1 Critical Care Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK. 2 MRC Trauma Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 3 Department of Computer Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. 4 North Western Medical Physics Department, South Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester, UK. 5 Critical Care Unit, Hope Hospital, Manchester, UK
* Corresponding author: University Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK. E-mail: m.nirmalan{at}man.ac.uk
Accepted for publication May 4, 2004.
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Methods. We caused ALI in 12 anaesthetized pigs by i.v. injection of oleic acid and removed 10% of estimated blood volume. EVLW, GEDV, ITBV (COLD; Pulsion Medical Systems), , lung compliance and haemodynamic variables were measured at baseline (time 0) and at 30 and 120 min. All animals were volume-resuscitated, followed by measurements at 180 min. A linear equation estimated from the 44 pairs of ITBV and GEDV values in 11 animals was applied iteratively to the four GEDV measurements in the 12th animal, enabling 48 comparisons between measured (ITBVm) and derived ITBV (ITBVd) to be made.
Results. Increase in extravascular lung water index (EVLWi) was associated with significant pulmonary hypertension, worsening of oxygenation and compliance (repeated measures ANOVA; P<0.05). There was good within-subject correlation and agreement between ITBVm and ITBVd (r=0.72, mean bias 0.8 ml; SD 32 ml). Mean error in deriving ITBV from GEDV was 4.5%. (SD 4.2%; range 0.0519%). There were no significant differences in errors in the presence of small (up to 10%) deficits in blood volume (F=1.0; P=0.41).
Conclusions. ITBV estimated by thermodilution alone is comparable to measurements made by the thermo-dye dilution technique in the presence of pulmonary hypertension and mild deficits in total blood volume.
Keywords: blood, volume ; lung, water ; measurement techniques, thermodilution ; model, pig
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The above limitations led to the development of an alternative method for estimating EVLW based on transpulmonary thermodilution alone (PiCCO; Pulsion Medical Systems) by utilizing the linear relationship between global end diastolic volume (GEDV) and ITBV demonstrated in previous studies in which the thermo-dye dilution method was used.89 The central assumption in this approach is that GEDV (total volume of blood in all cardiac chambers) has a constant and predictable relationship to ITBV.9 Since GEDV may be derived using the MTt and the exponential down-slope time of the thermodilution curve alone, the need for IcG dilution is eliminated. ITBV includes both GEDV and pulmonary blood volume (PBV), and therefore the above assumption implies that the relationship between GEDV and ITBV (GEDV+PBV) is constant even in the presence of all physiological derangements seen in critical illness. There is some evidence that this assumption may be flawed in the presence of regional pulmonary hypoperfusion.14 Furthermore, validation studies used9 to develop the model for the derivation of ITBV did not define the severity of lung injury, the state of the pulmonary circulation or the volume status of patients at the time of measurement. In this context it is relevant that one of the early clinical studies that included hypovolaemic patients concluded that significant discrepancies exist between the two techniques (double- and single-indicator dilution techniques) and we cannot recommend the use of single indicator dilution technique to estimate EVLW.10
Pulmonary hypertension in acute lung injury could potentially affect the relationship between GEDV and ITBV. Unrecognized small deficits in total blood volume (seen frequently in such patients) may further contribute to redistribution of blood from pulmonary vascular beds to more central compartments and such compensatory vasoconstriction could also alter the quantitative relationship between ITBV and GEDV. We believe that if single thermodilution technology is to receive wider application in haemodynamic monitoring it is necessary to define the extent of errors in the estimation of ITBV in the presence of the physiological derangements frequently seen in critically ill patients. The present study was therefore undertaken to evaluate the errors inherent in estimating ITBV using the transpulmonary thermodilution technique in a laboratory model of critical illness associated with acute lung injury (ALI) and mild deficits in total blood volume. We compared ITBV derived from GEDV with ITBV measured directly from IcG dilution in pigs with acute lung injury and mild haemorrhage. The temperature and IcG dilution curves used in the analyses were obtained using the thermo-dye dilution technique (COLD).
