Preserved direct hepatic insulin action in rats with diet-induced hepatic steatosis

Roland Buettner, Iris Ottinger, Jürgen Schölmerich, and L. Cornelius Bollheimer

Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Regensburg, 93042 Regensburg, Germany

Submitted 7 October 2003 ; accepted in final form 8 January 2004


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Recent in vivo studies have demonstrated a strong negative correlation between liver triglyceride content and hepatic insulin sensitivity, but a causal relationship remains to be established. We therefore have examined parameters of direct hepatic insulin action on isolated steatotic livers from high-fat (HF)-fed rats compared with standard chow (SC)-fed controls. Direct hepatic action of insulin was assayed in Wistar rats after 6 wk of HF diet by measuring the insulin-induced suppression of epinephrine-induced hepatic glucose output in an isolated liver perfusion system. Insulin-induced activation of glycogen synthase was measured by quantifying the incorporation of radioactive UDP-glucose into glycogen in HF and SC liver lysates. HF diet induced visceral obesity, mild insulin resistance, and hepatic steatosis. Both suppression of epinephrine-induced glycogenolysis and activation of glycogen synthase by insulin were sustained in HF rats; no significant difference from SC controls could be detected. In conclusion, in our model, triglyceride accumulation into the liver was not sufficient to impair direct hepatic insulin action. The data argue for an important role of systemic factors in the regulation of hepatic glucose output and hepatic insulin sensitivity in vivo.

insulin resistance; high-fat diet; liver perfusion


AN ELEVATED HEPATIC GLUCOSE OUTPUT (HGO), even under hyperglycemic conditions, is a major feature of obesity-linked type 2 diabetes. This impairment of hepatic glucose metabolism is classically thought to derive from hepatic insulin resistance, meaning an insufficient ability of insulin to suppress HGO in prediabetic and diabetic patients as well as in rodent models of type 2 diabetes (24, 28, 29). In recent years, much progress has been made in understanding insulin receptor signal transduction and intracellular pathways mediating insulin action downstream of the receptor in insulin-dependent tissues, such as muscle, fat, and liver (40). Circulating factors such as free fatty acids or adipose tissue secretory products have been postulated as humoral modulators of tissue insulin sensitivity (see recent review in Ref. 14). Recent studies link intracellular triglyceride and/or fatty acid accumulation, a common feature of diet-induced obesity, with insulin resistance in the muscle (7, 18), as well as with perturbed insulin secretion in fat-laden pancreatic islets (33, 37).

Clinical experience has associated insulin-resistant states, such as the metabolic syndrome, with fat accumulation in the liver over a long period of time (21). In patients with hepatic steatosis, but without known diabetes, insulin resistance as measured by homeostasis models is a common trait (8); impaired glucose tolerance as a hallmark of insulin resistance can be expected in <=30% of such patients (31, 38). Clamp experiments in humans reveal an impaired suppression of HGO by insulin in patients with hepatic steatosis before the onset of impaired glucose tolerance or overt type 2 diabetes (32). Animal studies have similarly described negative correlations between perturbed hepatic insulin action and liver fat content (19).

Although these data clearly show that hepatic steatosis is commonly associated with obesity, insulin resistance, and a decreased insulin-induced suppression of HGO, they do not prove a causal relationship between hepatic fat accumulation and impaired insulin action on the liver. After all, the latter could also result indirectly from systemic factors influencing the liver's insulin sensitivity in vivo. To our knowledge, studies proving a defect in insulin action on isolated fatty livers without single genetic defects of glucose or lipid metabolism, which would allow us to define the role of direct insulin action on steatotic livers in insulin-resistant states, do not exist at present.

This issue obviously cannot be studied in humans. We therefore used the Wistar rat high-fat-diet model of hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance (7) to quantify direct hepatic insulin action in fatty livers. For this, the effects of insulin on HGO and on the insulin-dependent activation of hepatic glycogen synthase were analyzed using a liver perfusion system. Our results show sustained hepatic insulin action in high-fat-fed animals despite a sevenfold elevation of hepatic triglyceride content; they therefore argue against a simple equation of hepatic steatosis with direct hepatic insulin resistance.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Experimental animals. Male Wistar rats were purchased from Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany) at a weight of 150 g. After 3 days of acclimatization, rats were caged with free access to water and to either a high-fat (HF) diet (43% of calories from fat) or standard rat chow diet (11% of calories from fat). Animals were held on a 12:12-h light-dark cycle. All animal procedures were approved by the local animal rights committee and complied with the German Law on Animal Protection as well as the National Research Council's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 1996.

