Prenatal and Postnatal Risk Factors for Mental Retardation among Children in Bangladesh

M. S. Durkin1,2, N. Z. Khan3, L. L. Davidson4, S. Huq5, S. Munir6, E. Rasul7 and S. S. Zaman5

1 Division of Epidemiology, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, and G. H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New York, NY.
2 New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY.
3 Bangladesh Institute of Child Health, Dhaka Shishu (Children's) Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
4 National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford University, Oxford, England.
5 Department of Special Education, Institute of Education and Research, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
6 Kalyani Special School, Bangladesh Protibondhi Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
7 BASICS, Dhaka, Bangladesh.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study evaluated the contribution of prenatal, perinatal, neonatal, and postnatal factors to the prevalence of cognitive disabilities among children aged 2–9 years in Bangladesh. A two-phase survey was implemented in 1987–1988 in which 10,299 children were screened for disability. In multivariate analyses, significant independent predictors of serious mental retardation in rural and urban areas included maternal goiter (rural odds ratio (OR) = 5.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23, 21.57; urban OR = 4.82, 95% CI: 2.73, 8.50) and postnatal brain infections (rural OR = 29.24, 95% CI: 7.17, 119.18; urban OR = 13.65, 95% CI: 4.69, 39.76). In rural areas, consanguinity (OR = 15.13, 95% CI: 3.08, 74.30) and landless agriculture (OR = 6.02, 95% CI: 1.16, 31.19) were also independently associated with the prevalence of serious mental retardation. In both rural and urban areas, independent risk factors for mild cognitive disabilities included maternal illiteracy (OR = 2.48, 95% CI: 0.86, 7.12), landlessness (OR = 4.27, 95% CI: 1.77, 10.29), maternal history of pregnancy loss (OR = 2.61, 95% CI: 0.95, 7.12), and small for gestational age at birth (OR = 3.86, 95% CI: 1.56, 9.55). Interventions likely to have the greatest impact on preventing cognitive disabilities among children in Bangladesh include expansion of existing iodine supplementation, maternal literacy, and poverty alleviation programs as well as prevention of intracranial infections and their consequences. Further population-based studies are needed to confirm and understand the association between consanguinity and serious cognitive disability.

child; consanguinity; development disorders; infant; newborn; diseases; mental retardation; nutrition disorders; poverty; prevalence

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IQ, intelligence quotient; OR, odds ratio


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cognitive disabilities in childhood are a leading public health problem internationally (1Go, 2Go). Their impacts on quality of life and productivity are considerable, not only for affected children but also for families and populations as a whole. In less developed countries where risk factors for childhood disabilities are prevalent and the age structures of populations are weighted toward the young (3Go), the need for public health initiatives to prevent these disabilities is especially pronounced. Effective prevention, however, requires better information on risk factors and causes than is currently available for populations in the less developed world.

For Bangladesh, we have previously reported the prevalence of mental retardation, defined as cognitive disability occurring early in life and indicated by deficits in intellectual function (intelligence quotient (IQ)) and adaptive behavior among children to be 5.9/1,000 children aged 2–9 years (95 percent confidence interval (CI): 3.4, 8.4/1,000) for serious mental retardation (IQ < 50) and 14.4/1,000 children aged 2–9 years (95 percent CI: 7.8, 21.1/1,000) for mild mental retardation (IQ, 50–70) (4Go). These prevalence estimates were similar in urban and rural populations sampled. This paper reports the results of an investigation of risk factors for these two classes of mental retardation based on the same national survey of disability in Bangladesh that was used previously to estimate prevalence. The goal of this investigation was to identify factors from successive epochs of fetal and child development (prenatal, perinatal, neonatal, and postnatal) that are associated cross-sectionally with the prevalence of mental retardation and that may have implications for prevention.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A two-phase, national household survey of childhood disability was undertaken in Bangladesh in 1987–1988. The sampling strategy was modeled after the Expanded Programme on Immunisation cluster sampling method developed by the World Health Organization for surveys in populations with no existing sampling frames (5Go). Within each of the five regions of Bangladesh, a sample of 10–15 zones was selected at random but with probability of selection proportional to the zone population size. Within each selected zone, a cluster of contiguous households was chosen at random. In phase I, all children aged 2–9 years in the cluster were screened for disability. Nearly all (99 percent) of the selected households were successfully contacted and agreed to participate. In all, 10,299 children were screened, and 8.2 percent of these screened positive for disability. In phase II, all children who were screened positive and, to allow estimation of population prevalence (6Go), a systematic sample of approximately 10 percent of those who were screened negative were referred for clinical evaluations. The systematic sample was selected by tagging in advance of the survey every eighth questionnaire for inclusion in the phase II assessment regardless of the screening result. The clinical evaluations were completed for 755 (89.3 percent) of those who screened positive and for 871 (9.2 percent) of those who screened negative.

