Effects of estrogen and estrous cycle on glucocorticoid and catecholamine responses to stress in sheep

Paul A. Komesaroff, Murray Esler, Iain J. Clarke, Meryl J. Fullerton, and John W. Funder

Baker Medical Research Institute, Prahran, Victoria 3181; and Prince Henry's Institute for Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

There have been relatively few studies of the effects of estrogen on hormonal responses to stress. We therefore studied changes in ACTH, cortisol, norepinephrine (NE), and epinephrine (Epi) after stress induced by a barking dog (audiovisual stressor) and insulin-induced hypoglycemia (metabolic stressor) in ovariectomized sheep treated with estradiol or placebo and in intact sheep in the follicular and luteal phases of the estrous cycle. Both stressors produced acute increases in ACTH, cortisol, Epi, and NE. A high physiological dose of estradiol significantly reduced the ACTH and cortisol responses to both stressors but did not affect Epi and NE responses. Plasma ACTH and cortisol responses to both stressors and Epi and NE responses to insulin were lower in the follicular than in the luteal phase, but catecholamine responses to the audiovisual stressor did not change during the estrous cycle. We conclude that in sheep, estrogen attenuates glucocorticoid responses to stress and that hormonal changes during the estrous cycle affect glucocorticoid responses to both metabolic and audiovisual stressors and catecholamine responses to a metabolic stressor.

catecholamines; adrenal gland; hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

HUMAN AND ANIMAL STUDIES suggest that hormonal and cardiovascular responses to stressors are sexually dimorphic. The cardiovascular responses of young women to psychological stress appear to be greater than those of young men (17). Women have been shown to have a reduced epinephrine response to mental stress in comparison with men but a greater increase in heart rate (10). Various studies suggest that female college students have smaller cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine responses to examination stress than do male students (32), and responses to stress appear to vary throughout the menstrual cycle (31).

In animal models, the nature of the effects of sex hormones on the stress response appears to vary across species. In rats, a hyperactivation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis occurs during the estrous cycle (35) and after administration of estrogen (6), and chronic stress increases the effects of estradiol on the uterus (8). Ovariectomized rhesus monkeys show a reduced responsiveness to hypoglycemic stress in comparison with intact animals, the difference being significantly reversed by estradiol (7). However, in cockerels, estradiol administration depresses the plasma corticosterone response to heat stress (36).

The mechanisms involved in the actions of sex steroids on the hormonal responses to stress and, in particular, the role of estrogens have received limited attention. Using a well-established model (14, 21), we have therefore examined the effects of estradiol administration and placebo on responses to two stressors in ovariectomized sheep. Levels of ACTH, cortisol, norepinephrine (NE), and epinephrine (Epi) were determined after an audiovisual stressor and also after insulin-induced hypoglycemia (a metabolic stressor).

A question of physiological interest is whether stress responses are altered during the estrous cycle, in which endogenous levels of progesterone as well as of estradiol vary in a cyclical pattern, levels of progesterone being higher in the luteal phase of the cycle and those of estradiol in the follicular phase (26). Accordingly, in a separate experiment, we sought to examine whether there is variation in the responses of these hormones during the estrous cycle in ewes by determining the responses of ACTH, cortisol, NE, and Epi after both audiovisual and hypoglycemic stress in the follicular and luteal phases of the estrous cycle.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Animals. For the experiment examining the effects of estrogen administration, two groups of eight ewes were studied in two separate studies involving two doses of estrogen. The sheep were ovariectomized at least 4 wk before they were studied. Each received a subcutaneous implant containing either estradiol or placebo 24 h before study and was subjected sequentially to audiovisual (barking dog) and insulin-induced hypoglycemic stressors.

For the experiment involving cycling sheep, eight mature Corriedale ewes were studied during the middle of the breeding season in late autumn. The estrous cycles were synchronized by administration of the prostaglandin analog cloprostenol, as described in Synchronization of reproductive cycles, and the sheep were studied during the luteal and follicular phases of the cycle. On each occasion, the sheep were subjected sequentially to audiovisual and insulin-induced hypoglycemic stress.

Jugular vein cannulas were inserted on the day before study. During the course of the experiments, the sheep were allowed access to both food and water. Approval for all experiments was obtained from the Baker Institute Animal Ethics Committee.

