Cardiovascular changes during drainage of pericardial effusion by thoracoscopy

J. A. Fernández*,1, R. Robles1, F. Acosta2, T. Sansano2 and P. Parrilla1

1 Servicio de Cirugía I and 2 Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar S/N, Murcia E-30120, Spain

*Corresponding author. E-mail: jumanjico@yahoo.com

Accepted for publication: June 6, 2003


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background. Cardiovascular changes during drainage of pericardial effusion are not well understood, and most studies are of systemic effects and not of right ventricular performance. Thoracoscopy is not widely used to drain pericardial effusions because of haemodynamic changes in relation to the use of single lung ventilation.

Patients and methods. We studied 16 patients undergoing partial pericardiectomy for pericardial effusion, using videothoracoscopy with a low-pressure pneumothorax (6 mm Hg). Cardiac output was measured by thermodilution with the patient anaesthetized in the supine position before the procedure; in the right lateral position after a low-pressure pneumothorax had been established; and after drainage of the pericardial effusion.

Results. Before the procedure, cardiac output was low and central venous pressure and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure were increased. Systemic vascular resistance and arterial blood pressure were within normal limits. Cardiac filling pressure and pulmonary arterial pressure increased during the pneumothorax. After the drainage cardiac index increased and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances were reduced.

Conclusions. Pericardial effusion reduces right ventricular distensibility, right and left systolic ventricular function, and cardiac output. Anaesthesia with mechanical ventilation and a low-pressure pneumothorax do not affect the circulation greatly. Drainage of the pericardial effusion allows cardiac distensibility to increase and cardiac performance changes to allow increased ejection.

Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 89–92

Keywords: heart, cardiac output; heart, pericardial effusion; heart, right ventricle; lung pneumothorax; surgery, pericardiectomy; surgery, videothoracoscopy


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Pericardial effusion reduces cardiac diastolic filling, depending on the amount of fluid that has accumulated, the speed of accumulation, and the distensibility of the pericardium.1 Most studies of changes in the circulation have concentrated on left ventricular function, and ignored changes on the right ventricle although this is greatly affected by the increase in intrapericardial pressure.2 The effects of the drainage procedure used, particularly during thoracoscopy, are not well understood.

Videothoracoscopic drainage of pericardial effusions requires a good view of the pleural space and pericardial surface during open surgery. This can be obtained by collapse of one lung and selective ventilation of the contralateral lung using an endotracheal double-lumen tube. This has potential risks of right ventricular failure, hypoxaemia, hypercapnia, atelectasis and pneumonia. An alternative procedure is to combine general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation and a low-pressure pneumothorax. This technique can cause complications but these are less than with the open procedure.3 4 We set out to measure the changes in the circulation, especially of the right side, in patients with pericardial effusions who were undergoing drainage of cardiac effusions by thoracoscopy with a low-pressure pneumothorax.


    Patients and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients
We studied 16 patients (10 females) having pericardial resection for pericardial effusion using a video-assisted technique. Patients were studied between February 1995 and May 1998. Four effusions were malignant, two were uraemic, seven idiopathic, two occurred after pericardial surgery, and one was tuberculous. The mean (range) age was 56 (18–60) yr. All patients had symptoms from the effusion such as orthopnea and venous distension.

The study was approved by the ethics committe of the hospital, and patients gave informed consent to the study. Anaesthesia was the same for all the patients. Anaesthesia was induced with the same drugs used as a continuous infusion during the procedure, but given as an initial dose, and maintained with infusions of midazolam 50 µg kg–1 h–1, ketamine 2 mg kg–1 h–1 and fentanyl 10 µg kg–1 h–1. Vecuronium was used for neuromuscular block. Before surgery, we gave 500–700 ml of Ringer’s-lactate to achieve a central venous pressure (CVP) between 15 and 20 mm Hg. During anaesthesia, fluid replacement was with Ringer’s-lactate at 6–8 ml kg–1 h–1 depending on the blood pressure. Dobutamine was used to treat hypotension. Patients were mechanically ventilated with a mixture of oxygen and air (FIO2 0.35–0.5) using a tidal volume of 8–10 ml kg–1, adjusted to give a PaO2 of >13 kPa and PaCO2 between 4 and 4.5 kPa.

