1 Muscle Cell Biochemistry Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, Victoria University, Melbourne City, Melbourne 8001; and 2 School of Zoology, Faculty of Science and Technology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In this study, we investigated whether the previously established differences between fast- and slow-twitch single skeletal muscle fibers of the rat, in terms of myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform composition and contractile function, are also detectable in excitation-contraction (E-C) coupling. We compared the contractile responsiveness of electrophoretically typed, mechanically skinned single fibers from the soleus (Sol), the extensor digitorum longus (EDL), and the white region of the sternomastoid (SM) muscle to t-system depolarization-induced activation. The quantitative parameters assessed were the amplitude of the maximum depolarization-induced force response (DIFRmax; normalized to the maximum Ca2+-activated force in that fiber) and the number of responses elicited until the force declined by 75% of DIFRmax (R-D75%). The mean DIFRmax values for type IIB EDL and type IIB SM fibers were not statistically different, and both were greater than the mean DIFRmax for type I Sol fibers. The mean R-D75% for type IIB EDL fibers was greater than that for type I Sol fibers as well as type IIB SM fibers. These data suggest that E-C coupling characteristics of mechanically skinned rat single muscle fibers are related to MHC-based fiber type and the muscle of origin.
excitation-contraction coupling; myosin heavy chain; single muscle fiber; hybrid fiber
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
IT IS WELL ESTABLISHED that mammalian skeletal muscle is a heterogeneous tissue consisting of fibers of different functional and structural characteristics (10, 40, 44). The functional and structural diversity of skeletal muscle fibers has been related to interfiber-type differences in the relative proportions of some membrane systems [e.g., sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) and t-tubular network (t system)] and to different amounts and molecular forms (isoforms) of proteins that play key roles in energy metabolism (e.g., glycolytic or oxidative enzymes) and excitation-contraction (E-C) coupling (e.g., myosin or Ca2+ regulatory proteins such as the Ca2+-ATPase pump). For the purposes of this study, E-C coupling refers to the whole sequence of events that occur in the twitch skeletal muscle fiber between the generation of an action potential and the activation of the contractile machinery (46).
The contractile protein myosin, which exists as a hexamer containing
four myosin light chain subunits and two myosin heavy chain (MHC)
subunits, accounts for almost half of the protein content in the
myofibrillar compartment of skeletal muscle (21). The MHC
subunit, a polymorphic protein, which is by far the most extensively
studied of all the myofibrillar proteins, contains the enzyme (myosin
ATPase) responsible for hydrolyzing ATP and the cross bridge
responsible for the production of force and muscle shortening
(1). Among the MHC isoforms expressed in mammalian skeletal muscle are four isoforms in adult mammalian muscle
(slow-twitch isoform MHC I or MHC/slow- and fast-twitch isoforms MHC
IIa, MHC IId/x, and MHC IIb), two isoforms in developing and
regenerating muscles (MHC-emb and MHC-neo), and five isoforms in highly
specialized (extraocular and jaw muscles) muscles (for reviews, see
Refs. 40 and 52).
In recent years, intense efforts have been directed toward the functional characterization of the contractile apparatus in single muscle fibers expressing specific MHC isoforms. These studies, in which MHC isoform analysis and determination of contractile parameters were carried out in the same fiber segment, have produced compelling evidence that the MHC isoform expressed in a single muscle fiber is a major determinant of the maximum shortening velocity (54), maximum power output (11), optimal velocity of shortening (9), rate of tension development (29), rate of ATP consumption (53), isometric force per cross-sectional area (26), and stretch activation properties (25) in skinned muscle fiber segments. Because of the central role of MHCs in muscle contractile performance and their relative abundance, MHC isoform expression (as detected by high-resolution PAGE or immunohistochemistry) has become the method of choice for classifying skeletal muscle fiber types into distinct functional groups (for reviews, see Refs. 5, 36, 52).
Very little is known about the E-C coupling characteristics (involving
the t system and SR compartments) of different MHC-based fiber types.
Qualitative molecular differences have been shown to exist between
rodent extensor digitorum longus (EDL, containing predominantly
fast-twitch fiber types) and soleus (Sol, containing predominantly
slow-twitch fiber types) muscles: varying amounts of cardiac
1C-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR)/voltage sensor isoform (23, 39), slow calsequestrin isoform
(16), and neonatal Ca2+ release
channel/ryanodine receptor (RyR) type 3 (RyR3) isoform (3)
are found in adult Sol, but not in EDL, muscles. Studies using whole
muscles or untyped single fibers have demonstrated functional and
structural differences between rat EDL and Sol muscles with respect to
Ca2+ transients (17, 22), DHPR/voltage sensor
density (33), number of SR RyR/Ca2+ release
channels functionally coupled to t-tubular DHPR/voltage sensors
(17), voltage dependence of DHPR/voltage sensor activation and inactivation (12), and SR volume (15).
Given the diversity of MHC-based fiber types that make up most commonly
used mammalian skeletal muscles (including the rat EDL and Sol) and the
complexity of MHC isoform expression displayed by a large proportion of
individual fibers (for review, see Ref. 52), the
methodological approaches using whole muscles or single fibers of
unknown MHC composition cannot determine whether E-C coupling
characteristics differ between MHC-based fiber types. No studies have
examined the E-C coupling characteristics and MHC isoform composition
in the same fiber segment.
