Gastroenterology Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
To determine the role of vagal nerves in initiation and modulation of the gastric migrating motor complex (MMC), motor activity was recorded in four dogs before and after total abdominal vagotomy during fasting, after exogenous intravenous motilin and insulin, and after feeding. After vagotomy, a temporally coordinated cyclic gastric and small bowel MMC persisted with an unchanged period. During gastric phase III, vagotomy decreased number of contractions (42 ± 4 vs. 16 ± 2), number of groupings of contractions (14 ± 1 vs. 7 ± 1), and motility index (12 ± 1 vs. 10 ± 1) and increased the duration between groupings (1 ± 1 vs. 3 ± 1 min) (P < 0.05 in each). Before and after vagotomy, motilin and insulin induced a premature MMC with minor changes in contractile pattern. A 200-g liver meal but not a 50-g liver meal inhibited the gastric MMC after vagotomy. A cyclic MMC persisted after vagotomy, but the contractile pattern during gastric phase III was altered. After a short recovery period, vagal innervation to the stomach modulates the pattern but not the presence of gastric interdigestive motility during phase III.
truncal vagotomy; gastrointestinal motility; gastric phase III; motilin; Hollander test; pancreatic polypeptide
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
DURING FASTING, THE STOMACH and small intestine undergo a temporally coordinated cyclic motor pattern termed the migrating motor complex (MMC) (6, 26). Many studies have suggested important roles for hormones and other regulatory substances (2, 8, 17, 29), the enteric nervous system (19, 20), and extrinsic innervation (10, 22) in the control and modulation of this cyclic motility pattern.
The role of the vagus nerves in initiating and regulating this cyclic contractile activity, especially in the stomach, remains controversial. In 1975, Weisbrodt et al. (31) suggested, by studying dogs after total abdominal vagotomy, that vagal innervation plays little role in the organization of the interdigestive myoelectric complex of the small bowel. In 1977, Aeberhard et al. (1) studied the effects of proximal gastric vagotomy and total vagotomy in dogs and found that the vagal nerves were unimportant in the control of fasting activity. Our previous work in dogs showed the persistence of a cyclic motor pattern in the stomach after complete neural isolation of the stomach (30), staged neural isolation of the stomach (25), and upper gut neural isolation (23). In contrast, Diamant and colleagues (3, 9), in a series of studies utilizing acute, reversible cervical vagal blockade in dogs, have suggested that vagal innervation is necessary for initiation of the gastric MMC. The aim of this study was to attempt to more fully quantitate gastric interdigestive motor activity, especially the characteristics of phase III activity, before and after complete abdominal vagotomy. On the basis of our previous work (23, 25, 30), we hypothesized that, whereas vagal innervation is not necessary for initiation of the MMC or for the presence of phase III activity in the stomach, vagal innervation does modulate the contractile pattern and amount of contractile activity during phase III.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Preparation of Animal Model
Surgical procedures and subsequent care and conduct of experiments were performed after approval from and according to criteria set forth by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Mayo Foundation in accordance with guidelines of the National Institutes of Health and Public Health Service Policy on the humane use and care of laboratory animals.Four female mongrel dogs weighing 15-20 kg were anesthetized with intravenous methohexital sodium (12.5 mg/kg; Brevital, Lilly, Indianapolis, IN); general anesthesia was maintained by inhalation of halothane. Through a midventral celiotomy, eight polyethylene manometry catheters (1.8 mm OD, 1.0 mm ID) were chronically inserted into the stomach, duodenum, and jejunum and fixed to the serosal surface. Four catheters were implanted into the gastric antrum 1, 2, 3, and 4 cm proximal to the pylorus, two into the duodenum, and two into the upper jejunum ~10 and 50 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz. Pyloromyotomy was performed to prevent the potential for gastric stasis after the total abdominal vagotomy to be performed at a second operation (see below). Manometry catheters were cemented within two stainless steel cannulas embedded in the abdominal wall. A modified Thomas gastric cannula was also fixed to the left abdominal wall to collect gastric juice for confirmation of vagal integrity (modified Hollander test). Postoperatively, dogs were given butorphanol tartrate (0.2-0.4 mg/kg; Torbugesic, Fort Dodge Animal Health, Fort Dodge, IA) intramuscularly for 1 day and buprenorphine hydrochloride (0.01-0.02 mg/kg; Buprenex, Reckitt & Colman Products, Hill, UK) subcutaneously for 2 days for control of pain. Dogs were fasted and hydrated with an intravenous infusion of electrolyte solution containing antibiotics for the first 3 days postoperatively as prophylaxis against postoperative infections. Dogs were housed in individual cages and, beginning on the second postoperative day, fed daily at 0900; drinking water was supplied ad libitum. After a 2-wk recovery, recordings of spontaneous gastrointestinal motor activity with monitoring of plasma motilin concentrations were obtained during fasting; the effects of injection of exogenous canine motilin (0.1 µg/kg) and exogenous insulin (0.7 U/kg) were performed ~30 min after a spontaneous gastric phase III. Recordings of gastrointestinal motor activity and monitoring of plasma motilin concentrations were also conducted after the feeding of a small meal (50 g pork liver, 64 kcal) and a large meal (200 g pork liver, 256 kcal) blended with 50 ml of water.
