Metabolic effects of nandrolone decanoate and resistance training in men with HIV

Fred R. Sattler1, E. Todd Schroeder1, Michael P. Dube1, S. Victoria Jaque1, Carmen Martinez1, Patricia J. Blanche2, Stanley Azen1, and Ronald M. Krauss2

1 Departments of Medicine, Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, and of Biometry, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, and the 2 Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Los Angeles, California 90033


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Thirty human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected men were randomized to a high dose of nandrolone decanoate weekly (group 1) or nandrolone plus resistance training (group 2) for 12 wk. For the two groups, nandrolone had no significant effects on total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, LDL phenotype, or fasting triglycerides, although triglycerides decreased by 66 ± 124 mg/dl for the entire population (P = 0.01). Group 2 subjects had a favorable increase of 5.2 ± 7.7Å in LDL particle size (P = 0.03), whereas there was no change in group 1. Lipoprotein(a) decreased by 7.3 ± 6.8 mg/dl for group 1 (P = 0.002) and by 6.9 ± 8.1 for group 2 (P = 0.013). However, HDL cholesterol decreased by 8.7 ± 7.4 mg/dl for group 1 (P < 0.001) and by 10.6 ± 5.9 for group 2 (P < 0.001). Percentages of HDL2b (9.7-12 nm) and HDL2a (8.8-9.7 nm) subfractions decreased similarly for the two groups, whereas HDL3a (8.2-8.8 nm) and HDL3b (7.8-8.2 nm) increased in the groups during study therapy (P <=  0.02 for all comparisons). There was no evidence of a decreased insulin sensitivity in either group, whereas fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and homeostasis model assessment improved in group 2 (P < 0.05). These metabolic effects were favorable (other than for HDL), but changes were generally transient (except for HDL in group 2), with measurements returning to baseline 2 mo after the interventions were completed.

anabolic steroids; lipoprotein(a); androgen therapy; insulin resistance; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; serum triglycerides


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

THE PRINCIPAL USE of supplemental testosterone therapy is to restore eugonadal hormone levels in men with primary or secondary hypogonadism. However, treatment with androgens, including semisynthetic derivatives of testosterone, also has positive anabolic effects in subjects with cachexia due to severe burns (16), renal failure (32), chronic lung disease (51), cancer (13), and alcoholic hepatitis (44). Androgens also promote synthesis of myofibrillar proteins (53, 59) and are attractive therapies for sarcopenia in older individuals with frailty (19, 56). Thus it is likely that androgens will be further tested for a broad range of medical conditions.

Androgens can also influence lipid and carbohydrate metabolism in both men and women. These effects include reductions in plasma triglycerides (30), HDL cholesterol (7, 21, 55), and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] (41), with variable effects on insulin sensitivity (17, 43). Evidence suggest that the 17-alkylated derivatives may affect lipids and insulin sensitivity more than 17beta -esterified analogs (see review in Refs. 23 and 24). However, doses of the different androgens evaluated have varied, baseline measurements were not described in some reports, persistence of metabolic effects after discontinuation of these agents has been described infrequently, and in studies involving athletes, subjects often received multiple anabolic agents. Thus there is incomplete understanding of the extent to which supplemental androgens affect lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity and their risks for cardiovascular disease and diabetes when used for purposes other than treatment of hypogonadism.

Androgens have been evaluated as therapies to improve weight, muscle mass, and strength for patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (9, 26, 50). Studies are also underway to determine whether therapy with testosterone will reduce visceral adipose tissue in this population, as reported in HIV-negative middle-aged men with abdominal obesity (43). In this context, a lipodystrophy syndrome (peripheral fat wasting and/or central fat accumulation) with abnormalities in lipid metabolism and evidence of insulin resistance may occur in 30-80% of persons with HIV (12, 29, 57). Thus understanding the effects of specific androgens on serum lipids and insulin sensitivity in subjects with HIV will be important in minimizing the risks for cardiovascular disease during therapy with these agents.

Nandrolone decanoate is a 17beta -esterified derivative of testosterone, which on the basis of its molecular structure is not expected to have profound adverse effects on important components of metabolism. We hypothesized and previously reported that high doses of nandrolone for 12 wk would significantly increase muscle mass and strength in HIV weight-stable men and that these effects were augmented with progressive resistance training (PRT) (31, 50, 52). A secondary objective was to assess safety, which included comprehensive measures of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. We now describe the effects of the study interventions on plasma lipoprotein components related to cardiovascular disease (CVD), including HDL subfractions, LDL peak particle size and phenotype, and Lp(a) as well as indirect measures of insulin sensitivity. Our results differed from those described in other populations receiving nandrolone (24, 28, 41), and, unlike reports with other androgens, we evaluated the persistence of metabolic effects several months after study interventions were discontinued. Because patients with HIV are predisposed to metabolic dysregulation, which may increase their risk for accelerated atherogenesis and diabetes, understanding the effects of specific androgens on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism will be important when these agents are prescribed for treatment of weight loss or central obesity in this population.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Study Design and Test Population

This was an open-label, proof-of-concept study to assess whether pharmacological doses of an androgen not aromatized to estrogen, and with or without resistance training, could increase skeletal muscle mass and voluntary muscle strength in men with chronic HIV infection. Subjects were recruited through local advertisements. To be eligible, subjects had to be HIV-seropositive men >= 18 yr of age with CD4 lymphocyte counts between 50 and 400/mm3, have had no prior weight loss >5% or weight variation >3% recorded in medical records in the prior 6 mo, and have a body mass index of 20-27.5 kg/m2. Subjects were required to have HIV plasma RNA levels at screening of <30,000 copies/mm3 and a dietary energy intake >0.8 of basal energy expenditure in the week before enrollment.

