1 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN.
2 Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA.
3 Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
4 Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Received for publication June 24, 2004; accepted for publication August 26, 2004.
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
dietary carbohydrates; dietary proteins; heart diseases; mortality; neoplasms; postmenopause; prospective studies
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Historically, experimental studies found that animal protein fed to rabbits was associated with atherosclerosis (3) and plaque formation (4) independent of dietary cholesterol and saturated fat (3, 5, 6). In contrast, rabbits fed soy protein did not develop vascular lesions (3, 7). A major limitation of the experimental trials is that only one type of animal protein (typically casein) was compared with only one type of vegetable protein (typically soy).
Human experimental trials observed favorable short-term effects on serum lipids, plasma insulin (810), and fasting blood glucose (11) when dietary animal protein replaced carbohydrate. Higher protein intake was also associated with a 26 percent lower risk of ischemic heart disease when substituted for carbohydrate in a large epidemiologic study after controlling for major CHD risk factors including dietary fats (12).
More recently, studies showed positive associations between consumption of well-done red meat and frequent frying, barbecuing, and broiling of meats with the development of several cancers (13), associations thought to be explained by increased exposure to the potent and highly bioavailable carcinogens, heterocyclic aromatic amines (14, 15).
With the advent of many popular high-protein diets, little information is available on their long-term effects on health outcomes in humans. Further, these diets typically do not discriminate among protein sources, treating the putative beneficial effects of animal and vegetable proteins equally. We investigated the relation of total protein substituted for carbohydrate, a change that would be expected while adhering to a high-protein diet, and the association of different protein sources substituted for one another with chronic disease and mortality using data collected from the Iowa Womens Health Study.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Dietary and risk factor assessment
The questionnaire inquired about factors known or suspected to be related to cancer, including smoking, physical activity level, postmenopausal hormone use, alcohol use, and anthropometric measurements. We assessed baseline diet in 1986 with a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire described by Rimm et al. (17). For each food, a common unit or portion size was specified, and participants were asked how often, on average, they had consumed that amount of the item over the past year. The nine responses ranged from "never or less than once per month" to "six or more times per day." The questionnaire also asked about vitamin and mineral supplement intake. Daily intakes of nutrients were calculated by summing across all food items the product of the frequency of consumption of the specified unit of each food by the nutrient content of that unit of food. The validity and reliability of the food frequency questionnaire have been documented in this cohort (18).
Exclusion criteria
We excluded women who, at baseline, were premenopausal, who reported a history of cancer other than skin cancer, known heart disease, or known diabetes, and who left 30 or more food items blank or had total energy intake less than 600 kcal/day (2.5 MJ/day) or more than 5,000 kcal/day (20.9 MJ/day). A total of 29,017 women were available for analysis.
Follow-up
We mailed questionnaires in 1987, 1989, 1992, and 1997 to establish vital status and change of address. Deceased nonrespondents were identified through linkage with the National Death Index. Incident cases of cancer were ascertained through the State Health Registry of Iowa, part of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (19), via an annual computer match of participant identifiers.
Statistical analysis
Person-years for each participant were calculated from the date of returning the baseline questionnaire to the date of diagnosis of cancer, death, emigration from Iowa, or December 31, 2000, whichever came first. Macronutrients were expressed as a percentage of total energy, and other dietary covariates were energy adjusted by the regression method (20). We examined the distribution of potential confounding and risk factors by quintiles of total protein intake. Continuous variables were categorized into quintiles and treated as indicator variables in statistical models following inspection of their relation with each outcome in univariable analysis. We calculated risk ratios and 95 percent confidence intervals using Cox regression, and we modeled survival as a function of age (21), using as the referent the lowest quintile of protein intake.
We assessed the relation between dietary protein and each outcome with multivariable-adjusted nutrient density models (22). These models allow estimation of the effect on each outcome of an increase in the percentage of energy from protein intake. By forcing total energy and other intake, such as dietary fats, to be constant and by excluding carbohydrate from the model, an increase in protein intake by definition statistically results in a decrease in carbohydrate intake. Thus, the effect estimates of protein assume a substitution interpretation (12, 22). The percentage of energy from protein that is "substituted" for carbohydrate is the difference in median energy intake of protein between the highest and lowest quintiles. For each endpoint, we first assessed the effect of an isoenergetic substitution of each of total, animal, and vegetable protein for total carbohydrate. Next, we assessed the effect of an isoenergetic substitution of vegetable protein for animal protein while holding constant the intakes of carbohydrate, total energy, and potential confounding factors. Thus, the difference in the percentage of energy from protein (or protein type) between the lowest and the four remaining quintiles varied according to the comparison under study.