Vagotomy. After completion of these baseline experiments, a left transthoracic, supradiaphragmatic truncal vagotomy was performed in each dog to establish a complete abdominal vagotomy. A 1-cm portion of each vagal trunk was excised 4 cm above the diaphragm along with any other neural fibers noted around the esophagus. After a 2-wk recovery, similar experiments were repeated in the fasting and fed states.
Vagal integrity to the stomach was determined before and after vagotomy by response to a modified Hollander test as we described before (25). In addition, acid secretory and antral motor response and plasma concentrations of pancreatic polypeptide (PP) were also monitored during the modified Hollander test as an additional confirmation of the presence or absence of vagal innervation below the diaphragm.Conduct of Experiments
During the 2-wk recovery period, the dogs were trained to rest comfortably in a Pavlov sling for 6-8 h/day. Experiments were started in the morning after an overnight fast. Only one study was performed each day, and the same dog was not studied more than four times a week. All experiments after vagotomy were performed within 2.5 mo after the vagotomy.Experiments for vagal integrity.
Gastric juice was collected over 15-min intervals from the gastric
cannula starting 15 min before and for 60 min after administration of
intravenous injection of insulin (Regular Iletin I, Lilly) for
measurement of pH. Decrease in gastric pH to <1.5 suggests vagal
integrity to the stomach. Blood glucose was monitored by Dextrostix
(Glucostix, Bayer, Elkhart, IN) to ensure hypoglycemia (blood glucose
<40 mg/dl). Plasma concentrations of PP were drawn at the same
time as the gastric acid samples. Increase in PP concentration after
injection of insulin suggests vagal integrity to the pancreas and
integrity of upper gut vagal innervation. Blood was collected on ice
and immediately centrifuged. The supernatant was stored at 70°C for
later batch assay of PP by a well-characterized immunoassay (13).
Experiments for motor activity. Manometry catheters were perfused with deionized water (0.1 ml/min) via a low-compliance pneumohydraulic pump (Mui-Scientific) connected to strain-gauge transducers (DT-XX, Viggo-Spectramed, Oxnard, CA) that transmitted intraluminal pressures to a eight-channel Grass Recorder (Grass Instruments, MA) using time constants of 1 s. Manometry data were collected simultaneously on an IBM XT computer and sampled at a rate of 4 Hz for later analysis. Motor activity was recorded during fasting (>4 experiments per dog), including at least three to four cycles of the spontaneous MMC; after intravenous canine motilin at a dose of 0.1 µg/kg (Peninsula Laboratories, Belmont, CA), or after intravenous insulin at a dose of 0.7 U/kg, given 30 min after gastric phase III (>4 experiments per dog); and after the feeding of small (50 g) and large (200 g) pork liver meals (2 experiments each per dog) given 30 min after gastric phase III.
Plasma concentrations of motilin.
Blood was collected on ice at the start of gastric phase III and at
30-min intervals thereafter. During each gastric phase III, a separate
blood sample was drawn. In the digestive state, plasma concentrations
of motilin were monitored at 30-min intervals beginning 30 min before
feeding and until recurrence of gastric phase III after being given a
50-g pork liver meal. After the 200-g liver meal, blood samples were
taken at 30-min intervals beginning 30 min before and until 240 min
after feeding. Plasma was stored at 70°C for later batch assay by a
well-established motilin immunoassay (23, 27).
Analysis of Data
Interdigestive experiments.
All manometry recordings were analyzed by visual inspection for cyclic
patterns of motor activity (i.e., the MMC). Criteria of the four phases
of gastric and small bowel MMCs were used as in previous reports
(6, 30). The mean duration of the MMC was assessed as the
time between the start of successive phase III activity at one channel
in each anatomic location (stomach, duodenum, jejunum). The mean
durations of the individual phases of the MMC (I, II, III, and IV) at
each of the three locations were also calculated. In an attempt to
quantitate gastric phase III activity, the following parameters were
determined during each phase III activity by using two separate gastric
manometry channels before and after vagotomy as shown in Fig.
1: 1) duration of
gastric phase III; 2) maximum amplitude of contractions;
3) total number of contractions; 4) number of
groupings of contractions; 5) mean number of contractions
per grouping; 6) mean duration of individual groupings of
contractions; 7) mean duration between groupings of
contractions, and 8) motility index (MI) [calculated by
computer analysis as MI = loge (sum of
amplitudes × frequency of pressure waves + 1), which is a
function both of frequency and amplitude of individual contractions].
Also, the timing between the onset of the gastric and duodenal phase
III was measured; positive values signify that the gastric phase III started before the duodenal phase III, whereas negative values represent duodenal phase III beginning before the gastric phase III.
Similar analyses of phase III activity after injection of motilin or
insulin were calculated. For the intervals when cyclic activity
disappeared during fasting, no measurements were made of the durations
of phases or the MMC.
|
Postprandial experiments. The duration of inhibition of the gastric MMC was measured after the small and large liver meals as the time to return of a typical gastric phase III after feeding the meal.
Plasma concentrations of motilin at each time point were monitored after the feeding of the 50-g meal or the 200-g meal to determine whether the return of gastric phase III was associated with an increase in plasma motilin concentrations and whether they would increase without gastric phase III during the fed state.Statistical Methods
Each experiment was performed at least four times per dog in the interdigestive state and two times per dog in the digestive state before and after vagotomy. Mean values for durations of the MMC, durations of the individual four phases of the MMC, and contractile parameters during gastric phase III were calculated on each experimental day, mean values across daily experiments were obtained in each dog, and finally grand means were calculated across all dogs. Differences before and after vagotomy were compared by using Student's t-test for paired data and repeated-measures ANOVA where appropriate, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Values in the text are expressed as means ± SE. ![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Health of Dogs
All four dogs remained healthy before and after vagotomy. No dog lost >10% of body weight after either operation, and no dog vomited after vagotomy.Vagal Integrity
There was a close relationship between blood glucose and pH of gastric juice after exogenous insulin. Hypoglycemia (40 mg/dl) was evident starting 15 min after insulin injection. In conjunction with hypoglycemia, pH of gastric juice decreased to <1.5 before vagotomy. In contrast, after vagotomy, gastric pH remained >2.0 despite the hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia induced by exogenous insulin led to the release of PP in the neurally intact dogs before vagotomy, with plasma PP concentrations increasing from a baseline concentrationSpontaneous Interdigestive Motor Patterns
A clearly visible, unmistakable cyclic motor pattern of contractile activity occurred in the stomach, duodenum, and jejunum in both neurally intact dogs and vagotomized dogs. Motor activity showed an easily recognizable gastric MMC with four phases of activity both before and after vagotomy (Fig. 2, A and B). Table 1 quantitates interdigestive parameters of the cyclic activity. The period of the MMC and the duration of most phases of the MMC in the stomach, duodenum, and jejunum did not differ before and after vagotomy; however, phase I of the stomach in the vagotomized dogs was shorter than in neurally intact dogs, whereas phase II was longer (P < 0.05 each). Phase III activity in the stomach was temporally coordinated with phase III activity in the duodenum both before and after vagotomy. Every gastric phase III was closely associated temporally with a duodenal phase III that began simultaneously or just after the start of the gastric phase III. Timing between the onset of gastric and duodenal phase III was 6 ± 1 vs. 5 ± 2 min before and after vagotomy, respectively. In contrast, on occasion under our experimental conditions (prevagotomy 0 ± 0 and postvagotomy 8 ± 5%), a duodenal phase III was not preceded by a gastric phase III. After vagotomy, on occasion, a noncyclic pattern of continuous contractions occurred and persisted for 2-4 h in three of the four dogs despite persistent fasting and despite the presence of a typical MMC preceding this noncyclic pattern; this type of noncyclic "interdigestive" pattern was not seen in dogs before vagotomy. The incidence of this pattern was 22 ± 7% of the fasting recording studies (Fig. 3A).
