1 Laboratoire de Nutrition Humaine, Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63009 Clermont-Ferrand; 2 Laboratoire de Technologie Laitière, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 35042 Rennes, France; and 3 Nestec, Nestlé Research Center, CH 1000 Lausanne 26 Switzerland
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
To evaluate the importance of
protein digestion rate on protein deposition, we characterized leucine
kinetics after ingestion of "protein" meals of identical amino acid
composition and nitrogen contents but of different digestion rates.
Four groups of five or six young men received an
L-[1-13C]leucine infusion and one of the
following 30-g protein meals: a single meal of slowly digested casein
(CAS), a single meal of free amino acid mimicking casein composition
(AA), a single meal of rapidly digested whey proteins (WP), or repeated
meals of whey proteins (RPT-WP) mimicking slow digestion rate.
Comparisons were made between "fast" (AA, WP) and "slow" (CAS,
RPT-WP) meals of identical amino acid composition (AA vs. CAS, and WP
vs. RPT-WP). The fast meals induced a strong, rapid, and transient
increase of aminoacidemia, leucine flux, and oxidation. After slow
meals, these parameters increased moderately but durably. Postprandial leucine balance over 7 h was higher after the slow than after the
fast meals (CAS: 38 ± 13 vs. AA: 12 ± 11, P < 0.01; RPT-WP: 87 ± 25 vs. WP: 6 ± 19 µmol/kg, P
< 0.05). Protein digestion rate is an independent factor
modulating postprandial protein deposition.
amino acid turnover; postprandial protein anabolism; milk protein; stable isotopes
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
SHIFTING FROM THE POSTABSORPTIVE (overnight fasting) to the fed state is characterized by protein deposition, as a result of coordinated changes in protein synthesis, breakdown, and amino acid oxidation (4, 17, 19, 28, 31, 33, 40). The main regulators of these metabolic pathways are hormones, primarily insulin (10, 15), and substrates, primarily amino acids (18, 38, 40). Amino acid availability depends directly on both the quantity (17, 31) and the quality (30, 33) of the dietary source of nitrogen. In addition, we have recently suggested the existence of a relationship between the regulation of postprandial protein kinetics and the rate of digestion and absorption of dietary proteins (5). Using milk protein fractions intrinsically labeled with L-[1-13C] leucine, we demonstrated that whey proteins are more rapidly digested than native micellar casein. Most importantly, postprandial leucine oxidation was significantly higher after ingestion of whey proteins than after ingestion of casein despite identical leucine intakes. Therefore, the postprandial leucine balance, an index of protein deposition, was better with casein than with whey (5). Taken together, our results suggested that, in young adults, "slow" proteins (e.g., casein) fare better than "fast" proteins (e.g., whey) with respect to postprandial protein gain. This new concept might represent an original and adjunctive dietary strategy to prevent protein losses in various pathological circumstances (16).
However, the relative importance of protein digestion rate on protein metabolism requires further investigation. The amino acid composition of a dietary protein is a major factor affecting its biological value. The amount of dietary nitrogen also affects postprandial protein anabolism. In our previous studies, we closely controlled the leucine contents of the different meals (5). However, both the total nitrogen content and the amino acid composition of the whey proteins and of the casein were different. This might have influenced the previous results and warranted further examination.
Therefore, the main objective of the present set of studies was to compare postprandial whole body protein kinetics, and mainly protein deposition, after ingestion of various protein meals having identical amino acid composition but differing only by their rate of digestion. Our primary end point was postprandial leucine balance. For that purpose, casein (a slow protein) was compared with a mixture of free amino acids that mimicked the amino acid composition of casein but acted as a fast-digested meal. The second pair of studies compared the effects of a single whey protein meal (a fast protein) with repeated small feeding of whey (same amount of protein but mimicking a slow protein). Thus, in each pair of studies, the slow and fast meals being compared had both identical nitrogen content and amino acid composition.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Materials
L-[1-13C]leucine [99 mole percent excess (MPE)], L-[5,5,5-2H3] leucine (97 MPE), and sodium [13C]bicarbonate (99 MPE) were obtained from MassTrace (Woburn, MA). Isotopic and chemical purity of leucine were checked by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Solutions of tracers were tested for sterility and pyrogenicity before use and were prepared in sterile pyrogen-free water. During each experiment, the tracers were membrane filtered through 0.22-µm filters.Two bovine milk protein fractions (casein and whey proteins)
were separated by microfiltration and ultrafiltration techniques as
already described (6). Their amino acid composition was determined by liquid chromatography (amino acid analyzer Beckman 6300)
after acid hydrolysis (or alkaline hydrolysis for tryptophan content).
