Prospective Study of Dietary Fat and Risk of Cataract Extraction among US Women

Minyi Lu1, Eunyoung Cho2, Allen Taylor3, Susan E. Hankinson2,4, Walter C. Willett2,4,5 and Paul F. Jacques1

1 Nutritional Epidemiology Program, Jean Mayer US Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA
2 Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
3 Laboratory for Nutrition and Vision Research, Jean Mayer US Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA
4 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
5 Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA

Correspondence to Dr. Paul F. Jacques, Nutritional Epidemiology Program, US Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, 711 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111 (e-mail: paul.jacques{at}tufts.edu).

Received for publication June 4, 2004. Accepted for publication December 14, 2004.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
The authors examined prospectively the association between dietary fat intake and cataract extraction in adult women from the Nurses' Health Study. A total of 71,083 women were followed prospectively for up to 16 years between 1984 and 2000. Dietary fat was assessed by repeated food frequency questionnaires. Incident cases of cataract extraction were determined by a biennial questionnaire. The multivariate-adjusted relative risk for the highest compared with the lowest quintile of total fat intake was 1.10 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99, 1.22; ptrend = 0.01). Women in the highest quintile of long-chain omega-3 fatty acid had a 12% lower risk of cataract extraction compared with those in the lowest quintile (relative risk = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79, 0.98; ptrend = 0.02). Total fish intake was inversely associated with cataract (for intake of ≥3/week vs. <1/month: relative risk = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81, 0.98; ptrend = 0.01). The authors' findings suggest that higher intake of long-chain omega-3 fatty acid (eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid) and consumption of fish may modestly reduce the risk of cataract.

cataract extraction; dietary fats; fatty acids, omega-3; trans fatty acids


Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Age-related cataract is the leading cause of blindness in the world today (1Go). Though surgery may be effective to reverse blindness that results from cataract, visual outcomes will be poor where experienced surgeons and appropriate postoperative care, including refraction, are not available (2Go, 3Go). Moreover, even where high-quality surgery is readily accessible, it may be expensive; cataract extraction is currently the most frequently performed surgical procedure among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States, at an annual cost of over $3 billion (4Go, 5Go). It has been estimated that a delay in cataract onset of 10 years could reduce the need for cataract surgery by as much as half (6Go). Finding a means to delay the development of cataracts would reduce disability and curb the expense associated with the growing number of cataract extractions.

Cataract formation is associated with perturbation of lens membrane composition, structure, and function (7Go–10Go), including changes in fatty acid composition (11Go), and high intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids delays the onset of mature cataracts in animal studies (12Go, 13Go). Thus, differences in lens membrane fatty acid composition and function due to dietary fat intake may influence cataract formation. Because there has been little epidemiologic research on dietary fat intake and risk of cataract, we examined the association between specific types of fat and incidence of cataract extraction among participants of the Nurses' Health Study.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Study population
The Nurses' Health Study began in 1976, when 121,700 female registered nurses aged 30–55 years residing in 11 US states completed questionnaires about their lifestyle and medical history (14Go). Every 2 years, follow-up questionnaires were sent to obtain updated lifestyle and medical history information and to ascertain new diagnoses of cataract extraction.

Assessment of dietary fat intake
In 1980, a 61-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire was sent to the study participants to assess dietary intake of specific fats and other nutrients. An expanded food frequency questionnaire with approximately 130 food items was sent to women in 1984, 1986, 1990, 1994, and 1998 to assess usual food intakes in the previous year. A common unit or portion size for each food was specified, and participants were asked how often, on average, they had consumed that amount of food or beverage during the previous year. There were nine possible responses for each food item, ranging from "almost never" to "6 or more times per day." For this analysis, we chose 1984 as the start of the follow-up, because the shorter food frequency questionnaire collected in 1980 did not have the detailed questions needed for calculation of intake of omega-3 fatty acids. The average daily intake of fat and other nutrients was calculated by multiplying the frequency of consumption of each item by its nutrient content per serving and totaling the nutrient intake for all food items.

