1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and 2 Department of Radiology, Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, 2529 rue Manin, F-75019 Paris, France
*Corresponding author. E-mail: jmdevys{at}fo-rothschild.fr
Accepted for publication: December 5, 2003
![]() |
Abstract |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 899901
Keywords: anaesthetic techniques, regional, peribulbar; complications, diploplia
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
Case reports |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Case 1
A 55-yr-old male (ASA II) underwent an uneventful surgical procedure on the right eye and was discharged 1 h later. The next day, the patient complained of diplopia. Ophthalmologic examination found vertical ophthalmoplegia as a result of paresis of the right inferior rectus muscle. The MRI scan of the orbit was normal. The diplopia persisted and the patient required correction with a prism.
Case 2
A 78-yr-old female (ASA II) with a history of diabetes mellitus underwent an uneventful surgical procedure on the right eye and was discharged 1 h later. The next day the patient complained of diplopia. Ophthalmologic examination found horizontal ophthalmoplegia as a result of paresis of the right lateral rectus muscle, which was confirmed with a Lancaster test. The MRI scan of the orbit found a T2 hyper-intensity signal and swelling of the right lateral rectus muscle, which was interpreted as oedema (Figs 1 and 2). The diplopia persisted and the patient required correction with a prism.
|
|
Case 4
A 54-yr-old female (ASA II) underwent an uneventful surgical procedure on the left eye and was discharged 1 h later. The next day the patient complained of diplopia. Ophthalmologic examination found vertical ophthalmoplegia as a result of paresis of the left inferior rectus muscle, which was confirmed with a Lancaster test. The MRI scan of the orbit found a mild T2 hyper-intensity signal of the left inferior rectus muscle, which was interpreted as inflammatory oedema. The diplopia persisted and the patient required corrective surgery.
Case 5
An 80-yr-old male (ASA II) underwent an uneventful surgical procedure on the right eye and was discharged 1 h later. The next day the patient complained of diplopia. Ophthalmologic examination found horizontal ophthalmoplegia as a result of paresis of the right lateral rectus muscle, which was confirmed with a Lancaster test. The MRI scan of the orbit found a T2 hyper-intensity signal and swelling of the right lateral rectus muscle, which was interpreted as oedema. The diplopia persisted and the patient required correction with a prism.
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Gòmez-Arnau and colleagues2 have recently reported an incidence of anaesthesia related diplopia of 0.25%. They suggest several mechanisms to explain the diplopia: direct needle injury to the muscle eventually causing i.m. haemorrhage, or i.m. injection of local anaesthetics causing direct myotoxicity or elevating tissue pressure thus causing muscle ischaemia. Direct injury to the nerve innervating the paralysed muscle has also been suggested.3 An experimental study conducted on the myotoxic effects of local anaesthetics on extra ocular muscle in primates showed inflammation of the muscles during the first week after injection followed by muscle regeneration in most cases.4 There was no histological lesion in muscles injected with saline thus refuting the hypothesis that elevated muscle pressure could itself cause ischaemic damage.
Cases of post-anaesthetic diplopia are regularly being reported but the precise mechanism of this complication is still unclear. This MRI study confirms that in four out of five cases with post-anaesthesia diplopia there was a large area of inflammation within the paralysed muscle. This is consistent with experimental data.4 Post-anaesthetic diplopia is most probably as a result of an accidental i.m. injection of myotoxic local anaesthetic causing necrosis of the myocytes, inflammation of the muscle and thereby muscle dysfunction. It is interesting to point out that in these four cases the paretic muscle was either the inferior rectus or the lateral rectus situated close to the infero-lateral injection. Case 2 illustrates that although this inflammation is transient (after 5 weeks, there remained no hyper-intensity signal), muscle dysfunction persisted suggesting in this case that myocyte regeneration was only partial. Furthermore, it suggests that MRI should be performed early after the diagnosis of diplopia when T2 hyper-intensity signal is still apparent. In case 1 the MRI performed at day 1 was normal despite confirmed clinical strabismic diplopia. We believe that the muscle dysfunction was not caused by an i.m. injection but rather by inferior rectus intraneural injection as suggested by Hunter and colleagues.3 It is also possible that the muscle dysfunction existed preoperatively.
The MRI investigation of cases 2 to 5 illustrates that post-anaesthetic diplopia is, in most cases, probably a result of direct myotoxicity of an accidental i.m. injection of local anaesthetics, clinically confirming experimental data.4 Performing an MRI early in the case of post-anaesthetic diplopia will determine whether it is secondary to the myotoxic effect of an accidental i.m. injection or whether it could have existed preoperatively.
![]() |
Acknowledgement |
---|
![]() |
References |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
2 Gòmez-Arnau JI, Yangüela A, Gonzàlez A, et al. Anaesthesia-related diplopia after cataract surgery. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 18993
3 Hunter DG, Lam GC, Guyton DC. Inferior oblique muscle injury from local anesthesia for cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 1995; 102: 5019[ISI][Medline]
4 Carlson BM, Emerick S, Komorowski TE, Rainin EA, Shepard BM. Extra ocular muscles regeneration in primates. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 5829[ISI][Medline]