1 Department of Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
2 Department of Rheumatology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
3 Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Durham, NC.
Received for publication June 4, 2003; accepted for publication September 9, 2003.
![]() |
ABSTRACT |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
maternal-fetal exchange; parity; pregnancy; scleroderma, systemic
Abbreviations: Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; OR, odds ratio.
![]() |
INTRODUCTION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
Because the incidence of scleroderma peaks after childbearing years, it has been proposed that hormonal factors or exposure to persisting fetal cells in maternal blood following pregnancymicrochimerismis involved in its pathogenesis (6, 7). The latter hypothesis has been supported by laboratory findings showing that fetal cells in maternal sera were more common in parous women with scleroderma than in healthy controls (8). However, evidence for childbearing as an etiologic factor or risk modifier of scleroderma risk is limited. One recent epidemiologic study assessed the role of parity in the development of scleroderma (9). In that small case-control study, nulliparity was associated with an increased risk of developing scleroderma. The objective of the present study was to examine possible associations between childbearing and the risk of scleroderma by using population-based registry data.
![]() |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
The Swedish Inpatient Register
The Swedish Inpatient Register, established in 1964 and with complete national coverage from 1987 onward, includes data on individual hospital discharges. Each record corresponds to one hospital admission and contains, in addition to the patients national registration number, the dates of admission and discharge, with diagnoses coded according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD), Seventh Revision (ICD-7, 19641968); Eighth Revision (ICD-8, 19691986); Ninth Revision (ICD-9, 19871996); and Tenth Revision (ICD-10, 19971999). The primary and as many as eight additional diagnoses are recorded for each hospitalization; specifically used in this study were ICD-7 codes 710.05, 710.06, 710.07, and 710.09; ICD-8 codes 701.00, 734.00, 734.01, and 734.09; ICD-9 codes 701A and 710B; and ICD-10 codes M340, M341, M348, and M349.
For the present study, the national registration number was used to link women in the Inpatient Register who had a first discharge diagnosis (primary or secondary) of scleroderma between 1964 and 1999 to the Multi-Generation Register (11), obtaining for each case information on reproductive history (number of births, including nulliparity, and age at births). For every case, up to five controls, matched on month and year of birth and region of residence, were randomly selected from women in a National Population Register who were alive at the cases diagnosis date, without themselves having been diagnosed with scleroderma. Reproductive data for controls were obtained in the same manner as that for cases. The randomly chosen controls were used only once. Pregnancy data were limited to pregnancies ending before the first scleroderma-related hospitalization date for each case and her corresponding controls. The analyses were restricted to women born in 1917 or later to ensure that the reproductive period was fully covered by information available in the Multi-Generation Register. In this manner, 2,149 women with a discharge diagnosis of scleroderma and 9,879 controls were available for analysis.
We used conditional logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios and 95 percent confidence intervals as measures of association between parity, age at first birth, and risk of scleroderma. The analyses were conducted by using the SAS statistical package (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina).
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
![]() |
RESULTS |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
|
|
We repeated the analyses, stratifying by age at hospitalization, to examine whether the observed associations were found among both reproductive-age and postreproductive-age women (table 2). Similar patterns were seen in both groups, but the increased risk associated with nulliparity was stronger for women less than age 45 years at diagnosis (OR = 1.60, 95 percent CI: 1.26, 2.03).
![]() |
DISCUSSION |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
In the present study, we found an increased risk of scleroderma for nulliparous women compared with parous women. These results corroborate findings in a recent Italian hospital-based case-control study of 46 cases and 153 controls (9). In that study, data were presented by using nulliparous women as the referent group, and the risk of scleroderma was found to be 70 percent lower for parous women (OR = 0.3, 95 percent CI: 0.1, 0.8). Similar to our findings, risk decreased with increasing parity. We observed an increase in risk with younger age at first birth, an association not found in the Italian study.
Women with scleroderma who become pregnant may be at higher risk of some adverse pregnancy outcomes such as premature births and small-for-gestational-age infants (16). Some evidence also exists that prior to disease onset, scleroderma patients have higher rates of infertility and delays in conception. Silman and Black (6) found a tripled rate of fertility problems before diagnosis among women with scleroderma compared with healthy controls. Similarly, Englert et al. (17) reported that both delay in conception and infertility were more common in patients who subsequently developed scleroderma. Thus, it is possible that the associations we observed (higher risk with nulliparity and decreasing risk with increasing parity) reflect subtle immunologic or vascular effects of scleroderma prior to clinical manifestation that reduce the likelihood of conception.
