1 Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232; and 2 Department of Medicine, Research Center, Hotel-Dieu de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2W 1T8
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
We assessed basal glucose metabolism in 16 female nonpregnant (NP) and 16 late-pregnant (P) conscious, 18-h-fasted
dogs that had catheters inserted into the hepatic and portal veins and
femoral artery ~17 days before the experiment. Pregnancy resulted in
lower arterial plasma insulin (11 ± 1 and 4 ± 1 µU/ml in
NP and P, respectively, P < 0.05), but plasma glucose
(5.9 ± 0.1 and 5.6 ± 0.1 mg/dl in NP and P, respectively)
and glucagon (39 ± 3 and 36 ± 2 pg/ml in NP and P,
respectively) were not different. Net hepatic glucose output was
greater in pregnancy (42.1 ± 3.1 and 56.7 ± 4.0 µmol · 100 g
liver1 · min
1 in NP and P,
respectively, P < 0.05). Total net hepatic
gluconeogenic substrate uptake (lactate, alanine, glycerol, and amino
acids), a close estimate of the gluconeogenic rate, was not different between the groups (20.6 ± 2.8 and 21.2 ± 1.8 µmol · 100 g
liver
1 · min
1 in NP and P,
respectively), indicating that the increment in net hepatic glucose
output resulted from an increase in the contribution of
glycogenolytically derived glucose. However, total glycogenolysis was
not altered in pregnancy. Ketogenesis was enhanced nearly threefold by
pregnancy (6.9 ± 1.2 and 18.2 ± 3.4 µmol · 100 g liver
1 · min
1 in NP and P,
respectively), despite equivalent net hepatic nonesterified fatty acid
uptake. Thus late pregnancy in the dog is not accompanied by changes in
the absolute rates of gluconeogenesis or glycogenolysis. Rather,
repartitioning of the glucose released from glycogen is responsible for
the increase in hepatic glucose production.
hepatic glucose production; gluconeogenesis; glycogenolysis; lipolysis; ketogenesis
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
AS PREGNANCY PROGRESSES, the fetus grows more rapidly and its glucose requirements increase, necessitating changes in maternal glucoregulation to meet maternal and uteroplacental-fetal glucose needs (2, 6, 14, 24, 29, 32, 35, 36, 40, 62, 63). Hepatic glucose production is increased in the basal state in pregnant women and rats (2, 6, 14, 35, 36, 53). This hepatic effect could be due to changes in insulin action at the liver, stimulation by pregnancy-associated hormones, or alteration(s) in the action of other glucoregulatory hormones, but the mechanism is unknown. Whether the increase in glucose release from the liver results from an increase in gluconeogenesis, or glycogenolysis also, has not been clarified (5, 35, 36, 53, 68, 74). In the human, an older study indicated that gluconeogenesis was not increased basally in late pregnancy (36), whereas a more recent study has suggested that changes in both gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis contribute to the pregnancy-induced increment in hepatic glucose production (35). Other studies in which labeled precursor carbon was administered, in vivo (31) and in perfused rat liver preparations (46), have implied that the gluconeogenic potential of the liver is enhanced in late pregnancy. These studies did not actually reflect the basal state, however, since the subjects were loaded with unlabeled gluconeogenic precursor carbon as well. Conclusions regarding whether an increase in gluconeogenesis accounts for part of the pregnancy-associated increase in hepatic glucose production are difficult to draw, and the topic requires further study.
Alteration of the liver's ability to release glucose is only one of the metabolic changes induced by pregnancy in the human (and other species). Changes occur in fat metabolism (3, 33, 38, 45, 49, 55), such that modest increases in circulating nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) and glycerol levels and marked increases in triglyceride levels are characteristic of late pregnancy. Circulating ketone levels tend to be elevated as well (16, 31, 38, 54, 61). Insulin resistance at peripheral tissues is characteristic of pregnancy (29, 32, 38, 40, 41, 62, 63), although this is not evident in the basal state, given that basal glucose levels are unchanged or lower than in the nonpregnant state, despite accelerated hepatic glucose production and normal (4, 36, 48, 49) or slightly elevated (6, 13, 14) insulin levels in the human. Taken together, the changes in metabolism that accompany pregnancy allow the mother to provide for the growth of the fetus while meeting her own energy needs.
The lack of extensive study examining the mechanisms that control pregnancy-induced changes in glucose metabolism can probably be attributed to several causes. The study of carbohydrate metabolism in humans, and pregnant women in particular, is limited by the invasiveness of the techniques required to assess hepatic substrate metabolism thoroughly. In addition, protecting the fetus from experimental conditions that might cause it harm is of highest priority. These limitations necessitate the use of animal models of pregnancy to address many of the issues of metabolic regulation. Experiments using animal models have made important contributions to the study of glucose metabolism during pregnancy. However, the available animal models of pregnancy are not well suited to the assessment of maternal glucose metabolism. The small size and blood volume of animals such as rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs limit the ability to perform studies in which serial blood sampling is required to assess a number of metabolic parameters simultaneously. Studies using the sheep have greatly advanced knowledge of fetal and placental metabolism; however, the sheep is not an ideal model for studying the regulation of maternal carbohydrate metabolism, since it relies partly on fuels that are not normally used by the human and other nonruminants, and its fasting glucose levels are quite low.
These limitations led us to investigate the suitability of the dog as an animal model for studying the regulation of carbohydrate metabolism during pregnancy. This model is unique, because it allows us to assess changes in metabolic processes during pregnancy in a comprehensive manner by using approaches that could not be used in the pregnant woman. Surgical and experimental techniques are available that permit study of the chronically catheterized, conscious dog under nonstressful circumstances, eliminating anesthetic, surgical, and handling stressors that influence metabolism (24). In addition, the dog's large size allows for thorough and simultaneous assessment of processes such as gluconeogenesis, glycogenolysis, lipolysis, and ketogenesis in one animal, since blood volume is not a limiting factor. Data gathered from the dog by use of these techniques are highly relevant to the human, since regulation of carbohydrate metabolism is quite similar in the dog and human (8). Finally, insulin resistance is thought to be a hallmark of canine pregnancy (12), just as it is in human pregnancy. The data presented here describe the changes in basal glucose metabolism that characterize pregnancy in this model.
![]() |
METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Animals and surgical procedures. Experiments were performed on 32 overnight-fasted (18 h), conscious female mongrel dogs [21.1 ± 0.5 and 24.8 ± 0.8 kg in nonpregnant (NP) and pregnant (P), respectively] that were fed a standard meat-and-chow diet (34% protein, 46% carbohydrate, 14.5% fat, and 5.5% fiber based on dry weight; Kal Kan meat, Kal Kan, Vernon, CA, and Purina Lab Canine Diet 5006, Purina Mills, St. Louis, MO) once daily; water was available ad libitum. The dogs were housed in a facility that met American Association for the Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care guidelines, and the protocol was approved by the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Animal Care Committee.
Sixteen of the dogs were 7-8 wk pregnant (full term = 9 wk) when studied. The other 16 dogs were not pregnant and were in the anestrous state (basal progesterone and estrogen levels) throughout the time they were housed and studied. Sixteen to 21 days before the experiment, each dog was placed under general anesthesia [thiopental sodium (Pentothal) and isoflurane gas] and a laparotomy was performed using standard sterile surgical techniques. A silicone rubber catheter (0.04 in. ID) was inserted into the hepatic portal vein and advanced so that its tip was positioned 4-5 cm into the common portal vein. A second catheter was inserted into the left common hepatic vein, which carries the largest volume of any of the hepatic veins (64), and the tip was placed 1.5 cm from its point of origin at the left lateral lobe. This positioned the catheter tip in an area where blood drains from three liver lobes, representing 60% of total liver weight, while avoiding catheterization of the inferior vena cava (64). These catheters were used for blood sampling during the experiment. A small portion of the jejunum was exposed, and a catheter (0.03 in. ID) was inserted into a mesenteric vessel and its tip was advanced 1 cm beyond the lymph nodes. The spleen was exteriorized, and another catheter was placed into a vein leading into the portal drainage system and advanced 1 cm beyond the first site of coalescence with the common splenic vein. The splenic and jejunal catheters were used for saline infusion during the experiment to allow these studies to be utilized as control experiments for future studies requiring splenic/jejunal infusions. Once inserted, the catheters were filled with heparinized saline (200 U/ml) and knotted. The muscular and subcutaneous layers were closed, with the catheter ends extending through the closures. The catheter ends were then placed in a subcutaneous pocket, and the skin layer was closed. A small incision was made in the left inguinal region, and a sampling catheter (0.04 in. ID) was placed into the femoral artery and advanced so that its tip was positioned beyond the branch of the common iliac arteries into the aorta. This catheter was filled with heparinized saline, knotted, and placed in a subcutaneous pocket, as described above. Arterial blood samples were obtained from this catheter during the experiment. One to 2 days before each experiment, the leukocyte count and hematocrit were determined. Dogs were used for an experiment only if they met the following criteria: 1) leukocyte count <20,000/mm3, 2) hematocrit >35% for nonpregnant dogs and >29% for pregnant dogs, values consistent with the typical gestationally associated fall in hematocrit (20), 3) consumption of the entire daily food ration, and 4) normal stools. On the morning of an experiment the catheter ends were removed from the subcutaneous pockets under local anesthesia (2% lidocaine, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL). The contents of the abdominal and femoral artery catheters were aspirated, and the catheters were flushed with saline. The dog was placed in a Pavlov harness. An Angiocath (20 gauge, Becton-Dickinson Vascular Access, Sandy, UT) was inserted percutaneously into a cephalic vein for infusion of indocyanine green and tracers.Experimental design.
Each experiment consisted of a 120-min tracer and dye
equilibration period (120 to 0 min) and a 30-min basal sampling
period (0-30 min). A primed (41.7-83.3 µCi), constant
(0.35-0.70 µCi/min) infusion of [3-3H]glucose (New
England Nuclear, Boston, MA) was begun at
120 min and continued
throughout the experiment. Infusions of indocyanine green (0.1 mg · m
2 · min
1;
Becton-Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, MD) and [U-14C]alanine (0.42-0.67 µCi/min; NEN) were begun
at
120 min and continued throughout the experiment.
Analytic procedures.
Blood samples were treated as described below and, if not assayed
immediately, were frozen at 70°C for later analyses. Three milliliters of whole blood were added to 60 µl of a solution
containing 90 mg/ml EGTA and 60 mg/ml glutathione (pH 7.0) for later
analysis of plasma epinephrine [interassay coefficient of variation
(CV) = 11%] and norepinephrine (CV = 9%) by HPLC
(51). The rest of the blood sample was placed in a tube
containing potassium EDTA (1.6 mg EDTA/ml). One milliliter of whole
blood was added to 3 ml of 4% (vol/vol) perchloric acid and
centrifuged (3,000 rpm for 7 min). One milliliter of the supernatant
was used for immediate spectrophotometric analysis of whole blood
acetoacetate (58). The remainder of the supernatant was
frozen for later analysis of whole blood glutamine and glutamate
(44) and whole blood lactate, alanine, glycerol, and
-hydroxybutyrate (43). One milliliter of whole blood
was added to 1 ml of 10% sulfosalicylic acid and centrifuged, and the
supernatant was frozen for later analysis of whole blood serine,
glycine, and threonine using o-phthalaldehyde derivatization
and HPLC (69). The remainder of each blood sample was then
centrifuged to separate the plasma.
Calculations. The values reported in RESULTS are averages of the values obtained during the sampling period. Total hepatic blood flow was assessed by measuring hepatic extraction of indocyanine green, according to the method of Leevy et al. (39). The proportions of the hepatic blood supply provided by the hepatic artery and portal vein were assumed to be 20 and 80%, respectively, on the basis of the Doppler-determined blood flow from other studies done in the Vanderbilt Diabetes and Research Training Center. Since the completion of the studies included here, Transonic flow probes have been implanted on the hepatic artery and portal vein in nonpregnant and pregnant dogs and have confirmed this distribution (unpublished observations; artery distribution of 20 and 19% in NP and P, respectively, n = 7 in each group).
