Combined nebulization and spray-as-you-go topical local anaesthesia of the airway

K. A. Williams, G. L. Barker, R. J. Harwood and N. M. Woodall*

Department of Anaesthesia, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK

* Corresponding author. E-mail: nicholas.woodall{at}nnuh.nhs.uk

Accepted for publication June 21, 2005.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background. Twenty-five anaesthetists underwent awake fibreoptic intubation using a combination of nebulization and topical local anaesthesia. Plasma lidocaine concentrations were measured and the quality of the local anaesthesia was assessed.

Methods. After i.v. glycopyrrolate 3 µg kg–1 and intranasal xylometolazone 0.1%, lidocaine 4% 200 mg was administered by nebulizer. Supplementary lidocaine to a maximum total of 9 mg kg–1 was applied directly and via a fibreoptic endoscope. Nasotracheal intubation was performed once the vocal cords became unreactive. Heart rate, non-invasive blood pressure and oxygen saturation were recorded at 5-min intervals. Blood sampling commenced with a baseline sample and continued at 10 min intervals until 60 min after final administration of local anaesthetic. Subjects graded levels of anxiety, pain and coughing using written and visual analogue scales.

Results. Conditions for fibreoptic endoscopy and intubation were good. Seventeen received the maximum lidocaine dose of 9 mg kg–1. The average dose used was 8.8 mg kg–1. All plasma lidocaine concentrations assayed were below 5 mg litre–1. Four volunteers reported feeling lightheaded after the procedure, despite normal blood pressure. Of these, two had the highest plasma lidocaine concentrations recorded: 3.5 and 4.5 mg litre–1. Twenty-two of the 25 subjects found endoscopy and intubation acceptable, three found it enjoyable and no subject rated it as distressing.

Conclusions. This method of airway anaesthesia was acceptable to this small group of unsedated subjects. It produced good conditions for fibreoptic intubation. A maximum calculated lidocaine dose of 9 mg kg–1 did not produce toxic plasma concentrations of lidocaine.

Keywords: airway, tracheal intubation ; anaesthetics local, lidocaine ; anaesthetic techniques, fibreoptic ; anaesthetic techniques, laryngoscopy ; toxicity, local anaesthetics


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Awake fibreoptic intubation is often regarded as a cornerstone in the management of the predicted difficult airway.13 The Department of Anaesthesia at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital provides a training course in local anaesthesia of the airway and awake fibreoptic intubation. Anaesthetists act as subjects whilst they learn and practise on each other.45 A technique for topical anaesthesia of the airway was evolved for this purpose; it uses a combination of nebulization and spray-as-you-go topical anaesthesia.

A local anaesthetic technique acceptable to unsedated volunteers undergoing awake fibreoptic intubation may have applications where avoidance of sedation is desirable, when haemodynamic stability is important,6 7 or, as used here, when providing instruction in awake fibreoptic intubation. Though well tolerated, the acceptability of the procedure might be improved by the application of more lidocaine. However, when using this method of airway anaesthesia we have observed symptoms that could possibly be attributed to lidocaine toxicity.5 Therefore, we undertook this study to assess the acceptability of the technique and measure peak plasma lidocaine concentrations achieved.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
After Local Research and Ethics Committee approval, course applicants were sent an information sheet detailing the background, method and risks of the study. Those willing to participate returned a completed consent form. The applicants were accepted for the training course irrespective of their consent to take part in the study. Risks of fibreoptic intubation under local anaesthetic were explained and written consent was obtained for an awake fibreoptic intubation as described previously.5 Subjects were excluded because of pregnancy, hypertension, heart disease, liver disease, epilepsy, diabetes, asthma, a history of epistaxis, nasal problems, allergy to drugs used during the procedure (xylometolazone, lidocaine, phenylephrine, glycopyrrolate) or a current infectious disease.

The subjects fasted for 4 h before endoscopy. The administration of local anaesthetic and performance of endoscopy took place in an anaesthetic room or operating theatre with a full range of resuscitation equipment immediately available. After initiation of non-invasive monitoring, a 20 gauge i.v. cannula was inserted and an infusion of Hartmann's solution was established. Intravenous glycopyrrolate 3 µg kg–1 was administered and two puffs of xylometolazone 0.1% were delivered to each nostril. Over the following 20 min, with the subject sitting upright, lidocaine 4%, 200 mg, was nebulized with an Intersurgical Cirrus nebulizer using oxygen 8 litre min–1 as a driving gas. After nebulization, 2 ml of 5% lidocaine (100 mg) containing 0.5% phenylephrine (Aurum) and 4 aliquots (40 mg) of 10% lidocaine were sprayed into the nose and oropharynx respectively. Endoscopy was then performed in the supine position; supplementary doses of lidocaine 4% up to a maximum total dose of 9 mg kg–1 were administered to the airway via the fibrescope. Most of the drug delivered by nebulization is wasted.8 For purposes of lidocaine dose calculation, it was assumed that 75% of the nebulized drug was lost, therefore only 50 mg of the nebulized lidocaine was included in the dosage calculation.

