SPECIAL COMMUNICATION
H+ secretion is inhibited by clostridial toxins in an inner medullary collecting duct cell line

Edward A. Alexander, Theodora Shih, and John H. Schwartz

Renal Section, Boston Medical Center and Departments of Medicine, Physiology and Pathology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118-2908

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Renal epithelial cell H+ secretion is an exocytic-endocytic phenomenon. In the inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) cell line, which we have utilized as a model of renal epithelial cell acid secretion, we found previously that acidification increased exocytosis and alkalinization increased endocytosis. It is likely, therefore, that the rate of proton secretion is regulated by the membrane insertion and retrieval of proton pumps. There is abundant evidence from studies in the nerve terminal and the chromaffin cell that vesicle docking, membrane fusion, and discharge of vesicular contents (exocytosis) involve a series of interactions among so-called trafficking proteins. The clostridial toxins, botulinum and tetanus, are proteases that specifically inactivate some of these proteins. In these experiments we demonstrated, by immunoblot and immunoprecipitation, the presence in this IMCD cell line of the specific protein targets of these toxins, synaptobrevin/vesicle-associated membrane proteins (VAMP), syntaxin, and synaptosomal-associated protein-25 (SNAP-25). Furthermore, we showed that these toxins markedly inhibit the capacity of these cells to realkalinize after an acid load. Thus these data provide new insight into the mechanism for H+ secretion in the IMCD.

exocytosis; synaptobrevin; vesicle-associated membrane proteins; syntaxin; synaptophysin; synaptosomal-associated protein-25 proton transport; exocytosis; botulinum toxin; tetanus toxin

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

RECENT EVIDENCE SUPPORTS the importance of the phenomenon of exocytosis-endocytosis in renal epithelial cell proton secretion (9, 12, 13). In an inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) cell line, which we have utilized as a model of renal epithelial cell acid secretion, we demonstrated both constitutive and cell pH-regulated exo-endocytosis. Specifically, we found that acidification increased exocytosis and alkalinization increased endocytosis (9, 13). It is likely, therefore, that the rate of proton secretion is regulated by the membrane insertion and retrieval of proton pumps.

There is abundant evidence from studies in the nerve terminal and the chromaffin cell that vesicle docking, membrane fusion, and discharge of vesicular contents (exocytosis), involves a series of interactions among so-called trafficking proteins (1, 4, 10, 16). Recently, evidence for the participation of some of these proteins, especially synaptobrevin/vesicle-associated membrane proteins (VAMP), has been suggested in the membrane fusion of vesicles that contain the antidiuretic hormone-sensitive water channel in the rat IMCD (7, 8). The clostridial toxins, botulinum and tetanus, are proteases that inactivate some of these proteins by cleavage. The specificity of this reaction between the botulinum serotypes or tetanus and the target synaptic protein synaptobrevin/VAMP, synaptosomal-associated protein (SNAP)-25, or syntaxin has provided a powerful tool in the understanding of the role of these proteins in the neuro-exocytic process (2, 3, 11).

Of particular importance concerning the present work, no information is available relating these synaptic proteins to renal epithelial cell proton secretion. The results of these experiments provide strong evidence that the specific proteins cleaved by these toxins are present in IMCD cells and that these proteins play a significant role in acid secretion by the IMCD.

    METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Solutions and reagents. The following solutions were used. NaCl N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer (NHB) contained (in mM) 110 NaCl, 50 HEPES acid, 5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, and 5 glucose (pH 7.2). Choline chloride HEPES buffer (CHB) was identical to NHB, except that 110 mM choline chloride was substituted for NaCl (pH 7.2). KCl HEPES buffer (KHB) contained (in mM) 130 KCl, 25 HEPES, 5 NaCl, 1 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, and 5 glucose (pH 7.2). Buffers were titrated to the desired pH using NaOH (for NHB), KOH (for CHB and KHB), or HCl. 2',7'-Bis(carboxyethyl)-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF) was prepared as stock solutions in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The total DMSO content to which the cells were exposed was less than 0.7%. Nigericin was prepared in ethanol. All other inhibitors employed in this study were dissolved in NHB or CHB. Bafilomycin was obtained from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Clostridial and botulinum toxins were purchased from Sigma Chemicals (St. Louis, MO).

Cell culture. IMCD cells were obtained from rat papillae as described previously (12, 14). Aliquots of these isolations have been preserved at -70°C and activated as needed. Cells from passages 6-12 were grown to confluence in 75-cm2 plastic flasks or on 12 × 12-mm glass coverslips in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium in an atmosphere of 95% air-5% CO2.

Cell pH. Quiescent cells grown on glass coverslips were incubated for 1 h at 37°C in NHB containing 10 µM of the acetoxymethyl ester of BCECF (BCECF-AM). The coverslip was then placed in a plastic cuvette containing 1 ml of NHB and secured by means of a device designed to hold the coverslip at a 35° angle to the excitation beam (12). The monolayer was washed three times with NHB and then suspended in 1 ml NHB. Fluorescence intensity was measured in a Perkin-Elmer model LS 650-10 fluorospectrophotometer equipped with a thermostatically controlled (37°C) cuvette holder, at excitation wavelengths 505 and 455 nm with a slit width of 2 nm and emission wavelength 560 nm with a slit width of 4 nm. At the end of each experiment, the fluorescence intensity ratio (FIR) was calibrated to cell pH (pHi) using KHB buffer containing nigericin 10 mg/ml (12, 14). The FIR varied linearly with pH over the range 6.3-7.6. Autofluorescence of probe-free monolayers was less than 10% of the fluorescent signal of BCECF-loaded monolayers at excitation of both 505 and 455 nm, and a correction for this was not made. Na+-independent and Na+-dependent pHi recovery after a 20 mM NH4Cl-induced acid load when incubated in CHB was determined as previously described (14, 15). After an initial control measurement of active H+-adenosinetriphosphatase (H+-ATPase)-mediated proton transport (JH-act), the monolayer was exposed to various inhibitors or just the diluent used to dissolve them, and JH-act was redetermined.

Antibodies. The following monoclonal antibodies were employed in these studies: anti-SNAP-25 (MAB331) obtained from Chemicon International (Temecula, CA); anti-synaptophysin (SVP-38) and anti-syntaxin (HPC-1) obtained from Sigma Chemicals; antibody C1 10.1, specific for synaptobrevin/VAMP and its homologs, was kindly provided by Prof. R. Jahn (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New Haven, CT).

Preparation of tissue homogenate. Confluent IMCD cells were washed three times in cold PBS and scraped from the growth surface and pelleted by centrifugation at 1,000 g for 10 min. The pellet was suspended in 4 vol of ice-cold homogenizing buffer containing 10 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) hydrochloride, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% Nonidet P-40, to which 4 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 µg/µl aprotinin, 2 µg/µl N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone, 5 µg/ml deoxyribonuclease, and 5 µg/ml ribonuclease were added just before use. The suspended pellet was homogenized by ten 1-s strokes in a Teflon homogenizer. To remove intact cells and nuclei, this homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 1,000 g at 4°C. Sample of rat brain (cortex) was washed with cold PBS and then suspended in 4 vol of ice-cold homogenizing buffer and homogenized in a Branson cell disrupter for 10 s. Intact tissue fragments and nuclei were removed by centrifugation at 1,000 g at 4°C for 10 min.

Immunoprecipitation. IMCD postnuclear homogenate was immunoprecipitated using one of the antibodies listed above, according to the following protocol. The homogenate was diluted to a protein concentration of 100 µg/ml with the homogenizing buffer that also contained 0.5% deoxycholate. To a 900-µl aliquot of this diluted homogenate was added 2 µl nonimmune serum and 30 µl of a 25% suspension of protein A-Sepharose 4B beads. This mixture was incubated at 4°C for 2 h, then centrifuged at 13,000 rpm in an Eppendorf centrifuge. The supernatant was incubated with 20 µl of primary antibody and 50 µl of a protein A-Sepharose 4B bead suspension for 12 h at 4°C. If the primary antibody was a mouse monoclonal antibody, then the beads were prereacted with rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Sigma Chemicals) prior to use, since monoclonal antibodies do not bind to protein A. In preliminary studies, we determined that the quantity of primary antibody employed for immunoprecipitation was in excess with respect to the target protein. The beads were pelleted by centrifugation and were washed three times and suspended in 60 µl of 2× sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer. The immunoprecipitate in this suspension was analyzed by Western blot analysis.

Immunoblot. Whole cell homogenates and immunoprecipitated samples prepared as described above were heated at 100°C for 5 min before loading on a 12-15% polyacrylamide SDS gel and run under reducing conditions (13). Protein was electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose filters that were washed in 150 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris · HCl, pH 7.5, and 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST), and blocked for 1 h in TBST containing 5% wt/vol nonfat powdered milk (TBSTM) before incubation with an antibody directed against the immunoprecipitated protein [1:1,000 in TBSTA (1% bovine serum albumin)] at 4°C overnight. The filters were washed three times with TBST and incubated in secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse, 1:2,000 in TBSTM) for 2 h at room temperature with agitation. After three washes, bound antibody was detected using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL; Pierce, Rockville, IL).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Effect of toxins on JH-act. In every experiment, each monolayer served as its own control. Thus each monolayer was acid loaded and allowed to recover, and the rate of alkalinization was determined. If the rate of alkalinization was <0.025 pH U/min, then the monolayer was discarded. Less than 15% of the monolayers studied were excluded. If recovery was >= 0.025 U/min, then the monolayer was allowed to recover and was then acid loaded in the presence of toxin, and the alkalinization rate was again determined.

To confirm that the degree of acid loading and recovery rate did not differ in each trial, four monolayers were acid loaded twice in the absence of Na+, HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>, and toxin. The rate of cell alkalinization observed after the first acid load (0.065 ± 0.009 pH U/min) was not statistically different from that obtained after the second acid load (0.060 ± 0.002 pH U/min). We had previously shown that 10 nM bafilomycin inhibited pHi recovery after acidification by >90%, using a protocol identical to the one used in these experiments (11). To confirm that the monolayers tested in these experiments were similarly responsive, four experiments with bafilomycin (10 nM) were performed. Recovery during the control period was 0.077 ± 0.005 pH U/min, and after bafilomycin was 0.004 ± 0.001 pH U/min.

The effect on JH-act of five clostridial toxins were then tested; botulinum A, B, C, and D and tetanus (all 50 nM). A representative tracing is depicted in Fig. 1. During the control period after an acute cellular acidification, pHi increased at the rate of 0.050 ± 0.009 pH U/min. With addition of botulinum A (n = 4), pHi recovery was significantly reduced to a rate of 0.014 ± 0.005 pH U/min. With botulinum B (n = 3), pHi recovery was reduced from 0.048 ± 0.006 to 0.022 ± 0.003 pH U/min, with botulinum C (n = 3) from 0.062 ± 0.009 to 0.019 ± 0.001 pH U/min, and with botulinum D (n = 3) from 0.047 ± 0.009 to 0.010 ± 0.005 pH U/min. Tetanus toxin (n = 3) also inhibits pHi recovery after an acute acid load from 0.045 ± 0.003 during control to 0.010 ± 0.006 pH U/min after the toxin. Recovery among each set of experiments did not differ statistically among control experiments or with toxin, but the rate of recovery was statistically reduced (~80%) with each toxin compared with control . 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Representative tracing of the effect of botulinum A on Na+- and HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>-independent cell pH (pHi) recovery: pHi was determined by an entrapped fluorescent probe (2',7'-bis(carboxyethyl)-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein) method. Monolayer was acidified by a 10-min exposure to NH4Cl followed by incubation in a Na+-free, HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>-free medium. After pHi recovered to base line, the cell was exposed to 25 nM botulinum A and reacidified.

To determine whether botulinum toxin had any effect on the Na+/H+ exchanger, pHi recovery after an acid load was determined in the presence of Na+. In these studies, the experimental design was similar to that described above for assessing the effect of the neurotoxins on JH-act, with the exception that after the cells were acid loaded the extracellular solutions was changed from one that was Na+ free to one containing 140 mM Na+ (14). Under these conditions, that rate of pHi recovery is primarily determined by Na+/H+ exchange (14). Na+/H+ exchange during the control period was 0.41 ± 0.02 pH U/min, and these monolayers recovered to a steady-state pH of 7.18 ± 0.04. The monolayers were then incubated with either botulinum A (n = 3) or botulinum B (n = 3), and the rate of Na+/H+ exchange was determined after a second acute acid load. These toxins did not change significantly the pHi recovery rate in the presence of Na+ (0.40 ± 0.01 pH U/min, P > 0.05) and the stable pHi to which they recovered (7.18 ± 0.05).

Immunoidentification of vesicular trafficking proteins. To determine the presence of some of the proteins expressed by our IMCD cell line and thought to be associated with exocytosis, we analyzed homogenates of these cells by immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis of the precipitate (synaptobrevin and synaptophysin) or by direct Western analysis of the homogenate (syntaxin and SNAP-25) (Fig. 2). Rat brain samples were also analyzed concurrently with the IMCD homogenates to provide positive controls for the analysis. Positive reactions were found to the antibodies for two vesicular proteins, synaptobrevin and synaptophysin, and two membrane proteins, syntaxin and SNAP-25 (Fig. 2).


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Immunoblot of regulatory proteins for neurosecretion in inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) cells and rat brain. Synaptosomal-associated protein (SNAP)-25, syntaxin, synaptophysin, and synaptobrevin were sequentially immunoprecipitated from an IMCD cell homogenate. Each IMCD immunoprecipitate (lane 1) was subjected to gel electrophoresis along with a sample of rat brain (lane 2) blotted onto nitrocellulose paper and probed with the same antibody used to initially precipitate the protein.

To confirm that cleavage of these trafficking proteins occurred in our IMCD cells, we examined the effect of one representative toxin, botulinum C, on its target protein, syntaxin. IMCD monolayers were exposed to 100 nM botulinum C for the same time period as in the pHi recovery studies. Control monolayers were exposed to the diluent only. Control and experimental monolayers were then homogenized, and syntaxin expression was evaluated by Western blot analysis (Fig. 3). The apparent molecular mass of syntaxin identified in botulinum C toxin-treated monolayers (lanes 1 and 4) is lower than that seen in control IMCD monolayers lanes (lanes 2, 3, and 5).


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Immunoblot of syntaxin in IMCD cells. All lanes were loaded with 40 µg protein. Lanes 1 and 4 were loaded with homogenate from botulinum C-treated IMCD cells; lanes 2, 3, and 5 were loaded with homogenates from control cells.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In this study, we provide evidence relating the regulated Na+ independent H+ transport by the IMCD with proteins important in the process of regulated neurosecretion. This might have been anticipated, since the secretion of protons by the IMCD is a calcium- and calmodulin-dependent exocytic process (13). Neurotransmitter release is similarly a calcium- and calmodulin-dependent exocytic process (1, 5).

Our data (Figs. 2 and 3) demonstrate the presence of four proteins that play a role in the incompletely understood but extensively investigated process of synaptic vesicle exocytosis. [A discussion of this process is beyond the scope of this report but can be found in recent excellent reviews (1, 5, 10, 16).] Synaptobrevin/VAMP and synaptophysin are vesicular proteins, whereas syntaxin and SNAP-25 are presynaptic membrane proteins. Previous studies have demonstrated synaptobrevin and its homolog, cellubrevin, in rat papillary cells associated with the fusion of the antidiuretic hormone-associated water channel (7, 8). In addition, other proteins such as N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor and alpha -SNAP, which are part of the synaptic vesicle fusion process, have been identified in the rat IMCD (6).

These studies further demonstrate that tetanus toxin and four botulinum serotypes, A, B, C and D, markedly inhibit the normal response of the IMCD cell to increase Na+-independent H+ secretion after an acid load. Activation of Na+-independent H+ secretion is dependent upon exocytic insertion of proton pump-containing vesicles into the apical membrane (13). In contrast, these toxins had no effect on Na+-dependent pHi recovery, a process which is not dependent on exocytosis (13). The neurotoxicity of these agents has been well characterized. They are Zn-dependent proteases that cleave specific synaptic proteins involved in the neuroexocytic process. Tetanus and botulinum B and D cleave synaptobrevin/VAMP; botulinum A cleaves SNAP-25; and botulinum C cleaves syntaxin (16). The data presented in Fig. 3 provide additional support for the claim that the mechanism of action of these toxins in the IMCD cell acidification process is similar to that in neural tissue, since botulinum C cleaved syntaxin in a time course comparable to the physiological inhibition of JH-act. The product, a protein of ~2-4 kDa smaller size, is similar to the results obtained in neural tissue (4, 17). We presume that the reduction in the JH-act after an acid load in the presence of these toxins is due to the inhibition of exocytic insertion of additional pump units into the apical membrane. In a prior study, when exocytosis was inhibited by another means, i.e., disruption of cytoskeletal function with either cytochalasin or colchicine, the degree of inhibition of pHi recovery from an acid load was similar (13). In the current and prior study (13), a residual rate of H+ transport was observed. This residual rate probably represents the activity of proton pumps that are constitutively expressed in the apical plasma membrane.

These data provide new insight into the mechanism for H+ secretion in the IMCD. Our results provide strong evidence for the presence of the specific proteins cleaved by clostridial toxins in the IMCD, as well as and the physiological result of this effect, impairment of JH-act. Presumably, this effect is through the interruption of critical protein interactions in the sequential exocytic process. Given the results of these experiments, perturbations in the acid-base milieu may provide a very useful tool in defining the interaction of these specific proteins in the exocytic process.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by an National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grant DK-28164.

