Laboratory for Neuroendocrinology and Department of Integrative Biology, Pharmacology, and Physiology, The University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas 77225
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The relative roles of infant suckling and of maternal prolactin (PRL) secretion in lactational anovulation were studied in ovary-intact and ovariectomized rhesus monkeys nursing young that had been removed from their natural mothers. Hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse generator activity was monitored electrophysiologically in freely behaving animals by radiotelemetry. Serum luteinizing hormone, PRL, estradiol, and progesterone were also measured. Suckling inhibited GnRH pulse generator activity and ovarian cyclicity in all ovary-intact females but had no such effect on the pulse generator in long-term ovariectomized animals. When PRL secretion was suppressed by daily bromocriptine administration, GnRH pulse generator activity remained significantly inhibited and ovulation was prevented in four monkeys (6 trials), whereas in two females (6 trials) a rapid increase in pulse generator frequency and the resumption of ovarian cyclicity were observed although suckling activity was maintained. One monkey displayed both response types. Although these results indicate that suckling per se is able to restrain GnRH pulse generator activity in the absence of PRL, they also suggest that the relative importance of these determinants is variable depending on factors that remain to be determined. The present study also confirms the permissive role of the ovary in the lactational suppression of GnRH pulse generator activity.
gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator; multiunit electrical activity volley; prolactin; bromocriptine; pregnancy
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
SUCKLING INHIBITS folliculogenesis and ovulation in most mammalian species including Old World monkeys and humans (see Ref. 22 for review). In all species for which there are adequate data, the major limiting factor with regard to follicular development appears to be the suppression of pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion (22), suggesting an inhibition of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse generator, the central neuronal oscillator in the mediobasal hypothalamus that controls pituitary gonadotropin secretion (reviewed in Ref. 17). The mechanisms underlying this suppression of the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian (HPO) axis are uncertain. Clinical and experimental data suggest that high levels of prolactin (PRL), the pituitary hormone secreted in response to suckling, can result in hypothalamic amenorrhea (9) and the inhibition of pulsatile LH secretion (31) and of GnRH release both in vivo (18) and in vitro (24). However, earlier studies in rhesus monkeys utilizing indirect indexes ofthe functioning of the HPO axis suggested that this suckling-induced process could not be accounted for simply by the associated hyperprolactinemia (32). That the suckling stimulus per se may play a significant role has also been suggested in other species including humans (reviewed in Ref. 22). However, the importance of elevated PRL levels in the lactational suppression of GnRH pulse generator activity remains unclear. The goal of this study was to reexamine in the rhesus monkey the relative roles of suckling per se and of suckling-induced hyperprolactinemia in this phenomenon by using more direct approaches to assess GnRH pulse generator activity than were previously possible.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Animals
Five adult, regularly cycling and five ovariectomized rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta, age 8-16 yr, wt 7-9.5 kg) were studied. The animals were housed singly in rooms with controlled temperature and illumination (lights on 0700-1900). Under these conditions, none of the ovary-intact females selected for the present study displayed seasonal anovulation. The animals were fed once daily with a ration of Purina monkey chow (Ralston Purina, St. Louis, MO) or High Protein Monkey Diet (PMI Feeds, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with fresh fruit three times weekly. Water was available ad libitum. Body weight was measured biweekly. The animals were fitted with bilateral recording electrode arrays, each consisting of nine nichrome wires, 50 µm in diameter, chronically implanted in the mediobasal hypothalamus as described previously (27) and with chronic indwelling cardiac catheters connected to subcutaneously implanted access ports (27). The animals were maintained and all experiments were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and all protocols were approved by the Animal Welfare and Use Committee of the University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center.Assessment of GnRH Pulse Generator Activity
In four ovary-intact and the five ovariectomized monkeys, GnRH pulse generator activity was assessed electrophysiologically by the frequency of the associated volleys of multiunit electrical activity (MUA volleys) recorded from the mediobasal hypothalamus (27). The correlation between LH pulses, as determined by bioassay of LH (28) in blood samples taken every 10 min, and hypothalamic MUA volleys was assessed in each animal before the study. A unitary correlation between MUA volleys and LH pulses has been absolute and invariable (Fig. 1) under a great variety of physiological and experimental circumstances, permitting the conclusion that LH pulses and MUA volleys both represent manifestations of the activity of the GnRH pulse generator (27-29). An identical conclusion has been drawn on the basis of similar experimental approaches in rats (14) and goats (26).
|
The animals selected for the study were transferred to shielded recording rooms with controlled temperature and illumination (lights on 0700-1900) and housed singly in Lucite-sided fiberglass or metal cages. Hypothalamic MUA was recorded continuously for 8-13 mo from a selected pair of electrodes in the freely behaving, unrestrained monkeys by use of radiotelemetry as described previously (27, 28). MUA discharge frequencies were processed as activity rates, in 1-min bins, and displayed in the form of time-based histograms (27). MUA volleys were counted in 12-h histograms obtained during the day and night (i.e., lights on and off) independently by four experimenters, and GnRH pulse generator activity was expressed as MUA volleys/h. The data representing any 12-h period were discarded unless at least three of four observers agreed on the MUA volley count. Such agreement was achieved in 91% of the daytime and 48% of the nighttime recordings. The exact reason for the poorer reliability of the nighttime recordings in some of the animals is unclear because it could not be fully explained on technical grounds.
