1 Institute for Surgical Research and 2 Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, D-81366 Munich, Germany
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The inducible nitric oxide (NO)
synthase gene in alveolar macrophages (AMs) is a stress response gene
that may contribute to tissue injury in the lung after respiration with
high O2 concentrations through extensive production of NO.
In this study, we investigated the influence of hyperoxia on the NO
pathway in rat AMs in vitro, its regulation by the transcription
factors nuclear factor (NF)-B and activator protein (AP)-1, and the
role of reactive oxygen species (ROS). AMs were treated with
lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and/or interferon (IFN)-
and incubated
under 21 or 85% O2. Stimulation with LPS and IFN-
led
to induction of the NO pathway that was further upregulated by
hyperoxia. The binding activity of NF-
B, in contrast to that of
AP-1, was activated on stimulation with LPS and IFN-
, and both were
further increased under hyperoxia. The antioxidants pyrrolidine
dithiocarbamate and N-acetyl-L-cysteine inhibited intracellular ROS production and the NO pathway under both
normoxic and hyperoxic conditions but had diverse effects on the
transcription factors. The results presented here indicate that
hyperoxia can upregulate the NO pathway in stimulated AMs through
increased production of intracellular ROS and activation of NF-
B and
AP-1.
activator protein-1; nuclear factor-B; inducible nitric oxide
synthase; transcription factors; antioxidants; reactive oxygen species; oxygen toxicity
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
EXPOSURE TO PURE
OXYGEN leads to lung injury characterized by endothelial and
epithelial cell damage, alveolar edema, type II cell proliferation, and
an influx of granulocytes and macrophages (8).
Although Joseph Priestly, who discovered the O2
molecule in 1774, already foresaw its "adverse effects on the healthy
state of the body" (13), the exact mechanisms of
O2 toxicity still remain to be elucidated. The current
concept of O2 poisoning, the free radical theory, implied
that elevated O2 concentrations cause oxidative stress
through formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide
(O
To further understand the exact mechanism of O2 toxicity,
recent studies have focused on the regulation of gene expression by
oxidants and antioxidants. ROS are known to be implicated in the stress
response of cells by activating stress response genes such as heme
oxygenase-1 (32-kDa heat shock protein) (32) and tumor
necrosis factor (TNF)- (18, 34). Two
well-defined transcription factors influenced by the intracellular
redox state are nuclear factor (NF)-
B and activator protein (AP)-1
(40, 43). Antioxidants such as pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate
(PDTC) and N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) have been
shown to inhibit NF-
B and AP-1 activation (28, 38).
However, activating effects of antioxidants have also been reported
(38).
A stress response gene that may contribute to tissue injury is
inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS). Also, the protective effects of iNOS activation after hyperoxia have been discussed (6, 15). Two NF-B and two AP-1 binding sites have been
identified in the human (7) and mouse (50)
iNOS promoters. The iNOS product NO, a simple gas, is known to be
involved in a variety of physiological as well as pathophysiological
processes such as signal transduction, vascular resistance, platelet
aggregation, and destruction of microbes and tumor cells (1,
31). In resting cells, iNOS is not detectable, but induction
through the stimulation of cells with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or
interferon (IFN)-
is well established (12, 30, 31).
An important source of NO formation by iNOS in the lung is the alveolar macrophage (AM). The cytotoxic effects of activated macrophages on epithelial cells mediated by NO in vitro have been reported (17). Several studies indicated that hyperoxia-induced oxidative stress can enhance NO production. Haddad et al. (16) reported that nitrotyrosine formation through peroxynitrite was elevated in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and rats exposed to 100% O2. Arkovitz et al. (2) showed that AMs from immature rats exposed to hyperoxia in vivo produced higher levels of NO than those from control animals. Cucchiaro et al. (9) found, however, that hyperoxia induces iNOS in the lung without an increase in NO concentration in the exhaled air.
We hypothesized that hyperoxia can elevate the generation of ROS,
which, in turn, activate redox-sensitive transcription factors such as
NF-B and AP-1 and thus upregulate the NO pathway. In the present
study, we show that hyperoxia-induced oxidative stress increases NO
production and iNOS expression only in activated rat AMs. Moreover, our
data suggest that increased levels of intracellular ROS under hyperoxia
activate NF-
B and AP-1. Inhibition of iNOS induction by the
antioxidants PDTC and NAC indicates an important role for ROS in the
intracellular signaling under normoxic as well as under hyperoxic conditions.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
AM donors. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-300 g) were obtained from Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany) and were given 3 days at the animal holding facilities of the institute to recover from transport stress. The animals were kept on a 12:12-h light-dark cycle in a conventional nonbarrier rodent housing unit. Tap water and standard rodent laboratory diets (ssniff, Soest, Germany) were supplied ad libitum.
Cell isolation and processing. AMs were obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage as described earlier (12). After anesthesia with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg body wt), the trachea was cannulated, the thorax was opened, and the lungs were mobilized. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed in situ 10 times, each with 10 ml of sterile nonpyrogenic phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany). The pooled samples were centrifuged at 300 g for 10 min, and the cell pellet was washed twice and resuspended in DMEM (GIBCO BRL, Eggenstein, Germany) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine (Seromed, Berlin, Germany), 0.16 mg/ml of gentamicin (Curasan, Kleinostheim, Germany), and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (GIBCO BRL). The total number of cells was assessed with a standard hemacytometer (Coulter Electronics, Krefeld, Germany). To identify the cellular populations, air-dried cytocentrifuged smears (500 rpm for 5 min) were stained with May-Grünwald-Giemsa. The preparations contained 97-100% AMs as characterized by morphological criteria. The cell viability proved to be >95% by trypan blue exclusion. The cells were adjusted to 1 × 106/ml, plated in 96-well (0.2 × 106 AMs/well) or 6-well (4 × 106 AMs/well) flat-bottomed cell culture plates (Nunclon Delta, Roskilde, Denmark), and incubated for 2 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 and 21% O2 to adhere. Subsequently, the AMs were washed twice with 37°C DMEM to remove nonadherent cells and covered with fresh DMEM. For flow cytometric analysis, the cells were incubated in suspension in polypropylene tubes (0.25 × 106 AMs/tube; Greiner, Frickenhausen, Germany).
The AMs were treated with either Escherichia coli LPS serotype 055:B5 (100 ng/ml) purchased from Sigma Chemie (Taufkirchen, Germany), rat recombinant IFN-Flow cytometric analysis. Viability, necrosis, and apoptosis were assessed by flow cytometry with a FACSort flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). For AM staining, a phosphatidylserine detection kit (DPC Biermann, Bad Nauheim, Germany) that allowed distinction between apoptosis and necrosis was used. Apoptotic cells expose phosphatidylserine, bind annexin V, and are recognized by their green fluorescence. Necrotic cells do not exclude propidium iodide and are detected by their red fluorescence (49). According to the manufacturer's protocol, the cells were washed and resuspended in calcium buffer. Ten microliters of annexin V-FITC were added and incubated for 20 min before 10 µl of propidium iodide were added. After 10 min on ice, fluorescence distribution properties were recorded for 104 events, and percentages of viable, necrotic, and apoptotic cells were determined.
Assessment of NO production. NO release was determined spectrophotometrically by evaluating the accumulation of its oxidation reaction product, nitrite, in the culture medium with the Griess reaction (11). All samples were analyzed in triplicate. Briefly, 50 µl of the AM supernatants were incubated with 50 µl of Griess reagent (1% sulfanilamide, 0.1% N-1-naphtylethylenediamine, and 2.5% phosphoric acid) in a 96-well microtiter plate for 10 min at room temperature. The absorbance of the reaction product at 550 nm was measured with a microplate reader (Salzburger Labortechnik, Salzburg, Austria), and concentrations were calculated with a sodium nitrite calibration curve.
Protein determination. Protein concentrations were measured with the bicinchoninic acid assay (42). Briefly, 200 µl of bicinchoninic acid reaction solution were added to 20 µl of cell lysates and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. All samples were analyzed in duplicate. Extinction at 562 nm was measured in a microplate reader (Salzburger Labortechnik), and protein concentrations were calculated with BSA (Sigma) as a standard.
Western blot analysis. Western blot analysis was performed as previously described (12). In brief, 4 × 106 cells were incubated for 4 h, and the cytoplasmic protein was isolated with the method of Dignam et al. (10). The cells were scraped into hypotonic buffer [10 mM HEPES, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT)], incubated on ice for 15 min, and centrifuged at 3,300 g for 10 min (4°C). The supernatants with the cytoplasmic protein were collected, and protein concentrations were determined. Samples (30 µg protein/lane) were separated on a 7.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel for 1 h. Electrophoretic protein transfer to nitrocellulose membranes (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) was carried out overnight, and nonspecific binding was blocked with 1.5% BSA in buffer (100 mM Tris and 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were incubated with a polyclonal rabbit iNOS antibody (1:2,000: Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) for 2 h at room temperature and washed with a 1% PBS-Tween solution. After application of alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:2,000; Sigma) for 1 h, the nitrocellulose membranes were washed again and developed with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indole phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium in alkaline phosphatase developing buffer (100 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris, and 5 mM MgCl2, pH 9.5). A high molecular mass kit (Dianova) served as a molecular mass standard.
RT-PCR.
RT-PCR was performed as described by Jesch et al. (20).
