cross-sectional association. The change from the current value of unmet need
to the value 1 month previously was included to model the longitudinal
association. Number of months since baseline was included to reflect any
overall linear trend in time. The effect of community mental health team
(18) was assessed in preliminary analyses, but was omitted from the
final model as it was not significant. Correlation between repeated
measurements for individual patients was accounted for by including a random
effect for each patient, within the random effects regression model. The
percentage of variation explained between and within patients is presented, as
well as the breakdown of residual variation into components associated with
individual patients (patient level random effects) and completely unexplained
variation. The model was fitted: (a) with level, change and time trend as
potential explanatory variables; (b) as (a) plus socio-demographic variables
(gender, age, White v. Black and minority ethnic, full-scale IQ); and
(c) as (b) plus BPRS and diagnosis (psychosis v. other). The model
was also fitted with (c) plus interaction terms to investigate whether the
difference in full-scale IQ found between responders and non-responders
affected the relationship between mean and changed unmet need and quality of
life. The acceptability of the final model was tested by visual assessment of
histograms showing the distributions of the random effects and of the residual
random errors, and by considering associations with the dependent variables
using scatter plots. The distribution of residuals was normal and uncorrelated
with the main explanatory variables. All analysis was undertaken using Stata
Version 8.0 for Windows.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
The only significant difference between patients with and without two consecutive ratings was in premorbid IQ, and this difference did not alter the model that was developed (analysis not shown).
A scatter plot of quality of life and unmet need scores is shown in Fig. 1. A scatter plot of changes in these scores is shown in Fig. 2.
|
|
|
The s indicate the amount of variation not explained in the
regression model which can be attributed to individual differences
(
u) and how much is random (
e). Rho is the
percentage of the variation attributable to individual differences, showing
that a substantial amount of the unexplained variance in quality of life was
accounted for by individual factors which are stable over time.
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Related research
Using the Bollen (1989)
criteria for causality, strong cross-sectional evidence and preliminary
longitudinal evidence exists for association and isolation. Robust evidence
from several studies across different countries and settings has shown higher
unmet needs (especially when rated by the patient) to be cross-sectionally
associated with lower subjective quality of life. The UK700 Study assessed
needs in four urban sites in England from the perspective of staff only
(UK700 Group, 1999).
Subjective patient-rated quality of life was predicted more by unmet needs
than any other clinical or social variable, in the sample of 620 patients.
Unmet need alone accounted for 20% of the variance, whereas social variables
accounted for only 7% and all other clinical variables only 19%. A study from
the PRiSM Psychosis Study compared the relative contribution of 133 staff and
patient assessments of needs (Slade et
al, 1999a). The study found that a higher number of
unmet needs was associated with lower quality of life (replicating the UK700
Study), and the association was more robust for patient ratings of need. A
multicentre Scandinavian study of 418 patients with a diagnosis of
schizophrenia found that patient-rated assessments of unmet need were
associated with quality of life, accounting for 6% of the variance
(Hansson et al,
2003). Finally, a study of 101 long-term mental health patients in
The Netherlands compared patient assessments of needs, quality of life and
satisfaction (Wiersma & van
Busschbach, 2001). Quality of life was not related to satisfaction
with care, but was strongly associated with level of unmet need.
Overall, there is consistent cross-sectional evidence that higher patient-rated unmet need is associated with lower subjective quality of life, and that this relationship is not due to both these measures being assessed by the patient. However, all these studies have two characteristics which limit their generalisability. First, they are cross-sectional, so causal inferences are not possible. Second, they are based on data collected by researchers, rather than routinely as part of the clinical process. This is likely to improve the quality of data, but raises the question of whether any causal relationship found in research data necessarily also occurs in routine practice settings. These two issues were recently addressed in a retrospective re-analysis of existing data (Slade et al, 2004). The South Verona Outcome Project assesses needs, quality of life, symptoms, disability, function and service satisfaction in the context of a routine mental health service (Ruggeri et al, 1998). The re-analysis considered data for 265 patients, and (replicating previous findings) higher patient-rated unmet need was associated with lower subjective quality of life, even when controlling for the influence of all other clinical and socio-demographic variables (Slade et al, 2004). In addition, subjective quality of life was re-assessed 1 year later for a subset of 121 patients. The only baseline predictor of quality of life at 1-year follow-up (apart from baseline quality of life) was patient-rated unmet need, accounting for 58% of the variance in quality of life.
Strengths and limitations
A strength of the current study is that the population is epidemiologically
representative of patients using adult community mental health teams in a
demographically representative London borough. The inclusion criteria were
broad to maximise external validity for community mental health teams which
include heterogeneous diagnoses on their case-loads. Clinical diagnosis was
not verified by assessment of a research diagnosis, since community mental
health teams rely on clinical diagnosis.
