Lung lining liquid modifies PM2.5 in favor of particle aggregation: a protective mechanism

Michaela Kendall1, Teresa D. Tetley2, Edward Wigzell1, Bernie Hutton3, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen1, and Paul Luckham1

1 Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine, London SW7 2BP; 2 National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine, London SW3 6LY; and 3 Christopher Ingold Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University College London WC1H 0AJ, United Kingdom


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The health effects of particle inhalation including urban air pollution and tobacco smoke comprise a significant public health concern worldwide, although the mechanisms by which inhaled particles cause premature deaths remain undetermined. In this study, we assessed the physicochemical interactions of fine airborne particles (PM2.5) and lung lining liquid using scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and X-ray photon spectroscopy. We provide experimental evidence to show that lung lining liquid modifies the chemistry and attractive forces at the surface of PM2.5, which leads to enhanced particle aggregation. We propose that this is an important protective mechanism that aids particle clearance in the lung.

fine particles; bronchoalveolar fluid; surface chemistry; interactions


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

THERE IS STRONG EPIDEMIOLOGICAL and toxicological evidence that demonstrates the adverse health effects of atmospheric particulate matter having an aerodynamic diameter of <2.5 µm, which is termed PM2.5 (5). Although the biological mechanism is not yet clear, particle size is believed to be a crucial factor in affecting health (13, 18). Particle size determines the site of deposition, the surface area-to-volume mass ratios, and importantly, the clearance rates within the respiratory tract. Thus smaller particles are more likely to reach the gas-exchange region of the lung and present a greater interactive surface per unit mass of inhaled material. In addition, although particles >5 µm in diameter undergo macrophage phagocytosis and mucociliary clearance, ultrafine particles (<0.1 µm in diameter) are not readily phagocytosed and may access the pulmonary interstitium via the epithelium (2, 9). Significantly, epidemiological studies of the effects of aerosols of different origins imply that bulk particle composition is a relatively poor predictor of health outcome compared with mass concentration (4) even though particle-surface chemistry is likely to be extremely significant in determining ultimate biological reactivity.

The first line of defense against inhaled particles is lung lining liquid, which bathes the underlying epithelial cells and contains important neutralizing agents including antioxidants, lysozyme defensins, lipids, mucins, and proteins. This liquid helps to maintain homeostasis of the airways through antimicrobial and immunologic defense mechanisms. An essential property of pulmonary surfactant, which is the predominant component of lung lining liquid in the respiratory units, is the capacity to reduce surface tension in an area-dependent way thereby preventing alveolar collapse. In addition, surfactant has been shown to displace respirable particles (<6 µm in diameter) into the hypophase of lung lining liquid, which makes the particles available for clearance by the mucociliary escalator (6, 15). Lung lining liquid proteins such as surfactant proteins A and D appear to be important modulators of the clearance of microorganisms by macrophage phagocytosis (3, 7, 12, 14, 22). Similar processes, possibly involving opsonization, may also trigger uptake by macrophages and clearance of inhaled PM2.5.

The factors that render individuals susceptible to increased ambient PM2.5 are also unclear, although those with existing respiratory and cardiovascular disease are most at risk during pollution episodes (17). Certainly the large surface areas presented to the peripheral lung by PM2.5 have enormous potential to deliver toxic material to or deplete defensive material from the lung lining fluid. If one role of the fluid is to prevent such toxic processes, abnormalities in lung lining liquid composition, e.g., in smokers and asthmatics (7, 8), may contribute to the observed susceptibility to PM2.5 episodes. However, very little is understood about the interaction between lung lining liquid and inhaled ambient particles.

In this study, we hypothesized that in healthy individuals the lung lining liquid plays an important protective role by modifying the physicochemical properties at the surface of particulate matter and thus changing the surface chemistry and neutralizing its reactivity in situ. We also hypothesized that these modifications act to enhance pulmonary clearance by increasing the attractive forces between the particles, thereby inducing aggregation and enhanced phagocytosis by macrophages. To investigate this, we used scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and X-ray photon spectroscopy (XPS) to show that lung lining liquid modifies the surface chemistry and attractive forces at the surface of PM2.5, which leads to enhanced particle aggregation. We used SEM to determine particle morphology before and after immersion in human lavage fluid, AFM to examine particle-liquid interactions, and XPS to examine changes in particle-surface chemistry before and after immersion in lavage fluid.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Lung lining liquid was collected using bronchoalveolar lavage. Human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected during diagnostic fiber-optic bronchoscopy with a routine method as described previously (21). Briefly, the tip of the bronchoscope was wedged into a segment of the right middle lobe. Warmed sterile 0.15 M NaCl (50 ml) was introduced and gently aspirated. This was repeated three times (total lavage, 200 ml), and the washings were pooled and centrifuged at 300 g for 10 min to remove the cellular component, which was used for diagnostic purposes. The supernatant was stored at -40°C until used. Because a large volume of lavage fluid was required to perform the whole experiment, the supernatant from two subjects (who were subsequently diagnosed as normal) were pooled before the study.