Phase I: the Ten Questions screen for disability
The Ten Questions is a brief questionnaire designed for surveys in culturally diverse populations to screen for serious cognitive, motor, seizure, vision, and hearing disabilities in young children (7Go). The questionnaire was translated into Bangla and administered in an interview with a parent or guardian of each child surveyed by community workers, whose training and supervision were overseen by the principal investigator (S. S. Z.). We have found the Bangla translation of the Ten Questions to have good reliability (8Go) and validity, with a sensitivity of 87 percent for detecting serious neurodevelopmental disabilities (9Go).

Phase II: the clinical evaluation and case definitions
Clinical evaluations of children referred to phase II were performed within 1 month of the screening by a team of local physicians and psychologists who were blinded to the screening results. The diagnosis of mental retardation was made by consensus of the physician and psychologist after each had independently examined the child and resolved any discrepant observations. The physician's assessment of mental retardation was based on developmental history and a brief, structured observation of how the child functioned in language skills, following instructions, motor skills, and behavior (10Go). The medical assessment also provided information on the presence of sensory and motor impairments that may explain inconsistent cognitive test results. The psychologic assessment of mental retardation was based on nonverbal scales of the 1985 revision of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales (11Go) and an adaptive behavior scale developed for and normalized on children in Bangladesh. Classification of children as mentally retarded implied significant deficits in both cognitive function and adaptive behavior. Severity was classified by the psychologist according to IQ: 50–70 for mild, 35–49 for moderate, and below 35 for severe mental retardation. In this paper, moderate and severe cognitive disabilities are combined into a single category, called "serious."

Potential risk factors for disability
Information was collected on numerous potential risk factors for disability by parent report using structured questionnaires during both the household survey and the medical assessments. For this analysis, 52 variables for which data were available were selected a priori as potential risk factors for mental retardation. These are listed in table 1 along with their weighted frequencies in the population based on data collected in phase II of the survey. We have categorized these into demographic factors and factors operating primarily during one of four epochs of fetal and child development: prenatal, perinatal, neonatal, and postnatal. To limit the potential for selection bias, we restricted the risk factor analyses to the 45 variables among the 52 considered, for which the data were at least 80 percent complete. The following seven variables from table 1 were excluded from the risk factor analyses because data for more than 20 percent were missing, often due to lack of knowledge or recall on the part of the respondent: maternal hypertension during pregnancy, breech delivery, delayed cry at birth, perinatal resuscitation, difficult birth, neonatal diarrhea, and neonatal breathing difficulty. Thus, we could not evaluate birth-related risk factors other than prematurity (birth more than 1 month early), low birth weight (baby's size estimated by mother to be very small at birth), birth unattended by a physician or trained midwife, and birth at home. Landless households were those that owned no land, while landless agricultural households were those that owned no land with agriculture as the primary occupation. Maternal illiteracy meant that the mother had never attended school.

Data management
All data from the household survey, the screening, and the psychologic and medical evaluations were recorded on precoded forms, entered into a computerized database, and linked by study identification numbers (with all personal identifiers removed). Accuracy checks and necessary corrections were made both before and after the data were entered into the database.

