Free radical-mediated transgene inactivation of macrophages by endotoxin

Sujatha Dokka1, David Toledo2, Liying Wang3, Xianglin Shi3, Chuanshu Huang3, Stephen Leonard3, and Yon Rojanasakul1

1 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown 26506; 3 Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505; and 2 Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Central Research, Collegeville, Pennsylvania 19426


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Endotoxin, the lipopolysaccharide component of gram-negative bacteria, is a common contaminant of plasmid DNA preparations. The present study investigated the effect of endotoxin on gene transfection efficiency and the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in this process. Gene transfection studies were performed in various cell types with cytomegalovirus-luciferase as a reporter plasmid and cationic liposome as a transfecting agent. The presence of endotoxin in plasmid DNA preparations severely limited transgene expression in macrophages but had little or no effect in other cell types tested. This decreased transfection was dependent on ROS-mediated cellular toxicity induced by endotoxin. Neutralizing the endotoxin by the addition of polymyxin B effectively increased transfection efficiency and reduced toxicity. Electron spin resonance studies confirmed the formation of ROS in endotoxin-treated cells and their inhibition by free radical scavengers. The ROS scavenger N-t-butyl-alpha -phenylnitrone, the H2O2 scavenger catalase, and the ·OH scavenger sodium formate effectively inhibited endotoxin-induced effects, whereas the O2- scavenger superoxide dismutase had lesser effects. These results indicate that multiple oxidative species are involved in the transfection inactivation process and that ·OH formed by H2O2-dependent, metal-catalyzed Fenton reaction play a major role in this process.

gene transfection; free radicals; macrophages


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

MACROPHAGES PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE in host defense against noxious substances and are involved in a variety of disease processes including autoimmune diseases, infections, and inflammatory disorders (see Ref. 9 for review). Molecular analysis of macrophage functions can be accomplished by gene transfection assays. However, gene transfection in macrophages has proven difficult due to their refractory nature. Over the years, numerous efforts have been made to improve gene transfection of macrophages (2, 4, 10, 17), but their transfection is still poor. Partly responsible for this limited success is a lack of understanding of the causes that contribute to the refractory nature of macrophages during gene transfection. Because macrophages are known to be highly susceptible to endotoxin stimulation and because endotoxin is a major contaminant of plasmid DNA preparations used in most transfection studies, we hypothesized that the presence of contaminating endotoxin may contribute to this low transfection. The present study was undertaken to test this hypothesis and to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the cellular unresponsiveness of macrophages to gene transfection.

Endotoxin [lipopolysaccharide (LPS)] is known to be an extremely bioactive substance and a potent stimulator of immune cells (13, 20). LPS consists of a variable polysaccharide domain covalently attached to a lipid domain (lipid A). LPS mediates most of its effects by binding to macrophages and inducing the production of many cellular mediators, including proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 (14), fatty acid metabolites (14), and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (8). ROS are known to exert multiple effects on cells and tissues and are involved in a variety of pathological processes. They can cause DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, protein modification, and activation of certain nuclear transcription factors such as activator protein-1 and nuclear factor-kappa B (11, 15). In the present study, we tested whether ROS are involved in the transfection inactivation process of macrophages.

LPS has been shown to reduce gene transfection efficiency in nonimmune cells (19); however, its mechanism of action is not known. We report here that cellular toxicity induced by LPS is responsible, at least in part, for the decreased transfection efficiency. Because macrophages are the primary cellular target for LPS stimulation, we postulated that this cell type may be more susceptible to LPS effects. We examined the role of ROS generation by macrophages in transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity. Our hypothesis is that if ROS are responsible for such effects, then blocking these reactive species, i.e., by free radical scavengers, would increase transfection efficiency and decrease cellular toxicity. We also attempted to identify key reactive species involved in the process. The following specific questions are addressed in this study. 1) Are macrophages more susceptible to LPS contamination of plasmid DNA than other cell types? 2) What is the underlying mechanism of LPS-induced cellular toxicity in macrophages? 3) Can free radical scavengers decrease this toxicity and do they reverse LPS-induced decrease in transfection? 4) If so, what are the key reactive species involved in the process?


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell culture. All cell lines including RAW 264.7 and NR 383 macrophages, alveolar epithelial A549 cells, kidney embryonic 293 cells, and liver Hep G2 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 100 U/ml of penicillin-streptomycin. They were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Before use, the cells were briefly trypsinized or mechanically scraped and centrifuged. They were plated at ~1 × 106 cells/ml in 12-well tissue culture plates 1 day before the transfection studies.

Plasmid DNA. The expression vector cytomegalovirus (CMV)-luciferase contains the promoter-enhancer region of CMV upstream from the luciferase gene (kindly provided by Dr. Leaf Huang, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA). The plasmid was purified with QIAGEN EndoFree or regular ion-exchange plasmid kits (QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Content of the endotoxin in plasmid DNA preparations was determined by using the chromogenic Limulus amebocyte lysate assay (Kinetic-QCL, BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) according to the manufacturer's instructions. In studies designed to study the effect of endotoxin on gene transfer efficiency, specified amounts of LPS [Escherichia coli 0111:B4, 1 endotoxin unit (EU)/µg; Sigma, St. Louis, MO] were added to the plasmid preparations.

Liposomal transfection. Approximately 1 × 106 cells were plated on 12-well plates and allowed to grow for 24 h before the transfection. Plasmid DNA (1 µg/ml) was diluted in 200 µl of DMEM (GIBCO BRL, Life Technologies), and the DNA-condensing agent protamine sulfate (0.1-2 µg/ml; Sigma) was added to the DNA. Liposomes (1-20 µg/ml) were diluted in 200 µl of DMEM. The diluted DNA and liposome samples were combined and incubated at room temperature for 15-20 min. In some studies, indicated amounts of polymyxin B sulfate, N-t-butyl-alpha -phenylnitrone (PBN), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and sodium formate (Sigma) were also added to the transfection medium. The cells with the transfection reagents were incubated for 4 h. The transfection medium was then replaced with growth medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. The cells were cultured for an additional 48 h before the level of gene expression was determined. All transfections were conducted under sterile conditions, and duplicate plates were tested for each condition.

Measurement of luciferase activity. Luciferase synthesized during the in vitro translation was quantitated with the assay of enzyme-dependent light production with a luciferase assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI). The cells were washed twice with PBS, incubated at room temperature for 10 min in the presence of 250 µl of lysis buffer (Promega), and then centrifuged at 12,000 g. Ten microliters of each sample were placed in a 5-ml polystyrene test tube, and the tubes were then loaded into an automated luminometer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). At the time of measurement, 100 µl of luciferase substrate were automatically injected into each sample, and total luminescence was measured over a 20-s time interval. Output was quantitated as relative light units. Protein content in the supernatant was determined by bicinchoninic acid protein assay reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Luminescence detected was standardized per microgram of protein present in the supernatant.

Lactate dehydrogenase activity. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay was performed to assess the effect of test agents on cellular toxicity. The cells were treated with plasmid DNA, LPS, and transfecting agents either individually or in combination as indicated. After the treatments, the cell supernatants were collected and assayed for LDH activity. LDH activity was determined by monitoring the oxidation of pyruvate coupled with the reduction of NAD at 340 nm with an LDH assay kit (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Montclair, NJ). The assay was performed on a Cobas Fara II analyzer (Roche Diagnostic Systems). One unit of LDH activity per liter is defined as the amount of enzyme that converts 1 µmol of lactate to 1 µmol of pyruvate, with the concomitant reduction of 1 µmol of NAD to 1 µmol of NADH per minute per liter of sample in the assay procedure.

Free radical measurements. The electron spin resonance (ESR) spin trapping technique was used to detect short-lived free radical intermediates. All measurements were conducted with a Varian E9 ESR spectrometer and a flat-cell assembly. Hyperfine splittings were measured (to 0.1 G) directly from magnetic field separations with potassium tetraperoxochromate (K3CrO8) and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl as standards. Reactants were mixed in test tubes in a total volume of 0.5 ml. The reaction mixture was then transferred to a flat cell for ESR measurement. All measurements were carried out with 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO; Aldrich) as a spin trap.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Macrophages are difficult to transfect. To evaluate the relative transfection efficiency of macrophages compared with other cell types, we transfected various cell lines from different origins including RAW 264.7 and NR 383 macrophages, kidney embryonic 293 cells, alveolar epithelial A549 cells, and liver Hep G2 cells with the CMV-luciferase reporter plasmid. Gene transfection was carried out under the same transfection conditions with LipofectAMINE and protamine as transfecting agents. Optimum transfection conditions were determined, and transfection efficiencies between cell lines were compared. Figure 1 shows that maximum luciferase activity was observed in Hep G2 cells, followed by embryonic 293 cells, epithelial A549 cells, and RAW 264.7 and NR 383 macrophages. In the absence of transfecting agents, all five cell lines exhibited minimum luciferase activity. These results indicate that gene transfection is cell type dependent and that macrophages are relatively difficult to transfect compared with other cell types. All transfection studies were also carried out with a CMV-beta -galactosidase reporter plasmid, and the results were consistent with those with CMV-luciferase.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Comparison of gene transfection in different cell lines. Cells (1 × 106/ml) were transfected with the reporter plasmid cytomegalovirus (CMV)-luciferase (1 µg/ml) in the presence and absence of transfecting agents (12 µg/ml of LipofectAMINE and 1 µg/ml of protamine) for 4 h at 37°C. The transfection conditions were optimized for maximum transfection of macrophages. Two days posttransfection, the cells were washed, lysed, and measured for luciferase activity (used to measure transfection efficiency). RAW 264.7 and NR 383, macrophages; 293, kidney embryonic cells; A549, alveolar epithelial cells; Hep G2, liver cells; RLU, relative light units. Data were normalized to protein content. Values are means ± SD; n = 4 experiments. * P < 0.05 vs. free DNA control.

Endotoxin reduces transfection efficiency and increases cellular toxicity. Endotoxin is known to be a frequent contaminant of plasmid DNA preparations (3) and a potent stimulator of macrophages (13, 20). We therefore tested whether the presence of contaminating endotoxin could contribute to the observed low transfection efficiency in macrophages. To test this possibility, we used highly purified plasmid preparations that we obtained by using the QIAGEN EndoFree plasmid preparation kit and tested the effect of added LPS on gene transfer efficiency. Plasmid samples prepared by this method were found to contain <0.1 EU/µg plasmid DNA as determined by the Limulus amebocyte lysate assay. This amount of endotoxin is typically 100-10,000 times less than that obtained by conventional methods of DNA preparation such as anion-exchange chromatography and silica-based adsorption (19). Not surprisingly, transfection of macrophages with the EndoFree plasmid was 30 times greater than that of plasmid prepared by anion-exchange chromatography (Fig. 2). Figure 3A shows that the addition of small amounts of LPS (0-0.5 µg/ml or 0-5 EU/ml) greatly reduced the transfection efficiency of macrophages. In contrast, LPS at the same concentration range had no significant effect on gene transfection efficiency in other cell types tested (Fig. 3A). These results suggest that macrophages are especially sensitive to LPS and that this increased susceptibility may be responsible for their poor transfection efficiency. To test whether the reduced transfection is associated with cellular toxicity potentially caused by LPS, we studied the effect of LPS on cellular LDH release. Figure 3B shows that at the same concentrations used in gene transfection studies, LPS caused a significant toxic effect in macrophages but had only minimal effect in other cell types. These results suggest that the low transfection efficiency in macrophages may be caused by LPS-mediated cellular toxicity.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effect of DNA preparation on gene transfer efficiency. RAW 264.7 macrophages (1 × 106/ml) were transfected with either EndoFree or anion-exchange plasmid CMV-luciferase (1 µg/ml) in the presence and absence of transfecting agents (12 µg/ml of LipofectAMINE and 1 µg/ml of protamine) for 4 h at 37°C. Two days posttransfection, the cells were washed, lysed, and measured for luciferase activity. Values are means ± SD; n = 4 experiments. * P < 0.05 vs. ion-exchange treatment.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effects of endotoxin on transfection efficiency (A) and cellular toxicity [as measured by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release; B] in different cell lines. Cells (1 × 106/ml) were transfected with EndoFree CMV-luciferase (1 µg/ml) in the presence of transfecting agents (12 µg/ml of LipofectAMINE and 1 µg/ml of protamine) for 4 h at 37°C. Indicated amounts of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were also added to the transfection medium during transfection. Two days posttransfection, the cells and supernatants were collected and analyzed for luciferase and LDH activities. Values are means ± SD; n = 4 experiments. * P < 0.05 vs. LPS-untreated control.