In one ovary-intact monkey whose hypothalamic electrodes failed in
radiotelemetry, GnRH pulse generator activity was determined weekly by
detecting pulses of LH in serial blood samples (1.0 ml). Samples were
taken remotely once every 10 min for 10 h using the chronic indwelling
cardiac catheter, which was extended through a protective
jacket-and-tether system (Alice King Chatham Medical Arts, Hawthorne,
CA) to a swivel joint mounted on the top of the cage as previously
described (27, 28). The jacket, to which the monkey had been
extensively habituated, was modified to expose the nipples permitting
normal nursing to occur. After each sample was taken, the catheter and
extension tubing were flushed with physiological saline containing 10 U/ml heparin. Plasma was separated after every second sample by
centrifugation and stored at 20°C until assay (see
Hormone Assays below). The heparin contained in
these samples did not affect the performance characteristics of the LH
bioassay. LH pulse frequency was determined by inspection and by
submitting the LH data to the ULTRA pulse detection algorithm (threshold 3 times the intra-assay coefficient of variation of 5-7% as determined by the bioassay of the LH content of the same serum pool at 3 volumes in every assay) (37). This more arduous approach yielded GnRH pulse generator frequency patterns that were in
agreement with those obtained with radiotelemetry.
Hormone Assays
Blood samples were taken by femoral venipuncture, a procedure the animals had been habituated to, once or twice a day (between 0800 and 0900 and between 1600 and 1700) for the measurement of LH, PRL, 17PRL levels in serum were measured with a modified human double-antibody
PRL RIA kit (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA). The product
literature reports no cross-reactivity with human growth hormone, FSH,
LH, chorionic gonadotropin, thyrotropin, or placental lactogen. We
found that a rhesus monkey PRL standard (WDP-XI-49-29)
cross-reacted in this assay identically with the human PRL standard. A
pool of monkey serum with high PRL levels was assayed at 5, 10, 20, and
50 µl, with results parallel to the human and rhesus standard curves.
The reactivity of purified rhesus monkey pituitary hormones was as
follows: LH (WDP-XV-20, NICHD RP1), 0.3%; FSH (WDP-XIII-24-42),
0.003%; growth hormone (AFP-5282B), 1%; and thyrotropin
(WP-X-103-30), not detectable. All assays were performed using the
human PRL kit standards and a quality control pool at 20 and 50 µl.
BSA (4%, in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.0) was used as an assay
diluent. The working range of the assay was 2.5-250
ng PRL/ml. Treatment of monkeys with 2-bromo--ergocryptine [bromocriptine (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) dissolved with an
equal weight of tartaric acid (Fisher Scientific, Houston, TX) in
warmed polyethylene glycol (Fisher Scientific) containing 6.25% of
70% ethanol to give a final concentration of 30 mg
bromocriptine/ml] administered as a single intramuscular
injection (30 mg/animal), provided PRL-free serum drawn 24-48 h
later, which was included in all assays as a separate control and used
as a diluent when serum samples <50 µl were assayed. In 20 assays
the standard pool of human PRL, when tested at 20 µl, read at 50.9 ng/ml, with intra- and interassay coefficients of variation of 5.3 and
13.2%, respectively. In the same assays, this standard pool was tested
at 50 µl, read at 59.0 ng/ml with intra- and interassay coefficients
of variation of 3.6 and 12.8%, respectively.
Estradiol levels in serum were measured using a double-antibody RIA kit
(Diagnostic Products) modified for use in the rhesus monkey. The
product literature reports significant cross-reactivity with estrone
(12.5%) and
17-estradiol-3
-D-glucuronide
(6.0%) but insignificant cross-reactivity (<5%) for 40 additional
steroids or steroid conjugates. Estradiol standards (3-1,400
pg/ml) were prepared in ovariectomized rhesus monkey serum, and
100-µl aliquots of the standards and experimental serum samples were
assayed without extraction. Replicates of five pooled sera (with
estradiol concentrations ranging from 80 to 800 pg/ml) were included in
each assay. In 20 assays the intra- and interassay coefficients of
variation for these five pools ranged from 1.3 to 2.0% and 6.7 to
9.3%, respectively.
Progesterone concentrations in duplicate 50-µl aliquots of rhesus
serum were measured using a double-antibody RIA with reagents purchased
from ICN Biomedicals (Costa Mesa, CA; rabbit anti-progesterone, 125I-labeled progesterone
derivative, and goat anti-rabbit -globulin second antibody
solution). Progesterone standards (0.2-16 ng/ml) were prepared in
ovariectomized monkey serum. Four replicates of a monkey serum pool
were included in each assay. In 20 assays the serum pool read 2.99 ± 0.20 (SD) ng/ml, with intra- and interassay coefficients of
variation of 3.58 and 6.78%, respectively. Levels
2 ng/ml were
considered as an indication that ovulation had occurred.
