1 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; 2 Department of Circulation Control, National Cardiology Research Center, Moscow 121552, Russia; and 3 Neuropharmacology, Baker Medical Research Institute, Prahran, Victoria 8008, Australia
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Renal blood flow (RBF) is modulated by renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA). However, agents that are supposed to reduce sympathetic tone, such as rilmenidine and captopril, influence RBF also by direct arteriolar effects. The present study was designed to test to what extent the renal nerves contribute to the renal hemodynamic response to rilmenidine and captopril. We used a technique that allows simultaneous recording of RBF and RSNA to the same kidney in conscious rabbits. We compared the dose-dependent effects of rilmenidine (0.01-1 mg/kg) and captopril (0.03-3 mg/kg) on RBF and RSNA in intact and renal denervated (RNX) rabbits. Because rilmenidine and captopril lower blood pressure, studies were also performed in sinoaortically denervated (SAD) rabbits to determine the role of the baroreflex in the renal hemodynamic response. Rilmenidine reduced arterial pressure, RBF, and RSNA dose dependently. In intact rabbits (n = 10), renal conductance (RC) remained unaltered (3 ± 5%), even after the 1-mg/kg dose, which completely abolished RSNA. In RNX rabbits (n = 6), RC fell by 18 ± 5%, whereas in SAD rabbits (n = 7) RC increased by 30 ± 20% after rilmenidine. In intact rabbits, captopril increased RSNA maximally by 64 ± 8%. RSNA did not rise in SAD rabbits. Despite the differential response or absence of RSNA, captopril increased RC to a comparable degree (maximally 40-50%) in all three groups. Using spectral analysis techniques, we found that in all groups, independently of ongoing RSNA, captopril, but not rilmenidine, attenuated both myogenic (0.07-0.25 Hz) and tubuloglomerular feedback (0.01-0.07 Hz) related fluctuations in RC. We conclude that, in conscious rabbits, the renal vasodilator effect of rilmenidine depends on the level of ongoing RSNA. Its sympatholytic effect is, however, blunted by a direct arteriolar vasoconstrictor effect. In contrast, the renal vasodilator effect of captopril is not modulated by ongoing RSNA and is associated with impairment of autoregulation of RBF.
baroflex; renal sympathetic nerve activity; spectral analysis
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
THE KIDNEY PLAYS A KEY
ROLE in the control of hemodynamics in essential hypertension and
heart failure. Drugs that increase renal blood flow (RBF) have
beneficial effects in these patients. One of the pharmacological
approaches to increase RBF is to inhibit the production of angiotensin
II. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have well-known
preferential renal vasodilator effects (31, 42). Besides
humoral mechanisms, centrally mediated sympatholytic effects are
thought to contribute to this effect of these drugs (27,
32). Because of the dense sympathetic innervation of the kidney,
an alternative approach to induce renal vasodilation may be to lower
ongoing renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) (6).
Reducing ongoing RSNA is thought to be beneficial, particularly in
conditions with elevated sympathetic activity (8). RSNA
may be reduced pharmacologically by centrally acting imidazoline- or
2-receptor agonists. Agents with affinity for imidazoline receptors, e.g., rilmenidine, decrease RSNA
(5) and increase renal conductance in hypertensive rats
(36) and humans (24). In addition, they have
been reported to enhance natriuresis and diuresis (9, 17,
28). The renal effects of these drugs are probably not entirely
mediated by their central sympatholytic action (37).
Peripheral renal targets may mediate the renal response to these drugs,
such as 1) a heterogeneous population of imidazoline
receptors (10, 35), 2) renal
2-adrenoceptor mediated NO release (45),
3) atrial natriuretic peptide (28), and
4) vasopressin (38).
This study was designed to examine to what extent the central nervous system contributes to the renal vascular effects of rilmenidine and captopril, an ACE inhibitor. We used a recently developed technique that allows simultaneous recording of RBF and RSNA to the same kidney in conscious rabbits (15). We studied the dose-dependent effects of rilmenidine and captopril on RBF and RSNA in intact as well as bilaterally renal denervated rabbits. Because both drugs lower blood pressure, the sympathetic control of RBF may be altered by a baroreflex-mediated increase in RSNA. To exclude this possibility, effects of rilmenidine and captopril on RBF and RSNA were also studied after sinoaortic denervation (SAD). Furthermore, the SAD rabbits may serve as a model with elevated ongoing RSNA (19, 33). Rilmenidine and captopril were chosen because these agents have been studied extensively before. Furthermore, the hemodynamic effects of these agents occur relatively quickly and allow the construction of a dose-response curve within a few hours. In addition to the steady-state effects, we evaluated the rilmenidine- and captopril-induced dynamic changes in RBF with spectral analysis techniques. These methods give insight into the different mechanisms controlling RBF, such as sympathetic nerves, myogenic tone, and tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF), all of which occur at quite different frequency domains (13, 14, 16).