The role of endotoxin in macrophage toxicity was further studied by using the endotoxin-neutralizing agent polymyxin B. Polymyxin B is a polycationic antibiotic that has been widely used to neutralize the effects of LPS (18). Treatment of the cells with this agent during gene transfection decreased cellular toxicity (Fig. 4A) and reversed the LPS-induced decrease in transfection (Fig. 4B). Thus these results confirm that the observed low transfection is due to the cytotoxic effects of endotoxin.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effects of polymyxin B and N-t-butyl-alpha -phenylnitrone (PBN) on LPS-induced toxicity (A) and transfection efficiency (B). Cells (1 × 106/ml) were transfected with CMV-luciferase (1 µg/ml) in the presence of transfecting agents (12 µg/ml of LipofectAMINE and 1 µg/ml of protamine) for 4 h at 37°C. Polymyxin B (1 µg/ml) and PBN (2 mM) were added to the transfection medium in different treatment groups. Two days posttransfection, the cells and supernatants were collected and analyzed for luciferase and LDH activities. Values are means ± SD; n = 4 experiments. * P < 0.05 vs. LPS-treated control.

ROS are involved in LPS-mediated toxicity. LPS stimulation of macrophages has been reported to cause activation and release of ROS (8). Because ROS are known to be involved in a number of pathological processes, we postulated that ROS may be responsible for LPS-induced toxicity and reduced transfection. To test this possibility, we treated the cells with PBN (a ROS scavenger) and studied its effects on LPS-induced toxicity and transfection activity. PBN has been used in a previous study (7) as a scavenger of ROS. Our results show that PBN effectively inhibited LPS-induced toxicity (Fig. 4A) and restored transfection activity (Fig. 4B). Thus our results support the role of ROS in the process. Subsequent studies using specific ROS scavengers (see Hydroxyl radical is the key reactive species responsible for LPS-induced effects) further confirm these results.

Hydroxyl radical is the key reactive species responsible for LPS-induced effects. Because PBN is a nonspecific ROS scavenger, the identity of specific oxygen species involved in this process is not known. To identify such species, we used specific ROS inhibitors, including SOD (O2- scavenger), catalase (H2O2 scavenger), and sodium formate [hydroxyl radical (·OH) scavenger] to study the effects on LPS. O2-, H2O2, and ·OH are three major reactive species produced by macrophages (5, 6, 16) and thus are the primary focus of our investigation. Figure 5, A and B, shows that all three scavengers had an inhibitory effect on cellular toxicity and transfection activity. However, the effects were more pronounced in the case of catalase and sodium formate, and lesser effects were observed with SOD. It should be noted that all three scavengers were tested at different concentrations; however, only optimal concentrations of each scavenger are presented here. The results obtained suggest that multiple ROS are involved in the toxicological process and that H2O2 and ·OH play a greater role. Because H2O2 has been reported to be a major source of ·OH formation in macrophages, i.e., via a metal-catalyzed Fenton reaction [Mn+ + H2O2 right-arrow M(n+1)+ + OH- + ·OH] (16), and because ·OH is known to be highly reactive, we suggest that ·OH may be the primary oxidative species responsible for the observed effects induced by LPS. Supporting this notion is the fact that sodium formate was equally as effective in decreasing toxicity and restoring transfection as catalase and that catalase can inhibit ·OH in macrophages as further demonstrated in our ESR studies (see below).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers on LPS-induced toxicity (A) and transfection efficiency (B). Cells (1 × 106/ml) were transfected with CMV-luciferase (1 µg/ml) in the presence of transfecting agents (12 µg/ml of LipofectAMINE and 1 µg/ml of protamine) for 4 h at 37°C. Superoxide dismutase (SOD; 100 µg/ml), catalase (100 U/ml), and sodium formate (5 mM) were added to the transfection medium in different treatment groups. Two days posttransfection, the cells and supernatants were collected and analyzed for LDH and luciferase activities. Values are means ± SD; n = 4 experiments. * P < 0.05 vs. LPS-treated control.

