Skeletal muscle protein mobilization during the progression of lactation

Emma J. Clowes, Frank X. Aherne, and Vickie E. Baracos

Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Submitted 5 May 2004 ; accepted in final form 19 October 2004


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
To investigate changes in muscle metabolism during lactation, serial biopsy of the triceps brachii was conducted in first-parity sows subjected to three degrees of selective protein mobilization through restriction of dietary protein intake (see Clowes EJ, Aherne FX, Foxcroft GR, and Baracos VE. J Anim Sci 81: 753–764, 2003). Muscle biopsies were taken 7 days before parturition and at 12 and 23 days of lactation. The following changes occurred after parturition, were progressive, and were significantly magnified in animals under the greatest degree of dietary protein restriction and hence of protein mobilization. Decreased RNA-to-DNA ratio (capacity for protein synthesis) was observed. The presence of increased expression of several elements of the ubiquitin proteasome proteolytic pathway suggested a robust catabolic response. However, as lactation progressed, and especially under conditions of increased dietary protein restriction, protein mobilization increased, muscle RNA-to-DNA ratio fell further, protease gene expression continued to rise, tissue free glutamine levels rose dramatically, and essential amino acid levels, especially branched-chain amino acids and threonine, fell to below prepartum levels.

ATP-ubiquitin proteasome proteolytic pathway; muscle free amino acids; muscle RNA, DNA, and protein concentration


LACTATION IMPOSES A UNIQUE CHALLENGE to mammalian protein metabolism, especially for species such as the pig, which support high growth rates in their 10–12 offspring. This state represents a physiological maximum in protein anabolism, with high rates of net protein export to the mammary gland. Milk production is sufficient to support a 40- to 50-kg net increase in litter body weight (equivalent to 20–25% of the maternal body mass) in ~3 wk (10, 12, 33). Because of the high rate of net protein export from the dam in the form of milk, lactation can also represent a physiological maximum in protein mobilization in the dam, as dietary intakes are often inadequate. The maternal catabolic response in lactation can approach levels seen in hypercatabolic patients after severe burn injury, with daily negative nitrogen balance at peak lactation of the order of 0.26 g N·kg body wt–1·day–1 (0.9 g N·kg body wt–0.75·day–1; Ref. 21). Lactation thus represents a highly orchestrated physiological state featuring intense milk protein anabolism and net catabolism of body protein reserves, especially skeletal muscle.

The capacity to mobilize body protein from skeletal muscle is an important resource for lactation (10–12, 30) that enables the dam to care for and nourish her offspring, and at least temporarily minimizes the maternal commitment to forage for food. Muscle protein mobilization is an adaptive response that enables a high level of milk production under conditions of poor nutrient supply (2, 21). Litter growth is largely maintained even when feed is restricted to 50% of ad libitum intake (36). Maternal protein mobilization is related to overall milk protein production and is proportional to the number of offspring suckled (5). Protein mobilization is also finely tuned in proportion to the dietary protein supply. At constant litter size, larger discrepancies between dietary protein intake and the demand for milk synthesis result in a greater impetus for protein mobilization (10, 11, 21, 45). Maternal protein loss cannot continue unabated and is attenuated if total protein mobilization exceeds a certain proportion of total body protein mass (10, 11) to prevent excessive depletion. Finally, protein mobilization must be sharply curtailed when weaning of the offspring occurs and milk production ceases.

Our research was motivated by a desire to understand the alterations in skeletal muscle protein metabolism that permit a highly controlled diversion of muscle protein reserves toward milk production. Protein synthesis in skeletal muscle is highly regulated, and a fall in the rate of this process is suggested to contribute to protein mobilization during starvation (24, 26) and in lactation (6, 8, 34, 39). However, the regulation of protein catabolism in lactating animals remains unclear, and the participation of skeletal muscle proteolysis is especially poorly understood. We hypothesized that, at constant litter size in lactating pigs, greater protein restriction would result in a larger proteolytic response.

To explore potential mechanisms by which loss of maternal protein might be orchestrated, we developed a biopsy technique to collect triceps muscle samples in late gestation (day 107) and midlactation (days 9–12) and within 3 h of weaning from the same animals. Samples were taken at all three time points from pigs that lost 7, 9, or 16% of their body protein in lactation under conditions of differential dietary protein supply (10). Muscle RNA, DNA, protein, the expression of genes involved in skeletal muscle proteolysis, and muscle free amino acids were measured.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was conducted in accordance with the Canadian Council of Animal Care Guidelines and was approved locally by the Institutional Animal Policy and Welfare Committee.

The experimental design, housing, and management of gilts during gestation and lactation, and their reproductive and lactational performance, are described in Clowes et al. (10). In brief, upon parturition, first-parity sows (Camborough, PIC; Acme, AB, Canada) were allocated to be fed divergent levels of total lysine (50, 35, and 24 ± 1.0 g/day) and dietary protein (878, 647, and 491 ± 19 g/day). These dietary treatments induced sows to lose approximately 7, 9, or 16% of their body protein, as a percentage of their protein mass at parturition, in lactation and to be in a more negative lysine balance in the first 20 days of lactation (–16, –27, and –42 g/day). At least 7 sows were allocated to each treatment: 8 sows to the 7% body protein loss treatment, 7 sows to the 9% body protein loss treatment, and 10 sows to the 16% body protein loss treatment. Losses of back fat (1.3 ± 0.29 mm) during lactation were small and not different among treatments, because sows were fed a similar energy level (61 ± 2.0 MJ metabolizable energy/day).