Estrogen treatment. Of the first group of eight sheep, four received a subcutaneous implant containing sufficient estradiol known on the basis of previous experiments (15) to produce plasma estradiol levels in the low normal physiological range ("low dose"), and four received implants containing placebo. Of the second group, four received implants containing an estrogen dosage known (15) to produce plasma estradiol levels in the high physiological range ("high dose"), and four received implants containing placebo. The estrogen used was in the form 17beta -estradiol (Sigma) and was contained in Silastic tubes (Dow Corning) 3 cm long with an internal diameter of 3.35 mm, as previously described (15, 19). For the low-dose experiment, one such tube was inserted; for the high-dose experiment, four tubes were used.

Synchronization of reproductive cycles. The reproductive cycles of the eight sheep were synchronized by the injection (im) of 125 µg of the prostaglandin F-2alpha analog cloprostenol (Estrumate; Pitman-Moore, North Ryde, NSW, Australia), which causes regression of the corpus luteum and precipitates a normal follicular phase (1, 8). The onset of estrus occurs 40-70 h after injection (8, 34). The sheep were studied 11 days later, during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle. All sheep then received another injection of cloprostenol on the evening after the study and a further injection 11 days later. The second study was conducted 2 days after the third injection, during the late follicular phase of the cycle.

Collection of blood samples. Blood was taken, as previously described (21), at 10-min intervals for 1 h to establish an undisturbed baseline, after which the sheep were exposed to 5 min of audiovisual stress. Blood samples were taken at 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min after commencement of this stress. After a 60-min break, baseline samples were once again taken each 10 min for 1 h. Sheep then received insulin sufficient to produce profound hypoglycemia, and blood samples were taken at 20-min intervals for 160 min, after which glucose was administered. Blood volume was replaced by normal saline as blood was collected. Selected samples were subsequently analyzed for ACTH, cortisol, NE, Epi, glucose, luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and progesterone.

Induction of stress. To induce an audiovisual "emotional" stress, a barking dog was introduced into the sheep shed for 5 min. The same dog was used on each occasion and was encouraged to bark equally at each of the four sheep and to jump over the dividers that separated them in a common pen. The method used (and the dog) is identical to that previously employed (14, 21).

To produce hypoglycemia, the sheep were injected with 100 units (~1.5 units/kg) of recombinant human Actrapid insulin (CSL-Novo, Parkville, Australia) as an intravenous bolus.

Hormone extraction and assays. ACTH was adsorbed from plasma onto porous Vycor glass and measured by specific RIA as previously described (14). The interassay coefficient of variation was 7% (n = 4), and the sensitivity was 15 pg/ml. Cortisol was measured in unextracted plasma by specific RIA (14). The intra-assay coefficient of variation was 8% (n = 32), and sensitivity was 10 nmol/l. Epi and NE were extracted from plasma onto activated alumina and assayed by HPLC with electrochemical detection by a modification of a previously described method (13). In view of difficulties experienced with the use of 3,4-dihydroxybenzylamine, N-methyldopamine was employed as the internal standard. The intra-assay coefficient of variation was 8% (n = 32), the interassay coefficient of variation was 10% (n = 10), and the sensitivity of the assay was 12 pg/ml. Plasma glucose was assayed by the glucose oxidase colorimetric method (21). FSH and LH were measured by RIA as previously described (5, 22). The sensitivity of the assay was 0.2 ng/ml for FSH and 0.23 ng/ml for LH. Estradiol was also measured by RIA as previously described (21). All measurements fell below the sensitivity of this assay, which was 30 pmol/l.

Statistics. Comparisons were made between baseline and stressed values of ACTH, cortisol, Epi, and NE for individual sheep and between estrogen-treated and control sheep and between luteal phase and follicular phase for these hormones for group data. Specifically, response curves were compared by ANOVA with repeated measures, and comparisons were made of the areas under the curve for each of the stress experiments using a paired Student's t-test; in addition, the time to peak levels was compared between the two groups using paired Student's t-test. For analysis of plasma glucose data, areas under the curve and average gradients were analyzed by a Student's t-test after logarithmic transformation. Results were taken to be statistically significant at the P < 0.05 level.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Plasma estrogen, progesterone, FSH, and LH levels. In the experiment involving estrogen administration, estrogen, FSH, and LH were measured for each sheep on one occasion at the commencement of the experiment. As expected, on no occasion did estradiol levels in plasma exceed the sensitivity of the assay. In the sheep that received placebo, plasma LH and FSH concentrations were 1.9-6.1 U/l and 3.1-6.5 U/l, respectively. In all sheep treated with estrogen, LH and FSH were undetectable (data not shown).

In the experiment involving cycling sheep, estrogen, progesterone, and LH were measured in each sheep on one occasion at the commencement of the experiment. Once again, as expected, on no occasion did estradiol levels exceed the sensitivity of the assay. Mean progesterone levels were 13.6 ± 1.7 nmol/l (mean ± SE) during the luteal phase and 1.3 ± 0.5 nmol/l during the follicular phase. Mean LH levels were 2.9 ± 0.2 ng/ml during the luteal phase and 13.3 ± 2.0 ng/ml during the follicular phase.

Glucose. The effects of insulin on plasma glucose levels before and after low- and high-dose estrogen are shown in Fig. 1, A and B. The low dose of estrogen did not affect glucose levels. However, in sheep treated with the high dose of estrogen, baseline glucose levels and minimum glucose levels attained were significantly higher, and the time taken to reach an arbitrary point of severe hypoglycemia (1.5 mmol/l) was shorter in placebo-treated animals than in estrogen-treated animals. However, all sheep achieved severe hypoglycemia, and the absolute fall in glucose levels, the rate of fall of plasma glucose, and the time taken to reach nadir were similar between the two groups.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Mean ± SE plasma glucose levels obtained after administration of insulin in control sheep and sheep treated with low-dose (A) and high-dose (B) estrogen. Curves are not significantly different at P = 0.05 level, as determined by ANOVA with repeated measures for entire data set or in terms of areas under curves, slopes of curves, or absolute changes in glucose levels as determined by a Student's t-test. C: plasma glucose levels obtained after administration of insulin in sheep in follicular and luteal phases of estrous cycle. Mean ± SE values for 8 sheep are shown. Baseline concentrations and those 20 min after administration of insulin are greater in follicular phase than in luteal phase (P < 0.05). However, subsequent values were indistinguishable, and data sets are not significantly different, as determined by ANOVA with repeated measures for entire time course or by comparison of areas under curves, slopes of curves, or absolute changes in glucose levels with a Student's t-test.

Baseline glucose levels were greater (P < 0.05) in the follicular phase than those measured at corresponding time points in the luteal phase of the cycle, as shown in Fig. 1C. However, subsequent values were not different at the two different stages of the estrous cycle. All sheep achieved profound hypoglycemia, with the minimum glucose levels and the time taken to reach them being identical. Following the achievement of hypoglycemia, the plasma glucose levels remained low until the conclusion of the experiment. Neither the areas under the two curves nor the rates of fall in plasma glucose concentrations differed significantly between the two phases of the estrous cycle.

Plasma ACTH and cortisol responses. Mean ACTH responses to audiovisual stress and insulin-induced hypoglycemia after estrogen treatment are shown in Fig. 2, A and B, and cortisol responses are presented in Fig. 3, A and B. As expected, exposure to both the audiovisual stressor and insulin-induced hypoglycemia produced abrupt elevation in ACTH and cortisol concentrations, with the effects of hypoglycemia exceeding those of audiovisual stress. After insulin administration, the increases in hormone levels resembled the falls in glucose. Plasma levels of both ACTH and cortisol had returned to baseline at the time of glucose infusion. In the experiment involving the low dose of estrogen, cortisol levels were indistinguishable between estrogen- and placebo-treated sheep after both audiovisual and hypoglycemic stress. Plasma ACTH levels were lower after dog stress with estrogen treatment compared with placebo; however, the two curves were not statistically different by any of the measures used. Similarly, there was no statistical difference in the ACTH responses to insulin administration between estrogen- and placebo-treated animals, although in this case in the estrogen-treated sheep, the average levels were lower for the first 100 min, after which they increased markedly, largely because of a very high level achieved by one sheep. In the high-dose experiment, the baseline cortisol levels in the placebo- and estrogen-treated sheep were similar, as were the times taken for cortisol concentrations to reach a peak after each stress. However, the absolute increases after both dog and insulin were less in the estrogen-treated sheep than in the animals that had received placebo, and the curves were significantly different, as assessed by ANOVA with repeated measures (P < 0.04). A similar result was found with ACTH: baseline levels were indistinguishable, but estrogen treatment significantly attenuated the rises after both dog stress and insulin-induced hypoglycemia (P < 0.03).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Mean plasma levels of ACTH before and after audiovisual ("dog") and hypoglycemic ("insulin") stress, with and without low-dose (A) and high-dose (B) estrogen treatment. Means ± SE for groups of 8 sheep are shown. For high-dose estrogen, ACTH response is significantly different (P < 0.001) from that after placebo, as determined by ANOVA with repeated measures (as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS). C: mean ± SE plasma levels of ACTH before and after stress in follicular and luteal phases of estrous cycle. Baseline plasma ACTH levels are similar between the two phases, but ACTH response is higher in luteal than in follicular phase after both dog stress (P < 0.01) and hypoglycemia (P < 0.025).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Mean ± SE plasma levels of cortisol before and after audiovisual (dog) and hypoglycemic (insulin) stress, with and without low-dose (A) and high-dose (B) estrogen treatment. For high-dose estrogen treatment, cortisol response is significantly different (P < 0.001) from that after control treatment. C: mean ± SE plasma levels of cortisol before and after stress in follicular and luteal phases. Baseline values are similar, but cortisol responses are significantly higher in luteal than in follicular phase after both dog (P < 0.02) and hypoglycemic (P < 0.04) stress.