The most efficient strategy for probing events that occur between t-system depolarization and force production in a single fiber involves the use of a mechanically skinned fiber preparation, which retains functional coupling between the sealed t-tubular system and the SR (42), and the experimental protocol for t-system depolarization-induced activation of contraction developed by Lamb and Stephenson (30). Recently, we refined the alanine SDS-PAGE method developed by Nguyen and Stephenson (37, 38), which can be used to analyze MHC in rat single muscle fiber segments with a high degree of reproducibility. In this study, we combined these two methods to examine the E-C coupling characteristics and MHC isoform composition in single fiber segments from two predominantly fast-twitch, but functionally different, muscles [EDL and the white region of the sternomastoid (SM) muscle] and one predominantly slow-twitch (Sol) muscle.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Animals and Muscles
Adult Long Evans hooded rats, aged 20-21 wk, were killed by an overdose of halothane in accordance with Victoria University animal ethics procedures. EDL, Sol, and SM muscles were carefully removed, blotted dry on filter paper (Whatman no. 1), and placed under paraffin oil as previously described (7). Single fiber segments were randomly isolated under oil. The SM muscle has two distinct regions, red and white (18, 28). Both regions are considered fast twitch (35), but for comparison with the fast-twitch fibers isolated from the white EDL muscle, single SM fiber segments were isolated from the white region only.Mechanically Skinned Single-Fiber Preparations
Mechanically skinned fiber segments (volume 1.0-8.8 nl) were prepared, and their dimensions were measured as described in detail by Bortolotto et al. (7). Each fiber was mounted between a force transducer (model AME801, SensoNor, Horten, Norway) and a pair of fine forceps (Bancroft) and stretched to 120% of its resting length, bringing the sarcomere length to 2.8-3.0 µm. The sarcomere length adjustment was performed on the basis of compelling evidence that 1) the plateau region for isometric force production in rat skeletal muscle occurs at longer sarcomere lengths (2.4-2.9 µm) (51), a characteristic that has been related to longer thin filaments (13), and 2) in vertebrate skeletal muscle, an increase in the sarcomere length was accompanied by an increase in the sensitivity of the contractile apparatus to Ca2+ (45). At sarcomere lengths of 2.8-3.0 µm, rat EDL muscle fibers produce close to maximum force. With the activation procedures used in this study, the sarcomere pattern and sarcomere homogeneity in small vertebrate skeletal muscle fiber segments are well preserved during submaximal activation (51). When they were not being used for single fiber isolation, muscles were stored under oil at 4°C. To minimize storage-related glycogen loss, each muscle was used within 3 h from dissection (27). All experiments were carried out at room temperature (22-25°C).Depolarization-Induced Force Responses
The t tubules of mechanically skinned muscle fibers have previously been shown to reseal and repolarize in a K+-hexamethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (HDTA)-based repriming solution (see Solutions). This allows depolarization of the t tubules, which triggers a force response via the normal E-C coupling pathway, when the fiber is subsequently exposed to a solution mimicking the myoplasmic environment in which K+ is replaced with Na+ (30). Each fiber was placed immediately after skinning in the K+-HDTA solution for 2 min. Subsequently, the K+-HDTA solution was rapidly substituted with the Na+-HDTA solution, which causes the t-system membrane to depolarize and Ca2+ to be released from the SR via the normal E-C coupling mechanism. Each depolarization lasted for ~3-5 s; then the fiber was returned to the K+-HDTA solution for 1 min of repriming before the next depolarization. As discussed by Posterino et al. (43), this force response is at least one order of magnitude slower than an action potential-induced twitch and is not abolished by the inclusion of tetrodotoxin in the sealed t system. The typical pattern of t-system depolarization-induced force responses produced by a fiber subjected to this protocol includes 1) an initial "work-up" period, where the force generated gradually increases to a maximum value (14) and 2) a "run-down" period, where the force responses decrease until no more force responses can be elicited (30). The amplitude of the force response reached at the end of the work-up period may begin to decrease rapidly or may be maintained for several depolarization-repolarization cycles.In this study, depolarizations were continued until the force
response had run down by 75% of the largest depolarization-induced force response. To determine whether the rundown was due to depleted SR
Ca2+ levels or to dysfunction of the Ca2+
release channels, each fiber was placed in a low-Mg2+
(0.015 mM) solution to release the endogenous Ca2+. Maximum
Ca2+-activated force (CaFmax) was then obtained
in a high-Ca2+ (pCa 4.5) solution. The parameters of E-C
coupling recorded in this study were the amplitude of the
maximum depolarization-induced force response
(DIFRmax), normalized to CaFmax in the same
fiber, and the number of DIFRs produced by the fiber until the force response was 75% lower than DIFRmax (R-D75%).
Under our experimental conditions, accurate determination of the
amplitude of the force response developed by a fiber was possible if
the response was 12 µN (detection limit for 5 mV/scale).
When the DIFRmax values were compared between different fiber types, potential interexperimenter-related differences must be minimized so that any differences between fiber types can be attributed to a difference in E-C coupling structures/events. For example, some minor differences with respect to the rate of t-system depolarization may occur between experimenters if they introduce the mechanically skinned preparation into the depolarizing solution with different velocities, inasmuch as this will lead to interfiber differences with respect to the rate of diffusion of substances out of and into the fiber segment. In this study, the same experimenter performed the skinning, mounting, and depolarization protocol, using the same batch of solutions for all fibers. The sealing of the t system is assumed to be effective if a "cuff" (a skinning-generated structure indicating that the sarcolemma has been peeled back) appears during the skinning process (30).
Solutions
All chemicals were obtained from Sigma, unless otherwise stated. The K+-HDTA solution contained (in mM) 126 K+, 37 Na+, 50 HDTA2MHC Analysis
After completion of the depolarization-induced activation protocol, single fiber segments (volume 1.0-8.8 nl) were placed in 12 µl of solubilizing buffer consisting of 62.5 mM Tris, 2.3% (wt/vol) SDS, 5% (vol/vol)Statistics
Values are means ± SE. Student's two-way t-test (GraphPad, Prism) was used for comparisons between two groups. Significance was set at P < 0.05. ![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Profiles of t-System Depolarization-Induced Force Responses Developed by Electrophoretically Typed Single-Fiber Preparations From EDL, SM, and SOL Muscles
A total of 58 mechanically skinned single fibers from EDL (10), SM (18), and Sol (32) muscles were subjected to t-system depolarization triggered by the rapid substitution of K+ with Na+ in the depolarizing solution. Under our conditions, the fibers produced three types of t-system depolarization-induced force responses: 1) rapid transient responses (rtF), where force returned to a level equivalent to <10% of the peak within 2-3 s (Fig. 1), 2) prolonged responses (pF; Fig. 2A), where force remained >10% of the peak, even when the fiber was kept in the depolarizing solution for as long as 13 s (Fig. 2B), and 3) no detectable responses (nF; Fig. 3). On the basis of the profile of the maximum t-system depolarization-induced response developed by the fiber preparations, we identified three groups of fibers: 1) fibers producing rtF responses (rtF fibers), 2) fibers producing pF responses (pF fibers), and 3) fibers that did not develop detectable force responses, even after four to six successive depolarization-repolarization cycles (nF fibers).