Subjects were excluded from participation if they had an active opportunistic infection, malignancy, chronic viral hepatitis, or diarrhea in the prior month. They could not have participated in weight training or vigorous exercise in the preceding 28 days, have any prostate abnormalities, evidence of organic heart disease, or a history of deep venous thrombosis. Subjects could not have used anabolic therapies (e.g., growth hormone, testosterone, or synthetic steroids) or appetite stimulants in the preceding 6 mo. All subjects signed informed consent documents approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Los Angeles County University of Southern California (USC) Medical Center.

Study Interventions

Nandrolone. All subjects received nandrolone decanoate (Deca Durabolin; Organon, West Orange, NJ) by weekly intramuscular injection for 16 wk. Subjects were randomized to nandrolone alone or nandrolone plus progressive resistance training (PRT). The first dose of nandrolone was 200 mg, the second dose was 400 mg, and for weeks 2-12 the dose was 600 mg. Doses were reduced during weeks 13-16 (400 mg, 200 mg, 100 mg, and 50 mg, respectively) to withdraw patients from pharmacological dosing.

Exercise training regimen. Subjects received periodized PRT under direct supervision by an exercise physiologist (E. T. Schroeder) in the Exercise Laboratory at USC three times per week for 12 wk (50). Upper body exercises included bench press, lat pull downs, military press, biceps curl, and triceps extension. Lower body exercises included leg press, calf raises, leg curl, and leg extension. After warm-up, subjects performed three sets of eight repetitions at 80% of the 1-repetition maximum (1-RM), with the final set performed to failure. The 1-RM was assessed every 2 wk for all exercises to adjust the training load to maintain intensities at 80% of the 1-RM.

Subjects assigned to nandrolone only were interviewed each week about their activities to ensure that they were not initiating or participating in any resistance training activities. Subjects receiving only nandrolone were offered instructions on PRT at the completion of the 12 wk of study therapy.

Measurements

Lean mass and fat mass. Whole body and regional measures of body composition were determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA; Hologic QDR 1500W scanner, version 7.1 software; Waltham, MA). Scans were performed at baseline and at the end of study weeks 6 and 12 but not study week 24. The same experienced technician who was blinded to study assignment analyzed all scans in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines. Scans were analyzed in real time without knowledge of prior or subsequent results. The coefficient of variation was <1.0%.

Fasting blood specimens. Subjects were instructed not to eat or drink any beverage other than water after 8:00 PM of the night before and until blood was collected the next day. Blood was collected between 10:00 AM and 12:00 noon on the next day before exercise testing. Plasma (Na2EDTA) was separated and stored at -80°C for later testing. Subjects were then allowed to eat before their exercise testing and training sessions.

Bioimmunochemical measurements. Fasting specimens were analyzed for total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and glucose by use of enzyme end-point reagent kits and an Express 550 autoanalyzer (Ciba-Corning Diagnostics, Oberlin, OH). LDL cholesterol was calculated from the Friedewald equation (20). Measurements and measurement error were within limits set by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Lipid Standardization Program (www.cdc.gov/nceh/dls/cv.htm; Berkeley Laboratory ID no. LSP-142). The coefficients of variation for total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol were 1.74, 2.22, and 3.18%, respectively.

Lp(a) concentration in plasma was measured by "sandwich"-style ELISA by use of purified goat anti-human Lp(a) polyclonal antibodies with and without conjugation to horseradish peroxidase and detection reagent o-phenylenediamine. Standardization was linked to reference plasma obtained from Northwest Lipid Research Center and to commercially available calibration standards. Samples were analyzed in triplicate. The coefficient of variation was within ±10%.

Insulin concentration in fasting plasma was measured by radioimmunoassay with a commercial kit (catalog no. 07-160102, ICN, Costa Mesa, CA). Radioactivity in the test product was measured by gamma counter (model 5002 Cobra, Packard Instruments), and sample concentrations were calculated from a standard curve (standard material included with each kit). Kit controls, as well as in-house controls, were used to monitor assay performance, which was within ±10% coefficient of variation.

Peak LDL particle diameter and LDL subclass analysis by gradient gel electrophoresis. Measurement of LDL peak particle size was performed on whole plasma by use of nondenaturing 2-14% polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis (GGE) and standardized conditions (46). After electrophoresis, lipoproteins were lipid stained with Oil Red O, and calibration standards were stained with Coomassie R-250. Gels were analyzed using computer-automated densitometry, and calculation of peak particle sizes was based on the migration of reference standards of known particle size. The coefficient of variation for LDL measurements was within ±1%. LDL subclass phenotype analysis was performed as described previously (6).