PM2.5 was collected from three sources, which represented outdoor urban air, outdoor "clean" air, and indoor tobacco smoke pollution. Atmospheric or outdoor PM2.5 was collected near London traffic ("urban PM2.5") and at a clean atmosphere-monitoring station in Mace Head, Galway ("clean air PM2.5"). "Indoor smoke PM2.5" was collected in an indoor smoking area. Personal PM2.5 samplers (BGI-400 pump fitted with GK-2.05 cyclone; BGI, Waltham, MA) were used to collect PM2.5 onto Nucleopore and Teflon filters for subsequent SEM and XPS analysis, respectively (11). In addition, a purpose-designed, direct particle-liquid (DPL) system was configured to allow collection of PM2.5 directly into liquid, in this case 0.15 M NaCl or BALF. This system is based on an existing bioaerosol sampler design and a more complete description can be found elsewhere (10). Table 1 summarizes the types of samples taken as part of this study, the collection methods used, and the associated analytic methods employed.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Summary of types of particle samples collected and analytical methods used

The filter samples collected with personal PM2.5 samplers were stored in airtight containers in a cool dark room for up to 4 days. Using a scalpel, the filters were then divided into three parts. One unchanged (dry) portion was analyzed using XPS, another portion was immersed in sterile 0.15 M NaCl, and the third was immersed in BALF, for 4 h. The saline- and lavage-treated samples were then bathed in nanopure water and placed in a desiccating argon atmosphere for 24 h. Samples collected by DPL were aspirated from the collection reservoir, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.4-µm-pore-size Nucleopore filter under negative pressure. Samples were centrifuged immediately after collection at 3,000 rpm for 30 min to remove the largest particles. The filters were placed in a desiccating argon atmosphere for 24 h to dry before SEM analysis.

AFM was performed on diesel exhaust particles of ~10 µm in diameter, because particles collected as PM2.5 were too small to manipulate accurately. Exhaust particles were collected onto a glass slide securely fixed inside a clean container. The container was opened and held at the exhaust outlet of a diesel engine to allow particles to strike the glass slide. The container was then sealed and taken to the laboratory where the slide was examined under a microscope to identify single compact 10-µm particles. Force-distance measurements were carried out with a Topoetrix Explorer 2000 (ThermoMicroscopes) using an Ultralever contact tipless cantilever (Park Scientific Instruments). A cantilever with the tip primed with a small amount of epoxy resin adhesive was maneuvered using a micromanipulator over a previously identified particle and lowered onto it; the cantilever was then moved away from the slide and viewed under a microscope to confirm that the particle was satisfactorily attached to the cantilever. In addition, the particle was examined to ensure that it was not too "flat" and that the contact area was not covered in resin. The preparation was allowed to dry for 48 h before study. A carbon graphite disc (20 mm in diameter) was used as the contact surface.

XPS was used to determine the surface chemistry of PM2.5 to a depth of ~5 nm. XPS measurements were performed on a VG ESCALAB 220i XL instrument using monochromatic Al-Kalpha radiation (1,486.6 eV) of 600-µm spot size. A magnetic objective lens was used for enhanced sensitivity throughout this work, and the analysis chamber was maintained at a pressure >10-9 Torr. Survey spectra of the particulates were collected over a 1,100-eV range at a resolution of 0.8 eV/step and 100 ms/step and a pass energy of 100 eV. High-resolution spectra were collected for species of interest at a resolution of 0.1 eV/step and 100 ms/step and a pass energy of 20 eV. Charge compensation was achieved by placing a tantalum-conducting mask over the sample to ensure good electrical contact before flooding the sample with low-energy (4 eV) electrons. All peaks were referenced to the C1s binding energy for hydrocarbons at 285.0 eV. Quantification was performed using a Shirley background (19) and the sensitivity factors described previously (23). Binding energies were taken at peak maxima for all species. Particles were collected on Teflon filters and analyzed before and after immersion in normal saline and unprocessed lavage fluid. Displacement of some of the atmospheric particles from the Teflon filters was detected after immersion in saline and lavage fluid. Blank Teflon filters were therefore used to establish the background Teflon spectra and to insure that there was no appreciable surface contamination during liquid treatments.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Representative SEM images of the atmospheric PM2.5 samples collected onto Nucleopore filters are shown in Fig. 1. Figure 1, A-C, shows typical examples of urban particles that are characteristic of those found in the U.K. urban atmosphere as previously reported (1, 20). Figure 1, D and E, shows typical indoor smoke particles. Both sample types are dominated by small particles comprised of loosely agglomerated 35-nm spheres that form chains or transparent particles. Figure 1F shows typical particles in the clean air sample; compared with the urban particle samples, these particles tend to appear as larger single crustal particles that are denser in structure and occur at much lower concentrations.


