Department of Pharmacology, The University of Iowa, College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Functional bowel and other visceral disorders exhibit multiple characteristics that suggest the presence of visceral hyperalgesia. The discomfort, pain, and altered sensations (e.g., to intraluminal contents) that define the hyperalgesia typically arise in the absence of tissue insult or inflammation. Visceral hyperalgesia thus differs from somatic hyperalgesia, which is commonly associated with tissue injury and inflammation. Hyperalgesia could develop and be maintained by either peripheral or central mechanisms; the altered sensations associated with functional visceral disorders are contributed to by both peripheral and central mechanisms. The relative contributions of peripheral and central mechanisms are not well understood, and the focus in this Themes article is on potential peripheral contributions: sensitization of visceral receptors, nerve injury, and ion channels.
ion channels; mechanosensitive; polymodal; visceral hyperalgesia
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
THE EXTRINSIC PRIMARY AFFERENT (sensory) innervation of the viscera serves two functions. Some primary visceral afferent fibers have a significant efferent function, although their role in the physiology and pathophysiology of the viscera has not been widely studied (12, 13). The more fully appreciated function of visceral receptors and their associated afferent axons is to convey information from the viscera to the central nervous system. Most of such information, of course, is rarely perceived (e.g., responses to intraluminal nutrients, baroreceptor input, lung inflation, normal gastrointestinal motility, and so forth). Accordingly, the principal conscious sensations that arise from the viscera are discomfort and pain.
The cell bodies of primary visceral afferent neurons are contained in the nodose ganglia (vagal afferents) and dorsal root ganglia (spinal afferents). Unlike somatic structures, the viscera receive dual innervation from vagal and spinal primary afferent neurons. The central terminals of vagal sensory neurons are in the brain stem, whereas the central terminals of spinal visceral afferent neurons are organized segmentally (although somewhat diffusely over several spinal segments). It has long been held that visceral pain is conveyed to the central nervous system by spinal afferents; vagal afferents are considered to play no role in visceral pain. A growing body of literature, however, suggests that perhaps most primary visceral afferents can contribute to altered sensations from the viscera in pathophysiological conditions.
The terminals (receptors) of primary visceral afferent neurons are located in mucosa, muscle, and serosa (mesentery) of hollow organs. Accordingly, visceral afferent neuron terminals are placed to respond to luminal and local chemical stimuli and to mechanical (usually distending) stimuli. Visceral receptors apparently have no end organs or morphological specialization (i.e., are unencapsulated). They are associated with unmyelinated and thinly myelinated axons, recording from which has provided the present understanding of the sensitivity and inferred function of visceral receptors. Receptors that respond to sugars, lipids, amino acids, and so forth (i.e., principally those associated with the mucosa) were an early focus of study (see Refs. 16 and 19 for overviews). Mechanical and nonnutrient chemical (irritant) stimuli have also been studied, with increasing emphasis on visceral nociceptive mechanisms. Improved understanding of the normal physiology of primary visceral afferent neurons has stimulated study of the mechanisms that contribute to development and maintenance of altered sensations from the viscera. These altered sensations, which characterize functional bowel disorders, interstitial cystitis, ureteric colic, and so forth, are considered to represent a visceral hyperalgesia (15). Hyperalgesia has been extensively studied in somatic tissue, but mechanisms of visceral hyperalgesia are not fully understood. Hyperalgesia consists of both peripheral and central nervous system components and theoretically can be initiated and maintained entirely by either peripheral or central mechanisms, although neither mechanism is well understood. Functional visceral disorders are contributed to by both peripheral and central mechanisms. The focus of this Themes article will be on peripheral contributions and mechanisms of visceral hyperalgesia.
![]() |
VISCERAL HYPERALGESIA |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The primary sensory neuron, innervating either somatic or visceral tissue, has been well established as contributing to the development of hyperalgesia (25). Primary visceral afferent neurons have been shown in the recent past to possess qualities that suggest a role in both acute and persistent pain and hyperalgesia.
Mechanosensitivity.