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Animal Preparations
The experiments were performed in male and female rabbits (2.4-3.1 kg) bred at the Baker Medical Research Institute. The rabbit colony is derived from an original multi-colored English strain with "Dutch Belted" introduced in 1994. All procedures were performed in accordance with the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (1990) and were approved by the Animal Experimentation Committee of the Alfred Hospital/Baker Medical Research Institute. Rabbits were housed individually under controlled temperature, humidity, and dark-light cycle and fed a controlled diet of pellets (0.5% sodium chloride) and vegetables but with water ad libitum. The present pharmacological studies were conducted in the same animal preparations that were described in a previous paper describing the effects of a short hypoxic stimulus (15). At the end of the study, the animals were anesthetized with pentobarbitone sodium (60 mg/kg) and euthanized by an overdose of this agent.Implantation of the device to simultaneously record RBF and RSNA. The device was constructed and implanted as described in detail previously (15). In short, a Doppler crystal housed in a silicone cuff (1.4 mm) with two coiled wires was sutured on the left renal artery. The renal nerves were gently slipped into the two spirals, and the entire preparation was embedded in silicone gel. The connectors of the electrode were placed under the skin at the back of the animal and retrieved while the animal was under local anesthesia (procaine 1%, Citanest, Astra Pharmaceuticals). The implantation of the device did not result in denervation of the kidney or increase of plasma renin levels (15). Experiments were performed in these rabbits between days 4 and 11 after surgery.
Renal denervation and renal Doppler flow probe implantation. In a second group of rabbits, bilateral renal denervation (RNX) was performed at least 7 days before the first experiment. With the use of fine forceps, the nerves were stripped from the renal arteries, and the vessels were painted with ethanol. After this procedure, a Doppler flow probe was placed on the left renal artery and embedded in silicone gel. As described before (15), RNX decreased renal norepinephrine content by 98%.
SAD. The deafferentation of aortic and carotid sinus barosensors was performed according to the procedure described by Korner et al. (18). The carotid sinus was bilaterally exposed, and all nerves were carefully stripped from the bulbus using fine forceps. In addition, the aortic depressor nerve was cut using iris scissors, avoiding any damage to the laryngeal nerve. Seven to ten days after SAD, the renal Doppler/electrode device was implanted as described in Implantation of the device to simultaneously record RBF and RSNA.
Implantation of catheters. On the day of the experiment, minor operative procedures were performed while the rabbits were under local prilocaine anesthesia. A transcutaneous 22-gauge, 25-mm Teflon catheter (Jelco, Critikon) was placed in the central ear artery. The catheter was then connected to a Statham P23Dc pressure transducer (Gould, Bernie, MD) for continuous measurements of arterial pressure and heart rate (HR). For intravenous injections, an ear vein was cannulated.
Experimental Protocol
During the experiments, rabbits were kept in a standard single-rabbit holding box (15 cm high and wide and 35 cm long) with a wire top and raised wire grid floor. The arterial line and the wires from the Doppler probe and renal nerve electrode were connected to the data-acquisition equipment, and hemodynamics were allowed to stabilize for at least 45-60 min. Experiments were performed on 3 separate days at 48-h intervals in random order. In one of the experiments, rilmenidine (dissolved in saline) was injected intravenously using a cumulative dosing schedule (0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, and 1 mg/kg) at 15-min intervals. Because part of the drug is eliminated over the course of the experiment, the indicated dose is slightly overestimated. On the other 2 days, either captopril (0.003, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg) or saline (0.5 ml) was injected every 15 min (time control). Experiments were conducted in 10 intact, 6 RNX, and 9 SAD rabbits. Because in some rabbits (2 intact, 1 RNX, and 2 SAD) either the Doppler flow probe signal or RSNA signal was lost over time, the number of observations for renal conductance (RC) and RSNA varies between 8 and 10 for the intact, 5-6 for the RNX, and 7 and 9 for the SAD group.Data Acquisition and Data Processing
Arterial pressure, RSNA, and RBF were recorded at 1 kHz (15). In each experiment, a short 15- to 30-s segment of original signals was stored on disk. These data were used to evaluate the efficacy of SAD as explained in Verification of SAD. During the pharmacological experiments, beat-to-beat values of mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse interval (PI), RBF, and integrated RSNA were calculated on-line and stored on computer disk for later analysis.Steady-state hemodynamic effects were defined as the average values taken between 10 and 15 min after each intravenous injection of rilmenidine, captopril, or saline. To facilitate a comparison among rabbits, average RBF and renal conductance were normalized to 100 units in the control period before a drug or saline was added. Similarly, we normalized integrated RSNA to 100 units after subtraction of the baseline noise, which was set as the value of RSNA during periods in which no obvious bursts occurred (15). HR was calculated as 60,000/PI.