Experimental design. Obesity and insulin resistance were induced in male Wistar rats by a 6-wk HF diet; controls were fed with standard chow (SC). The model was characterized metabolically by measuring basal fasting plasma insulin, glucose, triglyceride, and free fatty acids, and intraperitoneal insulin tolerance tests were performed. Retroperitoneal, epididymal, and perirenal fat pads were removed and weighed, and liver triglyceride content was measured. Fed animals were used for liver perfusion experiments to analyze the hepatic glucose output with or without exposure to epinephrine and insulin or the insulin stimulation of glycogen synthase activity, as we will describe in detail. Unless otherwise stated, all reagents were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) or Merck Eurolab (Darmstadt, Germany) at the highest purity grade available.

HF diet. A premixed HF diet (no. 157j) was purchased from Altromin (Lage, Germany). In terms of percentage by weight, it consisted of 20% fat (mainly lard), 42% carbohydrate, and 21% protein.

Liver perfusion experiments. Krebs-Ringer-Henseleit (KRB) buffer (7) [containing 4 mmol/l glucose and 2 mmol/l lactate and oxygenated by continuous gassing with carbogen (95% O2-5% CO2) at 37°C, and a pH of 7.4 with additions as will be described] was used as perfusate. The experiments were performed between 8:00 and 10:00 AM with fed HF or SC rats anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg body wt). Single-pass liver perfusion was then performed. For this, a 16-gauge catheter was inserted into the portal vein and secured by a ligature, and perfusion was started at a flow rate of 3–4 ml·min–1·g liver–1. To avoid an elevation of portal venous pressure, the vena cava inferior was immediately cut after the start of perfusion. A 16-gauge outflow catheter was inserted into the vena cava superior and a 23-gauge catheter into the common bile duct. After a stable perfusate flow was established with an adequate liver perfusion, assayed by homogenous color change and liver temperature as well as a portal venous pressure <5 cmH2O, the vena cava inferior was ligated, and the equilibration phase started. Glucose output was measured every 5 min with a portable glucose monitor (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). After 30 min, when a stable glucose output had been established, an epinephrine infusion (50 nmol/l) was started by use of a continuous pump to stimulate glycogenolysis (9). Glucose output was monitored as described above for 30 min. In another set of experiments, insulin was added to the perfusate from the start at 600 pmol/l, equaling a low physiological portal insulin concentration (5); epinephrine infusion and glucose monitoring were performed as described above. Appropriate control experiments were performed without insulin and/or epinephrine.

The quality of the perfusion was checked by monitoring O2 concentration before and after the liver passage, portal vein perfusion pressure (PVPP), bile flow, and liver temperature, as well as lactate levels and alanine aminotransferase (AAT) activity in the outflow. Only perfusion experiments with continuous O2 extraction of >40%, continuous bile flow, and homogenous liver surface temperature of >35°C, and without significant elevations of PPVP (i.e., <5 cmH2O) or lactate and AAT activity in the outflowing perfusate were used for subsequent analysis. All experimental subgroups consisted of at least five independent experiments.

