Leucine reduces the duration of insulin-induced PI 3-kinase activity in rat skeletal muscle

Jamie I. Baum,1 Jason C. O'Connor,2 Jennifer E. Seyler,1 Tracy G. Anthony,3 Gregory G. Freund,1,2,4 and Donald K. Layman1,5

1Division of Nutritional Sciences, Departments of 5Food Science and Human Nutrition, 2Animal Sciences, and 4Pathology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois; and 3Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Evansville, Indiana

Submitted 23 June 2004 ; accepted in final form 20 August 2004


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Leucine (Leu) is known to stimulate translation initiation of protein synthesis at mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in the insulin signaling pathway. However, potential feedback from mTOR to upstream aspects of the insulin signaling pathway remains controversial. This study evaluates the impact of a physiological oral dose of Leu and/or carbohydrate (CHO) on upstream elements of the insulin signaling pathway using phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) activity and glucose uptake as markers for insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis. Rats (~200 g) were fasted 12 h and administered oral doses of CHO (1.31 g glucose, 1.31 g sucrose), Leu (270 mg), or CHO plus Leu. Animals were killed at 15, 30, 60, and 90 min after treatment. Plasma and gastrocnemius muscles were collected for analyses. Treatments were designed to produce elevated blood glucose and insulin with basal levels of Leu (CHO); elevated Leu with basal levels of glucose and insulin (Leu); or a combined increase of glucose, insulin, and Leu (CHO + Leu). The CHO treatment stimulated PI 3-kinase activity and glucose uptake with no effect on the downstream translation initiation factor eIF4E. Leu alone stimulated the release of the translation initiation factor eIF4E from 4E-BP1 with no effects on PI 3-kinase activity or glucose uptake. The CHO + Leu treatment reduced the magnitude and duration of the PI 3-kinase response but maintained glucose uptake similar to the CHO treatment and eIF4E levels similar to the Leu treatment. These findings demonstrate that Leu reduces insulin-stimulated PI 3-kinase activity while increasing downstream translation initiation and with no effect on net glucose transport in skeletal muscle.

glucose; insulin receptor substrate-1; initiation factors; phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase


THE BRANCHED-CHAIN AMINO ACID (BCAA) leucine (Leu) supports numerous metabolic processes ranging from the fundamental role as a substrate for protein synthesis (4, 7, 18) to a modulator of insulin signaling (24, 32), as well as a metabolic role in glucose homeostasis, by serving as a nitrogen donor for synthesis of alanine and glutamine to be used in gluconeogenesis (2). The potential for Leu to participate in each of these metabolic processes appears to be in proportion to availability. Experimental evidence comparing the priority for use of Leu in each of these individual processes is limited but suggests that the first priority is for aminoacylation of tRNA for protein synthesis (31), whereas the influence of Leu on the insulin signaling pathway is dependent on increasing intracellular concentrations. The physiological impact of Leu on these combined metabolic processes has not been tested.

Interaction of Leu and insulin as regulators of the insulin signaling/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) phosphorylation cascade suggests a unique link between dietary protein content and peripheral actions of insulin (28). The PI 3-kinase signaling cascade is central to regulation of many metabolic processes, such as glucose uptake and protein synthesis. The signaling pathway is initiated when insulin binds its membrane-bound receptor. The insulin receptor contains an intrinsic tyrosine protein kinase activity that triggers a series of phosphorylations on the insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1). IRS-1 serves as a docking protein to mediate downstream signals through phosphotyrosine-SH-2 domain interactions with PI 3-kinase. PI 3-kinase plays a major role in regulation of the metabolic actions of insulin signaling, including stimulation of glucose transport via phosphorylation of Akt or protein kinase C-{lambda} and -{zeta}, resulting in stimulation of the GLUT4 glucose transporter and stimulation of protein synthesis through activation of the protein kinase mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin; see Ref. 8 for review). Increased intracellular Leu triggers mTOR-dependent translational stimulation of protein synthesis (3) via increased phosphorylation of p70S6 kinase and the inhibitory protein 4E-BP1, causing it to dissociate from the translation initiation factor eIF4E, resulting in increased translation initiation (17, 26).

Although these findings suggest an anabolic role for Leu, there are other reports that Leu can decrease glucose disposal, induce hyperinsulinemia, and potentially lead to insulin resistance (1, 15). Studies using euglycemic clamps and infusions of Leu in human forearm during fasted conditions resulted in increased plasma glucose concentrations, decreased glucose uptake, and elevated plasma insulin levels in a dose-dependent manner (29). Likewise, Ferrannini et al. (9) found that intravenous administration of a complete mixture of amino acids stimulated insulin secretion and reduced glucose use in normal humans. Boden and Tappy (6) found that infusion of a large dose of amino acids stimulated plasma insulin levels but did not alter insulin-stimulated glucose uptake.

At the molecular level, amino acids appear to influence upstream events in the insulin signaling pathway via mTOR phosphorylation of IRS-1 (24, 32). Addition of amino acids at increased concentrations decreases association of PI 3-kinase with IRS-1 and reduces PI 3-kinase activity (24, 32), suggesting that supplemental amino acids may impair insulin signaling and contribute to insulin resistance. Although high levels of amino acids reduce PI 3-kinase activity, they appear to have no effect on insulin-mediated activation of PI 3-kinase activity but instead accelerate the rate of deactivation (32). L6 muscle cells exposed to elevated concentrations of amino acids had increased Ser/Thr phosphorylation and degradation of IRS-1/PI 3-kinase complex. Similar results exist in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (30).

In total, high levels of amino acids (presumably Leu) stimulate mTOR, resulting in increased downstream signaling pathway activity at eIF4E and p70S6 kinase, whereas mTOR phosphorylation of IRS-1 appears to decrease upstream PI 3-kinase activity, hence, an apparent paradox with amino acids stimulating downstream muscle protein synthesis, while at the same time reducing insulin signaling activity and glucose transport. The report by Tremblay and Marette (32) appears to provide a hypothesis to explain both findings. These investigators suggest that Leu stimulation of mTOR does not prevent the initial activation of PI 3-kinase but instead accelerates the degradation of the active IRS-1/PI 3-kinase complex. Hence, mTOR may be a component of the feedback regulation of the signaling pathway.

As a first step to evaluate this hypothesis, we examined the time course of the Leu and insulin effects on PI 3-kinase activity after a meal and examined physiological outcomes associated with upstream activation (i.e., glucose transport) and downstream activation (i.e., translational initiation). Specifically, to isolate effects of insulin vs. Leu on regulation of the insulin/PI 3-kinase signaling pathway, we designed the following three acute feeding treatments: 1) a high-carbohydrate (CHO) meal designed to produce elevated blood insulin with basal levels of Leu, 2) a high-Leu meal designed to produce high blood Leu with basal levels of insulin, and 3) a combined meal of CHO plus Leu to produce elevated levels of both insulin and Leu.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and experimental design. The animal facilities and protocol were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care Review Board of the University of Illinois. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan-Teklad, Madison, WI) weighing ~200 g were maintained at 23–25°C with a 12:12-h light-dark cycle. All animals had free access to tap water and a commercial pelleted diet (Harlan-Teklad Rodent Chow) until the day before the experiment.

Before (12 h) the experiment, food was removed from all cages, and animals were randomly assigned to one of the following three treatments: CHO, Leu, or a combined meal of CHO plus Leu (CHO + Leu). The CHO treatment provided 2.63 g CHO (mixture of 262.5 g glucose/l and 262.5 g sucrose/l in distilled water) accounting for ~15% of daily energy intake for this age and strain of rat (14). The Leu treatment provided 0.27 g Leu (54.0 g Leu/l in distilled water) equivalent to the amount of Leu consumed by rats during 24 h of free access to AIN-93 powdered diet. The CHO + Leu treatment was a combination of the CHO and Leu treatments described above. These treatments were designed to represent potential dietary effects of CHO and Leu. Treatment consisted of 5 ml oral gavage of the designated test meal.

The combined treatment of CHO + Leu could be designed as levels of CHO and Leu equal to the individual treatments or as an isocaloric treatment with substitution of Leu for an equal energy level of sucrose from the CHO treatment. A preliminary experiment comparing these approaches showed that the decrease in CHO in the isocaloric treatment resulted in decreases in the plasma concentrations of glucose and insulin and PI 3-kinase activity. To ensure these differences were because of Leu and not the varying levels of CHO, we kept the level of CHO the same in the combined CHO + Leu test meal.

After oral gavage of the test meal, animals were killed at 0, 15, 30, 60, or 90 min after gavage. At the time of the oral gavage, animals killed at 60 min also received an intraperitoneal injection of 20 µCi 2-[14C]deoxyglucose (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) to measure glucose uptake by tissues.

Because of potential differences in the rate of gastric emptying associated with the presence of amino acids (20), we conducted an initial study to determine if oral administration of Leu interfered with the rate of glucose absorption from the gut. Animals were assigned to either CHO or CHO + Leu treatments identical to those described above. In addition, 20 µCi 2-[14C]deoxyglucose were included in the gavage solution. Animals were killed at 15, 30, and 60 min. Plasma specific activity of glucose was determined to compare treatment effects on glucose entry in the bloodstream from the gut.

Sample collection. Animals were killed via decapitation. Trunk blood was collected and centrifuged at 1,800 g for 10 min at 4°C to obtain plasma. Gastrocnemius and plantaris muscles were removed and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen.

Plasma measurements. Plasma glucose concentrations were determined by the glucose oxidase method (Infinity Glucose Reagent; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Plasma insulin was measured using a commercial radioimmunoassay kit for rat insulin (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO).

Determination of PI 3-kinase activity. Gastrocnemius muscles from each animal were homogenized using a Polytron homogenizer in 7 vol buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM sodium vanadate, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotonin, 1% IGEPAL (Sigma), and 10% glycerol. Immediately after homogenization, samples were centrifuged at 35,000 g for 60 min at 4°C. Supernatant was collected and stored at –80°C until analysis. PI 3-kinase was immunoprecipitated from supernatants with anti-IRS-1 antibodies (Upstate Biotechnology, Charlottesville, VA), and resultant immune complexes were washed extensively. Kinase reactions were performed in a buffer containing 0.33 mg/ml L-{alpha}-phosphatidylinositol, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.4 mM EGTA, 0.4 mM NaHPO4, 7.5 µM [{gamma}-32P]ATP (13 µCi/nmol), and 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.1 for 15 min. Phospholipids were extracted with 1:1 chloroform-methanol and resolved on silica gel plates by TLC in chloroform-methanol-ammonium hydroxide (4 M; 75:58:17). Results were analyzed by autoradiography on a Molecular Dynamics Typhoon phosphorimage system (22).

Quantification of IRS-1 and PI 3-kinase. Muscle supernatants, prepared as described above, were immunoprecipitated with an IRS-1-specific antibody and resolved on 7.5% SDS-PAGE to determine total IRS-1 content in each tissue. Total PI 3-kinase content was quantified using a PI 3-kinase antibody (Upstate Biotechnology) and running the samples on a 10% SDS-PAGE.

Glucose uptake. Animals received an intraperitoneal injection of 2-deoxy-D-[2,6-3H]glucose (Amersham Biosciences) immediately after the oral gavage. For determination of glucose uptake, plantaris muscles (~200 mg) were homogenized in 5 ml double-distilled H2O and boiled for 3 min at 100°C. Samples were centrifuged at 12,000 g for 5 min. Sample supernatant (1.5 ml) was applied to an equilibrated anion-exchange resin (Dowex 2 x 8, 400 mesh; Sigma) according to methods described by Ohishima et al. (23).

Quantification of 4E-BP1·eIF4E complex. Gastrocnemius muscles were homogenized using a Polytron homogenizer in 7 vol of homogenization buffer consisting of 20 mM HEPES, 100 mM potassium chloride, 0.2 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 50 mM {beta}-glycerophosphate, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM benzamidine, 0.5 mM sodium vanadate, and 1 µM Microcystin LR (Sigma). The homogenate was immediately centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was used for measurement of 4E-BP1 bound to eIF4E according to methods described by Gautsch et al. (14).

Statistics. Data analyses were performed using SAS version 8.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with treatment group as the independent variable and statistical significance set at P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Plasma glucose. Oral administration of CHO generated a glucose curve that peaked at 15 min and remained above fasting levels for 90 min (Fig. 1). The glucose curve after an oral gavage of Leu did not differ from fasted control at 15 and 30 min, but was less than fasting concentrations at 60 min. Combination of CHO and Leu produced a curve similar to that of CHO alone. Both the CHO and CHO + Leu treatments remained above fasting levels throughout the time course.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Plasma glucose levels during a 90-min time course from animals administered an oral gavage of leucine (Leu), carbohydrate (CHO), or CHO plus Leu (CHO + Leu). Values represent means ± SE; n = 4 animals/treatment at each time point. *P < 0.05, significantly different from CHO treatment. The fasted control line is extended across the graph to provide a baseline reference.

 
Plasma insulin. The CHO treatment produced a biphasic insulin curve that remained above fasting levels throughout the 90-min time course (Fig. 2). Treatment with Leu alone produced a phase I insulin response that was ~50% of the response of the CHO treatment. After Leu treatment (30 min), insulin concentrations returned to fasting values. Oral gavage of CHO + Leu generated a curve similar to that of CHO alone.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Plasma insulin levels during a 90-min time course from animals administered Leu, CHO, or CHO + Leu. Values represent means ± SE; n = 4 animals/treatment at each time point. *P < 0.05, significantly different from CHO treatment.

 
Comparison of the blood glucose and insulin values for the CHO and CHO + Leu treatments suggests that Leu had minimal impact on glucose uptake by peripheral tissues. However, stable blood glucose could be maintained by a combination of reduced peripheral uptake and a parallel reduction in splanchnic output. Because there is evidence that oral intake of protein and/or amino acids may delay the rate of gastric emptying (19), we measured the rate of glucose absorption from each treatment by adding a 2-[14C]deoxyglucose tracer to the test meal and evaluating changes in plasma specific activity. Plasma glucose specific activity was not different between the CHO and CHO + Leu treatments after the oral gavage (Fig. 3). These data indicate that Leu did not alter CHO absorption and/or the appearance of glucose from the splanchnic bed.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Specific activity of plasma glucose at 0, 30, and 60 min after an oral gavage of CHO or CHO + Leu, which contained 20 µCi 2-[3H]deoxyglucose. Bar graphs represent cpm·µmol glucose–1·ml plasma–1. Values represent means ± SE; n = 4 animals/treatment at each time point. There were no significant differences between treatments within time points.

 
PI 3-kinase activity. The CHO treatment increased PI 3-kinase activity at all time points, and the response appears to reflect the biphasic insulin curve (Fig. 4). At 15 min, CHO increased PI 3-kinase by >50%; however, the stimulation was not statistically different because of large variations. PI 3-kinase activities in muscles from the Leu-treated animals were not different from fasted controls at any time point. The combined CHO + Leu treatment blunted the CHO effect at 30, 60, and 90 min but was similar to the CHO treatment at 15 min.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) activity in skeletal muscle during a 90-min time course from animals administered an oral gavage of Leu, CHO, or CHO + Leu. Fasted control represents 12-h fasted conditions or sham treated with 5 ml double-distilled (dd) H2O. There was no difference in total protein levels of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) or PI 3-kinase at each time point (data not shown). Bar graphs represent means ± SE; n = 4 animals/treatment at each time point. 15, 15 min; 30, 30 min; 60, 60 min; 90, 90 min. *P < 0.05, significantly different from other values within each time point. Representative immunoblot exposures provided at top.

 
Glucose uptake. Glucose uptake represents the accumulative uptake of glucose in skeletal muscle during the first 60 min after oral gavage (Fig. 5). Glucose uptake increased dramatically in animals receiving CHO or the CHO + Leu treatments compared with the fasted control. The Leu treatment also increased glucose uptake, but the effect was ~25% of the stimulation observed for the CHO treatment. Glucose uptake for the CHO + Leu treatment did not differ from CHO-treated animals, indicating that the presence of high levels of Leu did not alter glucose uptake in skeletal muscle.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Glucose uptake in skeletal muscle in animals given an oral gavage of Leu, CHO, or CHO + Leu. The rate of uptake was determined as uptake of 2-[14C]deoxyglucose during 60 min based on muscle content of label and specific activity of plasma glucose. Values represent means ± SE; n = 4 animals/treatment group. Means with different letters are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05).

 
4E-BP1 associated with eIF4E. In agreement with previous data from our laboratory (19), we demonstrated that administration of Leu significantly increases (P < 0.05) dissociation of 4E-BP1 from eIF4E compared with administration of CHO (Fig. 6). Leu-treated animals generated an increase in 4E-BP1·eIF4E dissociation that remained throughout the 90-min time course. CHO + Leu treatment generated a response similar to that of Leu alone. As with PI 3-kinase activity, the presence of Leu appeared to blunt the CHO response.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. 4E-BP1 associated with eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)4E in skeletal muscle during a 90-min time course from animals administered an oral gavage of Leu, CHO, or CHO + Leu. Fasted control represents 12-h fasted conditions or sham treated with 5 ml ddH2O. Bar graph represents means ± SE; n = 4 animals/gavage treatment/time point. *P < 0.05, significantly different from each other within each time point. Representative immunoblot depicting amount of 4E-BP1 associated with eIF4E provided at top.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Leu is now recognized as an anabolic factor in translational control of muscle protein synthesis. The action of Leu appears to be exerted largely through the protein kinase mTOR, a downstream element of the insulin/PI 3-kinase signaling pathway. Although Leu and mTOR appear to exert positive control on muscle protein synthesis, there are numerous reports (810, 12, 15, 24, 25, 30, 32) that amino acids and specifically Leu induce hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance and reduce glucose uptake by skeletal muscle. This study demonstrates that an oral dose of Leu influences both PI 3-kinase and mTOR activity but has minimal effect on glycemic control.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the potential of Leu to modulate upstream elements of the insulin signaling pathway under physiological conditions. Studies using in vitro methods report that amino acids inhibit upstream events in the insulin signaling pathway (24, 32). These studies conclude that addition of amino acids at increased concentrations decreases the association of PI 3-kinase to IRS-1, resulting in inhibition of insulin-stimulated PI 3-kinase activity. In the present study, we found that an oral dose of Leu had no effect on PI 3-kinase activity compared with fasted control animals. However, when Leu and CHO were administered together, Leu appears to blunt the increased PI 3-kinase activity seen in animals administered CHO alone.

Although Leu alters PI 3-kinase activity, it did not affect glucose uptake in skeletal muscle under sedentary conditions compared with CHO-treated animals. Blood glucose concentrations (Fig. 1), absorption data (Fig. 3), and rate of glucose uptake in muscle (Fig. 5) are in agreement that Leu had minimal effect on glycemic control. In addition, glucose and insulin levels did not differ between the CHO + Leu and CHO treatments. These data indicate that administration of a physiological dose of Leu by oral gavage has minimal effect on plasma insulin and no effect on the in vivo glycemic response.

We propose that the decreases in PI 3-kinase activity seen in animals receiving CHO + Leu vs. CHO alone could be attributed to the following two possible mechanisms: 1) increased IRS-1 Ser/Thr phosphorylation, inhibiting formation of the IRS-1/PI 3-kinase complex, or 2) increased degradation of the IRS-1/PI 3-kinase complex. Tremblay and Marette (32) proposed that Leu accelerates degradation of the active IRS-1/PI 3-kinase complex. The importance of the distinction between these two potential mechanisms is that, in the former scenario, the signal is blocked and does not appear, whereas in the later scenario, the signal appears but the magnitude or duration of the signal is shortened. For example, if the signal was blocked, loss of PI 3-kinase activity would be expected to reduce insulin-dependent glucose transport. However, if the signal is initiated, the signal cascade could activate physiological outcomes, such as glucose transport or protein synthesis, and the subsequent deactivation may be more important to the duration of the signal or feedback regulations. The present study supports the second scenario, with findings of normal levels of glucose transport and normal activation of the initiation factor eIF4E.

There are numerous reports that amino acids such as Leu and arginine can induce hyperinsulinemia and potentially lead to insulin resistance (15). Studies using euglycemic clamps and infusions of Leu in the human forearm, under fasted conditions, resulted in increased plasma glucose concentrations, decreased glucose uptake, and elevated plasma insulin levels in a dose-dependent manner (29). In addition, intravenous administration of mixed amino acids stimulates insulin secretion and inhibits glucose use in normal humans (9, 25). Additional studies conclude that, after infusion with a large dose of amino acids, plasma insulin levels increase; however, insulin-stimulated total body glucose uptake is unaltered (6). An important consideration with these studies is that they used intraveneous euglycemic clamp methods conducted at supraphysiological concentrations.

In the present study, Leu, when given alone via oral gavage, produced an initial rise in plasma insulin concentration that returned to baseline within 30 min after the gavage. When Leu was given in combination with CHO, the early insulin response was indistinguishable from the response to CHO alone; however, at 60 and 90 min after the gavage, the CHO + Leu group had a somewhat higher level of insulin. Responses of plasma glucose to the Leu treatment were small. In the Leu-only treatment, there was a 15% decrease in the blood glucose concentration at 60 min after the gavage; whereas, in the CHO + Leu group, plasma glucose was ~15% lower than the CHO alone treatment at 90 min after the gavage. These decreases in blood glucose appear to follow the Leu-induced peaks in plasma insulin.

These data confirm that Leu is an insulin secretagogue (11, 12, 19); however, using direct comparisons with oral CHO, a large physiological dose of Leu produced minimal insulin response. The impact of Leu on insulin release and glycemic response appears to differ widely based on route of administration and experimental conditions. These findings are consistent with the previous reports by Floyd et al. (11, 12). These investigators evaluated the insulin response to intravenous infusion of amino acids or glucose (12) and also examined the insulin response to oral intake of protein (11). They found that infusion of 30 g amino acids produced a threefold higher insulin response (~180 µU/ml) than infusion of 30 g glucose (~50 µU/ml), suggesting a dramatic hyperinsulinemic effect of amino acids. However, these investigators also examined the same measurements after subjects consumed a meal of 500 g beef liver and found that the peak insulin response to the protein meal was only 30 µU/ml. Assuming that Leu is one of the most potent insulin secretagogues, the intravenous infusion provided <5 g Leu, whereas the beef meal provided one >14 g Leu (11). These data suggest that amino acids have substantially less impact on plasma insulin concentrations when entering the body via the gastrointestinal tract.

Similarly, Nuttall and Gannon and colleagues (13, 16, 21) reported minimal and colleagues effect of increased dietary protein on plasma insulin and glucose. Using isoenergetic meals, they demonstrated that substituting dietary protein for CHO reduced the meal responses of both plasma glucose and insulin (21). Likewise, they reported that, with consumption of a test meal containing 50 g protein (consumed as lean beef) vs. 50 g glucose, the protein intake alone had essentially no impact on basal blood glucose concentrations, and the insulin response to the meal was <20% of the response with a comparable energy intake from glucose (13). Although these results are intuitively obvious, they directly contradict the findings from studies using euglycemic clamp methods.

In summary, Leu participates in modulation of the insulin/PI 3-kinase signaling pathway. Leu appears to increase mTOR kinase activity, resulting in stimulation of translation control of protein synthesis (5). In the present study, we demonstrate that Leu also modifies upstream activity by modulating PI 3-kinase activity. Specifically, Leu appears to blunt the duration of the insulin-induced PI 3-kinase activity. Although Leu modifies PI 3-kinase activity in the presence of high blood glucose, there was no effect of Leu on net glucose transport in muscle or on stability of blood glucose concentration. These data suggest that Leu interacts with the insulin/PI 3-kinase signaling pathway at multiple steps but that a high Leu meal has no effects on acute glycemic control.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This research was funded by the State of Illinois through the Illinois Council on Food and Agricultural Research.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. K. Layman, Univ. of Illinois, 437 Bevier Hall, 905 South Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801 (E-mail: dlayman{at}uiuc.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Abumrad NN, Jefferson LS, Rannels SR, and Williams PE. Role of insulin in the regulation of leucine kinetics in the conscious dog. J Clin Invest 70: 1031–1041, 1982.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Ahlborg G, Felig P, Hagenfeldt L, Hendler R, and Wahren J. Substrate turnover during prolonged exercise in man. J Clin Invest 53: 1080–1090, 1974.[ISI][Medline]
  3. Anthony JC, Anthony TG, Kimball SR, and Jefferson LS. Signaling pathways involved in translational control of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle by leucine. J Nutr 131: 856S–860S, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Anthony JC, Gautsch TA, Kimball SR, Vary TC, and Jefferson LS. Orally administered leucine stimulates protein synthesis in skeletal muscle of postabsorptive rat in association with increased eIF4F formation. J Nutr 130: 139–145, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Anthony JC, Yoshizawa, Anthony TG, Vary TC, Jefferson LS, and Kimball SR. Leucine stimulates translation initiation in skeletal muscle of postabsorptive rats via a rapamycin-sensitive pathway. J Nutr 130: 2413–2419, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Boden G and Tappy L. Effects of amino acids on glucose disposal. Diabetes 39: 1079–1084, 1990.[Abstract]
  7. Buse MG and Reid SS. Leucine. A possible regulator of protein turnover in muscle. J Clin Invest 56: 1250–1261, 1975.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Felig P, Marliss E, and Cahill GF. Plasma amino acid levels and insulin secretion in obesity. N Engl J Med 281: 811–816, 1969.[ISI][Medline]
  9. Ferrannini E, Bevilacqua S, Lanzone L, Bonadonna R, Brandi L, Oleggini M, Boni C, Buzzigoli G, Ciociaro D, Luzi L, and DeFronzo RA. Metabolic interactions of amino acids and glucose in healthy humans. Diab Nutr Metab 3: 175–186, 1988.
  10. Flakholl PJ, Kulaylat M, Frexes-Steed M, Hill JO, and Abumrad NN. Amino acids enhance insulin resistance to exogenous glucose infusion in overnight-fasted humans. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 15: 123–127, 1991.[Abstract]
  11. Floyd JC, Fajans SS, Conn JW, Knopf RF, and Rull J. Insulin secretion in response to protein ingestions. J Clin Invest 45: 1479–1486, 1966.[ISI][Medline]
  12. Floyd JC, Fajans SS, Conn JW, Knopf RF, and Rull J. Stimulation of insulin secretion by amino acids. J Clin Invest 45: 1487–1502, 1966.[ISI][Medline]
  13. Gannon MC, Nuttall JA, and Nuttall FQ. Oral arginine does not stimulate an increase in insulin concentration but delays glucose disposal. Am J Clin Nutr 76: 1016–1022, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Gautsch TA, Anthony JC, Kimball SR, Paul GL, Layman DK, and Jefferson LS. Availability of eIF4E regulates skeletal muscle protein synthesis during recovery from exercise. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 274: C406–C414, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Krebs M, Krssak M, Bernroider E, Anderwald C, Brehm A, Meyespeer M, Nowotny P, Roth E, Waldhausl W, and Roden M. Mechanism of amino acid-induced skeletal muscle insulin resistance in humans. Diabetes 51: 599–605, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Krezowski PA, Nuttall FQ, Gannon M, and Bartosh NH. The effect of protein ingestion on the metabolic response to oral glucose in normal individuals. Am J Clin Nutr 44: 847–856, 1986.[Abstract]
  17. Lawrence JC Jr. mTOR-dependent control of skeletal muscle protein synthesis. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 11: S177–S185, 2001.[ISI][Medline]
  18. Li JB and Jefferson LS. Influence of amino acid availability on protein turnover in perfused skeletal muscle. Biochim Biophys Acta 544: 351–359, 1978.[ISI][Medline]
  19. Malaisse WJ. Branched chain amino and keto acids as regulators of insulin and glucagon release. In: Branched Chain Amino and Keto Acids in Health and Disease, edited by Adibi SA, Fekl W, Langenbeck U, and Schauder P. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1984, chapt. 9, p. 119–133.
  20. Morens C, Gaudichon C, Fromentin G, Marsset-Baglieri A, Bensaid A, Larue-Achagiotis C, Luengo C, and Tome D. Daily delivery of dietary nitrogen to the periphery is stable in rats adapted to increased protein intake. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 281: E826–E836, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Nuttall FQ, Gannon MC, Wald JL, and Ahmed M. Plasma glucose and insulin profiles in normal subjects ingesting diets of varying carbohydrate, fat, and protein content. J Am Coll Nutr 4: 437–450, 1985.[Abstract]
  22. O'Connor JC and Freund GG. Vanadate and rapamycin synergistically enhance insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. Metabolism 52: 666–674, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  23. Ohishima K, Shargill NS, Chan TM, and Bray GA. Adrenalectomy reverses insulin resistance in muscle from obese (ob/ob) mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 246: E193–E197, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Patti M-E, Brambilla E, Luzi L, Landaker EJ, and Kahn CR. Bidirectional modulation of insulin action by amino acids. J Clin Invest 101: 1519–1529, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Pisters PWT, Restifo NP, Cersosimo E, and Brennan MF. The effects of euglycemic hyperinsulinemia and amino acid infustion on regional and whole body glucose disposal in man. Metabolism 40: 59–65, 1991.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Proud CG. Role of mTOR signaling in the control of translation initiation and elongation by nutrients. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 279: 215–244, 2004.[ISI][Medline]
  27. Rossetti L, Rothman DL, DeFronzo RA, and Shulman GI. Effect of dietary protein on in vivo insulin action and liver glycogen repletion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 257: E212–E219, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Saltiel AR and Kahn CR. Insulin signalling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nature 414: 799–806, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  29. Schwenk WF and Haymond MW. Decreased uptake of glucose by human forearm during infusion of leucine, isoleucine, or threonine. Diabetes 36: 199–204, 1987.[Abstract]
  30. Takano A, Usui I, Haruta T, Kawahara J, Uno T, Iwata M, and Kobayashi M. Mammalian target of rapamycin pathway regulates insulin signaling via subcellular redistribution of insulin receptor substrate 1 and integrates nutritional signals and metabolic signals of insulin. Mol Cell Biol 21: 5050–5062, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Tischler ME, Desautels M, and Goldberg AL. Does leucine, leucyl-tRNA, or some metabolite of leucine regulate protein synthesis in degradation in skeletal and cardiac muscle? J Biol Chem 257: 1613–1621, 1982.[Free Full Text]
  32. Tremblay F and Marette A. Amino acid and insulin signaling via the mTOR/p70 S6 kinase pathway. J Biol Chem 276: 38052–38060, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]