A mixture of free amino acids (Ajinomoto, Hamburg, Germany) was made
very close to that of casein amino acid composition (Table 1). The mixture of amino acids, casein,
and whey protein fractions were tested for microbiological quality.
|
Subjects
Twenty-two healthy young male volunteers were divided into four groups. They were 25 ± 1 yr old and had normal body weight (mass 66.8 ± 1.2 kg; body mass index 21.5 ± 0.3 kg/m2; means ± SE). Each subject had a normal physical examination without any medical history of renal, cardiovascular, or endocrine disease. During the 4 days before the study, the subjects maintained their usual physical activity and protein-energy intake ofExperimental Protocol
On the day of the experiment, a catheter was retrogradely inserted into a dorsal vein of the hand and used for arterialized blood sampling after introduction of the hand into a ventilated box heated to 60°C. A second catheter was inserted into a vein of the contralateral arm for tracer infusion. After a priming dose of sodium [13C]bicarbonate (6 mg), a primed (3.9 µmol/kg) continuous (0.06 µmol · kg
|
All of the meals were prepared on the day of the protocol by adding 285 ml of water to the protein or amino acid powders. The single meals (CAS, AA, and WP studies) were ingested in <5 min. To evaluate the digestion rate, L-[5,5,5-2H3]leucine (12.9 µmol/kg body wt) was included in the AA and RPT-WP meals (in the latter case, the tracer was divided among the 13 meals). The goal of the experimental design was to compare the protocols in pairs: AA vs. CAS and WP vs. RPT-WP; in each of the study pairs, one meal (AA or WP) was intended to be fast, whereas the other one (CAS or RPT-WP) was intended to be slow. The leucine contents of the CAS and AA meals were identical [289 ± 8 and 289 ± 15 µmol/kg, respectively, not significant (NS)] but lower (P < 0.01) than the leucine contents of the WP and RPT-WP meals (359 ± 18 and 393 ± 15 µmol/kg, respectively, NS). The leucine content was slightly higher in the RPT-WP than in the WP meals, because two consecutive batches of whey fractions were used.
Blood and breath samples were taken before any infusion (170 and
160 min, respectively), before the meal when
L-[1-13C]leucine had reached a plateau (
60,
40,
20, and 0 min), and after meal ingestion at 20-min intervals
for the first 300 min and at 40-min intervals for the last 120 min
(Fig. 1). The plasma supernatant was separated, an internal standard
was added (norleucine), and the sample was kept at
20°C until
further analysis. Breath samples were collected and stored in 10-ml
Vacutainers (Beckton-Dickinson, Grenoble, France) until
[13C]CO2 enrichment analysis. Total
CO2 production rates were measured in the postabsorptive
state and after meal ingestion for 20 min by open-circuit indirect
calorimetery (Deltatrac, Datex, Geneva, Switzerland). Plasma insulin
and amino acid concentrations were also measured before the meal (
20
min) and after the meal (+60 min for insulin, +120 and +300 min for
insulin and amino acid, respectively).
Analytical Methods
Plasma [13C]leucine and ketoisocaproate (KIC) and [2H3]leucine enrichments were measured by selected ion monitoring electron impact GC-MS (Hewlett-Packard 5971A, Palo Alto, CA) using tert-butyldimethylsilyl derivatives as previously described (8). The L-[5,5,5-2H3]leucine enrichments in the RPT-WP and AA meals were also determined. Plasma leucine concentrations were measured on the same runs with an internal standard. Corrections for the 13C and 2H3 enrichments were applied according to Biolo et al. (4). [13C]CO2 enrichments were measured on a gas isotope ratio-mass spectrometer (µGas system, Fisons Instruments, VG Isotech, Middlewich, England). In preliminary studies, it was confirmed that diets did not induce any modification of the natural 13C abundance in CO2 (data not shown).Plasma insulin concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay (Schering, CIS Bio International, Gif-sur-Yvette, France) and plasma amino acid concentrations by liquid chromatography (Biotech-Kontron; St-Quentin, France).
Calculations
Leucine fluxes were calculated from the time-dependent evolution of plasma leucine and KIC enrichments and concentrations in the nonsteady state by use of a precursor pool model as previously described (8).The rate of total leucine appearance in the peripheral circulation (Tot Leu Ra) is the sum of the entry rate of endogenous leucine derived from protein breakdown (Endo Leu Ra) plus the intravenously infused labeled leucine plus the entry rate of exogenous (i.e., dietary) leucine (Exo Leu Ra). The latter is equal to zero before the meal, and then Tot Leu Ra equals Endo Leu Ra. Similarly, total leucine rate of disappearance from plasma (Tot Leu Rd) is the sum of the fluxes of leucine, either oxidized (Tot Leu Ox) or utilized for protein synthesis (total nonoxidative leucine disposal or total NOLD).
The equations used were previously reported in detail (8).
Briefly, Tot Leu Ra was calculated from the intravenous
tracer (13C]leucine) infusion rate, corrected for its
time-dependent appearance into the plasma, and from the plasma leucine
enrichment of the intravenous tracer. In the AA and RPT-WP studies, Exo
Leu Ra (plasma entry rate of dietary leucine) was
calculated from the simultaneous enrichments of the infused
([13C]leucine) and of the ingested
([5,5,5-2H3]leucine) tracers, according to
the transposition of Steele's equations by Proietto et al.