In further exploration of the pregnancy experience, we observed that, for parous women, a younger age at first birth (age <20 years) was associated with increased risk of scleroderma, and the magnitude of the risk was similar to that for nulliparous women. The inverse association with parity was seen most strongly among women whose first birth occurred after age 20 years. The explanation for this observation is not clear.
Strengths of the present study include its size and population-based approach. Exposure (childbearing) was recorded independently of outcome (scleroderma). However, information was not available on pregnancies not resulting in a livebirth. There is little evidence for an association between spontaneous abortion and risk of developing scleroderma (17, 18). In the case-control study by Pisa et al. (9), inclusion of spontaneous and induced abortions had little effect on the observed associations with parity.
Fewer than five controls were available for 12 percent of the cases. However, little difference was found in the age or parity experience of cases for whom there were five compared with fewer than five controls. To explore the potential for possible bias introduced by the difference in number of controls, we repeated our analyses, excluding those for whom there were fewer than five controls; we found that this exclusion had little effect on the results.
Another potential weakness was that this study was restricted to patients hospitalized for scleroderma. However, patients included are likely to be those with the most severe disease manifestations, most likely diffuse scleroderma. Results from a nationwide survey in Iceland indicate that as many as 78 percent of scleroderma patients had been hospitalized at least once (19). Most (91 percent) of the scleroderma patients in the case-control study from Italy had diffuse disease. In the present study, it was not possible to differentiate between patients with diffuse scleroderma and those with limited disease.
Some of the cases identified in the Inpatient Register may have been misclassified; that is, the discharge diagnosis of scleroderma could be incorrect. Unless the alternate, "true" diagnoses were strongly associated with reduced parity, it is most likely that misclassification would have attenuated the observed associations with parity. To assess the accuracy of the discharge diagnosis data, we reviewed the medical records of women discharged for the first time with a primary or secondary diagnosis of scleroderma from the rheumatology and dermatology clinics at the Karolinska Hospital, the largest hospital in the Stockholm region. On the basis of available information in the retrieved records of 129 (out of a total of 133 identified) patients, it was judged that 72 (56 percent) unequivocally fulfilled the 1980 American College of Rheumatology criteria (rheumatology clinic, 63 percent; dermatology clinic, 52 percent). A majority of those not fulfilling the criteria were judged to have localized scleroderma. Some patients had overlap syndromes, such as mixed connective tissue disease.
Another limitation was that date of first disease signs and symptoms was not available in the Inpatient Register. In addition, before 1987, the Inpatient Register did not fully cover all regions of Sweden, so the first scleroderma-related hospitalization of women who were not living in a region covered by the register could have been missed. The median age at first scleroderma-related hospitalization of our cases was about 4 years higher than the median age at diagnosis in a population-based study from Michigan (20). (The proportion of women aged 4059 years in the 2000 census data from Michigan is similar to that of Sweden (21, 22), so differences in the age distributions of these populations should not have a big effect on the age distribution of scleroderma cases in these areas.) To account for the possibility that some pregnancies could have occurred after debut of insidious scleroderma symptoms or a preliminary diagnosis (but before hospitalization), we repeated the analyses after excluding pregnancies that had occurred within the 2 or within the 5 years before first hospitalization. This restriction had little effect on our results.
Our results do not support the hypothesis that microchimerismas measured by parityplays a role in the etiology of scleroderma, corroborating findings of the previous epidemiologic study in this area (9). Microchimerism may be more clearly addressed at the cellular level (e.g., in studies that assess the persistence of nonself cells in circulation or at the site of specific lesions) than in studies relying on more indirect measures of the potential for maternal-fetal cell transfer such as parity. Some aspects of pregnancy, such as preeclampsia or other complications involving the placenta, could affect the maternal-fetal exchange of cells (23) and so may be an appropriate focus of epidemiologic studies.
In conclusion, little evidence exists that childbearing explains the strong female predilection for the disease. On the contrary, it appears that childless women are at increased risk of scleroderma. This finding could reflect subfecundity before clinically evident disease, yet-to-be-identified common causes of infertility and scleroderma, or a protective effect of pregnancy through an unknown mechanism.
![]() |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
---|
The authors thank Åke Jalo, Statistics Sweden, for expert help in providing the data for the present study.
![]() |
NOTES |
---|
![]() |
REFERENCES |
---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|