View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Typical particles observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of particulate matter with <2.5-µm diameter (PM2.5) samples collected directly onto Nucleopore filters from the London atmosphere (A-C) and an indoor smoking area (D-E). These two particle types are similar in appearance and comprise agglomerated ~35-nm spherules generated during combustion. Particles may even appear fibrous because of single-particle chain agglomeration (C). Smallest particle type found in the clean air sample is shown (F); compared with combustion particles, the particles sampled at this site tended to be larger in size, crystalline in structure, and tended to occur at much lower concentrations. Dark holes on all images are the filter pores.

When the urban particle samples were collected using the DPL sampler in the presence of BALF, the most striking feature was the appearance of increased numbers of dense conglomerates >5 µm (mostly in the 10-µm range) that consisted predominantly of agglomerated 35-nm particles (Fig. 2, A and B). This particle size (~10 µm) was largely absent in ambient air samples and in the saline DPL control sample, where most of the particles were 35-nm spheres and small-chain agglomerates (<2.5 µm) with the occasional less-dense larger particles that may have formed during sample drying. In 10 randomly selected fields of view, more than twice as many large- and medium-sized agglomerates appeared in the BALF-collected sample. Figure 3 shows two low-magnification backscatter SEM images of the BALF- and the saline-collected particles and shows the relative abundance of large, densely packed agglomerates, which appear as dark patches. Clearly, the BALF-collected particles agglomerated, whereas particles collected into the saline sample remained dispersed.


View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Densely agglomerated 35-nm particle conglomerates (>5 µm) found in particle samples collected by sampling PM2.5 directly into lung lining liquid. Samples were subsequently filtered onto 0.4 µm Nucleopore filters for SEM analysis.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Low-magnification images of particles sampled directly into lung lining liquid (A) and saline solution (B). Particles were subsequently filtered onto 0.4-µm Nucleopore filters for SEM analysis to illustrate the relative abundance of large particles in air sampled directly into lung lining.

AFM-measured force-distance values for the interaction forces between the particle and the surface in different media are presented in Fig. 4 under atmospheric conditions (A), in nanopure water (B), and in processed BALF (C). When a particle was brought toward the graphite surface in air, there was a short-range attraction due to van der Waals forces. The adhesive force observed on separation in air likely reflects van der Waals forces and/or capillary bridging. In water, there was a marked reduction in these forces, possibly due to a slight repulsion between the surfaces and reduced van der Waals interaction as would be expected in liquid. When BALF was examined without processing (i.e., centrifugation), the opaque, lipid-rich fluid interfered with the force measurements by attenuating the path of the laser in the AFM. Consequently, the lavage sample was centrifuged to remove most of the lipid component, which left a protein-rich supernatant. Treatment of particles with processed BALF resulted in longer range attraction and adhesion forces (Fig. 4C) than was observed in air or water.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   "Force in" graph shows the particle attached to the atomic force microscopy (AFM) cantilevered tip being brought toward a surface at 0 nm separation. As the tip pushes against the solid surface, an increasingly positive (repulsive) force is recorded whereby the tip remains stationary and the cantilever arm continues to be forced toward the surface. When the applied force reaches +2 nN, the force direction is reversed and the tip is pulled away from the surface (represented by the "force out" graph). A negative (attractive) force is recorded when the tip sticks to the surface during either adhesion or spontaneous attraction to the surface, causing curvature of the cantilever away from the surface. The "force out" graph shows particle attraction to the surface (A); at approximately -3 nN, the particle is separated from the surface abruptly and springs back to a distance of ~170 nm. In nanopure water (B), the attractive forces are eliminated. However, in centrifuged bronchoalveolar lavage (C), the AFM tip experiences a spontaneous attraction toward the surface at 100 nm, and the particle jumps to within 40 nm of the surface. As the tip is pulled away, an attractive force resists particle separation from the surface. This long-range attraction and adhesion is absent in the nanopure water control.