(35). The fraction of dietary leucine taken up by the gut
and the liver during its first pass (splanchnic extraction of leucine)
was also estimated as {[leucine ingested area under the
curve (AUC) of Exo Leu Ra]/leucine ingested} × 100. Endo Leu Ra, an index of whole body protein breakdown, was
obtained by subtracting Exo Leu Ra and the tracer infusion rate from Total Leu Ra. In the CAS and WP single-meal
studies, no oral tracer was given (see DISCUSSION);
therefore, Exo Leu Ra, splanchnic extraction, and Endo Leu
Ra were not calculated for these two meals.
Postabsorptive and postprandial Tot Leu Ox and NOLD were measured in the four studies. Tot Leu Ox was obtained by dividing the [13C]CO2 production rate by the plasma [13C]KIC enrichment. Tot Leu Rd was calculated as Tot Leu Ra minus the time-dependent changes in leucine pool size. Total NOLD was therefore Tot Leu Rd minus Tot Leu Ox. Postprandial leucine balance was finally calculated over a 420-min period by subtracting the integrated AUC of Tot Leu Ox from the leucine intake (leucine ingested + leucine infused). AUC was calculated by the trapezoidal method.
In all the calculations, the constants for leucine distribution volume (0.5 l/kg), correction factor of the pool size for instant mixing (0.25), and CO2 recovery factor (0.8) were the same as those previously utilized (5, 36, 39).
As described above, leucine oxidation was calculated using KIC as the precursor pool, because KIC is the immediate precursor of leucine decarboxylation (26). The choice of leucine or KIC as precursor for the other calculations is more controversial, because KIC could be more representative of the intracellular leucine enrichment. On the other hand, it is more logical to use the oral tracer enrichment to calculate Exo Leu Ra, because the dietary leucine is little transaminated on its first splanchnic pass (11, 42). Then, leucine enrichment was used all over the calculation of the fluxes (except oxidation) for the sake of homogeneity. In addition, this allowed easier comparisons with our previous single-meal studies (5, 8) in which the same approach was selected.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were performed (Statview, 4.02, Abacus Concept, Berkeley, CA) to 1) characterize leucine kinetics modification after a test meal (i.e., changes from the post absorptive state) and 2) compare the protocols two-by-two (i.e., AA vs. CAS and WP vs. RPT-WP).Changes induced by meal ingestion.
Individual curves were standardized by subtracting the mean of the
baseline values (40 to 0 min) from each individual time point. To
assess modifications in leucine kinetics induced by meal ingestion, a
confidence interval was calculated for each test meal by use of the
baseline values as follows: mean ± T
× SD, where SD is
the standard deviation of the n baseline individual values,
and T
is the critical value of the Student's distribution for
(n
1) degrees of freedom. The changes were declared
significantly different (
= 0.001) from the baseline when all
the individual values fell outside of this interval.
Comparison between the slow and fast meals.
Each individual curve was also characterized by its zenith or nadir
(Ymax) by the time at which
Ymax was observed (Tmax)
and by the AUC when appropriate. Because Ymax
occurred at variable times after the meal ingestion, the mean
Ymax values (Table
2) may be different from the mean values
at a given time point, as shown on Figs. 3-5. To compare
Ymax, Tmax, and AUC
between CAS and AA, and between WP and RPT-WP, we used (unpaired)
one-tailed Student's t-tests, because we expected
modifications in the same directions as the one previously reported
with the same model (5). A Wilcoxon rank sum test was also
performed on the same parameters. Because the P values were
always close to those calculated with the Student's test, only the
latter are provided. The results are expressed as means ± SE.
|
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Plasma Insulin and Amino Acid Concentrations
Plasma insulin concentration increased moderately 60 min after the AA meal (+6.9 ± 2.6 µU/ml above baseline, P < 0.05) but not after the CAS meal (AA vs. CAS, P < 0.05). Similarly, it increased after the WP meal (+14.9 ± 3.2 µU/ml, P < 0.01) but not during the RPT-WP meal (WP vs. RPT-WP, P < 0.01). The increase was slightly more pronounced after WP than after AA (P < 0.05).Leucine concentrations increased after each meal. The AA and WP (fast)
meals induced a higher and faster increase than their respective CAS
and RPT-WP counterparts (see Ymax and
Tmax in Table 2, and curves on Fig.
2A). In addition, this
elevation was more transient for the fast meals than for the slow
meals: it started at 20 min and lasted until 180-200 min after the
AA and WP meals, whereas for the CAS and RPT-WP meals the elevation
started at 20-40 min and continued until 420 min (time points
significantly different from baseline values, Fig. 2A). The
variations above baseline of the sum of total and essential plasma
amino acids are listed in Table 3. They
confirmed a marked but transient increase of essential and nonessential
amino acids after the fast meals. By contrast, the increases were
persistent at 240 min after the slow meals.