HDL particle size and subpopulation distribution. HDL peak particle sizes and subpopulation area distribution were analyzed using nondenaturing 4-30% GGE. Before electrophoresis, plasma was incubated for 30 min at 28°C with fluorescent lipophyllic reagent, DiIC18 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in the presence of 1 mM diethyl p-nitrophenyl phosphate (DENP, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). After centrifugation at 4°C for 10 min at 10,000 rpm to remove excess reagent, samples were mixed with 40% sucrose (1:4, sucrose/sample) and pipetted to wells of a gel sample comb. After electrophoresis, gels were analyzed by scanning densitometry of the fluorescent signal (560 nm emission filter) with a model FX Molecular Imager and Quantity One Software (Bio-Rad Instruments, Hercules, CA). Gel images were analyzed with modified NIH Image (version 1.61/PPC)-based software. Lipoprotein controls included on each gel were measured for peak particle sizes and area distribution within HDL subclasses, and coefficient of variation was consistently within ±10% or better.

Insulin resistance. Several indirect tests of insulin resistance, such as fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR), and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), have been utilized and correlated with insulin sensitivity by the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (33, 37, 39). HOMA-IR is calculated as [(If)×(Gf)]/22.5, where If is the fasting insulin level (µU/ml), and Gf is the fasting glucose level (mmol/l). QUICKI is calculated as 1/[log (If) + log (Gf)] (33).

Indirect calorimetry for resting energy expenditure. To assess resting energy expenditure (REE), indirect calorimetry was performed using a ventilated hood and dedicated metabolic cart (Delta Track, Sensor Medics, Anaheim CA). Before testing, CO2 and O2 gas analyzers were calibrated at existing temperature and atmospheric pressure. After subjects rested quietly at bed rest for 30 min, rates of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production were measured at 1-min intervals. The final thirty 1-min intervals of a 45-min test period were measured and recorded to calculate the 24-h REE.

Nutritional assessment. Subjects recorded dietary intake on three consecutive days, including two weekdays and one weekend day in the week before baseline, study week 12, and study week 24. Subjects were counseled that the days should be chosen to include usual activities and typical eating patterns. A licensed nutritionist (C. Martinez) reviewed all dietary entries with the subjects. This information was entered into the Nutritionist V software (First Data Bank, San Bruno, CA) and analyzed for total energy intake, macronutrients, and types of fat. Subjects were counseled not to change their routine dietary habit during the course of the study.

Statistical Considerations

The sample size for the original study was based on the hypothesis that nandrolone would cause a significant increase in total lean body mass (LBM) by DEXA and that nandrolone plus PRT would induce a greater than 3.0 kg increase in total LBM than treatment with nandrolone alone. With 15 subjects per group, the statistical power (1-beta ) was >0.80. All analyses utilized the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, Chicago, IL), version 10.0.

To test the hypothesis of no group differences for each variable (e.g., macronutrients, lipids, and measures of glucose metabolism) at baseline and at 12 and 24 wk, we utilized two-sample t-tests. If data were not normally distributed, we utilized the Wilcoxon rank sum test. To test the hypothesis of no treatment effect at 12 and 24 wk within each group (total study population and for each treatment group), we compared the change from baseline for each variable with paired t-tests. We also contrasted changes from 12 to 24 wk with the same procedure. Finally, to test the hypothesis of no difference in treatment effect between the two randomized groups at 12 and 24 wk, we utilized the two-sample t-test. The chi 2 test was used to compare ethnic and racial characteristics and the change in LDL phenotype for the study groups. A bidirectional alpha -level of significance was set at 0.05 for all measures.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Subject Characteristics

Thirty-three men were enrolled, and 15 subjects per group completed their randomized study therapy. Two subjects did not return for their week 24 evaluations. Thus final analyses included 28 subjects, unless otherwise indicated. Age, ethnicity, total serum testosterone, caloric and macronutrient intake, REE, and body composition were similar in the two treatment groups at baseline (Table 1). Measures of body composition indicated that study subjects were neither malnourished nor obese. Antiretroviral therapies, CD4 lymphocyte counts, HIV RNA levels, blood counts, and chemistries for subjects in each of the groups were also comparable at baseline (data not shown) (50). None of the study subjects changed their antiretroviral therapy during the study, and none showed evidence of lipodystrophy. Only three subjects in the nandrolone-only group requested instructions in PRT after the 12-wk intervention, and only two in the PRT group continued training during the second 12-wk period.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Baseline characteristics of study patients

Changes in Body Composition

As reported previously (50), subjects randomized to nandrolone without resistance training had a 3.9 ± 2.3 kg increase in LBM (P < 0.001) by study week 12, whereas the group who also received resistance training had a 5.2 ± 5.7 kg increase in LBM (P < 0.001). The difference in change in LBM between the groups was significant (P = 0.03). There were no changes in body fat in the nandrolone-only group. However, the combination group showed a significant decline in total body adiposity (-1.2 ± 1.3 kg, P = 0.003), trunk fat (-0.6 ± 0.9 kg, P = 0.02), and appendicular fat (-0.6 ± 0.8 kg, P = 0.016) during study treatment.

Dietary Intake and REE

Total caloric intake corrected for body weight (kJ · kg-1 · day-1) did not change from baseline to weeks 12 or 24 (P > 0.10 for each comparison). The amount and proportion of protein and carbohydrate intake remained constant during the course of therapy. However, total fat intake for the entire study population decreased from 1.59 ± 0.43 g · kg-1 · day-1 at baseline to 1.42 ± 0.37 g · kg-1 · day-1 at study week 12 (P = 0.04), although values at week 24 (1.44 ± 0.50 g · kg-1 · day-1) were similar to those at baseline (P = 0.24). There were no within-group differences in fat intake during the course of the study. REE corrected for fat-free mass (FFM) did not change from baseline to study week 12 (130 ± 18.0 vs. 131 ± 15.0 kJ/kg FFM, respectively, P = 0.75).

