Department of Medicine-Nephrology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
Submitted 19 February 2003 ; accepted in final form 3 February 2005
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
liver cirrhosis; nitric oxide; excretion
Inhibition of the sympathetic nervous system (1, 35) or angiotensin II in patients (30, 38) or animal models (10, 14, 20) could improve sodium and water excretion transiently, although possible decreases in blood pressure or renal perfusion could eventually worsen volume homeostasis instead of improving it (1, 8, 9).
We could demonstrate in rats that the effects of increased renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) on renal sodium and water excretion could be inhibited by very low doses of an angiotensin II AT1 receptor inhibitor not interfering with systemic angiotensin II effects or renal hemodynamics (39). These results suggested a tonic, indispensable influence of angiotensin II on the intrarenal effects of increased sympathetic drive. With respect to liver cirrhosis, these findings suggest the possibility that renal sodium and water handling could be improved by inducing a functional renal sympathetic inhibition with angiotensin II AT1 receptor inhibitors. Recent reports could be seen to support this concept as renal nerve stimulation augmented the effect of intraluminal angiotensin II on proximal tubule transport in rats, an effect that was attenuated by an ACE-inhibitor (32).
Hence, we wanted to test the hypothesis that in rats with liver cirrhosis after common bile duct ligature (BDL) the application of nonhypotensive doses of an angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonist improves the excretion of an infused saline load significantly. In addition, we investigated whether the intrarenal renin-angiotensin system and renal sympathetic outflow are increased after common BDL, compared with control animals.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Male Sprague-Dawley rats, weighing 250300 g (Charles River Wiga, Sulzfeld, FRG), were kept in a room at 24 ± 2°C, 6080% humidity, and a 12:12-h light-dark cycle. Rats were fed a normal diet containing 0.2% sodium (C-1000, Altromin, Lage, Germany) with free access to tap water. All procedures in animals were performed according to the guidelines of the American Physiological Society and were approved by the local governments committee on animal research ethics.
Common BDL. Rats were anesthetized with methohexital sodium (Brevimytal, Lilly, Bad Homburg, Germany) intraperitoneally. In 25 rats we performed a common BDL; additional 25 rats underwent sham operations. Abdominal midline incisions were made, the common bile duct was mobilized, ligated with a suture close to the liver and cut (14). All of the BDL rats were found to have ascites as evidenced by visible pools of fluid in the lateral abdominal gutters after being killed following the experiments 3 wk later.
Renal denervation. Sixteen days after BDL or sham operation, rats were again anesthetized as described above. One group of 10 rats of either the liver cirrhotic or the control animals was bilaterally denervated, and the others underwent sham operations. Bilateral flank incisions were made and renal denervation was performed by surgically stripping the renal arteries and veins of adventitia, cutting all visible renal nerve bundles under a dissection microscope (x25), and coating the vessels with a solution of 10% phenol in 95% ethanol as described previously (40). This renal denervation procedure prevents the renal vasoconstrictor response to suprarenal lumbar sympathetic nerve stimulation and prevents the antinatriuretic response to environmental stress. It can be demonstrated that this procedure reduces renal catecholamine histofluorescence to nondetectable levels and reduces renal tissue norepinephrine concentration to <5% of control (23, 40).
Test for efficacy of renal denervation. Kidneys asservated after animals were killed from all groups (renally innervated and denervated) were stored at 80°C and later processed as follows (4, 7). The tissue samples used to determine norepinephrine content were first extracted in 40 vol of ice-cold 0.1 M HCLO4. After extraction, the samples were centrifugated and 20 µl of the clear supernatant were transferred to a respective HPLC column. The peak heights obtained from the tissue samples were compared with those from known standards and then converted to nanograms of norepinephrine per gram of tissue.