In late gestation (day 107) and midlactation (days 9–12), a muscle sample was collected from alternate sides of each sow by biopsy. On day 23 of lactation, within a few minutes of slaughter, a third muscle sample was collected 2–3 h after weaning. Samples were immediately trimmed of connective and adipose tissue, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –70°C until analyzed for RNA, DNA, protein, free amino acids, and mRNA expression of several components of the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic system by Northern hybridization analysis. To ensure that sows were fasted for 16 h before collection, feed was removed from sows at 1800 (24-h clock) on the evening before surgery and slaughter. The long head of the triceps brachii muscle was chosen because it is a mixed fiber type muscle in the pig (27, 40) and thus represents the main source of mobilizable protein in the body (16).

Muscle Biopsy

A preliminary experiment was conducted with four animals (196 kg body wt and 17 mm back fat depth at parturition) to develop a muscle biopsy technique that could be undertaken in the animal unit rather than in the surgery room to 1) minimize the additional handling, transport, and environmental change stresses on the sow, 2) reduce the time during which the suckling litter and sow are apart, and 3) determine the most appropriate time to collect samples. The surgery was conducted in the sow’s individual farrowing pen, under general anesthetic, as described by Clowes et al. (12) with minor modifications. Samples (2–4 g) were surgically collected from the long head of the triceps brachii muscle, and this procedure took ~10 min. Alternate sides of the animal were used for sampling in late gestation and midlactation.

The surgery proved minimally disruptive to the sow and had little impact on the piglets. The piglets were only separated from the sow for the duration of the surgery and recovery period, which comprised one suckling bout (40–60 min), and immediately commenced suckling once placed back on the sow. Sow body temperatures were not elevated postsurgery, feed intake in lactation was only slightly reduced at 1–3 days postsurgery, and body weight losses were small (–5 kg) and in the range for first-parity sows in our herd not subjected to surgery. Respectable litter growth rates (2.36 ± 0.23 kg/day) were achieved.

Analyses

Before analysis, individual muscle samples were pulverized in a mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen and stored at –70°C until analysis.

Muscle free amino acids. About 25 mg of powdered muscle tissue were homogenized in 1 ml of 3% (wt/vol) trichloroacetic acid (Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO). The mixture was centrifuged at 2,800 g, and the supernatant fraction containing tissue free amino acids was analyzed by HPLC using orthopthaldialdehyde derivatization and ethanolamine as the internal standard (38).

Muscle RNA, DNA, and protein. Muscle RNA, DNA and protein were quantified, in the same sample, using a modification of the Schmidt-Thannhauser procedure (32). In brief, 250 mg of frozen powdered muscle tissue were incubated on ice for 10 min with 4 ml of 2% (wt/vol) perchloric acid (PCA) to precipitate out the protein and nucleotides. The precipitate was centrifuged for 15 min at 2,800 g and 4°C and washed with 4 ml of 2% PCA at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in 4 ml of 0.3 N NaOH and incubated at 37°C for 1 h, and the alkaline digest was cooled on ice. One hundred microliters of digest were removed, diluted with distilled, deionized H2O to make a 0.1 N NaOH alkaline digest, and stored at –20°C until bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay microtiter plate protein quantification (Pierce, Rockford, IL).

Ice-cold 12% PCA (2 ml) was added to the remaining alkaline digest, incubated on ice for 10 min, and centrifuged for 10 min, and the RNA containing supernatant was collected. The pellet was washed in 4 ml of 2% PCA and centrifuged, and the washings and pellet were collected separately. The acid-soluble supernatant plus washings was diluted with H2O to make a 1% PCA solution to spectrophotometrically quantify the RNA [see Ref. 3; RNA (µg/ml) = (32.9 A260 – 6.11 A232) x dilution factor, where A260 and A232 are absorption at 260 and 232 nm, respectively]. The acid-insoluble precipitate was incubated in 10% PCA at 70°C for 1 h (13), and the DNA was quantified using the diphenylamine method (7, 15).

Northern hybridization. Analysis was conducted as described by Adegoke et al. (1), with minor modifications. Total RNA was extracted from 200–300 mg of muscle tissue, using TRIzol (GIBCO BRL-Life Technologies, Frederick, MD; Ref. 12). Ethidium bromide (1.7 µg) was added to the sample buffer of each sample, and samples were made up to the same volume using sterile, distilled, deionized H2O. Muscle RNA to be hybridized with the cDNA probes [14-kDa ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (14-kDa E2) and the C9 subunit of the 20S proteasome] was transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Nitropure; Micro Separations, Westborough, MA), and RNA to be hybridized with the riboprobe for ubiquitin was transferred to a nylon membrane (Zeta-Probe; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and fixed onto the membranes by baking, under vacuum, for 2 h at 80°C. All blots were exposed to X-ray film (Kodak BioMax MR; Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) and evaluated quantitatively with a GS-670 Imaging Densitometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The densitometric scans were normalized to the fluorescence level of the 18S ribosomal RNA ethidium bromide band. The amount of 18S rRNA loaded did not vary among treatments (P = 0.98) or time points (P = 0.62), and there was no treatment x time interaction (P = 0.76), establishing consistent RNA gel loading. After stripping, all membranes were reprobed with a 32P-labeled cDNA fragment encoding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH).

