RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DOPAMINE D2 RECEPTOR-ASSOCIATED RESPONSES AND OPERANT ETHANOL SELF-ADMINISTRATION IN THE RAT: A FACTOR ANALYSIS

Artur Rogowski1, Dariusz Rokicki2, Wojciech Kostowski1,3 and Przemyslaw Bienkowski1,*

1 Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Sobieskiego 9 St., PL-02957 Warszawa,
2 Medagro International, Warszawa and
3 Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Warsaw Medical Academy, Warszawa, Poland

Received 4 November 2002; in revised form 15 January 2003; accepted 10 February 2003


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Aims: To characterize the relationship between dopamine D2 receptor-associated responses and operant ethanol self-administration in Wistar rats. Methods: Thirty-two rats were first tested for apomorphine-induced sniffing and raclopride-induced catalepsy. Subsequently, the same subjects were initiated to lever press for ethanol in the sucrose-fading procedure. The subjects were allowed to respond for 8% v/v ethanol for 20 days. A factor analysis was used to characterize the relationship between D2-associated responses and parameters of sucrose and ethanol self-administration. Results: The analysis revealed three factors accounting for 88.3% of the total variability. The first factor comprised only parameters of ethanol-reinforced behaviour. Parameters of sucrose self-administration and cataleptic responses to raclopride loaded heavily on the second and third factors, respectively. None of the factors comprised apomorphine-induced stereotypy. Conclusions: It appears that there is no relationship between apomorphine-induced sniffing, raclopride-induced catalepsy and operant responding for ethanol in Wistar rats. Our results, combined with previous reports, suggest that D2 receptors are not primarily involved in the regulation of ethanol reinforcement.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Brain dopamine receptors are thought to play an important role in the regulation of drug self-administration. It is widely accepted that the dopamine D1- and D2-like receptor families both mediate the positive reinforcing properties of psychostimulants (for a review see Self and Nestler, 1995Go; Wise, 1998Go; Tzschentke, 2001Go). However, in the case of alcohol (ethanol) the situation is less clear. In most studies, the effects of dopamine D2 receptor ligands on ethanol self-administration were either small in magnitude or non-selective (Lyness and Smith, 1992Go; Goodwin et al., 1996Go; Silvestre et al., 1996Go; Samson and Chappell, 1999Go).

Both animals and humans demonstrate marked individual differences in their propensity to ethanol self-administration (e.g. Cloninger et al., 1988Go; Piazza et al., 1989Go; Kampov-Polevoy et al., 1999Go). Several preclinical and clinical studies aimed to identify trait markers for excessive alcohol intake (Bisaga and Kostowski, 1993Go; Salimov, 1999Go; Scinska et al., 2001Go; Bienkowski et al., 2001Go; for a review see Farren and Tipton, 1999Go). In this respect, D2 receptors received much attention, since it has been reported that the TaqI A minor allele of the DRD2 gene (A1 allele) may be associated with alcohol dependence (Blum et al., 1991Go; Noble, 2000Go). Binding studies have revealed that the A1 allele predicts low D2 receptor availability in the human brain (Thompson et al., 1997Go; Pohjalainen et al., 1998Go). Animal studies have also provided some support for the relationship between D2 receptor function and alcohol drinking behaviour. Cools and co-workers have shown that rats genetically selected for low susceptibility to a non-selective D1/D2 receptor agonist, apomorphine, consumed more alcohol in a two-bottle choice procedure than rats selected towards high susceptibility to apomorphine (Cools and Gingras, 1998Go; Sluyter et al., 2000Go). In contrast, no relationship between apomorphine-induced stereotypy and subsequent ethanol drinking in another non-operant two-bottle choice procedure was found by Bisaga and Kostowski (1993)Go.

