Clinical diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies

K. S. Shaji, T. Iype and K. R. Anandan

Medical College, Thrissur-680596, Kerala, India

EDITED BY KHALIDA ISMAIL

It is clinically important to differentiate dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) from other types of neurodegenerative dementias because of the prospect of better response to drugs such as cholinesterase inhibitors as well as the risk of development of neuroleptic sensitivity. However, usefulness of the commonly used definition of DLB (McKeith et al, 1996) remains to be established in community and primary care settings. The findings of the Islington study (Stevens et al, 2002) suggest that DLB is a clinically significant type of dementia in the community.

We had an opportunity to look at the prevalence of DLB in a small but representative community sample of patients meeting DSM—IV criteria for dementia (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) in Kerala, a southern state of India. These cases were identified using a novel case-finding method (Shaji et al, 2002). We identified 33 cases of dementia in the study area with a population of 1979 aged >60 years. A psychiatrist assessed all the subjects at their residence and assigned a DSM—IV diagnosis. Seventeen people with dementia (52%) met criteria for Alzheimer's disease, 12 (36%) were diagnosed as having vascular dementia, while in 4 (12%) the dementia was felt to be secondary to other conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiac failure, Parkinson's disease and subdural haematoma. Three patients (9%) met criteria for probable DLB and one (3%) met criteria for possible DLB when the consensus criteria (McKeith et al, 1996) were applied. The combined prevalence of DLB was therefore 12%. All these patients had earlier met the criteria for Alzheimer's disease as per DSM—IV.

On retrospective application of the separate ‘clinical’ diagnostic criteria used in the Islington study to our case records, only two of our patients met those criteria, reducing the proportion of patients with DLB to 6%. This is strikingly similar to the figure reported in the Islington study. One limitation of these ‘clinical’ criteria is that they are too restrictive a definition of DLB. If visual hallucinations are indeed such an important diagnostic marker, then the consensus criteria themselves could be modified by making visual hallucinations an essential symptom for the diagnosis of DLB. We need to examine whether such modifications will improve the recognition of DLB in clinical practice.

REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn) (DSM—4). Washington, DC: APA.

McKeith, I. G., Galasko, D., Kosaka, K., et al (1996) Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB): report of the consortium on DLB international workshop. Neurology, 47, 1113-1124.[Abstract]

Shaji, K. S., Arun Kishore, N. R., Lal, K., et al (2002) Revealing a hidden problem. An evaluation of a community dementia case-finding program from the Indian 10/66 dementia research network. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 222-225.[CrossRef][Medline]

Stevens, T., Livingston, G., Kitchen, G., et al (2002) Islington study of dementia subtypes in the community. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 270-276.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Submit a response
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me when eLetters are posted
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Shaji, K. S.
Articles by Anandan, K. R.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Shaji, K. S.
Articles by Anandan, K. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals