Prostaglandin E2 EP2 and EP4 receptor activation mediates cAMP-dependent hyperpolarization and exocytosis of renin in juxtaglomerular cells

Ulla G. Friis,1 Jane Stubbe,1 Torben R. Uhrenholt,1 Per Svenningsen,1 Rolf M. Nüsing,2 Ole Skøtt,1 and Boye L. Jensen1

1Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; and 2Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Submitted 13 May 2005 ; accepted in final form 21 June 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
PGE2 and PGI2 stimulate renin secretion and cAMP accumulation in juxtaglomerular granular (JG) cells. We addressed, at the single-cell level, the receptor subtypes and intracellular transduction mechanisms involved. Patch clamp was used to determine cell capacitance (Cm), current, and membrane voltage in response to PGE2, EP2 and EP4 receptor agonists, and an IP receptor agonist. PGE2 (0.1 µmol/l) increased Cm significantly, and the increase was abolished by intracellular application of the protein kinase A antagonist Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS. EP2-selective ligands butaprost (1 µmol/l), AE1–259-01 (1 nmol/l), EP4-selective agonist AE1–329 (1 nmol/l), and IP agonist iloprost (1 µmol/l) significantly increased Cm mediated by PKA. The EP4 antagonist AE3–208 (10 nmol/l) blocked the effect of EP4 agonist but did not alter the response to PGE2. Application of both EP4 antagonist and EP2-antagonist AH-6809 abolished the effects of PGE2 on Cm and current. EP2 and EP4 ligands stimulated cAMP formation in JG cells. PGE2 rapidly stimulated renin secretion from superfused JG cells and diminished the membrane-adjacent granule pool as determined by confocal microscopy. The membrane potential hyperpolarized significantly after PGE2, butaprost, AE1–329 and AE1–259 and outward current was augmented in a PKA-dependent fashion. PGE2-stimulated outward current, but not Cm change, was abolished by the BKCa channel inhibitor iberiotoxin (300 nmol/l). EP2 and EP4 mRNA was detected in sampled JG cells, and the preglomerular and glomerular vasculature was immunopositive for EP4. Thus IP, EP2, and EP4 receptors are associated with JG cells, and their activation leads to rapid PKA-mediated exocytotic fusion and release of renin granules.

cyclooxygenase; capacitance; kidney; current; potential


RENIN IS STORED AND RELEASED by juxtaglomerular granular (JG) cells in the distal part of the afferent glomerular arterioles. The activity of the circulating renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is determined predominantly by the rate of renin secretion from the JG-cells. Cyclooxygenase (COX) activity supports basal renin release in vivo (32). The increase in renin expression and secretion seen in response to a low epithelial NaCl transport rate across the thick ascending limb of Henle's loop (TALH) is significantly attenuated by COX blockers, in both experimental animals and humans (10, 22, 31, 40, 41). Expression of the inducible COX enzyme COX-2 correlates inversely with NaCl transport across TALH, and COX-2 activity generates predominantly PGE2 at this site (5, 9, 29, 41, 42). Compared with the detailed insight into the regulation of prostaglandin synthesis by the epithelium, relatively less is known about the downstream stimulus-secretion mechanism through which prostaglandins promote renin secretion.

We have shown that PGE2 and PGI2 lead to a parallel accumulation of cAMP and stimulation of renin secretion in primary cell cultures enriched in JG cells (18). This finding suggested that the stimulation of renin by PGE2 and PGI2 was through interaction with receptors on JG cells and that it was mediated by cAMP. Intracellular delivery of cAMP in single JG cells elicits exocytosis of renin that depends on PKA activity (11). cAMP-mediated exocytosis of renin is associated with increased outward current through potassium channels (BKCa-ZERO variant) and hyperpolarization (12). PGE2 activates BKCa channels in vascular myocytes (45), but whether such electrophysiological events and PKA activity underlie the stimulatory effect of prostaglandins on intracellular signaling in JG-cells has not been determined.

The actions of PGI2 and PGE2 are mediated by G protein-coupled prostanoid receptors, IP and EP1–EP4 (7). IP, EP2, and EP4 receptors are encoded by different genes but converge on a Gs protein and can activate adenylyl cyclase with subsequent increased formation of cAMP (3, 7, 27, 33). The EP4 receptor has been shown in kidney vessels, glomeruli, and primary JG cell cultures (4, 26, 30, 35, 37). Kidneys from mice with targeted EP4 receptor disruption display a lower sensitivity of renin secretion to PGE2 infusion (34). EP2 transcripts have been detected in descending limbs of Henle's loop, but vascular expression is not a consistent finding (16, 20, 26, 30, 37, 44). EP2 knockout mice display normal plasma renin activity (6, 39), but isolated kidneys have altered renovascular sensitivity and renin response to PGE2 infusion (34). Thus both EP2 and EP4 receptors contribute to PGE2-mediated stimulatory effects on renin at integrated levels, but it is not clear whether this is due to direct effects of both receptors on JG cells or indirect effects related to tubular transport of NaCl. In particular, it is not known whether EP2 and EP4 colocalize in single JG cells. The aim of the present study was to examine the transduction mechanisms initiated by PGE2 and PGI2 at the single-JG cell level and to determine the contribution of EP2 and EP4 receptors to PGE2-mediated stimulatory effects on renin secretion.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Rat JG cells. JG cells were isolated from rat renal cortex as described (11). For patch clamp, cells were transferred to coverslips in RPMI-1640 medium. Superfusion of JG cells and measurement of renin were done as described (11, 25).

