Effect of death of Diana, Princess of Wales on suicide and deliberate self-harm

KEITH HAWTON, DM, LOUISE HARRISS, MSc and SUE SIMKIN, BA

Centre for Suicide Research, University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford

EDMUND JUSZCZAK, MSc

ICRF/NHS Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford

LOUIS APPLEBY, MD, ROS McDONNELL, BA, TIM AMOS, MRCPsych and KATY KIERNAN, BSc

School of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Manchester, Withington Hospital, Manchester

HILARY PARROTT, MRCPsych

Department of Psychological Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford

Correspondence: Professor Keith Hawton, Centre for Suicide Research, University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX37JX. E-mail: keith.hawton{at}psych.ox.ac.uk

Declaration of interest None.


   ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHOD
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Clinical Implications and...
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Background The death of the Princess of Wales in 1997 was followed by widespread public mourning. Such major events may influence suicidal behaviour.

Aims To assess the impact of the Princess's death on suicide and deliberate self-harm (DSH).

Method Analysis, using Poisson regression, of the number of suicides and open verdicts (‘suicides’) in England and Wales following the Princess's death compared to the 3 months beforehand, and the equivalent periods in 1992-1996. Similar analysis on DSH presentations to a general hospital.

Results Suicides increased during the month following the Princess's funeral (+17.4%). This was particularly marked in females (+33.7%), especially those aged 25-44 years (+45.1%). Suicides did not fall in the week between the death and the funeral. Presentations for DSH increased significantly during the week following the death (+44.3%), especially in females (+65.1%). Examination of case notes suggested that the influence of the death was largely through amplification of personal losses or exacerbation of existing distress.

Conclusions The death of a major public figure can influence rates of suicidal behaviour. For DSH, the impact may be immediate, but for suicide it may be delayed.


   INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHOD
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Clinical Implications and...
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Major events can influence rates of suicidal behaviour, perhaps through their impact on the degree of integration or cohesion within society (Durkheim, 1897). Some suicides are related to grief after bereavement (Bunch, 1972). Media reporting of deaths, especially of celebrities, can also influence suicide rates (Bollen & Phillips, 1982). The death of Diana, Princess of Wales on Sunday 31 August 1997 was arguably the event which has had the widest effect on public emotions in recent years, and which received greatest media coverage. During the week following her death there was a huge communal outpouring of grief, culminating in her funeral on Saturday 6 September. We have investigated the possible impact of the death of the Princess of Wales on suicides in England and Wales and on deliberate self-harm (DSH) in the Oxford area.


   METHOD
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHOD
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Clinical Implications and...
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Suicides
We obtained from the Office for National Statistics daily counts of deaths which were recorded as suicides (ICD-9 codes E950-E959) or undetermined injury deaths (E980-E989, excluding E988.8) (World Health Organization, 1977) between 1 June and 30 November for the years 1992 to 1997. The data were amalgamated into weekly (Sunday to Saturday) counts.

Deliberate self-harm
All cases of deliberate self-poisoning or self-injury presenting to the general hospital in Oxford, identified through the Oxford Monitoring System for Attempted Suicide (Hawton et al, 1997), were analysed. These data were similarly amalgamated into weekly counts.

Statistical analysis
Poisson regression was used to estimate the extent of any deviation in mortality and DSH following the death of the Princess, compared with mortality and DSH in the preceding 3 months in 1997. To control for seasonal variation and secular trends, including a recent decline in suicide (Kelly & Bunting, 1998) and an increase in DSH (Hawton et al, 1997), any changes were compared with those observed in the equivalent periods in 1992-1996.


   RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHOD
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Clinical Implications and...
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Suicides
In the week following the death of the Princess of Wales the number of suicides was not significantly different from that expected, based on the 1992-1996 figures (see Fig. 1(a)). The overall mean weekly number of suicides over the 4 weeks following the funeral exceeded the expected value by 17.4% (95% CI 4.0-32.6, P=0.01). The excess was particularly marked in females (+33.7%; 95% CI 5.0-70.3, P=0.019), with weaker evidence of an excess in males (+12.5%; 95% CI -2.3 to 29.4, P=0.1). Examination of the data for the 4 weeks after the funeral showed an excess in females during the fourth week (+70.6%; 95% CI 15.6-152.0, P=0.007). There was an excess of suicides in females in the Princess's age group (25-44 years) in the month after the funeral (+45.1%; 95% CI -2.5 to 116.1, P=0.067).



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Mean weekly numbers of suicides and open verdicts in England and Wales (a) and of episodes of deliberate self-harm (DSH) presenting to the general hospital in Oxford (b) in the 3 months before the death of the Princess of Wales, the week following her death, and the 3 months after the funeral; comparison with mean numbers for equivalent periods in 1992-1996. Note: the 1997 values for the week after death are absolute numbers of suicides.

 

The overall increase in the number of suicides in both men and women during the month following the funeral, compared to the number observed during the same period in 1992-1996, was approximately 40.