The reproducibility and validity of the 1984 dietary questionnaire were assessed previously (15Go). The Pearson correlation coefficients for energy-adjusted total and specific types of fat assessed by two 1-week dietary records and the food frequency questionnaire range from 0.48 to 0.79, with correction for attenuation due to random error. Spearman's correlation coefficients between fat intakes calculated from the food frequency questionnaire and the fatty acid composition of subcutaneous fat aspirates also indicated that the food frequency questionnaire provided a reasonable measure of fatty acids from exogenous sources (r = 0.48 for long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, r = 0.51 for trans-fatty acid) (16Go). The correlation coefficients between dietary records and the food frequency questionnaire for intake of meat and fish varied from 0.46 to 0.66 (17Go). The mean total fish intake was 3.7 servings per week assessed by the food frequency questionnaire and 3.6 servings per week assessed by dietary records, with a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.61.

Population analyzed
We restricted the baseline population to women who were older than 45 years in 1984 and excluded those who did not complete a baseline food frequency questionnaire, who had implausible caloric intakes (<600 or >3,500 kcal/day), or who left more than 70 items blank on the food frequency questionnaire. We also excluded participants who reported a diagnosis of cataract (n = 1,892), cancer (except nonmelanoma skin cancer) (n = 4,452), or diabetes mellitus (n = 2,455) at baseline. A total of 56,864 women who were aged 45 or more years in 1984 were included in the analysis, and those who were aged less than 45 years in 1984 were entered into the analysis in the 2-year cycle after they reached the age of 45. By the end of the follow-up in June 2000, a total of 71,083 women were available for analysis.

Outcome
Starting in 1984, participants were asked on the biennial questionnaire whether they had had a cataract extraction; if so, permission was requested to obtain information from their medical records. The ophthalmologist who had performed the surgery and, when available, the patient's optometrist or another health care provider who had ophthalmologic records were contacted and asked to complete a questionnaire that inquired about the dates of initial diagnosis and extraction; cause of the cataract, if known; the participant's best-corrected visual acuity in both eyes prior to surgery; and the location of the lens opacity. Ninety percent of the ophthalmologists contacted responded to the questionnaire, and all confirmed the extraction. For subjects whose information on cataract extraction could not be obtained from the physicians, self-report was used based on the 100 percent ophthalmologist confirmation of self-report. Participants with physician- or self-confirmed cataract extractions in at least one eye were defined as cases.

We excluded those cases whose cataracts were considered to be either congenital or secondary to chronic steroid use, chronic intraocular inflammation, ocular trauma, previous intraocular surgery, or glaucoma (n = 787). These cases accrued person-time up to the date on which the cataract was initially diagnosed, determined as the earlier of the dates indicated by the participant and the ophthalmologist. We also excluded subjects who developed cancer (n = 40) or diabetes mellitus (n = 214) before cataract diagnosis; these individuals accrued person-time up to the date of cancer or diabetes diagnosis and were not counted as cases. Finally, we excluded those whose cataracts were diagnosed prior to the age of 45 years (n = 145). A total of 4,196 cataract cases were included in the analysis. Cataracts in different areas of the lens (nuclear, posterior subcapsular, or cortical) may have different etiologies (18Go, 19Go). On the basis of information from those participants whose ophthalmologists indicated a subtype, we were able to identify cases with only one subtype and those with primarily one subtype. The primary analysis was based on the presence of any cataract, but we also considered cataract subtype: 1) primarily nuclear cataract, in either eye (if unilateral) or in both eyes (if bilateral), as determined by the participant's eye physician (n = 2,547); 2) primarily posterior subcapsular cataract (n = 995); and 3) primarily cortical cataract (n = 431). A total of 225 cases could not be classified.

Data analysis
The percentage of energy contributed by each type of fat was derived by dividing energy intake from each fat by total energy intake. Dietary variables were updated by using the information from the 1984, 1986, 1990, 1994, and 1998 dietary questionnaires to account for the long follow-up period. We calculated intake of fat as a cumulative average intake from all available dietary questionnaires up to the start of each 2-year follow-up interval. For example, the intake in 1984 was used for the 1984–1986 follow-up, and the average of the 1984 and 1986 intakes was used for the 1986–1990 follow-up. Participants were divided into categories according to quintiles of fat intake and frequency of consumption of individual fat-containing foods, which were also updated according to average frequencies of intake over the follow-up period.

Each participant's follow-up time began with the date of return of the 1984 questionnaire or the point at which the participant reached the age of 45 years, whichever was later. Since it was possible that participants could change their eating pattern after diagnosis of cataract but prior to extraction, we used the date of diagnosis as the end of follow-up for cases of cataract extraction. Because cataracts may be asymptomatic, participants who did not have eye examinations may have been less likely to have their cataracts diagnosed. Therefore, we did not accumulate follow-up time for those women who did not report having an eye examination during the previous 2-year period based on the 1990, 1992, 1994, 1996, and 1998 questionnaires (information on eye examination was not available prior to 1990). Follow-up continued until cataract diagnosis, death, cancer diagnosis, diabetes diagnosis, loss to follow-up, or end of follow-up (June 2000), whichever came first.

To determine the association between fat intake and other risk factors for cataract extraction, we used Cox proportional hazards models (PROC PHREG) for all multivariable analyses (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) (20Go). To control for confounding by age, calendar time, and any possible two-way interactions between these two time variables, we stratified the analysis jointly by age in months at the start of follow-up and calendar year of the current questionnaire cycle. The multivariable models included potential risk factors for cataract such as total energy intake, body mass index, lutein and zeaxanthin intake, alcohol intake, physical activity (quintiles of metabolic equivalents per week), menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone use, history of hypertension, cigarette smoking, number of visits with a physician in the past year (as reported in 1978), and state of residency (in 1976). We chose pack-years of smoking (the number of years of smoking multiplied by the average number of packs of cigarettes smoked per day) as a measure of smoking status, because cataract development is more strongly related to the cumulative effect of smoking than to current smoking status (21Go). We also added multivitamin supplement use and the Recommended Food Score, as adapted for use with the Nurses' Health Study food frequency questionnaire (22Go), to our multivariable model to examine the potential confounding by healthy dietary behaviors and patterns. Since there were no significant associations between risk of cataract extraction and intake of either vitamin C or vitamin E in our preliminary analyses, we did not include these two variables in our multivariable model. All the dietary and nondietary covariates were updated in every 2-year period except for number of visits with a physician and state of residency. The measures of fat intake were updated in the same manner.

Relative risks were calculated as the rate of occurrence of cataract extraction in each fat category, divided by the corresponding rate in the referent category, and 95 percent confidence intervals were calculated. Tests for trend across categories of fat intake were assessed by using the median within each category as a continuous variable. Tests for trend of foods were calculated with each intake category (e.g., 1, 2, 3, etc.) as a continuous variable.

We included an interaction between age and the fat intake variables in our multivariable models to determine whether there was any effect modification by age. In addition to using cumulative updated fat intake in the primary analyses, we performed alternate analyses using baseline intake and the most recent intake.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Women with a high total fat intake at baseline were more likely to be younger, to have a higher body mass index, to be a current smoker, to be premenopausal, to have less hypertension, and to have fewer physician visits in 1978 (table 1). Total fat intake was inversely related to alcohol, vitamin C, vitamin E, and lutein and zeaxanthin intakes and positively related to total energy intake. Women with a high intake of long-chain omega-3 fatty acid at baseline were more likely to be older, to be a noncurrent smoker, to be postmenopausal, to have more hypertension, and to have more physician visits in 1978 (table 2). Omega-3 fat intake was positively related to alcohol, vitamin C, vitamin E, and lutein and zeaxanthin intakes and inversely related to total energy intake.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Baseline characteristics of the cohort according to total fat intake of participants who were aged 45 or more years at baseline, Nurses' Health Study, 1984*