After 12 h of incubation at 37°C in the absence and presence of LPS and/or IFN- under either 21 or 85% O2, total RNA
was extracted with a ribonuclease protection kit (RNeasy Kit, QIAGEN,
Hilden, Germany). cDNA was prepared from 2 µg of RNA by adding 14.3 µl of a cDNA synthesis mixture containing 1.5 µM
p(dT)15 primer, 0.5 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphate
mixture, 32 U of RNase inhibitor (all from Boehringer Mannheim,
Mannheim, Germany), 5× first-strand buffer, 0.1 M DTT, and 400 U of
Moloney murine leukemia virus RT (all from GIBCO BRL). The reaction
mixture was incubated at 37°C for 60 min and subsequently heat
inactivated for 10 min at 95°C. For amplification with PCR, a DNA
thermal cycler (RoboCycler, Stratagene, Heidelberg, Germany) was
used. The PCR buffer contained 100 mM Tris · HCl (pH 8.3); 1.5 mM MgCl2; 50 mM KCl; 200 µM each dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and
dTTP; 400 nM each sense and antisense primers; and 1 U of
Taq DNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim). Oligonucleotide primers for iNOS were 5'-CACAAGGCCACATCGGATTTC-3' (sense) and 5'-TGCATACCACTTCAACCCGAG-3' (antisense; MWG Biotech,
Ebersberg, Germany). These correspond to murine macrophage iNOS
and also react with rat cDNA (29). The reaction mixture
was topped with light mineral oil and denatured for 1 min at
94°C. Amplification was done for 27 and 35 cycles as published
earlier (12) (denaturation at 94°C for 45 s, annealing at 55°C for 45 s, and extension at 72°C for
60 s). Amplified PCR products were analyzed on a 1% agarose gel
(Promega, Madison, WI) stained with ethidium bromide and visualized by
ultraviolet illumination. The housekeeping gene
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) with the
oligonucleotide sequences 5'-TCCCTCAAGATTGTCAGCAA-3' (forward) and
5'-AGATCCACAACGGATACATT-3' (reverse; MWG Biotech) served as an
internal control.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Nuclear and cytoplasmic protein fractions were separated with the method of Dignam et al. (10) with modifications. In brief, the cells were scraped into hypotonic buffer (10 mM HEPES, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.2 mM PMSF, and 1 mM DTT), incubated on ice for 15 min, and centrifuged at 3,300 g for 10 min (4°C). The supernatants with the cytoplasmic protein were removed, and the pellets were washed with hypotonic buffer and centrifuged again. The supernatants were discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in low-salt buffer (20 mM HEPES, 25% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 20 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM PMSF, and 1 mM DTT) and high-salt buffer (20 mM HEPES, 25% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1.2 M KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM PMSF, and 1 mM DTT) in aliquots to get a final concentration of 0.4 M KCl. After 30 min of incubation on ice and 30 min of centrifugation at 25,000 g at 4°C, the supernatants with nuclear protein were collected and the protein concentrations were quantified.
NF-Densitometric analysis. For densitometric analysis of immunoblots and RT-PCR gels, BIO-1D V.96 software (Vilber Lourmat, Marne La Valleé, France) was used. The results are presented as a percentage of the maximal value.
Detection of intracellular ROS.
To detect intracellular ROS, 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin diacetate
(DCFH-DA) (MoBiTec, Göttingen, Germany) was used. DCFH-DA diffuses into the cell and is hydrolyzed by intracellular esterases to
polar 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin. This nonfluorescent fluorescein analog
is trapped in the cells and can be oxidized to highly fluorescent 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein by intracellular oxidants, mainly
H2O2 or hydroxyl radicals (47).
The cells were cultured to adhere and incubated with 10 µM DCFH-DA
for 30 min. Baseline fluorescence was measured, and the antioxidants
(NAC and PDTC) and the stimuli (LPS and IFN-) were added in the
concentrations described in Cell isolation and
processing. After 2 h of incubation under 21 or 85%
O2, fluorescence was measured with a fluorometer (FLUOstar, BMG LabTechnologies, Offenburg, Germany). The results are shown as a
percentage of the baseline value. The addition of 1 µM
H2O2 served as an internal positive control.
Statistical analysis. The results are presented as arithmetic means ± SE. The data were analyzed with Friedman analysis of variances on ranks followed by Dunnett's test versus the control. Results among different O2 concentrations were compared with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Cell viability after 24 h of hyperoxia.
On the basis of the observation that apoptosis and necrosis may
contribute to cell death during hyperoxia (3), we
determined the percentages of apoptotic and necrotic AMs after
24 h to see whether changes in cell viability might influence the
results (Table 1). In unstimulated cells
after incubation under normoxia or hyperoxia for 24 h, viability
was unchanged. Treatment with LPS and/or IFN- as well as
preincubation with PDTC or NAC increased apoptosis and necrosis
in AMs. A discrete but significant effect of hyperoxia on cell
viability was only detectable after stimulation with IFN-
alone.
|
NO production in activated AMs under hyperoxia.
To investigate whether hyperoxia induced NO release in AMs or enhanced
NO formation after stimulation, the cells were incubated with 100 U/ml
of IFN-, 100 ng/ml of LPS, or a combination of both in either 21 or
85% O2 for 24 h (Fig.
1). In unstimulated cells, no NO
formation was detectable under normoxia or hyperoxia (<0.5 nmol
nitrite/mg protein). Treatment with LPS or IFN-
independently resulted in a significant NO release after 24 h under normoxic conditions (LPS, 165.6 ± 11.5 nmol/mg protein; IFN-
,
198.6 ± 12.3 nmol/mg protein; LPS plus IFN-
, 221.0 ± 8.5 nmol/mg protein). The combination of LPS and/or IFN-
and hyperoxia
resulted in a significant increase in NO release (LPS, 235.6 ± 17.7 nmol/mg protein; IFN-
, 237.2 ± 12.7 nmol/mg protein; LPS
plus IFN-
, 360.4 ± 18.5 nmol/mg protein) compared with that in
normoxic cells.
|
Time course of NO production under hyperoxic conditions.