Glycogen synthase activity. Liver perfusion was initiated as described above. After 30 min of equilibration with oxygenated KRB buffer, a liver sample of ~50–100 mg was carefully cut out from the right ventral liver lobe and clamp-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Perfusion pressure did not change during this procedure, indicating that no major hemodynamic changes had been induced. Insulin infusion was then started at 600 pmol/l via a continuous pump. Thirty minutes later, a second, similarly sized liver sample was removed from the right ventral liver lobe and immediately clamp-frozen. Control samples were obtained in perfusions performed without addition of insulin. The liver samples were then homogenized in 50 mmol/l Tris·HCl, pH 7.8, 10 mmol/l EDTA, 100 mmol/l NaF, 1 mmol/l dithiothreitol, and 1 mmol/l phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The insoluble matter was removed by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 15 min, and the supernatant was used for assaying insulin-stimulated glycogen synthase (GS) activity, as previously described (36) with slight modifications. The supernatant (60 µl) and 30 µl of assay buffer {50 mmol/l Tris·HCl, pH 7.8, 3.35 mmol/l EDTA, 10 mg/ml glycogen, 0.75 mmol/l uridine diphosphate (UDP)-D-glucose, 1.19 µCi/mol UDP-D-[14C]glucose} were mixed and incubated at 30°C for 20 min in the presence or absence of 10 mmol/l glucose 6-phosphate to quantitate activated and total GS activity. After stopping the reaction with 50 µl of 60% KOH, the samples were spotted onto prelabeled chromatography filter papers (3MM; Whatman, Maidstone, UK). Glycogen was precipitated by immersion in 500 ml of 70% ethanol at 4°C. The filters were washed two times in 250 ml of 70% ethanol for 30 min to remove unincorporated substrate from precipitated glycogen. Filters were air-dried, and incorporated radioactivity was measured by liquid scintillation counting. Activated GS (GS{alpha}) was normalized with total GS activity by calculating the ratios of radioactivity incorporated into glycogen with and without addition of glucose 6-phosphate.

Insulin tolerance tests. Experiments were performed with fasted HF and SC rats. Rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg body wt). After 30 min, baseline glucose was measured with a hand-held glucometer (AccuTrend, Roche Diagnostics) from whole blood drawn from the tail tip capillary region. The animals were then injected intraperitoneally with 600 pmol/kg body wt insulin (Aventis, Frankfurt, Germany). Whole blood glucose was monitored every 8 min for 60 min.

Liver triglycerides. Tissue triglycerides were determined as described previously, with slight modifications (7). Briefly, frozen liver samples were first powdered under liquid nitrogen. Twenty to fifty milligrams of frozen liver powder were then weighed in 1 ml of a chloroform-methanol mix (2:1 vol/vol) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with occasional shaking to extract the lipid. After addition of 200 µl of H2O, vortexing, and centrifugation for 5 min at 3,000 g, the lower lipid phase was collected and dried at room temperature. The lipid pellet was redissolved in 60 µl of tert-butanol and 40 µl of a Triton X-114-methanol (2:1 vol/vol) mix, and triglycerides were measured by means of the GPO-triglyceride kit (Sigma) with appropriate triglyceride standards (Sigma).

Plasma measurements. Plasma glucose, triglycerides, and free fatty acids as well as perfusate AAT activity and lactate content were measured with kits from Sigma and Roche Diagnostics. Plasma insulin was measured using rat-specific RIA kits (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO).

Statistical methods. All results are expressed as means ± SE of at least five independent experiments unless otherwise stated. The area under the curve (AUC) was analyzed by employing the trapezoid rule. Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired Student's t-test by use of the statistics module of Microsoft Excel, version 8.0 (Microsoft, Seattle, WA). P values were corrected for multiple testing according to the Bonferroni method. Statistical significance was assumed at P <= 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Effects of HF diet on body weight and whole body insulin sensitivity. The effects of 6 wk of HF diet on rat body weight, visceral fat mass, and liver triglyceride content, as well as the measured biochemical parameters, are shown in Table 1. On average, HF rats were 14% heavier than SC controls (P < 0.05), and their visceral fat pads were ~1.8-fold larger (P < 0.01), demonstrating that the HF diet induced visceral obesity. Liver triglyceride content was sevenfold higher in HF rats (P = 0.01). HF rat insulin levels were 35% elevated over those of SC controls, and fasting plasma glucose was ~20% higher in HF-fed rats (P <= 0.05). These results indicated insulin resistance in HF animals. This was confirmed by performing insulin tolerance tests. Here, tail whole blood glucose levels in SC rats dropped from 5.3 ± 0.3 mmol/l to a minimal 3.8 ± 0.2 mmol/l at 35 min after intraperitoneal insulin injection, whereas HF rats injected with an equal amount of insulin per kilogram body weight showed no clear decrease in glucose levels at any time point. Consequently, insulin-induced glucose disposal estimated from the AUC for glucose concentration after 60 min was ~25% in SC rats, whereas HF rats showed no significant change from controls (P <= 0.05 compared with SC).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. General and metabolic plasma characteristics of rats fed SC or HF diet for 6 wk