Mean plasma ACTH responses in follicular and luteal phases are shown in Fig. 2C, and plasma cortisol responses are shown in Fig. 3C. As expected, exposure to both dog stress and insulin-induced hypoglycemia produced significant acute rises in plasma ACTH and cortisol, although exceptionally and inexplicably in this case, the elevation after hypoglycemia of ACTH did not exceed that after dog stress. After insulin administration, the rise in hormone levels paralleled the fall in glucose. Plasma levels of both ACTH and cortisol had returned to baseline at the time of glucose infusion. Baseline plasma ACTH levels were similar between the two phases. Peak plasma ACTH levels were significantly higher in the luteal phase in comparison with the follicular phase after both dog (P < 0.01) and hypoglycemic (P < 0.025) stress. In addition, for both stressors, the total plasma ACTH response, as measured by the area under the concentration vs. time curve, was greater (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively) in the luteal phase. The findings with respect to plasma cortisol levels were similar. Baseline values were equivalent between the two phases, but peak levels were significantly higher in the luteal phase after both dog (P = 0.02) and hypoglycemic (P = 0.025) stress in comparison with the follicular phase. In addition, for both stresses, the areas under the concentration vs. time curve were greater in the luteal phase (P < 0.02 and P < 0.04).

Plasma Epi and NE levels. Data for Epi before and after low- and high-dose estrogen are presented in Fig. 4, A and B; data for NE are presented in Fig. 5, A and B. Plasma levels of both Epi and NE increased markedly in response to both stressors. Substantial variations were seen both within and between individual sheep; nonetheless, some clear patterns emerged. As with ACTH and cortisol, the changes in plasma levels of Epi after hypoglycemia were significantly greater than after dog stress. However, the responses of NE were similar after dog and hypoglycemic stress. Overall, estrogen treatment did not affect the changes in plasma levels of either Epi or NE after either stress. Baseline levels of Epi, the absolute increases in plasma levels, and the times taken to reach peak values were all similar between estrogen- and placebo-treated sheep for both dog and hypoglycemic stress. The same was found with NE, although here, in comparison with Epi, there was much more variation. The times between the injection of insulin and the responses of either ACTH or catecholamines did not differ significantly in the two experiments. Despite the fact that with high-dose estrogen severe hypoglycemia was delayed in comparison with placebo treatment, the onset of the catecholamine responses did not change, suggesting that the variations observed were not related to different levels of blood glucose attained or to the time course of hypoglycemia.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Mean ± SE plasma levels of epinephrine before and after audiovisual (dog) and hypoglycemic (insulin) stress, with and without low-dose (A) and high-dose (B) estrogen treatment. Curves do not show any effect of estrogen treatment. C: mean plasma epinephrine levels before and after stress in follicular and luteal phases. Baseline levels before application of each stressor are similar. Responses to hypoglycemic stress are greater in luteal phase than in follicular phase (P < 0.03), but differences do not reach significance in case of audiovisual stress (P = 0.18).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Mean ± SE plasma levels of norepinephrine before and after audiovisual (dog) and hypoglycemic (insulin) stress, with and without low-dose (A) and high-dose (B) estrogen treatment. Curves do not show any effect of estrogen treatment. C: mean plasma norepinephrine levels before and after stress in follicular and luteal phases. Baseline levels before application of each stressor are similar. Responses to hypoglycemic stress are greater in luteal phase than in follicular phase (P < 0.01), but differences do not reach significance in case of audiovisual stress (P = 0.051).

