Arginine, ornithine, and proline interconversion is dependent on small intestinal metabolism in neonatal pigs

Robert F. P. Bertolo1, Janet A. Brunton1, Paul B. Pencharz1,2,3,4, and Ronald O. Ball1,2,4

1 Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2P5; and 2 The Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, and the Departments of 3 Paediatrics and 4 Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have previously shown that arginine deficiency is exacerbated by the removal of dietary proline in orally, but not parenterally, fed piglets. Therefore, we hypothesized that the net interconversions of proline, ornithine, and arginine primarily occur in the small intestine of neonatal piglets. Ten intragastrically fed piglets received either intraportal (IP) or intragastric (IG) primed, constant infusions of [guanido-14C]arginine and [U-14C]ornithine + [2,3-3H]proline. By infusing amino acid isotopes via the stomach compared with the portal vein, we isolated small intestinal first-pass metabolism in vivo. During IP infusion, fractional net conversions (%) from proline to ornithine (0), ornithine to arginine (11 ± 6), and ornithine to proline (5 ± 1) were lower (P < 0.05) than during IG infusion (39 ± 8, 18 ± 6, and 42 ± 12, respectively); we speculate that these data are due to the localization of ornithine aminotransferase to the gut. The balance of these conversions indicated a large synthesis of arginine (70.0 µmol · kg-1 · h-1) by the gut, with a corresponding degradation of ornithine (70.8 µmol · kg-1 · h-1) and no change in proline balance. Gut synthesis of arginine from proline (48.1 µmol · kg-1 · h-1) was 50% of its requirement, whereas proline synthesis from arginine (33.0 µmol · kg-1 · h-1) amounted to 10% of its requirement. Overall, arginine synthesis is more dependent on the gut than proline synthesis. In situations in which gut metabolism is compromised, such as during parenteral nutrition or gastrointestinal disease, arginine and proline are individually indispensable because their biosyntheses are negligible.

biosynthesis; intraportal infusion; ornithine aminotransferase; amino acid kinetics; first-pass metabolism


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

UNLIKE IN THE ADULT, ARGININE SYNTHESIS occurs primarily in the neonatal small intestine; indeed, the net synthesis of arginine by the small intestine of the piglet has been demonstrated using arteriovenous differences across the gut (18, 23). Because of low pyrroline-5-carboxylate (P-5-C, EC no. not yet assigned) synthase activity in the neonatal small intestine, glutamate and glutamine are not significant precursors for arginine synthesis in the neonate (14, 22). As a result, proline is believed to be the primary dietary precursor for de novo synthesis of arginine by the gut. Indeed, in a previous experiment employing arginine deficiency-induced hyperammonemia as the primary outcome, we demonstrated that arginine and proline are coindispensable in intragastrically fed piglets (7). In that study, we concluded that 1) the neonatal piglet cannot synthesize sufficient arginine to maintain the urea cycle (and dispose of ammonia); 2) the piglet cannot synthesize sufficient proline to maintain plasma concentrations; and 3) arginine synthesis from proline is dependent on gut metabolism, which is diminished as a result of gut atrophy during parenteral feeding. Although these observations were convincing, they were indirect.

In another study (5), we demonstrated that the free pools of the P-5-C amino acids (arginine, ornithine, citrulline, proline, glutamate, and glutamine) were dramatically altered when identical diets were fed to piglets via the stomach, central vein, or portal vein. In particular, we observed dramatic changes in the ornithine pools in liver, small intestinal mucosa, kidney, and plasma. We hypothesized that gut atrophy due to parenteral feeding caused lower nitrogen retention because of lowered conditionally indispensable amino acid (i.e., arginine and proline) synthesis by the atrophied gut (4). Taken together, these results led to the present multi-isotope experiment, which was designed to demonstrate that proline and arginine interconversion via ornithine is dependent on first-pass metabolism by the gastrointestinal tract.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Animals and surgical procedures. Intact male Yorkshire piglets were obtained from the University of Alberta's swine unit at 1-3 days of age and 1.4-1.8 kg body wt. Piglets were removed from the sow and transported to the laboratory, where the piglets immediately underwent surgery to implant catheters. All procedures used in this study had been approved by the Animal Care Committee of the University of Alberta.

By use of a method modified from Wykes et al. (26) and Rombeau et al. (16), custom-made Silastic catheters (Ed-Art, Don Mills, ON, Canada) were installed using aseptic techniques. For all piglets, feeding catheters were installed in the stomach by Stamm gastrostomy with a Silastic tube (16). Tracer infusion catheters were implanted in the umbilical vein for intraportally infused (IP) piglets; the stomach catheter was used for both diet and tracer infusion in intragastrically infused (IG) piglets. All pigs were fitted with a femoral vein catheter for blood sampling. The umbilical catheter was introduced transperitoneally into the umbilical vein and advanced to the portal-hepatic junction. The femoral catheter was introduced into the left femoral vein and advanced to the inferior vena cava caudal to the heart. All catheters were tunneled under the skin from the point of exit on the left side of the chest to the points of entry into the blood vessels or stomach. Piglets were housed individually in circular metabolic cages that allowed visual and audio contact with other piglets. Toys and blankets were provided for environmental enrichment. The room was lighted from 0800 to 2000 and was maintained at 28°C with supplemental heat provided by heat lamps. Piglets and cages were cleaned daily.