While the use of nutrient values was necessary to evaluate our hypotheses of protein for carbohydrate substitutions on various outcomes, realistically most individuals interchange foods when implementing dietary changes. Therefore, we also evaluated the effect of an isoenergetic substitution of various intakes of high-protein foods, standardized as servings per 1,000 kcal/day (4.2 MJ/day), for carbohydrate-dense foods while holding constant total energy, dietary fats, and other components of protein foods such as cholesterol. This was done to better isolate the effect on our outcomes of the protein in these foods separate from the effects of other nutrients that have established associations with our outcomes. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis Software, version 8.0 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina), and S-Plus (Mathsoft, Seattle, Washington) software systems. All p values are based on two-sided tests.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Our results suggest that animal protein and total carbohydrate may have similar potentially adverse effects on CHD mortality compared with vegetable protein, because an inverse association was observed when vegetable protein replaced either carbohydrate or animal protein and because no association was observed when animal protein replaced carbohydrate. Although animal protein per se was not associated with any of the outcomes, a composite of red and processed meat servings in place of carbohydrate food servings was associated with a 44 percent increased risk of CHD mortality, and a similar increased risk was observed with dairy servings. Modest associations were also found with all-cause mortality and persisted despite adjustment for dietary fats and cholesterol. Indeed, the weak association of dietary fats across quintiles of total protein intake in this study supports the notion that our findings are unlikely to be from confounding by these variables. The apparent discrepancy between the animal protein and food group analyses may be from the inability to differentiate among the effects of proteins derived from different animal sources when using the nutrient value, suggesting that protein sources may differ in their metabolic effects.
Our data also provide evidence that reduced risk of CHD mortality may be obtained from the substitution of vegetable protein sources from the legume food group that included dried beans, tofu, nuts, and peanut butter for carbohydrate foods. The observed inverse trend with legume foods was unchanged regardless of whether we substituted legumes for all carbohydrate-rich foods or for only refined carbohydrate foods with simultaneous control for whole-grain foods. Indeed, all risk ratios for all outcomes were unchanged when only refined carbohydrate foods were used as the referent. This likely reflects the small contribution of whole-grain, compared with refined grain, food intake to total carbohydrate consumption in these Iowa women (table 1) despite the reported inverse association of whole-grain foods with CHD and all-cause mortality in this cohort (23, 24). Thus, one would not expect to see substantial differences in results comparing protein intake with total or refined carbohydrate intake. Our current findings therefore do not negate the apparent beneficial effects of increasing whole-grain intake and the carbohydrate that would come along with such food choices.
The reduced risk of CHD mortality from substitution of legume foods for refined carbohydrates may be from the diminution in the diet of highly refined carbohydrates that may have high glycemic indices (25), which are associated with CHD and its risk factors (811, 24), and possibly from the addition of constituents that are associated with legumes and that may decrease the risk of CHD. In addition to their higher protein content compared with other vegetable foods, legumes and nuts are also lower in their glycemic index (25) and are sources of other nutrients that may be important in the pathogenesis of CHD, such as magnesium (26), copper (27), phytosterols and antioxidants (28), and arginine, the precursor of nitric oxide which is an endothelium-derived relaxing factor (29). However, our findings persisted despite additional adjustment for those micronutrients for which we had available data. A previous analysis in this cohort observed an attenuated risk reduction of 28 percent for CHD mortality (ptrend = 0.11) from consumption of nuts and seeds following adjustment for vitamin E (30). In the current analyses, our composite index of legume foods also included dried beans and tofu. Nutrients unique to these foods other than vitamin E may explain why additional adjustment for vitamin E (whether from supplements only or from dietary plus supplemental sources combined) did not attenuate the association with CHD risk.
The distribution of protein intake in this cohort was similar to that from a large prospective study of US nurses, as was the distribution of various covariates, such as body mass index and physical activity, across quintiles of increasing protein intake (12). In that study, Hu et al. observed that an isoenergetic substitution of total protein for dietary carbohydrate was associated with a 26 percent lower risk of incident ischemic heart disease. Both vegetable and animal protein appeared to lower risk from 11 percent to 16 percent, respectively, although the associations were not statistically significant. The results from several short-term human metabolic experiments that substituted at least 30 percent of total energy from animal protein for carbohydrate suggested that the protective association may be from favorable changes in serum lipids, blood glucose, and plasma insulin (811). However, changes in serum lipid fractions related to higher animal protein intake may not translate to a beneficial CHD risk factor profile (31). In other epidemiologic investigations, meat consumption was positively associated with fatal ischemic heart disease during a 20-year follow-up study of 25,153 California Seventh-day Adventists (32). This association was apparently not due to confounding by eggs, dairy products, obesity, marital status, or cigarette smoking. During a 14-year follow-up of 80,082 US women, a higher ratio of red meat to poultry and fish consumption was associated with a significantly increased risk of incident cases of major CHD events independent of major risk factors (33). Among 57,031 postmenopausal women in the same cohort, processed meat (hot dog, bacon, sausage, salami, and bologna) was significantly associated with a 44 percent increased risk of CHD, independent of other CHD risk factors including iron or total red meat intake (34).