|
|
|
Quantification of Gastric Phase III Motor Patterns
Table 2 compares the characteristics of gastric phase III activity before and after vagotomy in an attempt to quantitate the motor pattern as outlined in Fig. 1. Phase III activity occurred as a typical 10- to 30-min burst of high-amplitude contractions; the antral contractions during phase III occurred usually as multiple groups of two to four contractions separated by intervals of 30 s to 1 min. The overall duration and the maximum amplitude of contractions during phase III did not differ before and after vagotomy. In contrast, the total number of contractions, number of groupings of contractions, and MI during gastric phase III decreased after vagotomy, whereas the duration between groupings of contractions increased (each P < 0.05).
|
Plasma Concentrations of Motilin in the Interdigestive State
Motilin continued to cycle in close temporal coordination with the gastric MMC. Plasma motilin concentrations were greater during phase III than during phase I or II both before and after vagotomy (Table 3). Values before and after vagotomy did not differ. Plasma motilin concentrations cycled in temporal association with gastric phase III before the onset of the noncyclic motor pattern, but, during the period of this unique motor activity, motilin levels remained high and did not cycle (Fig. 3B).
|
Motor Patterns Induced by Exogenous Motilin or Insulin
Exogenous intravenous motilin (0.1 µg/kg) induced within 15 min a premature gastric phase III both before and after vagotomy in 81 ± 12% of the experiments (Fig. 4, A and B). Phase III activity occurred in the stomach and then migrated aborad down the small bowel. The number of contractions, number of groupings of contractions, and MI during motilin-induced gastric phase III decreased, whereas the duration between groupings increased after vagotomy (Table 2). When compared within the same stage, the duration of motilin-induced gastric phase III was shorter than spontaneous phase III. When compared before vagotomy, the number of contractions, the number of groupings of contractions, and the MI during a premature gastric phase III were less than spontaneous phase III. However, these parameters were not different from spontaneous phase III after vagotomy except for the duration of gastric phase III. Timing between the onset of gastric and duodenal phase III did not differ before and after vagotomy (4 ± 1 vs. 3 ± 1 min).
|
After exogenous intravenous insulin (0.7 U/kg), a premature
gastric MMC occurred in 63 ± 13% of the experiments before
vagotomy, followed by continuous, noncyclic antral contractions for at
least 60 min (Fig. 5A). After
vagotomy, insulin was similarly successful (67 ± 13% of the
experiments) in inducing a premature gastric and/or duodenal MMC, but
the prolonged antral contractions afterward that were evident before
vagotomy no longer occurred (Fig. 5B). The initiation of a
premature phase III occurred 15-20 min after insulin and appeared
to correlate with the development of hypoglycemia both before and after
vagotomy. The timing between the onset of gastric and duodenal phase
III before and after vagotomy differed somewhat (2 ± 2 vs.
4 ± 1 min; P < 0.05). Also, after vagotomy, the number of contractions, number of groupings of contractions, and
the MI during the premature gastric phase III were decreased (P < 0.05). Before vagotomy, there were no differences
between spontaneous and insulin-induced gastric phase III incidents. In contrast, after vagotomy, insulin-induced gastric phase III incidents were shorter in duration than spontaneous phase III incidents. In
addition, there were many quantitative differences in the
characteristics of spontaneous and premature gastric phase III after
vagotomy (Table 2).
|
Postprandial Motor Patterns
The duration of postprandial inhibition was similar before and after vagotomy with the 200-g meal (374 ± 34 vs. 298 ± 38 min; P > 0.05). However, unlike before vagotomy, after vagotomy the 50-g meal did not inhibit the time to return of gastric MMC (218 ± 26 vs. 84 ± 19 min; P < 0.05). The MI in the gastric antrum before vs. after vagotomy did not differ for the first hour after the feeding of the 200-g meal (9 ± 1 vs. 10 ± 1; P = 0.1) or the 50-g meal (9 ± 1 vs. 10 ± 1; P = 0.5).Plasma Concentrations of Motilin in the Digestive State
After feeding the 200-g meal, plasma concentrations of motilin decreased and no longer cycled unless gastric phase III recurred before 240 min postprandially. Mean values during the postprandial state were 130 ± 15 and 135 ± 25 pg/ml before vagotomy and after vagotomy, respectively. In contrast, after the 50-g meal, plasma motilin began to cycle again when gastric phase III activity recurred. After the 50-g meal, mean values of plasma motilin concentrations during the postprandial period (before recurrence of phase III) were less than the plasma motilin concentrations at the time of return of the gastric phase III (before vagotomy: 155 ± 20 vs. 185 ± 15 pg/ml; after vagotomy: 145 ± 20 vs. 195 ± 15 pg/ml; P < 0.05 in each). ![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
This study demonstrates that vagal innervation is not necessary for initiation of the gastric MMC nor for the temporal gastroduodenojejunal coordination in the interdigestive state. Vagal innervation does, however, modulate the contractile patterns during the gastric phase III. Not only exogenous motilin but also exogenous insulin induced a premature gastric MMC after spontaneous gastric MMC in the interdigestive state before and after vagotomy. Furthermore, plasma motilin concentrations cycled during the fasting state in accordance with gastric phase III after vagotomy. The 200-g liver meal, but not the 50-g meal, inhibited the onset of the gastric MMC after vagotomy.
The primary goal of this study was to show conclusively that vagal innervation to the canine stomach is not necessary for the initiation of spontaneous interdigestive activity. We quantitated gastric phase III activity not only by pattern analysis (visual inspection) but also by a novel method to quantitate multiple aspects of contractile activity during phase III (Fig. 1). We undertook this study primarily because previous work by Diamant and colleagues (3, 9) showed that the MMC in the canine stomach and duodenum was abolished during acute, reversible vagal blockade (cervical vagal cooling to 4°C); their work suggested that vagal innervation was necessary for initiation of the gastric component of phase III activity during fasting. In contrast, Gleysteen et al. (7) showed that, when the vagal nerves were cooled intrathoracically just above the diaphragm, no effect on the presence of gastric phase III activity was evident, suggesting that vagal input to the stomach was not necessary for initiation of the gastric component of the MMC. This latter study by Gleysteen et al. seems to have been largely overlooked. Similarly, our previous work with models of staged nonvagal and subsequent vagal denervation of the stomach (25), complete, acute neural isolation of the stomach (30), complete neural isolation of the upper gut multivisceral complex (stomach, small bowel, pancreas, liver, and proximal colon) (23), and most recently a staged nonvagal and subsequent vagal denervation of this multivisceral upper gut complex (28) all suggested that a cyclic gastric and small bowel interdigestive activity continued to occur after these models of selective and complete extrinsic denervation.
The present study was designed to reexamine this controversy with a straightforward canine model of a simple, supradiaphragmatic total abdominal vagotomy. By examining both subjective analysis of patterns (visual analysis Fig. 2, Table 1) and objective quantification of contractile patterns during phase III (Fig. 1, Table 2), we demonstrated quite clearly that a cyclic MMC in both stomach and upper small bowel continues after a total abdominal vagotomy (confirmed by a modified Hollander test) but that the pattern of contractions during the gastric phase III was altered; the number of contractions, number of groupings of antral contractions, and total motor activity (MI) were decreased, whereas the duration between groupings of contractions was increased. These objective findings strongly suggested that, whereas vagal innervation is neither necessary nor required for the presence or initiation of gastric interdigestive motility, vagal innervation does appear to modulate the pattern of contractions during fasting and after exogenous infusion of motilin.