|
|
Leucine Enrichments
In all studies (Fig. 2B), the intravenous tracer enrichments ([13C]leucine) reached a plateau before meal ingestion. Thereafter, plasma [13C]leucine enrichment was reduced for 140-180 min after the fast meal ingestion. This decrease was less pronounced but lasted at least for 340 min after the slow meal consumption. Plasma [13C]KIC enrichments (data not shown) followed the same patterns as the plasma [13C]leucine enrichments. In the two studies that included [5,5,5 2H3]leucine as an oral tracer (AA and RPT-WP), the increase in plasma enrichment was high and transient after the AA meal but was persistent and low after the RPT-WP meal (Fig. 2C).Leucine Ra
The patterns of Tot Leu Ra paralleled those of leucine concentrations: Tot Leu Ra increased rapidly but transiently after the AA and WP meals, whereas a plateau was achieved after the CAS or RPT-WP meals (Fig. 3B). The Ymax values were significantly higher with the AA and WP than with the CAS or RPT-WP meals, whereas the corresponding Tmax values were shorter (Table 2).
|
As stated in Calculations, Exo Leu Ra and Endo
Leu Ra were measured only during the AA and RPT-WP studies.
The dietary leucine (Exo Leu Ra) appeared in the plasma
immediately (20 min) after ingestion of both meals (Fig.
3A). However, after AA ingestion, the peak of absorption was
achieved rapidly (Table 2) and Exo Leu Ra was close to the
basal value after 260 min (260 min: 0.16 ± 0.02 µmol · kg1 · min
1).
Conversely, after RPT-WP, Exo Leu Ra peaked at 136 min
(Table 2 and Fig. 3A) and remained high for 340 min (340 min: 0.43 ± 0.07 µmol · kg
1 · min
1).
The integrated values (AUC) of Exo leu Ra were 257.9 ± 13.5 and 312.0 ± 27.7 µmol/kg for AA and RPT-WP,
respectively. Splanchnic extraction of the dietary leucine was
10.9 ± 1.5 and 20.7 ± 3.6% for AA and RPT-WP, respectively.
Endo Leu Ra, an index of whole body protein breakdown,
decreased after the AA and RPT-WP meals (Fig. 3C and Table
2). However, after AA ingestion, the postprandial inhibition was
moderate (0.34 ± 0.07 µmol · kg
1 · min
1 below
baseline). After the RPT-WP meal, this inhibition was more pronounced
(
0.69 ± 0.13 µmol · kg
1 · min
1,
P < 0.05 vs. AA) and more prolonged (for 40-240 min).
Leucine Rates of Utilization
NOLD, an index of whole body protein synthesis, dramatically rose from 40 to 120 min after the AA meal and from 60 to 140 min after the WP meal (Fig. 4A and Table 2). By contrast, this increase was transient and moderate after either the CAS or RPT-WP meals and occurred at variable times after the meals. Therefore, the stimulation of NOLD, as assessed by the Ymax values, was more marked (P < 0.001, Table 2) after the fast meals than after the slow meals.
|
After protein ingestion, Tot Leu Ox increased in all studies (Fig. 4B). Again, the shapes of the curves were clearly different depending on the type of meal. A peak was clearly identified after the fast meals: Tot Leu Ox were significantly different from baseline from 20 (AA meal) or 40 min (WP meal) until only 240 min. After the CAS and RPT-WP meals, Tot Leu Ox was stimulated to a lesser extent but for a longer time (significant until 420 min). The peak values (Ymax, Table 2) were higher after the AA and WP meals than after their respective CAS and RPT-WP counterparts. The AUCs, which represent the total postprandial leucine losses over 7 h, were different between AA (325 ± 17 µmol/kg) and CAS (275 ± 9 µmol/kg, P < 0.05 vs. AA) but only tended to be higher with WP (377 ± 28 µmol/kg) than with RPT-WP (344 ± 12 µmol/kg, P = 0.15).
Finally, and as shown in Fig. 5,
postprandial leucine balance was higher after the CAS (38 ± 13 µmol/kg) than after the AA meal (12 ± 11 µmol/kg,
P < 0.01). It was also better after the RPT-WP
(87 ± 25 µmol/kg) than after the WP meal (6 ± 19 µmol/kg, P < 0.05).
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Our data demonstrate that the rate of absorption of a high biological value dietary nitrogen source affects postprandial leucine deposition independently of amino acid composition. In the first pair of studies, free amino acids and native casein were taken as paradigms for the fast and slow proteins, respectively. The rate of absorption of the AA meal was assessed by adding free [2H3]leucine into the meal and measuring its appearance into the plasma. We confirmed that a free amino acid mixture is rapidly absorbed by the gut, as previously shown (37). Assessment of the digestion rate of casein raised a more difficult problem. Adding an oral free tracer to the CAS meal would have been useless, because we had previously demonstrated that only an intrinsically labeled dietary protein is appropriate for such a purpose (8). Unfortunately, [2H3]leucine-labeled casein was not available. Using [13C]leucine-labeled casein was not adequate either. Because a reliable measurement of leucine oxidation was needed to calculate leucine balance, the [13C]leucine label had to be given intravenously in a continuous manner. A combination of oral [13C]leucine (as labeled casein) and intravenous [14C]leucine would have been ideal, but radioactive tracers are not allowed for such studies in France. However, despite the absence of direct measurement of the casein digestion rate, we have good evidence that casein did behave as a slow protein. First, we (5) and others (24, 25) had previously demonstrated this fact by means of various approaches. Second, in our previous studies (5), we had always observed a close relationship between the measured rate of digestion of a protein and the pattern of either plasma leucine concentration, Tot Leu Ra, or [13C]CO2 Ra. In the present CAS experiment, the postprandial evolution of these three parameters was quite consistent with a slow protein pattern, since they exhibited a pseudo-plateau. It is likely that the rate-limiting step of such a slow absorption is due to coagulation of casein in the stomach (24, 25). There is also a possibility that active opioid regulatory peptides, contained in the sequence of some of the casein fractions, could play a role by modulating gastrointestinal motility (12).
In our second pair of experiments, we actually compared two modes of administration of the same milk protein fraction, i.e., native whey. Again, leucine oxidation and balance were the most important variables; therefore, no tracer was included within the single WP meal for the same aforementioned reasons. However, the patterns of postprandial changes of leucine concentration, Tot Leu Ra, and oxidation again demonstrate that a single WP meal is indeed a fast meal, in keeping with previous data from our group (5, 8) and from others (25). To mimic a slow meal, small boluses were given every 20 min. Such a mode of feeding (4, 17, 28, 29, 31) was shown previously to result in a plateau equivalent to what is obtained with a continuous nasogastric feeding (11, 19, 27, 41). Steady state was indeed achieved after 1.5-2 h of feeding for leucine concentrations and for the oral and intravenous tracer enrichments. In steady-state conditions, free [13C]leucine added to protein induced identical enrichments and leucine fluxes to those observed with an intrinsically [13C]leucine-labeled protein (29). Therefore, it is likely that the free tracer added to the RPT-WP meals does represent the digestion rate of the meal, at least during the steady-state period. The purpose of the interruption of feeding at 240 min was to mimic the progressive return to baseline observed with casein. This was generally achieved in particular for the [13C]leucine and KIC enrichments and for leucine oxidation. Thus we believe that our study design allowed adequate comparison of fast and slow meals of identical amino acid composition.
The postprandial period involves modifications of protein breakdown and synthesis and of amino acid oxidation. Protein breakdown, as assessed by Endo Leu Ra, is a component of Tot Leu Ra together with the dietary leucine flux (Exo Leu Ra). Because the latter was measured only in the AA and RPT-WP experiments (see above), we had access to protein breakdown only in these two situations. After a fast meal made of free amino acids, protein breakdown was transiently and moderately inhibited. By contrast, in a previous study, a casein meal inhibited protein breakdown by 30% and for 7 h (5). In the second set of studies, the inhibition of protein breakdown induced by the slow meal (RPT-WP) was consistent with similar decreases reported in numerous continuous-feeding studies performed with (7) or without an oral tracer (4, 17, 32, 40). Again, this contrasts with the absence of inhibition observed in our previous studies of a single WP meal (5). The inhibition of protein breakdown after the RPT-WP meal is unlikely to be due to insulin, because no insulin increase was detectable (although the peak of secretion could have been missed). In this respect, the addition of carbohydates to a protein meal would certainly enhance the inhibition of protein breakdown. Amino acids are also known to inhibit protein breakdown (10, 18, 40), even in the presence of basal insulin levels (10). Although the hyperaminoacidemia after RPT-WP was not very high (and in any case lower than after a fast meal), it was prolonged over 4-5 h. This would suggest that a significant duration of hyperaminoacidemia is necessary to inhibit protein breakdown.
The most striking differences between the fast and slow meals had to do
with protein synthesis, as assessed by NOLD, and with amino acid
oxidation. Stimulation of synthesis was dramatic and immediate after
the fast meals, whereas it was absent after the slow meals. Such unique
responses to the fast and slow meals are most likely due to different
levels of amino acid availability. Indeed "fast proteins," which
strongly increased amino acid availability (as reflected by plasma
aminoacidemia), probably induced a stimulation of protein synthesis. By
contrast, "slow proteins," which modified plasma amino acid
concentration to a much slower extent, were not associated with a
stimulation of protein synthesis. In accordance with this theory, it
has been demonstrated that significant stimulation of protein synthesis
requires at least a twofold increase of plasma aminoacidemia above
basal level (10, 18, 38). Results obtained with continuous
feeding are also consistent with this interpretation. Indeed, protein
intakes >1.5
g · kg1 · day
1, which lead
to hyperaminoacidemia (11, 19), generally induce a
stimulation of protein synthesis (19, 31, 32), whereas it
is seldom seen for low protein intakes (17, 28, 31, 32). However, in the present study, stimulation of protein synthesis did not
result in a better leucine balance. Indeed, leucine oxidation was also
stimulated more by the fast than by the slow meals, which was likely
due to direct stimulation of the rate-limiting enzymes of amino acid
oxidation by the amino acids themselves. The absence of a relationship
between a better balance and a higher synthesis also emphasizes the
importance of the inhibition of protein breakdown in the postprandial
utilization of proteins (14).