The relationship between non-operant ethanol drinking and operant ethanol self-administration is still unclear. For example, it has been reported that rats avoiding alcohol in the two-bottle choice test may be successfully initiated to lever press for an alcohol solution in an operant oral self-administration procedure (George and Ritz, 1993Go; Koros et al., 1999bGo). Given the above, we aimed to further characterize the relationship between D2 receptor-associated responses and ethanol self-administration. For this purpose, apomorphine-induced sniffing and raclopride (a D2 receptor antagonist)-induced catalepsy were assessed in male Wistar rats. It has been shown that both apomorphine-induced sniffing and raclopride-induced catalepsy are mediated by dopamine D2 receptors (Köhler et al., 1985Go; Ögren et al., 1986Go; De Keyser et al., 1995Go; Rajakumar et al., 1997Go; Germeyer et al., 2002Go). Subsequently, lever pressing for ethanol was initiated in a procedure where increasing concentrations of ethanol were introduced in the presence of sucrose (Samson, 1986Go; Bienkowski et al., 1999Go, 2001Go). A factor analysis was used to characterize relationships between these behavioural parameters.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects
Thirty-two male Wistar rats weighing 300–400 g at the beginning of the study were housed two per cage. The subjects were kept in a room under standard environmental conditions (22 ± 1°C, relative humidity of 60%, 12 h–12 h light–dark cycle with lights on at 07:00 h). The animals were supplied by a breeder (Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland) 2 weeks before the onset of the experiments. During this time, the subjects were weighed and handled several times. Standard laboratory chow (Labofeed H, WPIK, Kcynia, Poland) was available ad libitum. Tap water was always available, except as noted below.

Treatment of the rats in the present study was in full accordance with the ethical standards laid down in respective Polish and European (directive No. 86/609/EEC) regulations. All procedures were reviewed and approved by an ethics committee on animal studies.

Raclopride-induced catalepsy
Before the evaluation of the D2 receptor-associated responses, the rats were repeatedly familiarized with a horizontal wooden bar and an observational cage used for measurement of raclopride-induced catalepsy and apomorphine-induced sniffing, respectively. Raclopride-induced catalepsy was assessed first. Four days later, apomorphine-induced sniffing was evaluated in the same rats.

Catalepsy was observed 30, 60 and 90 min after administration of 1 mg/kg raclopride (Ögren et al., 1986Go; Wadenberg and Ahlenius, 1991Go). Cataleptic responses were determined by a modification of the bar method (Undie and Friedman, 1988Go). Each rat was placed on a clean, smooth table with the wooden bar suspended 10 cm above the working surface. The animal’s front paws were gently placed over the bar. The length of time (in seconds) the animal touched the bar with both front paws was measured up to a pre-set cut-off time of 180 s. Cataleptic responses were averaged across the three observation times.

Apomorphine-induced stereotypy
Apomorphine-induce sniffing was assessed in the rectangular cage (height x width x length: 25 x 25 x 42 cm) with wooden chip bedding on the floor. Twenty minutes after administration of 0.5 mg/kg apomorphine, each rat was placed in the observational cage and its sniffing behaviour was recorded for 30 min using a video camera (Ögren et al., 1986Go; Kostowski and Krzascik, 1989Go).

Operant oral ethanol self-administration
Ethanol-reinforced behaviour was studied in eight standard operant chambers (Coulbourn Instruments, Inc., Allentown, PA, USA). The chambers consisted of modular test cages placed inside sound-attenuating cubicles with ventilation fans and background white noise (for details see Bienkowski et al., 1999Go). A white house light was centred near the top of the front of the cage. The start of test sessions was signalled by turning the house light on. The cage was also equipped with two response levers, separated by a liquid delivery system (a liquid dipper; Coulbourn Instruments, Inc.). Only one lever (an ‘active’ lever) activated the liquid dipper. Presses on the other lever (an ‘inactive’ lever) were recorded but not reinforced. The liquid delivery system presented a respective fluid in a 0.1 ml portion for 5 s. The availability of reinforcer was signalled by a brief audible click and a white light (4 W) located inside the liquid dipper hole. The programming of each session as well as data recording were based on the L2T2 Software package (Coulbourn Instruments, Inc.) running on an IBM-compatible PC.

The self-administration procedure started 10 days after the assessment of apomorphine-induced sniffing. The rats were trained to respond for 8% v/v ethanol according to the sucrose-fading procedure (Samson, 1986Go) with some modifications (Bienkowski et al., 1999Go, 2001Go). All sessions were 30 min long and there was only one session daily (Monday to Friday).

The whole procedure consisted of four phases. During the first 4 days of training, the animals were deprived of water for 22 h a day and shaped to lever press for water according to a fixed ratio 1 (FR1) schedule of reinforcement (Phase 1). As soon as the lever pressing was established (≥100 presses on the ‘active’ lever/30 min), tap water became freely available in the home cages.