How can we resolve the differences in the work by Diamant and colleagues (3, 9) and that of Gleysteen et al. (7) and ourselves (23, 25, 28, 30)? One potential explanation may be that the vagal nerves in the immediate supradiaphragmatic region contain some sympathetic fibers that may function as "inhibitory" nerves if unimpeded by vagal input (14, 16). Diamant's group (5) extended their work by showing that the gastric MMC did not cycle when both the cervical vagal nerves were cooled and pharmacological adrenergic blockade was simultaneously established, again proposing the vagal nerves to be the most important factor for initiation of the gastric MMC. However, the concomitant "sympathetic" blockade was only a pharmacological adrenergic blockade, and it remains possible that nonadrenergic sympathetic neurotransmitters mediate an inhibitory response. Another explanation may be that acute reversible neural blockade (by cooling) has different effects than the chronic effects of complete surgical neural transection. The gut has a remarkable plasticity that allows an adaptation mediated in part through the enteric nervous system. Indeed, Diamant and colleagues (4) have shown the ability of the stomach to regain a cyclic interdigestive activity many months after total duodenectomy, which we showed leads to the early loss of cyclic gastric interdigestive activity (27).
Our study also evaluated the effects of total abdominal vagotomy on interdigestive plasma concentrations of motilin and the motor response to exogenous motilin. We showed in the present study, as we have in other models of extrinsic vagal gastric denervation (24, 30), that plasma motilin concentrations cycle temporally with the gastric MMC, peaking during gastric phase III activity; also, when the interdigestive cyclic activity was disrupted, either spontaneously or after feeding, plasma motilin no longer cycled, peaks did not occur, and cyclic changes only recurred when the MMC recurred. Similarly, exogenous intravenous administration of motilin was able to induce a burst of gastric contractions in both the innervated and vagally denervated stomach followed by a characteristic intestinal MMC. Interestingly, the pattern of gastric contractions induced by motilin after vagotomy differed from that in the innervated stomach in ways similar to that of spontaneous gastric phase III. The number of contractions and the number of groupings of contractions in response to exogenous motilin were also fewer after vagotomy. However, these parameters were similar to the parameters of spontaneous gastric phase III in the vagally denervated stomach. Combined with the original work showing that plasma motilin cycles with the spontaneous MMC (12), exogenous intravenous motilin induces a "premature" MMC (11, 21), total duodenectomy inhibits the presence of a gastric MMC (27) at least for many months (4), and immunoneutralization of circulating plasma motilin disrupts the presence of the MMC in the gastroduodenal region (15), this present study supports the hypothesis that cyclic interdigestive activity in the stomach may be initiated and temporally coordinated with the small bowel MMC by cyclic changes in plasma concentrations of motilin.
We also investigated the role of the vagal nerves in mediating the motor effects of exogenous insulin at a dose great enough to induce hypoglycemia (0.7 U/kg). Before vagotomy, exogenous insulin induced a premature gastric and small bowel MMC, as shown by previous work (18), as well as a prolonged duration of antral contractile activity for at least 60 min. After vagotomy, exogenous insulin continued to induce a premature gastrointestinal MMC, but the prolonged antral contractions no longer occurred. The gastric pattern of contractions, however, differed before and after vagotomy; insulin-induced gastric motor activity had fewer contractions and lesser amplitude as well as a fewer number of groupings of contractions and a lesser motility. Before vagotomy, insulin-induced gastric contractile patterns were similar to spontaneous contractions, but after vagotomy, the total gastric motility, as measured by MI, and the pattern of contractions (duration, maximal amplitude, number of contractions, number of groupings) decreased, suggesting a role of vagal innervation in mediating some of the effects of insulin on gastric contractile activity. However, vagal innervation to the stomach and the small bowel was not necessary for the ability of insulin to induce a premature MMC.