The psychometric properties of MANSA and CANSAS were established using an interviewer to administer the measure. It is therefore possible that their administration through a postal questionnaire may compromise their psychometric properties. Similarly, although CANSASP was modified for this study from CANSAS, for which adequate psychometric properties have been demonstrated (Phelan et al, 1995; Andresen et al, 2000), the psychometric properties of CANSASP have not been established. The psychometric consequences for these measures of being self-administered by the patient are amenable to evaluation.
Another possible limitation relates to the sensitivity to change of quality of life. Ratings of quality of life were very stable the mean rating on a scale from 1 to 7 was 4.25 for both intervention and control groups at baseline, and 4.27 and 4.20 for these two groups, respectively, at follow-up. This may indicate an insensitivity to change in quality of life an undesirable property in a primary outcome measure. There is some evidence for a quality of life equilibrium from the wider literature on quality of life. Cummins (1995) investigated 16 general population studies of quality of life, and found a uniform population standard between 72.5 and 77.5% of the measurement scale maximum in all studies. The author noted that this is unlikely to be an artefact of the outcome measure since several different assessments were used. One proposed mechanism is the standard drift fallacy, a hypothesis proposing that patients with chronic disorders adjust their standards downwards to reduce the gap between their expectations and their achievements (Katschnig, 1997), leading to higher self-rated quality of life which appears similar to a community sample. However, the mean baseline MANSA score in the FOCUS Study was 54% of the scale maximum: lower than the 75% proposed by Cummins (1995) and not consistent with the standard drift fallacy. More generally, other reviewers have concluded that quality of life changes do occur in general populations, and have specifically shown that changes in quality of life occur for mental health samples in more studies than not (Evans & Huxley, 2002).
Clinical implications
Despite these limitations, this study is the first to use repeated measures
to investigate whether changes in patient-rated unmet need precede changes in
quality of life. Evidence was found that this causal relationship exists, and
that much of the remaining unaccounted variation in quality of life is due to
individual factors which are stable over time. This finding has implications
for the way in which mental health problems are understood, and consequently
how mental health care is provided. This issue is complex, and has been
conceptualised in a number of ways: causation v. meaning
(Bolton & Hill, 1996), idiographic v. nomothetic
(Schafer, 1999), and modernist
v. post-modernist (Bracken &
Thomas, 2001). The framework which will be described here to
illustrate the issue has been proposed by Long & Dixon
(1996). They identified a
spectrum of approaches to understanding mental health problems, ranging from
patient-defined to professionally defined. At the extreme of the
patient-defined end of the spectrum lies an understanding which emphasises the
importance and uniqueness of individual experience, and accords no value to
comparison of one person with another. The philosophical base for this
understanding is post-modernism
(Laugharne, 1999), and notions
of consumerism, choice and user involvement are embraced. Correspondingly, the
concepts of paternalism, professional expertise and mental illness are
rejected. At the extreme of the professionally defined end of the spectrum
lies an understanding which emphasises the importance of using scientific
knowledge to make sense of abnormal mental experiences, and accords no value
to the meaning attached by the patient to these experiences. The philosophical
base for this understanding is positivism, and notions of evidence-based care,
clinical judgement and compliance with treatment are embraced.
Correspondingly, the concepts of patient choice about treatment and the idea
of a continuum of mental health problems are rejected. Most clinical practice,
of course, takes place within these extremes, but the point on the continuum
will influence what interventions are provided, and what outcomes are targeted
for change.
Specifically, if the goal of mental healthcare is to improve quality of life, then this study indicates that practice in mental health services may need to move more towards the patient-defined end of the spectrum proposed by Long & Dixon (1996). Interventions to reduce symptoms will still have an important role, but the characteristics of an evidence-based service will be a focus on the patients perspective in assessment, the systematic identification of the full range of health and social care needs of the patient, the development of innovative services to address these needs, and the evaluation of the success of the service in terms of impact on quality of life. Staff in the service will require a negotiating style in their interactions, balancing what is asked for by the patient with staff assessment of what is in the patients interest, staff assessment of what is in societys interest, and what is available. If the tension between these considerations becomes irreconcilable, then it may be necessary to prioritise the focus on meeting patient needs, by developing approaches to support patients in taking well-managed risks. The service would need to be based on and evaluated against a model of the intended effects of increased patient involvement, and such a model is currently lacking (Crawford et al, 2002).