Total/LDL Cholesterol Concentrations, LDL Peak Particle Size, and LDL Subclass Phenotype

There were no changes (P >=  0.15 for all comparisons) in total (198 ±42, 191 ±45, 208 ±60 mg/dl) or calculated LDL concentrations (117 ±30, 128 ±37, 128 ±36 mg/dl) from baseline to week 12 or week 24 for the entire study population (Table 2). Similarly, there were no changes in either total or LDL cholesterol for the individual groups (P >=  0.24 for all comparisons; data not shown). However, in group 2 (nandrolone plus PRT), mean LDL particle size significantly increased (P = 0.03) by study week 12, but it returned to the baseline value by study week 24 (Table 2). There was no change in the proportion of subjects with LDL subclass phenotype A (predominantly large), AB (intermediate), and B (predominantly small) after 12 wk of study therapy (P > 0.10 for all categorical comparisons; data not shown).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Measurement of plasma lipids and lipoproteins

Lp(a) Concentrations

In both groups, there were sizable and significant decreases in the concentrations of Lp(a) by study week 12, but concentrations returned to values similar to baseline by study week 24 (Table 2).

Fasting Serum Triglycerides

For the entire study population, there was a significant decrease in fasting triglycerides at study week 12 (Table 2). There was large variability in results for the two groups; thus the differences did not reach statistical significance in either group. Values were similar to baseline at study week 24.

Total HDL Cholesterol, Peak Particle Size, and HDL Subfraction Concentrations

Total HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) decreased significantly after 12 wk of study intervention (Table 3). The absolute magnitude of the decrease was similar with the study interventions (P = NS). At study week 24, namely 8 wk after nandrolone was discontinued and 12 wk after completion of PRT, there was an increase of similar magnitude in both groups compared with study week 12. The mean HDL-C in group 1 was not significantly different from baseline, but in group 2, levels remained statistically below baseline at week 24 (P < 0.012).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Measurements of HDL cholesterol

There were also changes in HDL particle size distribution in the two study groups, with no differences between groups. Diameter of the major HDL peak decreased significantly at week 12 and then returned toward baseline at week 24. The percentage of the larger HDL subfractions, HDL2b and HDL2a, also decreased significantly in both groups by study week 12 but returned to levels similar to baseline at week 24. In contrast, the percentage of the smaller subfractions, HDL3a and HDL3b, significantly increased similarly in both groups after 12 wk and returned to baseline by week 24. There was no change during the study in the percentage of HDL3c, the smallest of the HDL particles.

Relationships of Lipid Changes

There was a correlation between change in LDL peak particle diameter with both fasting triglycerides (r = -0.59, P = 0.001) and HDL cholesterol (r = 0.51, P = 0.005) after 12 wk of study intervention for the entire study population, with similar relationships in both study groups. However, there was no relationship between change in HDL cholesterol and fasting triglycerides in the total population (r = 0.19, P = 0.34) or in either of the two treatment groups during the 12-wk study period.

For diet, in the group that received PRT, the decrease in fat intake at week 12 was associated with the decrease in triglycerides at this time point (r = -0.59, P = 0.035). However, all other changes in lipids could not be associated with change in dietary fat.

Carbohydrate Metabolism

There was a significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose levels at study week 12, due primarily to a decrease in group 2 (Table 4). Likewise, fasting insulin was significantly decreased in study group 2. A decrease in HOMA-IR for the entire study population was nearly significant at study week 12 and was significant for the group assigned to PRT. Of importance, the effect was sustained at study week 24. For QUICKI, both the entire study population and group 2 showed significant improvements by week 12, but the effects were not sustained at week 24 for this calculation of insulin resistance.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4.   Measurements of glucose and insulin metabolism


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The dose of nandrolone decanoate evaluated in this proof-of-concept study is of similar magnitude to the high doses of parenteral androgens used by body builders, is in the range of popular regimens to treat autoimmune deficiency syndrome, or AIDS wasting syndrome (e.g., 400 mg of testosterone enanthate plus 400 mg of nandrolone), and may be similar to the supraphysiological doses of testosterone (600 mg weekly) shown to be safe for 20 wk (10). The importance of our findings relates to the effects of pharmacological doses of this 17beta -esterified androgen with and without resistance exercise on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism in subjects with HIV who are prone to metabolic dysregulation. Moreover, we believe that this is the first study to assess the evolution of metabolic outcomes 2 mo after completion of a course of treatment with this anabolic steroid.

The effects of anabolic steroids on total and LDL cholesterol have been variable, with some studies showing significant increases and others relatively little change, although dose, duration of therapy, and type of agent have varied (23). In our study, pharmacological dosing did not result in deleterious effects on total or LDL cholesterol. To the contrary, there was a favorable shift of LDL particle size from 255.7 ± 5.2 to 260.9 ± 72 Å (P = 0.03) for the group receiving resistance training. This short-term change would be predictive of a reduced CVD risk (4, 22, 38), but the effects were not sustained at week 24. Furthermore, there was no increase in the proportion of subjects with phenotype B (characterized by a predominance of small LDL particles <255 Å), a documented risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity (4).