![]() |
Methods |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
All animals then received an infusion of oleic acid (OA; 0.05 ml kg1) directly into the right atrium followed by the removal of 10% blood volume. The total blood volume was estimated to be 75 ml kg1 in these animals based on previous studies in our laboratory,15 and 10% of this estimated volume was removed in each of the animals using a roller pump. A second set of haemodynamic and EVLW measurements was made after ALI and haemorrhage were established (measurements at 30 min) and the maintenance fluid infusion was stopped. The animals were allowed to remain undisturbed for a further period of 90 min followed by the third set of haemodynamic/EVLW measurements (measurements at 120 min). The animals were then volume-resuscitated over a period of 60 min followed by a final set of haemodynamic and EVLW measurements (measurements at 180 min). The end-points for resuscitation were to achieve and maintain cardiac output above the corresponding baseline values during the resuscitation phase. The experiment was terminated at this stage and the animals were killed by anaesthetic overdose and lungs removed for gravimetric estimation of lung water using wetdry lung weights. The thermo-dye dilution method (COLD Z-03; Pulsion Medical Systems) using duplicate injections of 10 ml cold indocyanine green was used to estimate EVLW at times 0, 30 min, 120 min and 180 min respectively. If the differences in EVLWi between the duplicate injections was >10% a third injection was made, in keeping with current clinical practice, and the two closest values for EVLWi was used in all subsequent calculations. All injections were standardized to the end-expiratory phase of the ventilatory cycle. At each of the above time points other parameters of haemodynamic status and lung function, including cardiac output (using the pulmonary artery thermodilution technique), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and a proxy measure of lung compliance (Cpeak pressure) based on peak and end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures, were measured.
An endotracheal tube with a purpose-built pressure monitoring port was used to intubate the trachea (Mallinckrodt Hi-Lo Jet; size 6.5). An oesophageal balloon (Mallinckrodt, size 8.5) was positioned in the mid-oesophagus and the pressure monitoring ports of both tubes were connected to a differential pressure transducer (Pneu-01; World Precision Instruments, USA) to obtain transpulmonary pressure (TPP) signals. A pneumotachograph (Godart 17212; Gould Electronics, Netherlands) was used for respiratory flow measurements. Transpulmonary pressure and respiratory flow signals were acquired and stored in a personal computer using standard equipment and software (CED 1902, CED 1401 and Spike 2; Cambridge Electronics Design, Cambridge, UK). Tidal volume (Vt) was obtained by integrating the inspiratory flow signals and Cpeak pressure was calculated using the equation [Cpeak pressure=Vt/(peak TPPend-expiratory TPP)], used in similar studies by our group previously.16 Post-mortem examination was carried out in all animals to confirm the presence of ALI.
Statistical analyses and error calculations
All variables were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measurements (general linear model; SPSS 9.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Significant factors were compared further using the 95% confidence intervals (CI) and statistical significance was defined as P<0.05 (two-sided). Within-subject standard deviation (Sw) of duplicate measurements of EVLWi was used as a measure of reproducibility.17 A linear regression equation was estimated using 44 paired measurements of ITBV and GEDV obtained in 11 animals (four sets of values for each animal) and this model was applied to measured GEDV values (at the four time points) of the 12th animal to derive the corresponding derived ITBV (ITBVd). The process was repeated in each of the 12 animals, allowing a total of 48 comparisons between measured and derived ITBV (ITBVm and ITBVd respectively) to be made. The regression equation developed using this technique is not influenced by data from the animal in which the equation will be applied for deriving ITBVd. This out-of-sample prediction technique is in the spirit of the leave one out cross-validation technique.18 ITBVm and ITBVd were compared using within-subject correlation(r) and the BlandAltman plot.19 All data were normally distributed; hence, the mean (SD) and the corresponding 95% CI were used as summary statistics.