A 1.1 mm end hole epidural catheter was threaded through the working channel of the endoscope. Proximally this was attached to a three-way tap and an oxygen supply of 1 litre min–1 (Fig. 1A). Lidocaine injected via the three-way tap (Fig. 1B) emerged distally as a fine spray.9 When the vocal cords ceased to react to further lidocaine administration, the endoscope was advanced into the trachea and a nasotracheal tube was inserted.



View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1 (A, B) Configuration of equipment used to deliver a fine spray of local anaesthetic from the endoscope.

 
The weight of each subject was recorded together with the time and total dose of lidocaine and glycopyrrolate administered. The application of local anaesthetic was performed by course delegates under direct supervision. ECG and oxygen saturation were monitored continuously throughout the procedure. Heart rate, non-invasive blood pressure and pulse-oximetry readings were recorded at 5 min intervals. The highest recorded values of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) for each subject were compared with their baseline values and the percentage increase for each subject was calculated.

A baseline blood sample was taken using the i.v. cannula before any lidocaine was administered (T0). The second sample was taken 20 min later, after nebulization (T20). Subsequently, additional topical lidocaine was administered directly and via the endoscope to the lower airway. Further blood samples were taken at 10 min intervals until 60 min had elapsed after the last dose of lidocaine. Two 5 ml samples of blood were drawn via a three-way-tap from the cannula; the first 5 ml, containing dead space fluid, was discarded. Blood samples were then separated in a centrifuge and stored at 4°C. Assays were performed usinghigh-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection accurate to 0.01 mg litre–1.10

After the procedure, all delegates completed an anonymous questionnaire. They graded levels of anxiety, pain and coughing using written and visual analogue scales. Subjects were asked to record any local anaesthetic side-effects they may have experienced.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Twenty-six delegates were studied over a 2-year period. Blood sampling was abandoned in one subject because of poor flow through the i.v. cannula; this subject was removed from the study. In the remaining 25 subjects, fibreoptic endoscopy and nasotracheal intubation were completed.

Continuous oximetry and ECG monitoring revealed no abnormalities. The average increase in MAP was 16.2%, with a range of 1.0–33.3% (Fig. 2). HR values were more variable, with an average increase of 30.2% and a range of 0–158.3% (Fig. 3).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2 Baseline and maximum mean arterial pressure (MAP) in each subject.

 


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3 Baseline and maximum heart rate in each subject.

 
The time from start (T0) to final application of local anaesthetic ranged from 40 to 60 min (T60). Blood sampling continued for a further 60 min. The total duration of sampling ranged from 100 to 120 min (T100–T120).

Seventeen volunteers received the maximum calculated lidocaine dose of 9 mg kg–1. The median dose of lidocaine used was 8.9 mg kg–1, with a range of 7.3–9.2 mg kg–1. All levels assayed were below 5 mg litre–1, a level commonly regarded as toxic.1114 These are represented graphically in Figure 4.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4 Plasma lidocaine concentration in each subject.

 
Four volunteers (subjects 9, 13, 18 and 23) reported feeling lightheaded with no evidence of hypotension. Subjects 9 and 18 recorded the highest peak plasma lidocaine concentrations, 4.5 and 3.5 mg litre–1 respectively. Subjects 13 and 23 recorded peak concentration levels below 3 mg litre–1. Subjects noted other symptoms: these included dysphoria, euphoria, dizziness, nausea and shivering.

All 25 subjects reported endoscopy and intubation to be acceptable; three found it enjoyable. The visual analogue scores for pain, anxiety and coughing/gagging averaged 6.3, 6.3 and 6.5 respectively (where 0 was described as absolutely awful and 10 as enjoyable).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Nebulized lidocaine has been shown to modify the haemodynamic response to fibreoptic intubation under sedation7 11 and to direct laryngoscopy under general anaesthesia.6 We use nebulized lidocaine before topical anaesthesia in order to render subsequent direct application of local anaesthetic more tolerable. This combination of techniques provides effective local anaesthesia for endoscopy and intubation. All 25 unsedated volunteers rated the experience as acceptable. This is supported by their visual analogue scores for pain, anxiety and coughing. However, side-effects such as lightheadedness, dysphoria, nausea and shivering were reported, symptoms suggestive of lidocaine toxicity.