Preparation for experiments. Three weeks after BDL, rats were again anesthetized with methohexital, and polyethylene catheters were inserted in a femoral vein and a femoral artery led out at the neck of the rat. In five rats with BDL and five control rats, blood was drawn from the arterial line 6 h after anesthesia in tubes containing 50 µl of ortho-phenanthroline (26 mmol/l) with Na-EDTA (125 mmol/l) for later measurement of angiotensin II. These rats were then anesthetized with thiobarbital, killed, and the kidneys were snap-frozen for RNA extraction or placed in methyl-carnoy solution for fixation. In the remaining rats, during methohexital anesthesia a fistula (polyethylene tubing) was inserted in the bladder and led out through the abdominal wall. A bipolar electrode (0.2-mm stainless steel wire, Science Products, Frankfurt, Germany) was placed on the left renal sympathetic nerve by a flank incision for direct RSNA recordings as previously described (9, 35, 36). This technique only allows for the recording of efferent nerve activity, as the activity of afferent nerve fibers is dependent on efferent nerve activity and too low to be assessed in the setting used (10). RSNA was amplified using a Grass P511 band-pass amplifier with a Grass HIP511 high-impedance probe (Grass Instruments, Quincy, MA) and then channeled to a rectifying voltage integrator (Grass model 7P10). The integrated voltage signals were displayed on the polygraph. The recording electrode was fixed to the nerve bundle with a silicone adhesive (Wacker Sil-Gel 604, Wacker-Chemie, Munich, Germany), and the electrode was tunneled to the back of the neck and exteriorized. Integrated RSNA was expressed as millivolts per second per 1-s interval. The data are mainly expressed as percent change from control values according to the conventional evaluation of multifiber recordings (39). Besides presenting the RSNA data as line/scatter plots, we also calculated the "area under the curve" in some experiments by increasing the number of evaluated data points to 50 per RSNA recordings in each experimental group. As area under the curve, we defined the area between the 100% line and the curves represented in the line scatter plots. The area under the curve was calculated with the help of a commercially available graphing and analyzing program (Sigmaplot 2001; Version 7.0).
Experimental Procedures
Assessment of the effects of the dose of the angiotensin II AT1receptor antagonist ZD-7155. We administered a nondepressor doses of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist ZD-7155 (6 µg iv) to putatively inhibit the renal effects of angiotensin II in BDL and control animals. To prove this assumption, 6 µg of ZD-7155 or vehicle (0,9% NaCl) were injected intravenously at the begin of a series of experiments after having achieved a "steady-state" situation (saline input = urine output) following the experimental procedures. After two 10-min control periods, nonpressor infusions of angiotensin II (either 6, 12, or 24 ng/min) were begun for additional 10 min. Then two recovery periods of 10 min each followed.
Assessment of different amounts of volume loads on RSNA. Volume expansions of 5 and 10% of the animals body weights were administered to cirrhotic and healthy rats, and the respective responses of renal nerve activity were assessed. Eventually, we infused an amount of saline of 10% body wt in all further experiments as we wanted to achieve a more severe challenge of sodium and water handling by the kidneys with this higher degree of volume expansion.
Angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockade in rats with BDL. Following surgical preparation, rats were placed in rat holders to permit steady-state urine collection. Urine was collected in 15- or 30-min fractions. Physiological saline was infused at a rate of 60 µl/min from the end of anesthesia until the end of all experimental maneuvers containing sufficient quantities of inulin and para-aminohippurate (PAH) for determination of inulin and PAH clearances (3, 17). Rats were allowed an equilibration period for at least 6 h after the end of the anesthesia. The recovery period ranged from 6 to 15 h with a median of 11 h. The recovery time was judged to be sufficient when the animals had gained a steady-state situation. Steady state meant that the background infusion of 60 µl/min equaled the urinary excretion per minute. This was used as a parameter to judge the recovery of the kidney function from surgery. This procedure allowed us to minimize the influence of postsurgical stress on our experimental outcome on the one hand, but to extend the recovery time not unnecessarily as to prevent a declining quality of renal nerve activity on the other. Hence, experimental protocols were started after urine output equaled saline input for at least four 15-min periods. Values for urine flow and sodium excretion of the last of these sampling periods were taken as data points at 0 min at the beginning of the first control period of the experimental protocol.