In summary, this study provides the first longitudinal evidence that high levels of patient-rated unmet need may actually cause low levels of quality of life. This might be because needs are the mediating link between quality of life and all, rather than simply the psychiatric, influences. Some unmet needs cannot be met, because they cannot be directly addressed (e.g. wanting a partner), they cannot be assessed fully (e.g. because the patient refuses to discuss the need), or no intervention is possible (e.g. because the appropriate service is unavailable, or the patient refuses help). However, some needs, once identified through assessment, can be met. Emerging evidence indicates that meeting patient-rated unmet needs should be the starting point for mental healthcare.
![]() |
Clinical Implications and Limitations |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
LIMITATIONS
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Bollen, K. (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
Bolton, D. & Hill, J. (1996) Mind, Meaning and Mental Disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bracken, P. & Thomas, P. (2001)
Postpsychiatry: a new direction for mental health.
BMJ, 322, 724
-727.
Crawford, M. J., Rutter, D., Manley, C., et al
(2002) Systematic review of involving patients in the
planning and development of health care. BMJ,
325, 1263
-1267.
Cummins, R. (1995) On the trail of the gold standard for subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 35, 179 -200.[CrossRef]
Department of Health (1999) National Service Framework for Mental Health. London: Department of Health.
Diggle, P. J., Heagerty, P. J., Liang, K-Y., et al (2002) The Analysis of Longitudinal Data (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, S. & Huxley, P. (2002) Subjective quality of life in the general population. International Review of Psychiatry, 14, 203 -211.[CrossRef]
Hansson, L., Sandlund, M., Bengtsson-Tops, A., et al (2003) The relationship of needs and quality of life in persons with schizophrenia living in the community. A Nordic multi-center study. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 57, 5-11.[CrossRef][Medline]
Katschnig, H. (1997) How useful is the concept of quality of life in psychiatry? Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 10, 337 -345.[CrossRef]
Lasalvia, A., Ruggeri, M., Mazzi, M. A., et al (2000) The perception of needs for care in staff and patients in community-based mental health services. The South Verona Outcome Project 3. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 102, 366 -375.[CrossRef][Medline]
Laugharne, R. (1999) Evidence-based medicine, user involvement and the post-modern paradigm. Psychiatric Bulletin, 23, 641 -643.
Long, A. & Dixon, P. (1996) Monitoring outcomes in routine practice: defining appropriate measurement criteria. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2, 71-78.[Medline]
Mental Health Branch (1997) National Mental Health Report 1996: 4th Annual Report. Changes in Australias Mental Health Services under the National Mental Health Strategy. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services.
Nelson, H. E. (1982) National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test Manual. Windsor: NFERNelson.
Oliver, J. P. J., Huxley, P. J., Priebe, S., et al (1997) Measuring the quality of life of severely mentally ill people using the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 32, 76-83.[CrossRef][Medline]
Overall, J. E. & Gorham, D. R. (1988) The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS): Recent developments in ascertainment and scaling. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24, 97-99.
Phelan, M., Slade, M., Thornicroft, G., et al (1995) The Camberwell Assessment of Need: the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the needs of people with severe mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 589 -595.[Abstract]
Priebe, S., Huxley, P., Knight, S., et al (1999) Application and results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 45, 7 -12.[Medline]
Ruggeri, M., Biggeri, A., Rucci, P., et al (1998) Multivariate analysis of outcome of mental health care using graphical chain models. The South-Verona Outcome Project 1. Psychological Medicine, 28, 1421 -1431.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schafer, M. (1999) Nomothetic and idiographic methodology in psychiatry a historical philosophical analysis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2, 265-274.[CrossRef]
Slade, M. (2002) What outcomes to measure in routine mental health services, and how to assess them a systematic review. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 743 -753.[CrossRef][Medline]
Slade, M., Leese, M., Taylor, R., et al (1999a) The association between needs and quality of life in an epidemiologically representative sample of people with psychosis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 100, 149 -157.[Medline]
Slade, M., Thornicroft, G., Loftus, L., et al (1999b) The Camberwell Assessment of Need. London: Gaskell.
Slade, M., Leese, M., Ruggeri, M., et al (2004) Does meeting needs improve quality of life? Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 73, 183 -189.[CrossRef][Medline]
UK700 Group (1999) Predictors of quality of life in people with severe mental illness. Study methodology with baseline analysis in the UK700 trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 175, 426 -432.[Abstract]
Wiersma, D. & van Busschbach, J. (2001) Are needs and satisfaction of care associated with quality of life? European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 251, 239 -246.[CrossRef][Medline]
Received for publication September 29, 2004. Accepted for publication December 9, 2004.
Related articles in BJP: