EDITORIAL FOCUS
Pulmonary edema fluid movement within the lung

Hugh O'Brodovich

Lung Biology Programme, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children; Canadian Institutes of Health Research Group in Lung Development; and Departments of Paediatrics and Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada


    ARTICLE
TOP
ARTICLE
REFERENCES

DESPITE MUCH RESEARCH and many medical advances, pulmonary edema remains one of the more common causes for admission to the hospital and intensive care units. Although many illnesses lead to pulmonary edema, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are one of two processes that may operate individually or in concert. Pulmonary edema occurs when the safety mechanisms of the lung (reviewed in Ref. 14) are overwhelmed by either high transvascular pressure gradients, as in cardiogenic edema, or increases in the microvascular permeability to solutes, as in the premature and adult acute respiratory distress syndromes. The excess fluid first accumulates in the interstitial spaces of the lungs (15), with few or no associated clinical symptoms. The interstitium can only accommodate a few hundred milliliters of excess fluid (14) so the fluid soon floods the airspaces, which in a 70-kg adult approximates 5,000 ml. This airspace flooding is associated with profound respiratory distress because the acini can no longer effectively exchange gases.

It is important to study the mechanisms involved in airspace fluid clearance because little is gained if one removes the cause of the edema and the lungs cannot clear the alveolar fluid. Increased work of breathing, hypoxemia, and pulmonary hypertension would lead to adverse clinical outcomes. This was best illustrated by studies (10, 18) of adult patients with cardiogenic and noncardiogenic edema where survival was associated with evidence of the active absorption of airspace fluid. Airspace fluid clearance is not only important in pulmonary edema but also during birth when the airspaces are filled with fetal lung liquid (reviewed in Ref. 11). All infants are born with "alveolar flooding," yet the vast majority of newborn infants uneventfully survive their "salt water drowning" and do not develop respiratory distress syndrome.

How is airspace fluid cleared? Historically, it was assumed that Starling forces were responsible for fluid clearance. However, in vivo studies subsequently showed that the lung could clear fluid from its airspaces against unfavorable transepithelial hydrostatic and colloid osmotic pressure gradients (9), raising the possibility of active transport processes.1 In vitro experiments with primary cultures of adult type II cells (5, 8) and late-gestation fetal distal lungs (13) showed that the epithelium actively transported Na+ via amiloride-sensitive pathways. In vivo pharmacological (12) and genetic (6) experiments documented the critical physiological importance of distal lung epithelial Na+ transport in airspace fluid clearance at the time of birth. Studies in the adult lung (3, 10) have indicated that the fluid clearance rate in humans is ~18%/h, with variable rates in other mammals (dog, 4%/h; sheep, 8%/h; rabbit, 15%/h; mouse, 27%/h).

New observations reported in this issue of the American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology (17) suggest that liquid can very rapidly move out of a fluid-filled acinus. Wang et al. (17), using an optical "real-time" method, provide direct and indirect evidence that liquid very rapidly leaves a fluid-filled acinus when the remainder of the lung is filled with air. The half-life of fluid movement was only 5 s, and changes in lung volume or intracellular Ca2+ concentration modulated the rate of fluid movement. The authors acknowledge that they are not studying active transport by the distal lung epithelium. As outlined above, the time frame of fluid movement is inconsistent with active transport processes, and their experiments showed that inhibitors of epithelial active ion transport did not alter the rate of fluid movement. It should also be noted that the authors were measuring the removal of fluid from the injected acinus and were not measuring the movement of fluid out of the lung. As such, despite the novelty of their observations, the clinical relevance of their findings needs further study because if there is only a shift of fluid from one acinus to another acinus, there would not be any benefit to the patient.

Mechanical forces, including those involved in lung interdependence (reviewed in Ref. 7), and surface tension forces at the air-liquid interface may be responsible for movement of the injected fluid. One could argue that the movement of fluid from the injected acinus to an adjacent acinus is the fluid equivalent of "pendulluft," a phenomenon where air moves from on acinus to an adjacent acinus (7). Although neither surfactant nor surface tension forces were assessed during the present study (17), the authors appropriately asked whether or not surface tension forces at the air-liquid interfaces are involved in the phenomenon they observed. Indeed, the work of Espinosa et al. (2) may be relevant; they indicate that bulk fluid movement can occur in response to gradients in surface tension, a phenomenon termed the "Marangoni effect." Their work suggests the interesting possibility that the high surface tension at the airway surface (4) draws the fluid out of the airspaces and up into the airways (2) where it could then either enter an adjacent acinus or be absorbed by respiratory bronchiolar and bronchial epithelia. Indeed, the smallest airways are lined by Clara cells, which are known to transport Na+ at ~10 times the rate of alveolar type II epithelium (16).

