Local longitudinal muscle shortening of the human esophagus from high-frequency ultrasonography

Mark A. Nicosia1, James G. Brasseur1, Ji-Bin Liu2, and Larry S. Miller3

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802; 2 Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, and 3 Division of Gastroenterology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We analyzed local longitudinal shortening by combining concurrent ultrasonography and manometry with basic principles of mechanics. We applied the law of mass conservation to quantify local axial shortening of the esophageal wall from ultrasonically measured cross-sectional area concurrently with measured intraluminal pressure, from which correlations between local contraction of longitudinal and circular muscle are inferred. Two clear phases of local longitudinal shortening were observed during bolus transport. During luminal filling by bolus fluid, the muscle layer distends and the muscle thickness decreases in the absence of circular or longitudinal muscle contraction. This is followed by local contraction, first in longitudinal muscle, then in circular muscle. Maximal longitudinal shortening occurs nearly coincidently with peak intraluminal pressure. Longitudinal muscle contraction begins before and ends after circular muscle contraction. Larger longitudinal shortening is correlated with higher pressure amplitude, suggesting that circumferential contractile forces are enhanced by longitudinal muscle shortening. We conclude that a peristaltic wave of longitudinal muscle contraction envelops the wave of circular muscle contraction as it passes through the middle esophagus, with peak longitudinal contraction aligned with peak circular muscular contraction. Our results suggest that the coordination of the two waves may be a physiological response to the mechanical influence of longitudinal shortening, which increases contractile force while reducing average muscle fiber tension by increasing circular muscle fiber density locally near the bolus tail.

muscle contraction; ultrasound; mechanics


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

WHEREAS CONTRACTION OF ESOPHAGEAL circular muscle during a swallow can be quantified with manometric measurement of intraluminal pressure, contraction of longitudinal muscle is difficult to measure precisely in humans. Consequently, the role of longitudinal muscle in bolus transport remains poorly understood. In a classic study by Dodds et al. (5), four metal markers were inserted into the muscle wall of a feline esophagus to measure longitudinal motions during normal bolus transport. Their data suggested the existence of a wave of localized longitudinal shortening that appeared to traverse the distal esophagus in concert with the bolus tail. Qualitatively similar characteristics have been observed in the human esophagus with widely spaced metal clips endoscopically attached to the mucosa (6, 16). In this study, we analyze the relationship between circular and longitudinal muscle contraction near the bolus tail by directly measuring local shortening of the esophagus concurrently with intraluminal pressure during normal bolus transport. This is done by coupling concurrent endoscopic ultrasonography and intraluminal manometry with a basic conservation law from mechanics.

A consequence of contraction of longitudinal muscle is shortening in the axial direction. For this reason, longitudinal muscle contraction of the human esophagus has been inferred from longitudinal shortening measured by using widely spaced metal clips attached to the esophageal mucosa (6, 9, 13, 16). The change in spacing between adjacent clips gives a relatively crude measure of longitudinal shortening over esophageal segments 3-10 cm in length. A characteristic of these studies, however, is that the motion of widely spaced mucosal clips measures global rather than local shortening. To illustrate this point, imagine a segment of the esophagus of initial length L* = 1 cm shortening to length L = 0.5 cm in the absence of any other shortening of the esophagus. Local longitudinal shortening is given by L/L* = 0.5. However, if the same isolated local contraction were measured by using clips spaced 3 cm apart, for example, global longitudinal shortening would be calculated as L/L* = (3 - 0.5)/3 = 0.83. Similarly, 5-cm spaced clips measure L/L* = 0.9. Thus mucosal clips spaced outside a localized contracting segment underestimate longitudinal shortening (larger L/L* implies less shortening), and the estimate varies with clip spacing. Furthermore, the relative motion between a clip on the mucosal surface and the underlying muscle layer (from shear distortion of the mucosa) introduces additional unknown error in the estimate of local longitudinal shortening.

To avoid the uncertainty associated with mucosal clips, we developed a new procedure for accurately measuring local longitudinal shortening of the esophageal wall using a high-frequency ultrasound transducer at fixed locations within the lumen. As discussed in METHODS, application of the law of mass conservation (a fundamental law of physics) to the incompressible matter within esophageal muscle implies that a local increase in cross-sectional area of the muscle wall is inversely proportional to longitudinal shortening of the muscle layer locally at the same cross-section. Thus measurement of cross-sectional area of the muscle layer(s) can be related quantitatively to local shortening (or lengthening) of the same muscle layer(s). Furthermore, we shall show that measuring only changes in esophageal muscle wall thickness (1, 14, 24), as during luminal filling, for example, is generally insufficient to deduce local longitudinal shortening.

In this study, cross-sectional area was measured during bolus transport at a point in the middle esophagus from ultrasound images generated from a high-frequency transducer. Placement of the ultrasound probe within an endoscope adjacent to a single manometric sidehole allowed concurrent measurement of intraluminal pressure with local longitudinal shortening at the same luminal location. From these data we infer a correlation between longitudinal and circular muscle contraction from concurrent measurement of muscle cross-sectional area and intraluminal pressure.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The principle of mass conservation applied to muscle. Mass conservation is a basic law of physics that underlies the deformation of all matter. In context with muscle, the law can be understood by imagining a volume within the muscle where each material particle along the surface of the volume is tagged by a marker (a material particle may be thought of as extremely large numbers of molecules within a submicroscopic volume much smaller than any volume of interest). As the muscle deforms, so does the surface defined by these same mass particles. Mass conservation states that at all times, before, during, and after its change in shape, the mass within the volume defined by the same tagged material particles cannot change (23).

Whereas the mass within the material volume cannot change, the density of the material (mass divided by volume) can change if the size of the material volume changes during deformation. This is the case, for example, when air within a closed cylinder is compressed by a piston. Indeed, a fundamental characteristic of a gas is that when pressure is applied to the enclosing surface of a material gas volume, the relative change in volume is as large as the relative change in pressure. By contrast, when pressure is applied to liquids or solids, the change in volume is negligible. Liquids and solids are described as "incompressible," meaning that the density of the substance and material volumes do not change with changes in pressure (to a high degree of accuracy).