Adoption of Infants
After a control period that included at least two ovulatory menstrual cycles in the intact females, the instrumented animals were given infants (n = 11) born to other monkeys. In an earlier study from our laboratory, this approach was shown to result in a suppression of the HPO axis in intact monkeys indistinguishable from that seen in postpartum lactating females (30). Although most infants were 1-11 days old at the time of adoption (n = 9), foster pairs could also be successfully established using older infants (up to 105 days old). Interestingly, only females that had previously nursed young of their own would accept (adopt) infants, whereas monkeys with no prior maternal experience invariably rejected or ignored them. However, prior nursing experience did not necessarily predict a favorable adoption because two animals with a history of nursing their own young did not accept alien infants. The initiation and progress of lactation were monitored by manual expression of milk, a procedure that was performed daily until copious amounts of milk were detected and daily or weekly thereafter. The body weight of the adopted infants was measured at least weekly. To accomplish this the mothers were sedated with 3-5 mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride (Ketaset; American Vet Supply, San Antonio, TX) usually before the evening blood sample was taken. The administration of this low dose of ketamine was maintained throughout the entire study, even in the absence of the infant, as a control measure, but was found to have no effect on circulating PRL levels. After one or more bromocriptine trials (see Bromocriptine Treatment and Supplemental Feeding below), the young were weaned and the intact foster mothers monitored until normal menstrual cycles were re-established.Assessment of Suckling Behavior
The magnitude of sensory inputs associated with suckling was estimated by determining the percentage of time the infant was attached to the nipple (total suckling activity) (1, 38, 42) and by the frequency of the suckling episodes (10). To this end, behavioral observations were made of five mother-infant pairs from 0900 to 1700 on 3-5 consecutive days, both before and during bromocriptine treatments (total 9 pairs of 3- to 5-day series) by seven different observers in 2-h shifts. The animals were familiar with all seven observers and were apparently not disturbed by their presence in the recording room, as indicated by the observation that between suckling episodes the foster mothers let the infants roam and play in the cage. In these sessions the clock time at which attachment and detachment from the nipple occurred was recorded along with the duration of the periods when no assessment could be made because the observer's view of the infant was obstructed. The duration of these "no assessment" intervals never exceeded 10% of the total observation time and was subtracted from the latter before the percentage values were calculated. A suckling bout was considered to be completed when the infant interrupted nipple contact forBecause nighttime suckling has been reported to play an important role in the stimulation of PRL release and in the maintenance of the suppression of the HPO axis (1, 22), we have attempted to extend our observations beyond the day by using a surveillance camera connected to a videotape recorder and a dim red light source. Although the single infant so observed appeared to spend virtually the entire night attached to the nipple, no reliable assessments could be made because a clear view of the infant's face could only be obtained for a small fraction of the total observation time, a finding that forced us to abandon this approach.
Bromocriptine Treatment and Supplemental Feeding
The role of PRL in the lactational suppression of GnRH pulse generator activity was studied by daily bromocriptine administration (0.1 mg · kgBecause lactation was also inhibited by the administration of bromocriptine, the infants were bottle fed with a commercially available liquid infant primate diet (Primilac; Bio-Serv, Frenchtown, NJ). The formula was offered in a volume of 25 ml twice a day (32). As a control measure this feeding regimen was continued throughout the entire study whether or not the animals were lactating.
Data Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using the SigmaStat Statistical Analysis System, Version 1.01 (Jandel Scientific, Sausalito, CA). Nonparametric tests were used when the assumptions for the parametric test were violated. The following analyses were used: Student's t-test (paired and unpaired), Mann-Whitney rank-sum test, one-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by all-pairwise multiple comparisons (Student-Newman-Keuls method), and Pearson product moment correlation. The probability value of P < 0.05 was used as a cutoff for statistical significance. For the purpose of data presentation and statistical analysis, serum hormone concentrations below the limit of detectability were assigned the value of the minimum detectable level. ![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Ovary-Intact Animals
Control cycles.
Before adoption, GnRH pulse generator activity, pituitary and gonadal
hormone secretion in all five intact rhesus monkeys studied, displayed
time courses characteristic of ovulatory menstrual cycles in this
species (15, 28). These patterns are illustrated in Figs.
2 (days
22-44), 3 (days 64-0), and
4 (days
34-1), beginning with the first day of a
control menstrual cycle. MUA volley frequency increased during
luteolysis and achieved a plateau frequency of 1.00-1.50/h by
midfollicular phase. The rise in serum estradiol concentrations late in
the follicular phase arrested GnRH pulse generator activity for
~12-24 h and elicited the midcycle LH surge. After this sharp
decline, MUA volley frequency resumed at a low rate (0.17-0.42/h)
under the influence of progesterone secreted by the corpus luteum. GnRH
pulse generator activity was lower at night in the follicular but not
in the luteal phase. Circulating PRL was undetectable or very low
(<10 ng/ml) throughout the cycle.