Deliberate self-harm
During the first week after the Princess's death there was an apparent rise in frequency of DSH (see Fig. 1(b)). The number of episodes of DSH exceeded the expected value by 44.3% (95% CI -3.6 to 116.0, P=0.075). The excess in females was 65.1% (95% CI -1.4 to 176.5, P=0.056), but only 19.6% (95% CI -37.5 to 129.2, P=0.6) in males. During the 4 weeks following the funeral there was no evidence of a major increase in DSH presentations, either overall (+2.0%; 95% CI -19.3 to 29.1, P=0.9) or in females (+10.6%; 95% CI -18.9 to 50.9, P=0.5) and males (-8.2%; 95% CI -35.9 to 31.5, P=0.6), taken separately. However, as found for suicide, there was an excess of episodes in females in the fourth week after the funeral (69.6%; 95% CI -3.8 to 198.9, P=0.068). There were insufficient numbers in specific age groups to conduct an analysis of DSH episodes by age.

Case notes examination in DSH patients
Scrutiny of the case notes for 116 patients who presented to the hospital in Oxford following DSH during the 5 weeks after the death of the Princess, and were assessed by the general hospital psychiatric service, revealed that in nine (7.8%) cases (all involving overdoses) there was mention of Princess Diana's death as contributing to the DSH (Table 1). All but one occurred in the first 9 days after the death. Two-thirds were male. The apparent influence of the Princess's death varied (Table 1), the two most prominent themes being amplification of the impact of other losses, and general distress about the death in the context of other difficulties.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Overdose patients presenting during first 5 weeks following the death of the Princess of Wales and mentioning the death as a contributing factor
 


   DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHOD
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Clinical Implications and...
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We have found evidence of an increase in the number of suicides in England and Wales and of DSH presentations to one general hospital following the death of the Princess of Wales. The increase in suicides contrasts with the reported reduction in suicides in the USA following the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963 (Biller, 1977).

There was no evidence of a decline in suicides in the week following the death of the Princess, as might be expected from apparently greater social cohesion (Durkheim, 1897). The increase in the number of suicides occurred in the month following the funeral, when depressive disorders may have been amplified or precipitated in vulnerable individuals. In contrast, DSH presentations increased substantially only in the week following the Princess's death. Since many acts of DSH are impulsive, one might have expected the impact to be more immediate, and the review of the DSH case notes supports this.

The increase in both suicide and DSH following the Princess's death was mainly found for females. The suicides occurred particularly in the age range which included the Princess's age (36 years), suggesting a specific modelling effect (Bandura, 1973), in keeping with findings for media influence on suicide (Schmidtke & Schaller, 2000). The increase in the number of suicides and DSH episodes in females in the fourth week after the funeral is difficult to explain. The increase in suicides in the month following the funeral appeared to relate to individuals who were in contact with psychiatric services as well as those who were not, since, according to data from the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness (Appleby et al, 1999), there was no change during this period in the proportion of suicides known to mental health services.


   Clinical Implications and Limitations
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHOD
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Clinical Implications and...
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

LIMITATIONS


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHOD
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Clinical Implications and...
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was supported by South East Region NHSE Research and Development Directorate. Professor Hawton is also supported by Oxford Mental Healthcare Trust. We thank Sue Kelly and colleagues at the Office for National Statistics for supplying mortality data, Jon Deeks at the Centre for Statistics in Medicine for statistical advice, and Deborah Ward and Paul Davis of Oxford University Computer Services for assistance with the database.


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHOD
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Clinical Implications and...
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Appleby, L., Shaw, J., Amos, T., et al (1999) Suicide within 12 months of contact with mental health services: national clinical survey. British Medical Journal, 318, 1235-1239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bandura, A. (1973) Aggression: a Social Learning Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Biller, O. A. (1977) Suicide related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior, 7, 40-44.[Medline]

Bollen, K. A. & Phillips, D. P. (1982) Imitative suicides: a national study of the effects of television news stories. American Sociological Review, 47, 802-809.

Bunch, J. (1972) Recent bereavement in relation to suicide. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 16, 361-366.[CrossRef][Medline]

Durkheim, E. (1897) Le Suicide. English transl. 1951. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Hawton, K., Fagg, J., Simkin, S., et al (1997) Trends in deliberate self-harm in Oxford, 1985-1995. Implications for clinical services and the prevention of suicide. British Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 556-560.[Abstract]

Kelly, S. & Bunting, J. (1998) Trends in suicide in England and Wales, 1982-96. Population Trends, 92, 29-41.[Medline]

Schmidtke, A. & Schaller, S. (2000) The role of mass media in suicide prevention. In The International Handbook of Suicide and Attempted Suicide (eds K. Hawton & K. Van Heeringen), pp. 675-697. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

World Health Organization (1977) Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death (9th revision) (ICD-9). Geneva: WHO.

Received for publication December 6, 1999. Revision received April 5, 2000. Accepted for publication April 7, 2000.