Rapid absorption, or the administration of excessive doses of local anaesthetic (lidocaine), is well known to cause toxicity. The toxic plasma concentration of lidocaine is commonly accepted as 5 mg litre–1,1114 though concentrations of up to 18 mg litre–1 have been recorded without apparent toxicity.15 Side-effects of lidocaine administration1619 are reported to develop when plasma concentrations reach 4 mg litre–1. Early features include tinnitus, lightheadedness and circum-oral numbness. Visual disturbances may occur with a plasma concentration of 6 mg litre–1, involuntary muscle spasms at 8 mg litre–1, convulsions at 10 mg litre–1 and cardiac depression at 20 mg litre–1. The adoption of 5 mg litre–1 as a toxic plasma lidocaine concentration appears to be somewhat arbitrary; however, the acceptance of 5 mg litre–1 as an upper limit affords a margin of safety with regard to serious side-effects, such as convulsions and cardiac arrest.

The highest plasma lidocaine concentration we observed was 4.5 mg litre–1. Only two subjects experienced peak plasma lidocaine levels greater than 3 mg litre–1. Both subjects complained of lightheadedness and of feeling unwell immediately after the procedure. Symptoms coincided with the peak plasma lidocaine concentration observed 20–60 min after the last administration of lidocaine. These symptoms might alert the clinician to limit further administration or indicate the need for continued close monitoring after the procedure.

In eight of the 25 subjects studied, the highest lidocaine concentration was observed in the final sample, 60 min after the cessation of lidocaine administration (subjects 1, 6, 8, 10, 13, 16, 19 and 22). It is possible that plasma lidocaine levels continued to rise in these subjects. However in all eight cases the highest measured concentration level was less than 3 mg litre–1 and the rate of increase was decreasing. The highest plasma lidocaine concentrations were noted in those subjects in whom concentrations increased most rapidly.

Lidocaine pharmacokinetics are complex;18 absorption varies with site and mode of delivery20 and the use of anticholinergic drugs.21 Direct application of an average lidocaine dose of 9.3 mg kg–1 has been used for diagnostic bronchoscopy without clinical manifestations of toxicity,13 although a peak plasma lidocaine concentration of 9.5 mg litre–1 was observed in one subject.

Parkes and colleagues12 reported peak plasma lidocaine concentrations of less than 0.5 mg litre–1 after nebulization of 6 mg kg–1. Mostafa and colleagues11 recorded a peak plasma lidocaine concentration of 1.51 mg litre–1 with the same dose and delivery method. Where many factors influence the absorption of lidocaine, subtle changes in the overall technique, such as the use of anticholinergic drugs or possibly even the position of the subject, may alter the site or speed of absorption. Each method of airway anaesthesia must be assessed independently with regard to local anaesthetic toxicity, particularly where high doses of local anaesthetic are used.

The median dose of lidocaine we used was 8.9 mg kg–1, with a range 7.3–9.2 mg kg–1. It has been estimated that only 8–12% of lidocaine given by a nebulizer will reach the airway as a result of wastage.8 If the nebulized lidocaine is ignored, a median dose of 8.27 mg kg–1 (range of 6.7 to 8.5 mg kg–1) of lidocaine was administered to the airway. This correlates closely with recent guidelines issued by the British Thoracic Society;14 they recommend the total dose of lidocaine applied during bronchoscopy should be limited to 8.2 mg kg–1.

The death of a healthy volunteer from presumed lidocaine toxicity has occurred after fibreoptic bronchoscopy for research purposes.22 23 This may indicate ignorance of the significance of lidocaine toxicity within the medical community. More recently, a report of anaesthetists attending a training course in airway local anaesthesia raises concerns.24 Doses of up to 14.77 mg kg–1 of lidocaine were administered by a spray-as-you-go method; some delegates were reported to have experienced involuntary movements—symptoms which indicate cortical irritability and may precede convulsions.18 19 No involuntary movements were observed with the lower doses of lidocaine used during our study.

In conclusion, a combined method of nebulization and direct application of lidocaine to the airway was acceptable to this small group of unsedated subjects. It produced good conditions for fibreoptic intubation. In this series of 25 subjects a maximum calculated dose of 9 mg kg–1 produced one peak plasma lidocaine concentration of 4.5 mg litre–1 but none greater than 5 mg litre–1. When using combined nebulization and topical anaesthesia for training purposes, calculated lidocaine administration should not exceed 9 mg kg–1.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1 Benumof JL. Laryngeal Mask Airway and the ASA difficult airway algorithm. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 686–99[ISI][Medline]

2 Caplan R, Benumof JL, Berry FA, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: a report by the ASA Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 597–602[ISI][Medline]

3 Ovassapian A, Krejcie TC, Yelich SJ, Dykes MHM. Awake fibre-optic intubation in the patient at high risk of aspiration. Br J Anaesth 1989; 62: 13–6[Abstract]

4 Woodall NM, Barker GL, Harwood RJ. Instruction in awake fibre-optic intubation using the trainees as subjects. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 510

5 Patil V, Barker GL, Harwood RJ, Woodall NM. Training course in local anaesthesia of the airway and fibreoptic intubation using course delegates as subjects. Br J Anaesth 2002; 4: 586–93[CrossRef]

6 Venus B, Polassani V, Pham CG. Effects of aerosolized lidocaine on circulatory responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Crit Care Med 1984; 12: 391–4[ISI][Medline]

7 Sutherland AD, Williams RT. Cardiovascular responses and lidocaine absorption in fiberoptic-assisted intubation. Anesth Analg 1986; 65: 389–91[Abstract]

8 Clay MM, Clarke SW. Wastage of drug from nebulisers: a review. J R Soc Med 1987; 80: 38–9[ISI][Medline]

9 O'Hare D, Harwood RJ, Woodall NM, Barker GL. A method of administering topical anaesthesia for flexible airway endoscopy. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 616[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

10 Nation RL, Peng GW, Chion WL. High-performance liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of lidocaine and its N-dealkylated metabolites in plasma. J Chromatogr 1979; 162: 446–73[Medline]

11 Mostafa SM, Murthy BV, Hodgson CA, Beese E. Nebulized 10% lignocaine for awake fibreoptic intubation. Anaesth Intensive Care 1998; 26: 222–3[ISI][Medline]

12 Parkes SB, Butler CS, Muller R. Plasma lignocaine following nebulization for awake intubation. Anaesth Intensive Care 1997; 25: 369–71[ISI][Medline]

13 Efthimiou J, Higenbottam T, Holt D, Cochrane GM. Plasma concentrations of lignocaine during fibreoptic bronchoscopy. Thorax 1982; 37: 68–71[Abstract]

14 British Thoracic Society Bronchoscopy Guidelines Committee, a Subcommittee of Standards of Care Committee of British Thoracic Society. British Thoracic Society Guidelines on diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy. Thorax 2001; 56: 11–21

15 Patterson JR, Blaschke TF, Hunt KK, Meffin PJ. Lidocaine blood concentrations during fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Am Rev Resp Dis 1975; 112: 53–7[ISI][Medline]

16 Foldes FF, Molloy R, McNall PG, Koukal LR. Comparison of toxicity of intravenously given local anesthetic agents in man. JAMA 1960; 172: 1493–5[ISI][Medline]

17 Howe JP. Local anaesthetics. In: McCaughy W, Clarke RSJ, Fee JPH, Wallace WFM, eds. Anaesthetic Physiology and Pharmacology. New York and Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1997; 83–100

18 Bromage PR, Robson JG. Concentrations of lignocaine in the blood after intravenous, intramuscular, epidural and endotracheal administration. Anaesthesia 1961; 16: 461–78[ISI][Medline]

19 Cass N, Cass L. Local anaesthetics. In: Cass N, Cass L. Pharmacology for Anaesthetists. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1994; 111–7

20 Kinnear WJM, Reynolds L, Gaskin D, MacFarlane JT. Comparison of transcricoid and bronchoscopic routes for administration of local anaesthesia before fibreoptic bronchoscopy. Thorax 1988; 43: 805p

21 Watanabe H, Lindgren L, Rosenberg P, Randell T. Glycopyrronium prolongs topical anaesthesia of the oral mucosa and enhances absorption of lignocaine. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70: 94–5[Abstract]

22 State of New York, Department of Health. Case report on death of University of Rochester student issued. Available from http://www.health.state.ny.us/press/releases/1996/wan.htm

23 Day RO, Chalmers DRC, Williams KM, Campbell TJ. Death of a healthy volunteer in a human research project: implications for Australian clinical research. Med J Aust 1998; 168: 449–51[ISI][Medline]

24 Martin KM, Larsen PD, Segal R, Marsland CP. Effective nonanatomical endoscopy training produces clinical airway endoscopy proficiency. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 938–44[Abstract/Free Full Text]




E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Not all light-headedness is local anaesthetic toxicity
Kar-Soon Lim
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 17 Oct 2005 [Full text]
bupivacaine 0.25% nebulisation for post tracheostomy cough
Manoj Sharma, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 24 Oct 2005 [Full text]

This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
All Versions of this Article:
95/4/549    most recent
aei202v1
E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
E-letters: View responses
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me when E-letters are posted
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My Personal Archive
Download to citation manager
Disclaimer
Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Williams, K. A.
Articles by Woodall, N. M.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Williams, K. A.
Articles by Woodall, N. M.