An elemental and complete diet (3) was fed via the gastric catheter continuously for 6 days after surgery. Diets were premixed and administered through a tether-swivel system (Alice King Chatham Medical Arts, Los Angeles, CA) with pressure-sensitive infusion pumps. The infusion regimen was designed to supply all nutrients required by piglets (26); targeted intakes were 15 g amino acids · kg-1 · day-1 and 1.1 MJ metabolizable energy · kg-1 · day-1, with glucose and lipid (Intralipid 20%, Fresenius Kabi, Uppsala, Sweden) each supplying 50% of nonprotein energy. The amino acid pattern was similar to that of a commercial total parenteral nutrition (TPN) solution, which is based on human milk protein (Vaminolact, Fresenius Kabi) and consisted of (mg/g total L-amino acids) 105 alanine, 60 arginine, 60 aspartic acid, 14 cysteine, 104 glutamic acid, 31 glycine, 30 histidine, 45 isoleucine, 103 leucine, 102 lysine, 19 methionine, 40 phenylalanine, 82 proline, 55 serine, 4 taurine, 52 threonine, 21 tryptophan, 21 tyrosine (supplied as the soluble dipeptide glycyl-L-tyrosine), and 52 valine. The sterile TPN solutions were manufactured in our laboratory, as previously described (26). TPN was stored in the dark at 4°C until used; immediately before usage, vitamins (MVI Paediatric, Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Canada, Montreal, PQ) and minerals were added.

After surgery, all piglets received intravenously infused diet at 50% targeted intake until the following morning to prevent dehydration and provide nutrients. Pigs then received diet via the gastric catheter at 50% of the full rate for 12 h, at 75% of the full rate for 12 h, and then at full rate (324 ml · kg-1 · day-1) for 4.5 days; distilled water was simultaneously infused so that total diet volume infused was ~324 ml · kg-1 · day-1 throughout adaptation. Piglets were weighed each morning, and infusion rates were adjusted accordingly.

Constant tracer infusions. Ten piglets were blocked by body weight between the two treatments: IP- or IG-infused piglets. On the morning of day 5, arginine kinetics were determined by a primed [111 kBq (3 µCi)/kg], constant infusion [185 kBq (5 µCi) · kg-1 · h-1] of L-[guanido-14C]arginine. The urea product pool was also primed [463 kBq (12.5 µCi)/kg] with [14C]urea via the femoral catheter (n = 4); as a result of preliminary evidence of overpriming, this prime was reduced to 370 kBq (10 µCi)/kg for the remaining pigs (n = 6). The constant infusion continued for 6 h, with blood sampled every 30 min. On the morning of day 6, ornithine kinetics were determined by a primed [481 kBq (13 µCi)/kg], constant infusion [370 kBq (10 µCi) · kg-1 · h-1] of L-[U-14C]ornithine. Simultaneously, proline kinetics were determined by a primed [370 kBq (10 µCi)kg], constant infusion [370 kBq (10 µCi) · kg-1 · h-1] of L-[2,3-3H]proline. All priming doses were determined in a pilot experiment in similar pigs; specific radioactivity data after bolus isotope infusions were fitted to a monoexponential function, and turnover time (i.e., prime-to-constant ratio) was calculated (21).

To collect 14CO2 during L-[U-14C]ornithine infusions, piglets were placed in a covered Plexiglas box (60 × 40 × 40 cm) and acclimatized for 30 min. Air was drawn through the box at 25 l/min through three gas-washing bottles in series containing a total of 400 ml of CO2 absorber composed of ethanolamine and 2-methoxyethanol (Fisher Scientific, Nepean, ON) (1:2, vol/vol). After an initial 45-min collection, fresh absorber was exchanged every 30 min, volumes in each bottle were recorded, and aliquots were collected for scintillation counting. The constant infusions continued for 6.5 h, with blood sampling and 14CO2 collection conducted every 30 min.

Analytical procedures. Plasma amino acids and the specific radioactivity (SRA) of plasma glutamate, hydroxyproline, glutamine, citrulline, arginine, proline, and ornithine were measured by reverse-phase HPLC using phenylisothiocyanate derivatives as previously described (10). A 400-µl plasma sample was mixed with two internal standards: norleucine and L-[U-14C]phenylalanine (NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA). Radioactive derivatives were collected postcolumn in 1-ml fractions; 5 ml of scintillant were added, and fractions were counted on a liquid scintillation counter by use of the dual-isotope counting protocol for 3H and 14C. Plasma urea concentrations were determined using a spectrophotometric assay kit (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO); radioactivity associated with urea was determined by collecting the underivatized urea fraction by HPLC. The rate of 14CO2 expiration was determined for each collection period by quantifying the total radioactivity collected in the 14CO2 absorber with liquid scintillation counting of a 1-ml aliquot of absorber mixed with 5 ml of scintillant (Atomlight; Dupont Canada, Mississauga, ON).