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Baseline characteristics of the cohort according to long-chain omega-3 fat intake of participants who were aged 45 or more years at baseline, Nurses' Health Study, 1984*

 
Higher total fat intake was associated with an increased risk of cataract extraction (ptrend = 0.01), although the relative risk of 1.10 between the highest and lowest quintile categories was only marginally significant (95 percent confidence interval (CI): 0.99, 1.22) (table 3). Animal fat, vegetable fat, and cholesterol intake were not related to risk of cataract extraction with or without additional adjustment. Analyses for subtypes of cataract yielded similar results, except that the trend for total fat was not significant for primary posterior subcapsular cataract.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Multivariate relative risk of cataract extraction (any type, primary nuclear, and primary posterior subcapsular) according to quintile of fat intake,* Nurses' Health Study, 1984–2000

 
Saturated and polyunsaturated fats were not related to risk of cataract extraction (table 4). Although none of the individual relative risks was significant in comparisons between the higher intake quintile category and the referent quintile category, there was a significant positive trend for monounsaturated fat (p = 0.04). The relative risk for the fifth quintile category of trans-fat intake compared with the first quintile category was 1.11 (95 percent CI: 1.00, 1.23) and the trend was marginally significant (p = 0.06). The significant finding for monounsaturated and trans-fat disappeared after additional adjustment for each other and saturated and polyunsaturated fat intakes (data not shown). These associations were also attenuated after adjustment for either multivitamin supplement use or the Recommended Food Score (data not shown). No significant findings were observed in the analysis of subtype of cataract and saturated, monounsaturated, polyunsaturated, or trans-fat intake.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Multivariate relative risk of cataract extraction (any type, primary nuclear, and primary posterior subcapsular) according to quintile of fat intake,* Nurses' Health Study, 1984–2000

 
Since different types of polyunsaturated fats have different metabolic roles, we examined the relation between cataract and several important polyunsaturated fatty acids (table 5). The most prominent finding was an inverse association between long-chain omega-3 fatty acid intake, which was mostly composed of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid, and risk of cataract extraction. The relative risk for the highest intake quintile category compared with the lowest quintile category was 0.88 (95 percent CI: 0.79, 0.98; ptrend = 0.02). Even after additional adjustment for all the other fats (saturated, monounsaturated, trans-, and the other polyunsaturated fatty acids included in table 5), the relative risk was only slightly attenuated (relative risk = 0.90, 95 percent CI: 0.80, 1.01). This association was not affected by adjustment for either multivitamin supplement use or the Recommended Food Score (data not shown). In the analysis of primary nuclear cataract, the association between omega-3 fatty acid intake and cataract extraction was stronger (relative risk = 0.83, 95 percent CI: 0.73, 0.96) and the trend was stronger (p = 0.004). The relative risk was also not affected with additional adjustment of other fats. A similar relation with omega-3 fats was found in the analysis for primary posterior subcapsular cataract, although it did not reach significance.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Multivariate relative risk of cataract extraction (any type, primary nuclear, and primary posterior subcapsular) according to quintile of polyunsaturated fatty acid intake,* Nurses' Health Study, 1984–2000

 
There was a weak positive association between linoleic acid intake and the risk of any type of cataract extraction; the relative risk was 1.08 for the highest versus the lowest quintile category (95 percent CI: 0.98, 1.20; ptrend = 0.04). This significance disappeared with additional adjustment for other fats and was absent from the cataract subtype analysis. Alpha-linolenic acid and arachidonic acid intakes were not related to risk of cataract extraction, either for overall cataract extraction or for specific subtypes.