After having achieved the steady-state situation, the angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonist ZD-7155 (6 µg iv) or vehicle (0.9% NaCl) was given as a bolus injection (30 µl/vol iv) in these experiments. The dosage of the AT1 receptor antagonist ZD-7155 was previously proven to be only intrarenally effective (39). After two 15-min control periods, all rats were infused for 30 min with saline (10% body wt). Thereafter, three further periods of 30 min each were allowed for recovery. Blood samples of 150 µl were taken at the midpoint of each period for the assessment of glomerular filtration rate and PAH. At the end of the experiments, 3 mg of the ganglion blocking agent trimetapham-camsylate (Hoffmann-LaRoche, Basel, Switzerland) were injected to shut off postsynaptic RSNA. The background activity remaining thereafter was subtracted from the activity recorded throughout the experiment. Finally, the rats were killed and both kidneys and the liver were excised and weighed. The experimental protocol was repeated in bilaterally denervated cirrhotic rats and controls or in animals without renal sympathetic innervation and additional pretreatment with AT1 receptor antagonist ZD-7155.
Urine Analysis
Urine volume was determined gravimetrically. Urine and plasma sodium concentrations were measured by flame photometry. Values for urinary volume were expressed per gram kidney weight (gKW). Urine and plasma inulin and PAH concentrations were determined by the anthrone and ethylenediamine methods to assess inulin and PAH clearances.
Angiotensin II Measurements
Blood samples obtained as described above were immediately centrifuged, and plasma was stored at 26°C until analysis. Angiotensin II was measured by radioimmunoassay as described previously (25, 26). The angiotensin II antiserum "Celine III" (26) exhibited 1% cross-reactivity with angiotensin I and 100% cross-reactivity with angiotensin III and IV, respectively.
Real-Time PCR of Renin
Four rats of each group (control, DNX-control, cirrhosis, DNX cirrhosis) were used to assess whether the induction of cirrhosis 21 days and/or renal denervation 5 days before the actual experiments could alter renal renin expression.
Renal tissue was extracted with TriFast reagent (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany) by the method of Chomczynski (5).
First-strand cDNA was synthesized with TaqMan reverse transcription reagents (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany) using random hexamers as primers. Final RNA concentration in the reaction mixture was adjusted to 0.1 ng/µl. Reactions without Multiscribe reverse transcriptase were used as negative controls for genomic DNA contamination.
PCR was performed with an ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detector System and TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturers instructions. For amplification of the rat renin cDNA, the forward primer was 5'-GCTACATGGAGAATGGGACTGAA-3', the reverse primer was 5'-ACCACATCTTGGCTGAGGAAAC-3' and the Fam-labeled probe was 5'-CCATCCACTATGGATCAGGGAAGGTCAA-3' (28). The relative amount of the specific RNA was normalized with respect to 18S rRNA. Primers used for amplification of 18S cDNA were foreward 5'-TTGATTAAGT-CCCTGCCCTTTGT-3', reverse 5'-CGATCCGAGGGCCTCACTA-3' and probe 5'-CGCCCGTCGCTACTACCGATTGG-3'. All samples were run in triplicate.
Immunohistochemistry
After fixation in methyl-carnoy solution and embedding in paraffin, 2-µm sections were cut with a Leitz SM 2000 R microtome (Leica Instruments, Nussloch, Germany). Immunohistochemistry was performed (19) using a peroxidase reaction for detection of staining (Vectastain DAB kit, Vector Lab, Burlingame, CA). The antiserum used to detect rat renin (W. Fischli, Hofmann-LaRoche, Basel, Switzerland) was used at a dilution of 1:2,000 (18). For detection of angiotensin II, the polyclonal rabbit antiserum Celine III (26) was used at a dilution of 1:500.