There was a significant decrease in fasting triglycerides, a lipid that independently predicts cardiac events (3, 5), from 228 ± 138 to 163 ± 78 mg/dl (P = 0.01) for the entire study population. These effects appeared to be largely due to improvements in the resistance training group. However, triglycerides returned to baseline values at study week 24. In other populations, serum triglycerides are inversely related to LDL particle size (18, 27). In our subjects, decreases in triglycerides were associated with a favorable increase in LDL particle size (r = -0.59, P = 0.001).

Levels of plasma Lp(a) are highly correlated with measures of atherosclerosis and may act synergistically with LDL in the pathogenesis of atherogenesis (15, 36, 42). However, none of the lipid-lowering agents, other than nicotinic acid, affect levels of Lp(a). Hormone replacement in women can lower Lp(a), and those with elevated pretreatment levels of Lp(a) have had fewer subsequent coronary events (54). Because use of protease inhibitors is reported to increase Lp(a) (35, 48), it is noteworthy that our subjects had an almost 50% reduction in Lp(a). Whether short-term improvements in Lp(a) in our male subjects and, as reported for other anabolic steroids in women (1, 14), have any CVD protective effects is uncertain.

In keeping with the known effects of testosterone and other androgenic derivatives to reduce HDL cholesterol through induction of hepatic lipase (21, 58) and evidence that the hepatic lipase gene is closely linked with HDL cholesterol levels (2, 25), total HDL decreased modestly (9.6 ± 6.7 mg/dl) by study week 12 for the entire population. Levels increased significantly by week 24 but were still below baseline for the group assigned to resistance training. Further follow-up is not available to ascertain whether levels eventually returned to pretreatment values in this group.

Low levels of the larger, less dense HDL2 subfractions have been associated with LDL phenotype B and other risk factors for CVD (11, 34) and may bear a closer relationship to CVD than total HDL (8). However, it is not certain whether the transient reductions in HDL2, as well as total HDL, that are induced by nandrolone carry the same risk as has been observed in cross-sectional studies. There were also significant increases in the smaller, more dense subfractions HDL3a and HDL3b during study therapy, but the significance of changes in this subfraction for risk of CVD remains unknown (8, 45). It is likely that these changes were direct effects of study therapy, because there were no correlations (P > 0.10) between the small but statistically significant reductions in dietary fat observed for the entire study population during the treatment interventions and the reductions in HDL levels and HDL2 subsets (60).

There is concern that androgen excess may worsen carbohydrate metabolism. Moreover, insulin resistance has been linked to LDL phenotype B and low levels of HDL cholesterol (40, 49), possibly through linkage to a locus near the LDL and insulin receptor genes on chromosome 19p (47). In our subjects, there was no evidence of worsening carbohydrate metabolism as measured by fasting glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, and QUICKI, which suggests that the decreases in HDL cholesterol during study therapy were not due to worsening insulin sensitivity. Moreover, fasting glucose and QUICKI for the entire population actually improved significantly during study therapy (Table 4). Because fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, and QUICKI improved significantly during study therapy in the exercise group, it is possible that any overall benefits in carbohydrate metabolism were largely due to PRT per se or greater changes in appendicular body composition (either an increase in skeletal muscle mass and/or reduction in intramyocellular lipid) for the group receiving PRT.

Several limitations of the study design need to be considered, including the absence of a nonintervention control group. However, the data suggest that the adverse effects on HDL-C and improvements in Lp(a) were largely due to the nandrolone, because changes were generally reversible shortly after nandrolone was discontinued. The reversibility of these effects also argues against the acute decreases in HDL as being primarily due to HIV infection per se. The short-term improvements in serum triglyceride and carbohydrate metabolism appeared to be related primarily to PRT, but an exercise-only group would have strengthened this contention, because the small decrease in dietary fat in this group may have contributed to the improvement in their triglycerides. Moreover, it is unlikely that PRT would have negatively affected HDL cholesterol, and it may be a safer strategy. Regardless, these outcomes may not be generalizable to other parenteral androgens with different anabolic potency or to use of these agents at different doses and for different lengths of therapy. Additionally, oral androgens, which are 17-alkylated and have high first-pass effects in the liver, might have even greater effects on hepatic lipase and HDL concentrations (21, 58). Finally, the effects of nandrolone might be different in subjects with established lipodystrophy or dysregulation of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, and the effects may differ in women.

Although our study population lacked evidence of lipodystrophy, the study provides important insights into the potential for adverse effects when pharmacological doses of 17beta -esterified androgens with or without exercise are administered to persons receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. Although reductions in total HDL and HDL2 concentrations appeared readily reversible, the short-term effects of declines in HDL for subjects with a cumulative number of other CVD risk factors are uncertain. Thus great care should be taken in prescribing androgens to HIV-positive subjects, and the duration of therapy should be relatively brief to minimize the potential for adverse metabolic outcomes. However, treatment with nandrolone per se resulted in lower levels of Lp(a), and concomitant resistance exercise appeared to improve LDL particle size, fasting triglycerides, and indirect measures of insulin sensitivity. We are uncertain whether these short-term changes have any cardioprotective effects. Additional research is necessary to clarify these issues and further define the benefits and risks of androgen therapy in HIV subjects at risk for metabolic complications.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Connie Olson, study coordinator, without whose extraordinary efforts this study would not have been possible.


