1 Gut Barrier Group, Section of Gastrointestinal Science, Clinical Division I, University of Manchester, Hope Hospital, Salford M6 8HD; and 2 School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Despite significant advances in the characterization of tight junction (TJ) proteins, little is known about how molecular changes relate to function due primarily to the limitations of conventional paracellular probes. To address this, the paracellular pathway in Caco-2 and T84 cell lines was profiled by measuring the permeabilities of 24 polyethylene glycols (PEG) of increasing molecular radius (3.5-7.4 Å) analyzed by mass spectrometry. When combined with a paracellular sieving model, these data provided quantitative descriptors of the pathway under control conditions and after exposure to TJ modulators. PEG profiles in both cell lines conformed to a biphasic process involving a restrictive pore (radius 4.3-4.5 Å) and a nonrestrictive component responsible for permeability of larger molecules. PEG profiling revealed significant differences between the effects of EGTA and sodium caprate (C10). The restrictive component of EGTA-treated cells lost all size discrimination due to an increase in pore radius. Sodium caprate had no effect on pore radius but increased permeability via a different mechanism possibly involving increased numbers of functional pores. PEG profiling provides a useful tool for probing the functional regulation of the paracellular route.
paracellular permeability; Caco-2; T84; transepithelial resistance; tight junction modulation
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
THE TIGHT JUNCTION IS A MACROMOLECULAR assembly of proteins that circumscribe the apical region of polarized epithelial cells. This complex divides apical from basolateral cell surface domains and, in tissues such as the intestine, forms a crucial protective barrier that allows the paracellular diffusion of ions and small solutes but excludes potentially toxic macromolecules and microorganisms. The electrical resistance of this seal can vary dramatically between tissue types (9, 40), and the permeability characteristics of a given barrier can be dynamically altered by a variety of physiological, pathological, and pharmacological stimuli (2, 32).
Over the past 30 years, our knowledge of tight junction structure has advanced dramatically. Information provided by early freeze-fracture studies describing the structural elements of the tight junction (9, 45) has evolved in recent years into a greater understanding of the molecular composition of this complex facilitated by the identification of occludin (14) and the claudin family (13, 37), both proposed components of the transmembrane seal, and proteins of the intracellular domain of the tight junction, such as the ZO proteins (ZO-1, ZO-2, ZO-3; Refs. 15, 18, 47).
Despite these advances, our understanding of how these proteins interact to regulate the barrier is limited. This in turn has impeded our understanding of the functional properties of the tight junction. Indeed, in contrast to our molecular understanding of the tight junction, our ideas concerning the nature of the paracellular barrier have progressed little since the 1970s when tight junction fibril numbers were correlated with paracellular electrical resistance (9) and the presence of fluctuating aqueous pores embedded in these fibrils was postulated to account for diffusion through the tight junction (8). Recent studies proposing that claudins are the pore-forming structures in the tight junction (44, 51) are interesting, yet progress in this area will be limited without the means to better functionally profile the paracellular pathway. Numerous questions remain unanswered. What are the functional dimensions of the paracellular pathway, and how are these altered when the tight junction is perturbed? How do macromolecules cross the tight junction? Is this achieved by simple dilatation of existing junctions, or do populations of pores with different sieving properties exist? Existing methods employed to functionally characterize tight junction permeability, such as monitoring the transepithelial flux of single, hydrophilic probes like mannitol, inulin, or dextran or simply measuring transepithelial resistance (TER), lack the necessary resolution to answer these questions. The commonly held view is that increases in paracellular permeability in perturbed or disease states results from dilatation of existing tight junction pores (21, 48). However, alternative explanations are possible including increases in pore number or the presence of subpopulations of pores accessible to large molecules (25).
To address these issues, we have developed an approach that simultaneously measures the paracellular permeability of 24 PEG oligomers separated by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and allows detailed functional profiling and mathematical modeling of the paracellular route. This technique is used here to define the functional characteristics of the paracellular route in the intestinal cell models, T84 and Caco-2, and to investigate possible mechanistic differences in the actions of tight junction modulators.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Materials
[14C]-Mannitol (56mCi/mmol) was purchased from Amersham International (Buckinghamshire, UK); mannitol and polyethylene glycol 400/1000 were from BDH (Poole, UK); Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) powder was from Sigma (Poole, UK); FITC-labeled 3-kDa dextran (FD3) was from Molecular Probes (Leiden, The Netherlands); EGTA and sodium caprate (C10) were from Sigma; and all tissue culture reagents were from GIBCO Life Technologies (Paisley, UK).Colonic Cell Lines
Caco-2 cells, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD), were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing high glucose (4.5 g/l), 10% fetal calf serum, 1% nonessential amino acids, 2 mM glutamine, and 50 IU/ml penicillin/50 µg/ml streptomycin. These cells (passages 98-120) were cultured in 75-cm2 T-flasks (Costar, High Wycombe, UK) at 37°C in a 5% CO2, constant humidity environment with medium replaced three times a week. Monolayers were subcultured when they reached ~80% confluency at a split ratio of 1:10 using 0.05% trypsin/0.02% EDTA. T84 cells (passages 100-120) were cultured in a similar fashion to Caco-2 cells except that they were maintained in a 1:1 mixture of DMEM/F-12 nutrient mix supplemented with 14 mM NaHCO3 and 50 IU penicillin/50 µg/ml streptomycin in 25-cm2 flasks (Costar).For transport, experiments cells were seeded on Snapwell polycarbonate cell culture inserts with a mean pore size of 0.4 µm (Costar) at 2-3 × 105 cells/cm2 and were grown for at least 21 days before experiment.