The patients were placed on their right side and the surgical approach was through the left pleural space. A 10-mm trocar was placed in the 5th intercostal space, in the posterior axillary line, and a pneumothorax was created with carbon dioxide insufflation to a pressure of 6 mm Hg, with partial pulmonary collapse to allow an adequate view of the pericardial surface. Additional 5-mm trocars were placed under direct vision through the 4th and 7th intercostal spaces in the anterior axillary line. The telescope was passed through the 10-mm trocar, a coagulation/irrigation/ aspiration system (Surgiwand®, Autosuture®) was placed through the trocar in the 4th intercostal space, and holding clamps through the 7th intercostal space trocar. We inspected the pleural space, pulmonary surface and pericardial surface, and identified the left phrenic nerve to avoid damage. Samples were taken of pleural effusions and suspicious pleuropulmonary lesions. A pericardiotomy was performed, the effusion was drained, and a partial pericardiectomy of 10 x 6 cm was done. The pericardial space was then inspected through the telescope. A thoracic drain was placed in the pleural space under direct vision and connected to a suction of –20 cm H2O.

Cardiovascular measurements
Vascular pressures, ECG, and pulse oximetry were measured with a Kolormon–7250 (Kontron) monitor. Right ventricular performance was measured with an ejection fraction (EF) catheter (Swan–Ganz® right ventricular ejection fraction/volumetric oximetry TD catheter and Edwards REF-1 ejection fraction/cardiac output computer, SAT-2 Oximeter/cardiac output computer; Baxter, Edwards, Inving, CA, USA) which has a rapid-response thermistor (95 ms), atrial and ventricular electrodes and four lumens. Calculations were carried out by computer (Explorer®, Baxter).

Haemodynamic measurement technique
The cardiac output catheter was inserted into the right internal jugular vein through an 8.5-fr introducer, advanced so that the tip had entered the pulmonary artery and connected to the haemodynamic calculation computer. Catheterization was completed after the induction of the anaesthesia.

Cardiac output was measured with injections of 10 ml of saline 0.9% at 4°C into the right atrium, through one of the two proximal lumens, just above the tricuspid valve, at end-expiration during mechanical ventilation. We used at least six injections of cold saline per measurement and discarded the smallest and largest value of cardiac output.

Initial measurements were made with the patient supine, after induction of anaesthesia and before starting the surgery, and repeated after positioning in the right lateral position. Further measurements were made after creation of the pneumothorax, and then at the end of the procedure, after drainage of the effusion and removal of the pneumothorax, with the patient supine. Comparisons were made with the previous stage and with the initial measurements. The levels of the transducers were adjusted in relation to the right atrium after moving from the supine to right lateral position.

Statistical analysis
Measurements were compared with analysis of variance for repeated measurements, using a hierarchical factorial design. The principal factor was the surgical stages. Subsequent comparison were with a paired t-test and statistical significance was taken when P<0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
There was no hypotension or arrythmia during the procedure. Expired carbon dioxide, pulse oximetry and inspiratory pressures remained within normal values during the procedure. Table 1 shows the haemodynamic values obtained at the four stages of the procedure. Expected values are also shown.5


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Circulatory measurements at different stages of the procedure. Data are presented as mean (SD). *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001, compared with the previous condition. {dagger}P<0.05; {ddagger}P<0.01; §P<0.001, compared with baseline
 
Cardiac index was less, and CVP and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) were greater, than expected values. Arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) were within the normal range, but systolic ventricular function, both left and right, EF and right/left ventricular stroke work index (R/LVSWI) were below normal.

In the right lateral position significant increases were noted in CVP (P<0.05), PAOP (P<0.01), and pulmonary arterial systolic (SPAP; P<0.01), diastolic (DPAP; P<0.001) and mean (MPAP; P<0.001) pressures. Systemic diastolic (DAP; P<0.01) and mean (MAP; P<0.05) pressures also increased.

During the pneumothorax significant increases in MPAP and DPAP were noted, along with CVP, PAOP, pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI) and SVRI.