    FOOTNOTES

The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (DK-49308; NCRR GCRC MOI RR-43; HL-184573).

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: F. Sattler, 1300 North Mission Road, Los Angeles, California 90033 (E-mail: fsattler{at}usc.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

August 27, 2002;10.1152/ajpendo.00189.2002

Received 3 May 2002; accepted in final form 12 August 2002.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Albers, JJ, Taggart HM, Applebaum-Bowden D, Haffner S, Chesnut CH, III, and Hazzard WR. Reduction of lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase, apolipoprotein D and the Lp(a) lipoprotein with the anabolic steroid stanozolol. Biochim Biophys Acta 795: 293-296, 1984[ISI][Medline].

2.   Allayee, H, Dominguez KM, Aouizerat BE, Krauss RM, Rotter JI, Lu J, Cantor RM, de Bruin TW, and Lusis AJ. Contribution of the hepatic lipase gene to the atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype in familial combined hyperlipidemia. J Lipid Res 41: 245-252, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Assmann, G, Schulte H, and von Eckardstein A. Hypertriglyceridemia and elevated lipoprotein(a) are risk factors for major coronary events in middle-aged men. Am J Cardiol 77: 1179-1184, 1996[ISI][Medline].

4.   Austin, MA, Breslow JL, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Willett WC, and Krauss RM. Low-density lipoprotein subclass patterns and risk of myocardial infarction. J Am Med Assoc 260: 1917-1921, 1988[Abstract].

5.   Austin, MA, Hokanson JE, and Edwards KL. Hypertriglyceridemia as a cardiovascular risk factor. Am J Cardiol 81: 7B-12B, 1998[ISI][Medline].

6.   Austin, MA, and Krauss RM. Genetic control of low-density-lipoprotein subclasses. Lancet 2: 592-595, 1986[ISI][Medline].

7.   Bagatell, CJ, Heiman JR, Matsumoto AM, Rivier JE, and Bremner WJ. Metabolic and behavioral effects of high-dose, exogenous testosterone in healthy men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79: 561-567, 1994[Abstract].

8.   Ballantyne, FC, Clark RS, Simpson HS, and Ballantyne D. High density and low density lipoprotein subfractions in survivors of myocardial infarction and in control subjects. Metabolism 31: 433-437, 1982[ISI][Medline].

9.   Bhasin, S, Storer TW, Javanbakht M, Berman N, Yarasheski KE, Phillips J, Dike M, Sinha-Hikim I, Shen R, Hays RD, and Beall G. Testosterone replacement and resistance exercise in HIV-infected men with weight loss and low testosterone levels. J Am Med Assoc 283: 763-770, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Bhasin, S, Woodhouse L, Casaburi R, Singh AB, Bhasin D, Berman N, Chen X, Yarasheski KE, Magliano L, Dzekov C, Dzekov J, Bross R, Phillips J, Sinha-Hikim I, Shen R, and Storer TW. Testosterone dose-response relationships in healthy young men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 281: E1172-E1181, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   Campos, H, Roederer GO, Lussier-Cacan S, Davignon J, and Krauss RM. Predominance of large LDL and reduced HDL2 cholesterol in normolipidemic men with coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 15: 1043-1048, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Carr, A, Samaras K, Thorisdottir A, Kaufmann GR, Chisholm DJ, and Cooper DA. Diagnosis, prediction, and natural course of HIV-1 protease-inhibitor-associated lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia, and diabetes mellitus: a cohort study. Lancet 353: 2093-2099, 1999[ISI][Medline].

13.   Chlebowski, RT, Herrold J, Ali I, Oktay E, Chlebowski JS, Ponce AT, Heber D, and Block JB. Influence of nandrolone decanoate on weight loss in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer 58: 183-186, 1986[ISI][Medline].

14.   Crook, D, Sidhu M, Seed M, O'Donnell M, and Stevenson JC. Lipoprotein Lp(a) levels are reduced by danazol, an anabolic steroid. Atherosclerosis 92: 41-47, 1992[ISI][Medline].

15.   Dahlen, GH, Weinehall L, Stenlund H, Jansson JH, Hallmans G, Huhtasaari F, and Wall S. Lipoprotein(a) and cholesterol levels act synergistically and apolipoprotein A-I is protective for the incidence of primary acute myocardial infarction in middle-aged males. An incident case-control study from Sweden. J Intern Med 244: 425-430, 1998[ISI][Medline].

16.   Demling, RH, and Orgill DP. The anticatabolic and wound healing effects of the testosterone analog oxandrolone after severe burn injury. J Crit Care 15: 12-17, 2000[ISI][Medline].