Mean Epi and NE responses in follicular and luteal phases are presented in Figs. 4C and 5C. Both Epi and NE increased markedly in response to both stressors. As in previous experiments, substantial variations were seen both within and between individual sheep. There was no difference between follicular and luteal phases in the baseline levels of either hormone before the application of stress. For both Epi and NE, the responses to insulin were markedly greater in the luteal phase than in the follicular phase (P < 0.03 and P = 0.01, respectively). However, the response to dog stress did not change significantly for either hormone between the two phases of the estrous cycle.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

These studies suggest that, in ovariectomized sheep, estrogen attenuates the glucocorticoid responses to both audiovisual and insulin-induced hypoglycemic stress but does not have an effect on catecholamine responses to either stressor. In addition, in mature sheep across the estrous cycle, the ACTH and cortisol responses to both audiovisual and insulin-induced hypoglycemic stress and Epi and NE responses to hypoglycemic stress are greater in the luteal phase than in the follicular phase, whereas Epi and NE responses to audiovisual stress do not appear to vary during the estrous cycle.

Several previous studies have also shown an effect of estrogen on glucocorticoid responses to stress, and some have suggested an effect on catecholamine responses. For example, it has been shown (23) that estrogen administration to postmenopausal women attenuates the ACTH, cortisol, androstenedione, and NE responses to mental stress, although, in this case, somewhat surprisingly, the responses of premenopausal and postmenopausal women were indistinguishable. It has also been shown that estrogen administration to young men blunts the Epi and NE responses to mental stress (12).

Our results are also consistent with results from studies on women during the menstrual cycle. For example, in one study in normal women, the luteal phase was associated with greater stroke volume responses and lower vascular tone than the follicular phase (17); in another, women in the luteal phase reacted significantly more to the cold pressor test but not to mental arithmetic (33); and, in a third, the responses of systolic pressure and pulse rate to normal environmental stresses in normally cycling young women were higher in the luteal phase (25). Several other studies have suggested differences in catecholamine secretion between men and women after complex behavioral stresses (31, 32), although in these, plasma catecholamine levels were not directly measured, making the results difficult to interpret.

The variations in glucocorticoid and catecholamine responses over the estrous cycle and the finding that estrogen treatment does not affect catecholamine responses in ovariectomized sheep may reflect variations in the rates of change of hormones, the background of hormonal priming (4), and differences in progesterone levels. The finding in intact sheep of an effect on Epi and NE responses to hypoglycemic but not audiovisual stress is consistent with earlier findings that control of catecholamine secretion may vary with respect to the stimulus (21). The few studies in which hormonal responses to stress have been measured after administration of progesterone are consistent with our results in that they have shown that progesterone opposes the effects of estradiol on stress responses. However, it is recognized that variations across species occur: for example, in rats, estradiol increased glucocorticoid responses to stress (35), and the effects were attenuated after progesterone administration (30). In young women, during the follicular phase, estradiol administration increased heart rate responses and prolonged diastolic blood pressure responses, while progesterone administration increased heart rate at rest and maintained it during the stress (24). It appears possible that progesterone may have an independent effect on stress responses, since a progesterone analog, tetrahydroprogesterone, has been shown to have anxiolytic effects (28).

In our study, estrogen clearly had an effect on plasma glucose levels, and this may have contributed to differences in the responses to hypoglycemia. In this case, the stimulus is mainly hypoglycemia itself (9), with the initiation of the hormonal response occurring abruptly once a threshold is crossed (3, 20), although the rates of fall and the absolute levels of plasma glucose that are reached are also of some importance. In the present case, although (as expected) the decreased insulin sensitivity after estrogen administration resulted in higher baseline and trough levels, the dose of insulin administered in all cases was sufficient to induce profound hypoglycemia, and the times of onset of hypoglycemia and the decrements and rates of fall of plasma glucose levels were similar for estrogen- and placebo-treated animals. Similarly, in the intact sheep, the baseline glucose levels in the follicular phase were higher than in the luteal phase, and it might thus be argued that this altered the hypoglycemic stress and therefore confounds the results. This would also seem unlikely, because in this experiment too, the rate of fall and the time to nadir and the absolute value of nadir were all identical, suggesting that the stress in the follicular phase was not diminished with respect to the luteal phase (3, 20); indeed, the absolute fall in the follicular phase was greater than that in the luteal phase, which would suggest a greater rather than a smaller stress. Furthermore, in both cases, the results were consistent between the audiovisual and the hypoglycemic components of the experiment, suggesting that the effects noted were real ones. Accordingly, we believe that, as in our previous study (21), the comparisons of the catecholamine responses after insulin-induced hypoglycemia are valid.