Spectral Analysis
The dynamic fluctuations of MAP, HR, RC, RBF, and RSNA were investigated in the frequency domain using fast Fourier transform algorithms (15). Relative stable 10-min segments were selected from the tracings obtained during the 0.3-mg/kg dose of rilmenidine and the 3-mg/kg dose of captopril because at these doses the drugs had equipotent blood pressure-lowering efficacy. A 10-min segment selected from the control period before the drug was given served as the appropriate control. Because equidistantly sampled data are required for a fast Fourier transform, the beat-to-beat values of each parameter in such segments were interpolated (cubic spline) and resampled at 20.48 Hz. The resulting time series were divided into half-overlapping sequential sets of 200 s. Before calculation of spectral power, each segment was subjected to linear trend removal and cosine tapering. For each parameter, spectral power was calculated as the average over the sequential data sets.To determine the extent to which fluctuations of MAP cause those of RBF, the admittance gain, phase, and coherence between MAP and RBF were calculated (15). When the admittance gain equals one, it indicates that the output (RBF) fluctuates with the same relative amplitude as the input (MAP). An admittance gain of one does not necessarily mean that RBF oscillations passively follow the MAP oscillations. Only when the phase is close to zero do the MAP and RBF changes occur simultaneously. An admittance gain of less than one would mean that the imposed fluctuations by MAP are buffered. A gain close to zero would indicate perfect autoregulation of RBF. Gains of more than one suggest that fluctuations in MAP are either amplified in the renal vascular bed or that the oscillations in RBF are generated within the vascular bed itself. This does not exclude autoregulatory mechanisms. For instance, when the myogenic response is amplified by sympathetic nerves and the resulting change in flow is greater than the original change in pressure, the admittance gain will be greater greater than one at a specific frequency.
The power spectra were divided into four different domains: 1) a high-frequency domain containing oscillations that are linked to the breathing cycle (HF: 0.6-2 Hz); 2) a midfrequency domain (MF: 0.25-0.6 Hz) containing oscillations associated with sympathetic nerve firing; 3) a low-frequency range (LF 0.07-0.25 Hz), which comprises oscillations related to myogenic control; and 4) a very-low-frequency band (VLF: 0.01-0.07 Hz), including fluctuations related to TGF as well as other undefined low-frequency fluctuations (13, 15). In each frequency band, the sum of powers and the average of the gain, phase, and coherence were determined. These values were used for statistical purposes.
Verification of SAD
The effectiveness of SAD was verified in two ways. First, traditional sigmoidal blood pressure-HR curves were constructed using intravenous injections of phenylephrine hydrochloride (0.5 mg/ml, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and sodium nitroprusside (1 mg/ml, Fluka, Fig. 1A). Second, spectral analysis techniques were employed. For this purpose, the amplitude and time relations of the frequencies inherent in the original blood pressure and RSNA signal were compared. As indicated in Fig. 1B, under resting control conditions, the dominant rhythm in RSNA was at the cardiac rate of 4 Hz. As described by Barman et al. (2), this can be largely explained by baroreceptor afferents entraining sympathetic outflow. The peak at lower frequencies is due to respiratory modulation of RSNA. In contrast, in SAD rabbits, bursts of RSNA were no longer synchronized to the cardiac cycle, and there was no dominant cardiac-related peak in the power spectrum of RSNA (Fig. 1C). The strength of the coupling between the pressure and RSNA oscillations was quantified by the calculation of the cross-correlation function. As shown in Fig. 1D, under resting conditions, the cross-correlation between blood pressure and RSNA was significantly blunted after SAD. Due to baroreceptor unloading induced by the 3-mg/kg dose of captopril, RSNA power increased at the cardiac rate in intact (Fig. 1B), but not in SAD, rabbits (Fig. 1C). Functional baroreceptor deafferentation was indicated by 1) the depressed gain of the sigmoidal pressure HR curve, 2) the lack of coherence between MAP and RSNA, and 3) the lack of spectral changes in response to reductions in pressure induced by baroreceptor unloading.
|
Statistical Analysis
Data are means ± SE, unless otherwise indicated. To compare the steady-state hemodynamic changes in the control, RNX, and SAD animals, a split plot or "nested" repeated analysis of variance was performed with group differences as the between factor and the repeated doses of saline (time control study) and captopril or rilmenidine as the within factor. From the latter, dose-response relationships were determined by linear and nonlinear polynomial orthogonal contrasts (39). Differences among groups were identified with the between groups term and the group × dose interaction. A Bonferroni adjustment of the t-statistic was made, with the number of hypotheses tested and the number of variables examined taken into consideration. Furthermore, the Greenhouse-Geisser coefficient was used to redress the "relatedness" of the repeated measurements. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05. ![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Steady-State Effects of Rilmenidine
The time control data obtained with saline injections in the three different groups of animals are presented in Fig. 2, which shows that, in each group, hemodynamic variables were stable during the recording period. Baseline MAP and HR were significantly higher in the SAD than in the intact or RNX rabbits. Figure 3 summarizes the effects of rilmenidine in the three preparations. Rilmenidine dose dependently reduced MAP, HR, and RBF in all rabbits. The reductions of MAP were greater in SAD than in intact and RNX rabbits. The decline of RSNA was not different in intact and SAD rabbits. RC was not altered in intact rabbits; however, in RNX rabbits, RC fell when high doses of the agent were applied. In contrast, in SAD rabbits, RC rose by 30% at the 0.3- and 0.6-mg/kg doses. This vasodilator effect was diminished after the 1-mg/kg dose.