Visceral afferent fibers innervating hollow organs have been
documented, as summarized in Table 1, to
have either low or high thresholds for response to mechanical
distension, an adequate stimulus (in the Sherringtonian context) for
hollow organs. There exists a proportion (~25%) of the
mechanosensitive fiber population that has high thresholds for response
(>30 mmHg) and likely represents a group of visceral nociceptors. The
remaining ~75% of the mechanosensitive population of visceral
afferent fibers has thresholds for response in the physiological range;
most respond to distending stimuli between 1 and 5 mmHg. Unlike
low-threshold cutaneous mechanoreceptors, low-threshold
mechanosensitive visceral afferent fibers encode distending pressures
into the noxious range and, as a group, give greater-magnitude
responses throughout the noxious range of distending pressures than do
high-threshold visceral afferent fibers (Fig. 1).
|
|
Polymodality. It is generally assumed that primary visceral afferent fibers are polymodal in character, but this has largely been inferred rather than documented experimentally. When mechanosensitive visceral afferent fibers have been tested for sensitivity to other modalities of stimulation, all have also been found thermosensitive and/or chemosensitive (22). Similarly, many chemosensitive mucosal afferent fibers also give evidence of mechanosensitivity when tested. Determination of the adequate stimulus for primary visceral afferent fibers has not been rigorously examined, but if the mechanosensitive population is representative of the visceral innervation in general, then polymodal sensitivity is the rule rather than the exception.
Sensitization.
Another characteristic of the low-threshold group of mechanosensitive
visceral afferent fibers that distinguishes them from their
low-threshold cutaneous counterparts is the ability to sensitize after
experimental organ inflammation. Sensitization means an increase in
response magnitude, sometimes accompanied by an increase in spontaneous
activity and/or a decrease in response threshold, after inflammation.
Sensitization of cutaneous nociceptors has long been recognized as an
initial, important event in the development of cutaneous hyperalgesia.
Mechanosensitive visceral afferent fibers, both those with low and
those with high response thresholds, have the ability to sensitize and
thus contribute to altered sensations arising from the viscera (Fig.
2). Because low response threshold visceral
afferent fibers encode well into the noxious range and sensitize when a
viscus is insulted, both populations of mechanosensitive visceral
neurons can contribute to visceral discomfort and pain.
|
![]() |
PERIPHERAL MECHANISMS OF PERSISTENT VISCERAL HYPERALGESIA |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
If this is so, what possible changes in the periphery could be responsible? What follows is speculative, and experimental evidence is scant. However, all propositions are testable.
Enhanced sensitivity to normal intraluminal contents. Our own work has shown that bile salts instilled acutely into the colon significantly increase the activity of mechanosensitive (polymodal) colon sensory fibers (see Fig. 2). Response magnitude to colonic distension was not increased for all fibers tested (22), but resting activity was significantly increased for all fibers studied. Bile salts in the gut thus can contribute an exaggerated afferent input to the spinal cord in the absence of colonic inflammation. When mechanoreceptors previously insulted (infection or inflammation) are exposed to bile salts (and/or other substances normally present), effects greater than those illustrated in Fig. 2 could result and lead to discomfort and pain. The effect of other normally present substances on mechanosensitive visceral afferent fibers has not been widely studied.
How bile salts (or other normally present intraluminal substances) might affect mucosal chemosensitive (polymodal?) receptors, such as those exposed in the past to an acute infection or inflammation, is not known. One could imagine, however, that chemosensitive mucosal receptors in patients with functional bowel disorders may give enhanced responses and contribute exaggerated input to the central nervous system when exposed to normal content or secreted chemicals in response to food intake. For example, peptides such as CCK are released from mucosal endocrine cells in the presence of intraluminal nutrients. Amines like serotonin are also present, and serotonin, CCK, or both CCK and serotonin could act on their respective receptors located on the terminals of primary visceral afferent neurons. Furthermore, potentially important interactions between the intrinsic and extrinsic primary afferent populations of neurons have not been characterized. The anatomical proximity and the richness of the chemical soup in which their terminals reside suggest an interface and potential contribution to altered sensations that has yet to be explored.Nerve injury.
Irritation of peripheral nerve trunks (neuritis) or frank damage
(neuropathy) both contribute altered input to the central nervous
system. In animal models of somatic nerve mononeuropathy or neuritis,
hyperalgesia is characteristically produced and is long lasting. There
is little experimental evidence that similar insult to spinal visceral
afferent nerve trunks produces exaggerated responses to stimuli applied
to the viscera. Visceral neuropathy has been associated principally
with altered function (e.g., pseudoobstruction, slow
transit constipation) but has not been studied as a possible contributor to the altered sensations that characterize functional bowel disorders. In preliminary studies of a model of pelvic nerve neuritis in the rat, response magnitude at low distending
(physiological) pressures and spontaneous activity are clearly
increased (Fig. 3), suggesting that a
visceral nerve neuritis could contribute significantly to the afferent
barrage arriving at the spinal cord.
|
Ion channels. Ligand- and voltage-gated channels in sensory neurons may be altered subsequent to insult to a viscus or nerve injury and thus contribute to the discomfort and pain present in functional visceral disorders. Candidate channels include voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels, acid-sensing and temperature-sensing ion channels, and ion channels gated by endogenous ligands such as serotonin or ATP. The presumed changes in such channels occur at the nerve terminal in the viscus as well as in the cell body in the nodose or spinal dorsal root ganglia. Because it is not possible to interrogate directly the peripheral nerve terminal, ion channels in sensory neuron cell bodies are studied as representative of peripheral events. Many ion channels have been cloned, and there now exist molecular and pharmacological probes with which to study them.