|
|
|
Suckling and PRL levels during lactation. The young started suckling within 1-2 h after they were introduced to and accepted by the foster mothers. PRL levels rose dramatically within 24 h (Fig. 2, day 45) and milk secretion became detectable within 1-6 days. When blood was taken both in the morning and in the evening (3 mothers, 7 trials), PRL was significantly higher in the evening samples [78.1 ± 8.8 (evening) vs. 54.3 ± 11.5 (SE) ng/ml (morning); P < 0.001, paired t-test]. The infants started to eat solid food between 32 and 71 days of age, but in most cases their access to the chow was limited by the restrictive behavior of the foster mothers. Between 26 and 227 days of infant age (the time frame within which most of our bromocriptine trials were performed), daytime suckling activity declined from 76% (63-86%, median and 25-75 percentiles) of time spent on the nipple to 40% (38-41%) (P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney rank-sum test), whereas the frequency of suckling episodes remained unchanged [4.0/h (2.0-6.1/h) vs. 4.3/h (3.6-5.0/h); median (25-75 percentiles); P > 0.05; Mann-Whitney rank-sum test]. The morning and evening PRL levels remained relatively stable over the same period [Fig. 2, days 45-170 (morning); Fig. 4, days 1-205 (evening)]. When PRL concentrations during the first 50 days of infant age were compared with those measured during another 50- to 60-day interval around the age of 180 days, no significant differences were found [73.8 ± 12.7 vs. 81.3 ± 7.1 (SE) ng/ml; P > 0.05; paired t-test]. This constancy of PRL levels with time in the face of falling daytime suckling activity probably reflects a constant high nighttime suckling activity (1), a notion that is also supported by our observation that even relatively old babies remain attached to the nipple whenever asleep. In two foster mothers, PRL levels were found to decline after ~300 days of infant age.
Effects of nursing on GnRH pulse generator activity, LH, and gonadal
hormone levels.
The effects of nursing on GnRH pulse generator activity, LH, and
gonadal hormone levels are illustrated in Fig. 2 and summarized in
Table 1. In all ovary-intact animals, suckling significantly suppressed
GnRH pulse generator activity relative to the frequencies observed
during both the follicular and the luteal phases of the control
menstrual cycles (Table 1). MUA volley
frequency remained significantly reduced during both the day and
night.1 Whereas Pearson
product moment correlation indicated a significant negative correlation
between daytime pulse generator activity and morning PRL levels
(r 0.606,
P < 0.02), the correlation between nighttime MUA volley frequencies and evening PRL concentrations did not
reach statistical significance (r
0.479, P > 0.05). Although the inhibition of pulse generator activity could be observed within a
couple of days after the initiation of suckling in both the luteal
(Fig. 2, from day 44) and the
follicular phases (Fig. 3, days
1-34), in some experiments the introduction of
the infant in the late luteal or early follicular phase did not cause a
suppression of MUA volley frequency until the subsequent luteal phase.
In these instances (n = 3, not shown),
the nursing animals underwent an apparently normal follicular phase and
had an LH surge, and the inhibition of pulse generator activity
specifically due to suckling could be recognized by the fact that
despite an early decline in progesterone secretion, MUA volley
frequency did not increase.
|
Effects of bromocriptine inhibition of PRL secretion during suckling. Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the typical responses to bromocriptine treatments, and the results are summarized in Fig. 5 and in Tables 2 and 3. Although daily bromocriptine administration suppressed serum PRL levels to or below the limit of detectability, neither suckling activity (62 ± 9% of time on the nipple vs. 63 ± 6%, means ± SE, bromocriptine vs. prebromocriptine, P > 0.05, paired t-test) nor the frequency of suckling episodes (3.2 ± 0.6 vs. 4.3 ± 0.6/h, P > 0.05, paired t-test) changed significantly relative to prebromocriptine levels despite the fact that lactation was suspended and the infants had already begun eating solid food by the time of these observations. In three control experiments performed in three cycling animals, this bromocriptine regimen did not inhibit day- or nighttime GnRH pulse generator activity (P > 0.05; Student's t-test; e.g., Fig. 3, days 121-149), had no effect on LH, estradiol, and progesterone levels (P > 0.05, Student's t-test, or Mann-Whitney rank-sum test), and did not seem to affect the duration of the menstrual cycle.
|
|
|
Ovariectomized Animals
Suckling in long-term ovariectomized animals (n = 5) did not have any effect on GnRH pulse generator activity and LH levels (Fig. 6). Serum PRL concentrations during lactation in the gonadectomized monkeys did not differ significantly from those in the ovary-intact animals (34.1 ± 8.9 vs. 50.4 ± 14.1, respectively; means ± SE; morning samples only; P > 0.05; Student's t-test).
|
One of the ovariectomized foster mothers was given an infant soon after ovariectomy (35 days). Suckling initially suppressed GnRH pulse generator activity to ~30% of control levels and LH also decreased (Fig. 7, days 11-35), but this response later became attenuated (Fig. 7, days 65-102) and was completely lost ~150-160 days after gonadectomy (around day 130 in Fig. 7). During the initial suppression, bromocriptine treatment restored MUA volley frequency and increased LH secretion (days 36-60).
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The results obtained with bromocriptine administration to nursing animals demonstrate that in the rhesus monkey suckling alone can inhibit GnRH pulse generator activity and ovarian cyclicity even in the absence of maternal PRL secretion. That the bromocriptine regimen used in this study did not inhibit the pulse generator and LH secretion (9, 19) was clearly demonstrated in control experiments using nonnursing monkeys. Nevertheless, in some of the suckled animals, GnRH pulse generator frequency promptly increased and ovarian cyclicity resumed when PRL secretion was abolished by bromocriptine administration. Behavioral observations performed during the day hours in three of these six trials clearly indicated that the recovery of the HPO axis in these instances was not due to reduced suckling activity. Because nursing restricted to the daytime only has been reported to maintain the suppression of the HPO axis for >80 days in monkeys (11), there is no reason to believe that an unrecognized decrease in nighttime suckling activity, an unlikely scenario in this species (1), could have been responsible for this response. A causal relationship between the decline in PRL and the increase in GnRH pulse generator activity was also indicated by the promptness of the latter after the suppression of PRL secretion. Therefore, it can be concluded that, whereas suckling-induced suppression of pulse generator activity can occur in the absence of PRL in some circumstances, PRL may play a critical role in the induction of lactational anovulation in others, but it should be emphasized that the small number of animals involved in the present study does not permit generalization regarding the relative frequency of the two response types in this species.