Concentration curves, of increasing amounts of total RNA from lactating sow muscle, were run to determine the amount of total RNA to load for each probe. For example, muscle mRNA expression of both 14-kDa E2 transcripts increased linearly (r2 > 0.95) from 5 to 20 µg of total RNA (Fig. 1). Muscle mRNA expression of both ubiquitin transcripts plateaued between 5 and 10 µg of total RNA. Therefore, 15 µg of total RNA were loaded for the 14-kDa E2 hybridization and 3 µg for the ubiquitin hybridization. Muscle C9 mRNA expression increased linearly (r2 = 0.998) from 15 to 42 µg of total RNA (Fig. 1); thus 30 µg of total RNA were loaded onto a 1.2% agarose-formaldehyde gel for this hybridization. The design of the main experiment entailed the comparison of three animal treatments and three time points per animal, for a total of 75 samples. To accommodate this sample number, five gels and blots were simultaneously run for each mRNA measured. Each of the three animal treatments was represented within each blot, and all three time points were tested on the same blot for each sow.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Total RNA concentration curves for lactating sow muscle mRNA expression for 14-kDa ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (14-kDa E2) transcripts and the proteasome subunit C9. Total RNA is indicated by the membrane 18S rRNA ethidium bromide stain from muscle hybridized against either the 1.8- and 1.2-kb 14-kDa E2 transcripts (A) or the proteasome subunit C9 (B). mRNA transcripts are expressed in arbitrary densitometric units. mRNA expression increased linearly with increasing levels of total RNA loaded for both 14-kDa E2 transcripts to 20 µg (1.8 kb, y = 0.845x – 0.465, r2 = 0.954; 1.2 kb, y = 0.861x – 3.59, r2 = 0.999) and for C9 to >42 µg (y = 0.486x – 6.410, r2 = 0.998).

 
Statistical analyses. Analyses involving continuous variables were computed using the GLM procedures of SAS version 8.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Variables were tested for normality with the Shapiro-Wilk statistic. The effect of feeding level in gestation (2.8, 2.5, and 2.3 kg/day), the degree of body protein lost in lactation (7, 9, and 16% of the calculated body protein mass at parturition), and their interactions were analyzed over time (late gestation, midlactation, and weaning) on the various muscle parameters using repeated-measures ANOVA. Membrane was included as a covariate in the analysis of mRNA expression. Because gestational feeding regimen had no effect (P > 0.35) on any parameters measured in lactation, results for the gestation treatment are not presented. In the event of a significant (P < 0.05) time x lactation protein loss interaction, the differences among time within each lactation protein loss treatment were computed using a priori orthogonal contrasts. To test for differences among lactation treatments in the time x lactation protein loss interaction, the absolute or percent difference between the two time periods was analyzed by ANOVA. If lactation treatment was significant in the repeated-measures ANOVA for any parameter, differences among lactation treatments in late gestation were tested for. If no treatment difference was observed in late gestation, the values within treatment over the three time periods were averaged, and an ANOVA was performed on the mean value. If significant treatment differences were detected (P < 0.05), then these differences were computed using Fishers protected least significant difference test.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Changes in Muscle RNA, DNA, and Protein Concentrations

The capacity for protein synthesis (RNA-to-DNA ratio) decreased by ~15% between late gestation and midlactation (P < 0.05) in all treatments and continued decreasing in sows that lost the most protein, to 68% of prepartum levels at weaning (Fig. 2A). The protein-to-DNA ratio also decreased (P < 0.001) between late gestation and weaning in all treatments (Fig. 2B). The size of this decline reflected (P < 0.10) the degree of protein lost in lactation and resulted in protein-to-DNA ratios at weaning that were, respectively, 84, 77, and 69% of prepartum levels in sows that lost 7, 9, and 16% of their protein mass at parturition. Muscle RNA concentrations decreased (P < 0.001) 10–15% between late gestation and midlactation in all treatments. By the day of weaning, they increased to prepartum levels in sows that lost 7 and 9% of their body protein mass but remained low in sows that lost the most protein (Fig. 2C). Muscle DNA concentrations increased (P < 0.001) by ~5% between late gestation and midlactation in all treatments and then increased to weaning in a manner that reflected the degree of protein lost in lactation (Fig. 2D). The increase was largest (P < 0.05) in sows that lost the most protein, resulting in the DNA concentration of these sows at weaning being 134% of prepartum levels.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Changes in muscle RNA-to-DNA ratio (RNA:DNA; A), protein-to-DNA ratio (protein:DNA; B), RNA concentration (C), and DNA concentration (D) from day –7 to day 23 of lactation in first-parity sows that lost, in lactation, 7, 9, and 16% of their protein mass at parturition. Muscle RNA concentrations and RNA-to-DNA ratio differed (P < 0.05) with lactation treatment. All variables changed (P < 0.001) with time over lactation. Variables on day 23 without a common letter differ: xy (P < 0.05) and wx (P < 0.10). Changes in muscle variables between day 12 and day 23 without a common letter (ab) differ (P < 0.05).