Calculations. The following calculations were used for both plasma amino acids and urea. SRA was calculated as
plasma SRA (Bq/mmol) = amino acid

radioactivity (Bq/l)/amino acid concentration (mmol/l)
SRA for plasma amino acids for each time point during the infusion study were plotted. Plateau values were calculated as the means of the plasma SRA at the time points within the plateau. Plateaus were visually determined and then verified using regression analysis by determining that the slope was not different from zero. All plateaus included >= 4 time points.

Fluxes of infused amino acids (arginine, ornithine, and proline) were calculated as
flux (&mgr;mol · kg<SUP>−1</SUP> · h<SUP>−1</SUP>) = constant infusion

rate (Bq · kg<SUP>−1</SUP> · h<SUP>−1</SUP>)/SRA<SUB>plasma amino acid</SUB> at plateau (Bq/&mgr;mol)
The first-pass small intestinal "extraction" was determined from the fluxes during IP and IG tracer infusions for the respective amino acids (calculated for each amino acid in each pig). This method is similar to that used previously for determination of "splanchnic disappearance," which used IG and intravenous tracer infusions (2)
first-pass small intestinal extraction (%) =

[(flux<SUB>IG</SUB> − flux<SUB>IP</SUB>)/flux<SUB>IG</SUB>] × 100
The rate of 14CO2 expiration (V14CO2, Bq · kg-1 · h-1) was plotted for each collection period, and plateaus were determined as for plasma SRA. The isotopic steady state was determined, and the V14CO2 was corrected for bicarbonate retention (0.93) as described by Wykes et al. (26). The percentage of [14C]ornithine dose oxidized was determined by
fraction oxidized (%)

= (corrected <A><AC>V</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SUP>14</SUP>CO<SUB>2</SUB>/constant infusion rate) × 100
To compare the role of first-pass small intestinal metabolism on net amino acid interconversions, we used SRA ratios to represent "fractional net conversion": fractional net conversion (% of product flux) = (SRAplasma product at plateau/SRAplasma precursor) × 100. The fractional net conversion of arginine to ornithine was equivalent to that of arginine to urea, because equimolar amounts of ornithine and urea are produced from arginine breakdown. Similar to the approach of Beaumier et al. (2), molar rates of conversion of plasma labeled amino acid precursor to labeled product (Qprecursor to product) were calculated for those conversions where product flux was determined (i.e., proline, ornithine, arginine). Qprecursor to product calculations used mean IP flux data, which reflect a more accurate estimate of flux, because the isotope is infused into the sampled pool (2)
<A><AC>Q</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SUB>precursor to product</SUB> (&mgr;mol · kg<SUP>−1</SUP> · h<SUP>−1</SUP>) = fractional net

conversion × flux<SUB>amino acid product</SUB> (&mgr;mol · kg<SUP>−1</SUP> · h<SUP>−1</SUP>)
To determine the proportion of precursor flux converted to product, Qprecursor to product was divided by fluxamino acid precursor (Table 3). Molar conversion of proline to arginine (Qproline to arginine) is calculated from the molar conversion of proline to ornithine multiplied by the proportion of ornithine flux converted to arginine (and similarly for the flux of arginine to proline)
<A><AC>Q</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SUB>proline to arginine</SUB> = <A><AC>Q</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SUB>proline to ornithine</SUB> × (<A><AC>Q</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SUB>ornithine to arginine</SUB>/flux<SUB>ornithine</SUB>)

<A><AC>Q</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SUB>arginine to proline</SUB> = <A><AC>Q</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SUB>arginine to ornithine</SUB> × (<A><AC>Q</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SUB>ornithine to proline</SUB>/flux<SUB>ornithine</SUB>)

Statistical analyses. IG and IP treatments (means ± SD) were compared using a paired sample t-test (two-tailed) (version 6.02, Corel Quattro Pro, Ottawa, ON, Canada) and were considered significantly different if P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Piglet performance. The piglets remained healthy and were interested in the environment during the course of all protocols. The weight upon arrival (1.57 kg, pooled SD: 0.15), final weight (2.52 kg, pooled SD: 0.22), and rate of body weight gain (178 g/day, pooled SD: 25) was not significantly different between IG and IP treatments.

Fate of constant radiotracer infusions. In one of the pigs in the IP infusion group, the femoral sampling catheter was not patent during the [guanido-14C]arginine infusion protocol, and blood could not be collected; thus the IP group consists of four pigs for the arginine infusion data. However, the catheter was patent during the [14C]ornithine and [3H]proline infusion protocol, and these data included five pigs for both groups.