Statistical analysis
Because the probability of being clinically evaluated in phase II was differential by screening status, it is necessary to compute weighted estimates of prevalence in the population surveyed, as described by Shrout and Newman (6Go). Thus, because 89.3 percent of children with positive screening results and 9.2 percent of those with negative screening results were evaluated, the data for these children were weighted by factors of 1.12 and 10.87, respectively, in the analysis. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between mental retardation and potential risk factors. PC CARP (12Go), a computer program developed for weighted analysis of data from multiphase studies, was used to obtain standard errors for constructing confidence intervals around the prevalence estimates and the regression coefficients (exponentiated to obtain odds ratios). All analyses were restricted to records for which the data required were complete. Associations were quantified separately for serious and mild mental retardation, since previous studies suggest these have distinct risk factor profiles (13Go). As recommended by Hosmer and Lemeshow (14Go), variables were entered into the multivariate logistic regression models if the p values associated with their regression coefficients were less than 0.25; they were retained if their respective p values were less than 0.10 and/or if their removal substantially affected the magnitude of the regression coefficients for other variables in the model.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The estimated numbers of children in the population of 10,299 surveyed who had serious and mild mental retardation (obtained by weighting the data from phase II) were 62 and 149, respectively. Sixty-seven percent of those with serious mental retardation had cooccurring motor, seizure, vision, and/or hearing disabilities compared with 13 percent of those with mild mental retardation and 5 percent of children without cognitive disabilities. Among children with serious mental retardation, a specific cause of the disability was identified by the assessment team for only 8.1 percent on the basis of physical examination and medical history; these included three cases attributed to thyroid disorders (two to iodine deficiency disorder or cretinism and one to congenital hypothyroidism) and two cases attributed to postnatal brain infections. None of the cases of mild mental retardation were attributed to a specific cause.

Univariate analysis
Twenty of the 45 potential risk factors examined (table 1) were found to be associated in univariate analyses (p < 0.10) with either serious or mild cognitive disability. These are listed in table 2, along with unadjusted odds ratios and 95 percent confidence intervals for both forms of mental retardation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Number of children screened and evaluated, and weighted frequencies of potential risk factors for disability, by rural/urban residence, Bangladesh*, 1987–1988

 
Serious cognitive disability.
We present odds ratios for serious cognitive disability and selected risk factors separately for rural and urban children because of heterogeneity of effect or effect modification by rural-urban residence. Specifically, we found maternal illiteracy, landless agriculture, and consanguinity (defined here to include offspring of parents related as first cousins or uncle-niece) to be strongly associated with serious mental retardation in rural, but not urban, areas. A history of neonatal jaundice was associated with serious cognitive disability in urban areas. In addition, in urban areas only, school-aged children with serious cognitive disability were less likely to attend school than were children without cognitive disabilities (table 2). The odds ratios for the other variables considered, which did not show evidence of interaction with residence, are not stratified by rural and urban residence. Among these, factors significantly associated with the prevalence of serious cognitive disability include maternal history of goiter; birth history of being small for gestational age; being very small at birth, regardless of gestational age (an indicator for low birth weight); and histories of neonatal complications, lack of breastfeeding, and postnatal brain infections. Children with serious cognitive disabilities were also at increased risk of being diagnosed with malnutrition and xerophthalmia at the time of study assessment (table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Unadjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals indicating associations with potential risk factors for serious and mild cognitive disability, Bangladesh, 1987–1988

 
Mild cognitive disability.
Because there was no rural-urban difference in the factors associated with mild cognitive disability, the odds ratios for mild cognitive disability were not stratified by residence. The prenatal factors associated with mild mental retardation included lack of maternal education, landlessness (particularly landless agriculture), maternal history of pregnancy loss, and being small for gestational age (table 2). Consanguinity was negatively associated with mild cognitive disability in univariate analysis. The perinatal variables low birth weight and birth at home rather than in a hospital or clinic were also associated with mild mental retardation (table 2). Neonatal factors associated with mild mental retardation included neonatal history of infections and neonatal feeding difficulties (table 2). Postnatal factors associated with mild mental retardation included histories of lack of breastfeeding and severe diarrheal disease with dehydration. Current xerophthalmia and not being enrolled in school at the time of assessment (among children of school age, 6–9 years) were also associated with the prevalence of mild cognitive disability.

Hypothesized risk factors that were found not to be significantly associated with the prevalence of serious or mild childhood cognitive disability in univariate analyses included several socioeconomic indicators (unskilled, manual occupation; the housing characteristics of earth flooring, lack of electricity, and lack of a water tap in the home or yard; lack of home ownership; and family size). In addition, maternal age, history of first-trimester bleeding, history of maternal infection or fever during pregnancy, lack of prenatal care, premature birth, multiple birth, not being immunized against common infectious diseases, and a history of diseases preventable by vaccine, such as measles and pertussis, were not associated with mild or serious cognitive disabilities.

Multivariate analysis
Serious cognitive disability.
To develop multivariate models for serious cognitive disability, we first entered the prenatal variables found to be significant in the univariate analysis. In rural areas, the model restricted to prenatal independent variables includes consanguinity, landless agriculture, and maternal goiter history; maternal illiteracy was no longer associated with serious mental retardation once maternal goiter history was included in the model. In urban areas, no prenatal factors other than maternal goiter history were independently associated with serious mental retardation once maternal goiter was entered. In both rural and urban areas, no perinatal or neonatal variable reached statistical significance at p < 0.10 once the relevant prenatal variables were included. We then entered history of postnatal brain infection, a variable that was based on parental report and that, in every case, was reported to have preceded or coincided with the age at which the parent first saw evidence of developmental delay in the child. Models A-rural and A-urban in table 3 include all variables that necessarily or probably preceded the onset of cognitive disability and that were significantly associated with serious cognitive disability in rural and urban areas, respectively. In both rural and urban areas, no additional variables other than xerophthalmia at the time of survey, which cannot be assumed to have preceded the onset of developmental delay, were significantly associated with serious cognitive disability once the variables in the models of table 3 were controlled.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Factors independently associated with the prevalence of serious and mild mental retardation among children 2–9 years in Bangladesh, 1987–1988*

 
Mild cognitive disability.
The multivariate model for mild cognitive disability includes four prenatal variables independently associated with mild mental retardation in both urban and rural areas: maternal illiteracy, landlessness, maternal history of pregnancy loss, and being small for gestational age (table 3). No other factors for which we had data were significantly associated with the prevalence of mild mental retardation once these prenatal factors were included.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Mental retardation is among the most difficult categories of childhood disability to document epidemiologically, in part because its causes are multifactorial and often elusive (2Go). In less developed countries, the difficulties of documenting the causes of mental retardation are compounded by the lack of diagnostic services and routinely collected health data. For example, more than 90 percent of the children in this study were born at home, most without trained clinical assistance, and basic perinatal information, such as birth weight, mode of delivery, and history of complications or congenital abnormalities, was never documented. In addition, of the children with cognitive disabilities identified in this study, fewer than 2 percent had been referred for cognitive assessment previously and/or had received educational or medical services in response to noted cognitive delay or disability.

Despite these difficulties, we have demonstrated that it is possible not only to identify children with cognitive disabilities and estimate prevalence but also to identify important risk factors for poor cognitive development in populations lacking universal health care and routine data collection. An understanding of risk factors is a critical first step toward the prevention of any public health problem. The specific risk factors identified in this study provide a basis for designing programs to help assure that children at risk not only survive but also reach their full intellectual and human potential.

Serious cognitive disability
Our findings suggest that primary prevention of serious cognitive disabilities in Bangladesh will require prevention of the prenatal factors of maternal iodine deficiency or other possible causes of goiter, consanguineous marriage, extreme poverty (indicated by landlessness, particularly among agricultural households) as well as postnatal brain infections. Once these factors were accounted for, low birth weight and neonatal variables were not significantly associated with cognitive disabilities. As mentioned, we were not able to take into account complications of pregnancy or birth such as evidence of birth asphyxia or breech delivery because relevant data were missing for more than 20 percent of the children surveyed.

To prevent goiter, Bangladesh has implemented a universal salt iodization program during the past decade, but efforts to promote this program must continue because recent data suggest that fewer than half of the households consume iodized salt (15Go). There are also indications that iodine deficiency alone might not account for the high prevalence of goiter among pregnant women in rural Bangladesh (16Go), suggesting that other factors must be considered.

To understand why consanguinity would be associated with serious mental retardation in rural but not urban areas, a difference that persisted in univariate and multivariate analyses, we examined the correlates of consanguinity in the two areas and found them to differ significantly. In rural areas, children from consanguineous marriages are more advantaged and affluent relative to children from nonconsanguineous marriages because they are less likely to be exposed to factors such as landlessness, maternal illiteracy, and malnutrition. In urban areas, these relations are reversed: Urban children from consanguineous unions are relatively disadvantaged on each of these variables. In addition, relative to nonconsanguineous urban families, consanguineous urban families in this study were 70 percent more likely to report the death of one or more children. In the rural areas investigated, on the other hand, childhood death was not associated with consanguinity. These findings are consistent with the possibility that an association between consanguinity and mental retardation in urban areas would be masked in a cross-sectional prevalence study such as this because of selective survival bias. Serious mental retardation may be less compatible with survival in urban consanguineous families relative to nonconsanguineous families because of the socioeconomic disadvantage and higher child death rates in the consanguineous families. In fact, there were no cases of serious cognitive disability from urban, consanguineous families in which one or more children had died, whereas among urban families that had not lost a child, consanguinity was associated with the prevalence of serious cognitive disability.

Although consanguineous marriage has been shown to be associated with increased risk of birth defects and infant mortality (17Go), we know of no previous study showing it to be associated with the prevalence of mental retardation at the population level. In an epidemiologic study of mental retardation in Karachi, Pakistan, which used the same survey and assessment procedures as our study, no association was found between consanguinity and the prevalence of mental retardation (18Go). Compared with 9 percent in Bangladesh, in the Karachi population, 60 percent of the children surveyed were offspring of consanguineous unions (mostly first cousin, a preferred marriage pattern among many Pakistanis), and the overall prevalence of serious mental retardation was extremely high (19.1/1,000). It may be that in populations where consanguinity is a dominant marriage pattern, it is not possible to demonstrate its association with the occurrence of disorders resulting from recessive genes, such as many of the specific causes of mental retardation. This is because even offspring of marriages not recognized to be consanguineous in such populations would be expected to have high inbreeding coefficients due to consanguinity in previous generations (i.e., their grandparents, great-grandparents) (19GoGo–21Go). In rural Bangladesh, where the practice of marriage to a first cousin is confined to a smaller segment of the population than is true of Karachi and the average inbreeding coefficient for individuals not reported to be from consanguineous unions is presumably lower, we have been able to demonstrate a strong association between this marriage pattern and the prevalence of serious cognitive disabilities in offspring. This finding calls for further research into the contribution of consanguinity and inherited disorders to the occurrence of neurodevelopmental disabilities in Bangladesh.

Confirmation of the association between consanguinity and serious cognitive disability found in this study would suggest that public health campaigns may be indicated to inform families at risk about genetically inherited disorders and the increased risk conferred by consanguineous unions. This marriage pattern may be difficult to change, however, if it serves as an adaptive strategy in times of scarcity to preserve land and other property within families.

In rural areas, landlessness among agricultural households was also identified as an independent risk factor for serious cognitive disability. In recent years, subsequent to the data collection for this study, Bangladesh has implemented extensive programs to alleviate the poverty of landless agricultural families. For example, the Vulnerable Group Feeding Programme is operated by the government of Bangladesh to provide food to families during floods and droughts. In addition, microcredit programs for poor women, pioneered by the Grameen Bank of Bangladesh, have been shown to bring economic empowerment to vulnerable women and families (22Go). The impact of such programs on the prevalence of childhood disabilities remains to be demonstrated.

The strong association between brain infections and the risk of serious cognitive disability along with the relatively high prevalence of this exposure (reported for 1.3 percent of the children aged 2–9 years who were studied) clearly suggests the need for prevention as well as early recognition and treatment of these infections. Studies of children hospitalized for intracranial infections in Dhaka show that Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae are frequent causes and that most recognized cases involve children under age 2 years (23Go, 24Go). However, population-based data on the incidence of these infections and the role of other agents are not available.

Mild cognitive disability.
Although several neonatal and postnatal medical variables were identified in univariate analyses to be risk factors for mild cognitive disability, these were not retained in the multivariate model once indicators of maternal illiteracy, poverty, and evidence of intrauterine growth retardation (small for gestational age) were controlled, suggesting that the determinants of mild cognitive disabilities are largely social and economic. This finding is consistent with studies of mild mental retardation in European and North American studies (13Go). The contribution of maternal cognitive disability, however, to the relation between maternal illiteracy and childhood cognitive disability cannot be discerned with the data available. In recent years, the government of Bangladesh has put special emphasis on the education and literacy of girls, resulting in an increase in primary school enrollment of from 64 to 82 percent between 1992 and 1997 (15Go, 25Go). Enrollment in secondary education is still less than 50 percent, however, and is particularly low for girls, perhaps due to the pressure on families to keep girls at home or to arrange for their marriage at a young age (26Go). The anticipated public health impact of improvements in education and literacy include adoption of better nutritional practices and health behaviors that, along with increased cognitive stimulation in the home, have the potential to contribute to enhanced cognitive development and prevention of mild cognitive disabilities in children.