During days 5–6, the animals received 8% w/v sucrose (Phase 2). Then, over the next 14 sessions (sucrose fading; Phase 3), ethanol concentrations were gradually increased from 0 to 8%, and sucrose concentrations were decreased from 8 to 0%. The rats were given the following combinations of ethanol and sucrose solutions: 2.5% ethanol/8% sucrose (1 day); 5% ethanol/8% sucrose (2 days); 6.5% ethanol/8% sucrose (2 days); 8% ethanol/6% sucrose (2 days); 8% ethanol/4% sucrose (2 days); 8% ethanol/2% sucrose (2 days); and 8% ethanol/1% sucrose (3 days).

The subjects were then allowed to make their 8% ethanol consumption stable during the next 20 days (8% ethanol self-administration; Phase 4).

Drugs
Raclopride and apomorphine (both from Sigma, Poznan, Poland) were dissolved in sterile distilled water and administered intraperitoneally in a volume of 1 ml/kg. Raclopride and apomorphine solutions were prepared immediately prior to use and protected from light. Sucrose and ethanol (95% rectified spirit; Polmos, Zielona Gora, Poland) used in the self-administration procedure were dissolved in tap water. The solutions were prepared daily and stored at room temperature.

Data analysis
The ‘active’ lever responding (lever presses/30 min) was averaged across the 2 days of 8% sucrose availability (Phase 2) and across days 1–5, 6–10, 11–15 and 16–20 of 8% ethanol self-administration (Phase 4). Sucrose (ml/kg/30 min; Phase 2) and ethanol (g/kg/30 min; Phase 4) intakes were estimated by measuring the amount of solution remaining in the dipper after the self-administration session.

A principal components factor analysis with varimax rotation (Salimov, 1999Go) was run for 12 variables, i.e. raclopride-induced catalepsy, apomorphine-induced sniffing, responding for and intake of 8% sucrose, and responding for and intake of 8% ethanol in the four successive weeks of Phase 4. All variables included in the factor analysis were independent and normally distributed. The Statistica software package for Windows (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA) was used to analyse all data.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Table 1Go presents the basic characteristics of raclopride-induced catalepsy, apomorphine-induced sniffing, and 8% sucrose and 8% ethanol self-administration. Individual responding on the ‘active’ lever averaged across the 5 day periods of ethanol availability ranged from 0.3 to 99.4 responses/30 min. Ethanol consumption ranged from 0.01 to 1.5 g/kg/30 min. Responding on the ‘inactive’ lever was always marginal and ranged from 0 to 2.4 responses/30 min. The pattern of ethanol consumption in the present study followed that found in our previous experiments (Bienkowski et al., 1999Go, 2001Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Raclopride-induced catalepsy, apomorphine-induced sniffing, 8% sucrose (Phase 2) and 8% ethanol self-administration (Phase 4) in Wistar rats (n = 32 rats)
 
Table 2Go presents a full matrix of correlations between the behavioural parameters included in the factor analysis. The factor analysis revealed three factors accounting for 88.3% of the total variability (Table 3Go). The first factor (‘ethanol self-administration’) comprised the parameters of ethanol-reinforced behaviour. The second factor (‘sucrose self-administration’) comprised the parameters of sucrose-reinforced behaviour. Cataleptic responses to raclopride loaded on the third factor (‘raclopride catalepsy’). Apomorphine-induced stereotypy was not associated with the other variables.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. A matrix of correlations (Pearson’s r values) between parameters used in a factor analysis (n = 32 rats)
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. A principal components factor analysis of raclopride-induced catalepsy, apomorphine-induced sniffing, 8% sucrose self-administration (Phase 2) and 8% ethanol self-administration (days 1–20, Phase 4) (n = 32 rats)
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The present study examined the relationship between the D2-associated behavioural responses and ethanol-reinforced behaviour initiated in the sucrose-fading procedure. The factor analysis indicated no consistent relationship between apomorphine-induced sniffing, raclopride-induced catalepsy and operant ethanol self-administration. The results of the present study are in agreement with our previous report (Bisaga and Kostowski, 1993Go) that apomorphine-induced stereotypy did not correlate with non-operant two-bottle choice alcohol drinking. In this respect, our findings support several previous reports indicating marginal, if any, role of D2 receptors in the reinforcing properties of ethanol in rodents (Risinger et al., 1992Go; Goodwin et al., 1996Go; Silvestre et al., 1996Go; Samson and Chappell, 1999Go; Nowak et al., 2000Go; but see also Samson et al., 1993Go; Salimov et al., 2000Go).