17.   Diamond, MP, Grainger D, Diamond MC, Sherwin RS, and DeFronzo RA. Effects of methyltestosterone on insulin secretion and sensitivity in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83: 4420-4425, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Edwards, KL, Mahaney MC, Motulsky AG, and Austin MA. Pleiotropic genetic effects on LDL size, plasma triglyceride, and HDL cholesterol in families. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19: 2456-2464, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Ferrando, AA, Sheffield-Moore M, Yeckel CW, Gilkison C, Jiang J, Achacosa A, Lieberman SA, Tipton K, Wolfe RR, and Urban RJ. Testosterone administration to older men improves muscle function: molecular and physiological mechanisms. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 282: E601-E607, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Friedewald, WT, Levy RI, and Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 18: 499-502, 1972[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Friedl, KE, Hannan CJ, Jr, Jones RE, and Plymate SR. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol is not decreased if an aromatizable androgen is administered. Metabolism 39: 69-74, 1990[ISI][Medline].

22.   Gardner, CD, Fortmann SP, and Krauss RM. Association of small low-density lipoprotein particles with the incidence of coronary artery disease in men and women. J Am Med Assoc 276: 875-881, 1996[Abstract].

23.   Glazer, G. Atherogenic effects of anabolic steroids on serum lipid levels. A literature review. Arch Intern Med 151: 1925-1933, 1991[Abstract].

24.   Glazer, G, and Suchman AL. Lack of demonstrated effect of nandrolone on serum lipids. Metabolism 43: 204-210, 1994[ISI][Medline].

25.   Goldberg, AP, Busby-Whitehead MJ, Katzel LI, Krauss RM, Lumpkin M, and Hagberg JM. Cardiovascular fitness, body composition, and lipoprotein lipid metabolism in older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55: M342-M349, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

26.   Grinspoon, S, Corcoran C, Parlman K, Costello M, Rosenthal D, Anderson E, Stanley T, Schoenfeld D, Burrows B, Hayden D, Basgoz N, and Klibanski A. Effects of testosterone and progressive resistance training in eugonadal men with AIDS wasting. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 133: 348-355, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

27.   Haffner, SM, Mykkanen L, Valdez RA, Paidi M, Stern MP, and Howard BV. LDL size and subclass pattern in a biethnic population. Arterioscler Thromb 13: 1623-1630, 1993[Abstract].

28.   Hassager, C, Podenphant J, Riis BJ, Johansen JS, Jensen J, and Christiansen C. Changes in soft tissue body composition and plasma lipid metabolism during nandrolone decanoate therapy in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Metabolism 38: 238-242, 1989[ISI][Medline].

29.   Heath, KV, Hogg RS, Chan KJ, Harris M, Montessori V, O'Shaughnessy MV, and Montanera JS. Lipodystrophy-associated morphological, cholesterol and triglyceride abnormalities in a population-based HIV/AIDS treatment database. AIDS 15: 231-239, 2001[ISI][Medline].

30.   Hromadova, M, Hacik T, Malatinsky E, Sklovsky A, and Cervenakov I. Some measures of lipid metabolism in young sterile males before and after testosterone treatment. Endocrinol Exp 23: 205-211, 1989[ISI][Medline].

31.   Jaque, S, Schroeder E, Azen S, Dube M, Olson C, Afghani A, Wiswell R, and Sattler F. Regional body composition changes during anabolic therapy. Clin Exercise Physiol 4: 50-59, 2002.

32.   Johansen, KL, Mulligan K, and Schambelan M. Anabolic effects of nandrolone decanoate in patients receiving dialysis: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Ass 281: 1275-1281, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

33.   Katz, A, Nambi SS, Mather K, Baron AD, Follmann DA, Sullivan G, and Quon MJ. Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: a simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85: 2402-2410, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

34.   Katzel, LI, Krauss RM, and Goldberg AP. Relations of plasma TG and HDL-C concentrations to body composition and plasma insulin levels are altered in men with small LDL particles. Arterioscler Thromb 14: 1121-1128, 1994[Abstract].

35.   Koppel, K, Bratt G, Eriksson M, and Sandstrom E. Serum lipid levels associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease are associated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV-1 infection. Int J STD AIDS 11: 451-455, 2000[ISI][Medline].

36.   Kronenberg, F, Kronenberg MF, Kiechl S, Trenkwalder E, Santer P, Oberhollenzer F, Egger G, Utermann G, and Willeit J. Role of lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) phenotype in atherogenesis: prospective results from the Bruneck study. Circulation 100: 1154-1160, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

37.   Laakso, M. How good a marker is insulin level for insulin resistance? Am J Epidemiol 137: 959-965, 1993[Abstract].

38.   Lamarche, B, Tchernof A, Moorjani S, Cantin B, Dagenais GR, Lupien PJ, and Despres JP. Small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles as a predictor of the risk of ischemic heart disease in men. Prospective results from the Quebec Cardiovascular Study. Circulation 95: 69-75, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

39.   Lansang, MC, Williams GH, and Carroll JS. Correlation between the glucose clamp technique and the homeostasis model assessment in hypertension. Am J Hypertens 14: 51-53, 2001[ISI][Medline].

40.   Laws, A, and Reaven GM. Evidence for an independent relationship between insulin resistance and fasting plasma HDL-cholesterol, triglyceride and insulin concentrations. J Intern Med 231: 25-30, 1992[ISI][Medline].

41.   Lippi, G, Guidi G, Ruzzenente O, Braga V, and Adami S. Effects of nandrolone decanoate (Decadurabolin) on serum Lp(a), lipids and lipoproteins in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 57: 507-511, 1997[ISI][Medline].