Estrogen doses in this experiment were chosen on the basis of previous studies that employed an identical methodology (15, 26). These have shown mean estradiol levels to be in the range of 3-5 pmol/l in ovariectomized sheep, 7-10 pmol/l after the low-dose estradiol treatment, and 14-18 pmol/l after high-dose estradiol. These values are within the physiological range for cycling sheep. The lower limit of sensitivity of all available commercial estradiol assays is at least 25 pmol/l, as a result of which all the levels in our study were undetectable. The attenuation of the glucocorticoid responses by estrogen was statistically significant with the high-dose but not with the low-dose regimen, suggesting that the effects we have observed are likely to be of relevance in the physiological context. In the intact sheep, as expected, progesterone levels were lower and LH levels were markedly higher in the follicular than in the luteal phase.

In these experiments, on each occasion, dog stress preceded hypoglycemia, raising the question of whether there is either a facilitatory or an inhibitory effect of the former stress on the latter one. This possibility, however, was explicitly tested and excluded in our earlier study (9). Despite this, it should be noted that these results in sheep may not apply to other species, in which prior stress has on occasion been shown to produce a facilitatory (29) or an inhibitory effect or no effect at all (11). In our experiments on intact sheep, testing was in each case conducted in the luteal phase before the follicular phase rather than in random order, raising the possibility of an effect of one phase on the other. We do not feel that this is likely, however, because our previous study showed no changes in responses when testing was conducted 2 wk apart; and, in any case, the fact that in vivo repeated cycling leads to mutual interactions between phases suggests that such an effect would not alter the conclusions of this experiment.

Although the mechanisms of the effects of estradiol on glucocorticoid levels are uncertain, it appears probable that it acts via ACTH and thus the pituitary or hypothalamus rather than directly on the adrenal gland. This is also likely to be the main pathway underlying the changes observed in the stress responses during the estrous cycle, although a contribution from changing progesterone levels is also likely, as discussed above, and a contribution from LH and perhaps FSH cannot be excluded. This is consistent with evidence obtained from women with hypothalamic amenorrhea, in whom a blunted response to corticotropin-releasing hormone administration and increased cortisol levels were observed (2). Similarly, in ovariectomized rhesus monkeys, a reduced responsiveness to hypoglycemic stress is found that can be largely reversed with estradiol through an effect on gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator activity (7). It is likely that these effects of estrogen on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis are modulated, at least in part, by changes in glucocorticoid receptor (GR) numbers and/or function. In rats, it has been shown that estradiol abolishes the autologous downregulation of GR seen in hippocampus and hypothalamus (16). Furthermore, there is evidence of gender-specific differences in the gene expression of hippocampal and hypothalamic GR and of an effect of exogenous estrogen on GR mRNA levels (27).

In conclusion, this study shows that, in ovariectomized ewes, administration of estrogen at physiological levels attenuates the glucocorticoid responses to audiovisual and hypoglycemic stress and that, in mature cycling ewes, the cortisol and ACTH responses to audiovisual and hypoglycemic stress and the Epi and NE responses to hypoglycemic stress are greater in the luteal phase than in the follicular phase of the estrous cycle. These results raise questions as to whether similar effects are found in cycling women. Despite indirect evidence that this is the case, in view of the well-established species differences in the effects of estrogen on hormonal responses to stress, caution should be exercised in applying them to physiological conditions or to humans. Further studies are needed to address this question directly.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

P. A. Komesaroff is assisted by the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation.

    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests: P. A. Komesaroff, Baker Medical Research Institute, PO Box 348, Prahran, Victoria 3181, Australia.