 
Changes in Muscle Ubiquitin Proteasome Proteolytic Pathway Gene Expression

When equal amounts of total RNA from each animal and time point were studied, marked changes in GAPDH mRNA expression were observed over the course of lactation and by treatment (Fig. 3). GAPDH mRNA fell by nearly 50% (P < 0.001) between late gestation and midlactation and remained low until weaning. The overall GAPDH mRNA level was lowest (P < 0.01) in sows that lost the most protein in lactation. These differences precluded the use of GAPDH mRNA as a "housekeeping" gene to normalize gene expression. Therefore, the measured mRNA expression was corrected for slight differences in loading, using the relative fluorescence of the 18S rRNA ethidium bromide stain.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Muscle glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA expression during lactation. A: Northern blot hybridized against GAPDH from porcine triceps muscle (15 µg) taken immediately prepartum (day –7), at midlactation (day 12), and at weaning (day 23). B: quantification of GAPDH mRNA, expressed in arbitrary densitometric units, from first-parity sows that lost, in lactation, 7, 9, and 16% of their protein mass. Level of total RNA loaded is indicated by the inverted 18S rRNA ethidium bromide staining. Muscle GAPDH mRNA expression decreased (P < 0.001) between day –7 and day 12 and differed (P < 0.05) among lactation treatments.

 
Because the level of muscle mRNA, for all genes measured, did not differ among treatments in late gestation (prepartum), gene expression data are presented as a percentage of prepartum values. Muscle mRNA levels of several key elements of the ATP-ubiquitin proteasome-dependent proteolytic pathway in muscle increased (P < 0.05) as lactation progressed (Fig. 4). The 1.2-kb 14-kDa E2 transcript showed the most marked increase. Many of the changes in mRNA expression between late gestation and lactation reflected the degree of protein mobilization elicited by the dietary treatments in lactation, such that, at weaning, expression was highest in sows that lost the most protein (Table 1).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Muscle mRNA expression of the 1.2-kb (A) and 1.8-kb (B) transcripts of 14-kDa E2, the 1.2-kb (C) and 2.6-kb (D) transcripts of ubiquitin (Ub), and the proteasome subunit C9 (E) from day –7 (prepartum) to day 23 of lactation in first-parity sows that lost 7, 9, and 16% of their protein mass in lactation. mRNA expression was normalized to 18S rRNA and expressed as a percentage of prepartum values. All muscle variables increased (P < 0.001) over lactation. Overall ubiquitin 1.2-kb transcript mRNA expression differed among treatments (P < 0.05) and was highest in sows that lost the most protein. Increases in mRNA expression of both 14-kDa E2 transcripts between midlactation and weaning without a common letter (xy) differ (P < 0.05). Increases in C9 mRNA expression between late gestation and weaning without a common letter (vw) tend to differ (P = 0.06).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Muscle mRNA expression of the ubiquitin-ATP-dependent proteasome proteolytic pathway

 
The 1.2-kb 14-kDa E2 transcript more than doubled between late gestation and midlactation in all treatments. Between midlactation and weaning, the increase in expression was highest (P < 0.05) in sows that lost the most protein and was, respectively, 0, 60, and 120% of midlactation mRNA expression values in sows that lost 7, 9, and 16% of their protein mass at parturition (Fig. 4A). The 1.8-kb 14-kDa E2 transcript did not change between late gestation and midlactation in any treatment. However, expression of this transcript almost doubled (P < 0.05) between midlactation and weaning in sows that lost the most protein and did not change in the other two treatments (Fig. 4B). Overall, the 1.2-kb ubiquitin transcript expression was highest (P < 0.05) in sows that lost the most protein and was, respectively, 0.28, 0.37, and 0.40 ± 0.03 arbitrary densitometric units in sows that lost 7, 9, and 16% of their protein mass at parturition (Fig. 4C). In all treatments, 2.6-kb ubiquitin transcript expression increased by 40–60% over lactation. Although there were no significant treatment effects, the expression tended to be lowest in sows that mobilized the least protein in lactation (Fig. 4D). Expression of the proteasome subunit C9 mRNA also increased (P < 0.001) between late gestation and weaning. This increase tended (P = 0.09) to be highest in sows that lost the most protein (Fig. 4E) and was reflected in a higher (P = 0.002) C9 expression at weaning in these sows (Table 1).

Changes in Muscle Free Amino Acid Concentrations

The chromatographic procedure used resolved 19 amino acids. Because muscle free amino acid concentrations in late gestation did not differ among treatments, the amino acid data are presented as a percentage of prepartum values. The average concentrations of individual muscle free amino acids in late gestation are presented in Table 2. Muscle free amino acids were divided into two groups based on their pattern of change between late gestation and weaning. The first group consisted of six essential amino acids (EAA; leucine, isoleucine, valine, phenylalanine, lysine, and threonine). Methionine and histidine were not included in this group because a value was not obtained for every sow at every time point. Arginine was not included because its concentrations did not change over lactation. The second group consisted of seven nonessential amino acids (NEAA; alanine, glycine, serine, aspartic acid, asparagine, and glutamic acid). Glutamine was excluded from this group because it behaved differently from the other NEAA.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Prepartum triceps muscle free amino acid concentrations

 
Most muscle free amino acid (NEAA, EAA, and glutamine) concentrations increased (P < 0.001) by ~30% between late gestation and midlactation (Fig. 5A). A divergence in the pattern of free EAA and NEAA concentrations then occurred between midlactation and weaning. At weaning, muscle free NEAA concentrations remained elevated above prepartum levels, as their concentrations either did not change (alanine, glycine, and serine) or slightly declined (asparagine, aspartate, and glutamate) between midlactation and weaning. In contrast, muscle free glutamine concentrations increased (P < 0.001) over this time period, resulting in muscle free glutamine concentrations at weaning that were more than double prepartum levels (Fig. 5A). Muscle free taurine and citrulline concentrations were similar in late gestation and midlactation and increased (P < 0.05) ~25% between midlactation and weaning.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Changes in free muscle nonessential (NEAA; A) and essential (EAA; B) amino acid and glutamine (Gln) concentrations from day –7 (prepartum) to day 23 of lactation as a percentage of prepartum levels; treatment differences in NEAA (B) and glutamine (C) concentrations on days 12 and 23 of lactation as a percentage of prepartum levels in first-parity sows that lost, in lactation, 7, 9, and 16% of their protein mass; and EAA and isoleucine (D) concentrations on day 23 of lactation, expressed as a percentage of day 12 concentrations. NEAA: Ala, Gly, Ser, Asp, Asn, and Glu. EAA: Leu, Ile, Val, Phe, Lys, and Thr. Percent amino acid levels without a common letter differ: xy (P < 0.05) and wx (P < 0.10).