The present observations (17) are relevant to previous work investigating the sequence of events during the formation of interstitial and alveolar edema. In a classic paper, Staub et al. (15) determined the sequence of events leading from interstitial to airspace edema. As edema formation occurs, the gas volume of the alveolus decreases in a nonlinear relationship with the distending pressure and the absolute size of the alveolus decreases as it becomes fluid filled (Fig. 1). A decrement in acinar size with fluid filling is consistent with the data provided by Wang et al. (Fig. 2 in Ref. 17). As such, the argument provided by Wang et al. (APPENDIX A in Ref. 17) may need revision as they speculate that the fluid-filled alveolus A has a greater diameter than the partially filled alveolus B.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic representation of the sequence of fluid accumulation during acute pulmonary edema. A: normal alveolar walls and no excess fluid in perivascular connective tissue spaces. Br, bronchus; PA, pulmonary artery. B: initial fluid leak. Fluid flows to the interstitial space (at subatmospheric pressure) around the conducting vessels and airways. C: tissue space filled, alveolar edema increases, and fluid begins to overflow into the alveoli, notably at the corners where curvature is great. D: quantal filling. Individual alveoli read critical configuration at which existing inflation pressure can no longer maintain stability. Alveolar gas volume rapidly passes to a new configuration with a much reduced curvature (bottom right). The volume deficit is absorbed by additional fluid filling or alveolar collapse depending on associated conditions such as alveolar surface tension and availability of fluid. [Reproduced from Staub et al. (15).]

The state-of-the-art optical imaging developed by Wang et al. (17) represents a major advance. Their ability to provide "real-time" measurements of fluid movement within the distal regions of the lung is an important new approach that will supplement the existing gravimetric and histopathological techniques in studying the resolution of pulmonary edema.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I thank Dr. A. Charles Bryan for insight regarding potential Marangoni flow within the lung.


    FOOTNOTES

My research is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Group in Lung Development, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, and the Ontario Thoracic Society.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: H. O'Brodovich, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada (E-mail: hugh.obrodovich{at}sickkids.on.ca).

1 This speculation was also supported on a theoretical basis. Because the reflection coefficient of the alveolar epithelium for Na+ is 1 (1), a phenomenon arising from the 4-Å effective molecular radius of the intercellular junction, electrolytes become osmotically relevant in transepithelial fluid and solute movement. Because each 1 mosmol/l generates 19 mmHg pressure, the approximate 1.5 mosmol/l protein-induced osmotic pressure becomes trivial relative to the 280 mosmol/l electrolyte-induced osmotic pressure. Electrolytes, and not colloids, are therefore the quantitatively most important osmotic particle when airspaces with normal epithelium are filled with fluid.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ARTICLE
REFERENCES

1.   Effros, RM, Mason GR, Sietsema K, Hukkanen J, and Silverman P. Pulmonary epithelial sieving of small electrolytes in rat lungs. J Appl Physiol 65: 640-648, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Espinosa, FF, Shapiro AH, Fredberg JJ, and Kamm RD. Spreading of exogenous surfactant in an airway. J Appl Physiol 75: 2028-2039, 1993[Abstract].

3.   Garat, C, Carter EP, and Matthay MA. New in situ mouse model to quantify alveolar epithelial fluid clearance. J Appl Physiol 84: 1763-1767, 1998[Free Full Text].

4.   Gehr, P, Schurch S, Berthiaume Y, Im Hof V, and Geiser M. Particle retention in the airways by surfactant. J Aerosol Med 3: 27-43, 1990.

5.   Goodman, BE, and Crandall ED. Dome formation in primary cultured monolayers of alveolar epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 243: C96-C100, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Hummler, E, Barker P, Gatzy J, Beermann F, Verdumo C, Schmidt A, Boucher R, and Rossier BC. Early death due to defective neonatal lung liquid clearance in alpha ENaC-deficient mice. Nat Genet 12: 325-328, 1996[ISI][Medline].

7.   Macklem, PT. Airway obstruction and collateral ventilation. Physiol Rev 51: 368-436, 1971[Free Full Text].

8.   Mason, R, Williams MC, Widdicombe JH, Sanders MJ, Misfeldt DS, and Berry LC, Jr. Transepithelial transport by pulmonary alveolar type II cells in primary culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 6033-6037, 1982[Abstract].

9.   Matthay, MA, Landolt CC, and Staub NC. Differential liquid and protein clearance from the alveoli of anesthetized sheep. J Appl Physiol 53: 96-104, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Matthay, MA, and Wiener-Kronish JP. Intact epithelial barrier function is critical for the resolution of alveolar edema in man. Am Rev Respir Dis 142: 1250-1257, 1990[ISI][Medline].

11.   O'Brodovich, H. Epithelial ion transport in the fetal and perinatal lung. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 261: C555-C564, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   O'Brodovich, H, Hannam V, Seear M, and Mullen JBM Amiloride impairs lung water clearance in newborn guinea pigs. J Appl Physiol 68: 1758-1762, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   O'Brodovich, H, Rafii B, and Post M. Bioelectric properties of fetal alveolar epithelial monolayers. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 258: L201-L206, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Staub, NC. Pulmonary edema. Physiol Rev 54: 678-811, 1974[Free Full Text].

15.   Staub, NC, Nagano K, and Pearce ML. Pulmonary edema in dogs, especially the sequence of fluid accumulation in lungs. J Appl Physiol 22: 227-240, 1967[Free Full Text].

16.   Van Scott, MR, Hester S, and Boucher R. Ion transport by rabbit nonciliated bronchiolar epithelial cells (Clara cells) in culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 5496-5500, 1987[Abstract].

17.   Wang, PM, Ashino Y, Ichimura H, and Bhattacharya J. Rapid alveolar liquid removal by a novel convective mechanism. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 281: L1327-L1334, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Ware, LB, and Matthay MA. Alveolar fluid clearance is impaired in the majority of patients with acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163: 1376-1383, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 281(6):L1324-L1326
1040-0605/01 $5.00 Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society