Integrated in-patient adolescent services

R. Corrigall

Snowfields Adolescent Unit, Thomas Guy House, Guy’s Hospital, 47 Weston St, London SE1 3RR, UK.

R. Refaat

Coborn Adolescent Unit, London, UK

Correspondence: E-mail: richard.corrigall{at}slam.nhs.uk

Gowers & Cotgrove (2003) correctly draw attention to the scarcity of emergency access to in-patient care for adolescents. It is therefore disappointing that they have reported the evidence from Snowfields Adolescent Unit (Corrigall & Mitchell, 2002) – the first unit in the UK to offer an all-beds, 24-hour, 7-day-a-week emergency admission service – in such a misleading way. Gowers & Cotgrove claim that the paper describes a service focused principally on responding to emergencies, but neglecting other aspects of a comprehensive Tier 4 service. This is not true. The service was designed from the outset to be comprehensive, inclusive and adapted to local needs. An emergency admission service was a necessary response to need, not an end in itself, and has not been provided at the expense of other aspects of care. Evidence in the paper demonstrating the comprehensiveness of the service includes the broad range of diagnoses covered, the wide distribution in length of stay, the high rate of admissions with learning disabilities and, most tellingly of all, the very low rate of referral on to other forms of Tier 4 adolescent service. In fact, since publication, the need to seek alternative in-patient provisions has dropped even further. In the past 3 years, out of 189 discharges, only one case has been transferred on to another type of in-patient care as a result of Snowfields being unable to meet the patient’s needs – and that individual went to a specialist adult service (the National Psychosis Unit), not a Tier 4 adolescent service.

The Snowfields approach has now been generalised to other settings, with similar principles having been successfully incorporated into new adolescent services such as the Coborn Unit in East London.

Gowers & Cotgrove call for the establishment of specialist units to complement existing services as an answer to the need for more emergency access, but a failure to rethink existing provision would be a mistake. The Snowfields and Coborn Units have shown that it is perfectly possible to provide an integrated and comprehensive adolescent in-patient service that includes emergency access.

REFERENCES

Corrigall, R. & Mitchell, B. (2002) Service innovations: rethinking in-patient provision for adolescents. A report from a new service. Psychiatric Bulletin, 26, 388 -392.[Free Full Text]

Gowers, S. G. & Cotgrove, A. J. (2003) The future of in-patient child and adolescent mental health services. British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 479 -480.[Free Full Text]





This Article
Full Text (PDF)
Submit a response
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me when eLetters are posted
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Corrigall, R.
Articles by Refaat, R.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Corrigall, R.
Articles by Refaat, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Psychiatric Bulletin Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals