EditorA 2-yr-old, 17 kg girl presented with episodes of cough and stridor. The chest X-ray was negative. No other significant medical history was reported. A possible diagnosis of foreign body aspiration was made and a bronchoscopy under general anaesthesia was planned.
Anaesthesia was induced with sevoflurane in oxygen 100%, i.v. access was established and a size 2 LMA® was inserted without difficulty. Ventilation was easy, with a leak pressure of 17 cm H2O. A paediatric bronchoscope was introduced through the LMA while the patient was breathing spontaneously isoflurane 1.5% in oxygen 100% but the vocal cords could not be visualizedscore 1 on the Brimacombe scale.1 The LMA was removed and reinserted, ventilation was satisfactory, but vocal cord visualization failed again. At this stage a CobraPLA size 1.5 was inserted without difficulties, ventilation was easy with a leak pressure of 28 cm H2O. The bronchoscope was introduced through the CobraPLA, the cords visualized (score 4 on the Brimacombe scale) and advanced into the larynx. No foreign body was found. The isoflurane was discontinued, the CobraPLA was removed and the patient recovered without complications.
CobraPLA (Engineered Medical System, Indianapolis, IN, USA) is a new supraglottic device that may have some advantages over the LMA: (i) it may be easier to insert than the LMA with no need for any airway manipulation;2 3 (ii) it may be more stable owing to the CobraPLA's head, which lies on the posterior pharynx and does not allow rotation; (iii) it has a good airway seal, permitting use of higher airway pressure in case positive pressure ventilation is necessary;3 and (iv) larger tube diameter and shorter tube length than the LMA permitting positioning of a larger endotracheal tube.3
An LMA is a safe and effective adjunct to fibreoptic bronchoscopy under general anaesthesia in children.4 In one study,5 appropriate positioning, as judged by fibreoptic laryngoscopy, was achieved in 49% of patients. CobraPLA was compared with the LMA and PAXexpress in adult patients, and proved to have a more effective seal and a better fiberoptic score.6 In adults, Akça and colleagues7 found both LMA and PLA gave an equally good laryngeal view. In children, the there are no comparative data available and conclusions cannot be drawn from a single case. Nevertheless, with the new supraglottic devices on the market, anaesthesiologists have another option available.
In conclusion, CobraPLA can be used as an alternative to LMA for flexible bronchoscopy in children under general anaesthesia.
Houston, TX, USA
Footnotes
LMA® is the property of Intavent Limited.
References
1 Brimacombe J, Berry A. A proposed fiber-optic scoring system to standardize the assessment of laryngeal mask airway position. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 457
2 Agro F, Barzoi G, Carassiti M, Galli B. Getting the tube in the oesophagus and oxygen in the trachea: preliminary results with the new supraglottic device (Cobra) in 28 anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 9201[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
3 Agro F, Barzoi G, Galli B. The CobraPLATM in 110 anaesthetized and paralysed patients: what size to choose? Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 7778
4 Yazbeck-Karam VG, Aouad MT, Baraka AS. Laryngeal mask airway for ventilation during diagnostic and interventional fibreoptic bronchoscopy in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2003; 13: 6914[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
5 Rowbottom SJ, Simpson DL, Grubb D. The laryngeal mask airway in children. A fibreoptic assessment of positioning. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 48991[ISI][Medline]
6 Gaitini LA, Somri MJ, Kersh K. A comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway UniqueTM, Pahryngeal Airway XpressTM, and Perilaryngeal Airway CobraTM in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: A1495
7 Akça O, Wadhwa A, Sengupta P, et al. The new perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA) is as efficient as the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) but provides better airway sealing pressures. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 2728