It is important to note that the validity of all kinetic equations employed was verified by plasma amino acid concentrations that were not different between IG and IP groups during any of the infusion protocols (P > 0.05) and that were not different within pigs over time during infusion protocols (P > 0.05). SRA plateaus for each infusate were reached before 3.5 h in all IG pigs for [14C]ornithine (mean: 2.2 h), [3H]proline (mean: 2.5 h), [guanido-14C]arginine (mean: 2.2 h), and [14C]urea (mean 2.1 h). In all IP pigs, SRA plateaus were reached before 3 h for [14C]ornithine (mean: 1.5 h), [3H]proline (mean: 1.4 h), [guanido-14C]arginine (mean: 2.0 h), and [14C]urea (mean 3.1 h). Typical SRA curves for each of the infused tracers are presented in Fig. 1 (A: ornithine and proline, B: arginine and urea). Plateaus for the SRA of all [14C]ornithine, [3H]proline, and [guanido-14C]arginine products (including infusate and breath 14CO2) included >= 4 time points and are summarized in Table 1. Coefficients of variation (CV) for the plateaus of each product were determined within pigs and averaged for each group (Table 1). The percentage of ornithine oxidized and fractional net conversions to products during [14C]ornithine infusion are presented in Table 2. A greater percentage of the flux was oxidized to CO2 during IP infusion (P = 0.006). Fractional net conversions of ornithine to citrulline, arginine, proline, or hydroxyproline were all lower when [14C]ornithine was infused IP (P < 0.02). Fractional net conversions of ornithine to urea (P = 0.22), glutamate (P = 0.14), or glutamine (P = 0.08) were not significantly different between infusion routes. The fractional net conversions to products for [3H]proline and [guanido-14C]arginine are presented in Table 2. Only the fractional net conversion of proline to ornithine was significantly lower during IP [3H]proline infusion (P < 0.01); these conversion data (1 ± 1) were not different from zero. Fractional net conversions of proline to glutamate or hydroxyproline were not significantly different between infusion routes (P > 0.05); conversions to other products (i.e., arginine, citrulline, and glutamine) were not calculable due to negligible radioactivity in plasma. Fractional net conversion of arginine to urea was not different between infusion routes (P > 0.05).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Typical specific radioactivity (SRA) plateau curves in intragastrically fed piglets after (A) primed, constant intragastric infusions of [14C]ornithine and [3H]proline or (B) a primed, constant intragastric infusion of [guanido-14C]arginine, including an overpriming intravenous dose of [14C]urea; [14C]urea overprime was resolved in remaining pigs by reducing bolus prime dose by 20% (not shown).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Specific radioactivity at plateau and CV of average plateau for labeled products from intragastric or intraportal infusions of [14C]ornithine, [3H]proline, and [guanido-14C]arginine in intragastrically fed piglets


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Fractional net conversions to products and ornithine oxidation from intragastric or intraportal infusion of [14C]ornithine, [3H]proline and [guanido-14C]arginine in intragastrically fed piglets

Fluxes during IP infusion were significantly lower than those during IG infusion for ornithine (P = 0.007), proline (P = 0.005), and arginine (P < 0.002) (Table 3). Plasma ornithine fluxes were lower than those for arginine and proline, which was not surprising given that arginine and proline have inputs from both the diet and protein breakdown, unlike ornithine. The small intestinal extractions for ornithine and arginine (51 and 40% of dose, respectively) were greater than the extraction for proline (14% of dose; Table 3).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Small intestinal first-pass extraction of ornithine, proline, and arginine from intragastric and intraportal infusions of [14C]ornithine, [3H]proline, and [guanido-14C]arginine in intragastrically fed piglets


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In our previous study, the IP infusion of diet was developed as a new and unique way to isolate small intestinal metabolism by maintaining hepatic first-pass metabolism (4). It is important to note that the plexus of anastomotic channels, which function as a ductus venosus in the fetal piglet, closes before birth (8), so that portal infusions via the umbilical vein are completely metabolized by the liver on first pass. To our knowledge, this method of in vivo separation of small intestinal metabolism has not previously been used to study amino acid kinetics. Thus, in the present study, we infused amino acid tracers into the portal vein or stomach, thus separating the respective absence or presence of intestinal first-pass metabolism. Unlike previous studies in which "splanchnic metabolism" was estimated by tracer infusion into a central vein rather than the stomach (2, 14), the present experiment reduced splanchnic metabolism to "gut metabolism," thereby excluding the substantial effects of hepatic metabolism. This more focused model is critical in establishing the role of the small intestine in P-5-C amino acid metabolism, because very different metabolic activities occur in the small intestine and the liver (11, 13). Therefore, using an in vivo model in intragastrically fed piglets, we have elucidated the role of small intestinal first-pass metabolism on P-5-C amino acid kinetics, including the net interconversions among proline, ornithine, and arginine.