 
By contrast, EAA concentrations declined (P < 0.001) between midlactation and weaning to be slightly above (lysine and histidine), at the same level (valine, isoleucine, and tryptophan), or below (leucine, phenylalanine, and threonine) prepartum levels. Unlike the other EAA measured, methionine and threonine concentrations did not change between late gestation and midlactation and then declined 30% to weaning. This decline was significant (P < 0.05) for threonine only.

The increase in muscle free NEAA concentrations between late gestation and midlactation (Fig. 5B) and in glutamine concentrations between late gestation and weaning (Fig. 5C) was proportional to the degree of protein mobilized by the sow in lactation. Increases in these amino acids were highest (P < 0.05) in sows that lost the most protein. The NEAA concentrations in midlactation were, respectively, 122, 131, and 146% of prepartum values, and the glutamine concentrations at weaning were, respectively, 205, 240, and 308% of prepartum values in sows that lost 7, 9, and 16% of their protein mass at parturition. The decrease in muscle free EAA concentrations between midlactation and weaning (such as isoleucine) was greatest (P < 0.05) in sows that lost the most protein (Fig. 5D). Similarly, muscle free valine concentrations at weaning were lowest (P < 0.05) in sows that had mobilized the most protein.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Methodological Considerations: Use of Indirect Indexes of Muscle Anabolism and Catabolism

Direct measures of muscle protein synthesis and degradation were not made in our study. Classic techniques for measurement of these processes employing isotopically labeled amino acids would have been very difficult in the context studied here. Some of the limitations for research on protein turnover in large animals, and in swine in particular, are as follows. 1) Studies are cost prohibitive if sows and their progeny have to be killed and disposed of suitably, for tissue sampling or because of contamination with radioactivity, rather than returned to the research herd. 2) Studies using isotopes are especially costly because of large animal size. 3) Tracer recycling precludes making repeated measures in the same animals over time (14, 25). 4) Because of unique metabolic pathways, urinary 3-methylhistidine may not be used to follow muscle protein catabolism in this species. A further consideration is that the level of stress and disruption in the experimental setting may not be compatible with maintenance of normal maternal behavior, as the approaches for in situ muscle metabolism tend to be relatively invasive and may require venous and arterial cannulation/perfusion/biopsy. For all of these reasons, we opted for a variety of indirect indexes of muscle metabolism in our serial biopsies.

RNA-to-DNA ratio (capacity for protein synthesis) has been extensively reported on and related to determined rates of protein synthesis (29). Proteolytic processes in muscle appear to have a large degree of transcriptional regulation, and increases in mRNA expression of genes that encode proteins in the ATP-dependent proteolytic pathway (the cofactor ubiquitin, ubiquitin conjugation system enzymes, and the proteasome complex) generally correlate with protein levels and directly measured protein degradation rates (22, 37, 42, 43). Changes in the free amino acid pool of skeletal muscle reflect the net balance of several inputs (amino acid uptake, appearance from protein degradation) and outputs (protein synthesis, export) and may be considered a crude barometer of the net balance of amino acid appearance and loss in the tissue. Decreases in muscle free amino acid levels are often larger and more numerous than those in the plasma pool under conditions of muscle atrophy (17, 31, 41).

Changes in Muscle Variables Between Late Gestation and Lactation

RNA and gene expression. We provided evidence that upregulation of the ubiquitin-ATP-dependent proteolytic pathway occurs at the level of gene expression in the muscle of lactating sows that mobilize protein. The fall in total RNA and in GAPDH mRNA makes the increases in mRNA for ubiquitin, 14-kDa E2, and the C9 subunit of the 20S proteasome all the more striking and selective. The marked increase in the 1.2-kb 14-kDa E2 transcript agrees with other evidence that this transcript is tightly upregulated in various conditions of muscle atrophy in rats (reviewed in Refs. 4, 23).

This is the first time that this proteolytic pathway has been studied in the muscle of lactating animals. Upregulation of this pathway occurs in numerous conditions involving protein catabolism, including fasting, cancer, sepsis, diabetes, acidosis, burn injury, and muscle denervation, and, in all of these cases, protein degradation and mRNA are increased (4, 22, 23). The increase in mRNA expression of genes that encode proteins in the ubiquitin-ATP-dependent proteasome proteolytic pathway suggests that the rate of muscle protein degradation was higher in our sows during lactation than gestation. This inference is supported by several studies in the lactating first-parity sow. In early lactation (days 1 and 4), myofibrillar protein breakdown was at least 15% higher, and protein degradation was higher in sows fed <36 vs. 55 g lysine/day (20, 45). These differences were maintained until the end of lactation (days 15 and 20). In several studies in the lactating rat (34, 35) and dairy goat (39), where only protein synthesis was measured, a fall in protein synthesis was either not observed during lactation or was too small to account by itself for the net muscle protein loss. From these studies it can also be inferred that protein degradation rates rose, and Pine and colleagues (34, 35) suggested that the increase in protein degradation was quantitatively the more important effect.