|
|
Steady-State Effects of Captopril
The dose-dependent, steady-state effects of captopril are compared in Fig. 4. In all groups MAP fell significantly (P < 0.001) in a dose-dependent manner, whereas HR remained unaltered. In the intact rabbits, average RSNA increased by 64 ± 8% after the highest dose. This was not observed in the SAD group, showing that the increase in RSNA after captopril is derived from baroreceptor unloading. In all rabbits, captopril dose dependently increased RBF and RC. The magnitude of the increase in RBF and RC was comparable in all three groups, despite the different effects on RSNA.
|
Dynamic Effects of Rilmenidine
In Fig. 5, the effect of rilmenidine (0.3 mg/kg) on spectral power of MAP, RC, and RSNA is presented. Associated with the average reduction of RSNA, the spectral power of RSNA was reduced over all frequency bands. Associated with the fall in blood pressure, the spectral power of MAP was significantly reduced over the VLF, LF, and MF ranges. In SAD rabbits, the same pattern was observed (data not shown). In intact rabbits, rilmenidine-induced changes in the spectral power of RC occurred in the same frequency bands as for blood pressure. As expected, when renal nerves were absent, rilmenidine did not change the spectral power of RC in the MF band of RNX rabbits. Interestingly, MF spectral power of MAP was also not altered. In the RNX animals, changes in spectral power were limited to the VLF range. The effects of rilmenidine on the admittance gain between MAP and RBF are presented in Fig. 6. In all of the preparations, rilmenidine did not alter the admittance gain between MAP and RBF at any frequency. The average admittance value in the VLF band (pooled over all 3 preparations) was 0.93 ± 0.13. After rilmenidine, this value was not significantly altered (1.17 ± 0.16, P > 0.2). The average phase delay in the VLF range also remained unaltered with pressure fluctuations leading the flow fluctuations with ~3 s. These data indicate that there was a comparable decline in the amplitude of MAP and RBF oscillations.
|
|
Dynamic Effects of Captopril
The effect of captopril on spectral power of MAP, RC, and RSNA is presented in Fig. 7. Associated with the average fall in blood pressure, in intact rabbits the spectral power of MAP was slightly but significantly (P = 0.04) reduced in the LF band. Furthermore, in these animals, captopril significantly reduced RC power in the LF and MF bands, suggesting a reduction of myogenic and sympathetic influences, respectively. In contrast, the amplitude of MF (P = 0.02) and HF (P = 0.03) fluctuations of RSNA was enhanced after the 3-mg/kg dose of captopril. In RNX animals, comparable changes in LF power of MAP and RC were observed as was found in intact rabbits.
|
Captopril, unlike rilmenidine, significantly changed the dynamic
characteristics of renal autoregulatory behavior (Fig.
8). In the three groups of rabbits, in
control conditions, admittance gain values lower than one were found in
the VLF band, whereas the gains greater than one were found at higher
frequencies. Captopril markedly altered this pattern. However, the
alterations were very similar in all groups, indicating that these
dynamic effects were not influenced by the renal nerves or by
baroreceptor afferents. In the VLF band, the admittance gain increased
from 0.59 ± 0.08 to 0.92 ± 0.06 (data are averages over all
rabbits, P < 0.01). This was associated with an
increase in coherence in the VLF range from 0.38 ± 0.04 to
0.64 ± 0.05 (P < 0.05), whereas the phase relationship became close to zero (from 2.0 ± 0.8 to 0.2 ± 0.4 s, P < 0.01). In the LF band, captopril
reduced the admittance gain from 1.44 ± 0.09 to values close to
one (0.97 ± 0.05, P < 0.01). The average
coherence between MAP and RBF increased from 0.57 ± 0.03 to
0.69 ± 0.05. In control conditions, LF pressure oscillations
preceded the LF flow oscillations by 1.0 ± 0.1 s. After
captopril the average phase delay was significantly shortened to
0.3 ± 0.1 s, P < 0.02. These dynamic
changes indicate that, in the presence of captopril, the relationship
of MAP and RBF oscillations has been altered as such that they occur
now more synchronized and with the same relative amplitude.
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
By using simultaneous recordings of RBF and RSNA to the same kidney in preparations from conscious rabbits, this study provides evidence that the renal hemodynamic effects of the imidazoline receptor agonist rilmenidine were dependent on the level of ongoing RSNA. In conditions where there was elevated RSNA, a sympathetically mediated vasodilatation occurred, whereas in the absence of RSNA a direct vasoconstrictor effect was observed. In contrast, the renal hemodynamic effect of captopril was not dependent on ongoing RSNA. The captopril-induced renal vasodilatation was similar regardless of whether RSNA was enhanced or even present. The renal vasodilator effects of captopril, unlike those of rilmenidine, were associated with impaired autoregulation of blood flow.