42.   Maher, VM, Brown BG, Marcovina SM, Hillger LA, Zhao XQ, and Albers JJ. Effects of lowering elevated LDL cholesterol on the cardiovascular risk of lipoprotein(a). J Am Med Assoc 274: 1771-1774, 1995[Abstract].

43.   Marin, P. Testosterone and regional fat distribution. Obes Res 3, Suppl 4: 609S-612S, 1995[Abstract].

44.   Mendenhall, CL, Moritz TE, Roselle GA, Morgan TR, Nemchausky BA, Tamburro CH, Schiff ER, McClain CJ, Marsano LS, and Allen JI. Protein energy malnutrition in severe alcoholic hepatitis: diagnosis and response to treatment. The VA Cooperative Study Group #275. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 19: 258-265, 1995[Abstract].

45.   Miller, NE, Hammett F, Saltissi S, Rao S, van Zeller H, Coltart J, and Lewis B. Relation of angiographically defined coronary artery disease to plasma lipoprotein subfractions and apolipoproteins. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 282: 1741-1744, 1981[Medline].

46.   Nichols, AV, Krauss RM, and Musliner TA. Non-denaturing polyacylamide gradient gel electrophoresis. In: Methods in Enzymology: Plasma Lipoproteins, edited by Segrist JP, and Albers JJ. New York: Academic, 1986, p. 417-431.

47.   Nishina, PM, Johnson JP, Naggert JK, and Krauss RM. Linkage of atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype to the low density lipoprotein receptor locus on the short arm of chromosome 19. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 708-712, 1992[Abstract].

48.   Purnell, JQ, Zambon A, Knopp RH, Pizzuti DJ, Achari R, Leonard JM, Locke C, and Brunzell JD. Effect of ritonavir on lipids and post-heparin lipase activities in normal subjects. AIDS (Phila) 14: 51-57, 2000.

49.   Reaven, GM, Chen YD, Jeppesen J, Maheux P, and Krauss RM. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia in individuals with small, dense low density lipoprotein particles. J Clin Invest 92: 141-146, 1993[ISI][Medline].

50.   Sattler, FR, Jaque SV, Schroeder ET, Olson C, Dube MP, Martinez C, Briggs W, Horton R, and Azen S. Effects of pharmacological doses of nandrolone decanoate and progressive resistance training in immunodeficient patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84: 1268-1276, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

51.   Schols, AM, Soeters PB, Mostert R, Pluymers RJ, and Wouters EF. Physiologic effects of nutritional support and anabolic steroids in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A placebo-controlled randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152: 1268-1274, 1995[Abstract].

52.   Schroeder, E, Jaque S, Hawkins S, Olson C, Wiswell R, and Sattler F. Regional DXA and MRI in assessment of muscle adaptations to anabolic stimuli. Clin Exercise Physiol 3: 199-206, 2001.

53.   Sheffield-Moore, M, Urban RJ, Wolf SE, Jiang J, Catlin DH, Herndon DN, Wolfe RR, and Ferrando AA. Short-term oxandrolone administration stimulates net muscle protein synthesis in young men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84: 2705-2711, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

54.   Shlipak, MG, Simon JA, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, Barrett-Connor E, Knopp RH, Levy RI, and Hulley SB. Estrogen and progestin, lipoprotein(a), and the risk of recurrent coronary heart disease events after menopause. J Am Med Assoc 283: 1845-1852, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

55.   Singh, AB, Hsia S, Alaupovic P, Sinha-Hikim I, Woodhouse L, Buchanan TA, Shen R, Bross R, Berman N, and Bhasin S. The effects of varying doses of T on insulin sensitivity, plasma lipids, apolipoproteins, and C-reactive protein in healthy young men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 136-143, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text].

56.   Snyder, PJ, Peachy H, Hannoush P, Berlin JA, Loh L, Lenrow DA, Holmes JH, Dlewati A, Santanan J, Rosen CJ, and Strom BL. Effect of testosterone treatment on body composition and muscle strength in men over 65 years of age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84: 2647-2653, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

57.   Thiebaut, R, Daucourt V, Mercie P, Ekouevi DK, Malvy D, Morlat P, Dupon M, Neau D, Farbos S, Marimoutou C, and Dabis F. Lipodystrophy, metabolic disorders, and human immunodeficiency virus infection: Aquitaine cohort, France, 1999. Clin Infect Dis 31: 1482-1487, 2000[ISI][Medline].

58.   Thompson, PD, Cullinane EM, Sady SP, Chenevert C, Saritelli AL, Sady MA, and Herbert PN. Contrasting effects of testosterone and stanozolol on serum lipoprotein levels. J Am Med Assoc 261: 1165-1168, 1989[Abstract].

59.   Urban, RJ, Bodenburg YH, Gilkison C, Foxworth J, Coggan AR, Wolfe RR, and Ferrando A. Testosterone administration to elderly men increases skeletal muscle strength and protein synthesis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 269: E820-E826, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

60.   Williams, PT, Dreon DM, and Krauss RM. Effects of dietary fat on high-density-lipoprotein subclasses are influenced by both apolipoprotein E isoforms and low-density-lipoprotein subclass patterns. Am J Clin Nutr 61: 1234-1240, 1995[Abstract].


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 283(6):E1214-E1222
0193-1849/02 $5.00 Copyright © 2002 the American Physiological Society