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (60–80 g) on a standard diet were used. Animal care was approved and carried out in accordance with institutional and American Physiological Society principles and guidelines on the care and use of laboratory animals.

Patch-clamp experiments. The patch-clamp experiments were performed as described (11, 12) with an internal solution (in mmol/l): 135 K-glutamate, 10 NaCl, 10 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES-NaOH, 0.5 Mg-ATP, and 0.3 Na2GTP; osmolality was 303 mosmol/kgH2O, pH 7.07, with or without Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS (RpcAMPS; 5 µmol/l). The external solution was (in mmol/l) 10 HEPES-NaOH, 140 NaCl, 2.8 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 11 glucose, and 10 sucrose; osmolality was ~300 mosmol/kgH2O (range 296–314 mosmol/kgH2O), pH 7.25, with or without agonists/antagonists.

RT-PCR analysis of EP receptors in sampled JG cells. Single JG cells were sampled with patch pipettes, and total RNA was isolated and used as a template for RT-PCR analysis (11, 20). DNA oligonucleotide primer sequences for rat EP2 and EP4 receptors were as published (20).

Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescent labeling. Fixation, paraffin-embedding, and sectioning of rat kidneys and tissue-labeling procedures for EP4 and EP2 immunoreactive proteins were as described (38). Immunofluorescent labeling of isolated JG cells for renin was performed as described (12). For confocal imaging, the labeled cells were visualized with a Leica DM IRBE microscope (x100/1.4 numerical aperture oil-immersion lens) with TCS four-dimensional confocal attachments and an air-cooled argon/krypton laser (3 major emission lines at 488, 568, and 647 nm). Images of the labeled cells (anti-IgG Alexa Fluor 488) were obtained using a 488-nm excitation wavelength and 510-nm long-pass filter. The sectional image stacks (20–25 2-dimensional images) were produced from line scans of ~1-s duration.

Agents. HEPES, Tris·HCl, glucose, sucrose, insulin, penicillin, streptomycin, K-glutamate, IBMX, Mg-ATP, Na2-ATP, forskolin, dithiothreitol, PGE2 and trypsin were from Sigma, St. Louis, MO. RPMI 1640 and FCS were from GIBCO Life Technologies. Collagenase A, Na2-GTP, and cAMP were from Roche. Iberiotoxin was from Alomone Labs (Jerusalem, Israel). RpcAMPS was from Biomol. AH-6809, iloprost, and butaprost were from Cayman Chemical. ONO-AE1–329 (AE1–329), ONO-AE1–259-01 (AE1–259), and ONO-AE3–208 (AE3–208) were kind gifts from ONO Pharmaceuticals. AE1–329 has a Kd value for EP4 at 10 nmol/l and >3,000 nmol/l for EP2. AE1–259 has a Kd value for EP2 at 3 nmol/l and >6,000 nmol/l for EP4. AE3–208 has a Ki value to displace endogenous ligand of 1.3 nmol/l for EP4 and >10,000 nmol/l for EP2 receptor (21, 36). Stock solutions of ligands were made in ethanol or DMSO (10–2 mol/l) and kept at –20°C. Antibodies directed against the EP4 receptor (rabbit anti-human, 101775) and EP2 receptor (rabbit anti-rat, 101750) were from Cayman Chemical.