|
|
|
The fiber type (based on MHC composition) populations dissected from
EDL, SM, and Sol muscles and the profiles of the force responses
produced by t-system depolarization in these fibers are summarized in
Table 1. Also shown in Table 1 are the
low Mg2+-induced force responses developed by rtF and pF
fibers after rundown and by nF fibers after failure to respond to four
to six successive depolarization-repolarization cycles. The pF profile was displayed by a total of 11 Sol fibers, a large enough number to
validate treatment as a separate group. However, because only the data
collected for three of these fibers were complete, we subjected the
fibers to quantitative analyses and reported only these fibers. Three
Sol fibers (2 type I and 1 type I/IIA) initially developed pF-type
force responses (Fig. 2C), but, by the end of the work-up
period, these responses had changed to rtF-type responses. In this
study, only fibers displaying rtF and pF responses were subjected to
analyses of quantitative E-C coupling characteristics. Representative
electrophoretograms of the four fiber types examined in this study are
shown in Fig. 4.
|
|
Relation Between Quantitative E-C Coupling Characteristics
The two quantitative E-C coupling characteristics examined in this study are DIFRmax and R-D75%. The data show a poor correlation between DIFRmax and R-D75% for pure type IIB fibers from EDL (r2 = 0.19, n = 8; Fig. 5A) and SM (r2 = 0.20, n = 13; Fig. 5B) and for pure type I fibers from Sol (r2 = 0.02, n = 8; Fig. 5C). This suggests that in these fibers the intracellular process(es) responsible for the use-dependent loss of contractile responsiveness to t-system depolarization is/are in large part independent of the factors determining the size of DIFRmax. We did not include fiber type groups IIB/D (SM; n = 3) and I/IIA (Sol; n = 4), which consisted of fewer than eight fibers.
|
Quantitative E-C Coupling Characteristics in Electrophoretically Typed Single Fibers From EDL, SM, and Sol Muscles
In this study, DIFRmax and R-D75% were compared in 1) fibers of the same type from different muscles (type IIB EDL fibers vs. type IIB SM fibers), 2) different fiber types from different muscles (type IIB EDL fibers and type IIB SM fibers vs. type I Sol fibers), 3) different fiber types (hybrid vs. pure) from the same muscle (type IIB/D SM fibers vs. type IIB SM fibers; type I/IIA Sol fibers vs. type I Sol fibers), and 4) fibers of the same type from the same muscle (type I Sol fibers).Type IIB EDL fibers vs. type IIB SM fibers.
The mean DIFRmax for type IIB fibers from EDL (84.0 ± 6.0%) was not different from that for IIB SM fibers (78.8 ± 2.9%; Fig. 6A). By
comparison, the mean R-D75% for type IIB SM fibers (20.0 ± 2.9) was significantly lower than that for type IIB EDL fibers (98.6 ± 20.1; Fig. 6B). The interfiber
variability (coefficient of variation) with respect to the two E-C
coupling characteristics considered was 20.2% (DIFRmax)
and 57.6% (R-D75%) for type IIB fibers from EDL muscle
and 26.7% (DIFRmax) and 53.5% (R-D75%) for
type IIB fibers from SM muscle.
|
Type IIB EDL and type IIB SM fibers vs. type I Sol fibers. Figure 6 also shows DIFRmax (Fig. 6A) and R-D75% (Fig. 6B) values for type I Sol fibers. These fibers displayed significantly lower values than pure type IIB EDL fibers for DIFRmax (Fig. 6A) and R-D75% (Fig. 6B). Pure type I Sol fibers also produced significantly lower maximum depolarization-induced force responses (Fig. 6A) than pure type IIB SM fibers. However, although R-D75% developed by type I Sol fibers was lower (1.7 times) than that developed by type IIB SM fibers, this difference just failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.0529; Fig. 6B). The coefficients of variation for the two E-C coupling characteristics in Sol fibers were 81.2% (DIFRmax) and 20.7% (R-D75%).
Type IIB/D vs. type IIB SM fibers and type I/IIA vs. type I Sol fibers. A comparison of the small group (n = 3) of hybrid type IIB/D SM fibers with the pure type IIB SM fibers (n = 13) showed no significant difference with respect to DIFRmax (78.8 ± 5.8 vs. 95.1 ± 3.9%) or R-D75% (20.0 ± 2.9 vs. 26.0 ± 8.1). Taken together with the data presented above (see Type IIB EDL and type IIB SM fibers vs. type I Sol fibers), this finding could indicate that, under the conditions used in this study, mechanically skinned rat muscle fibers containing MHC II isoforms are more responsive to t-system depolarization than fibers expressing the MHC I isoform. Contrary to this conclusion, the four type I/IIA hybrid Sol fibers examined in this study, all of which contained a larger proportion (mean 72.5%) of MHC IIa isoforms, were not significantly different from the pure type I Sol fibers (n = 8) with respect to DIFRmax (23.1 ± 12.8 vs. 29.8 ± 8.5%) or R-D75% (10.3 ± 0.6 vs. 12.1 ± 0.9).