In five cirrhotic and five control kidneys, quantification of juxtaglomerular renin or angiotensin II staining was performed by counting the number of glomeruli with an adjacent juxtaglomerular apparatus with positive staining; 250450 glomeruli per kidney were counted, and the number of positive glomeruli was expressed as a percentage of the total number of glomeruli counted. Medullary interstitial peritubular angiotensin staining was graded by two blinded observers as 0 (no staining), 1 (occasional patchy staining of peritubular interstitium), or 3 (widespread medullary interstitial peritubular staining).
Statistics
Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to assess significance of differences within groups. Two-way ANOVA was used for comparisons between groups. A Newman-Keuls test was employed for post hoc testing. Only a priori defined hypotheses were tested (41). A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results are expressed as means ± SE.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The assessment of our renal denervation surgery showed the following results: noradrenaline content in renally innervated animals was 160.3 ± 18.7 ng/g wet tissue (n = 12). In renally denervated animals, it decreased to 2.53 ± 0.7 ng/g wet tissue (n = 12), suggesting successful procedures (4).
Assessment of Renal Effect of Dose of Angiotensin II AT1Receptor Antagonist ZD-7155 Used
The low dose of ZD-7155 administered did not induce any hemodynamic responses. It was, however, effective in the kidney as two of the administered three nonpressor doses of ANG II (12 and 24 ng/min) induced water and sodium retention, which was significantly impaired after pretreatment with 6 µg of ZD-7155. (Fig. 1).
|
RSNA due to a volume load of 5% body wt was decreased during the time of infusion and returned gradually toward baseline levels during the following 1.5-h recovery period in controls and BDL animals (Fig. 2). However, the decreases were more pronounced in control animals compared with BDL rats.
|
The area under the curve in the experiments with volume expansion of 5% body wt were 1,152 ± 105 AU (arbitrary units) in cirrhotic vs. 2,696 ± 215 AU in control animals (ratio 1: 2, 3) (P < 0.05 vs. intact controls). The respective values in the experiments with volume expansion of 10% body wt were 2,177 ± 196 in cirrhotic vs. 5,499 ± 298 in control rats [ratio 1: 2, 5 (P < 0.05 vs. intact controls)].
Angiotensin II AT1 Receptor Blockade in Rats with BDL
Rats with common BDL excreted only 71.5 ± 4% of the administered volume load by 90 min after completing volume expansion. In cirrhotic rats pretreated with an angiotensin II AT1 inhibitor or after renal denervation (without or with additional AT1 inhibitor pretreatment) as well as in all control groups, the respective value ranged from 92 to 103% in 90 min. They were not different from one another but significantly greater than the excretion rate of the untreated cirrhotic animals (P < 0.05). As displayed in Figs. 3 and 4, absolute urinary flow rates (V) and urinary Na excretion (UNAV) increased to the highest level during the volume expansion period and were back to control values during the third 30-min period of recovery in cirrhotic animals and controls. This pattern was similar for the four groups of animals suffering from liver cirrhosis and for the four groups of control rats with no significant differences among them. However, animals with BDL and no further treatment exhibited a significantly smaller increase in urinary V and UNAV compared with all other groups of animals either suffering from liver cirrhosis or belonging to the healthy control groups (P < 0.05). In none of the experimental groups was blood pressure or heart rate affected by the experimental procedures (see Figs. 2 and 3).
|
|
|
|
Assessment of Angiotensin II and Renin
Systemic angiotensin II level were not different between cirrhotic animals and controls (78 ± 14 vs. 64 ± 16 fmol/ml; n = 5). RT PCR for renal RNA exhibited a marked increase of renal renin expression (Fig. 7) in cirrhotic animals compared with controls, but angiotensinogen and angiotensin-converting enzyme mRNA levels were unaltered (data not shown). However, renal denervation 5 days before our experiments reduced renin expression in cirrhotic animals to levels seen in controls. Renal denervation did not influence renin expression in healthy controls (Fig. 7). Immunostaining for renin was confined to juxtaglomerular areas in cirrhotic and control rats. The number of glomeruli with adjacent renin staining was similar in cirrhotic rats (10.7 ± 1.3%) and controls (14.8 ± 1.8%). Similarly, the number of glomeruli with adjacent staining for angiotensin II was also not different between cirrhotic (18.7 ± 2.0%) and control (17.7 ± 5.1%) rats.