The nodose or dorsal root ganglia cell bodies of specific viscera can be labeled by injection into the viscus of a retrogradely transported dye and subsequently identified with fluorescence microscopy. With the use of such a strategy, we know that colon sensory neurons contain both tetrodotoxin-sensitive and tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channels, capsaicin-sensitive cation channels (the VR1 receptor, a temperature-sensing channel), and stretch-activated potassium channels (23, 24). It is not known at present how the number, subunit composition, or biophysical properties of such channels may change (and remain changed?) after a visceral insult, but it has been shown that a tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium current is increased by putative inflammatory mediators, consistent with a role in peripheral sensitization and hyperalgesia (8). ![]() |
SUMMARY |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The physiology of visceral afferent pathways was the emphasis of study in the recent past, and we now understand much better how mechanoreceptors contribute to acute noxious events in the viscera. The pathophysiology of visceral sensory neurons is not as well understood, but it is clear that they share with their somatic counterparts the ability to sensitize. In the cutaneous sensory realm, however, only nociceptors sensitize, whereas both low- and high-threshold mechanosensitive visceral sensory neurons sensitize. Accordingly, both mechanosensitive populations in the viscera can contribute to discomfort and pain. Knowledge about the potential contribution of the nonmechanosensitive population of visceral receptors in mucosa, muscle, and/or serosa to visceral pain and visceral hyperalgesia is limited at present. However, given the approximately fourfold greater size of the low-threshold population of mechanosensitive afferent fibers, acute inflammatory events in the viscera are conceivably represented in the central nervous system by a greatly increased afferent input relative to normal. Because these receptors are polymodal, intraluminal chemical or mechanical visceral stimuli in the physiological range have the potential to contribute significantly to altered sensations arising from the viscera.
Mechanisms by which primary visceral afferent neurons contribute to functional visceral disorders, which often exist in the absence of detectable insult to the viscus, are not known. Several avenues of investigation were presented above. The functional visceral disorders, characterized by discomfort and pain, could be a consequence of visceral nerve neuritis or nerve damage or could arise from changes in the number and behavior of one or several neuron ion channels, initiated and maintained by presently unknown means. It is known that there are long-term consequences (e.g., changes in sensory-motor function, visceral hyperalgesia) following resolution of acute visceral inflammation (see, e.g., Refs. 1 and 6). Because normally non-pain-producing stimuli, such as eating or drinking, often precipitate discomfort and pain, functionally disordered visceral receptors respond inappropriately. Inappropriate visceral receptor(s) transduction or amplification of these physiological stimuli or normally present luminal contents contributes an exaggerated peripheral input to the central nervous system. This input could initiate in a normal central nervous system interpretation of the event as inappropriately painful. More likely, however, is that the peripheral input adds to central nervous system mechanisms that also contribute significantly to the visceral hyperalgesia.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
The excellent secretarial assistance of Susan Birely and the graphics produced by Michael Burcham are gratefully acknowledged.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
* Fourth in a series of invited articles on Pathobiology of Visceral Pain: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.
G. F. Gebhart is supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DA-02879, NS-19912, and NS-35790.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. F. Gebhart, Dept. of Pharmacology, Bowen Science Bldg., The Univ. of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 (E-mail: gf-gebhart{at}uiowa.edu).
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1.
Al-Chaer, ED,
and
Pasricha PJ.
Transient colorectal irritation in the neonatal period produces long lasting visceral sensitization in rats: a potential model for IBS and other painful functional bowel disorders (Abstract).
Gastroenterology
116:
G4139,
1999.
2.
Blumberg, H,
Haupt P,
Jänig W,
and
Kohler W.
Encoding of visceral noxious stimuli in the discharge patterns of visceral afferent fibers from the colon.
Pflügers Arch
398:
33-40,
1983[ISI][Medline].
3.
Buéno, L,
Fioramonti J,
Delvaux M,
and
Frexinos J.
Mediators and pharmacology of visceral sensitivity: from basic to clinical investigations.
Gastroenterology
112:
1714-1743,
1997[ISI][Medline].
4.
Cervero, F.