Type I Sol fibers. As mentioned above, five pure type I Sol fibers produced rapid transient force responses, and three gave prolonged responses to t-system depolarization. A comparison of the E-C coupling characteristics in the two groups of type I Sol fibers showed, however, that rtF fibers did not differ significantly from pF fibers with respect to DIFRmax (34.0 ± 8.5 vs. 22.9 ± 19.9%) or R-D75% (13.2 ± 0.8 vs. 10.3 ± 1.7). To determine whether the prolonged elevated force responses developed by the pF fibers were artifacts due to contaminating Ca2+ in the depolarizing solution that would directly activate the contractile apparatus, pF fibers were incubated in a 2% Triton-K+-HDTA solution (to disrupt the t-tubular and SR membrane systems and abolish E-C coupling) for 10 min after maximum Ca2+-activated force was obtained, washed in a Triton-free K+-HDTA solution, and then exposed to the depolarizing solution. Under these conditions, no force was developed by any of the pF fibers, indicating that contaminating Ca2+ was not responsible for the prolonged elevated forces (data not shown).
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
This is the first systematic investigation, at the single-fiber level, of the relation between functional parameters of the t system and SR compartments and MHC-based fiber type in mammalian skeletal muscle. More specifically, this study was undertaken to address whether E-C coupling characteristics, measured in a mechanically skinned fiber preparation, are correlated to the MHC isoform(s) expressed in the same fiber segment. Our experimental strategy involved the use of single muscle fibers from one predominantly slow-twitch (Sol) and two predominantly fast-twitch, but functionally distinct, muscles (EDL and the white region of SM) of the adult rat.
E-C Coupling Parameters
In mechanically skinned muscle fiber preparations, DIFRmax is ultimately determined by the amount of Ca2+ released from the SR, the rate of Ca2+ release/uptake, and the sensitivity of the contractile apparatus to Ca2+. Several non-experimenter-related events involving the t system and SR can impact the amount of Ca2+ released and the rate of Ca2+ release/uptake by the SR compartment (Table 2). Generally, the size of a DIFR is influenced by the number of voltage sensors activated by the depolarizing stimulus, the number of SR Ca2+ release channels opened as the result of the cross talk between voltage sensors and the SR channels, and the SR luminal Ca2+ concentration. It is assumed that if Ca2+ loss from the intramyofibrillar space into the aqueous bathing solution is minimal (30), full coupling of the two compartments will result in release of enough Ca2+ from the SR to elicit a near-maximal contractile response compared with the CaFmax (30).
|
The determinants of R-D75% are unknown. According to Lamb and Stephenson (30), rundown is not related to the length of exposure of a fiber to aqueous solutions, nor is it related to the depletion of SR Ca2+ content, inasmuch as exposure to low Mg2+ concentration (0.015 mM) produces relatively large force responses in rundown fibers, indicative of adequate SR free Ca2+ and functional RyR/Ca2+ release channels (32). Rundown in mechanically skinned muscle fibers is unlikely to be related to energy depletion, inasmuch as experiments are carried out in the presence of high ATP (8 mM) and creatine phosphate (10 mM) concentrations, which maintain the energetic potential of the fiber. One possibility is that the decrease in depolarization-induced force responses in mechanically skinned fiber preparations is related to a use-dependent loss of some factor such as glycogen located near the triad region (49). Ca2+-dependent or phosphorylation/dephosphorylation-dependent processes leading to a gradual inactivation of t-tubule voltage sensors or disruption of the coupling between the DHPR/voltage sensor and RyR/Ca2+ release channel may also contribute to the rundown (for review, see Ref. 48). Regardless of the cellular mechanism involved, the rundown phenomenon described by R-D75% indicates a use-dependent loss of functional E-C coupling.
DIFRmax and MHC-Based Fiber Type
The DIFRmax values found in the present study for mechanically skinned type IIB fibers from rat EDL muscle (84.0%) are similar to those reported for rat EDL fibers in previous investigations (70-90%) in which the same kind of preparation and experimental protocol were used (31). In the present study, we have also determined DIFRmax in fast-twitch fiber preparations from the white region of rat SM (35), a predominantly fast-twitch skeletal muscle not used in previous investigations of E-C coupling processes in mechanically skinned fiber segments. Under the same conditions of t-system depolarization, type IIB SM fibers also produced high force responses (78.8%) that were not statistically different from those produced by type IIB EDL fibers. Although we have not measured the membrane potential of any of the single fibers examined in this study, the relatively large depolarization-induced force responses (compared with CaFmax) elicited in type IIB EDL and type IIB SM fibers suggest that, in these preparations, rapid replacement of K+ with Na+ achieved near-maximal t-system depolarization (30).Slow-twitch fibers are known to be more sensitive than fast-twitch fibers to membrane depolarization (19) and to have a higher SR luminal Ca2+ concentration (24). Furthermore, the contractile apparatus is more sensitive to activating levels of Ca2+ in slow- than in fast-twitch fibers (50). Despite these factors, which favor the production of force, mechanically skinned pure type I slow-twitch Sol fibers gave consistently smaller responses (29.8 ± 8.5% of CaFmax, n = 8) to t-tubule membrane depolarization than the type IIB fast-twitch fibers from EDL and SM. This result is in agreement with the preliminary data of Stephenson et al. (47) and with two studies in which mechanically skinned rat Sol fibers were used to investigate the effects of clenbuterol (2) and hydrogen peroxide (41) on E-C coupling parameters. Our value for the DIFRmax in Sol fibers (29.8%) is lower than that reported by Plant et al. (41) (47 ± 5%, n = 5) but higher than that reported by Stephenson et al. (47) (10 ± 4.5%, n = 8), although Bakker et al. (2) did not report the relative size of the Sol force responses.
The smaller responses of the type I slow-twitch fibers to t-system depolarization could be partly explained by the lower proportion of DHPRs functionally coupled to SR Ca2+ release channels [resulting in less Ca2+ released on depolarization (17)] and by the slower rate of Ca2+ release (22) previously reported for Sol fibers. Other potential contributors include incomplete sealing of the t tubules after they are skinned and ineffective depolarization/repolarization of the t system. From the data obtained from an extensive series of experiments performed on skinned fiber preparations from toad and rat, in which fluorescent dyes were trapped within the t system, Launikonis and Stephenson (34, and personal communication) concluded that, in all fibers (fast and slow twitch) mechanically skinned by the procedure used in our study, the t system is invariably and uniformly sealed. This finding supports the possibility that, under our conditions, t-system depolarization and/or repolarization is less effective in slow-twitch type I fibers than in fast-twitch type IIB fibers. This may be due to subtle fiber type-specific differences in structure/function of the molecular components of the t system, such as Na+-K+-ATPase. No studies have quantified the number, density, or activity of Na+-K+ pumps located in the t-tubule compartment of electrophoretically typed single fibers from slow- or fast-twitch muscle.