Figure 2 illustrates the time course of
NO formation under hyperoxic conditions. AMs were stimulated with 100 ng/ml of LPS plus 100 U/ml of IFN- for increasing periods of time
(12, 24, and 48 h). There was a time-dependent formation of
nitrite by rat AMs that reached maximal levels at 48 h under 21%
O2 (12 h, 106.7 ± 9.4 nmol/mg protein; 24 h,
218.8 ± 10.2 nmol/mg protein; 48 h, 268.0 ± 14.4 nmol/mg protein). Hyperoxia did not affect nitrite concentrations after
12 h but compared with normoxic exposure, induced a significant
increase in nitrite levels after 24 and 48 h (12 h, 113.7 ± 11.2 nmol/mg protein; 24 h, 368.2 ± 35.0 nmol/mg protein;
48 h, 358.2 ± 21.0 nmol/mg protein). Maximal enhancement of
NO production through hyperoxia was reached at 24 h.
|
Effect of hyperoxia on iNOS expression.
To investigate the expression of the iNOS protein, immunoblots of the
cytoplasmic protein fraction were performed after 12 h under 21 or
85% O2 (Fig. 3A).
In unstimulated AMs, no specific reactivity was found (Fig.
3A, lane 1). In line with NO levels, hyperoxia
did not induce iNOS expression in unstimulated cells (Fig.
3A, lane 2). Treatment with 100 ng/ml of LPS, 100 U/ml of IFN-, or the combination caused the appearance of a band
with a molecular mass of 125-130 kDa (Fig. 3A,
lanes 3, 5, and 7, respectively). Hyperoxia enhanced iNOS expression in stimulated cells (Fig.
3A, lanes 4, 6, and 8). To
quantify the differences in iNOS protein expression, the results were
analyzed densitometrically (Fig. 3B). In the presence of LPS
and IFN-
, iNOS protein expression was significantly increased by
hyperoxia compared with normoxia.
|
|
Activation of NF-B and AP-1 under hyperoxia.
We extended our studies on the redox-sensitive transcription factors
NF-
B and AP-1. Nuclear translocation of NF-
B has been thought to
play a key role in the activation of the iNOS gene (21).
NF-
B was detected by EMSA after 4 h of incubation (Fig. 5A). In normoxic unstimulated
cells, only small amounts of NF-
B were detectable in the nucleus.
Hyperoxia without further stimulation dramatically increased NF-
B
activation. Stimulation with LPS and IFN-
led to NF-
B activation,
which was enhanced by hyperoxic conditions.
|
Influence of antioxidants on NO release.
To explore the role of ROS in NO production, the antioxidants NAC and
PDTC were added 1 h before stimulation. After 24 h in the
presence of NAC, NO production was strongly reduced under normoxia
(control, <0.5 nmol/mg protein; LPS, 15.4 ± 0.8 nmol/mg protein;
IFN-, 23.1 ± 1.2 nmol/mg protein; LPS plus IFN-
, 96.3 ± 11.5 nmol/mg protein) and hyperoxia (control, <0.5 nmol/mg protein; LPS, 19.3 ± 11.5 nmol/mg protein; IFN-
, 38.5 ± 3.8 nmol/mg protein; LPS plus IFN-
, 119.4 ± 27 nmol/mg protein).
Preincubation with PDTC completely inhibited NO release (all groups,
<0.5 nmol/mg protein) under normoxic as well as hyperoxic conditions.
Influence of antioxidants on iNOS expression and activation of
NF-B and AP-1.
To examine whether the effect of antioxidants on NO production was a
direct effect based on its radical scavenger properties or whether iNOS
induction was inhibited, immunoblots were performed (Fig.
6A). After treatment with LPS
and/or IFN-
, the antioxidant NAC inhibited iNOS protein expression.
Interestingly, inhibition by NAC was stronger under hyperoxic
conditions. In the presence of PDTC, no iNOS protein was detectable
after incubation with either 21 or 85% O2. RT-PCR products
of iNOS mRNA were analyzed after 35 cycles (Fig. 6B). The
higher number of amplification cycles masks the differences between
O2 concentrations but shows that there was some iNOS mRNA
detectable in the presence of NAC. In line with the findings for NO
production and iNOS protein expression, no iNOS mRNA was detectable in
the presence of PDTC in both normoxia- and hyperoxia-exposed cells.
Expression of the housekeeping gene GAPDH was unchanged (data not
shown).
|
Intracellular production of ROS.
To see whether ROS indeed participate in the upregulation of the NO
pathway under hyperoxia and whether the effects of NAC and PDTC are due
to their antioxidative capacity, intracellular ROS were measured with
DCFH-DA (Fig. 7). Under stimulation with LPS and IFN-, hyperoxia led to a significant increase in ROS production compared with normoxia (21% O2, 160.4 ± 12.9% of baseline; 85% O2, 190.2 ± 19.1% of
baseline). In the LPS- and/or IFN-
-stimulated cells, NAC and PDTC
caused a significant suppression of ROS production under normoxia as
well as under hyperoxia (NAC in 21% O2, 105.8 ± 2.1% of baseline; NAC in 85% O2, 108.1 ± 2.8% of
baseline; PDTC in 21% O2, 111.3 ± 2.5% of baseline;
PDTC in 85% O2, 115.1 ± 2.6% of baseline).