Development of TER was monitored using an Evometer (World Precision Instruments) fitted with chopstick electrodes.
Transport Studies
Epithelial cell layers were removed from growth medium and washed twice in prewarmed HBSS (supplemented with 20 mM HEPES). Monolayers were subsequently placed in a modified Ussing chamber with a 1.0-cm2 diffusion window and allowed to equilibrate for 30 min with 5 ml HBSS in both chambers. Chambers were maintained at 37°C and under constant gassing with O2. Spontaneous tissue potential differences and TER, measured as deflection in potential differences caused by a 100-µA current pulse, were monitored throughout the experiment. After the equilibration period, paracellular markers were added at a final concentration of 2 mg/ml, 100 µM, and 10 µM for PEG 400/1000, unlabeled mannitol, and FD3, respectively, to the donor chamber. In the mannitol studies, the donor solution also contained 0.2 µCi/ml of [14C]mannitol. A 100-µl sample was removed from the donor chamber to determine the initial concentration. Samples (1 ml) from the receiving chamber were taken every 30 min and replaced with fresh buffer. Mannitol samples were mixed with 4 ml of Ultima Gold scintillation cocktail (Packard) and analyzed by liquid scintillation counting. Aliquots (200 µl) of FD3 receiver samples were placed in a 96-well plate and read using a Perkin Elmer LS50b fluorimeter at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 530 nm. PEG samples were stored atPermeability values were expressed as apparent permeability
(Papp) in centimeter per second, obtained
according to the equation
![]() |
(1) |
LC-MS Analysis of PEG Oligomers
Sample preparation. Internal standard (dimethoxytetraethylene glycol) was added to 500 µl of each sample before application to HLB extraction cartridges (Waters Oasis, MA) previously conditioned with 4 × 1 ml methanol and equilibrated using 1 ml of water. The cartridge was then washed with 1 ml of 5% methanol before PEG elution with 1 ml of methanol. After drying down under a stream of nitrogen at 40°C, the concentrate was reconstituted in 500 µl of mobile phase and a 50-µl aliquot was injected into the LC system with mass spectrometric detection. The chromatographic run time for each sample was 40 min. Blank buffer was also spiked with known amounts of both PEG 400 and 1000 to provide a calibration curve covering the range of 0.05 to 10.0 µg/ml. These samples were processed and analyzed alongside study samples. Blank samples were also prepared to account for PEG oligomers derived from external sources (e.g., plasticware).
LC analysis. A Hewlett-Packard 1090 automated system with a Spherisorb C8 guard and analytical column (250 × 4.6 mm, Phenomenex, Macclesfield, UK) operating at ambient temperature were used. The mobile phase (flow rate 1 ml/min, split to give 0.2 ml/min to the mass spectrometer) was set to give a gradient elution by varying the proportions of methanol (A) to water (B) (both containing 0.1% formic acid) as follows: 0 min, 20% A:80% B; 1-8 min, 30% A:70% B; 10-19 min, 40% A:60% B; 21-28 min, 50% A:50% A; 31-40 min, 60% A:40% B. The composition was returned to the initial conditions for 5 min before the next injection.
Mass spectrometer. The detector (Micromass platform, Manchester, UK), operating in electrospray positive ion mode, was set to: source temperature, 160°C; capillary voltage, 3.71 kV; HV lens voltage, 0.6 kV. The cone voltage was ramped from 35 V at the lowest mass scanned to 90 V at the highest mass. Masses 245 (internal standard), 261-745 (representing the sodium adducts of PEG 400), and 789-1273 (representing the sodium adducts of PEG 1000) were scanned. These ionisation conditions allowed for each oligomer to generate a single ion corresponding to the sodium adduct with no fragmentation.