This study has clearly demonstrated that small intestinal metabolism is necessary for the net conversion of proline to arginine. Indeed, no net conversion was evident when gut first-pass metabolism was bypassed, whereas 16% of arginine flux [42% (proline to ornithine) × 39% (ornithine to arginine), Table 2] or 48 µmol proline · kg-1 · h-1 (Table 4) were converted when gut first-pass metabolism was maintained. The net conversion of proline to arginine appears to occur during first-pass metabolism by the gut, because our models do not preclude the arterial extraction by the gut of precursors (i.e., proline) for the synthesis of arginine. Neonatal mammals are in a continuously fed state due to suckling, and so their dependence on first-pass metabolism of dietary precursors by the gut would not be a limiting scenario for the synthesis of conditionally indispensable amino acids.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4.   Rates of conversion (Qprecursor to product) of proline, ornithine and arginine from intragastric or intraportal infusions of [14C]ornithine, [3H]proline and [guanido-14C]arginine in intragastrically fed piglets

Proline synthesis from arginine was also dependent on small intestinal metabolism, as indicated by the fractional net conversion differences for the pathway from ornithine to proline (Table 2). The fractional net conversion of arginine to ornithine (via arginase; EC 3.5.3.1), measured as arginine to urea as in Table 2, was not different between IP and IG infusions, probably because arginase activity is negligible in the neonatal piglet small intestine (6, 22) and is exceedingly abundant in the neonatal liver (12). However, the conversion of ornithine to proline appeared to be localized to the gut, because a 75% lower fractional net conversion was observed during IP infusion (Table 2). Indeed, the molar rate of conversion to proline was 41.5 µmol arginine · kg-1 · h-1 in IG infused pigs, which was reduced to 8.5 µmol arginine · kg-1 · h-1 when gut first-pass metabolism was bypassed (Table 4). The importance of proline in the rapidly growing piglet was demonstrated by the fractional net conversions to hydroxyproline. Although proline net conversion to hydroxyproline was not affected by route of isotope infusion, the finding that hydroxyproline SRA reached plateau rapidly during either [3H]proline or [14C]ornithine infusions indicates a very rapid turnover of collagen in the neonatal piglet. Because hydroxyproline synthesis is posttranslational and irreversible, this rapid collagen turnover must be a considerable proline "sink" in the neonatal pig; indeed, proline has been shown to be indispensable in the piglet (1). Furthermore, this proline loss may be extreme in situations that lead to increased collagen turnover, such as during wound or burn healing; such situations would increase proline requirements and should be quantified.

Several data in this study strongly support the conclusion that the synthesis of arginine from proline is more dependent on first-pass metabolism than is the synthesis of proline from arginine. In particular, the contribution of the gut to the fractional net conversion of ornithine to proline (75%, Table 2) was not as profound as that of proline to ornithine (100%, Table 2). In addition, the overall molar flux from proline to arginine (48.1 µmol proline · kg-1 · h-1, Table 4) was entirely dependent on the gut, whereas the arginine-to-proline molar conversion attributable to the gut amounted to 33.0 µmol arginine · kg-1 · h-1. More revealing are the arginine balance data (to and from ornithine), which indicate a large net synthesis of arginine (i.e., 40.9 µmol · kg-1 · h-1) when gut metabolism is included, and a large net catabolism of arginine (i.e., -29.1 µmol · kg-1 · h-1) when gut metabolism is bypassed. These data suggest a net synthesis of 70.0 µmol arginine · kg-1 · h-1 from ornithine during first-pass gut metabolism and a net degradation of arginine by the rest of the body. These data are in contrast to those for proline balance, when equal amounts of proline were synthesized from ornithine regardless of gut metabolism; indeed, the large degradation of ornithine by the gut (70.8 µmol · kg-1 · h-1) was entirely accounted for by the higher synthesis of arginine during gut metabolism. Despite the greater dependence of arginine synthesis on gut metabolism, it is obvious from the combined data that proline synthesis also relies on gut metabolism and that ornithine is central to these conversions.