 
Effects of HF diet on basal and epinephrine-stimulated hepatic glucose output. Livers of fed HF and SC rats were perfused with KRH buffer containing 4 mmol/l glucose and 2 mmol/l lactate as gluconeogenic substrate. The time course of the HGO with and without epinephrine stimulation is depicted in Figs. 1A (SC) and 2A (HF). SC and HF rats showed similar basal HGO values of 1.34 ± 0.1 and 1.42 ± 0.05 µmol·g liver–1·min–1. After addition of epinephrine at 50 nmol/l, we observed a rapid increase in HGO of 2.5-fold over basal conditions in SC rats. This effect did not differ significantly in HF rats, with a 2.8-fold increase of HGO over basal. In both groups, epinephrine-stimulated HGO was continuously elevated for ~16 min. It then declined very slowly but was still significantly elevated over basal after <=30 min of epinephrine infusion.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Hepatic glucose output under basal conditions and during stimulation with epinephrine and/or insulin in isolated perfused livers of rats fed standard chow (SC). Single-pass liver perfusion was set up in livers from fed animals. After a 30-min equilibration period, livers were stimulated with epinephrine (50 nM, A) and/or insulin (600 pmol/l, B) for 30 min. Hepatic glucose output was quantified as the difference between glucose concentrations in the inflow and the outflow perfusate normalized by liver wet weight. Data represent means ± SE of 5 independent experiments/group. *P <= 0.05 vs. untreated control at corresponding time point.

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Hepatic glucose output under basal conditions and during stimulation with epinephrine and/or insulin in isolated perfused livers of rats fed a high-fat (HF) diet. Single-pass liver perfusion was set up in livers from fed animals. After a 30-min equilibration period, livers were stimulated with epinephrine (50 nM, A) and/or insulin (600 pmol/l, B) for 30 min. Hepatic glucose output was quantified as difference between glucose concentrations in perfusate and outflow normalized by liver wet weight. Data represent means ± SE of 5 independent experiments/group. *P <= 0.05 vs. untreated control at corresponding time point.

 
Effects of HF diet on insulin-induced suppression of HGO. In the next set of experiments, the liver perfusions were performed as described above, with an additional continuous insulin infusion from the start to the end of perfusion (Figs. 1B and 2B). We did not observe any relevant effects of insulin on basal HGO in SC or HF rats. During the first 10 min of epinephrine infusion, HGO increased rapidly to 2.2-fold and 2.7-fold over basal in SC and HF rats, respectively. This initial HGO increment was slightly, but not significantly, lower than that measured in the previous experiments without insulin for both SC and HF rats. After time point t = 10 min, HGO decreased steadily in the insulin-exposed livers, leading to a near basal hepatic glucose release at 20 min after the start of epinephrine. This insulin-induced suppression of epinephrine-stimulated HGO was quantified by subtracting the total glucose output (calculated by AUC analysis) over basal HGO between the epinephrine-treated and the epinephrine and/or insulin-treated groups. When SC were compared with HF rats with respect to this parameter, no significant difference was found (33 ± 10% in SC rats, 32 ± 10% in HF rats, respectively, P = 0.96).

Activation of GS by insulin in HF and SC rats. To further analyze the direct hepatic insulin sensitivity in SC and HF rats, we measured the activation of GS in livers perfused with insulin at 100 µmol/l. The results are shown in Fig. 3. Both basal and insulin-stimulated GS{alpha} activities tended to be higher in HF rats, whereas the relative increment in enzyme activity induced by insulin was similar in the two diet groups (fold increase for SC: 1.68 ± 0.11; for HF: 1.60 ± 0.08, P = 0.65, when diet groups were compared with each other).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Stimulation of glycogen synthase (GS) by insulin in perfused livers of rats fed SC or HF diet. GS activity was measured in samples from isolated perfused livers before and after stimulation with insulin (600 pmol/l) by quantifying incorporation of UDP-[14C]glucose into glycogen. Activated GS (GS{alpha}) was normalized by total GS activity by calculating the ratio of radioactivity incorporated with to that without addition of glucose 6-phosphate. Each bar represents mean ± SE of >=4 independent experiments. *P <= 0.05 vs. untreated control.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Liver insulin resistance develops in patients and rodent models with elevated intrahepatic triglycerides (hTG) (2, 8, 19). It is also a common trait in patients with type 2 diabetes, who often present with hepatic steatosis (31). Although the association between hepatic insulin resistance and elevated liver triglycerides demonstrated by these and other studies seems obvious, the direct effects of insulin on fat-laden livers have not been well characterized. Therefore, the goal of this study was to analyze parameters of hepatic insulin action in steatotic livers of HF rats compared with SC-fed controls.

By using a lard-based high-fat rodent diet, we were able to induce visceral obesity and moderate signs of whole body insulin resistance in normal male Wistar rats. The animals showed a marked rise in hTG content, as previously described (30). Hepatic insulin action was assessed in HF-fed and control rats by using an isolated liver perfusion system that enabled us to look at direct insulin effects. By this method, the multiple confounding factors influencing insulin action in in vivo clamp settings, in which systemic insulin effects on glucose as well as on lipid and amino acid metabolism may influence hepatic glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis, could be ruled out. Hepatocyte cultures were not employed, because the time-consuming isolation procedure might have led to changes of hTG deposits and also might have influenced the putative insulin-resistant phenotype. We used a cell-free perfusate to avoid changes in lactate concentration originating from erythrocyte metabolism. The perfusions were performed with fed rats to ensure sufficient glycogen deposits. A physiological perfusate glucose concentration was chosen because hyperglycemia is known to attenuate diet-induced insulin resistance (10), whereas low glucose conditions would have increased hepatic glucose production, thereby diminishing glycogen stores and potentially lowering the HGO-suppressing effect of insulin. Relevant hypoxia during the perfusions, which would influence the results, can be ruled out, because the parameters of liver vitality, in particular oxygen extraction, were stable during the perfusions.

Basal HGO, as assessed by the portocaval glucose difference during liver perfusions, did not differ significantly between HF rats and SC controls. These results argue against an increase in basal hepatic glucose production induced solely by chronic hTG elevation, although we cannot rule out that a putative HGO elevation might have been counteracted by concomitantly decreased hepatic glycogen stores, as observed previously in high-fat-fed rats (23). Insulin at a low physiological portal concentration was not able to suppress basal HGO in either experimental group. This is in keeping with previous results, demonstrating that insulin by itself does not change HGO in isolated liver perfusion systems at normal glucose concentrations (41).

The glycogenolytic catecholamine epinephrine effectively stimulated HGO; the extent and duration of epinephrine-induced HGO stimulation were markedly lowered by insulin in SC rats. These results correspond with earlier work demonstrating a strong reduction of adrenergically stimulated glycogenolysis by insulin in comparable perfusion systems (11, 16, 22). In livers of HF rats, insulin also effectively decreased epinephrine-induced HGO stimulation. This indicates that insulin is able to directly suppress adrenergically stimulated hepatic glycogenolysis regardless of liver triglyceride content. To our knowledge, no previous study has measured direct hepatic insulin action in high-fat-fed rats with defined hepatic steatosis by use of an isolated perfusion system. Ikeda and Fujiyama (17) showed insulin resistance in perfused livers of high-fructose-fed rats, but they did not state hepatic triglyceride content, making our results difficult to compare. To confirm the sustained action of insulin in fatty livers with a second experimental parameter, we measured GS activity in livers perfused with and without insulin. We observed clear insulin-induced increments of GS activity, showing that the experimental system was valid for analysis of hepatic insulin action. No clear difference between HF and SC rat livers was found (Fig. 3). Again, to our knowledge, no comparable previous results exist.

In conclusion, no signs of resistance to direct actions of insulin were detected in steatotic rat livers when two different parameters of hepatic insulin action were observed. These results do not support the simple preconception that elevated liver trigyceride deposition by itself necessarily impairs hepatic insulin action, e.g., by influencing binding of insulin to its receptor, insulin receptor activity, or postreceptor signal transduction. This notion is supported by a previous study, which failed to demonstrate clear deteriorating effects of hepatic steatosis when insulin-induced activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in livers of high-fat-fed rats was analyzed (3). However, other authors have reported a decreased insulin receptor kinase activity (39), so this issue must remain controversial. Also, when interpreting our results, it should be considered that the results we obtained apply only to the insulin suppression of hepatic glycogenolysis. HGO deriving from gluconeogenesis might be regulated differently, and direct insulin action on this part of hepatic glucose metabolism remains to be quantified in fat-laden livers.