Further analysis of the effect of the bromocriptine-induced reduction in PRL secretion revealed that the response of the HPO axis was not an all-or-none phenomenon, GnRH pulse generator activity being obviously (and at night significantly, see Table 2) increased even in the trials that did not result in ovulation and that peak GnRH pulse generator frequencies seemed to form a continuum across the two ovarian response types (see Fig. 5). In the animals that did not ovulate, these moderate elevations in pulse generator frequency did support some follicular development as indicated by a significant increase in serum estradiol levels (data not shown). These findings therefore strongly suggest that in this species both PRL-dependent and -independent factors participate in suckling-induced suppression of GnRH pulse generator activity and ovarian cyclicity albeit the relative importance of these factors can vary from case to case and even in the same animal. Because it has been shown that the inhibition of gonadotropin secretion by nursing is independent of antecedent events such as pregnancy and delivery (30), the conclusions of the present study performed in foster mothers are also applicable to normal postpartum lactation.
We have attempted to identify the cause of the aforementioned variability in the role of PRL by comparing some uncontrolled variables relevant to suckling-induced anovulation (10, 34, 43) between the two groups with different ovarian responses to bromocriptine administration (see Table 3). These analyses, however, failed to reveal compelling explanations for this phenomenon (see RESULTS). Of particular interest is the observation that, unlike in the rat (13, 21, 34), the stage of lactation does not seem to affect the sensitivity of the HPO axis to bromocriptine inhibition of PRL secretion. Although older foster mothers tended to be more likely to ovulate in response to bromocriptine treatments, this association did not reach statistical significance. Interestingly, the same monkeys also tended to suckle the infants with fewer interruptions, a finding that confirms a report by Gomendio (10) but conflicts with another by Wilson et al. (43). The difference between the two reports is probably due to the use of a different statistical procedure to define a "suckling bout" (10). Whether these statistically insignificant differences in suckling frequency and in the age of the foster mother are relevant to the degree of recovery of the GnRH pulse generator and of the ovary in response to the inhibition of PRL secretion remains to be determined.
Our observation that PRL can be a critical factor in lactational anovulation is at variance with an earlier view (22, 32) that this hormone plays but a minor role in this phenomenon. In our previous experiments (32) none of six bromocriptine-treated nursing animals with undetectable circulating PRL responded to an estradiol benzoate-challenge with an LH surge, whereas all four of the weaned, bromocriptine-treated controls did, suggesting that PRL is inconsequential in the lactational suppression of the HPO axis. At present, we have no compelling explanation for the discrepancy between our earlier finding and the findings of the present study, but considering that a full recovery of the HPO axis in response to the suppression of PRL secretion may be relatively infrequent and given the small number of animals involved, it is possible that such a response could simply have been missed by chance.
The role of PRL in lactational anovulation is also unclear in women (22). A causative role has been suggested on the basis of an association between the duration of hyperprolactinemia and the duration of amenorrhea (7), although this relationship could be indirect, with PRL levels reflecting the intensity of suckling (23). More convincing is the observation that high bioactive PRL levels can forecast a prolonged lactational anovulation even though suckling activity in the group with long amenorrhea is not different from that in mothers who experience a shorter period of suppressed ovarian cyclicity (3). Similarly, an increased release of PRL in response to suckling was observed in women with prolonged lactational amenorrhea (8), although this was not confirmed by another group (36).
Among nonprimate species considerable differences seem to exist with respect to the relative roles of suckling and PRL. In lactating cows and sows PRL does not seem to play a major role in postpartum anovulation because bromocriptine treatment did not appear to influence LH secretion (40, 41) or has but marginal effects compared with those of weaning (2). In lactating cows partial suppression of PRL secretion by bromocriptine administration also did not advance the onset of estrus (6, 25). That suckling may be a more important factor than PRL is suggested by the finding that suckling markedly increases the postpartum interval to first ovulation when compared with machine milking, although PRL levels are the same in both circumstances (5). On the other hand, in lactating sheep, the reflex discharge of PRL in response to the suckling stimulus, but not its basal release, has been implicated in the suppression of the HPO axis (16). In rats, unlike in monkeys (present results), the relative importance of suckling per se and of PRL is clearly dependent on the stage of lactation (13, 21, 34). During early and midlactation, the inhibition of PRL secretion does not result in the rapid return of estrus (13) or recovery of LH secretion (20) seen after pup removal. Similarly, bromocriptine inhibition of PRL secretion does not completely (34) or even partially (21) prevent the suppression of the postcastration rise in LH or the inhibition of LH secretion in response to the reinitiation of suckling after a period of pup separation (20, 33). On the other hand, in late lactation, when suckling activity is reduced, the lowering of PRL levels increases LH secretion (20), advances estrus (13, 20), and abolishes the inhibition of the postcastration rise in circulating gonadotropin concentrations (21, 34).