One of the goals of our multiple tracer infusion protocol was to identify the limiting step in the pathway that results in arginine synthesis being dependent on gut metabolism. As shown in Fig. 2, P-5-C is the central metabolite for the interconversions among ornithine, proline, and glutamate. The pathway from ornithine to proline involves the two enzymes, ornithine aminotransferase (OAT, ornithine to P-5-C) and P-5-C reductase (EC 1.5.1.2, P-5-C to proline); the reverse pathway from proline to ornithine involves proline dehydrogenase (EC 1.5.99.8, proline to P-5-C) and OAT (P-5-C to ornithine). The limiting step in the pathway for proline synthesis from arginine was the net conversion from ornithine to proline (4.5 vs. 18%). Furthermore, the limiting step for arginine synthesis from proline was the net conversion of proline to ornithine (0 vs. 42%). The interconversion between ornithine and proline appears to be the pathway that is localized to the small intestine. Therefore, the gut-localized enzymes are either OAT or P-5-C reductase and proline dehydrogenase. Proline dehydrogenase is also the first enzyme in the pathway from proline to glutamate; however, despite the relatively high concentrations of proline dehydrogenase in the neonatal pig small intestine (17, 24), this net conversion was not dependent on the gut, because IP and IG infusions gave similar rates (22 vs. 18%, respectively, P = 0.20). However, OAT is also involved in the conversion from ornithine to glutamate, and this net conversion was lower when gut metabolism was bypassed (4.2 vs. 6.7%, P = 0.04). Consequently, we conclude that, in the neonatal pig, OAT must be predominantly localized to the small intestine, and this localization therefore explains the negligible net interconversion between arginine and proline when gut metabolism is bypassed.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Pathways demonstrating the localization of ornithine aminotransferase to the gut. Fractional net conversions from [3H]proline to [3H]ornithine and [3H]glutamate (solid arrows and boxes) and from [14C]ornithine to [14C]proline and [14C]glutamate (dashed arrows and boxes) with respective enzymes for each conversion pathway. P5C, pyrroline-5-carboxylate. Data (mean ± SD) were from intragastric (IG) or intraportal (IP) infusions of [3H]proline and [14C]ornithine in intragastrically fed piglets. Underlined values were significantly greater (P < 0.05).

It is important to note that this extrapolation of plasma amino acid kinetic data to intracellular enzyme activity assumes that equilibration is achieved among the various pools. Although true enzyme activity cannot be determined from such data, the net in vivo consequence of these activities can be inferred, because all amino acid precursors and products reached kinetic equilibrium in the plasma. Nevertheless, the present data add to previous studies by measuring the net interconversions among the amino acids associated with OAT activity with and without small intestinal first-pass metabolism. Indeed, although all of the enzymes involved in arginine and proline interconversion have been shown to be present in the small intestine of neonatal pigs (17, 22), OAT activity is present predominantly in the small intestine (24). The critical role of intestinal OAT for arginine synthesis has also been demonstrated in mice and humans with intestinal OAT deficiency; this deficiency results in hypoornithinemia, hypocitrullinemia, hypoargininemia, hyperammonemia, and even death during the neonatal period (20). Furthermore, gabaculine (an inhibitor of OAT) results in decreased plasma concentrations of ornithine, citrulline, and arginine by 59, 52, and 76%, respectively, in 4-day-old suckling piglets (9). The present interpretation of plasma kinetic data, suggesting the localization of enzyme activity to the gut, is supported by these other studies and provides important in vivo verification of in vitro evidence.

The relative differences in fractional net conversions when the gut is or is not bypassed clearly indicate that interconversions among arginine, ornithine, and proline are dependent on first-pass gut metabolism. The quantitative importance of these conversions on whole body metabolism can be extrapolated from the flux data. On first pass, the small intestine extracted 40% of dietary arginine and 15% of dietary proline; although ornithine was not provided in the diet, 51% of the oral dose was also extracted on first pass (Table 3). The fate of extracted arginine and proline within the small intestine is oxidation, protein synthesis, and conversion to other metabolites. For extracted ornithine, which is not a component of protein, its fate is oxidation and conversion. Ornithine oxidation was significantly higher during IP infusion, suggesting that ornithine oxidation occurs primarily in the liver. However, during IG infusion of ornithine isotope, 49% of the ornithine dose reaches the liver (i.e., 51% extraction), and 35.7% of that dose is oxidized (i.e., IP infusion oxidation rate). This calculation predicts an ornithine oxidation rate of 17.5% during IG infusion, which is lower than the rate observed (i.e., 25.1%). Therefore, ~7.6% of the ornithine dose must be oxidized within the small intestine. Of the ornithine extracted by the small intestine, ~15% was oxidized, and the remaining 85% must have been converted. The flux data also indicate that 40% of dietary arginine was extracted by the gut on first pass. Because arginine-to-ornithine conversion was not dependent on the gut, intestinal arginine oxidation via ornithine was negligible. Therefore, the majority of this extracted arginine must have been either converted or incorporated into protein. Stoll et al. (18) estimated that threonine was incorporated into piglet mucosa at a rate of 2.2 µmol · kg-1 · h-1. With a relative proportion of 3.4% of protein, this threonine incorporation involves ~4.4 µmol arginine · kg-1 · h-1 and 5.3 µmol proline · kg-1 · h-1, with the assumption that piglet protein includes 6.8% arginine and 8.2% proline (25). Thus protein synthesis accounts for 6% of the 78 µmol arginine · kg-1 · h-1 and 9% of the 57 µmol proline · kg-1 · h-1 extracted by the gut on first pass. Therefore, the primary fate of the substantial amounts of arginine, proline, and ornithine extracted by the gut is conversion to other amino acids, as well as to other minor products such as nitric oxide, polyamines, and creatine.