Substantial evidence for an impairment of direct insulin action on fatty livers does exist from in vivo studies. Seppala-Lindroos et al. (32) recently demonstrated that basal HGO remains unchanged in subjects with hepatic steatosis despite elevated fasting insulin levels. Basal HGO is regulated by the portal vein insulin concentration in vivo (35). Taken together, these studies suggest that higher insulin concentrations were needed to restrain HGO in these subjects. The fact that steatotic livers show an impairment of insulin action in vivo, but not in our isolated perfusion system, argues for the hypothesis of a secondary origin of hepatic insulin resistance. Extrahepatic factors that regulate aspects of hepatic insulin action, e.g., suppression of HGO, would then be pathologically changed in insulin-resistant states. Previous authors examining hepatic insulin action have come to similar conclusions. The "single gateway theory" proposed by Bergman (4) states that insulin resistance of the adipocyte impairs insulin-induced suppression of lipolysis. This leads to an elevation of free fatty acids, which in turn stimulate hepatic glucose production. Key assumptions of this theory have been confirmed during the last few years (1, 20, 25, 34), but they are challenged by recent findings in liver-specific insulin receptor knockout mice, demonstrating that both the direct and the indirect insulin actions on HGO require an intact insulin-signaling pathway in the liver (12).

Other studies following the single gateway theory have suggested alternative extrahepatic regulators of HGO. New studies show that adipocyte-derived hormones, such as resistin, decrease the hepatic insulin effect (27). Also, it has recently been demonstrated that mice lacking insulin receptors in the central nervous system develop insulin resistance (6), and central insulin antagonism impairs the ability of circulating insulin to inhibit hepatic glucose production (26). Other arguments against hepatic triglyceride content as the main regulator of the insulin effect on the liver come from rodent studies that use different interventions to increase hepatic insulin action. Insulin-induced HGO suppression was reversed to normal after a 3-day diet change, which cannot reasonably be expected to reverse hepatic steatosis, in HF-fed rats (15). Removal of visceral fat in obese rats markedly improved hepatic insulin action over that in controls (13). In summary, a multitude of recent results strongly argues for the existence of an extrahepatic regulation of hepatic insulin action, which might be altered in insulin-resistant and diabetic states.