XPS analysis confirmed that very low particle loads were present in the clean air sample. Particles from this site consisted of graphite-hydrocarbon, Cl-, and oxide species only. Higher particle loads were observed for the outdoor urban and indoor smoke samples. Graphite-hydrocarbon species dominated at the particle surface, although lower levels of SiO2, oxide, and amide species were also present. In addition, trace species on urban outdoor-particle surfaces included C---O/N and C==O/COO-, Cl-, NO3-, NH4+, and SO4-. After immersion in saline, Cl-, NO3-, NH4+, and SO4- were no longer observed at the surface and were deemed bioavailable. After immersion in BALF, a strong amide signal was observed on the particles, which indicates that significant quantities of protein had adsorbed onto the surface of these particles. No amide signal was recorded on the blank filter control or the saline control. Figure 5 shows the detected amide signal from urban PM2.5: dry PM2.5 (A), saline-soaked PM2.5 (B), and lung lining liquid-soaked PM2.5 (C).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Amide signal detected from the surface of dry (A), saline-soaked (B), and bronchoalveolar lining fluid-soaked (C) urban PM2.5, using X-ray photon spectroscopy.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this study, we have shown that when PM2.5 is collected directly into normal lung lining liquid, the particles aggregate into larger (>5 µm) dense structures compared with samples collected in air or into saline. The control showed that the agglomeration effects were not due to drying per se but were specifically associated with the protein-rich solution, which is in line with the AFM study that showed enhanced attraction between surfaces in BALF. The XPS studies of surface chemistry for urban and smoking PM2.5 showing significant modification by BALF together with the AFM findings of increased attractive and adhesive forces in BALF suggest that aggregation is enhanced by components of lung lining liquid. The transition of PM2.5 surface chemistry from a principally organic carbon layer with trace soluble species to an organic layer with no trace soluble species and a strong amide signal indicates that the surface adsorption of protein from lung lining liquid may be responsible for this change. The long-range molecular attractions shown to occur between a particle and a graphite surface in protein-rich BALF may be attributable to particle surface-protein interactions. Opsonization of inhaled particles by surfactant proteins [which are known to have opsonizing properties (12, 22)], antioxidants, and serum-derived and other locally produced proteins may change the surface-charge forces in favor of aggregation. The processed BALF used in this study may represent the hypophase of lung lining liquid (described in Refs. 7 and 16) into which the surface surfactant film has been shown to submerge particles <6 µm (15, 16). It is suggested that when the particles reach the hypophase, they are then more readily cleared by normal clearance mechanisms.

This aggregation mechanism is highly significant because macrophages do not readily phagocytize the smaller agglomerates of 35-nm spheres that dominate urban air in developed countries (1); epithelial cells have been demonstrated to internalize these ultrafine particles (9). We hypothesize that in susceptible subjects, the inability of PM2.5 to aggregate in lung lining liquid, which is possibly due to low opsonization, reduces the chances of particle clearance by macrophages and enhances the possibility of epithelial cell uptake and transfer to the interstitium (2, 9). In addition, particle adsorption and depletion of lung lining components, for example surfactant components such as proteins and antioxidants, may compromise lung defense mechanisms. Such processes may contribute to susceptibility to PM2.5 in elderly patients with existing cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and may result in the acute increased mortality rates observed during PM2.5 pollution episodes.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank John Watt (Middlesex University) for producing Fig. 3, A and B.


    FOOTNOTES

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the U.K. Department of Health for funding this project.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence and present address of M. Kendall: EPA Particulate Matter Center, Nelson Institute of Environmental Medicine, New York Univ., 57 Old Forge Rd., Tuxedo, NY 10987 (E-mail: Michaela.Kendall{at}env.med.nyu.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 25 April 2001; accepted in final form 1 August 2001.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Berube, KA, Jones TP, Williamson BJ, Winters C, Morgan AJ, and Richards RJ. Physicochemical characterisation of diesel exhaust particles: factors for assessing biological activity. Atmos Environ 33: 1599-1614, 1999[ISI].