Received 2 September 1997; accepted in final form 11 June 1998.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Baird, D. T., I. A. Swanston, and A. S. McNeilly. Relationship between LH, FSH and prolactin concentration and the secretion of androgens and estrogens by the preovulatory follicle in the ewe. Biol. Reprod. 24: 1013-1025, 1981[Medline].

2.   Biller, B. M., H. J. Federoff, J. I. Koenig, and A. Klibanski. Abnormal cortisol secretion and responses to corticotropin-releasing hormone in women with hypothalamic amenorrhea. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 70: 311-317, 1990[Abstract].

3.   Bolli, G. B., I. S. Gottesman, P. E. Cryer, and J. E. Gerich. Glucose counterregulation during prolonged hypoglycemia in normal humans. Am. J. Physiol. 247 (Endocrinol. Metab. 10): E206-E214, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Brann, D. W., and V. B. Mahesh. Role of corticosteroids in female reproduction. FASEB J. 5: 2691-2698, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   Bremner, W. J., J. K. Findlay, V. W. K. Lee, D. M. de Kretser, and I. A. Cumming. Feedback effects of the testis on pituitary responsiveness to luteinizing hormone infusions in the ram. Endocrinology 106: 329-336, 1980[Medline].

6.   Burgess, L. H., and R. J. Handa. Chronic estrogen-induced alterations in ACTH and corticosterone secretion, and glucocorticoid receptor-mediated functions in female rats. Endocrinology 131: 1261-1269, 1992[Abstract].

7.   Chen, M. D., K. T. O'Byrne, S. E. Chiappini, J. Hotchkiss, and E. Knobil. Hypoglycemic stress and gonadotropin releasing hormone pulse generator activity in the rhesus monkey: role of the ovary. Neuroendocrinology 56: 666-673, 1992[Medline].

8.   Clarke, I. J. Evidence that the switch from negative to positive feedback at the level of the pituitary gland is an important timing event for the onset of the preovulatory surge in LH in the ewe. J. Endocrinol. 145: 271-282, 1995[Abstract].

9.   Clarke, I. J., R. J. Horton, and B. W. Doughton. Investigation of the mechanisms by which insulin-induced hypoglycemia decreases luteinizing hormone secretion in ovariectomized ewes. Endocrinology 127: 1470-1476, 1990[Abstract].

10.   Collins, A., and M. Frankenhaeuser. Stress responses in male and female engineering students. J. Human Stress 4: 43-48, 1978[Medline].

11.   Dallman, M. R., and M. T. Jones. Corticosteroid feedback control of ACTH secretion: effects of stress-induced corticosterone secretion on subsequent stress response in the rat. Endocrinology 92: 1367-1375, 1973[Medline].

12.   Del Rio, G., A. Velardo, G. Zizzo, A. Avogaro, C. Cipolli, L. Della Casa, and P. Marrama. Effect of estradiol on the sympathetic response to mental stress in normal men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 79: 836-840, 1994[Abstract].

13.   Eisenhofer, G. Analytical differences between the determination of plasma catecholamines by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection and by radio-enzymatic assay. J. Chromatogr. 377: 328-333, 1986[Medline].

14.   Engler, D., T. Pham, M. Fullerton, J. W. Funder, and I. J. Clarke. Studies of the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in sheep with hypophysial-portal disconnection. I. Effect of an audio-visual stimulus and insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Neuroendocrinology 48: 551-560, 1988[Medline].

15.   Evans, N. P., G. E. Dahl, B. H. Glover, and F. J. Karsch. Central regulation of pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion by estradiol during the period leading up to the preovulatory GnRH surge in the ewe. Endocrinology 134: 1806-1811, 1994[Abstract].

16.   Ferrini, M., and A. F. Lima de Nichola. Estradiol abolishes the autologous down-regulation of glucocorticoid receptor in brain. Life Sci. 57: 2403-2412, 1995[Medline].

17.   Girdler, S. S., J. R. Turner, A. Sherwood, and K. Light. Gender differences in BP control during a variety of behavioral stressors. Psychosom. Med. 52: 571-591, 1990[Abstract].

18.   Gunin, A. G. Effect of chronic stress on estradiol action in the uterus of ovariectomized rats. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 66: 169-174, 1996[Medline].

19.   Karsch, F. J., D. J. Dierschke, R. F. Weick, T. Yamaji, J. Hotchkiss, and E. Knobil. Positive and negative feedback control by estrogen of luteinizing hormone secretion in the rhesus monkey. Endocrinology 92: 799-804, 1973[Medline].