Modulation of Paracellular Permeability
The changes in PEG permeation profiles after exposure of cell monolayers to the calcium chelator EGTA and the medium chain fatty acid sodium caprate (C10), both known modulators of tight junction integrity, were assessed. For the EGTA study, T84 cells grown on Snapwell inserts were mounted in modified Ussing chambers as described in Colonic Cell Lines. EGTA was added to both mucosal and serosal chambers at the desired concentration and TER, and flux measurements were carried out for up to 30 min. Sodium caprate was added to the apical compartment, basolateral samples were removed, and electrical readings were taken at desired intervals subsequent to addition of the modulator. The sodium caprate experiments were carried out using standard HBSS in the basolateral chamber and Ca2+/Mg2+-free HBSS in the apical chamber to avoid precipitation of the fatty acid. No decrease in TER stability was observed, so it was assumed that these conditions had little effect on monolayer integrity.Mathematical Modeling of Paracellular Permeation
The hydrodynamic radii of PEG oligomers are known (42) and can be related to molecular masses (M) by the relationship r (Å) = 0.29 M0.454. The paracellular flux of PEG 400/1000 across the cell line monolayers utilized in this study yielded two-component permeation profiles (see RESULTS); component 1 (C1) is a restrictive component where PEG permeability declines with increasing molecular radius and a second component (C2) where no size restriction is apparent for this size range of markers. The sieving model employed in this study takes account of this two-component profile. C1 is viewed as having a radius rs1, with a size discrimination to PEG such that no permeation occurs through this component when the radius of the oligomer, r, equals or exceeds a critical value, rs1. The tight junctions are viewed as fluid filled cylindrical pores, and permeation through these is assumed to occur only by diffusion.First it is necessary to evaluate permeability and the available surface area. Ps represents the permeability of an oligomer passing through tight junctions of total available surface area As. In practice the serosal surface area (AT) is typically used in permeability calculations instead of the area associated only with tight junctions
![]() |
(2) |
![]() |
(3) |
![]() |
(4) |
![]() |
(5) |
![]() |
(6) |
![]() |
(7) |
![]() |
(8) |
![]() |
(9) |
![]() |
(10) |
Statistical Analysis
Results are means ± SE. For statistical comparisons, Student's t-tests were performed as appropriate; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Modeling of Paracellular Permeability Across Human Colonic Cell Lines Using PEG Oligomers
Initial studies examined the permeability of the 24 PEG oligomers across two established models of the intestinal epithelium, Caco-2 and T84. These cell lines, although both derived from the colon, are phenotypically different. Caco-2 exhibit an absorptive phenotype characteristic of immature small bowel enterocytes, whereas T84 are more characteristic of the chloride secretory cells of the colonic crypt (11, 20). Figure 1 shows the PEG permeation profile for both cell lines with the apparent permeability plotted against PEG hydrodynamic radius. Profiles for both lines were essentially identical showing a biphasic relationship with a first component (C1) characterized by marked decline in permeability over the four to five smallest oligomers, followed by sharp "cutoff" to a relatively constant but quantitatively minor second component (C2) composed of oligomers 458-1250 (4.68-7.39 Å). PEG cumulative flux across cell monolayers remained linear over a 2-h period over the whole range of PEG oligomers (Fig. 2). The permeation of PEG oligomers across an unseeded filter support was at least 40-fold greater than across polarized monolayers and displayed no significant size selectivity (Fig. 1C), although the free diffusion of the oligomers did decline with increasing hydrodynamic radius, consistent with the Stokes-Einstein equation (Eq. 7).
|
|
The permeabilities of the smaller PEG oligomers was lower in T84
compared with Caco-2 (40% lower permeability for the smallest oligomer, PEG 238) consistent with the higher electrical resistance of
T84. However, it is interesting that the difference in PEG permeability
between these cell lines is relatively modest compared with the
fivefold difference in their TER values (261 ± 43 and 1,315 ± 182 .cm2 for Caco-2 and T84, respectively).
Application of the modified sieving model to the cell line data yields
values describing C1 (rs1, the
restrictive pore radius, and , which is proportional to the number
of restrictive tight junction pores). In addition, the model describes
the contribution of C2 to PEG permeability in terms of
,
which is proportional to the number and/or radius of tight junction
pores nonrestrictive for this size range of PEGs. By definition, the
model cannot provide a radius value for the "unrestricted"
C2 using probes of this size range. The mean values
calculated for Caco-2 and T84 are shown in Table
1. No significant differences were
observed in either the radius of the restrictive pore or the
-values
calculated for the two cell lines, although
did tend to be lower in
T84 (5.7 ± 0.4 vs 7.5 ± 1.6) consistent with a smaller
number of restrictive pores in the higher resistance line. In both
lines, the value of
, descriptor of the "unrestricted"
C2, was 15- to 20-fold lower than
(Table 1).
|
Comparison of PEG Oligomers with Other Paracellular Markers
Figure 3 compares the permeabilities of PEG oligomers 282, 326, and 1250 in Caco-2 with two other widely used paracellular markers, mannitol, and FD3. The hydrodynamic radius of mannitol (4.1 Å; Refs. 26, 27) is directly comparable with that of PEG 326 (4.01 Å), and both probes exhibit near identical apparent permeability values (4.2 ± 0.07 and 4.1 ± 0.06 × 10
|
Functional Profiling of Tight Junction Modulators with PEG Oligomers
A variety of tight junction modulators have been described that act through distinct mechanisms to increase paracellular transport (2, 32). However, the precise functional changes induced by different modulators have been difficult to define due to the limitations of conventional paracellular probes. We therefore examined the effects on T84 monolayers of two agents that act via different mechanisms to modulate tight junctions. EGTA acts by chelating extracellular Ca2+ with concomitant "loosening" of the tight junction while sodium caprate (C10) acts through an intracellular mechanism involving activation of phospholipase C (29). EGTA and sodium caprate cause a dramatic, concentration-dependent decrease in TER in T84 monolayers (Fig. 4, B and C), which was quantitatively similar with both modulators although sodium caprate acted over a much longer time course than EGTA (Fig. 4A). However, analysis of PEG oligomer permeability during the period of maximum TER reduction (30 min after EGTA addition and 120 min after addition of sodium caprate) reveals markedly different effects on paracellular permeability. In the case of EGTA (Fig. 5), the permeability of all PEG oligomers increase although proportionally the increases are much greater with the larger oligomers (4-fold for 4.68 Å ; 44-fold for 7.39 Å at 2.5 mM). The result of this is to virtually abolish size selectivity across this range of probes. The profile generated by sodium caprate is, however, markedly different (Fig. 6). With the use of this modulator, although there was also a general increase in PEG permeability, this was similar across the whole range. The net effect is to produce an upward shift in the PEG profile while retaining the overall size selectivity. Application of the sieving model to these data suggests important mechanistic differences in the action of these modulators on the tight junction in T84 cells (Table 2). In the case of higher concentrations of EGTA, there is no longer evidence of a restrictive pore in that the estimated radius was far in excess of the size of even the largest PEG oligomer (7.4 Å) used in this study. At the same time, the contribution of component 2 (
|
|
|
|
The differential effects of EGTA and sodium caprate could not be explained by cytotoxicity because neither modulator stimulated the release of lactate dehydrogenase from T84 monolayers at the concentrations used in this study (data not shown).