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Oxidative stress caused by exposure to elevated O2 concentrations, an important therapy for hypoxemic patients, may result in hyperoxic lung injury (8). High levels of NO produced by iNOS may contribute to tissue damage. For various pathophysiological conditions in the lung, such as intestinal ischemia-reperfusion-induced pulmonary vascular dysfunction (46) and LPS-induced lung injury (33), the beneficial effects of iNOS inhibition have been shown, indicating that NO formation by iNOS mediates deleterious effects in lung tissue. However, the beneficial effects of NO produced by iNOS in the lung are also discussed (6, 15).
In this study, we focused on the influence of hyperoxia on NO
formation, iNOS mRNA and protein expression, and possible regulatory mechanisms through transcription factors in primary cultured AMs from
rats. We chose AMs as a target for our study because AMs are exposed
directly to elevated O2 concentrations in the alveoli (30). In addition, AMs are a major source of NO produced
by iNOS in the lung (14), and overproduction of NO by AMs
might be the culprit of hyperoxic lung injury. Berg et al.
(4) showed that AM depletion in rats resulted in prolonged
survival under hyperoxia. Survival times of adult rats exposed to 100%
O2 are only 60-72 h (8). Despite species
differences between rats and humans (20), it has been
shown that human AMs are capable of expressing iNOS (22,
45). Also, NF-B and AP-1 binding sites have been described in
the human iNOS promoter (7).
Our findings indicate that hyperoxia alone does not suffice to induce
iNOS expression (Figs. 3 and 4) and NO formation (Figs. 1 and 2) in rat
AMs. However, the response to inflammatory stimuli such as LPS and/or
IFN-, which increased iNOS expression and NO formation in AMs (Figs.
1, 3, and 4), was significantly enhanced by the application of
hyperoxia (Figs. 1-4). Activation of the transcription factors
NF-
B and AP-1 was already observed during hyperoxia alone. Stimulation with LPS and IFN-
activated NF-
B, but surprisingly, they had no influence on AP-1. Coapplication of hyperoxia further enhanced activation of both transcription factors (Fig. 5). Incubation of AMs with the antioxidants PDTC and NAC before stimulation resulted in inhibition of the NO pathway. PDTC completely inhibited activation of transcription factors, iNOS expression, and NO formation under both
21 and 85% O2 (Fig. 6), suggesting that ROS play an
important role in iNOS induction under normoxic as well as under
hyperoxic conditions. NAC, although in a much higher concentration,
caused a weaker inhibition. Interestingly, on the protein and
transcription factor level, inhibition by NAC seemed to be even greater
under hyperoxic conditions. Measurement of intracellular ROS revealed that there is increased ROS production under hyperoxia and that NAC and
PDTC can serve as potent antioxidants.
Our data are consistent with a previous study (25)
demonstrating that rat AMs treated with LPS and/or IFN- produce NO
in a time-dependent manner. Hyperoxia alone failed to induce NO
production in unstimulated cells, but in the presence of LPS and
IFN-
, elevated O2 concentrations led to a significant
increase in NO formation. Enhancing effects of hyperoxia after
stimulation with LPS have also been shown for TNF-
and
interleukin-1
release in human AMs (34) and TNF-
and
macrophage inflammatory protein-1
gene and protein expression in
mouse AMs (48).
Here, we report that enhanced NO production correlates with elevated iNOS protein concentrations, suggesting that it is not the increased enzyme activity but the accumulation of iNOS protein that causes increased NO formation under hyperoxia. O2 is a cosubstrate for NO synthesis (7), but, obviously, O2 is not a limiting factor for iNOS activity under normoxia. This is in line with the finding that NOSs in intact tissue are exposed to saturating concentrations of O2 under normoxic conditions, as expected from the Michaelis-Menten constant values for O2 (36).
Our data indicate that LPS and IFN- activate NF-
B under normoxic
conditions. Oxidative stress induced by H2O2
has been shown to activate NF-
B, an essential transcription factor
for the iNOS induction as proven by truncation of the iNOS promoter
(39, 23). In our experimental setting, NF-
B was
strongly activated through incubation with 85% O2 in
unstimulated cells. In stimulated cells that also produce NO,
activation under hyperoxic conditions was less despite the combination
of stimuli, indicating a negative feedback mechanism on NF-
B via NO
that has already been suggested in hepatocytes (44). In
contrast to the findings by Camhi et al. (5), who found
increased AP-1 activity after stimulation with LPS in RAW 264.7 cells,
in our setting, AP-1 activity was not induced by stimulation with LPS
or IFN-
but was dramatically increased by hyperoxia as shown by Lee
et al. (26).