The results of factor analysis were at variance with the reports of Cools and co-workers (Cools and Gingras, 1998Go; Sluyter et al., 2000Go; see Introduction); however, one should bear in mind that a non-operant ethanol drinking procedure was used in these latter studies. In another study on this topic, Behnert et al.(1987)Go analysed the relationship between ethanol drinking and subsequent behavioural reactivity to apomorphine. The authors have reported that apomorphine-induced stereotypy did not differ between alcohol-preferring and alcohol-naive rats. More recently, Samson and Chappell (1995)Go have reported no correlation between amphetamine-induced locomotion and non-operant ethanol intake. As mentioned in the Introduction, clinical studies have suggested some association between the A1 allele of DRD2 gene and alcohol dependence (e.g. Blum et al., 1991Go). However, the most recent large family-based study (the COGA project) was negative (Edenberg et al., 1998Go). Taken together, the present and previous studies suggest that D2-associated responses may not serve as predictors of ethanol self-administration.

It can be argued that the behavioural responses assessed in the present study were associated with D2 receptors located in the dorsal striatum (Arnt, 1985Go; Klockgether et al., 1988Go), while it is dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens that plays a specific role in drug reinforcement (Wise, 1998Go). However, D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens may also contribute to cataleptic responses induced by dopamine antagonists (Al-Khatib et al., 1989Go; Ossowska et al., 1990Go). Similarly, various stereotypical responses, including apomorphine-induced sniffing, may depend on both striatal and accumbal dopamine transmission (Arnt, 1985Go; Bradberry et al., 1991Go). On the other hand, selective lesions of mesolimbic dopaminergic neurones with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) failed to alter either free-choice ethanol drinking or operant responding for ethanol (Lyness and Smith, 1992Go; Rassnick et al., 1993Go; Ikemoto et al., 1997Go; Koistinen et al., 2001Go). Notably, Ikemoto et al.(1997)Go have shown that although the 6-OHDA lesion did not alter ethanol consumption in rats that had prior experience with ethanol, it slowed the acquisition of ethanol preference in subjects with no ethanol-drinking history. In two of the above studies, genetically selected alcohol-preferring rats served as subjects (Ikemoto et al., 1997Go; Koistinen et al., 2001Go).

The results of the present study and the data cited above do not exclude the possibility that other dopamine receptor subtypes play a more prominent role in the regulation of alcohol reinforcement. For example, D1 receptors seem to be related to addictive behaviours in general (Self and Nestler, 1995Go; Cohen et al., 1999Go; Farren and Tipton, 1999Go) and D3 receptors may be preferentially involved in operant ethanol self-administration in rats (Cohen et al., 1998Go).

The absence of a consistent relationship between operant responding for 8% sucrose and 8% ethanol was not surprising. Contrary to previous suggestions (for a review see Kampov-Polevoy et al., 1999Go), sweets preference predicted neither long-term two-bottle choice alcohol intake in Wistar rats (Koros et al., 1998Go, 1999aGo) nor the risk of alcohol dependence in humans (Bogucka-Bonikowska et al., 2001Go; Scinska et al., 2001Go). In a more recent study, Rogowski et al.(2002)Go assessed correlations between parameters of operant sucrose and ethanol self-administration in the sucrose-fading procedure. As in the present study, the factor analysis did not show any relationship between sucrose- and ethanol-reinforced behaviour.

The present experiment and other studies of correlations between drug-induced responses and ethanol self-administration may be confounded by ‘carry-over’ effect(s). One may hypothesize that even a single exposure to a test drug (apomorphine and raclopride in the present study) may alter subsequent initiation of ethanol self-administration. Although the risk of such carry-over effects cannot be fully avoided, one may address this problem by including in future studies an additional control group pre-treated with respective drug vehicles.

A highly significant correlation between responding on the ‘active’ lever and ethanol consumption (in g/kg) was found in the present and previous studies from our laboratory. Although it has been shown that these measures may predict alcohol concentration in the animal’s body, correlations between lever pressing, alcohol intake and blood alcohol levels are not perfect (Suzuki et al., 1988Go; Czachowski et al., 1999Go). Thus, assessment of blood alcohol levels could increase the validity of future experiments on the relationship between receptor-mediated behavioural responses and ethanol self-administration.