The present results, obtained either with the monitoring of electrophysiological correlates of GnRH pulse generator activity or by detecting LH pulses in the peripheral circulation, are in complete agreement with the generally accepted notion that the suppression of the HPO axis by suckling per se and/or by PRL is primarily due to the inhibition of this hypothalamic signal generator (reviewed in Ref. 22). In some species lactation, in addition to inhibiting pulse generator activity, can also affect the functioning of the gonadotropes by attenuating their responsiveness to GnRH (reviewed in Ref. 22). This mechanism was clearly demonstrated by a study employing simultaneous sampling of pituitary portal and jugular blood in lactating ewes with suppressed pulse generator activity, showing the occurrence of considerably more GnRH than LH pulses in the same animals (44). Indeed, in rats, the decrease in pituitary responsiveness to endogenous GnRH during lactation has been attributed to a downregulation of GnRH receptors subsequent to the decrease of GnRH secretion per se (35). On the other hand, a recent report by Cardenas and Ramirez (4) showed an insignificant decrease in pulse generator activity and in the rate of GnRH secretion during lactation as measured by detecting pulses of GnRH in push-pull perfusates of pituitary glands of rats suckling 4-15 pups, suggesting a "decoupling" of GnRH and LH secretion by mechanisms independent of changes in GnRH release. Although it is unclear at present what underlies the striking discrepancy between this and other studies in the same species (22, 35), this finding underscores the importance of direct monitoring of GnRH pulse generator activity in the investigation of such complex physiological situations.
Our data confirm the observation by Gordon et al. (12) that in long-term ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys, suckling is unable to suppress GnRH pulse generator activity and LH secretion. We have also confirmed their finding that there are no significant differences in PRL levels between the suckled ovary-intact and long-term ovariectomized groups (12), indicating that the striking dissimilarity of the hypothalamic response to nursing in the presence and absence of the ovaries cannot be explained on this basis. Whether ovarian estradiol production or other ovarian factors are involved in this phenomenon remains to be investigated.
Contrary to the absence of an inhibitory effect of nursing on the hypothalamo-hypophysial apparatus in long-term ovariectomized monkeys, suckling is initially able to suppress the rise in gonadotropin secretion that follows castration (12, 39), but this suppression eventually declines despite the maintenance of suckling (12). Our present finding in a recently ovariectomized foster mother that suckling-inhibited GnRH pulse generator activity can be demonstrated for up to 150-160 days after castration (Fig. 7), but not thereafter, is in accord with these earlier observations. That this decline in the suppression of pulse generator activity cannot be attributed to a decrease in suckling intensity with time is demonstrated by the finding that the adoption of newborns, whose suckling is the most intense (see RESULTS), does not inhibit hypothalamic activity in chronically ovariectomized monkeys (see Fig. 6).
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
The expert technical assistance of S. M. Pate, R. W. Thiagarajan, S. Tran, C. D. Williamson, and J. C. Woodhouse II is much appreciated. The authors are grateful to W. D. Peckham and A. F. Parlow for the rhesus monkey pituitary hormone preparations.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
This study was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants HD-17438, HD-08610, and T32-HD-07324-07 and by grants from the Clayton Foundation for Research and from the Ellwood Foundation.
A preliminary report of this work was presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC, November 1996.
1 In a single animal that had been artificially inseminated, GnRH pulse generator activity was continuously monitored by radiotelemetry for 16 mo throughout pregnancy, postpartum lactation, and the recovery of ovarian cyclicity after weaning. MUA volleys disappeared 18 days after insemination, and pulse generator activity remained completely suppressed during pregnancy (177 days, day 1 being the day of insemination) except for 5 days when one or two MUA volleys/12 h were observed. During lactation, pulse generator activity remained within the range of 0 and 0.25 MUA volleys/h. After weaning the infant on postpartum day 193, MUA volley frequency increased to normal follicular phase levels within 4 days.
Address for reprint requests: E. Knobil, Lab. for Neuroendocrinology, Univ. of Texas-Houston Medical School, PO Box 20708, Houston, TX 77225.
Received 10 October 1997; accepted in final form 9 January 1998.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1.
Aso, T.,
and
R. F. Williams.
Lactational amenorrhea in monkeys: effects of suckling on prolactin secretion.
Endocrinology
117:
1727-1734,
1985[Abstract].
2.
Bevers, M. M.,
A. H. Willemse,
and
T. A. M. Kruip.
The effect of bromocriptine on luteinizing hormone levels in the lactating sow: evidence for a suppressive action by prolactin and the suckling stimulus.
Acta Endocrinol.
104:
261-265,
1983[Medline].
3.
Campino, C.,
S. Ampuero,
S. Díaz,
and
M. Serón-Ferré.
Prolactin bioactivity and the duration of lactational amenorrhea.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
79:
970-974,
1994[Abstract].
4.
Cardenas, H.,
and
V. D. Ramirez.
Maintenance of hypothalamic GnRH release during lactation in the rat: a push-pull perfusion study.
Biol. Res.
29:
259-265,
1996[Medline].