In combination with the fractional conversion differences between routes of infusion, we conclude that interconversion among the P-5-C amino acids is dependent on first-pass metabolism by the piglet small intestine and amounts to a significant proportion of whole body fluxes of these amino acids. Indeed, of the 57 µmol proline · kg-1 · h-1 extracted by the gut from the diet, an estimated 84% (i.e., 48.1 µmol · kg-1 · h-1, Table 4) is converted to arginine; similarly, ~42% (i.e., 33.0 µmol · kg-1 · h-1, Table 4) of the extracted 78 µmol arginine · kg-1 · h-1 is converted to proline. In total, the gut releases 48.1 µmol of synthesized arginine and 117 µmol · kg-1 · h-1 of dietary arginine, which is in excess of the recommended arginine requirement for piglets of 96 µmol · kg-1 · h-1 (i.e., 2.3 mmol · kg-1 · day-1) (15). As a comparison, the gut releases 33 and 348 µmol · kg-1 · h-1 of synthesized and dietary proline, respectively, compared with an estimated requirement of 329 µmol · kg-1 · h-1 (i.e., 7.9 mmol · kg-1 · day-1) (1). In other words, the gut synthesizes 50% of the arginine required by the piglet but only 10% of the proline requirement. Therefore, the de novo synthesis of arginine from proline is not only more dependent on the gut, it is also more important in relation to whole body supply and requirement.

Because ornithine is not a component of protein or the diet, the only input to ornithine flux is de novo synthesis. However, there appears to be a substantial amount of ornithine synthesis (i.e., flux) that is not accounted for by molar inputs from arginine and proline (i.e., 149 µmol · kg-1 · h-1 in IG and 76 µmol · kg-1 · h-1 in IP). It is possible that some ornithine is synthesized from glutamate and glutamine via P-5-C synthase and OAT. However, in vitro data suggest that P-5-C synthase activity is negligible in intestinal tissues (14, 22) and thus probably does not account for the 55% of ornithine synthesis that is missing. Alternatively, it is probable that ornithine plasma flux estimates do not reflect all aspects of ornithine metabolism (2) and can be overestimated if corrections for recycling are not employed (19). For example, the conversion of ornithine to citrulline was over 100% of citrulline flux (Table 2), which suggests either tracer recycling, possibly via nitric oxide synthase, which bypasses ornithine, or more likely, preferential conversion to citrulline during first-pass intestinal metabolism (2). These data suggest that absolute flux rates and associated stochastic calculations need to be used with caution, given the inappropriateness of an imposed single-pool model to complicated amino acid metabolism. In the present study, the relative conversions, which are independent of flux data, provide the primary basis for our conclusions.

In conclusion, the data in this study support our previous findings that arginine and proline are coindispensable in gastrically fed piglets (7). In situations in which first-pass gut metabolism is bypassed or compromised (i.e., TPN, gut resection, intestinal disease, or weaning-induced gut stress), arginine and proline are individually indispensable because their biosyntheses are negligible. Therefore, the requirements for arginine and proline need to be established for parenterally fed or gut-stressed neonates. Because the net synthesis of arginine from proline was more dependent on small intestinal metabolism than the reverse net conversion, we speculate that the increase in arginine requirement in such neonates will be greater than the increase in proline requirement. There is a need to quantify the synthetic capacity of the piglet as well as the minimum dietary requirement. Because of their coindispensability, the arginine and proline requirements need to be determined together; then the maximum ratio of arginine to proline (and vice versa) should be determined, similar to the way requirements are expressed for phenylalanine/tyrosine or methionine/cysteine. Because of the role of the gut in arginine and proline metabolism, in situations of gut stress or bypass (i.e., parenteral nutrition), the arginine and proline "requirement ratio" will be very different from that in healthy orally fed neonates and should be determined separately.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The amino acids were generously donated by Biokyowa/Nutriquest, St. Louis, MO.


    FOOTNOTES

This study was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Alberta Pork Producers Development Corporation, and the Alberta Agricultural Research Institute.

Present address for R. F. P. Bertolo and J. A. Brunton: Department of Biochemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada A1B 3X9.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. O. Ball, Dept. of Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Science, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2P5 (E-mail: rball{at}afns.ualberta.ca).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

First published January 14, 2003;10.1152/ajpendo.00269.2002

Received 19 June 2002; accepted in final form 7 January 2003.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Ball, RO, Atkinson JL, and Bayley HS. Proline as an essential amino acid for the young pig. Br J Nutr 55: 659-688, 1986[ISI][Medline].