Environmental factors associated with poverty, but not measured in this study, may also contribute to the association between poverty and mild cognitive disability. For example, an alarming prevalence of lead poisoning has been reported recently among poor children living in urban Bangladesh (27Go). The potential neurodevelopmental effects of recently discovered, widespread arsenic poisoning from tubewells in rural Bangladesh also calls for further study (28Go).

An important limitation of this study, already mentioned, is the cross-sectional nature of the data, which limits their usefulness for causal inference. Thus, the associations between cognitive disability and postnatal nutritional deficiencies and brain infections could result from these exposures being markers for long-term exposures and, therefore, causes or from children with cognitive disabilities being at increased risk for these exposures. The fact that all brain infections associated with cognitive disability were reported by parents to have preceded or coincided with the onset of developmental delay in the children gives some support to the causal role of this exposure. A prospective study of urban and rural children with cerebral palsy in Bangladesh, however, demonstrated that almost all deaths occurred in the most severely malnourished children and were preceded by an infective episode (29Go). Another limitation imposed by the cross-sectional data is our inability to determine whether exposures not associated with the prevalence of cognitive disability in the population play important etiologic roles that are masked by selective mortality of children with those exposures. For example, the lack of association between consanguinity and serious mental retardation in urban areas may be due to the greater social disadvantage and higher child mortality of urban, consanguineous families. Our failure to identify histories of multiple birth, certain indicators of neonatal morbidity, or traumatic brain injuries as risk factors for cognitive disabilities in this population could similarly be due to selective mortality of exposed children. This limitation, it should be noted, is one that applies to virtually all epidemiologic studies of childhood cognitive disabilities, since an indeterminable number of those affected do not survive to an age at which cognitive disability can be diagnosed (30Go).

Other limitations are the retrospective nature of the risk factor data and the fact that they were based largely on parental report, which open the possibilities that random measurement error could mask important relations and/or that recall bias could produce spurious associations. In addition, the power of this study to detect odds ratios significantly different from unity was limited due to large standard errors of the regression coefficients that result from the weighted analysis required by the two-phase design of the survey. With this power limitation, only very strong associations could be detected; it is possible that factors not found to be significantly associated with cognitive disability in the multivariate analysis, such as childhood infections, lack of immunization, or breastfeeding, are important risk factors but were not identified as such because of the limited power of the study. For example, for the association between lack of breastfeeding and mild cognitive disability, the minimum odds ratio that would have had a 95 percent confidence interval excluding 1.0 would have been 3.8 because of the relatively large standard error of the logistic regression coefficient for this variable.

Despite these limitations, the risk factors identified point to specific interventions likely to have the greatest impact in preventing childhood cognitive disabilities in Bangladesh. These include strategies for poverty alleviation, maternal literacy programs, expansion of nutritional interventions to prevent iodine deficiency in mothers and children, and interventions to prevent postnatal brain infections. The complex association between consanguinity and serious cognitive disability found in this study calls for further research. If replicated, this finding would support the need to include public health education about the risks of consanguineous marriage within the list of priorities for primary prevention of cognitive disabilities among children in Bangladesh.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Supported by the BOSTID Program of the National Academy of Sciences, the Epilepsy Foundation of America, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (grant R29 NS27971) and the New York State Psychiatric Institute.

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Drs. Zena Stein, Lillian Belmont, Meher Hasan, Zaki Hasan, Patrick Shrout, and Molly Thorburn to the design and conduct of this research.


    NOTES
 
Correspondence to Dr. Maureen S. Durkin, Columbia University, Sergievsky Center, 630 W. 168 St., New York, NY 10032 (e-mail: durkinm{at}sergievsky.cpmc.columbia.edu).