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Recent advances are providing an ever more detailed picture of the tight junction at the molecular level (52). However, our understanding of how changes at the molecular level relate to function has lagged behind due primarily to the limitations of conventional paracellular probes. To address this, we have utilized an approach that allows functional profiling of the paracellular route using polydispersed PEG oligomers separated by LC-MS. With the use of this technique, the paracellular permeabilities of 24 PEG oligomers of increasing molecular radii (3.5-7.39 Å) can be measured simultaneously. This produced a permeation profile that can be further analyzed by a mathematical sieving model yielding quantitative descriptors of the paracellular pathway. In the present study, a PEG oligomer methodology has been used to profile paracellular permeation in two colonic epithelial cell lines, Caco-2 and T84, and to examine the functional changes elicited by tight junction modulators. A similar methodology has been used previously to identify species differences in the intestinal paracellular route in vivo (19) but to our knowledge this is the first attempt to use this approach to profile the paracellular pathway in in vitro models of intestinal epithelium.
PEG has been used extensively as a marker of intestinal permeability since the 1970s (5) although in most studies it has been treated as a single molecular weight marker and its polydispersed nature was ignored. Some investigators have questioned the suitability of PEG as a paracellular probe. For example, the intestinal permeation rate of PEG 400 is significantly higher than mono- , di-, and trisaccharide markers of comparable molecular weight (36). This, together with claims that PEG had significant lipid solubility (24), led to suggestions of a transcellular permeation route. However, Ma and et al. (31) showed PEG 400 to be strongly hydrophilic and found a previous determination of its lipophilic properties to be technically flawed. In addition, there was no evidence for significant PEG permeation into isolated brush-border membrane vesicles (23) and very similar size discrimination in intestinal epithelia was seen between PEG oligomers and a series of polar D-peptides, permeating via the paracellular route (19). The higher than expected permeation of PEG 400 compared with other markers of similar molecular weight is almost certainly due to its smaller molecular size. A recent study using monodispersed PEG oligomers showed PEG 194 permeation to be sixfold greater than mannitol in cell monolayers despite being of comparable molecular weight (3). However, the findings of the present study suggest this can be explained by the smaller hydrodynamic radius of PEG 194 (3.2 Å) compared with mannitol (4.1 Å). A relatively small difference in the radii of the probes will have profound effects on permeability particularly where they lie close to the radius of the paracellular pore.
The ability to simultaneously monitor permeabilities of a 24-member homologous series produced detailed and highly reproducible permeation profiles in cell monolayers, which were used as the basis for mathematical modeling of the paracellular route. We explored the inclusion of the Renkin term (39) in the model for the restrictive pore, which aims to take account of frictional resistance as molecules move through the pore. However, the validity of the Renkin correction is in doubt when the parameter r/rs1 exceeds 0.4 [as is the case for all the PEG oligomers used in this study, with even the smallest measurable oligomer PEG 238 having a radius (3.5 Å) of 75% of the estimated size of the restricted pore (4.5 Å)]. Under these conditions, the Renkin term tends to exaggerate diffusional resistance within the pore resulting, as we found, in both a poor fit of the model to the data and unsatisfactory estimates of sieving parameters. Other investigators have expressed similar concerns about including the Renkin term when modeling paracellular permeability of compounds the size of the PEG oligomers (16, 27). Therefore, this aspect was not pursued any further.
With the use of the model, two distinct permeation components could be
defined in both T84 and Caco-2, a restrictive component with a sharp
molecular size cut-off (component 1) and a second component that is not
restrictive for these size molecules (component 2). The model
allows a quantitative assessment of the contribution of these two
components to paracellular transport ( and
) as well as
estimating the pore size of the restrictive component. The fact that,
under control conditions, the value for
is ~20-fold greater than
illustrates the dominance of the restrictive pathway for
paracellular permeation of small molecules of radii <4.0 Å. In
contrast, the nonrestrictive pathway (defined by
) provides the
permeation route for larger molecules (>4.0 Å). A previous study
demonstrated biphasic oral absorption vs. molecular size profiles of
PEG oligomers in rat, dog, and humans qualitatively similar to those
presented here for epithelial monolayers. However, the greater
complexity of tissues makes it more difficult to draw conclusions
regarding the biological basis for the biphasic profiles observed in
intestinal preparations. For example, they may reflect distinct
populations of tight junction pores associated with villus tip and
intestinal crypt cells as suggested by Hollander (22). This theory would not explain the two-component profile observed in
intestinal monolayers.