20.   Khalil, Z., P. D. Marley, and B. G. Livett. Elevation in plasma catecholamines in response to insulin stress is under both neuronal and non-neuronal control. Endocrinology 119: 159-167, 1986[Abstract].

21.   Komesaroff, P. A., and J. W. Funder. Differential glucocorticoid effects on catecholamine responses to stress. Am. J. Physiol. 266 (Endocrinol. Metab. 29): E118-E128, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Lee, V. W. K., I. A. Cumming, D. M. de Kretser, J. K. Findlay, B. Hudson, and E. J. Keogh. Regulation of gonadotrophin secretion in rams from birth to sexual maturity. I. Plasma LH, FSH and testosterone levels. J. Reprod. Fertil. 46: 1-6, 1976[Abstract].

23.   Lindheim, S. R., R. S. Legro, L. Bernstein, F. Z. Stanczyk, M. A. Vijod, S. C. Presser, and R. A. Lobo. Behavioral stress responses in premenopausal and postmenopausal women and the effects of estrogen. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 167: 1831-1836, 1992[Medline].

24.   Manhem, K., L. Hansson, I. Milsom, M. Pilhall, and S. Jern. Estrogen and progestogen modify the hemodynamic response to mental stress in young women. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 75: 57-62, 1996[Medline].

25.   Manhem, K., C. Jern, M. Pilhall, G. Shanks, and S. Jern. Haemodynamic responses to psychosocial stress during the menstrual cycle. J. Hypertens. 8: 861-867, 1992.

26.   Pant, H. C., C. R. N. Hopkinson, and R. J. Fitzpatrick. Concentration of oestradiol, progesterone, luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in the jugular venous plasma of ewes during the oestrous cycle. J. Endocrinol. 73: 247-255, 1977[Abstract].

27.   Patchev, V. K., S. Hayashi, C. Orikasa, and O. F. Almeida. Implications of estrogen-dependent brain organization for gender differences in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal regulation. FASEB J. 9: 419-423, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28.   Patchev, V. K., M. Shoaib, F. Holsboer, and O. F. Almeida. The neurosteroid tetrahydroprogesterone counteracts CRH induced anxiety and alters the release and gene expression of CRH in the rat hypothalamus. Neuroscience 62: 262-271, 1994.

29.   Raff, H., J. Shinsako, and M. F. Dallman. Surgery potentiates the adrenocortical responses to hypoxia in dogs. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 172: 400-406, 1982[Abstract].

30.   Redei, E., L. Li, I. Halasz, R. F. McGivern, and F. Aird. Fast glucocorticoid feedback inhibition of ACTH secretion in the ovariectomized rat: effect of chronic estrogen and progesterone. Neuroendocrinology 60: 113-123, 1994[Medline].

31.   Saab, P. G., K. A. Matthews, C. M. Stoney, and R. H. McDonald. Premenopausal and postmenopausal women differ in their cardiovascular and neuroendocrine responses to behavioural stressors. Psychophysiology 26: 270-280, 1989[Medline].

32.   Stoney, C. M., K. A. Matthews, R. H. McDonald, and C. A. Johnson. Sex differences in lipid, lipoprotein, cardiovascular, and neuroendocrine responses to acute stress. Psychophysiology 25: 645-656, 1988[Medline].

33.   Tersman, Z., A. Collins, and P. Enerith. Cardiovascular responses to psychological and physiological stressors during the menstrual cycle. Psychosom. Med. 53: 185-197, 1991[Abstract].

34.   Tsonis, C. G., L. P. Cahill, R. S. Carson, and J. K. Findlay. Identification at the onset of luteolysis of follicles capable of ovulation in the ewe. J. Reprod. Fertil. 70: 609-614, 1984[Abstract].

35.   Viau, V., and M. J. Meaney. Variations in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal response to stress during the estrous cycle in the rat. Endocrinology 129: 2503-2511, 1991[Abstract].

36.   Wang, S., and F. W. Edens. Heat-stress response of broiler cockerels to manipulation of the gonadal steroids, testosterone and estradiol. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 106: 629-622, 1933.


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 275(4):E671-E678
0002-9513/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society




This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Komesaroff, P. A.
Articles by Funder, J. W.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Komesaroff, P. A.
Articles by Funder, J. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online