Statistics. All values are given as means ± SE. Paired Student's t-tests were used to estimate statistical significant difference from zero in experiments where Cm was measured. The change in Cm was calculated as the difference (in %) in Cm (at t = 0 min and t = 10 min). ANOVA was used to determine whether there was statistical significance among several groups of data. A post hoc test was performed by Student's unpaired t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Effect of PGE2, EP subtype-, and IP-specific agonists on cell Cm in single JG cells. Granular cells were accepted for measurements of Cm if they displayed the typical current-voltage relationship (11, 12). Cells selected with these criteria contain active renin and renin mRNA (11). The whole cell configuration was obtained in 61 JG cells from 36 preparations. The cells had an average Cm of 1.94 ± 0.08 pF (n = 61). After the whole cell configuration was established, a current-voltage relationship was recorded and then individual cells were superfused with agonists, and Cm was followed with time. PGE2 (0.1 µmol/l) significantly increased Cm (Fig. 1A, n = 4). Dialysis with the PKA antagonist RpcAMPS (5 µmol/l) abolished the PGE2-mediated effects on Cm (Fig. 1A, n = 4). The EP2-specific ligand butaprost (1 µmol/l) significantly increased Cm (Fig. 1B, n = 4), and in a separate series RpcAMPS significantly inhibited the effect of butaprost on Cm (Fig. 1B, n = 4). The potent EP2-specific agonist AE1–259 also increased Cm significantly (1 nmol/l, Fig. 1C, n = 4), and this increase also depended on intact PKA activity (Fig. 1C, n = 4). The EP4 receptor-specific ligand AE1–329 significantly increased Cm (1 nmol/l, Fig. 1D, n = 4). The AE1–329-mediated increase in Cm was significantly inhibited by intracellular RpcAMPS (Fig. 1D, n = 4). Iloprost, an IP receptor agonist (1 µmol/l), also enhanced Cm significantly (11.5 ± 2%, n = 4, P ≤ 0.006, not shown). We did not detect any difference in the lag time before Cm began to increase in response to the different EP agonists (measurements started 1 min after addition of agonist: PGE2, 138 ± 45 s; butaprost, 98 ± 52 s; AE1–329, 135 ± 17 s; AE1–259, 120 ± 12 s; all n = 4; the average of the entire series was 137 ± 29 s). For iloprost, the lag time was 208 ± 29 s.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effect of PGE2 and EP receptor-specific ligands on cell capacitance changes (Cm) in single juxtaglomerular granular (JG) cells. A: effect of PGE2 (arrow, –; 0.1 µmol/l) on Cm (n = 4) and effect of intracellular dialysis with a protein kinase A inhibitor, Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS (RpcAMPS; +; 5 µmol/l, n = 4) on PGE2-induced changes in Cm (left). Right: average changes in Cm in response to PGE2 with and without intracellular RpcAMPs ± SE. *P ≤ 0.05 at t = 0 vs. t = 10 min. **P ≤ 0.05 PGE2 with and without RpcAMPs. B: conditions are as in A, but cells were superfused with EP2-specific butaprost (1 µmol/l) without (filled bar) and with (open bar) intracellular RpcAMPs. C: conditions are as in A, but cells were superfused with EP2-specific ONO-AE1–259-01 (1 nmol/l) without (filled bar) and with intracellular RpcAMPS (open bar). D: conditions are as in A, but JG cells were superfused with EP4-specific ligand ONO-AE1–329 (1 nmol/l) with and without RpcAMPS. These cells were also used for membrane current and potential measurements, and data are shown in Fig. 2.

 
Effect of PGE2 and IP-, EP2-, and EP4-specific ligands on whole cell current and membrane potential in single JG cells. PGE2 (0.1 µmol/l) significantly increased outward current, which was associated with hyperpolarization (Fig. 2A, n = 4). This response was abolished by dialysis of the cells with the PKA antagonist RpcAMPS (Fig. 2A, right, n = 4). The EP2-specific agonists butaprost and AE1–259 led to significant increases in outward current and hyperpolarization, also in a PKA-sensitive manner (Fig. 2B, both n = 4). Similar cellular responses were recorded in response to the EP4 agonist AE1–329 (1 nmol/l, n = 4 and with blocker n = 4, Fig. 2B). An IP agonist, iloprost, significantly enhanced outward current (94 ± 25%, P ≤ 0.001) and hyperpolarized cell potential (–10 ± 4.7 mV, P ≤ 0.04; not shown, n = 6).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of PGE2 and EP receptor-specific ligands on whole cell current and membrane potential in single JG-cells. A: control average current-voltage (I-V) relationship was measured immediately after the whole cell configuration was obtained ({bullet}). The measurement was repeated 10 min after addition of PGE2 ({blacksquare}). Membrane potential was determined as 0-current potential before and after PGE2, and the average change over 10 min is shown (filled bar, n = 4, *P ≤ 0.05 at t = 0 and t = 10 min). In a second series, the effect of a PKA blocker on PGE2 responses on current and membrane potential was examined. The average change is shown (open bar, n = 4). **P ≤ 0.05, PGE2 with and without RpcAMPS. B: membrane potential was determined as 0-current potential before and after superfusion of the cell with EP2-specific ligands butaprost and AE1–259 and with EP4-specific ligand AE1–329 (filled bars, n = 4 in each series. *P ≤ 0.05 at t = 0 and t = 10 min). In subsequent experimental series, the effect of dialysis with a PKA blocker (RpcAMPS) on the membrane potential response to superfusion with EP agonists was examined (n = 4 with each agonist, open bars). **P ≤ 0.05, agonist with and without RpcAMPS.