To evaluate further the relation between fat intake and cataract, we examined the major food sources of fat (table 6). Among these foods, intake of beef, pork, or lamb as a main dish was positively related to cataract extraction. More than one serving/day of this food item was associated with a 22 percent greater risk of cataract extraction compared with one or fewer servings/week (95 percent CI: 1.03, 1.44; ptrend = 0.01), and the trend was significant in analysis of primarily nuclear cataract. High intake of mayonnaise or other creamy salad dressings and cheese was significantly associated with increased risk of cataract extraction. Margarine and oil-and-vinegar dressing intakes were not related to risk of cataract extraction. Analyses of cataract subtype yielded similar results.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 6. Multivariate relative risk of cataract extraction (any type, primary nuclear, and primary posterior subcapsular) according to major fat-containing food intake,* Nurses' Health Study, 1984–2000

 
Because fish is the major source of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, namely, eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid, accounting for more than 85 percent of its intake in our study population, we also studied the relation between total and different types of fish intake and risk of cataract extraction (table 7). We found that women who consumed fish three or more times per week had 11 percent lower risk of cataract extraction than did those who consumed fish one or fewer times per week (95 percent CI: 0.81, 0.98; ptrend = 0.01). For individual fish items, only dark-meat fish intake was found to be inversely associated with cataract; the relative risk for those participants who ate dark-meat fish more than once per week compared with those who ate it once per month or less was 0.85 (95 percent CI: 0.75, 0.96; ptrend = 0.003). The results were similar for analyses of cataract subtypes.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 7. Multivariate relative risk of cataract extraction (any type, primary nuclear, and primary posterior subcapsular) according to fish intake,* Nurses' Health Study, 1984–2000

 
We also conducted analyses using baseline intake and most recent intake as exposures because we do not know the time period during which diet may affect cataract extraction. There were no significant trends between fat intake and cataract extraction in these analyses (data not shown). We also did not find any significant interaction between our measures of fat intake and age in our analyses (data not shown). We observed no significant associations between any measure of fat intake and primarily cortical cataract (data not shown).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
In this first comprehensive study of fat intake and incident cataract, women with the highest long-chain omega-3 fat intakes had a reduced risk of cataract extraction over a 16-year follow-up period. This was corroborated by our observation that women who consumed dark-meat (fatty) fish at least once per week had a significantly lower risk of cataract extraction compared with women who rarely consumed fatty fish. Since intakes of other types of fish, which are lower in omega-3 fatty acids, were not associated with decreased risk of cataract, and since adjustment for multivitamin supplement use and the Recommended Food Score did not attenuate the association with omega-3 fatty acid intake, our findings are consistent with a relation between cataract risk and eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid intake, and not a healthy lifestyle per se.

The relation between dietary fat intake and risk of cataract was previously evaluated in only a few cross-sectional studies, and none considered specific fatty acids. Tavani et al. (23Go) observed that a high total dietary fat intake was related to greater risk of cataract extraction (odds ratio = 1.8, 95 percent CI: 1.2, 2.8), which was consistent with our findings. In the Blue Mountains Eye Study, intake of polyunsaturated fatty acid was associated with a lower prevalence of cortical cataract (odds ratio = 0.7, 95 percent CI: 0.5, 0.9) (24Go). We did not observe any significant relation between polyunsaturated fatty acid intake and cataract extraction, but we had limited statistical power to examine relations with primary cortical cataract.

The long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, namely, eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid, play important functional roles in animal cells. The amount of omega-3 fatty acid incorporated into the plasma membrane is partly determined by dietary intake and greatly influences membrane fluidity, the formation of receptors, binding of ligands to their receptors, and activation of intracellular signaling pathways (25Go–28Go). Many clinical, experimental, and epidemiologic studies indicate that omega-3 fatty acids exert beneficial effects on atherosclerosis and some types of cancer (29Go, 30Go). Higher omega-3 fat and fish intakes have been related to a reduced risk of age-related macular degeneration, another common eye disease in the elderly, in some (31Go–34Go), but not all (35Go, 36Go), studies.