|
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
One could argue that we only demonstrated that renal denervation and AT1 receptor inhibition relieved the volume retention in cirrhotic rats exposed to an acute volume load to the same extent but by different mechanisms. Hence, the AT1 receptor inhibition was able to produce a sort of "functional denervation" by chance. We cannot rule out this possibility completely. However, the fact that denervation and AT1 receptor blockade did not lead to an exaggerated sodium and volume excretion is not in favor of this assumption: if sympathetic innervation and angiotensin II were to account for sodium and water excretion in our cirrhotic animals completely independent from one another, it is not easy to explain why the amount of salt and water excreted was again the same as with denervation alone under these circumstances. If low amounts of angiotensin (inhibited by small amounts of an AT1 inhibitor) are mandatory for the tubular effect of sympathetic impulses, it is conceivable that angiotensin under these circumstances acts for example on pre- and postsynaptic receptors without any further effect on salt and water reabsorption. Our previous data on rats subjected to air-jet stress support the idea of an interaction between RSNA and tubular angiotensin II in renal sodium and water handling (39). Furthermore, a recent paper demonstrated that renal nerve stimulation increased the effect of intraluminal angiotensin II on proximal tubule transport in rats, an effect that was attenuated by an ACE-inhibitor (32).
It is possible that sodium and water retention in cirrhotic animals was not only the consequence of a tubular interaction of peritubular sympathetic nerve endings and local angiotensin II. Our results also suggest a possible indirect influence of sympathetic activity on tubular reabsorption via the increase in renin expression in the iuxtaglomerular apparatus (10), as 5 days of renal denervation were enough to reduce renin expression in cirrhotic animals to levels seen in healthy control animals.
Our results when using a saline load of 5% body wt suggest that our rats (control and cirrhotic) might be more sensitive to volume expansion than animals used by others, likely due to strain differences (9). However, the responses of RSNA in controls as well as in cirrhotic animals are comparable to previous reports.
While using a saline load of 10% body wt, we were naturally able to initially decrease RSNA further than in reports using less amount of fluid (9, 10). Furthermore, we got more complex response patterns of RSNA. During the actual infusion of saline of 10% body wt, RSNA was decreased more pronounced in controls compared with the infusion of a load of 5% body wt. This might be due to a more pronounced stimulation of baroreceptor mechanisms involved in the downregulation of renal nerve activity.
In addition, the decreases in RSNA in BDL animals were nominally lowered to same percentage degree as in the respective controls during the infusion of the volume load. However, the similar reduction of RSNA in BDL animals during actual volume expansion does not necessarily mean that the absolute sympathetic nerve activity was reduced to the same levels as in controls. Given the settings of our Grass recording equipment, the basal absolute RSNA levels were for the cirrhotic groups 510 ± 39 µV and for controls 360 ± 34 µV. Furthermore, the effect of renal denervation and the blunted excretion of the infused saline load in cirrhotic animals rather argue against this assumption of a similar absolute depression of RSNA in cirrhotic animals and controls.
The higher amount of fluid infused was also followed in the recovery period by responses that were phenomenologically different from the ones seen in the animals infused with a lower load. The mechanisms involved in the downregulation of RSNA decrease were obviously so strongly stimulated that it took up to 3 h for RSNA to recover. In BDL animals, the vigorous stimulation of RSNA controlling mechanism during VE was followed by a strong counterregulation that restored RSNA rapidly to control levels again. A response quite different from what we and others saw in the animals receiving a load of 5% body wt (9).
Does this mean that the different shape of the curves in animals receiving loads of 5 and 10% body wt also suggests a completely different ability to withdraw sympathetic activity to the kidneys to volume expansion in the 10% group?