 
Effect of EP receptor antagonists and K channel blockers on the electrophysiological response to PGE2 in JG cells. The effect of PGE2 was tested in the presence of an EP4 receptor-selective antagonist, AE3–208 (21). AE3–208 alone (10 nmol/l) did not change current and Cm, and subsequent addition of the EP4 agonist AE1–329 (1 nmol/l) had no effect on currents, membrane potential (Vm; 6.8 ± 7 mV, not significant), or Cm (Fig. 3, C-IV, n = 4) showing effective blockade of the EP4 receptor. In the presence of the EP4 blocker, PGE2 still induced a significant hyperpolarization (–20.3 ± 2.0 mV, P ≤ 0.004, n = 3), augmented outward current (Fig. 3E), and increased Cm (Fig. 3, A and C-II, n = 4). In JG cells pretreated with both AE3–208 and an established EP1-EP2 antagonist, AH-6809, PGE2 had no significant effect on Cm and current (Fig. 3, B, C-III, and F) or Vm (2.8 ± 4.6 mV, NS) (n = 4).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. A and B: traces showing the effect of PGE2 on Cm in single JG cells in the presence of an EP4-selective antagonist, AE3–208 (A), and combined AE3–208 and EP2 antagonist AH-6809 (B). C: average changes in Cm ± SE in single JG cells. PGE2 was used at 0.1 µmol/l. I: PGE2 and iberiotoxin (300 nmol/l, n = 4); II: PGE2 and EP4 blocker AE3–208 (10 nmol/l, n = 4); III: PGE2 and combined AE3–208 (10 nmol/l) and EP2 antagonist AH-6809 (10 µmol/l); IV: EP4 agonist AE1–329 (1 nmol/l) and EP4 blocker AE3–208 (10 nmol/l, n = 5). *P ≤ 0.05. D: current traces from a single experiment displaying the effect of iberiotoxin on PGE2-induced membrane currents. Whole cell currents were measured immediately after the whole cell configuration was obtained and repeated after addition of PGE2 for 10 min and after further addition of iberiotoxin. E: steady-state average I-V relationships immediately after the whole cell configuration was obtained in the presence of an EP4 antagonist ({bullet}, control) and after the same cells were exposed to PGE2 ({blacksquare}). *P ≤ 0.05. F: steady-state average I-V relationships immediately after the whole cell configuration was obtained in the presence of an EP4 and an EP2 antagonist ({bullet}, control) and after the same cells were exposed to PGE2 ({blacksquare}). G: steady-state average I-V relationships immediately after the whole cell configuration was obtained ({bullet}, control), after the cells were exposed to PGE2 for ~3–8 min ({blacksquare}, PGE2), and after up to 4 min of local superfusion with iberiotoxin ({blacktriangleup}). *P ≤ 0.05 (n = 5).

 
PGE2-induced outward current (0.1 µmol/l, Fig. 2A, Fig. 3, D and G) was reversibly inhibited (79.3 ± 2.5%) by the BKCa blocker iberiotoxin (300 nmol/l) (Fig. 3, D and G, n = 4). Hyperpolarization was significantly reduced to –8.0 ± 2.3 mV, but not fully prevented, after iberiotoxin. In a separate series, iberiotoxin (300 nmol/l) did not modify the increase in Cm in response to PGE2 (Fig. 3, CI, n = 4).

Effect of EP receptor-specific ligands on cAMP formation. EP2-specific ligands (butaprost, AE1–259) and EP4-specific AE1–329 increased cAMP formation significantly in a dose-dependent fashion in primary JG cell cultures (Fig. 4). Hanes-Woolf plots yielded EC50 values of 1.5 ± 1 µmol/l for butaprost, 29 ± 4 nmol/l for AE1–259, and 1.6 ± 0.3 nmol/l (AE1–329), which are in accordance with reported values for these agonists from heterologous expression systems (36). Forskolin significantly increased cAMP from 355 ± 22 to 5,901 ± 283 fmol/well in the butaprost-series (n = 5) and from 160 ± 11 to 5,255 ± 942 fmol/well in the AE-compound series (n = 5).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of EP receptor-specific ligands on cAMP formation in isolated JG cells. JG cells were incubated for 10 min with various agonists (AC) in the presence of 100 mmol/l of the phosphodiesterase inhibitor IBMX. C, control. Bars represent average cAMP content per well ± SE (n = 6 separate experiments; 2 wells assigned/condition in each experiment). *P ≤ 0.05.