2.   Churg, A, and Brauer M. Human lung parenchyma retains PM2.5. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1555: 2109-2111, 1997.

3.   Crouch, EC. Modulation of host-bacterial interactions by collectins. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 21: 558-561, 1999[Free Full Text].

4.   Department of Health, Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollution. Non-Biological Particles and Health. London: HMSO, 1995.

5.   Dockery, DW, and Pope CA. Epidemiology of particle effects. In: Air Pollution and Health, edited by Holgate ST, Koren HS, Maynard RL, and Samet JM.. London: Academic, 1999, p. 673-705.

6.   Gehr, P, Geiser M, Im Hof V, Schürch S, Waber U, and Baumann M. Surfactant and inhaled particles in the conducting airways: structural, stereological, and biophysical aspects. Microsc Res Tech 26: 423-426, 1993[ISI][Medline].

7.   Gehr, P, Green FHY, Geiser M, Im Hof V, Lee MM, and Schürch S. Airway surfactant, a primary defense barrier: mechanical and immunological aspects. J Aerosol Med 9: 163-181, 1996[ISI][Medline].

8.   Griese, M. Pulmonary surfactant in health and human lung disease. Eur Respir J 13: 1455-1476, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9.   Griese, M, and Reinhardt D. Smaller sized particles are preferentially taken up by alveolar type II pneumocytes. J Drug Target 5: 471-479, 1998[ISI][Medline].

10.   Griffiths, WD, Stewart IW, Futter SJ, Mark D, and Upton SL. The development of sampling methods for the assessment of indoor bioaerosols. J Aerosol Sci 28: 437-457, 1997[ISI].

11.  Kendall M, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Cullinan P, Ashmore M, and Jantunen M. Methodology and preliminary results of EXPOLIS Oxford: determinants and distribution of personal indoor airborne pollutants in urban populations. Proc Indoor Air Conf Edinburgh UK 1999, vol. 2, p. 806-811.

12.   Mason, RJ, Greene K, and Voelker DR. Surfactant protein A and surfactant protein D in health and disease. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 275: L1-L13, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Oberdorster, G, Ferin J, and Lehnert BE. Correlation between particle size and in vivo particle persistence and lung injury. Environ Health Perspect 102, Suppl5: 173-179, 1994[ISI][Medline].

14.   Restrepo, CI, Dong Q, Savov J, Mariencheck MI, and Wright JR. Surfactant protein D stimulates phagocytosis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by alveolar macrophages. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 21: 576-585, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Schürch, S, Gehr P, Im Hof V, Geiser G, and Green FHY Surfactant displaces particles toward the epithelium in airways and alveoli. Respir Physiol 80: 17-32, 1990[ISI][Medline].

16.   Schürch, S, Geiser M, Lee M, and Gehr P. Particles at the airway interfaces of the lung. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 15: 339-353, 1999[ISI].

17.   Schwartz, J. What are people dying of on high pollution days? Environ Res 64: 26-35, 1994[ISI][Medline].

18.   Seaton, A, MacNee W, Donaldson K, and Godden D. Particulate air pollution and acute health effects. Lancet 345: 176-178, 1995[ISI][Medline].

19.   Shirley, DA. High-resolution X-ray photoemission spectrum of the valence bands of gold. Phys Rev B 5: 4709-4715, 1972[ISI].

20.   Sitzmann, B, Kendall M, Watt J, and Williams ID. Characterisation of airborne particles in London by computer-controlled scanning electron microscopy. Sci Total Environ 241: 63-73, 1999[ISI].

21.   Smith, SF, Guz A, Burton GH, Cooke NT, and Tetley TD. Comparison of alastolytic activity in lung lavage from current, ex- or non-smokers. Life Sci 43: 459-464, 1998.

22.   Van Iwaarden, JF, van Strijp JA, Ebskamp MJ, Welmers AC, Verhoef J, and van Golde LM. Surfactant protein A is an opsonin in the phagocytosis of herpes simplex virus type I by rat alveolar macrophages. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 261: L204-L209, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23.   Wagner, CD, Davis LE, Zeller MV, Taylor JA, Raymond RM, and Gale LH. Empirical atomic sensitivity factors for quantitative analysis by electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis. Surface Interface Analysis 3: 211-225, 1981[ISI].


Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 282(1):L109-L114
1040-0605/02 $5.00 Copyright © 2002 the American Physiological Society




This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Google Scholar
Articles by Kendall, M.
Articles by Luckham, P.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Kendall, M.
Articles by Luckham, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online