We observed a decrease in the capacity for protein synthesis in muscle between late gestation and midlactation. By the time the sow was weaned, this variable had changed further in a manner related to the degree of protein mobilized. This agrees with our previous observation of lower (~–20%) triceps muscle RNA-to-DNA ratio on day 25 of lactation in sows that had lost >10% of their body protein (12). These reductions in the capacity for protein synthesis may underlie a decrease in the rate of muscle protein synthesis. This inference is supported by data in the rat and dairy goat, in which the rate of muscle protein synthesis was measured by either a flooding or a tracer dose of [3H]phenylalanine or L-[35S]methionine. Compared with dry goats, no reduction in the fractional rate of muscle protein synthesis was observed in early lactation in goats that had mobilized a moderate amount of protein (~28 g/day; Ref. 6). However, a 30% reduction was observed in goats of a similar weight that had mobilized more protein (~57 g/day; Ref. 8). Similarly, the rate of muscle protein synthesis decreased only in rats that lost a large proportion of their body weight (20 vs. 5%) during lactation (34); a 25% reduction in the fractional and a >45% reduction in the absolute rates of muscle protein synthesis were observed. Changes in the rate of muscle protein synthesis may help provide control and sensitivity to the degree of protein mobilized in lactation.

The large reduction in muscle GAPDH mRNA between late gestation and lactation in our sows suggests that the glycolytic pathway in muscle was downregulated, at least at the level of gene expression. This is consistent with our recent observation that the common pattern of gene expression in diverse forms of muscle atrophy includes downregulation of multiple enzymes participating in muscle energy metabolism (22). The data could also suggest that the size of the glycolytic muscle fibers was reduced relative to the oxidative fibers. Glycolytic muscle fibers appear to be targeted for degradation in muscle undergoing protein mobilization (18), and this was reflected in a decrease in the activity of glycolytic enzymes such as GAPDH (19, 27).

Muscle free amino acids. The muscle free amino acid pool increased during early lactation for most amino acids. The pattern observed later in lactation was strikingly different, with increased levels of glutamine and a fall in the levels of threonine, leucine, and phenylalanine to below prepartum levels. These changes (accumulation or loss) reflect an imbalance between the inputs into the muscle free amino acid pool (rate of amino acid appearance from myofibrillar protein breakdown and uptake from blood) and its outputs (rates of protein synthesis and amino acid export out of the tissue into blood).

We observed a sharp rise in muscle free glutamine levels in sows toward the end of lactation, in a manner related to the degree of protein loss. These data suggest a relative oversupply of glutamine, and this is consistent with the observations that plasma glutamine concentrations also increase in later lactation (28) and that free glutamine concentrations increased by almost fourfold (8–31% of free amino acids) in sow milk over the course of lactation (44). Similarly, the relative depletion of several EAA in muscle suggests an overall inadequacy of EAA supply in the free amino acid pool in muscle in late lactation.

Changes in Muscle Metabolism on Loss of Divergent Degrees of Body Protein

By the end of lactation, sows on our study were calculated to have lost ~16, 20, and 36% of their muscle mass present at parturition (9). However, the demand for milk continually increases as the litter grows, even after feed intake has reached maximum, so that rates of muscle protein mobilization increase as lactation progresses. This would occur to the greatest degree when dietary protein was most limited. All of the changes described above (RNA-to-DNA ratio, protease gene expression, and amino acid pools) were magnified in the animals on the highest dietary protein restriction. This makes sense, considering that the law of diminishing returns applies to mobilization of a fixed resource. To release the same total amount of amino acids per day, the fractional mobilization rate must increase progressively to compensate as muscle mass shrinks. Our data are consistent with a continuous attempt to keep raising the muscle mobilization rate, so that, during later lactation and in animals provided the lowest dietary protein intake, all of the observed effects were magnified (i.e., further upregulation of the ubiquitin-ATP-dependent proteasome proteolytic pathway and decrease in the capacity for protein synthesis).