 
Rapid effects of PGE2 on renin secretion. To validate that Cm changes reflected release of renin, we measured renin release from superfused JG cells at 30-s intervals. PGE2 (10 µmol/l) elicited a significant, transient increase in secretion rate 150 s after addition of PGE2 (Fig. 5A). Moreover, renin granules were visualized by laser confocal renin immunofluorescence. In control JG cells, renin immunofluorescence displayed a distinct radial heterogeneity with confluent areas in the juxtanuclear area and smaller separate granular structures more distant from the nucleus adjacent to the plasma membrane (Fig. 5, BaBe). Three-dimensional reconstruction of optical sections showed that peripheral labeling corresponded to limited spheres, probably mature secretory granules (see supplementary data at http://ajprenal.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/00201.2004/DC1). The perinuclear labeling was associated with large confluent structures compatible with renin-containing parts of endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi cisterns. The nucleus was distinct from these cisterns as evidenced by labeling with DAPI (Fig. 5, BkBm). The peripheral granules were significantly diminished after PGE2 stimulation for 20 min before fixation (Fig. 5, BfBj), whereas the perinuclear labeling largely remained (see supplementary data with 3D-reconstructed prestimulated JG cell at the URL noted above).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. A: effect of PGE2 on renin secretion from superfused JG cells. Left: result from a single experiment. Right: average renin release rate immediately before change of superfusate and 150 s after the change in superfusate ± SE (n = 5 in each series). *P ≤ 0.05. B: effect of PGE2 on renin granule morphology in JG cells. Single JG cells were labeled with anti-renin antibody that was visualized with a fluorescence-coupled secondary antibody. The photos display 2-dimensional projections of 3-dimensional reconstructed cells (see supplementary data at http://ajprenal.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/00201.2004/DC1). ae: Untreated control cells. fj: Cells pretreated with PGE2 for 20 min before fixation. The Bluefire pseudocolor intensity scale was used and is shown at right (aj). No filtering or intensity changes were made post hoc. The depicted cells were from 4 different preparations (n = 6 experiments). km: Immunofluorescence labeling for renin (red) in resting JG cells where the nucleus was visualized (blue). Bars = 8 µm.

 
Expression of EP2 and EP4 mRNAs in single sampled JG cells and distribution of EP2 and EP4 receptor immunoreactive protein. Amplification of cDNA from single, sampled JG cells by PCR yielded products for EP2 and EP4 with the expected molecular size and only in the presence of RT and cDNA (Fig. 6A). Immunostaining with the EP2-specific antibody yielded labeling that was associated with descending limbs of Henle's loop in the medulla (not shown) and distal convoluted tubules in the cortex (Fig. 6B, top left). Labeling was observed predominantly in the basolateral aspect of the epithelial cells, as in human kidney (Fig. 6B, top) (38). In serial sections, there was no apparent overlap in the labeling pattern for EP2 and renin, which was observed in the distal afferent arteriole (Fig. 6B, top).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Localization of EP2 and EP4 receptor in JG cells and kidney sections. A: PCR amplification of cDNA from single, sampled JG cells for EP2 and EP4 receptor. Negative controls were omission of reverse transcriptase (0-RT) and water instead of cDNA. Size marker is {phi}X174DNA/HaeIII fragments. B: immunohistochemical and immunofluorescent labeling of rat kidney sections for EP2 receptor and renin (top) and EP4 receptor (middle and bottom). In adjacent sections, EP2 and renin immunoreactivity did not colocalize (top). EP4 labeling was associated with preglomerular arterioles and glomeruli (left) and intrarenal arteries (right). EP4 labeling was observed in media smooth muscle and endothelium (right). Bars = 50 µm.

 
Labeling of kidney sections with EP4-specific antibody showed that immunoreactivity was associated with all segments of the preglomerular vasculature including afferent arterioles and glomeruli (Fig. 6B, middle and bottom). Intraglomerular labeling was observed along the endothelial cells of glomerular capillaries and in perivascular cells, most likely visceral podocytes (Fig. 6B). EP4 immunostaining was detected in media smooth muscle cells, including the juxtaglomerular end of afferent arterioles, and, of note, also in endothelium (Fig. 6B).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The present data showed that PGE2 EP2 and EP4 receptors and the PGI2 IP receptor were associated with single JG cells. Selective activation of each EP receptor subtype led to rapid cAMP formation and a BKCa channel-mediated increase in outward current, hyperpolarization, and an increase in Cm. The PGE2-mediated increase in Cm and hyperpolarization depended on protein kinase A and was abolished only by combined application of EP2 and EP4 receptor antagonists. The PGE2-induced increase in Cm was associated with rapid release of active renin and a decreased size of the membrane-adjacent renin granule pool. Thus the data indicate that EP2 and EP4 receptors are coexpressed in single JG cells and that they contribute redundantly to exocytosis of renin in response to PGE2.

EP4 receptors have been detected consistently in glomeruli, vasculature, and distal nephron segments (4, 16, 26, 30, 35, 37). The present immunostaining data confirmed the vascular and glomerular expression. EP2 receptors have been found in kidney vessels and glomeruli in some studies (16, 20, 44) and not in others (30, 37). We observed EP2 immunoreactivity associated with the basolateral surface of descending limb cells of Henle's loop. In a previous study, EP2 mRNA was observed in this segment by analysis of microdissected segments (20), which indicates that the EP2 antibody was specific. The fact that EP2 immunoreactivity was not observed in the vasculature whereas EP2 transcripts were detected in sampled JG cells could be due to a lower sensitivity of immunostaining compared with PCR, because data at the functional level suggest that EP2 receptors contribute significantly to PGE2-mediated depressor effects on renal and systemic hemodynamics (1, 17, 23, 34, 44). EP2 binding sites are present in vascular smooth muscle from several vascular beds (24, 43). EP2 is by far the least abundant EP receptor subtype in kidney and vasculature in comparative assays (19, 20, 44). Together, the data indicate functionally significant, although low, EP2 expression in JG cells.

