Ammonotelic teleosts and urea transporters

John C. Mathai

Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

UREA, A SMALL MOLECULE, IS an end product of nitrogen metabolism. In fish, it is mostly used as an osmolyte or excreted as a waste product of ammonia detoxification (22). Marine elasmobranch fish (dogfish, skate, and stingray) keep their plasma osmolality (~1,050 mosmol/kgH2O) slightly above that of seawater by retaining high concentrations of urea, ranging from 300–600 mM (4). In contrast, teleost fish have plasma urea levels of 2–4 mM and maintain their tissue osmolality at 340 mosmol/kgH2O even in seawater (10). Since teleosts do not have high levels of urea and have a nephron that is not involved in urine concentration, most of the work pertaining to urea transport has been done in marine elasmobranchs. Recently, an eel urea transporter (eUT) present in the salt-secreting chloride cells of the gill of the Japanese eel was cloned and is thought to aid in urea excretion (11). Mistry et al. (10) report in this issue the discovery of another novel urea transporter in the Takifugu (puffer fish) genome and the cloning of its ortholog (eUT-C) from seawater-adapted eel kidney. The eUT-C is present in the basolateral membranes of renal proximal tubule cells of the kidney and is made up of 378 amino acid residues compared with 486 amino acid residues in the e-UT homolog from the gill. Both of these transporters are functionally similar as they are inhibited by phloretin and are not sensitive to forskolin or vasopressin treatments. The discovery of these two urea transporters by Mistry et al. in the eel, an ammonotelic teleost, raises more questions than it answers. Why does an ammonotelic teleost need a urea transporter?

Teleosts and elasmobranchs respond differently to severe osmotic stress. When a euryhaline elasmobranch is acclimated to a freshwater habitat, it reduces its plasma osmolality by excreting more urea and salts, increases its urinary output, and decreases the fractional reabsorbtion of urea in the kidney (5, 13, 15). In contrast, in teleosts such as eels acclimated to seawater, plasma osmolality and urea concentration increase. However, the magnitude of change is much less compared with marine elasmobrach fish acclimated to freshwater (10, 12). The serum osmolality changes from 297 ± 7 to 343 ± 15 mosmol/kgH2O, and urea concentration increases from 1.9 ± 0.4 to 3.7 ± 0.1 mM, respectively. They maintain their water balance by continuous drinking and intestinal absorption of seawater, coupled with excretion of excess salt via chloride cells in the gills (6). Recently, eel aquaporins (S-AQP and L-AQP) were shown to be strongly induced on the apical surface of columnar epithelial cells in the intestine of the Japanese eel on seawater acclimation, and these are thought to aid in water absorption (1).

Most teleosts are ammonotelic; however, they can be partially or fully ureotelic depending on their habitat. Two well-studied examples are the gulftoad fish and Lake Magadi tilapia, the only fish living at pH ~10, where ammonia excretion is inoperable due to high pH (14, 20). The gill is the major site of urea excretion, as reflected by the presence of urea transporters mtUP and tUP in the gills of Lake Magadi tilapia and gulftoad fish, respectively (17, 18). In eel gills, eUT is strongly upregulated on seawater acclimation (11). Northern and Western blot analyses also showed that eUT-C is strongly induced in the kidney and stomach following seawater acclimation (8, 10). Mistry et al. (10) contend that eUT-C is involved in reabsorption of urea from proximal tubules and works in conjunction with gill eUT to effectively reduce urea levels in plasma. In teleosts, ammonia levels of 2 mmol/l can result in paralysis (8). In freshwater fish, the presence of an acidified boundary layer on the gill surface is thought to aid in trapping NH3 as NH4+, which ensures a favorable NH3 gradient across the gill. Eels acclimated to seawater have very low urine output, which, coupled with insignificant acidification of the gill boundary layer in seawater for efficient ammonia excretion, would result in ammonia toxicity (19). Mistry et al. (10) suggest that urea excretion may be a backup mechanism to prevent ammonia toxicity. However, in the related European eel, branchial urea clearance was shown to decrease on seawater acclimation (9). This observation combined with the basolateral location of the eUT in the gill led to the suggestion that eUT may be involved in urea retention (19). Although eUT-C is not sodium dependent, it is not clear whether eUT from the gill is sodium dependent so as to function as an active transporter to retain urea. Hence, actual urea flux measurements would be required to confirm these hypotheses. More molecular and physiological studies are required to understand the importance of eUT-C expression also seen in the stomach on seawater acclimation. Although the urea diet-fed rainbow trout was shown to absorb urea, it is not clear whether it was mostly due to passive diffusion or if there was also facilitated urea uptake (7). Recently, it was shown that urea excretion by teleosts is more widespread and that UT mRNA is expressed in the gills of a wide variety of teleosts (16). Isolation of purified apical and basal membrane vesicles from sites known to express UTs and use of cultured gill epithelia as models would aid in functional characterization of these transporters (2, 3, 21). However, molecular characterization of these channels would require functional expression and reconstitution of cloned urea transporters in a heterologous expression system. Clearly, additional work needs to be done to get at a complete physiological understanding of urea transporters present in fish in aquatic and marine habitats.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. C. Mathai, Renal-Electrolyte Div., A1222 Scaife Hall, Univ. of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 (E-mail: mathaij{at}msx.dept-med.pitt.edu)