Net hepatic substrate balance was calculated using the following formula
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Hormone levels and hepatic blood and plasma flow.
After an overnight fast, arterial plasma insulin and C-peptide levels
were lower in the pregnant than in the nonpregnant group (Table
1). There were no differences in arterial
plasma glucagon, cortisol, or epinephrine levels with pregnancy, but
arterial plasma norepinephrine was ~50% greater in the pregnant
group. Arterial plasma estrogen, progesterone, and prolactin levels
were also elevated in the pregnant group.
|
Glucose levels and kinetics.
Arterial plasma glucose was not significantly different between the two
groups (5.9 ± 0.1 and 5.6 ± 0.1 mmol/l in NP and P, respectively; Fig. 1, Table 1). Net
hepatic glucose output was greater during pregnancy (42.1 ± 3.1 and 56.7 ± 4.0 µmol · 100 g
liver1 · min
1 in NP and P,
respectively, P < 0.05; Fig. 1), consistent with the
increase in tracer-determined glucose production (54.7 ± 2.3 and
80.8 ± 3.9 µmol · 100 g
liver
1 · min
1 in NP and P,
respectively, P < 0.05; Table
2). Tracer-determined glucose utilization
and clearance rates were also elevated in the pregnant dogs.
|
|
Gluconeogenic precursor levels and net hepatic balance.
The arterial blood lactate level was lower in the pregnant than in the
nonpregnant dogs (643 ± 50 vs. 494 ± 35 µmol/l,
P < 0.05; Fig. 2). Net
hepatic lactate output was 1.70 ± 6.87 µmol · 100 g
liver1 · min
1 in the
nonpregnant group. In contrast, the liver was a net consumer of lactate
after an overnight fast in the pregnant group (21.38 ± 3.59 µmol · 100 g
liver
1 · min
1, P < 0.05 vs. NP).
|
|
|
Gluconeogenic parameters.
The rate (see METHODS) of gluconeogenesis was not altered
by pregnancy (20.6 ± 2.8 and 21.2 ± 1.8 µmol · 100 g
liver1 · min
1 in NP and P,
respectively; Fig. 4). The increment in
NHGO was thus due to a greater contribution of glucose from
glycogenolysis (21.5 ± 2.5 and 35.3 ± 3.8 µmol · 100 g
liver
1 · min
1 in NP and P,
respectively, P < 0.05). The overall rate of
glycogenolysis was not significantly different between the two groups
(36.4 ± 3.8 and 42.4 ± 4.0 µmol · 100 g
liver
1 · min
1 in NP and P,
respectively, P = 0.09). Thus a greater fraction of the
glucose released from glycogen went to hepatic glucose production in
the pregnant group (59 vs. 83%).
|
NEFA levels and net hepatic uptake.
Arterial plasma NEFA levels (967 ± 68 and 1,094 ± 87 µmol/l in NP and P, respectively), hepatic NEFA fractional extraction (0.17 ± 0.02 and 0.21 ± 0.02 in NP and P, respectively),
and net hepatic NEFA uptake (11.23 ± 1.56 and 14.23 ± 1.34 µmol · 100 g
liver1 · min
1 in NP and P,
respectively) did not differ significantly between the two groups (Fig.
5).
|
Ketone body levels and net hepatic output.
Arterial blood acetoacetate (76 ± 9 and 114 ± 9 µmol/l in
NP and P, respectively) and -hydroxybutyrate levels (23 ± 4 and 120 ± 32 µmol/l in NP and P, respectively) were
significantly elevated in the pregnant dogs (Fig.
6). Likewise, the rates of net hepatic
output of acetoacetate (2.96 ± 0.51 and 6.84 ± 0.97 µmol · 100 g
liver
1 · min
1 in NP and P,
respectively) and
-hydroxybutyrate (3.97 ± 0.70 and 11.26 ± 2.63 µmol · 100 g
liver
1 · min
1 in NP and P,
respectively) were increased during pregnancy.
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
It is well known that pregnancy is accompanied by significant alterations in glucose metabolism (2, 6, 14, 24, 29, 32, 35, 36, 40, 62, 63), yet the control mechanisms regulating these changes have not been well defined. Assessment of metabolism is limited in pregnant women by the invasive nature of the required methodology and in animal models by a variety of considerations, as discussed in the introduction. Our goal was to characterize a new animal model of pregnancy by thoroughly assessing hepatic glucose (gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis), fat, and amino acid metabolism in the chronically catheterized, conscious, overnight-fasted (18-h) dog during late gestation.
The glucose level was not significantly decreased in the pregnant dogs, despite a 61% increase in tracer-determined glucose utilization. Given that pregnancy is characterized by insulin resistance in maternal tissues, this was likely due to glucose consumption by uteroplacental-fetal tissues (41, 47). Arteriovenous glucose measurements across the uterus were not possible, but, in fact, the magnitude of glucose utilization by these tissues is evident in the lack of rise in the glucose level, despite the large increase in hepatic glucose production and the lower maternal insulin levels. The parallel increases in the rates of tracer-determined glucose utilization and production have also been documented in other species (6, 12, 36, 62). The increase in net hepatic glucose output confirmed that an increase in glucose release from the liver (as opposed to the kidneys) was the primary source of the increment in glucose production.