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The choice of anaesthetic technique has been discussed previously.16 Gravimetric methods obviously provide the gold standard measure of lung water. The most accurate gravimetric method, as described by Pearce and colleagues,21 is not valid in the presence of significant pulmonary haemorrhage and hence was inappropriate for the present study. The wetdry lung weight method unfortunately does not distinguish between EVLW and pulmonary blood volume and hence would in effect overestimate EVLW. Therefore, the percentage of true EVLW detected by the dye-thermodilution technique is likely to be greater than reported in the present study (mean 82%, SD 7%). The severity of lung injury caused by oleic acid is dose-dependent22 and the dose of OA used in the present study was, by design, small compared with other similar studies23 in order to minimize the severity of lung injury. This is reflected in the modest, albeit significant, increase in EVLWi. Since greater blood loss is unlikely to be tolerated in the presence of an OA-induced lung injury, it was decided to restrict the haemorrhage to 10% of circulatory volume. This degree of blood loss, as expected, did not lead to significant changes in cardiac output, stroke volume, ITBV, GEDV or PBV. Even though a small reduction in cardiac output was evident at 30 and 120 min, the differences were small compared with the corresponding baseline values. Table 1 confirms that the animals achieved effective compensation for the relatively small loss in blood volume, with GEDV, ITBV and SV returning to the baseline values at 120 min, even before fluid resuscitation. Mean PBV, on the other hand, remained low at 120 min and returned to baseline values only after volume resuscitation. The absence of significant changes in cardiac output and ITBV is a potential limitation of the present study and may account for the predictable relationship between GEDV and ITBV at 30 and 120 min in spite of significant pulmonary hypertension. In the clinical context, however, larger deficits in circulatory volume or cardiac output are likely to be recognized and corrected as an immediate priority using GEDV (or other measurements, such as central venous pressure or arterial pressure wave oscillations) values before EVLW measurements become relevant. Therefore, the errors introduced by unrecognized mild hypovolaemia and pulmonary hypertension are arguably of greater concern in the clinical application of the single thermodilution technique than similar errors in the presence of gross hypovolaemia. We therefore did not set out to estimate the errors inherent in using this method in subjects with larger deficits in circulatory volume in the present study.
The correlation coefficient between ITBVm and ITBVd (r=0.72) is less than the correlation coefficient reported in two previous studies (0.87 and 0.96 respectively).8 9 Because repeated measurements were undertaken, it was important to determine whether a change in ITBVm was reflected in a corresponding change in ITBVd. We therefore used the within-subject correlation coefficient (r) in order to provide an estimate of the size and direction of changes within each subject. This measure is conceptually different24 from the simple correlation coefficient reported in the two previous studies.8 9 In clinical monitoring, within-subject changes are usually more relevant than absolute values in different subjects, and this is the first study in which within-subject changes in ITBVm and ITBVd have been compared and prediction errors quantified. Lewis and colleagues12 and Wickerts and colleagues25 showed that EVLW measurements determined by the thermo-dye dilution technique were independent of cardiac output and functioned well over the entire range of cardiac output and pulmonary oedema seen in clinical practice.12 Nevertheless, the potential dependence on homogeneous pulmonary perfusion has been cited as an impediment to the widespread acceptance of this technology.26 In fact, some authors have indicated that this method should be validated for the different subgroups of patients in the ICU.26 The PiCCO system, by its reliance on an indirect estimate of ITBV, raises further doubt about the accuracy of EVLW measurements. These issues have not been addressed satisfactorily in the current literature and were the primary objectives of our study. In a similar study, Neumann found a good correlation between measured and derived ITBV.8 This study was carried out in normovolaemic pigs with a single measurement of EVLW before and after lung injury. The present study differs from the Neumann study in many important aspects. First, repeated measurements were undertaken as lung injury evolved and all animals had a 10% deficit in total blood volume at two of the four time points. Furthermore, by applying an out-of-sample prediction technique the present analysis separates the source of the predictive model from the subject in which the actual measurement was made. Our findings are therefore more relevant to the way ITBV and EVLW measurements are made in clinical practice using the single thermodilution technique. The relationship between EVLW and indices of oxygenation has been studied by Hachenberg and colleagues,27 who found no correlation between EVLW and any of the indices of oxygenation. In the present study, however, an increase in EVLWi was associated with an acute deterioration in oxygenation and pulmonary compliance.
In conclusion, this study shows that, even in the face of pulmonary hypertension and small deficits in total blood volume, ITBV may be estimated with reasonable certainty by the single thermodilution technique. The errors inherent in estimating ITBV (and therefore EVLW) in the presence of an ALI and associated pulmonary hypertension were small. These conclusions, however, cannot be extended to situations in which a greater deficit in circulatory volume or regional perfusion defects may be present. We suggest that further experimental studies are necessary to evaluate prediction errors in the presence of circulatory shock associated with major changes in ITBV and GEDV.