Finally, we showed that vagal innervation did play a role in postprandial inhibition of interdigestive gastrointestinal motility. After a small liver meal, vagotomy abolished the inhibition of the return of the MMC seen in the neurally intact dogs but did not alter the early motor effects, as measured by the MI for the first postprandial hour before the return of the MMC. In contrast, no differences in duration of inhibition of the MMC were noted after the larger 200-g meal. These observations suggest that the vagal nerves do mediate, in part, some of the postprandial motor events in the stomach and small intestine; however, other hormonally mediated effects, as noted in the neurally isolated stomach (30) or after neural isolation of the entire upper gut complex (23) may play a dominant role with larger meals.
In conclusion, our study shows that vagal innervation to the stomach and small intestine is not necessary for the initiation or presence of the gastric or intestinal MMC, the cyclic changes in plasma motilin, or the motor response of a premature MMC after exogenous motilin or insulin. Vagal innervation does, however, modulate the pattern of gastric contractions during interdigestive activity and the postprandial duration of inhibition of the MMC after a small but not a larger oral meal.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
We thank George M. Thomforde and Louis J. Kost for technical assistance, Carol M. Schimek for measurements for plasma motilin and PP, and Deborah I. Frank for preparation of the manuscript.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
This work was supported in part by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grant DK-39337 (to M. G. Sarr) and by the Mayo Foundation.
This study was presented as an oral paper at the American Motility Society (AMS) on September 17, 2000, in Kansas City, KS. T. Tanaka received the AMS Student Travel Award for this work.
Address for correspondence: M. G. Sarr, Gastroenterology Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 13 September 2000; accepted in final form 6 March 2001.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1.
Aeberhard, P,
and
Bedi BS.
Effects of proximal gastric vagotomy (PGV) followed by total vagotomy (TV) on postprandial and fasting myoelectrical activity of the canine stomach and duodenum.
Gut
18:
515-523,
1977[Abstract].
2.
Bueno, L,
and
Ferre JP.
Central regulation of intestinal motility by somatostatin and cholecystokinin octapeptide.
Science
216:
1427-1429,
1982[ISI][Medline].
3.
Chung, SA,
and
Diamant NE.
Small intestinal motility in fasted and postprandial states: effect of transient vagosympathetic blockade.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
252:
G301-G308,
1987
4.
Chung, SA,
Rotstein O,
Greenberg GR,
and
Diamant NE.
Mechanisms coordinating gastric and small intestinal MMC: role of extrinsic innervation rather than motilin.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
267:
G800-G809,
1994
5.
Chung, SA,
Valdez DT,
and
Diamant NE.
Adrenergic blockade does not restore the canine gastric migrating motor complex during vagal blockade.
Gastroenterology
103:
1491-1497,
1992[ISI][Medline].
6.
Code, CF,
and
Marlett JA.
The interdigestive myo-electric complex of the stomach and small bowel of dogs.
J Physiol (Lond)
246:
289-309,
1975[Abstract].
7.
Gleysteen, JJ,
Sarna SK,
and
Myrvik AL.
Canine cyclic motor activity of stomach and small bowel: the vagus is not the governor.
Gastroenterology
88:
1926-1931,
1985[ISI][Medline].
8.
Hall, KE,
Diamant NE,
El-Sharkawy TY,
and
Greenberg GR.
Effect of pancreatic polypeptide on canine migrating motor complex and plasma motilin.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
245:
G178-G185,
1983
9.
Hall, KE,
El-Sharkawy TY,
and
Diamant NE.
Vagal control of migrating motor complex in the dog.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
243:
G276-G284,
1982
10.
Hashmonai, M,
Go VLW,
and
Szurszewski JH.
Effect of total sympathectomy and of decentralization on migrating complexes in dogs.
Gastroenterology
92:
978-986,
1987[ISI][Medline].
11.
Itoh, Z,
Honda R,
Hiwatashi K,
Takeuchi S,
Aizawa I,
Takayanagi R,
and
Couch EF.
Motilin-induced mechanical activity in the canine alimentary tract.
Scand J Gastroenterol
11, Suppl39:
93-110,
1976[ISI][Medline].
12.
Itoh, Z,
Takeuchi S,
Aizawa I,
Mori K,
Taminato T,
Seino Y,
Imura H,
and
Yanaihara N.
Changes in plasma motilin concentration and gastrointestinal contractile activity in conscious dogs.
Am J Dig Dis
23:
929-935,
1978[ISI][Medline].