The increment in NHGO could not be explained by a change in the rate of
gluconeogenesis from circulating precursors. Nevertheless, pregnancy
altered the profile of circulating gluconeogenic precursor availability. Most notably, when taken as a group average, there was
net lactate release from the liver in the nonpregnant dogs but net
lactate uptake in the pregnant group. In the subset of nonpregnant dogs
that took up lactate, the rate of uptake was one-half that in the
pregnant group (10.5 ± 4.0 vs. 22.8 ± 2.5 µmol · 100 g
liver1 · min
1). If net hepatic
lactate uptake occurred at any time point, in pregnant or nonpregnant
dogs, it was included in the gluconeogenic calculation (see
METHODS for a detailed description of the technique). Circulating levels of four of the six gluconeogenic amino acids (serine, threonine, glutamine, and alanine) were lower in the pregnant
group, while the rates of net hepatic uptake of serine, glycine, and
alanine were significantly reduced. In contrast, glutamine output by
the liver was markedly enhanced by pregnancy. The possibility that
another gluconeogenic amino acid taken up by the liver contributed the
carbon to glutamine synthesis, rather than gluconeogenesis, was not
considered in the gluconeogenic calculation. If this were the case, the
impact on the gluconeogenic calculation would be to reduce the rate by
only ~3 µmol · 100 g
liver
1 · min
1, an amount
insufficient to alter the conclusions drawn. Alternatively, the carbon
for glutamine synthesis may have been derived from the breakdown of
glycogen (50, 73). In either case, the net rate of
glycogen breakdown would thus be greater than calculated. It is also
possible that the hepatic output of glutamine was related to
disposition of nongluconeogenic amino acids within the liver. In a net
sense, then, liver consumption of gluconeogenic amino acid precursors
was diminished by ~50% in the pregnant dogs (20.4 ± 2.1 vs.
11.0 ± 1.2 µmol · 100 g
liver
1 · min
1). Since
steady state existed, this indicated that the supply of amino acids
reaching the liver was reduced. There were no apparent differences in
glycerol metabolism (5.6 ± 0.7 and 5.3 ± 0.5 µmol · 100 g
liver
1 · min
1 in NP and P,
respectively). Overall, the increase in hepatic lactate uptake equaled
the decrease in gluconeogenic amino acid delivery to the liver in the
pregnant group; therefore, if it is assumed that all precursors were
converted to glucose, the rate of gluconeogenesis from circulating
substrates was equivalent in the pregnant and nonpregnant groups. It is
clear that gluconeogenic precursor availability did not limit
gluconeogenesis, and thus the rise in hepatic glucose release in the
pregnant dogs was a function of a liver event.
Methodological limitations and differences in experimental conditions probably explain the slight differences in conclusions made from our data and data of others regarding the rate of gluconeogenesis in the basal state in pregnancy. Administration of [13C]alanine to pregnant women resulted in less label incorporation in glucose in a study by Kalhan et al. (36), suggesting that gluconeogenic efficiency was decreased. More recently, however, Kalhan et al. (35) used the deuterated water method to assess gluconeogenesis and reported that the fractional contribution of gluconeogenesis to glucose production was unchanged in pregnancy. Since hepatic glucose production was modestly increased, the actual rate of gluconeogenesis was thus greater. This group explains the different results from the two studies as a function of limitations of the precursors used. However, in the more recent work (35) the subjects were studied after a slightly longer than usual, but metabolically important (49), length of fast, which resulted in mild hypoglycemia in the pregnant women. This may have evoked a modest counterregulatory response that could have contributed to the increase in gluconeogenesis (glucagon levels were not reported). Despite the minor differences in the conclusions of that study and the present study, it appears that, in general, gluconeogenesis is not dramatically altered by pregnancy in the basal, overnight-fasted state in the human or the dog.
The caveats of assessing gluconeogenesis using labeled gluconeogenic precursors have been discussed previously (35, 72). This approach cannot provide a quantitative measure of the gluconeogenic rate, and the assumptions that must be made regarding dilution of labeled precursor in intrahepatic pools limit the utility of methods (10) of estimating gluconeogenic efficiency. Nevertheless, the value of calculating the fraction of labeled precursor that was consumed by the liver and incorporated into glucose lies in the difference between groups. This parameter was markedly increased in the pregnant group (0.77 vs. 0.34), and yet the arteriovenous difference method indicated that there was no difference in the gluconeogenic rates in the pregnant and nonpregnant groups. The question thus arises as to how the liver could appear to be more gluconeogenic but not demonstrate an increase in glucose production from gluconeogenesis. The increased fraction of label in glucose suggests that there was an intrahepatic change in some aspect of the gluconeogenic/glycolytic pathways in the pregnant dog. This possibility was, in fact, supported by the switch to lactate uptake in the pregnant dogs. Thus, although the load of amino acids delivered to the liver diminished in the pregnant group, this was offset by an intrahepatic change that pulled lactate into the liver, with a net result of no difference in total gluconeogenic precursor load to the liver in the two groups. It therefore appears that basal intrahepatic mechanisms in pregnancy could be geared to shunt precursors to glucose synthesis, but the gluconeogenic rate is ultimately limited by the precursor load to the liver.
Given that gluconeogenesis from circulating precursors was unchanged in the pregnant dogs, the increment in glucose output must have resulted from an increase in the contribution of glycogenolytically derived glucose. Interestingly, this was not associated with a significant increase in the overall rate of glycogen breakdown. An increase in the rate would not have been unexpected given the lower insulin levels, since acute, complete insulin withdrawal in nonpregnant dogs causes glucose production to double, primarily because of increased glycogenolysis (7). The data indicated that the primary effect of pregnancy on glycogen metabolism in the basal state was to route the glucose released from glycogen through different pathways. In the pregnant group, the glucose left the cell as glucose, possibly as a result of the effect of lower insulin levels on glucose-6-phosphatase activity (42). Lactate was not released from the liver in the pregnant dogs, indicating that glucose did not flux through the glycolytic pathway in a net sense. In contrast, in the nonpregnant dogs a portion of the glucose released from glycogen not only left the cell as glucose but was also channeled into the glycolytic pathway for lactate production, as evidenced by the net hepatic lactate balance data. Thus the increment in hepatic glucose production during pregnancy in the dog is glycogenolytic in origin, but this occurs due to a change in postglycogenolytic partitioning of glucose, rather than a change in the net rate of glycogen breakdown per se. The mechanism for this is not known. Glucagon, cortisol, and epinephrine levels were unaffected by pregnancy, and norepinephrine was only slightly elevated, so these hormones were unlikely to affect liver glucose metabolism. Conceivably, the action of pregnancy-associated hormones or impaired hepatic insulin action could impact on hepatic glucose metabolism, but these possibilities await further study.