R-D75% and MHC-Based Fiber Type
This study is the first to compare the number of DIFRs to rundown in fibers expressing the same MHC isoform from two different muscles. Our data show that t-system depolarization-induced force responses developed by type IIB fibers from the SM muscle declined 4.9 times faster than those developed by type IIB EDL fibers. This result is surprising, given the similarity displayed by type IIB EDL and type IIB SM fibers with respect to DIFRmax.We have shown also that the t-system depolarization-induced force responses developed by fibers expressing the MHC I isoform from the Sol muscle decline faster than those developed by fibers expressing MHC IIb isoform from EDL (8.1 times) and SM (1.7 times) muscles. This result is in agreement with the data of Plant et al. (41), who reported that Sol fibers, classified as slow-twitch fibers on the basis of the sensitivity of the contractile apparatus to Sr2+, produced 2.9 times fewer responses to rundown than fast-twitch EDL fibers.
Within the framework of the previously discussed mechanisms involved in the rundown phenomenon (30), the differences in R-D75% between type IIB fibers from EDL and SM muscles and between the type I (Sol) and type IIB (EDL and SM) fibers indicate that the processes associated with the use-dependent loss of E-C coupling in mechanically skinned fiber preparations may be specific for muscle of origin and muscle fiber type. It is unlikely that rundown in either of these fiber groups was related to SR dysfunction or depleted SR Ca2+, as indicated by the relatively large (>70% of CaFmax) responses to low Mg2+ produced by these fibers (Table 1).
EDL muscle fibers and the t-system depolarization/repolarization protocol described here have been used in several studies for determining the effects of particular compounds on E-C coupling (2, 4, 20). After the work-up period, test responses produced by the fiber preparations, when exposed to depolarization/repolarization solutions containing the compound of interest, are preceded and followed ("bracketed") by control responses (i.e., responses produced in the absence of the compound of interest). The sensitivity of this method is determined in large part by the number and amplitude of successive responses of similar height developed by a fiber between the end of the work-up process and the onset of the rundown process. Given the relatively small number of total responses (12.1) to rundown found by us in mechanically skinned type I Sol fibers, it is reasonable to suggest that, in its present form, the protocol developed by Lamb and Stephenson (30) may not be suitable for accurately determining the magnitude and reversibility of effects of particular compounds on E-C coupling characteristics in slow-twitch fiber preparations.
Profile of t-System Depolarization-Induced Force Responses Produced by Mechanically Skinned Fibers From EDL, SM, and Sol Muscles
All previous studies using the t-system depolarization method of Lamb and Stephenson (30) and mechanically skinned single-fiber segments have reported only rtF-type depolarization-induced force responses for rat EDL (30, 41) and Sol fibers (2, 41). Under the same conditions, however, the fibers examined in the present study produced two different types of responses, rtF and pF, or did not respond, even after several depolarization-repolarization cycles. The lowest variability with respect to the profile of force responses induced by t-system depolarization was found among type IIB EDL fibers, all of which developed only rtF responses. By comparison, although the majority of type IIB SM fibers also produced rtF responses, a small proportion failed to respond. The highest variability with regard to this parameter was found in the population of type I Sol fibers, which contained a small proportion of fibers producing typical rtF responses, a small proportion of fibers producing pF responses, and a large proportion of fibers that did not develop any force (nF). Taken together, these data suggest that, under our conditions, the profile of t-system depolarization-induced force responses produced by mechanically skinned muscle fiber preparations is related to fiber type, muscle of origin, and even individual fiber characteristics.Our finding that some Sol muscle fibers developed rapid transient forces (indicating complete inactivation) while others developed prolonged forces (indicating incomplete inactivation) in response to t-system depolarization provides the strongest evidence for the "voltage window" model put forward in an earlier study by Chua and Dulhunty (12). According to this model, the activation and inactivation curves for a given muscle preparation overlap to some extent, thereby creating a "window"-like area, the size of which is related to the dependence of the activation and inactivation processes on the membrane potential at the peak of depolarization. Because the sensitivity of the voltage sensor to membrane potential is higher (activation) and lower (inactivation) in the Sol than in the EDL muscle, the size of the voltage window is expected to be larger for Sol than for EDL muscle preparations. Chua and Dulhunty used the voltage window model to explain the incomplete inactivation of K+ contractures ("pedestal tensions") observed in bundles of intact Sol fibers and argued against the possibility that the profile of these contractures could have been due to a subpopulation of Sol fibers that did not inactivate. The single-fiber study presented here revealed the presence in the rat Sol muscle of rtF and pF fibers; their responsiveness to t-system depolarization can be easily explained if one considers that, at the peak of depolarization, the membrane potential reached a value that was more positive (rtF) than the limit of the voltage window or was within it (pF). Given the steepness of the activation and inactivation curves constructed for Sol muscles (see Fig. 6, A and B, in Ref. 12), we suggest that, despite the marked difference in the profile of the rtF and pF force responses, the actual difference between the membrane potentials of rtF and pF fibers could be very small.
The forces produced by a small number (2 type I and 1 type I/IIA) of
rtF Sol fibers during the work-up period displayed a pF-type profile,
with the pedestal component becoming smaller with successive
depolarization-repolarization cycles, such that the DIFRmax
was of the rtF type. The work-up phenomenon has been related to the
presence in the sealed t system of Cl ions, which exert a
polarizing effect on the membrane potential, thereby reducing the
effectiveness of the depolarization step (14). With
successive depolarizations, Cl
gradually diffuses out of
the t system, the membrane potential reaches more positive values, more
DHPR/voltage sensors become activated, and the fiber produces force
responses of greater magnitude. Within this context, the transition of
the aforementioned force responses from pF to rtF suggests that the
membrane potential reached in these fibers in the depolarizing solution
at the beginning of an experiment may be within the voltage window and
that successive depolarization-repolarization cycles (and subsequent
loss of t-system Cl
) cause the membrane potential reached
during depolarization to shift out of the voltage window closer to zero.