Despite intense interest in the structure and regulation of the intestinal tight junction, its functional dimensions have remained poorly defined. Madara and Dharmsathaphorn (33) suggested a pore size for T84 cells in the range 3.6-15 Å based on the ability of two probes of widely different size, mannitol and inulin, to cross T84 monolayers. Similarly, Ma et al. (30) proposed that the paracellular pore in rat colon was accessible to molecules with a radius >11 Å on the basis of significant permeation of inulin. However, a systematic determination of the dimensions of the paracellular pore radius requires the use of multiple probes spanning a defined range of molecular size. A recent study by Knipp et al. (27) addressed the problem using a group of structurally unrelated compounds of known hydrodynamic radii. With the use of this approach, the pore radius of Caco-2 was estimated to be 5.2 Å, although the fact that all of the probes used were smaller than the estimated pore size was an acknowledged limitation. The PEG methodology described here takes this approach further by using a stable chemical series with radii that span that of the restrictive paracellular pore. As a result, we would argue that the radius calculated for Caco-2 and T84 (4.5 and 4.3 Å, respectively) in this study represents a more accurate estimate of the small molecular size-restrictive pore in these systems. The in vivo PEG absorption profiles produced for rat, dog, and human (19) were not modeled but did show a significant molecular mass cut-off at ~600 Da, which corresponds to a hydrodynamic radius of ~5.3 Å. This compares well with the estimates obtained in Caco-2 and T84 described in this study. The relatively small standard errors associated with the estimates of pore radius suggest that the paracellular pathway in these cells is relatively homogeneous, particularly compared with intestinal tissues.
The similarity in sieving parameters estimated for Caco-2 and T84 is intriguing given the 10-fold difference in TER values between the two lines. However, several recent reports have noted a disparity between TER and paracellular flux, suggesting that permeation pathways for ions and larger hydrophilic solutes may be functionally dissociated (4, 17). The sieving model indicates that differences in TER in Caco-2 and T84 cannot be explained by differences in either pore radius or the number of restrictive pores as calculated by the sieving model. A correlation between strand number and paracellular resistance has been proposed (8, 9) but, to our knowledge, there have been no direct comparisons of fibrillar arrangements in Caco-2 and T84. However, the TER of high- and low-resistance MDCK cells varies by two orders of magnitude despite possessing similar arrangements of tight junction strands (46). Recent evidence suggests that differences in occludin phosphorylation between MDCK strains may mediate the observed differences in TER (54). Further studies will be needed to determine whether a similar mechanism can explain the observed differences in TER between T84 and Caco-2.
A key aim of the present study was to determine whether PEG profiling
could be used to investigate the mechanism of action of tight junction
modulators at the functional level. Many factors have been shown to
influence tight junction integrity including physiological modulators
such as cytokines and growth factors (53), bacterial
toxins (12), and pharmacological agents (28). Their effects are mediated through a range of intracellular and extracellular pathways but the general assumption is that they all act
to dilate the tight junction pore. The data presented here suggest this
may be simplistic. EGTA and sodium caprate, C10, elicited profoundly
different changes in PEG profile and sieving parameters in T84 cells
despite having similar effects on TER. EGTA, a classic tight junction
modulator that acts by chelating extracellular calcium (10, 35,
49), abolished size discrimination due to a marked increase in
the previously restrictive pore radius, reverting essentially to a
single component system consisting of large pores. Under these
conditions, the two component sieving model does not allow an accurate
estimate of pore radius but it is clear that after EGTA treatment the
radius of paracellular pores will be far >7.4 Å (the size of the
largest PEG oligomer used here). The precise mechanism behind
EGTA-induced reductions in barrier function remains unclear but appears
to involve a substantial redistribution of E-cadherin, a
Ca2+-dependent adhesion molecule within the adherens
junction (10). A downstream effect of this may be the
disassembly of other junctional components, including the tight
junction, mediated at least in part by protein kinase C (6, 7,
49). In contrast, sodium caprate-induced increases in
permeability involve phospholipase C-dependent increases in
intracellular Ca2+ concentration and a resulting
contraction of perijunctional actin (29, 48). The results
of PEG profiling argue strongly that pore dilatation of the tight
junction is not the mechanism by which sodium caprate increases
paracellular permeability. Sodium caprate markedly increased PEG
permeability (indicated by the increase in ) but maintained size
selectivity across T84 monolayers such that the restrictive pore size
was unchanged compared with control monolayers. What could produce an
increase in
without affecting pore size? Possible explanations
include an increase in the number of restrictive pores caused by
rearrangement of junctional proteins. In this respect, it is
interesting that Lindmark et al. (29) showed that sodium
caprate induced redistribution of ZO-1 and occludin in Caco-2 cells. It
has been suggested that tight junction pores fluctuate between open and
closed states (8), and it is possible that modulators such
as sodium caprate could be acting to increase the open probability of
restrictive pores, again mediated by alterations in junctional
proteins. Alternatively, it is interesting to speculate that increased
permeability in the absence of changes in size selectivity could also
be caused by changes in strand complexity or path length within the
restrictive pore. Recent studies in HT29-cl.19A colonocytes show that
tumor necrosis factor-
-induced increases in mannitol flux are
accompanied by a decrease in both average strand number and junctional
depth (41). Glucose (34)- and protein kinase
C (38)-mediated increases in paracellular permeability
occur with similar alterations in tight junction morphology.