Our results suggest that a slowly digested protein induces a better
postprandial utilization than a fast one. The efficiency of
postprandial protein utilization can be calculated on the basis of
leucine balance, as proposed by Millward et al. (30). In brief, leucine balance (postprandial balance
postabsorptive balance) is used to predict a
protein nitrogen balance assuming a
tissue protein leucine content of 3.93 mmol leucine/g N. This predicted
nitrogen balance is then divided by nitrogen intake. With these
calculations, we confirm a better (P < 0.05) protein utilization over 7 h after the slow meals (CAS, 0.78 ± 0.04;
RPT-WP, 0.80 ± 0.07) than after the fast meals (AA, 0.62 ± 0.06; WP, 0.66 ± 0.03). Obviously, studies in other populations
and dealing with more complex meals and examining longer-term changes
are needed. In this respect, it will be particularly important to
assess the effects of nonprotein energy sources, because they could
affect both digestion rate (9, 20, 23) and protein
metabolism (3, 21, 34). It was important, however, to
reinforce the initial data (5) obtained with two proteins
strongly differing not only by their rate of digestion but also by
their amino acid composition.
More generally, our results support the idea that the chronology of amino acid availability is an important and independent factor modulating nitrogen retention. Substrate availability can vary with time by feeding slow and fast meals, as in the present study, but it can also be modified by changing the repartition of dietary proteins (or protein/energy) during the day. In young women, nitrogen balance was higher when the daily protein intake was spread fairly evenly over three meals than when spread over two meals, with one meal containing no protein (22). In young men, whole body leucine balance was higher with a diet given over 24 h than with three discrete meals (13). More recently, Arnal et al. (2) showed that, in elderly women, protein retention was better with a protein pulse-feeding pattern than with a spread-feeding pattern. It is tempting to equate pulse feeding with a fast protein condition and spread feeding with a slow one. Thus, extrapolating from Arnal's study, the fast feeding would give a better balance than a slow one in older populations. However, the same authors further demonstrated that, in young people, the opposite effect was observed, i.e., a trend for a better nitrogen balance with a spread feeding than with a pulse feeding (1). The latter result is more in accord with the present study. It also emphasizes the fact that age may be an important determinant of the mechanisms of nitrogen retention. There are numerous differences among all these studies, such as sex and age, the nature and amount of the protein and nonprotein energy intake, or the methods used. Collectively, however, these results support the idea that postprandial nitrogen retention is dependent on the time and level (the two being related) of amino acid availability.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that, in addition to protein quantity and amino acid composition, the protein digestion rate is an independent factor modulating postprandial protein deposition. The concept of slow and fast proteins offers a number of applications in elderly people or in patients with wasting disorders (e.g., protein-energy malnutrition, critically ill patients). It could also be applied to circumstances where excessive amino acid concentrations have to be avoided while preserving the anabolic action of dietary proteins (e.g., renal diseases, hepatic encephalopathy).
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
We wish to thank P. Rousset, L. Morin, J. Vuichoud, and M. Genest for their technical and nursing assistance, S. Corny for tracer preparations, M.-O. Gailing of Nestlé (France), for help, and K. Short for stylistic and grammatical corrections.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
This study was supported by Nestlé and by Grant 96G0174 from the Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche and Grant 443/95 from the Association Nationale de la Recherche Technique.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: B. Beaufrère, Laboratoire de Nutrition Humaine, BP 321, 58 rue Montalembert, 63009 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France (E-mail: beaufrer{at}clermont.inra.fr).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 23 June 2000; accepted in final form 16 October 2000.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1.
Arnal, MA,
Mosoni L,
Boirie Y,
Houlier ML,
Morin L,
Verdier E,
Ritz P,
Antoine JM,
Prugnaud J,
Beaufrère B,
and
Mirand PP.
Protein feeding pattern does not affect protein retention in young women.
J Nutr
130:
1700-1704,
2000
2.
Arnal, MA,
Mosoni L,
Boirie Y,
Houlier ML,
Morin L,
Verdier E,
Ritz P,
Antoine JM,
Prugnaud J,
Beaufrère B,
and
Mirand PP.
Protein pulse feeding improves protein retention in elderly women.
Am J Clin Nutr
69:
1202-1208,
1999
3.
Beaufrère, B,
Chassard D,
Broussolle C,
Riou JP,
and
Beylot M.
Effects of D--hydroxybutyrate and long- and medium-chain triglycerides on leucine metabolism in humans.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
262:
E268-E274,
1992
4.
Biolo, G,
Tessari P,
Inchiostro S,
Bruttomesso D,
Fongher C,
Sabadin L,
Fratton MG,
Valerio A,
and
Tiengo A.
Leucine and phenylalanine kinetics during mixed-meal ingestion: a multiple tracer approach.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
262:
E455-E463,
1992
5.
Boirie, Y,
Dangin M,
Gachon P,
Vasson MP,
Maubois JL,
and
Beaufrère B.
Slow and fast dietary proteins differently modulate postprandial protein accretion.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:
14930-14935,
1997
6.