An interesting finding of this study is that 11.1% of type IIB SM fibers and >50% of type I Sol fibers did not respond to t-system depolarization. The large proportion of nonresponding fibers to t-system depolarization in Sol muscle of the rat makes studies on E-C coupling in type I fibers using the skinned fiber preparation and the depolarization protocol of Lamb and Stephenson (30) a difficult task. It is unlikely that the nF fibers could have been damaged, because all single fibers used in this study were dissected, skinned, and mounted by the same investigator. Furthermore, all the nF fibers produced large force responses when exposed to a low-Mg2+ solution (Table 1), indicating that the SR compartment was not depleted of Ca2+ and that the RyR/Ca2+ release channels were functional. On the basis of these data, we suggest that in nF fibers the DHPR/voltage sensors may have been irreversibly inactivated and/or the coupling mechanism between the DHPR/voltage sensors and the RyR/Ca2+ release channels may have been disrupted by some unknown causes.
Are Functional Characteristics of the t-System and SR Compartments Related to MHC-Based Fiber Type?
MHCs are the most widely used molecular markers of fiber-type differentiation, specialization, and adaptation; yet the extent to which the functional properties of the t system and SR in different fiber types are related to MHC-based fiber type is far from being understood. One of our findings is that, regardless of the muscle of origin (EDL or SM), pure fast-twitch fiber preparations expressing the MHC IIb isoform produce larger t-system depolarization-induced responses than pure slow-twitch fiber preparations expressing the MHC I isoform. On the basis of this finding, which suggests a close relation between MHC isoform expression and the amplitude of the responses, one would predict that DIFRs produced by pure muscle fibers expressing MHC IIa (type IIA fibers) or MHC IId/x isoforms (type IID/X fibers) and by hybrid I/II fibers expressing a larger proportion of MHC II isoform should be larger than the DIFRs produced by fibers expressing only MHC I or a combination of MHC I and MHC II, with MHC I being the major component. Surprisingly, the force responses produced by four type I/IIA Sol fibers, expressing predominantly the MHC IIa isoform (mean 73%), were not different from those produced by pure type I Sol fibers. This result may indicate that, in the rat, type IIA fibers resemble type I, rather than type IIB, fibers with respect to the intracellular factors/events determining the amplitude of DIFR. Unfortunately, we could not test this possibility, because the pool of fibers used in this study contained only one pure type IIA fiber, which failed to respond to t-system-induced depolarization. Moreover, there is no published information on the E-C coupling phenotype of mechanically skinned fiber preparations expressing the MHC IIa isoform. The similarity between the DIFRmax values for type I/IIA and type I Sol fibers may indicate, however, that the relation between MHC isoform expression and the factors determining this parameter (Table 2) is stronger for MHC I than for MHC IIa. This possibility seems unlikely given that, for the population of type I Sol fibers, the interfiber variability (as indicated by coefficient of variation) with respect to DIFRmax was four times higher than that for type IIB EDL and type IIB SM fibers. A third possible explanation for the lower DIFRs developed by the type I/IIA Sol fibers expressing predominantly the MHC IIa isoform is that the factors determining DIFRmax relate more to the muscle of origin (Sol) and its specific physiological role than to the MHC isoform (IIa) expressed in the fiber. In this case, one would expect that, if present in Sol muscle, even pure type IIB fibers would produce lower force responses to t-system depolarization, comparable in height to those produced by the pure type I and type I/IIA Sol fibers. Again, the absence of type IIB fibers from the pool of rat Sol muscle fibers examined in this study made it impossible to validate/reject this point.The possibility that responsiveness to t-system depolarization in a mechanically skinned fiber preparation relates to MHC-based fiber type as well as to the muscle from which the fiber was obtained is supported also by the R-D75% data. Type I Sol fibers produced fewer force responses to rundown than type IIB fibers from EDL and SM (in agreement with a close relation between E-C coupling characteristics and fiber type), and type IIB SM fibers produced fewer force responses to rundown than type IIB EDL fibers (in agreement with a close relation between E-C coupling characteristics and the muscle of origin). Recently, we reported another example of functional/structural differences between fibers expressing the same MHC isoform but originating from two different rat muscles. In this case, in which significantly higher sensitivity of the contractile apparatus to Ca2+ was displayed by type IIA Sol than by type IIA EDL fibers (6), the intermuscle difference involved components of the myofibrillar compartment (such as troponin C). Taken together with the results presented in this study, these data suggest that the optimum contractile function of a skeletal muscle fiber type is related to its MHC isoform composition and the innervation pattern and functional role of the muscle of origin (8).
Concluding Remarks
Our study provides the first evidence that E-C coupling characteristics of mechanically skinned, single fibers from adult rat skeletal muscles are related to MHC-based fiber type and the muscle from which the fiber originated. This finding supports the emerging idea that the functional phenotype of a muscle fiber may be related to the muscle of origin. This study also provides the first evidence that the voltage window created by the overlap between activation and inactivation curves, reported by Chua and Dulhunty (12) using bundles of Sol fibers, is also detectable in single type I Sol fiber preparations. This finding strongly supports the model of the overlap between voltage sensor activation and inactivation curves in rat slow-twitch Sol fibers. Our study also provides strong evidence that, in its present form, the protocol developed by Lamb and Stephenson (30) may not be suitable for accurately determining the magnitude and reversibility of effects of particular compounds on E-C coupling characteristics in slow-twitch fiber preparations. ![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. Stephenson, School of Biomedical Sciences, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, MCMC, Melbourne, Victoria 8001, Australia (E-mail: Gabriela.Stephenson{at}vu.edu.au).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
First published January 29, 2003;10.1152/ajpcell.00569.2002
Received 6 December 2002; accepted in final form 25 January 2003.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1.