Compared with wild-type mice, EP2 receptor null mice exhibit no difference in basal renin parameters and renin increases similarly after various stimuli (1, 6, 23, 39). In isolated, perfused kidneys from mice with loss-of-function mutations in each of the four EP receptors, both EP2 and EP4 receptors contributed significantly to PGE2-mediated acute effects on renin secretion (and vascular resistance) (34). In the isolated perfused kidney, effects of PGE2 on renin secretion could be either direct on JG cells or indirect through effects on tubular transport of NaCl. Our data suggest that PGE2 interacts with EP2 and EP4 receptors associated with JG cell surface membranes. A recent study reported that PGI2, and not PGE2, was the dominant prostanoid to control renin release in vivo and in vitro (15). The present data confirmed at the single-cell level that an IP agonist enhances Cm and whole cell current. The discrepancy on the role of PGE2 could be caused by the fact that Fujino et al.(15) determined total renin activity in cells and supernatant of JG cell cultures after prolonged incubation with agonists. This parameter probably reflects renin synthesis/degradation more than secretion.

We observed that all patch-clamped JG cells were sensitive to either EP ligand and that double blockade of both EP2 and EP4 receptors was necessary to abolish the cellular responses to PGE2. This indicates that both receptors were coexpressed in the same cells. If so, why are there two cAMP-coupled EP receptors associated with JG cells and do they contribute differentially to stimulus-secretion coupling? We did not detect qualitative differences in acute electrophysiological responses (Vm, I, Cm) between PGE2 and EP2- or EP4-specific ligands. A cooperative action of EP2 and EP4 receptors is involved in the transduction of PGE2 signals in other cell types (36), but it appears not to be a prerequisite for the acute effects on renin secretion. Distinguishing features of the EP4 receptor could play a role during prolonged exposure to PGE2 and comprise ligand-mediated desensitization (2, 8, 28), activation of PI3-K/ERK/MAP kinase pathways (13, 14), and a greater susceptibility to metabolic inactivation of PGE2 (28). If EP4 internalization occurs in JG cells, a restricted stable EP2 expression could potentially serve to sustain PGE2 sensitivity.

EP2 and EP4 receptor activation elicited hyperpolarization mediated by cAMP-dependent interaction with the BKCa channel (12). When hyperpolarization was prevented, the PGE2-mediated Cm increase was intact. Thus hyperpolarization is not necessary for exocytosis of renin. In vivo, different and opposing stimuli influence JG cell membrane potential. In this setting, the hyperpolarizing impact of K channel activation may have a permissive role in stimulus-secretion coupling by stabilizing membrane potential in a range that prevents activation of voltage-gated calcium channels. At depolarized potentials, cAMP loses its ability to increase Cm dependent on voltage-dependent calcium channels (12).