2.   Beaumier, L, Castillo L, Ajami AM, and Young VR. Urea cycle intermediate kinetics and nitrate excretion at normal and "therapeutic" intakes of arginine in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 269: E884-E896, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Bertolo, RFP, Chen CZL, Law G, Pencharz PB, and Ball RO. Threonine requirement of neonatal piglets receiving total parenteral nutrition is considerably lower than that of piglets receiving an identical diet intragastrically. J Nutr 128: 1752-1759, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Bertolo, RFP, Chen CZL, Pencharz PB, and Ball RO. Small intestinal atrophy has a greater impact on nitrogen metabolism than liver bypass in piglets fed identical diets via gastric, central venous, or portal venous routes. J Nutr 129: 1045-1052, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   Bertolo, RFP, Pencharz PB, and Ball RO. Organ and plasma amino acid concentrations are profoundly different in piglets fed identical diets via gastric, central venous or portal venous routes. J Nutr 130: 1261-1266, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Blachier, F, M'Rabet-Touil H, Posho L, Darcy-Vrillon B, and Duée P-H. Intestinal arginine metabolism during development. Evidence for de novo synthesis of L-arginine in newborn pig enterocytes. Eur J Biochem 216: 109-117, 1993[Abstract].

7.   Brunton, JA, Bertolo RFP, Pencharz PB, and Ball RO. Proline ameliorates arginine deficiency during enteral but not during parenteral feeding in neonatal piglets. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 277: E223-E231, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Dickson, AD. The ductus venosus of the pig. J Anat 90: 143-152, 1956[ISI].

9.   Flynn, NE, and Wu G. An important role for endogenous synthesis of arginine in maintaining arginine homeostasis in neonatal pigs. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 271: R1149-R1155, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   House, JD, Pencharz PB, and Ball RO. Phenylalanine requirements determined by using L-[1-14C]phenylalanine in neonatal piglets receiving total parenteral nutrition supplemented with tyrosine. Am J Clin Nutr 65: 984-993, 1997[Abstract].

11.   Jones, ME. Conversion of glutamate to ornithine and proline: pyrroline-5-carboxylate, a possible modulator of arginine requirements. J Nutr 115: 509-515, 1985[ISI][Medline].

12.   Meijer, AJ, Lamers WH, and Chamuleau RAFM Nitrogen metabolism and ornithine cycle function. Physiol Rev 70: 701-748, 1990[Free Full Text].

13.   Morris, SM. Regulation of enzymes of urea and arginine synthesis. Ann Rev Nutr 12: 81-101, 1992[ISI][Medline].

14.   Murphy, JM, Murch SJ, and Ball RO. Proline is synthesized from glutamate during intragastric infusion but not during intravenous infusion in neonatal piglets. J Nutr 126: 878-886, 1996[ISI][Medline].

15.   National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Swine (10th ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998.

16.   Rombeau, JL, Barot LR, Low DW, and Twomey PL. Feeding by tube enterostomy. In: Clinical Nutrition. Volume 1. Enteral and Tube Feeding, edited by Rombeau JL, and Caldwell MD.. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1984, p. 275-285.

17.   Samuels, SE, Aarts HLM, and Ball RO. Effect of dietary proline on proline metabolism in the neonatal pig. J Nutr 119: 1900-1906, 1989[ISI][Medline].

18.   Stoll, B, Henry J, Reeds PJ, Yu H, Jahoor F, and Burrin DG. Catabolism dominates the first-pass intestinal metabolism of dietary essential amino acids in milk protein-fed piglets. J Nutr 128: 606-614, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Van Goudoever, JB, Stoll B, Henry JF, Burrin DG, and Reeds PJ. Adaptive regulation of intestinal lysine metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 11620-11625, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Wang, T, Lawler AM, Steel G, Sipila I, Milam AH, and Valle D. Mice lacking ornithine-delta-aminotransferase have paradoxical neonatal hypoornithinaemia and retinal degeneration. Nat Genet 11: 185-190, 1995[ISI][Medline].

21.   Wolfe, RR. Determination of substrate kinetics: bolus-injection technique. In: Tracers in Metabolic Research: Radioisotope and Stable Isotope/Mass Spectrometry Methods, edited by Wolfe RR.. New York, NY: Liss, 1984, p. 27-39.

22.   Wu, G. Amino acid metabolism in the small intestine. Trends Comp Biochem Physiol 4: 39-74, 1998.

23.   Wu, G, Borbolla AG, and Knabe DA. The uptake of glutamine and release of arginine, citrulline and proline by the small intestine of developing pigs. J Nutr 124: 2437-2444, 1994[ISI].

24.   Wu, G, Davis PK, Flynn NE, Knabe DA, and Davidson JT. Endogenous synthesis of arginine plays an important role in maintaining arginine homeostasis in postweaning growing pigs. J Nutr 127: 2342-2349, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

25.   Wu, G, Ott TL, Knabe DA, and Bazer FW. Amino acid composition of the fetal pig. J Nutr 129: 1031-1038, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

26.   Wykes, LJ, Ball RO, and Pencharz PB. Development and validation of a total parenteral nutrition model in the neonatal piglet. J Nutr 123: 1248-1259, 1993[ISI][Medline].


Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 284(5):E915-E922
0193-1849/03 $5.00 Copyright © 2003 the American Physiological Society