    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests: E. A. Alexander, Renal Section, Evans 401, One Boston Medical Place, Boston, MA 02118-2908.

Received 13 March 1997; accepted in final form 21 August 1997.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Augustine, G. J., M. E. Burns, W. M. DeBello, D. L. Pettit, and F. E. Schweitzer. Exocytosis: proteins and perturbations. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 36: 659-701, 1996[Medline].

2.   Binz, T., J. Blasi, S. Yamasaki, A. Baumeister, E. Link, T. C. Sudhof, R. Jahn, and H. Niemann. Proteolysis of SNAP-25 by types E and A botulinal neurotoxins. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 1617-1620, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Blasi, S., E. R. Chapman, E. Link, T. Binz, S. Yamasaki, P. De Camilli, T. C. Sudhof, A. Baumeister, H. Niemann, and R. Jahn. Botulinum neurotoxin A selectively cleaves the synaptic protein SNAP-25. Nature 365: 160-163, 1993[Medline].

4.   Blasi, J., E. R. Chapman, S. Yamasaki, T. Binz, H. Niemann, and R. Jahn. Botulinum neurotoxin C1 blocks neurotransmitter release by means of cleaving HPC-1/syntaxin. EMBO J. 12: 4821-4824, 1993[Abstract].

5.   Calakos, N., and R. H. Scheller. Synaptic vesicle biogenesis, docking and fusion: a molecular description. Physiol. Rev. 76: 1-29, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Franki, N., F. Macaluso, Y. Gao, and R. M. Hays. Vesicle fusion proteins in rat inner medullary collecting duct and amphibian bladder. Am. J. Physiol. 268 (Cell Physiol. 37): C792-C797, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Franki, N., F. Macaluso, W. Schubert, L. Gunther, and R. M. Hays. Water channel-carrying vesicles in the rat IMCD contain cellulobrevin. Am. J. Physiol. 269 (Cell Physiol. 38): C797-C801, 1995[Abstract].

8.   Jo, I., H. W. Harris, A. M. Amendt-Raduege, R. R. Majewski, and T. G. Hammond. Rat kidney papilla contains abundant synaptobrevin protein that participates in the fusion of antidiuretic hormone-regulated water channel-containing endosomes in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 1876-1880, 1995[Abstract].

9.   Mankus, R., J. H. Schwartz, and E. A. Alexander. Acidification adaptation in cultured inner medullary collecting duct cells. Am. J. Physiol. 264 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 33): F765-F769, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Rothman, J. E. Mechanisms of intracellular protein transport. Nature 372: 55-63, 1994[Medline].

11.   Sciavo, G., F. Benfenati, B. Poulain, O. Rossetto, P. Polverino De Lauretto, B. R. Dasgupta, and C. Montecucco. Tetanus and botulinum-B neurotoxins block neurotransmitter release by proteolytic cleavage of synaptobrevin. Nature 359: 832-835, 1992[Medline].

12.   Schwartz, G. J., and Q. Al-Awqati. Carbon dioxide causes exocytosis of vesicles containing H+ pumps in isolated proximal and collecting duct tubules. J. Clin. Invest. 75: 1638-1644, 1985[Medline].

13.   Schwartz, J. H., S. A. Masino, R. D. Nichols, and E. A. Alexander. Intracellular modulation of acid secretion in rat inner medullary collecting duct cells. Am. J. Physiol. 266 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 35): F94-F101, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Selvaggio, A. M., J. H. Schwartz, H. H. Bengele, F. D. Gordon, and E. A. Alexander. mechanisms of H+ secretion by inner medullary collecting duct cells. Am. J. Physiol. 254 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 23): F391-F400, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Slotki, I. N., J. H. Schwartz, and E. A. Alexander. Effect of increases in cytosolic Ca2+ on inner medullary collecting duct cell pH. Am. J. Physiol. 257 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 26): F210-F217, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Sudhof, T. C. The synaptic vesicle cycle: a cascade of protein-protein interactions. Nature 375: 645-653, 1995[Medline].

17.   Williamson, L. C., J. L. Halpern, C. Montecucco, J. E. Brown, and E. A. Neale. Clostridial neurotoxins and substrate proteolysis in intact neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 7694-7699, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].


AJP Renal Physiol 273(6):F1054-F1057
0363-6127/97 $5.00 Copyright © 1997 the American Physiological Society