Although there is no known mechanism for the effects of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids on cataract formation, they may affect lens membrane composition, which could alter membrane structure and function, for example, intracellular signaling and membrane enzyme function, as has been demonstrated in other tissue cell membranes (37Go, 38Go). Numerous studies suggest that cataractogenesis is associated with perturbation of lens membrane integrity (7Go–10Go). In the lipid bilayer of lens fiber membranes from cataractous lenses, there is a significant increase in the level of oxidized unsaturated fatty acids with an increase in the content of palmitic acid and a decrease in the levels of docosahexaenoic acid (9Go, 39Go).

Theoretically, the highly unsaturated nature of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids renders them particularly vulnerable to oxidative stress, which is an important factor in cataract formation. However, experimental results that indicated no change or even decreased lipid peroxidation in non-lens tissues enriched with docosahexaenoic acid (40Go–43Go) have led to the hypothesis that docosahexaenoic acid, possibly in association with the vinyl ether linkage of plasmalogens, can combat free radicals.

Our analysis of primary nuclear subtype yielded findings similar to those for all cataracts combined. For primary posterior subcapsular cataract, we found similar relative risks as for all types combined, but associations reached statistical significance for dark-meat fish only, possibly because of a smaller number of cases of this subtype. The lack of significant findings for primary cortical cataract was probably due to the much smaller number of cases of this subtype.

The difference between the primary analyses (using cumulative updated average fat intake) and the secondary analyses (using either baseline or the most recent fat intake) may suggest that cumulative updated average intake was better representing the long-term intake than a single measure of intake.

Because of our large study population, repeated and standardized eye examinations were not possible. However, this should not present a major limitation. Detailed confirmation of cataract extraction without similar confirmation of noncases should not compromise validity. By restricting the analysis to cataract extraction, we have essentially no false positive cases (100 percent specificity in our disease definition). Although there will be subjects with cataracts not requiring extraction in our noncase group, this underascertainment of cases (i.e., low sensitivity) should not bias the relative risk in a prospective study, unless the likelihood of someone with cataract extraction's identification as a case is associated with the exposures of interest (44Go), in our case, fatty acid intake. This is very unlikely for a number of reasons. 1) The severity of cataract (as measured by presurgical visual acuity) is unrelated to omega-3 fatty acid intake in our study population, indicating that those with higher intakes are not having cataract extracted at an earlier stage. 2) Omega-3 fatty acid intakes were unrelated to the frequency of reported eye examinations. 3) Starting in 1990 (when the question about eye examinations was first asked), we allowed only those women who reported having undergone an eye examination during that questionnaire cycle (i.e., in the previous 2 years) to contribute person-time to that follow-up interval. We are unable to place similar limits on the follow-up time before 1990. 4) Because all participants are registered nurses, factors that are likely to influence the decision of individuals with cataract to have it extracted, such as access to medical care and threshold for surgery, are likely to be more uniform than in the general population. 5) Any bias resulting from a greater tendency for healthier behaviors to result in earlier identification of cataract and surgery for less mature cataract would tend to elevate the apparent risk of cataract extraction among those with healthier behaviors. Thus, if women who were more likely to consume fatty fish were also more likely to be screened for cataract or to have cataract extracted at an earlier stage, there would be a tendency to either underestimate the potential benefit of omega-3 intake or create a spurious positive association between omega-3 fatty acid intake and cataract risk. Such bias could not explain the observed protective association with omega-3 fatty acid intake.

Bias may be introduced through other means as well, such as assessment of fat intake or loss to follow-up. The date of initial diagnosis of cataract, rather than the date of cataract surgery, was used as the end of follow-up to minimize bias due to change in fat intake in response to diagnosis. Since fat intake was assessed before the diagnosis of disease, any misclassification of fat intake would be nondifferential and tend to bias our association toward the null. In addition, misclassification of exposure was reduced by averaging intakes during the long follow-up. Loss to follow-up as a source of bias was minimized because of the high follow-up rate in this cohort. Although we controlled for a wide range of potential confounders, some unmeasured risk factors might have confounded the associations seen. Finally, our study population was a nonrepresentative sample of women.