Boirie, Y,
Fauquant J,
Rulquin H,
Maubois JL,
and
Beaufrère B.
Production of large amounts of [13C]leucine-enriched milk proteins by lactating cows.
J Nutr
125:
92-98,
1995[ISI][Medline].
7.
Boirie, Y,
Gachon P,
and
Beaufrère B.
Splanchnic and whole-body leucine kinetics in young and elderly men.
Am J Clin Nutr
65:
489-495,
1997[Abstract].
8.
Boirie, Y,
Gachon P,
Corny S,
Fauquant J,
Maubois JL,
and
Beaufrère B.
Acute postprandial changes in leucine metabolism as assessed with an intrinsically labeled milk protein.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
271:
E1083-E1091,
1996
9.
Calbet, JA,
and
MacLean DA.
Role of caloric content on gastric emptying in humans.
J Physiol (Lond)
498:
553-559,
1997[Abstract].
10.
Castellino, P,
Luzi L,
Simonson DC,
Haymond M,
and
DeFronzo RA.
Effect of insulin and plasma amino acid concentrations on leucine metabolism in man. Role of substrate availability on estimates of whole body protein synthesis.
J Clin Invest
80:
1784-1793,
1987[ISI][Medline].
11.
Collin-Vidal, C,
Cayol M,
Obled C,
Ziegler F,
Bommelaer G,
and
Beaufrère B.
Leucine kinetics are different during feeding with whole protein or oligopeptides.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
267:
E907-E914,
1994
12.
Daniel, H,
Vohwinkel M,
and
Rehner G.
Effect of casein and beta-casomorphins on gastrointestinal motility in rats.
J Nutr
120:
252-257,
1990[ISI][Medline].
13.
El Khoury, AE,
Sánchez M,
Fukagawa NK,
Gleason RE,
Tsay RH,
and
Young VR.
The 24-h kinetics of leucine oxidation in healthy adults receiving a generous leucine intake via three discrete meals.
Am J Clin Nutr
62:
579-590,
1995[Abstract].
14.
Fereday, A,
Gibson NR,
Cox M,
Pacy PJ,
and
Millward DJ.
Variation in the apparent sensitivity of the insulin-mediated inhibition of proteolysis to amino acid supply determines the efficiency of protein utilization.
Clin Sci (Colch)
95:
725-733,
1998[ISI][Medline].
15.
Flakoll, PJ,
Kulaylat M,
Frexes-Steed M,
Hourani H,
Brown LL,
Hill JO,
and
Abumrad NN.
Amino acids augment insulin's suppression of whole body proteolysis.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
257:
E839-E847,
1989
16.
Fruhbeck, G.
Protein metabolism. Slow and fast dietary proteins.
Nature
391:
843-845,
1998[ISI][Medline].
17.
Gibson, NR,
Fereday A,
Cox M,
Halliday D,
Pacy PJ,
and
Millward DJ.
Influences of dietary energy and protein on leucine kinetics during feeding in healthy adults.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
270:
E282-E291,
1996
18.
Giordano, M,
Castellino P,
and
DeFronzo RA.
Differential responsiveness of protein synthesis and degradation to amino acid availability in humans.
Diabetes
45:
393-399,
1996[Abstract].
19.
Hoerr, RA,
Matthews DE,
Bier DM,
and
Young VR.
Leucine kinetics from [2H3]- and [13C]leucine infused simultaneously by gut and vein.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
260:
E111-E117,
1991
20.
Houghton, LA,
Mangnall YF,
and
Read NW.
Effect of incorporating fat into a liquid test meal on the relation between intragastric distribution and gastric emptying in human volunteers.
Gut
31:
1226-1229,
1990[Abstract].
21.
Krempf, M,
Hoerr RA,
Pelletier VA,
Marks LM,
Gleason R,
and
Young VR.
An isotopic study of the effect of dietary carbohydrate on the metabolic fate of dietary leucine and phenylalanine.
Am J Clin Nutr
57:
161-169,
1993[Abstract].
22.
Leverton, RM,
and
Gram MR.
Nitrogen excretion of women related to the distribution of animal protein in daily meals.
J Nutr
39:
57-65,
1949[ISI].
23.
Maes, BD,
Ghoos YF,
Geypens BJ,
Hiele MI,
and
Rutgeerts PJ.
Relation between gastric emptying rate and energy intake in children compared with adults.
Gut
36:
183-188,
1995[Abstract].
24.
Mahe, S,
Messing B,
Thuillier F,
and
Tome D.
Digestion of bovine milk proteins in patients with a high jejunostomy.
Am J Clin Nutr
54:
534-538,
1991[Abstract].
25.
Mahe, S,
Roos N,
Benamouzig R,
Davin L,
Luengo C,
Gagnon L,
Gausseres N,
Rautureau J,
and
Tome D.
Gastrojejunal kinetics and the digestion of [15N]beta-lactoglobulin and casein in humans: the influence of the nature and quantity of the protein.
Am J Clin Nutr
63:
546-552,
1996[Abstract].
26.