Steady-State Effects of Rilmenidine and Captopril
To evaluate whether renal nerves modulate the renal hemodynamic effects of rilmenidine and captopril, we compared the renal hemodynamic effects of increasing doses in intact, RNX, and SAD rabbits. The latter preparation was chosen as a model of presumed sympathetic hyperactivity (19) and to evaluate the potential role of the baroreflex in the effects of these blood pressure-lowering agents. Baseline blood pressure and hyperactivity values were indeed higher in the SAD group, which suggests that the normalization of blood pressure, which is known to return gradually to predenervation levels between 5-36 days after deafferentation (33), has not been completed. In SAD rabbits, the hypotensive response to rilmenidine was enhanced. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that these rabbits had some form of neurogenic hypertension. It was not possible to judge from our multifiber nerve preparations whether sympathetic activity was truly higher in the SAD group than in the intact rabbits, as only relative changes in RSNA could be compared between groups.In conscious rabbits, the rilmenidine-induced renal hemodynamic
effects were dependent on ongoing RSNA as well as a direct vascular
effect. Vasodilatation occurred in the SAD rabbits, whereas in RNX
rabbits a vasoconstrictor response was found. The present study was not
designed to evaluate the pharmacology of the receptors involved in this
latter response, but presumably the vasoconstriction was due to
2-receptor stimulation because rilmenidine has an affinity for such receptors (9, 10, 37). In intact
animals, rilmenidine did not alter renal conductance. This suggests
that in this resting preparation the vasodilator and vasoconstrictor effects were equally strong. The present observation is in accordance with previous studies that evaluated the role of renal nerves in the
control of RBF with electrical stimulation techniques (7). At low levels of stimulation, renal nerves did not control renal conductance. Only when high levels of electrical activity were imposed
did tonic renal vascular changes occur. Elevated RSNA can be observed
in hypertensive conditions (8), which may explain why
rilmenidine increases renal conductance in hypertensive rats (36) and hypertensive patients (24). In
resting conditions in rabbits, baseline RSNA is relatively low because
sympathetic bursts do not occur with every heartbeat and do not show a
profound 0.3-Hz modulation, which is only present during stressful
conditions such as hypoxia (15) or hemorrhage
(25).
Captopril reduced blood pressure to a comparable degree in all three preparations. In intact, but not SAD, rabbits, the fall in blood pressure was accompanied by a 64 ± 8% increase in postganglionic RSNA. This indicates that the increase in sympathetic activity is due to baroreceptor unloading. Furthermore, it excludes the possibility that captopril has a central sympatholytic effect. In contrast, captopril may have enhanced the baroreflex-mediated RSNA response by a central effect on AT1 receptors (4, 20). This is supported by the observation that in renal hypertensive rabbits captopril increased RSNA more than when the calcium antagonist nicardipine was given at equipotent blood pressure-lowering doses (21).
Despite the increase in RSNA, captopril increased renal conductance in intact rabbits. The renal vasodilator response to captopril was similar in the three groups of rabbits. In the case of a vasoconstrictor role of the renal nerves in the response to captopril, we would have expected differences in affinity or in maximum efficacy to increase RC among the three groups. Because this was not the case, we conclude that, in the rabbit, the humoral effect of captopril on the renal vasculature is far more important than a potential sympatholytic effect. In contrast to this view, it is possible that the renal hemodynamic effects of captopril were very similar in intact, RNX, and SAD animals because captopril very effectively blocked the release of norepinephrine at the sympathetic nerve terminals. This is very unlikely, because presynaptic inhibitory effects of angiotensin II antagonism are 1) dose dependent, 2) modulate but do not fully block norepinephrine release, and 3) can only be demonstrated when there is a high sympathetic activity (32).
The present data on rilmenidine support the view that the renal nerves do modulate RBF (6, 23). However, comparison of the increases in renal conductance after rilmenidine and captopril, especially in the preparation from resting intact animals, suggests that the role of the renin-angiotensin system is dominant.
Dynamic Effects of Rilmenidine and Captopril
Renal nerves modulate RBF variability in several physiological conditions (3, 15, 26, 45). As recently demonstrated by Nafz et al. (29), oscillations of RBF exert an antihypertensive effect when renal perfusion pressure is reduced. Associated with the steady-state reduction of RSNA, rilmenidine decreased the amplitude of the RSNA oscillations over a wide frequency range. Conversely, after captopril both RSNA and the amplitude of the RSNA oscillations in the MF band were increased. Because the response time of the renal vasculature is fast enough to follow RSNA oscillations <0.5 Hz, RSNA fluctuations in the MF band are usually transmitted into comparable oscillations of MAP, RBF, and RC, especially when RSNA is increased during hypoxia or hemorrhage (15, 25). Here we show that the inverse is also true. When rilmenidine reduced RSNA variability, this resulted in a comparable decrease in MAP and RC variability. The dynamic coupling between RSNA and RC in the MF band was different for captopril. During ACE inhibition, MF power of RC declined despite the increase in RSNA power in the MF band. In other words, captopril inhibited the renal vascular response to the 3-s rhythm in sympathetic nerve firing, which may point to a prejunctional inhibitory effect of the drug. The MF fluctuations in RC contribute only to a small degree (5-10%) to total RC variation. Hence, the physiological significance of this potential sympatholytic effect can be considered to be small.In intact RNX and SAD rabbits, rilmenidine reduced the amplitude
of the LF and VLF fluctuations of both MAP and RBF. However, as
indicated by the unchanged admittance gain, the decline in the
amplitude of these MAP and RBF fluctuations was of the same magnitude.