In conclusion, there is no consistent relationship between apomorphine-induced sniffing, raclopride-induced catalepsy and operant responding for ethanol in Wistar rats. Our results, combined with previous reports, suggest that D2 receptors are not primarily involved in the regulation of ethanol reinforcement.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported in part by PARPA (grant No. Alc 1/01) and the State Committee for Scientific Research (grant No. PBZ-KBN-033/P05/2002).


    FOOTNOTES
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Sobieskiego 9 St., PL-02957 Warsaw, Poland. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 FOOTNOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Al-Khatib, I. M., Fujiwara, M. and Ueki, S. (1989) Relative importance of the dopaminergic system in haloperidol-catalepsy and the anticataleptic effect of antidepressants and methamphetamine in rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 33, 93–97.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Arnt, J. (1985) Antistereotypic effects of dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists after intrastriatal injections in rats. Pharmacological and regional specificity. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology 330, 97–104.

Behnert, P., Keller, G. and Andreas, K. (1987) Ethanol preference and stereotype behavior of rats. Biomedica et Biochemica Acta 46, 841–844.

Bienkowski, P., Kostowski, W. and Koros, E. (1999) The role of drug-paired stimuli in extinction and reinstatement of ethanol-seeking behaviour in the rat. European Journal of Pharmacology 374, 315–319.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Bienkowski, P., Koros, E. and Kostowski, W. (2001) Novelty-seeking behaviour and operant oral ethanol self-administration in Wistar rat. Alcohol and Alcoholism 36, 525–528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bisaga, A. and Kostowski, W. (1993) Individual behavioral differences and ethanol consumption in Wistar rats. Physiology and Behavior 54, 1225–1131.

Blum, K., Noble, E. P., Sheridan, P. J., Finley, O., Montgomery, A., Ritchie, T., Ozkaragoz, T., Fitch, R. J., Sadlack, F., Sheffield, D., Dahlmann, T., Halbardier, S. and Nogami, H. (1991) Association of the A1 allele of the D2 dopamine receptor gene with severe alcoholism. Alcohol 8, 409–416.[ISI][Medline]

Bogucka-Bonikowska, A., Scinska, A., Koros, E., Polanowska, E., Habrat, B., Woronowicz, B., Kukwa, A., Kostowski, W. and Bienkowski, P. (2001) Taste responses in alcohol-dependent men. Alcohol and Alcoholism 36, 516–519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bradberry, C. W., Gruen, R., Berridge, C. W. and Roth, R. M. (1991) Individual differences in behavioral measures: correlations with nucleus accumbens dopamine measured by microdialysis. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 39, 877–882.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Cloninger, C. R., Sigvardsson, S. and Bohman, M. (1988) Childhood personality predicts alcohol abuse in young adults. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 12, 494–505.[ISI][Medline]

Cohen, C., Perrault, G. and Sanger, D. J. (1998) Preferential involvement of D3 versus D2 receptors in the effects of dopamine receptor ligands on oral self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 140, 478–485.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Cohen, C., Perrault, G. and Sanger, D. J. (1999) Effects of D1 dopamine receptor agonists on oral ethanol self-administration in rats: comparison with their efficacy to produce grooming and hyperactivity. Psychopharmacology 142, 102–110.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Cools, A. R. and Gingras, M. A. (1998) Nijmegen high and low responders to novelty: a new tool in the search after the neurobiology of drug abuse liability. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 60, 151–159.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Czachowski, C. L., Samson, H. H. and Denning, C. E. (1999) Blood ethanol concentrations in rats drinking sucrose/ethanol solutions. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 23, 1331–1335.[ISI][Medline]

De Keyser, J., De Backer, J. P., Wilczak, N. and Herroelen, L. (1995) Dopamine agonists used in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease and their selectivity for the D1, D2, and D3 dopamine receptors in human striatum. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 19, 1147–1154.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Edenberg, H. J., Foroud, T., Koller, D. L., Goate, A., Rice, J., van Eerdewegh, P., Reich, T. et al. (1998) A family-based analysis of the association of the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) with alcoholism. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 22, 505–512.[ISI][Medline]

Farren, C. K. and Tipton, K. F. (1999) Trait markers for alcoholism: clinical utility. Alcohol and Alcoholism 34, 649–665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

George, F. R. and Ritz, M. C. (1993) A psychopharmacology of motivation and reward related to substance abuse treatment. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 1, 7–26.[CrossRef]