The lack of effect of sodium caprate on the size of the restrictive
pore raises the question of how such modulators increase the
permeability of large molecules across cell monolayers. In common with
other studies, we have observed that both EGTA and sodium caprate can
increase the permeability of probes that are much larger than the
restrictive pore. We found that the transepithelial flux of a 10-kDa
fluorescent dextran (hydrodynamic radius of 23 Å) (43)
increased by 1.9-fold and 21-fold across T84 monolayers in the presence
of sodium caprate and EGTA, respectively. One explanation is that
larger molecules cross epithelial monolayers through an alternative
pathway that is characterized in these studies by , the descriptor
of the second component of PEG flux. This component represents a small
proportion of total paracellular flux in unperturbed monolayers and is
increased significantly in the presence of sodium caprate, although it
remains a minor component compared with the restrictive pathway (e.g.,
is 3-fold larger than
even after exposure to sodium caprate).
At present we can only speculate on the nature of the second pathway. A
small population of large radius pores may exist within the tight
junction strands alongside the restrictive pores and their numbers may be upregulated in response to extracellular stimuli to increase the
paracellular flux of larger solutes. It may reflect heterogeneity within the junction itself. Transmission electron microscopy studies show sodium caprate induced dilations in Caco-2 tight junctions similar
to those observed in hamster small intestine in the presence of glucose
(1, 34). Tumor necrosis factor-
was reported to induce discontinuities in junctional strands in colonic monolayers, which may represent pathways for increased permeability of large molecules such as horseradish peroxidase (41). The second
component could alternatively reflect heterogeneity in the monolayer
such that some cells form incomplete or immature junctions that are much less restrictive. The possibility that the second component represents a nonspecific leak pathway seems unlikely given that it is
upregulated by sodium caprate. Clearly, more studies are needed to
characterize these pathways because they do raise important questions
about the routes for movement of small and large molecules across the
gut and whether this can be explained by simple dilatation of a single
population of homogenous pores.
In conclusion, we have described in this study a useful technique to functionally probe the paracellular pathway and have utilized this procedure to characterize this pathway in Caco-2 and T84 cell lines. We believe this methodology yields more informative data compared with the use of conventional paracellular probes and is particularly useful when investigating junctional modulation. This technique, combined with molecular and morphological approaches, should provide valuable insights into the nature of the paracellular pathway.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
---|
We thank Dr. Richard Stephens, Norman Higgs, Sue Murby, and Brent Collins for technical expertise.
![]() |
FOOTNOTES |
---|
This work was supported by AstraZeneca.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. Warhurst, Section of Gastrointestinal Science, Clinical Sciences Bldg., Hope Hospital, Salford, UK, M6 8HD (E-mail:gwarhurs{at}fs1.ho.man.ac.uk).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 28 November 2000; accepted in final form 5 March 2001.
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
1.
Anderberg, EK,
Lindmark T,
and
Artursson P.
Sodium caprate elicits dilatations in human intestinal tight junctions and enhances drug absorption by the paracellular route.
Pharm Res
10:
857-864,
1993[ISI][Medline].
2.
Anderson, JM,
and
Van-Itallie CM.
Tight junctions and the molecular basis for regulation of paracellular permeability.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
269:
G467-G475,
1995
3.
Artursson, P,
Ungell AL,
and
Lofroth JE.
Selective paracellular permeability in two models of intestinal absorption: cultured monolayers of human intestinal epithelial cells and rat intestinal segments.
Pharm Res
10:
1123-1129,
1993[ISI][Medline].
4.
Balda, MS,
Whitney JA,
Flores C,
Gonzalez S,
Cereijido M,
and
Matter K.
Functional dissociation of paracellular permeability and transepithelial electrical resistance and disruption of the apical-basolateral intramembrane diffusion barrier by expression of a mutant tight junction membrane protein.
J Cell Biol
134:
1031-1049,
1996[Abstract].
5.
Chadwick, VS,
Phillips SF,
and
Hofman AF.
Measurements of intestinal permeability using low molecular weight polyethylene glycols (PEG 400). II. Application to study of normal and abnormal permeability states in man and animals.
Gastroenterology
73:
247-251,
1977[ISI][Medline].
6.
Citi, S.
Protein kinase inhibitors prevent junction dissociation induced by low extracellular calcium in MDCK epithelial cells.
J Cell Biol
117:
169-178,
1992[Abstract].
7.
Clarke, H,
Marano CW,
Peralta SA,
and
Mullin JM.
Modification of tight junction function by protein kinase C isoforms.
Adv Drug Delivery Res
41:
283-301,
2000[ISI][Medline].
8.
Claude, P.
Morphological factors influencing transepithelial permeability: a model for the resistance of the zonula occludens.
J Membr Biol
39:
219-232,
1978[ISI][Medline].
9.
Claude, P,
and
Goodenough DA.
Fracture faces of zonulae occludentes from "tight" and "leaky" epithelia.
J Cell Biol
58:
390-400,
1973
10.
Collares, BC,
McEwan GTA,
Jepson MA,
Simmons NL,
and
Hirst BH.
Paracellular barrier and junctional protein distribution depend on basolateral extracellular Ca(2+) in cultured epithelia.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1222:
147-158,
1994[ISI][Medline].