This indicates that after rilmenidine, RBF dynamics in response to
pressure fluctuations are not altered. In contrast to these findings
with rilmenidine, captopril had marked effects on the dynamic control
of RBF. After the highest dose of captopril, LF myogenic oscillations
in RC were completely abolished. LF myogenic oscillations probably
originate from spontaneous intracellular Ca2+ oscillations
in the arteriolar smooth muscle cells (1, 43). In the
renal vascular bed, these oscillations are found at 0.15 Hz. They
may arise in the afferent arterioles (30) and can be entrained by certain stimuli, here being pressure-induced arteriolar stretch or RSNA (26). Recently, it has been shown that the
dynamic Ca2+ signaling in arterial smooth muscles is under
the control of the local renin-angiotensin system and can be blunted by
captopril as well as losartan (1). This may be the reason
that the effect of captopril on the LF fluctuations was similar in all
three preparations and that inhibition of the RAS system dominated the
sympatholytic effect.
Similarly, as found by He and Marsh (12) in rats, captopril increased the admittance gain at frequencies <0.1 Hz. In the VLF band, the admittance gain rose significantly from 0.6 to 0.9, meaning that the magnitude of the flow oscillations was now similar to those of pressure. In addition, the phase relationship between MAP and RBF became close to zero. These findings are compatible with an attenuation of TGF during ACE inhibition (40). Recent studies showed that TGF responses were also absent in ACE-deficient (41) as well as in AT1A receptor-deficient (34) mice and could be restored to near-normal levels with angiotensin II (41). From simulation studies Feldberg et al. (11), concluded that the myogenic response is a prerequisite to obtaining any degree of autoregulation of RBF by the TGF mechanism. Conversely, myogenic oscillations can be present when TGF is absent (30). These aforementioned studies were all done in isolated preparations from or those from anesthetized animals. The new aspect of the present study is therefore that the dynamic effects of ACE inhibition are now shown to be true in a preparation from an intact conscious animal and, second, that they are not influenced by sympathetic nerves. This is also supported by the lack of change in admittance gain by rilmenidine.
A potential point of concern in the interpretation of the present results may have been that the renal hemodynamic changes related to rilmenidine and captopril are due to the fact that blood pressure may have dropped below the autoregulatory range. Hence, it would be no surprise that renal autoregulation was impaired by captopril. However, several arguments speak against this. First, in rabbits, autoregulation is preserved down to 70 mmHg (44) and in our dynamic analysis pressures varied between 60 and 80 mmHg. Second, as reported by Sorenson et al. (40), resetting of renal autoregulation is a relatively fast process and occurs within 10 min. Only in the SAD group, which received rilmenidine, was blood pressure below 60 mmHg. However, changes in dynamic control were never different between groups but only between agents. Renal autoregulatory efforts were attenuated with captopril but not with rilmenidine. Therefore, these data suggest that the present dynamic changes in renal vascular control are drug specific and not entirely related to the pressure fall.
In conclusion, renal hemodynamic effects of rilmenidine are mediated by a central sympatholytic as well as direct vascular effect. However, the renal vasodilator effect is dependent on the level of ongoing sympathetic activity. In contrast, the renal vasodilatation induced by captopril was not influenced by the central nervous system but was predominantly due to a peripheral inhibition of renal myogenic and TGF oscillations. This implies that, despite the captopril-induced reduction of systemic arterial pressure, pressure oscillations are further transmitted into the renal vascular bed and probably prevent a further fall in glomerular pressure, which may contribute to the diuretic effect of the drug.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
The authors thank Dr. Simon Malpas for scientific discussions and Sandra Burke for proofreading the manuscript. The authors also thank Servier Laboratories for the gift of rilmenidine.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
The study was supported by travel grants (B. J. A. Janssen) of the Dutch Heart Foundation, Dutch Kidney Foundation, and Foundation "De Drie Lichten te Leiden," The Netherlands, and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. E. V. Lukoshkova was supported by the Russian-Australian Scientific exchange program while in Australia.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: B. J. A. Janssen, Dept. of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Universiteitssingel 50, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands (E-mail: b.janssen{at}farmaco.unimaas.nl).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
First published August 8, 2001; 10.1152/ajprenal.00153.2001
Received 15 May 2001; accepted in final form 23 August 2001.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1.