Germeyer, S., Birke, A., Schmitt, U., Dahmen, N., Hiemke, C. and Havemann-Reinecke, U. (2002) New dopamine D2 receptor polymorphisms in rats and association with apomorphine-induced stereotypies. Brain Research 926, 1–9.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Goodwin, F. L., Koechling, U. M., Smith, B. R. and Amit, Z. (1996) Lack of effect of dopamine D2 blockade on ethanol intake in selected and unselected strains of rats. Alcohol 13, 273–279.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Ikemoto, S., McBride, W. J., Murphy, J. M., Lumeng, L. and Li, T.-K. (1997) 6-OHDA-lesions of the nucleus accumbens disrupt the acquisition but not the maintenance of ethanol consumption in the alcohol-preferring P line of rats. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 21, 1042–1046.[ISI][Medline]

Kampov-Polevoy, A. B., Garbutt, J. C. and Janowsky, D. S. (1999) Association between preference for sweets and excessive alcohol intake: a review of animal and human studies. Alcohol and Alcoholism 34, 386–395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Klockgether, T., Schwarz, M., Turski, L. and Sontag, K. H. (1988) Catalepsy after microinjection of haloperidol into the rat medial prefrontal cortex. Experimental Brain Research 70, 445–447.[ISI][Medline]

Köhler, Ch., Hall, H., Ögren, S. O. and Gavell, L. (1985) Specific binding of 3H-raclopride, a potent substituted benzamide drug with high affinity for dopamine D2 receptors in the rat brain. In vivo and in vitro studies. Biochemical Pharmacology 34, 2251–2259.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Koistinen, M., Tuomainen, P., Hyytia, P. and Kiianmaa, K. (2001) Naltrexone suppresses ethanol intake in 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 25, 1605–1612.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Koros, E., Piasecki, J., Kostowski, W. and Bienkowski, P. (1998) Saccharin drinking rather than open field behaviour predicts ethanol acceptance in Wistar rats. Alcohol and Alcoholism 33, 131–140.[Abstract]

Koros, E., Kostowski, W. and Bienkowski, P. (1999a) Development of alcohol deprivation effect in rats: lack of correlation with saccharin drinking and locomotor activity. Alcohol and Alcoholism 34, 542–550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Koros, E., Kostowski, W. and Bienkowski, P. (1999b) Operant responding for ethanol in rats with long-term history of free-choice ethanol drinking. Alcohol and Alcoholism 34, 685–689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kostowski, W. and Krzascik, P. (1989) Research for evaluating the role of dopaminergic mechanisms in the action of valproate. Biogenic Amines 6, 169–176.[ISI]

Lyness, W. H. and Smith, F. L. (1992) Influence of dopaminergic and serotonergic neurons on intravenous ethanol self-administration in the rat. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 42, 187–192.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Noble, E. P. (2000) Addiction and its reward process through polymorphisms of D2 dopamine receptor gene: a review. European Psychiatry 15, 79–89.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nowak, K. L., McBride, W. J., Lumeng, L., Li, T.-K. and Murphy, J. M. (2000) Involvement of dopamine D2 autoreceptors in ventral tegmental area on alcohol and saccharin intake of the alcohol-preferring P rat. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 24, 476–483.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Ögren, S.-O., Hall, H., Köhler, Ch., Magnusson, O. and Sjöstrand, S.-E. (1986) The selective dopamine D2 antagonist raclopride discriminates between dopamine-mediated motor functions. Psychopharmacology 90, 287–294.[ISI][Medline]

Ossowska, K., Karcz, M., Wardas, J. and Wolfarth, S. (1990) Striatal and nucleus accumbens D1/D2 dopamine receptors in neuroleptic catalepsy. European Journal of Pharmacology 182, 327–334.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Piazza, P. V., Deminiere, J. M., Le Moal, M. and Simon, H. (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 29, 1511–1513.