11.
Dharmsathaphorn, K,
McRoberts JA,
Mandel KG,
Tisdale LD,
and
Masui H.
A human colonic tumor cell line that maintains vectorial electrolyte transport.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
246:
G204-G208,
1984
12.
Fasano, A.
Novel approaches for oral delivery of macromolecules.
J Pharm Sci
87:
1351-1356,
1998[ISI][Medline].
13.
Furuse, M,
Fujita K,
Hiiragi T,
Fujimoto K,
and
Tsukita S.
Claudin-1 and -2: novel integral membrane proteins localizing at tight junctions with no sequence similarity to occludin.
J Cell Biol
141:
1539-1550,
1998
14.
Furuse, M,
Hirase T,
Itoh M,
Nagafuchi A,
Yonemura S,
and
Tsukita S.
Occludin: a novel integral membrane protein localizing at tight junctions.
J Cell Biol
123:
1777-1788,
1993[Abstract].
15.
Gumbiner, B,
Lowenkopf T,
and
Apatira D.
Identification of a 160-kDa polypeptide that binds to the tight junction protein ZO-1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
88:
3460-3464,
1991[Abstract].
16.
Hamalainen, KM,
Kontturi K,
Auriola S,
Murtomaki L,
and
Urtii A.
Estimation of pore size and pore density of biomembranes from permeability measurements of polethylene glycols using an effusion like process.
J Controlled Release
49:
97-104,
1997[ISI].
17.
Hasegawa, H,
Fujita H,
Katoh H,
Aoki J,
Nakamura K,
Ichikawa A,
and
Negishi M.
Opposite regulation of transepithelial electrical resistance and paracellular permeability by Rho in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells.
J Biol Chem
274:
20982-20988,
1999
18.
Haskins, J,
Gu L,
Wittchen ES,
Hibbard J,
and
Stevenson BR.
ZO-3, a novel member of the MAGUK protein family found at the tight junction, interacts with ZO-1 and occludin.
J Cell Biol
141:
199-208,
1998
19.
He, YL,
Murby S,
Warhurst G,
Gifford L,
Walker D,
Ayrton J,
Eastmond R,
and
Rowland M.
Species differences in size discrimination in the paracellular pathway reflected by oral bioavailability of poly(ethylene glycol) and D-peptides.
J Pharm Sci
87:
626-633,
1998[ISI][Medline].
20.
Hidalgo, IJ,
Raub TJ,
and
Borchardt RT.
Characterization of the human colon carcinoma cell line (Caco-2) as a model system for intestinal epithelial permeability.
Gastroenterology
96:
736-749,
1989[ISI][Medline].
21.
Hochman, J,
and
Artursson P.
Mechanisms of absorption enhancement and tight junction regulation.
J Controlled Release
29:
253-267,
1994[ISI].
22.
Hollander, D.
The intestinal permeability barrier-a hypothesis as to its regulation and involvement in Crohns disease.
Scand J Gastroenterol
27:
721-726,
1992[ISI][Medline].
23.
Hollander, D,
Koyama S,
Dadufalza V,
Tran DQ,
Krugliak P,
Ma T,
and
Ling KY.
Polyethylene glycol 900 permeability of rat intestinal and colonic segments in vivo and brush border membrane vesicles in vitro.
J Lab Clin Med
113:
505-515,
1989[ISI][Medline].
24.
Iqbal, TH,
Lewis KO,
and
Cooper BT.
Diffusion of polyethylene glycol-400 across lipid barriers in vitro.
Clin Sci (Colch)
85:
111-115,
1993[ISI][Medline].
25.
Karczewski, J,
and
Groot JA.
Molecular physiology and pathophysiology of tight junctions. III. Tight junction regulation by intracellular messengers: differences in response within and between epithelia.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
279:
G660-G665,
2000
26.
Kaskel, FJ,
Kumar AM,
Lockhart EA,
Evan A,
and
Spitzer A.
Factors affecting proximal tubular reabsorption during development.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol
252:
F188-F197,
1987
27.
Knipp, GT,
Ho NFH,
Barsuhn CL,
and
Borchardt RT.
Paracellular diffusion in Caco-2 monolayers: effect of perturbation on the transport of hydrophillic compounds that vary in charge and size.
J Pharm Sci
86:
1105-1110,
1997[ISI][Medline].
28.
Lecluyse, EL,
and
Sutton SC.
In vitro models for the selection of development candidates. Permeability studies to define mechanisms of absorption enhancement.
Adv Drug Delivery Res
23:
163-183,
1997[ISI].
29.
Lindmark, T,
Kimura Y,
and
Artursson P.
Absorption enhancement through intracellular regulation of tight junction permeability by medium chain fatty acids in Caco-2 cells.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
284:
362-369,
1998
30.
Ma, TY,
Hollander D,
Erickson RA,
Truong H,
Nguyen H,
and
Krugliak P.
Mechanism of colonic permeation of inulin: is rat colon more permeable than small intestine?
Gastroenterology
108:
12-20,
1995[ISI][Medline].
31.
Ma, TY,
Hollander D,
Krugliak P,
and
Katz K.
PEG 400, a hydrophilic molecular probe for measuring intestinal permeability.
Gastroenterology
98:
39-46,
1990[ISI][Medline].
32.