We do not consider it likely that an increase in the supply of gluconeogenic precursor within the liver itself contributed to the increment in hepatic glucose production. Recent work comparing the methodologies of Giaccari and Rossetti (23) and Goldstein et al. (25) to assess gluconeogenesis indicated that intrahepatic gluconeogenic precursors provide only a minor contribution (<5%) to glucose release by the liver in dogs in the basal state (25; R. Goldstein, personal communication). Prolonged fasting did not affect the process, and the data indicated the possibility of only a modest stimulation in response to chronic cortisol administration. However, cortisol is not elevated in the pregnant dog, and there is no evidence that the sex steroids of pregnancy have an intrahepatic proteolytic effect. Thus we must assume that a change in intrahepatic gluconeogenic precursor metabolism does not contribute to the accelerated glucose release from the liver of the pregnant dog.
The concept of human pregnancy as a state of "accelerated
starvation" (22), in which basal glucose levels are
somewhat lower and ketone levels somewhat higher, appears to apply to
pregnancy in the dog as well. This, in fact, probably explains the
lower insulin levels in the pregnant group. Metzger et al.
(49) showed that as fasting proceeds beyond the
overnight-fasted state (for another 6 h), glucose levels fall in
pregnant women, presumably due to the unremitting glucose needs of the
fetus. Insulin levels fall as well, whereas glucose and insulin levels
remain stable in nonpregnant women (49). While blood
glucose was only slightly lower in the group of pregnant dogs, recent
studies in dogs have shown that the -cell is so sensitive to
decrements in glucose that a fall in blood glucose of only 0.4 mmol/l
can result in a 50% reduction in circulating insulin levels
(21). Thus the lower insulin levels in the pregnant dogs
suggest that the pregnant dog may be slightly further along in the
switch to a fasting state than pregnant women, who generally have
normal (4, 36, 48, 49) or elevated (6, 13,
14) insulin levels after an overnight fast. Although the glucose
level was not reduced to as great an extent by pregnancy in the dog as
it is in women, the dog adapts more quickly to a fasting state and does
not experience a marked fall in glucose after a fast as long as 7 days
(30). This ability to match the glucose production rate to
the glucose utilization rate during fasting does not appear to be
maintained in pregnant dogs, since in two pregnant dogs fasted for
42 h glucose dropped ~20 mg/dl. C-peptide levels were decreased
by 35%, while insulin levels were decreased by a greater extent (64%)
in the pregnant group, suggesting that pregnancy also may have caused
an increase in insulin clearance, possibly due to placental degradation
of the hormone (57).
The lipolytic parameters (glycerol and NEFA) were relatively unaffected by pregnancy, despite the lower insulin, although we could not assess whether there were changes within the adipocyte that were masked by offsetting changes in peripheral fat utilization. Acute insulin deficiency in nonpregnant dogs results in elevation of glycerol and NEFA levels (17; D. Edgerton, personal communication), despite inhibitory effects of the ensuing hyperglycemia on lipolysis (65). We cannot explain the failure of glycerol and NEFA to rise in response to the lower insulin in the pregnant group. It is interesting, however, that the most dramatic alteration in fat metabolism in pregnant women is elevation of circulating triglyceride levels (33, 55); in comparison, NEFA and glycerol levels are more moderately increased (3, 45, 49, 55). Triglyceride levels were measured in two pregnant and two nonpregnant dogs, and the data indicated that circulating triglycerides are elevated during gestation in the dog (70 vs. 41 mg/dl) as well.
Despite the lack of effect on hepatic NEFA uptake, ketogenesis was
markedly elevated in the pregnant group. Acetoacetate and -hydroxybutyrate levels rose due to a two- to threefold increase in
net hepatic ketone production. It is not clear if the lower circulating
insulin levels could have accelerated this process. Acute insulin
deficiency (3 h) in the nonpregnant dog is insufficient to alter
-hydroxybutyrate production by the liver (26). In pregnant women, ketone levels are basal or elevated, despite the increased circulating insulin, suggesting that another factor must
stimulate ketogenesis as well. Progesterone has been implicated in this
process (37).
In summary, in the basal state, hepatic glucose production and glucose utilization are increased in late pregnancy in the dog. Interestingly, the increase in hepatic glucose release is not associated with a change in gluconeogenic flux or net glycogenolysis in the pregnant dog. Instead, there is a change in the partitioning of glucose once it is released from glycogen, such that the increment in hepatic glucose production is due to an increase in the contribution of glycogenolytically derived glucose, rather than a change in the contribution of gluconeogenesis. Further study is required to assess the mechanisms for these hepatic adaptations. Circulating basal gluconeogenic amino acid levels are reduced in the pregnant dog. Overnight-fasted ketone levels are elevated by pregnancy, even though net hepatic NEFA uptake is unchanged. Insulin levels are lower in the overnight-fasted pregnant dog, while glucagon levels remain unchanged. With these changes in mind, the concept of pregnancy as a state of accelerated starvation in the human thus appears to apply to pregnancy in the dog as well, indicating that it will be a useful model for studying the regulation of carbohydrate metabolism in pregnancy.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
The authors appreciate the technical assistance of Phillip Williams, Jon Hastings, Wanda Snead, Pam Venson, Eric Allen, and Pat Donahue.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
This work was supported by Canadian Diabetes Association Research Grant 1119 and Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International Research Grant 193113. C. C. Connolly was the recipient of a Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International Postdoctoral Fellowship.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. C. Connolly, 702 Light Hall, Dept. of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232 (E-mail: cindy.connolly{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 2 December 1999; accepted in final form 5 June 2000.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1.