Asada, Y,
Yamazawa T,
Hirose K,
Takasaka T,
and
Iino M.
Dynamic Ca2+ signaling in rat arterial smooth muscle cells under the control of local renin-angiotensin system.
J Physiol (Lond)
512.2:
497-505,
1999.
2.
Barman, SM,
Gebber LG,
and
Zhong S.
The 10-Hz rhythm in sympathetic nerve discharge.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
262:
R1006-R1014,
1992
3.
Barret, CJ,
Navakatikyan MA,
and
Malpas SC.
Long-term control of renal blood flow: what is the role of the renal nerves?
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
280:
R1534-R1545,
2001
4.
Bendle, RD,
Malpas SC,
and
Head GA.
Role of endogenous angiotensin II on sympathetic reflexes in conscious rabbits.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
272:
R1816-R1825,
1997
5.
Burke, SL,
Malpas SC,
and
Head GA.
Effect of rilmenidine on cardiovascular responses to stress in the conscious rabbit.
J Auton Nerv Syst
72:
177-186,
1998[ISI][Medline].
6.
DiBona, GF.
Neural control of the kidney: functionally specific renal sympathetic nerve fibers.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
279:
R1515-R1524,
2000.
7.
DiBona, GF.
Neural control of renal function in health and disease.
Clin Auton Res
4:
69-94,
1994[Medline].
8.
Esler, ME.
The sympathetic nervous system and hypertension.
Am J Hypertens
13:
99S-105S,
2000[ISI][Medline].
9.
Evans, RG,
and
Anderson WP.
Renal effects of infusion of rilmenidine and guanabenz in conscious dogs: contribution of peripheral and central nervous system 2-adrenoceptors.
Br J Pharmacol
116:
1557-1570,
1995[Abstract].
10.
Evans, RG,
and
Haynes JM.
Characterization of binding sites for [3H]-idazoxan, [3H]-P-aminoclonidine and [3H]-rauwolscine in the kidney of the dog.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol
21:
649-658,
1994[ISI][Medline].
11.
Feldberg, R,
Colding-Jorgensen M,
and
Holstein-Rathlou N-H.
Analysis of interaction between TGF and the myogenic response in renal blood flow autoregulation.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol
269:
F581-F593,
1995
12.
He, J,
and
Marsh DJ.
Effect of captopril on fluctuations of blood pressure and renal blood flow in rats.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol
264:
F37-F44,
1993
13.
Holstein-Rathlou, NH.
Oscillations and chaos in renal blood flow control.
J Am Soc Nephrol
4:
1275-1287,
1993[Abstract].
14.
Holstein-Rathlou, NH,
Wagner AJ,
and
Marsh DJ.
Tubuloglomerular feedback dynamics and renal blood flow autoregulation in rats.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol
260:
F53-F68,
1991
15.
Janssen, BJA,
Malpas SC,
Burke SL,
and
Head GA.
Frequency-dependent modulation of renal blood flow by renal nerve activity in conscious rabbits.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
273:
R597-R608,
1997
16.
Janssen, BJA,
Oosting J,
Slaaf DW,
Persson PB,
and
Struyker-Boudier HAJ
Hemodynamic basis of oscillations in systemic arterial pressure in conscious rats.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
269:
H62-H71,
1995
17.
Kline, RL,
and
Cechetto DF.
Renal effects of rilmenidine in anesthetized rats: importance of renal nerves.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
266:
1556-1562,
1993[Abstract].
18.
Korner, PI.
The effect of section of the carotid sinus and aortic nerves on the cardiac output of the rabbit.
J Physiol (Lond)
180:
266-278,
1965[Medline].
19.
Krieger, EM.
Neurogenic hypertension in the rat.
Circ Res
15:
511-521,
1964[ISI][Medline].
20.
Kumagai, H,
Averill DB,
Khosla MC,
and
Ferrario CM.
Role of nitric oxide and angiotensin II in the regulation of sympathetic nerve activity in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Hypertension
21:
476-484,
1993[Abstract].
21.
Kumagai, H,
Suzuki H,
Ichikawa M,
Nishizawa M,
Ryuzaki M,
Kumagai K,
and
Saruta T.
Different responses of renal blood flow and sympathetic nerve activity to captopril and nicardipine in conscious renal hypertensive rabbits.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
25:
57-64,
1995[ISI][Medline].
22.
Kurjiaka, DT,
and
Segal SS.
Interaction between conducted vasodilation and sympathetic nerve activity in arterioles of hamster striated muscle.
Circ Res
76:
885-891,
1995
23.
Leonard, BL,
Malpas SC,
Denton KM,
Madden AC,
and
Evans RG.
Differential control of intrarenal blood flow during reflex increases in sympathetic nerve activity.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
280:
R62-R68,
2001
24.