13.
Keane, FB,
DiMagno EP,
Dozois RR,
and
Go VLW
Relationships among canine interdigestive exocrine pancreatic and biliary flow, duodenal motor activity, plasma pancreatic polypeptide, and motilin.
Gastroenterology
78:
310-316,
1980[ISI][Medline].
14.
Kewenter, J.
The vagal control of the jejunal and ileal motility and blood flow.
Acta Physiol Scand
65, Suppl251:
1-68,
1965[ISI].
15.
Lee, KY,
Chang TM,
and
Chey WY.
Effect of rabbit antimotilin serum on myoelectric activity and plasma motilin concentration in fasting dog.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
245:
G547-G553,
1983
16.
Martin, JS,
Innes DL,
and
Tansy MF.
A demonstration of vagal adrenergic vascular and motor influences in the small intestine of the dog.
Surg Gynecol Obstet
138:
6-12,
1974[ISI][Medline].
17.
Poitras, P.
Hormonal control of the interdigestive migrating complex.
In: Small Intestinal and Colonic Motility, edited by Poitras P.. Montreal, Canada: Jouveinal Laboratories, 1985, p. 15-23.
18.
Prasad, KR,
and
Sarna SK.
The central and peripheral effects of insulin on migrating myoelectric complexes (MMC) (Abstract).
Gastroenterology
90:
1589,
1986.
19.
Sarna, SK.
Cyclic motor activity: migrating motor complex: 1985.
Gastroenterology
89:
894-913,
1985[ISI][Medline].
20.
Sarna, S,
Stoddard C,
Belbeck L,
and
McWade D.
Intrinsic nervous control of migrating myoelectric complexes.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
241:
G16-G23,
1981
21.
Sarr, MG,
and
Duenes JA.
Site of action of morphine sulfate and motilin in the induction of "premature" phase III-like activity in the canine gastrointestinal tract.
Surgery
103:
653-661,
1988[ISI][Medline].
22.
Sarr, MG,
and
Kelly KA.
Myoelectric activity of the autotransplanted canine jejunoileum.
Gastroenterology
81:
303-310,
1981[ISI][Medline].
23.
Siadati, MR,
Murr MM,
Foley MK,
Duenes JA,
Steers JL,
and
Sarr MG.
In situ neural isolation of the entire canine upper gut: Effects on fasting and fed motility patterns.
Surgery
121:
174-181,
1997[ISI][Medline].
24.
Siadati, M,
and
Sarr MG.
Role of extrinsic innervation in release of motilin and patterns of upper gut canine motility.
J Gastrointest Surg
2:
363-372,
1998[Medline].
25.
Spencer, MP,
Sarr MG,
Hakim NS,
and
Soper NJ.
Interdigestive gastric motility patterns: the role of vagal and nonvagal extrinsic innervation.
Surgery
106:
185-194,
1989[ISI][Medline].
26.
Szurszewski, JH.
A migrating electric complex of the canine small intestine.
Am J Physiol
217:
1757-1763,
1969[ISI][Medline].
27.
Tanaka, M,
and
Sarr MG.
Role of the duodenum in the control of canine gastrointestinal motility.
Gastroenterology
94:
622-629,
1988[ISI][Medline].
28.
Tanaka T, VanKlompenberg LH, and Sarr MG. Selective role of vagal
and nonvagal innervation in initiation and coordination of gastric and
small bowel patterns of interdigestive and postprandial motility.
J Gastrointest Surg. In press.
29.
Thor, P,
Król R,
Konturek SJ,
Coy DH,
and
Schally AV.
Effect of somatostatin on myoelectrical activity of small bowel.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Gastrointest Physiol
235:
E249-E254,
1978
30.
Van Lier Ribbink, JA,
Sarr MG,
and
Tanaka M.
Neural isolation of the entire canine stomach in vivo: Effects on motility.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
257:
G30-G40,
1989
31.
Weisbrodt, NW,
Copeland EM,
Moore EP,
Kearley RW,
and
Johnson LR.
Effect of vagotomy on electrical activity of the small intestine of the dog.
Am J Physiol
228:
650-654,
1975[ISI][Medline].