Adkins, BA,
Myers SR,
Hendrick GK,
Stevenson RW,
Williams PE,
and
Cherrington AD.
Importance of the route of intravenous glucose delivery to hepatic glucose production in the conscious dog.
J Clin Invest
79:
557-565,
1987[ISI][Medline].
2.
Assel, B,
Rossi K,
and
Kalhan S.
Glucose metabolism during fasting through human pregnancy: comparison of tracer method with respiratory calorimetry.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
265:
E351-E356,
1993
3.
Bleicher, SB,
O'Sullivan JB,
and
Freinkel N.
Carbohydrate metabolism in pregnancy. V. The interrelationships of glucose, insulin and free fatty acids in late pregnancy and post partum.
N Engl J Med
271:
866-872,
1964[ISI].
4.
Buchanan, TA,
Metzger BE,
Freinkel N,
and
Bergman RN.
Insulin sensitivity and B-cell responsiveness to glucose during late pregnancy in lean and moderately obese women with normal glucose tolerance or mild gestational diabetes.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
162:
1008-1014,
1990[ISI][Medline].
5.
Casado, J,
Remesar X,
and
Pastor-Anglada M.
Hepatic uptake of amino acids in late-pregnant rats. Effect of food deprivation.
Biochem J
248:
117-122,
1987[ISI][Medline].
6.
Catalano, PM,
Tyzbir ED,
Wolfe RR,
Roman NM,
Amini SB,
and
Sims EAH
Longitudinal changes in basal hepatic glucose production and suppression during insulin infusion in normal pregnant women.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
167:
913-919,
1992[ISI][Medline].
7.
Cherrington, AD,
Lacy WW,
and
Chiasson J-L.
Effect of glucagon on glucose production during insulin deficiency in the dog.
J Clin Invest
62:
664-677,
1978[ISI][Medline].
8.
Cherrington, AD,
Stevenson RW,
Steiner KE,
Davis MA,
Myers SR,
Adkins BA,
Abumrad NN,
and
Williams PE.
Insulin, glucagon, and glucose as regulators of hepatic glucose uptake and production in vivo.
Diabetes Metab Rev
3:
307-332,
1987[Medline].
9.
Cherrington, AD,
and
Vranic M.
Effect of arginine on glucose turnover and plasma free fatty acids in normal dogs.
Diabetes
22:
537-543,
1973[ISI][Medline].
10.
Chiasson, J-L,
Liljenquist JE,
Lacy WW,
Jennings AS,
and
Cherrington AD.
Gluconeogenesis: methodological approaches in vivo.
Fed Proc
36:
229-235,
1977[ISI][Medline].
11.
Chiasson, J-L,
Liljenquist JE,
Sinclair-Smith BC,
and
Lacy WW.
Gluconeogenesis from alanine in normal postabsorptive man. Intrahepatic stimulatory effect of glucagon.
Diabetes
24:
574-584,
1975[Abstract].
12.
Concannon, PW,
McCann JP,
and
Temple M.
Biology and endocrinology of ovulation, pregnancy and parturition in the dog.
J Reprod Fertil Suppl
39:
3-25,
1989[Medline].
13.
Cousins, L,
Rigg L,
Hollingsworth D,
Brink G,
Aurand J,
and
Yen SSC
The 24-hour excursion and diurnal rhythm of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide in normal pregnancy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
136:
483-488,
1980[ISI][Medline].
14.
Cowett, RM,
Susa JB,
Kahn CB,
Giletti B,
Oh W,
and
Schwartz R.
Glucose kinetics in nondiabetic and diabetic women during the third trimester of pregnancy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
146:
773-780,
1983[ISI][Medline].
15.
DeBodo, RC,
Steele R,
Altszuler N,
Dunn A,
and
Bishop JS.
On the hormonal regulation of carbohydrate metabolism: studies with C14 glucose.
Recent Prog Horm Res
19:
445-488,
1983.
16.
Denne, SC,
Patel D,
and
Kalhan SC.
Leucine kinetics and fuel utilization during a brief fast in human pregnancy.
Metabolism
40:
1249-1256,
1991[ISI][Medline].
17.
Edgerton, DS,
Cardin S,
Neal DW,
and
Cherrington AD.
The effect of physiologic changes in insulin on gluconeogenesis in the conscious dog (Abstract).
Diabetes
48, Suppl1:
A276,
1999[ISI].
18.
Ensinck, JW.
Immunoassays for glucagon.
In: Glucagon. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, edited by Lefèbvre PJ.. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983, vol. 66, p. 203-221.
19.
Farmer, RW,
and
Pierce CE.
Plasma cortisol determination: radioimmunoassay and competitive protein binding compared.
Clin Chem
20:
411-414,
1974
20.
Feldman, E,
and
Nelson R.
Canine female reproduction.
In: Canine and Feline Endocrinology and Reproduction. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1987, p. 399-480.
21.
Flattem, N,
Venson P,
Snead W,
Emshwiller MG,
and
Shiota M.
Glucagon secretion sensitively increases in response to mild non-insulin-induced hypoglycemia in the dog (Abstract).
Diabetes
46, Suppl 1:
17A,
1997.
22.
Freinkel, N.
Banting Lecture 1980. Of pregnancy and progeny.
Diabetes
29:
1023-1035,
1980[Abstract].
23.
Giaccari, A,
and
Rossetti L.
Predominant role of gluconeogenesis in the hepatic glycogen repletion of diabetic rats.
J Clin Invest
89:
36-45,
1992[ISI][Medline].
24.
Gilbert, M,
Hay WW,
Johnson RL,
and
Battaglia FC.
Some aspects of maternal metabolism throughout pregnancy in the conscious rabbit.
Pediatr Res
18:
854-859,
1984[Abstract].
25.
Goldstein, R,
Palmer B,
Liu R,
and
Massillon D.
The effects of chronic hypercortisolemia on gluconeogenesis assessed using two independent methods in vivo (Abstract).
Diabetes
44, Suppl1:
55A,
1995.
26.