When our findings are taken together, we demonstrate sustained direct hepatic insulin action in steatotic livers of HF-fed rats in terms of suppression of glycogenolysis. Elevated hTG, therefore, do not necessarily interfere with insulin receptor function or intracellular insulin signaling. The hepatic "insulin resistance" observed in vivo may at least partially result indirectly, i.e., be caused by circulating factors that interfere with insulin signaling and/or hepatic glucose production.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by a grant from the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung, Bad Homburg, Germany.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. Buettner, Dept. of Internal Medicine I, Univ. of Regensburg, 93042 Regensburg, Germany (E-mail: roland.buettner{at}klinik.uni-regensburg.de).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Ader M and Bergman RN. Peripheral effects of insulin dominate suppression of fasting hepatic glucose production. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 258: E1020–E1032, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Akiyama T, Tachibana I, Shirohara H, Watanabe N, and Otsuki M. High-fat hypercaloric diet induces obesity, glucose intolerance and hyperlipidemia in normal adult male Wistar rat. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 31: 27–35, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Anai M, Funaki M, Ogihara T, Kanda A, Onishi Y, Sakoda H, Inukai K, Nawano M, Fukushima Y, Yazaki Y, Kikuchi M, Oka Y, and Asano T. Enhanced insulin-stimulated activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in the liver of high-fat-fed rats. Diabetes 48: 158–169, 1999.[Abstract]
  4. Bergman RN. New concepts in extracellular signaling for insulin action: the single gateway hypothesis. Recent Prog Horm Res 52: 359–385, 1997.[ISI][Medline]
  5. Bergsten P, Westerlund J, Liss P, and Carlsson PO. Primary in vivo oscillations of metabolism in the pancreas. Diabetes 51: 699–703, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bruning JC, Gautam D, Burks DJ, Gillette J, Schubert M, Orban PC, Klein R, Krone W, Muller-Wieland D, and Kahn CR. Role of brain insulin receptor in control of body weight and reproduction. Science 289: 2122–2125, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Buettner R, Newgard CB, Rhodes CJ, and O'Doherty RM. Correction of diet-induced hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and skeletal muscle insulin resistance by moderate hyperleptinemia. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 278: E563–E569, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Chitturi S, Abeygunasekera S, Farrell GC, Holmes-Walker J, Hui JM, Fung C, Karim R, Lin R, Samarasinghe D, Liddle C, Weltman M, and George J. NASH and insulin resistance: insulin hypersecretion and specific association with the insulin resistance syndrome. Hepatology 35: 373–379, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  9. Chu CA, Sindelar DK, Neal DW, and Cherrington AD. Direct effects of catecholamines on hepatic glucose production in conscious dog are due to glycogenolysis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 271: E127–E137, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Commerford SR, Bizeau ME, McRae H, Jampolis A, Thresher JS, and Pagliassotti MJ. Hyperglycemia compensates for diet-induced insulin resistance in liver and skeletal muscle of rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281: R1380–R1389, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Englisch R, Wurzinger R, Furnsinn C, Schneider B, Frisch H, Waldhausl W, Graf J, and Roden M. Effects of insulin-like growth factor I on basal and stimulated glucose fluxes in rat liver. Biochem J 351: 39–45, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  12. Fisher SJ and Kahn CR. Insulin signaling is required for insulin's direct and indirect action on hepatic glucose production. J Clin Invest 111: 463–468, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Gabriely I, Ma XH, Yang XM, Atzmon G, Rajala MW, Berg AH, Scherer P, Rossetti L, and Barzilai N. Removal of visceral fat prevents insulin resistance and glucose intolerance of aging: an adipokine-mediated process? Diabetes 51: 2951–2958, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Goldstein BJ. Insulin resistance as the core defect in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 90: 3G–10G, 2002.[ISI][Medline]
  15. Harris RB and Kor H. Insulin insensitivity is rapidly reversed in rats by reducing dietary fat from 40 to 30% of energy. J Nutr 122: 1811–1822, 1992.[ISI][Medline]
  16. Hems DA, Rodrigues LM, and Whitton PD. Glycogen phosphorylase, glucose output and vasoconstriction in the perfused rat liver. Concentration-dependence of actions of adrenaline, vasopressin and angiotensin II. Biochem J 160: 367–374, 1976.[ISI][Medline]
  17. Ikeda T and Fujiyama K. The effect of pioglitazone on glucose metabolism and insulin uptake in the perfused liver and hindquarter of high-fructose-fed rats. Metabolism 47: 1152–1155, 1998.[ISI][Medline]