The situation of diminishing returns described above may provide a mechanism whereby lactation becomes self-limiting. The fractional rate of muscle protein mobilization may simply have a maximal rate. Once this is attained, the overall daily rate of amino acid delivery from muscle will shrink with the size of the muscle protein mass to a point where milk production will decline for lack of substrate. This would be consistent with the fall in milk protein concentration seen in late lactation, which was most prominent in animals with the most restricted protein intake (10, 11). Maternal nitrogen balance became less negative, indicating a reduction in protein mobilization, and growth of the litter of piglets slowed. The highest degree of protein loss was also accompanied by a decline in ovarian function. These physiological changes to delay or prevent a further cycle of reproduction would also help preserve the remaining maternal protein mass.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
We gratefully acknowledge the Alberta Agricultural Research Institute, Farming for the Future Matching Funding Program, and Alberta Pork for financial support.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Simon S. Wing (McGill University, Montreal, Canada) for provision of plasmids containing cDNA sequences encoding rat 14-kDa E2, Dr. Keiji Tanaka (Tokyo Institute for Medical Research, Tokyo, Japan) for kindly providing plasmids encoding the rat proteasome subunit C9, and Dr. J. Walker (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) for the riboprobe for ubiquitin. The cDNA probe for GAPDH was generated by RT-PCR, kindly provided by Gordon Murdoch (University of Alberta), using primers designed according to Yelich et al. (46). Pig Improvement Company-Canada provided the experimental animals, and the staff of the Swine Research Unit, especially Janes Goller and Jay Willis, cared for the animals and assisted with experimental procedures. The surgical expertise of Dr. Artur Cegielski and the assistance of Charlane Gorsak and Brenda Tchir; the technical assistance of Renata Meuser, A. Dunichand-Hoedl, Joan Turchinsky, Rose O’Donoghue, Shirley Shostak, Gary Sedgewick, and other staff in the Department of Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Science; and the statistical assistance of Dr. R. T. Hardin are gratefully acknowledged.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: E. J. Clowes, Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, no. 204, 7000-113 St., Edmonton, AB, T6H 5T6 Canada (E-mail: emma.clowes{at}gov.ab.ca)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. AdegokeOAJ, McBurney MI, Samuels SE, and Baracos VE. Modulation of intestinal protein synthesis and protease mRNA by luminal and systemic nutrients. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 284: G1017–G1026, 2003.
  2. AllisonJB and Wannemacher RW. The concept and significance of labile and over-all protein reserves of the body. Am J Clin Nutr 16: 445–452, 1965.
  3. AshfordAJ and Pain VM. Effect of diabetes on the rates of synthesis and degradation of ribosomes in rat muscle and liver in vivo. J Biol Chem 261: 4059–4065, 1986.
  4. AttaixD, Aurousseau E, Combaret L, Kee A, Larbaud D, Rallière C, Souweine B, Taillandier D, and Tilignac T. Ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent proteolysis in skeletal muscle. Reprod Nutr Dev 38: 153–165, 1998.
  5. AuldistDE, Carlson D, Morrish L, Wakeford CM, and King RH. The influence of suckling interval on milk production of sows. J Anim Sci 78: 2026–2031, 2000.
  6. BaracosVE, Brun-Bellut J, and Marie M. Tissue protein synthesis in lactating and dry goats. Br J Nutr 66: 451–465, 1991.
  7. BurtonKA. A study of the conditions and mechanism of the diphenylamine reaction for the colorimetric estimation of deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochem J 62: 315–323, 1956.
  8. ChampredonC, Debras E, Mirand PP, and Arnal M. Methionine flux and tissue protein synthesis in lactating and dry goats. J Nutr 120: 1006–1015, 1990.
  9. ClowesEJ. Lactational Protein Loss and Sow Performance (PhD thesis). Edmonton, Canada: Univ. of Alberta, 2001.
  10. ClowesEJ, Aherne FX, Foxcroft GR, and Baracos VE. Selective protein loss in lactating sows is associated with reduced litter growth and ovarian function. J Anim Sci 81: 753–764, 2003.
  11. ClowesEJ, Aherne FX, Schaefer AL, Foxcroft GR, and Baracos VE. Parturition body size and body protein loss during lactation influence performance during lactation and ovarian function at weaning in first-parity sows. J Anim Sci 81: 1517–1528, 2003.
  12. ClowesEJ, Williams IH, Baracos VE, Pluske JR, Cegielski AC, Zak LJ, and Aherne FX. Feeding lactating primiparous sows to establish three divergent metabolic states. II. Effect of nitrogen partitioning and skeletal muscle composition. J Anim Sci 76: 1154–1164, 1998.
  13. ForsbergAM, Nilsson E, Werneman J, Bergstrom J, and Hultman E. Muscle composition in relation to age and sex. Clin Sci (Colch) 81: 249–256, 1991.
  14. GarlickPJ, McNurlan MA, and Preedy VR. A rapid and convenient technique for measuring the rate of protein synthesis in tissues by injection of [3H]phenylalanine. Biochem J 192: 719–723, 1980.
  15. GilesKW and Myers A. An improved diphenylamine method for the estimation of deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature 207: 93, 1965.
  16. GoodmanMN and Ruderman NB. Starvation in the rat. I. Effect of age and obesity on organ weight, RNA, DNA, and protein. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 239: E269–E276, 1980.
  17. HammarqvistF, Wernerman J, Rustom A, von der Decken A, and Vinnars E. Addition of glutamine for total parenteral nutrition after elective abdominal surgery spares free glutamine in muscle, counteracts the fall in muscle protein synthesis, and improves nitrogen balance. Ann Surg 209: 455–461, 1989.
  18. HenrickssonJ. The possible role of skeletal muscle in the adaptation to periods of energy deficiency. Eur J Clin Nutr 44, Suppl 1: 55–64, 1990.