To confirm that ·OH was actually formed during LPS activation, ESR studies using the spin trap DMPO were carried out. Cells were treated with LPS in the presence and absence of ROS scavengers. Figure 6 shows that in the presence of LPS, an ESR spectrum consisting of a 1:2:2:1 quartet pattern, which is characteristic of a DMPO-·OH adduct (1), was observed. Addition of the ·OH scavenger sodium formate to the system decreased the intensity of the DMPO-·OH signal, thus confirming the formation of ·OH induced by LPS. Interestingly, catalase, the function of which is to scavenge H2O2, also inhibited ·OH formation. These results are consistent with a previous study by Rojanasakul et al. (16) that demonstrated that H2O2 can react with endogenous metal ions to form ·OH via the Fenton reaction. The results also explain the observed comparable effects of catalase and sodium formate in our toxicity and transfection studies.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Electron spin resonance (ESR) measurements of LPS-induced ROS generation. A: ESR spectrum recorded 1 h after an addition of LPS (10 µg/ml) to RAW 264.7 macrophages (1 × 106/ml) in the presence of the spin trapper 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO; 100 mM). B: same as A but with no LPS treatment. C: same as A but with catalase (100 U/ml) added. D: same as A but with sodium formate (5 mM) added. The spectrometer settings were as follows: receiver gain, 1.5 × 105; time constant, 0.3 s; modulation amplitude, 1.0 G; scan time, 4 min; and magnetic field, 3,470 ± 100 G.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Transfection of macrophages represents a significant challenge in the gene regulation studies that utilize these cells. Because of their crucial function in a variety of biological processes and pathologies, these cells also represent important targets for gene therapies. Using a liposome-based gene transfection assay, we have shown that macrophages are difficult to transfect compared with other cell types. Macrophages are sensitive to the content of contaminating endotoxin and hence are sensitive to the method of DNA preparation.

A previous study (19) has shown that the presence of contaminating endotoxin in plasmid preparations can reduce gene transfection efficiency in other cell types. However, this effect is generally observed at high levels of endotoxin, i.e., >100 EU/ml. In this study, we found that macrophages are susceptible to endotoxin at very low levels (0-5 EU/ml). At these concentrations, gene transfection was greatly diminished in macrophages but was relatively unaffected in other cell types. These results indicated that macrophages are particularly sensitive to endotoxin contamination and that this increased susceptibility may be responsible for their poor transfection efficiency.

The mechanism by which endotoxin decreases gene transfection in macrophages is not known. We suggest that this decreased efficiency may be associated with cellular toxicity induced by endotoxin. Supporting this notion is evidence that endotoxin induced cellular toxicity and also decreased gene transfection in macrophages, effects that were not observed in other cell types tested. The role of cellular toxicity in decreasing transfection efficiency is confirmed by treatment of the cells with polymyxin B during transfection. Polymyxin B is a polycationic antibiotic that has been widely used to neutralize the effects of LPS. Polymyxin B is known to bind the lipid A portion of LPS with high affinity (12). The lipid A portion has also been shown to be responsible for most of the biological activities of LPS (13, 14). We have observed in this study that the addition of polymyxin B to the transfection medium effectively inhibited the cytotoxic effect of endotoxin and restored the gene transfection efficiency of macrophages.

Endotoxin is known to activate macrophages and induce the production of various cellular mediators including ROS (8, 14). Consistent with these studies, our ESR and ROS scavenging studies indicated the formation of ROS in our system. To test whether the ROS generated were responsible for the decreased transfection induced by LPS, we treated the cells with different ROS scavengers during transfection. All scavengers increased gene transfection efficiency, thus supporting the role of ROS in this process. These scavengers also decreased cellular toxicity induced by LPS, further substantiating the relationship between these two processes. The observation that all ROS scavengers exhibited LPS-inhibitory effects and that PBN, a general ROS scavenger, was more effective than other scavengers in neutralizing the LPS effects also indicated that multiple ROS are involved in the process. Careful analysis of the test results further showed that O2- plays a less significant role and ·OH formed by a H2O2-dependent, metal-catalyzed Fenton reaction plays a major role in the process.

The conclusions of this study are that 1) LPS decreases transfection efficiency in macrophages due to its toxic effect, 2) LPS-induced ROS generation is involved in this process, 3) inactivating LPS by the addition of polymyxin B or the addition of ROS scavengers decreases the toxicity associated with LPS, and 4) ·OH appears to be the major reactive species responsible for LPS-induced toxicity and reduced transfection. Several possibilities exist with regard to the effect of ROS on transfection activity. Cellular toxicities included by ROS would impair endocytic activity of the cells and hence transfection activity. Other possibilities include DNA damage and alterations in liposome binding and fusion activities.

We report here, for the first time, the role of ROS in causing decreased transfection in macrophages. Gene transfer studies of the lung are crucial to the understanding of normal and pathological lung functions at a molecular level. The results of this study should facilitate further mechanistic studies of lung cell physiology and pathology when gene transfer methodology is utilized.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported in part by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-62959 and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.