Matthews, DE,
Bier DM,
Rennie MJ,
Edwards RH,
Halliday D,
Millward DJ,
and
Clugston GA.
Regulation of leucine metabolism in man: a stable isotope study.
Science
214:
1129-1131,
1981[ISI][Medline].
27.
Matthews, DE,
Marano MA,
and
Campbell RG.
Splanchnic bed utilization of leucine and phenylalanine in humans.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
264:
E109-E118,
1993
28.
Melville, S,
McNurlan MA,
McHardy KC,
Broom J,
Milne E,
Calder AG,
and
Garlick PJ.
The role of degradation in the acute control of protein balance in adult man: failure of feeding to stimulate protein synthesis as assessed by L-[1-13C]leucine infusion.
Metabolism
38:
248-255,
1989[ISI][Medline].
29.
Metges, CC,
El-Khoury AE,
Selvaraj AB,
Tsay RH,
Atkinson A,
Regan MM,
Bequette BJ,
and
Young VR.
Kinetics of L-[1-13C]leucine when ingested with free amino acids, unlabeled or intrinsically labeled casein.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
278:
E1000-E1009,
2000
30.
Millward, DJ,
Fereday A,
Gibson NR,
and
Pacy PJ.
Human adult amino acid requirements: [1-13C]leucine balance evaluation of the efficiency of utilization and apparent requirements for wheat protein and lysine compared with those for milk protein in healthy adults.
Am J Clin Nutr
72:
112-121,
2000
31.
Motil, KJ,
Matthews DE,
Bier DM,
Burke JF,
Munro HN,
and
Young VR.
Whole body leucine and lysine metabolism: response to dietary protein intake in young men.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
240:
E712-E721,
1981
32.
Pacy, PJ,
Price GM,
Halliday D,
Quevedo MR,
and
Millward DJ.
Nitrogen homeostasis in man: the diurnal responses of protein synthesis and degradation and amino acid oxidation to diets with increasing protein intakes.
Clin Sci (Colch)
86:
103-116,
1994[ISI][Medline].
33.
Pannemans, DL,
Wagenmakers AJ,
Westerterp KR,
Schaafsma G,
and
Halliday D.
Effect of protein source and quantity on protein metabolism in elderly women.
Am J Clin Nutr
68:
1228-1235,
1998[Abstract].
34.
Pellet, PL,
and
Young VR.
The effects of different levels of energy intake on protein metabolism and of different levels of protein intake on energy metabolism: a statistical evaluation from the published literature.
In: Protein and Energy Interactions, edited by Scrimshaw N,
and Schürch B. Waterville Valley, NH: International Dietary Energy Consultancy Group, 1992, p. 81-121.
35.
Proietto, J,
Rohner-Jeanrenaud F,
Ionescu E,
Terrettaz J,
Sauter JF,
and
Jeanrenaud B.
Non-steady-state measurement of glucose turnover in rats by using a one-compartment model.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
252:
E77-E84,
1987
36.
Raguso, CA,
El-Khoury AE,
and
Young VR.
Leucine kinetics in reference to the effect of the feeding mode as three discrete meals.
Metabolism
48:
1378-1386,
1999[ISI][Medline].
37.
Silk, DBA,
Chung YC,
Berger KL,
Conley K,
Beigler M,
Sleisenger MH,
Spiller GA,
and
Kim YS.
Comparison of oral feeding of peptide and amino acid meals to normal human subjects.
Gut
20:
291-299,
1979[ISI][Medline].
38.
Tessari, P,
Inchiostro S,
Biolo G,
Trevisan R,
Fantin G,
Marescotti MC,
Iori E,
Tiengo A,
and
Crepaldi G.
Differential effects of hyperinsulinemia and hyperaminoacidemia on leucine-carbon metabolism in vivo. Evidence for distinct mechanisms in regulation of net amino acid deposition.
J Clin Invest
79:
1062-1069,
1987[ISI][Medline].
39.
Tessari, P,
Pehling G,
Nissen SL,
Gerich JE,
Service FJ,
Rizza RA,
and
Haymond MW.
Regulation of whole-body leucine metabolism with insulin during mixed-meal absorption in normal and diabetic humans.
Diabetes
37:
512-519,
1988[Abstract].
40.
Volpi, E,
Lucidi P,
Cruciani G,
Monacchia F,
Reboldi G,
Brunetti P,
Bolli GB,
and
De Feo P.
Contribution of amino acids and insulin to protein anabolism during meal absorption.
Diabetes
45:
1245-1252,
1996[Abstract].
41.
Volpi, E,
Mittendorfer B,
Wolf SE,
and
Wolfe RR.
Oral amino acids stimulate muscle protein anabolism in the elderly despite higher first-pass splanchnic extraction.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
277:
E513-E520,
1999
42.
Yu, Y-M,
Wagner DA,
Tredget EE,
Walaszewski JA,
Burke JF,
and
Young VR.
Quantitative role of splanchnic region in leucine metabolism: L-[1-13C,15N]leucine and substrate balance studies.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
259:
E36-E51,
1990