![]() |
Acknowledgments |
---|
![]() |
Footnotes |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
2 Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Zeravik J, Pfeiffer UJ. Intrathoracic blood volume accurately reflects circulatory volume status in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 1992; 18: 1427[ISI][Medline]
3 Nirmalan M, Willard T, Walsh K, Columb MO, Edwards JD, Little RA. Haemodynamic monitoring in a combined trauma-hypovolaemic shock model. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 173P174P
4 Halperin BD, Feeley TW, Mihm FG, Chiles C, Guthaner DF, Blank NE. Evaluation of the portable chest roentgenogram for quantifying extravascular lung water in critically ill adults. Chest 1985; 88: 64952[Abstract]
5 Baudendistel L, Shields JB, Kaminski DL. Comparison of double indicator thermodilution measurements of extravascular lung water (EVLW) with radiographic estimation of lung water in trauma patients. J Trauma 1982; 22: 9838[ISI][Medline]
6 Mitchell JP, Schuller D, Calandrino FS, Schuster DP. Improved outcome based on fluid management in critically ill patients requiring pulmonary artery catheterisation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 145: 9908[ISI][Medline]
7 Eisenberg PR, Hansbrough JR, Anderson D, Schuster DP. A prospective study of lung water measurement during patient management in an intensive care unit. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136: 6628[ISI][Medline]
8 Neumann P. Extravascular lung water and intrathoracic blood volume: double versus single indicator dilution technique. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25: 2169[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
9 Sakka SG, Ruhl CC, Pfeiffer UJ, et al. Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 1807[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
10 Schuster DP, Calandrino FS. Single versus double indicator dilution measurements of extravascular lung water. Crit Care Med 1991; 19: 848[ISI][Medline]
11 Mihm FG, Feeley TW, Rosenthal MH, Lewis F. Measurement of extravascular lung water in dogs using the thermal-green dye indicator dilution method. Anaesthesiology 1982; 57: 11622[ISI][Medline]
12 Lewis FR, Elings VB, Hill SL, Christensen JM. The measurement of extravascular lung water by thermal-green dye indicator dilution. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1982; 384: 394410[Abstract]
13 Goedje O, Seebauer T, Peyerl M, Pfeiffer UJ, Reichart B. Haemodynamic monitoring by double-indicator dilution technique in patients after orthotopic heart transplantation. Chest 2000; 118: 77581
14 Schreiber T, Huter L, Schwarzkopf K, et al. Lung perfusion affects preload assessment and lung water calculation with the transpulmonary double indicator method. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27: 18148[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
15 Foex BA, Quinn JV, Little RA, Shelly MP, Slotman GJ. Differences in eicosanoid and cytokine production between injury/haemorrhage and bacteraemic shock in the pig. Shock 1997; 8: 27683[ISI][Medline]
16 Nirmalan M, Willard T, Edwards JD, Dark P, Little RA. Effects of sustained post-traumatic shock and initial fluid resuscitation on extravascular lung water content and pulmonary vascular pressures in a porcine model of shock. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 22432
17 Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ 1996; 313: 744
18 Bishop CM. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press, 1995; 3725
19 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 30710[ISI][Medline]
20 Nirmalan M. Quantifying lung injury in critical illness. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, 2001.
21 Pearce ML, Yamashita J, Beazell J. Measurement of pulmonary oedema. Circulation Research 1965; 16: 4828[ISI]
22 Hinz J, Neumann P, Dudykevych T, et al. Regional ventilation by electrical impedance tomography. Chest 2003; 124: 31422
23 Perchiazzi G, Hogman M, Rylander C, Giuliani R, Fiore T, Hedenstierna G. Assessment of respiratory system mechanics by artificial neural networks: an exploratory study. J Appl Physiol 2001; 90: 181724
24 Bland JM, Altman DG. Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations. Part 1: correlation within subjects. BMJ 1995; 310: 446
25 Wickerts CJ, Jakobsson J, Frostell C, Hedenstierna G. Measurement of extravascular lung water by thermal-dye dilution technique: mechanisms of cardiac output dependence. Intensive Care Med 1990; 16: 11520[ISI][Medline]
26 Boeck JC, Lewis FR. Clinical relevance of lung water measurement with the thermal-dye dilution technique. J Surg Res 1990; 48: 25465[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
27 Hachenberg T, Tenling A, Rothen HU, Nystrom SO, Tyden H, Hedenstierna G. Thoracic intravascular and extravascular fluid volumes in cardiac surgical patients. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 97684[ISI][Medline]
|