Pohjalainen, T., Rinne, J. O., Nagren, K., Lehikoinen, P., Antilla, K., Syvalahti, E. K. and Hietala, J. (1998) The A1 allele of the human D2 receptor gene predicts low D2 receptor availability in healthy volunteers. Molecular Psychiatry 3, 256–260.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Rajakumar, N., Laurier, L., Niznik, H. B. and Stoessl, A. J. (1997) Effects of intrastriatal infusion of D2 receptor antisense oligonucleotide on apomorphine-induced behaviors in the rat. Synapse 26, 199–208.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Rassnick, S., Stinus, L. and Koob, G. L. (1993) The effects of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens and the mesolimbic dopamine system on oral self-administration of ethanol in the rat. Brain Research 623, 16–24.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Risinger, F. O., Dickinson, S. D. and Cunningham, C. L. (1992) Haloperidol reduces ethanol-induced motor activity stimulation but not conditioned place preference. Psychopharmacology 107, 453–456.[ISI][Medline]

Rogowski, A., Kostowski, W. and Bienkowski, P. (2002) Sucrose self-administration predicts only initial phase of ethanol-reinforced behaviour in Wistar rats. Alcohol and Alcoholism 37, 436–440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Salimov, R. M. (1999) Different behavioral patterns related to alcohol use in rodents: a factor analysis. Alcohol 17, 157–162.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Salimov, R. M., Salimova, N. B., Shvets, L. N. and Maisky, A. I. (2000) Haloperidol administered subchronically reduces the alcohol-deprivation effect in mice. Alcohol 20, 61–68.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Samson, H. H. (1986) Initiation of ethanol reinforcement using a sucrose-substitution procedure in food- and water-sated rats. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 10, 436–442.[ISI][Medline]

Samson, H. H. and Chappell, A. M. (1995) Home-cage ethanol consumption and motor activity: Lack of relation to either initial activity or amphetamine-induced locomotion. Alcohol 12, 37–42.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Samson, H. H. and Chappell, A. M. (1999) Effects of microinjection of D2 dopamine antagonist raclopride into the ventral tegmental area on ethanol and sucrose self-administration. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 23, 421–426.[ISI][Medline]

Samson, H. H., Hodge, C. W., Tolliver, G. A. and Haraguchi, M. (1993) Effects of dopamine agonists and antagonists on ethanol-reinforced behavior: the involvement of nucleus accumbens. Brain Research Bulletin 30, 133–141.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Scinska, A., Bogucka-Bonikowska, A., Koros, E., Polanowska, E., Habrat, B., Kukwa, A., Kostowski, W. and Bienkowski, P. (2001) Taste responses in sons of male alcoholics. Alcohol and Alcoholism 36, 79–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Self, D. W. and Nestler, E. J. (1995) Molecular mechanisms of drug reinforcement and addiction. Annual Reviews in Neuroscience 18, 463–495.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Silvestre, J. S., O’Neill, M. F., Fernandez, A. G. and Palacios, J. M. (1996) Effects of a range of dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists on ethanol intake in the rat. European Journal of Pharmacology 318, 257–265.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Sluyter, F., Hof, M., Ellenbroek, B. A., Degen, S. B. and Cools, A. R. (2000) Genetic, sex, and early environmental effects on the voluntary alcohol intake in Wistar rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 67, 801–808.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Suzuki, T., George, F. R. and Meisch, R. A. (1988) Differential establishment and maintenance of oral ethanol reinforced behavior in Lewis and Fischer 344 inbred rat strains. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 245, 164–170.[Abstract]

Thompson, J., Thomas, N., Singleton, A., Piggott, M., Lloyd, S., Perry, E. K., Morris, C. M., Perry, R. H., Ferrier, I. N. and Court, J. A. (1997) D2 dopamine receptor gene (DRD2) TaqI A polymorphism: reduced dopamine D2 receptor binding in the human striatum associated with the A1 allele. Pharmacogenetics 7, 479–484.[ISI][Medline]

Tzschentke, T. M. (2001) Pharmacology and behavioral pharmacology of the mesocortical dopamine system. Progress in Neurobiology 63, 241–320.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Undie, A. S. and Friedman, E. (1988) Differences in the cataleptogenic actions of SCH 23390 and selected classical neuroleptics. Psychopharmacology 96, 311–316.[ISI][Medline]

Wadenberg, M.-L. and Ahlenius, S. (1991) Effects of raclopride and haloperidol on spontaneous motor activity and on conditioned avoidance behavior in rats. Arzneimittel-Forschung/Drug Research 41, 692–695.

Wise, R. A. (1998) Drug activation of brain reward pathways. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 51, 13–22.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]





This Article
Abstract
FREE Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My Personal Archive
Download to citation manager
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Rogowski, A.
Articles by Bienkowski, P.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Rogowski, A.
Articles by Bienkowski, P.