Goldstein, RE,
Wasserman DH,
Reed GW,
Lacy DB,
Abumrad NN,
and
Cherrington AD.
The effects of acute hypercortisolemia on -hydroxybutyrate and glycerol metabolism during insulin deficiency.
Horm Metab Res
26:
9-13,
1994[ISI][Medline].
27.
Goresky, CA,
Back GG,
and
Nadeau BE.
Red cell carriage of label: its limiting effect on the exchange of materials in the liver.
Circ Res
36:
328-351,
1975[Abstract].
28.
Hamilton, KS,
Gibbons FK,
Bracy DP,
Lacy DB,
Cherrington AD,
and
Wasserman DH.
Effect of prior exercise on the partitioning of an intestinal glucose load between splanchnic bed and skeletal muscle.
J Clin Invest
98:
125-135,
1996
29.
Hauguel, S,
Gilbert M,
and
Girard J.
Pregnancy-induced insulin resistance in liver and skeletal muscle of the conscious rabbit.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
252:
E165-E169,
1987
30.
Hendrick, GK,
Frizzell RT,
Williams PE,
and
Cherrington AD.
Effect of hyperglucagonemia on hepatic glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis after a prolonged fast.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
258:
E841-E849,
1990
31.
Herrera, E,
Knopp R,
and
Freinkel N.
Carbohydrate metabolism in pregnancy. VI. Plasma fuels, insulin, liver composition, gluconeogenesis, and nitrogen metabolism during late gestation in the fed and fasted rat.
J Clin Invest
48:
2260-2272,
1969[ISI][Medline].
32.
Holemans, K,
Van Bree R,
Verhaeghe J,
Aerts L,
and
Van Assche FA.
In vivo glucose utilization by individual tissues in virgin and pregnant offspring of severely diabetic rats.
Diabetes
42:
530-536,
1993[Abstract].
33.
Hollingsworth, DR,
and
Grundy SM.
Pregnancy-associated hypertriglyceridemia in normal and diabetic women. Differences in insulin-dependent, non-insulin-dependent, and gestational diabetes.
Diabetes
31:
1092-1097,
1982[ISI][Medline].
34.
Kadish, AH,
Litle RL,
and
Sternberg JC.
A new and rapid method for the determination of glucose by measurement of rate of oxygen consumption.
Clin Chem
14:
116-131,
1968[ISI].
35.
Kalhan, S,
Rossi K,
Gruca L,
Burkett E,
and
O'Brien A.
Glucose turnover and gluconeogenesis in human pregnancy.
J Clin Invest
100:
1775-1781,
1997
36.
Kalhan, SC,
D'Angelo LJ,
Savin SM,
and
Adam PA.
Glucose production in pregnant women at term gestation. Sources of glucose for human fetus.
J Clin Invest
63:
388-394,
1979[ISI][Medline].
37.
Kalkhoff, RK.
Metabolic effects of progesterone.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
142:
735-738,
1982[ISI][Medline].
38.
Kalkhoff, RK,
Kissebah AH,
and
Kim H-J.
Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism during normal pregnancy: relationship to gestational hormone action.
In: The Diabetic Pregnancy. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1979, p. 3-21.
39.
Leevy, CM,
Mendenhall CL,
Lesko W,
and
Howard MM.
Estimation of hepatic blood flow with indocyanine green.
J Clin Invest
41:
1169-1179,
1962[ISI].
40.
Leturque, A,
Burnol AF,
Ferre P,
and
Girard J.
Pregnancy-induced insulin resistance in the rat: assessment by glucose clamp technique.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
246:
E25-E31,
1984
41.
Leturque, A,
Ferre P,
Burnol A-F,
Kande J,
Maulard P,
and
Girard J.
Glucose utilization rates and insulin sensitivity in vivo in tissues of virgin and pregnant rats.
Diabetes
35:
172-177,
1986[Abstract].
42.
Liu, Z,
Barrett EJ,
Dalkin AC,
Zwart AD,
and
Chou JY.
Effect of acute diabetes on rat hepatic glucose-6-phosphatase activity and its messenger RNA level.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
205:
680-686,
1994[ISI][Medline].
43.
Lloyd, B,
Burrin J,
Smythe P,
and
Alberti KGMM
Enzymatic fluorometric continuous-flow assays for blood glucose, lactate, pyruvate, alanine, glycerol and 3-hydroxybutyrate.
Clin Chem
34:
1724-1729,
1978.
44.
Lund, P.
L-Glutamine and L-glutamate. U-V method with glutaminase and glutamate dehydrogenase.
In: Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. Deerfield Beach, FL: VCH (Weinheim), 1985, p. 357-363.
45.
McDonald-Gibson, RG,
Young M,
and
Hytten FE.
Changes in plasma nonesterified fatty acids and serum glycerol in pregnancy.
Br J Obstet Gynecol
82:
460-466,
1975[ISI][Medline].
46.
Metzger, BE,
Agnoli FS,
Hare JW,
and
Freinkel N.
Carbohydrate metabolism in pregnancy. X. Metabolic disposition of alanine by the perfused liver of the fasting pregnant rat.
Diabetes
22:
601-612,
1973[ISI][Medline].
47.
Metzger, BE,
and
Freinkel N.
Diabetes and pregnancy: metabolic changes and management.
Clin Diabetes
8:
1-10,
1990.
48.
Metzger, BE,
Unger RH,
and
Freinkel N.
Carbohydrate metabolism in pregnancy. XIV. Relationships between circulating glucagon, insulin, glucose and amino acids in response to a "mixed meal" in late pregnancy.
Metabolism
26:
151-156,
1977[ISI][Medline].
49.
Metzger, BE,
Vileisis RA,
Ravnikar V,
and
Freinkel N.
"Accelerated starvation" and the skipped breakfast in late normal pregnancy.
Lancet
1:
588-592,
1982[ISI][Medline].
50.
Miller, RG,
Jahoor F,
Reeds PJ,
Heird WC,
and
Jaksic T.