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Aoki M, Kaneko T, Katoh F, Hasegawa S, Tsutsui N, and Aida K. Intestinal water absorption through aquaporin 1 expressed in the apical membrane of mucosal epithelial cells in seawater-adapted Japanese eel. J Exp Biol 206: 3495–3505, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Fines GA, Ballantyne JS, and Wright PA. Active urea transport and an unusual basolateral membrane composition in the gills of a marine elasmobranch. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 280: R16–R24, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hill WG, Mathai JC, Gensure RH, Zeidel JD, Apodaca G, Saenz JP, Kinne-Saffran E, Kinne R, and Zeidel ML. Permeabilities of teleost and elasmobranch gill apical membranes: evidence that lipid bilayers alone do not account for barrier function. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 287: C235–C242, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Holmes WN and Donaldson EM. Body compartments and distribution of electrolytes. In: Fish Physiology, edited by Hoar WS and Randall DJ. New York: Academic, 1969, vol. 1, p. 1–90.
  5. Janech MG, Fitzgibbon WR, Chen R, Nowak MW, Miller DH, Paul RV, and Ploth DW. Molecular and functional characterization of a urea transporter from the kidney of the Atlantic stingray. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 284: F996–F1005, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Karnaky KJ. Osmotic and ionic regulation. In: The Physiology of Fishes, edited by Evans DH. New York: CRC, 1997.
  7. Kaushik SJ, Dabrowski KR, Dabrowska H, Olah E, and Luquet P. Utilization of dietary urea in rainbow trout. Ann Nutr Metab 27: 94–106, 1983.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Levi G, Morisi G, Coletti A, and Catanzaro R. Free amino acids in fish brain: normal levels and changes upon exposure to high ammonia concentrations in vivo, and upon incubation of brain slices. Comp Biochem Physiol A 49: 623–636, 1974.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Masoni A and Payan P. Urea, inulin and para-amino-hippuric acid (PAH) excretion by the gills of the eel, Anguilla anguilla L. Comp Biochem Physiol A 47: 1241–1244, 1974.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Mistry AC, Chen G, Kato A, Nag K, Sands JM, and Hirose S. A novel type of urea transporter, UT-C, is highly expressed in proximal tubule of seawater eel kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 288: F455–F465, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Mistry AC, Honda S, Hirata T, Kato A, and Hirose S. Eel urea transporter is localized to chloride cells and is salinity dependent. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281: R1594–R1604, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Munroe VR and Poluhowich JJ. Ionic composition of the plasma and whole blood of marine and fresh water eels, Anguilla rostrata. Comp Biochem Physiol A 49: 541–544, 1974.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Payan P, Goldstein L, and Forster RP. Gills and kidneys in ureosmotic regulation in euryhaline skates. Am J Physiol 224: 367–372, 1973.[Free Full Text]
  14. Randall DJ, Wood CM, Perry SF, Bergman H, Maloiy GM, Mommsen TP, and Wright PA. Urea excretion as a strategy for survival in a fish living in a very alkaline environment. Nature 337: 165–166, 1989.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  15. Schmidt-Nielsen B, Truniger B, and Rabinowitz L. Sodium-linked urea transport by the renal tubule of the spiny dogfish Squalus acanthias. Comp Biochem Physiol A 42: 13–25, 1972.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Walsh P, Wang Y, Campbell CE, De Boeck G, and Wood CM. Patterns of nitrogenous waste excretion and gill urea transporter mRNA expression in several species of marine fish. Mar Biol (Berl) 139: 839–844, 2001.[CrossRef]
  17. Walsh PJ, Grosell M, Goss GG, Bergman HL, Bergman AN, Wilson P, Laurent P, Alper SL, Smith CP, Kamunde C, and Wood CM. Physiological and molecular characterization of urea transport by the gills of the Lake Magadi tilapia (Alcolapia grahami). J Exp Biol 204: 509–520, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Walsh PJ, Heitz MJ, Campbell CE, Cooper GJ, Medina M, Wang YS, Goss GG, Vincek V, Wood CM, and Smith CP. Molecular characterization of a urea transporter in the gill of the gulf toadfish (Opsanus beta). J Exp Biol 203: 2357–2364, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Wilkie MP. Ammonia excretion and urea handling by fish gills: present understanding and future research challenges. J Exp Zool 293: 284–301, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  20. Wood C, Hopkins T, Hogstrand C, and Walsh P. Pulsatile urea excretion in the ureagenic toadfish Opsanus beta: an analysis of rates and routes. J Exp Biol 198: 1729–1741, 1995.[ISI][Medline]
  21. Wood CM, Kelly SP, Zhou B, Fletcher M, O'Donnell M, Eletti B, and Part P. Cultured gill epithelia as models for the freshwater fish gill. Biochim Biophys Acta 1566: 72–83, 2002.[ISI][Medline]
  22. Wright PA and Land MD. Urea production and transport in teleost fishes. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 119: 47–54, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]




This Article
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Mathai, J. C.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Mathai, J. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.