  18. Kuhlmann J, Neumann-Haefelin C, Belz U, Kalisch J, Juretschke HP, Stein M, Kleinschmidt E, Kramer W, and Herling AW. Intramyocellular lipid and insulin resistance: a longitudinal in vivo 1H-spectroscopic study in Zucker diabetic fatty rats. Diabetes 52: 138–144, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kusunoki M, Tsutsumi K, Hara T, Ogawa H, Nakamura T, Miyata T, Sakakibara F, Fukuzawa Y, Suga T, Kakumu S, and Nakaya Y. Correlation between lipid and glycogen contents in liver and insulin resistance in high-fat-fed rats treated with the lipoprotein lipase activator NO-1886. Metabolism 51: 792–795, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  20. Lam TKT, van de Werve G, and Giacca A. Free fatty acids increase basal hepatic glucose production and induce hepatic insulin resistance at different sites. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 284: E281–E290, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Li Z, Clark J, and Diehl AM. The liver in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Liver Dis 6: 867–877, 2002.[Medline]
  22. Meyerholz HH, Gardemann A, and Jungermann K. Control of glycogenolysis and blood flow by arterial and portal adrenaline in perfused liver. Biochem J 275: 609–616, 1991.[ISI][Medline]
  23. Miller WC, Bryce GR, and Conlee RK. Adaptations to a high-fat diet that increase exercise endurance in male rats. J Appl Physiol 56: 78–83, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Mitrakou A, Kelley D, Mokan M, Veneman T, Pangburn T, Reilly J, and Gerich J. Role of reduced suppression of glucose production and diminished early insulin release in impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 326: 22–29, 1992.[Abstract]
  25. Mittelman SD, Van Citters GW, Kirkman EL, and Bergman RN. Extreme insulin resistance of the central adipose depot in vivo. Diabetes 51: 755–761, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Obici S, Zhang BB, Karkanias G, and Rossetti L. Hypothalamic insulin signaling is required for inhibition of glucose production. Nat Med 8: 1376–1382, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  27. Rajala MW, Obici S, Scherer PE, and Rossetti L. Adipose-derived resistin and gut-derived resistin-like molecule-beta selectively impair insulin action on glucose production. J Clin Invest 111: 225–230, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Revers RR, Fink R, Griffin J, Olefsky JM, and Kolterman OG. Influence of hyperglycemia on insulin's in vivo effects in type II diabetes. J Clin Invest 73: 664–672, 1984.[ISI][Medline]
  29. Rossetti L, Giaccari A, Barzilai N, Howard K, Sebel G, and Hu M. Mechanism by which hyperglycemia inhibits hepatic glucose production in conscious rats. Implications for the pathophysiology of fasting hyperglycemia in diabetes. J Clin Invest 92: 1126–1134, 1993.[ISI][Medline]
  30. Rustan AC, Christiansen EN, and Drevon CA. Serum lipids, hepatic glycerolipid metabolism and peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation in rats fed omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids. Biochem J 283: 333–339, 1992.[ISI][Medline]
  31. Schlottmann K, Baer A, Lock G, Scholmerich J, and Palitzsch KD. The sonographic picture of an echogenic liver is an indicator of pathologic glucose tolerance. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 125: 517–522, 2000.[ISI][Medline]
  32. Seppala-Lindroos A, Vehkavaara S, Hakkinen AM, Goto T, Westerbacka J, Sovijarvi A, Halavaara J, and Yki-Jarvinen H. Fat accumulation in the liver is associated with defects in insulin suppression of glucose production and serum free fatty acids independent of obesity in normal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 3023–3028, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Shimabukuro M, Zhou YT, Lee Y, and Unger RH. Troglitazone lowers islet fat and restores beta cell function of Zucker diabetic fatty rats. J Biol Chem 273: 3547–3550, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Sindelar DK, Chu CA, Rohlie M, Neal DW, Swift LL, and Cherrington AD. The role of fatty acids in mediating the effects of peripheral insulin on hepatic glucose production in the conscious dog. Diabetes 46: 187–196, 1997.[Abstract]
  35. Sindelar DK, Chu CA, Venson P, Donahue EP, Neal DW, and Cherrington AD. Basal hepatic glucose production is regulated by the portal vein insulin concentration. Diabetes 47: 523–529, 1998.[Abstract]
  36. Thomas JA, Schlender KK, and Larner J. A rapid filter paper assay for UDPglucose-glycogen glucosyltransferase, including an improved biosynthesis of UDP-14C-glucose. Anal Biochem 25: 486–499, 1968.[ISI][Medline]
  37. Unger RH. Lipotoxicity in the pathogenesis of obesity-dependent NIDDM. Genetic and clinical implications. Diabetes 44: 863–870, 1995.[Abstract]
  38. Valenti L, Fracanzani AL, Dongiovanni P, Santorelli G, Branchi A, Taioli E, Fiorelli G, and Fargion S. Tumor necrosis factor alpha promoter polymorphisms and insulin resistance in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 122: 274–280, 2002.[ISI][Medline]
  39. Watarai T, Kobayashi M, Takata Y, Sasaoka T, Iwasaki M, and Shigeta Y. Alteration of insulin-receptor kinase activity by high-fat feeding. Diabetes 37: 1397–1404, 1988.[Abstract]
  40. White MF. IRS proteins and the common path to diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 283: E413–E422, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Williams TF, Exton JH, Friedmann N, and Park CR. Effects of insulin and adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate on K+ flux and glucose output in perfused rat liver. Am J Physiol 221: 1645–1651, 1971.[Free Full Text]