After drainage, cardiac index and EF returned to normal and the resistance values decreased appropriately. CVP and PAOP decreased, but remained greater than expected values. Measures of cardiac work suggest that distensibility of the heart increased and contractility decreased.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Pericardial effusion limits cardiac expansion and increases atrial, ventricular, and pericardial pressures. The result is a reduction in cardiac output, and vasoconstriction to maintain the blood pressure.68 In the lateral position, intrathoracic pressures increase because of the distended pericardium and the insufflation of the pneumothorax.

Selective one-lung ventilation provides the best field for surgery,9 10 but not all patients can tolerate the hypoxaemia caused by lung collapse.11 12 Incorrect tube position, absorption atelectasis and hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction can aggravate this situation.13 Hypoxia and hypercapnia may cause acidosis and increase PVRI.1416 Acute failure or dilatation of the right ventricle1719 can further reduce left ventricular filling and cardiac output. Pulmonary collapse can occur, especially in patients with chronic lung disease.911 20 21

Anaesthetic management by simple tracheal intubation and a pneumothorax is technically simple, and partial lung collapse allows a good view of the pericardium. We found that by avoiding complete lung collapse, arterial oxygenation can be maintained during the operation, with few postoperative complications.

The pneumothorax increases cardiac filling pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary resistance by a pressure effect of the pneumothorax on the mediastinum. Venous return is reduced and cardiac output is reduced by 13%. MAP does not change substantially (9%) and peripheral resistance is increased (20%). Cardiac systolic function (SVI, EF and R/LVSWI) does not change with the pneumothorax. We found that a pressure of 6 mm Hg had no adverse effects but provided good surgical conditions. A recent study4 describes reduced cardiac output with a pneumothorax of 10 or 15 mm Hg, but not with a 5 mm Hg pneumothorax.

After drainage, cardiac output is increased and MAP remains practically unaltered. Stroke volume increases because end-diastolic volume increases, although end-systolic volume increases also, so that EF, despite increasing also, does not reach the lower limits of normal.22 After drainage, the right ventricle has an increased preload and reduced afterload, and dilates, which is the main reason for the increase in cardiac index.23

Does removal of the pericardial effusion reduce right ventricular contractility? The decreased contractility, indicated by reduced Emax, contrasts with the increase in right and left ventricular stroke work. The relationship between ventricular stroke work and end-diastolic volume (preload recruitable stroke work) is considered the most appropriate measurement of ventricular function.23 24 A decrease in the Ea:Emax ratio produces a greater ventricular contractile efficiency, as it improves ventriculo-arterial coupling.2427 The decrease in afterload does not prevent the considerable increase in stroke work, as the determining factor is the increased SVI. Cardiac performance increases as the conditions change from a situation of pressure work to ejection work.

In conclusion, in patients with pericardial effusion, right ventricular distensibility is reduced, shown by a disproportionately high pressure in relation to the existing volume, and by impaired right and left systolic ventricular function. A low-pressure pneumothorax during thoracoscopy has little effect on cardiac and respiratory function and gives an adequate surgical field. Drainage of the pericardial effusion increases cardiac distensibility and cardiac volumes.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1 Reddy PS, Curtiss EI, O’Toole JD, et al. Cardiac tamponade. Hemodynamic observation in man. Circulation 1978; 58: 265–72[Abstract]

2 Savitt MA, Tyson GS, Elbeery JR. Physiology of cardiac tamponade and paradoxical pulse in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol 1993; 265: H1996[ISI][Medline]

3 Grichnik KP, Dentz M, Lubarsky DA. Hemodynamic collapse during thoracoscopy. J Cardithorac Vasc Anesth 1993; 7: 588–9[Medline]

4 Brock H, Rieger R, Gabriel C, Polz W, Moosbauwer W, Nececk S. Haemodynamic changes during thoracoscopy surgery. The effects of one-lung ventilation compared with carbon dioxide insufflation. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 10–16[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

5 Rippe JM, Irwin RS, Fink MP, Cerra FB. Intensive Care Medicine, 3rd Edn. Little Brown Company: Boston, 1996

6 Moller C, Schoonber C, Rosendorf C. Haemodynamics of cardiac tamponade during various models of ventilation. Br J Anaesth 1979; 51: 409–15[Abstract]