Afferent activity evoked by natural stimulation of the biliary system in the ferret.
Pain
13:
137-151,
1982[ISI][Medline].
5.
Cervero, F,
and
Sann H.
Mechanically evoked responses of afferent fibers innervating the guinea-pig's ureter: an in vitro study.
J Physiol (Lond)
412:
245-266,
1989[Abstract].
6.
Collins, SM.
The immunomodulation of enteric neuromuscular function: implications for motility and inflammatory disorders.
Gastroenterology
111:
1683-1699,
1996[ISI][Medline].
7.
Fiocchi, C.
Intestinal inflammation: a complex interplay of immune and nonimmune cell interactions.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
273:
G769-G775,
1997
8.
Gold, MS,
Reichling DB,
Shuster MJ,
and
Levine JD.
Hyperalgesic agents increase a tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current in nociceptors.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:
1108-1112,
1996
9.
Häbler, J,
Jänig W,
and
Koltzenburg M.
Activation of unmyelinated afferent fibers by mechanical stimuli and inflammation of the urinary bladder of the cat.
J Physiol (Lond)
425:
545-562,
1990[Abstract].
10.
Häbler, J,
Jänig W,
and
Koltzenburg M.
Myelinated primary afferents of the sacral spinal cord responding to slow filling and distension of the cat urinary bladder.
J Physiol (Lond)
463:
449-460,
1993[Abstract].
11.
Hammer, K,
Sann H,
and
Pierau FK.
Functional properties of mechanosensitive units from the chicken ureter in vitro.
Pflügers Arch
425:
353-361,
1993[ISI][Medline].
12.
Holzer, P.
Neural emergency system in the stomach.
Gastroenterology
114:
823-839,
1998[ISI][Medline].
13.
Holzer, P,
and
Maggi CA.
Dissociation of dorsal root ganglion neurons into afferent and efferent-like neurons.
Neuroscience
86:
389-398,
1998[ISI][Medline].
14.
Hong, SK,
Han HC,
Yoon YW,
and
Chung JM.
Response properties of hypogastric afferent fibers supplying the ureter in the cat.
Brain Res
622:
215-225,
1993[ISI][Medline].
15.
Mayer, EM,
and
Gebhart GF.
Basic and clinical aspects of visceral hyperalgesia.
Gastroenterology
107:
271-293,
1994[ISI][Medline].
16.
Raybould, HE.
Does your gut taste? Sensory transduction in the gastrointestinal tract.
News Physiol Sci
13:
275-280,
1998
17.
Sengupta, JN,
and
Gebhart GF.
Characterization of mechanosensitive pelvic nerve afferent fibers innervating the colon of the rat.
J Neurophysiol
71:
2046-2060,
1994
18.
Sengupta, JN,
and
Gebhart GF.
Mechanosensitive properties of pelvic nerve afferent fibers innervating the urinary bladder of the rat.
J Neurophysiol
72:
2420-2430,
1994
19.
Sengupta, JN,
and
Gebhart GF.
Gastrointestinal afferent fibers and sensation.
In: Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract (3rd ed.), edited by Johnson LR.. New York: Raven, 1994, p. 483-519.
20.
Sengupta, JN,
Saha JK,
and
Goyal RK.
Stimulus-response function studies of esophageal mechanosensitive nociceptor in sympathetic afferents of opossum.
J Neurophysiol
64:
796-812,
1990
21.
Sengupta, JN,
Saha JK,
and
Goyal RK.
Differential sensitivity of bradykinin to esophageal distension-sensitive mechanoreceptor in vagal and sympathetic afferents of the opossum.
J Neurophysiol
68:
1053-1067,
1992
22.
Su, X,
and
Gebhart GF.
Mechanosensitive pelvic nerve afferent fibers innervating the colon of the rat are polymodal in character.
J Neurophysiol
80:
2632-2644,
1998
23.
Su, X,
Wachtel RE,
and
Gebhart GF.
Capsaicin sensitivity and voltage-gated sodium currents in colon sensory neurons from rat dorsal root ganglia.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
277:
G1180-G1188,
1999
24.
Su, X,
Wachtel RE,
and
Gebhart GF.
Rat colon sensory neurons contain mechanosensitive channels (Abstract).
Soc Neurosci Abstr
25:
410,
1999.
25.
Torebjörk, HE,
Schmelz M,
and
Handwerker HO.
Functional properties of human cutaneous nociceptors and their role in pain and hyperalgesia.
In: Neurobiology of Nociceptors, edited by Belmonte C,
and Cervero F.. New York: Oxford, 1996, p. 349-369.