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Committee on Nervous System Disorders in Developing Countries. Neurological, psychiatric, and developmental disorders: meeting the challenge in developing countries. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
  2. Richmond JB, Butler JA, Stenmark S. Reducing childhood disability in the 80s. Hosp Commun Psych 1983;34:507–14.
  3. United Nations. Demographic yearbook, 1997. New York, NY: United Nations, 1999 (Publication no. E/F.99, XIII.1).
  4. Islam S, Durkin M, Zaman SS. Socioeconomic status and the prevalence of mental retardation in Bangladesh. Ment Retard 1993;31:412–17.[ISI][Medline]
  5. Lemeshow S, Stroh B. Sampling techniques for evaluating health parameters in developing countries. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1988.
  6. Shrout P, Newman S. Design of two-phase prevalence surveys of rare disorders. Biometrics 1989;45:549–55.[ISI][Medline]
  7. Stein ZA, Durkin MS, Davidson LL, et al. Guidelines for identifying children with mental retardation in community settings. In: World Health Organization, Assessment of People with Mental Retardation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1992:12–41.
  8. Durkin MS, Wang W, Shrout PE, et al. Evaluating a Ten Questions screen for childhood disability: reliability and internal structure in different cultures. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:657–66.[ISI][Medline]
  9. Durkin MS, Davidson LL, Desai P, et al. Validity of the Ten Questions screened for childhood disability: results from population-based studies in Bangladesh, Jamaica and Pakistan. Epidemiology 1994;5:283–9.[ISI][Medline]
  10. Thorburn MJ, Desai P, Davidson LL. Categories, classes, and criteria in childhood disability--experience from a survey in Jamaica. Disabil Rehabil 1992;14:122–32.[Medline]
  11. Thorndike RM, Hagen EP, Sattler JM. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales. Fourth ed. Riverside, CA: Riverside Publishing Co., 1986.
  12. Fuller WA, Kennedy W, Schnell D, et al. PC CARP. Ames, IA: Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State University, 1989.
  13. Stein ZA, Susser MW. The epidemiology of mental retardation. In: Butler NR, Connor BD, eds. Stress and disability in childhood. Bristol, England: Wright, 1984:21–46.
  14. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.
  15. Bellamy C. The state of the world's children. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1988.
  16. Filteau SM, Sullivan KR, Anwar US, et al. Iodine deficiency alone cannot account for goiter prevalence among pregnant women in Modhupur, Bangladesh. Eur J Clin Nutr 1994;48:293–302.[ISI][Medline]
  17. Bundey S, Alam H. A five-year prospective study of the health of children in different ethnic groups, with particular reference to the effect of inbreeding. Eur J Hum Genet 1993;1:206–19.[Medline]
  18. Durkin MS, Hasan ZM, Hasan KZ. Prevalence and correlates of mental retardation among children in Karachi, Pakistan. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:281–8.[Abstract]
  19. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Bodmer WF. The genetics of human populations. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1971.
  20. Darr A, Modell B. The frequency of consanguineous marriage among British Pakistanis. J Med Genet 1988;25:186–90.[Abstract]
  21. Roberts DF. Consanguineous marriages and calculation of the genetic load. Ann Hum Genet 1969;32:407–10.[ISI][Medline]
  22. Hashemi SM, Schuler S. Rural credit programs and women's empowerment in Bangladesh. World Development. 1996;24:635–53.
  23. Saha SK, Rikitomi N, Ruhulamin M, et al. The increasing burden of disease in Bangladeshi children due to Haemophilus influenzae type b meningitis. Ann Trop Paediatr 1997;17:5–8.[ISI][Medline]
  24. Saha SK, Rikitomi N, Watanabe K, et al. Serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae causing invasive childhood infections in Bangladesh. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:785–97.[Abstract]
  25. Grant J. The state of the world's children 1995. UNICEF. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  26. Khan NZ, Lynch MA. Recognizing child maltreatment in Bangladesh. Child Abuse Negl 1997;21:815–18.[ISI][Medline]
  27. Khan NZ, Khan AH. Lead poisoning and psychomotor delay in Bangladeshi children. (Letter). Lancet 1999;353:754.
  28. Rahman M, Tondel M, Ahmad SA, et al. Diabetes mellitus associated with arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:198–203.[Abstract]
  29. Khan NZ, Ferdous S, Munir S, et al. Mortality of urban and rural young children with cerebral palsy in Bangladesh. Dev Med Child Neurol 1998;40:749–53.[ISI][Medline]
  30. Hook EB. Incidence and prevalence as measures of the frequency of birth defects. Am J Epidemiol 1116:743–7.
Received for publication June 24, 1999. Accepted for publication February 22, 2000.