In summary, the present findings demonstrate coexpression of EP2 and EP4 receptors at the level of the single JG cell. The rapid EP2 and EP4 transduction mechanism in JG cells is associated with enhanced production of cAMP, activation of PKA, PKA-mediated membrane hyperpolarization, and an increase in Cm.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The present work was supported by grants from Carlsbergfondet, the Danish Medical Research Council (UGF: 52001085; BLJ: 22040305; OS: 99022742), the Danish Heart Foundation (UGF: 00–2-1–3-22831; OS: 99–2-2–36-22743), the NOVO Nordisk Foundation, and the Foundation of 17.12.1981. Data were presented in abstract form at the 36th annual meeting of the American Society of Nephrology (November 14–17, 2003, San Diego, CA).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Annette K. Rasmussen, Inge Andersen, Gitte Dybmose, and Mette Fredenslund for excellent technical assistance. The authors also thank Anthony M. Carter for linguistic advice.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: B. L. Jensen, Dept. of Physiology and Pharmacology, Univ. of Southern Denmark, Winslowparken 21, 3, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark (e-mail: bljensen{at}health.sdu.dk)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Audoly LP, Tille SL, Goulet J, Key M, Nguyen MT, Stock J, McNeish J, Koller BH, and Coffman TM. Identification of specific EP receptors responsible for the hemodynamic effects of PGE2. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 277: H924–H930, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bastepe M and Ashby B. The long cytoplasmic carboxyl terminus of the prostaglandin E2 receptor EP4 subtype is essential for agonist-induced desensitization. Mol Pharmacol 51: 343–349, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Boie Y, Stocco R, Sawyer N, Slipetz DM, Ungrin MD, Neuschafer-Rube F, Puschel P, Metters KM, and Abramovitz M. Molecular cloning and characterization of the four rat prostaglandin E2 receptor subtypes. Eur J Pharmacol 340: 227–241, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Breyer MD, Davis L, Jacobsson HR, and Breyer R. Differential localization of prostaglandin E receptor subtypes in human kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 270: F912–F918, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cheng HF, Wang JL, Zhang MZ, McKanna JA, and Harris RC. Role of p38 in the regulation of renal cortical cyclooxygenase-2 expression by extracellular chloride. J Clin Invest 106: 681–688, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Cheng HF, Wang SW, Zhang MZ, McKanna JA, Breyer R, and Harris RC. Prostaglandins that increase renin production in response to ACE inhibition are not derived from cyclooxygenase-1. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 283: R638–R646, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Coleman RA, Smith WL, and Narumiya SVIII. International union of pharmacology classification of prostanoid receptors: properties, distribution, and structure of the receptors and their subtypes. Pharmacol Rev 46: 205–229, 1994.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Desai S, April H, Nwaneshiudu, and Ashby B. Comparison of agonist-induced internalization of the human EP2 and EP4 prostaglandin receptors: role of the carboxyl terminus in EP4 receptor sequestration. Mol Pharmacol 58: 1279–1286, 2000.[ISI][Medline]
  9. Farman N, Pradelles P, and Bonvalet JP. PGE2, PGF2{alpha}, 6-keto-PGF1{alpha}, and TxB2 synthesis along the rabbit nephron. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 252: F53–F59, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Francisco LL, Osborn JL, and DiBona GF. Prostaglandin in renin release during sodium deprivation. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 243: F537–F542, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Friis UG, Jensen BL, Sethi S, Andreasen D, Hansen PB, and Skøtt O. Control of renin secretion from rat juxtaglomerular cells by cAMP-specific phosphodiesterases. Circ Res 90: 996–1003, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI]
  12. Friis UG, Jørgensen F, Andreasen D, Jensen BL, and Skøtt O. Molecular and functional identification of cyclic AMP-sensitive BKCa potassium channels (ZERO variant) and L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels in single rat juxtaglomerular cells. Circ Res 93: 213–220, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Fujino H, West KA, and Regan JW. Phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 and stimulation of T-cell factor signaling following activation of EP2 and EP4 prostanoid receptors by prostaglandin E2. J Biol Chem 277: 2614–2619, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Fujino H, Xu W, and Regan JW. Prostaglandin E2 induced functional expression of early growth response factor-1 by EP4, but not EP2, prostanoid receptors via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinases. J Biol Chem 278: 12151–12156, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Fujino T, Nakagawa N, Yuhki K, Hara A, Yamada T, Takayama K, Kuriyama S, Hosoki Y, Takahata O, Taniguchi T, Fukuzawa J, Hasebe N, Kikuchi K, Narumiya S, and Ushikubi F. Decreased susceptibility to renovascular hypertension in mice lacking the prostaglandin I2 receptor IP. J Clin Invest 114: 805–812, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Hartner A, Pahl A, Brune K, and Goppelt-Struebe M. Upregulation of cyclooxygenase-1 and the PGE2 receptor EP2 in rat and human mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis. Inflamm Res 49: 345–354, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  17. Imig JD, Breyer MD, and Breyer RM. Contribution of prostaglandin EP2 receptors to renal microvascular reactivity in mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 283: F415–F422, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Jensen BL, Schmid C, and Kurtz A. Prostaglandins stimulate renin secretion and renin mRNA in mouse renal juxtaglomerular cells. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 271: F659–F669, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Jensen BL, Mann B, Skøtt O, and Kurtz A. Differential regulation of renal prostaglandin receptor mRNAs by dietary salt intake in the rat. Kidney Int 56: 528–537, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  20. Jensen BL, Stubbe J, Hansen PB, Andreasen D, and Skøtt O. Localization of prostaglandin E2 EP2 and EP4 receptors in the rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 280: F1001–F1009, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kabashima K, Saji T, Murata T, Nagamachi M, Matsuoka T, Segi E, Tsuboi K, Sugimoto Y, Kobayashi T, Miyachi Y, Ichikawa A, and Narumiya S. The prostaglandin receptor EP4 suppresses colitis, mucosal damage and CD4 cell activation in the gut. J Clin Invest 109: 883–893, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kammerl MC, Nusing RM, Schweda F, Endemann D, Stubanus M, Kees F, Lackner KJ, Fischereder M, and Kramer BK. Low sodium and furosemide-induced stimulation of the renin system in man is mediated by cyclooxygenase 2. Clin Pharmacol Ther 70: 468–474, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  23. Kennedy CRJ, Zhang Y, Brandon S, Guan Y, Coffee K, Funk CD, Magnuson MA, Oates JA, Breyer MD, and Breyer RM. Salt-sensitive hypertension and reduced fertility in mice lacking the prostaglandin EP2 receptor. Nature Med 5: 217–220, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  24. Lydford SJ, McKechnie KCW, and Dougall IG. Pharmacological studies on prostanoid receptors in the rabbit isolated saphenous vein; a comparison with the rabbit isolated ear artery. Br J Pharmacol 117: 13–20, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
  25. Lykkegaard S and Poulsen K. Ultramicroassay for plasma renin concentration in the rat using the antibody trapping technique. Analyt Biochem 75: 250–259, 1976.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Morath R, Klein T, Seyberth HW, and Nüsing RM. Immunolocalization of the four prostaglandin E2 receptor proteins EP1, EP2, EP3 and EP4 in human kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 1851–1860, 1999.
  27. Nemoto K, Pilbeam CC, Bilak SR, and Raisz LG. Molecular cloning and expression of a rat prostaglandin E2 receptor of the EP2 subtype. Prostaglandins 54: 713–725, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  28. Nishigaki N, Negishi M, and Ichikawa A. Two Gs-coupled prostaglandin E receptor subtypes, EP2 and EP4, differ in desensitization and sensitivity to the metabolic inactivation of the agonist. Mol Pharmacol 50: 1031–1037, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Peti-Peterdi J, Komlosi P, Fuson AL, Guan Y, Schneider A, Qi Z, Redha R, Rosivall L, Breyer MD, and Bell PD. Luminal NaCl delivery regulates basolateral PGE2 release from macula densa cells. J Clin Invest 112: 76–82, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Purdy KE and Arendshorst WJ. EP1 and EP4 receptors mediate prostaglandin E2 actions in the microcirculation of rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 279: F755–F764, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Reinalter SC, Jeck N, Brochhausen C, Watzer B, Nusing RM, Seyberth HW, and Komhoff M. Role of cyclooxygenase-2 in hyperprostaglandin E syndrome/antenatal Bartter syndrome. Kidney Int 62: 253–260, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  32. Romero JC, Dunlap CL, and Strong CG. The effect of indomethacin and other anti-inflammatory drugs on the renin-angiotensin system. J Clin Invest 58: 282–288, 1976.[ISI][Medline]
  33. Sando T, Usui T, Tanaka L, Mori K, Sasaki Y, Fukuda Y, Namba T, Sugimoto Y, Ichikawa A, Narumiya S, and Nakao K. Molecular cloning and expression of rat prostaglandin E receptor EP2 subtype. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 200: 1329–1333, 1999.[CrossRef]
  34. Schweda F, Klar J, Narumiya S, Nusing RM, and Kurtz A. Stimulation of renin release by prostaglandin E2 is mediated by EP2 and EP4 receptors in mouse kidneys. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 287: F427–F433, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Sugimoto Y, Namba T, Shigemoto R, Negishi M, Ichikawa A, and Narumiya S. Distinct cellular localization of mRNAs for three subtypes of prostaglandin E receptor in kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 266: F823–F828, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Suzawa T, Miyaura C, Inada M, Maruyama T, Sugimoto Y, Ushikubi F, Ichikawa A, Narumiya S, and Suda T. The role of prostaglandin E receptor subtypes (EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4) in bone resorption: an analysis using specific agonists for the respective EPs. Endocrinology 141: 1554–1559, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Tang L, Loutzenhiser K, and Loutzenhiser R. Biphasic actions of prostaglandin E2 on the renal afferent arteriole. Circ Res 86: 663–670, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Therland KL, Stubbe J, Thiesson HC, Ottosen PD, Walter S, Sorensen GL, Skøtt O, and Jensen BL. Cycloxygenase-2 is expressed in vasculature of normal and ischemic adult human kidney and is colocalized with vascular prostaglandin E2 EP4 receptors. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 1189–1198, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Tilley SL, Audoly LP, Hicks EH, Kim HS, Flannery PJ, Coffmann TM, and Koller BH. Reproductive failure and reduced blood pressure in mice lacking the EP2 prostaglandin E2 receptor. J Clin Invest 103: 1539–1545, 1999.
  40. Traynor Smart A TR, Briggs JP, and Schnermann J. Inhibition of macula densa-stimulated renin secretion by pharmacological blockade of cyclooxygenase-2. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 277: F706–F710, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Wang JL, Cheng HF, and Harris RC. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition decreases renin content and lowers blood pressure in a model of renovascular hypertension. Hypertension 34: 96–101, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Yang T, Park JM, Arend L, Huang Y, Topaloglu R, Pasumarthy A, Praetorius H, Spring K, Briggs JP, and Schnermann J. Low chloride stimulation of prostaglandin E2 release and cyclooxygenase-2 expression in a mouse macula densa cell line. J Biol Chem 275: 37922–37929, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Yau L and Zahradka P. PGE2 stimulates vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation via the EP2 receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol 203: 77–90, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  44. Zhang Y, Guan Y, Schneider A, Brandon S, Breyer RM, and Breyer MD. Characterization of murine vasopressor and vasodepressor prostaglandin E2 receptors. Hypertension 35: 1129–1134, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Zhu S, Han G, and White RE. PGE2 action in human coronary artery smooth; Role of potassium channels and signaling cross-talk. J Vasc Res 39: 477–488, 2001.[CrossRef]




This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Supplemental Movies
All Versions of this Article:
289/5/F989    most recent
00201.2005v1
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Friis, U. G.
Articles by Jensen, B. L.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Friis, U. G.
Articles by Jensen, B. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.