At the microscopic level, muscle is a matrix of liquid (e.g., intracellular and interstitial water) and deformable solid (e.g., cellular material). Therefore, muscle is incompressible, and a predefined macroscopic segment of the esophageal wall can only change its volume during deformation if either vapor pockets of significant size exist within the muscle or significant liquid content were to leave the muscle volume during contraction and be taken up again after contraction. There is no evidence to suggest that either of these scenarios is relevant during esophageal muscle contraction, and the incompressibility of muscle (including esophageal muscle) has been verified experimentally by several investigators (7, 8, 22). Furthermore, any fluid that might be speculated to leave the muscle layer during contraction will lead to an underestimate of muscle cross-section and, as we show next, local longitudinal shortening. Thus any observations made from measurements of local longitudinal shortening can be enhanced only if fluid exchange existed.

Measuring local longitudinal shortening. Incompressibility is tacitly assumed in muscle clip studies when global longitudinal muscle contraction is inferred from relative displacement of two clips. Here we explicitly apply the principle to quantify local shortening from measurement of change in cross-sectional area from ultrasound images.

Consider the schematic in Fig. 1, a short material segment of esophageal wall muscle at two instants in time, in the resting state and after longitudinal contraction. Because this axial muscle segment contains the same incompressible material components within and between cells before and after contraction (i.e., the surfaces of the segment are always attached to the same material particles), the volume of this muscle segment must also be the same before and after contraction. It follows that a contraction of the muscle segment in the longitudinal direction must be accompanied by an increase in cross-sectional area according to the equation LA=L*A*, where L*A* and LA are the volumes of the muscle segments before and after contraction. Thus
<FR><NU>L</NU><DE>L*</DE></FR>=<FR><NU>1</NU><DE>A/A*</DE></FR> (1)
where the precontractile (resting) state is denoted by *. This formula states that a local increase in muscle cross-sectional area (A/A* > 1) is inversely proportional to local longitudinal shortening (L/L* < 1) at the same axial location along the esophagus.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic showing the relationship between longitudinal shortening and changes in the cross-sectional area of esophageal muscle. The dotted line is the outer wall of an esophageal muscle layer; a cross-sectional material surface of the muscle layer is illustrated by the cross-hatched surface. A local longitudinal slice of esophageal muscle has shortened from length L* to length L as a result of local longitudinal contraction. For convenience, only one muscle layer is shown. To conserve volume, the longitudinal contraction must be accompanied by an increase in cross-sectional area according to the relationship L/L* =A*/A, where A* and A are the cross-sectional areas in the resting and contracted states, respectively.

Using Eq. 1, we can measure A/A* from ultrasound images to unambiguously infer L/L*. In doing so, we recognize that, because the muscle surface moves 1-2 cm relative to the transducer during local longitudinal shortening, the material elements within area A in Eq. 1 measured at one time likely originated a short distance above or below the ultrasound transducer. However, the potential error in the measurement of A/A* associated with axial wall motion is very small, given quantitatively by the percent variation in A* over a 1-2 cm segment of middle esophagus.

Note that the method can, in principal, be applied to any layer or groups of layers of the esophageal wall. Whereas we primarily analyze the two muscle layers as a unit (longitudinal/circular muscle layers plus intermuscular connective tissue), we also present a separate analysis of the longitudinal muscle layer alone.

Concurrent ultrasonography with manometry. Concurrent ultrasound and water-perfused manometry data from Miller et al. (14) were analyzed from four healthy subjects with no swallowing disorders (ages 23-25 years), lying supine (at 30° inclination) and for 24 swallows. The subjects were asked to swallow 10-ml boluses of water or gelatin mix. The gelatin bolus was designed to reduce the level of air bubbles within the bolus, which disrupt the ultrasound waves and render many images unsuitable for analysis. The resulting liquid was roughly the thickness of honey at room temperature.

Images were digitized from VHS videotape at 5 frames/s, corresponding to 50-60 images/swallow. Because of the time-consuming nature of the image analysis (see Image processing) and the inability to fully analyze some swallows due to significant image loss from air swallowed with the bolus (which is quite common and interferes with ultrasound), time-resolved image analysis and curve fitting for complete swallows were feasible in eight swallows from two subjects from which the changes in muscle cross-sectional area and local longitudinal shortening were deduced during entire bolus transport sequences. The time-resolved data analyzed in detail were chosen by the quality of the ultrasound images and the extent of air-induced image degradation. However, 16 additional swallows were analyzed over fewer images to determine the resting state geometry, maximum local longitudinal shortening (i.e., maximum cross-sectional area ratio Amus/A*mus), and maximum intraluminal pressure (Pamp). The details of swallows from each subject are shown in Table 1. Further data collection details are given in Ref. 14.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Subjects and swallows quantified

The esophageal wall was imaged using a 20-MHz ultrasonographic transducer housed in a 4.8-Fr catheter (1.52 mm outer diameter) with an axial resolution of 0.1 mm and a penetration depth of 2.0 cm. The 4.8-F catheter was glued to a 3-F manometric catheter (0.95 mm outer diameter), and the combined assembly was passed transnasally through a 16-F nasogastric tube (5.09 mm outer diameter) with the manometric sidehole and ultrasound transducer extending ~2 cm from the proximal margin of the tube. The ultrasonic transducer and manometric sidehole were placed at the same axial location, ~10 cm proximal to the lower esophageal sphincter. The baseline of manometrically measured intraluminal pressure (P) was approximately atmospheric.

Image processing. Figure 2, a, b, and c, shows typical ultrasound images of the esophageal cross-section obtained at three different times during a swallow: the relaxed state (a; i.e., before a swallow), the esophagus distended by the bolus (b), and the maximally contracted state (c). The inner wall of the circular muscle and the outer wall of the longitudinal muscle are shown by dashed lines on the same images in Fig. 2, a', b', and c', respectively. The white annulus in the middle of each image is the catheter, inside of which the ultrasound transducer is housed. Because the transducer spins to obtain the image, the concentric circular bands that appear in the image are artifacts and do not correspond to any anatomic structure.


View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Typical ultrasound images obtained at 3 different times during a swallow: resting state (a), esophagus distended by the bolus (b), and maximally contracted state (c). In a', b', and c', the inner wall of the circular muscle and the outer wall of the longitudinal muscle are outlined on the same images as per the method described in Image processing.

To compute the cross-sectional area of the circular and longitudinal muscle layers, it was necessary to extract three contours from each image: the inner wall of the circular muscle, the intermuscular connective tissue (between circular and longitudinal muscle layers), and the outer wall of the longitudinal muscle. To this end, we developed an in-house interactive image processing system using a Silicon Graphics Indigo 4000 workstation (Silicon Graphics, Mountain View, CA). Digitized images were converted to grayscale and imported into our analysis system.

The quality of ultrasound images is degraded by high (spatial) frequency noise known as "speckle" (12), which results from interference among signals scattered from sources smaller than the resolution of the imaging system. To smooth this noise we applied an Olympic filter (18): a moving window of M × M pixels was placed at each pixel of the image, and the average grayscale intensity of the pixels within the window was computed, ignoring the highest and lowest grayscale values. The pixel at the center of the window was then replaced with this average value and the other pixels within the window were left unchanged. We found the Olympic filter with M = 5 to be most effective at reducing speckle noise and enhancing contrast at esophageal muscle boundaries.

Having filtered the images, we designed software to extract the edges of the circular and longitudinal muscle layers using a "knowledge-based" edge detection method (19), whereby knowledge of the image structure was used in the edge detection algorithm. We applied the knowledge obtained in the study of Miller et al. (15), which related ultrasonically imaged esophageal cross-section to histologically defined muscle layers. (M. A. Nicosia was extensively trained by L. S. Miller, an experienced sonographer, in identifying muscle layer boundaries in these ultrasound images.)

To detect the muscle layers in as automated a way as possible, the catheter was used as a point of reference, because it was at the same location in every image and always located within the esophageal contours. The computer program first searched for the outer wall of the longitudinal muscle. Because the adventitia appears white and muscle appears black, there is an abrupt change in grayscale intensity moving from the longitudinal muscle to the adventitia (see Fig. 2), which the computer was often able to find automatically. Once the outer wall was detected, the program moved inward (toward the catheter) to search for the inner margin of the circular muscle, which appears as a transition from the darker muscle layer to the lighter submucosa. The intermuscular connective tissue appears as a slight increase in grayscale intensity within the dark band of the muscle layers and is difficult to extract automatically.

After allowing the computer to identify edges automatically, the edges were superimposed on the raw image and presented to the user, who added and/or deleted points as appropriate to correct and complete the computer-detected edges. The user always made the final decision about the location of the muscle boundary. The purpose of the initial automatic detection phase was to speed up the very time-consuming edge detection process. In portions of the image in which the muscle edge was not clearly visible, the edge was interpolated by passing a smooth curve from adjoining regions where the edge could be clearly identified. In most images, however, interpolation was only required over a small percentage of the edge (<10%). Images of the maximally distended esophagus were the most difficult to analyze, since the esophageal walls were farthest away from the transducer and the signal was correspondingly weaker. In these images it was generally necessary to interpolate ~35% of the edge. To aid in the interpolations, however, the location of the edge in previous and following images was used to guide the choice of interpolation control points.

From the detected edges, the cross-sectional areas of the circular muscle (Acirc), longitudinal muscle (Along), and lumen (Alumen) were determined, as illustrated in Fig. 3. The total muscle area was given by Amus = Acirc + Along.


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A schematic describing the effective radii of the muscle layers. The three cross-sectional areas of the lumen (Alumen), circular muscle (Acirc), and longitudinal muscle (Along), measured from the ultrasound images (A), were placed concentrically within an effective circle with the same total area (B). The effective radii to the inner circular muscle (Rin), intermuscular connective tissue (Rmid), and outer longitudinal muscle (Rout) were defined from this effective circle (see Eq. 2). The total muscle area is Amus = Acirc Along.

Analysis. Effective radii to the inner circular muscle (Rin), to the intermuscular connective tissue (Rmid), and to the outer longitudinal muscle (Rout) were defined as shown in Fig. 3, where the measured areas Alumen, Acirc, and Along were placed in concentric circles. Thus the effective radii were defined by
R<SUB>in</SUB>=<RAD><RCD><FR><NU>A<SUB>lumen</SUB></NU><DE>&pgr;</DE></FR></RCD></RAD>

R<SUB>mid</SUB>=<RAD><RCD><FR><NU>A<SUB>lumen</SUB>+A<SUB>circ</SUB></NU><DE>&pgr;</DE></FR></RCD></RAD> (2)

R<SUB>in</SUB>=<RAD><RCD><FR><NU>A<SUB>lumen</SUB>+A<SUB>circ</SUB>+A<SUB>long</SUB></NU><DE>&pgr;</DE></FR></RCD></RAD>
and the average muscle thicknesses (tau ) by
&tgr;<SUB>circ</SUB>=R<SUB>mid</SUB>−R<SUB>in</SUB>

&tgr;<SUB>long</SUB>=R<SUB>out</SUB>−R<SUB>mid</SUB> (3)

&tgr;<SUB>mus</SUB>=&tgr;<SUB>circ</SUB>+&tgr;<SUB>long</SUB>
The resting state (*) was measured before initiation of a swallow. The time corresponding to the maximum total muscle area in each sequence [(Amus/A*mus)max] was defined as t = 0. The different sequences were aligned relative to this reference time, and mean values and standard deviations were computed.

As per Eq. 1, longitudinal shortening (a decrease in L/L* to values <1) was given equivalently by an increase in A/A* to values >1, where A* is the muscle cross-sectional area in the resting state and A can be Acirc, Along, or Amus. Equation 1 was applied separately to Amus and Along, and longitudinal shortening in the muscle wall was compared with the longitudinal layer alone.

The onsets and offsets of circular and longitudinal muscle contractions were subjectively defined as the times when manometric pressure and cross-sectional area initiated a rapid increase in and returned to their baseline values (see RESULTS). Defining the onset times as tC,1 and tL,1, the delay between the onset of circular and longitudinal muscle contractions is given by
&Dgr;t=t<SUB>C,l</SUB>−t<SUB>L,l</SUB> (4)
The Pearson coefficient was computed to test for correlation. Significance was analyzed by Student's t-test.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The wall muscle layer. The resting state was measured before the initiation of a swallow. Averaged over eight swallows, the resting state in the middle esophagus was characterized by wall muscle layer area and thickness A*mus = 0.40 ± 0.03 cm2 and tau *mus = 0.138 ± 0.007 cm; longitudinal muscle area and thickness A*long = 0.218 ± 0.013 cm2 and tau *long = 0.069 ± 0.005 cm; radius to circular muscle R*in = 0.40 ± 0.05 cm; and intraluminal pressure P* = -0.12 ± 0.80 mmHg (means ± SD).

Recall from Eq. 1 that local longitudinal shortening relative to the rest state (L/L*) is given by the inverse of A/A*, so that the larger is the deviation of A/A* > 1, the greater is the relative shortening in the longitudinal direction. Similarly, A/A* < 1 implies longitudinal lengthening. Figures 4 and 5 give the time variation in longitudinal shortening of the wall muscle layers (Amus/A*mus and Along/A*long) and wall muscle thicknesses (tau mus and tau long) and intraluminal pressure and inner muscle radius (Rin) at a fixed point in the middle esophagus averaged over eight swallows and centered on the time of maximum total muscle cross-sectional area (Amus/A*mus). These figures contain a great deal of information that shall be interpreted in terms of muscle contractile physiology in the DISCUSSION. We focus first on the characteristics of the total muscle layer (Fig. 4).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Temporal variation in total muscle area Amus/A*mus and intraluminal pressure (A), and average radius to circular muscle and total muscle thickness (B), averaged over 8 swallows. The average resting muscle area, A*mus, is 0.40 cm2. The bars indicate SD. The horizontal dotted lines indicate the resting state values A*mus and P* (A), and R*in and tau *mus (B). The vertical dotted lines are chosen to match features in the 2 panels.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Temporal variation in total muscle area Along/A*mus and intraluminal pressure (A) and average radius to circular muscle and total muscle thickness (B), averaged over 8 swallows. The average resting muscle area, A*mus, is 0.218 cm2. The bars indicate SD. The horizontal dotted lines indicate the resting state values A*mus and P* (A), and R*in and tau *long (B). The vertical dotted lines are chosen to match features in the 2 panels.

A general characteristic that appears when the four curves in Fig. 4 are compared is the existence of two overall phases of muscle activity during bolus transport through the middle esophagus. Initially, the esophageal lumen distended, as indicated by the rise in Rin from its resting state to a peak at about -2 s. During most of this period, until about -3 s, the thickness of muscle layer decreased in approximate inverse proportion to Rin, but with Amus/A*mus hovering close to 1 (the slight increase in Amus/A*mus during this period is only marginally significant). Intraluminal pressure rose to a plateau of 4.4 mmHg during this period, which reflects intrabolus pressure preceding the arrival of the circular muscle contraction wave (3). During this distension phase (roughly -7 to -3 s), the bolus fills the lumen and the muscle layer thickness decreases in the absence of significant longitudinal shortening or circular muscle contractile activity.

A local longitudinal shortening phase followed as both the thickness and cross-sectional area of the muscle increased above their resting state values, beginning their rise at about the same time (-3 s) and reaching coincident maxima at t = 0. The increase in Amus/A*mus > 1 necessarily implies increasing local longitudinal shortening, with maximum relative reduction in longitudinal length of L/L* = 0.36 having occurred ~0.25 s before maximum luminal pressure. The maximum muscle area was 1.11 ± 0.10 cm2, significantly greater than the resting area 0.40 ± 0.03 cm2 (P < 0.001).

Whereas average Amus/A*mus > 1 implies local longitudinal shortening, the rapid increase in intraluminal pressure above the slightly elevated intrabolus pressure implies circular muscle contraction, luminal narrowing, and subsequent luminal closure (3). We estimate from Fig. 4A that this rise in average intrabolus pressure began at about -2.0 s. The upstroke in local longitudinal shortening, by contrast, was estimated subjectively from Fig. 4A to begin at -3 s, roughly 1 s before the upstroke in pressure. Indeed, Fig. 4A shows that a wave of local longitudinal shortening enveloped the wave of circular muscle contraction: Amus/A*mus began a rapid increase before the upstroke in intraluminal pressure and returned to its resting state level well after intraluminal pressure had returned approximately to its resting state (t > 4.6 s). In Fig. 4A, the difference in duration between the waves of circular muscle contraction and local longitudinal shortening waves is indicated qualitatively by defining subjectively the downstrokes in pressure and longitudinal shortening as the times when pressure and Amus/A*mus reached plateaus after an initially rapid drop. Defined in this way, the duration of the longitudinal shortening wave was 1.45 times longer than the duration of the circular muscle contraction wave. A more precise ratio of durations, defined by the periods at which pressure and Amus/A*mus are above their half-maxima, gives the same ratio of durations to within the accuracy of the data.

The distension phase is heralded by an increase in radius Rin concurrent with a decrease in muscle thickness tau mus in the absence of significant change in Amus/A*mus. Circular muscle contraction is heralded by a sudden rise in intraluminal pressure coincident with a decrease in Rin at about -2 s. In contrast, longitudinal shortening begins with a rapid increase in Amus/A*mus, which, in Fig. 4, is coincident with an increase in tau mus at t approx  -3 s, reaching its peak at the time of peak Amus/A*mus (i.e., peak local longitudinal shortening). Maximum local longitudinal shortening preceded the peak in intraluminal pressure by only 0.25 s; they were very nearly coincident. At the times of maximal longitudinal shortening and intraluminal pressure, the average radius Rin had reached a plateau of ~0.46 cm, above the resting state value R*in = 0.40 cm.

The plateau in average Rin, which began at peak longitudinal shortening and circular muscle contraction, remained in the range 0.44-0.46 cm until longitudinal shortening and intraluminal pressure had reduced to low levels and reached plateaus at ~3.7 s, after which Rin decreased to its resting state value together with intraluminal pressure. During this reduction, however, Amus/A*mus and tau mus remained above their resting state values (Amus/A*mus approx  1.1-1.2), suggesting a persistence of lower-level longitudinal shortening beyond the period of circular muscle contraction.

The longitudinal muscle layer. Figure 5 shows the variation in longitudinal shortening of the isolated longitudinal muscle layer (Along/A*mus) together with intraluminal pressure, inner muscle radius Rin, and longitudinal muscle thickness tau long, with t = 0 defined at peak total muscle cross-sectional area (Amus/A*mus). Comparison of Fig. 5 with Fig. 4 shows that the temporal variations in longitudinal shortening of the longitudinal muscle layer were the same as longitudinal shortening of the entire muscle layer, to within the precision of the data. In particular, a wave of local longitudinal shortening enveloped the pressure wave, with upstroke, downstroke, and duration essentially the same as longitudinal shortening of the entire muscle layer. Note that it is more difficult to identify and measure accurately the cross-sectional area and thickness of the longitudinal muscle layer from ultrasound images than to measure the total muscle layer, so the precisions of Along and tau long are less than that of Amus/A*mus and tau mus. The difference between peak Along/A*mus (Fig. 5A) and peak Amus/A*mus (Fig. 4A), for example, is not statistically significant (P = 0.25).

Cross-sectional shape of the lumen. To illustrate the change in cross-sectional shape of the lumen during the passage of the bolus and contraction wave, Fig. 6 shows three-dimensional reconstructions (two space and one time coordinates) of the cross-sectional shape of the inner wall of the esophagus over time during a representative swallow. To evaluate the correlation between the change in shape of the luminal cross-section and the waves of local longitudinal shortening and circular muscle contraction, we have shaded the surfaces of the figures so that the gray level is proportional to the magnitude of Amus (i.e., local longitudinal shortening) in Fig. 6A and to the magnitude of intraluminal pressure in Fig. 6B.


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Three-dimensional (space-time) reconstructions of the inner wall of the circular muscle for a representative swallow. The lateral cross-sectional shape of the lumen (to the circular muscle) is shown as a function of time at the transducer location, and the large tickmarks in time imply seconds. The resulting surfaces are shaded so that the grayscale value is proportional in A to the magnitude of Amus and in B to the magnitude of intraluminal pressure for this swallow. Lighter gray color in A implies greater local longitudinal shortening, whereas in B lighter tone implies higher intraluminal pressure (and circular muscle contraction), as shown. Like the average result in Fig. 4, the wave of longitudinal shortening envelops the wave of circular muscle contraction. The reconstructions also show that the noncircular lumen cross-section becomes circular at maximal circular muscle contraction.

The distension of the lumen during esophageal filling is apparent in the images by the increase in luminal cross-sectional area during the first few seconds. During most of this distension phase, neither longitudinal shortening nor circular muscle contraction had occurred. The change in cross-sectional shape with time indicates that the esophageal lumen had a noncircular cross-section in the resting and distended states, whereas the lumen became circular during the period of strong circular and longitudinal muscle contraction. These changes in cross-sectional shape are apparent also in the ultrasound images of Fig. 2. At the final time shown in the images, the bolus is fully cleared from the lumen and the luminal cross-section apparently returned to its resting state geometry. The muscle physiology, however, had not fully returned to its resting state at the final time, as is apparent by the lighter shade of Amus indicating that Amus A*mus.

Figure 6 shows clearly the envelopment of the wave of circular muscle contraction (Fig. 6B) by a wave of local longitudinal shortening (Fig. 6A). Also apparent is the axially nonsymmetric nature of longitudinal shortening: local longitudinal shortening extended much farther from the time of maximal shortening in the direction of advancing time than in the reverse time direction. This structure is in contrast with intraluminal pressure, which was relatively symmetrical in time about peak pressure. Note also that, whereas the luminal cross-section became circular under the action of circular muscle squeeze, longitudinal shortening extended in time in both directions into periods when the cross-section was highly noncircular.

Correlations. As discussed in METHODS, the process of carefully done image analysis required for Figs. 4 and 5 was highly time intensive, limiting the full-wave analysis to eight swallows. However, to establish statistically the correlation between levels of circular muscle contraction and local longitudinal shortening, peak cross-sectional areas were quantified for 24 swallows. Figure 7 shows that larger peak longitudinal shortening (Amus/A*mus)max was correlated with larger maximum intraluminal pressure (i.e., pressure amplitude Pamp), on average (r = 0.61, P < 0.001, N = 24). That is, stronger closure force near the bolus tail tended to be accompanied by greater local longitudinal shortening in the same local area. Furthermore, from Fig. 8, a shorter delay between the onset of circular muscle contraction and onset of longitudinal shortening (Delta t) was negatively correlated with larger Pamp (r = -0.85, P < 0.01, N = 8). Thus the strength of the luminal closure force was altered both by the magnitude of longitudinal shortening and by the closeness of temporal coordination between longitudinal and circular muscle contraction.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Correlation between maximum longitudinal shortening [(Amus/A*mus)max] and maximum intraluminal pressure (Pamp) for 24 individual swallows (r = 0.61; P < 0.001).



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Correlation between the delay in onset of local longitudinal shortening and circular muscle contractions (Delta t) and Pamp for 8 individual swallows (r = -0.85; P < 0.01).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Measurement of longitudinal shortening. In this study, we have quantified shortening of longitudinal muscle locally in the middle human esophagus during bolus transport. The method combines explicit measurement of circular, longitudinal, and total muscle layer cross-sectional geometry with the incompressibility of the muscle layer to unambiguously deduce shortening (or lengthening) in the longitudinal direction within an axially thin segment of the esophageal wall segment at the location of the transducer. Whereas a single-point measurement using the method introduced here does not provide the motion of material points on the esophageal wall, the approach yields a purely local measurement of longitudinal shortening without inaccuracies inherent in the use of widely spaced clips placed on the mucosa.

Incompressibility of muscle layers has been confirmed experimentally (7, 8, 22), and the accuracy of the method is limited primarily by the accuracy with which the cross-sectional area of the muscle layer under consideration can be measured from endoscopic ultrasound images (or other imaging techniques). The method is applicable throughout the gastrointestinal tract wherever it is possible to image the cross-section with sufficient resolution to quantify muscle cross-sectional area. However, practical application of the method is limited by the time-intensive nature of interactive edge detection and analysis of the hundreds of images which underlie the data, for example, in Figs. 4-8.

The two phases of muscle activity in the middle esophagus. Whereas one might anticipate that shortening of the esophageal wall muscle implies a change in muscle layer thickness, Figs. 4 and 5 make it clear that muscle thickness cannot be used alone as an indicator of longitudinal shortening. This is because, in the absence of longitudinal shortening, the muscle layer thickness tau mus varies approximately in inverse proportion to the luminal radius Rin. Thus tau mus is sensitive to change in luminal radius, particularly to distension of the esophageal lumen by filling, as is apparent in Figs. 4 and 5. Relative change in muscle layer cross-sectional area, on the other hand, unambiguously reflects local relative change in the longitudinal dimension of the muscle layer, through Eq. 1. We conclude from Figs. 4 and 5, therefore, that the changes in geometry at the middle esophagus in response to bolus transport occur in two broad parts: 1) a "distension phase," which occurs in the absence of longitudinal shortening or circular muscle contraction, but during which muscle wall thickness decreases while luminal radius increases as the esophagus is filled, followed by 2) a "contraction phase," whereby longitudinal shortening and circular muscle contraction act in concert; local longitudinal shortening increases cross-sectional area and muscle layer thickness while circular muscle contraction decreases luminal radius and raises intraluminal pressure.

