1 Unit of Bone and Soft Tissue Oncology, Division of Oncology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv; 2 Institute of Oncology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, affiliated to Rappaport School of Medicine, Technion, Haifa; 3 Division of Oncology, The Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv; 4 Sharet Institute of Oncology, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein-Karem, Jerusalem, affiliated to Hadassah School of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem; 5 Oncology Clinic, Lin Center, Haifa, affiliated to Rappaport School of Medicine, Technion, Haifa; 6 Institute of Oncology, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv; 7 Sharet Institute of Oncology, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein-Karem, Jerusalem, affiliated to Hadassah School of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem; 8 Unit of Oncology, Nahariya Medical Center, Nahariya; 9 Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, affiliated to The Hebrew University, Jerusalem; 10 Institute of Oncology, Soroka Medical Center, affiliated to Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheba; 11 Unit of Oncology, Ha'Emek Medical Center, Afula, affiliated to Rappaport School of Medicine, Technion, Haifa; 12 Institute of Oncology, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, affiliated to with Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv; 13 Institute of Oncology, Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv; 14 Division of Oncology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv; 15 Division of Oncology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Received 31 October 2003; revised 3 December 2003; accepted 22 December 2003
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Pulmonary metastases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are associated with poor prognosis. Inhalation therapy with interleukin-2 (IL-2) is thus an appealing method for palliation. This multicenter study summarizes the national experience of IL-2 inhalation in patients with lung metastases of RCC.
Patients and methods:
Forty patients (median, 66.5 years of age) with radiologically documented progressing pulmonary metastases were enrolled. All patients had to be able to comply with inhalation technique, and were not candidates for other treatment options. Twenty-eight patients were systemic treatment-naïve. The protocol included three daily inhalations of IL-2 to a total dose of 18 MU. Treatment had to be continued until one of the following occurred: progression; a complete response; a life threatening toxicity; or patient refusal. Response was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) system.
Results:
The diseasecontrol rate reached 57.5%, with a partial response rate of 2.5% and a disease stabilization rate of 55%. Median time to progression was 8.7 months. The main side-effects were cough and weakness.
Conclusions:
Inhalation of IL-2 for the treatment of pulmonary metastases in RCC is feasible, tolerable and beneficial in controlling progressive disease for considerable periods of time. The definition of response of biological therapy may need to be re-assessed and modified: stable disease should be regarded as a favorable response.
Key words: inhalation therapy, interleukin-2, pulmonary metastases, renal cell carcinoma, response criteria
![]() |
Introduction |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Patients
Forty patients (30 males, 10 females) with ages ranging from 45 to 88 years (median, 66.5 years) with a histological or cytological diagnosis of RCC were enrolled. All patients had to have radiologically documented progressing lung metastases, to comply with inhalation technique and were not candidates for other treatment options. Nephrectomy was performed in a total of 32 patients, of whom 17 underwent nephrectomy as surgical treatment of the primary disease. The other 15 patients underwent nephrectomy in the presence of metastatic disease, proceeding on the notion of improved results of consequent immunotherapy. Stage IV as presentation of disease was observed in 23 patients. In the other 17 patients a loco-regional disease was first treated by cure-intended resection of the primary tumor and kidney, and lung metastases developed post-operatively. Time to pulmonary metastases ranged from 0 (for stage IV patients) to 240 months (in case of late relapse), with a median of 10.5 months. Twenty-two patients reported pulmonary symptoms, such as dyspnea, cough and hemoptysis, while 18 patients were asymptomatic. In 15 patients the lungs were the only site of metastases, while in 25 patients the lung plus at least another extra-pulmonary site were involved. The extra-pulmonary sites of metastases were bones in 11 patients, retroperitoneal nodes in six, renal bed mass in five patients, mediastinal nodes in four, viscera (liver, gastrointestinal tract) in two, and skin and soft tissues in three. Previous treatments for metastatic disease included various combinations of systemic chemo-immunotherapy in 12 patients. Twenty-eight patients were systemic treatment-naïve.
Protocol
All the patients signed an informed consent form. Pretreatment evaluation included physical examination, CT studies of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, complete blood count and biochemistry panel. Other ancillary tests were performed on a clinical basis according to signs and symptoms. Treatment monitoring was based on repeated studies that documented the disease extent at baseline, and at intervals of 3 months.
Treatment protocol included three daily inhalations of IL-2 (Proleukin; Chiron Corporation, Emeryville, CA, USA) to a total dose of 18 MU, by using a Salvia Lifetec Jetair 20c inhalator (Kronberg, Germany). The IL-2 was dissolved in 12 ml 5% glucose solution, out of which 4 ml were taken for each of the three-daily administrations. A once-daily subcutaneous injection of 510% of the inhaled dose (0.91.8 MU) was to be given in order to get a systemic effect. This injection was omitted from protocol after the first 10 patients refused to get it because of intolerable systemic side-effects. Treatment had to be continued until progression or complete response or life threatening toxicity or patients refusal. Analysis of toxicity was based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, and that of response was based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) system. All X-ray films and chest CT studies were evaluated by the treating oncologist and by an independent radiologist.