The O2 concentration-dependent activation of AP-1 and
NF-B and iNOS induction in rat AM primary culture on stimulation
with LPS and/or IFN-
suggests that hyperoxia can influence
intracellular signaling directly or indirectly via ROS. To further
investigate the involvement of ROS, we used the antioxidants NAC and
PDTC. NAC acts as a glutathione precursor and has just recently been shown to be efficient in protecting the lungs of patients with acute
respiratory distress syndrome (35). In our experimental setting, application of NAC in vitro downregulated the NO pathway under
normoxia as well as under hyperoxia. There was only little iNOS mRNA,
iNOS protein, and NO detectable in the presence of NAC. The impact on
transcription factors, however, was diverse. Inhibition of NF-
B and
AP-1 by NAC seemed to be stronger under hyperoxic conditions. Under
normoxia, even enhancing effects of NAC on AP-1 activity have been
found. A concentration-dependent activating or inhibitory effect of NAC
on NF-
B has already been shown (27). The effects,
however, are not yet fully understood. PDTC is a radical scavenger and
an iron chelator and has also been described as a potent NF-
B
inhibitor (38). Its iron-chelating properties reduce the
production of OH· radicals by inhibiting the Fenton reaction. In our
experimental setting, 50 µM PDTC completely inhibited the activation
of NF-
B and AP-1 as described before (28, 37, 38, 40).
Concomitantly, iNOS mRNA transcription, protein expression, and NO
production were not detectable in the presence of PDTC under both
normoxic and hyperoxic conditions. PDTC is known to be toxic in higher
concentrations. The PDTC concentrations used in our experiments did
reduce viability to ~70%. Because this cannot explain the almost
complete inhibition of the NO pathway, our result must be attributed to
the antioxidative capacity of PDTC. To further investigate the role of
oxidants and antioxidants, DCFH-DA was used to detect intracellular
ROS. We show that hyperoxia significantly increases intracellular ROS
production after stimulation with LPS and IFN-
, indicating that the
increased NO production under hyperoxia is a result of enhanced ROS
production, with subsequent activation of NF-
B and AP-1. In the
presence of NAC and PDTC, intracellular levels of ROS were suppressed
dramatically under normoxia as well as under hyperoxia. Therefore, we
conclude that despite possible nonspecific actions of NAC and PDTC,
these molecules act as antioxidants in our experimental setting. Our
results indicate that ROS are necessary for intracellular signaling in
the NO pathway after treatment with LPS or IFN-
in normoxia-exposed
cells. Moreover, increased production of ROS in hyperoxia-exposed cells
resulted in augmentation of NF-
B and AP-1 activation and,
subsequently, enhanced iNOS gene transcription, protein expression, and
NO production after stimulation with LPS and IFN-
. Hyperoxia alone,
although activating NF-
B and AP-1, was not sufficient to induce the
NO pathway. Therefore, other transcription factors such as
NF-interleukin-6 and signal transducer and activator of transcription
that are activated by stimulation with LPS or IFN-
must also play a
role in iNOS induction.
In summary, we report that hyperoxia increased NO production and iNOS
mRNA and protein expression in rat AMs after stimulation with LPS
and/or IFN- in vitro. Enhanced NF-
B and AP-1 activation participates in iNOS upregulation under hyperoxia, but other
transcription factors are involved. ROS are implicated in the
intracellular signaling under normoxic conditions. Hyperoxia leads to
an increase in intracellular ROS formation. PDTC and NAC can inhibit
the NO pathway through their antioxidative capacity. To further shed light on the role of NO in hyperoxic lung injury, in vivo studies with
selective iNOS inhibitors or iNOS-deficient mice are essential.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
We thank A.-M. Allmeling, S. Münzing, and E. Ronft for excellent technical assistance and Prof. G. Enders for helpful comments. Special thanks to Dr. John Doweiko for revision of the manuscript.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: F. Krombach, Institut für Chirurgische Forschung, Klinikum Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, D-81366 München, Germany (E-mail: krombach{at}icf.med.uni-muenchen.de).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 21 April 2000; accepted in final form 17 November 2000.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1.
Albakri, QA,
and
Stuehr DJ.
Intracellular assembly of inducible NO synthase is limited by nitric oxide-mediated changes in heme insertion and availability.
J Biol Chem
271:
5414-5421,
1996
2.
Arkovitz, MS,
Szabó C,
Wispé JR,
Ziegler MM,
and
Garcia VF.
Hyperoxia upregulates alveolar macrophage nitric oxide production.
Surg Forum
27:
696-698,
1996.
3.
Barazzone, C,
Horowitz S,
Donati YR,
Rodriguez I,
and
Piguet P-F.
Oxygen toxicity in mouse lung: pathways to cell death.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
19:
573-581,
1998
4.
Berg, JT,
White JE,
and
Tsan M-F.
Response of alveolar macrophage-depleted rats to hyperoxia.
Exp Lung Res
21:
175-185,
1995[ISI][Medline].
5.
Camhi, SL,
Alam J,
Otterbein L,
Sylvester SL,
and
Choi AM.
Induction of heme oxygenase-1 gene expression by lipopolysaccharide is mediated by AP-1 activation.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
13:
387-398,
1995[Abstract].
6.
Capellier, G,
Maupoil V,
Boillot A,
Kantelip JP,
Rochette L,
Regnard J,
and
Barale F.
L-NAME aggravates pulmonary oxygen toxicity in rats.
Eur Respir J
9:
2531-2536,
1996
7.
Chu, SC,
Marks-Konczalik J,
Wu H-P,
Banks TC,
and
Moss J.
Analysis of the cytokine-stimulated human inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) gene: characterization of differences between human and mouse iNOS promoters.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
248:
871-878,
1998[ISI][Medline].
8.
Crapo, JD,
Barry BE,
Foscue HA,
and
Shelburne J.
Structural and biochemical changes in rat lungs occurring during exposure to lethal and adaptive doses of oxygen.