Whereas active circular muscle contraction began ~1 s after the initiation of local longitudinal shortening and circular muscle contraction was nearly coincident (within ~0.25 s) with longitudinal shortening, circular muscle tone decreases more rapidly than does longitudinal shortening. We conclude that longitudinal shortening envelops circular muscle contraction as the peristaltic wave moves through the middle esophagus. Defining the durations of the waves of circular muscle contraction and local longitudinal shortening either with upstrokes and downstrokes or in terms of half-maxima of the excursions in Figs. 4 and 5 (see RESULTS), we find that the duration of local longitudinal shortening in the middle esophagus is ~1.5 times that of circular muscle contraction. However, we also find that the variation of local longitudinal shortening in time is very much more asymmetric around its peak than is intraluminal pressure (especially obvious in Fig. 6). Our results show no significant longitudinal shortening from the initiation of a swallow to ~1 s before circular muscle contraction. However, as intraluminal pressure returns toward its resting state value, local longitudinal shortening and muscle layer thickness, L/L* and tau /tau *, reach plateaus 10-15% different from 1, suggesting that the esophageal wall remains in a state of mild longitudinal shortening for some period after the passage of waves of circular muscle contraction and local longitudinal shortening. Whereas the lumen is noncircular in general, the circular geometry of the lumen during contraction (Fig. 6) suggests relatively uniform circumferential active fiber tension in the circular muscle layer during peristalsis.

Comparisons with mucosal clip studies. Dodds et al. (5) measured the axial motion of four tantalum wires inserted into the in vivo longitudinal muscle over the distal half of the feline esophagus. Although coarser in resolution than the current study, their results suggested the progression of a wave of longitudinal shortening into the lower esophagus roughly coincident with the bolus tail. Pouderoux et al. (16) placed three clips at ~4-cm intervals in the distal 8-10 cm of the human esophagus and concluded, consistent with the current study, that the "contracting longitudinal segment was advancing ahead of the contracting circular muscle segment." An earlier study with mucosal clips by Edmundowicz and Clouse (6) measured change in length of upper and lower halves of the human esophagus and observed that early in the swallow the lower half lengthened while the upper half shortened, consistent with the clip motions in the cat esophagus measured by Dodds et al. (5). Their coarse measurements are also consistent with the later clip data of Pouderoux et al. (16), who observed that two adjacent 4-cm segments of the distal esophagus initially lengthen and later shorten in peristalsis-like fashion. In the current study, the wave of longitudinal shortening is preceded by negligible change in esophageal length locally, indicating that the middle-esophageal ultrasound transducer was located above the more distal esophageal segments that initially lengthen and later shorten.

In the introduction, we pointed out that the quantification of longitudinal shortening using mucosal clips will change with the distance between the clips; the more widely spaced the clips, the more underpredicted will be the measurement of longitudinal shortening. Thus it is not surprising that we measure significantly greater local shortening than previous clip studies. Figure 4 gives maximal local longitudinal shortening of the muscle wall layers in the middle esophagus to be L/L* approx  0.34 ± 0.02. Kahrilas et al. (9) and Pouderoux et al. (16) give rough estimates of minimum L/L* between 0.6 and 0.8 over esophageal segments 3-5 cm in length, whereas Edmundowicz and Clouse (6) measure much lower levels of shortening, maximum L/L* approx  0.92 and 0.98 over the distal and proximal halves of the esophagus roughly 10-14 cm in length (remember that lower values of L/L* imply greater longitudinal shortening). The lower levels of longitudinal shortening measured in the clip studies no doubt reflect the global nature of the measurement.

In fact, whereas the cross-sectional area-based method introduced here arguably yields the most precise measurement of local longitudinal shortening, clip-based measurements are complementary in that the relative change in length of the segment between mucosal clips (ignoring potential error in measured clip position from mucosal deformation) may be shown to give the average of the local longitudinal shortening over that segment. The results in Figs. 4 and 5 show that local shortening varies strongly along the esophagus, with a peak nearly coincident with the circular muscle contraction wave. Thus average longitudinal shortening measured with clips will always underestimate maximum local shortening in the segment between the clips, and the underestimate will depend on the distance over which the average is taken (i.e., the distance between the clips).

Coordinated waves of local longitudinal and circular muscle contraction. The data in Figs. 4 and 5 are presented as time changes in a variable at a fixed location in the middle esophagus. However, Figs. 4 and 5 may also be interpreted qualitatively as variations along the esophagus at a fixed time by imagining the peaks in intraluminal pressure and local longitudinal shortening in these figures to be at the transducer location in the middle esophagus and assuming that the spatial wave forms change only slowly as they propagate distally. The data to the left of these peaks in the figures, then, represents the esophagus distal to the transducer (note that the bolus arrives in advance of the pressure peak), whereas the data to the right of the peaks represents the esophagus proximal (3). Applied to Fig. 6, where the time axis is reversed, this interpretation places the distal esophagus on the right and the proximal esophagus on the left of the three-dimensional images. The time axes can be converted roughly to distance along the esophageal lumen by multiplying time by the peristaltic wave speed, typically ~2 cm/s in the middle esophagus. The resulting image is an approximation to the spatial structure along the esophageal lumen of coordinated waves of circular muscle contraction and local longitudinal shortening as they propagate distally through the middle esophagus. The clip studies discussed above indicate that, although the spatial structure of these peristaltic waves likely changes slowly as the waves move into the distal esophagus, the peaks in the circular muscle and local longitudinal shortening waves remain closely aligned.

Previous studies using mucosal clips have implicitly assumed that measured longitudinal shortening may be interpreted as indicating contraction of longitudinal muscle (note, for example, the reference to the "contracting longitudinal segment" in the quote above from Ref. 16). Recognizing that studies of longitudinal shortening, using either mucosal clips or the method introduced here, are ultimately directed at the contractile activity of longitudinal muscle, it is of interest to consider possible interpretations of longitudinal shortening in context with circular and longitudinal muscle contraction and the law of mass conservation.

To interpret the observed longitudinal shortening in terms of longitudinal muscle contraction, consider the possibility that longitudinal shortening within a segment might occur in the absence of longitudinal muscle contraction within the same segment. In this case, the observed longitudinal shortening at peak intraluminal pressure is possible only if the longitudinal muscle in segments proximal or distal to the shortened segment were to extend. Because muscle has the property that it can only contract (or relax from a previous contraction), it is difficult to imagine a physiologically consistent scenario in which the longitudinal shortening measured in this study (and previous studies) could result from other than contraction of longitudinal muscle fibers. It has been remarked that contraction of circular muscle fibers concentrated within a narrow axial segment could, in principle, create a bulge in area, and consequently local longitudinal shortening, in adjacent esophageal segments as a result of local deformation of the muscle layer from compression by the contracting circular muscles. Although this effect is, in principle, a possible contributor to longitudinal shortening, the relative magnitude of the effect is undoubtedly minimal, given the material stiffness of muscle. Nevertheless, if the effect were measurable, it could serve only to reduce the peaks in A/A* in Figs. 4 and 5, implying a slight underprediction of maximal local longitudinal shortening, and the conclusions from this study, and related clip studies, remain unaffected.

We conclude that the local longitudinal shortening measured in this study may be interpreted as indicating contraction of longitudinally aligned muscle fibers either within the esophageal wall or within the muscularis mucosa. Inferring the existence of circular muscle contraction by deviations from baseline of intrabolus intraluminal pressure, Figs. 4-6 indicate that a longitudinal muscle contraction wave (LMCW) accompanies the peristaltic circular muscle contraction wave (CMCW) as it traverses the esophagus, with peak longitudinal contraction well coordinated with peak circular muscular contraction. The LMCW envelops the CMCW, extending axially over a broader region of the esophagus. In particular, whereas longitudinal muscle contraction extends perhaps 2 cm distal to circular muscle contraction in the middle esophagus (assuming a wave speed of 2 cm/s), low-level contraction of longitudinal muscle appears to extend at least twice that distance proximally from the CMCW (especially apparent in Fig. 6). It may be that this low-level longitudinal shortening that persists in the proximal esophagus after passage of the circular muscle contraction wave reflects establishment of global shortening of the esophagus that persists until the contraction waves have passed through the lower esophageal sphincter and the esophagus has returned to its resting state.

A physiological interpretation of local longitudinal shortening. The observation that longitudinal shortening envelops circular muscle contraction as the peristaltic wave traverses the esophagus was made in excised opossum esophagi by Sugarbaker et al. (21), leading them to suggest a physiological role for longitudinal muscle contraction. Sugarbaker et al. hypothesized that longitudinal shortening leads to local increases in circular muscle fiber number density within axial segments, which in turn increases the closure force generated by circular muscle contraction in that segment. Our observation that local longitudinal shortening peaks close to the peak in luminal pressure is consistent with this hypothesis.

Defining the force acting to close a segment of the esophagus of length L as Fclosure, an approximate relationship between average circular muscle fiber tension Tfiber and the closure force Fclosure can be developed from a force balance called the "Laplace equation"
T<SUB>fiber</SUB>=<FR><NU>const</NU><DE>L</DE></FR> <FR><NU>F<SUB>closure</SUB></NU><DE>&tgr;<SUB>circ</SUB></DE></FR> (5)
where tau circ is the thickness of the circular muscle layer and const = 1/(2pi ) is a constant. This expression states that for given closure force Fclosure, the average circular muscle fiber tension Tfiber can be reduced by increasing the thickness of the muscle layer tau circ. Alternatively, for given muscle fiber tension Tfiber, closure force Fclosure is enhanced by increasing muscle layer thickness tau circ. Figs. 4 and 5 show that tau circ increases under local longitudinal shortening, thus reducing the average circular muscle fiber tension for given closure force, or increasing closure force for given fiber tension.

Closure force Fclosure, it may be shown, is directly proportional to intraluminal pressure P. Thus if the Sugarbaker et al. hypothesis is valid, one should expect to find a correlation between peak intraluminal pressure Pamp and maximum local longitudinal shortening (Amus/A*mus)max. This is, in fact, the result in Fig. 7, where the correlation coefficient is r = 0.61. [The correlation would be significantly higher if the two lower points at (Amus/A*mus)max approx  2.6 were missing.] This conclusion is potentially significant for the transport of solid boluses, for which clearance typically requires multiple circular muscle contraction waves, each contraction wave moving the bolus partially along the esophagus before passing over. The correlation in Fig. 7 between closure force and longitudinal shortening implies the generation of higher axial propulsive force on solid boluses compared with no longitudinal shortening. This conjecture might explain the in vitro result of Ren and Schulze-Delrieu (17), who found that the transport of a solid bolus through an excised opossum esophagus was enhanced if the esophagus was allowed to shorten globally.

Figure 8 indicates a strong correlation between a lower delay Delta t between onset of circular and longitudinal muscle contraction and higher pressure amplitude Pamp, or closure force. The following speculative scenario is offered as a possible explanation for this observation in terms of bolus transport. Maximal longitudinal shortening occurs nearly coincident with peak intraluminal pressure (Figs. 4-6). If, in addition, the rate of increase in pressure is approximately the same from swallow to swallow, then a shorter time delay Delta t between the initiation of circular and longitudinal muscle contraction would allow intraluminal pressure to reach higher amplitude. In this way, the physiological system could modulate the degree of contractile force required to maintain closure for a given swallow by controlling the delay between onset of circular and longitudinal muscle contraction.

Esophageal wall dimensions. We have measured the thicknesses of the muscle layers in the middle esophagus from the ultrasound images in the resting state to be tau mus = 1.38 ± 0.07 mm (tau long approx  tau circ = 0.69 ± 0.05 mm) and tau mucosa approx  3.0 mm. These data likely represent the most accurate measurements to date of in vivo esophageal muscle layer thicknesses. Others' data include dimensions from surgically removed esophagi from cadavers (2, 10, 20) in which the excised esophagus has shortened by 30-50%, and three other ultrasound studies, one of which is from the same data set used in the current study (14), and a related data set other from the same group (11). The one independent ultrasound study (4) quoted only an approximate estimate of 3 mm (no precision bounds), presumably over the middle-to-distal esophagus in achalasics and apparently including part or all of the mucosa. Furthermore, whereas Biancani et al. (2) did quote dimensions allowing for estimates of mucosal thickness in the middle esophagus that match those in this study, they did not quote surgically obtained dimensions of muscle wall thickness directly, and it was necessary to deduce these from their plots and equations. Nevertheless, taking into account shortening of excised esophagi, their measurements were within range of the more careful ultrasound studies presented here and in Refs. 11 and 14.

In summary, our results indicate that a wave of longitudinal muscle contraction envelops the peristaltic wave of circular muscle contraction as it passes through the middle esophagus, with peak longitudinal contraction aligned with peak circular muscular contraction. Our results support the hypothesis proposed by Sugarbaker et al. (21) that the spatial and temporal coordination of longitudinal and circular muscle contraction may be a physiological response to the mechanical influence of longitudinal shortening on increasing contractile force while reducing average muscle fiber tension. It follows, therefore, that mechanical advantage results by physiologically maintaining close coordination between peak local longitudinal shortening and maximal circular muscle contraction force.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grant R01-DK-41436.


    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. G. Brasseur, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802 (E-mail: brasseur{at}jazz.me.psu.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 30 June 2000; accepted in final form 20 June 2001.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Balaban, DH, Yamamoto Y, Liu J, Pehlivanov N, Wisniewski R, DeSilvey D, and Mittal RK. Sustained esophageal contraction: a marker of esophageal chest pain identified by intraluminal ultrasonography. Gastroenterology 116: 29-37, 1999[ISI][Medline].

2.   Biancani, P, Zabinski MP, and Behar J. Pressure, tension and force of closure of the human lower esophageal sphincter and esophagus. J Clin Invest 56: 476-483, 1975[ISI][Medline].

3.   Brasseur, JG, and Dodds WJ. Interpretation of intraluminal manometric measurements in terms of swallowing mechanics. Dysphagia 6: 100-119, 1991[Medline].

4.   Deviére, J, Dunham F, Rickaert F, Bourgeois N, and Cremer M. Endoscopic ultrasonography in achalasia. Gastroenterology 96: 1210-1213, 1989[ISI][Medline].

5.   Dodds, WJ, Stewart ET, Hodges D, and Zboralske FF. Movement of the feline esophagus associated with respiration and peristalsis. J Clin Invest 52: 1-13, 1972[ISI].

6.   Edmundowicz, SA, and Clouse RE. Shortening of the esophagus in response to swallowing. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 260: G512-G516, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Girerd, XJ, Acar C, Mourad J-J, Boutouyrie P, Safarm ME, and Laurent S. Incompressibility of the human arterial wall: an in vitro ultrasound study. Hypertension 10, Suppl6: S111-S114, 1992.

8.   Goyal, RK, Biancani P, Phillips A, and Spiro HM. Mechanical properties of the esophageal wall. J Clin Invest 50: 1456-1465, 1971[ISI][Medline].

9.   Kahrilas, PJ, Wu S, Lin S, and Pouderoux P. Attenuation of esophageal shortening during peristalsis with hiatus hernia. Gastroenterology 109: 1818-1825, 1995[ISI][Medline].

10.   Liebermann-Meffert, D, Allgöwer M, Schmid P, and Blum AL. Muscular equivalent of the lower esophageal sphincter. Gastroenterology 76: 31-38, 1979[ISI][Medline].

11.   Liu, JB, Miller LS, Goldberg BB, Feld RI, Alexander AA, Needleman L, Castell DO, Klenn PJ, and Millward CL. Transnasal US of the esophagus: preliminary morphologic and function studies. Radiology 184: 721-727, 1992[Abstract].

12.   Macovski, A. Medical Imaging Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.

13.   Massey, BT, Gorny JM, Kern MK, Arndorfer RC, Ryan C, and Hofmann C. Is esophageal longitudinal muscle function affected by deglutitive inhibition? (Abstract). Dysphagia 12: 111, 1997.

14.   Miller, LS, Liu J-B, Colizzo FP, Marzano J, Barbarevech C, Hedwig K, Leung L, and Goldberg BB. Correlation of high-frequency esophageal ultrasound and manometry in the study of esophageal motility. Gastroenterology 109: 832-837, 1995[ISI][Medline].

15.   Miller, LS, Liu J-B, Klenn PJ, Dhuria M, Feld RI, and Goldberg BB. High-frequency endoluminal ultrasonography of the esophagus in human autopsy specimens. J Ultrasound Med 12: 563-566, 1993[Abstract].

16.   Pouderoux, P, Lin S, and Kahrilas PJ. Timing, propagation, and effect of esophageal shortening during peristalsis. Gastroenterology 112: 1147-1154, 1997[ISI][Medline].

17.   Ren, J, and Schulze-Delrieu K. Movement of wax particles by contractions of the isolated opossum esophagus. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 258: G164-G170, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Russ, JC. The Image Processing Handbook. Boca Raton: CRC, 1995.

19.   Sonka, M, Zhang X, Siebes M, Bissing MS, DeJong SC, Colling SM, and McKay CR. Segmentation of intravascular ultrasound images: a knowledge-based approach. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 14: 719-732, 1995[ISI].

20.   Stein, HJ, Liebermann-Meffert D, DeMeester T, and Siewert JR. Three-dimensional pressure image and muscular structure of the human lower esophageal sphincter. Surgery 117: 692-698, 1995[ISI][Medline].

21.   Sugarbaker, DJ, Rattan S, and Goyal RK. Mechanical and electrical activity of esophageal smooth muscle during peristalsis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 246: G145-G150, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Tsuiki, K, and Ritman EL. Direct evidence that left ventricular myocardium is incompressible through systole and diastole. Tohoku J Exp Med 132: 119-120, 1980[ISI][Medline].

23.   White, FM. Fluid Mechanics. New York: McGraw Hill, 1986.

24.   Yamamoto, Y, Liu J, Smith TK, and Mittal RK. Distension-related responses in circular and longitudinal muscle of the human esophagus: an ultrasonographic study. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 275: G805-G811, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 281(4):G1022-G1033
0193-1857/01 $5.00 Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society