Licata, G,
Scaglione R,
Guillet C,
Capuana G,
Parrinello G,
Indovina A,
Lipari R,
Mazzola G,
and
Merlino G.
Double-blind controlled study of rilmenidine vs. hydrochlorothiazide in mild hypertension: clinical and renal hemodynamic evaluation.
J Hum Hypertens
7:
153-157,
1993[ISI][Medline].
25.
Malpas, SC,
Evans RG,
Head GA,
and
Lukoshkova EV.
Contribution of renal nerves to renal blood flow variability during hemorrhage.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
274:
R1283-R1294,
1998
26.
Malpas, SC,
Hore TA,
Navakatikyan M,
Lukoshkova EV,
Kiong Nguang S,
and
Austin PC.
Resonance in the renal vasculature evoked by activation of the sympathetic nerves.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
276:
R1311-R1319,
1999
27.
Montano, N,
Gnecchi-Ruscone T,
Contini M,
Finocchiaro ML,
Lombardi F,
and
Malliani A.
Effect of captopril on sympathetic preganglionic efferent activity in cats.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
264:
H345-H351,
1993
28.
Mukaddam, S,
and
Gutkowska J.
Atrial natriuretic peptide is involved in renal actions of moxonidine.
Hypertension
35:
1215-1220,
2000
29.
Nafz, B,
Stegemann J,
Bestle MH,
Richter N,
Seeliger E,
Schimke I,
Reinhardt HW,
and
Persson PB.
Antihypertensive effect of 0.1 Hz blood pressure oscillations to the kidney.
Circulation
101:
553-557,
2000
30.
Navar, LG.
Integrating multiple paracrine regulators of renal microvascular dynamics.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol
274:
F433-F444,
1998
31.
Nelissen-Vrancken, HJMG,
Struijker-Boudier HAJ,
and
Smits JFM
Renal hemodynamic effects of nonhypotensive doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in hypertension and heart failure rats.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
19:
163-168,
1992[ISI][Medline].
32.
Reid, IA.
Interactions between ANG II, sympathetic nervous system, and baroreceptor reflexes in regulation of blood pressure.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
262:
E763-E778,
1992
33.
Saito, M,
Terui N,
Numao Y,
and
Kumada M.
Absence of sustained hypertension in sinoaortic-denervated rabbits.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
251:
H742-H747,
1986[ISI][Medline].
34.
Schnermann, JB,
Traynor T,
Yang T,
Huang YG,
Oliverio MI,
Coffman T,
and
Briggs JP.
Absence of tubuloglomerular feedback responses in AT1A receptor-deficient mice.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol
273:
F315-F320,
1997
35.
Sjoholm, B,
Lahdesmaki J,
Pyykko K,
Hillila M,
and
Scheinin M.
Non-adrenergic binding of [3H]atipamezole in rat kidneyregional distribution and comparison to alpha2-adrenoceptors.
Br J Pharmacol
128:
1215-1222,
1999
36.
Smits, JFM,
and
Struyker-Boudier HAJ
Regional hemodynamic effects of rilmenidine and clonidine in the conscious spontaneously hypertensive rat.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol
5:
651-661,
1991[ISI][Medline].
37.
Smyth, DD,
and
Penner SB.
Peripheral and central imidazoline receptor-mediated natriuresis in the rat.
Ann NY Acad Sci
881:
334-357,
1999.
38.
Smyth, DD,
Umemura S,
and
Pettinger WA.
Alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonism of vasopressin-induced changes in sodium excretion.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol
248:
F767-F772,
1985[ISI][Medline].
39.
Snedecor, GW,
and
Cochran WG.
Statistical Methods (7th ed.). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1980.
40.
Sorenson, CM,
Leyssac PP,
Skott O,
and
Holstein-Rathlou N-H.
Role of the renin-angiotensin system in regulation and autoregulation of renal blood flow.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
279:
R1017-R1024,
2000
41.
Traynor, T,
Yang T,
Huang YG,
Krege JH,
Briggs JP,
Smithies O,
and
Schnermann J.
Tubuloglomerular feedback in ACE-deficient mice.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol
276:
F751-F757,
1999
42.
Ventura, HO,
Frohlich ED,
Messerli FH,
Kobrin I,
and
Kardon MB.
Cardiovascular effects of regional blood flow distribution with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition (captopril) in essential hypertension.
Am J Cardiol
55:
1023-1026,
1985[ISI][Medline].
43.
Weissberg, PL,
Little PJ,
and
Bobik A.
Spontaneous oscillations in cytoplasmic calcium concentrations in vascular smooth muscle.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
256:
C951-C957,
1989
44.
Woods, LL,
Mizelle HL,
and
Hall JE.
Autoregulation of renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate in the pregnant rabbit.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
252:
R69-R72,
1987
45.
Zou, AP,
and
Cowley JRAW
2-Adrenergic receptor-mediated increase in NO production buffers renal medullary vasoconstriction.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
279:
R769-R777,
2000
|
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Visit Other APS Journals Online |