  19. HoodDA and Pette D. Chronic long-term electrostimulation creates a unique metabolic enzyme profile in rabbit fast-twitch muscle. FEBS Lett 247: 471–474, 1989.
  20. JonesDB and Stahly TS. Impact of amino acid nutrition during lactation on body nutrient mobilization and milk nutrient output in primiparous sows. J Anim Sci 77: 1513–1522, 1999.
  21. KingRH, Toner MS, Dove H, Atwood CS, and Brown WG. Response of first-litter sows to dietary protein level during lactation. J Anim Sci 71: 2457–2463, 1993.
  22. LeckerSH, Jagoe RT, Gilbert A, Gomes M, Baracos VE, Bailey J, Price SR, Mitch WE, and Goldberg AL. Multiple types of skeletal muscle atrophy involve a common program of changes in gene expression. FASEB J 18: 39–51, 2004.
  23. LeckerSH, Solomon V, Mitch WE, and Goldberg AL. Muscle protein breakdown and the critical role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in normal and disease states. J Nutr 129: 227S–237S, 1999.
  24. LiJB and Wassner SJ. Effects of food deprivation and refeeding on total protein and actomyosin degradation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 246: E32–E37, 1984.
  25. LobleyGE, Harris PM, Skene PA, Brown D, Milne E, Calder AG, Anderson SE, Garlick PJ, Nevison I, and Connell A. Reponses in tissue protein synthesis to sub- and supra-maintenance intake in young growing sheep: comparison of large-dose and continuous-infusion techniques. Br J Nutr 68: 373–388, 1992.
  26. LowellBB, Ruderman NB, and Goodman MN. Regulation of myofibrillar protein degradation in rat skeletal muscle during brief and prolonged starvation. Metabolism 35: 1121–1127, 1986.
  27. McAllisterRM, Reiter BL, Amann JF, and Laughlin MH. Skeletal muscle biochemical adaptations to exercise training in miniature swine. J Appl Physiol 82: 1862–1868, 1997.
  28. McMillanDJ. Development of Low Protein Diets for Sows: Effect on Performance and Energy Metabolism (MSc thesis). Edmonton, Canada: Univ. of Alberta, 2003.
  29. MillwardDJ, Garlick PJ, James WPT, Nnan-Yelugo DO, and Ryatt JS. Relationship between protein synthesis and RNA content in skeletal muscle. Nature 241: 204–205, 1973.
  30. MullanBP and Williams IH. The chemical composition of sows during their first lactation. Anim Prod 51: 375–387, 1990.
  31. MunroHM. Free amino acid pools and their role in regulation. In: Mammalian Protein Metabolism, edited by Munro HN. New York: Academic, 1970, vol. 4, p. 299–387.
  32. MunroHM and Fleck A. Recent developments in the measurement of nucleic acids in biological materials. Analyst 91: 78–88, 1966.
  33. NobletJ and Etienne M. Estimation of sow milk nutrient output. J Anim Sci 67: 3352–3359, 1989.
  34. PineAP, Jessop NS, and Allan GF. Maternal protein reserves and their influence on lactational performance in rats. 2. Effects of dietary protein restriction during gestation and lactation on tissue protein metabolism and Na+, K+ATPase (EC 3613) activity. Br J Nutr 72: 181–197, 1994.
  35. PineAP, Jessop NS, Allan GF, and Oldham JD. Maternal protein reserves and their influence on lactational performance in rats. 4. Tissue protein synthesis and turnover associated with mobilization of maternal protein. Br J Nutr 72: 831–844, 1994.
  36. PluskeJR, Williams IH, Zak L, Clowes EJ, Cegielski AC, and Aherne FX. Feeding lactating primiparous sows to establish three divergent metabolic states. 3. Milk production and pig growth. J Anim Sci 76: 1165–1171, 1998.
  37. SacheckJM, Ohtsuka A, McLary SC, and Goldberg AL. IGF-1 stimulates muscle growth by suppressing protein breakdown and expression of atrophy-related ubiquitin ligases, atrogin-1 and MuRF1. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 287: E591–E601, 2004.
  38. SedgwickGW, Fenton TF, and Thompson JR. Effect of protein precipitating agents on the recovery of plasma free amino acids. Can J Anim Sci 71: 953–957, 1991.
  39. TesseraudS, Grizard J, Debras E, Papet I, Bonnet Y, Bayle G, and Champredon C. Leucine metabolism in lactating and dry goats: effect of insulin and substrate availability. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 265: E402–E413, 1993.
  40. UhrinP and Liptaj T. Effect of training on fibre composition and phosphate metabolites in rest measured in vitro in muscles of young pigs. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 102B: 397–401, 1992.
  41. VinnarsE, Bergstöm J, and Fürst P. Influence of the postoperative state on the intracellular free amino acids in human muscle tissue. Ann Surg 182: 665–671, 1975.
  42. VoisinL, Breuillé D, Combaret L, Pouyet C, Taillandier D, Aurousseau E, Obled C, and Attaix D. Muscle wasting in a rat model of long-lasting sepsis results from the activation of lysosomal, Ca2+-activated, and ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathways. J Clin Invest 97: 1610–1617, 1996.
  43. WingSS and Banville D. 14-kDa ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme: structure of the rat gene and regulation upon fasting and by insulin. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 267: E39–E48, 1994.
  44. WuG and Knabe DA. Free and protein-bound amino acids in sow’s colostrum and milk. J Nutr 124: 415–424, 1994.
  45. YangH, Pettigrew JE, Johnson LJ, Shurson GC, Wheaton JE, White ME, Koketsu Y, Sower SF, and Rathmacher JA. Effects of dietary lysine intake during lactation on blood metabolites, hormones, and reproductive performance in primiparous sows. J Anim Sci 78: 1001–1009, 2000.
  46. YelichJV, Pomp D, and Geisert RD. Ontogeny of elongation and gene expression in the early developing porcine conceptus. Biol Reprod 57: 1256–1265, 1997.




This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
All Versions of this Article:
288/3/E564    most recent
00198.2004v1
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Google Scholar
Articles by Clowes, E. J.
Articles by Baracos, V. E.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Clowes, E. J.
Articles by Baracos, V. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.