![]() |
Results |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
Discussion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The second point of interest is a tumor control rate of almost 58% achieved in our patients. It is true that the objective response rate according to RECIST was only 2.5%, and was studied only in the targeted pulmonary lesions, while no systemic efficacy could be expected with inhalation therapy. In comparison with the reported results of Huland et al., our true objective response rate was less impressive than their response rate of 2129% [12]. However, the disease control rates were very close: 58% in our series for a median of almost 9 months, versus 68% freedom-from-progression rate for a median of 7 months as reported.
Intravenous IL-2 is regarded by many oncologists as the treatment of choice for selected patients with metastatic RCC, including pulmonary and extra-pulmonary involvement. This mode of administration is much more effective, but more toxic and not suitable for all patients [13]. The mode of inhalation is more tolerable and suitable for most of the patients, even for those with low performance status and co-existing medical problems. Besides, it does not require an intensive supportive care service and can be carried out at the patients home. Inhalation therapy of IL-2 does not substitute for intravenous administration in highly selected patients, but may be applied to almost all elderly patients with co-morbidities, and those with pulmonary-only metastases. Moreover, patients not eligible for systemic IL-2 therapy may be treated with inhalation therapy. Another very important aspect of inhalation therapy is that this mode of treatment preserves the patients quality of life more than every other way of IL-2 administration.
The third point for discussion is the adequacy of the modern system to assess the efficacy of biological treatments. It is accepted that response is determined according to tumor regression in diameter or volume or two-dimensional surface area for a period of more than 46 weeks. According to these criteria, disease stabilization is not regarded as a true response. Several anti-RCC agents (such as thalidomide [14] or troxacitabine [15]) yielded disease arrest without marked overt tumor shrinkage. Some biological reactions or signal transduction steps are targeted and blocked, and the tumor growth arrested. It certainly results from a favorable effect of a drug on the tumor, and should be covered by the definition of a response to biological treatment. The rate of stabilization achieved with IL-2 inhalation was much higher than the spontaneous regression or stabilization of metastatic RCC [3]. This means that in most of the cases with stabilization, the favorable effect resulted from the administration of IL-2 rather than from the unpredictable natural course of the disease. The duration of stabilization was significant and probably led to improvement in survival [12].
Therefore, disease arrest may be regarded as a true response. Consequently, long-term stable disease or a longer time to progression might be a more appropriate treatment end point for biologicals and some of the cytotoxics, than the traditional definitions of response [16]. It should be remembered that from the patients point of view, stabilization, although traditionally defined as no response, is of course better than progression, especially when it is achieved by a treatment with acceptable side-effects.
![]() |
Conclusion |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
![]() |
Acknowledgements |
---|
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
2. Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W. The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1969; 101: 297301.[ISI][Medline]
3. Motzer RJ, Mazumdar M, Bacik J et al. Survival and prognostic stratification of 670 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 25302540.
4. Negrier S, Escudier B, Lasset C et al. Recombinant human interleukin-2, recombinant human interferon -2a, or both in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 12731278.
5. Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, Topalian SL et al. The treatment of 283 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma or renal cell cancer using high dose bolus interleukin-2. JAMA 1994; 271: 907913.[Abstract]
6. Ritchie AWS. Interferon- and survival in metastatic renal carcinoma: early results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 1417.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
7. Fossa S, Jones M, Johnson P et al. Interferon- and survival in renal cell cancer. Ann Oncol 1995; 76: 286290.
8. Huland E, Heinzer H, Huland H. Inhaled interleukin-2 in combination with low-dose systemic interleukin-2 and interferon in patients with pulmonary metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: effectiveness and toxicity of mainly local treatment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1994; 120: 221228.[ISI][Medline]
9. Nakamoto T, Kasaoka Y, Mitani S, Usui T. Inhalation of interleukin-2 combined with subcutaneous administration of interferon for the treatment of pulmonary metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 1997; 4: 343348.[Medline]
10. Huland E, Heinzer H, Mir TS, Huland H. Inhaled interleukin-2 therapy in pulmonary metastatic renal cell carcinoma: six years of experience. Cancer J Sci Am 1997; 3 (Suppl 1): S98S105.[Medline]
11. Putnam JB Jr. New and evolving treatment methods for pulmonary metastases. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 14: 4956.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Huland E, Heinzer H, Huland H, Yung R. Overview of interleukin-2 inhalation therapy. Cancer J Sci Am 2000; 6 (Suppl 1): S104S112.[Medline]
13. Fyfe G, Fisher RI, Rosenberg SA et al. Results of treatment of 255 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 688696.[Abstract]
14. Motzer RJ, Berg W, Ginsberg M et al. Phase II trial of thalidomide for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 302306.
15. Townsley CA, Chi K, Ernst DS et al. National Cancer Institute of CanadaClinical Trials Group. Phase II study of troxacitabine (BCH-4556) in patients with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a trial of the National Cancer Institute of CanadaClinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 15241529.
16. Korn EL, Arbuck SG, Pluda JM et al. Clinical trial designs for cytostatic agents: are new approaches needed? J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 265272.