Madara, JL.
Regulation of the movement of solutes across tight junctions.
Annu Rev Physiol
60:
143-159,
1998[ISI][Medline].
33.
Madara, JL,
and
Dharmsathaphorn K.
Occluding junction structure-function relationships in a cultured epithelial monolayer.
J Cell Biol
101:
2124-2133,
1985[Abstract].
34.
Madara, JL,
and
Pappenheimer JR.
Structural basis for physiological regulation of paracellular pathways in intestinal epithelia.
J Membr Biol
100:
149-164,
1987[ISI][Medline].
35.
Martinez-Palomo, A.
Experimental modulation of occluding junctions in a cultured transporting epithelium.
J Cell Biol
87:
736-745,
1980[Abstract].
36.
Maxton, DG,
Bjarnason I,
Reynolds AP,
Catt S,
Peters TJ,
and
Menzies IS.
Lactulose,51CrEDTA, L-rhamnose and polyethylene glycol as probe markers for in vivo assessment of human intestinal permeability.
Clin Sci (Colch)
71:
71-80,
1986[ISI][Medline].
37.
Morita, K,
Furuse M,
Fujimoto K,
and
Tsukita S.
Claudin multigene family encoding four-transmembrane domain protein components of tight junction strands.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:
511-516,
1999
38.
Mullin, JM,
Kampherstein JA,
Laughlin KV,
Clarkin CE,
Miller RD,
Szallasi Z,
Kachar B,
Soler AP,
and
Rosson D.
Overexpression of protein kinase C-delta increases tight junction permeability in LLC-PK1 epithelia.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
275:
C544-C554,
1998
39.
Renkin, EM.
Filtration, diffusion and molecular sieving through porous cellulose membranes.
J Gen Physiol
38:
225-243,
1954
40.
Reuss, L.
Tight junction permeability to ions and water. Tight Junctions, edited by Cereijido M.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1991, p. 49-66.
41.
Rodriguez, P,
Heyman M,
Candalh C,
Blaton MA,
and
Bouchaud C.
Tumour necrosis factor-alpha induces morphological and functional alterations of intestinal HT29 cl.19A cell monolayers.
Cytokine
7:
441-448,
1995[ISI][Medline].
42.
Ruddy, SB,
and
Hadzija BW.
Iontophoretic permeability of polyethylene glycols through hairless rat skin: application of hydrodynamic theory for hindered transport through liquid-filled pores.
Drug Des Discov
8:
207-224,
1992[Medline].
43.
Sanders, SE,
Madara JL,
McGuirk DK,
Gelman DS,
and
Colgan SP.
Assessment of inflammatory events in epithelial permeability: a rapid screening method using fluorescein dextrans.
Epithelial Cell Biol
4:
25-34,
1995[ISI][Medline].
44.
Simon, DB,
Lu Y,
Choate KA,
Velazquez H,
Al-Sabban E,
Praga M,
Casari G,
Bettinelli A,
Colussi G,
Rodriguez SJ,
McCredie D,
Milford D,
Sanjad S,
and
Lifton RP.
Paracellin-1, a renal tight junction protein required for paracellular Mg2+ resorption.
Science
285:
103-106,
1999
45.
Staehelin, LA.
Structure and function of intercellular junctions.
Int Rev Cytol
39:
191-283,
1974[ISI][Medline].
46.
Stevenson, BR,
Anderson JM,
Goodenough DA,
and
Mooseker MS.
Tight junction structure and ZO-1 content are identical in two strains of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells which differ in transepithelial resistance.
J Cell Biol
107:
2401-2408,
1988[Abstract].
47.
Stevenson, BR,
Siliciano JD,
Mooseker MS,
and
Goodenough DA.
Identification of ZO-1: a high molecular weight polypeptide associated with the tight junction (zonula occludens) in a variety of epithelia.
J Cell Biol
103:
755-766,
1986[Abstract].
48.
Tomita, M,
Hayashi M,
and
Awazu S.
Absorption-enhancing mechanism of sodium caprate and decanoylcarnitine in Caco-2 cells.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
272:
739-743,
1995[Abstract].
49.
Tomita, M,
Hayashi M,
and
Awazu S.
Absorption-enhancing mechanism of EDTA, caprate, and decanoylcarnitine in Caco-2 cells.
J Pharm Sci
85:
608-611,
1996[ISI][Medline].
50.
Tomita, M,
Menconi MJ,
Delude RL,
and
Fink MP.
Polarised transport of hydrophilic compounds across rat colonic mucosa from serosa to mucosa is temperature dependent.
Gastroenterology
118:
535-543,
2000[ISI][Medline].
51.
Tsukita, S,
and
Furuse M.
Pores in the wall: claudins constitute tight junction strands containing aqueous pores.
J Cell Biol
149:
13-16,
2000
52.
Tsukita, S,
Furuse M,
and
Itoh M.
Structural and signalling molecules come together at tight junctions.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
11:
628-633,
1999[ISI][Medline].
53.
Walsh, SV,
Hopkins AM,
and
Nusrat A.
Modulation of tight junction structure and function by cytokines.
Adv Drug Delivery Res
41:
303-313,
2000[ISI][Medline].
54.
Wong, V.
Phosphorylation of occludin correlates with occludin localization and function at the tight junction.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
273:
C1859-C1867,
1997