    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Y. Rojanasakul, West Virginia Univ. School of Pharmacy, Dept. of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, PO Box 9530, Morgantown, WV 26506 (E-mail: yrojanasakul{at}hsc.wvu.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 15 March 2000; accepted in final form 10 May 2000.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Buettner, GR. The spin trapping of superoxide and hydroxyl radicals. In: Superoxide Dismutase, edited by Oberly LW.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1984, p. 63-81.

2.   Burkholder, JK, Decker J, and Yang NS. Rapid transgene expression in lymphocyte and macrophage primary cultures after particle bombardment-mediated gene transfer. J Immunol Methods 165: 149-156, 1993[ISI][Medline].

3.   Cotten, M, Baker A, Saltik M, Wagner E, and Buschle M. Lipopolysaccharide is a frequent contaminant of plasmid DNA preparations and can be toxic to primary human cells in the presence of adenovirus. Gene Ther 1: 239-246, 1994[ISI][Medline].

4.   Daumler, R, and Zimmermann U. High yields of stable transformants by hypo-osmolar plasmid electroinjection. J Immunol Methods 122: 203-210, 1989[ISI][Medline].

5.   Drath, DB, and Karnovsky ML. Superoxide production in phagocytic leukocytes. J Exp Med 141: 257-262, 1975[Abstract].

6.   Gee, JBL, Vassallo CL, Bell P, Kaskin J, Basford RE, and Field JB. Catalase-dependent peroxidative metabolism in the alveolar macrophage during phagocytosis. J Clin Invest 49: 1280-1287, 1970[ISI][Medline].

7.   Gossart, S, Cambon C, Orfila C, Seguelas MH, Lepert JC, Rami J, and Pipy B. Reactive oxygen intermediates as regulators of TNF-alpha production in rat lung inflammation induced by silica. J Immunol 156: 1540-1548, 1996[Abstract].

8.   Guthrie, LA, McPhail LC, Henson PM, and Johnston RB. Priming of neutrophils for enhanced release of oxygen metabolites by bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Evidence for increased activity of the superoxide-producing enzyme. J Exp Med 160: 1656-1671, 1984[Abstract].

9.   Lewis, CE, and McGee JOD The Macrophages. New York: IRL, 1992.

10.   Mack, KD, Wei R, Elbagarri A, Abbey N, and McGrath MS. A novel method for DEAE-dextran mediated transfection of adherent primary cultured human macrophages. J Immunol Methods 211: 79-86, 1998[ISI][Medline].

11.   Meyer, M, Pahl HL, and Baeuerle PA. Regulation of transcription factors NF-kappa B and AP-1 by redox changes. Chem Biol Interact 91: 91-100, 1994[ISI][Medline].

12.   Morrison, DC, and Jacobs DM. Binding of polymyxin B to the lipid A portion of bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Immunochemistry 13: 813-818, 1976[ISI][Medline].

13.   Morrison, DC, and Ryan JL. Endotoxins and disease mechanisms. Annu Rev Med 38: 417-432, 1987[ISI][Medline].

14.   Raetz, CRH Biochemistry of endotoxins. Annu Rev Biochem 59: 129-170, 1990[ISI][Medline].

15.   Remacle, J, Raes M, Toussaint O, Renard P, and Rao G. Low levels of reactive oxygen species as modulators of cell function. Mutat Res 316: 103-122, 1995[ISI][Medline].

16.   Rojanasakul, Y, Wang L, Hoffman AH, Shi X, Dalal NS, Banks DE, and Ma JKH Mechanisms of hydroxyl free radical-induced cellular injury and calcium overloading in alveolar macrophages. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 8: 377-383, 1993[ISI][Medline].

17.   Rupprecht, A, and Coleman D. Transfection of adherent murine peritoneal macrophages with a reporter gene using DEAE-dextran. J Immunol Methods 144: 157-163, 1991[ISI][Medline].

18.   Storm, DR, Rosenthal KS, and Swanson PE. Polymyxin and related peptide antibiotics. Annu Rev Biochem 46: 723-763, 1977[ISI][Medline].

19.   Weber, M, Moller K, Welzeck M, and Schorr J. Effects of lipopolysaccharide on transfection efficiency in eukaryotic cells. Biotechniques 19: 930-940, 1995[ISI][Medline].

20.   Wright, SD. Multiple receptors for endotoxin. Curr Opin Immunol 3: 83-90, 1991[ISI][Medline].


Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 279(5):L878-L883




This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Dokka, S.
Articles by Rojanasakul, Y.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Dokka, S.
Articles by Rojanasakul, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online