A new stable isotope tracer technique to assess human neonatal amino acid synthesis.
J Pediatr Surg
30:
1325-1329,
1995[ISI][Medline].
51.
Moghimzadeh, E,
Nobin A,
and
Rosengren E.
Fluorescence microscopical and chemical characterization of the adrenergic innervation in mammalian liver tissue.
Cell Tissue Res
230:
605-613,
1983[ISI][Medline].
52.
Morgan, CR,
and
Lazarow A.
Immunoassay of insulin. Two antibody system. Plasma insulin levels in normal, subdiabetic and diabetic rats.
Diabetes
12:
115-126,
1963[ISI].
53.
Ogata, ES,
Metzger BE,
and
Freinkel N.
Carbohydrate metabolism in pregnancy. XVI. Longitudinal estimates of the effects of pregnancy on D-[6-3H]glucose and D-[6-14C]glucose turnovers during fasting in the rat.
Metabolism
30:
487-492,
1981[ISI][Medline].
54.
Pere, MC,
Baudelin A,
Briggs K,
and
Gilbert M.
Hepatic metabolism during fasting-refeeding transition in conscious pregnant rabbits.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
262:
E899-E905,
1992
55.
Phelps, RL,
Metzger BE,
and
Freinkel N.
Carbohydrate metabolism in pregnancy. XVII. Diurnal profiles of plasma glucose, insulin, free fatty acids, triglycerides, cholesterol, and individual amino acids in later normal pregnancy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
140:
730-736,
1981[ISI][Medline].
56.
Polonsky, K,
Jaspan J,
Pugh W,
Cohen D,
Schneider M,
Schwartz T,
Moossa AR,
Tager H,
and
Rubenstein AH.
Metabolism of C-peptide in the dog. In vivo demonstration of the absence of hepatic extraction.
J Clin Invest
72:
1114-1123,
1983[ISI][Medline].
57.
Posner, BI.
Insulin metabolizing enzyme activities in human placental tissue.
Diabetes
22:
552-563,
1973[ISI][Medline].
58.
Price, CP,
Lloyd B,
and
Alberti KGMM
A kinetic spectrophotometric assay for rapid determination of acetoacetate in blood.
Clin Chem
23:
1893-1897,
1977
59.
Reimers, TJ,
Lamb SV,
Bartlett SA,
Matamoros RA,
Cowan RG,
and
Engle JS.
Effects of hemolysis and storage on quantification of hormones in blood samples from dogs, cattle, and horses.
Am J Vet Res
52:
1075-1080,
1991[ISI][Medline].
60.
Reimers, TJ,
Phemister RD,
and
Niswender GD.
Radioimmunological measurement of follicle stimulating hormone and prolactin in the dog.
Biol Reprod
19:
673-679,
1978[ISI][Medline].
61.
Rossi, G,
Lapaczewski P,
Diamond MP,
Jacob RJ,
Shulman GI,
and
Sherwin RS.
Inhibitory effect of pregnancy on counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia in awake rat.
Diabetes
42:
1440-1445,
1993[Abstract].
62.
Rossi, G,
Sherwin RS,
Penzias AS,
Lapaczewski P,
Jacob RJ,
Shulman GI,
and
Diamond MP.
Temporal changes in insulin resistance and secretion in 24-h-fasted conscious pregnant rats.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
265:
E845-E851,
1993
63.
Ryan, EA,
O'Sullivan MJ,
and
Skyler JS.
Insulin action during pregnancy. Studies with the euglycemic clamp technique.
Diabetes
34:
380-389,
1985[Abstract].
64.
Shoemaker, W,
Walker W,
Van Italie T,
and
Moore F.
A method for simultaneous catheterization of major hepatic vessels in a chronic canine preparation.
Am J Physiol
196:
311-314,
1959[ISI].
65.
Shulman, GI,
Williams PE,
Liljenquist JE,
Lacy WW,
Keller U,
and
Cherrington AD.
Effect of hyperglycemia independent of changes in insulin and glucagon on lipolysis in the conscious dog.
Metabolism
29:
317-320,
1980[ISI][Medline].
66.
Snedecor, GW,
and
Cochran WG.
Statistical Methods (6th ed.). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1967.
67.
Stumvoll, M,
Meyer C,
Perriello G,
Kreider M,
Welle S,
and
Gerich J.
Human kidney and liver gluconeogenesis: evidence for organ substrate selectivity.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
274:
E817-E826,
1998
68.
Valcarce, C,
Cuezva JM,
and
Medina JM.
Increased gluconeogenesis in the rat at term gestation.
Life Sci
37:
553-560,
1985[ISI][Medline].
69.
Venkatakrishnan, A,
Abel MJ,
Campbell RA,
Donahue EP,
Uselton TC,
and
Flakoll PJ.
Whole blood analysis of gluconeogenic amino acids for estimation of de novo gluconeogenesis using pre-column o-phthalaldehyde derivatization and high-performance liquid chromatography.
J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl
676:
1-6,
1996[Medline].
70.
Wahren, J,
Felig P,
Ahlborg G,
and
Jorfeldt L.
Glucose metabolism during leg exercise in man.
J Clin Invest
50:
2713-2725,
1971.
71.
Wall, JS,
Steele R,
DeBodo RC,
and
Altszuler N.
Effect of insulin on utilization and production of circulating glucose.
Am J Physiol
189:
43-50,
1957[ISI].
72.
Wolfe, RR.
Glucose metabolism.
In: Radioactive and Stable Isotope Tracers in Biomedicine. Principles and Practice of Kinetic Analysis. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1992, p. 283-315.
73.
Yang, D,
and
Brunengraber H.
Glutamate, a window on liver intermediary metabolism.
J Nutr
130:
991S-994S,
2000[ISI][Medline].
74.
Zorzano, A,
Lasuncion MA,
and
Herrera E.
Role of the availability of substrate on hepatic and renal gluconeogenesis in the fasted late pregnant rat.
Metabolism
35:
297-303,
1986[ISI][Medline].