5.
Carruthers, T. D.,
and
H. D. Hafs.
Suckling and four-times daily milking: influence on ovulation, estrus and serum luteinizing hormone, glucocorticoids and prolactin in postpartum Holsteins.
J. Anim. Sci.
50:
919-925,
1980[Medline].
6.
Cummins, L. J.,
J. K. Findlay,
and
R. A. S. Lawson.
An attempt at the use of CB-154 (ergocryptine) to reduce post-partum anoestrus in Hereford heifers.
Theriogenology
8:
193,
1977.
7.
Delvoye, P.,
M. Demaegd,
Uwayitu-Nyampeta,
and
C. Robyn.
Serum prolactin, gonadotropins, and estradiol in menstruating and amenorrheic mothers during two years' lactation.
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
130:
635-639,
1978[Medline].
8.
Díaz, S.,
M. Serón-Ferré,
H. Cárdenas,
V. Schiappacasse,
A. Brandeis,
and
H. B. Croxatto.
Circadian variation of basal plasma prolactin, prolactin response to suckling, and length of amenorrhea in nursing women.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
68:
946-955,
1989[Abstract].
9.
Evans, W. S.,
M. J. Cronin,
and
M. O. Thorner.
Hypogonadism in hyperprolactinemia: proposed mechanisms.
Front. Neuroendocrinol.
7:
77-122,
1982.
10.
Gomendio, M.
Differences in fertility and suckling patterns between primiparous and multiparous rhesus mothers (Macaca mulatta).
J. Reprod. Fertil.
87:
529-542,
1989[Abstract].
11.
Gordon, K.,
T. Aso,
and
R. F. Williams.
Lactational anovulation in non-human primates: restriction of nursing inhibits Prl secretion without precipitating the return of ovulatory menstrual cyclicity in cynomolgus monkeys.
Contraception
51:
265-272,
1995[Medline].
12.
Gordon, K.,
G. D. Hodgen,
and
D. W. Richardson.
Postpartum lactational anovulation in a nonhuman primate (Macaca fascicularis): endogenous opiate mediation of suckling-induced hyperprolactinemia.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
75:
59-67,
1992[Abstract].
13.
Hansen, S.,
P. Södersten,
and
P. Eneroth.
Mechanisms regulating hormone release and the duration of dioestrus in the lactating rat.
J. Endocrinol.
99:
173-180,
1983[Abstract].
14.
Hiruma, H.,
M. Nishihara,
and
F. Kimura.
Hypothalamic electrical activity that relates to the pulsatile release of luteinizing hormone exhibits diurnal variation in ovariectomized rats.
Brain Res.
582:
119-122,
1992[Medline].
15.
Hotchkiss, J.,
and
E. Knobil.
The menstrual cycle and its neuroendocrine control.
In: The Physiology of Reproduction (2nd ed.), edited by E. Knobil,
and J. D. Neill. New York: Raven, 1994, vol. 2, p. 711-749.
16.
Kann, G.,
and
J. Martinet.
Prolactin levels and duration of postpartum anoestrus in lactating ewes.
Nature
257:
63-64,
1975[Medline].
17.
Knobil, E.
The GnRH pulse generator: past, present and future.
In: GnRH, GnRH Analogs, Gonadotropins and Gonadal Peptides, edited by P. Bouchard,
A. Caraty,
H. J. T. Coelingh Bennink,
and S. N. Pavlou. Pearl River, NY: Parthenon, 1992, p. 3-13.
18.
Koike, K., A. Miyake, T. Aono, T. Sakumoto, M. Ohmichi, M. Yamaguchi, and O. Tanizawa. Effect of prolactin on the secretion
of hypothalamic GnRH and pituitary gonadotropins.
Horm. Res. 35, Suppl. 1: 5-12, 1991.
19.
Kordon, C.,
S. V. Drouva,
G. Martinez de la Escalera,
and
R. I. Weiner.
Role of classic and peptide neuromediators in the neuroendocrine regulation of luteinizing hormone and prolactin.
In: The Physiology of Reproduction (2nd ed.), edited by E. Knobil,
and J. D. Neill. New York: Raven, 1994, vol. 1, p. 1621-1681.
20.
Lu, K. H.,
H. T. Chen,
H. H. Huang,
L. Grandison,
S. Marshall,
and
J. Meites.
Relation between prolactin and gonadotrophin secretion in post-partum lactating rats.
J. Endocrinol.
68:
241-250,
1976[Medline].
21.
Maeda, K.-I.,
E. Uchida,
H. Tsukamura,
N. Ohkura,
S. Ohkura,
and
A. Yokoyama.
Prolactin does not mediate the suppressive effect of the suckling stimulus on luteinizing hormone secretion in ovariectomized lactating rats.
Endocrinol. Jpn.
37:
405-411,
1990[Medline].
22.
McNeilly, A. S.
Suckling and the control of gonadotropin secretion.
In: The Physiology of Reproduction (2nd ed.), edited by E. Knobil,
and J. D. Neill. New York: Raven, 1994, vol. 2, p. 1179-1212.
23.
McNeilly, A. S.,
C. C. K. Tay,
and
A. Glasier.
Physiological mechanisms underlying lactational amenorrhea.
Ann. NY Acad. Sci.
