Contrasting Roles of Epidemiology in Dioxin-related Policy: Lessons Learned

Joseph V. Rodricks1, James J. Collins2, William H. Farland3 and David J. Tollerud4

1 ENVIRON International Corporation, Arlington, VA.
2 Solutia Inc., St. Louis, MO.
3 National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
4 Center for Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, MCP Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, PA.

Abbreviations: EPA, US Environmental Protection Agency; NIOSH, US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2,4,5-T, trichlorophenoxyacetic acid; 2,3,7,8-TCDD, tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; VA, US Department of Veterans Affairs

NOTES

Correspondence to Dr. Joseph Rodricks, ENVIRON International Corporation, 4350 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22203 (e-mail: jrodricks{at}environcorp.com).

Received for publication March 5, 2001. Accepted for publication September 13, 2001.





This Article
Extract
FREE Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My Personal Archive
Download to citation manager
Disclaimer
Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Articles by Rodricks, J. V.
Articles by Tollerud, D. J.
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Rodricks, J. V.
Articles by Tollerud, D. J.