Our findings and those of others suggest that factors uniquely associated with meat proteins may potentiate CHD morbidity and mortality. Although animal studies suggest that heterocyclic aromatic amines may be involved in the development of atherosclerosis (35), red meat protein was not associated with cancer incidence in this study, possibly because the relation is stronger for specific cancer sites in this cohort, such as breast cancer (36) and potentially colon cancer. Further, only well-done and charred meats contain heterocyclic amines and thus may not be accurately represented by our composite measure of red and processed meats that comprise various degrees of doneness. However, in our study, dairy products, which do not contain heterocyclic aromatic amines, increased the risk for CHD mortality to a similar magnitude as did red meat. It has been suggested (37) that dairy and meat products, the two largest contributors to animal protein in our cohort (table 1), may increase CHD risk via methionine, the dietary precursor to homocysteine production. Although dietary methionine is positively associated with homocysteine (38), our findings were not appreciably altered when methionine was excluded from the analyses. Other metabolic studies reported increases of 24-hour urinary free cortisol concentrations following a diet in which the percentage of total energy as protein was increased from 15 percent to 30 percent (39) and increases of postmeal serum cortisol in subjects consuming a 40 percent protein diet ingested as three identical meals over a 12-hour period of time (40). The metabolic consequences of a dietary protein-stimulated increase in cortisol production are unknown. Future studies are needed to address the mechanism(s) by which dietary proteins over the long-term may exert an effect on CHD and cancer.
An unexpected finding from our data was the observed positive association of legume intake with cancer mortality. This nuance in the data is difficult to explain and may be a reflection of using mortality measures for our outcome, which could be difficult to interpret if participants changed their pattern of intake following a morbid event during follow-up. This is less likely to be of a concern for CHD mortality, as prolonged survival after a sudden ischemic event is less likely than after a diagnosis of cancer. In addition, the consistency in our findings of an inverse association of vegetable protein, and a positive association of animal protein and red meat servings, for CHD mortality is strengthened by others reports that protein sources may exert differential effects in the pathogenesis of CHD.
Finally, our results raise doubts about the safety of long-term adherence to diets that favor animal protein, particularly red/processed meat or dairy servings, in place of carbohydrate foods or vegetable sources of protein. It is important to note that the potential adverse effects of mortality from CHD and from all causes observed in this investigation were from intakes of approximately 22 percent of energy from total protein (tables 2 and 5), of which the majority was of animal origin, and not from a high-protein intake, generally defined as 30 percent or more of total energy from protein intake. Yet, surprisingly modest substitutions of specific animal sources of proteins for carbohydrate appeared to be associated with adverse effects. Our results, together with the lack of benefit to sustained weight loss due to consumption of a high-animal-protein diet such as promoted by Atkins and tested in a recent randomized trial (41), do not support any salutary gain of these diets and suggest potential harm.
Our study has several strengths. The prospective nature of our data collection discounts any biases associated with recall of diet and lifestyle behaviors. The use of a large, well-defined sample derived from a general population permits the generalizability of our findings, at least to older Caucasian females. We were also able to adjust for multiple confounding and potential risk factors. Further, it was reasonable to assume that, with a high-protein diet, the natural substitution would be for carbohydrate rather than dietary fats, since fats as a percentage of energy appear to be only modestly associated with increasing protein in this cohort (table 1), and the comparison with carbohydrate is typical in metabolic studies because it is the largest source of energy in most diets (22).
Our study also has potential limitations. First, diet was assessed once in 1986, and dietary changes may have occurred from the baseline period to the present, possibly biasing our associations. Systematic errors in measuring diet can also bias associations. However, if this were the case, we would not have expected to see different associations of protein intake for the different outcomes. Second, we were unable to examine whether intermediate variables, such as serum lipid, glucose, or insulin concentrations, could account for the associations that we found, as reported in the short-term metabolic studies that replaced dietary protein for carbohydrate because blood samples were not collected. Third, we were unable to assess the impact on our outcomes of weight change as a consequence of nutrient or food substitutions. Although controlling for weight change may help to explain the mechanism by which dietary substitutions are associated with our outcomes, it would not preclude performing such dietary substitution analyses. Fourth, we recognize that, in performing food substitution analyses, we may also be measuring the effect on CHD mortality and other outcomes of nonprotein components of these foods. We controlled for dietary fats, cholesterol, fiber, and multivitamin and individual micronutrient intake to better isolate the effect on our outcomes of the protein in these foods separate from the effects of other nutrients that have established associations with our outcomes. However, confounding by unmeasured constituents associated with plant proteins cannot be excluded. Despite the limitations of this approach, these analyses are included in this report because these substitutions realistically represent typical dietary changes.
In conclusion, dietary proteins from animal and vegetable food sources appear to be differentially associated with mortality from CHD and all causes when substituted for carbohydrates in the diet. Long-term adherence to popular high-protein diets, without discrimination toward protein source, may have potentially adverse health consequences.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
![]() |
NOTES |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|