Am Rev Respir Dis
122:
123-143,
1980[ISI][Medline].
9.
Cucchiaro, G,
Tatum AH,
Brown MC,
Camporesi EM,
Daucher JW,
and
Hakim TS.
Inducible nitric oxide synthase in the lung and exhaled nitric oxide after hyperoxia.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
277:
L636-L644,
1999
10.
Dignam, JD,
Lebovitz RM,
and
Roeder RG.
Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res
11:
1475-1489,
1983[Abstract].
11.
Ding, AH,
Nathan CF,
and
Stuehr DJ.
Release of reactive nitrogen intermediates and reactive oxygen intermediates from mouse peritoneal macrophages. Comparison of activating cytokines and evidence for independent production.
J Immunol
141:
2407-2412,
1988
12.
Dörger, M,
Jesch NK,
Rieder G,
Hirvonen M-R,
Savolainen K,
Krombach F,
and
Messmer K.
Species differences in NO formation by rat and hamster alveolar macrophages in vitro.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
16:
413-420,
1997[Abstract].
13.
Elstner, EF.
Der Sauerstoff. Mannheim, Germany: Wissenschaftsverlag, 1991.
14.
Fujii, Y,
Goldberg P,
and
Hussain SNA
Contribution of macrophages to pulmonary nitric oxide production in septic shock.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
157:
1645-1651,
1998
15.
Garat, C,
Jayr C,
Eddahibi S,
Laffon M,
Meignan M,
and
Adnot S.
Effects of inhaled nitric oxide or inhibition of endogenous nitric oxide formation on hyperoxic lung injury.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
155:
1957-1964,
1997[Abstract].
16.
Haddad, IY,
Pataki G,
Hu P,
Galliani C,
Beckman JS,
and
Matalon S.
Quantitation of nitrotyrosine levels in lung sections of patients and animals with acute lung injury.
J Clin Invest
94:
2407-2413,
1994[ISI][Medline].
17.
Hirano, S.
Nitric oxide-mediated cytotoxic effects of alveolar macrophages on transformed lung epithelial cells are independent of the 2 integrin-mediated intercellular adhesion.
Immunology
93:
102-108,
1998[ISI][Medline].
18.
Horinouchi, H,
Wang C-C,
Shepherd KE,
and
Jones R.
TNF gene and protein expression in alveolar macrophages in acute and chronic hyperoxia-induced lung injury.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
14:
548-555,
1996[Abstract].
19.
Jamieson, D.
Oxygen toxicity and reactive oxygen metabolites in mammals.
Free Radic Biol Med
7:
87-108,
1989[ISI][Medline].
20.
Jesch, NK,
Dörger M,
Enders G,
Rieder G,
Vogelmeier C,
Messmer K,
and
Krombach F.
Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and formation of nitric oxide by alveolar macrophages: an interspecies comparison.
Environ Health Perspect
105:
1297-1300,
1997[ISI][Medline].
21.
Kim, Y-M,
Lee B-S,
Yi K-Y,
and
Paik S-G.
Upstream NF-B site is required for maximal expression of mouse inducible nitric oxide synthase gene in interferon-
plus lipopolysaccharide-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
236:
655-660,
1997[ISI][Medline].
22.
Kobzik, L,
Bredt DS,
Lowenstein CJ,
Drazen J,
Gaston B,
Sugarbaker D,
and
Stamler JS.
Nitric oxide in human and rat lung: immunochemical and histochemical localization.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
9:
371-377,
1993[ISI][Medline].
23.
Kolyada, AY,
Savikovsky N,
and
Madias NE.
Transcriptional regulation of the human iNOS gene in vascular-smooth-muscle cells and macrophages: evidence for tissue specificity.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
220:
600-605,
1996[ISI][Medline].
24.
Kupatt, C,
Weber C,
Wolf DA,
Becker BF,
Smith TW,
and
Kelly RA.
Nitric oxide attenuates reoxygenation-induced ICAM-1 expression in coronary microvascular endothelium: role of NFkappaB.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
29:
2599-2609,
1997[ISI][Medline].
25.
Lavnikova, N,
Drapier J-C,
and
Laskin DL.
A single exogenous stimulus activates resident rat macrophages for nitric oxide production and tumor toxicity.
J Leukoc Biol
54:
322-328,
1993[Abstract].
26.
Lee, PJ,
Alam J,
Sylvester SL,
Inamdar N,
Otterbein L,
and
Choi AMK
Regulation of heme oxygenase-1 expression in vivo and in vitro in hyperoxic lung injury.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
14:
556-568,
1996[Abstract].
27.
Legrand-Poels, S,
Maniglia S,
Boelaert JR,
and
Piette J.
Activation of transcription factor NF-B in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated U937 cells.
Biochem Pharmacol
53:
339-346,
1997[ISI][Medline].
28.
Li, J-J,
Westergaard C,
Ghosh P,
and
Colburn NH.
Inhibitors of both nuclear factor-B and activator protein-1 activation block the neoplastic transformation response.
Cancer Res
57:
3569-3576,
1997[Abstract].
29.
Liu, SL,
Adcock IM,
Old RW,
Barnes PJ,
and
Evans TE.