Bagshaw, CR.
Muscle Contraction (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall, 1994.
2.
Bakker, AJ,
Head SI,
Wareham AC,
and
Stephenson DG.
Effect of clenbuterol on sarcoplasmic reticulum function in single skinned mammalian skeletal muscle fibers.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
274:
C1718-C1726,
1998
3.
Bertocchini, F,
Ovitt CE,
Conti A,
Barone V,
Scholer HR,
Bottinelli R,
Reggiani C,
and
Sorrentino V.
Requirement of the ryanodine receptor type 3 for efficient contraction in neonatal skeletal muscles.
EMBO J
16:
6956-6963,
1997
4.
Blazev, R,
Hussain M,
Bakker AJ,
Head SI,
and
Lamb GD.
Effects of the PKA inhibitor H-89 on excitation-contraction coupling in skinned and intact skeletal muscle fibres.
J Muscle Res Cell Motil
22:
277-286,
2001[ISI][Medline].
5.
Bortolotto, S,
and
Reggiani C.
Cellular and molecular basis of heterogeneity in contractile performance of human muscles.
Basic Appl Myol
12:
7-16,
2002.
6.
Bortolotto, SK,
Cellini M,
Stephenson DG,
and
Stephenson GM.
MHC isoform composition and Ca2+- or Sr2+-activation properties of rat skeletal muscle fibers.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
279:
C1564-C1577,
2000
7.
Bortolotto, SK,
Stephenson DG,
and
Stephenson GMM
Fiber type populations and Ca2+-activation properties of single fibers in soleus muscles from SHR and WKY rats.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
276:
C628-C637,
1999
8.
Bottinelli, R.
Functional heterogeneity of mammalian single muscle fiber: do myosin isoforms tell the whole story?
Pflügers Arch
443:
6-17,
2001[ISI][Medline].
9.
Bottinelli, R,
Canepari M,
Pellegrino MA,
and
Reggiani C.
Force-velocity properties of human skeletal muscle fibres: myosin heavy chain isoform and temperature dependence.
J Physiol
495:
573-586,
1996[Abstract].
10.
Bottinelli, R,
and
Reggiani C.
Human skeletal muscle fibres: molecular and functional diversity.
Prog Biophys Mol Biol
73:
195-262,
2000[ISI][Medline].
11.
Bottinelli, R,
Schiaffino S,
and
Reggiani C.
Force-velocity relations and myosin heavy chain isoform compositions of skinned fibres from rat skeletal muscle.
J Physiol
437:
655-672,
1991[Abstract].
12.
Chua, M,
and
Dulhunty AF.
Inactivation of excitation-contraction coupling in rat extensor digitorum longus and soleus muscles.
J Gen Physiol
91:
737-757,
1988[Abstract].
13.
Close, RI.
Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles.
Physiol Rev
52:
129-197,
1972
14.
Coonan, JR,
and
Lamb GD.
Effect of transverse-tubular chloride conductance on excitability in skinned skeletal muscle fibres of rat and toad.
J Physiol
509:
551-564,
1998
15.
Cullen, MJ,
Hollingworth S,
and
Marshall MW.
A comparative study of the transverse tubular system of the rat extensor digitorum longus and soleus muscles.
J Anat
138:
297-308,
1984[ISI][Medline].
16.
Damiani, E,
and
Margreth A.
Characterization study of the ryanodine receptor and of calsequestrin isoforms of mammalian skeletal muscles in relation to fibre types.
J Muscle Res Cell Motil
15:
86-101,
1994[ISI][Medline].
17.
Delbono, O,
and
Meissner G.
Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release in rat slow- and fast-twitch muscles.
J Membr Biol
151:
123-130,
1996[ISI][Medline].
18.
Dulhunty, AF,
and
Dlutowski M.
Fiber types in red and white segments of the rat sternomastoid muscle.
Am J Anat
156:
51-62,
1979[ISI][Medline].
19.
Dulhunty, AF,
and
Gage PW.
Asymmetrical charge movement in slow- and fast-twitch mammalian muscle fibres in normal and paraplegic rats.
J Physiol
341:
213-231,
1983[Abstract].
20.
Dutka, TL,
and
Lamb GD.
Effect of lactate on depolarization-induced Ca2+ release in mechanically skinned skeletal muscle fibers.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
278:
C517-C525,
2000
21.
Eddinger, TJ.
Myosin heavy chain isoforms and dynamic contractile properties: skeletal versus smooth muscle.
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol
119:
425-434,
1998[ISI][Medline].
22.
Eusebi, F,
Miledi R,
and
Takahashi T.
Calcium transients in mammalian muscles.
Nature
284:
560-561,
1980[ISI][Medline].
23.
Froemming, GR,
Murray BE,
Harmon S,
Pette D,
and
Ohlendieck K.
Comparative analysis of the isoform expression pattern of Ca2+-regulatory membrane proteins in fast-twitch, slow-twitch, cardiac, neonatal and chronic low-frequency stimulated muscle fibers.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1466:
151-168,
2000[ISI][Medline].
24.
Fryer, MW,
and
Stephenson DG.
Total and sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium contents of skinned fibres from the rat.
J Physiol
493:
357-370,
1996[Abstract].
25.
Galler, S,
Schmitt TL,
and
Pette D.
Stretch activation, unloaded shortening velocity, and myosin heavy chain isoforms of rat skeletal muscle fibres.
J Physiol
478:
513-521,
1994[Abstract].
26.
Geiger, PC,
Cody MJ,
Macken RL,
and
Sieck GC.
Maximum specific force depends on myosin heavy chain content in rat diaphragm muscle fibers.
J Appl Physiol
89:
695-703,
2000
27.
Goodman, CA,
and
Stephenson GMM
Glycogen stability and glycogen phosphorylase activities in isolated skeletal muscles from the rat and toad.
J Muscle Res Cell Motil
21:
655-662,
2000[ISI][Medline].