7 Armstrong W, Schilt B, Helper D. Diastolic collapse of the right ventricle with cardiac tamponade: an echocardiographic study. Circulation 1982; 65: 1491–6[Abstract]

8 Manyari D, Kostuk W, Purves P. Effect of pericardiocentesis on right and left ventricular function and volumes in pericardial effusion. Am J Cardiol 1983; 52: 159–62[ISI][Medline]

9 Kessler RM. Modern diagnostic and therapeutic thoracoscopy. In: Hunter JG, Sackier JM, eds. Minimally Invasive Surgery. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1993; 329–38

10 Inderbitzi RGC, Leisser A, Furrer M, Althaus U. Three years’ experience in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for spontaneous pneumothorax. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107: 1410–15[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11 Horswell JL. Anesthetic techniques for thoracoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 624–9[Abstract]

12 Katz Y, Zissman E, Isserles SA, Rosenberg B. Left, but not right, one lung ventilation causes hypoxemia during endoscopic transthoracic sympathectomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1996; 10: 207–9[ISI][Medline]

13 Rosenberg B, Katz Y, Isserles SA, Baitman B. Near sitting position and two lung ventilation for endoscopic transthoracic sympathectomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1996; 10: 210–12[ISI][Medline]

14 Barker SJ, Clark C, Trivedi N, Hyatt J, Fynes M, Roessler P. Anesthesia for thoracoscopic laser ablation of bullous emphysema. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 44–50[ISI][Medline]

15 Rudolph A, Yuan S. Response of the pulmonary circulation to hypoxia and H+ ion changes. J Clin Invest 1966; 45: 339–405

16 Lake C. Perioperative management of increased pulmonary vascular resistance. Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Update 1990; 13: 1–21

17 Sibbald W, Driedger A. Right ventricular function in acute diseases states: pathophysiologic considerations. Crit Care Med 1983; 11: 339–5[ISI][Medline]

18 Craig A, Rice C. The right ventricle: an emerging concern in the multiple injured patients. J Crit Care 1989; 4: 58–66[ISI]

19 Calvin J. Acute right heart failure: pathophysiology, recognition and pharmacological management. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1991; 5: 507–13[Medline]

20 Hasnain JU, Krasna MJ, Barker SJ. Case conference: case 6-5-1992. Anesthetic considerations for thoracoscopic procedures. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1992; 6: 624–7[Medline]

21 Mack M. Surgical techniques. Thoracoscopy. In: Pearson FG, Hiebert CA, Deslauriers JD, McKneally MF, Ginsberg RJ, Urschel HC Jr, eds. Thoracic Surgery. Churchill-Livingstone: New York, 1995; 1488–509

22 Mangano D, Van Dyke D, Ellis R. The effect of increasing preload on ventricle output and ejection in man: limitations of the Frank–Starling mechanism. Circulation 1980; 62: 535–41[ISI][Medline]

23 Dambrosio M, Fiore G, Brienza N. Right ventricular myocardial function in ARF patients. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22: 772–80[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

24 Karunarithi M, Michmiewicz J, Copelan S. Right ventricular preload recruitable stroke work, end-systolic pressure-volume, and dP/dTmax end-diastolic volume relations compared as indexes of right ventricular contractile performance in conscious dogs. Circ Res 1992; 70: 1169–79[Abstract]

25 Robotham J, Takata M, Berman M. Ejection fraction revisited. Anesthesiology 1991; 74: 172–83[ISI][Medline]

26 Ognibene F, Parker M, Natanson C. Depressed left ventricular performance. Response to volume infusion in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Chest 1988; 93: 903–10[Abstract]

27 Oshita S, Kaieda R, Murakawa T. Effects of nicardipine on ventriculoarterial coupling in humans. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: A128[ISI]





This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me when E-letters are posted
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My Personal Archive
Download to citation manager
Disclaimer
Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Fernández, J. A.
Articles by Parrilla, P.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Fernández, J. A.
Articles by Parrilla, P.