In summary, our findings suggest that a high intake of long-chain omega-3 fatty acid through consumption of dark-meat fish may contribute to the prevention of cataract formation. More studies, particularly in population-based samples, are needed to confirm and clarify the relation between dietary fat intake and cataract.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Financial support for this project has been provided by the US Department of Agriculture under agreement 58-1950-4-401 and by research grants EY09611 and CA87969 from the National Institutes of Health.


    References
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. Thylefors B, Negrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, et al. Global data on blindness. Bull World Health Organ 1995;73:115–21.[ISI][Medline]
  2. He M, Xu J, Li S, et al. Visual acuity and quality of life in patients with cataract in Doumen County, China. Ophthalmology 1999;106:1609–15.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Dandona L, Dandona R, Naduvilath TJ, et al. Population-based assessment of the outcome of cataract surgery in an urban population in southern India. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:650–8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Steinberg EP, Javitt JC, Sharkey PD, et al. The content and cost of cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1041–9.[Abstract]
  5. Vision problems in the U.S.: prevalence of adult vision impairment and age-related eye disease in America. PREVENT BLINDNESS AMERICA (Chicago, IL) and National Eye Institute (Bethesda, MD), 2002. (http://www.nei.nih.gov/eyedata/pdf/VPUS.pdf).
  6. Kupfer C. Bowman lecture. The conquest of cataract: a global challenge. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1985;104:1–10.[ISI][Medline]
  7. Borchman D, Cenedella RJ, Lamba OP. Role of cholesterol in the structural order of lens membrane lipids. Exp Eye Res 1996;62:191–7.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Kistler J, Bullivant S. Structural and molecular biology of the eye lens membranes. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 1989;24:151–81.[Abstract]
  9. Simonelli F, Libondi T, Romano N, et al. Fatty acid composition of membrane phospholipids of cataractous human lenses. Ophthalmic Res 1996;28:101–4.[ISI][Medline]
  10. Sato H, Borchman D, Ozaki Y, et al. Lipid-protein interactions in human and bovine lens membranes by Fourier transform Raman and infrared spectroscopies. Exp Eye Res 1996;62:47–53.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  11. Rosenfeld L, Spector A. Comparison of polyunsaturated fatty acid levels in normal and mature cataractous human lenses. Exp Eye Res 1982;35:69–75.[ISI][Medline]
  12. Hatcher H, Andrews JS. Changes in lens fatty acid composition during galactose cataract formation. Invest Ophthalmol 1970;9:801–6.[ISI][Medline]
  13. Hutton JC, Schofield PH, Williams JF, et al. The effect of an unsaturated-fat diet on cataract formation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Br J Nutr 1976;36:161–77.[ISI][Medline]
  14. Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, et al. Dietary fat and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1987;316:22–8.[Abstract]
  15. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1998.
  16. London SJ, Sacks FM, Caesar J, et al. Fatty acid composition of subcutaneous adipose tissue and diet in postmenopausal US women. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;54:340–5.[Abstract]
  17. Salvini S, Hunter DJ, Sampson L, et al. Food-based validation of a dietary questionnaire: the effects of week-to-week variation in food consumption. Int J Epidemiol 1989;18:858–67.[Abstract]
  18. Leske MC, Chylack LT Jr, Wu SY. The Lens Opacities Case-Control Study. Risk factors for cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:244–51.[Abstract]
  19. Mares-Perlman JA, Brady WE, Klein BE, et al. Diet and nuclear lens opacities. Am J Epidemiol 1995;141:322–34.[Abstract]
  20. D'Agostino RB, Lee ML, Belanger AJ, et al. Relation of pooled logistic regression to time dependent Cox regression analysis: the Framingham Heart Study. Stat Med 1990;9:1501–15.[ISI][Medline]
  21. Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Colditz GA, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of cataract surgery in women. JAMA 1992;268:994–8.[Abstract]
  22. McCullough ML, Feskanich D, Stampfer MJ, et al. Diet quality and major chronic disease risk in men and women: moving toward improved dietary guidance. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:1261–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Tavani A, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Food and nutrient intake and risk of cataract. Ann Epidemiol 1996;6:41–6.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  24. Cumming RG, Mitchell P, Smith W. Diet and cataract: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2000;107:450–6.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  25. Bourre JM, Pascal G, Durand G, et al. Alterations in the fatty acid composition of rat brain cells (neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes) and of subcellular fractions (myelin and synaptosomes) induced by a diet devoid of n-3 fatty acids. J Neurochem 1984;43:342–8.[ISI][Medline]