Lipopolysaccharide treatment in vivo induces widespread tissue expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
196:
1208-1213,
1993[ISI][Medline].
30.
Lohmann-Matthes, M-L,
Steimüller C,
and
Franke-Ullmann G.
Pulmonary macrophages.
Eur Respir J
7:
1678-1689,
1994
31.
Moncada, S,
Palmer RMJ,
and
Higgs EA.
Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology.
Pharmacol Rev
43:
109-141,
1991[ISI][Medline].
32.
Motterlini, R,
Foresti R,
Intaglietta M,
and
Winslow RM.
NO-mediated activation of heme oxygenase: endogenous cytoprotection against oxidative stress to endothelium.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
270:
H107-H114,
1996
33.
Numata, M,
Suzuki S,
Miyazawa N,
Miyashita A,
Nagashima Y,
Inoue S,
Kaneko T,
and
Okubo T.
Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase prevents LPS-induced acute lung injury in dogs.
J Immunol
160:
3031-3037,
1998
34.
O'Brien-Ladner, AR,
Nelson ME,
Cowley BD, Jr,
Bailey K,
and
Wesselius LJ.
Hyperoxia amplifies TNF- production in LPS-stimulated human alveolar macrophages.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
12:
275-279,
1995[Abstract].
35.
Ortolani, O,
Conti A,
De Gaudino AR,
Masoni M,
and
Novelli G.
Protective effects of N-acetylcysteine and rutin on the lipid peroxidation of the lung epithelium during the adult respiratory distress syndrome.
Shock
13:
14-18,
2000[ISI][Medline].
36.
Rengasamy, A,
and
Johns RA.
Determination of Km for oxygen of nitric oxide synthase isoforms.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
276:
30-33,
1996[Abstract].
37.
Schenk, H,
Klein M,
Erdbrügger W,
Dröge W,
and
Schulze-Osthoff K.
Distinct effects of thioredoxin and antioxidants on the activation of transcription factors NF-B and AP-1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:
1672-1676,
1994[Abstract].
38.
Schreck, R,
Albermann K,
and
Baeuerle PA.
Nuclear factor B: an oxidative stress-responsive transcription factor of eukaryotic cells (a review).
Free Radic Res Commun
17:
221-237,
1992[ISI][Medline].
39.
Schreck, R,
Grassmann R,
Fleckenstein B,
and
Baeuerle PA.
Antioxidants selectively suppress activation of NF-kappa B by human T-cell leukemia virus I tax protein.
J Virol
66:
6288-6293,
1992[Abstract].
40.
Sen, CK,
and
Packer L.
Antioxidant and redox regulation of gene transcription.
FASEB J
10:
709-720,
1996
41.
Sies, H.
Oxidative stress: oxidants and antioxidants.
Exp Physiol
82:
291-295,
1997[Abstract].
42.
Smith, PK,
Krohn RI,
Hermanson GT,
Mallia AK,
Gartner FH,
Provenzano MD,
Fujimoto EK,
Goeke NM,
Olson BJ,
and
Klenk DC.
Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid.
Anal Biochem
150:
76-85,
1985[ISI][Medline].
43.
Suzuki, YJ,
Forman HJ,
and
Sevanian A.
Oxidants as stimulators of signal transduction.
Free Radic Biol Med
22:
269-285,
1996[ISI].
44.
Taylor, BS,
Kim YM,
Wang Q,
Shapiro RA,
Billiar TR,
and
Geller DA.
Nitric oxide down-regulates hepatocyte-inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expression.
Arch Surg
132:
1177-1183,
1997[Abstract].
45.
Tracey, WR,
Xue C,
Klinghofer V,
Barlow J,
Pollock JS,
Forstermann U,
and
Johns RA.
Immunochemical detection of inducible NO synthase in human lung.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
266:
L722-L727,
1994
46.
Turnage, RH,
Wright JK,
Iglesias J,
LaNoue JL,
Nguyen H,
Kim L,
and
Myers S.
Intestinal reperfusion-induced pulmonary edema is related to increased pulmonary inducible nitric oxide synthase activity.
Surgery
124:
457-462,
1998[ISI][Medline].
47.
Vanden Hoek, TL,
Li C,
Shao Z,
Schumacker PT,
and
Becker LB.
Significant levels of oxidants are generated by isolated cardiomyocytes during ischemia prior to reperfusion.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
29:
2571-2583,
1997[ISI][Medline].
48.
VanOtteren, GM,
Standiford TJ,
Kunkel SL,
Danforth JM,
and
Strieter RM.
Alterations of ambient oxygen tension modulate the expression of tumor necrosis factor and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha from murine alveolar macrophages.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
13:
399-409,
1995[Abstract].
49.
Vermes, I,
Haanen C,
Steffens-Nakken H,
and
Reutelingsperger C.
A novel assay for apoptosis. Flow cytometer detection of phosphatidylserine expression on early apoptotic cells using fluorescein labeled annexin V.
J Immunol Methods
184:
39-51,
1995[ISI][Medline].
50.
Xie, Q-W,
Whisnant R,
and
Nathan C.
Promoter of the mouse gene encoding calcium-independent nitric oxide synthase confers inducibility by interferon and bacterial lipopolysaccharide.
J Exp Med
177:
1779-1784,
1993[Abstract].