28.
Gottschall, J,
Zenker W,
Neuhuber W,
Mysicka A,
and
Muntener M.
The sternomastoid muscle of the rat and its innervation. Muscle fiber composition, perikarya and axons of efferent and afferent neurons.
Anat Embryol (Berl)
160:
285-300,
1980[ISI][Medline].
29.
Harridge, SDR,
Bottinelli R,
Canepari M,
Pellegrino MA,
Reggiani C,
Esbjorsson M,
and
Saltin B.
Whole-muscle and single-fibre contractile properties and myosin heavy chain isoforms in humans.
Pflügers Arch
432:
913-920,
1996[ISI][Medline].
30.
Lamb, GD,
and
Stephenson DG.
Calcium release in skinned muscle fibres of the toad by transverse tubule depolarization or by direct stimulation.
J Physiol
423:
495-517,
1990[Abstract].
31.
Lamb, GD,
and
Stephenson DG.
Excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle fibres of rat and toad in the presence of GTPS.
J Physiol
444:
65-84,
1991[Abstract].
32.
Lamb, GD,
and
Stephenson DG.
Effects of intracellular pH and [Mg2+] on excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle fibres of the rat.
J Physiol
478:
331-339,
1994[Abstract].
33.
Lamb, GD,
and
Walsh T.
Calcium currents, charge movement and dihydropyridine binding in fast- and slow-twitch muscles of the rat and rabbit.
J Physiol
393:
595-617,
1987[Abstract].
34.
Launikonis, BS,
and
Stephenson DG.
Tubular system volume changes in twitch fibres from toad and rat skeletal muscle assessed by confocal microscopy.
J Physiol
538:
607-618,
2002
35.
Luff, AR.
Dynamic properties of fiber bundles from the rat sternomastoid muscle.
Exp Neurol
89:
491-502,
1985[ISI][Medline].
36.
Moss, RL,
Diffee GM,
and
Greaser ML.
Contractile properties of skeletal muscle fibers in relation to myofibrillar protein isoforms.
Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol
126:
1-62,
1995[ISI][Medline].
37.
Nguyen, LT,
and
Stephenson GM.
An electrophoretic study of myosin heavy chain expression in skeletal muscles of the toad Bufo marinus.
J Muscle Res Cell Motil
20:
687-695,
1999[ISI][Medline].
38.
Nguyen, LT,
and
Stephenson GM.
Myosin heavy chain isoform expression and Ca2+-stimulated ATPase activity in single fibres of toad rectus abdominis muscle.
J Muscle Res Cell Motil
23:
147-156,
2002[ISI][Medline].
39.
Pereon, Y,
Dettbarn C,
Lu Y,
Westlund KN,
Zhang JT,
and
Palade P.
Dihydropyridine isoform expression in adult rat skeletal muscle.
Pflügers Arch
436:
309-314,
1998[ISI][Medline].
40.
Pette, D,
and
Staron RS.
Myosin isoforms, muscle fiber types, and transitions.
Microsc Res Tech
50:
500-509,
2000[ISI][Medline].
41.
Plant, DR,
Lynch GS,
and
Williams DA.
Hydrogen peroxide increases depolarization-induced contraction of mechanically skinned slow-twitch fibres from rat skeletal muscles.
J Physiol
539:
883-891,
2002
42.
Posterino, GS.
"Current" advances in mechanically skinned skeletal muscle fibres.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol
28:
668-674,
2001[ISI][Medline].
43.
Posterino, GS,
Lamb GD,
and
Stephenson DG.
Twitch and tetanic force responses and longitudinal propagation of action potentials in skinned skeletal muscle fibres of the rat.
J Physiol
527:
131-137,
2000
44.
Punkt K. Fibre types in skeletal muscles. Adv Anat Embryol
Cell Biol 162: IIIXV, 1-109, 2002.
45.
Rassier, DE,
MacIntosh BR,
and
Herzog W.
Length dependence of active force production in skeletal muscle.
J Appl Physiol
86:
1445-1457,
1999
46.
Sandow, A.
Excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle.
Pharmacol Rev
17:
265-320,
1965[ISI][Medline].
47.
Stephenson, DG,
Lamb GD,
and
Stephenson GMM
Events of the excitation-contraction-relaxation (E-C-R) cycle in fast- and slow-twitch mammalian muscle fibres relevant to muscle fatigue.
Acta Physiol Scand
162:
229-245,
1998[ISI][Medline].
48.
Stephenson, DG,
Lamb G,
Stephenson GMM,
and
Fryer MW.
Mechanisms of excitation-contraction coupling relevant to skeletal muscle fatigue.
Adv Exp Med Biol
384:
45-56,
1995[Medline].
49.
Stephenson, DG,
Nguyen LT,
and
Stephenson GMM
Glycogen content and excitation-contraction coupling in mechanically skinned muscles of the cane toad.
J Physiol
519:
177-187,
1999
50.
Stephenson, DG,
and
Williams DA.
Temperature effect on Ca2+-activation curves in fast- and slow-twitch skinned muscle fibres of the rat.
J Physiol
317:
281-302,
1981[Abstract].
51.
Stephenson, DG,
and
Williams DA.
Effects of sarcomere length on the force-pCa relation in fast- and slow-twitch skinned muscle fibres from the rat.
J Physiol
333:
637-653,
1982[ISI][Medline].
52.
Stephenson, GMM
Hybrid skeletal muscle fibers: a rare or common phenomenon?
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol
28:
692-702,
2001[ISI][Medline].
53.
Szentesi, P,
Zaremba R,
Van Mechelen W,
and
Stienen GJM
ATP utilization for calcium uptake and force production in different types of human skeletal muscle fibres.
J Physiol
531:
393-403,
2001
54.
Weiss, S,
Rossi R,
Pellegrino MA,
Bottinelli R,
and
Geeves MA.
Differing ADP release rates from myosin heavy chain isoforms define the shortening velocity of skeletal muscle fibers.
J Biol Chem
276:
45902-45908,
2001