  26. Mitchell DC, Litman BJ. Molecular order and dynamics in bilayers consisting of highly polyunsaturated phospholipids. Biophys J 1998;74:879–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Clandinin MT, Van Aerde JE, Parrott A, et al. Assessment of the efficacious dose of arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acids in preterm infant formulas: fatty acid composition of erythrocyte membrane lipids. Pediatr Res 1997;42:819–25.[Abstract]
  28. Corrocher R, Pagnan A, Ambrosio GB, et al. Effects induced by olive oil-rich diet on erythrocytes membrane lipids and sodium-potassium transports in postmenopausal hypertensive women. J Endocrinol Invest 1992;15:369–76.[ISI][Medline]
  29. Angerer P, von Schacky C. n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the cardiovascular system. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2000;3:439–45.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Kang JX, Leaf A. Prevention of fatal cardiac arrhythmias by polyunsaturated fatty acids. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71(suppl):202S–7S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Smith W, Mitchell P, Leeder SR. Dietary fat and fish intake and age-related maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:401–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Seddon JM, Rosner B, Sperduto RD, et al. Dietary fat and risk for advanced age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1191–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Seddon JM, Cote J, Rosner B. Progression of age-related macular degeneration: association with dietary fat, transunsaturated fat, nuts, and fish intake. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1728–37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Cho E, Hung S, Willett WC, et al. Prospective study of dietary fat and the risk of age-related macular degeneration. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;73:209–18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Mares-Perlman JA, Brady WE, Klein R, et al. Dietary fat and age-related maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:743–8.[Abstract]
  36. Heuberger RA, Mares-Perlman JA, Klein R, et al. Relationship of dietary fat to age-related maculopathy in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1833–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Rudolph IL, Kelley DS, Klasing KC, et al. Regulation of cellular differentiation and apoptosis by fatty acids and their metabolites. Nutr Res 2001;21:381–93.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  38. Hwang D, Rhee SH. Receptor-mediated signaling pathways: potential targets of modulation by dietary fatty acids. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;70:545–56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Babizhaev MA, Linberg LF. [Evidence of the oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids in cataracts]. (In Russian). Biokhimiia 1986;51:1702–7.[Medline]
  40. Rhodes LE, Shahbakhti H, Azurdia RM, et al. Effect of eicosapentaenoic acid, an omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid, on UVR-related cancer risk in humans. An assessment of early genotoxic markers. Carcinogenesis 2003;24:919–25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Finnegan YE, Minihane AM, Leigh-Firbank EC, et al. Plant- and marine-derived n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids have differential effects on fasting and postprandial blood lipid concentrations and on the susceptibility of LDL to oxidative modification in moderately hyperlipidemic subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:783–95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Saito M, Kubo K. Relationship between tissue lipid peroxidation and peroxidizability index after alpha-linolenic, eicosapentaenoic, or docosahexaenoic acid intake in rats. Br J Nutr 2003;89:19–28.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  43. Yavin E, Brand A, Green P. Docosahexaenoic acid abundance in the brain: a biodevice to combat oxidative stress. Nutr Neurosci 2002;5:149–57.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  44. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1998.




This Article
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My Personal Archive
Download to citation manager
Disclaimer
Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Lu, M.
Articles by Jacques, P. F.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Lu, M.
Articles by Jacques, P. F.