709:
145-155,
1994[Abstract].
24.
Milenkovic, L.,
G. D'Angelo,
P. A. Kelly,
and
R. I. Weiner.
Inhibition of gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone release by prolactin from GT1 neuronal cell lines through prolactin receptors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:
1244-1247,
1994[Abstract].
25.
Montgomery, G. W.
Influence of suckling frequency and bromocryptine treatment on the resumption of ovarian cycles in post-partum beef cattle.
Theriogenology
17:
551-563,
1982.
26.
Mori, Y.,
M. Nishihara,
T. Tanaka,
T. Shimizu,
M. Yamaguchi,
Y. Takeuchi,
and
K. Hoshino.
Chronic recording of electrophysiological manifestation of the hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator activity in the goat.
Neuroendocrinology
53:
392-395,
1991[Medline].
27.
O'Byrne, K. T.,
and
E. Knobil.
Electrophysiological analysis of GnRH pulse generator activity in the rhesus monkey.
Methods Neurosci.
20:
100-113,
1994.
28.
O'Byrne, K. T.,
J.-C. Thalabard,
P. M. Grosser,
R. C. Wilson,
C. L. Williams,
M.-D. Chen,
D. Ladendorf,
J. Hotchkiss,
and
E. Knobil.
Radiotelemetric monitoring of hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator activity throughout the menstrual cycle of the rhesus monkey.
Endocrinology
129:
1207-1214,
1991[Abstract].
29.
Ördög, T.,
M.-D. Chen,
M. Nishihara,
M. A. Connaughton,
J. R. Goldsmith,
and
E. Knobil.
On the role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in the operation of the GnRH pulse generator in the rhesus monkey.
Neuroendocrinology
65:
307-313,
1997[Medline].
30.
Plant, T. M.,
E. Schallenberger,
D. L. Hess,
J. T. McCormack,
L. Dufy-Barbe,
and
E. Knobil.
Influence of suckling on gonadotropin secretion in the female rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta).
Biol. Reprod.
23:
760-766,
1980[Medline].
31.
Sauder, S. E.,
M. Frager,
G. D. Case,
R. P. Kelch,
and
J. C. Marshall.
Abnormal patterns of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in women with hyperprolactinemia and amenorrhea: responses to bromocriptine.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
59:
941-948,
1984[Abstract].
32.
Schallenberger, E.,
D. W. Richardson,
and
E. Knobil.
Role of prolactin in the lactational amenorrhea of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta).
Biol. Reprod.
25:
370-374,
1981[Medline].
33.
Sirinathsinghji, D. J. S.,
and
L. Martini.
Effects of bromocriptine and naloxone on plasma levels of prolactin, LH and FSH during suckling in the female rat: responses to gonadotrophin releasing hormone.
J. Endocrinol.
100:
175-182,
1984[Abstract].
34.
Smith, M. S.
The relative contribution of suckling and prolactin to the inhibition of gonadotropin secretion during lactation in the rat.
Biol. Reprod.
19:
77-83,
1978[Medline].
35.
Smith, M. S.,
and
L. R. Lee.
Modulation of pituitary gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors during lactation in the rat.
Endocrinology
124:
1456-1461,
1989[Abstract].
36.
Tay, C. C. K.,
A. F. Glasier,
and
A. S. McNeilly.
The 24 h pattern of pulsatile luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone and prolactin release during the first 8 weeks of lactational amenorrhea in breastfeeding women.
Hum. Reprod.
7:
951-958,
1992[Abstract].
37.
Van Cauter, E.
Estimating false-positive and false-negative errors in analyses of hormone pulsatility.
Am. J. Physiol.
254 (Endocrinol. Metab. 17):
E786-E794,
1988
38.
van der Schoot, P.,
R. R. Lankhorst,
J. A. de Roo,
and
W. J. de Greef.
Suckling stimulus, lactation, and suppression of ovulation in the rat.
Endocrinology
103:
949-956,
1978[Abstract].
39.
Weiss, G.,
W. R. Butler,
D. J. Dierschke,
and
E. Knobil.
Influence of suckling on gonadotropin secretion in the postpartum rhesus monkey.
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
153:
330-331,
1976.
40.
Williams, G. L.,
and
M. K. Griffith.
Sensory and behavioral control of gonadotrophin secretion during suckling-mediated anovulation in cows.
J. Reprod. Fertil., Suppl.
49:
463-475,
1995[Medline].
41.
Williams, G. L.,
and
D. E. Ray.
Hormonal and reproductive profiles of early postpartum beef heifers after prolactin suppression or steroid-induced luteal function.
J. Anim. Sci.
50:
906-918,
1980[Medline].
42.
Wilson, M. E.
Oestradiol negative feedback inhibition on LH secretion during lactation is prolonged in adolescent primiparous rhesus monkeys.
J. Endocrinol.
136:
127-136,
1993[Abstract].
43.
Wilson, M. E.,
M. L. Walker,
N. S. Pope,
and
T. P. Gordon.
Prolonged lactational infertility in adolescent rhesus monkeys.
Biol. Reprod.
38:
163-174,
1988[Abstract].
44.
Wise, M. E.
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion during the postpartum anestrus period of the ewe.
Biol. Reprod.
43:
719-725,
1990[Abstract].