One has to take into account the sympathetic withdrawal during actual volume expansion and recovery period as a whole to answer this question. One possibility to evaluate sympathetic withdrawal is to calculate the area under the curve (e.g., in our experiments the area between the RSNA curves and the 100% line). These calculations showed that in our experiments in controls the sympathetic withdrawals were always much more pronounced than in cirrhotic animals. Furthermore, it turned out that the relationship of sympathetic withdrawal between cirrhotic animals and controls was about the same in both groups if assessed by the areas under the curves (1:2.2 in the 5% group and 1:2.5 in the 10% group). Hence, the impaired possibility to withdraw sympathetic activity to the kidneys was comparable in cirrhotic animals whether they received a saline load of 5 or 10% body wt.
In control animals, no effect of AT1 receptor inhibition or renal denervation could be observed since RSNA was likely lowered to a very low level of activity in the first place during the volume expansion with saline (10). This is in contrast to the likely situation in cirrhotic animals when renal sympathetic activity is not properly suppressed and controlled.
In our experiments with background infusions of nonpressor doses of angiotensin II, which altered urinary volume and sodium excretion, the specific AT1 receptor antagonist ZD-7155 could abolish these angiotensin II-dependent responses, suggesting a specific intrarenal effect (30). The kidney is known to be very sensitive to the effects of angiotensin II (17, 23).
In addition to the likely inadequately high RSNA, we found evidence for a stimulated intrarenal renin-angiotensin system, in agreement with previous studies (37). Renin synthesis was stimulated, although there was no abnormality of the intrarenal distribution of immunoreactive renin. In contrast, immunoreactive angiotensin II was clearly increased in cirrhotic rat kidneys in a medullary localization in the vicinity of proximal tubules, where the sympathetic innervation is most abundant (10).
The functional response to the AT1 antagonist supports the notion that intrarenal angiotensin II was increased. Under these circumstances, AT1 blockade was equivalent to renal denervation in restoring the excretory responses to a volume load. Although we cannot exclude additive effects of AT1 and sympathetic outflow on volume retention, a specific interaction between AT1 and sympathetic nerves appears more likely. Such an interaction could occur at peritubular sympathetic varicosities by AT1-mediated presynaptic stimulation of neurotransmitter release(36, 39) or at the juxtaglomerular apparatus by nerve-mediated stimulation of renin release (2). The peritubular angiotensin II staining points to an interaction with the renal nerves at the peritubular level (39).
More than a decade ago, Solis-Herruzo et al. (35) could demonstrate that the acute inhibition of sympathetic drive to the kidney of patients with severe liver cirrhosis could improve and stabilize the renal excretory function in these patients. In this study, RSNA to the kidney was blocked with the help of an injection of a anesthetic drug into the lumbar plexus. We speculate that a prescription of low doses of an angiotensin II AT1 receptor inhibitors could be an alternative way to achieve a comparable effect in situations of acutely exacerbating volume retention in liver cirrhotic patients. Our study with an angiotensin II AT1 receptor inhibitor does not only provide information how a low-grade inhibition of the renal renin-angiotensin system might improve sodium and water handling by the kidney in liver cirrhosis but could also implicate an advantage of AT1 receptor antagonists over ACE inhibitors in this respect: in experimental settings, AT1 receptor inhibitors had less detrimental effects on glomerular perfusion pressure as the vasodilatory properties of bradykinin on the afferent arteriole of the glomeruli were preserved (24).
Our study demonstrates that in rats with liver cirrhosis after common BDL, low doses of an angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonist without effects on blood pressure and heart rate or detectable alterations in glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow induced a functional renal sympathetic denervation of the kidney, which restored the normal handling of acute volume expansions in these animals. Interestingly, we found signs of an increased activity of the renin-angiotensin system in cirrhotic rat kidneys in a medullary localization in the vicinity of proximal tubules, where the sympathetic innervation is most abundant (10). In how far this observation is of importance for the treatment of volume and sodium retaining in patients with liver cirrhosis warrants further research.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Visit Other APS Journals Online |